Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUSRE43122 E1
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 12/820,390
Publication date24 Jan 2012
Filing date22 Jun 2010
Priority date26 Nov 1999
Fee statusPaid
Also published asUS6432290
Publication number12820390, 820390, US RE43122 E1, US RE43122E1, US-E1-RE43122, USRE43122 E1, USRE43122E1
InventorsD. Jed Harrison, Richard Oleschuk, Loranelle L. Lockyear, Cameron Skinner, Paul Li
Original AssigneeThe Governors Of The University Of Alberta
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Apparatus and method for trapping bead based reagents within microfluidic analysis systems
US RE43122 E1
Abstract
The present invention provides an on-chip packed reactor bed design that allows for an effective exchange of packing materials such as beads at a miniaturized level. The present invention extends the function of microfluidic analysis systems to new applications including on-chip solid phase extraction (SPE) and on-chip capillary electrochromatography (CEC). The design can be further extended to include integrated packed bed immuno- or enzyme reactors.
Images(15)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(31)
1. A microfluidic analysis system, comprising:
(a) a substantially planar substrate having an upper surface;
(b) at least one main channel formed into said upper surface, said main channel having first and second ends and a defined direction of flow in use;
(c) a cover plate arranged over said planar substrate, said cover plate closing off said channel from above;
(d) a first weir formed across said main channel and between said first and second ends of said channel, said first weir providing at least one flow gap to allow, in use, at least some fluid to flow past said first weir while trapping packing material having constituent particles that are generally larger than said flow gap; and
(e) at least one side channel formed into said planar substrate, said side channel being connected at a first end to said main channel at a location upstream from said first weir, and at a second end to a reservoir, said side channel providing a higher flow resistance than said main channel; and
(e)(f) a second weir located upstream from said connected first end of said side channel, said first and second weirs forming a chamber therebetween, said second weir providing at least one flow gap to allow, in use, at least some fluid to flow past said second weir while trapping said packing material within said chamber.
2. The microfluidic analysis system claimed in claim 1, further comprising at least one side channel formed into said planar substrate, said side channel being connected at a first end to said main channel at a location upstream from said first weir, and at a second end to a reservoir, said side channel providing a higher flow resistance than said main channel.
3. The microfluidic analysis system claimed in claim 2 1, wherein, each side channel connection to said main channel is provided with a hook structure whereby, in use, packing material is sprayed into said chamber to facilitate even packing.
4. The microfluidic analysis system claimed in claim 3, wherein, said hook structure at least partially obstructs direct line-of-sight entry of packing material from said side channel into said chamber and forms a chamber mouth to one side of said hook structure.
5. The microfluidic analysis system claimed in claim 1, wherein, said flow gaps comprise a generally uniform gap between said cover plate and the top of said weirs.
6. The microfluidic analysis system claimed in claim 1, wherein, said flow gaps comprise a plurality of substantially vertical gaps in said weirs.
7. The microfluidic analysis system claimed in any previous claim, wherein, said system is formed entirely on a single microfluidic chip.
8. A method of creating a packed reactor bed in the microfluidic analysis system claimed in claim 2 1, said method comprising, effecting a pressure driven flow by providing a relatively high pressure at said second end of said main channel and at said reservoir, said reservoir containing packing material, and providing a relatively low pressure at said first end of said main channel, whereby, packing material flows from said reservoir into said main channel and is trapped against said first weir.
9. The method as claimed in claim 8, wherein, packing material is removed from the said main channel by providing relatively high pressure at said first and second ends of said main channel while providing relatively low pressure at said reservoir.
10. A method of packing the chamber in the microfluidic analysis system claimed in claim 2 1, said method comprising, providing a non-conductive substrate and effecting an electrokinetic flow by applying a relatively high voltage at said reservoir, said reservoir containing packing material, and providing relatively low voltages at said first and second ends of said main channel, whereby, packing material flows from said reservoir into said chamber and is trapped by said first and second weirs.
11. The method as claimed in claim 10, wherein, packing material may be removed from the chamber by reversing said electrokinetic flow.
12. A method of packing the chamber in the microfluidic analysis system claimed in claim 2 1, said method comprising, effecting a pressure driven flow by providing a relatively high pressure at said reservoir, said reservoir containing packing material, and providing relatively low pressure at said first and second main reservoirs, whereby, packing material flows from said packing material reservoir into said chamber and is trapped by said first and second weirs.
13. The method as claimed in claim 12, wherein, packing material may be removed from the chamber by reversing said pressure driven flow.
14. A method of packing the chamber in the microfluidic analysis system claimed in claim 13 1, said method comprising, providing magnetically charged packing material, and effecting a magnetically driven flow by providing a magnetically attractive force in the chamber, whereby, the packing material enters the chamber and is trapped by said first and second weirs.
15. The method as claimed in claim 14, wherein, packing material may be removed from the chamber by reversing said magnetic force in said chamber.
16. A method of creating a packed reactor bed in a microfluidic analysis system comprising:
(a) a substantially planar substrate having an upper surface;
(b) at least one main channel formed into said upper surface, said main channel having first and second ends and a defined direction of flow in use;
(c) a cover plate arranged over said planar substrate, said cover plate closing off said channel from above;
(d) a first weir formed across said main channel and between said first and second ends of said channel, said first weir providing at least one flow gap to allow, in use, at least some fluid to flow past said first weir while trapping packing material having constituent particles that are generally larger than said flow gap; and
(e) at least one side channel formed into said planar substrate, said side channel being connected at a first end to said main channel at a location upstream from said first weir, and at a second end to a reservoir, said side channel providing a higher flow resistance than said main channel,
said method comprising, providing a non-conductive substrate and effecting an electrokinetic flow by applying a relatively high voltage at said second end of said main channel and at said reservoir, said reservoir containing packing material, and providing a relatively low voltage at said first end of said main channel, whereby, packing material flows from said reservoir into said main channel and is trapped against said first weir.
17. The method as claimed in claim 16, wherein, packing material is removed from said main channel by providing a relatively high voltage at said first and second ends of said main channel while providing a relatively low voltage at said reservoir.
18. A method of treating a sample within a microfluidic analysis system, comprising the steps of:
(a) providing a main channel having a trapping zone suitable for trapping packing material;
(b) providing a first weir positioned at a first end of said trapping zone, wherein said first weir has at least one flow gap to allow, in use, at least some fluid to flow past said first weir while trapping said packing material within said zone;
(c) providing a second weir positioned at a second end of said trapping zone, wherein said second weir has at least one flow gap to allow, in use, at least some fluid to flow past said second weir while trapping said packing material within said zone;
(d) providing a slurry of a reagent treated packing material prepared in a solution having a predetermined composition of a solvent;
(e) providing a flow channel having a first end connected to said trapping zone, wherein said first end is positioned between said first weir and said second weir;
(f) inducing a flow of said packing material into said trapping zone through said flow channel so as to load said trapping zone and form a packed bed of said packing material; and
(g) flowing a sample containing analytes through said packed bed, said reagent treating the sample, whereby the sample leaving the trapping zone has an altered analyte composition.
19. The method claimed in claim 18, further comprising the step of:
(h) adjusting the composition of the solvent, so as to affect the aggregation of said packing material and the stabilization of the packed bed.
20. The method claimed in claim 18 wherein, step (d) comprises providing packing material comprising porous beads.
21. The method claimed in claim 20, wherein said porous beads are selected to have a diameter in the range from about 0.7 to about 10.0 μm.
22. The method claimed in claim 21, wherein said solvent is acetonitrile, and step (h) comprises adjusting the concentration level to less than about 50% to stabilize the packed bed.
23. The method claimed in claim 22 further including the steps of adjusting the concentration level to above 50% to destabilize the packed bed, and reversing the flow in step (f) so as to unload said trapping zone.
24. The method claimed in claim 23, further including the step of repeating step (f) so as to reload said trapping zone, and readjusting the concentration level to restabilize the packed bed.
25. The method claimed in claim 21, wherein said solvent is acetonitrile, and step (h) comprises adjusting the concentration level to less than about 30% to stabilize the packed bed.
26. The method claimed in claim 20, wherein said porous beads are selected to have a diameter in the range from about 1.5 to about 4.0 μm.
27. The method claimed in claim 18, further comprising the steps of:
before step (f), adding a neutral surfactant to said packing material so as to inhibit aggregation; and
after step (f), removing the neutral surfactant to promote aggregation.
28. The method claimed in claim 18, wherein step (f) comprises applying a fluid force to induce the flow of said packing material.
29. The method claimed in claim 18, wherein said packing material comprises at least some electrically charged particles and step (f) comprises applying a voltage potential to induce the flow of said packing material.
30. The method claimed in claim 18, wherein said packing material comprises at least some particles susceptible to a magnetic field and step (f) comprises applying a magnetic field to induce the flow of said packing material.
31. The method claimed in any one of claims 18, 19, 20, 21, 26, 23, 24, 27, 28, 29 and 30, including the step of providing a hook structure at the connection point between said flow channel and said trapping zone, so as to prevent direct line-of-sight entry of said packing material, thereby to promote even packing.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to microfluidic analysis systems, and more specifically to micro-Total Analysis Systems μ-TAS), for performing liquid phase analysis at a miniaturized level.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Recent developments in the field of micro-Total Analysis Systems (μ-TAS) have led to systems that perform chemical reactions, separation and detection at a miniaturized level on a single microchip [see, for example Harrison, D. J. ; Fluri, K.; Fan, Z.; Effenhauser, C.S.; and Manz, A., Science 1993, 261, 895-897. Harrison, D. J.; and van den Berg, E.; Eds., Micro Total Analysis Systems '98, Proceedings of the μTAS '98 Workshop (Kluwer: Dordrecht, 1998), Coyler, C. L.; Tang, T.; Chiem, N.; and Harrison, D. J., Electrophoresis 1997, 18 1733-1741].

Most prior art microfluidic devices are based on conventional open tubular flow designs and solution phase reagents. While the functionality of these devices has continued to increase, one key feature that is presently lacking in these prior art devices is the ability to effectively incorporate on-chip packed reactor beds, for introduction of packing materials with immobilized reagents or stationary phases. While a few attempts have been made to employ packed reactor beds in some prior art designs, the difficulty of packing portions of a complex microfluidic manifold with packing material (such as microscopic beads) has so far hindered the effective utilization of these reagent deliver vehicles within microfluidic devices. (The difficulty of packing has been well recognized by practitioners in the field [see, for example, Ericson, C; Holm, J.; Ericson, T.; and Hjertén, S., Analytical Chemistry.)

In one prior art example, a packed bed chromatographic device with a bead trapping frit was fabricated in a silicon substrate [Oevirk, G., Verpoorte, E., Manz, A., Grasserbauer, M., and Widmer, H. M. Analytical Methods and Instrumentation 1995, 2, 74-82]. However, the packing material in this prior art design could not be readily packed or exchanged, thus limiting its utility.

Several authors have also described the difficulties associated with reproducibly fabricating frits for retaining packing material in conventional capillaries [Boughtflower, R. J.; Underwood, T.; Patterson, C. J. Chromatographia 1995, 40, 329-335. Van den Bosch, S. E.; Heernstra, S.; Kraak, J. C.; Poppe, H. J. Chromatogr. A 1996,755, 165-177. Colon, L. A.; Reynolds, K. J.; Alicea-Maldonado, K.; Fermier, A. M. Electrophoresis 1997, 18, 2162-2174. Majors, R. E. LC CC 1998, 16, 96-110.]. The frits used in conventional systems are prepared using time and labor intensive procedures, the most commonly used method involving the use of pure silica gel, wetted down with aqueous sodium silicate. The frit is made by first tapping a capillary end into a paste made from silica and aqueous sodium silicate. The resulting plug of silica is then heated to make a frit.

Furthermore, using frits produced by prior art methods of construction often leads to the formation of undesirable bubbles. Altria, K. D.; Smith, N. W.; and Turnbull, C. H., Chromatographia, 46 (1997) 644. Majors, R. E., LC-GC, 16 (1998) 96. ]Bubbles cause discontinuity within a column, hindering solution flow and ultimately preventing separation from occurring. The bubbles are thought to arise from a change in electroosmotic flow (EOF) velocity caused by moving from a bead trapping frit into an open capillary. The formation of bubbles, which have been observed to increase at higher voltages, also limits the amount of voltage that can be applied across the capillary, thereby limiting column lengthy, separation efficiency, and speed of analysis.

Developing a functional on-chip packed reactor bed design which overcomes the limitations in the prior art would significantly enhance the range of the microfluidic toolbox and extend the number of applications of such devices.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Generally, the present invention provides an on-chip packed reactor bed design using one or more weir structures that allow for an effective exchange of packing materials (beads for example) at a miniaturized level. The present invention extends the function of microfluidic analysis systems to new applications. For example, the packed reactor bed formed according to the present invention allows on-chip solid phase extraction (SPE) and on-chip capillary electrochromatography (CEC), as explained in detail further below. The design can be further extended to include, for example, integrated packed bed immuni- or enzyme reactors.

More specifically, the present invention provides:

A microfluidic analysis system, comprising:

    • a) a substantially planar substrate having an upper surface;
    • b) at least one main channel formed into said upper surface, said main channel having first and second ends and a defined direction of flow in use;
    • c) a cover plate arranged over said planar substrate, said cover plate closing off said channel from above; and
    • d) a first weir formed across said main channel and between said first and second ends of said channel, said first weir providing at least one flow gap to allow, in use, at least some fluid to flow past said first weir while trapping packing material having constituent particles that are generally larger than said flow gap.

The microfluidic analysis system may further comprise at least one side channel formed into said planar substrate, said side channel being connected at a first end to said main channel at a location upstream from said first weir, and at a second end to a reservoir, said side channel providing a higher flow resistance than said main channel.

The microfluidic analysis system may further comprise a second weir located upstream from said connected firs end of said side channel, said first and second weirs forming a chamber therebetween, said second weir providing at least one flow gap to allow, in use, at least some fluid to flow past said second weir while trapping said packing material within said chamber.

Each side channel connection to said main channel may be provided with a hook structure whereby, in use, packing material is sprayed into said chamber to facilitate even packing.

Said hook structure preferably at least partially obstructs direct line-of-sight entry of packing material from said side channel into said chamber and forms a chamber mouth to one side of said hook structure.

The present invention also provides a method of packing the chamber in the microfluidic analysis system as claimed above, said method comprising, providing a non-conductive substrate and effecting an electrokinetic flow by applying a relatively high voltage at said reservoir, said reservoir containing packing material, and providing relatively low voltages at said first and second ends of said main channel, whereby, packing material flows from said reservoir into said chamber and is trapped by said first and second weirs.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a better understanding of the present invention, and by way of example, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, which show preferred embodiments of the present invention in which:

FIG. 1A shows a top plan view of a microfluidic device according to the present invention;

FIG. 1B shows an enlarged perspective view of a chamber in which packing materials (such as beads) are trapped;

FIG. 2A shows a cross-sectional view of the chamber shown in FIG. 1B taken along line A-A, and further shows packing material (beads) which are parked into the chamber and which are retained by a cover plate;

FIGS. 2B and 2C show a side view and end view, respectively, of an alternative embodiment of a weir according to the present invention;

FIG. 3A shows an initial stage of packing material (beads) being packed into the chamber shown in FIGS. 1B and 2A;

FIG. 3B shows the chamber of FIG. 3A after it has been completely filled with packing material (beads);

FIG. 4A shows an early stage of preconcentration of a 10 nM BODIPY solution at the weir/bed interface near the top of FIG. 4A;

FIG. 4B shows a later stage of preconcentration of a 1.0 nM BODIPY solution at the weir/bed interface near the top of FIG. 4B;

FIG. 5 shows a plot of fluorescence intensity vs. time, showing fluorescence of a first 1.0 nM BODIPY sample during loading, followed by a buffer flush, and then preconcentrated BODIPY during elution with acetonitrile (ACN);

FIG. 6 shows an electrochromatogram of BODIPY and fluorescein, showing different steps of the separation including load, flush, and elution;

FIGS. 7A-7D show electrochromatograms of BODIPY and fluorescein with different concentrations of acetonitrile in the mobile phase, specifically at: (a) 30%; (b) 22%; (c) 15%; and (d) 10%;

FIG. 8A-8C show top plan views of alternative embodiments of a microfluidic device according to the present invention;

FIG. 9 shows a top plan view of a microfluidic device according to the present invention having multiple packed chambers;

FIG. 10 shows a schematic view of a microfluidic device according to the present invention being used in conjunction with a mass spectrometer;

FIG. 11 shows a graph plotting the fluorescence intensity of theophylline against time, as it saturates a packed bed;

FIG. 12 shows theophylline being eluted from packed bed in a relatively narrow band; and

FIG. 13 shows each successive trial resulting in lower light generated from the CL reaction.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

As explained above, the present invention is designed to provide a convenient system and method of trapping packing materials (such as beads) on-chip, and of effectively packing and unpacking the trapping zones, to provide a functional on-chip packed reactor bed which significantly extends the number of applications of microfluidic analysis devices.

One such extended application facilitated by the present invention is on-chip sample preconcentration by solid phase extraction (SPE). In microfluidic analysis, SPE is often required to overcome detection limit problems, or to eliminate a potential interferent. To date, preconcentration within microchips has been performed by sample stacking using “isoelectric focusing” [Jacobson, S. C. and Ramsey, M. Electrophoresis 1995, 16, 481-486]. Advantageously, unlike sample stacking, SPE can be made selective for a particular analyte and does not require precise control of buffer concentrations. For SPE the amount of preconcentration is limited by the preconcentration time, which makes it more flexible than sample stacking. The SPE of an analyte can be beneficial not only for analyte preconcentration, but also for removing other impurities or changing solvent conditions. While the coupling of SPE with microfluidic devices has been accomplished [Figeys, D. and Aebersold, R. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 3721-3727], the SPE component in these prior art devices have been made in a capillary or similar cartridge external to the chip, thus resulting in a more complex and more expensive system. The present invention is designed to overcome this prior art limitation by facilitating an on-chip SPE component.

As realized by the present inventors, an integrated, on-chip SPE component is ultimately easier to manufacture, does not require low dead volume coupling to the chip, and eliminates sample handling looses or contamination problems arising from the off-chip sample manipulation required in the prior art. It is anticipated that routine incorporation of SPE onto a chip, as facilitated by the present invention, will reduce problems with on-chip detection limits and will improve the range of sample preparation steps which can be integrated.

Another extended application facilitated by the present invention is on-chip capillary electrochromatography (CEC). CEC has recently received significant attention due to the fact that it combines the separation power of both liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis. To date the difficulty associated with packing chromatographic material within devices has focused most previous chromatographic efforts upon prior art open channel methods [Manz, A., Miyahara, U., Miura, J., Watanabe, Y., MIyagi and H. Sato, K. Sens Actuators 1990, B1, 249-255; Jacobson, S. C., Hergenröder, R., Koutny, L. B. and Ramsey, J. M. Anal. Chem. 1994, 66, 2369-2373; Kutter, J. P., Jacobson, S. C., Matsubara, N. and Ramsey, J. M. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 3291-3297; He, B., Tait, N. and Regnier, F. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 3790-3797]. In the prior art, open channel method devices with channel widths of 2 μm or less were required to improve mobile-phase transfer in open columns leading to other practical considerations such as clogging and a short path length for detection. There were also problems with the reproducibility and the cost of stationary phase coating in such structures.

As realized by the inventors, on-chip packed bed chromatography according to the present invention has the benefit of providing low mobile-phase mass transfer, and makes available a wide variety of stationary phases. In this case, the use of an off-chip prepared stationary phase offers the advantage that it eliminates the need for coating the chip and allows for optimization of the stationary phase preparation.

Yet another extended application facilitated by the present invention is providing on-chip bead-based immunoassay and enzyme based assays. These applications are described further below.

EXAMPLE

To illustrate the present invention by way of example, the inventors conducted a series of experiments, which are described here.

Chip Design

FIGS. 1A and 1B show a microfluidic device 10 as used in these experiments. The device 10 comprises a main channel 11 formed into the top surface of a substrate 8, and the main channel 11 is separated by a chamber 4, also formed into the substrate 8. Two branches of the main channel 11, as separated by the chamber 4, are further identified as main reservoirs 1 and 2. The chamber 4 is connected to a packing material reservoir 3 by a narrow side channel 5. The packing material reservoir and the narrow side channel 5 are also formed into the substrate 8. FIG. 1B shows an enlarged image of the chamber 4 obtained with a scanning electron microscope (Jeol X-Vision JSM6301FXV, Peabody, Mass.). the chamber 4 is formed by providing two weirs 6, 7 formed across the main channel 11 at a relatively narrow portion of the main channel 11 (FIG. 1A). As can be seen from FIG. 1B, the weirs 6, 7 are not as high as the main channel 11 is deep, so that some fluid is allowed to flow over the weirs 6, 7, as explained below. The device 10 was prepared in Corning 0211 glass by the Alberta Microelectronic Corporation (Edmonton, AB), using known chemical etching procedures [Fan, Z. H.; Harrison, D. J. Anul. Chem. 1994, 66, 177-184]. It is noted that this substrate material is non-conductive, but if other than electrokinetic forces are being used (as detailed further below), then the substrate material may be semiconducting or conducting. Two photomasks were required to create device 10: a first photomask was used to etch the tops of the weirs 6, 7 to a depth of approximately 1 μm; and a second photomask was used to etch the channels 5, 11 to a depth of approximately 10 μm.

FIG. 2A shows a cross-sectional view of the weirs 6, 7 which are not as high as the channel 11 (main reservoirs 1, 2) is deep, and thus small flow gaps 14, 15 are provided between the top of the weirs 6, 7 and a cover plate 9 (not shown in FIG. 1A or 1B) which is placed on top of the substrate 8, thereby closing off the chamber 4, channels 5, 11 and reservoirs 1, 2, 3. As can be seen in FIG. 2A, the beads 12 are generally larger than the flow gaps 14, 15 and therefore cannot escape form the chamber 4.

FIGS. 2B and 2C show a side view and an end view, respectively, of an alternative embodiment of a weir 6′ in which substantially vertical notches 6″ are provided so that the weir 6′ provides less flow impedance. The vertical notches 6″ should be narrow enough that no beads can pass through them (i.e. they should be at least about 10% smaller than the smallest bead diameter).

Solutions and Reagents

Various solutions and reagents were used in these experiments. Acetonitrile (BDH, Toronto, ON) was filtered through a 0.45 μm Nylon-6,6 filter (Altech, Deerfield, Ill.) prior to use. Otherwise, the acetonitrile was used as received, with no added electrolyte. Also, 50 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.0) and ammonium acetate (pH 8.5) buffers were prepared in ultra-pure water (Millipore Canada, Mississauga, ON). A 1:1 (v/v) mixture of acetonitrile and buffer was prepared. A stock solution of 0.10 mM, 4,4-difluoro1,3,5,67,8 penta methyl -4-bora-3a4a-diaza-s-indacene, BODIPY 493/503 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, Ore.) was prepared in HPLC grade methanol (Fisher, Fair Lawn, N.J.) A 1 mM stock solution of fluorescein di-sodium salt (Sigma) was prepared in phosphate buffer. Both stock solutions were then diluted in the 50 mM phosphate and 50 mM ammonium acetate buffers to give 1.0 μM solutions, which were then diluted to 1.0 nM. This 1.0 nM solution served as the sample for preconcentration and electrochromatography. All aqueous (buffer and sample) solutions were filtered through a cellulose acetate syringe filter (0.2 μm pore size) (Nalgene, Rochester, N.Y.) prior to use.

Packing Material

One suitable packing material used in these experiments comprises a revers-phase chromatographic stationary resin. The resin was Spherisorb ODS1 (Phase Separations, Flintshire, UK), a porous C-18 resin whose particles ranged from 1.5 to 4.0 μm in diameter, as determined by scanning electron microscopy (ODS beads 12). A slurry of approximately 0.003 g/mL of ODS1 was prepared in acetonitrile. This slurry was used to supply the packing material reservoir 3, to subsequently pack the chamber 4.

Certain solvent and additive combinations were found to help the packing material stay in the packed chambers. For example, if ODS beads are introduced in acetonitrile they flow readily, while subsequently switching to an aqueous or predominantly aqueous solvent causes the beads to aggregate and become trapped within the chamber. With ODS heads up to 30% acetonitrile could be present in the aqueous solution without disrupting the aggregation observed to the point of de-stabilizing the packed bed. Up to 50% acetonitrile could be present with only modest loss in aggregation and weak demobilization of the bed. As another example protein G or protein A coated beads formed aggregates in aqueous solution, which made it hard to introduce them into the trapping zone. However, the addition of a neutral surfactant such as Tween 20 or Brij 35 (both are trademarks) prevented such aggregation and allowed the beads to be introduced. Conversely, subsequent removal of the surfactants form the aqueous solvent resulted in aggregation and enhanced stability of the trapped bed. The following trend was observed: when using non-polar or partially non-polar bead phases (for example, ODS and protein coated beads) lowering the surface tension of the solvent from that of water or buffered water, by the addition of organic additives such as organic solvents or surfactants, reduced the tendency to aggregate. Conversely reducing or eliminating materials with lower surface tension from aqueous solution increased the tendency to lock the beads in place on the bed, creating a “solvent lock” method to enhance bead trapping within these devices. Other organic solvents other than acetonitrile, miscible with water may also be used for these purposes, such as methanol, ethanol, dimethylsulfoxide, propylene carbonate, etc. Charged surfactants may also be used instead of neutral surfactants, so long as they are compatible with the proteins that may be present on the beads or in the sample.

Magnetic beads used for magnetic packing may comprise AbeBaw—protein “A” coated beads: composition 36-40% magnetite dispersed within a copolymer matrix consisting of styrene and divinyl benzene (Prozyme, Calif.) Also, Guifeng-oligo (dT)25 coated beads may be used for the isolation of mRNA. The beads have an even dispersion of magnetic material (Fe2 O3 and Fe3O4) through out the bead. The beads are coated with a polystyrene which encases the magnetic material (Dynal, Oslo, Norway).

Instrumentation

Various instruments were used in conducting the present experiments. As these instruments and their operation are well known to those skilled in the art, only a brief description is provided, and the instruments are not shown in the figures.

A power supply and relay system used to control the electrophoretic voltages necessary for bead packing and all liquid handling on-chip has been described previously [Fluir, K., Fitzpatrick, G., Chiem, N. and Harrison, D. J. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 4285-4290]. LabVIEW programs (National Instruments, Austin, Tex.), were written for computer control of the voltage system and for data acquisition.

A laser-induced fluorescence detection system used in this experiment consisted of a 488 nm argon ion laser (Uniphase, San Jose, Calif.), operated at 4.0 mW, and associated focusing optics [Manz. A., Miyahara, Y., Miura, J., Watanabe, Y., Miyagi, H. and Sato, K. Sens. Actuators 1990, B1, 249-255] (Melles Griot, Irvine, Calif.). Fluorescence emitted from the BODIPY sample (as described above) was collected by a 25 X, 0.35 NA microscope objective (Leitz Wetzlar, Germany). The images were observed with a SONY CCD-IRIS camera. Alternatively a 530 nm emission filter and a photo multiplier tube (PMT) (R1477, Hamamatus, Bridgewater, N.J.) were used as a detector positioned so that the narrow channel 5 between the chamber 4 and packing material reservoir 3 could be monitored. Data were collected from the section of main channel 11 just next to the chamber 4. The weir 6 was just out of the field of view. The PMT was biased at 530 V while the PMT signal was amplified, filtered (25 Hz Butterworth) and sampled at a frequency of 50 Hz.

The fluorescence of the buffer, acetonitrile, and 1.0 nM BODIPY in both buffer and acetonitrile was measured using a Shimadzu RF-5301PC Spectrofluorophotometer.

While specific models and manufacturers have been provided for various instrumentation described above, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that any suitable, functional equivalent may be used.

Chip Operation

Referring back to FIGS. 1A and 1B, the narrow side channel 5 leading into the chamber 4 form packing material reservoir 3 was used to direct stationary phase packing material into the chamber 4 using electrokinetic pumping [Yan, C., U.S. Pat. No. 5,453,163, 1995; Knox, J. J. and Grant, I. H. Chromatographia 1991, 32, 317-328]. As mentioned above, the substrate 8 is non-conductive, which allows packing of the beads 12 using the electrokinetic pumping method.

The device 10 was not conditioned with any aqueous solutions prior to use. The chamber 4, channels 5, 11, and reservoirs 1, 2, 3 were first filled with acetonitrile. The chamber 4 was packed with ODS treads 12 (FIG. 2) by replacing the acetonitrile in packing material reservoir 3 with the ODS/acetonitrile slurry (described above), then applying positive high voltage at packing material reservoir 3 while holding main reservoirs 1 and 2 at ground. The voltage applied at packing material reservoir 3 was sampled from 200 V to 800 V over approximately 5 min to effect packing of chamber 4.

Once the chamber 4 was packed, a step gradient was performed to introduce aqueous solution to the main channel 11 and the ODS beads 12 in the chamber 4. A 1:1 (v/v) mixture of acetonitrile and buffer was placed in reservoirs 1 and 2. Acetonitrile replaced the slurry in packing material reservoir 3. A voltage was then applied to main reservoir 1 and was ramped from 200 V to 800 V, with packing material reservoir 3 biased at 400 V and main reservoir 2 grounded. After 2 to 5 min at 800 V, the acetonitrile/buffer mixture in reservoirs 1 and 2 was replaced with buffer, and the same voltage program repeated. The chamber 4 was monitored visually to ensure that the acetonitrile was completely replaced by buffer and that the packing material (beads 12) did not shift or unpack during this procedure. (The beads 12 could be seen to agglomerate as the acetonitrile was expelled, and the index of refraction change at the water/acetonitrile interface was clearly visible.) The experiments conducted are described in further detail below.

Experimental Results and Discussion

In order to conduct the experiments, it was necessary to pack the chamber 4 with packing material (beads 12), as shown in FIG. 2A.

The narrow side channel 5 shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B was made to be about 30 μm wide to supply packing material (beads 12) to the chamber 4. A sample could then be delivered from reservoir 2 (the inlet channel), across the chamber 4 and on towards main reservoir 1 (the outlet channel). The volume of the chamber 4 was 330 pL, while the volume of the outlet and inlet channels was 1.5×10−8 L, respectively. The main channel 11 had much lower flow resistance than the side channel 5, in spite of the weirs 6, 7, given their relatively wide widths (580 μm, tapering to 300 μm at the weirs) in comparison to the width of the narrow channel 5 (30 μm). The relative flow resistance in the device 10 was manipulated by the selection of the width dimensions for these channels 5, 11 in order to encourage flow between main reservoirs 1 and 2, rather than into the narrow bead introduction side channel 5 during sample loading and elution.

Reverse phase ODS beads 12 (as described previously) were used in the SPE device because of their extensive use for the chromatography of proteins, peptides and tryptic digests [Seifar, R. M.; Kok, W. T.; Kraak, J. C.; and Poppe, II. Chromatographia, 1997, 46, 131-136. Yan, C.; Dadoo, R.; Zhao, H.; Zare, R. N.; and Rakestraw, D. J., Anal. Chem. 1995, 67, 2026-2029. ] as well as other applications of SPE and CEC [Nielsen, R. G.; Riggin, R. M.; Rickard, E. C. J. Chromatogr. 1989, 480, 393-401. Hancock, W. S.; Chloupek, R. C.; Kirkland, J. J.; Snyder, L. R. J. Chromatogr. A 1994, 686, 31-43.] Electrokinetic packing of conventional capillaries has been described previously, [Yan, C.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,453,163, 1995. Knox, J. H.; Grant, I. H. Chromatographia 1991, 32, 317-328.], and the inventors have adapted the method for the present invention.

As briefly explained earlier, the packing procedure involved applying a positive voltage (ramped from 200-*00 V) to the packing material reservoir 3, while grounding main reservoirs 1 and 2. The applied voltage induced EOF to flow down the bead channel, carrying the beads into the cavity. An organic solvent was required to suspend the chromatographic beads 12 to prevent them from aggregating and plugging the narrow side channel 5. Studies have shown that capillaries filled with acetonitrile exhibit substantial electgroosmostic flow [Wright, P. B.; Lister, A. S.; Dorsey, J. G. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69 3251-3259, Lister, A. S.; Dorsey, J. G.; Burton, D. E. J. High Resol. Chromatogr. 1997, 20, 523-528. Schwer, C.; Kenndler, E. Anal. Chem. 1991, 63, 180114 1807. Salimi-Moosavi, H.; Cassidy, R. M. Anal. Chem. 1995, 67, 1067-1073. ].

As shown in FIG. 3A, at the early stages of packing, the beads 12 entering the chamber 4 contacted the weirs 6, 7 on either side of the chamber 4. As explained earlier, the beads 12 are unable to traverse the weirs 6, 7 because the distance from the top of the weirs 6, 7 to the bottom of the cover plate 9 (approximately 1.0 μm) is less than the diameter of the individual particles of the ODS beads 12 (approximately 1.5-4.0 μm).

As shown in FIG. 3B, the chamber 4 continued to pack until it was entirely filled with chromatographic material. As discussed earlier, the difficulties associated with reproducibly fabricating frits for retaining packing material is well known. Importantly, the weir design used in the present invention circumvented this problem, and the electrokinetic packing of the beads provided an even distribution of beads throughout the chamber with no observable voids. In fact, the use of weir structures may ultimately eliminate the need for on column frit fabrication.

The weir design of the present invention allows electric fields to be applied across the trapping zone formed by two weirs, when filled with beads, in a range as high as 20,000 to 80,000 V/cm without bubble formation at the weir. Separations performed in devices with these weirs can use electric fields at least as high as 15,000 V/cm. The power dissipated across a weir can be as high as 3-7 V/m without the formation of bubbles. In contrast firts formed in conventional columns have at the best been reported to form bubbles at power dissipations above 0.6 W/m, and electric fields in the range of 150-600 V/cm are the best that have been reported without bubble formation.

It is possible to couple an external capillary to a chip and allow the weir to be used as the trapping element for the beads packed within the external electrochromatography capillary. This can be accomplished using a low dead volume coupling, such as described by bings et al. ( N. H. Bings, C. Wang, C. D. Skinner, C. L. Colyer, P. Thibeault, D. J. Harrison, Anal. Chem. 71 (1999) 3292-3296.) In this way the chip based weir can replace the frits normally formed within external capillaries, and allow higher electric fields to be used, improving speed and separation efficiency.

(It is noted here that it was also possible to pack the cavity by applying a vacuum at main reservoirs 1 and 2, although this was less convenient when electrokinetic flow was used for sample loading and elution).

If for some reason the beads 12 did not pack as tightly as was desirable (as shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B) they were removed from the chamber 4 by simply reversing the voltages, and the packing procedure was then repeated. It is noted that once an aqueous solution was introduced to the chamber 4, the reverse-phase beads 12 tended to aggregate and were more difficult to remove. However, subsequent removal was accomplished by flushing the aqueous solution out with acetonitrile, using either EOF or vacuum, or a combination of the two. Advantageously, the ability to effectively remove the beads 12 from chamber 4 allowed used chromatographic beads to be refreshed, or a more applicable material to be substituted.

Significantly, a design utilizing a hook structure 13 at the chamber entrance (FIGS. 1B and 3A) yielded the most favorable results in packing, enabling the chamber 4 to be packed and remain so after removal or alteration of voltages or vacuum. As seen from the figures the side channel 5 connects to the chamber 4 via a chamber mount 4A in an asymmetric fashion, relative to the weirs 6, 7. Also, the hook structure 13 preferably obstructs direct line-of-sight entry of packing material from the side channel 5 into the chamber 4. Rather, the hook structure 13 forces packing material to enter the chamber 4 indirectly via the chamber mouth 4A.

As explained earlier, during the packing step, the packing material reservoir 3 has a positive bias applied with reservoirs 1 and 2 grounded. The inventors believe that the hooked structure 13 causes electric field lines to follow a curved pathway into the cavity. Consequently, as the chromatographic beads 12 follow the electric field lines into the chamber mouth 4A they appear to be “sprayed” as if from a snow blower (FIG. 3A), to become uniformly packed.

During the packing procedure the chamber 4 filled only to the beginning of the hook structure 13 (see FIG. 3B). Once filled, the beads were observed to flow down the sides and up the middle of the narrow side channel 5 (toward packing material reservoir 3) mimicking the solvent back flow generated in a closed electrophoretic system [Shaw, D. J. Introduction to Colloid and Surface Chemistry, 3rd ed. Butterworths: London, 1980.]. In such a closed system, EOF is directed along the walls until it reaches the end of the chamber, where pressure causes the solution to reverse direction and flow back up the center of the bead introduction channel.

A key aspect of the hooked structure as shown is the asymmetric entrance into the traping zone, which allows for better packing. A symmetric entrance means the entering beads can go to both weir equally, which tends to lead to uneven or difficult packing. An asymmetric structure allows the beads to pack preferentially at one end of the trapping zone firt and then build up in one direction from that location. The key role of the hook structure is to prevent line-of sight outflow form the trapping zone during use of the packed bed.

Chambers constructed without an asymmetry in the entrance were not observed to pack as well as asymmetric entry designs. In these cases, packing material tended to fill the corners furthest from the entrance, but no additional material would enter the chamber. The inventors believe that, due to its symmetric design, this type of chamber exhibits solvent back flow, after it has filled to a certain extent. That is, the partially filled chamber may resemble a closed or restricted system. Such an occurrence would preclude the filling of the symmetric chamber with beads and is consistent with previously observed behavior, as explained by Shaw. Such behavior may account for the ability to fill symmetric structures on some occasions but less readily on others. In contrast, an asymmetric design, with or without a hook structure 13 guarding the entrance is less likely to experience back flow directly into the narrow bead introduction channel 5.

Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) On-Chip

As explained earlier, the present invention allows applications of microfluidic analysis systems to be extended. One such extension is facilitating SPE directly on-chip. Preconcentration is a valuable tool that can be used to enhance the sensitivity of microfluidic devices. To determine the ability of a packed SPE bed constructed on a microchip to preconcentrate an analyte, we concentrated a 1.0 nM solution of BODIPY reagent from 50 mM phosphate buffer. Solution conditions utilized were similar to those used for protein and peptide analysis in HPLC-CE systems. [Bushey, M. M.; Jorgenson, J. W. Anal. Chem. 1990, 62, 978-984. Castagnola, M.; Cassiano, L.; Rabino, R.; Rossetti, D. V. J. Chromatogr. 1991, 572, 51-58.] The BODIPY reagent, when diluted in aqueous buffer, exhibits a high affinity for ODS material and is an excellent fluorophore. The preconcentration and elution of the BODIPY reagent was carried out in four steps: equalization of the SPE bed with buffer; sample introduction; buffer flush; and elution of analyte.

Following rinsing of the packed bed with phosphate buffer, a solution of 1.0 nM BODIPY was placed in main reservoir 1, and +200 V was applied for 2 minutes, with main reservoir 2 grounded. The EOF (0.2 mm/sec, 1.2×10−9 L/sec) flowed towards reservoir 2, carrying the BODIPY onto the SPE bed during the loading step.

As shown in FIG. 4A, fluorescence of the adsorbed BODIPY occurred initially at the first few layers of beads 12 only (near the top of the Figure). FIG. 4B shows the SPE bed after 1.5 minutes, with a total of 1.4×10−16 moles of BODIPY reagent loaded on the bed (assuming complete capture of the dye). No sample breakthrough was observed with BODIPY, due to its high affinity for the ODS material. In fact, visual observation indicated that after concentrating 1.0 n M BODIPY solution for two minutes only 5% of the physical volume of the SPE bed was utilized suggesting that the capacity of the 330 pL bed was about 2.8×10−15 moles of analyte.

A buffer wash step was used after loading to wash sample remaining within the channel 11 onto the bed (in chamber 4). The solutions in reservoirs 1 and 2 were then replaced with acetonitrile, and the dye was eluted with solvent moving in the same direction as the initial loading step (or by reversal of the potential gradient during the elution step, it could be directed back towards the original sample reservoir). Both procedures work well, but the latter was more convenient for our testing. FIG. 5 shows graphically the 3-step preconcentration experiment for a 1.0 nM BODIPY sample following bed equalization. The 90 second loading step showed an increase in signal as the fluorescent sample passed by the detector positioned as shown in FIG. 1A. This was followed by a 60-second rinse step. Acetonitrile was then used to elute the BODIPY reagent off the bed in the opposite direction to which it was loaded, eliminating the need for detector repositioning. The BODIPY reagent eluted in a relatively narrow 3-second band following a 90-second preconcentration step exhibiting a many fold concentration increase compared to the original sample. The fluorescence of the BODIPY (1.0 nM) reagent was tested in both buffer and acetonitrile and did not show a significant difference in intensity for either of the solvents. The preconcentration factor (P.F.) can be estimated using equation (1):

P . F . = V i V f = t pre · f buff t elute · f elute ( 1 )
where Vi is the volume of buffer containing analyte and Vf is the volume of acetonitrile containing analyte. The volume Vi is the product of the preconcentration time (tpre, sec.) and the electroosmotic flow of the sample being concentrated (fbuff, L/sec.) while Vf is the product of width of the eluted analyte peak (telute, sec.) and the flow rate of the eluting solvent felute (1./sec). For this case, the analyte was preconcentrated by a factor of at least 100 times. After sufficient concentration the BODIPY is easily observed visually on the SPE bed.

Different sample loading times were utilized to increase the amount of preconcentration. In the experiments, reconsecration times ranging from 120-532 seconds were studied yielding preconcentration factors of 80-500. Peak area (rsd 3-11%) plotted versus preconcentration time yielded a linear relationship (r2=0.9993) over the studied conditions.

Capillary Electrochromatography (CEC) On-Chip

As explained earlier, another application facilitated by the present invention is on-chip capillary electrochromatography (CEC). Reversed phase mode CEC was performed on a chamber 4 packed with octadecyl silane beads 12 equilibrated with buffer. Due to the lack of an injector within the chip design, the samples were loaded onto the front of the chromatographic bed in 50 mM ammonium acetate buffer, pH 8.5 (see “Solutions and Reagents,” above). Both compounds were totally retained under these conditions, as indicated by a lack of analyte signal in the loading and flush steps. The loading step functioned to both introduce the sample and preconcentrate the retained analyzes at the front of the bed [Swartz, M. E. ; Merion, M.; J. Chromatogr, 1993, 632, 209-213.] FIG. 6 shows the three steps involved in the CEC separation of BODIPY and fluorescein with a mobile phase composition of 30% acetonitrile/ 70% aqueous 50 mM ammonium acetate. Once the mixed mobile phase reaches the bed, both compounds begin to undergo chromatography and are eluted from the bed. The compounds are completely eluted and separated in less than 20 sec on less than 200 μm of chromatographic bed, yielding a plate height of 2 μm (N=100 plates or 500 000 plates/m) for the fluorescein peak. Under these conditions, the fluorescein is eluted prior to the BODIPY reagent. Peaks were identified by comparing retention times of the standards with those of the mixture. At pH 8.5 fluorescein possesses a net (−2) charge while BODIPY is neutral. In a normal CZE separation the electrophoretic mobility of fluorescein would oppose the EOF, causing the BODIPY to elute prior to fluorescein. In this case the elution order of the two components is reversed, indicating an interaction between the analytes and the stationary phase. The BODIPY being more hydrophobic has a higher affinity for the chromatographic material than does fluoroscein causing the BODIPY to be retained more and eluted later.

Finally, FIGS. 7A-7D shows the CEC separation of BODIPY and fluorescein utilizing mobile phases with different concentrations of acetonitrile. It was observed that the increased acetonitrile concentration lowers the polarity of the mobile phase, decreasing the amount of time required for the BODIPY to elute. The elution time for fluorescein does not change, indicating little to no chromatographic retention except at low % acetonitrile. Decreasing the acetonitrile concentration provides baseline resolution, but leads to more extensive band broadening.

Our present results are comparable to that reported for open tubular CEC on a chip [Jacobson, S. C., Hergenröder, R., Koutny, L. B., Ramsey, J. M. Anal. Chem. 1994, 66, 2369-2373. Kutter, J. P.; Jacobson, S. C.; Matsubara, N.; Ramsey, J. M. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 3291-3297. Ho, B., Tait, N., Regnier, F. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 3790-3797.]

Immunoassay Using Bead-based Reagents

Immunoassay on beads, or immunosorbent assays involves placing either an antibody or antigen on the surface of the bead. As a solution containing an antigen passes over the beads, the antigen specifically binds the antibody. In this way the specificity of the antigen for the antibody is utilized to separate it from other species in solution. Later the solution conditions are changed so that the antibody or antigen is eluted from the beads and is detected as either complex or the free antibody. The development of immunosorbent assays on chip is attractive because of the small amounts of reagents that are consumed. In addition microchips offer very fast analysis times compared to conventional methods performed in micro titer plates or in syringes packed with immuno-beads. Immunosorbent assays on-chip also provide lower concentration detection limits than solution phase immunoassays on-chip. Making the development of bead based immunoassay on-chip important.

Beads that have specific enzymes linked to them are packed into the chamber created by the two weirs. The use of beads is preferential because of the increased surface area of the beads as opposed surface area of the channel walls. The higher surface area leads to a greater capacity and more efficient trapping of the analyte. The weirs form a well-defined chamber for the immunoassay beads to pack. We have demonstrated bead-based immunoassay on chip for the enzyme theoplylline. In the experiment magnetic beads coated with protein A are packed within the chamber of the chip. Later the antibody (antitheophylline) is flowed across the bed in a 1 mM tricine buffer pH 8.0. When the antitheophylline flows through the packed bed the antibody binds to the protein A. The antitheophylline was passed over the bed for several minutes to ensure that the bed is saturated with antibody. A buffer washing step was then utilized to remove the remaining unbound antibody from the chamber and channels. The bed was then saturated with fluorescently labeled theophylline (diluted from a kit) by flowing it through the bed where it binds to the antitheophylline. The point at which the bed was saturated was determined by monitoring fluorescence below the bed and determining the point where the breakthrough curve plateaus. Following breakthrough the theophylline solution is washed from the device using a buffer flush step. A chaotropic agent is then added to elute the theophylline from the bed as either free protein or theophylline/antibody complex. Chaotropic agents can be of various types, however in this example a mixture of 90% acetone/10% tricine buffer was used. Once the chaotropic agent reaches the packed bed the theophylline is eluted in a relatively narrow band.

Although normally under these circumstances a competitive assay would be performed the direct assay demonstrates the ability of the chamber on the weir device to act as an immunoassay bed.

Enzyme Reactor Beds

There have been several methods developed for immobilizing enzymes onto solid supports like beads. Once immobilized the enzyme beads can be packed into beds to perform chemical reactions on solutions as they are flowed through them. Normally a solution containing a substrate is passed through the bed. When the substrate comes in contact with the enzyme reacts with the substrate to yield a product. The product resulting from the reaction of the immobilized enzyme and substrate can be later used as a method of detection or in other synthetic processes. This example illustrates the use of the immobilized enzyme horse radish peroxidase(HRP) and xanthine oxidase(XO) on porous silica beads (5 μm diameter). These results show that enzymes, once immobilized onto beads, can be trapped/packed into the weir device, where they are still active and can be used as an enzyme reactor bed.

XOD and HRP were immobilized onto Nucleosil 1000-5 silica beads (Machrey-Nagel, Germany) that has been silanized with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane, by crosslinking with gluteraldehyde (Sigma). The immobilization of enzymes on glass beads has been described previously and is known by practitioners of the art. All studies were performed using 50 mM boric acid adjusted with 1 M NaOH to pH 9.

The immobilization of HRP and XOD was performed to demonstrate two principals. First was the ability to pack the enzyme immobilized beads within the weir device and then second was to demonstrate that the enzyme was still active and could be utilized to catalyze reactions once packed. To show each of these principals a chemiluminscent reaction was performed using the weir device.

The ability to pack immobilized enzymes allows different methods of detection to be used for certain analytes. For example the luminol chemiluminescence (CL) reaction can be used for very sensitive determinations when only small amounts of analyte are available or when labeling reactions are otherwise difficult to perform. CL reactions are unique in that they do not require a light source simplifying the detection scheme. The chemiluminescence reaction catalyzed by HRP is shown below.
Luminol+H2O2+HRP (Light(425 nm)+other products
Beads immobilized with HRP were packed into the weir device and a solution containing the reagents for the reaction passed through the bed. The immobilized HRP was found to catalyze the chemiluminescent reaction when a solution of H2O2 (100(M) and luminol (10 mM) was flowed over a bed that had been packed with beads containing immobilized HRP. Light generated from the reaction was detected downstream from the enzyme bed.

However, it was noticed that with each successive trial the light generated from the CL reaction was lower than in the previous trial. This is probably caused by a decrease in the activity of the enzyme with each successive run. These results evidence the advantage of a method of removing the exhausted beads and replacing them with fresh ones, such as discussed for the replacement of ODS beads within the weir device.

Alternative Embodiments

While a two weir embodiment of the design according to the present invention has been described above, other embodiments are also possible. For example, it is possible to implement a single weir design to form an on-chip reactor bead (i.e. not having a second weir 6 located upstream in the main channel 11). Specifically, by providing a downstream weir 7 formed across the main channel and providing pressure only in a downstream direction (i.e. from main reservoir 2 and side channel 5 to main reservoir 1), it has been observed that packing can be achieved against the downstream weir 7. However, it is noted that a single weir design may result in the formation of a ragged leading edge for the packed bed that reduces separation efficiency when used for SPE or CEC. Additionally, the high back pressure associated with a long bed of small beads limited the length of the pack to about 4-6 mm. A high pressure fitting for the microchip would allow high pressure pumping and allowing somewhat greater lengths.

Other types of forces may also be used to create a packed bed using a single weir design. For example, it was also possible to achieve a limited degree of packing (to a length of a few millimeters) using electrokinetic forces, directed only in a downstream direction (i.e. from main reservoir 2 and packing material reservoir 3, to main reservoir 1).

In addition to varying the numbers of weirs, it is also possible to provide more than one inlet or outlet to a chamber, as shown in alternative embodiments of the present invention in FIGS. 8A-8C.

In FIG. 8A, a chamber 4 is formed between two weirs 6, 7. Two side channels 5a, 5b are provided to serve as an inlet or outlet to the chamber 4. As shown in FIG. 8A, the side channels 5a, 5b may be offset relative to each other to better facilitate packing of the chamber. A second side channel is added to allow the beads to be flushed out to waste at the other end of the trapping zone, or to allow the flushing agent to be delivered from an alternate reservoir. The latter design can prevent used beads from contaminating the fresh bead stream, and/or prevent sample and sample waste solutions from being directed into the trapping zone during flushing.

As shown in FIG. 8B the side channel in this design may have one or more optional branches 5c, to allow the side channel 5b to be flushed of beads, or to allow beads being flushed out of the trapping zone to be directed, for example, into a waste reservoir instead of into the packing material reservoir 3 (not shown).

Another embodiment is shown in FIG. 8C, in which a side channel weir 16 is provided near the entrance of a third side channel 5d to the chamber 4, to allow fluid flow without passage of beads. This “weired” side channel 5d may be used, for example, to release pressure build up in the chamber 4 during loading of the beads, particularly when the length of the chamber 4 (as measured between the weirs 6, 7) is greater than 4-6 mm.

In all three embodiments shown in FIGS. 8A-8C, the side channel entrance into the chamber 4 may be modified to include a hook or similar shape, as described earlier, in order to prevent direct “line-of-sight” flow from a side channel into the chamber 4, or vice versa. As explained earlier, this entrance modification serves to spray the beads into the trapping zone in order to assist packing, and to reduce the tendency of the beads to exit from the chamber 4 during later use.

Loading of beads with more than one side channel, as shown in FIGS. 8A-8C, is performed in a manner similar to that for a single side channel, two weir design, (as described above) except that a potential must also be applied to the additional side channels to prevent flow into those side channels when using electrokinetic loading. During removal of the beads a voltage may be applied to a second side channel (e.g. side channel 5b in FIG. 8A) to drive beads out of the trapping zone or chamber 4, applying voltage potentials such as those used with the single side channel design but adjusted for the potential drop in the additional side channel. As will be appreciated, the direction of flow during the flushing step can be controlled by the polarity of the applied voltage.

When using pressure driven flow to load beads, a back pressure must be applied to the additional side channels during loading, or else the reservoirs attached to the additional side channels may be temporarily sealed. When flushing the beads from the chamber 4, a pressure may be applied to the bead supply channel 5a to flush beads out of one or more additional side channels.

When performing SPE or CEC using a multiple side channel design and electrokinetic forces, a voltage may be applied to the additional side channels to prevent leakage of sample or beads out of the trapping zone and into the side channels, substantially in the same manner as described for a single side channel in the trapping zone. When using pressure drive pumping, the side channels may a have enough positive pressure applied to eliminate flow into the side channel, or else the reservoirs attached to the respective side channels can be temporarily sealed.

Dimension Guidelines

While the theoretical limits of various dimensions of a microfluidic device designed according to the present invention are not known, the inventors have adopted some general guidelines for practical purposes, which are discussed below.

It is thought that the length of the trapping zone may range anywhere from about 10 μm up to about 200 cm (using a coiled or serpentine path if necessary to allow for incorporation of such a length within the confines of a single device wafer). The trapping zone length required will be dependent upon the application and will also be limited by the forces which may be applied to achieve packing and unpacking. For example, on-chip CEC would require relatively long trapping zones, with a preferred upper limit of about 5 cm.

As to the depth of the trapping zone, sample and waste channels, a practical range is estimated to be about 400 μm to 0.25 μm. More preferably, the upper limit should be about 100 μm and the lower limit should be about 10% larger than the particle depth at a minimum.

Also, in order to reduce the likelihood of clogging, the bead delivery and bead waste channels (side channels 5, 5a 5d) preferably should be at least about 3 times deeper and three times wider than the bead diameter.

The maximum dimensions of the side channels 5, 5a-5d are also dependent upon the relative flow resistances required (i.e. the flow resistance of the side channel versus the main channel and the weirs, so as to minimize side channel backflow during use). Generally, speaking, the flow resistance of the side channels should be higher than the flow resistance of weirs to minimize the backflow problem.

The accompanying tables provide information on the calculated effect of channel and weir dimensions on the volumetric flow rates out of the trapping zone, as a function of flow channel depth, weir depth and side channel length using pressure driven flow.

In the tables below, what is called channel W is element 1 in FIG. 1A; what is called channel C is called element 5 in FIG. 1A; and what is called channel C′ is element 3 in FIG. 1A

Correlation to FIG. 1A Width Length
20 μm Deep
Element 1 Channel W 600 6,500
Weir 280 variable
Element 5 Channel C  50 variable
Element 3 Channel C′ 600 3,500
10 μm Deep
Element 1 Channel W 580 6,500
Weir 280 variable

The volumetric flow rates were estimated using the Navier-Stokes equation for a rectangular channel cross section and Perry's tabulated values of the effect of channel shape. The flow resistance of a channel with half width a and half depth b is given by equation 2:
ΔP/U=hL/abN  (2)
where ΔP is the pressure drop along a channel segment of length L, U is the average linear flow velocity, h is the viscosity, and N is a form factor dependent upon the cross sectional ratio b/a (b<a). The factor N may be estimated from solutions to the Navier-Stokes equation for pressure driven, parabolic flow, and was tabulated by Perry in Chemical Engineer's Handbook, (3rd edition, 1950) pp 387. The goal in device design is to make the resistance of the side channel, C in the Tables, higher than the resistance of the weir and the following flow channel W, so that flow across the weir is favoured. When flow elements are in series the fluid resistance given by the right hand side of equation 1 for each segment can be added in the manner that the resistance of series electrical impedances can be added. When fluid elements are in parallel the inverse of their fluid resistance can be added to obtain the inverse of the total impedance, as is done for parallel electrical resistances. The volumetric flow rate Q, through a channel or a combination of channels is then given by equation 3.
Q=abΔP/Rf  (3)
Where Rf is the resistance to fluid flow defined by the right hand side of equation 1, combined to gether for all channel segments as discussed above. The ratio, r, of volumetric flow rate across the weir, QW versus into the side channel, QC, r−QW/QC, should be large to ensure the percent of solution flowing across the weir, % QW=1(1+r), is high. This can be accomplished by using a long narrow side channel compared to a wide main channel, by increasing the depth of the weir relative to the depth of the other channels, by decreasing the depth of the side channel relative to the main channel, etc, as indicated by several calculations presented in the Tables.

TABLE
Volumetric Flow Ratios for 10 and 20 μm Deep Designs
Channel Channel C Weir Weir Volumetric
depth Length Depth Length ratio r % QW
20 μm 15,000 3 20 12.58 92.6
25,000 20.85 95.4
15,000 10 18.75 94.9
20 μm 15,000 1 20 0.687 41.1
25,000 1.16 53.6
15,000 10 1.37 57.8
10 μm 15,000 3 40 38.9 97.5
25,000 63.7 98.5
15,000 30 41.7 97.7
10 μm 15,000 1 40 4.14 80.5
25,000 6.87 87.3
15,000 30 5.83 84.3

TABLE
Fixed Device Dimensions for Calculations with a Given Etch Depth
Width Length
20 μm Deep
Channel W 600 6,500
Weir 280 variable
Channel C 50 variable
Channel C′ 600 3,500
10 μm Deep
Channel W 580 6,500
Weir 280 variable
Channel C 30 variable
Channel C′ 580 3,500

Integrated Analytical Procedures

It will be appreciated that the various features of the present invention as described above may be utilized in a more complex microfluidic design.

FIG. 9 shows a multiple weir and multiple side channel design, generally referred to by reference numeral 20, in which several trapping zones are integrated, each serving a different function.

As an illustrative example, in a first trapping zone 25, formed between weirs 6a and 6b, beads loaded with an antibody to a specific protein are introduced via side channel 24 (and exit via side channel 26). A cell lysate or serum sample or other protein source is directed from a sample reservoir (not shown) and loaded into the chip via sample inlet 21 and entrance channel 38 (the sample is removed at sample outlet 22 and an eluent inlet 23 is also provided at the entrance channel. The sample is then passed into the antibody bead bed in trapping zone 25 to isolate a specific protein, while the effluent is directed towards waste outlet 27.

A chaotropic elution agent, such as an acetonitrile, water mix, is then introduced (eluent inlet 23) to elute the protein from the column and deliver it to the next trapping zone 30 (formed between weirs 6c and 6d) where it is designed by a protease enzyme immobilized on beads loaded into the zone 30 (via side channels 29, 31). The effluent at this stage would be directed towards waste outlet 32. After sufficient reaction time, a buffer is delivered (elution inlet 28, running buffer 28a, waste from bed 25) to flush the protein digest from the bed and into the next trapping zone 35 (formed between weirs 6e and 6f) with effluent delivered to waste outlet 39.

The third trapping zone 35 contains a solid phase extraction material (packed and unpacked via side channels 34, 36), allowing concentration of the digest peptides onto the bed in zone 35. An elution solvent, such as a methanol/aqueous mixture or acetonitrile/aqueous mixture is then introduced (elution inlet 33, running buffer 33a) to deliver (exit channel 37, waste 39, or collection 40) a concentrated protein digest to another location on the chip for final analysis.

Packed Bed Chip to Electrospray Mass Spectrometry Interface

Packed bed flow channels may according to the present invention may be interfaced to a mass spectrometer via an electrospray coupler 41, as illustrated in FIG. 10. The packed bed 4 may perform an enzyme digestion of a protein, affinity purification and pre-concentration of a specific chemical or protein, solid phase extraction concentration enhancement, or capillary electrochromatographic separation, or any combination of these and other steps, prior to electrospray introduction in to a mass spectrometer. The chip to electrospray interface may be made using any method that provides a less than 100 nL dead volume, preferably less than 1 nL and most preferably less than 100 pL dead volume at the coupling region. A method such as that described by Wang et al, or Karger can be used to create the interface [Bings, N. H.; Wang, C.; Skinner, C. D.; Colyer, C. L.; Thibeault, P.; Harrison, D. J. Anal. Chem. 71 (1999) 3292-3296. Zhang, B.; Liu, H.; Karger, B. L.; Foret, F. Anal. Chem 71 (1999) 3258-3264].

While the present invention has been described by reference to various preferred embodiments, it will be understood that obvious changes may be made and equivalents substituted without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention which is set out in the following claims.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US33526432 Sep 196414 Nov 1967Hitachi LtdLiquid chromatography and chromatographs
US34332571 Feb 196618 Mar 1969IbmDiaphragm type fluid logic latch
US356869227 Nov 19679 Mar 1971Bowles Eng CorpOptical machining process
US41136653 Feb 197712 Sep 1978Ameron, Inc.Coatings prepared from trialkoxysilanes
US48471207 Nov 198811 Jul 1989Cogent LimitedCompositions and processes producing scratch resistant polysiloxane coatings
US496349815 Jan 198816 Oct 1990BiotrackCapillary flow device
US527564524 Nov 19924 Jan 1994Ameron, Inc.Polysiloxane coating
US537625210 Nov 199227 Dec 1994Pharmacia Biosensor AbMicrofluidic structure and process for its manufacture
US53875054 May 19907 Feb 1995Eastman Kodak CompanyPreparation and isolation of single-stranded biotinylated nucleic acids by heat avidin-biotin cleavage
US545316329 Oct 199326 Sep 1995Yan; ChaoElectrokinetic packing of capillary columns
US548283614 Jan 19939 Jan 1996The Regents Of The University Of CaliforniaDNA purification by triplex-affinity capture and affinity capture electrophoresis
US55714107 Jun 19955 Nov 1996Hewlett Packard CompanyFully integrated miniaturized planar liquid sample handling and analysis device
US558712814 Nov 199424 Dec 1996The Trustees Of The University Of PennsylvaniaMesoscale polynucleotide amplification devices
US563535814 Feb 19943 Jun 1997Trustees Of The University Of PennsylvaniaFluid handling methods for use in mesoscale analytical devices
US563942819 Jul 199417 Jun 1997Becton Dickinson And CompanyMethod and apparatus for fully automated nucleic acid amplification, nucleic acid assay and immunoassay
US57058131 Nov 19956 Jan 1998Hewlett-Packard CompanyIntegrated planar liquid handling system for maldi-TOF MS
US572602614 Nov 199410 Mar 1998Trustees Of The University Of PennsylvaniaMesoscale sample preparation device and systems for determination and processing of analytes
US574146225 Apr 199521 Apr 1998IroriRemotely programmable matrices with memories
US575001513 Mar 199612 May 1998Soane BiosciencesMethod and device for moving molecules by the application of a plurality of electrical fields
US577002930 Jul 199623 Jun 1998Soane BiosciencesIntegrated electrophoretic microdevices
US57753718 Mar 19957 Jul 1998Abbott LaboratoriesValve control
US57767486 Jun 19967 Jul 1998President And Fellows Of Harvard CollegeMethod of formation of microstamped patterns on plates for adhesion of cells and other biological materials, devices and uses therefor
US583066223 Sep 19943 Nov 1998The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New YorkMethod for construction of normalized cDNA libraries
US58427879 Oct 19971 Dec 1998Caliper Technologies CorporationMicrofluidic systems incorporating varied channel dimensions
US585617419 Jan 19965 Jan 1999Affymetrix, Inc.Integrated nucleic acid diagnostic device
US586350223 Jan 199726 Jan 1999Sarnoff CorporationParallel reaction cassette and associated devices
US58720103 Jul 199616 Feb 1999Northeastern UniversityMicroscale fluid handling system
US588547014 Apr 199723 Mar 1999Caliper Technologies CorporationControlled fluid transport in microfabricated polymeric substrates
US590855210 Oct 19971 Jun 1999Hewlett-Packard CompanyColumn for capillary chromatographic separations
US592259127 Jun 199613 Jul 1999Affymetrix, Inc.Integrated nucleic acid diagnostic device
US594244328 Jun 199624 Aug 1999Caliper Technologies CorporationHigh throughput screening assay systems in microscale fluidic devices
US594868425 Jul 19977 Sep 1999University Of WashingtonSimultaneous analyte determination and reference balancing in reference T-sensor devices
US597115813 Jun 199726 Oct 1999University Of WashingtonAbsorption-enhanced differential extraction device
US60012291 Aug 199414 Dec 1999Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc.Apparatus and method for performing microfluidic manipulations for chemical analysis
US600769030 Jul 199728 Dec 1999Aclara Biosciences, Inc.Integrated microfluidic devices
US600777526 Sep 199728 Dec 1999University Of WashingtonMultiple analyte diffusion based chemical sensor
US601060716 Sep 19984 Jan 2000Lockheed Martin Energy Research CorporationApparatus and method for performing microfluidic manipulations for chemical analysis and synthesis
US604810010 Mar 199911 Apr 2000Industrial Label Corp.Resealable closure for a bag
US605686018 Sep 19972 May 2000Aclara Biosciences, Inc.Surface modified electrophoretic chambers
US607348220 Jan 199913 Jun 2000Ysi IncorporatedFluid flow module
US60748275 Feb 199813 Jun 2000Aclara Biosciences, Inc.Microfluidic method for nucleic acid purification and processing
US610319915 Sep 199815 Aug 2000Aclara Biosciences, Inc.Capillary electroflow apparatus and method
US612018417 Nov 199919 Sep 2000Stone Container CorporationBag apparatus with reclosable pour spout
US61362126 Aug 199724 Oct 2000The Regents Of The University Of MichiganPolymer-based micromachining for microfluidic devices
US616894812 Jan 19982 Jan 2001Affymetrix, Inc.Miniaturized genetic analysis systems and methods
US617696218 Jun 199723 Jan 2001Aclara Biosciences, Inc.Methods for fabricating enclosed microchannel structures
US619061611 Sep 199720 Feb 2001Molecular Dynamics, Inc.Capillary valve, connector, and router
US619759519 Apr 19996 Mar 2001Affymetrix, Inc.Integrated nucleic acid diagnostic device
US620703114 Sep 199827 Mar 2001Whitehead Institute For Biomedical ResearchMethods and apparatus for processing a sample of biomolecular analyte using a microfabricated device
US62354713 Apr 199822 May 2001Caliper Technologies Corp.Closed-loop biochemical analyzers
US62385386 Apr 199929 May 2001Caliper Technologies, Corp.Controlled fluid transport in microfabricated polymeric substrates
US625134324 Feb 199826 Jun 2001Caliper Technologies Corp.Microfluidic devices and systems incorporating cover layers
US628058912 Apr 199428 Aug 2001Zeptosens AgMethod for controlling sample introduction in microcolumn separation techniques and sampling device
US63194762 Mar 199920 Nov 2001Perseptive Biosystems, Inc.Microfluidic connector
US63217914 Oct 200027 Nov 2001Caliper Technologies Corp.Multi-layer microfluidic devices
US632268314 Apr 199927 Nov 2001Caliper Technologies Corp.Alignment of multicomponent microfabricated structures
US63483183 Apr 199819 Feb 2002Biosite DiagnosticsMethods for concentrating ligands using magnetic particles
US637992919 Nov 199730 Apr 2002The Regents Of The University Of MichiganChip-based isothermal amplification devices and methods
US638770728 May 199914 May 2002Bioarray SolutionsArray Cytometry
US640333827 Jun 200011 Jun 2002Mountain ViewMicrofluidic systems and methods of genotyping
US640887828 Feb 200125 Jun 2002California Institute Of TechnologyMicrofabricated elastomeric valve and pump systems
US642353623 May 200023 Jul 2002Molecular Dynamics, Inc.Low volume chemical and biochemical reaction system
US642902524 Jun 19976 Aug 2002Caliper Technologies Corp.High-throughput screening assay systems in microscale fluidic devices
US64321918 Feb 200113 Aug 2002John B. SchuttSilane-based, coating compositions, coated articles obtained therefrom and methods of using same
US643229026 Nov 199913 Aug 2002The Governors Of The University Of AlbertaApparatus and method for trapping bead based reagents within microfluidic analysis systems
US645492423 Feb 200124 Sep 2002Zyomyx, Inc.Microfluidic devices and methods
US64891122 Aug 20003 Dec 2002Molecular Dynamics, Inc.Methods and apparatus for template capture and normalization for submicroliter reaction
US652118822 Nov 200018 Feb 2003Industrial Technology Research InstituteMicrofluidic actuator
US652445629 Sep 199925 Feb 2003Ut-Battelle, LlcMicrofluidic devices for the controlled manipulation of small volumes
US653299728 Dec 200118 Mar 20033M Innovative Properties CompanySample processing device with integral electrophoresis channels
US653391427 Jun 200018 Mar 2003Shaorong LiuMicrofabricated injector and capillary array assembly for high-resolution and high throughput separation
US65377578 Aug 200025 Mar 2003The Regents Of The University Of MichiganNucleic acid sequencing and mapping
US65447349 Dec 19998 Apr 2003Cynthia G. BriscoeMultilayered microfluidic DNA analysis system and method
US655183925 Jan 200122 Apr 2003Amersham Biosciences Corp.Method of merging chemical reactants in capillary tubes
US65814411 Feb 200224 Jun 2003Perseptive Biosystems, Inc.Capillary column chromatography process and system
US660545422 Mar 200112 Aug 2003Motorola, Inc.Microfluidic devices with monolithic microwave integrated circuits
US661352517 Jan 20022 Sep 2003Aclara Biosciences, Inc.Microfluidic apparatus and method for purification and processing
US661422824 Oct 20012 Sep 2003Bruker Analytik GmbhDevice for trapping at least one component of a chromatography flow in an LC/NMR environment
US661867927 Jan 20019 Sep 2003Althea Technologies, Inc.Methods for analysis of gene expression
US66236132 Oct 200023 Sep 2003The Regents Of The University Of CaliforniaMicrofabricated liquid sample loading system
US66274462 Jul 199830 Sep 2003Amersham Biosciences (Sv) CorpRobotic microchannel bioanalytical instrument
US662982026 Jun 20017 Oct 2003Micralyne Inc.Microfluidic flow control device
US663261916 May 199714 Oct 2003The Governors Of The University Of AlbertaMicrofluidic system and methods of use
US663265522 Feb 200014 Oct 2003Caliper Technologies Corp.Manipulation of microparticles in microfluidic systems
US66638335 Mar 199916 Dec 2003Strategic Diagnostics Inc.Integrated assay device and methods of production and use
US668544220 Feb 20023 Feb 2004Sandia National LaboratoriesActuator device utilizing a conductive polymer gel
US67529225 Apr 200222 Jun 2004Fluidigm CorporationMicrofluidic chromatography
US676464820 Apr 200020 Jul 2004Amersham Biosciences (Sv) Corp.Robotic microchannel bioanalytical instrument
US678274624 Oct 200031 Aug 2004Sandia National LaboratoriesMobile monolithic polymer elements for flow control in microfluidic devices
US678670818 Jul 20027 Sep 2004The Regents Of The University Of MichiganLaminated devices and methods of making same
US678711113 Dec 20007 Sep 2004Amersham Biosciences (Sv) Corp.Apparatus and method for filling and cleaning channels and inlet ports in microchips used for biological analysis
US679375328 Feb 200121 Sep 2004California Institute Of TechnologyMethod of making a microfabricated elastomeric valve
US680234226 Nov 200112 Oct 2004Fluidigm CorporationMicrofabricated fluidic circuit elements and applications
US680301915 Oct 199812 Oct 2004Aclara Biosciences, Inc.Laminate microstructure device and method for making same
US682466325 Aug 200030 Nov 2004Aclara Biosciences, Inc.Efficient compound distribution in microfluidic devices
US682975327 Jun 20017 Dec 2004Fluidigm CorporationMicrofluidic design automation method and system
US683324629 Mar 200221 Dec 2004Solexa, Ltd.Polynucleotide sequencing
US685228712 Sep 20018 Feb 2005Handylab, Inc.Microfluidic devices having a reduced number of input and output connections
US68701851 Aug 200322 Mar 2005Amersham Biosciences (Sv) CorpIntegrated microchip design
US688598227 Jun 200126 Apr 2005Fluidigm CorporationObject oriented microfluidic design method and system
US68991376 Apr 200131 May 2005California Institute Of TechnologyMicrofabricated elastomeric valve and pump systems
US692390713 Feb 20032 Aug 2005Nanostream, Inc.Separation column devices and fabrication methods
US692903028 Nov 200116 Aug 2005California Institute Of TechnologyMicrofabricated elastomeric valve and pump systems
US695163216 Nov 20014 Oct 2005Fluidigm CorporationMicrofluidic devices for introducing and dispensing fluids from microfluidic systems
US695305827 Aug 200411 Oct 2005Fluidigm CorporationMicrofabricated fluidic circuit elements and applications
US69604375 Apr 20021 Nov 2005California Institute Of TechnologyNucleic acid amplification utilizing microfluidic devices
US69949867 Sep 20017 Feb 2006The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford UniversityIn vitro synthesis of polypeptides by optimizing amino acid metabolism
US700529222 Aug 200328 Feb 2006The Trustees Of The University Of PennsylvaniaDevice and method for the detection of an analyte utilizing mesoscale flow systems
US70054935 Apr 200228 Feb 2006Fluidigm CorporationPolymer surface modification
US701503028 Jul 200021 Mar 2006Genset S.A.Microfluidic devices and uses thereof in biochemical processes
US704635729 Jan 200416 May 2006Ciphergen Biosystems, Inc.Apparatus for microfluidic processing and reading of biochip arrays
US711891027 Nov 200210 Oct 2006Fluidigm CorporationMicrofluidic device and methods of using same
US71987593 Jan 20033 Apr 2007Applera CorporationMicrofluidic devices, methods, and systems
US723265630 Jun 200319 Jun 2007Solexa Ltd.Arrayed biomolecules and their use in sequencing
US72449612 Feb 200517 Jul 2007Silicon Valley ScientificIntegrated system with modular microfluidic components
US72587742 Oct 200121 Aug 2007California Institute Of TechnologyMicrofluidic devices and methods of use
US727914619 Apr 20049 Oct 2007Fluidigm CorporationCrystal growth devices and systems, and methods for using same
US72823618 Mar 200516 Oct 2007Transnetyx, Inc.Systems and methods for transgenic and targeted mutagenesis screening
US73120851 Apr 200325 Dec 2007Fluidigm CorporationMicrofluidic particle-analysis systems
US731261127 Nov 200025 Dec 2007The Governors Of The University Of AlbertaApparatus and method for trapping bead based reagents within microfluidic analysis systems
US732330528 Jan 200429 Jan 2008454 Life Sciences CorporationMethods of amplifying and sequencing nucleic acids
US743885624 Jun 200321 Oct 2008Zyomyx, Inc.Microfluidic devices and methods
US744592629 Dec 20034 Nov 2008The Regents Of The University Of CaliforniaFluid control structures in microfluidic devices
US748860317 Aug 200410 Feb 2009Phynexus, Inc.Method and device for extracting an analyte
US752674129 Oct 200428 Apr 2009Fluidigm CorporationMicrofluidic design automation method and system
US75758651 Aug 200518 Aug 2009454 Life Sciences CorporationMethods of amplifying and sequencing nucleic acids
US77452072 Feb 200729 Jun 2010IntegenX, Inc.Microfluidic devices
US776345322 Nov 200627 Jul 2010Micronics, Inc.Microfluidic mixing and analytic apparatus
US776603321 Mar 20073 Aug 2010The Regents Of The University Of CaliforniaMultiplexed latching valves for microfluidic devices and processors
US779955325 May 200521 Sep 2010The Regents Of The University Of CaliforniaMicrofabricated integrated DNA analysis system
US794330513 Apr 200617 May 2011Cornell Research FoundationHigh speed nucleic acid sequencing
US79598755 Jan 200714 Jun 2011Rheonix, Inc.Microfluidic chips and assay systems
US797678922 Jul 200812 Jul 2011The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of IllinoisMicrofluidic device for preparing mixtures
US2001004135729 Jan 200115 Nov 2001Yves FouilletMethod for carrying out a biochemical protocol in continuous flow in a microreactor
US2002002258727 Mar 200121 Feb 2002Ferguson Alastair V.Methods for effecting neuroprotection
US2002002552918 Jul 200128 Feb 2002Stephen QuakeMethods and apparatus for analyzing polynucleotide sequences
US2002002557613 Aug 200128 Feb 2002CepheidIntegrated sample analysis device
US2002004700328 Jun 200125 Apr 2002William BedinghamEnhanced sample processing devices, systems and methods
US200200485367 Mar 200125 Apr 2002Bergh H. SamParallel flow process optimization reactors
US2002005199217 Jul 20012 May 2002Lynx Therapeutics, Inc.System and apparatus for sequential processing of analytes
US2002005833214 Sep 200116 May 2002California Institute Of TechnologyMicrofabricated crossflow devices and methods
US200200683579 Aug 20016 Jun 2002Mathies Richard A.Miniaturized integrated nucleic acid processing and analysis device and method
US2002009809722 Jan 200125 Jul 2002Angad SinghMagnetically-actuated micropump
US2002011090018 Apr 200215 Aug 2002Jovanovich Stevan B.Low volume chemical and biochemical reaction system
US200201194806 Dec 200129 Aug 2002Lawrence WeirPurification devices comprising immobilized capture probes and uses therefor
US2002011948217 Jan 200229 Aug 2002Aclara Biosciences, Inc.Microfluidic method for nucleic acid purification and processing
US2002013908413 Nov 20013 Oct 2002Stefan TobolkaHeat sealing and cutting mechanism and container forming apparatus incorporting the same
US2002016036127 Jan 200131 Oct 2002Christine LoehrleinMethods for analysis of gene expression
US200300083085 Apr 20029 Jan 2003California Institute Of TechnologyNucleic acid amplification utilizing microfluidic devices
US200300217342 Aug 200230 Jan 2003Vann Charles S.Bead dispensing system
US2003002972422 Jan 200113 Feb 2003Helene DerandMethod for covering a microfluidic assembly
US2003007067723 Jul 200117 Apr 2003The Regents Of The University Of MichiganCompositions and methods for liquid metering in microchannels
US2003009589731 Aug 200122 May 2003Grate Jay W.Flow-controlled magnetic particle manipulation
US2003021792324 May 200227 Nov 2003Harrison D. JedApparatus and method for trapping bead based reagents within microfluidic analysis systems
US2004000868711 Jul 200215 Jan 2004Hitachi Ltd.Method and apparatus for path configuration in networks
US2004001409111 Mar 200322 Jan 2004Athenix CorporationIntegrated system for high throughput capture of genetic diversity
US2004001861123 Jul 200229 Jan 2004Ward Michael DennisMicrofluidic devices for high gradient magnetic separation
US2004002106826 Nov 20025 Feb 2004Staats Sau Lan TangInterface members and holders for microfluidic array devices
US200400377398 Mar 200226 Feb 2004Mcneely MichaelMethod and system for microfluidic interfacing to arrays
US2004003838519 Aug 200326 Feb 2004Langlois Richard G.System for autonomous monitoring of bioagents
US2004005329011 Apr 200318 Mar 2004Terbrueggen Robert HenryDevices and methods for biochip multiplexing
US2004006321714 May 20031 Apr 2004Webster James RussellMiniaturized fluid delivery and analysis system
US200400722781 Apr 200315 Apr 2004Fluidigm CorporationMicrofluidic particle-analysis systems
US2004008687231 Oct 20026 May 2004Childers Winthrop D.Microfluidic system for analysis of nucleic acids
US2004013217024 Feb 20038 Jul 2004Imego AbMicrofluidic device and method with trapping of sample in cavities having lids that can be opened or closed
US2004015162931 Jan 20035 Aug 2004Grant PeaseMicrofluidic device with thin-film electronic devices
US2004019784524 Jul 20037 Oct 2004Arjang HassibiMethods and apparatus for pathogen detection, identification and/or quantification
US2004020072417 Sep 200314 Oct 2004Teruo FujiiMicrofluidic device
US2004020935429 Dec 200321 Oct 2004The Regents Of The University Of CaliforniaFluid control structures in microfluidic devices
US2004022438011 Dec 200311 Nov 2004Fluidigm Corp.Microfluidic particle-analysis systems
US2005002630031 Jul 20033 Feb 2005Agency For Science, Technology And ResearchMicrofluidics packages and methods of using same
US200500479673 Sep 20033 Mar 2005Industrial Technology Research InstituteMicrofluidic component providing multi-directional fluid movement
US200500539522 Oct 200310 Mar 2005California Institute Of TechnologyMicrofluidic nucleic acid analysis
US2005014266324 May 200430 Jun 20053M Innovative Properties CompanyMethods for nucleic acid isolation and kits using a microfluidic device and concentration step
US2005016132622 Nov 200428 Jul 2005Tomoyuki MoritaMicrofluidic treatment method and device
US200501616692 Feb 200528 Jul 2005Jovanovich Stevan B.Integrated system with modular microfluidic components
US200502241349 Apr 200413 Oct 2005Hongfeng YinParticle packing of microdevice
US200502243526 May 200313 Oct 2005The Governors Of The University Of AlbertaApparatus and method for trapping bead based reagents within microfluidic analysis systems
US200502419416 Jul 20053 Nov 2005Caliper Life Sciences, Inc.High throughput screening assay systems in microscale fluidic devices
US200502550003 May 200517 Nov 2005Minao YamamotoMicrochip for analysis, analysis system having the same, and analysis method
US200502550035 Sep 200317 Nov 2005Philip SummersgillModular microfluidic system
US2005025500729 Dec 200417 Nov 2005Konica Minolta Sensing, Inc.Microfluidic device, method for testing reagent and system for testing reagent
US2005028757225 May 200529 Dec 2005The Regents Of The University Of CaliforniaMicrofabricated integrated DNA analysis system
US200600274565 Oct 20059 Feb 2006The Governors Of The University Of AlbertaApparatus and method for trapping bead based reagents within microfluidic analysis systems
US2006005720916 Sep 200416 Mar 2006Predicant Biosciences, Inc.Methods, compositions and devices, including microfluidic devices, comprising coated hydrophobic surfaces
US2006007348429 Dec 20036 Apr 2006Mathies Richard AMethods and apparatus for pathogen detection and analysis
US200600760683 Oct 200513 Apr 2006Kionix CorporationMicrofluidic pump and valve structures and fabrication methods
US2006014005122 Nov 200529 Jun 2006Jin-Tae KimMicrofluidic device including microchannel on which plurality of electromagnets are disposed, and methods of mixing sample and lysing cells using the microfluidic device
US2006016314326 Jan 200527 Jul 2006Chirica Gabriela SMicroliter scale solid phase extraction devices
US200601860438 Feb 200624 Aug 2006Mds Inc., Doing Business Through It's Mds Sciex DivisionMethod and apparatus for sample deposition
US2006026664527 May 200530 Nov 2006Taidoc Technology CorporationElectrochemical biosensor strip
US2007001517926 Apr 200618 Jan 2007Trustees Of Boston UniversityPlastic microfluidic chip and methods for isolation of nucleic acids from biological samples
US2007001781230 Mar 200625 Jan 2007Luc BousseOptimized Sample Injection Structures in Microfluidic Separations
US200700318656 Jul 20068 Feb 2007David WilloughbyNovel Process for Construction of a DNA Library
US200700340259 Aug 200515 Feb 2007Cfd Research CorporationElectrostatic sampler and method
US2007010516326 Dec 200610 May 2007Grate Jay WFlow-controlled magnetic particle manipulation
US2007012281925 Nov 200531 May 2007Industrial Technology Research InstituteAnalyte assay structure in microfluidic chip for quantitative analysis and method for using the same
US2007017575626 Jul 20062 Aug 2007Michael NguyenOptimized sample injection structures in microfluidic separations
US200701844632 Oct 20069 Aug 2007Caliper Life Sciences, Inc.Microfluidic device for purifying a biological component using magnetic beads
US200702025314 May 200730 Aug 2007Joel GroverThermal Cycling Device
US2007023768621 Mar 200711 Oct 2007The Regents Of Theuniversity Of CaliforniaMultiplexed latching valves for microfluidic devices and processors
US2007023810927 Oct 200611 Oct 2007Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Method and apparatus for purifying nucleic acid on hydrophilic surface of solid support using hydrogen bonding
US2007024895815 Sep 200525 Oct 2007Microchip Biotechnologies, Inc.Microfluidic devices
US2007029794715 May 200727 Dec 2007Invitrogen CorporationApparatus and method for fluid delivery to a hybridization station
US200800145762 Feb 200717 Jan 2008Microchip Biotechnologies, Inc.Microfluidic devices
US2008001458911 May 200717 Jan 2008Link Darren RMicrofluidic devices and methods of use thereof
US200800478365 Dec 200328 Feb 2008David StrandConfigurable Microfluidic Substrate Assembly
US2008006461021 May 200713 Mar 2008Codon DevicesNucleic acid library design and assembly
US2008012472329 Jun 200729 May 2008Canon U.S. Life Sciences, Inc.Combined thermal devices for thermal cycling
US2008013880914 Jun 200712 Jun 2008Ravi KapurMethods for the Diagnosis of Fetal Abnormalities
US2008016415511 Feb 200810 Jul 2008Grant PeaseMicrofluidic device with thin-film electronic devices
US2008017925530 Apr 200731 Jul 2008Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of DelawareFluidic devices
US2008023714613 Dec 20072 Oct 2008The Governors Of The University Of AlbertaApparatus and method for trapping bead based reagents within microfluidic analysis systems
US2008024256020 Nov 20072 Oct 2008Gunderson Kevin LMethods for generating amplified nucleic acid arrays
US200802810905 Dec 200513 Nov 2008California Institute Of TechnologyMicrofluidic Chemical Reaction Circuits
US2008030273223 May 200811 Dec 2008Hyongsok SohIntegrated fluidics devices with magnetic sorting
US200803115856 Jun 200818 Dec 2008Affymetrix, Inc.System and method for multiplex liquid handling
US2009000449418 Dec 20071 Jan 2009Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc.Laminated absorbent product with increased strength in defined areas
US2009001195927 May 20088 Jan 2009Costa Gina LMethod for preparing single-stranded DNA libraries
US2009003577025 Oct 20075 Feb 2009The Regents Of The University Of CaliforniaInline-injection microdevice and microfabricated integrated DNA analysis system using same
US2009005379922 Aug 200826 Feb 2009Cynvenio Biosystems, LlcTrapping magnetic sorting system for target species
US200900568229 Oct 20085 Mar 2009Kionix, Inc.Microfluidic Pump and Valve Structures and Fabrication Methods
US200900607973 Sep 20085 Mar 2009The Regents Of The University Of CaliforniaFluid control structures in microfluidic devices
US2009008467923 Oct 20082 Apr 2009The Governors Of The University Of AlbertaApparatus and method for trapping bead based reagents within microfluidic analysis systems
US2009009297023 Oct 20079 Apr 2009Pacific BiosciencesComposition and method for nucleic acid sequencing
US2009013406923 Jul 200828 May 2009Handylab, Inc.Integrated Heater and Magnetic Separator
US2009013741330 Oct 200728 May 2009Caliper Life Sciences, Inc.Manipulation of Microparticles In Microfluidic Systems
US2009014893310 Sep 200811 Jun 2009Micronics, Inc.Integrated nucleic acid assays
US2009018141122 Dec 200816 Jul 2009Micronics, Inc.Methods and devices for microfluidic point-of-care immunoassays
US2009025318121 Jan 20098 Oct 2009Microchip Biotechnologies, Inc.Universal sample preparation system and use in an integrated analysis system
US2009026950424 Apr 200829 Oct 2009Momentive Performance Materials Inc.Flexible hardcoats and substrates coated therewith
US200902863277 May 200919 Nov 2009Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Microfluidic device containing lyophilized reagent therein and analyzing method using the same
US2009031180410 Jun 200917 Dec 2009Honeywell International Inc.Magnetic bead assisted sample conditioning system
US2009031497220 Jun 200824 Dec 2009Silverbrook Research Pty LtdMechanically-Actuated Microfluidic Diaphragm Valve
US2010006872323 Oct 200918 Mar 2010Stevan Bogdan JovanovichMicrofluidic devices
US201001298108 Sep 200927 May 2010Life Technologies CorporationMethods and systems for nucleic acid sequencing validation, calibration and normalization
US2010016578418 Dec 20091 Jul 2010Microchip Biotechnologies, Inc., A California CorporationInstrument with microfluidic chip
US2010019750710 Mar 20105 Aug 2010Ion Torrent Systems IncorporatedMethods and apparatus for measuring analytes using large scale fet arrays
US201002855783 Feb 201011 Nov 2010Network Biosystems, Inc.Nucleic Acid Purification
US2010028597524 Jul 200811 Nov 2010The Regents Of The University Of CaliforniaMicrofabricated droplet generator for single molecule/cell genetic analysis in engineered monodispersed emulsions
US2010030368727 May 20102 Dec 2010Integenx Inc.Fluidic devices with diaphragm valves
US201003268267 Jul 201030 Dec 2010The Governors Of The University Of AlbertaApparatus and method for trapping bead based reagents within microfluidic analysis systems
US201100059327 Jun 201013 Jan 2011Integenx Inc.Universal sample preparation system and use in an integrated analysis system
US201100279134 Feb 20083 Feb 2011Bau Haim HMultiplexed nanoscale electrochemical sensors for multi-analyte detection
US2011012691023 Jul 20102 Jun 2011Fluidigm CorporationMicrofluidic devices and methods for binary mixing
US201101724037 Oct 201014 Jul 2011Life Technologies CorporationMicrofluidic Device Including Purification Column with Excess Diluent and Method
EP0459241B116 May 199126 Oct 1994Waters Investments LimitedProcess and apparatus for effecting capillary electrophoresis
EP0527905B18 May 199122 Nov 1995Pharmacia Biotech ABMicrofluidic structure and process for its manufacture
EP0637999A129 Apr 199315 Feb 1995The Trustees Of The University Of PennsylvaniaPolynucleotide amplification analysis using a microfabricated device
EP1065378B127 Jun 20003 Apr 2002California Institute of TechnologyMicrofabricated elastomeric valve and pump systems
EP1411340A225 Feb 200021 Apr 2004EXACT Sciences CorporationBiochemical purification devices with immobilized capture probes and their uses
EP1411340A325 Feb 200019 May 2004EXACT Sciences CorporationBiochemical purification devices with immobilized capture probes and their uses
EP1658890B122 Nov 200528 May 2008Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Microfluidic device including microchannel on which plurality of electromagnets are disposed, and methods of mixing sample and lysing cells using the microfluidic device
JP408327594A * Title not available
JPH08327594A * Title not available
WO1996004547A11 Aug 199515 Feb 1996Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc.Apparatus and method for performing microfluidic manipulations for chemical analysis and synthesis
WO1998052691A115 May 199826 Nov 1998Alberta Research CouncilMicrofluidic system and methods of use
WO1998053300A222 May 199826 Nov 1998Lynx Therapeutics, Inc.System and apparaus for sequential processing of analytes
WO1998053300A322 May 199825 Feb 1999Lynx Therapeutics IncSystem and apparaus for sequential processing of analytes
WO1999036766A119 Jan 199922 Jul 1999Biacore AbMethod and device for laminar flow on a sensing surface
WO1999040174A11 Feb 199912 Aug 1999Aclara Biosciences, Inc.Integrated microfluidic devices
WO2000040712A16 Jan 200013 Jul 2000Medical Research CouncilOptical sorting method
WO2000060362A110 Apr 200012 Oct 2000Chung Chang YoungApparatus for fast preparation and analysis of nucleic acids
WO2000061198A111 Apr 200019 Oct 2000Hitachi Chemical Co., Ltd.Method of producing probe arrays for biological materials using fine particles
WO2001038865A127 Nov 200031 May 2001The Governors Of The University Of AlbertaApparatus and method for trapping bead based reagents within microfluidic analysis systems
WO2001085341A114 May 200115 Nov 2001Pyrosequencing AbMicrofluidic devices
WO2002043615A228 Nov 20016 Jun 2002California Institute Of TechnologyMicrofabricated elastomeric valve and pump systems
WO2002043615A328 Nov 200113 Mar 2003California Inst Of TechnMicrofabricated elastomeric valve and pump systems
WO2003085379A21 Apr 200316 Oct 2003Fluidigm CorporationMicrofluidic particle-analysis systems
WO2003085379A31 Apr 200318 Dec 2003Fluidigm CorpMicrofluidic particle-analysis systems
WO2004098757A26 May 200418 Nov 2004New Jersey Institute Of TechnologyMicrofluidic mixing using flow pulsing
WO2004098757A36 May 200411 May 2006New Jersey Tech InstMicrofluidic mixing using flow pulsing
WO2005075081A12 Feb 200518 Aug 2005Silicon Valley Scientific, Inc.Integrated system with modular microfluidi components
WO2005121308A13 Jun 200522 Dec 2005Konica Minolta Medical & Graphic, Inc.Microreactor enhancing efficiency of liquid mixing and reaction
WO2007082480A118 Jan 200726 Jul 2007Capitalbio CorporationCartridge-based microfluidic analyzer
WO2008039875A126 Sep 20073 Apr 2008California Institute Of TechnologySystem and method for interfacing with a microfluidic chip
WO2008115626A25 Feb 200825 Sep 2008Microchip Biotechnologies, Inc.Microfluidic and nanofluidic devices, systems, and applications
WO2008115626A35 Feb 200820 Nov 2008Microchip Biotechnologies IncMicrofluidic and nanofluidic devices, systems, and applications
WO2009015296A124 Jul 200829 Jan 2009The Regents Of The University Of CaliforniaMicrofabricated dropley generator
WO2009108260A221 Jan 20093 Sep 2009Microchip Biotechnologies, Inc.Universal sample preparation system and use in an integrated analysis system
WO2009108260A321 Jan 200930 Dec 2009Microchip Biotechnologies, Inc.Universal sample preparation system and use in an integrated analysis system
WO2009129415A116 Apr 200922 Oct 2009Cynvenio Biosystems, LlcMagnetic separation system with pre and post processing modules
WO2010041174A11 Oct 200915 Apr 2010Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.Microfluidic device
WO2010042784A29 Oct 200915 Apr 2010Massachusetts Institute Of TechnologyMethod of hydrolytically stable bonding of elastomers to substrates
WO2010042784A39 Oct 20091 Jul 2010Massachusetts Institute Of TechnologyMethod of hydrolytically stable bonding of elastomers to substrates
WO2010141921A14 Jun 20109 Dec 2010Integenx Inc.Universal sample preparation system and use in an integrated analysis system
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1Amendment and Request for Correction of Inventorship mailed Jan. 10, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/750,533.
2Anderson, et al. A miniature integrated device for automated multistep genetic assays. Nucleic Acids Research. 2000;28:e60.
3Armani, et al. Re-configurable fluid circuits by PDMS elastomer micromachining. Proceedings of IEEE Micro Electro Mechanical Systems: MEMS. 1999; 222-227.
4Bennett, et al. Toward the 1,000 dollars human genome. Pharmacogenomics, 6 (4) 373-382. (Jun. 2005).
5Bings, et al. Microfluidic Devices Connected to Fused-Silica Capillaries with Minimal Dead Dead Volume. Analytical Chemistry. 1999;71(15):3292-3296.
6Bings, Nicolas H. et al., "Microfluidic Devices Connected to Fused-Silica Capillaries with Minimal Dead Volume," Analytical Chemistry, vol. 71, No. 15, Aug. 1999, pp. 3292-3296.
7Blazej, et al. Microfabricated bioprocessor for integrated nanoliter-scale Sanger DNA sequencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006;103:7240-7245.
8Blazej, et al. Polymorphism Ratio Sequencing: A New Approach for Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Discovery and Genotyping. Genome Research. 2003;13:287-293.
9Brenner, et al. Gene expression analysis by massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS) on microbead arrays. Nature Biotechnology. 2000;18(6):630-634.
10Buchholz, et al. The use of light scattering for precise characterization of polymers for DNA sequencing by capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis. 2001;22:4118-4128.
11Caplus abstract of Krohkin et al. Modified silica as a stationary phase for ion chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A. 1995;706:93-8.
12 *CAPLUS abstract of Krokhin et al. ("Modified silica as a stationary phase for ion chromatography", J. Chromatogr., A (1995), 706(1+2), 93-8).
13Chan, et al. Microfabricated Polymer Devices for Automated Sample Delivery of Peptides for Analysis by Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. 1999;71(20):4437-4444.
14Chan, Jason H. et al., "Microfabricated Polymer Devices for Automated Sample Delivery of Peptides for Analysis by Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry," Analytical Chemistry, vol. 71, No. 20, Oct. 1999, pp. 4437-4444.
15Chiem, et al. Microchip systems for immunoassay: an integrated immunoreactor with electrophoretic separation for serum theophylline determination. Clinical Chemistry.1998;44(3):591-598.
16Chiem, et al. Room temperature bonding of micromachined glass devices for capillary electrophoresis. Sensors and Actuators. 2000;B63(3):147-152.
17Chinese office action dated Jan. 31, 2011 for CN 200580035911.7. (In Chinese with English translation).
18Coleman, et al. A sequential injection microfluidic mixing strategy. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics. 2005;319-327.
19Curcio, et al. Continuous Segmented-Flow Polymerase Chain Reaction for High-Throughput Miniaturized DNA Amplification. Analytical Chemistry. 2003;75(1):1-7.
20Datasheet Cycle Sequencing, Retrieved from the internet, URL:http//answers.com/topic/cycle sequencing. Printed Sep. 3, 2010, pp. 1-2.
21Diehl, et al. BEAMing: single-molecule PCR on microparticles in water-in-oil emulsions. Nature Methods. 2006;3(7):551-9.
22Doherty, et al. Sparsely Cross-linked "Nanogel" Matrices as Fluid, Mechanically Stablized Polymer Networks for High-Throughput Microchannel DNA Sequencing. Analytical Chemistry. 2004;76:5249-5256.
23Doherty, et al. Sparsely cross-linked "nanogels" for microchannel DNA sequencing. Electrophoresis. 2003;24(24):4170-4180.
24Dorfman, et al. Contamination-Free Continuous Flow Microfluidic Polymerase Chain Reaction for Quantitative and Clinical Applications. Analytical Chemistry. 2005;77(11):3700-3704.
25Doyle, et al. Self-Assembled Magnetic Matrices for DNA Separation Chips. Science. 2000;295:2237.
26Dressman, et al. Transforming single DNA molecules into fluorescent magnetic particles for detection and enumeration of genetic variations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(15):8817-8822.
27Emrich, et al. Microfabricated 384-Lane Capillary Array Electrophoresis Bioanalyzer for Ultrahigh-Throughput Genetic Analysis. Analytical Chemistry. 2002;74(19):5076-5083.
28Ericson, et al. Electroosmosis- and Pressure-Driven Chromatography in Chips Using Continuous Beds. Analytical Chemistry. 2000;72(1):81-87.
29Erratum for Margulies, et al. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature. 2005;437(7057):376-80.: Margulies, et al. Nature. 441(7089):120. (May 4, 2006).
30European search report and search opinion dated Jun. 6, 2011 for Application No. 10011511.2.
31European search report dated Dec. 18, 2009 for Application No. 03808583.3.
32European search report dated Sep. 1, 2010 for Application No. 5804847.1.
33Ewing, et al. Base-Calling of Automated Sequencer Traces Using Phred. I. Accuracy Assessment. Genome Research. 1998;8:175-185.
34Ewing, et al. Base-Calling of Automated Sequencer Traces Using Phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Research. 1998;8:186-194.
35Figeys, Daniel et al., "A Microfabricated Device for Rapid Protein Identification by Microelectrospray Ion Trap Spectrometry," Analytical Chemistry, vol. 69, No. 16, Aug. 1997, pp. 3153-3160.
36Figeys, Daniel et al., "An Integrated Microfluidics-Tandem Mass Spectrometry System for Automated Protein Analysis," Analytical Chemistry, vol. 70, No. 18, Sep. 1998, pp. 3728-3734.
37Figeys, Daniel et al., "Microfabricated Device Coupled with an Electrospray Ionization Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer: Protein Identifications Based on Enhanced-Reslution Mass Spectrometry and Tandem Mass Spectrometry Data," Rapid Communications In Mass Spectrometry, vol. 12, Aug. 1998, pp. 1435-1444.
38Figeys, Daniel et al., "Nanoflow Solvent Gradient Delivery from a Microfabricated Device for Protein Identifications by Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry," Analytical Chemistry, vol. 70, No. 18, Sep. 1998, pp. 3721-3727.
39Figeys, et al. A Microfabricated Device for Rapid Protein Identification by Microelectrospray Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. 1997;69(16):3153-3160.
40Figeys, et al. An Integrated Microfluidics-Tandem Mass Spectrometry System for Automated Protein Analysis. Analytical Chemistry. 1998;70(18):3728-3734.
41Figeys, et al. Microfabricated Device Coupled with an Electrospray Ionization Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer: Protein Identifications Based on Enhanced-Resolution Mass Spectrometry and Tandem Mass Spectrometry Data. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 1998;12:1435-1444.
42Figeys, et al. Nanoflow Solvent Gradient Delivery from a Microfabricated Device for Protein Identifications by Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. 1998;70(18):3721-3727.
43Francis, et al. Flow analysis based on a pulsed flow of solution: theory, instrumentation and applications. Talanta. 2002;58(6):1029-1042.
44Ghadessy, et al. Directed evolution of polymerase function by compartmentalized self-replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:4552-4557.
45Giddings, et al. A software system for data analysis in automated DNA sequencing. Genome Research. 1998;8:644-665.
46Goll, et al. Microvalves with bistable buckled polymer diaphragms. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering. 1996;6:77-79.
47Grover, et al. An integrated microfluidic processor for single nucleotide polymorphism-based DNA computing. Lab on a Chip. 2005;5(10):1033-1040.
48Grover, et al. Development and multiplexed control of latching pneumatic valves using microfluidic logical structures. Lab on a chip. 2006;6:623-631.
49Grover, et al. Monolithic membrane valves and diaphragm pumps for practical large-scale integration into glass microfluidic devices. Sensors and Actuators. 2003;B89:315-323.
50Grover, et al. Practical Valves and Pumps for Large-Scale Integration into Microfludic Analysis Devices. Micro Total Analysis Systems. 2002;1:136-138.
51Hansen, et al. A robust and scalable microfluidic metering method that allows protein crystal growth by free interface diffusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99(26): 16531-16536.
52Harrison, et al. Micromachining a Miniaturized Capillary Electrophoresis-Based Chemical Analysis System on a Chip. Science. 1993;261(5123):895-897.
53Hayes, et al. EDGE: A Centralized Resource for the Comparison, Analysis, and Distribution of Toxicogenomic Information. Molecular Pharmacology. 2005;67(4):1360-1368.
54Hultman, et al. Bidirectional Solid-Phase Sequencing of In Vitro-Amplified Plasmid DNA. BioTechniques. 1991;10(1):84-93.
55International Preliminary Report for corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/CA2000/01421 dated Feb. 14, 2002.
56International Preliminary Report for corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2005/018678 dated Nov. 13, 2007.
57International Preliminary Report for corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2005/033347 dated Mar. 20, 2007.
58International Preliminary Report for corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/007381 dated Sep. 23, 2008.
59International Preliminary Report for corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/02721 dated Aug. 5, 2008.
60International Preliminary Report for corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/061573 dated Aug. 26, 2008.
61International search report and written opinion dated Jun. 9, 2011 for PCT Application No. US2011/30973.
62International search report and written opinion dated Mar. 24, 2011 for PCT Application No. US2010/58227.
63International search report dated Apr. 5, 2001 for PCT Application No. CA2000/01421.
64International search report dated Aug. 18, 2009 for PCT Application No. US09/00419.
65International search report dated Aug. 23, 2006 for PCT Application No. US2005/033347.
66International search report dated Aug. 26, 2004 PCT Application No. US2003/41466.
67International search report dated Jul. 11, 2008 for PCT Application No. US07/61573.
68International search report dated Jul. 30, 2010 for PCT Application No. US2010/36464.
69International search report dated May 14, 2010 for PCT Application No. US2009/06640.
70International search report dated Oct. 6, 2010 for PCT Application No. US10/37545.
71International search report dated Sep. 1, 2010 for PCT/US2010/040490.
72International search report dated Sep. 25, 2007 for PCT Application No. US2007/02721.
73International Search Report for PCT/US2005/033347.
74Jacobson, et al. Electrokinetic Focusing in Microfabricated Channel Structures. Anal. Chem., 1997, 69 (16), pp. 3212-3217.
75Japanese Office Action dated Apr. 27, 2010 for Application No. JP2001-540363 (in Japanese with English translation).
76Japanese Office Action dated Dec. 21, 2010 for Application No. JP2001-540363 (in Japanese with English translation).
77 *JAPIO Abstract of Arai (JP408327594A).
78 *JPO computer generated English language translation of JP 08-327594 A, patent published on Dec. 13, 1996.
79Ju, et al. Fluorescence energy transfer dye-labeled primers for DNA sequencing and analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1995;92;4347-4351.
80Kan, et al. A novel thermogelling matrix for microchannel DNA sequencing based on poly-N-alkoxyalkylaclylamide copolymers. Electrophoresis. 2003;24(24):4161-4169.
81Koh, et al. Integrating Polymerase Chain Reaction, Valving, and Electrophoresis in a Plastic Device for Bacterial Detection. Analytical Chemistry. 2003;75(17):4591-4598.
82Kopp, et al. Chemical Amplification Continuous-Flow PCR on a Chip. Science. 1998;280:1046-1048.
83Kopp, Martin U. et al., "Chemical Amplification: Continuous-Flow PCR on a Chip," Science, vol. 280, May 1998, pp. 1046-1048.
84Lagally, et al. Fully integrated PCR-capillary electrophoresis microsystem for DNA analysis. Lab on a Chip. 2001;1(2):102-107.
85Lagally, et al. Integrated Portable Genetic Analysis Microsystem for Pathogen/Infectious Disease Detection. Analytical Chemistry. 2004;76:3162-3170.
86Lagally, et al. Monolithic integrated microfluidic DNA amplification and capillary electrophoresis analysis system. Sensors and Actuators. 2000;B63(3):138-146.
87Lagally, et al. Single-Molecule DNA Amplification and Analysis in an Integrated Microfluidic Device. Analytical Chemistry. 2001;73(3): 565-570.
88Lazar, et al. Subattomole-Sensitivity Microchip Nanoelectrospray Source with Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Detection. Analytical Chemistry. 1999;71(17):3627-3631.
89Lazar, Julia M. et al., "Subattomole-Sensitivity Microchip-Nanoelectrospray Source with Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Detection," Analytical Chemistry, vol. 71, No. 17, Sep. 1999, p. 3627-3631.
90Li, et al. Integration of Microfabricated Devices to Capillary Electrophoresis-Electrospray Mass Spectrometry Using a Low Dead Volume Connection: Application to Rapid Analyses of Proteolytic Digests. Analytical Chemistry. 1999;71(15):3036-3045.
91Li, et al. Rapid and sensitive separation of trace level protein digests using microfabricated devices coupled to a quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometer. Electrophoresis. 2000;21:198-210.
92Li, et al. Rapid and sensitive separation of trace level protein digests using microfabricated devices coupled to a quadrupole—time-of-flight mass spectrometer. Electrophoresis. 2000;21:198-210.
93Li, et al. Separation and Identification of Peptides from Gel-Isolated Membrane Proteins Using a Microfabricated Device for Combined Capillary Electrophoresis/Nanoelectrospray Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. 2000;72(3):599-609.
94Li, Jianjun et al., "Integration of Microfabricated Devices to Capillary Electrophoresis-Electrospray Mass Spectrometry Using a Low Dead Volume Connection: Application to Rapid Analyses of Proteolytic Digests," Analytical Chemistry, vol. 71, No. 15, Aug. 1999, pp. 3036-3045.
95Li, Jianjun et al., "Rapid and Sensitive Separation of Trace Level Protein Digests Using Microfabricated Devices Coupled to a Quadrupole—Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer," Electrophoresis, 2000, pp. 198-210.
96Li, Jianjun et al., "Separation and Identification of Peptides from Gel-Isolated Membrane Proteins Using a Microfabricated Device for Combined Capillary Electrophoresis/Nanoelectrospray Mass Spectrometry," Analytical Chemistry, vol. 72, No. 3, Feb. 1999, pp. 599-609.
97Licklider, et al. A Micromachined Chip-Based Electrospray Source for Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. 2000;72(2):367-375.
98Licklider, Larry et al., "A Micromachined Chip-Based Electrospray Source for Mass Spectrometry," Analytical Chemistry, vol. 72, No. 2, Jan. 2000, pp. 367-375.
99Lisec, et al. A bistable pneumatic microswitch for driving fluidic components. Sensors and Actuators. 1996;A54:746-749.
100Liu, et al. Automated parallel DNA sequencing on multiple channel microchips. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97(10):5369-5374.
101Liu, et al. Optimization of High-Speed DNA Sequencing on Microfabricated Capillary Electrophoresis Channels. Analytical Chemistry. 1999;71:566-573.
102Margulies, et al. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature. 2005;437(7057):376-80. (Abstact only).
103Melin, et al. A Passive 2-Dimensional Liquid Sample Micromixer. 7th International Conference on Miniaturized Chemical and Biochemical Analysis Systems. 2003;167170.
104MillGat pump user manual, version 2.12, published 2005, pp. 1-28.
105Mitra, et al. Digital genotyping and haplotyping with polymerase colonies. Proc Nati Acad Sci USA. 2003.100(10):15926-5931.
106Norris, et al. Fully-integrated, multiplexed STR-based human identification using a single microfluidic chip and automated instrument. Available at http://www.promega.com/geneticidproc/ussymp20proc/oralpresentations/landersbienvenue.pdf. Accessed Jun. 2, 2010.
107Notice of allowance dated Jun. 9, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/831,949.
108Obeid, et al. Microfabricated Device for DNA and RNA Amplification by Continuous-Flow Polymerase Chain Reaction and Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction with Cycle Number Selection. Analytical Chemistry. 2003;75(2): 288-295.
109Ocvirk, et al. High Performance Liquid Chromatography Partially Integrated onto a Silicon Chip. Analytical Methods and Instrumentation. 1995;2:74-82.
110Ocvirk, et al. Optimization of confocal epifluorescence microscopy for microchip-based miniaturized total analysis systems. The Analyst. 1998;123:1429-1434.
111Ocvirk, Gregor et al., "High Performance Liquid Chromatography Partially Integrated onto a Silicon Chip," Research Articles, Nov. 1994, 9 pp.
112Ocvirk, Gregor et al., "Optimization of Confocal Epifluorescence Microscopy for Microchip-Based Miniaturized Total Analysis Systems," The Analyst, vol. 123, Jun. 1998, pp. 1429-1434.
113Office Action Final dated Feb. 19, 2008 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/540,658.
114Office Action Final dated Feb. 6, 2008 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/139,018.
115Office Action mailed Apr. 27, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/139,018, filed May 25, 2005.
116Office Action mailed Jul. 12, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/750,533, filed Dec. 29, 2003.
117Office Action mailed Jul. 2, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/540,658, filed Jun. 23, 2005.
118Ohori, et al. Partly disposable three-way mirovalve for a medical micro total analysis system (muTAS). Sensors and Actuators. 1998;A64(1): 57-62.
119Oleschuk, et al. Trapping of Bead-Based Reagents within Microfluidic Systems: On-Chip Solid-Phase Extraction and Electrochromatography. Analytical Chemistry. 2000;72:585-590.
120Olsen, et al. Immobilization of DNA Hydrogel Plugs in Microfluidic Channels. Analytical Chemistry. 2002;74:1436-1441.
121Paegel, et al. High-throughput DNA sequencing with a 96-lane capillary array electrophoresis bioprocessor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:574-579.
122Paegel, et al. Microchip Bioprocessor for Integrated Nanovolume Sample Purification and DNA Sequencing. Analytical Chemistry. 2002;74(19):5092-5098.
123Paegel, et al. Microfluidic devices for DNA sequencing: sample preparation and electrophoretic analysis. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 2003;14(1):42-50.
124Paegel, et al. Turn Geometry for Minimizing Band Broadening in Microfabricated Capillary Electrophoresis Channels. Analytical Chemistry. 2000;72:3030-3037.
125PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and The Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, mailed Jun. 17, 2008, Application No. PCT/US2007/082568 (UCALP067WO).
126Peterson, et al. Enzymatic Microreactor-on-a-Chip: Protein Mapping Using Trypsin Immobilized on Porous Polymer Monoliths Molded in Channels of Microfluidic Devices. Analytical Chemistry. 2002;74:4081-4088.
127Ramsey, et al. Generating Electrospray from Microchip Devices Using Electroosmotic Pumping. Analytical Chemistry. 1997;69(6):1174-1178.
128Ramsey, R.S. et al., "Generating Electrospray from Microchip Devices Using Electroosmotic Pumping," Analytical Chemistry, vol. 69, No. 6, Mar. 1997, pp. 1174-1178.
129Rohr, et al. Porous polymer monoliths: Simple and efficient mixers prepared by direct polymerization in the channels of microfluidic chips. Electrophoresis. 2001;22:3959-3967.
130Rye, et al. High-sensitivity two-color detection of double-stranded DNA with a confocal fluorescence gel scanner using ethidium homodimer and thiazole orange. Nucleic Acids Research. 1991;19(2):327-333.
131Scherer, et al. High-Pressure Gel Loader for Capillary Array Electrophoresis Microchannel Plates. Biotechniques. 2001;31(5):1150-1154.
132Schomburg, et al. Design Optimization of Bistable Microdiaphragm Valves. Sensors and Actuators. 1998;A64:259-264.
133Seifar, et al. Capillary electrochromatography with 1.8-mum ODS-modified porous silica particles. Journal of Chromatography. 1998; A808:71-77.
134Simpson, et al. High-throughput genetic analysis using microfabricated 96-sample capillary array electrophoresis microplates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:2256-2261.
135Simpson, et al. Microfabrication Technology for the Production of Capillary Array Electrophoresis Chips. Biomedical Microdevices. 1998;1:7-26.
136Soper, et al. Sanger DNA Sequencing Reactions Performed in a Solid-Phase Nanoreactor Directly Coupled to Capillary Gel Electrophoresis. Analytical Chemistry. 1998;70:4036-4043.
137Spiering, et al. Novel microstructures and technologies applied in chemical analysis techniques. 1997 International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators. 1997;1:511-514.
138Spiering, Vincent L., et al., "Novel Microstructures and Technologies Applied in Chemical Analysis Techniques," Transducers '97, Jun. 1997, pp. 511-514.
139Takao, et al. A Pneumatically Actuated Full In-Channel Microvalve With MOSFET-Like Function in Fluid Channel Networks. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems. 2002;11(5):421-426.
140Takao, et al. Microfluidic Integrated Circuits for Signal Processing Using Analogous Relationship Betweeen Pneumatic Microvalve and MOSFET. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems. 2003;12(4):497-505.
141Thomas, et al. Application of Genomics to Toxicology Research. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2002;110(6):919-923.
142Thorsen, et al. Microfluidic Large-Scale Integration. Science. 2002;298(5593):580-584.
143Tice, et al. Formation of Droplets and Mixing in Multiphase Microfluidics at Low Values of the Reynolds and the Capillary Numbers. Langmuir. 2003;19:9127-9133.
144U.S. Appl. No. 12/026,510, filed Feb. 5, 2008, Jovanovich et al.
145U.S. Appl. No. 12/526,015, filed Nov. 3, 2010, Jovanovich et al.
146U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,685, filed Jun. 15, 2010, Jovanovich et al.
147U.S. Appl. No. 12/845,650, filed Jul. 28, 2010, Jovanovich et al.
148U.S. Appl. No. 12/852,370, filed Aug. 6, 2010, Harrison et al.
149U.S. Appl. No. 12/949,623, filed Nov. 18, 2010, Kobrin et al.
150U.S. Appl. No. 13/075,165, filed Mar. 29, 2011, Eberhart et al.
151U.S. Appl. No. 13/113,968, filed May 23, 2011, Majlof et al.
152U.S. Appl. No. 13/202,877, filed Aug. 23, 2011, Vangbo et al.
153U.S. Appl. No. 13/202,884, filed Aug. 23, 2011, Jovanovich et al.
154Unger, et al. Monolithic Microfabricated Valves and Pumps by Multilayer Soft Lithography. Science. 2000;288:113-116.
155Van Der Moolen, et al. A Micromachined Injection Device for CZE: Application to Correlation CZE. Analytical Chemistry. 1997;69(20):4220-4225.
156Van Der Moolen, et al. Correlation Capillary Zone Electrophoresis, a Novel Technique to Decrease Detection Limits. Chromatographia. 1995;40(7/8):368-374.
157van der Moolen, J.N. et al., "Correlation Capillary Zone Electrophoresis, a Novel Technique to Decrease Detection Limits," Chromatographia, vol. 40, No. 7/8, Apr. 1995, pp. 368-374.
158van der Moolen, Johannes N. et al., "A Micromachined Injection Device for CZE: Application to Correlation CZE," Analytical Chemistry, vol. 69, No. 20, Oct. 1997, pp. 4220-4225.
159Vazquez, et al. Electrophoretic Injection within Microdevices. Analytical Chemistry. 2002;74:1952-1961.
160Veenstra, et al. The design of an in-plane compliance structure for microfluidical systems. Sensors and Actuators. 2002;B81:377-383.
161Waller, et al. Quantitative Immunocapture PCR Assay for Detection of Campylobacter jejuni in Foods. Applied Environmental Microbiology. 2000; 66(9):4115-4118.
162Weimer, et al. Solid-Phase Capture of Proteins, Spores, and Bacteria. Applied Environmental Microbiology. 2001;67(3):1300-1307.
163Wen, et al. Microfabricated isoelectric focusing device for direct electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. Electrophoresis. 2000;21:191-197.
164Wen, Jenny et al., "Microfabricated Isoelectric Focusing Device for Direct Electrospray Ionization-Mass Spectrometry," Electrophoresis, vol. 21, 2000, pp. 191-197.
165Wikipedia brochure for defining stocahstic process. Sep. 2, 2009.
166Williams, et al. Amplification of complex gene libraries by emulsion PCR. Nature Methods. 2006;3(7):545-50.
167Woolley, et al. Functional Integration of PCR Amplification and Capillary Electrophoresis in a Microfabricated DNA Analysis Device. Analytical Chemistry. 1996;68(23):4081-4086.
168Wright, et al. Behavior and Use of Nonaqueous Media without Supporting Electrolyte in Capillary Electrophoresis and Capillary Electrochromatography. Analytical Chemistry. 1997;69(16):3251-3259.
169Xiang, et al. An Integrated Microfabricated Device for Dual Microdialysis and On-Line ESI-Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry for Analysis of Complex Biological Samples. Analytical Chemistry. 1999;71(8):1485-1490.
170Xiang, Fan et al., "An Integrated Microfabricated Device for Dual Microdialysis and On-Line ESI-Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry for Analysis of Complex Biological Samples," Analytical Chemistry, vol. 71, No. 8, Apr. 1999, pp. 1485-1490.
171Xue Qifeng et al., "Multichannel Microchip Electrospray Mass Spectrometry," Analytical Chemistry, vol. 69, No. 3, Feb. 1997, pp. 426-430.
172Xue, et al. Integrated Multichannel Microchip Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry: Analysis of Peptides from On-Chip Tryptic Digestion of Melittin. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 1997;11:1253-1256.
173Xue, et al. Multichannel Microchip Electrospray Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. 1997;69(3):426-430.
174Xue, Qifeng et al., "Integrated Multichannel Microchip Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry: Analysis of Peptides from On Chip Tryptic Digestion of Melittin," Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, vol. 11, Jun. 1997, pp. 1253-1256.
175Yang, et al. A MEMS thermopneumatic silicone rubber membrane valve. Sensors and Actuators. 1998;A64(1):101-108.
176Yu, et al. Preparation of Monolithic Polymers with Controlled Porous Properties for Microfluidic Chip Applications Using Photoinitiated Free Radial Polymerization. Journal of Polymer Science. 2002;40:755-769.
177Yu, et al. Towards stationary phases for chromatography on a microchip: Molded porous polymer monoliths prepared in capillaries by photoinitiated in situ polymerization as separation media for electrochromatography. Electrophoresis. 2000;21:120-127.
178Zhang, B. et al., "Microfabricated Devices for Capillary Electrophoresis-Electrospray Mass Spectrometry," Analytical Chemistry, vol. 71, No. 15, Aug. 1999, pp. 3258-3264.
179Zhang, Bailin et al., "A Microdevice with Integrated Liquid Junction for Facile Peptide and Protein Analysis in Capillary Electrophoresis/Electrospray Mass Spectrometry," Analytical Chemistry, vol. 72, No. 5, Mar. 2000, pp. 1015-1022.
180Zhang, et al. A Microdevice with Integrated Liquid Junction for Facile Peptide and Protein Analysis by Capillary Electrophoresis/Electrospray Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. 2000;72(5):1015-1022.
181Zhang, et al. Microfabricated Devices for Capillary Electrophoresis-Electrospray Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. 1999;71(15):3258-3264.
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US874816521 Aug 201210 Jun 2014Integenx Inc.Methods for generating short tandem repeat (STR) profiles
US901223615 Aug 201321 Apr 2015Integenx Inc.Universal sample preparation system and use in an integrated analysis system
US912105820 Aug 20111 Sep 2015Integenx Inc.Linear valve arrays
US934128430 Jun 201417 May 2016Integenx Inc.Microfluidic devices with mechanically-sealed diaphragm valves
WO2015013210A1 *21 Jul 201429 Jan 2015The Regents Of The University Of CaliforniaMicrofluidics cell culture device
Classifications
U.S. Classification204/453, 422/503, 204/605, 204/455, 204/604, 422/513, 422/502, 204/601, 204/451
International ClassificationG01N30/28, G01N30/56, G01N27/26, G01N33/00, B81B1/00, G01N30/60, B01L3/00, B01L3/02, G01N30/00, G01N27/447
Cooperative ClassificationB01L2300/0816, B01L3/5027, B01L2400/0487, G01N27/44704, B01L3/502753, G01N30/56, B01L2300/087, B01L2400/0415, G01N27/44791, B01L2200/0668, G01N2030/565, G01N30/6095, G01N2030/009, B01L3/0241, G01N2030/285
European ClassificationG01N27/447C7, G01N27/447B, G01N30/56, B01L3/5027
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
15 Jan 2014FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 12