CA2211103A1 - Firefighter training simulator - Google Patents
Firefighter training simulatorInfo
- Publication number
- CA2211103A1 CA2211103A1 CA002211103A CA2211103A CA2211103A1 CA 2211103 A1 CA2211103 A1 CA 2211103A1 CA 002211103 A CA002211103 A CA 002211103A CA 2211103 A CA2211103 A CA 2211103A CA 2211103 A1 CA2211103 A1 CA 2211103A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- training device
- trainee
- firefighter training
- controller
- segments
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A62—LIFE-SAVING; FIRE-FIGHTING
- A62C—FIRE-FIGHTING
- A62C99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
- A62C99/0081—Training methods or equipment for fire-fighting
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B9/00—Simulators for teaching or training purposes
Abstract
This invention is a firefighter training device (20) for limiting a trainee's vision and simulating fire fighting conditions across a trainee's field of view. The device (20) includes a view limiting simulation mask (24) which is worn by a trainee (e.g., respirator mask, glasses, or goggles). The mask (24) houses a voltage controlled liquid crystal (LC) lens (21) system, either single or multilayered, which is divided into various individually and electronically controllable segments (31). Host dyes might be injected into LC materials to produce colors in the lens segments (31). Preprogrammed and random pattern control of lens segments (31, 32) occludes the trainee's vision and simulates smoke and/or fires. Sound and strobes might be added to simulate explosions and other fire fighting conditions. A transmitter, which includes switchable controls, can be used to send control signals to the mask (24). The training device (20) can effectively be used indoors or outdoors. Audio devices may accompany the visual trainer, providing alarms and simulating the sounds of actual fire fighting conditions.
Description
wo 96/23291 1 Pcr/uss6 F~REFI(~l~K TRAINING SIMULATOR
BACKGROUND OF T~IE I~VENTION
Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a firemen's tr~ining device for ~im~ tion of smoke, fires, and explosions which might impair a S firefighter's vision, and the generation of accolllpanying audio signals to coincide with the visual ~im~ tions.
Desc~ ion of the Prior Art In the area of firefightPr training, one objective of training devices is to occlude the trainee's visual references. This will teach the trainee to fight fires and to find trapped occupants in burning and smoke-filled environmPnt~.
Previous methods of simulating actual field conditions have incl~lded the intentional burning of, for example, old tires, used oil, and old b--il(ling~. Such intentional burning of often dangerous and toxic substances is now prohibited in most areas because of environmental and safety concerns. Comml-nities wish to avoid the pollution reslllting from such intentional fires, as well as the possibility of such fires spreading.
Alternatively, smoke m~-~hinPs and smoke bombs can be used, but little control over the location and density of the smoke is possible with these devices. Often the wind will carry smoke from a training area, thus rendering the training exercise ineffective and polluting surrounding areas or shutting down assembly lines or other production areas.
Some fire departments use darkened rooms, and will primitively simulate a fire by placing a colored sock over a fl~hlight Still other departments place waxed paper over the firefighter's respirator mask to simulate smoke and fire.
Liquid crystal (LC) lenses are voltage controlled devices whose opacity can be varied. LC lensed glasses have previously been used in flight tr~ining situations to ~im~ tP cloud cover (See this inventor's W O96/23291 2 PCT~US96/00413 U.S. Patent Nos. 4,152,846 - Flight Training Method and Apparatus;
4,482,386 - Flight Training Glasses). Firefighting conditions and simulations thereof, however, are dr~m~tic~lly dirre,ellt than flight conrlition~
As a result, none of the prior methods effectively ~im~ tes the dyn~mi~-~lly ch~nging conditions most often encountere~ by firefighters in the field. Prior sim~ t~d training conditions are difficult or inlpos~ible to accurately control and/or duplicate. Accordingly, standardization of testing conditions is difficult and/or impossible to achieve.
Sl~MMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an objective of the present invention to provide an apparatus for firefighter training which includes a tr~nsmitter and a view-limiting simulation device (training mask, glasses, or goggles) with a receiver/controller for receiving and decoding transmitted signals. The simulation device, as driven by the decoded signals, includes a voltage controlled liquid crystal (LC) lens for controlled occlusion of the trainee's view, and for simulating fire, smoke, explosions, and related audio alarms.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a portable a~p~lus which allows a trainee to re~ tir~lly train inside of training areas (e.g. fire halls, ~ miPs, special f~ilitiPs, schools, office b~ tling~ factories, aircraft, ships, etc.) without smoke-polluting and/or setting aflame the tr~ining areas and surrounding areas.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a training system which utilizes radio tr~n~mi~ions to send instruction signals between the instructor and the trainee's ~imlll~tion device.
It is yet a further object of the present invention to provide a training system which utilizes light frequency patterns to send instruction signals to the trainee's view-limiting ~imlll~tion device, thus allowing a trainee's simulated view to vary with the trainee's orientation in a training environment with multiple light pattern sources.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a training system which utilizes both visual and audio simulation of firefighting conditions (e.g. sights and sounds of fire, wind, and explosions) to work in concert with each other.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a training system with visual occlusion and simulation of firefighting conr1itionc, as well as acco-l-pa~ying projection systems for simulating fires so as to provide for more realistic training experiences.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 is a tr~ncmittPr/controller which can be configured to a cable-tethered device or separate tPncmiccion medium system such as radio, light patterns (infrared - IR), or sonar.
Figure 2 is a typical ,es~i.dlor-type view-limiting simulation device used by firemen (with related ~tt~t~hm~nts in fathom).
Figure 3 is a glasses-style view-limiting simulation device.
Figure 4 is a goggles-style view-limiting simulation device that could be used inside a conventional r~ dtol.
Figure S is a child-sized view-limiting simulation device for training in school environm~nt~.
Figure 6 is a military-style view-limiting simulation device that could also be used by forest firefighters without a res~i,dtor.
Figure 7 is a single-layered liquid crystal (LC) lens construction.
Figure 8 is a cross-sectional view of a complex multi-layered and multi-color liquid crystal (LC) lens construction.
Figure 9 is top view of a training room which contains multiple light pattern sources which transmit light pattern signals to the trainee's photometric sensors.
Figure 10 is a system/block diagram showing electrical data paths for the tr~n.~mitter/controller.
W O 96/23291 4 PCT~US96/00413 Figure ll is a system/block diagram showing electrical data paths for the receiver/controller.
Figure 12 shows three adjoining segments, repleselll; tive from the LC lens of the view-limiting simulation device of Figures 2 and 8, S with the red and yellow LC layers activated.
Figure 13 shows three adjoining segmPnt~, representative from the LC lens of the view-limitinp sim~ tion device of Figures 2 and 8, at three diLrerellt points in time (a, b, and c) showing a ~imnl~tion of "rolling" fire.
Figure 14 shows three adjoining segm~ont~, represçnt~tive from the LC lens of the view-limiting simulation device of Figures 2 and 8, at three dirrelellt points in time (a, b, and c) showing a simulation of "rolling" smoke.
Figure 15 is a flowchart of a representative program which might run the switch~ ling and memory-access processes of the tr~nsmitter/controller or receiver/controller and associated microprocessors .
Figure 16 shows a trainee wearing a simulation device which additionally senses relative head movements and shifts the simulation which then appears to remain in a constant relative location as the trainee moves his head.
DE:SCRIPrION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Referring to Figures 1 and 2, a firemen's training simulator includes a tr~n~mitter 1 used by an instructor in conjunction with a view-limiting cim~ tion device 20 worn by a trainee (not shown). The signals between tr~n~mitter 1 and view-limiting ~im~ tion device 20 can be tr~n~mitt~d and received via any conventional medium (e.g. light signals -- IR or visible; sonar; radio waves; and/or electrical or fiber-optic signals through cable). The ~lef~lled embodiment uses Frequency Modulated (FM) radio waves.
W O96/23291 5 PCT~US96/00413 Tr~n~mitter 1 includes an external housing 2 for cont~ining the tr~n~mitter circuitry. Tr~n~mitter 1 further inclu~les a control panel 3 for operation and control of view-limiting simulation device 20, and an ~nttonn~ 4 for tr~n~mittin~ FM radio waves to view-limiting simulation device 20.
Control panel 3 inclllde~ an ON-OFF switch S for controlling supply of power to tr~n~mitter 1. Control panel 3 further includes a first see-through liquid-crystal (LC) lens 11 which provides the instructor with visual confirmation of the simulation that the trainee is currently viewing. LC lens 11 m~tch~s, in mini~tllre, an LC lens 21 of view-limiting simulation device 20 as worn by the trainee.
Control panel 3 further includçs the following:
An operation mode switch 6 (e.g., a rotary switch) for selecting either manual operation (AUTO-SIM OFF) or preprogrammed operation (AUTO-SIM ON) which ~ ce-s~es, from electronic memory storage devices, a predetermined syllabus of settingC; Figure 15 shows an example flowchart of a switch-sampling and memory-access program which might drive the microprocessors (Figures 10, 11) of the tr~n~mitter/controller 1 (Figure 1) and/or the receiver/controller 25 (Figure 2);
A vision acuity switch 7 (e.g., a rotary switch) which allows selection of one of various levels of vision occlusion (e.g. Levels 1-5).
The visual acuity setting~ range from total smoke engulfment to some pre-determined unit of higher visibility;
A smoke pattern switch 8 (e.g., a rotary switch) for selecting possible smoke simulation conditions and patterns (e.g. normal, random or swirling). With switch 8 in the normal position, a pre-set value taken from vision acuity switch 7 is used. In the random position, simulated smoke varies ~biLl~ily in its visually occlusive effect. In the swirling position, simulated smoke takes on a rolling character across LC lens 21 (and thus across tr~n~mitter lens 11). Pre-programmed settings are drawn from a pre-set syllabus stored in memory;
-CA 022lll03 l997-07-22 W O96/23291 PCT~US96/00413 An explosion ~im~ tion switch 9 (e.g., a pushbutton switch) which allows the instructor to hllel"~ tly trigger bright flashes of light from at least one strobe lamp 22 located central to the trainee's vision in the housing 24 of view-limit;ng .~im~ tion device 20;
A clear switch 10 (e.g., a pushbutton switch) for clearing LC
lens 21 (and thus tr~n~mitter lens 11) and immediately removing occlusions to the trainee's vision. Clear switch 10 also activates an audio alarm 23 located in the housing 24 of view-limiting simulation device 20;
An LC display 12 which provides a readout of the visual acuity setting (level 1-5) and the tr~n~mitter operating mode (manual or automatic).
Referring again to Figure 2, view-limiting simulation device 20 is shown in the form of a trainee's respirator mask (with attachments in fathom). The ,e~spi,alQr mask housing 24 encompasses the following:
a receiver/controller 25 which includes an FM radio receiver/decoder/driver unit; a battery col--p~L,,Ient 33 with a battery 34, and a battery backup 35; a locking ON/OFF power switch 27; a clear switch 28; an FM ~ntenn~ 29; at least one flash strobe lamp 22;
a photometric platform 30; an audio shutdown alarm 23; and a multi-layered LC lens 21. Simulation device 20 might include a full set of manual switch settings as found on tr~n~mitter 1 (Figure 1).
The power switch 27 controls all power to the ~im~ tor mask 20. Battery colllpalLIllent 33, battery 34 and battery backup 35 provide power for the mask 20. LED in~ tor 36 remains constantly lit upon full charge of b~tt~,ries 34, 35 and stays lit as long as a sufficient level of charge remains in the batteries. Upon ~letecting a certain level of battery discharge, LED indicator 36 flashes so that the trainee and trainer can see that batteries 34, 35 need recharging. A total power failure causes alarm 23, which might be a piezo-electric tone generator, to generate an inL~lll.iLlent tone so that the trainee will know that a power failure has occurred and the mask 20 should be removed.
W O96/23291 7 PCT~US96/00413 Mask 20 also includes its own clear switch 28 which is used for cl~ring LC lens 21 in the event of an emergency. Activation of the clear switch 28 energizes alarm 23 to generate a solid tone so that the - instructor and/or the trainee will know that a clear has been initi~tyl The tr~n~mitter and simulation mask audio warning devices normally operate in-lependently of each other. Accordingly, the instructor and the trainee can receive independent or ~imlllt~neous warning signals.
Other audio signals might be generated by at least one audio speaker (not shown) located at a point near the ears of the wearer on the ~imnl~tion device, and driver cil~;ui~ly (not shown) to simulate sounds encountered in firefighting situations (e.g. fire, wind, burning and stressed structures, explosions, and spraying water).
FM ~ntenn~ 29 is mounted inside mask housing 24 so as to be unobstructive. ~nt~nn~ 29 receives FM signals from transmitter 1 and sends these signals to receiver/controller 25. Receiver/controller 25 receives the FM radio signals, decodes the signals' content, and fol"~als the resnlting info~"la~ion to drive LC lens 21 of mask 20.
Referring to Figure 10 a represent~tive system/block diagram shows the electrical flow for the tr~n~mitter 1 (Figure 1). The control panel switch setting~ (as described above) select manual control 160 and/or automatic control 161. Automatic control depends on pre-programmed patterns being ~t~cesse~ from electronic memory storage devices 162 (e.g., computer disk, RAM, ROM, CD). A microprocessor 163 processes such control inrol",ation into driver signals for LC driver 164 and See-through LC lens 165. Microprocessor 163 also sends such control information to an encoder 166, which in turn sends to encoded signals to an FM tr~ncmitter 167, or an optional IR tr~n~mitter 168.
In Figure 11, a l~leselltative system/block diagram shows the electrical flow for the receiver/controller 25 (Figure 2). As in.li(~ted, the signals can be tr~n.~mitted and received through several mediums, for example, FM or IR. An FM receiver 170 (or IR receiver 180) sends signals to a controller 171 (or IR controller 181). The controller CA 022lll03 l997-07-22 W O 96/23291 8 PCTrUS96/00413 171 (181) uses a decoder 172 which feeds the decoded signals into a microprocessor 173. Automatic control selections may access pre-programmed pattern sequences stored in electronic memory devices (e.g., computer disk, RAM, ROM, CD). Microprocessor 173 sends control signals to LC driver which in turn drives LC lens 175.
Microprocessor 173 might also produce control signals to drive audio speakers 176. Alternatively, photometric sensor signals 177 might feed control pattern signals into microprocessor 173 to then drive LC driver 174 and LC lens 175.
Referring to Figure lS, an example flowchart of a switch-sampling and memory-access program is shown. This program might drive the micloplocessols 163 and/or 173 (Figures 10, 11). The program checks the auto-simulation switch 185; if it is on, the auto-simulation settings are ~cecc~ from memory 186 and counters are incre~n~nted 187 and settingc are output to LC driver 194; else the auto-simulation setting is off and battery failure 188 is tested. If the battery has failed, an alarm is sounded 189 and the program ends 204;
else the clear switch 190 is tested. If the clear switch is activated, an alarm is sounded 191 and the program ends 204; else the normal mode of operation 192 is tested. If in normal mode, a vision acuity setting is ~ccçsc~d 193 and output to the LC driver 194. If not in normal mode, then random mode 195 is checked. If in random mode, then random settings are acces~çd 198 and counters increm~nted 200 and settings output to LC driver 194; else swirl mode is check~d If in swirl mode, then swirl settings are ~t~cecc~l 197 and counters incremented 199 and setting.c output to LC driver 194. The explosion simulation switch 201 is then tested. If activated, then a strobe is fired 202; else no strobe is fired. The program then loops back to resample the a~lopliate switches and output driver settin~c.
For automatic control selections, pre-programmed pattern sequences are ~cesce~l from electronic memory. Referring again to Pigures 1 and 2, such automatic control can bê achieved by storing such W O 96/23291 9 PCT~US96/00413 control sequences in electronic memory storage devices 162 (Figure 10) located in tr~ncmitter 1 (Figure 1). The transmitter/controller would then access a~r~iate control sequences to drive the LC lens segments and contin~-~lly transmit this control information to receiver/controller 25 (Figure 2). Such control uses an ~ ell~pted tr~ncmicsion link between the tr~n.cmitter 1 and simulation device 20 to progress through the electronically stored pattern sequences.
Alternatively, pre-programmed con~rol sequences might reside in electronic memory storage devices 178 (Figure 11 - shown in phanto.ll) located in receiver/controller 25. Automatic control selections might then require tr~ncmitter 1 to transmit much shorter electronic comm~ntls which would direct receiver/controller 25 to access and progress through the electronically stored pattern sequences without further instructions. In this alte,na~ e embodiment, since memory devices 178 are local to receiver/controller 25, the automatic sequences might progress without a continuous t~ncmi.c~ion link between tr~n.cmitter 1 and simulation device 20.
In the prere~r~d embodim~-nt, it is desired to In~ a constant tr~nsmicsion link between tr~n~smittpr 1 and receiver/controller 25. This is so that constant control can be exercised over the trainee's visual abilities. Training environments are often dangerous and/or located in high and unprotected places (e.g., fire towers and b~ ling.s with open windows and ledges). It is illlpOl ~lt for the trainer to constantly know what the trainee is seeing so that the trainer can keep the trainee out of danger. As a result, another feature incl~ldes ci~c~ y in simulation device housing 24 to clear the LC lens 21 of simulation device 20 and to generate an audible signal if the trainee wanders outside of tr~n.smittPr range and loses tr~ncmi.csion signal lock.
Referring to Figure 7, a typical single layer LC lens construction 85 is shown with substrates 80 and 81 (typically made from plastic) sandwiching the voltage controlled LC material 82. LC lens 85 includes a front plane 86 and a back plane 87. Substrate 80 and conductive layer W O96/23291 lo PCT~US96/00413 84 line the front plane of LC m~t~,ri~l 82. Substrate 81 and conductive layer 83 line the back plane of LC m~ten~l 82. Conductive layers 83, 84 allow voltage to be applied to LC material 82. The opacity of LC
m~t~,ri~l 82 can be controlled by varying the voltage applied to conductive layers 83, 84. Example varieties of LC material 82 include twisted nPm~tic, supertwist, and active matrix. Polarizers may line the outer sllrf~ s of substrates 80, 81 to control the contrast and tr~ncmiccion of light.
Conductive layers 83, 84 may be etched to create dirr~ t segrnentc which are electrically icol~tel from each other. Electrical connections (not shown) can lead to each segment and can be used to apply voltage to that segment of LC material 82. The front and back plane conductive layers 83, 84 might be identically (or similarly) etched to create individually controllable segm~ntc. Similarly, controllable segmt~,ntc might also be created by etching only one conductive plane for each LC layer. The plefelled embodiment etches only one conductive plane, thus leaving the other conductive plane unetched.
The l)r~relled embodiment also uses dynamic scattering LC
layers with plastic substrates. The plastic substrates prove to be flexible (even in multi-layered configurations) and are more easily mounted in simulation devices which might require bending of the mounted LC lens construction. A polycarbonite film is optically l~min~ted on each side of the plastic substrates to give added rigidity and to protect the substrate surfaces. This film ranges in thickness from 5 to 30 tholls~nllth~ of an inch. The pler~;lled embodiment also utilizes LC
configurations which default to a completely opaque condition when no voltage is applied (i.e., a negative image LC).
In Figure 7, LC m~t~,ri~l 82 may be undyed and appear completely white when no voltage is applied. Alternatively, a guest-host dichroic can be used which consists of an LC material with a "host"
fluid co~ g a color dyed "guest. " In the single-layered W O96/23291 - 11 - PCTrUS96/00413 configuration, smoke conditions can be re~lictic~lly simulated with either undyed-white or gray-dyed LC materials.
Referring to Figure 8, a multi-layered LC lens construction 100 - is shown with various host dyes incl~lded between the substrate layers 90, 91, 92, 93 to f~.ilit~te producing colors. This multi-layered LC
construction is utilized in the pfefel,~d embodiment and is comprised of stacked single-layered constructions (as per Figure 7). If, however, only smoke conditions are to be simulated, a simulation device 20 (Figure 2) might use only a single-layered LC lens (as per Figure 7), constructed with individually controllable non-linear segmPnts -- as described below, but for only one layer. This single layer construction is equally applicable to the smoke simulation examples also described below.
LC lens 100 (and LC lens 21 in Figure 2) is divided, across its working area, into various areas or segments 101 (s~m~nt.c 31 in Figure 2) to f~cilit~tto simulating a wide range of manual and auto-controlled opt;l~ g conditions. A yellow host dye is mixed with LC
m~teri~l 97 located between substrates 90 and 91. A red host dye is mixed with LC m~ttori~l 98 located between substrates 91 and 92.
Either no host dye (white LC) or a gray host dye is mixed with LC
m~teri~l 99 located between substrates 92 and 93.
Line 94 r~l~sellts a wavering (e.g., non-linear, curve-shaped) line etched horizontally across the conductive layer which drives yellow LC m~teri~l 97. Such wavering lines might be irregularly curved and/or irregular in displ~em~nt (from the line's center axis), or regularly curved and/or regular in displ~r-çmPnt Alternatively this line might be a combination of all such char~cteri~tics. Line displ~emPnt typically varies to within one inch or less from the line's center axis. Such line ~ pl~ement will be constrained by the relative size and number of controllable segments across the working area of the lens. Smaller, tighter segmentation will allow for less displacement from a given line's center axis. Larger segm~nt~tion will allow for more displacement.
CA 022lll03 l997-07-22 W O 96/23291 - 12 - PCT~US96/00413 Line 95 ~ senl~ a similar wavering line etched horizontally across the conductive layer which drives red LC material 98. Line 96 l~rese~ a similar wavering line etched horizontally across the conductive layer which drives undyed-white (or dyed-gray) LC material S 99. These hori7Ont~l lines are etched at dirrere.lt substrate levels. In this embo~limPnt, the lines appear to cross when the LC layers are stacked and viewed from the front of LC lens, due to their sufficient displacement and irregularly curved-shape.
Similarly, line 105 r~lesent~ a wavering line etched vertically across the conductive layer which drives yellow LC material 97. Line 106 l~lc~se"L~ a wavering line etched vertically across the conductive layer which drives red LC m~tPri~l 98. Line 107 represents a wavering line etched vertically across the conductive layer which drives undyed-white (or dyed-gray) LC m~teri~l 99. These vertical lines are etched at dirrt;lent substrate levels, but appear to cross, due to their wavering nature, when the substrate levels are stacked and viewed from the front of LC lens. In practice, however, lines 94-96 and 105-107, and the res~lting segment 101 separations, are beyond the focal length of the trainee. They cannot be seen and present no distractions.
Referring again to Figures 2 and 8, the red, yellow and undyed-white (or dyed-gray) conductive layers also have flame shape segments 32 etched into the conductive layers which drive the LC materials.
These flame segmP-nt~ 32 are uniformly dispersed and aligned across the red, yellow, and undyed-white (or dyed-gray) LC layers. Alternatively, as with the wavering segmPnt~ above, each flame se~mPnt 32 is puIposefully mi~lignP~ with the underlying color layer's flame segmPnt Each flame segment 32 is individually controllable so as to create a moving or fli~kering flame to the viewer. The flame shapes 32 are relatively more noticeable to the trainee, due to their physical size, than the wavering lines 94-96 and 105-107.
As combined, these horizontal and vertical lines create a grid of individual wavering segments 101, and flame shape segments 32, in CA 022lll03 l997-07-22 each color layer 97, 98, 99 which can be individually addressed and controlled through mllltipleYing control of the individual wavering and flame shape segm~nt~. As each colored LC m~t~ri~l and conductive ~ layer is stacked upon each other, the wavering segments and flame S shapes segmt-nt~ overlap, in a general way, and form a matrix extending across the working area and depth (layering) of the LC lens 100.
By controlling this matrix of segmentc and/or flame shapes, the trainee's vision can be occluded by activating any color, or a combination of colors, in any segm~nt, at any level of opacity, for any period of time. The wavering overlap 108 of lines 94-96, 105-107 and aligned overlap of flame segments 32, allows for more realistic simulations of fire and smoke patterns, particularly as adjoining segm~ntc are sequentially activated and deactivated across LC lens 100.
Referring again to Figures 8 and 12, a variety of conditions may be ~imlll~t~A which are typically encountered by a firefighter. Figure 12 shows three ~ cent wavering segmçnt~ 101 with both red and yellow ovella~ing/wavering se~m.ont.~ activated, and with the undyed-white (or dyed-gray) segments not activated. As shown, where the red and yellow segments overlap and both are active, the trainee sees an 20 . orange color (orange areas color coded as "3"). Where the red segm~nting line 94 wavers and extends beyond the yellow segmPnting line 95, the trainee sees red (red areas color coded as "1").
Alternatively, where the yellow segmPnting line 95 wavers and extends beyond the red segmpnting line 94, the trainee sees yellow (yellow areas color coded as "2"). This is ~suming that the adjoining segments above segmPnts 101 (not shown in detail) are non-active -- otherwise, different color combinations might result.
Referring to Figure 12, the individually controllable flame segmPnt~ 125 have been independently activated (as indicated) to be either red or yellow. This example is r~.esPnt~tive only. Flame segm~nt~ 125 might appear oppositely colored or appear orange colored W O96/23291 PCT/US96/~0413 - 14 -if both red and yellow LC layers are activated as with the surrounding wavering ~egmPnt~ 101.
Accordingly, adjoining and/or overlapping red and yellow dyed wavering segmP-nt~ 101 can be activated on an ~lte.rn~ting basis to S ~im~ te, for eY~mple, "licking flames" across the wavering sPgmPnt lines. Similarly, flame segmPnt~ 125 can be activated, either together or on an allelllali,lg basis, to add to the "licking flame" sim~ tion.
Given the generally random nature of a "licking flame," this simulation could take on many forms, with the above description being a l~l~se~ e example.
A "rolling flame" might be ~im~ tP~, for example, as follows:
In Figures 13(a)-13(c), three adjoining segments 120, 121, 122 are shown at three dirrerellt points in time. The first point in time is illustrated in Figure 13(a) which shows the first adjoining segment 120 having both its red and yellow overlapping wavering layers activated, causing the trainee to see red, yellow, and orange as described above for Figure 12. For added effect, the individually controllable flame segments 125 have been activated in red and yellow as shown in the first segm~-nt 120. The second and third adjoining segments 121, 122 have only their yellow wavering layers activated.
The second point in time is illustrated in Figure 13(b) which shows the second adjoining segmPnt 121 having both red and yellow wavering layers active. Additionally, flame segments 125 have been activated in red and yellow as shown. Only the yellow wavering layer is active in the first and third adjoining segments 120, 122.
At the third point in time, Figure 13(c) shows the third adjoining segment 122 having both red and yellow wavering layers active.
Additionally, flame segmPnt~ 125 have been activated in red and yellow as shown. Only the yellow wavering layer is active in the first and second adjoining segments 120, 121.
As the red layer in each adjoining segment 120-122 is progressively activated and then deactivated, the colors associated with a flame (at close proximity) appear to "roll" across and approl.liately occlude the trainee's field of vision. The shifting activation of flame segm~nt~ 125 adds to this effect. The wavering vertical segmçnt~tion (not det~ in Figure 13) will also add realism to the simulation, as per S the related description of colors associated with the hori7Ont~l wavering lines of Figure 12 -- but as applied to the vertical lines.
Referring again to Figure 8, undyed-white (or dyed-gray) LC
m~te.ri~l 99 and corresponding undyed-white (or dyed-gray) segments 108 can be opaqued to simulate various levels of smoke density and resulting trainee vision occlusion. For total blackout effects, segments 101 can be collectively opaqued across the whole LC lens 100.
Al~"~a~ively or collectively, "rolling" smoke conditions might, for éxample, be simulated as follows: In Figure 14(a)-(c), three adjoining segments 120, 121, 122 are shown at three dirrelc;i~t points in time (as in Figure 13). At the first point in time, Figure 14(a) shows the first adjoining segment 120 with its undyed-white (or dyed-gray) LC
layer opaqued ~ignifi~ntly, while adjoining segments 121, 122 are more tr~n~lucent At the second point in time, Figure 14(b) shows the second adjoining segment 121 opaqued ~ignific~ntly, with adjoining segments 120, 122 being more translucent. At the third point in time, Figure 14(c) shows the third adjoining segment 122 opaqued significantly, with adjoining segments 120, 121 being more translucent. As this example demonstrates, by sequentially varying the opacity of adjoining undyed-white (or dyed-gray) LC segm~nts 120-122, a "rolling" smoke across the trainee's vision is effectively simulated.
AlL~l"atively, a "swirling" smoke could be simulated by varying the opacity of undyed-white (or dyed-gray) LC layer segments lOl (Figure 8) in a generally circular, or spiraling, pattern. Higher degrees of realism could be achieved through more precise and gr~ t~d control of opacity levels in adjoining segm~nt~. This would more realistically simulate densifying smoke across the trainee's field of view. Similarly, faster and tighter progressions of smoke patterns across segments 101 W O96/23291 PCTrUS96/00413 of LC lens 100 would more realistically simulate the visual occlusion experienced in dyn~mic~lly ch~nging smoke-filled conditions.
While the fire and smoke sim~ tion examples have been described s~ Ply for explanation purposes, such fire and smoke S simulations are inten-1ei to function either alone, or in combination with one another. Smoke simulations involve opaquing undyed-white (or dyed-gray) LC m~t~ori~l 99, which is separate from LC red and yellow m~tPri~l 97, 98 used for fire sim~ tions. In the most complete cimul~tion, all color layers -- white (or gray), red, and yellow -- would operate simultaneously to simulate the full effect of being exposed to fire and smoke at the same time.
Purthermore, the aforementioned patterns rely on a sequential progression as to which adjoining segmentc and/or LC color layers will be activated next. As mentioned above, these sequential patterns are ~cecced from a preprogrammed syllabus which is stored in electronic memory. This electronic memory might reside in either the tr~ncmitt~r 1 (Figure 1) or the cim~ tion device 20 (Figure 2), or both. Random smoke patterns progress according to electronically generated random sequences.
Referring to Figure 16, another feature of the present invention is demonctr~t~l which will cimul~tt- the proximate location of an obstruction such as a fire. In any .cim~ tion, the LC lens 213 is mounted to the trainee's head 214 as part of the simulation device 210.
In an uncorrected simulation, if a fire is simulated across lens 213 in the trainee's line of sight, the fire will "move" with the trainee's line of sight as the trainee moves his head up and down.
Such a result is unrealistic and can be co~ ed by including an ~ttit~lde sensor 215 (e.g., an electrolytic tilt sensor), in the simulation device 210 which detects the relative elevation motion (up and down) of the trainee's head movements. This relative motion can then be used to shi~t the present simulation up or down the ~lu~liate segment~ of LC
lens 213 so that the cimul~tit)n aRears to remain in relatively the same "external" location.
For inct~nce~ if a fire is cim~ tyi directly in front of the trainee's leveled head, the simulated fire will be properly shifted downwards on LC lens 213 if the trainee raises his head; Similarly, the fire will be shifted upwards if the trainee lowers his head. This relative shifting up and down on the different levels of holi;Gonl;llly wavering lines 212 and horizontally adjoining segmPntc simulates the appearance of a constant relative "eYtern~l" location of the fire.
A left-and-right (axial) motion sensor could also provide inputs to relatively shift the simulation across the vertical lines and vertical adjoining segments of LC lens 213, as per the trainee's head movements, to additionally simulate a constant relative location of a fire.
Alternatively or collectively with the example simulations described above, the a~ ce (e.g. darkness, contrast, opacity) of the red and yellow colors in each of the wavering segments 101 (Figures 8 and 12), and the flame-shaped segm~ntc 125 (Figure 12), can be controlled by varying the voltage to each segm~nt andtor the darkness of the underlying undyed-white (or dyed-gray) LC segments. As mentioned above, each multi-layered wavering segment 101 has an individually controllable undyed-white (or d,ved-gray) LC material in the stack. Similarly, each flame-shaped segml~-nt 125 in the yellow and red LC m~t~ lc aligns with an individually controllable flame-shaped segmPnt in the undyed-white (or dyed-gray) LC m~t~ l. This allows for individual and/or collective control over the appea.~lce of the wavering segments 101 and flame segml-nts 125. For example, "deeper" colored fires (e.g. reds and yellows) might be simulated by a~l~upliately opaquing the undyed-white (or dyed-gray) LC material for any given wavering segment 101 and/or flame segment 125.
Alternatively or collectively with the example simulations described above, the visual effects of blackouts -- due, for instance, to -CA 022lll03 l997-07-22 W O96/23291 - 18 - PCT~US96/00413 depleted oxygen levels -- might also be simulated. For example, adjoining and/or overlapping white (or gray), red, and yellow segmPnts can be collectively activated in their primary colors to simulate the blackout effects of training under depleted oxygen levels. The opacity and intensity of the colors might be increased across the LC lens 21 (Figure 2) until total blackout conditions are achieved.
An ~ltern~tive means for controlling the view-limiting simulation device incl~ldes light pattern tr~n~mi~siQns (either visual or IR).
Referring to Figure 2 and Figure 9, mask housing 24 additionally includes a photometric sensor housing and platform 30 which senses light p~ttPrn~ from various sources 150. LC receiver/controller 25 can ~lt~rn~tively process such patterned light signals to subsequently drive LC lens 21 and simulate various firefighting conditions (e.g. smoke, flames, blackouts) as described above.
lS Photometric sensor housing and platform 30 (Figure 2) is controlled by controller circuitry and a microprocessor which evaluates pulsed light from sources lS0 (Figure 9). Depending on the visual simulation desired, the instructor will switch on the a~~ iate light pattern frequencies for various locations in the training room.
Each independent light source 150 can generate independent frequencies of fl~ching light. When the trainees 151, 152 look in any given direction, the individual pattern frequencies of each lamp lS0 will be tr~n~mitte~l to control the vision of the trainee by way of the photometric platform 30, and the col~onding controller circuitry and microprocessor.
In other words, the visual simulation will change as the trainee moves his head in various directions in a controlled area lSS (Figure 9).
This is achieved by using photometric sensors and associated control cir~ ly which will directionally isolate and detect individual frequency patterns from lamps lS0. Individual lamps lS0 might also send directional signals which will minimi7e inte,relel-ce between adjoining (and other) lamps.
For eY~mple, the frequency pattern generated by pulsed light source 153 might cause the LC driver circuitry to simulate rolling smoke with an underlying low intensity yellow fire. Pulsed light source 154 might cause the LC driver circui~ly to cim~ te wildly fluctuating S and inten.c~-ly licking flames, with little or no smoke. Adjoining pulsed light source 156 might cause the LC driver circuitry to simulate licking flames at a slightly lesser intensity. Such realistic differences in p~ ate conditions, with no crossover intelrerellce between the lamps, could help teach the trainee to discern between dangerous and life~hl~~e,-ing situations on opposite sides of a training room. The prere~red type of lamp 150 would be infrared LED's so as not to confuse the trainee with visible fl~.ching lights.
Accordingly, the trainee might train in one of two environm.o.nt.c.
The first environment would be any training facility as it is currently configured, without additional in.ct~ tion of light sources 150. This might include buil~lingc, houses, aircraft, vehicles, forests, ships, factories and/or oil drilling operations. The trainee's vision would be limited by the white (or gray), red, and/or yellows segm~.nts of LC lens 21 (Figure 2) according to the switch settingc on the FM radio tr~ncmittPr 1 (Figure 1).
A second environment might be customized, with the inct~ tion of multiple light sources 150, to simulate conditions as dependant upon the trainee's position and orientation in the environment. Such positioning of light sources 150 could easily coincide with actual physical barriers to provide a more realistic firefighting simulation.
Referring again to Figure 1, the tr~ncmitter 1 might also include control switches (not shown) in the lower panel 13 for a fire projection system (not shown). This projection system would also utilize tr~n.cmitter 1 to transmit coded cign~l.c, as configured by the instructor, to receivers/drivers mounted inside separate fire projection devices (not shown). These fire projection devices would utilize multi-layered and multi-colored LC lenses for .cim~ ting fire patterns, and an W O 96123291 20 PCTrUS96/00413 accompanying projection devices for projecting the simulated fires onto walls, screens, and other objects.
In combination, the view-limiting ~imul~tion device 20 (Figure 2), along with the fire projection system (not shown), creates a S controllable, safe, and realistic training environment for firefighter trainees.
Referring to Figure 3, an alternative embodiment is shown which uses a glasses-style view-limiting simulation device 40. Device 40 ~imil~rly in~ des the following (some not shown) in device housing 41:
a receiver/controller, an ~ntenn~ a locking ON/OFF switch, a clear switch, an audible alarm, at least one strobe, a battery compartment, a battery and a battery backup, a photometric sensor platform 44, and at least one multi-layered LC lens 42. This style of simulator might also include side-mounted LC lenses 43 as viewed peripherally by the trainee.
Referring to Figure 4, another alternative embodiment is shown which uses a goggle-style view-limiting simulation device 50. Device 50 ~imil~rly includes the following (some not shown) in device housing 51: a receiver/controller, an ~ntt~nn~, a locking ON/OFF switch, a clear switch, an audible alarm, at least one strobe, a battery ~o.. -pall.. ent, abattery, and a battery backup, a photometric sensor platform 52, and a pair of multi-layered LC lenses 53. This style of simulator incorporates separate lens elements 53 over each eye.
Referring to Figure 5, another alternative embodiment is shown which uses a smaller sized mask-type view-limiting simulation device 60 for use as a child trainer. Device 60 similarly includes the following (some not shown) in device housing 61: a receiver/controller, an ~ntenn~, a locking ON/OFF switch, a clear switch, an audible alarm, at least one strobe, a battery co,,,pa,L~Ient, a battery, and a battery backup, a photometric sensor platform 62, and a multi-layered LC lens 63.
Referring to Figure 6, another alternative embodiment is shown which uses a military-style view-limitin~ simulation device 70. Device W O96/23291 PCTrUS96/00~13 - 21 -70 ~imil~rly includes the following (some not shown) in device housing 71: a receiver/controller, an antenna, a locking ON/OFF switch, a clear switch, an audible alarm, at least one strobe, a battery coll.p~l,.ent, a - battery, and a battery backup, a photometric sensor platform 72, and a S multi-layered LC lens 73. This style of .~im~ tor, for example, might also be used by forest firefi~htPrs without a re~il~t~
While only two ~l~relled embo~iment~ of the invention have been described hereinabove, those of ordina y skill in the art will recognize that either embodiment may be modified and altered without departing from the central spirit and scope of the invention. Thus, the plef~ d embo-limPnt.s described hereinabove are to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being intlic~tPA by the appended claims, rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the m~ning and range of equivalency of the claims are intended to be embraced herein.
BACKGROUND OF T~IE I~VENTION
Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a firemen's tr~ining device for ~im~ tion of smoke, fires, and explosions which might impair a S firefighter's vision, and the generation of accolllpanying audio signals to coincide with the visual ~im~ tions.
Desc~ ion of the Prior Art In the area of firefightPr training, one objective of training devices is to occlude the trainee's visual references. This will teach the trainee to fight fires and to find trapped occupants in burning and smoke-filled environmPnt~.
Previous methods of simulating actual field conditions have incl~lded the intentional burning of, for example, old tires, used oil, and old b--il(ling~. Such intentional burning of often dangerous and toxic substances is now prohibited in most areas because of environmental and safety concerns. Comml-nities wish to avoid the pollution reslllting from such intentional fires, as well as the possibility of such fires spreading.
Alternatively, smoke m~-~hinPs and smoke bombs can be used, but little control over the location and density of the smoke is possible with these devices. Often the wind will carry smoke from a training area, thus rendering the training exercise ineffective and polluting surrounding areas or shutting down assembly lines or other production areas.
Some fire departments use darkened rooms, and will primitively simulate a fire by placing a colored sock over a fl~hlight Still other departments place waxed paper over the firefighter's respirator mask to simulate smoke and fire.
Liquid crystal (LC) lenses are voltage controlled devices whose opacity can be varied. LC lensed glasses have previously been used in flight tr~ining situations to ~im~ tP cloud cover (See this inventor's W O96/23291 2 PCT~US96/00413 U.S. Patent Nos. 4,152,846 - Flight Training Method and Apparatus;
4,482,386 - Flight Training Glasses). Firefighting conditions and simulations thereof, however, are dr~m~tic~lly dirre,ellt than flight conrlition~
As a result, none of the prior methods effectively ~im~ tes the dyn~mi~-~lly ch~nging conditions most often encountere~ by firefighters in the field. Prior sim~ t~d training conditions are difficult or inlpos~ible to accurately control and/or duplicate. Accordingly, standardization of testing conditions is difficult and/or impossible to achieve.
Sl~MMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an objective of the present invention to provide an apparatus for firefighter training which includes a tr~nsmitter and a view-limiting simulation device (training mask, glasses, or goggles) with a receiver/controller for receiving and decoding transmitted signals. The simulation device, as driven by the decoded signals, includes a voltage controlled liquid crystal (LC) lens for controlled occlusion of the trainee's view, and for simulating fire, smoke, explosions, and related audio alarms.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a portable a~p~lus which allows a trainee to re~ tir~lly train inside of training areas (e.g. fire halls, ~ miPs, special f~ilitiPs, schools, office b~ tling~ factories, aircraft, ships, etc.) without smoke-polluting and/or setting aflame the tr~ining areas and surrounding areas.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a training system which utilizes radio tr~n~mi~ions to send instruction signals between the instructor and the trainee's ~imlll~tion device.
It is yet a further object of the present invention to provide a training system which utilizes light frequency patterns to send instruction signals to the trainee's view-limiting ~imlll~tion device, thus allowing a trainee's simulated view to vary with the trainee's orientation in a training environment with multiple light pattern sources.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a training system which utilizes both visual and audio simulation of firefighting conditions (e.g. sights and sounds of fire, wind, and explosions) to work in concert with each other.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a training system with visual occlusion and simulation of firefighting conr1itionc, as well as acco-l-pa~ying projection systems for simulating fires so as to provide for more realistic training experiences.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 is a tr~ncmittPr/controller which can be configured to a cable-tethered device or separate tPncmiccion medium system such as radio, light patterns (infrared - IR), or sonar.
Figure 2 is a typical ,es~i.dlor-type view-limiting simulation device used by firemen (with related ~tt~t~hm~nts in fathom).
Figure 3 is a glasses-style view-limiting simulation device.
Figure 4 is a goggles-style view-limiting simulation device that could be used inside a conventional r~ dtol.
Figure S is a child-sized view-limiting simulation device for training in school environm~nt~.
Figure 6 is a military-style view-limiting simulation device that could also be used by forest firefighters without a res~i,dtor.
Figure 7 is a single-layered liquid crystal (LC) lens construction.
Figure 8 is a cross-sectional view of a complex multi-layered and multi-color liquid crystal (LC) lens construction.
Figure 9 is top view of a training room which contains multiple light pattern sources which transmit light pattern signals to the trainee's photometric sensors.
Figure 10 is a system/block diagram showing electrical data paths for the tr~n.~mitter/controller.
W O 96/23291 4 PCT~US96/00413 Figure ll is a system/block diagram showing electrical data paths for the receiver/controller.
Figure 12 shows three adjoining segments, repleselll; tive from the LC lens of the view-limiting simulation device of Figures 2 and 8, S with the red and yellow LC layers activated.
Figure 13 shows three adjoining segmPnt~, representative from the LC lens of the view-limitinp sim~ tion device of Figures 2 and 8, at three diLrerellt points in time (a, b, and c) showing a ~imnl~tion of "rolling" fire.
Figure 14 shows three adjoining segm~ont~, represçnt~tive from the LC lens of the view-limiting simulation device of Figures 2 and 8, at three dirrelellt points in time (a, b, and c) showing a simulation of "rolling" smoke.
Figure 15 is a flowchart of a representative program which might run the switch~ ling and memory-access processes of the tr~nsmitter/controller or receiver/controller and associated microprocessors .
Figure 16 shows a trainee wearing a simulation device which additionally senses relative head movements and shifts the simulation which then appears to remain in a constant relative location as the trainee moves his head.
DE:SCRIPrION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Referring to Figures 1 and 2, a firemen's training simulator includes a tr~n~mitter 1 used by an instructor in conjunction with a view-limiting cim~ tion device 20 worn by a trainee (not shown). The signals between tr~n~mitter 1 and view-limiting ~im~ tion device 20 can be tr~n~mitt~d and received via any conventional medium (e.g. light signals -- IR or visible; sonar; radio waves; and/or electrical or fiber-optic signals through cable). The ~lef~lled embodiment uses Frequency Modulated (FM) radio waves.
W O96/23291 5 PCT~US96/00413 Tr~n~mitter 1 includes an external housing 2 for cont~ining the tr~n~mitter circuitry. Tr~n~mitter 1 further inclu~les a control panel 3 for operation and control of view-limiting simulation device 20, and an ~nttonn~ 4 for tr~n~mittin~ FM radio waves to view-limiting simulation device 20.
Control panel 3 inclllde~ an ON-OFF switch S for controlling supply of power to tr~n~mitter 1. Control panel 3 further includes a first see-through liquid-crystal (LC) lens 11 which provides the instructor with visual confirmation of the simulation that the trainee is currently viewing. LC lens 11 m~tch~s, in mini~tllre, an LC lens 21 of view-limiting simulation device 20 as worn by the trainee.
Control panel 3 further includçs the following:
An operation mode switch 6 (e.g., a rotary switch) for selecting either manual operation (AUTO-SIM OFF) or preprogrammed operation (AUTO-SIM ON) which ~ ce-s~es, from electronic memory storage devices, a predetermined syllabus of settingC; Figure 15 shows an example flowchart of a switch-sampling and memory-access program which might drive the microprocessors (Figures 10, 11) of the tr~n~mitter/controller 1 (Figure 1) and/or the receiver/controller 25 (Figure 2);
A vision acuity switch 7 (e.g., a rotary switch) which allows selection of one of various levels of vision occlusion (e.g. Levels 1-5).
The visual acuity setting~ range from total smoke engulfment to some pre-determined unit of higher visibility;
A smoke pattern switch 8 (e.g., a rotary switch) for selecting possible smoke simulation conditions and patterns (e.g. normal, random or swirling). With switch 8 in the normal position, a pre-set value taken from vision acuity switch 7 is used. In the random position, simulated smoke varies ~biLl~ily in its visually occlusive effect. In the swirling position, simulated smoke takes on a rolling character across LC lens 21 (and thus across tr~n~mitter lens 11). Pre-programmed settings are drawn from a pre-set syllabus stored in memory;
-CA 022lll03 l997-07-22 W O96/23291 PCT~US96/00413 An explosion ~im~ tion switch 9 (e.g., a pushbutton switch) which allows the instructor to hllel"~ tly trigger bright flashes of light from at least one strobe lamp 22 located central to the trainee's vision in the housing 24 of view-limit;ng .~im~ tion device 20;
A clear switch 10 (e.g., a pushbutton switch) for clearing LC
lens 21 (and thus tr~n~mitter lens 11) and immediately removing occlusions to the trainee's vision. Clear switch 10 also activates an audio alarm 23 located in the housing 24 of view-limiting simulation device 20;
An LC display 12 which provides a readout of the visual acuity setting (level 1-5) and the tr~n~mitter operating mode (manual or automatic).
Referring again to Figure 2, view-limiting simulation device 20 is shown in the form of a trainee's respirator mask (with attachments in fathom). The ,e~spi,alQr mask housing 24 encompasses the following:
a receiver/controller 25 which includes an FM radio receiver/decoder/driver unit; a battery col--p~L,,Ient 33 with a battery 34, and a battery backup 35; a locking ON/OFF power switch 27; a clear switch 28; an FM ~ntenn~ 29; at least one flash strobe lamp 22;
a photometric platform 30; an audio shutdown alarm 23; and a multi-layered LC lens 21. Simulation device 20 might include a full set of manual switch settings as found on tr~n~mitter 1 (Figure 1).
The power switch 27 controls all power to the ~im~ tor mask 20. Battery colllpalLIllent 33, battery 34 and battery backup 35 provide power for the mask 20. LED in~ tor 36 remains constantly lit upon full charge of b~tt~,ries 34, 35 and stays lit as long as a sufficient level of charge remains in the batteries. Upon ~letecting a certain level of battery discharge, LED indicator 36 flashes so that the trainee and trainer can see that batteries 34, 35 need recharging. A total power failure causes alarm 23, which might be a piezo-electric tone generator, to generate an inL~lll.iLlent tone so that the trainee will know that a power failure has occurred and the mask 20 should be removed.
W O96/23291 7 PCT~US96/00413 Mask 20 also includes its own clear switch 28 which is used for cl~ring LC lens 21 in the event of an emergency. Activation of the clear switch 28 energizes alarm 23 to generate a solid tone so that the - instructor and/or the trainee will know that a clear has been initi~tyl The tr~n~mitter and simulation mask audio warning devices normally operate in-lependently of each other. Accordingly, the instructor and the trainee can receive independent or ~imlllt~neous warning signals.
Other audio signals might be generated by at least one audio speaker (not shown) located at a point near the ears of the wearer on the ~imnl~tion device, and driver cil~;ui~ly (not shown) to simulate sounds encountered in firefighting situations (e.g. fire, wind, burning and stressed structures, explosions, and spraying water).
FM ~ntenn~ 29 is mounted inside mask housing 24 so as to be unobstructive. ~nt~nn~ 29 receives FM signals from transmitter 1 and sends these signals to receiver/controller 25. Receiver/controller 25 receives the FM radio signals, decodes the signals' content, and fol"~als the resnlting info~"la~ion to drive LC lens 21 of mask 20.
Referring to Figure 10 a represent~tive system/block diagram shows the electrical flow for the tr~n~mitter 1 (Figure 1). The control panel switch setting~ (as described above) select manual control 160 and/or automatic control 161. Automatic control depends on pre-programmed patterns being ~t~cesse~ from electronic memory storage devices 162 (e.g., computer disk, RAM, ROM, CD). A microprocessor 163 processes such control inrol",ation into driver signals for LC driver 164 and See-through LC lens 165. Microprocessor 163 also sends such control information to an encoder 166, which in turn sends to encoded signals to an FM tr~ncmitter 167, or an optional IR tr~n~mitter 168.
In Figure 11, a l~leselltative system/block diagram shows the electrical flow for the receiver/controller 25 (Figure 2). As in.li(~ted, the signals can be tr~n.~mitted and received through several mediums, for example, FM or IR. An FM receiver 170 (or IR receiver 180) sends signals to a controller 171 (or IR controller 181). The controller CA 022lll03 l997-07-22 W O 96/23291 8 PCTrUS96/00413 171 (181) uses a decoder 172 which feeds the decoded signals into a microprocessor 173. Automatic control selections may access pre-programmed pattern sequences stored in electronic memory devices (e.g., computer disk, RAM, ROM, CD). Microprocessor 173 sends control signals to LC driver which in turn drives LC lens 175.
Microprocessor 173 might also produce control signals to drive audio speakers 176. Alternatively, photometric sensor signals 177 might feed control pattern signals into microprocessor 173 to then drive LC driver 174 and LC lens 175.
Referring to Figure lS, an example flowchart of a switch-sampling and memory-access program is shown. This program might drive the micloplocessols 163 and/or 173 (Figures 10, 11). The program checks the auto-simulation switch 185; if it is on, the auto-simulation settings are ~cecc~ from memory 186 and counters are incre~n~nted 187 and settingc are output to LC driver 194; else the auto-simulation setting is off and battery failure 188 is tested. If the battery has failed, an alarm is sounded 189 and the program ends 204;
else the clear switch 190 is tested. If the clear switch is activated, an alarm is sounded 191 and the program ends 204; else the normal mode of operation 192 is tested. If in normal mode, a vision acuity setting is ~ccçsc~d 193 and output to the LC driver 194. If not in normal mode, then random mode 195 is checked. If in random mode, then random settings are acces~çd 198 and counters increm~nted 200 and settings output to LC driver 194; else swirl mode is check~d If in swirl mode, then swirl settings are ~t~cecc~l 197 and counters incremented 199 and setting.c output to LC driver 194. The explosion simulation switch 201 is then tested. If activated, then a strobe is fired 202; else no strobe is fired. The program then loops back to resample the a~lopliate switches and output driver settin~c.
For automatic control selections, pre-programmed pattern sequences are ~cesce~l from electronic memory. Referring again to Pigures 1 and 2, such automatic control can bê achieved by storing such W O 96/23291 9 PCT~US96/00413 control sequences in electronic memory storage devices 162 (Figure 10) located in tr~ncmitter 1 (Figure 1). The transmitter/controller would then access a~r~iate control sequences to drive the LC lens segments and contin~-~lly transmit this control information to receiver/controller 25 (Figure 2). Such control uses an ~ ell~pted tr~ncmicsion link between the tr~n.cmitter 1 and simulation device 20 to progress through the electronically stored pattern sequences.
Alternatively, pre-programmed con~rol sequences might reside in electronic memory storage devices 178 (Figure 11 - shown in phanto.ll) located in receiver/controller 25. Automatic control selections might then require tr~ncmitter 1 to transmit much shorter electronic comm~ntls which would direct receiver/controller 25 to access and progress through the electronically stored pattern sequences without further instructions. In this alte,na~ e embodiment, since memory devices 178 are local to receiver/controller 25, the automatic sequences might progress without a continuous t~ncmi.c~ion link between tr~n.cmitter 1 and simulation device 20.
In the prere~r~d embodim~-nt, it is desired to In~ a constant tr~nsmicsion link between tr~n~smittpr 1 and receiver/controller 25. This is so that constant control can be exercised over the trainee's visual abilities. Training environments are often dangerous and/or located in high and unprotected places (e.g., fire towers and b~ ling.s with open windows and ledges). It is illlpOl ~lt for the trainer to constantly know what the trainee is seeing so that the trainer can keep the trainee out of danger. As a result, another feature incl~ldes ci~c~ y in simulation device housing 24 to clear the LC lens 21 of simulation device 20 and to generate an audible signal if the trainee wanders outside of tr~n.smittPr range and loses tr~ncmi.csion signal lock.
Referring to Figure 7, a typical single layer LC lens construction 85 is shown with substrates 80 and 81 (typically made from plastic) sandwiching the voltage controlled LC material 82. LC lens 85 includes a front plane 86 and a back plane 87. Substrate 80 and conductive layer W O96/23291 lo PCT~US96/00413 84 line the front plane of LC m~t~,ri~l 82. Substrate 81 and conductive layer 83 line the back plane of LC m~ten~l 82. Conductive layers 83, 84 allow voltage to be applied to LC material 82. The opacity of LC
m~t~,ri~l 82 can be controlled by varying the voltage applied to conductive layers 83, 84. Example varieties of LC material 82 include twisted nPm~tic, supertwist, and active matrix. Polarizers may line the outer sllrf~ s of substrates 80, 81 to control the contrast and tr~ncmiccion of light.
Conductive layers 83, 84 may be etched to create dirr~ t segrnentc which are electrically icol~tel from each other. Electrical connections (not shown) can lead to each segment and can be used to apply voltage to that segment of LC material 82. The front and back plane conductive layers 83, 84 might be identically (or similarly) etched to create individually controllable segm~ntc. Similarly, controllable segmt~,ntc might also be created by etching only one conductive plane for each LC layer. The plefelled embodiment etches only one conductive plane, thus leaving the other conductive plane unetched.
The l)r~relled embodiment also uses dynamic scattering LC
layers with plastic substrates. The plastic substrates prove to be flexible (even in multi-layered configurations) and are more easily mounted in simulation devices which might require bending of the mounted LC lens construction. A polycarbonite film is optically l~min~ted on each side of the plastic substrates to give added rigidity and to protect the substrate surfaces. This film ranges in thickness from 5 to 30 tholls~nllth~ of an inch. The pler~;lled embodiment also utilizes LC
configurations which default to a completely opaque condition when no voltage is applied (i.e., a negative image LC).
In Figure 7, LC m~t~,ri~l 82 may be undyed and appear completely white when no voltage is applied. Alternatively, a guest-host dichroic can be used which consists of an LC material with a "host"
fluid co~ g a color dyed "guest. " In the single-layered W O96/23291 - 11 - PCTrUS96/00413 configuration, smoke conditions can be re~lictic~lly simulated with either undyed-white or gray-dyed LC materials.
Referring to Figure 8, a multi-layered LC lens construction 100 - is shown with various host dyes incl~lded between the substrate layers 90, 91, 92, 93 to f~.ilit~te producing colors. This multi-layered LC
construction is utilized in the pfefel,~d embodiment and is comprised of stacked single-layered constructions (as per Figure 7). If, however, only smoke conditions are to be simulated, a simulation device 20 (Figure 2) might use only a single-layered LC lens (as per Figure 7), constructed with individually controllable non-linear segmPnts -- as described below, but for only one layer. This single layer construction is equally applicable to the smoke simulation examples also described below.
LC lens 100 (and LC lens 21 in Figure 2) is divided, across its working area, into various areas or segments 101 (s~m~nt.c 31 in Figure 2) to f~cilit~tto simulating a wide range of manual and auto-controlled opt;l~ g conditions. A yellow host dye is mixed with LC
m~teri~l 97 located between substrates 90 and 91. A red host dye is mixed with LC m~ttori~l 98 located between substrates 91 and 92.
Either no host dye (white LC) or a gray host dye is mixed with LC
m~teri~l 99 located between substrates 92 and 93.
Line 94 r~l~sellts a wavering (e.g., non-linear, curve-shaped) line etched horizontally across the conductive layer which drives yellow LC m~teri~l 97. Such wavering lines might be irregularly curved and/or irregular in displ~em~nt (from the line's center axis), or regularly curved and/or regular in displ~r-çmPnt Alternatively this line might be a combination of all such char~cteri~tics. Line displ~emPnt typically varies to within one inch or less from the line's center axis. Such line ~ pl~ement will be constrained by the relative size and number of controllable segments across the working area of the lens. Smaller, tighter segmentation will allow for less displacement from a given line's center axis. Larger segm~nt~tion will allow for more displacement.
CA 022lll03 l997-07-22 W O 96/23291 - 12 - PCT~US96/00413 Line 95 ~ senl~ a similar wavering line etched horizontally across the conductive layer which drives red LC material 98. Line 96 l~rese~ a similar wavering line etched horizontally across the conductive layer which drives undyed-white (or dyed-gray) LC material S 99. These hori7Ont~l lines are etched at dirrere.lt substrate levels. In this embo~limPnt, the lines appear to cross when the LC layers are stacked and viewed from the front of LC lens, due to their sufficient displacement and irregularly curved-shape.
Similarly, line 105 r~lesent~ a wavering line etched vertically across the conductive layer which drives yellow LC material 97. Line 106 l~lc~se"L~ a wavering line etched vertically across the conductive layer which drives red LC m~tPri~l 98. Line 107 represents a wavering line etched vertically across the conductive layer which drives undyed-white (or dyed-gray) LC m~teri~l 99. These vertical lines are etched at dirrt;lent substrate levels, but appear to cross, due to their wavering nature, when the substrate levels are stacked and viewed from the front of LC lens. In practice, however, lines 94-96 and 105-107, and the res~lting segment 101 separations, are beyond the focal length of the trainee. They cannot be seen and present no distractions.
Referring again to Figures 2 and 8, the red, yellow and undyed-white (or dyed-gray) conductive layers also have flame shape segments 32 etched into the conductive layers which drive the LC materials.
These flame segmP-nt~ 32 are uniformly dispersed and aligned across the red, yellow, and undyed-white (or dyed-gray) LC layers. Alternatively, as with the wavering segmPnt~ above, each flame se~mPnt 32 is puIposefully mi~lignP~ with the underlying color layer's flame segmPnt Each flame segment 32 is individually controllable so as to create a moving or fli~kering flame to the viewer. The flame shapes 32 are relatively more noticeable to the trainee, due to their physical size, than the wavering lines 94-96 and 105-107.
As combined, these horizontal and vertical lines create a grid of individual wavering segments 101, and flame shape segments 32, in CA 022lll03 l997-07-22 each color layer 97, 98, 99 which can be individually addressed and controlled through mllltipleYing control of the individual wavering and flame shape segm~nt~. As each colored LC m~t~ri~l and conductive ~ layer is stacked upon each other, the wavering segments and flame S shapes segmt-nt~ overlap, in a general way, and form a matrix extending across the working area and depth (layering) of the LC lens 100.
By controlling this matrix of segmentc and/or flame shapes, the trainee's vision can be occluded by activating any color, or a combination of colors, in any segm~nt, at any level of opacity, for any period of time. The wavering overlap 108 of lines 94-96, 105-107 and aligned overlap of flame segments 32, allows for more realistic simulations of fire and smoke patterns, particularly as adjoining segm~ntc are sequentially activated and deactivated across LC lens 100.
Referring again to Figures 8 and 12, a variety of conditions may be ~imlll~t~A which are typically encountered by a firefighter. Figure 12 shows three ~ cent wavering segmçnt~ 101 with both red and yellow ovella~ing/wavering se~m.ont.~ activated, and with the undyed-white (or dyed-gray) segments not activated. As shown, where the red and yellow segments overlap and both are active, the trainee sees an 20 . orange color (orange areas color coded as "3"). Where the red segm~nting line 94 wavers and extends beyond the yellow segmPnting line 95, the trainee sees red (red areas color coded as "1").
Alternatively, where the yellow segmPnting line 95 wavers and extends beyond the red segmpnting line 94, the trainee sees yellow (yellow areas color coded as "2"). This is ~suming that the adjoining segments above segmPnts 101 (not shown in detail) are non-active -- otherwise, different color combinations might result.
Referring to Figure 12, the individually controllable flame segmPnt~ 125 have been independently activated (as indicated) to be either red or yellow. This example is r~.esPnt~tive only. Flame segm~nt~ 125 might appear oppositely colored or appear orange colored W O96/23291 PCT/US96/~0413 - 14 -if both red and yellow LC layers are activated as with the surrounding wavering ~egmPnt~ 101.
Accordingly, adjoining and/or overlapping red and yellow dyed wavering segmP-nt~ 101 can be activated on an ~lte.rn~ting basis to S ~im~ te, for eY~mple, "licking flames" across the wavering sPgmPnt lines. Similarly, flame segmPnt~ 125 can be activated, either together or on an allelllali,lg basis, to add to the "licking flame" sim~ tion.
Given the generally random nature of a "licking flame," this simulation could take on many forms, with the above description being a l~l~se~ e example.
A "rolling flame" might be ~im~ tP~, for example, as follows:
In Figures 13(a)-13(c), three adjoining segments 120, 121, 122 are shown at three dirrerellt points in time. The first point in time is illustrated in Figure 13(a) which shows the first adjoining segment 120 having both its red and yellow overlapping wavering layers activated, causing the trainee to see red, yellow, and orange as described above for Figure 12. For added effect, the individually controllable flame segments 125 have been activated in red and yellow as shown in the first segm~-nt 120. The second and third adjoining segments 121, 122 have only their yellow wavering layers activated.
The second point in time is illustrated in Figure 13(b) which shows the second adjoining segmPnt 121 having both red and yellow wavering layers active. Additionally, flame segments 125 have been activated in red and yellow as shown. Only the yellow wavering layer is active in the first and third adjoining segments 120, 122.
At the third point in time, Figure 13(c) shows the third adjoining segment 122 having both red and yellow wavering layers active.
Additionally, flame segmPnt~ 125 have been activated in red and yellow as shown. Only the yellow wavering layer is active in the first and second adjoining segments 120, 121.
As the red layer in each adjoining segment 120-122 is progressively activated and then deactivated, the colors associated with a flame (at close proximity) appear to "roll" across and approl.liately occlude the trainee's field of vision. The shifting activation of flame segm~nt~ 125 adds to this effect. The wavering vertical segmçnt~tion (not det~ in Figure 13) will also add realism to the simulation, as per S the related description of colors associated with the hori7Ont~l wavering lines of Figure 12 -- but as applied to the vertical lines.
Referring again to Figure 8, undyed-white (or dyed-gray) LC
m~te.ri~l 99 and corresponding undyed-white (or dyed-gray) segments 108 can be opaqued to simulate various levels of smoke density and resulting trainee vision occlusion. For total blackout effects, segments 101 can be collectively opaqued across the whole LC lens 100.
Al~"~a~ively or collectively, "rolling" smoke conditions might, for éxample, be simulated as follows: In Figure 14(a)-(c), three adjoining segments 120, 121, 122 are shown at three dirrelc;i~t points in time (as in Figure 13). At the first point in time, Figure 14(a) shows the first adjoining segment 120 with its undyed-white (or dyed-gray) LC
layer opaqued ~ignifi~ntly, while adjoining segments 121, 122 are more tr~n~lucent At the second point in time, Figure 14(b) shows the second adjoining segment 121 opaqued ~ignific~ntly, with adjoining segments 120, 122 being more translucent. At the third point in time, Figure 14(c) shows the third adjoining segment 122 opaqued significantly, with adjoining segments 120, 121 being more translucent. As this example demonstrates, by sequentially varying the opacity of adjoining undyed-white (or dyed-gray) LC segm~nts 120-122, a "rolling" smoke across the trainee's vision is effectively simulated.
AlL~l"atively, a "swirling" smoke could be simulated by varying the opacity of undyed-white (or dyed-gray) LC layer segments lOl (Figure 8) in a generally circular, or spiraling, pattern. Higher degrees of realism could be achieved through more precise and gr~ t~d control of opacity levels in adjoining segm~nt~. This would more realistically simulate densifying smoke across the trainee's field of view. Similarly, faster and tighter progressions of smoke patterns across segments 101 W O96/23291 PCTrUS96/00413 of LC lens 100 would more realistically simulate the visual occlusion experienced in dyn~mic~lly ch~nging smoke-filled conditions.
While the fire and smoke sim~ tion examples have been described s~ Ply for explanation purposes, such fire and smoke S simulations are inten-1ei to function either alone, or in combination with one another. Smoke simulations involve opaquing undyed-white (or dyed-gray) LC m~t~ori~l 99, which is separate from LC red and yellow m~tPri~l 97, 98 used for fire sim~ tions. In the most complete cimul~tion, all color layers -- white (or gray), red, and yellow -- would operate simultaneously to simulate the full effect of being exposed to fire and smoke at the same time.
Purthermore, the aforementioned patterns rely on a sequential progression as to which adjoining segmentc and/or LC color layers will be activated next. As mentioned above, these sequential patterns are ~cecced from a preprogrammed syllabus which is stored in electronic memory. This electronic memory might reside in either the tr~ncmitt~r 1 (Figure 1) or the cim~ tion device 20 (Figure 2), or both. Random smoke patterns progress according to electronically generated random sequences.
Referring to Figure 16, another feature of the present invention is demonctr~t~l which will cimul~tt- the proximate location of an obstruction such as a fire. In any .cim~ tion, the LC lens 213 is mounted to the trainee's head 214 as part of the simulation device 210.
In an uncorrected simulation, if a fire is simulated across lens 213 in the trainee's line of sight, the fire will "move" with the trainee's line of sight as the trainee moves his head up and down.
Such a result is unrealistic and can be co~ ed by including an ~ttit~lde sensor 215 (e.g., an electrolytic tilt sensor), in the simulation device 210 which detects the relative elevation motion (up and down) of the trainee's head movements. This relative motion can then be used to shi~t the present simulation up or down the ~lu~liate segment~ of LC
lens 213 so that the cimul~tit)n aRears to remain in relatively the same "external" location.
For inct~nce~ if a fire is cim~ tyi directly in front of the trainee's leveled head, the simulated fire will be properly shifted downwards on LC lens 213 if the trainee raises his head; Similarly, the fire will be shifted upwards if the trainee lowers his head. This relative shifting up and down on the different levels of holi;Gonl;llly wavering lines 212 and horizontally adjoining segmPntc simulates the appearance of a constant relative "eYtern~l" location of the fire.
A left-and-right (axial) motion sensor could also provide inputs to relatively shift the simulation across the vertical lines and vertical adjoining segments of LC lens 213, as per the trainee's head movements, to additionally simulate a constant relative location of a fire.
Alternatively or collectively with the example simulations described above, the a~ ce (e.g. darkness, contrast, opacity) of the red and yellow colors in each of the wavering segments 101 (Figures 8 and 12), and the flame-shaped segm~ntc 125 (Figure 12), can be controlled by varying the voltage to each segm~nt andtor the darkness of the underlying undyed-white (or dyed-gray) LC segments. As mentioned above, each multi-layered wavering segment 101 has an individually controllable undyed-white (or d,ved-gray) LC material in the stack. Similarly, each flame-shaped segml~-nt 125 in the yellow and red LC m~t~ lc aligns with an individually controllable flame-shaped segmPnt in the undyed-white (or dyed-gray) LC m~t~ l. This allows for individual and/or collective control over the appea.~lce of the wavering segments 101 and flame segml-nts 125. For example, "deeper" colored fires (e.g. reds and yellows) might be simulated by a~l~upliately opaquing the undyed-white (or dyed-gray) LC material for any given wavering segment 101 and/or flame segment 125.
Alternatively or collectively with the example simulations described above, the visual effects of blackouts -- due, for instance, to -CA 022lll03 l997-07-22 W O96/23291 - 18 - PCT~US96/00413 depleted oxygen levels -- might also be simulated. For example, adjoining and/or overlapping white (or gray), red, and yellow segmPnts can be collectively activated in their primary colors to simulate the blackout effects of training under depleted oxygen levels. The opacity and intensity of the colors might be increased across the LC lens 21 (Figure 2) until total blackout conditions are achieved.
An ~ltern~tive means for controlling the view-limiting simulation device incl~ldes light pattern tr~n~mi~siQns (either visual or IR).
Referring to Figure 2 and Figure 9, mask housing 24 additionally includes a photometric sensor housing and platform 30 which senses light p~ttPrn~ from various sources 150. LC receiver/controller 25 can ~lt~rn~tively process such patterned light signals to subsequently drive LC lens 21 and simulate various firefighting conditions (e.g. smoke, flames, blackouts) as described above.
lS Photometric sensor housing and platform 30 (Figure 2) is controlled by controller circuitry and a microprocessor which evaluates pulsed light from sources lS0 (Figure 9). Depending on the visual simulation desired, the instructor will switch on the a~~ iate light pattern frequencies for various locations in the training room.
Each independent light source 150 can generate independent frequencies of fl~ching light. When the trainees 151, 152 look in any given direction, the individual pattern frequencies of each lamp lS0 will be tr~n~mitte~l to control the vision of the trainee by way of the photometric platform 30, and the col~onding controller circuitry and microprocessor.
In other words, the visual simulation will change as the trainee moves his head in various directions in a controlled area lSS (Figure 9).
This is achieved by using photometric sensors and associated control cir~ ly which will directionally isolate and detect individual frequency patterns from lamps lS0. Individual lamps lS0 might also send directional signals which will minimi7e inte,relel-ce between adjoining (and other) lamps.
For eY~mple, the frequency pattern generated by pulsed light source 153 might cause the LC driver circuitry to simulate rolling smoke with an underlying low intensity yellow fire. Pulsed light source 154 might cause the LC driver circui~ly to cim~ te wildly fluctuating S and inten.c~-ly licking flames, with little or no smoke. Adjoining pulsed light source 156 might cause the LC driver circuitry to simulate licking flames at a slightly lesser intensity. Such realistic differences in p~ ate conditions, with no crossover intelrerellce between the lamps, could help teach the trainee to discern between dangerous and life~hl~~e,-ing situations on opposite sides of a training room. The prere~red type of lamp 150 would be infrared LED's so as not to confuse the trainee with visible fl~.ching lights.
Accordingly, the trainee might train in one of two environm.o.nt.c.
The first environment would be any training facility as it is currently configured, without additional in.ct~ tion of light sources 150. This might include buil~lingc, houses, aircraft, vehicles, forests, ships, factories and/or oil drilling operations. The trainee's vision would be limited by the white (or gray), red, and/or yellows segm~.nts of LC lens 21 (Figure 2) according to the switch settingc on the FM radio tr~ncmittPr 1 (Figure 1).
A second environment might be customized, with the inct~ tion of multiple light sources 150, to simulate conditions as dependant upon the trainee's position and orientation in the environment. Such positioning of light sources 150 could easily coincide with actual physical barriers to provide a more realistic firefighting simulation.
Referring again to Figure 1, the tr~ncmitter 1 might also include control switches (not shown) in the lower panel 13 for a fire projection system (not shown). This projection system would also utilize tr~n.cmitter 1 to transmit coded cign~l.c, as configured by the instructor, to receivers/drivers mounted inside separate fire projection devices (not shown). These fire projection devices would utilize multi-layered and multi-colored LC lenses for .cim~ ting fire patterns, and an W O 96123291 20 PCTrUS96/00413 accompanying projection devices for projecting the simulated fires onto walls, screens, and other objects.
In combination, the view-limiting ~imul~tion device 20 (Figure 2), along with the fire projection system (not shown), creates a S controllable, safe, and realistic training environment for firefighter trainees.
Referring to Figure 3, an alternative embodiment is shown which uses a glasses-style view-limiting simulation device 40. Device 40 ~imil~rly in~ des the following (some not shown) in device housing 41:
a receiver/controller, an ~ntenn~ a locking ON/OFF switch, a clear switch, an audible alarm, at least one strobe, a battery compartment, a battery and a battery backup, a photometric sensor platform 44, and at least one multi-layered LC lens 42. This style of simulator might also include side-mounted LC lenses 43 as viewed peripherally by the trainee.
Referring to Figure 4, another alternative embodiment is shown which uses a goggle-style view-limiting simulation device 50. Device 50 ~imil~rly includes the following (some not shown) in device housing 51: a receiver/controller, an ~ntt~nn~, a locking ON/OFF switch, a clear switch, an audible alarm, at least one strobe, a battery ~o.. -pall.. ent, abattery, and a battery backup, a photometric sensor platform 52, and a pair of multi-layered LC lenses 53. This style of simulator incorporates separate lens elements 53 over each eye.
Referring to Figure 5, another alternative embodiment is shown which uses a smaller sized mask-type view-limiting simulation device 60 for use as a child trainer. Device 60 similarly includes the following (some not shown) in device housing 61: a receiver/controller, an ~ntenn~, a locking ON/OFF switch, a clear switch, an audible alarm, at least one strobe, a battery co,,,pa,L~Ient, a battery, and a battery backup, a photometric sensor platform 62, and a multi-layered LC lens 63.
Referring to Figure 6, another alternative embodiment is shown which uses a military-style view-limitin~ simulation device 70. Device W O96/23291 PCTrUS96/00~13 - 21 -70 ~imil~rly includes the following (some not shown) in device housing 71: a receiver/controller, an antenna, a locking ON/OFF switch, a clear switch, an audible alarm, at least one strobe, a battery coll.p~l,.ent, a - battery, and a battery backup, a photometric sensor platform 72, and a S multi-layered LC lens 73. This style of .~im~ tor, for example, might also be used by forest firefi~htPrs without a re~il~t~
While only two ~l~relled embo~iment~ of the invention have been described hereinabove, those of ordina y skill in the art will recognize that either embodiment may be modified and altered without departing from the central spirit and scope of the invention. Thus, the plef~ d embo-limPnt.s described hereinabove are to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being intlic~tPA by the appended claims, rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the m~ning and range of equivalency of the claims are intended to be embraced herein.
Claims (46)
1. A firefighter training device for occluding a trainee's vision and simulating field conditions across the trainee's field of view, said device comprising:
a mask adapted to be worn by the trainee, said mask having a housing;
a multi-layered, voltage controlled liquid crystal (LC) lens mounted in said mask, said lens having a plurality of stacked LC layers which combine to define a working area viewed by the trainee, each LC layer including a colored, host-dyed LC material and associated conductive layers on each side of said LC material, said LC material and conductive layers being located between layers of substrate, at least one conductive layer being divided into a grid of independently controllable segments, wherein said segments substantially overlap each other; and a controller for individually and collectively controlling said segments to provide view-limiting simulation of field conditions.
a mask adapted to be worn by the trainee, said mask having a housing;
a multi-layered, voltage controlled liquid crystal (LC) lens mounted in said mask, said lens having a plurality of stacked LC layers which combine to define a working area viewed by the trainee, each LC layer including a colored, host-dyed LC material and associated conductive layers on each side of said LC material, said LC material and conductive layers being located between layers of substrate, at least one conductive layer being divided into a grid of independently controllable segments, wherein said segments substantially overlap each other; and a controller for individually and collectively controlling said segments to provide view-limiting simulation of field conditions.
2. The firefighter training device of Claim 1, wherein said controller for controlling said segments includes an LC driver unit located in said housing for individually and collectively controlling said segments.
3. The firefighter training device of Claim 2, further comprising receiver/controller means in said housing for obtaining control signals and delivering said control signals to said LC driver unit.
4. The firefighter training device of Claim 3, wherein said receiver/controller means includes an electronic receiver/controller for receiving transmitted signals and controlling said LC driver unit.
5. The firefighter training device of Claim 4, which further includes a separately housed transmitter/controller for transmitting control signals to said receiver/controller, said transmitter/controller having a control panel for selecting manual and automatic control signals.
6. The firefighter training device of Claim 5, wherein said device is powered by a battery and a backup battery, both contained in a battery compartment.
7. The firefighter training device of Claim 6, which further includes a locking power switch.
8. The firefighter training device of Claim 1, which further includes a power locking switch.
9. The firefighter training device of Claim 1, further comprising a plurality of independently controllable flame-shaped segments dispersed uniformly across said working area and etched into said conductive layers, said flame-shaped segments aligning with said segments.
10. The firefighter training device of Claim 1, wherein said housing further includes at least one audio speaker placed near the trainee's ear and circuit means for producing firefighting sounds in concert with visual simulation.
11. The firefighter training device of Claim 1, wherein said multi-layered LC lens includes three LC
layers and said host-dye LC materials are red, yellow, and undyed-white.
layers and said host-dye LC materials are red, yellow, and undyed-white.
12. The firefighter training device of Claim 9, wherein said multi-layered LC lens includes three LC
layers and said host-dye LC materials are red, yellow, and gray.
layers and said host-dye LC materials are red, yellow, and gray.
13. The firefighter training device of Claim 5, wherein said transmitter/controller and receiver/controller utilize FM radio-wave frequencies.
14. The firefighter training device of Claim 1, wherein said segments on said conductive layers are formed, both vertically and horizontally, from non-linear, curve-shaped lines, said lines generally overlapping and repeatedly crossing when viewed from the front of said LC lens.
15. The firefighter training device of Claim 1, wherein said LC lens is a dynamic-scattering, negative-image LC device.
16. The firefighter training device of Claim 5, further comprising at least one electronic memory storage device for storing preprogrammed control pattern sequences which are accessed when said control panel is set to select automatic control.
17. The firefighter training device of Claim 16, wherein said electronic memory storage device containing preprogrammed control pattern sequences is located in said transmitter/controller.
18. The firefighter training device of Claim 16, wherein said electronic memory storage device containing preprogrammed control pattern sequences is located in said receiver/controller.
19. The firefighter training device of Claim 16, wherein multiple electronic memory storage devices containing preprogrammed control pattern sequences are located in both said transmitter/controller and said receiver/controller.
20. The firefighter training device of Claim 3, wherein said receiver/controller means includes a photometric sensor platform which senses signal patterns from a plurality of light sources, said light sources being interspersed throughout a training environment, each of said light sources being capable of emitting independent light frequency patterns as selected by the instructor, each independent light frequency pattern transmitting an independent simulation instruction to said LC driver unit and said multi-layered LC lens.
21. The firefighter training device of Claim 1, wherein said device worn by the trainee is a respirator-style mask unit.
22. The firefighter training device of Claim 1, wherein said device worn by the trainee is a glasses-style unit.
23. The firefighter training device of Claim 1, wherein said device worn by the trainee is a goggle-style unit.
24. The firefighter training device of Claim 1, wherein said device worn by the trainee is a child-sized unit.
25. The firefighter training device of Claim 1, wherein said device worn by the trainee is a military-style unit.
26. A firefighter training device for occluding a trainee's vision and simulating field conditions across the trainee's field of view, said device comprising:
a mask adapted to be worn by the trainee, said mask having a housing;
a single-layered, voltage controlled liquid crystal (LC) lens mounted in said mask, said lens having an LC
layer defining a working area viewed by the trainee, said LC layer including an LC material and associated conductive layers on each side of said LC material, said LC material and conductive layers being located between layers of substrate, at least one conductive layer being divided into a grid of independently controllable segments, said segments being divided along substantially vertically and horizontally aligned lines; and a controller for individually and collectively controlling said segments to provide view-limiting simulation of field conditions.
a mask adapted to be worn by the trainee, said mask having a housing;
a single-layered, voltage controlled liquid crystal (LC) lens mounted in said mask, said lens having an LC
layer defining a working area viewed by the trainee, said LC layer including an LC material and associated conductive layers on each side of said LC material, said LC material and conductive layers being located between layers of substrate, at least one conductive layer being divided into a grid of independently controllable segments, said segments being divided along substantially vertically and horizontally aligned lines; and a controller for individually and collectively controlling said segments to provide view-limiting simulation of field conditions.
27. The firefighter training device of Claim 26, wherein said controller for controlling said segments includes an LC driver unit located in said housing for individually and collectively controlling said segments.
28. The firefighter training device of Claim 26, further comprising receiver/controller means in said housing for obtaining control signals and delivering said control signals to said LC driver unit.
29. The firefighter training device of Claim 26, wherein said receiver/controller means includes an electronic receiver/controller for receiving transmitted signals and controlling said LC driver unit.
30. The firefighter training device of Claim 26, which further includes a separately housed transmitter/controller for transmitting control signals to said receiver/controller, said transmitter/controller having a control panel for selecting manual and automatic control signals.
31. The firefighter training device of Claim 26, further comprising an electronic memory storage device for storing preprogrammed control pattern sequences which are accessed when said control panel is set to select automatic control.
32. The firefighter training device of Claim 26, wherein said receiver/controller means includes a photometric sensor platform which senses signal patterns from a plurality of light sources, said light sources being interspersed throughout a training environment, each of said light sources being capable of emitting independent light frequency patterns as selected by the instructor, each independent light frequency pattern transmitting an independent simulation instruction to said LC driver unit and said multi-layered LC lens.
33. The firefighter training device of Claim 26, wherein said device worn by the trainee is a respirator-style mask unit.
34. The firefighter training device of Claim 26, wherein said device worn by the trainee is a glasses-style unit.
35. The firefighter training device of Claim 26, wherein said device worn by the trainee is a goggle-style unit.
36. The firefighter training device of Claim 26, wherein said device worn by the trainee is a child sized unit.
37. The firefighter training device of Claim 26, wherein said device worn by the trainee is a military-style unit.
38. The firefighter training device of Claim 1, which further includes an tilt sensor for sensing head movements of the trainee and a translating circuit for translating the simulation appearing on said LC lens in relation to said sensed head movements, so that the simulation appears to remain proximally constant in relation to the trainee's location.
39. The firefighter training device of Claim 26, which further includes a tilt sensor for sensing head movements of the trainee and a translating circuit for translating the simulation appearing on said LC lens in relation to said sensed head movements, so that the simulation appears to remain proximally constant in relation to the trainee's location.
40. The firefighter training device of claim 1, wherein said controller simulates predetermined levels of field conditions and resulting trainee vision occlusion by adjusting a level to which said segments are opaque.
41. The firefighter training device of claim 1, wherein said controller collectively adjusts a level of opacity of all of said segments across the whole LC layer to simulate a field condition.
42. The fire firefighter training device of claim 1, wherein said LC lens simulates at least one of smoke and fire field conditions by adjusting a level of opacity of all of said segments across the trainee's entire field of view.
43. The firefighter training device of claim 26, wherein the vertical and horizontal lines are non-linear, curve-shapes lines.
44. The firefighter training device of claim 26, wherein said controller simulates predetermined levels of field conditions and resulting trainee vision occlusion by adjusting a level to which said segments are opaque.
45. The firefighter training device of claim 26, wherein said controller collectively adjusts a level of opacity of all of said segments across the whole LC layer to simulate a field condition.
46. The fire firefighter training device of claim 26, wherein said LC lens simulates at least one of smoke and fire field conditions by adjusting a level of opacity of all of said segments across the trainee's entire field of view.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/377,326 US5660549A (en) | 1995-01-23 | 1995-01-23 | Firefighter training simulator |
| US08/377,326 | 1995-01-23 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2211103A1 true CA2211103A1 (en) | 1996-08-01 |
Family
ID=23488657
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002211103A Abandoned CA2211103A1 (en) | 1995-01-23 | 1996-01-17 | Firefighter training simulator |
Country Status (5)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (2) | US5660549A (en) |
| EP (1) | EP0806025A4 (en) |
| AU (1) | AU707807B2 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2211103A1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO1996023291A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (53)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6899540B1 (en) * | 1998-07-30 | 2005-05-31 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Transportation | Threat image projection system |
| US6255650B1 (en) * | 1998-12-11 | 2001-07-03 | Flir Systems, Inc. | Extreme temperature radiometry and imaging apparatus |
| US6607038B2 (en) * | 2000-03-15 | 2003-08-19 | Information Decision Technologies, Llc | Instrumented firefighter's nozzle and method |
| US6616454B2 (en) * | 2000-03-15 | 2003-09-09 | Information Decision Technologies, Llc | Method of simulating nozzle spray interaction with fire, smoke and other aerosols and gases |
| GB0013924D0 (en) * | 2000-06-07 | 2000-08-02 | Ifte Plc | Aviation fire scenarios for firefighter training |
| US7505557B2 (en) * | 2006-01-30 | 2009-03-17 | Rapiscan Security Products, Inc. | Method and system for certifying operators of x-ray inspection systems |
| WO2003015057A1 (en) * | 2001-08-09 | 2003-02-20 | Information Decision Technologies Llc | Augmented reality-based firefighter training system and method |
| US7478837B2 (en) * | 2002-11-11 | 2009-01-20 | Kittrich Corporation | Elastomeric book cover |
| US8275091B2 (en) | 2002-07-23 | 2012-09-25 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Compact mobile cargo scanning system |
| US7963695B2 (en) | 2002-07-23 | 2011-06-21 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Rotatable boom cargo scanning system |
| US7291014B2 (en) * | 2002-08-08 | 2007-11-06 | Fats, Inc. | Wireless data communication link embedded in simulated weapon systems |
| DE60333375D1 (en) | 2002-08-09 | 2010-08-26 | Meggitt Training Systems Inc | CONTROLLED GAS SUPPLY SYSTEM |
| US6687910B1 (en) * | 2002-09-13 | 2004-02-10 | Ronald F. Smallwood | Smoke simulating shield covering SCBA faceplate |
| US6947714B2 (en) * | 2002-10-31 | 2005-09-20 | Mattel, Inc. | Piezo-powered amusement device identification system |
| DE10259123B3 (en) * | 2002-12-18 | 2004-09-09 | Dräger Safety AG & Co. KGaA | Device and method for monitoring the use of respiratory protective device wearers |
| US20040191736A1 (en) * | 2003-03-25 | 2004-09-30 | Werhun Walter John | Fire light and sound simulator for fire fighter training |
| US6928141B2 (en) | 2003-06-20 | 2005-08-09 | Rapiscan, Inc. | Relocatable X-ray imaging system and method for inspecting commercial vehicles and cargo containers |
| US7140387B2 (en) | 2003-07-31 | 2006-11-28 | Fats, Inc. | Regulated gas supply system |
| US7845948B2 (en) * | 2003-11-10 | 2010-12-07 | Ricky Dion Barnes | Training method and device for teaching a trainee to remain within a safety zone |
| US7471764B2 (en) | 2005-04-15 | 2008-12-30 | Rapiscan Security Products, Inc. | X-ray imaging system having improved weather resistance |
| CA2615796A1 (en) * | 2005-07-19 | 2007-01-25 | Fats, Inc. | Two-stage gas regulating assembly |
| US8995619B2 (en) | 2010-03-14 | 2015-03-31 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Personnel screening system |
| US8576982B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2013-11-05 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Personnel screening system |
| US8638904B2 (en) | 2010-03-14 | 2014-01-28 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Personnel screening system |
| US7796733B2 (en) * | 2007-02-01 | 2010-09-14 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Personnel security screening system with enhanced privacy |
| CN103064125B (en) | 2007-06-21 | 2016-01-20 | 瑞皮斯坎系统股份有限公司 | For improving the system and method for the people screening guided |
| CA2742127C (en) | 2007-11-01 | 2017-01-24 | Rapiscan Security Products, Inc. | Multiple screen detection systems |
| CN101918820B (en) * | 2007-12-25 | 2014-03-12 | 拉皮斯坎系统股份有限公司 | Improved security system for screening people |
| GB0803644D0 (en) * | 2008-02-28 | 2008-04-02 | Rapiscan Security Products Inc | Scanning systems |
| GB0803641D0 (en) | 2008-02-28 | 2008-04-02 | Rapiscan Security Products Inc | Scanning systems |
| GB0809110D0 (en) | 2008-05-20 | 2008-06-25 | Rapiscan Security Products Inc | Gantry scanner systems |
| US7843326B2 (en) * | 2008-05-30 | 2010-11-30 | Weber Judd R | Forward illumination headgear with personal rescue system |
| GB2488930B (en) * | 2009-11-18 | 2014-04-30 | Rapiscan Systems Inc | X-ray based system for inspecting a person's shoes for aviation security threats |
| US8662856B2 (en) * | 2010-02-17 | 2014-03-04 | Akron Brass Co. | Pump control system |
| PL2548207T3 (en) | 2010-03-14 | 2020-07-13 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Beam forming apparatus |
| US8418773B2 (en) | 2010-09-10 | 2013-04-16 | Jason Cerrano | Fire-fighting control system |
| US9218933B2 (en) | 2011-06-09 | 2015-12-22 | Rapidscan Systems, Inc. | Low-dose radiographic imaging system |
| US9295862B2 (en) | 2012-01-19 | 2016-03-29 | Jason Cerrano | Fire-fighting system |
| US9791590B2 (en) | 2013-01-31 | 2017-10-17 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Portable security inspection system |
| FR3016232B1 (en) * | 2014-01-06 | 2017-08-11 | Cordia | FIRE FIGHTING TRAINING KIT AND METHOD FOR OPERATING SUCH A TRAINING KIT |
| GB2538921B (en) | 2014-03-07 | 2020-06-03 | Rapiscan Systems Inc | Ultra wide band detectors |
| US11280898B2 (en) | 2014-03-07 | 2022-03-22 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Radar-based baggage and parcel inspection systems |
| WO2015153083A1 (en) * | 2014-03-31 | 2015-10-08 | Parker Jonathan Macdonald | Switchable facemask for simulating smoke |
| WO2016057655A1 (en) | 2014-10-07 | 2016-04-14 | Akron Brass Company | Fire suppression system component integration |
| GB2548299B (en) | 2014-11-25 | 2022-04-27 | Rapiscan Systems Inc | Intelligent security management system |
| US9454022B1 (en) | 2014-12-10 | 2016-09-27 | Nickolas Joseph Sinopoli | Controlled selective visual occlusion system and method |
| US10345479B2 (en) | 2015-09-16 | 2019-07-09 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | Portable X-ray scanner |
| US11020624B2 (en) | 2016-04-19 | 2021-06-01 | KFT Fire Trainer, LLC | Fire simulator |
| US10726734B2 (en) * | 2016-08-25 | 2020-07-28 | TBRT Engineering, LLC | Film for emergency responder smoke simulation training |
| WO2018064434A1 (en) | 2016-09-30 | 2018-04-05 | American Science And Engineering, Inc. | X-ray source for 2d scanning beam imaging |
| US10971027B2 (en) | 2016-12-02 | 2021-04-06 | AT Systems, LLC | System and method for improving safety when operating aircraft in reduced- or modified-visibility conditions |
| US10249208B2 (en) | 2016-12-02 | 2019-04-02 | AT Systems, LLC | System and method for training aircraft pilots for sudden-onset reduced-visibility conditions |
| CN106964086A (en) * | 2017-03-30 | 2017-07-21 | 合肥工业大学 | A kind of sound wave extinguishing device for being used to test |
Family Cites Families (22)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3245315A (en) * | 1962-09-05 | 1966-04-12 | Alvin M Marks | Electro-optic responsive flashblindness controlling device |
| US3575493A (en) * | 1969-08-05 | 1971-04-20 | Rca Corp | Fast self-quenching of dynamic scattering in liquid crystal devices |
| US3647279A (en) * | 1970-05-27 | 1972-03-07 | Liquid Crystal Ind Inc | Color display devices |
| US3749474A (en) * | 1971-11-26 | 1973-07-31 | Ncr | Oriented light scattering display device |
| US3873804A (en) * | 1972-04-14 | 1975-03-25 | Mack Gordon | Welding helmet with eye piece control |
| US4066334A (en) * | 1975-01-06 | 1978-01-03 | National Research Development Corporation | Liquid crystal light deflector |
| JPS526497A (en) * | 1975-07-07 | 1977-01-18 | Hitachi Ltd | Liquid crystal display element |
| US4155122A (en) * | 1975-12-02 | 1979-05-22 | Revue Thommen Ag | Light shield for welder's mask |
| US4021935A (en) * | 1976-02-20 | 1977-05-10 | Frank Witt | Flight training hood |
| US4039803A (en) * | 1976-04-08 | 1977-08-02 | Mack Gordon | Electro-optic welding helmet lens assembly |
| US4237557A (en) * | 1979-07-30 | 1980-12-09 | Mack Gordon | Control system for welding helmet liquid crystal light shutter |
| US4279474A (en) * | 1980-03-25 | 1981-07-21 | Belgorod Barry M | Spectacle lens having continuously variable controlled density and fast response time |
| US4482326A (en) * | 1982-01-26 | 1984-11-13 | Instrument Flight Research Inc. | Flight training glasses |
| US4462661A (en) * | 1982-02-23 | 1984-07-31 | Instrument Flight Research | Laser protection goggles |
| US4511225A (en) * | 1982-12-23 | 1985-04-16 | Lipson Herbert G | Variable neutral density laser goggles |
| US4560239A (en) * | 1984-02-29 | 1985-12-24 | Amnon Katz | Liquid crystal active light shield |
| US4595262A (en) * | 1984-08-23 | 1986-06-17 | Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc. | Tunable birefringent safety goggles for laser beams |
| US4878741A (en) * | 1986-09-10 | 1989-11-07 | Manchester R & D Partnership | Liquid crystal color display and method |
| US5006072A (en) * | 1989-03-16 | 1991-04-09 | Bernie Fried Racing Enterprises, Inc. | High performance motorcycle simulator and helmut display |
| US5081542A (en) * | 1989-12-12 | 1992-01-14 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Liquid crystal light valve goggles for eye protection |
| US5420828A (en) * | 1992-06-25 | 1995-05-30 | Geiger; Michael B. | Viewing screen assembly |
| DE4237868A1 (en) * | 1992-11-10 | 1994-05-11 | Mueller Alexander | Special spectacles with LCD colour monitor - are worn for observation of video images created by computer and relayed by invisible optical link to receiver in eyepiece |
-
1995
- 1995-01-23 US US08/377,326 patent/US5660549A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1996
- 1996-01-17 CA CA002211103A patent/CA2211103A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1996-01-17 AU AU46979/96A patent/AU707807B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1996-01-17 EP EP96902658A patent/EP0806025A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1996-01-17 WO PCT/US1996/000413 patent/WO1996023291A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
1997
- 1997-03-27 US US08/825,194 patent/US5846085A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| EP0806025A4 (en) | 2000-04-26 |
| US5846085A (en) | 1998-12-08 |
| EP0806025A1 (en) | 1997-11-12 |
| AU4697996A (en) | 1996-08-14 |
| AU707807B2 (en) | 1999-07-22 |
| US5660549A (en) | 1997-08-26 |
| WO1996023291A1 (en) | 1996-08-01 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US5846085A (en) | Firefighting training simulator | |
| US8195084B2 (en) | Apparatus and method of simulating a somatosensory experience in space | |
| US5518402A (en) | Fire fighter trainer having personal tracking and constructive injury determination and methods of training | |
| US7298535B2 (en) | Digital situation indicator | |
| CN109389877A (en) | A kind of building fire escape drilling system based on virtual reality technology | |
| CN107427701A (en) | direction indicator for protecting mask | |
| CN107889466A (en) | For improving the vigilant illuminator and method of people | |
| WO2002002191A1 (en) | Digital situation indicator | |
| CN109780940A (en) | A kind of gunnery training method based on mimicry shooting training range | |
| US9146078B2 (en) | Adapter for communicating between an anti-personnel training device and a user worn monitoring device | |
| KR102212241B1 (en) | Fire fighting experience system based on mixed reality | |
| US6144302A (en) | Emergency worker protection apparatus and method | |
| WO2011015562A1 (en) | Method for training the use of fire-fighting equipment | |
| US5413483A (en) | Night vision goggle simulator | |
| US10209532B2 (en) | Switchable facemask for simulating smoke | |
| CN110299038A (en) | Construction scene training system | |
| CN103090461A (en) | Function indicator system for electric fireplace | |
| USRE45525E1 (en) | Apparatus and method of simulating a somatosensory experience in space | |
| KR100379177B1 (en) | Simulator device for training fire fight | |
| KR101285064B1 (en) | Display of seriously wounded person and dead in simulated exercies at putting on multiple integrated laser engagement system | |
| JPH10156047A (en) | Air walk theater | |
| JP2008185639A (en) | Target apparatus for simulation fire-extinguishing drill | |
| KR101950955B1 (en) | Environmenatl safety education system having the same | |
| KR102079048B1 (en) | Fire extinguisher practice equipment for fire fight training | |
| CN110941335A (en) | VR (virtual reality) technology-based emergency treatment plan system and application method thereof |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FZDE | Discontinued |