Non-Final Office Action mailed Oct. 5, 2009, for U.S. Appl 10/919,226, filed Aug. 16, 2004. Non-Final Office Action mailed Oct. 7, 2009, for U.S. Appl 12/119,614, filed May 13, 2008.
Non-Final Office Action mailed Oct. 29, 2009, for U.S. Appl.
12/194,148, filed Aug. 19, 2008.
Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 17, 2010, for U.S. Appl.
11/690,834, filed Mar. 25, 2007.
Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 21, 2010, for U.S. Appl.
10/773,092, filed Feb. 4, 2004.
Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 17, 2010, for U.S. Appl.
11/765,899, filed Jun. 20,2007. Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 1, 2010, for U.S. Appl. 10/919,226, filed Aug. 16, 2004.
Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 19, 2010, for U.S. Appl.
12/119,614, filed May 13, 2008.
Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 19, 2010, for U.S. Appl.
12/194,148, filed Aug. 19,2008. Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 27, 2010, for U.S. Appl. 12/192,897, filed Aug. 15, 2008.
Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 18, 2009, for U.S. Appl.
11/282,954, filed Nov. 18, 2005.
Page 10 No. Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 22, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/187,763, filed Aug. 7, 2008. N°~ Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 28, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. NO 12/192,335, filed Aug. 15,2008. ' Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 28, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. NO‘ 11/690,834, filed Mar. 25, 2007. Patent Abstracts of Japan, publication No. 2000050062, Image Input NO, Device, application No. 10-217124, published Feb. 18, 2000, 1 page. United Kingdom Search Report dated May 22, 2007, issued in AppliN0, cation No. GB 0701957.3. U.S. Appl. No. 10/170,511, filed Jun. 12, 2002, inventor Michael J. No. DeLuca. U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,772, entitled “Method ofimproving orientaN0- tion and color balance of images mages using face detection information”, filed Jun. 26, 2003. N9 U.S. Appl. No. 10/772,767, filed Feb. 4, 2004, by inventors Michael J . DeLuca, et al. No
U.S. Appl. No. 11/217,788, filed Aug. 30, 2005, inventors Eran Steinberg, et al.
1
0.9
0.8
Q" 0.?
£1)
5 Q5 Grayscale
L? Ree GN
9, U5 —I— CIELAB bl\l
"5 —~— |i|2|? SChl\l
2 0.4 + |il2 eciiu
E
S Gs
0.2
0.1 _
A ‘ i
U I I I I I
U 5 10 15 20 25
Fig. 3. Cumulative histogram of pointtopoint boundary errors after applying the (PIE) models on PIE Subset 1 (seen images).
0 5-
—@— G-rayscale
0.45 —e- RGEI GM
—I— CIELAB GN
U4 —-— lil2l3SChl\l
—><— l1l2 SChN
0.35
5* U3
E
%
U025
E
LL 02
U 15
Oi
0 O5
Fig. 4. Histogram of point-to-curve boundary errors after applying the (PIE) models on PIE Subset 2 (unseen images).
Fig. 5. Cumulative histogram of point-to-point boundary errors after applying the (PIE) models
10 15 20 25
F>t—F>t (pixels)
Fig 6. Actual dx vs. predicted dx displacements for (PIE) RGB GN model applied on PIE
Fig. 7. Actual dx vs. predicted dx displacements for (PIE) CIELAB GN model applied on PIE Subset 2.
Fig. 8. Actual dx vs. predicted dx displacements for (PIE) l1I2I3 SChN model applied on PIE Subset 2.
|
