WO1999006952A1 - Texture mapping in 3-d computer graphics - Google Patents

Texture mapping in 3-d computer graphics Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1999006952A1
WO1999006952A1 PCT/US1998/010763 US9810763W WO9906952A1 WO 1999006952 A1 WO1999006952 A1 WO 1999006952A1 US 9810763 W US9810763 W US 9810763W WO 9906952 A1 WO9906952 A1 WO 9906952A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
image
source image
filter
destination
reconstruction filter
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1998/010763
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO1999006952A8 (en
Inventor
Garth A. Dickie
Original Assignee
Avid Technology, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Avid Technology, Inc. filed Critical Avid Technology, Inc.
Priority to CA002297916A priority Critical patent/CA2297916C/en
Priority to JP2000505604A priority patent/JP2001512265A/en
Priority to AU76974/98A priority patent/AU7697498A/en
Priority to DE69816824T priority patent/DE69816824T2/en
Priority to EP98924914A priority patent/EP0998727B1/en
Publication of WO1999006952A1 publication Critical patent/WO1999006952A1/en
Publication of WO1999006952A8 publication Critical patent/WO1999006952A8/en

Links

Classifications

    • G06T3/18
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T15/003D [Three Dimensional] image rendering
    • G06T15/04Texture mapping

Definitions

  • the invention relates to graphics editing, and more particularly to determining a pixel value in an image produced by a special effect which includes a function that performs non- uniform scaling or arbitrary distortion of a source image function.
  • an image displayed on a two-dimensional display screen is generated by transforming another image, called a source image.
  • the source image may be texture mapped to a three-dimensional object which is projected onto a two-dimensional plane defined by the display.
  • Another application includes special effects in motion video or animation in which a source image is deformed to create a desired image.
  • the source image can be represented by a rectangular grid of samples of a continuous
  • Each sample is the value of the continuous function at a given sample point or pixel, with each pixel representing a point of the image, including the color of the image at that point.
  • An ideal procedure for scaling the image i.e., an image represented as discrete pixel locations along fixed scan lines in a rectangular array of scan lines, involves reconstructing the original continuous function of the source image from the sampled data and then deforming the continuous image.
  • a low pass filter is applied to eliminate frequencies in the destination image above a Nyquist frequency. The Nyquist frequency determines the lowest sampling rate possible to preserve details in the image and is equal to twice the frequency of the highest frequency component in a source signal.
  • the low pass filter is used since any frequency component that is higher than half the sampling rate will be sampled incorrectly and will be aliased to a lower frequency.
  • sampling is performed on the continuous function of the deformed image using a different sampling resolution to produce a destination image.
  • the sine function f(x,y) [sin( ⁇ x)sin( ⁇ y)]/ ⁇ 2 x, is ideal for reconstructing a two-dimensional image. Sampling would determine the color value of each point in the destination to create the final destination image.
  • the entire process of reconstructing, deforming, filtering and sampling is known as resampling.
  • the ideal process as outlined above is impractical, primarily because an ideal reconstruction filter cannot be implemented practically.
  • One way to simulate the ideal process includes applying a transformation to regularly spaced pixels from a source image and then applying a low pass filter to the transformed image.
  • the transformed image may no longer include regularly spaced points and applying a low pass filter to the irregularly spaced points is difficult to perform.
  • scaling down may be performed using mip-mapping techniques.
  • mip-mapping although a standard shape of a square is used in filtering, the area of the filter may vary.
  • a source image is successively averaged down to a lower resolution. Each image is half the resolution of the previous image, i.e., half the linear dimension and a quarter the number of samples of its previous image.
  • Using bilinear inte ⁇ olation an intensity is determined for values of each pixel as it is scaled down. Linear interpolation between levels of filtering further smooths the values.
  • mip-mapping may produce undesired artifacts.
  • Standard box filtering may also be used for mapping an image.
  • a rectangular box corresponding to the approximate shape of the destination pixel may be used to compute a filtered pattern value for the pixel by summing all of the values in the source image included in the rectangle.
  • Each destination pixel has a value that is a weighted average of an area of source pixels. However, if the transformed pixel is not approximately an aligned rectangle, then undesired artifacts may result in the destination image.
  • the problem of undesired artifacts may be particularly troublesome when an image is non-uniformly scaled, i.e., is subject to an arbitrary deformation. These artifacts arise particularly when applying special effects to an image which involves altering at least one portion of the image differently from other portions of the image.
  • Two examples of a non- uniform special effect scaling include sphere and ripple.
  • the resulting image includes a ripple pattern, such as one resulting from throwing a stone in a lake. Applying the sphere effect creates an enlarged lateral portion of a sphere, i.e., a "bulge", while maintaining the surrounding image in the sphere.
  • the present invention approximates an ideal resampling process by using a reconstruction filter which has been modified by a linear transformation.
  • the modified reconstruction filter is applied in the source image in order to determine values for pixels in the destination image.
  • artifacts caused by resampling a filtered source image are reduced.
  • One aspect of the present invention is a process for obtaining a pixel value in a destination image produced by non-uniform scaling.
  • a reconstruction filter is chosen and a unit circle centered on a pixel in a destination image is determined.
  • An affine transformation function determined by the non-uniform scaling is performed on the unit circle to define at least two orthogonal axes in a source image.
  • a linear transformation between a unit circle in the source image space and the orthogonal axes is determined.
  • the linear transformation is then applied to the reconstruction filter.
  • the pixels from the source image space which are included in the modified reconstruction filter are then identified.
  • a value for a pixel in a destination image is determined from the pixels included in the support of the selected reconstruction filter.
  • Fig. 1 is a block diagram of a system for processing non-uniform scaling of images in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
  • Fig. 2 is a block diagram of a general pu ⁇ ose computer suitable for an embodiment of the invention
  • Fig. 3 is a functional diagram of the process of an embodiment of the present invention
  • Fig. 4 is a flowchart of the process of an embodiment of the present invention
  • Fig. 5 is a block diagram of a system for processing non-uniform scaling of images in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the present invention approximates an ideal resampling process by using a reconstruction filter which has been modified by a linear transformation.
  • the modified reconstruction filter is applied in the source image in order to determine values for pixels in the destination image.
  • artifacts caused by resampling a filtered source image are reduced.
  • Special effect tools module 125 creates an effect which includes non-uniform scaling. Various tools may be used to define such effects.
  • the effect data 130 may be stored for future use, or may be sent to filter modifier 105.
  • Filter modifier 105 receives a selected filter 120, a selected pixel 115 in a destination image, and data 130 indicating the effect to be applied to a source image 110.
  • the filter modifier 105 modifies the selected filter 120 according to a relationship, defined by the effect 130, between the selected pixel 115 and a point in the source image 110 to create a transformed filter 135.
  • the filter application module 140 applies the modified filter 135 to the source image 110 to obtain a pixel value 145 in the destination image.
  • the pixel value 145 is outputted to a rendering device 150 to display the destination image.
  • the present invention may be implementing using a general pu ⁇ ose computer that is programmed to generate, with reduced artifacts, a destination image by non-uniformly scaling a source image.
  • An example computer system is shown in Fig. 2.
  • the apparatus as shown in Fig. 2 includes a general pu ⁇ ose computer 20 having a processor 22, an input device 24, an output device 26, and memory 28 connected together through a computer bus 30.
  • the memory 28 includes primary memory 32 (i.e., fast volatile memory such as dynamic semiconductor memory) and secondary memory 34 (i.e., nonvolatile memory such as magnetic disks).
  • the memory 28 stores one or more programs 36 that, when executed by the processor 22, effect a transformation from a source image to a destination image.
  • the input device 24 receives commands from a graphics editor, and the output device 26 displays results of the transformed image to the graphics editor. The results of the transformed image can be stored in memory 28 for future use.
  • Example output devices 26 include various imaging devices including a cathode ray tube (CRT) display, a liquid crystal display (LCD), printers, and communication devices such as a modem.
  • One or more input devices 24 may be connected to the computer system.
  • Example input devices include a keyboard, keypad, track ball, mouse, pen and tablet, communication device and scanner. It should be understood the invention is not limited to the particular input or output devices used in combination with the computer system 20 or to those described herein. Also, the invention is not limited to a particular computer platform, particular processor or particular high-level programming language. Additionally, the computer system 20 may be a multiprocessor computer system or may include multiple computers connected over a computer network. Referring now to Fig.
  • Non-uniform scaling may include any deformation of the source image.
  • Such scaling may be used for enhancing graphics either in still pictures, e.g., a high quality poster, or in motion videos, e.g., video games, movies, etc., and may include two-dimensional or three-dimensional special effects.
  • Three-dimensional effects may include arbitrary deformation of a source image by mapping a two-dimensional source image into another two-dimensional image. In particular, this may include arbitrary deformation by mapping onto a three-dimensional surface followed by orthographic or perspective projection.
  • the two-dimensional special effects to be applied using non-uniform scaling of an image may include sphere, ripple, twirl, page turn, wa ⁇ , tumble, flag wave or pinch effects, or any deformation determined by a function from one plane to another plane.
  • both destination image 205 and source image 210 may be considered as a set of samples, called points or pixels, in a two-dimensional plane, where each sample has coordinates in the plane and a value indicative of its color. It should be understood that the invention also applies to black and white images.
  • the destination image 205 and source image 210 may have an arbitrary shape and size.
  • a point 225 in the source image 210 may contribute to the value of a point, e.g., 215 or 230, in the destination image 205, according to the deformation to be applied to the source image 210.
  • an affine transformation can be defined that maps a point 230 in the destination image 205 to a point 225 in the source image 210.
  • this affine transformation maps a unit circle 235 centered about point 230 in the destination image to an ellipse 260 in the source image 210.
  • the length and direction of the orthogonal axes of the ellipse 260 may be determined using this affine transformation. When the length of one of the axes is greater than two units, the deformation to be applied to the source implies low pass filtering should occur in the direction of that axis.
  • a unit is the distance between two adjacent pixels in the source image 210.
  • a linear transformation is determined which maps a unit circle 240 concentric with the ellipse 220 into the ellipse 220.
  • a desired reconstruction filter 245, e.g., a bilinear or bicubic filter, also concentric with the unit circle 240 is modified according to this linear transformation.
  • This modified reconstruction filter is represented at 250. Pixels 255 of the source image 210 that fall within the modified reconstruction filter 250 are used to determine a pixel value for point 230 in destination image 205.
  • This process starts in step 305 with selection of a special effect involving non-uniform scaling or arbitrary deformation of an image, which may be input to computer 20 (Fig. 2).
  • the special effect may be a two-dimensional or three- dimensional effect, such as described above, which is used to transform a source image 210 into a destination image 205.
  • Predetermined special effects may be stored in memory 28 ( Fig. 2) and may be selected according to user input into computer 20 (Fig. 2).
  • Example arbitrary deformation functions include mapping a two-dimensional source image to a three-dimensional surface, such as in texture mapping, and then projecting the surface as a two-dimensional destination image.
  • Another kind of arbitrary deformation function is an inverse perspective transformation into three-dimensional space followed by a mapping back into two-dimensional space. Other functions which scale an image non-uniformly also may be used.
  • a reconstruction filter is chosen in step 310.
  • the filter may be selected from predetermined functions stored in memory 28, which also may have user selectable parameters.
  • Example reconstruction filters include bilinear filters, bicubic filters and box filters. In the example shown in Fig. 3, the reconstruction filter is a bilinear filter.
  • a value for a pixel in the destination image 205 is then determined through steps 315 through 350 which will now be described.
  • a point 230 in the destination image 205 is selected.
  • the point may be the center of a pixel in the destination image, or may be an arbitrary point in the destination image space which is in turn used to compute the value of a particular pixel.
  • the coordinates of the selected point 230 are used to define an affine transformation that maps a unit circle 235 centered around the selected point 230 into an ellipse 260 in the source image. This affine transformation locally approximates and represents the inverse of the arbitrary deformation function that implements the special effect selected in step 305.
  • the affine function is represented by coordinate functions u A (x,y) and v A (x,y) which map a point (x,y) in the destination image to a point (u,v) in the source image space.
  • u A (x,y) v A (x,y) have partial derivatives at (x 0 y 0 )
  • is the partial derivative of u(x,y) with respect to x; and — (x 0 ,y 0 ) is that partial dx dx derivative evaluated at (x 0 ,y 0 ), resulting in a numeric value.
  • the ellipse 260 is defined in the source image 210 by computing, using the affine transformation, the length and direction of its orthogonal axes.
  • the ellipse 260 is stretched, in step 325, along its axes to make the axes at least two units in length to produce stretched ellipse 220.
  • R, or R 2 has a value less than 1, then its value is set to 1.
  • the axes of the ellipse 220 then have a length 2R !
  • a linear transformation from a unit circle 240 concentric with ellipse 220 to the ellipse 220 then is determined.
  • the simplest linear transformation from the unit circle 240 to the ellipse 220 maps unit vectors (1,0) and (0,1) to vectors (R, u,,R, v,) and (R 2 u 2 ,R 2 v 2 ), respectively, and has coordinate functions u'(u,v), v'(u,v) as follows:
  • the affine transformation used to create the ellipse 220 may introduce a rotational or skew component in any transformation between the unit circle 240 and the ellipse 220.
  • the linear transformation shown in Equations 23 and 24 has a rotational component, but no skew component.
  • a linear transformation that removes both skew and rotational components also may be defined.
  • v'(u,v) ((R r R 2 )v, v 2 u - (R, u 2 v,-R 2 u, v 2 )v) /(u, v 2 - ⁇ u 2 ) (Eq. 26)
  • the selected reconstruction filter 245 centered around the origin 225 is modified to obtain a new reconstruction filter 250 centered about the origin 225 by defining a filter that first applies the inverse of the linear transformation to the coordinates of a point and then filters those points with the original selected reconstruction filter 245.
  • the modified filter and the original filter may be the same if the linear transformation is a unity transformation, which simplifies the processing of steps 340 and 345 described below. If the size of the selected reconstruction filter when centered on the unit circle 240 includes the area of the unit circle, then the modified reconstruction filter includes the entire ellipse 220, as shown.
  • the selected reconstruction filter 245 may be included within the unit circle 240, such as a box filter with a radius of one-half Since the filter 245 in that case is smaller than the unit circle 240, then the modified filter 250 is smaller than the ellipse 220.
  • the pixels 255 in the source image 210 included in the area defined by the modified reconstruction filter 250 are identified.
  • This support area of the reconstruction filter includes any pixels where the filter is non-zero.
  • Several methods may be used to identify the pixels with centers included in the support of the transformed filter 250.
  • a rectangular bounding box which includes the support of the modified filter is defined. This bounding box may be defined by applying the linear transformation determined in step 330 to the coordinates of the four corners of the filter. For each pixel in the source image with a center inside the bounding box, the inverse of Equations 25 and 26 is applied to its coordinates to obtain transformed coordinates in the source image space. If the transformed coordinates of the pixel lie inside of the support of the original unmodified filter in the source image space, then the pixel is within the support of the modified filter.
  • pixels with centers in the support of the modified filter are identified, with the support defined by a polygon. Then a standard polygon rasterizing technique, such as using the Bresenham line drawing algorithm along the sides of the polygon may be used. The pixels which lie between the left and right lines are then identified and the inverse of the linear transform of Equations 25 and 26 is applied to the coordinates of each pixel to obtain transformed coordinates in the source image space. If the transformed coordinates of the pixel lie inside of the support of the original unmodified filter in the source image space, then the pixel is within the support of the modified filter.
  • the values, such as color and intensity, of pixels 255 included in the support of modified reconstruction filter 250 are then used to determine a pixel value for the selected pixel 230 in destination image 205, in step 345.
  • the color value of each pixel within the support of the reconstruction filter is scaled by a corresponding value from the original unmodified filter. These scaled values are averaged to provide a color value for the selected pixel 230 in the destination image.
  • step 350 If a value for each pixel in destination image 205 has been calculated, as determined in step 350, then the process ends and the destination image 205 is rendered in step 355. Otherwise a next pixel is selected and the process continues with step 315 as described above.
  • Fig. 5 illustrates a corresponding system that implements the embodiment described by the flowchart of Fig. 4, and illustrates in more detail one embodiment of the system of Fig. 1.
  • This system may be implemented using a high-level computer programming language on a computer system, such as described above in Fig. 2.
  • an affine transformation selection module 415 receives user input 405 typically via a graphical user interface.
  • the user input 405 includes an indication of a desired special effect to be achieved that performs non- uniform scaling or arbitrary deformation.
  • an affine transformation 420 is generated or retrieved, which represents and approximates the arbitrary deformation of the special effect. How such an affine transformation is generated is well known in the art.
  • the affine transformation 420 may be stored in memory.
  • the ellipse definer 430 receives an indication of a point 425 identified in the destination image and a source image 410 and uses the affine transformation 420 to define an ellipse in the source image 410 which corresponds to a transformed unit circle defined about point 425.
  • the ellipse is defined to have axes of at least two units in length as described above.
  • An indication of the center 435 of the defined ellipse, and the length and direction of its orthogonal axes is output by the ellipse definer 430 to transformation unit 445.
  • the transformation unit 445 defines a linear transformation between a unit circle 440 in the source image around the defined center of the ellipse 435 and the ellipse. Such a linear transformation is described above.
  • the linear transformation 450 required to scale the unit circle 440 may be stored in memory for later use.
  • a reconstruction filter 455, as described above, is input along with an indication of the linear transformation 450 to a filter transformation unit 460.
  • the unit 460 outputs a modified filter 465 as described above in step 335 of Fig. 4.
  • the modified filter may be stored in memory and applied to other source images.
  • the identification unit 470 determines which pixels in the source image are included in the domain or support of the modified filter 465.
  • the identification unit 470 may use various methods to determine which pixels are included in the support of the modified filter, as discussed above in reference to step 340 of Fig. 4.
  • the values of the pixels 475 in the source image included in the support of the filter 465 are stored in memory.
  • a calculator unit 480 receives pixel values 475 to determine the value of a point in a destination image.
  • the calculator unit may use any of variety of functions to make this determination. For example, the values for the pixels in the support of the filter may be filtered then averaged to determine the pixel value for the destination image 485.
  • a display device 490 displays
  • the process and apparatus of the present invention may be applied to resample an image of three dimensions or higher.
  • a unit circle 240 (Fig. 3) in the source image 210 is an N-dimensional sphere and an ellipse 220 in the source image 210 is an N- dimensional ellipsoid.
  • the source image, such as image 210 may be a three-dimensional image including volumetric data such as that used for medical imaging or weather applications.
  • the source image 210 may also be a four-dimensional image, which would include, for example, a three-dimensional image changing over time.
  • the source image in any dimension may be a single image or it may be a sequence of images.
  • Another embodiment of the present invention includes optimizing the resampling process shown in Fig. 3. Since the non-uniform scaling of the source image is performed by an arbitrary function, the ellipse computations for each pixel of the destination image may be too time consuming and expensive for some applications. Therefore, the process as shown in Figs. 3 and 4 may be optimized to approximate the arbitrary scaling using a piecewise approach.
  • a plurality of triangles may be defined in the destination image. Each triangle would represent a collection of points in the destination image. The vertices of each triangle are then used to determine the non-uniform scaling function from the destination image to the source image.
  • An affine transformation representing the non- uniform scaling function of each vertex, and therefore an affine transformation on each individual triangle, based on each vertex, is performed to define an ellipse in a source image.
  • the affine transformation represents the non-uniform scaling function of the source image and the ellipse calculations are performed one time per triangle, and thus is applied to several pixels at a time.
  • the linear transformation performed to transform a unit circle centered around a center point of an ellipse to the ellipse is then applied to the reconstruction filter.

Abstract

A source image may be manipulated by a computer to include special graphics effects. The source image may be used for still pictures or motion video applications and may include a single image or a sequence of images. The special graphics effects applied to the source image to create a desired destination image include various non-uniform scaling or arbitrary distortion functions. The effect has a corresponding affine transformation that approximates the non uniform scaling function. This affine transformation is used to define an ellipse in the source image. A linear transformation from a unit circle in the source image to the ellipse in the source image is calculated. The linear transformation is used to modify a reconstruction filter in the source image. A pixel value in the destination image is determined by identifying pixels included in a support of the modified reconstruction filter in the source image in order to reduce artifacts in non-uniform scaling applications.

Description

TEXTURE MAPPING IN 3-D COMPUTER GRAPHICS
FIELD OF THE INVENTION The invention relates to graphics editing, and more particularly to determining a pixel value in an image produced by a special effect which includes a function that performs non- uniform scaling or arbitrary distortion of a source image function.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION In many computer graphics applications, an image displayed on a two-dimensional display screen is generated by transforming another image, called a source image. For example, the source image may be texture mapped to a three-dimensional object which is projected onto a two-dimensional plane defined by the display. Another application includes special effects in motion video or animation in which a source image is deformed to create a desired image. The source image can be represented by a rectangular grid of samples of a continuous
2-D function f(x,y). Each sample is the value of the continuous function at a given sample point or pixel, with each pixel representing a point of the image, including the color of the image at that point. An ideal procedure for scaling the image, i.e., an image represented as discrete pixel locations along fixed scan lines in a rectangular array of scan lines, involves reconstructing the original continuous function of the source image from the sampled data and then deforming the continuous image. A low pass filter is applied to eliminate frequencies in the destination image above a Nyquist frequency. The Nyquist frequency determines the lowest sampling rate possible to preserve details in the image and is equal to twice the frequency of the highest frequency component in a source signal. The low pass filter is used since any frequency component that is higher than half the sampling rate will be sampled incorrectly and will be aliased to a lower frequency. After applying the filter, sampling is performed on the continuous function of the deformed image using a different sampling resolution to produce a destination image. According to sampling theory, the sine function f(x,y)=[sin(πx)sin(πy)]/π2x, is ideal for reconstructing a two-dimensional image. Sampling would determine the color value of each point in the destination to create the final destination image. The entire process of reconstructing, deforming, filtering and sampling is known as resampling. However, in practice, the ideal process as outlined above is impractical, primarily because an ideal reconstruction filter cannot be implemented practically. For instance, since the sine function is nonzero on points arbitrarily far from the origin, performing computations on all points is impractical. Therefore, a finite reconstruction filter is used, such as bilinear and bicubic filters are often used for filtering the signal representing a source image. In addition, an actual continuous image cannot be represented in a computer environment and a continuous image cannot be easily distorted.
One way to simulate the ideal process includes applying a transformation to regularly spaced pixels from a source image and then applying a low pass filter to the transformed image. However, after the transformation is applied, the transformed image may no longer include regularly spaced points and applying a low pass filter to the irregularly spaced points is difficult to perform.
In conventional systems, scaling down may be performed using mip-mapping techniques. In mip-mapping, although a standard shape of a square is used in filtering, the area of the filter may vary. A source image is successively averaged down to a lower resolution. Each image is half the resolution of the previous image, i.e., half the linear dimension and a quarter the number of samples of its previous image. Using bilinear inteφolation, an intensity is determined for values of each pixel as it is scaled down. Linear interpolation between levels of filtering further smooths the values. However, in motion video applications, mip-mapping may produce undesired artifacts.
Standard box filtering may also be used for mapping an image. A rectangular box corresponding to the approximate shape of the destination pixel may be used to compute a filtered pattern value for the pixel by summing all of the values in the source image included in the rectangle. Each destination pixel has a value that is a weighted average of an area of source pixels. However, if the transformed pixel is not approximately an aligned rectangle, then undesired artifacts may result in the destination image.
The problem of undesired artifacts may be particularly troublesome when an image is non-uniformly scaled, i.e., is subject to an arbitrary deformation. These artifacts arise particularly when applying special effects to an image which involves altering at least one portion of the image differently from other portions of the image. Two examples of a non- uniform special effect scaling include sphere and ripple. When applying a ripple effect, the resulting image includes a ripple pattern, such as one resulting from throwing a stone in a lake. Applying the sphere effect creates an enlarged lateral portion of a sphere, i.e., a "bulge", while maintaining the surrounding image in the sphere.
A need exists for a system or process for transforming a source image to a destination image which approximates the ideal resampling process and eliminates the artifacts caused by conventional filtering methods used with non-uniform scaling applications.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention approximates an ideal resampling process by using a reconstruction filter which has been modified by a linear transformation. The modified reconstruction filter is applied in the source image in order to determine values for pixels in the destination image. By applying a modified reconstruction filter in the source image, artifacts caused by resampling a filtered source image are reduced.
One aspect of the present invention is a process for obtaining a pixel value in a destination image produced by non-uniform scaling. A reconstruction filter is chosen and a unit circle centered on a pixel in a destination image is determined. An affine transformation function determined by the non-uniform scaling is performed on the unit circle to define at least two orthogonal axes in a source image. A linear transformation between a unit circle in the source image space and the orthogonal axes is determined. The linear transformation is then applied to the reconstruction filter. The pixels from the source image space which are included in the modified reconstruction filter are then identified. A value for a pixel in a destination image is determined from the pixels included in the support of the selected reconstruction filter.
Other aspects of the present invention include a computer system that implements this process, and other systems and processes as set forth below and in the appended claims.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
In the drawings,
Fig. 1 is a block diagram of a system for processing non-uniform scaling of images in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
Fig. 2 is a block diagram of a general puφose computer suitable for an embodiment of the invention;
Fig. 3 is a functional diagram of the process of an embodiment of the present invention; Fig. 4 is a flowchart of the process of an embodiment of the present invention; and Fig. 5 is a block diagram of a system for processing non-uniform scaling of images in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION The present invention will be more completely understood through the following detailed description which should be read in conjunction with the attached drawings in which similar reference numbers indicate similar structures.
The present invention approximates an ideal resampling process by using a reconstruction filter which has been modified by a linear transformation. The modified reconstruction filter is applied in the source image in order to determine values for pixels in the destination image. By applying a modified reconstruction filter in the source image, artifacts caused by resampling a filtered source image are reduced.
This process will now be described generally in connection with Fig. 1 and will be described in more detail below in connection with Figs. 3, 4 and 5. Special effect tools module 125 creates an effect which includes non-uniform scaling. Various tools may be used to define such effects. The effect data 130 may be stored for future use, or may be sent to filter modifier 105. Filter modifier 105 receives a selected filter 120, a selected pixel 115 in a destination image, and data 130 indicating the effect to be applied to a source image 110. The filter modifier 105 modifies the selected filter 120 according to a relationship, defined by the effect 130, between the selected pixel 115 and a point in the source image 110 to create a transformed filter 135. The filter application module 140 applies the modified filter 135 to the source image 110 to obtain a pixel value 145 in the destination image. The pixel value 145 is outputted to a rendering device 150 to display the destination image.
The present invention may be implementing using a general puφose computer that is programmed to generate, with reduced artifacts, a destination image by non-uniformly scaling a source image. An example computer system is shown in Fig. 2. In particular, the apparatus as shown in Fig. 2 includes a general puφose computer 20 having a processor 22, an input device 24, an output device 26, and memory 28 connected together through a computer bus 30. The memory 28 includes primary memory 32 (i.e., fast volatile memory such as dynamic semiconductor memory) and secondary memory 34 (i.e., nonvolatile memory such as magnetic disks). The memory 28 stores one or more programs 36 that, when executed by the processor 22, effect a transformation from a source image to a destination image. The input device 24 receives commands from a graphics editor, and the output device 26 displays results of the transformed image to the graphics editor. The results of the transformed image can be stored in memory 28 for future use.
It should be understood that one or more output devices may be connected to the computer 20. Example output devices 26 include various imaging devices including a cathode ray tube (CRT) display, a liquid crystal display (LCD), printers, and communication devices such as a modem. One or more input devices 24 may be connected to the computer system. Example input devices include a keyboard, keypad, track ball, mouse, pen and tablet, communication device and scanner. It should be understood the invention is not limited to the particular input or output devices used in combination with the computer system 20 or to those described herein. Also, the invention is not limited to a particular computer platform, particular processor or particular high-level programming language. Additionally, the computer system 20 may be a multiprocessor computer system or may include multiple computers connected over a computer network. Referring now to Fig. 3, a general example illustrating principles of a process in accordance with the present invention will now be described. In this process, a pixel value in a destination image 205 is determined according to non-uniform scaling of a source image 210. Non-uniform scaling may include any deformation of the source image. Such scaling may be used for enhancing graphics either in still pictures, e.g., a high quality poster, or in motion videos, e.g., video games, movies, etc., and may include two-dimensional or three-dimensional special effects. Three-dimensional effects may include arbitrary deformation of a source image by mapping a two-dimensional source image into another two-dimensional image. In particular, this may include arbitrary deformation by mapping onto a three-dimensional surface followed by orthographic or perspective projection. The two-dimensional special effects to be applied using non-uniform scaling of an image may include sphere, ripple, twirl, page turn, waφ, tumble, flag wave or pinch effects, or any deformation determined by a function from one plane to another plane.
In Fig. 3, both destination image 205 and source image 210 may be considered as a set of samples, called points or pixels, in a two-dimensional plane, where each sample has coordinates in the plane and a value indicative of its color. It should be understood that the invention also applies to black and white images. The destination image 205 and source image 210 may have an arbitrary shape and size. A point 225 in the source image 210 may contribute to the value of a point, e.g., 215 or 230, in the destination image 205, according to the deformation to be applied to the source image 210.
For any arbitrary deformation of the source image 210, an affine transformation can be defined that maps a point 230 in the destination image 205 to a point 225 in the source image 210. Similarly, this affine transformation maps a unit circle 235 centered about point 230 in the destination image to an ellipse 260 in the source image 210. The length and direction of the orthogonal axes of the ellipse 260 may be determined using this affine transformation. When the length of one of the axes is greater than two units, the deformation to be applied to the source implies low pass filtering should occur in the direction of that axis. If the length of the axis is less than two, no low pass filtering should occur in the direction of that axis, and the length of that axis may be assumed to be one, as shown at 220. A unit is the distance between two adjacent pixels in the source image 210. Given the length and direction of the orthogonal axes R, and R2 of the ellipse 220, a linear transformation is determined which maps a unit circle 240 concentric with the ellipse 220 into the ellipse 220. A desired reconstruction filter 245, e.g., a bilinear or bicubic filter, also concentric with the unit circle 240 is modified according to this linear transformation. This modified reconstruction filter is represented at 250. Pixels 255 of the source image 210 that fall within the modified reconstruction filter 250 are used to determine a pixel value for point 230 in destination image 205.
One embodiment of the process described above in connection with Fig. 3 will now be described in more detail in connection with Fig. 4. This process starts in step 305 with selection of a special effect involving non-uniform scaling or arbitrary deformation of an image, which may be input to computer 20 (Fig. 2). The special effect may be a two-dimensional or three- dimensional effect, such as described above, which is used to transform a source image 210 into a destination image 205. Predetermined special effects may be stored in memory 28 ( Fig. 2) and may be selected according to user input into computer 20 (Fig. 2). Example arbitrary deformation functions include mapping a two-dimensional source image to a three-dimensional surface, such as in texture mapping, and then projecting the surface as a two-dimensional destination image. Another kind of arbitrary deformation function is an inverse perspective transformation into three-dimensional space followed by a mapping back into two-dimensional space. Other functions which scale an image non-uniformly also may be used.
A reconstruction filter is chosen in step 310. The filter may be selected from predetermined functions stored in memory 28, which also may have user selectable parameters. Example reconstruction filters include bilinear filters, bicubic filters and box filters. In the example shown in Fig. 3, the reconstruction filter is a bilinear filter.
A value for a pixel in the destination image 205 is then determined through steps 315 through 350 which will now be described. In step 315, a point 230 in the destination image 205 is selected. The point may be the center of a pixel in the destination image, or may be an arbitrary point in the destination image space which is in turn used to compute the value of a particular pixel. The coordinates of the selected point 230 are used to define an affine transformation that maps a unit circle 235 centered around the selected point 230 into an ellipse 260 in the source image. This affine transformation locally approximates and represents the inverse of the arbitrary deformation function that implements the special effect selected in step 305.
In one embodiment, the affine function is represented by coordinate functions uA(x,y) and vA(x,y) which map a point (x,y) in the destination image to a point (u,v) in the source image space. Assuming uA(x,y), vA(x,y) have partial derivatives at (x0y0), point 230, the affine transformation representing the arbitrary differentiable function from (x,y) to (u,v) is: du du uA(χ,y) =u(xo,yo) +_(χo,yo)(χ -χo) +— (χo,yo)(y -yo) (Eq. 1)
3v cV vA(x,y) =v(xo,yo) +— (xo,yo)(x -χo) +— (x0,y0)(y -y0) (Eq. 2)
Here — is the partial derivative of u(x,y) with respect to x; and — (x0,y0) is that partial dx dx derivative evaluated at (x0,y0), resulting in a numeric value. In step 320, the ellipse 260 is defined in the source image 210 by computing, using the affine transformation, the length and direction of its orthogonal axes. Given an arbitrary deformation from source image space to destination image space, a point (x0 , y0) in the destination image space, and given a local inverse deformation with coordinate functions u(x,y), v(x,y), it is possible to compute axis directions (ul5v,), (u2,v2) and magnitudes Rl5R2 for the ellipse 220 which is the image under the inverse deformation of the unit circle 235 centered at (X,>y0), Point 230. The functions u(x,y), v(x,y) may have well-defined partial derivatives at (x0,y0) which may be used to define values a, b, c, d as:
5u
0,y0) (Eq. 3) θx
b= — (χ 0,y0) (Eq. 4) σx du , c= — (χ 0,y0) (Eq. 5) δy
A dv , . (Eq. 6) σy
If a=b=c=d=0, then R,=R2=0, and we (u^v^l.O), (u2,v2)=(0,l). Otherwise, if ad-bc=0, then
Figure imgf000010_0001
Since one of a, b, c, d is non-zero, either a 2 +b 2 or c 2 +d 2 is non-zero. If a 2 +b 2 is non-zero, then
Figure imgf000010_0002
Figure imgf000010_0003
If c +d is non-zero, then
Figure imgf000010_0004
Otherwise, the axes are computed as follows: b2+d2
A = (Eq.12)
(ad -be)2 ab+cd
B -2 (Eq.13)
(ad- -be)2
Figure imgf000011_0001
A-C+y/(A-C)2+B: (Eq.15)
Ifλ=0,R, i Mm iMO ) (Eq-17)
Figure imgf000011_0002
Otherwise, the following value is computed:
2(A +C) . μ (Eq.18) B2+4λ2
Figure imgf000011_0003
Figure imgf000011_0004
and
Figure imgf000011_0005
After the ellipse 260 is defined by determining R„ R2, (u„ v,) and (u2, v2), the ellipse 260 is stretched, in step 325, along its axes to make the axes at least two units in length to produce stretched ellipse 220. In particular, if either R, or R2 has a value less than 1, then its value is set to 1. The axes of the ellipse 220 then have a length 2R! and 2R2 in the directions defined by vectors (u,,v,) and (u2,v2), respectively, where R, and R2 are the half lengths of first and second orthogonal axes, respectively, of the ellipse 220. Therefore, the axes of the ellipse are defined by vectors (R, u,,R] v,) and (R2 u2,R2 v2).
Next, in step 330, a linear transformation from a unit circle 240 concentric with ellipse 220 to the ellipse 220 then is determined. The simplest linear transformation from the unit circle 240 to the ellipse 220 maps unit vectors (1,0) and (0,1) to vectors (R, u,,R, v,) and (R2u2,R2 v2), respectively, and has coordinate functions u'(u,v), v'(u,v) as follows:
u'(u,v) = R, u, u +R2 u2 v (Eq. 23) v'(u,v) = R, v, u +R2 v2 v (Eq. 24)
where u and v are coordinates in the source image with (u,v) = (0,0) the origin of the ellipse 220. The affine transformation used to create the ellipse 220 may introduce a rotational or skew component in any transformation between the unit circle 240 and the ellipse 220. The linear transformation shown in Equations 23 and 24 has a rotational component, but no skew component.
A linear transformation that removes both skew and rotational components also may be defined. An example of such a linear transformation maps (u,,v,) to (R^i^v,) and (u2,v2) to (R2 u2,R2v2) using coordinate functions as follows: u'(u,v) = ((Rj u, v2-R2 u2 v,)u - (R,-R2)u, u2 v) /(u, v2 - v, u2) (Eq. 25) v'(u,v) = ((RrR2)v, v2 u - (R, u2 v,-R2 u, v2)v) /(u, v2 - \ u2) (Eq. 26)
These transformations treat the center of the ellipse 220 as the origin in the source image space. A translation to the actual coordinates may be performed by adding appropriate offsets to Equations 25 and 26 or to the application of its inverse in steps 340 to 345 below.
Next, in step 335, the selected reconstruction filter 245 centered around the origin 225 is modified to obtain a new reconstruction filter 250 centered about the origin 225 by defining a filter that first applies the inverse of the linear transformation to the coordinates of a point and then filters those points with the original selected reconstruction filter 245. Note that the modified filter and the original filter may be the same if the linear transformation is a unity transformation, which simplifies the processing of steps 340 and 345 described below. If the size of the selected reconstruction filter when centered on the unit circle 240 includes the area of the unit circle, then the modified reconstruction filter includes the entire ellipse 220, as shown. However, the selected reconstruction filter 245 may be included within the unit circle 240, such as a box filter with a radius of one-half Since the filter 245 in that case is smaller than the unit circle 240, then the modified filter 250 is smaller than the ellipse 220.
In step 340, the pixels 255 in the source image 210 included in the area defined by the modified reconstruction filter 250 are identified. This support area of the reconstruction filter includes any pixels where the filter is non-zero. Several methods may be used to identify the pixels with centers included in the support of the transformed filter 250. In one embodiment, a rectangular bounding box which includes the support of the modified filter is defined. This bounding box may be defined by applying the linear transformation determined in step 330 to the coordinates of the four corners of the filter. For each pixel in the source image with a center inside the bounding box, the inverse of Equations 25 and 26 is applied to its coordinates to obtain transformed coordinates in the source image space. If the transformed coordinates of the pixel lie inside of the support of the original unmodified filter in the source image space, then the pixel is within the support of the modified filter.
In another embodiment, only those pixels with centers in the support of the modified filter are identified, with the support defined by a polygon. Then a standard polygon rasterizing technique, such as using the Bresenham line drawing algorithm along the sides of the polygon may be used. The pixels which lie between the left and right lines are then identified and the inverse of the linear transform of Equations 25 and 26 is applied to the coordinates of each pixel to obtain transformed coordinates in the source image space. If the transformed coordinates of the pixel lie inside of the support of the original unmodified filter in the source image space, then the pixel is within the support of the modified filter.
The values, such as color and intensity, of pixels 255 included in the support of modified reconstruction filter 250 are then used to determine a pixel value for the selected pixel 230 in destination image 205, in step 345. In one embodiment, the color value of each pixel within the support of the reconstruction filter is scaled by a corresponding value from the original unmodified filter. These scaled values are averaged to provide a color value for the selected pixel 230 in the destination image.
If a value for each pixel in destination image 205 has been calculated, as determined in step 350, then the process ends and the destination image 205 is rendered in step 355. Otherwise a next pixel is selected and the process continues with step 315 as described above.
Fig. 5 illustrates a corresponding system that implements the embodiment described by the flowchart of Fig. 4, and illustrates in more detail one embodiment of the system of Fig. 1. This system may be implemented using a high-level computer programming language on a computer system, such as described above in Fig. 2. In this system, an affine transformation selection module 415 receives user input 405 typically via a graphical user interface. The user input 405 includes an indication of a desired special effect to be achieved that performs non- uniform scaling or arbitrary deformation. Given a specified special effect 405, an affine transformation 420 is generated or retrieved, which represents and approximates the arbitrary deformation of the special effect. How such an affine transformation is generated is well known in the art. The affine transformation 420 may be stored in memory.
The ellipse definer 430 receives an indication of a point 425 identified in the destination image and a source image 410 and uses the affine transformation 420 to define an ellipse in the source image 410 which corresponds to a transformed unit circle defined about point 425. The ellipse is defined to have axes of at least two units in length as described above. An indication of the center 435 of the defined ellipse, and the length and direction of its orthogonal axes is output by the ellipse definer 430 to transformation unit 445. The transformation unit 445 defines a linear transformation between a unit circle 440 in the source image around the defined center of the ellipse 435 and the ellipse. Such a linear transformation is described above. The linear transformation 450 required to scale the unit circle 440 may be stored in memory for later use.
A reconstruction filter 455, as described above, is input along with an indication of the linear transformation 450 to a filter transformation unit 460. The unit 460 outputs a modified filter 465 as described above in step 335 of Fig. 4. The modified filter may be stored in memory and applied to other source images. The identification unit 470 determines which pixels in the source image are included in the domain or support of the modified filter 465. The identification unit 470 may use various methods to determine which pixels are included in the support of the modified filter, as discussed above in reference to step 340 of Fig. 4. The values of the pixels 475 in the source image included in the support of the filter 465 are stored in memory. A calculator unit 480 receives pixel values 475 to determine the value of a point in a destination image. The calculator unit may use any of variety of functions to make this determination. For example, the values for the pixels in the support of the filter may be filtered then averaged to determine the pixel value for the destination image 485. A display device 490 displays the non- uniformly scaled image.
The process and apparatus of the present invention may be applied to resample an image of three dimensions or higher. In such applications, a unit circle 240 (Fig. 3) in the source image 210 is an N-dimensional sphere and an ellipse 220 in the source image 210 is an N- dimensional ellipsoid. The source image, such as image 210 may be a three-dimensional image including volumetric data such as that used for medical imaging or weather applications. The source image 210 may also be a four-dimensional image, which would include, for example, a three-dimensional image changing over time. In addition, the source image in any dimension may be a single image or it may be a sequence of images.
Another embodiment of the present invention includes optimizing the resampling process shown in Fig. 3. Since the non-uniform scaling of the source image is performed by an arbitrary function, the ellipse computations for each pixel of the destination image may be too time consuming and expensive for some applications. Therefore, the process as shown in Figs. 3 and 4 may be optimized to approximate the arbitrary scaling using a piecewise approach. In this embodiment, rather than identifying an individual pixel, a plurality of triangles may be defined in the destination image. Each triangle would represent a collection of points in the destination image. The vertices of each triangle are then used to determine the non-uniform scaling function from the destination image to the source image. An affine transformation representing the non- uniform scaling function of each vertex, and therefore an affine transformation on each individual triangle, based on each vertex, is performed to define an ellipse in a source image. The affine transformation represents the non-uniform scaling function of the source image and the ellipse calculations are performed one time per triangle, and thus is applied to several pixels at a time. The linear transformation performed to transform a unit circle centered around a center point of an ellipse to the ellipse is then applied to the reconstruction filter.
Having now described a few embodiments of the invention, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that the foregoing is merely illustrative and not limiting, having been presented by way of example only. Numerous modifications and other embodiments are within the scope of one of ordinary skill in the art and are contemplated as falling within the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims and equivalents thereto.

Claims

1. A process for obtaining a value for a pixel in a destination image produced by non- uniform scaling of a source image, comprising the steps of: selecting a reconstruction filter; applying an affine transformation determined by the non-uniform scaling on a unit circle centered on the pixel in the destination image to define at least two orthogonal axes in a source image space, wherein the at least two orthogonal axes are at least two units in length, wherein each unit is equal to a distance between two adjacent pixels; determining a linear transformation between a unit circle in the source image space and the at least two orthogonal axes, wherein the unit circle is centered around a center of the at least two orthogonal axes; modifying the selected reconstruction filter using the linear transformation to create a modified reconstruction filter with a support region; identifying which pixels from the source image are included in the support of the modified reconstruction filter; and determining the value for the pixel in the destination image from pixel centers of the source image included in the support of the modified reconstruction filter.
2. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the identifying step further includes: creating a rectangular bounding box which includes the support of the modified filter; applying an inverse transformation to coordinates of each pixel with a center inside the bounding box; and determining whether the coordinates are included in the support of the untransformed selected reconstruction filter.
3. A process as claimed in claim 2, wherein the determining a value step includes: multiplying a color value of each pixel included in the support of the modified filter by the value from the untransformed selected reconstruction filter; determining a weighted average of the pixel values included in the modified filter.
4. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the identifying step further includes: determining pixels with centers in the support of the modified filter by treating the support of the transformed filter as a polygon; and using a polygon rasterizing technique.
5. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the affine transformation step is performed for a plurality of pixels.
6. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the performing an affine transformation step includes approximating a function for implementing two-dimensional special effects.
7. A process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the performing an affine transformation step includes approximating a function for implementing three-dimensional effects.
8. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the determining a linear transformation step includes removing a skew component.
9. A process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the determining a linear transformation step includes removing a skew and a rotational component.
10. A process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the performing an affine transformation step is followed by performing a perspective projection.
11. A destination image produced by the process of non-uniformly scaling a source image performed by a process that includes: modifying a reconstruction filter according to an approximation of the non-uniform scaling function; and applying the modified reconstruction filter to the source image by identifying pixels included in the support of the modified reconstruction filter and using the value of the pixels to determine the value of a destination pixel to produce the destination image.
12. A destination image as claimed in claim 11, wherein the source image includes a two- dimensional data set.
13. A destination image as claimed in claim 11, wherein the source image includes a three- dimensional volumetric data set.
14. A destination image as claimed in claim 11, wherein the source image includes a single image.
15. A destination image as claimed in claim 11 , wherein the source image includes a sequence of images.
16. A destination image as claimed in claim 11 , wherein the reconstruction filters include bilinear or bicubic functions.
17. A destination image as claimed in claim 11, wherein the non-uniform scaling function includes a two-dimensional special effect.
18. A destination image as claimed in claim 11 , wherein the non-uniform scaling function includes a three-dimensional special effect.
19. A computer-implemented process for generating a non-uniformly scaled destination image including the steps of: determining an affine transformation of a source image based on a non-uniform effect; defining orthogonal axes in the source image according to the affine transformation; calculating a linear transformation from a unit circle in the source image to the orthogonal axes; modifying a reconstruction filter in the source image according to the linear transformation; identifying pixels included in a support of the modified reconstruction filter; calculating the value of a point in the destination image based on the value of the identified pixels in the source image; and displaying the non-uniformly scaled destination image.
20. A computer system for generating a representation of a non-uniformly scaled source image including a processor and a memory connected to the processor for storing a program, which when executed by the processor performs the steps of: receiving a source image, a desired special effect, and a reconstruction filter; modifying the reconstruction filter based on the application of the desired special effect to the source image; identifying pixels in the source image included in the modified reconstruction filter; determining the value of a pixel in a destination based on the identified pixels; and rendering the destination image.
21. A computer system as claimed in claim 20, wherein the source image is a single image.
22. A computer system as claimed in claim 20, wherein the source image is a sequence of images.
23. A computer system as claimed in claim 20, wherein the modified reconstruction filter does not include at least one of a skew or a rotational component.
24. A computer system as claimed in claim 20, wherein the special effect includes two- dimensional or higher dimensional effects.
PCT/US1998/010763 1997-08-01 1998-05-27 Texture mapping in 3-d computer graphics WO1999006952A1 (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA002297916A CA2297916C (en) 1997-08-01 1998-05-27 Texture mapping in 3-d computer graphics
JP2000505604A JP2001512265A (en) 1997-08-01 1998-05-27 Texture mapping in 3D computer graphics
AU76974/98A AU7697498A (en) 1997-08-01 1998-05-27 Texture mapping in 3-d computer graphics
DE69816824T DE69816824T2 (en) 1997-08-01 1998-05-27 TEXTURE IMAGE IN 3-D COMPUTER GRAPHICS
EP98924914A EP0998727B1 (en) 1997-08-01 1998-05-27 Texture mapping in 3-d computer graphics

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/904,470 1997-08-01
US08/904,470 US6016152A (en) 1997-08-01 1997-08-01 Apparatus and method for non-uniform image scaling

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1999006952A1 true WO1999006952A1 (en) 1999-02-11
WO1999006952A8 WO1999006952A8 (en) 1999-03-25

Family

ID=25419222

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1998/010763 WO1999006952A1 (en) 1997-08-01 1998-05-27 Texture mapping in 3-d computer graphics

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US6016152A (en)
EP (1) EP0998727B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2001512265A (en)
AU (1) AU7697498A (en)
CA (1) CA2297916C (en)
DE (1) DE69816824T2 (en)
WO (1) WO1999006952A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1800289A1 (en) * 2004-09-09 2007-06-27 Silicon Optix Inc. Single -pass image warping system and mehtod with anisotropic filtering
CN102087751A (en) * 2009-12-03 2011-06-08 英特尔公司 Computing level of detail for anisotropic filtering
JP2013512279A (en) * 2009-12-01 2013-04-11 ボストン メディカル センター コーポレーション Method for treating IgE-mediated diseases

Families Citing this family (35)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6259827B1 (en) 1996-03-21 2001-07-10 Cognex Corporation Machine vision methods for enhancing the contrast between an object and its background using multiple on-axis images
US6381375B1 (en) * 1998-02-20 2002-04-30 Cognex Corporation Methods and apparatus for generating a projection of an image
US6191795B1 (en) * 1998-09-30 2001-02-20 Silicon Graphics, Inc. Ellipsoidal projection mapping
US6687402B1 (en) 1998-12-18 2004-02-03 Cognex Corporation Machine vision methods and systems for boundary feature comparison of patterns and images
US6577776B1 (en) 1999-02-24 2003-06-10 Media 100, Inc. Transforming video images
US6388673B1 (en) * 1999-09-30 2002-05-14 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for filter type approximation in computer graphics processing
US6922483B2 (en) * 1999-12-28 2005-07-26 Texas Instruments Incorporated Methods for measuring DMD low frequency spatial uniformity
US6771841B1 (en) * 1999-12-29 2004-08-03 Intel Corporation Determining a bounding shape for a collection of points
US7367042B1 (en) * 2000-02-29 2008-04-29 Goldpocket Interactive, Inc. Method and apparatus for hyperlinking in a television broadcast
US7343617B1 (en) 2000-02-29 2008-03-11 Goldpocket Interactive, Inc. Method and apparatus for interaction with hyperlinks in a television broadcast
US6748104B1 (en) 2000-03-24 2004-06-08 Cognex Corporation Methods and apparatus for machine vision inspection using single and multiple templates or patterns
US6766281B1 (en) * 2000-05-12 2004-07-20 S3 Graphics Co., Ltd. Matched texture filter design for rendering multi-rate data samples
US6828983B1 (en) 2000-05-12 2004-12-07 S3 Graphics Co., Ltd. Selective super-sampling/adaptive anti-aliasing of complex 3D data
WO2002019719A1 (en) * 2000-08-30 2002-03-07 Watchpoint Media, Inc. A method and apparatus for hyperlinking in a television broadcast
US6665450B1 (en) * 2000-09-08 2003-12-16 Avid Technology, Inc. Interpolation of a sequence of images using motion analysis
US7043058B2 (en) * 2001-04-20 2006-05-09 Avid Technology, Inc. Correcting motion vector maps for image processing
US7545957B2 (en) * 2001-04-20 2009-06-09 Avid Technology, Inc. Analyzing motion of characteristics in images
KR100423503B1 (en) * 2001-09-14 2004-03-18 삼성전자주식회사 Apparatus for disposing digital image and a method using the same
US7194676B2 (en) 2002-03-01 2007-03-20 Avid Technology, Inc. Performance retiming effects on synchronized data in an editing system
US6940511B2 (en) * 2002-06-07 2005-09-06 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Graphics texture processing methods, apparatus and computer program products using texture compression, block overlapping and/or texture filtering
KR20060006102A (en) * 2003-06-04 2006-01-18 코닌클리케 필립스 일렉트로닉스 엔.브이. Interpolation of images
US7064770B2 (en) * 2004-09-09 2006-06-20 Silicon Optix Inc. Single-pass image resampling system and method with anisotropic filtering
US8111904B2 (en) * 2005-10-07 2012-02-07 Cognex Technology And Investment Corp. Methods and apparatus for practical 3D vision system
US8162584B2 (en) * 2006-08-23 2012-04-24 Cognex Corporation Method and apparatus for semiconductor wafer alignment
US8442316B2 (en) 2007-01-05 2013-05-14 Geo Semiconductor Inc. System and method for improving color and brightness uniformity of backlit LCD displays
US8055070B2 (en) * 2007-01-05 2011-11-08 Geo Semiconductor Inc. Color and geometry distortion correction system and method
US8073291B2 (en) * 2007-10-17 2011-12-06 Seiko Epson Corporation Center based image resizer
US8200037B2 (en) * 2008-01-28 2012-06-12 Microsoft Corporation Importance guided image transformation
US8086073B2 (en) * 2008-02-07 2011-12-27 Seiko Epson Corporation Non-uniform image resizer
GB2470942B (en) * 2009-06-11 2014-07-16 Snell Ltd Detection of non-uniform spatial scaling of an image
JP5559222B2 (en) * 2012-03-01 2014-07-23 クゥアルコム・インコーポレイテッド Single-pass image warping system and method using anisotropic filtering
US9865073B2 (en) 2015-10-05 2018-01-09 Adobe Systems Incorporated Computer animation of artwork using fast 2-dimensional deformation solving
US9858701B2 (en) 2015-10-05 2018-01-02 Adobe Systems Incorporated Computer animation of artwork using adaptive meshing
US10672155B2 (en) 2016-08-17 2020-06-02 International Business Machines Corporation Non-linear, multi-resolution visualization of a graph
US10552939B1 (en) 2019-02-12 2020-02-04 Google Llc Image processor complex transfer functions

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0447222A2 (en) * 1990-03-16 1991-09-18 Hewlett-Packard Company Gradient calculation for texture mapping

Family Cites Families (28)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4602286A (en) * 1982-01-15 1986-07-22 Quantel Limited Video processing for composite images
FR2546017B1 (en) * 1983-05-11 1986-01-17 Thomson Csf METHOD FOR PERFORMING A GEOMETRIC TRANSFORMATION ON A VIDEO IMAGE, AND DEVICES IMPLEMENTING THIS METHOD
US4698666A (en) * 1985-07-12 1987-10-06 The Grass Valley Group, Inc. Video key glow and border generator
CA1309198C (en) * 1987-12-10 1992-10-20 Carlo J. Evangelisti Parallel rendering of smoothly shaded color triangles with anti-aliased edges for a three dimensional color display
US5179641A (en) * 1989-06-23 1993-01-12 Digital Equipment Corporation Rendering shaded areas with boundary-localized pseudo-random noise
US5204944A (en) * 1989-07-28 1993-04-20 The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York Separable image warping methods and systems using spatial lookup tables
US5153937A (en) * 1989-09-22 1992-10-06 Ampex Corporation System for generating anti-aliased video signal
US5333245A (en) * 1990-09-07 1994-07-26 Modacad, Inc. Method and apparatus for mapping surface texture
JP2956213B2 (en) * 1990-11-30 1999-10-04 ソニー株式会社 Image processing device
EP0494325B1 (en) * 1991-01-07 1995-11-08 SHIMA SEIKI MFG., Ltd. Apparatus for editing and creating video image and method for editing and creating video image
GB9109999D0 (en) * 1991-05-09 1991-07-03 Quantel Ltd Improvements in or relating to keying systems and methods for television image processing
US5185808A (en) * 1991-06-06 1993-02-09 Eastman Kodak Company Method for merging images
US5339387A (en) * 1991-10-24 1994-08-16 Abekas Video Systems, Inc. Planar color gradients constructed as an arbitrary function of a distance function from an arbitrary 2-D curvilinear function
EP0540313B1 (en) * 1991-10-30 1996-12-27 Fujitsu Limited Color adjustment for smoothing a boundary between color images
US5592599A (en) * 1991-12-18 1997-01-07 Ampex Corporation Video special effects system with graphical operator interface
WO1993013489A1 (en) * 1991-12-24 1993-07-08 Sierra Semiconductor Corporation An anti-aliasing method for polynomial curves using integer arithmetics
US5715385A (en) * 1992-07-10 1998-02-03 Lsi Logic Corporation Apparatus for 2-D affine transformation of images
US5581665A (en) * 1992-10-27 1996-12-03 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Three-dimensional object movement and transformation processing apparatus for performing movement and transformation of an object in a three-diamensional space
WO1994024830A1 (en) * 1993-04-15 1994-10-27 Ultimatte Corporation Screen filtering boundary detection for image compositing
US5644364A (en) * 1993-04-16 1997-07-01 Avid Technology, Inc. Media pipeline with multichannel video processing and playback
US5420971A (en) * 1994-01-07 1995-05-30 Panasonic Technologies, Inc. Image edge finder which operates over multiple picture element ranges
US5596687A (en) * 1994-07-29 1997-01-21 David Sarnoff Research Center, Inc. Apparatus and method for addressing pixel values within an image pyramid using a recursive technique
JPH08129647A (en) * 1994-10-28 1996-05-21 Yamaha Corp Graphics device
US5710876A (en) * 1995-05-25 1998-01-20 Silicon Graphics, Inc. Computer graphics system for rendering images using full spectral illumination data
US5867166A (en) * 1995-08-04 1999-02-02 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for generating images using Gsprites
US5754180A (en) * 1996-03-11 1998-05-19 Avid Technology, Inc. Computer system and process for defining and manipulating images using structured objects with variable edge characteristics
US5835099A (en) * 1996-06-26 1998-11-10 Xerox Corporation Representing a region of a color image using a space-color separable model
US5808623A (en) * 1996-10-07 1998-09-15 Adobe Systems Incorporated System and method for perspective transform in computer using multi-pass algorithm

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0447222A2 (en) * 1990-03-16 1991-09-18 Hewlett-Packard Company Gradient calculation for texture mapping

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
BUCHANAN J: "The filtering of 3d textures", PROCEEDINGS. GRAPHICS INTERFACE '91, CALGARY, ALTA., CANADA, 3-7 JUNE 1991, ISBN 0-9695338-0-2, 1991, Toronto, Ont., Canada, Canadian. Inf. Process. Soc, Canada, pages 53 - 60, XP002074442 *
GHAZANFARPOUR D ET AL: "A HIGH-QUALITY FILTERING USING FORWARD TEXTURE MAPPING", COMPUTERS AND GRAPHICS, vol. 15, no. 4, 1 January 1991 (1991-01-01), pages 569 - 577, XP000281890 *

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1800289A1 (en) * 2004-09-09 2007-06-27 Silicon Optix Inc. Single -pass image warping system and mehtod with anisotropic filtering
EP1800289A4 (en) * 2004-09-09 2010-07-28 Silicon Optix Inc Single -pass image warping system and mehtod with anisotropic filtering
JP2013512279A (en) * 2009-12-01 2013-04-11 ボストン メディカル センター コーポレーション Method for treating IgE-mediated diseases
CN102087751A (en) * 2009-12-03 2011-06-08 英特尔公司 Computing level of detail for anisotropic filtering
CN102087751B (en) * 2009-12-03 2014-07-02 英特尔公司 Computing level of detail for anisotropic filtering

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2297916A1 (en) 1999-02-11
AU7697498A (en) 1999-02-22
EP0998727B1 (en) 2003-07-30
JP2001512265A (en) 2001-08-21
CA2297916C (en) 2009-01-27
EP0998727A1 (en) 2000-05-10
DE69816824D1 (en) 2003-09-04
US6016152A (en) 2000-01-18
WO1999006952A8 (en) 1999-03-25
DE69816824T2 (en) 2004-05-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6016152A (en) Apparatus and method for non-uniform image scaling
US6782130B2 (en) Rendering of photorealistic computer graphics images
US5224208A (en) Gradient calculation for texture mapping
US6232981B1 (en) Method for improving texture locality for pixel quads by diagonal level-of-detail calculation
US6292193B1 (en) Techniques for anisotropic texture mapping using multiple space-invariant filtering operations per pixel
US5754180A (en) Computer system and process for defining and manipulating images using structured objects with variable edge characteristics
US7081895B2 (en) Systems and methods of multi-pass data processing
US8149235B2 (en) System and method for upscaling low-resolution images
US7692661B2 (en) Method of creating and evaluating bandlimited noise for computer graphics
JP4522996B2 (en) A system for adaptive resampling in texture mapping.
US7679618B2 (en) Bandlimited texture slicing for computer graphics
JPH0771936A (en) Device and method for processing image
JP2012009053A (en) Image synthesis through rank -1 lattice
JP3959862B2 (en) Texture mapping method and apparatus
KR101107114B1 (en) Method of rendering graphical objects
US9230359B2 (en) Method for resizing an image
US7643702B1 (en) Object detection in images using a graphics processor
WO1999045502A1 (en) Subsampled texture edge antialiasing
US11145108B2 (en) Uniform density cube map rendering for spherical projections
US7656408B1 (en) Method and system for animating a border
US7689057B2 (en) Method of bandlimiting data for computer graphics
CA2307356A1 (en) Texturing apparatus and method therefor

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AU CA CN JP

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: C1

Designated state(s): AU CA CN DE GB JP

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: C1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

CFP Corrected version of a pamphlet front page
CR1 Correction of entry in section i

Free format text: PAT. BUL. 06/99 UNDER (81) ADD "DE, GB"; DUE TO LATE TRANSMITTAL BY THE RECEIVING OFFICE

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 76974/98

Country of ref document: AU

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2297916

Country of ref document: CA

Ref country code: CA

Ref document number: 2297916

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1998924914

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1998924914

Country of ref document: EP

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 1998924914

Country of ref document: EP