WO2004111661A2 - System and method for low coherence broadband quadrature interferometry - Google Patents

Abstract

A quadrature broadband interferometry system and method obtains a complete complex interferometric signal instantaneously in both homodyne and heterodyne systems in a simple, compact, and inexpensive setup. This is accomplished by separating interferometric components from non-interferometric components in each of at least two detector signals of an interferometer having a number of NxN couplers, scaling the interferometric components, and generating real and imaginary parts of a complex interferometric signal from the scaled interferometric components. The detector signals preferably derive from a broadband light source coupled to the interferometer, and the number of NxN couplers may be one or more, with N ≥ 3.

Description

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR LOW COHERENCE BROADBAND QUADRATURE INTERFEROMETRY

GOVERNMENT RIGHTS

This invention was made with United States Government support under Federal

Grant No. R24 EB000243 awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The United

States Government may have certain rights in this invention.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial

No. 60/474,222, filed on May 30, 2003. The contents of this provisional application is

incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention.

The invention relates to broadband interferometry and, more particularly, to an

interferometry system and method in which all components of a complex interferometric

signal can be simultaneously acquired.

2. Background of the Related Art.

Interferometry with broadband light sources has become a widely used technique

for imaging in biologic samples using time-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT),

optical coherence microscopy (OCM), spectral domain OCT (which encompasses spectrometer based Fourier domain OCT and swept source OCT), color Doppler OCT,

and phase-referenced interferometry. In all of these interferometry techniques, light

traveling a reference path is mixed with light returning from or traversing a sample on the

surface of a single or multiple detectors.

In homodyne interferometry, the optical frequency of the sample and reference

light is the same, and mixing of the fields on the detector results in sum and difference

frequency terms corresponding to a second harmonic frequency component and a DC

frequency component. The second harmonic frequency component is at twice the optical

frequency, and is therefore not resolved by conventional square-law electronic detectors.

In heterodyne interferometry, either the reference or sample arm light is

purposefully modulated at a carrier frequency, which results in the difference frequency

component residing on a carrier frequency which is electronically detectable. The

complete interferometric signal consists of DC components arising from non-mixing

light from each of the arms, and interferometric components arising from mixed light. In

heterodyne interferometry it is straightforward to separate the DC from interferometric

components, since the latter are distinguished by their carrier frequency. In homodyne

interferometry, it is impossible to separate the interferometric and non-interferometric

components based on their frequency content alone.

In both homodyne and heterodyne interferometers, the interferometric

component of the detector signal depends sinusoidally on both the optical path length

difference between the arms of the interferometer, and also on an additional phase term

which specifies the phase delay between the reference and sample arm fields when the

path length difference is zero. When this phase term is zero, the interferometric signal varies as a cosine of the optical path length difference between the arms, and when the

phase term is 90 degrees, the interferometric signal varies as a sine of the path length

difference. Although a single detector can only detect one of these phase components at

a time, it is convenient to refer to the zero and 90 degree phase delayed versions of the

interferometric signal as the real and imaginary components (or zero and 90 degree

quadrature components) of a complex interferometric signal.

In OCT and many of its variations discussed above, it is often useful or necessary

to have access to the entire complex interferometric signal in order to extract amplitude

and phase information encoding, scatterer locations and/or motions. For example, in

Doppler OCT, multiple phase measurements are required to extract the magnitude and

direction of sample motions. In spectral domain OCT, acquiring only one quadrature

component of the interferometric signal results in a complex phase ambiguity which does

not allow for separation of image information resulting from positive and negative spatial

frequencies of the detected data. This ambiguity results in double images, image

contamination with undesirable autocorrelation terms, and is wasteful of detector pixels

(in Fourier domain OCT) and data collection time (in swept source OCT). Unfortunately,

the square-law detector output which is available in previously disclosed OCT systems

and their variations obtains only the real part of the complex signal (in the case of single

receiver systems), or the real part and its inverse (in the case of differential receiver

systems).

Several methods have been reported which allow for instantaneous or sequential

retrieval of both quadrature components of the complex interferometric signal. These

include 1) polarization quadrature encoding, where orthogonal polarization states encode the real and imaginary components; 2) phase stepping, where the reference reflector is

serially displaced, thus time encoding the real and imaginary components; and 3)

synchronous detection, where the photodetector output is mixed with an electronic local

oscillator at the heterodyne frequency. Synchronous detection methods include lock-in

detection and phase-locked loops. Polarization quadrature encoding and phase stepping

can be genetically called quadrature interferometry since the complex signal is optically

generated. As such, they are useful in both homodyne and heterodyne systems.

Each of these techniques suffers from shortcomings. Polarization quadrature

encoding is instantaneous, but it requires a complicated setup, and suffers from

polarization fading. Phase shifting requires a stable and carefully calibrated reference arm

step, is not instantaneous, and is sensitive to interferometer drift between phase-shifted

acquisitions. Synchronous detection is not instantaneous, and depends on the presence of

an electronic carrier frequency. Systems based on synchronous detection are thus not

useful in an important class of homodyne systems, such as en-face imaging schemes,

those which take advantage of array detection (e.g. Fourier domain OCT), and in swept

source OCT.

There is thus a clear need for a system and method for instantaneous and

simultaneous acquisition of both quadrature components of the complex interferometric

signal in OCT and related systems.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An object of the invention is to solve at least the above problems and/or

disadvantages and to provide at least the advantages described hereinafter. Another object of the invention is to provide a quadrature broadband

interferometry system and method that can obtain the complete complex interferometric

signal instantaneously in both homodyne and heterodyne systems in a simple, compact,

and inexpensive setup.

To achieve these and other objects and advantages, the present invention provides

an improved system and method for quadrature broadband interferometry which exploit

the inherent phase shifts of NxN (N>2) fiber optic couplers to obtain the complete

complex interferometric signal instantaneously in both homodyne and heterodyne

systems.

In accordance with one embodiment, the present invention provides a signal

processing method which includes separating interferometric components from non-

interferometric components in each of at least two detector signals of an interferometer

having a number of NxN couplers, scaling the interferometric components, and

generating real and imaginary parts of a complex interferometric signal from the scaled

interferometric components. The detector signals preferably derive from a broadband

light source coupled to the interferometer. Also, the number of NxN couplers may be

one or more, with N ≥ 3.

Separating the interferometric components may be performed by high-pass or

band-pass filtering signals output from the detectors. This separation may also be

accomplished by extracting AC-coupled signals from signals output from the detectors.

Such an extraction may be performed by removing at least one of DC components,

source noise components, and auto-correlation terms from the detector outputs prior to

re-scaling. Scaling the interferometric components may be performed by phase shifting the

inteϊferometric components of the two detector signals to have a predetermined phase

difference. The interferometric components are preferably shifted to have orthogonal

phases, although other phase relationships are possible. Scaling may also be performed to

reduce optical losses which correspond, for example, to at least one of optical path losses

and variations in gain between different ones of the detectors.

Generating the imaginary part of the complex interferometric signal from the real

part may be performed based on a method derived from the cosine sum rule. Once the

real and imaginary parts are obtained, a Doppler shift value may be calculated based on a

time derivative of the calculated phase.

In accordance with another embodiment, the present invention provides an

analyzer which includesan interferometer including at least one fiber-optic coupler, a

number of detectors that detect light from said at least one coupler, and a processor

which acquires interferometric components from signals output from the detectors,

scales the interferometric components, and generates real and imaginary parts of a

complex interferometric signal from the scaled interferometric components.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention will be described in detail with reference to the following drawings

in which like reference numerals refer to like elements wherein:

Fig. IA is a schematic diagram of a differential low-coherence Michelson

interferometer based on 2x2 fiber couplers in accordance with one embodiment of the

present invention; Fig. IB is a schematic diagram of a Michelson interferometer based on a 3x3 fiber coupler in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention; and

Fig. 1C is a graphical representation of the intrinsic phase shifts in a 3x3 coupler-based

Michelson interferometer in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;

Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of a 3x3 coupler-based interferometer with all

potential detector locations populated in accordance with one embodiment of the present

invention;

Fig. 3 is a schematic diagram of a 3x3 coupler-based interferometer that provides

simultaneous detector outputs with 120 degree phase separation and a DC component

that includes source fluctuations in accordance with one embodiment of the present

invention;

Fig. 4 is a plot of the interferometric detector outputs of the 3x3 coupler-based

Michelson interferometer embodiment of Fig. IB during a heterodyne experiment, in

which amplitudes have been normalized, in accordance with one embodiment of the

present invention;

Fig. 5 A is a three-dimensional Lissajous plot of the interferometric signal from

three photodetectors in the 3x3 coupler-based Michelson interferometer of Fig. IB; Fig.

5B is a Lissajous plot of interferometric signal k vs. interferometric signal h for the 3x3

coupler-based Michelson interferometer of Fig. IB; Fig. 5C is a plot of real vs. imaginary-

signals calculated from interferometric signals h and h for the 3x3 coupler-based

Michelson interferometer of Fig. IB; and Fig. 5D is a plot of interferometric signal vs.

time for the 3x3 coupler-based Michelson interferometer of Fig. IB; Fig. 6 is a plot of the magnitude, phase and Doppler shift of the complex

heterodyne interferometric signal calculated from outputs of the 3x3 coupled-based

Michelson interferometer of Fig. IB;

Figs. 7A-7D are graphs showing plots of the magnitudes and phases of the

complex interferometric signal for a homodyne experiment using the embodiment of Fig.

IB;

Fig. 8 is a diagram of an NxN coupler-based interferometer generalized to an

arbitrarily high order NxN coupler in accordance with one embodiment of the present

invention;

Fig. 9 is a diagram of an NxN coupler-based homodyne low coherence

interferometer in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;

Fig. 10 is a schematic diagram of a Fourier-domain OCT system employing a 3x3

fiber coupler in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;

Fig. 11 is a schematic diagram of an OCT system that employs the spectral-

domain technique of swept source OCT for depth ranging in accordance with one

embodiment of the present invention; and

Fig. 12 is a schematic diagram of a homodyne DLS system that employs a 3x3 (or

NxN, N>2) fiber coupler in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Fused-fiber couplers rely on evanescent wave coupling to split an input electric

field between output fiber paths, according to coupled-mode theory. (It is to be

understood that an optical signal is one type of electric field that may be subject to the present invention. In a broader sense, the embodiment of the present invention disclosed

herein may be applied to any type of electromagnetic radiation). A formalism based on

conservation of energy which predicts phase shifts for interferometers based on 2x2 and

3x3 couplers will now be described. While higher-order couplers (e.g. 4x4) can be used in

a manner similar to that described below for 3x3 couplers to acquire the complex

interferometric signal, the phase shifts in these couplers only can be explained by

coupled-mode theory.

Figs. IA and IB respectively show examples of 2x2 and 3x3 coupler-based

Michelson interferometers in accordance with the present invention. In these and

subsequent figures, coupling coefficients may be denoted by dab, which describes the

power transfer from one fiber or optical path α to another fiber or optical path b. For

example, the 2x2 coupler may have a 50/50 split ratio where cfti = an — Vz, and the 3x3

coupler may have a 33/33/33 ratio where an = an — an — 1/3. Alternative

embodiments of the invention may use couplers with disproportionate split ratios if

desired.

The Fig. IA interferometer includes a source 1, two fiber-optic couplers 2 and 3,

and reference and sample arms 4 and 5. The light source is preferably a broadband light

source (e.g., one having multiple wavelengths or modes), however a narrowband source

may be used if desired. The source is shown as 2γlo for reasons that will become more

apparent below. In this embodiment, the couplers are both 2x2 couplers. The first

coupler splits light from the source along two optical paths, one of which is input into

the second coupler. The second coupler splits this beam along fibers Fl and F2 which respectively lead to the reference and sample arms. At least the reference arm terminates

with a reflector 6. The sample serves as the reflection source of the other arm.

Light beams reflected from the reference and sample arms are re-combined in

coupler 3. A portion of this re-combined light is then detected by detector D2, and

another portion of this light is input into coupler 2, where it is detected by detector Dl.

As will be described in greater detail below, the detector signals may be processed to

derive a complex interferometric signal in accordance with the present invention.

The Fig. IB interferometer includes a source 10, two fiber-optic couplers 12 and

13, and reference and sample arms 14 and 15. The light source is preferably a broadband

light source (e.g., one having multiple wavelengths or modes), however a narrowband

source may be used if desired. The source is shown as 2γlo for reasons that will become

more apparent below. In this embodiment, the first coupler is a 2x2 coupler and the

second coupler is an NxN coupler, where N ≥ 3. For illustrative purposes, N = 3 in the

figure.

The first coupler splits light from the source along two optical paths, one of which

is input into the second coupler. The second coupler splits this beam along fibers Fl and

F2 which respectively lead to the reference and sample arms. Light beams reflected from

these arms are re-combined in coupler 13. Portions of this re-combined light is then

detected by detectors D2 and D3, and another portion of the re-combined light is input

into coupler 12, where it is detected by detector Dl. As in the previous embodiment, the

reference arm may terminate with a reflector 16 and the sample may reflect the light in

the sample arm. The detector signals may differ in respect to their phase, e.g., the phase of the

interference signal on detectors D2 and D3 may be different. For example, if the 3x3

coupler has a splitting ratio of 1/3:1/3:1/3, then the interference signals on D2 and D3

will be out of phase by 120 degrees. The amplitude of the interference signals may also be

different, if the splitting ratio is something other than 1/3:1/3:1/3. The amplitudes will

also be different if detectors D2 and D3 have different electronic gains.

In Figs. IA and IB, the first coupler may be used to allow for detection of that

portion of the interferometric signal which would otherwise return to the source. In

other embodiments of the invention, the first coupler may be replaced by an optical

circulator (if all returning components of the interferometric signal are required) or

eliminated entirely (if all but one of the returning components are sufficient for signal

processing). Ignoring the return loss from the source arm 50/50 coupler, the optical

intensity incident on the n^Λ detector due to a single reflection in the sample is:

I_n = yI₀(a_na_ln + a_na_2n +2E(Axya_na_lna_ua_2n cos(2kAx + φ,,)), (1)

where k is the optical wavenumber, Δx is the path length difference between reflectors in

the reference and sample arms, E(ΔΛΓ) is the interferometric envelope (i.e. the magnitude

of the complex signal), and φ_a is the phase shift between the detector photocurrents. This

phase shift is imparted by the evanescent wave coupling process. Also, γ ensures mat the

total power incident on the reference and sample arms is Io, e.g. γ is 1 for a 2x2 and

Since the non-interferometric portions of I_n sum to Io, the interferometric

portions must sum to zero, independent of Ax. Assuming perfect reciprocity (i.e.

<Xb⁼(%a) , losslessness (y i), and directionality (no internal coupling from input

---^j ^ aann

back into input fibers) in die fiber coupler, this implies diat:

ΣV^αin«2n

• n n

(2b)

Because variations in &dx rotate the

vector in the complex

plane (Eq. 2a), Eq. 2a is true if and only if

sum to zero (Eq. 2b). These

equations demand that |

for 2x2 couplers, regardless of the coupler splitting

ratio, while φ_m-φ_a is an explicit function of Oώ for 3x3 couplers.

Fig. 1C shows one way in which Eq. 2b may be graphically represented as a sum

of three complex vectors with magnitude (flfinCfen)¹/² and phase φ_a. Given a set of

measured values of Ωkb, the interferometric phase shifts between coupler arms φ_m-φn are

uniquely determined, since the three vectors correspond to the sides of a triangle whose

inner angles are related to φm-φa. For example, if

for all fibers a and b, then the

interferometric phase shift between any two output ports of a 3x3 Michelson

interferometer is 120°. For 4x4 and higher order couplers, Eqs. (l)-(2b) are still valid, but are not

sufficient to uniquely predict the interferometric phase shifts between coupler arms φ_m-φn

as a function of the coupling ratios. However, 4x4 and higher order couplers may be

extremely useful for instantaneous quadrature interferometry, especially by specifically

designing them to give phase angles separated by 90°, in that they give all in-phase,

quadrature, and out-of-phase components (0^o,90°,180^o,270°) of the complex

interferometric signal without requiring any further signal processing.

Extracting Complex Interferometric Data from NxN Interferometers

Because the phase shifts among J_n in Eq. (1) are not constrained to be 0° or 180°

for interferometers based on 3x3 and higher-order couplers, the complex interferometric

signal can be obtained instantaneously from simultaneous measurements of any two or

more detector outputs. It should be appreciated that this can be accomplished with all

higher-order NxN interferometers (N>2) of various topologies (e.g. Michelson, Mach-

Zehnder, etc.). The detectors are preferably connected to a processor (not shown) which

performs computations for deriving the complex interferometric signal.

A method for extracting the real and imaginary components of the complex

interferometric signal from die interferometer detector outputs, corresponding to

detectors located on all NxN input fibers, and on any unused output detectors, will now

be described with reference to Fig. 2.

Fig. 2 shows a 3x3 interferometer in accordance wkh another embodiment of the

present invention. This interferometer may be constructed in a manner similar to Fig. IB,

except that a detector D4 is attached to optical fiber F3, an X-Y scanning mirror 30 is used to scan and capture reflected light from a sample (which in this case is illustratively

shown as' insect), and a superluminescent diode (SLD) serves as the broadband light

source. An optional lens 31 may be included to focus the light into and out of the

scanning mirror. The Fig. 2 embodiment also includes a processor 35 which processes

signals from at least two detectors to compute a complex interferometric signal in

accordance with the present invention. (While only Fig. 2 shows this processor, it is

understood that other embodiments described herein also include a processor for

generating a complex interferometric signal from detector signals or pairs of detector

signals).

The first step in extraction of the complex interferometric data from NxN

interferometers is to separate out the interferometric components of at least two detector

signals from the non-interferometric or DC components. DC components, as used

herein, refer both to any non-interferometric light appearing on detector outputs due to

amplitude or polarization mismatch between sample and reference arms, as well as to any

autocorrelation terms resulting from multiple partial reflections occurring in either

sample or reference arms.

Removing DC components is critical to obtaining the complex interferometric

signal, and is also useful in optimizing signal-to-noise ratio in OCT systems, since these

DC components also contain light source fluctuations (excess noise) which are common

mode to light returning from the sample and reference arms. Cancellation of common-

mode source noise and removal of autocorrelation terms may be accomplished by some

of the techniques that will now be described. In heterodyne systems, selection of interferometric components is done by AC

coupling or high-pass filtering all input fiber detector outputs (e.g., detectors Di through

D₃ in Fig. 2) with a cutoff frequency below the heterodyne carrier frequency. An

alternatively approach would involve band-pass filtering around the heterodyne carrier

frequency. In homodyne systems, where AC coupling is not an option, AC coupling may

be simulated by separately measuring the DC level appearing on each input fiber detector

output (detectors Di through D₃ in Fig. 2) due to the reference arm DC level and sample

arm DC level measured separately, then subsequently subtracting these DC levels from

each respective detector output during interferometric measurements. In the usual case in

OCT, where the quantity of light reflected from the sample is small compared to the

reference arm recoupling, this procedure may be approximated by subtracting only the

reference arm recoupled DC level from each of the detector outputs.

Simulating AC coupling by pre-measuring DC recoupling into each of the input

fiber detectors is sufficient for reconstruction of the complex interferometric signal, but

does not remove the common-mode source noise or autocorrelation terms. Two

techniques will now be described which accomplish all three tasks simultaneously.

If detector outputs are available from all input fibers of the NxN interferometer

(detectors Di through D3 in Fig. 2), then the DC level to be subtracted from each

detector, including source fluctuations and autocorrelation terms, may be obtained by

summing all detector outputs, scaled by any loss experienced on the path back to each

detector. For the embodiment of Fig. 2, the ideal total re-coupled power is given by

where the factor of 2 multiplying Di arises from the insertion loss of

the 2x2 coupler in the source arm. Given this measurement of DT, each detector output may be effectively AC coupled by subtraction of the proper fraction of DT from that

output, i.e. Di^AC=Di-Dτ/6,

These equations should be corrected in view of die exact coupling ratios and any additional losses present

upstream of each detector in any system implementation.

A second technique for removal of DC components, including source fluctuations

(but not autocorrelation terms), from the detector outputs involves the use of any unused

output fiber of the NxN interferometer (e.g., detector D₄ in Fig. 2). In the embodiment

of Fig. 2, the AC-coupled input fiber detector outputs are given approximately by

D₂-γ₂*D₂, and D₃ ^AC D₃-γ₃*D₃. Here, the quantities γ_n are

proportionality constants, which depend upon the specific recoupling ratios of light from

sample and reference arms back into the NxN coupler, as well as specific losses in each

detector arm, and would likely have to be separately characterized for each instrument.

Following the removal of DC components, source noise fluctuations, and

autocorrelation terms from each of the detector outputs in an NxN coupler-based

interferometer system, each detector output is preferably re-scaled to compensate for

specific losses in die optical path to each detector, as well as for variations in the gain

between different detectors, before proceeding to complex interferogram extraction. For

example, in the interferometer of Fig. 2, the output of detector Di must be multiplied by

a factor of 2 to compensate for the presence of the 2x2 coupler between detector Di and

die 3x3 coupler. The exact values for re-scaling of each detector output will depend on

the specific pattern and/or characteristics of the optical losses and electronic gains

associated with each detector's optical and electronic paths. The complex interferometric signal may be exttacted from the AC-coupled and

re-scaled detector outputs. A technique for reconstructing the complex interferometric

signal uses the AC-coupled and re-scaled signal from any two detectors located on input

fibers of the NxN coupler (e.g. detectors D1-D3 in Fig. 2). Defining i_a as the

interferometric portion of J_n, and assigning any in as the real part of the complex signal

(denoted zke below), then the imaginary part iι_m ⁼2Ε(Ax)(an(Xi_na\2(X2^)^'ι^²sin(2kΔx+φa),

may be obtained by using the cosine sum rule, as:

The re-scaling of the m* detector output is expressed as an explicit function of

the coupling coefficients of the NxN coupler. The re-scaling parameter β may also be

obtained experimentally, as described above. Once zke and 2Ϊ_m are obtained according to

Eq. (3), then the magnitude and phase of the complex interferometric signal may be

obtained according to standard formulas from complex mathematics.

The technique summarized by Eq. (3) may be applied to any 2 detector outputs

(located on an input fiber to the NxN coupler) of an NxN interferometer. If multiple

pairs of outputs are available (e.g., detectors D1&D2, D2&D3, D1&D3 in Fig. 2), then an

improved estimate of the interferometric amplitude and phase may be applied by

averaging the amplitudes and phases obtained from the application of the technique of

Eq. (3) to each detector pak calculated separately.

Fig. 3 shows another particularly robust instantaneous quadrature interferometer

system in accordance with the present invention. This system takes advantage of the technique described by Eq. (2) and includes a 3x3 coupler-based interferometer without a

2x2 coupler. In this embodiment, die broadband source is shown as λo, Δλ, where λo

corresponds to the source center wavelength and Δλ corresponds to the bandwidth. Also,

the optical signal reflected in the reference arm is generated by a 2-reference scan.

Through this arrangement, the quadrature output is simplified from Eq. (3) as l90°c(Ii20 -

Io cos(120°)), and A scans can then be processed based on this derived output and the

original 0 detector output.

In the case of a 4x4 coupler, quadrature and differential spectra are available

directly from the three unused input ports, akhough the overall power utilization

efficiency is slightiy less than in the 3x3 coupler case. In both 3x3 and 4x4 coupler cases,

all required signals are available from the unused input ports. Thus, a circulator or input

2x2 coupler is not required, as is included in the embodiments of Figs IA and IB. The

implementation of the system of Fig. 3 could be extremely robust, as no optics or

mechanics are required in the reference arm path at all. For example, the reference arm

path could simply be a length of fiber with a reflective end coating coiled in a box. Of

course, any mismatch in fiber lengths between the sample and reference arms will need to

be dispersion compensated using known techniques.

Instantaneous Quadrature Interferometry with NxN Interferometers

The embodiment of Fig IB has been tested using a superluminescent diode source

(OptoSpeed;

Δλ^:z:28nm) and an AC Photonics, Inc. 3x3 truly fused fiber

coupler. To demonstrate instantaneous quadrature signal acquisition in a heterodyne experiment, the reference arm was scanned at ^=8.3 mm/sec. The interferometiϊc

portion of all three acquired photodetector outputs is illustrated in Fig 4. The phase shifts

between detector outputs were measured to be φι -

130.8° and

- φi — 255.4.

When experimentally measured values of c&b were used to solve for the theoretical

interferometric phase shifts (Eqs. 2a and 2b), these theoretical shifts deviated from the

experimental shifts by ≤ 2.5% (Fig 1C), φm-φn drifted over the course of minutes to

hours, and it is believed that these drifts are due to temperature sensitivity of the coupler

splitting ratio.

If Zi₅ /₂, and h are parametrically plotted against each other, a three-dimensional

Lissajous curve may be formed, as shown in the plot of Fig. 5A. Time is encoded by the

color of the curve: in this experiment the data was captured as Ax increased with time,

and the curve spirals outwards from the center and transitions from green to black to red.

(The green color corresponds to an inner portion including an inner circumferential

portion of the curve, the black color corresponds to an intermediate portion of the curve,

and the red color corresponds to an outer portion including an outer circumferential

portion of the curve). The curve fills an ellipse.

Fig. 5B is a Lissajous plot of interferometric signal h vs. interferometric signal Z₂,

where the progression of color from green to black to red is similar to the pattern in Fig.

5A. Fig. 5D is a plot of interferometric signal vs. time. In this plot color progresses from

green to black to red with increasing time. The real (&) and imaginary parts (calculated

from Eq. 3) of the interferogram are plotted as a Lissajous curve in Fig. 5C with the same

color pattern as in Figs. 5A and B. The real and imaginary parts were used to calculate the magnitude and phase as plotted in Fig 6. The time derivative of the phase yields the

Doppler shift fa. generated by the scanning reference mirror:

The experimentally-calculated Doppler shift (Fig 6) agrees well with the predicted

value of 13kHz, based on the calibrated scan velocity of the reference arm. This result

demonstrates the utility of NxN interferometers in color Doppler OCT.

A 3x3 instantaneous quadrature signal acquisition in a homodyne experiment has

also been demonstrated by positioning a non-scanning reference mirror (v=Q) such that

Δx corresponds to the middle of an interferogram. The outputs h and h (from detectors

D2 and D3) were then recorded for 10 seconds, and Eq. (3) was used to reconstruct

amplitude and phase. Due to interferometer drift on the order of ~λ, the phase of the

complex interferometric signal varied by ~2π, while the magnitude remained steady

(mean=1.52, variance=1.96xlθ"⁴. This is shown in Figs. 7A-7D, which are plots of the

magnitude and phase of the complex interferometric signal for the homodyne experiment

using the embodiment of Fig. IB. This result demonstrates the utility of NxN

interferometers in homodyne OCT setups such as optical coherence microscopy,

Fourier-domain OCT, and swept source OCT.

Although higher-order NxN (N>2) interferometers are less efficient with source

light than 2x2 interferometers, they are more efficient at collecting light reflected from

the sample, and may thus be advantageous in exposure-limited applications, such as

retinal imaging. For example, the 3x3 coupler-based interferometer of Fig. IB delivers only 1/6 of the source light to the sample, but collects l/3+l/3+(l/3)(l/2)=83% of the

light returning from the sample. Replacing the first 2x2 coupler in Fig. IB with a

circulator would result in sample reflected light collection efficiency limited only by the

insertion loss of the circulator.

The simpler embodiment of Fig. 3 delivers 1/3 of the source light to the sample,

and collects 2/3 of the light returning from the sample. By modeling and analysis, it is

possible to optimize source utilization efficiency, sample return utilization efficiency, or

some combination by proper specification of NxN coupler splitting ratios.

As described above, NxN interferometers allow for instantaneous optical

extraction of magnitude and phase information simultaneously in a compact and simple

design. Their advantages are particularly compelling in FD-OCT and swept source OCT,

where they allow for optical resolution of the complex conjugate ambiguity without

phase stepping.

Higher Order Interferometric Topologies

The analysis described above, including the governing equations for NxN

interferometers (Eqs. 1-3) and the disclosed techniques for recovering the complex

interferometric signal from the raw detector outputs, are generalizable to NxN

interferometers based on arbitrarily high order NxN couplers.

Fig. 8 shows an exemplary embodiment of a generalized NxN interferometer

formed in accordance with the present invention. This interferometer includes a source

20 which is preferably a broadband source, an optical circulator 21, and an NxN coupler

22 having two outputs for inputting optical signals into reference and sample arms 23 and 24 along respective fibers Fl and F2. The sample arm terminates with a reflector 25.

Detectors Di - DN+I are connected to receive optical beams passing through the coupler.

In this embodiment, N ≥ 3.

While 3x3 coupler-based interferometers are attractive due to their simplicity and

efficiency with source light, and suitably designed 3x3 and 4x4 coupler-based

interferometers provide direct access to 90°-separated quadrature components of the

interferometric signal, higher-order NxN interferometers may be useful in situations

where more sophisticated phase extraction schemes than that described in Eq. (3) require

denser sampling of the complex plane, or where increased sample reflection utilization

efficiency is required in the absence of a circulator in the source arm.

Heterodyne Time-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography

An important potential application of NxN instantaneous quadrature

interferometry in heterodyne OCT systems is in Doppler OCT. In Doppler OCT, the

sign and magnitude of Doppler shifts arising from moving scatterers within a sample may

be recovered from time-frequency analysis of the interferometric signal. This analysis has

taken the form of windowed Fourier transform, wavelet transform, or Hubert transform

analysis of interferometric data, either digitized directly or electronically down-mixed

using synchronous detection. All of these approaches are non-instantaneous, and involve

considerable electronic and/or computational complexity.

Polarization encoding has been used to encode the real and imaginary parts of the

complex interferometric signal for Doppler processing. However, the polarization

encoding apparatus was complex and expensive and is subject to polarization fading. The use of NxN interferometry for instantaneous recovery of the sign and magnitude of

Doppler shifts in Doppler OCT, as described above with reference to Fig. 6, greatly simplifies Doppler OCT.

Homodyne Time-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography

Use of NxN coupler-based low coherence interferometer systems of the present

invention allow for near instantaneous extraction of interference phase and amplitude.

One major advantage of such an approach is that it eliminates the need to generate a

heterodyne beat frequency through which the phase and amplitude information are

measured. The technical disadvantages of a heterodyne based system are varied, and

some major ones are now discussed.

The time window for extracting time varying amplitude and phase information is

limited by the period of the heterodyne beat. In other words, if the sample reflectance

where to change in phase shift or amplitude, the quickest the change can be resolved will

be in a time window that is at least larger than the heterodyne beat period.

However, NxN homodyne based systems can, in principle, render instantaneous

phase and amplitude measurements. In such a situation, the resolving time window and

the sensitivity of the measurements trade off with each other. An arbitrarily small time

window is achievable with a correspondingly arbitrarily low sensitivity. There is no longer

a hard limit on the resolving time window as with the heterodyne situation.

Heterodyne based phase detection is very prone to heterodyne beat frequency

fluctuations and finite data sampling rate. In an ideal world, where the heterodyne signal

can be sampled with infinite sampling frequency, any beat frequency fluctuations can be detected and corrected for prior to amplitude and phase extraction. Realistically, this is

likely not possible and beat frequency fluctuations that are not corrected for will lead to

amplitude and phase errors.

Fig. 9 shows an NxN homodyne-based system in accordance with the present

invention which overcomes this problem in two ways. First, it does not require a moving

element, which is the most commonly used means for generating the heterodyne

frequency. As the non-uniformity of the velocity of the moving element is a major

contributor to the heterodyne beat frequency fluctuations, a homodyne-based system is

automatically free of this source of error. Second, even if a moving element is present in

the interferometer, such as for the purpose of making depth scanning, scan velocity

fluctuations can be detected and corrected for by setting the resolving time window at a

time scale that is shorter than the fluctuation time scale. (The Fig. 9 embodiment may

have a structure similar to the Fig. 8 embodiment except that the NxN coupler is

replaced by a 3x3 coupler 40, an X-Y scanning mirror 41 and lens 42 are included along

the sample signal path, a Z-scan is performed along the reference signal path, and four

detectors Di - D₄ are included).

Heterodyne-based OCT systems generally acquire depth resolved scans (A-scans),

since the general incorporation of a moving element to induce the necessary heterodyne

beat generally generate a varying optical delay. This optical delay can be used to render

depth resolved scans. Heterodyne-based systems can disentangle depth scans from the

heterodyne beat generation process through the use of other optical elements, such as an

acousto-optic modulator or electro-optic modulator. Such distanglement allows for easier en-face scan pattern (to create en-face images), by then scanning the focal point created

by the OCT horizontally within the sample.

However, such systems generally set a limit on the speed of en-face scanning.

Each pixel dwell time must be larger than the heterodyne frequency, which leads to slow

scan speed due to low heterodyne beat frequency, or high scan speed with a high

heterodyne beat frequency. The first situation is not ideal in terms of image acquisition

speed. The second requires fast data collection and processing and entails sophisticated

instrumentation .

However, an NxN homodyne-based system does not suffer from such limitations.

The point of interest can be as easily scanned in depth as it can be scanned laterally. A

shorter pixel acquisition time may be traded off by permitting lower sensitivity. The ease

of performing en-face scanning means that a homodyne-based en-face scanning optical

coherence microscope is possible that exhibits an image acquisition rate that is

unobtainable using a heterodyne-based system.

Fourier-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography With Array Detection

An alternate method of coherence gating that does not employ a scanning delay

line has been called various terms including spectral radar, Fourier domain OCT (FD-

OCT), and complex spectral OCT. In FD-OCT, the positions of reflectors in the sample

arm of a Michelson interferometer are resolved by acquiring the optical spectrum of

sample light interfered with light from a single, stationary (or phase modulated) reference

reflector. The power incident on the array of detectors is related to: P_D (* ) = (|E _D (/c )|² ^ S (k )R _R + S (Jc )R _s + 2 S (k y R _R R _S cos (2 /tΔx) (5)

where S(^) is the source spectral shape, ED(^) is the total field incident on the

spectrometer, Rs and RR are, respectively, the sample and reference reflectivities, and

PD(/&) has units of watts per wave number.

The double-pass position of the sample reflector is encoded in the frequency of

cosinusoidal variations of PD(^), while the sample reflectivity is encoded in the visibility

of these variations. The spectrally-indexed detector outputs, therefore, represent the real

part of the Fourier-transform of the A-scan. This is consistent with the assertion that

electronic photodetectors only give the real part of the interferometric signal.

Because Eq. (5) yields the real part of the Fourier transform, a reflector at +Ax

cannot be distinguished from a reflector at -Ax.

2 S(kyR_RR_s cos(2/cΔx) = 2 S(k)y]R_RR_s cos(- 2kΔx) . (6)

This ambiguity is called complex conjugate ambiguity, and can be resolved by additionally

collecting the imaginary part of the interferometric signal 2S(M)(RκRsy^/2cos(2kAx),

noting that:

2 s(kyR_RR_s sin(2/cΔx) ≠ 2 S(k)jR_RR_s sin(- 2IcAx) (7) Since the reference arm is not scanned in FD-OCT, the detector signals do not

contain an electronic carrier signal related to the phase of the interferometric signal. This

constitutes a homodyne detection system and, as such, electronic synchronous detection

methods cannot be used to extract the interferometric magnitude and phase.

Phase-shifting interferometry has been utilized to dither the phase of the reference

electric field, in order to collect real and imaginary parts on sequential scans. Phase

shifting, however, requires a stable and carefully calibrated reference arm step, is not

instantaneous, and is sensitive to interferometer drift between phase-shifted acquisitions.

Fig. 10 shows an FD-OCT system in accordance with the present invention that

uses the techniques described above to acquire a complex interferometric signal, and

which removes DC and autocorrelation terms for each spectrometer detector element.

This embodiment has a structure similar to Fig. 9, except that detectors Di through D₄

are replaced by the spectrometer detector elements Speci through Spec₄, respectively, and

the reference signal is not subject to a Z-scan. Also, in this embodiment, it must be

realized that since array detectors contain a finite number of elements that collect

photoelectrons in proportion to incident power and integration time, Eq. (5) must be

represented in a discrete form.

If an array contains M elements and interrogates an optical bandwidth of Ak, the

optical channel spacing is bk=Ak/M. The signal thus has values at M evenly spaced

wavenumbers K= {k\, ki,- . .,MM)- We can write N_e»[/έ»], the number of electrons collected

from the //* wavenumber on the «^ώ spectrometer as: (8)

where A is an autocorrelation signal, S is source noise, At is the detector integration time,

η is the detector quantum efficiency, h is Planck's constant, and c is the vacuum speed of

light. It should be noted that since dispersive spectrometers operate in wavelength and

not wavenumber, Eq. (8) is experimentally obtained by numerically resampling the

spectrometer data.

As discussed above, the use of detectors (in this case, spectrometers) 1 through 3

allows for the removal of DC terms (i.e. those associated with RR. and Rs), autocorrelation

terms, and source noise, while the use of detectors 2-4 allows for the removal of DC

terms and source noise only. In either case, if ϋf>>R.R, autocorrelation terms are small

compared to the other terms in Eq. (8), so it is reasonable to assume that A~0 if

detectors 2-4 are used.

If is defined as the interferometric portion of Eq. (8), then any

can be defined as Ne^re[/£], the real part of the complex interferometric signal. Referring to

Eq. (3), and noting that n,me {1,2,3}, the imaginary part of the complex interferometric

signal is:

_Λri_m[_/:]_ K:[k]cos(φ_m -<U-β NM \ a_ua_ua_na_2n _ sinC^ -^J ' \ cc_na_Xma_na_2m ^' The aim of FD-OCT is to obtain a depth-reflectivity profile of the sample arm.

This can be obtained with the discrete Fourier transform:

(10)

Optical Coherence Tomography With Optical Frequency Domain Reflectometry

(Swept-Source OCT) In optical frequency domain reflectometry, the A-scan Fourier transform is

acquired by sweeping a narrow-linewidth source over a broad spectral range. Fig. 11

shows an OCT embodiment that employs the frequency-domain technique of optical

frequency domain reflectometry for depth ranging, in accordance with one embodiment

of the present invention. Use of 3x3 (or more generally an NxN, N>2) coupler 70 allows

for acquisition of the entire complex inter ferometric signal. λ(t) is either a narrow-

linewidth source whose wavelength is tuned over time, or a broadband light source

filtered by a narrowband optical filter whose passband is tuned over time. Embodiments

which use only detectors D₂ and D₃, Di-D₃, or D₂-D₄ are also possible, with reduced

immunity to source fluctuations or autocorrelation terms.

If source sweeping begins at t=0 and ends at At, then the detector output is

proportional to PD(^= Vt+k_mhl) (Eq. 5). Here, k_min is the smallest wavenumber emitted by

the source, V has units of wavenumber per second, and V is such that

kndn— Ak. A-scans are obtained by Fourier transforming the time (and therefore wavenumber) indexed detector output. Since the reference arm is not scanned in OFDR,

the detector signals do not contain an electronic carrier signal related to the phase of the

interferometric signal. This constitutes a homodyne detection system and, as such,

electronic synchronous detection methods cannot be used to extract the interferometric

magnitude and phase.

As with FD-OCT, a complex conjugate ambiguity is present if the entire complex

interferometric signal is not collected (see Eq. (6), k—Vt+km,!). The complex signal needs

to be extracted with an optical technique (e.g., polarization diversity, phase shifting). DC

and autocorrelation terms can be removed with the techniques described above. Unlike

FD-OCT, however, it also is possible to remove the DC components by AC coupling the

photodetectors. Defining i»(M) as the interferometric portion of L(M) (see Eq. (1),

k= Vt+kmn), and assigning any i_tt(β) as the real part of the complex signal (denoted i&dfi)

below), then the imaginary part iι_m(^^:=2&(J^x){an(XiQ(XnC(2^)^'{/2sva(2kΔx+φ^)_i may be

obtained by using the cosine sum rule, as (see Eq. (3) ):

• _(j \ _ K {k)cos(φ_m -φ_n)-$i_m (k) I a_na_lna_na ".2n

"2m

(11)

The complete complex interferometric signal is iκe+jh_m, and the Fourier transform

of zke+jim yields the depth-resolved A-scan:

ASCAN(X) = l(i_Re + jx i_lm)ex_V(-jkx)dk

(12) Homodyne Phase-Resolved Interferometry

A significant advantage of the NxN couplet-based interferometer systems of the

present invention are their ability to measure phase within an arbitrarily small time

window. However, phase measured through such means will simply be equal to the

optical path difference between the reference and sample interferometer arms. Any

vibrational jitters will still be encoded onto the phase as errors.

Fortunately, NxN coupler-based homodyne phase measurement can readily be

adapted for use with the numerous interferometer phase measurement techniques that

have been developed to circumvent the jitter induced error.

Phase noise considerations

Assuming negligible 1/f noise, one can arrive at an order of magnitude estimation

of the phase noise as obtained by the heterodyne approach. The shot noise of each

measurement is given approximately by sqrt(εl_oτ/e) (numerical scaling factor due to

coupling coefficients is presently ignored). The homodyne interference amplitude is equal

to 2sqrt(RI_o ²)τ/e (numerical scaling factor due to coupling coefficients is presently

ignored). The maximum phase error that can be created is when the shot noise and

homodyne interference are orthogonal: θerror = tan-ⁱ(sqϊt(εIoτ/e)/( 2sqϊt(R.Io²)τ/e)) » (l/2)sqrt(e/(εl_oτ)) ,

(13)

where, ε is the detector responsivity, I₀ is the light power, τ is the acquisition time, e is

the electron charge, and R is the reflectivity of the sample.

When accounting for coupling coefficients, this error will be corrected slightly.

From the error analysis, we can see that higher intensity or longer acquisition time will

improve phase sensitivity.

Birefringence OCT

In birefringence OCT, two low coherence light components compose a pair of

orthogonal light polarization states. OCT signals are simultaneously acquired for both

polarization states and there relative phases can then be processed to determine the depth

resolved refractive index difference for the two polarization states within the target

sample. Common path interferometer jitters affects both phases equally and, thus, are

cancelled out during birefringence computations.

This OCT technique can be implemented in the homodyne mode by simply

inputting the two orthogonal polarization states into the OCT system and measuring the

homodyne signal at the two polarization states separately. One of the key advantages of

operating in homodyne mode is that it is very easy to acquire en-face images.

Wollaston prism based phase contrast OCT In this form of phase contrast OCT, low coherence light of a pair of orthogonal

polarization states is physically displaced (but propagating in the same direction) prior to incidence on the sample. OCT signals are simultaneously acquired for both polarization

states and their relative phases can then be processed to determine the refractive index or

height variation between the two focal points.

This OCT technique can be implemented in the homodyne mode by simply

inputting the two orthogonal polarization states into the OCT system and measuring the

homodyne signal at the two polarization states separately. One of the key advantages of

operating in homodyne mode is that it will be very easy to acquire en-face images.

Phase dispersion OCT

For phase dispersion OCT, low coherence light of two different wavelengths is

used in the OCT system. OCT signals are simultaneously acquired for both wavelengths,

and their relative phases can then be processed to determine the wavelength dependent

refractive index through the depth of the target.

This OCT technique can be implemented in the NxN coupler-based homodyne

mode by simply inputting the two wavelengths into the OCT system and measuring the

homodyne phases for the two wavelengths.

One of the key advantages of operating in NxN coupler-based homodyne mode is

that it will be very easy to acquire en-face images. In addition, the 2 pi ambiguity problem

can be substantially mitigated by measuring phase variation with very high spatial

resolution. In such a situation, it is possible to depart from the condition that the two wavelengths be harmonically matched, and yet still achieve superior 2 pi ambiguity free

measurements.

Phase referenced low coherence interferometry

For phase referenced low coherence interferometry, low coherence light of one

wavelength (or 1 polarization) and monochromatic light of a second wavelength (or the

orthogonal polarization) is used in the OCT system. An OCT signal and a

monochromatic interference signal are simultaneously acquired for both wavelengths,

and their relative phases can then be processed to determine optical path length changes

within the sample.

This OCT technique can be implemented in the NxN coupler-based homodyne

mode by simply inputting the two wavelengths into the OCT system and measuring the

homodyne phases for the two wavelengths.

One of the key advantages of operating in homodyne mode is that it will be very

easy to acquire en- face images. In addition, the 2 pi ambiguity problem can be

substantially mitigated by measuring phase variation with very high spatial resolution. In

such a situation, it is possible to depart from the condition that the two wavelengths be

harmonically matched, and yet still achieve superior 2 pi ambiguity free measurements.

This technique, which can be used to measure very small and slow motions in the

target (manifested as optical path length changes), has previously been limited in

sensitivity and time resolution by the first two problems described in the Homodyne Time-

Domain Optical Coherence Tomography section above. With the use of homodyne based approaches, one no longer needs a heterodyne beat generator, and the monitoring of

optical path length changes can be made with an arbitrarily small time window.

Magnitude and Phase Resolved Dynamic Light Scattering

Dynamic light scattering (DLS) techniques characterize the time-variations in the

properties of light scattered from an illuminated sample. An important class of DLS

techniques involves the interferomettic mixing of the backscattered sample light with

unscattered sample light. The light source used in these techniques can be either CW laser

light or broadband light.

One advantage of using broadband light is that it allows for depth-localization

within an inhomogenous sample. In either case, the detector measures the real part of the

interferomettic signal. This is somewhat problematic because the magnitude and phase

variations in the interferomettic signal are due to different physical processes. For

example, the magnitude of the signal is influenced by the total number of particles within

the illuminated volume, while phase (speckle) variations are due to subwavelength

motions of particles within the illuminated volume. Unfortunately, it is impossible to tell

phase from magnitude variations from the real signal alone (see Fig. 7 and associated

discussion above).

Fig. 12 shows a homodyne DLS system that employs a 3x3 (or more generally an

NxN, N>2) fiber coupler 80 in accordance with one embodiment of the present

invention. This embodiment can be used with one or more sources 81 of any bandwidth

(e.g., CW where Δλ<<λ, broadband where Δλ~λ). In the case of a broadband light

source, the reference arm 82 is scanned to select a particular depth to interrogate in the sample. If the sample arm light 83 is scanned, it is scanned in an en-face manner, as

described above. (Optional lenses 84 and 85 may be used to focus this light). This

embodiment is a homodyne detection system, and can extract the complex

interferometric signal with the techniques described above.

The foregoing embodiments and advantages are merely exemplary and are not to

be construed as limiting the present invention. The present teaching can be readily

applied to other types of apparatuses. The description of the present invention is

intended to be illustrative, and not to limit the scope of the claims.

For example, although fiber couplers are used as the NxN couplers in the

embodiments described above, it should be appreciated that bulk optical analog versions

of the NxN fiber couplers could be used while still falling within the scope of the present

invention. This would enable the extension of the techniques described above to two-

dimensional imaging geometries.

Many alternatives, modifications, and variations will be apparent to those skilled in

the art. In the claims, means-plus- function clauses are intended to cover the structures

described herein as performing the recited function and not only structural equivalents

but also equivalent structures.

Claims

We claim:

1. A signal processing method, comprising:

separating interferometric components from non-interferometric

components in each of at least two detector signals of an interferometer having a number

of NxN couplers;

scaling the interferometric components; and

generating real and imaginary parts of a complex interferometric signal

from the scaled interferometric components.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the detector signals derive from a

broadband light source coupled to the interferometer.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein scaling the interferometric components

includes phase shifting the interferometric components of the two detector signals to

have a predetermined phase difference.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the interferometric components are

shifted to have orthogonal phases.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein scaling the interferometric components is

performed to reduce optical losses.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the optical losses correspond to at least

one of optical path losses and variations in gain between different ones of the detectors.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein separating the interferometric

components includes performing high-pass filtering of signals output from the detectors.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein separating the interferomettic

components includes extracting AC-coupled signals from signals output from the

detectors.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the AC-coupled signals are extracted by:

removing at least one of DC components, source noise components, and

auto-correlation terms from the detector outputs prior to re-scaling.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the imaginary part of the complex

interferometric signal is computed based on a method derived from the cosine sum rule.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the cosine sum rule-derived method is

based on the following equation:

i... ⁼ sinfø, - φ_n) where I_n is the teal part of a first detector output, i_m is the real part of a second detector

output, φ_m — φ_n corresponds to a phase shift between the first and second detector

outputs, and β is a re-scaling parameter.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein scaling the interferometric components

includes adjusting φ_m — φ_n to equal a predetermined angle.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the predetermined angle is at least

substantially 90°.

14. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

calculating a magnitude and phase from the real and imaginary parts of the

complex interferometric signal.

15. The method of claim 14, further comprising:

calculating a Doppler shift value based on a time derivative of the

calculated phase.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein the Doppler shift value is calculated

based on the following equation: = f_d — — cos(#), where λ is optical dt λ

wavelength, v is reflector velocity, and θ is the Doppler angle.

17. The method of claim 17, further comprising: estimating reπ _CTector ve _Tloci •ty ₁ based i on — d phase

18. The method of claim I₅ wherein the number of NxN couplers is one.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein N > 3.

20. The method of claim 19, wherein the detector signals are at least partially

derived from outputs of the NxN coupler.

21. The method of claim 20, wherein scaling the interferometric components

includes:

adjusting the interferometric components output from the NxN coupler to

have predetermined phases, wherein the complex interferometric signal is derived from

the —phase-adjusted interferometric components.

22. The method of claim 21, wherein the interferometric components of the

NxN coupler are adjusted to have orthogonal phases.

23. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

generating a plurality of complex interferometric signals from scaled

interferometric components derived from different pairs of detectors in the

interferometer; and generating an average complex interferometric signal from said plurality of

complex interferometric signals.

24. The method of claim 1, wherein the interferometer includes a first coupler

connected to a second coupler by an optical fiber, and wherein the two detector signals

respectively correspond to different outputs of the first and second fiber-optic couplers.

25. The method of claim 23, wherein the first coupler is an NxN coupler and

the second coupler is an MxM coupler, where N Φ M.

26. The method of claim 23, wherein the fitst coupler is an NxN coupler and

the second coupler is an MxM coupler, where N = M.

27. The method of claim 1, wherein the interferometer includes an optical

ckculator connected to one of the fiber-optic couplers, and wherein the two detector

signals respectively correspond to outputs of the fiber-optic coupler and optical

circulator.

28. The method of claim 1, wherein separating the interferometric

components includes:

measuring DC levels of the detector outputs prior to re-scaling; and

subtracting the DC levels from the detector outputs respectively.

29. An analyzer, comprising:

an interferometer including at least one fiber-optic coupler;

a number of detectors that detect light from said at least one coupler; and

a processor which acquires interferometric components from signals

output from the detectors, scales the interferometric components, and generates real and

imaginary parts of a complex interferometric signal from the scaled interferometric

components.

30. The analyzer of claim 29, wherein the light from said at least one coupler

derives from a broadband light source coupled to the interferometer.

31. The analyzer of claim 29, wherein said at least one coupler is an NxN

coupler, where N ≥ 2.

32. The analyzer of claim 31 , wherein N > 3.

33. The analyzer of claim 29, wherein the interferometer includes at least a first

NxN coupler and a second MxM coupler, and wherein the detector signals are generated

from light output from the first and second couplers respectively.

34. The analyzer of claim 33, wherein N = M.

35. The analyzer of claim 34, wherein N ≠ M.

36. The analyzer of claim 29, wherein, during scaling, the processor phase

shifts the interferometric components of the detector signals to have a predetermined

phase difference.

37. The analyzer of claim 36, wherein the interferometric components are

shifted to have orthogonal phases.

38. The analyzer of claim 29, wherein the processor scales the interferometric

components to reduce optical losses.

39. The analyzer of claim 38, wherein the optical losses correspond to at least

one of optical path losses and variations in gain between different ones of the detectors.

40. The analyzer of claim 29, wherein the processor separates the

interferometric components of each of the detector signals from non-interferometric

components.

41. The analyzer of claim 40, wherein the processor separates the

interferometric components by performing high-pass or band-pass filtering of the

detector signals.

42. The analyzer of claim 40, wherein the processor separates the

interferometric components by extracting AC-coupled signals from the detector signals.

43. The analyzer of claim 42, wherein the processor extracts the AC-coupled

signals by removing at least one of DC components, source noise components, and auto¬

correlation terms from the detector outputs prior to re-scaling.

44. The analyzer of claim 29, wherein the processor computes the imaginary

part of the complex interferometric signal based on a cosine sum rule.

45. The analyzer of claim 44, wherein the cosine sum rule is based on the

following equation:

where i_n is the real part of a first detector output, i_m is the real part of a second detector

output, φ_m - φ_n corresponds to a phase shift between the first and second detector

outputs, and β is a re-scaling parameter.

46. The analyzer of claim 45, wherein the processor scales the interferometric

components by adjusting φ_m — φ_n to equal a predetermined angle.

47. The analyzer of claim 46, wherein the predetermined angle is at least

substantially 90°.

48. The analyze* of claim 29, wherein the processor calculates a magnitude and

phase from the real and imaginary parts of the complex interferometric signal.

49. The analyzer of claim 48, wherein the processor calculates a Doppler shift

value based on a time derivative of the calculated phase.

50. The analyzer of claim 49, wherein the Doppler shift value is calculated

_{I 1} i _{c I}i • • d phase , 2v . . . . . based on the following equation: = j_d = — , where λ is optical dt λ

wavelength, v is reflector velocity, and θ is the Doppler angle.

51. The analyzer of claim 29, wherein the processor generates a plurality of

complex interferometric signals from scaled interferometric components derived from

different pairs of the detectors, and generates an average complex interferometric signal

from said plurality of complex interferometric signals.

52. A method for performing optical coherence tomography, comprising:

generating a complex interferometric signal; and

instantaneously recovering Doppler shift information from the complex

interferometric signal.

53. The method of claim 52, wherein the recovering step includes: recovering, from the complex interferometric signal, a sign and magnitude

of a Doppler shift arising from moving scatterers in a sample scanned by light from the

interferometer.

54. The method of claim 52, wherein the generating step includes:

acquiring interferometric components from signals output from at least

one fiber-optic coupler located along an optical signal path of the interferometer;

scaling the interferometric components; and

generating real and imaginary parts of a complex interferometric signal

from the scaled interferometric components. ,

55. The method of claim 54, wherein the light from said at least one couplet-

derives from a broadband light source coupled to the interferometer.

56. The method of claim 54, wherein said at least one coupler is an NxN

coupler, where N > 2.

57. The method of claim 56, wherein N ≥ 3.

58. The method of claim 52, wherein the interferometer includes at least a first

NxN coupler and a second MxM coupler, and wherein the detector signals are generated

from light output from the first and second couplers respectively.

59. The method of claim 58, wherein N ≠ M.

60. The method of claim 54, wherein the generating step includes:

generating the imaginary part of the complex interferometric signal based

on a cosine sum rule.

61. The method of claim 60, wherein the cosine sum rule is based on the

following equation:

^lm = sin(^ - φ_n)

where in is the real part of a first detector output, i_m is the real part of a second detector

output, φ_m - φ_n corresponds to a phase shift between the first and second detector

outputs, and β is a re-scaling parameter.

62. The method of claim 61, wherein the first and second detectors detect light

along different optical signal paths of the NxN coupler.

63. The method of claim 61, wherein the processor scales the interferometric

components by adjusting φ_m — φ_n to equal a predetermined angle.

64. The method of claim 63, wherein the predetermined angle is at least

substantially 90°. 4 016744

65. The method of claim 52, further comprising: calculating a magnitude and phase from the real and imaginary parts of the complex interferometric signal.

66. The method of claim 65, wherein the recovering step includes obtaining a

Doppler shift value based on a time derivative of the calculated phase.

67. The method of claim 65, wherein the Doppler shift value is calculated

i _{T r n} • d phase 2v . . , based on the following equation: — = j_d - — , where λ is optical at λ

wavelength, v is reflector velocity, and θ is the Doppler angle.