WO2003029844A9 - Remote data access - Google Patents
Remote data accessInfo
- Publication number
- WO2003029844A9 WO2003029844A9 PCT/US2002/031146 US0231146W WO03029844A9 WO 2003029844 A9 WO2003029844 A9 WO 2003029844A9 US 0231146 W US0231146 W US 0231146W WO 03029844 A9 WO03029844 A9 WO 03029844A9
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- data
- remote
- under inspection
- item under
- station
- Prior art date
Links
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 90
- 238000013480 data collection Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 63
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 claims description 64
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 18
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 abstract description 10
- 239000002360 explosive Substances 0.000 abstract description 7
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 12
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000002591 computed tomography Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000007405 data analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006835 compression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940079593 drug Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002595 magnetic resonance imaging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G01V5/271—
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a system and method for remotely transmitting X- ray data over a communication channel to enable remote access to, and analysis of, that data.
- One application for the invention is in the field of baggage screening.
- a number of conventional systems for screening baggage at airports are in use, including X-ray scanners, computed tomography (CT) scanners, and the like. Some of the systems are largely automated, and include computing equipment and that implements threat detection software. Some of these and other such systems are multilevel screening systems which may involve human operation in at least some levels of the screening process. An operator views a reconstructed image of an item under inspection on a monitor or view-screen, and makes decisions regarding, for example, whether the item may present a threat, and/or should be subjected to more detailed screening.
- CT computed tomography
- a method for remotely analyzing an item under inspection comprises acts of collecting data about an item under inspection at a data collection location, transmitting the data to a remote location via a communication channel, analyzing the data at the remote location to determine a presence of a suspect object and provide a screening result, and transmitting the screening result to the data collection location.
- the method may further include establishing a telephone, or other voice and/or data, link between the data collection location and the remote location.
- a remote screening system comprises a data collection station that scans an item under inspection to obtain data about the item under inspection, a remote expert station adapted to analyze the data about the item under inspection to provide a screening result for the item under inspection, and a communication channel that couples the data collection station to the remote expert station, wherein the data about the item under inspection is transmitted between the data collection station and the remote expert station via the communication channel.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of an example of a multilevel screening system
- FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of one example of a remote data access system according to aspects of the invention.
- FIG. 3 is a flow diagram illustrating aspects of one example of a method of remote data access, according to one embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating aspects of an example of remote data access, according to an embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 5 is a schematic block diagram of another example of a screening system, according to aspects of the invention.
- the present invention provides a system and methods for remote screening of objects that enables a remote expert, which may be a human operator, a machine or a combination thereof, to access and analyze data collected at another location and make screening decisions regarding the objects. It is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. Other embodiments and manners of carrying out the invention are possible. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of "including,” “comprising,” or “having” and variations thereof is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items. In addition, it is to be appreciated that the term
- communication channel refers to any now known or later developed channel for transmission of data, such as, but not limited to a telephone line, the Internet, a wireless channel, a local or wide area network link, an intranet, a dedicated link, and the like.
- FIG. 1 there is illustrated one embodiment of a multilevel screening system, located for example, at an airport.
- items of baggage 100 may be transported along a conveyor 102 and may be examined by one or more baggage inspection stations 104, 106.
- the system includes two levels of screening : a level one inspection station 104, and a level two inspection station 106. Items of baggage 100 that are not cleared by the level one station 104 may be transported to the level two inspection station 106 for further examination.
- the system is not limited to two levels of screening, as shown, but may include only one level of screening or more than two levels of screening, as desired.
- an inspection station such as the level one or level two inspection stations 104, 106 illustrated in FIG. 1, may include an inspection machine 108 and an operator station 110, coupled to the inspection machine 108, that may be used to scan and screen an item under inspection.
- the item under inspection may be, for example, an item of baggage 100, or may be located within an item of baggage 100.
- the inspection machine may include, for example, a single-energy X-ray scanner, a dual- energy X-ray scanner, a CT scanner, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner, a nuclear quadrapole resonance (NQR) scanner, any nuclear-based imaging scanner or gamma scanning system, or a combination of such scanners.
- MRI magnetic resonance imaging
- NQR nuclear quadrapole resonance
- a data collection station 200 may include an X-ray scanner 202, that may scan an item under inspection and obtain X-ray data about the item.
- the item may be placed on a conveyor belt 201 that may transport the item through the X-ray scanner.
- the data collection station may be, for example, either of the level one or level two inspection stations illustrated in FIG. 1.
- the X-ray data may be passed to an operator interface 204, coupled to the X-ray scanner, which may display an X-ray image of the item under inspection, reconstructed from the X-ray data.
- An operator may examine the X-ray image and make a screening decision regarding the item under inspection, hi some cases, the operator may decide that the item warrants further or more detailed inspection, and the item and X-ray data obtained about the item may be passed to, for example, a level two or level three inspection station.
- the inspection stations such as inspection stations 104, 106 (see FIG. 1) are connected in a closed, local area network. Data obtained by the level one inspection station 104 about an item of baggage 100 is sent only to the level two inspection station 106, and may be passed from the level two inspection station 106 to a level three inspection station if the system includes one.
- the X-ray data obtained about the item under inspection at the data collection station 200 may be transferred not only to a higher level inspection station, but to any number of remote locations, as is discussed in more detail below.
- the X-ray data obtained about the item under inspection may be transferred across a communication channel 206 from the data collection station 200 to a remote server 208 which may in turn transfer the X-ray data to any one or more remote expert stations 210.
- the communication channel 206 may comprise any of a telephone line, the Internet, a wireless channel, a local or wide area network link, an intranet, a dedicated link, etc. that may be used to transfer data to a remote location. It is to be understood that the term "remote" as used herein refers to a location that is not on the same premises as the local item.
- a "remote" expert may be an expert located in a different city, at a location in the same city that is not the airport where the data collection station is located, or another terminal of the airport, etc. It is also to be appreciated that the system need not include a server 208 and that the data collection station 200 may transfer the X-ray data directly to a remote expert station 210, as is discussed in more detail below.
- each of the data collection station 200 and remote expert stations 210 may include computing equipment and operator interfaces that may operate according to known principles.
- an operator at any station may "log on” to the system and access data and software using conventional computing operator interfaces known to those of skill in the art.
- step 300 an operator may log on to a data collection station. This may occur at the beginning of an operator's shift, or when the data collection station begins operation on a particular day or at a particular time. It is to be appreciated that where the data collection station is automated and does not require the presence of a human operator, step 300 may represent the turning on of the X-ray scanner and/or associated computing system.
- step 302 the X-ray scanner at the data collection station may scan the item under inspection and collect X-ray data about the item under inspection.
- the X-ray scanner may scan the entire item, for example, an entire item of baggage, hi another example, the X-ray scanner may scan a portion of the item, such as, for example, a previously identified suspect region within the item under inspection.
- the X-ray scanner may transfer the X-ray data to an operator interface where the operator may view an X-ray image of the item under inspection.
- the operator interface may include computer equipment that may be adapted to run threat detection software.
- the displayed X-ray image may include indications of potential threats that may have been detected by the software.
- the image may include a threat polygon, or a highlighted region that may correspond to a potential threat located within the item under inspection.
- the operator may decide to transmit the X-ray data to a remote expert station, as indicated by step 304. If, on the other hand, the operator decides that the item under inspection does not need to be examined by an expert, the item may be passed along to either a higher level inspection station or to a loading area, and the operator may allow a next item to be scanned by the X-ray scanner.
- a threat such as, for example, an explosive material or other contraband item
- the operator may decide to transmit the X-ray data to a remote expert station, as indicated by step 304. If, on the other hand, the operator decides that the item under inspection does not need to be examined by an expert, the item may be passed along to either a higher level inspection station or to a loading area, and the operator may allow a next item to be scanned by the X-ray scanner.
- the data collection station may not be operated by a human operator, and instead may include a computer processor and threat detection software that may automatically analyze the X- ray data obtained by the X-ray scanner and automatically decide whether or not to transfer the X-ray data to the remote expert station based upon, for example, particular threat detection algorithms.
- the operator may transmit the X-ray data to the remote expert station via a communication channel, as illustrated in FIG. 2, and indicated by steps 306-312.
- a communication channel as illustrated in FIG. 2, and indicated by steps 306-312.
- the operator may establish a link between the data collection station 200 and the remote expert station 210.
- this step may involve initiating a dial-up connection, for example, where the communication channel may be a telephone line or Internet connection.
- this step may involve selecting a "send" option presented in the user interface software.
- the user interface software may inform the operator of connection failure (step 310) by, for example, displaying a connection error message or symbol, and the operator may take appropriate action. If the connection is successfully established (step 308), the X-ray data may be transferred to the remote expert station, as indicated in step 312.
- the X-ray data may be transmitted in step 312 using any conventional data transfer software and/or protocol.
- the X-ray data may be transmitted in digital or analog form, in mixed signal form, as compressed data (which may have been compressed using any compression algorithm or technique known to those skilled in the art), or in another form.
- the X-ray data transmitted may be raw X-ray data, or may be processed data, having been processed by software running on the data collection station operator interface, hi addition, the transmitted data may include identification data in addition to the X-ray data so as to link or identify the X-ray data with a particular item under inspection.
- the identification data may include data such as, but not limited to, data associated with a digital photograph of a passenger or person to whom the item under inspection belongs, flight information (such as flight number, airline, point of origin or destination), a passport number, a bar code of a ticket of the passenger, or other data regarding the item or the person to whom the item belongs.
- flight information such as flight number, airline, point of origin or destination
- passport number such as flight number, airline, point of origin or destination
- bar code of a ticket of the passenger such as bar code of a ticket of the passenger, or other data regarding the item or the person to whom the item belongs.
- This identification data may be used by the remote expert during analysis of the X-ray data, as is discussed in more detail below.
- the data may be encrypted using an encryption algorithm as known to those skilled in the art, and/or may be transmitted using a secure transfer protocol, such as, for example, secure socket layer (SSL) protocol or secure hypertext transfer protocol (HTTPS) or another secure transfer protocol known to those of skill in the art.
- SSL secure socket layer
- HTTPS secure hypertext transfer protocol
- the operator at the data collection station may email the X-ray and identification data to the remote expert station.
- the system and methods disclosed herein allow for an operator at the data collection station to "push" the data to a remote expert station, i.e., the operator initiates transfer of the data when deemed necessary or desirable.
- the system may include a plurality of remote expert stations, each of which may be co-located or disposed at different locations.
- the operator at the data collection station 200 may select to which remote expert station to fransmit the X-ray data based on, for example, the type of threat suspected to be present within the item under inspection.
- one remote expert may be particularly qualified to analyze X-ray data from an item under inspection that potentially contains an explosive, whereas another remote expert may be particularly qualified to examine data from an item that may contain agricultural contraband. If either the operator or computing equipment present at the data collection station is capable of making an initial determination about the type of threat potentially present in a suspect item, then the remote expert may be selected on this basis, hi another embodiment, the system may include a server 208, as illustrated. All X-ray data may be transmitted from the data collection station 200 to the server 208, which may pass the X-ray data on to a selected remote expert station 210 based on criteria such as, for example, availability of the remote experts, the amount of data traffic present on any given link 212 to a particular remote expert station, etc.
- the operator may wait for instructions from the remote expert regarding handling of the item under inspection, as illustrated by step 314. During this waiting period, the suspect item under inspection may be removed from the conveyor and stored so that other items may be scanned in the meantime.
- FIG. 4 there is illustrated a flow diagram of one example of a method of remote data analysis occurring at the remote expert station, hi a first step 400, an operator may log on to a remote expert station, and/or computing equipment located at the remote expert station may be powered on. This step may represent the beginning of an operator's shift at the remote expert station, or the beginning of the day, etc.
- the remote expert station waits for an operator at the data collection station to initiate a data transfer and send the X-ray data and associated identification data.
- the remote expert may access the transmitted data through any protocol known to those of skill in art, such as, but not limited to, email, an Internet web page, an intranet, and the like.
- the remote expert may be required to enter a password to access any new data, or to access encrypted data.
- a password may only be required at the log on step 400.
- the system includes a server
- the server may store X-ray and identification data collected about items under inspection at the data collection station.
- the remote expert station becomes operational (step 400)
- the remote expert may access the server and retrieve stored data for analysis.
- the term "remote expert” as used herein may refer to a trained human operator, who may have a higher level of skill or more expertise than an operator at the data collection station.
- the term may also refer to a computing system that may include sophisticated threat detection software adapted to analyze the X-ray data and produce, for example, a clearing decision (i.e., threat or no threat detected) or a threat polygon, etc., that may then be transmitted back to the operator at the data collection station.
- the remote expert may be a human operator that may work in conjunction with threat detection software running on the computing equipment at the remote expert station, and in other embodiments a human operator may not be present at the remote expert station.
- the remote expert may analyze received X-ray data for potential threat items, such as, for example, explosives or other contraband.
- the transmitted data may include raw X-ray data, in which case computing equipment at the remote expert station may perform data processing to provide an X-ray image of the item under inspection for analysis by the remote expert.
- the computing equipment may further include advanced image and/or data processing software with which the remote expert may manipulate the X-ray data and/or image in order to determine whether or not a threat is present in the item under inspection.
- the remote expert may run tailored threat detection algorithms on the X-ray data, depending on information contained in the identification data. For example, the threat detection algorithm may be chosen based on a point of origin of the passenger associated with the item under inspection.
- the remote expert may run a variety of threat detection algorithms on the X-ray data, as shown by steps 408, 412 and 414, using multiple algorithms to attempt to locate or identify a suspicious region or material in the item under inspection (represented by the X-ray data).
- the remote expert may inform the operator at the data collection station of the result.
- the data (X-ray and identification) may be re-transmitted back to the data collection station, along with the remote expert's screening results.
- the remote expert may initiate a voice and/or video link with the operator at the data collection station.
- the remote expert may engage in dialog with the operator at the data collection station, and may, for example, request that the item under inspection be re-scanned, or scanned from a different angle, etc., to assist the remote expert in analyzing the item.
- the remote expert may further provide the operator at the data collection station with instructions regarding handling of the item under inspection. For example, the remote expert may indicate that the item does not contain a threat and may be passed along to its destination. Alternatively, the remote expert may suggest that the operator contact other security officials, such as the police.
- the remote expert may discuss with and instruct the operator at the data collection station regarding how to repair faulty equipment or components. It is to be understood that a voice connection between the remote expert and the operator may be established through the system (e.g., using the computing equipment at the stations) or using conventional land or wireless telephone lines that may not be otherwise associated with the screening system.
- the remote expert informs the operator at the data collection station that a threat was detected (step 316)
- the operator may respond appropriately (step 318) as discussed above. If no threat was detected, the operator may allow the item to continue on to either another inspection station or a loading point, and may continue to scan and screen other items.
- remote analysis of the X-ray data collected about an item under inspection may occur in "real time," i.e., as quickly as possible while the operator awaits instructions regarding the item.
- the remote screening may thus occur prior to a passenger being allowed to board a flight with the item under inspection. This is most likely the case where the screening is for the purpose of detecting explosives or other dangerous articles.
- remote screening for example, for agricultural contraband or drugs, may be implements according to the methods described while the flight is in progress, and screening results may be transmitted to a destination point of the flight.
- the data collection station 200 may be any of a level one, level two or level three inspection station in a multilevel screening system.
- the data collection station may be a level one inspection station, and the remote expert station may be considered to be a level two inspection station, hi this example, an operator at the data collection station may transmit to the remote expert station X-ray data corresponding to only suspect items, hi another example, where the data collection station may already be a level two or level three inspection station, X-ray data corresponding to all items under inspection may be transmitted to the remote expert for analysis, even if an operator at the data collection station does not detect a potential threat in an item under inspection. It is to be appreciated that the collected X-ray data may or may not be analyzed at the data collection station prior to transmission of the data to the remote expert station.
- each data collection station 500 may X-ray scan an object (item under inspection) and may have automated, first-level screening capabilities.
- each may have a human operator who performs second level screening through viewing and/or manipulating a reconstructed image of scanned items on an operator interface.
- X-ray data of suspect items may be transmitted over a local network 502 to a local server 504 and local workstation 506, where Level 3 screening may be performed.
- the screening may include automated detection software and/or a human expert who views and manipulates a reconstructed image of the object on the workstation operator interface, as discussed above.
- a fourth level of even more expert screening located remotely from the data collection stations 500 and local server 504, may be performed by transmitting X-ray data, and/or possibly additional passenger information, over a communications channel 508 to a remote server 510, as discussed above in reference to FIG. 2.
- Remote expert stations 210 may gain access to the transmitted information, via the remote server 510, and remote experts may analyze the X-ray data, as discussed in reference to FIG. 2.
- each level of screening may eliminate certain inspected items as "cleared," i.e., containing no potential threats, and send only suspect items on for further screening, such that fewer and fewer items are analyzed by each higher level of screening.
- any number of levels of screening, whether remote or local, can be supported by such a system, according to the present invention.
- the number of levels, and arrangement and locations of local and remote screening stations may be arranged to suit a particular application or organization of an airport or airline, or the like.
- the occurrence of suspect items transmitted to a next higher level may be tracked via an electronic or automated system that may alert an expert at a next higher level when a certain frequency of suspect items have been noted in a single airport, in geographically related airports, on particular flight patterns, or in any type of pattern that may pose some kind of possible threat.
- experts at different locations may be able to collaborate.
- two human experts, located at different locations may be able to view the same reconstructed image of a scanned object where one of the operators, e.g., the remote operator, is manipulating the image.
- Additional collaborative tools may include text, voice, video, white board drawings, etc. that may be able to be shared through the communications channel, or over separate voice and/or video link's as described above, between remotely located operators.
- the present invention thus allows for remote, specialized analysis of data collected about an item under inspection, even if sophisticated data analysis, threat detection or image processing algorithms are not available at the data collection site.
- remote experts may be networked, and X-ray data may sent to any currently available expert, regardless of their location.
- the system may also be used to transit "training data," i.e., data that may have been artificially generated or stored from previous screenings, that may be used to train operators, experts and algorithms in detecting threat articles.
- a data collection station may include a scanner other than an X-ray scanner, such as, for example, a CT scanner, and may transfer data other than X-ray data to the remote expert station, for example, CT data.
- a scanner other than an X-ray scanner such as, for example, a CT scanner
- CT data may transfer data other than X-ray data to the remote expert station, for example, CT data.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP02800397A EP1440333A2 (en) | 2001-10-01 | 2002-10-01 | Remote data access |
CA002462523A CA2462523A1 (en) | 2001-10-01 | 2002-10-01 | Remote data access |
IL16120502A IL161205A0 (en) | 2001-10-01 | 2002-10-01 | Remote data access |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US32640601P | 2001-10-01 | 2001-10-01 | |
US60/326,406 | 2001-10-01 |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2003029844A2 WO2003029844A2 (en) | 2003-04-10 |
WO2003029844A3 WO2003029844A3 (en) | 2003-10-30 |
WO2003029844A9 true WO2003029844A9 (en) | 2004-07-08 |
Family
ID=23272056
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2002/031146 WO2003029844A2 (en) | 2001-10-01 | 2002-10-01 | Remote data access |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1440333A2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2462523A1 (en) |
IL (1) | IL161205A0 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2003029844A2 (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8837669B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2014-09-16 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray scanning system |
US8885794B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2014-11-11 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray tomographic inspection system for the identification of specific target items |
US9113839B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2015-08-25 | Rapiscon Systems, Inc. | X-ray inspection system and method |
Families Citing this family (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP4538321B2 (en) | 2002-10-02 | 2010-09-08 | リビール イメージング テクノロジーズ, インコーポレイテッド | Folded array CT luggage scanner |
US7224765B2 (en) | 2002-10-02 | 2007-05-29 | Reveal Imaging Technologies, Inc. | Computed tomography system |
US7046761B2 (en) | 2003-01-23 | 2006-05-16 | Reveal Imaging Technologies, Inc. | System and method for CT scanning of baggage |
US7116751B2 (en) | 2003-04-02 | 2006-10-03 | Reveal Imaging Technologies, Inc. | System and method for resolving threats in automated explosives detection in baggage and other parcels |
US7949101B2 (en) | 2005-12-16 | 2011-05-24 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray scanners and X-ray sources therefor |
US8243876B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2012-08-14 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray scanners |
US8223919B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2012-07-17 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray tomographic inspection systems for the identification of specific target items |
GB0525593D0 (en) | 2005-12-16 | 2006-01-25 | Cxr Ltd | X-ray tomography inspection systems |
US7889835B2 (en) | 2003-08-07 | 2011-02-15 | Morpho Detection, Inc. | System and method for detecting an object by dynamically adjusting computational load |
US7039154B1 (en) | 2003-10-02 | 2006-05-02 | Reveal Imaging Technologies, Inc. | Folded array CT baggage scanner |
US7366281B2 (en) * | 2003-11-12 | 2008-04-29 | Ge Invision Inc. | System and method for detecting contraband |
CN100416300C (en) * | 2003-11-12 | 2008-09-03 | Ge本国防护股份有限公司 | System and method for detecting contraband |
EP1719000A2 (en) | 2004-02-11 | 2006-11-08 | Reveal Imaging Technologies, Inc. | Contraband detection systems and methods |
EP1782102B1 (en) | 2004-08-09 | 2013-10-09 | Nauchno-Proizvodstvennoe Chastnoe Unitarnoe Predpriyatie ADANI | A security entrance system |
ITMI20042086A1 (en) * | 2004-11-02 | 2005-02-02 | Gilardoni Spa | VERSATILE DEVICE FOR THE EXECUTION OF SAFETY CHECKS BY means of X-RAYS |
US7684421B2 (en) | 2005-06-09 | 2010-03-23 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Information routing in a distributed environment |
WO2011130845A1 (en) * | 2010-04-21 | 2011-10-27 | Optosecurity Inc. | Method and system for use in performing security screening |
CN112444889A (en) * | 2020-11-13 | 2021-03-05 | 北京航星机器制造有限公司 | Rapid security inspection luggage remote centralized interpretation system and method |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5367552A (en) * | 1991-10-03 | 1994-11-22 | In Vision Technologies, Inc. | Automatic concealed object detection system having a pre-scan stage |
US5608774A (en) * | 1995-06-23 | 1997-03-04 | Science Applications International Corporation | Portable, digital X-ray apparatus for producing, storing, and displaying electronic radioscopic images |
US5642393A (en) * | 1995-09-26 | 1997-06-24 | Vivid Technologies, Inc. | Detecting contraband by employing interactive multiprobe tomography |
AU2002303207B2 (en) * | 2001-04-03 | 2009-01-22 | L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems, Inc. | A remote baggage screening system, software and method |
-
2002
- 2002-10-01 WO PCT/US2002/031146 patent/WO2003029844A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2002-10-01 EP EP02800397A patent/EP1440333A2/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2002-10-01 IL IL16120502A patent/IL161205A0/en unknown
- 2002-10-01 CA CA002462523A patent/CA2462523A1/en not_active Abandoned
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8837669B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2014-09-16 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray scanning system |
US8885794B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2014-11-11 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray tomographic inspection system for the identification of specific target items |
US9113839B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2015-08-25 | Rapiscon Systems, Inc. | X-ray inspection system and method |
US9442082B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2016-09-13 | Rapiscan Systems, Inc. | X-ray inspection system and method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CA2462523A1 (en) | 2003-04-10 |
WO2003029844A3 (en) | 2003-10-30 |
IL161205A0 (en) | 2004-08-31 |
WO2003029844A2 (en) | 2003-04-10 |
EP1440333A2 (en) | 2004-07-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20030085163A1 (en) | Remote data access | |
US20060274916A1 (en) | Remote data access | |
US20060115109A1 (en) | Ensuring airline safety while safeguarding personal passenger information | |
US8031903B2 (en) | Networked security system | |
WO2003029844A9 (en) | Remote data access | |
US7139406B2 (en) | Remote baggage screening system, software and method | |
US7193515B1 (en) | System and method for centralized security screening | |
US20070168467A1 (en) | Method and system for providing remote access to baggage scanned images | |
EP2561340B1 (en) | Method and system for use in performing security screening | |
EP2753920B1 (en) | X-ray inspection system that integrates manifest data with imaging/detection processing | |
US7046761B2 (en) | System and method for CT scanning of baggage | |
US20070115123A1 (en) | System and method for associating baggage with a passenger | |
US20070235652A1 (en) | Weapon detection processing | |
US20080106405A1 (en) | Passenger and item tracking with system alerts | |
WO2007103216A2 (en) | Method and system for electronic unpacking of baggage and cargo | |
US9922386B2 (en) | Systems and methods for facilitating remote security threat detection | |
AU2002362398A1 (en) | Remote data access |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MN MW MX MZ NO NZ OM PH PL PT RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TN TR TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC PT SE SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 161205 Country of ref document: IL Ref document number: 2462523 Country of ref document: CA |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2002362398 Country of ref document: AU |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2002800397 Country of ref document: EP |
|
COP | Corrected version of pamphlet |
Free format text: PAGES 1/5-5/5, DRAWINGS, REPLACED BY NEW PAGES 1/5-5/5 |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 2002800397 Country of ref document: EP |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: JP |
|
WWW | Wipo information: withdrawn in national office |
Ref document number: JP |