|Publication number||WO1995007014 A1|
|Publication date||9 Mar 1995|
|Filing date||31 Aug 1994|
|Priority date||1 Sep 1993|
|Also published as||CN1130459A, EP0716800A1|
|Publication number||PCT/1994/9931, PCT/US/1994/009931, PCT/US/1994/09931, PCT/US/94/009931, PCT/US/94/09931, PCT/US1994/009931, PCT/US1994/09931, PCT/US1994009931, PCT/US199409931, PCT/US94/009931, PCT/US94/09931, PCT/US94009931, PCT/US9409931, WO 1995/007014 A1, WO 1995007014 A1, WO 1995007014A1, WO 9507014 A1, WO 9507014A1, WO-A1-1995007014, WO-A1-9507014, WO1995/007014A1, WO1995007014 A1, WO1995007014A1, WO9507014 A1, WO9507014A1|
|Inventors||August F. Mostardo|
|Applicant||Knowles Electronics, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (7), Referenced by (27), Classifications (7), Legal Events (9)|
|External Links: Patentscope, Espacenet|
RECEIVER FOR A HEARING AID
DESCRIPTION Technical Field
The invention relates to a miniaturized re¬ ceiver, as for a hearing aid. Background Prior Art
Miniaturized receivers, such as for use in hearing aids, are known. Often such receivers are designed to provide a certain frequency response characteristic to accomplish a particular result. For example Carlson, U.S. Patent No. 5,068,901, discusses the fact that hearing loss for many people is primarily at higher frequencies. Accord¬ ingly Carlson provided a dual outlet passage hear¬ ing aid transducer, having a pair of elongated sound transmission tubes, which produced a high pass band. This receiver was able to better assist the user at the higher frequencies of hearing i - pairment, yet which effectively eliminated low frequency transmission. To permit the user to hear low frequencies, a low frequency sound transmission channel was provided parallel to the hearing aid. This sound transmission channel bypassed the hear¬ ing aid, to permit the user to directly hear low frequencies.
The hearing aid transducer of Carlson worked satisfactorily for many applications; however, the elongated sound transmission tubes tended to make further miniaturization of the hearing aid diffi¬ cult.
The present invention is provided to solve these and other problems. Summary of the Invention
It is an object of the invention to provide a compact band pass receiver for a hearing aid, such as for use in combination with a. hearing aid for use by an individual having a high frequency hear- ing impairment.
In accordance with the invention, the receiver includes a housing, being for example D-shaped in cross section. The D-shape configuration permits the receiver to more readily be placed in the canal portion of the hearing aid. A diaphragm is provid¬ ed having a plurality of peripheral edges. The diaphragm is disposed within the housing and de¬ fines first and second acoustical chambers in the housing. One of the diaphragm peripheral edges is pivotally secured to the housing. This pivotable edge may also be further secured to the housing by a cement, such as an epoxy, to prevent lateral movement. The remaining edges of the diaphragm are compliantly secured to the housing. An electromag- netic motor, including an armature, forms a portion of the housing, and means are provided for coupling the armature to the diaphragm to move the diaphragm at frequencies in accordance with an electrical signal applied to the motor. First and second outlet ports extend through the housing. The first outlet port is acoustically coupled to the first chamber via a tube, and the second outlet port is acoustically coupled to the second chamber. The first and second ports provide an exit path for acoustical vibrations generated as a result of diaphragm movement. The first and second acousti¬ cal chambers cooperate to cancel low frequency acoustical waves, while generating high frequency acoustical waves at the frequencies of interest. This phenomenon is more fully explained in the above referenced Carlson patent.
It is contemplated that the armature is cou¬ pled to the diaphragm by a compliant compound, such as compliant RTV having a durometer of 22 Shore A, or less. It is further contemplated that the receiver includes a tube disposed within the first acoustic chamber. The tube terminates substantially flush with the first port.
In a further aspect of the invention, the above receiver is provided, but without the tube and the first outlet port. Accordingly, low fre¬ quency acoustical waves are not cancelled, and, hence, the receiver has a broad band frequency response. It is a still further aspect of the invention to combine two of the above receivers in back-to- back relationship, to provide a generally oval- shaped receiver having twice the output as a single receiver. Vibration is reduced in this, embodiment because the respective armatures move 180° out-of- phase. Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following specification taken in conjunction with the following drawings. Brief Description of Drawings Figure 1 is a side sectional view of a recei¬ ver in accordance with one aspect of the invention;
Figure 2 is a top sectional view taken along line 2-2 of Figure 1;
Figure 2a is an enlarged view of a portion of Figure 2;
Figure 2b is an enlarged view of another portion of Figure 2;
Figure 3 is an end view taken along line 3-3 of Figure 1; Figure 4 is an exploded view of the receiver of Figure 1;
Figure 5 is a logarithmic frequency response curve for the receiver of Figure 1;
Figure 6 is an isometric view of the receiver of Figure 1 in combination with a hearing aid;
Figure 7, is a perspective view of an alterna¬ tive embodiment of a receiver for a hearing aid in accordance with the invention;
Figure 8 is a side sectional view of the receiver of Figure 7;
Figure 9 is a logarithmic frequency response curve for the receiver of Figure 7;
Figure 10 is a perspective view of a modifica¬ tion to the receiver of Figure 7; Figure 11 is a logarithmic frequency response curve for the receiver of Figure 10;
Figure 12 is a perspective view of a further modification to the receiver in Figure 7;
Figure 13 is a logarithmic frequency response cover for one version of the receiver of Figure 12; Figure 14 is a logarithmic frequency response curve for another version of the receiver of Figure 12;
Figure 15 is a perspective view of a further alternative embodiment of a receiver for a hearing aid in accordance with the invention; and
Figure 16a-16e are perspective views of var¬ ious embodiments of a protective boot for a recei¬ ver for a hearing aid. Detailed Description
While this invention is susceptible of embodi¬ ments in many different forms, there is shown in the drawings and will herein be described in de¬ tail, preferred embodiments of the invention with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as an exemplification of the princi¬ ples of the invention and is not intended to limit the broad aspects of the invention to the embodi¬ ments illustrated. The receiver disclosed in the above referenced
Carlson patent worked satisfactorily as a high- frequency band pass receiver, yet the two elongated tubes presented an obstacle to further hearing aid miniaturization. The frequency response of the Carlson receiver had three peaks. The middle peak occurred at approximately 4.5 kHz, and was a result of motor resonance. The lower peak occurred at a frequency of approximately 3 kHz and was a result of the resonance of the first elongated tube in combination with the first chamber. The upper peak occurred at a frequency of approximately 5.7 kHz and was a result of the resonance of the second elongated tube in combination with the second chamber. Elimination of the tubes was considered as a way to permit further miniaturization of the Carlson receiver, yet this was found to degrade the overall frequency response of the receiver because it eliminated the lower and upper resonant peaks. A design goal of the miniaturized receiver was to provide a lOOdB spl response at 4 kHz into a 2 cc. cavity. Accordingly, it was also considered to eliminate the second tube, thereby eliminating the upper resonant peak (5.7 kHz) out of the pass band, while also moving the first tube into the housing. Thus, it was believed that this change would main- tain the lower (3 kHz) and middle (4.5 kHz) reso¬ nant peaks, while permitting downsizing of the receiver. By doing so, it was determined that this change resulted in the response at 4 kHz being too low. The 4 kHz response was occurring in a "valley" between the lower and middle resonant peaks. Moving the peaks closer together to raise the valley to the desired level was considered. Conventionally, one would move, the second, or higher, peak, which was a result of the tube now located in the housing, by varying the tube dimen¬ sion. However, this change did not provide the de¬ sired result because varying the dimension of the tube also varied the frequency of the first, or lower, resonant peak as well. Thus any improvement gained by moving the frequency of the second reso¬ nant peak was countered by detrimental movement of the frequency of the first resonant peak.
Applicants recognized that the first resonant peak could be raised by reducing the effective mass of the system seen by the armature. The armature bends about a point, located generally where the armature is attached to the housing. Applicants realized that the effective mass of the system seen by the armature could be reduced by attaching the diaphragm to the housing of the receiver along the edge of the diaphragm opposite the point where the armature is coupled to the diaphragm so that the diaphragm would pivot about an effectively shorter lever arm. Conventionally when a diaphragm is pivotally connected to a housing, the diaphragm is driven by a drive rod coupled to the motor arma¬ ture. The drive rod was able to flex slightly to compensate for the pivot action of the diaphragm which is pivoting about a different axis than the armature. However, in the present miniaturized receiver, there was insufficient space to locate the drive rod. Accordingly, applicants have deve¬ loped a novel means for attaching an armature to a pivotable diaphragm, wherein the attachment is rigid along the coupled axis while being compliant along the shear axis.
A more detailed explanation of the operation of a band pass transducer can be found in the Carlson patent, the specification of which is expressly incorporated by reference. In accordance with the invention, a compact band pass receiver 10 for a hearing aid 11 (Figure 6) is illustrated in Figures 1-4. As discussed in greater detail below, the receiver 10 is extremely compact, yet provides a commercially satisfactory band pass frequency response as shown in Figure 5. In the disclosed embodiment, the receiver 10 has a high frequency band pass charac¬ teristic.
The receiver 10 comprises an electromagnetic motor, generally designated 16, and a first housing portion 18. The electromagnetic motor 16 has a second housing portion 17, a conventional coil 20, a magnet housing 22 formed of conventional nickel/iron alloy laminations 24 and two permanent magnets 26, and an armature 28. The second housing portion 17 is a generally D-shaped cup, formed of conventional nickel/iron alloy and has substan¬ tially open 17a and closed 17b ends. The armature 28 has a fixed end 28a and a free end 28b. The coil 20 is disposed within the second housing por- tion 17. The armature fixed end 28a is uniquely secured, as by welding, to the closed end 17b of the second housing portion 17. The magnet housing 22 adjoins the substantially open end 17a of the second housing portion 17, and is secured thereto by projection welding. Laser welding is also being considered. The armature free end 28b extends out¬ wardly from the magnet housing 22. A gap of 0.003" is provided between the armature 28 and the magnets 26. The first housing portion 18 is also generally a D-shaped cup having open 18a and closed 18b ends. The housing portion open end 18a adjoins the magnet housing 22 opposite the second housing portion 17, such that the armature free end 28b extends into the first housing portion 18. The first housing portion 18 is also projection welded, or alterna¬ tively laser welded, to the magnet housing 22. A supporting cup 34 (shown in phantom in Figure 2) is disposed in the housing portion 18, providing a peripheral ledge 36 circumferentially about each of four walls 34a of the acoustical housing portion 18. The overall length of the receiver 10 is 0.244". The overall width at the base of the receiver 10 is 0.118". A generally square diaphragm 40 is provided comprising a generally rigid, aluminum paddle 42 secured to a conventional diaphragm membrane 43. In certain conventional diaphragms, the membrane extends outwardly from the paddle from all four sides of the paddle, for compliant connection within the receiver housing. According to such prior art diaphragms, the diaphragm effectively pivots about the fixed end 28a of the armature 28 when acted upon by its respective armature. How¬ ever,, in the present embodiment, as with certain other conventional diaphragms, the membrane 43 extends outwardly from three sides of the paddle 42, forming a compliant peripheral annulus 44 about the three sides. The annulus 44 thus terminates at three peripheral edges 40a. The annulus 44 about the three edges 40a is secured to the respective ledges 36 of the cup 34, providing a compliant connection therebetween. In other words, the paddle 42 is spaced from the cup 34 along these three edges by the annulus 44, as illustrated in Figure 2a. A fourth edge 4Ob of the diaphragm 40 has no annulus. Rather the paddle 42 extends to the inside edge of the cup 34, as illustrated in Figure 2b. The membrane 43 extends beyond the edge of the paddle 42, to be secured to the respective ledge 36. In other words, the paddle 42 is not spaced from the cup 34 by the annulus 44 along the fourth edge 40b. Accordingly, the fourth edge 40b is rigidly secured to the cup 34, rather than compliantly secured thereto. The diaphragm 40 is disposed across the first housing portion 18, supported by the peripheral ledge 36 of the cup 34. The diaphragm 40 defines first and second acoustical chambers, generally designated 48,50. The second acoustical chamber 50 includes all air space within the electromagnetic motor 16. The three sides forming the peripheral annulus 44 of the diaphragm 40 are compliantly secured to the ledge 36 by a film of 0.0005" thick¬ ness, such as urethane. The fourth edge_ 40b of the diaphragm 40, which is generally rigid due to the coextensive paddle 42, rests along the remaining side of the edge 36. To insure that the fourth edge 40b of the diaphragm 40 remains along the remaining side of the edge 36, so as to eliminate any possible unwanted resonance, a drop or two of epoxy 51 may be applied. It should be noted that this pivotal connection of the diaphragm 40 reduces the amplitude of the receiver output, because the pivotal diaphragm moves less air per unit motion of the armature as compared to convention complaint coupling of the diaphragm. However, this amplitude reduction was considered a necessary tradeoff to obtain the desired frequency response.
In prior receivers having a pivotable dia¬ phragm, the diaphragm was spaced from the armature by approximately 0.060", and they were operatively coupled by a drive rod. The drive rod could slightly flex, to conform to the action of the dia¬ phragm moving along a different arc than the moving armature. However, in the present receiver 10, the armature 28 is spaced from the diaphragm 40 by only about 0.002"-0.003", which does not provide suffi¬ cient room to assemble a drive rod. Further, such a shortened drive rod would have a diameter to length ratio too great to flex sufficiently. Accordingly, in the present invention, the armature free end 28b is compliantly coupled to the dia¬ phragm 40, by a compliant compound, such as a compliant RTV having a durometer of 22 Shore A, or less. The diaphragm 40 pivots about the rigid edge 40b by the motion of the armature 28 at frequencies in accordance with an electrical signal applied to the motor 16. Because the diaphragm 40 pivots about the rigid edge 40b, the effective mass of the diaphragm 40, as seen by the armature 28, is re- duced, thereby increasing the frequency of the motor resonance peak. A locating embossment 54 is provided on each of the paddle 42 and the membrane 43 of the dia¬ phragm 40 to assist in the assembly of the receiver 10 by locating placement of the RTV bonding the diaphragm 40 to the armature 28.
First and second outlet ports 56,58 extend through the housing portion 18. The first outlet port 56 is acoustically coupled to the first cham¬ ber 18, and the second outlet port 58 is acousti- cally coupled to the second chamber 50. The first and second outlet ports 56,58 extend through the substantially closed end 18b of the housing portion 18. A generally round tube 60 having a diameter of 0.018" is disposed in the first acoustic chamber 18. The tube 60 is preferably 0.1" long, though its length and/or radius can be modified to adjust the frequency of both peak frequencies. Specifi¬ cally, increasing radius, or decreasing length of the tube 60 increases the frequency of each of the peak frequencies.
The structure of the above described receiver 10 lends itself to relatively simplified linear assembly, in that the receiver 10 comprises, in effect, three subassemblies. The first subassembly comprises the armature
28 attached to the inner rear wall of the second housing portion 17. Typically, the armature of prior art receivers was a part of the motor, rather than separately connected directly to the housing. For added support of the armature 28, the closed end 17b of the second housing portion 17 is 0.006" thick, while the sides are 0.005" thick. The first subassembly further includes a tab 64 for electri¬ cal terminations. The second subassembly comprises the magnet housing 22, the magnets 26 and the coil 20. The magnets 26 are glued within the magnet housing 32 in mutually spaced relation, and the coil 20 is glued to the magnet housing 22. The second subas¬ sembly is unique in that the magnet housing 22, which functions as a magnet return flux path, actually forms part of the receiver housing. While this design sacrifices flux leakage, the design permits significant reduction in the overall size of the receiver 10. The third subassembly comprises the diaphragm
40 secured to the open end of the cup 34 and dis¬ posed in the first housing portion 18. The third subassembly further comprises the tube 60 which is spot welded in the first housing portion 18. Thus the receiver 10 can be assembled in a linear manner by inserting the armature free end 28b of the first subassembly through the coil 20 of the second subassembly, and laser welding the second housing portion 17 to the magnet housing 22. The armature free end then extends outwardly from the opposite end of the magnet housing 22. A drop of the RTV in uncured, liquid form is placed on the locating embossment 54 of the paddle 42, and the first housing portion 18 is brought into engagement with magnet housing 22, and are laser welded together. The armature free end 28b contacts the liquid RTV in blind attach fashion, and the RTV is permitted to cure and the assembly is complete.
Referring to Figure 6, the receiver 10 is shown positioned in the hearing aid 11. The hear¬ ing aid includes a shell 66, a vent 68 and a sound port 70. The vent 68 permits passage of low fre¬ quency sound which is below the pass frequencies of the band pass receiver 10. The sound port 70 permits passage of sound from the receiver 10 into a user's ear canal, not shown. In accordance with a second aspect of the invention, a receiver 10' is illustrated in Figures 7 and 8, and having a frequency response as illus¬ trated in Figure 9. The receiver 10' has the same general construction of the previously described receiver 10, but for the following differences.
The primary difference is an elimination of the tube 60 and the corresponding first port 56. A further difference is an elimination of the rigid, pivotal attachment of the paddle 42 of the dia¬ phragm 40 to the fourth edge 40b of the cup 34. Rather, the annulus 44 extends around all four edges of the diaphragm 40, for compliant connection to all four ledges 36 of the cup 34. As discussed above, the pivotal connection of the diaphragm 40 to the cup 34 of the first described receiver 10 was to reduce the effective mass of the armature to raise the resonant frequency of .the receiver 10. As this increase of resonant frequency is not necessary with respect to the second described receiver 10', the more traditional compliant con¬ nection of the diaphragm to the cup is used so as to obtain the maximum amplitude of receiver output. Further modifications to the second receiver 10' are also contemplated, as discussed below.
Figure 10 discloses a modification to the receiver 10' wherein a screen 100 is disposed over the port 58. This screen 100 operates to smooth (or dampen) the peak of the resonant frequency response, as illustrated in Figure 11.
Figure 12 discloses a still further modifica¬ tion to the receiver 10' wherein a back cavity port 104 has been placed in the second housing portion 17. The back cavity port 104 vents the second acoustical chamber 50 (See Figure 1) . Because of the venting, air is not compressed in the second acoustical chamber 50, which results in a greater output magnitude and reduces the resonant frequen¬ cy. A back cavity screen 106 can be used to reduce the effective opening dimension of the back cavity and, hence, change the output magnitude and reso¬ nant frequency. Placement of an adjustable vari¬ able mesh screen would permit a user to adjustably control the output magnitude and resonant frequen¬ cy. Figure 13 discloses a frequency response curve for the receiver 10' having a 0.020" x 0.080" back cavity port 104 covered by the back cavity screen 106 having a mesh with 33% light transmission. By utilizing both the port screen 100 and the back cavity screen 106, and by varying the relative mesh densities of the port screen 100 and the back cavity screen 106, one can vary the sharpness of the resonant peak while also varying the output magnitude and resonant frequency..
In another embodiment, two of the receivers 10' are placed back-to-back, forming in effect a generally oval, dual receiver 10" (in cross sec¬ tion) . The dual receiver 10" has double the output magnitude of the previously discussed single re¬ ceiver 10', yet exhibits reduced mechanical vibra- tion, because the respective armatures 28 of each of the individual receivers are moving 180° out-of- phase. Thus the center of mass of the dual recei¬ ver 10" remains fixed. This reduction in vibration is significant, because vibration can be picked up by the hearing aid microphone (not shown) , resul¬ ting in feed back.
A final aspect of the invention relates to various embodiments of a protective boot for placement over the ported end of the receiver, to prevent cerumen from entering the ports of the receiver. The first boot 110 is illustrated in Figure 16a comprising a molded form of urethane approxi¬ mately 0.001" thick with sufficient resiliency to snugly fit over the ported end of a receiver. The first boot 110 has a depth "d" of approximately .050"-.070", which is believed sufficient to retain the boot 110 on the receiver. Any cerumen collec¬ ting on the boot 110 from the user's ear canal can simply be wiped away by the user's finger, or other device.
The second boot 114 is shown in Figures 16b and 16c. The second boot 114 comprises a resilient cup 118 and a urethane film 120. Preferably, the cup 118 would be adhesively bonded to the receiver. The third boot 126 is generally similar to the second boot 114, but includes a screen 128 disposed in spaced relationship from the urethane film 120 by a spacer ring 130. As discussed above, a screen over a sound port can be used for various frequency response modifying purposes. However, because sound ports are directed into a user's ear canal, the screen can often become quickly clogged by cerumen, adversely affecting the sound quality of the receiver. The third boot 126 provides cerumen protection for the screen 128, which can easily be wiped clean.
It will be understood that the invention may be embodied in other specific forms without depart¬ ing from the spirit or central characteristics thereof. The present examples and embodiments, therefore, are to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|EP0077764A1 *||13 Oct 1982||27 Apr 1983||Fisher Controls International, Inc.||Piezoelectric pressure sensor|
|EP0377074A2 *||8 Jun 1989||11 Jul 1990||Knowles Electronics, Inc.||Hearing aid transducer|
|EP0455203A2 *||29 Apr 1991||6 Nov 1991||Knowles Electronics, Inc.||Dual outlet passage hearing aid transducer|
|US3876843 *||2 Jan 1973||8 Apr 1975||Textron Inc||Directional hearing aid with variable directivity|
|US4450930 *||3 Sep 1982||29 May 1984||Industrial Research Products, Inc.||Microphone with stepped response|
|US4956868 *||26 Oct 1989||11 Sep 1990||Industrial Research Products, Inc.||Magnetically shielded electromagnetic acoustic transducer|
|USH595 *||15 Jul 1987||7 Mar 1989||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force||Field splice assembly for tactical fiber optic cable|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|WO2001091517A2 *||23 May 2001||29 Nov 2001||Sonionmicrotronic Nederland B.V.||An assembly comprising an electrical element|
|WO2001091517A3 *||23 May 2001||21 Nov 2002||Jeroen Augustijn||An assembly comprising an electrical element|
|WO2003024149A1 *||10 Sep 2002||20 Mar 2003||Sonion A/S||Miniature speaker with integrated signal processing electronics|
|WO2007022773A1 *||23 Aug 2005||1 Mar 2007||Widex A/S||Hearing aid with increased acoustic bandwidth|
|WO2015010716A1 *||22 Jul 2013||29 Jan 2015||Phonak Ag||Hearing device with improved low frequency response and method for manufacturing such a hearing device|
|DE19914235B4 *||29 Mar 1999||1 Jun 2006||Knowles Electronics, LLC, Itasca||Elektroakustischer Wandler und Hörgerät, umfassend einen elektroakustischen Wandler|
|EP1287721B2 †||6 Jun 2000||5 Aug 2009||Phonak Ag||Method for producing a hearing aid placed in the ear|
|EP1353531A3 *||8 Apr 2003||12 Apr 2006||Sonionmicrotronic Nederland B.V.||Acoustic transducer having reduced thickness|
|EP1810547A2 *||9 Nov 2005||25 Jul 2007||Shure Acquisition Holdings, Inc.||Earphone for sound reproduction|
|EP1810547A4 *||9 Nov 2005||30 Mar 2011||Shure Acquisition Holdings Inc||Earphone for sound reproduction|
|EP1962550A2||12 Feb 2008||27 Aug 2008||Sonion Nederland B.V.||A moving armature receiver with reduced parasitic coupling|
|EP1962551A2||12 Feb 2008||27 Aug 2008||Sonion Nederland B.V.||A moving armature receiver|
|EP2271131A3 *||8 Apr 2003||18 May 2011||Sonion Nederland B.V.||Acoustic transducer having reduced thickness|
|EP2480007A1 *||9 Nov 2005||25 Jul 2012||Shure Acquisition Holdings, Inc.||Earphone for sound reproduction|
|EP2733956A3 *||13 Nov 2013||7 Oct 2015||Starkey Laboratories, Inc.||Methods for wideband receiver and module for a hearing assistance device|
|US5960093 *||30 Mar 1998||28 Sep 1999||Knowles Electronics, Inc.||Miniature transducer|
|US6704427||23 Feb 2001||9 Mar 2004||Knowles Electronics, Llc||Acoustic transducer with improved acoustic damper|
|US6751326||15 Mar 2001||15 Jun 2004||Knowles Electronics, Llc||Vibration-dampening receiver assembly|
|US6909613||24 May 2001||21 Jun 2005||Sonionmicrotronic Nederland B.V.||Assembly comprising an electrical element|
|US7181035||16 Nov 2001||20 Feb 2007||Sonion Nederland B.V.||Acoustical receiver housing for hearing aids|
|US7190803||9 Apr 2002||13 Mar 2007||Sonion Nederland Bv||Acoustic transducer having reduced thickness|
|US7657048||6 Dec 2006||2 Feb 2010||Sonion Nederland B.V.||Acoustical receiver housing for hearing aids|
|US7970161||31 Jan 2007||28 Jun 2011||Sonion Nederland B.V.||Acoustic transducer having reduced thickness|
|US8223996||19 Feb 2008||17 Jul 2012||Sonion Nederland B.V.||Moving armature receiver|
|US8798304||8 Dec 2010||5 Aug 2014||Knowles Electronics, Llc||Acoustic valve mechanisms|
|US9473857||21 Feb 2008||18 Oct 2016||Widex A/S||Hearing aid with increased acoustic bandwidth|
|US9668067||22 Jul 2013||30 May 2017||Sonova Ag||Hearing device with improved low frequency response and method for manufacturing such a hearing device|
|Cooperative Classification||H04R25/48, H04R2225/43, H04R25/60, H04R25/65, H04R25/604|
|9 Mar 1995||AK||Designated states|
Kind code of ref document: A1
Designated state(s): AM AT AU BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CZ DE DK ES FI GB GE HU JP KE KG KP KR KZ LK LT LU LV MD MG MN MW NL NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SI SK TJ TT UA UZ VN
|9 Mar 1995||AL||Designated countries for regional patents|
Kind code of ref document: A1
Designated state(s): KE MW SD AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN ML MR NE SN TD TG
|1 Jun 1995||DFPE||Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)|
|14 Jun 1995||121||Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application|
|23 Jan 1996||WWE||Wipo information: entry into national phase|
Ref document number: 1994928555
Country of ref document: EP
|19 Jun 1996||WWP||Wipo information: published in national office|
Ref document number: 1994928555
Country of ref document: EP
|20 Jun 1996||REG||Reference to national code|
Ref country code: DE
Ref legal event code: 8642
|14 Mar 1997||WWW||Wipo information: withdrawn in national office|
Ref document number: 1994928555
Country of ref document: EP
|1 May 1997||NENP||Non-entry into the national phase in:|
Ref country code: CA