WO1997004705A1 - Hybrid fes and active orthosis method and system for controlling the movement of a limb - Google Patents

Hybrid fes and active orthosis method and system for controlling the movement of a limb Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1997004705A1
WO1997004705A1 PCT/US1996/007412 US9607412W WO9704705A1 WO 1997004705 A1 WO1997004705 A1 WO 1997004705A1 US 9607412 W US9607412 W US 9607412W WO 9704705 A1 WO9704705 A1 WO 9704705A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
signal
person
limb
control signal
control
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1996/007412
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Nicholas M. Labun
Thomas J. Mcclaughry
Shay-Ping Thomas Wang
Original Assignee
Motorola Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Motorola Inc. filed Critical Motorola Inc.
Priority to AU58704/96A priority Critical patent/AU5870496A/en
Publication of WO1997004705A1 publication Critical patent/WO1997004705A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61NELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N1/00Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
    • A61N1/18Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
    • A61N1/32Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
    • A61N1/36Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation
    • A61N1/36003Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation of motor muscles, e.g. for walking assistance

Definitions

  • the present invention is related to the following inventions which are assigned to the same assignee as the present invention:
  • the present invention relates generally to controllers and, in particular, to controllers for controlling the movement of inactive limbs.
  • Prior art control systems have attempted to correct many of these problems by providing motion of the impaired limb based upon the introduction of functional electrical stimulation signals to the muscles of the limb.
  • Alternative active orthosis systems provide an exoskeletal support structure that is driven by electrical motors or hydraulic systems.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram representation of a system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention for controlling the motion of at least one limb of a person's body.
  • FIG. 2 shows a perspective view of the interface unit 12 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 shows a schematic representation of a person's body in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 shows a schematic representation of the polynomial processor used in an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 shows a flow chart representation of a method of determining control coefficients for a O 97/04705 PO7US96/07412
  • FIG. 6 illustrates a block diagram of the system in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates a block diagram representation of a hybrid system in accordance with a further embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 8 illustrates a block diagram representation of a system in accordance with an additional embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 9 presents a flowchart representation of a method used in conjunction with one embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 10 presents a flowchart representation of a method used in conjunction with an alternative embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 11 presents a flowchart representation of a method used in conjunction with a further embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 12 presents a flowchart representation of a method used in conjunction with an additional embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram representation of a system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention for controlling the motion of at least one limb of a person's body.
  • Person's body 10 has a limb with a plurality of inactive muscles. It is assumed that the person, due to any one of a number of medical reasons has limited use of the limb and thus, has limited or no control of the plurality of inactive muscles of the limb through the operation of the person's body.
  • Interface unit 12 in communication with the person's body, generates an input signal 14.
  • This input signal 14 can be generated in many ways. For instance, input signal 14 can be generated by one or more sensors that monitor the person's biological functions or by one or more switches that provide the person the ability to more directly provide input to the system.
  • the input signal 14 can be represented by either a scalar function of time or a vector function of time depending on the configuration and make-up of the interface unit 12.
  • Polynomial processor 16 is responsive to the input signal 14 and generates a control signal 18 as a polynomial function of the input signal.
  • This sophisticated device allows for the system to provide more accurate control and faster response times to allow the limb motion that is more complex than traditional control systems and with greater fluidity of motion of the effected limb.
  • the operation of a specific embodiment of the polynomial processor 16 and a method for programming this processor is provided in conjunction with FIG.s 4 and 5.
  • the introduction of the nonlinear terms of the polynomial allow for greater diversity in the determination of a control solution.
  • the great speed that the control signal can be calculated by the parallel network configuration of the polynomial processor that is described herein allow for more rapid control response.
  • the FES Generator 20 is responsive to the control signal 18 and generates a functional electrical stimulation (FES) signal 22.
  • the FES signal is introduced to a plurality of electrodes 24, coupled to at least one of the plurality of inactive muscles of the person's body 10, for stimulating the motion.
  • the FES signals provide current pulses to produce controlled muscle contractions in inactive muscles.
  • These electrodes can be placed percutaneously via implants under the skin of the person's body 10. Alternatively the electrodes can be placed transcutaneously outside of the skin of the person's body 10.
  • polynomial processor 16 and generator 20 work in combination to provide a sequence of FES signals that have the effect of providing a sequence of desired movements of the inactive muscle or muscles.
  • complex patterns of motion such as reaching, standing, walking etc. can be accomplished through the control of a plurality of muscles in a sequence that emulates the normal motion of an unimpaired person.
  • FIG. 2 shows a perspective view of the interface unit 12 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • interface unit 12 includes a plurality of buttons 40 - 46 that are each coupled to a separate switch (not expressly shown) .
  • the depression of button 40 for instance, closes a switch contact that generates an input signal to polynomial processor 16 indicative of the desire of the person to stand.
  • buttons 42 - 46 correspond to other complex patterns of motion such as reaching with the person's right or left hand or walking.
  • the buttons 40 - 46 of interface unit 12 can be designed to be activated by touch of a chin, nose or other portion of the person's body 10.
  • buttons 40 - 46 of interface unit 12 can be designed to be activated by touch of a wand or stylus held by the person in his or her teeth.
  • interface unit 12 includes a microphone and speech recognition system for monitoring the voice of the person and for providing input signals 14 in response to recognized commands such as "stand", "walk” or "reach".
  • FIG. 3 shows a schematic representation of a person's body in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Person's body 10 is attached with a plurality of electrodes 24 that are provided a like plurality of FES signals 22.
  • the person is paraplegic, that is, the person is paralyzed from the waist down.
  • the electrodes 24 provide current pulses to the inactive muscles of the legs so as to stimulate complex patterns of motion such as standing, balancing, and walking.
  • FIG. 3 also a plurality of sensors 52 - 64 used in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention,
  • sensors 50 - 64 provide the function of interface unit 12 of generating a plurality of input signals 14.
  • Input signals 14 from sensors 50 - 56, in contact with the person's body 10, provide empirical electromyographic signature data from non-paralyzed portions of the person's body 10.
  • the natural response of the non-paralyzed muscle sites can be used to trigger the initiation of movement in the paralyzed limbs.
  • the action of the chest muscles of the person's body 10 while trying to stand could be used to trigger the control of the person's paralyzed legs via generated FES signals so as to stimulate the standing response.
  • sensors 50 - 56 can be used to monitor other biological parameters of the person's body 10, such as skin resistivity, perspiration levels, heart-rate, breathing-rate etc. which are useful to the motion control.
  • Input signals 14 from sensors 58 - 64 in contact with inactive muscles of the legs generate input signals 14 that provide data on the fatigue of these inactive muscles.
  • fatigue feedback that is normally felt by a non-paralyzed person
  • Appropriate control action may include ceasing the movement until the fatigue passes or modifying the control based on the presence of fatigue.
  • FIG. 4 shows a schematic representation of the polynomial processor used in an embodiment of the present invention.
  • This polynomial processor 16 calculates output command signals as a polynomial function of one or more control input signals.
  • a plurality of control input signals, xi, X 2 , . . ., n are fed to input nodes 176, 178, . . . 180 of an input layer.
  • the output of each input node 176, 178, . . . 180 in the input layer is distributed at least one processing element of a hidden layer (of which only processing elements 182, 184, 186 are shown) .
  • Each processing element applies a gating function to each of the control inputs to produce a corresponding gated input.
  • processing element 182 applies a gating function (gu) to the control input it receives from input node 176; it applies a gating function (g2l) to the control input it receives from input node 178; and so forth.
  • the gated inputs are multiplied together by a multiplier in the processing element to form a product, which is then multiplied by a control coefficient w - ⁇ to form the ith term of the polynomial.
  • the ith term of the polynomial is added to the other, similarly calculated, terms by summer 188 to produce the control output y.
  • processing element 182 which happens to be responsible for generating the first polynomial term, multiplies its gated inputs together to form a product (which happens to be one because in this case the gating functions gu, g21/ • • • 9nl are all 0), which is multiplied by a control coefficient w 0 to produce a corresponding output w 0 .
  • Processing element 184 which happens to be responsible for generating the wi i term of the polynomial, multiplies its gated inputs together to form a product (which happens to be i because in this case the gated functions are all 0 except for the gating function that is applied to the xi output of the input node 176) , which is multiplied by a control coefficient wi to produce a corresponding output i wi .
  • processing element 186 produces an output w n - ⁇ xi to the power of gin, >-2 to the power of g2n • • • • • / ⁇ n to the power of gn N -
  • the outputs of processing elements 182, 184, . . . 186 are summed together by a suitable summing means or function, such as summer 188, in an output layer to produce the output command signal y of the processor as follows:
  • m is an integer which represents the number of terms in the polynomial.
  • FIG. 5 shows a flow chart representation of a method of determining control coefficients for a processor in accordance with FIG. 4 in one embodiment of the present invention.
  • control transfer characteristic data that represent the desired control output values as a function of the input values are provided.
  • box 170 the number of data is compared with the number of control coefficients.
  • decision box 171 if the number of data equal the number of control coefficients, the procedure goes to box 172 which indicates that a matrix inversion technique is used to solve for the initial value of each coefficient. If, on the other hand, the number of data is not equal to the number of control coefficients, the procedure goes to box 173, which indicates that a least squares estimation technique is used to solve for the initial value of each coefficient.
  • control transfer characteristic data are generated based upon the movements of a unimpaired limb.
  • an input/output data set can be generated by reading a plurality of example input signals and reading the corresponding drives signals off a series of drive motors that are acting as tachometers.
  • the motion of the unimpaired person's limbs drives the external bracing and the velocity of the drive motors generates a voltage signal in proportion to velocity.
  • a similar arrangement can be used for the FES embodiment of the present invention.
  • Example input signals can be read and recorded, the unimpaired person's limbs can be moved in response to the input and the actual muscle stimulation signals (generated by the body so as to generate the motion of the limb) can be read and recorded to generate the input/output data necessary for forming the control transfer characteristic.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates a block diagram of the system in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention. Elements 10 - 18 correspond to like elements previously discussed.
  • an active orthosis system for controlling the motion of at least one limb of a person's body 10 is presented that uses an external bracing apparatus 34.
  • This external bracing apparatus 34 provides support to the limb and may include at least one drive unit 36, a cybernetic actuator that drives the motion of external bracing apparatus in response to a drive signal 32.
  • Generator 30 responsive to the control signal 18, generates the drive signal 32 for the drive unit 36.
  • the drive unit consists of an actuated clutch mechanism that selectively "freezes” or restricts the motion of a joint of the external bracing apparatus in response to the drive signal. In this fashion the external bracing apparatus can provide more rigid support in some selected instances such as the act of holding still while standing.
  • the system of FIG. 6 has the advantage that it need not rely upon the stimulation of inactive muscles of person's body 10 and it can retain or support the position of persons body 10. In some cases, the inactive muscles of person's body 10 may be unsuitable for stimulation by the methods previously described. In this case, the system of FIG. 6 provides an alternative solution to the control of limbs including these inactive muscles.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates a block diagram representation of a hybrid system in accordance with a further embodiment of the present invention. This system presents a hybrid between the active orthosis system of
  • a second polynomial processor 31 calculates a control signal 19 based on the input signal 14.
  • First generator 20 generates FES signals in response to the control signal 18.
  • Second generator 30 generates drive signals in response to control signal 19.
  • polynomial processors 16 and 31 synchronously control the operation of both the inactive muscles and the external bracing apparatus so as to simultaneously control the motion of the limb from these two sources.
  • FIG. 8 illustrates a block diagram representation of a system in accordance with an additional embodiment of the present invention.
  • this system includes a preprocessor 70 and a post processor 72.
  • a single polynomial processor 16 is used to generate a single control signal 18.
  • Preprocessor 70 preprocesses input signal 14 prior to its introduction to polynomial processor 16.
  • preprocessor 70 filters input signal 14.
  • high-pass, low-pass, band-pass or notch filtering or any combination thereof can be performed on input signal 14 so as to condition this signal or signals prior to processor.
  • input signal 14 is a vector quantity comprising a plurality of individual signals
  • these filters can be customized to each individual signal to provide the appropriate conditioning. While the operation of preprocessor 70 has been described in terms of a filtering operation, other preprocessing operations such as limiting, dead-band, sample and hold, etc, can likewise be performed and should be considered to be within the broad scope of the term preprocessing.
  • Post processor 72 processes the control signal 18 prior to its introduction to either the generator 20 or the generator 30.
  • the control signal 18 is compared with a control signal threshold. If the control signal is above a threshold a first control signal is generated. If however, the control signal is below the threshold, a second control signal is generated. While the operation of post processor 72 has been described in terms of a comparing operation, other post processing operations such as filtering, limiting, dead-band, sample and hold, etc, can likewise be performed and should be considered to be within the broad scope of the term post processing.
  • post processor 72 generates two different signals, a first signal for input to the first generator 20, and a second signal for input to the second generator 30. In this fashion potentially distinct requirements of the two generators can be accommodated.
  • FIG. 9 presents a flowchart representation of a method used in conjunction with one embodiment of the present invention. This method of operation can be used in conjunction with the system of FIG 1.
  • the method begins in step 200 by receiving an input signal from an interface unit in communication with the person's body.
  • a control signal is generated as a polynomial function of at least one input signal as shown in step 202.
  • a functional electrical stimulation signal is generated based on the control signal as shown in step 204 and the motion of at least one limb is stimulated by introducing the functional electrical stimulation signal to at least one of the plurality of inactive muscles as shown in step 206.
  • FIG. 10 presents a flowchart representation of a method used in conjunction with an alternative embodiment of the present invention.
  • This method is for controlling the motion of a least one limb of a person's body using a external bracing apparatus having at least one drive unit that drives the motion of external bracing apparatus in response to a drive signal.
  • this method can be used in conjunction with the system of FIG 6.
  • Like reference numerals correspond with steps common to the method of FIG. 9.
  • Step 210 includes generating the drive signal based on the control signal. The at least one limb is moved by introducing the drive signal to the drive unit as shown in step 212.
  • FIG. 11 presents a flowchart representation of a method used in conjunction with a further embodiment of the present invention.
  • This method is for controlling the motion of at least one limb of a person's body using an external bracing apparatus having at least one drive unit that drives the motion of external bracing apparatus in response to a drive signal, the limb having a plurality of inactive muscles, the person having limited control of the plurality of inactive muscles of at least one limb through the operation of the person's body.
  • this method can be used in conjunction with the system of FIG 7.
  • Like reference numerals correspond with steps common to the method of FIG. 9 & 10.
  • This method includes step 220 for moving the at least one limb by introducing the functional electrical stimulation signal to at least one of the plurality of inactive muscles and by introducing the drive signal to the drive unit.
  • FIG. 12 presents a flowchart representation of a method used in conjunction with an additional embodiment of the present invention.
  • This method is for controlling the motion of at least one limb of a person's body using an external bracing apparatus having at least one drive unit that drives the motion of external bracing apparatus in response to a drive signal, the limb having a plurality of inactive muscles, the person having limited control of the plurality of inactive muscles of at least one limb through the operation of the person's body.
  • this method can be used in conjunction with the system of FIG 8.
  • Like reference numerals correspond with steps common to the method of FIG. 9, 10 & 11.
  • this method includes step 230 of preprocessing the input signal prior to the step of generating a control signal.
  • the control signal is also post processed as shown in step 232.

Abstract

A system for controlling the movement of at least one limb of a person's body (10) uses an external bracing apparatus (34) having at least one drive unit (36) that drives or controls the movement of external bracing apparatus (34) in response to a drive signal (32). An interface unit (12) in communication with the person's body (10) receives an input signal. A polynomial processor (16) generates a control signal (18) as a polynomial function of the at least one input signal. A first generator (20) generates a functional electrical stimulation signal (22). A second generator (30) generates the drive signal (32) for the drive unit. A plurality of electrodes (24), coupled to at least one of a plurality of inactive muscles, stimulates the movement of the at least one limb by introducing the functional electrical stimulation signal to the at least one of the plurality of inactive muscles.

Description

HYBRID FES AND ACTIVE ORTHOSIS METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING THE MOVEMENT OF A LIMB
Related Inventions
The present invention is related to the following inventions which are assigned to the same assignee as the present invention:
(1) "Artificial Neuron and Method of Using Same", having Serial No. 08/076,602, filed June 14, 1993;
(2) "Auto Tuning Controller and Method of Use Therefor" having Serial No. 08/268,395, filed June 30, 1994;
(3) "Auto-Scaling Controller and Method of Use Therefor" having Serial No. 08/282,118, filed July 28,
1994; and
(4) "Cascade Tuning Controller and Method of Use Therefor" having Serial No. 08/288,379, filed August 10, 1994. (5) "Controller for Nonlinear Systems and Method for Use Thereof", having Serial No. 08/358,291, filed December 19 , 1994.
(6) "Method of Programming a Polynomial Processor", having Serial No. 08/358,278, filed December 19, 1994. (7) "Polynomial controller for nonlinear systems and methods of use thereof," having Serial No. 08/358,426, filed December 19, 1994.
(8) "FES method and system for controlling the movement of a limb," filed concurrently herewith.
(9) "Active orthosis method and system for controlling the movement of a limb, " filed concurrently herewith.
The subject matter of the above-identified related inventions is hereby incorporated by reference hereto into the disclosure of this invention.
Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to controllers and, in particular, to controllers for controlling the movement of inactive limbs.
Background of the Invention
More than one-quarter of a million people currently have impaired use of their limbs due to injuries to their spinal cords. This impaired limb use, besides creating mental and physical challenges to the patient also can generate muscular atrophy, loss of bone mineral content, decubitus ulcers, urinary tract infections, muscles spasticity, impaired circulation, and reduced heart and lung capacity.
Prior art control systems have attempted to correct many of these problems by providing motion of the impaired limb based upon the introduction of functional electrical stimulation signals to the muscles of the limb. Alternative active orthosis systems provide an exoskeletal support structure that is driven by electrical motors or hydraulic systems.
While providing a great advance in the medical prostheses, these prior art approaches suffer from an inaccurate and coarse form of control that is unsuitable for many patients. There is a need for a control system that provides a greater fluidity of limb motion.
Brief Description of the Drawings
The invention is pointed out with particularity in the appended claims. However, other features of the invention will become more apparent and the invention will be best understood by referring to the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram representation of a system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention for controlling the motion of at least one limb of a person's body.
FIG. 2 shows a perspective view of the interface unit 12 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 3 shows a schematic representation of a person's body in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 4 shows a schematic representation of the polynomial processor used in an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 5 shows a flow chart representation of a method of determining control coefficients for a O 97/04705 PO7US96/07412
processor in accordance with FIG. 4 in one embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 6 illustrates a block diagram of the system in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 7 illustrates a block diagram representation of a hybrid system in accordance with a further embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 8 illustrates a block diagram representation of a system in accordance with an additional embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 9 presents a flowchart representation of a method used in conjunction with one embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 10 presents a flowchart representation of a method used in conjunction with an alternative embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 11 presents a flowchart representation of a method used in conjunction with a further embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 12 presents a flowchart representation of a method used in conjunction with an additional embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description of a Preferred Embodiment
FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram representation of a system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention for controlling the motion of at least one limb of a person's body. Person's body 10 has a limb with a plurality of inactive muscles. It is assumed that the person, due to any one of a number of medical reasons has limited use of the limb and thus, has limited or no control of the plurality of inactive muscles of the limb through the operation of the person's body.
Interface unit 12, in communication with the person's body, generates an input signal 14. This input signal 14 can be generated in many ways. For instance, input signal 14 can be generated by one or more sensors that monitor the person's biological functions or by one or more switches that provide the person the ability to more directly provide input to the system. The input signal 14 can be represented by either a scalar function of time or a vector function of time depending on the configuration and make-up of the interface unit 12.
Polynomial processor 16 is responsive to the input signal 14 and generates a control signal 18 as a polynomial function of the input signal. The use of this sophisticated device allows for the system to provide more accurate control and faster response times to allow the limb motion that is more complex than traditional control systems and with greater fluidity of motion of the effected limb. The operation of a specific embodiment of the polynomial processor 16 and a method for programming this processor is provided in conjunction with FIG.s 4 and 5. In particular, the introduction of the nonlinear terms of the polynomial allow for greater diversity in the determination of a control solution. Further, the great speed that the control signal can be calculated by the parallel network configuration of the polynomial processor that is described herein allow for more rapid control response.
Generator 20 is responsive to the control signal 18 and generates a functional electrical stimulation (FES) signal 22. The FES signal is introduced to a plurality of electrodes 24, coupled to at least one of the plurality of inactive muscles of the person's body 10, for stimulating the motion. In effect, the FES signals provide current pulses to produce controlled muscle contractions in inactive muscles. These electrodes can be placed percutaneously via implants under the skin of the person's body 10. Alternatively the electrodes can be placed transcutaneously outside of the skin of the person's body 10.
In an embodiment of the present invention, polynomial processor 16 and generator 20 work in combination to provide a sequence of FES signals that have the effect of providing a sequence of desired movements of the inactive muscle or muscles. In this manner, complex patterns of motion such as reaching, standing, walking etc. can be accomplished through the control of a plurality of muscles in a sequence that emulates the normal motion of an unimpaired person.
FIG. 2 shows a perspective view of the interface unit 12 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In this embodiment, interface unit 12 includes a plurality of buttons 40 - 46 that are each coupled to a separate switch (not expressly shown) . The depression of button 40, for instance, closes a switch contact that generates an input signal to polynomial processor 16 indicative of the desire of the person to stand. Similarly buttons 42 - 46 correspond to other complex patterns of motion such as reaching with the person's right or left hand or walking. In instances where the person does not have the full use of his or her hands, the buttons 40 - 46 of interface unit 12 can be designed to be activated by touch of a chin, nose or other portion of the person's body 10. Further, buttons 40 - 46 of interface unit 12 can be designed to be activated by touch of a wand or stylus held by the person in his or her teeth. In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, interface unit 12 includes a microphone and speech recognition system for monitoring the voice of the person and for providing input signals 14 in response to recognized commands such as "stand", "walk" or "reach".
FIG. 3 shows a schematic representation of a person's body in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Person's body 10 is attached with a plurality of electrodes 24 that are provided a like plurality of FES signals 22. In this embodiment of the present invention, the person is paraplegic, that is, the person is paralyzed from the waist down. The electrodes 24 provide current pulses to the inactive muscles of the legs so as to stimulate complex patterns of motion such as standing, balancing, and walking.
FIG. 3 also a plurality of sensors 52 - 64 used in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention, In this embodiment sensors 50 - 64 provide the function of interface unit 12 of generating a plurality of input signals 14. Input signals 14 from sensors 50 - 56, in contact with the person's body 10, provide empirical electromyographic signature data from non-paralyzed portions of the person's body 10. In this manner, the natural response of the non-paralyzed muscle sites can be used to trigger the initiation of movement in the paralyzed limbs. For instance, the action of the chest muscles of the person's body 10 while trying to stand could be used to trigger the control of the person's paralyzed legs via generated FES signals so as to stimulate the standing response.
In addition, sensors 50 - 56 can be used to monitor other biological parameters of the person's body 10, such as skin resistivity, perspiration levels, heart-rate, breathing-rate etc. which are useful to the motion control.
Input signals 14 from sensors 58 - 64 in contact with inactive muscles of the legs generate input signals 14 that provide data on the fatigue of these inactive muscles. In this fashion, fatigue feedback (that is normally felt by a non-paralyzed person) can be incorporated into the control of the person's body so as to take appropriate control action. Appropriate control action may include ceasing the movement until the fatigue passes or modifying the control based on the presence of fatigue.
FIG. 4 shows a schematic representation of the polynomial processor used in an embodiment of the present invention. This polynomial processor 16 calculates output command signals as a polynomial function of one or more control input signals. A plurality of control input signals, xi, X2, . . ., n are fed to input nodes 176, 178, . . . 180 of an input layer. The output of each input node 176, 178, . . . 180 in the input layer is distributed at least one processing element of a hidden layer (of which only processing elements 182, 184, 186 are shown) . Each processing element applies a gating function to each of the control inputs to produce a corresponding gated input. Any given processing element may apply a different gating function to each different control input it receives. For example, processing element 182 applies a gating function (gu) to the control input it receives from input node 176; it applies a gating function (g2l) to the control input it receives from input node 178; and so forth. The gated inputs are multiplied together by a multiplier in the processing element to form a product, which is then multiplied by a control coefficient w -ι to form the ith term of the polynomial. The ith term of the polynomial is added to the other, similarly calculated, terms by summer 188 to produce the control output y.
For example, in FIG. 4 processing element 182, which happens to be responsible for generating the first polynomial term, multiplies its gated inputs together to form a product (which happens to be one because in this case the gating functions gu, g21/ • • • 9nl are all 0), which is multiplied by a control coefficient w0 to produce a corresponding output w0. Processing element 184, which happens to be responsible for generating the wi i term of the polynomial, multiplies its gated inputs together to form a product (which happens to be i because in this case the gated functions are all 0 except for the gating function that is applied to the xi output of the input node 176) , which is multiplied by a control coefficient wi to produce a corresponding output i wi . In like fashion, processing element 186 produces an output wn-ι xi to the power of gin, >-2 to the power of g2n • • • • / χn to the power of gnN- The outputs of processing elements 182, 184, . . . 186 are summed together by a suitable summing means or function, such as summer 188, in an output layer to produce the output command signal y of the processor as follows:
m y = Σ i-i xχ9li 2^2i . . . xn9ni (1) i=l
where m is an integer which represents the number of terms in the polynomial.
FIG. 5 shows a flow chart representation of a method of determining control coefficients for a processor in accordance with FIG. 4 in one embodiment of the present invention. First, regarding box 169, control transfer characteristic data that represent the desired control output values as a function of the input values are provided. Next, regarding box 170, the number of data is compared with the number of control coefficients. Regarding decision box 171, if the number of data equal the number of control coefficients, the procedure goes to box 172 which indicates that a matrix inversion technique is used to solve for the initial value of each coefficient. If, on the other hand, the number of data is not equal to the number of control coefficients, the procedure goes to box 173, which indicates that a least squares estimation technique is used to solve for the initial value of each coefficient.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the control transfer characteristic data are generated based upon the movements of a unimpaired limb. In particular, for an active orthosis embodiment, an input/output data set can be generated by reading a plurality of example input signals and reading the corresponding drives signals off a series of drive motors that are acting as tachometers. In this case the motion of the unimpaired person's limbs drives the external bracing and the velocity of the drive motors generates a voltage signal in proportion to velocity. A similar arrangement can be used for the FES embodiment of the present invention. Example input signals can be read and recorded, the unimpaired person's limbs can be moved in response to the input and the actual muscle stimulation signals (generated by the body so as to generate the motion of the limb) can be read and recorded to generate the input/output data necessary for forming the control transfer characteristic.
While a preferred embodiment is described herein, one with ordinary skill-in-the-art will recognize that other suitable estimation techniques, for example, extended least squares, pseudo inverse, Kalman filtering techniques, maximum likelihood techniques, Bayesian estimation, polynomial splines, and alike, could likewise be used to fit the control polynomial to the transfer characteristic data.
FIG. 6 illustrates a block diagram of the system in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention. Elements 10 - 18 correspond to like elements previously discussed. In this embodiment of the present invention an active orthosis system for controlling the motion of at least one limb of a person's body 10 is presented that uses an external bracing apparatus 34.
This external bracing apparatus 34 provides support to the limb and may include at least one drive unit 36, a cybernetic actuator that drives the motion of external bracing apparatus in response to a drive signal 32. Generator 30, responsive to the control signal 18, generates the drive signal 32 for the drive unit 36. In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, the drive unit consists of an actuated clutch mechanism that selectively "freezes" or restricts the motion of a joint of the external bracing apparatus in response to the drive signal. In this fashion the external bracing apparatus can provide more rigid support in some selected instances such as the act of holding still while standing.
The system of FIG. 6 has the advantage that it need not rely upon the stimulation of inactive muscles of person's body 10 and it can retain or support the position of persons body 10. In some cases, the inactive muscles of person's body 10 may be unsuitable for stimulation by the methods previously described. In this case, the system of FIG. 6 provides an alternative solution to the control of limbs including these inactive muscles.
FIG. 7 illustrates a block diagram representation of a hybrid system in accordance with a further embodiment of the present invention. This system presents a hybrid between the active orthosis system of
FIG. 6 and the FES system of FIG. 1. A second polynomial processor 31 calculates a control signal 19 based on the input signal 14. First generator 20 generates FES signals in response to the control signal 18. Second generator 30 generates drive signals in response to control signal 19. In this fashion, polynomial processors 16 and 31 synchronously control the operation of both the inactive muscles and the external bracing apparatus so as to simultaneously control the motion of the limb from these two sources.
FIG. 8 illustrates a block diagram representation of a system in accordance with an additional embodiment of the present invention. In addition to the elements of FIG. 7, this system includes a preprocessor 70 and a post processor 72. In this embodiment of the present invention, a single polynomial processor 16 is used to generate a single control signal 18.
Preprocessor 70 preprocesses input signal 14 prior to its introduction to polynomial processor 16. In an embodiment of the present invention, preprocessor 70 filters input signal 14. In alternative embodiments of the present invention, high-pass, low-pass, band-pass or notch filtering or any combination thereof can be performed on input signal 14 so as to condition this signal or signals prior to processor. In an embodiment where input signal 14 is a vector quantity comprising a plurality of individual signals, these filters can be customized to each individual signal to provide the appropriate conditioning. While the operation of preprocessor 70 has been described in terms of a filtering operation, other preprocessing operations such as limiting, dead-band, sample and hold, etc, can likewise be performed and should be considered to be within the broad scope of the term preprocessing.
Post processor 72 processes the control signal 18 prior to its introduction to either the generator 20 or the generator 30. In one embodiment of the post processor 72, the control signal 18 is compared with a control signal threshold. If the control signal is above a threshold a first control signal is generated. If however, the control signal is below the threshold, a second control signal is generated. While the operation of post processor 72 has been described in terms of a comparing operation, other post processing operations such as filtering, limiting, dead-band, sample and hold, etc, can likewise be performed and should be considered to be within the broad scope of the term post processing. In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, post processor 72 generates two different signals, a first signal for input to the first generator 20, and a second signal for input to the second generator 30. In this fashion potentially distinct requirements of the two generators can be accommodated.
FIG. 9 presents a flowchart representation of a method used in conjunction with one embodiment of the present invention. This method of operation can be used in conjunction with the system of FIG 1. The method begins in step 200 by receiving an input signal from an interface unit in communication with the person's body. A control signal is generated as a polynomial function of at least one input signal as shown in step 202. A functional electrical stimulation signal is generated based on the control signal as shown in step 204 and the motion of at least one limb is stimulated by introducing the functional electrical stimulation signal to at least one of the plurality of inactive muscles as shown in step 206.
FIG. 10 presents a flowchart representation of a method used in conjunction with an alternative embodiment of the present invention. This method is for controlling the motion of a least one limb of a person's body using a external bracing apparatus having at least one drive unit that drives the motion of external bracing apparatus in response to a drive signal. In particular, this method can be used in conjunction with the system of FIG 6. Like reference numerals correspond with steps common to the method of FIG. 9. Step 210 includes generating the drive signal based on the control signal. The at least one limb is moved by introducing the drive signal to the drive unit as shown in step 212.
FIG. 11 presents a flowchart representation of a method used in conjunction with a further embodiment of the present invention. This method is for controlling the motion of at least one limb of a person's body using an external bracing apparatus having at least one drive unit that drives the motion of external bracing apparatus in response to a drive signal, the limb having a plurality of inactive muscles, the person having limited control of the plurality of inactive muscles of at least one limb through the operation of the person's body. In particular, this method can be used in conjunction with the system of FIG 7. Like reference numerals correspond with steps common to the method of FIG. 9 & 10. This method includes step 220 for moving the at least one limb by introducing the functional electrical stimulation signal to at least one of the plurality of inactive muscles and by introducing the drive signal to the drive unit.
FIG. 12 presents a flowchart representation of a method used in conjunction with an additional embodiment of the present invention. This method is for controlling the motion of at least one limb of a person's body using an external bracing apparatus having at least one drive unit that drives the motion of external bracing apparatus in response to a drive signal, the limb having a plurality of inactive muscles, the person having limited control of the plurality of inactive muscles of at least one limb through the operation of the person's body. In particular, this method can be used in conjunction with the system of FIG 8. Like reference numerals correspond with steps common to the method of FIG. 9, 10 & 11. In addition, this method includes step 230 of preprocessing the input signal prior to the step of generating a control signal. The control signal is also post processed as shown in step 232.
It should be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that many of the elements used in the various embodiments of the present invention are well suited for implementation on a processor such as a microprocessor, a digital signal processor or a micro controller.
Likewise these elements could be performed in hardware by a custom integrated circuit, ASIC, programmable logic array or similar devices.
While specific embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the disclosed invention may be modified in numerous ways and may assume many embodiments other than the preferred form specifically set out and described above. Accordingly, it is intended by the appended claims to cover all modifications of the invention which fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
What is claimed is:

Claims

Claims
1. A system for controlling a movement of at least one limb of a person's body using an external bracing apparatus having at least one drive unit that drives the movement of external bracing apparatus in response to a drive signal, the at least one limb having a plurality of inactive muscles, the person having limited control of the plurality of inactive muscles of at least one limb through operation of the person's body, the system comprising: an interface unit in communication with the person's body for receiving an input signal; a polynomial processor, responsive to the input signal, for generating a control signal as a polynomial function of the at least one input signal; a first generator, responsive to the control signal, for generating a functional electrical stimulation signal; a second generator, responsive to the control signal, for generating the drive signal for the drive unit; and a plurality of electrodes, coupled to at least one of the plurality of inactive muscles, for stimulating the movement of the at least one limb by introducing the functional electrical stimulation signal to the at least one of the plurality of inactive muscles.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein the interface unit includes a sensor in contact with the person's body for generating an input signal.
3. The system of claim 1 wherein the interface unit includes a switch activated by action of the person's body.
4. The system of claim 1 further comprising a preprocessor for preprocessing the input signal prior to the step of generating a control signal.
5. The system of claim 4 wherein the preprocessor includes a filter for filtering the input signal.
6. The system of claim 1 further comprising a post processor, responsive to the control signal, for post processing the control signal prior to generating a functional electrical stimulation signal.
7. The system of claim 6 wherein the post processor includes a comparator for comparing the control signal to a control signal threshold.
8. The system of claim 1 wherein the first generator generates a sequence of functional electrical stimulation signals that correspond to a sequence of desired movements of the at least one of the plurality of inactive muscles.
9. The system of claim 1 wherein the second generator generates a sequence of drive signals that correspond to a sequence of desired movements of the external bracing apparatus.
10. A method for controlling a movement of at least one limb of a person's body using an external bracing apparatus having at least one drive unit that drives the movement of external bracing apparatus in response to a drive signal, the at least one limb having a plurality of inactive muscles, the person having limited control of the plurality of inactive muscles of at least one limb through operation of the person's body, the method comprising the steps of: receiving an input signal from an interface unit in communication with the person's body; generating a control signal as a polynomial function of the at least one input signal; generating a functional electrical stimulation signal based on the control signal; generating the drive signal based on the control signal; and moving the at least one limb by introducing the functional electrical stimulation signal to at least one of the plurality of inactive muscles and by introducing the drive signal to the drive unit.
PCT/US1996/007412 1995-07-31 1996-05-21 Hybrid fes and active orthosis method and system for controlling the movement of a limb WO1997004705A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU58704/96A AU5870496A (en) 1995-07-31 1996-05-21 Hybrid fes and active orthosis method and system for controlling the movement of a limb

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US50955695A 1995-07-31 1995-07-31
US08/509,556 1995-07-31

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1997004705A1 true WO1997004705A1 (en) 1997-02-13

Family

ID=24027130

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1996/007412 WO1997004705A1 (en) 1995-07-31 1996-05-21 Hybrid fes and active orthosis method and system for controlling the movement of a limb

Country Status (2)

Country Link
AU (1) AU5870496A (en)
WO (1) WO1997004705A1 (en)

Cited By (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2002013695A1 (en) * 2000-08-14 2002-02-21 Neopraxis Pty Ltd Interface to fes control system
WO2002013694A1 (en) * 2000-08-14 2002-02-21 Neopraxis Pty Ltd An exercise apparatus for a person with muscular deficiency
WO2010033366A1 (en) * 2008-09-19 2010-03-25 Medtronic, Inc. Automatic validation techniques for validating operation of medical devices
US8886302B2 (en) 2008-07-11 2014-11-11 Medtronic, Inc. Adjustment of posture-responsive therapy
US8905948B2 (en) 2008-07-11 2014-12-09 Medtronic, Inc. Generation of proportional posture information over multiple time intervals
US8958885B2 (en) 2008-07-11 2015-02-17 Medtronic, Inc. Posture state classification for a medical device
US9026223B2 (en) 2009-04-30 2015-05-05 Medtronic, Inc. Therapy system including multiple posture sensors
US9050471B2 (en) 2008-07-11 2015-06-09 Medtronic, Inc. Posture state display on medical device user interface
US9149210B2 (en) 2010-01-08 2015-10-06 Medtronic, Inc. Automated calibration of posture state classification for a medical device
US9174055B2 (en) 2010-01-08 2015-11-03 Medtronic, Inc. Display of detected patient posture state
US9327070B2 (en) 2009-04-30 2016-05-03 Medtronic, Inc. Medical device therapy based on posture and timing
US9357949B2 (en) 2010-01-08 2016-06-07 Medtronic, Inc. User interface that displays medical therapy and posture data
US9440084B2 (en) 2008-07-11 2016-09-13 Medtronic, Inc. Programming posture responsive therapy
US9566441B2 (en) 2010-04-30 2017-02-14 Medtronic, Inc. Detecting posture sensor signal shift or drift in medical devices
US9592387B2 (en) 2008-07-11 2017-03-14 Medtronic, Inc. Patient-defined posture states for posture responsive therapy
US9737719B2 (en) 2012-04-26 2017-08-22 Medtronic, Inc. Adjustment of therapy based on acceleration
US9907959B2 (en) 2012-04-12 2018-03-06 Medtronic, Inc. Velocity detection for posture-responsive therapy
US9956418B2 (en) 2010-01-08 2018-05-01 Medtronic, Inc. Graphical manipulation of posture zones for posture-responsive therapy
US10130815B2 (en) 2003-09-15 2018-11-20 Medtronic, Inc. Automatic therapy adjustments
US10207118B2 (en) 2008-07-11 2019-02-19 Medtronic, Inc. Associating therapy adjustments with posture states using a stability timer
US10471264B2 (en) 2005-12-02 2019-11-12 Medtronic, Inc. Closed-loop therapy adjustment
WO2023023456A1 (en) * 2021-08-18 2023-02-23 Northwestern University Methods and systems for limb movement detection

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5016635A (en) * 1988-11-29 1991-05-21 Sigmedics, Inc. Of Delaware Control of FNS via pattern variations of response EMG
US5092329A (en) * 1989-04-07 1992-03-03 Sigmedics, Inc. Microprocessor-controlled multiplexed functional electrical stimulator for surface stimulation in paralyzed patients with safety enhancements

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5016635A (en) * 1988-11-29 1991-05-21 Sigmedics, Inc. Of Delaware Control of FNS via pattern variations of response EMG
US5092329A (en) * 1989-04-07 1992-03-03 Sigmedics, Inc. Microprocessor-controlled multiplexed functional electrical stimulator for surface stimulation in paralyzed patients with safety enhancements

Non-Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, Vol. 34, No. 2, February 1989, GRAUPE et al., "Control of Electrically-Stimulated Walking of Paraplegics via Above- and Below-Lesion EMG Signature Identification", pages 130-138. *
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, Vol. 40, No. 10, October 1993, POPOVIC et al., "Sensory Nerve Recording for Closed-Loop Control to Restore Motor Functions", pages 1024-31. *
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, Vol. 2, No. 1, March 1994, HAUGLAND et al., "Artifact-Free Sensory Nerve Signals Obtained from Cuff Electrodes During Functional Electrical Stimulation of Nearby Muscles", pages 37-40. *
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, Vol. 2, No. 2, June 1994, MIZRAHI et al., "EMG as an Indicator of Fatigue in Isometrically Fes-Activated Paralyzed Muscles", pages 57-65. *
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, Vol. 2, No. 4, December 1994, LAN et al., "Neural Network Generation of Muscle Stimulation Patterns for Control of Arm Movements", pages 213-24. *

Cited By (38)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2002013695A1 (en) * 2000-08-14 2002-02-21 Neopraxis Pty Ltd Interface to fes control system
WO2002013694A1 (en) * 2000-08-14 2002-02-21 Neopraxis Pty Ltd An exercise apparatus for a person with muscular deficiency
US7346396B2 (en) 2000-08-14 2008-03-18 Neopraxis Pty Ltd Interface to FES control system
US7497806B2 (en) 2000-08-14 2009-03-03 Neopraxis Pty Ltd. Exercise apparatus for a person with muscular deficiency
US10130815B2 (en) 2003-09-15 2018-11-20 Medtronic, Inc. Automatic therapy adjustments
US10471264B2 (en) 2005-12-02 2019-11-12 Medtronic, Inc. Closed-loop therapy adjustment
US9560990B2 (en) 2008-07-11 2017-02-07 Medtronic, Inc. Obtaining baseline patient information
US9968784B2 (en) 2008-07-11 2018-05-15 Medtronic, Inc. Posture state redefinition based on posture data
US11672989B2 (en) 2008-07-11 2023-06-13 Medtronic, Inc. Posture state responsive therapy delivery using dwell times
US9050471B2 (en) 2008-07-11 2015-06-09 Medtronic, Inc. Posture state display on medical device user interface
US11004556B2 (en) 2008-07-11 2021-05-11 Medtronic, Inc. Associating therapy adjustments with posture states using a stability timer
US10925517B2 (en) 2008-07-11 2021-02-23 Medtronic, Inc. Posture state redefinition based on posture data
US9272091B2 (en) 2008-07-11 2016-03-01 Medtronic, Inc. Posture state display on medical device user interface
US9327129B2 (en) 2008-07-11 2016-05-03 Medtronic, Inc. Blended posture state classification and therapy delivery
US10231650B2 (en) 2008-07-11 2019-03-19 Medtronic, Inc. Generation of sleep quality information based on posture state data
US10207118B2 (en) 2008-07-11 2019-02-19 Medtronic, Inc. Associating therapy adjustments with posture states using a stability timer
US9440084B2 (en) 2008-07-11 2016-09-13 Medtronic, Inc. Programming posture responsive therapy
US9545518B2 (en) 2008-07-11 2017-01-17 Medtronic, Inc. Posture state classification for a medical device
US8905948B2 (en) 2008-07-11 2014-12-09 Medtronic, Inc. Generation of proportional posture information over multiple time intervals
US8886302B2 (en) 2008-07-11 2014-11-11 Medtronic, Inc. Adjustment of posture-responsive therapy
US9592387B2 (en) 2008-07-11 2017-03-14 Medtronic, Inc. Patient-defined posture states for posture responsive therapy
US9662045B2 (en) 2008-07-11 2017-05-30 Medtronic, Inc. Generation of sleep quality information based on posture state data
US8958885B2 (en) 2008-07-11 2015-02-17 Medtronic, Inc. Posture state classification for a medical device
US9776008B2 (en) 2008-07-11 2017-10-03 Medtronic, Inc. Posture state responsive therapy delivery using dwell times
US9956412B2 (en) 2008-07-11 2018-05-01 Medtronic, Inc. Linking posture states for posture responsive therapy
US9919159B2 (en) 2008-07-11 2018-03-20 Medtronic, Inc. Programming posture responsive therapy
WO2010033366A1 (en) * 2008-09-19 2010-03-25 Medtronic, Inc. Automatic validation techniques for validating operation of medical devices
US10071197B2 (en) 2009-04-30 2018-09-11 Medtronic, Inc. Therapy system including multiple posture sensors
US9327070B2 (en) 2009-04-30 2016-05-03 Medtronic, Inc. Medical device therapy based on posture and timing
US9026223B2 (en) 2009-04-30 2015-05-05 Medtronic, Inc. Therapy system including multiple posture sensors
US9956418B2 (en) 2010-01-08 2018-05-01 Medtronic, Inc. Graphical manipulation of posture zones for posture-responsive therapy
US9357949B2 (en) 2010-01-08 2016-06-07 Medtronic, Inc. User interface that displays medical therapy and posture data
US9174055B2 (en) 2010-01-08 2015-11-03 Medtronic, Inc. Display of detected patient posture state
US9149210B2 (en) 2010-01-08 2015-10-06 Medtronic, Inc. Automated calibration of posture state classification for a medical device
US9566441B2 (en) 2010-04-30 2017-02-14 Medtronic, Inc. Detecting posture sensor signal shift or drift in medical devices
US9907959B2 (en) 2012-04-12 2018-03-06 Medtronic, Inc. Velocity detection for posture-responsive therapy
US9737719B2 (en) 2012-04-26 2017-08-22 Medtronic, Inc. Adjustment of therapy based on acceleration
WO2023023456A1 (en) * 2021-08-18 2023-02-23 Northwestern University Methods and systems for limb movement detection

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU5870496A (en) 1997-02-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5748845A (en) FES method and system for controlling the movement of a limb
WO1997004705A1 (en) Hybrid fes and active orthosis method and system for controlling the movement of a limb
Hart et al. A comparison between control methods for implanted FES hand-grasp systems
Graupe EMG pattern analysis for patient-responsive control of FES in paraplegics for walker-supported walking
US7346396B2 (en) Interface to FES control system
Graupe et al. Patient controlled electrical stimulation via EMG signature discrimination for providing certain paraplegics with primitive walking functions
Alibeji et al. A muscle synergy-inspired control design to coordinate functional electrical stimulation and a powered exoskeleton: Artificial generation of synergies to reduce input dimensionality
US20210275807A1 (en) System and method for determining user intention from limb or body motion or trajectory to control neuromuscular stimuation or prosthetic device operation
Sangha et al. A compact robotic orthosis for wrist assistance
Iftime et al. Automatic determination of synergies by radial basis function artificial neural networks for the control of a neural prosthesis
Popović Finite state model of locomotion for functional electrical stimulation systems
Kiguchi et al. Design and control of an exoskeleton system for human upper-limb motion assist
JPH0328225B2 (en)
HANDA et al. Application of functional electrical stimulation to the paralyzed extremities
WO1997005532A1 (en) Active orthosis method and system for controlling the movement of a limb
Akdoğan et al. A muscular activation controlled rehabilitation robot system
Ahmed et al. Robotic glove for rehabilitation purpose
JPH03241414A (en) Operation device by head skin preparation potential pattern
Lyman et al. Studies toward a practical computer-aided arm prosthesis system
JP2507043B2 (en) Myoelectric control learning robot hand
Munih et al. Current status and future prospects for upper and lower extremity motor system neuroprostheses
Philipson Adaptable myoelectric prosthetic control with functional visual feedback using microprocessor techniques
Graupe et al. EMG parameter identification for controlling electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves to provide certain paraplegics with primitive walking functions
Brown Life in the Son
CN115300194A (en) Control system based on artificial limb slippage perception and spontaneous gripping

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AM AT AU BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GE HU IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LK LR LT LU LV MD MG MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK TJ TM TT UA UG US UZ VN AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): KE LS MW SD SZ UG AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN ML MR NE SN TD

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase