WO1997039577A1 - Processing of video signals prior to compression - Google Patents

Processing of video signals prior to compression Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1997039577A1
WO1997039577A1 PCT/GB1997/001034 GB9701034W WO9739577A1 WO 1997039577 A1 WO1997039577 A1 WO 1997039577A1 GB 9701034 W GB9701034 W GB 9701034W WO 9739577 A1 WO9739577 A1 WO 9739577A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
flag
encoder
shot change
picture
frame
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB1997/001034
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Michael James Knee
Stuart Somerville
Original Assignee
Snell & Wilcox Limited
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Snell & Wilcox Limited filed Critical Snell & Wilcox Limited
Priority to AU25184/97A priority Critical patent/AU2518497A/en
Priority to EP97916569A priority patent/EP0893025A1/en
Publication of WO1997039577A1 publication Critical patent/WO1997039577A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G11INFORMATION STORAGE
    • G11BINFORMATION STORAGE BASED ON RELATIVE MOVEMENT BETWEEN RECORD CARRIER AND TRANSDUCER
    • G11B27/00Editing; Indexing; Addressing; Timing or synchronising; Monitoring; Measuring tape travel
    • G11B27/02Editing, e.g. varying the order of information signals recorded on, or reproduced from, record carriers
    • G11B27/031Electronic editing of digitised analogue information signals, e.g. audio or video signals
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N19/00Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals
    • H04N19/10Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using adaptive coding
    • H04N19/102Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using adaptive coding characterised by the element, parameter or selection affected or controlled by the adaptive coding
    • H04N19/103Selection of coding mode or of prediction mode
    • H04N19/114Adapting the group of pictures [GOP] structure, e.g. number of B-frames between two anchor frames
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N19/00Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals
    • H04N19/10Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using adaptive coding
    • H04N19/134Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using adaptive coding characterised by the element, parameter or criterion affecting or controlling the adaptive coding
    • H04N19/142Detection of scene cut or scene change
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N19/00Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals
    • H04N19/10Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using adaptive coding
    • H04N19/169Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using adaptive coding characterised by the coding unit, i.e. the structural portion or semantic portion of the video signal being the object or the subject of the adaptive coding
    • H04N19/177Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using adaptive coding characterised by the coding unit, i.e. the structural portion or semantic portion of the video signal being the object or the subject of the adaptive coding the unit being a group of pictures [GOP]
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N19/00Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals
    • H04N19/10Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using adaptive coding
    • H04N19/169Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using adaptive coding characterised by the coding unit, i.e. the structural portion or semantic portion of the video signal being the object or the subject of the adaptive coding
    • H04N19/179Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using adaptive coding characterised by the coding unit, i.e. the structural portion or semantic portion of the video signal being the object or the subject of the adaptive coding the unit being a scene or a shot
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N19/00Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals
    • H04N19/46Embedding additional information in the video signal during the compression process
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N19/00Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals
    • H04N19/60Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using transform coding
    • H04N19/61Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using transform coding in combination with predictive coding
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N19/00Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals
    • H04N19/85Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using pre-processing or post-processing specially adapted for video compression
    • H04N19/87Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using pre-processing or post-processing specially adapted for video compression involving scene cut or scene change detection in combination with video compression
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N7/00Television systems
    • H04N7/01Conversion of standards, e.g. involving analogue television standards or digital television standards processed at pixel level
    • H04N7/0112Conversion of standards, e.g. involving analogue television standards or digital television standards processed at pixel level one of the standards corresponding to a cinematograph film standard

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the processing of video signals prior to MPEG encoding or other compression processes.
  • Compression schemes such as MPEG2 work optimally with ordered sequences of input pictures having the relatively high level of correlation - one to the next - that is characteristic of "true" unedited video. Shot changes or the results of telecine operation and edits between true and telecined video, disturb these ordered sequences and can degrade the performance of an encoder.
  • the present invention consists in one aspect in a video signal processing for use upstream of a compression encoder and adapted to provide for use by the encoder one or more flags from the group consisting of a shot change flag; a frame/field based encoding flag; a 3:2 pull-down flag; a 25/24 telecine flag; a luminance fade flag and a flash effect flag.
  • a shot change flag is provided to the encoder for the insertion, if buffer occupancy permits, of an I picture. If the buffer occupancy does not permit, the shot change flag may trigger pre- filtering of the I picture so as to reduce the encoder buffer requirement or encoding as a P picture.
  • the shot change flag is provided in advance so as to enable the encoder to encode pictures preceding the shot change in a manner so as to provide sufficient buffer occupancy for an I picture to be inserted at the shot change.
  • a frame-field based encoding flag is provided to enable the encoder to employ a frame based encoding wherever possible.
  • a 3:2 pull-down flag is capable of indicating the 3:2 sequence whether or not interrupted by edit.
  • a 25/24 telecine flag will identify locations where fields making up a film frame are straddled over a video frame.
  • a luminance fade flag will identify for the encoder a luminance fade in the encoder to make use of correlation between pictures not withstanding progressive changes in luminance.
  • a flash effect flag serves to look at histogrammed luminance intensities across a number of pictures to identify sudden luminance changes and to enable the encoder to avoid degradation of the encoded sequence.
  • Figure 1 is a block diagram showing apparatus according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 2 is a diagram illustrating the derivation of a shot change flag in film material
  • Figure 3 is a diagram illustrating the derivation of a shot change flag in video material
  • Figure 4 is a diagram illustrating the derivation of a frame/field flag
  • Figure 5 is a diagram illustrating the derivation of a 3:2 pull-down flag
  • Figure 6 is a diagram similar to Figure 5 but includes a sequence discontinuity
  • Figure 7 is a diagram illustrating the derivation of a 625 frame pairing flag.
  • Figure 8 is a diagram illustrating the derivation of a luminance fade flag.
  • FIG. 1 there is shown a comparator 12 receiving the input video signal from input terminal 10 and a field or frame delayed signal via field/frame delay 14.
  • a video analysis processor 16 receives the current field/frame difference and - via delay line 18 - an appropriate number of past differences and serves to generate pre ⁇ processing flags in a manner to be described.
  • the processor 16 provides a control input to the field/frame delay 14.
  • the flags are (if necessary) converted into the appropriate form for transmission in flag processor 20 and are made available to a downstream compression encoder 22, alongside the input video signal.
  • the presence of a picture or shot change is detected by the analysis of picture difference between frames or fields.
  • Several correlation techniques are available such as integrated low pass filtered luminance and chrominance differences or correlation of histogrammed luminance intensities.
  • Film material which is frame based will generate a strong intra-frame correlation i.e. there will be no motion differences between fields which originate from the same film frame.
  • video originated material which has individual fields representing different points in time has no frame correlation. Nevertheless, at the presence of a shot change the integrated field and frame difference outputs will show a distinctive pattern which can be correlated to identify the exact field where the shot change occurs. This is illustrated for the case of film material in Figure 2 and for the case of video in Figure 3.
  • the processor 16 which can take the form of a dedicated microprocessor, is used to monitor a number of previous field and frame differences as well as other parameters which may also be taken into account, such as noise floor level.
  • the shot change flag is a single line active high immediately prior to the shot change and is cleared at the end of the following field. Therefore the line is active for a period of one field and can be used to influence a downstream encoder in such a manner that it can reduce the visibility of the temporal discontinuity caused by a scene change.
  • the flag processor can also be programmed to supply the flag in advance of the shot change by a number of fields, this parameter being user programmable in field steps, typically from one to six fields.
  • This flag is provided to overcome an MPEG encoder trying to predict across a cut boundary.
  • the intention is to modify the Group of Pictures (GOP) structure to produce the best possible result.
  • the constraints on this modification are the buffer occupancy at the point of the edit. If the buffer will allow an I picture to be inserted at the beginning of the sequence after the edit point this is the ideal situation. However, this might not be possible so the following options could be considered:- i) encoding as a P picture so that the prediction of the pictures leading up to the edit point are only based on the preceding I picture, or ii) pre-filtering the I picture so that the buffer requirement can be reduced when the picture is subsequently encoded.
  • the idea of providing shot change information can be further refined by using advanced shot change information.
  • Film originated material has a high level of picture correlation on fields which are extracted from the same film frame.
  • a film originated signal will therefore produce a frame rate output signal which can be identified and used to identify the source as film originated.
  • a video originated source however, has no such frame correlation.
  • a single bit is used to indicate film/video origination and is provided at the start of each field. If the material contains mixed film and video originated material then the flag changes state immediately prior to the first field of the film/video edit. This is illustrated in schematically in Figure 4, which shows the frame/filed flag remaining high only in the presence of the characteristic film signature.
  • an encoder wishes to encode using the most efficient coding modes. Therefore the use of frame based encoding as opposed to field based encoding is preferable. So a flag to indicate the nature of the input video is highly desirable to ensure that the quality of the video is preserved whilst coding efficiency is maintained.
  • Film material which is scanned by telecine to produce a 525 line output uses the well known 3:2 pull-down technique to insert an additional field for each pair of film frames. This has the effect of increasing the output field rate to 60Hz required for 525 distribution.
  • the output video signal has a distinctive pattern of 2 fields followed by 3 fields followed by 2 fields etc.. This pattern can be reliably detected using techniques described earlier such as integrated low pass filtered luminance between frames.
  • the presence of the repeat field can be used to identify the noise floor level since the frame difference output will produce a very low level for one field in every five. This occurs whenever a film frame has been scanned to produce three output fields of which two are identical and separated by one field. In this case the residual noise value is comprised of film grain noise, quantisation noise etc..
  • the five field sequence can be identified by a specific code for each field in the sequence.
  • the edit has caused a discontinuity in the sequence count resulting in the counter value changing from a 2 back to a 1 at the edit point.
  • This embodiment will accurately detect the edit and adjust the sequence count value until it is co-timed with the video output.
  • Film source material is scanned directly to produce a 625 line 50Hz output by running the telecine at 25/24 normal speed.
  • the resulting output has pairs of fields corresponding to each original film frame. No additional fields are required as the resulting frame rate of 25Hz is exactly correct for the 625 line standard.
  • the frame pairs are identified by analysis of field differences.
  • a characteristic frame rate signal is produced by the frame pairing which can be extracted and provided to downstream equipment as shown in Figure 7.
  • the two fields making up a film frame will be conveyed as the two fields of a video frame.
  • This relationship does not hold and the two fields making up a film frame are straddled over a video frame.
  • the problem with this splitting up of the "film field pairing" is that if an encoder tries to use the most efficient frame coding modes the field pairing is incorrect and consequently the quality of the encoded pictures is poor and/or the encoding efficiency is less than optimal. Flagging this situation allows corrective action to be taken so the correct relationship between the field and frame pairing can be maintained. This corrective action might take the form of the introduction of a field delay. Therefore the more coding efficient frame based encoding can be used. If it is not possible to take this "corrective action" the flagging of this situation means that the encoder will not try and use frame based techniques if it is not correct to do so.
  • the mixer is a standard electronic edit tool which is widely used to control switching between two sources. Typically described as a dissolve or fade, one input is reduced in amplitude while a second input is increased by a corresponding amount.
  • the gradient signal is usually linear on each signal. The linear gradient is usually applied to each field and may affect many fields. On film originated material the mix can mask the normal frame correlation of field pairs since mix can cause field-to-field differences. A picture correlation will have a minimum value corresponding to the mid point of the mixing function.
  • the microprocessor can use this information along with the field and frame difference outputs to provide a co-timed flag indicating the duration of the video mix as shown in Figure 8.
  • Luminance fades and cross-fades can be thought of as linear or non-linear keying.
  • the luminance fade/cross-fade information can be presented as a linear key but provided the encoder had been provided with the transfer function of the key involved, a non-linear key could also be used.
  • a non-linear key could also be used.
  • the luminance fade/cross -fade information may nonetheless remain of value.
  • the video analysis processor can generate a flash effect flag by looking at histogrammed luminance intensities across a number of pictures to identify sudden luminance changes.
  • the encoder may make use of this flag to ensure that a picture which suffers from a flash effect is not used as a reference picture.
  • the encoder may react to a flash effect flag by forcing the coding of a B picture. In this way, the encoder can avoid or reduce the degradation of the encoded sequence that would normally accompany a photographic lighting or other flash effect.

Abstract

Video analysis processing upstream of a compression encoder provides for use by the encoder flags such as a shot change flag; a frame/field based encoding flag; a 3:2 pull-down flag; a 25/24 telecine flag; a luminance fade flag and a flash effect flag. The encoder makes use of these flags in its coding decisions to improve coding efficiency or to reduce artefacts.

Description

PROCESSING OF VIDEO SIGNALS PRIOR TO COMPRESSION
This invention relates to the processing of video signals prior to MPEG encoding or other compression processes.
Compression schemes such as MPEG2 work optimally with ordered sequences of input pictures having the relatively high level of correlation - one to the next - that is characteristic of "true" unedited video. Shot changes or the results of telecine operation and edits between true and telecined video, disturb these ordered sequences and can degrade the performance of an encoder.
It is an object of the present invention to provide for processing of video signals prior to encoding, so as to provide information capable of enhancing the compression or at least minimising degradation.
Accordingly, the present invention consists in one aspect in a video signal processing for use upstream of a compression encoder and adapted to provide for use by the encoder one or more flags from the group consisting of a shot change flag; a frame/field based encoding flag; a 3:2 pull-down flag; a 25/24 telecine flag; a luminance fade flag and a flash effect flag.
In one form of the invention, a shot change flag is provided to the encoder for the insertion, if buffer occupancy permits, of an I picture. If the buffer occupancy does not permit, the shot change flag may trigger pre- filtering of the I picture so as to reduce the encoder buffer requirement or encoding as a P picture.
Advantageously, the shot change flag is provided in advance so as to enable the encoder to encode pictures preceding the shot change in a manner so as to provide sufficient buffer occupancy for an I picture to be inserted at the shot change.
In another form of the invention a frame-field based encoding flag is provided to enable the encoder to employ a frame based encoding wherever possible. In another form of the invention, a 3:2 pull-down flag is capable of indicating the 3:2 sequence whether or not interrupted by edit.
In yet a further form a 25/24 telecine flag will identify locations where fields making up a film frame are straddled over a video frame.
In still a further form of the invention, a luminance fade flag will identify for the encoder a luminance fade in the encoder to make use of correlation between pictures not withstanding progressive changes in luminance.
In still a further form of the invention, a flash effect flag serves to look at histogrammed luminance intensities across a number of pictures to identify sudden luminance changes and to enable the encoder to avoid degradation of the encoded sequence.
The invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:-
Figure 1 is a block diagram showing apparatus according to one embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 2 is a diagram illustrating the derivation of a shot change flag in film material;
Figure 3 is a diagram illustrating the derivation of a shot change flag in video material;
Figure 4 is a diagram illustrating the derivation of a frame/field flag;
Figure 5 is a diagram illustrating the derivation of a 3:2 pull-down flag;
Figure 6 is a diagram similar to Figure 5 but includes a sequence discontinuity;
Figure 7 is a diagram illustrating the derivation of a 625 frame pairing flag; and
Figure 8 is a diagram illustrating the derivation of a luminance fade flag.
Referring initially to Figure 1 , there is shown a comparator 12 receiving the input video signal from input terminal 10 and a field or frame delayed signal via field/frame delay 14. A video analysis processor 16 receives the current field/frame difference and - via delay line 18 - an appropriate number of past differences and serves to generate pre¬ processing flags in a manner to be described. The processor 16 provides a control input to the field/frame delay 14. The flags are (if necessary) converted into the appropriate form for transmission in flag processor 20 and are made available to a downstream compression encoder 22, alongside the input video signal.
There are a number of different input formats which are identified by the video analysis processor.
• Film originated 525 (using 3:2 pull-down technique)
• Film originated 625 (telecine operates at 25/24 rate)
• Video originated 525\625 (2:1 interlaced)
• Any electronically post produced combination of the above
The presence of a picture or shot change is detected by the analysis of picture difference between frames or fields. Several correlation techniques are available such as integrated low pass filtered luminance and chrominance differences or correlation of histogrammed luminance intensities.
Film material which is frame based will generate a strong intra-frame correlation i.e. there will be no motion differences between fields which originate from the same film frame.
On the other hand, video originated material which has individual fields representing different points in time has no frame correlation. Nevertheless, at the presence of a shot change the integrated field and frame difference outputs will show a distinctive pattern which can be correlated to identify the exact field where the shot change occurs. This is illustrated for the case of film material in Figure 2 and for the case of video in Figure 3. The processor 16, which can take the form of a dedicated microprocessor, is used to monitor a number of previous field and frame differences as well as other parameters which may also be taken into account, such as noise floor level.
The shot change flag is a single line active high immediately prior to the shot change and is cleared at the end of the following field. Therefore the line is active for a period of one field and can be used to influence a downstream encoder in such a manner that it can reduce the visibility of the temporal discontinuity caused by a scene change.
The flag processor can also be programmed to supply the flag in advance of the shot change by a number of fields, this parameter being user programmable in field steps, typically from one to six fields.
This flag is provided to overcome an MPEG encoder trying to predict across a cut boundary. The intention is to modify the Group of Pictures (GOP) structure to produce the best possible result. The constraints on this modification are the buffer occupancy at the point of the edit. If the buffer will allow an I picture to be inserted at the beginning of the sequence after the edit point this is the ideal situation. However, this might not be possible so the following options could be considered:- i) encoding as a P picture so that the prediction of the pictures leading up to the edit point are only based on the preceding I picture, or ii) pre-filtering the I picture so that the buffer requirement can be reduced when the picture is subsequently encoded. The idea of providing shot change information can be further refined by using advanced shot change information. This would allow pictures leading up to the shot change to be encoded so that the necessary buffer space can be obtained to accommodate the shot change by inserting an I picture. For example, an I picture which would otherwise have been encoded in the period now known to precede a shot change, can be deferred until the location of the shot change.
Film originated material has a high level of picture correlation on fields which are extracted from the same film frame. A film originated signal will therefore produce a frame rate output signal which can be identified and used to identify the source as film originated. A video originated source however, has no such frame correlation.
A single bit is used to indicate film/video origination and is provided at the start of each field. If the material contains mixed film and video originated material then the flag changes state immediately prior to the first field of the film/video edit. This is illustrated in schematically in Figure 4, which shows the frame/filed flag remaining high only in the presence of the characteristic film signature.
Ideally an encoder wishes to encode using the most efficient coding modes. Therefore the use of frame based encoding as opposed to field based encoding is preferable. So a flag to indicate the nature of the input video is highly desirable to ensure that the quality of the video is preserved whilst coding efficiency is maintained.
Film material which is scanned by telecine to produce a 525 line output uses the well known 3:2 pull-down technique to insert an additional field for each pair of film frames. This has the effect of increasing the output field rate to 60Hz required for 525 distribution.
The output video signal has a distinctive pattern of 2 fields followed by 3 fields followed by 2 fields etc.. This pattern can be reliably detected using techniques described earlier such as integrated low pass filtered luminance between frames. The presence of the repeat field can be used to identify the noise floor level since the frame difference output will produce a very low level for one field in every five. This occurs whenever a film frame has been scanned to produce three output fields of which two are identical and separated by one field. In this case the residual noise value is comprised of film grain noise, quantisation noise etc.. The five field sequence can be identified by a specific code for each field in the sequence.
This is achieved using a 3 bit code running from 0 to 4 as shown in Figure 5.
The removal of the repeat field of the 3/2 sequence greatly increases coding efficiency. To do this well, temporal analysis of the material is required and for a description of an appropriate technique, reference is directed to US-A- 5,255,091. What should be stressed is important is not only the detection of the 3/2 sequence, but also the ability to detect an interrupted 3/2 sequence as is experienced in material that has been edited as film and then transcribed to video. This changing of the 3/2 sequence and being able to not only detect this but also convey it to the compression encoder makes this approach very powerful.
Although the process of detecting the 3:2 sequence is relatively straight forward, complications arise whenever the 525 material is electronically edited. This causes temporary discontinuities in the 3:2 sequence at the edit point. Downstream equipment which relies on the accuracy of this flag could be affected if the sequence counter does not correspond exactly to the video at the edit point. This embodiment uses a correlation algorithm to:-
detect the edit
• analyse the 3:2 sequence following the edit
• provide accurate co-timed sequence count at the output
An example of an electronic edit to a film originated master is shown in Figure 6.
In this case, the edit has caused a discontinuity in the sequence count resulting in the counter value changing from a 2 back to a 1 at the edit point. This embodiment will accurately detect the edit and adjust the sequence count value until it is co-timed with the video output.
Film source material is scanned directly to produce a 625 line 50Hz output by running the telecine at 25/24 normal speed. The resulting output has pairs of fields corresponding to each original film frame. No additional fields are required as the resulting frame rate of 25Hz is exactly correct for the 625 line standard. The frame pairs are identified by analysis of field differences. A characteristic frame rate signal is produced by the frame pairing which can be extracted and provided to downstream equipment as shown in Figure 7.
Normally, the two fields making up a film frame will be conveyed as the two fields of a video frame. However, there are situations when this relationship does not hold and the two fields making up a film frame are straddled over a video frame. The problem with this splitting up of the "film field pairing" is that if an encoder tries to use the most efficient frame coding modes the field pairing is incorrect and consequently the quality of the encoded pictures is poor and/or the encoding efficiency is less than optimal. Flagging this situation allows corrective action to be taken so the correct relationship between the field and frame pairing can be maintained. This corrective action might take the form of the introduction of a field delay. Therefore the more coding efficient frame based encoding can be used. If it is not possible to take this "corrective action" the flagging of this situation means that the encoder will not try and use frame based techniques if it is not correct to do so.
The mixer is a standard electronic edit tool which is widely used to control switching between two sources. Typically described as a dissolve or fade, one input is reduced in amplitude while a second input is increased by a corresponding amount. The gradient signal is usually linear on each signal. The linear gradient is usually applied to each field and may affect many fields. On film originated material the mix can mask the normal frame correlation of field pairs since mix can cause field-to-field differences. A picture correlation will have a minimum value corresponding to the mid point of the mixing function. The microprocessor can use this information along with the field and frame difference outputs to provide a co-timed flag indicating the duration of the video mix as shown in Figure 8.
In the presence of a fade to or from black or a cross-fade, many motion estimators within the compression encoder have difficulty in producing the correct motion vectors. By providing a flag to indicate that these fades are occurring, the motion estimator can then take into account the luminance changes experienced during a fade and so improve the quality of the motion vectors produced. The type of action that would be taken during a fade would be to adjust the thresholds used between the search window and the trial block so that the luminance change can also be included in this comparison. Luminance fades and cross-fades can be thought of as linear or non-linear keying. The luminance fade/cross-fade information can be presented as a linear key but provided the encoder had been provided with the transfer function of the key involved, a non-linear key could also be used. In compression encoders having motion estimators which remain effective in the presence of luminance fades, such as those utilising phase correlation, the luminance fade/cross -fade information may nonetheless remain of value. In the case of a linear fade, for example, it may prove beneficial to force the GOP structure IBPBPBI, that is to say to employ single B pictures between reference pictures.
The video analysis processor can generate a flash effect flag by looking at histogrammed luminance intensities across a number of pictures to identify sudden luminance changes. The encoder may make use of this flag to ensure that a picture which suffers from a flash effect is not used as a reference picture. In other words, the encoder may react to a flash effect flag by forcing the coding of a B picture. In this way, the encoder can avoid or reduce the degradation of the encoded sequence that would normally accompany a photographic lighting or other flash effect.

Claims

1. A method of video signal processing for use upstream of a compression encoder and adapted to provide for use by the encoder one or more flags from the group consisting of a shot change flag; a frame/field based encoding flag; a 3:2 pull-down flag; a 25/24 telecine flag; a luminance fade flag and a flash effect flag.
2. A method according to Claim 1 , wherein the 3:2 pull-down flag is capable of indicating the 3:2 sequence whether or not interrupted by edit.
3. A method according to Claim 1 , wherein the 25/24 telecine flag is capable of indicating the locations where fields making up a film frame are straddled over a video frame.
4. A method of video signal processing utilising a video analysis processor upstream of a compression encoder, wherein the video analysis processor provides a shot change flag on detection of a shot change in the video signal and wherein the encoder, if buffer occupancy permits, inserts an intra picture coded picture (I picture) on receipt of a shot change flag.
5. A method according to Claim 4, wherein, if the buffer occupancy does not permit the insertion of an I picture, the shot change flag triggers pre- filtering of the I picture so as to reduce the encoder buffer requirement for encoding as a P picture.
6. A method according to Claim 4, wherein, the shot change flag is provided in advance so as to enable the encoder to encode pictures preceding the shot change in a manner so as to provide sufficient buffer occupancy for an I picture to be inserted at the shot change.
7. A method according to Claim 6, wherein pictures preceding the shot change are encoded without use of I pictures so as to enable an I picture to be inserted at the shot change
8. A method of video signal processing utilising a video analysis processor upstream of a compression encoder, wherein the video analysis processor provides a frame-field based encoding flag and wherein the encoder receives said flag and employs a frame based encoding wherever possible.
9. A method of video signal processing utilising a video analysis processor upstream of a compression encoder, wherein the video analysis processor provides a luminance fade flag and wherein the encoder serves to make use of correlation between pictures not withstanding progressive changes in luminance.
10. A method of video signal processing utilising a video analysis processor upstream of a compression encoder, wherein the video analysis processor serves to look at histogrammed luminance intensities across a number of pictures to identify sudden luminance changes and thereby generate a flash effect flag and wherein the encoder serves to make use of the flash effect flag to avoid degradation of the encoded sequence.
11. A method according to Claim 10, wherein the compression encoder employs the flash effect flag to ensure that pictures suffering from flash effect are not coded as reference pictures.
PCT/GB1997/001034 1996-04-12 1997-04-14 Processing of video signals prior to compression WO1997039577A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU25184/97A AU2518497A (en) 1996-04-12 1997-04-14 Processing of video signals prior to compression
EP97916569A EP0893025A1 (en) 1996-04-12 1997-04-14 Processing of video signals prior to compression

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9607645.0 1996-04-12
GB9607645A GB9607645D0 (en) 1996-04-12 1996-04-12 Processing of video signals prior to compression

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1997039577A1 true WO1997039577A1 (en) 1997-10-23

Family

ID=10791989

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB1997/001034 WO1997039577A1 (en) 1996-04-12 1997-04-14 Processing of video signals prior to compression

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0893025A1 (en)
AU (1) AU2518497A (en)
GB (1) GB9607645D0 (en)
WO (1) WO1997039577A1 (en)

Cited By (39)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0881836A1 (en) * 1997-05-27 1998-12-02 Thomson Broadcast Systems Pre-processing device for MPEG 2 coding
WO1999033273A1 (en) * 1997-12-23 1999-07-01 Thomson Licensing S.A. Low noise encoding and decoding method
WO1999052297A1 (en) * 1998-04-03 1999-10-14 Sarnoff Corporation Method and apparatus for encoding video information
WO1999052115A1 (en) * 1998-04-03 1999-10-14 Avid Technology, Inc. Graphical user interface for field-based definition of special effects in a video editing system
WO2000019726A1 (en) * 1998-09-29 2000-04-06 General Instrument Corporation Method and apparatus for detecting scene changes and adjusting picture coding type in a high definition television encoder
WO2000042776A1 (en) * 1999-01-19 2000-07-20 Sarnoff Corporation Constraining video production based on compression-related information
EP1051837A2 (en) * 1998-01-21 2000-11-15 Sarnoff Corporation Apparatus and method for using side information to improve a coding system
WO2001015166A1 (en) * 1999-08-20 2001-03-01 Mti Film, Llc Method and apparatus for cadence editing of digital video field sequences
EP1100267A1 (en) * 1999-05-12 2001-05-16 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Telecine video signal detecting device
WO2001043448A1 (en) * 1999-12-06 2001-06-14 Snell & Wilcox Limited Apparatus and method for image data coding with additional data embedding
WO2002060184A1 (en) * 2001-01-26 2002-08-01 France Telecom Image coding and decoding method, corresponding devices and applications
FR2820256A1 (en) * 2001-01-26 2002-08-02 France Telecom Image coding and decoding method, e.g. for digital transmission over communications network, selectively using two coding modes, each optimizing the compression of an image as a function of different optimization criteria
US6731684B1 (en) 1998-09-29 2004-05-04 General Instrument Corporation Method and apparatus for detecting scene changes and adjusting picture coding type in a high definition television encoder
US6804301B2 (en) 2001-08-15 2004-10-12 General Instrument Corporation First pass encoding of I and P-frame complexity for compressed digital video
EP1359770A3 (en) * 2002-05-03 2004-11-17 Microsoft Corporation Signaling for fading compensation in video encoding
EP1501298A1 (en) * 2003-07-21 2005-01-26 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus of identifying a telecine portion and bad-edits in a video sequence
US6873368B1 (en) 1997-12-23 2005-03-29 Thomson Licensing Sa. Low noise encoding and decoding method
EP1524856A1 (en) * 2003-10-15 2005-04-20 Sony International (Europe) GmbH Method for processing video signals
EP1549066A2 (en) * 2003-12-22 2005-06-29 Thomson Licensing S.A. Method and apparatus for replay mode selection
EP1549065A1 (en) * 2003-12-22 2005-06-29 Deutsche Thomson-Brandt Gmbh Method and apparatus for selecting the replay mode for a picture sequence that is stored or recorded in a first format on a storage medium
WO2005101823A1 (en) * 2004-03-26 2005-10-27 Thomson Licensing Changing a playback speed for video presentation recorded in a modified film format
US6963377B2 (en) 2000-02-29 2005-11-08 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Encoding method and device including thresholding pixel-to-pixel differences
WO2005107266A1 (en) * 2004-04-16 2005-11-10 Apple Computer, Inc. Automated reverse telecine process
WO2006058114A1 (en) * 2004-11-24 2006-06-01 Analog Devices, Inc. Video data encoder employing telecine detection
CN1317900C (en) * 2003-07-21 2007-05-23 三星电子株式会社 Apparatus and method for detecting a 2:2 pull-down sequence
WO2007065041A1 (en) * 2005-10-24 2007-06-07 Qualcomm Incorporated Inverse telecine algorithm based on state machine
US7277486B2 (en) 2002-05-03 2007-10-02 Microsoft Corporation Parameterization for fading compensation
CN100361538C (en) * 2003-07-21 2008-01-09 三星电子株式会社 Apparatus and method for detecting film mode
EP1968325A2 (en) * 2007-02-28 2008-09-10 Tandberg Television ASA Compression of video signals containing fades and flashes
US7463684B2 (en) 2002-05-03 2008-12-09 Microsoft Corporation Fading estimation/compensation
EP2109320A3 (en) * 2008-04-11 2011-01-05 Sony Corporation Information processing apparatus and information processing method
US7986847B2 (en) 2004-10-15 2011-07-26 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Digital video camera with a moving image encoding feature and control method therefor, that selectively store decoded images as candidate reference images
US8009739B2 (en) 2003-09-07 2011-08-30 Microsoft Corporation Intensity estimation/compensation for interlaced forward-predicted fields
CN101014096B (en) * 2006-01-30 2011-09-07 Lsi罗吉克公司 Detection of moving interlaced text for film mode decision
US8718448B2 (en) 2011-05-04 2014-05-06 Apple Inc. Video pictures pattern detection
US8879635B2 (en) 2005-09-27 2014-11-04 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and device for data alignment with time domain boundary
US8948260B2 (en) 2005-10-17 2015-02-03 Qualcomm Incorporated Adaptive GOP structure in video streaming
US9131164B2 (en) 2006-04-04 2015-09-08 Qualcomm Incorporated Preprocessor method and apparatus
US9197912B2 (en) 2005-03-10 2015-11-24 Qualcomm Incorporated Content classification for multimedia processing

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0584840A2 (en) * 1989-04-27 1994-03-02 Victor Company Of Japan, Limited Apparatus for adaptive interframe predictive decoding of a video signal
US5317398A (en) * 1992-08-17 1994-05-31 Rca Thomson Licensing Corporation Video/film-mode (3:2 pulldown) detector using patterns of two-field differences
US5319468A (en) * 1991-04-18 1994-06-07 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Image signal recording and reproducing system with use of bandwidth compression coding
EP0612187A2 (en) * 1993-02-19 1994-08-24 Philips Electronics Uk Limited Identifying film frames in a video sequence
EP0637027A2 (en) * 1993-07-29 1995-02-01 Hewlett-Packard Company Detecting scene cuts in video processing
WO1995015659A1 (en) * 1993-12-02 1995-06-08 Compression Labs, Incorporated An analyzer and methods for detecting and processing video data types in a video data stream
EP0659016A2 (en) * 1993-12-17 1995-06-21 Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Corporation Method and apparatus for video cut detection
EP0660327A2 (en) * 1993-12-21 1995-06-28 AT&T Corp. Method and apparatus for detecting abrupt and gradual scene changes in image sequences
EP0705041A2 (en) * 1994-09-29 1996-04-03 Sony Corporation Scene change adaptive video encoder
EP0708564A2 (en) * 1994-10-21 1996-04-24 AT&T Corp. Method of encoder control

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0584840A2 (en) * 1989-04-27 1994-03-02 Victor Company Of Japan, Limited Apparatus for adaptive interframe predictive decoding of a video signal
US5319468A (en) * 1991-04-18 1994-06-07 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Image signal recording and reproducing system with use of bandwidth compression coding
US5317398A (en) * 1992-08-17 1994-05-31 Rca Thomson Licensing Corporation Video/film-mode (3:2 pulldown) detector using patterns of two-field differences
EP0612187A2 (en) * 1993-02-19 1994-08-24 Philips Electronics Uk Limited Identifying film frames in a video sequence
EP0637027A2 (en) * 1993-07-29 1995-02-01 Hewlett-Packard Company Detecting scene cuts in video processing
WO1995015659A1 (en) * 1993-12-02 1995-06-08 Compression Labs, Incorporated An analyzer and methods for detecting and processing video data types in a video data stream
EP0659016A2 (en) * 1993-12-17 1995-06-21 Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Corporation Method and apparatus for video cut detection
EP0660327A2 (en) * 1993-12-21 1995-06-28 AT&T Corp. Method and apparatus for detecting abrupt and gradual scene changes in image sequences
EP0705041A2 (en) * 1994-09-29 1996-04-03 Sony Corporation Scene change adaptive video encoder
EP0708564A2 (en) * 1994-10-21 1996-04-24 AT&T Corp. Method of encoder control

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
LEE J ET AL: "TEMPORALLY ADAPTIVE MOTION INTERPOLATION EXPLOITING TEMPORAL MASKING IN VISUAL PERCEPTION", IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, vol. 3, no. 5, 1 September 1994 (1994-09-01), pages 513 - 526, XP000476828 *

Cited By (65)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6229925B1 (en) 1997-05-27 2001-05-08 Thomas Broadcast Systems Pre-processing device for MPEG 2 coding
FR2764156A1 (en) * 1997-05-27 1998-12-04 Thomson Broadcast Systems PRETREATMENT DEVICE FOR MPEG II CODING
EP0881836A1 (en) * 1997-05-27 1998-12-02 Thomson Broadcast Systems Pre-processing device for MPEG 2 coding
WO1999033273A1 (en) * 1997-12-23 1999-07-01 Thomson Licensing S.A. Low noise encoding and decoding method
US6873368B1 (en) 1997-12-23 2005-03-29 Thomson Licensing Sa. Low noise encoding and decoding method
US7800690B2 (en) 1997-12-23 2010-09-21 Thomson Licensing Low noise encoding and decoding apparatus and method
EP1051837A4 (en) * 1998-01-21 2004-03-31 Sarnoff Corp Apparatus and method for using side information to improve a coding system
EP1051837A2 (en) * 1998-01-21 2000-11-15 Sarnoff Corporation Apparatus and method for using side information to improve a coding system
JP2002502158A (en) * 1998-01-21 2002-01-22 サーノフ コーポレイション Apparatus and method for using side information to improve coding systems
US6434196B1 (en) 1998-04-03 2002-08-13 Sarnoff Corporation Method and apparatus for encoding video information
US6392710B1 (en) 1998-04-03 2002-05-21 Avid Technology, Inc. Graphical user interface for field-based definition of special effects in a video editing system
WO1999052297A1 (en) * 1998-04-03 1999-10-14 Sarnoff Corporation Method and apparatus for encoding video information
WO1999052115A1 (en) * 1998-04-03 1999-10-14 Avid Technology, Inc. Graphical user interface for field-based definition of special effects in a video editing system
WO2000019726A1 (en) * 1998-09-29 2000-04-06 General Instrument Corporation Method and apparatus for detecting scene changes and adjusting picture coding type in a high definition television encoder
US6731684B1 (en) 1998-09-29 2004-05-04 General Instrument Corporation Method and apparatus for detecting scene changes and adjusting picture coding type in a high definition television encoder
WO2000042776A1 (en) * 1999-01-19 2000-07-20 Sarnoff Corporation Constraining video production based on compression-related information
US6785338B1 (en) 1999-01-19 2004-08-31 Sarnoff Corporation Constraining video production based on compression-related information
EP1100267A1 (en) * 1999-05-12 2001-05-16 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Telecine video signal detecting device
EP1100267A4 (en) * 1999-05-12 2004-05-19 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Telecine video signal detecting device
WO2001015166A1 (en) * 1999-08-20 2001-03-01 Mti Film, Llc Method and apparatus for cadence editing of digital video field sequences
US6542199B1 (en) 1999-08-20 2003-04-01 Mti Film Llc Cadence editing
WO2001043448A1 (en) * 1999-12-06 2001-06-14 Snell & Wilcox Limited Apparatus and method for image data coding with additional data embedding
US6963377B2 (en) 2000-02-29 2005-11-08 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Encoding method and device including thresholding pixel-to-pixel differences
US7512179B2 (en) 2001-01-26 2009-03-31 France Telecom Image coding and decoding method, corresponding devices and applications
FR2820256A1 (en) * 2001-01-26 2002-08-02 France Telecom Image coding and decoding method, e.g. for digital transmission over communications network, selectively using two coding modes, each optimizing the compression of an image as a function of different optimization criteria
WO2002060184A1 (en) * 2001-01-26 2002-08-01 France Telecom Image coding and decoding method, corresponding devices and applications
US6804301B2 (en) 2001-08-15 2004-10-12 General Instrument Corporation First pass encoding of I and P-frame complexity for compressed digital video
US7463684B2 (en) 2002-05-03 2008-12-09 Microsoft Corporation Fading estimation/compensation
US9363536B2 (en) 2002-05-03 2016-06-07 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Parameterization for fading compensation
US7277486B2 (en) 2002-05-03 2007-10-02 Microsoft Corporation Parameterization for fading compensation
US7609767B2 (en) 2002-05-03 2009-10-27 Microsoft Corporation Signaling for fading compensation
US8265148B2 (en) 2002-05-03 2012-09-11 Microsoft Corporation Parameterization for fading compensation
US10264284B2 (en) 2002-05-03 2019-04-16 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Parameterization for fading compensation
EP1359770A3 (en) * 2002-05-03 2004-11-17 Microsoft Corporation Signaling for fading compensation in video encoding
US9843822B2 (en) 2002-05-03 2017-12-12 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Parameterization for fading compensation
CN100450194C (en) * 2003-07-21 2009-01-07 三星电子株式会社 Image signal detecting apparatus and method thereof capable of removing comb by bad-edit
CN1317900C (en) * 2003-07-21 2007-05-23 三星电子株式会社 Apparatus and method for detecting a 2:2 pull-down sequence
EP1501298A1 (en) * 2003-07-21 2005-01-26 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus of identifying a telecine portion and bad-edits in a video sequence
CN100361538C (en) * 2003-07-21 2008-01-09 三星电子株式会社 Apparatus and method for detecting film mode
US8009739B2 (en) 2003-09-07 2011-08-30 Microsoft Corporation Intensity estimation/compensation for interlaced forward-predicted fields
EP1524856A1 (en) * 2003-10-15 2005-04-20 Sony International (Europe) GmbH Method for processing video signals
EP1549066A3 (en) * 2003-12-22 2008-01-23 Thomson Licensing Method and apparatus for replay mode selection
EP1549066A2 (en) * 2003-12-22 2005-06-29 Thomson Licensing S.A. Method and apparatus for replay mode selection
EP1549065A1 (en) * 2003-12-22 2005-06-29 Deutsche Thomson-Brandt Gmbh Method and apparatus for selecting the replay mode for a picture sequence that is stored or recorded in a first format on a storage medium
WO2005101823A1 (en) * 2004-03-26 2005-10-27 Thomson Licensing Changing a playback speed for video presentation recorded in a modified film format
US7480447B2 (en) 2004-03-26 2009-01-20 Thomson Licensing Pause time recovery and playback speed-up without loss of picture information
WO2005107266A1 (en) * 2004-04-16 2005-11-10 Apple Computer, Inc. Automated reverse telecine process
US7986847B2 (en) 2004-10-15 2011-07-26 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Digital video camera with a moving image encoding feature and control method therefor, that selectively store decoded images as candidate reference images
WO2006058114A1 (en) * 2004-11-24 2006-06-01 Analog Devices, Inc. Video data encoder employing telecine detection
US9197912B2 (en) 2005-03-10 2015-11-24 Qualcomm Incorporated Content classification for multimedia processing
US8879635B2 (en) 2005-09-27 2014-11-04 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and device for data alignment with time domain boundary
US8879856B2 (en) 2005-09-27 2014-11-04 Qualcomm Incorporated Content driven transcoder that orchestrates multimedia transcoding using content information
US8879857B2 (en) 2005-09-27 2014-11-04 Qualcomm Incorporated Redundant data encoding methods and device
US9071822B2 (en) 2005-09-27 2015-06-30 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and device for data alignment with time domain boundary
US9088776B2 (en) 2005-09-27 2015-07-21 Qualcomm Incorporated Scalability techniques based on content information
US9113147B2 (en) 2005-09-27 2015-08-18 Qualcomm Incorporated Scalability techniques based on content information
US8948260B2 (en) 2005-10-17 2015-02-03 Qualcomm Incorporated Adaptive GOP structure in video streaming
WO2007065041A1 (en) * 2005-10-24 2007-06-07 Qualcomm Incorporated Inverse telecine algorithm based on state machine
CN101014096B (en) * 2006-01-30 2011-09-07 Lsi罗吉克公司 Detection of moving interlaced text for film mode decision
US9131164B2 (en) 2006-04-04 2015-09-08 Qualcomm Incorporated Preprocessor method and apparatus
EP1968325A2 (en) * 2007-02-28 2008-09-10 Tandberg Television ASA Compression of video signals containing fades and flashes
EP1968325A3 (en) * 2007-02-28 2009-09-09 Ericsson AB Compression of video signals containing fades and flashes
EP2109320A3 (en) * 2008-04-11 2011-01-05 Sony Corporation Information processing apparatus and information processing method
US8718448B2 (en) 2011-05-04 2014-05-06 Apple Inc. Video pictures pattern detection
US9661261B2 (en) 2011-05-04 2017-05-23 Apple Inc. Video pictures pattern detection

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB9607645D0 (en) 1996-06-12
EP0893025A1 (en) 1999-01-27
AU2518497A (en) 1997-11-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO1997039577A1 (en) Processing of video signals prior to compression
US5734420A (en) Film mode video sequence detector
CA2216077C (en) Scene change detector for digital video
US20070064148A1 (en) Methods and apparatus for correction of 2-3 field patterns
JP4402219B2 (en) Detection and encoding of flash frames in video data
CA2295754C (en) Switching compressed video bitstreams
US5821991A (en) Method and apparatus for inverse telecine process by correlating vectors of pixel differences
WO1995019682A1 (en) Suppression of sawtooth artifacts in the display of a progressively scanned television signal
KR20030031961A (en) Video content analysis method and system leveraging data-compression parameters
JPH09154143A (en) Video data compression method
EP2048889A2 (en) Method and system for processing B pictures with missing or invalid forward reference pictures
WO2000033579A1 (en) Progressive/interlace and redundant field detection for encoder
US6271879B1 (en) Controlling and detecting alignment of composite video color frames
US6983013B1 (en) Method and device for encoding video signal
WO1996001023A1 (en) Methods for the synchronisation of successive digital video
EP0117719B1 (en) Method of decoding an encoded video signal and a receiving apparatus for decoding the signal
US5559558A (en) Apparatus and methodology for coding digital video signals to improve picture quality with minimal overhead
US6067117A (en) Image signal processor
JP2002077922A (en) Picture control system and picture decoder
JP3006544B2 (en) Image signal encoding device
KR100345312B1 (en) Splicing Method for video stream with open GOP
JPH08336138A (en) Moving image compression device
JP3861347B2 (en) Filter device and filtering method
Wang et al. Improved error concealment using scene information
JP2000295567A (en) Coded data editor

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AU CA JP US

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1997916569

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1997916569

Country of ref document: EP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

Ref document number: 97536860

Format of ref document f/p: F

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: CA

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 1997916569

Country of ref document: EP