|Publication number||USRE41479 E1|
|Application number||US 10/836,861|
|Publication date||10 Aug 2010|
|Filing date||30 Apr 2004|
|Priority date||3 Dec 1984|
|Publication number||10836861, 836861, US RE41479 E1, US RE41479E1, US-E1-RE41479, USRE41479 E1, USRE41479E1|
|Inventors||Larry W. Fullerton|
|Original Assignee||Time Domain Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (84), Non-Patent Citations (31), Classifications (24), Legal Events (1)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a Reissue application of application Ser. No. 08/480,447, filed on Jun. 7, 1995, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,952,956, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/335,676, filed on Nov. 8, 1994, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 07/846,597, filed on Mar. 5, 1992, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,363,108, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 07/363,831, filed on Jun. 20, 1989, now abanbonded; which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 07/192,475, filed on May 10, 1988 now abandoned; which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 06/870,177, filed on Jun. 3, 1986, now U.S. Pat. No. 4,743,906; which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 06/677,597, filed on Dec. 3, 1984, now U.S. Pat. No. 4,641,317.
This application is also a continuation-in-part of International Application No. PCT/US90/01174, filed on Mar. 2, 1990, which is a continuation-in-part of International Application No. PCT/US89/01020, filed on Mar. 10, 1989. Said PCT Application No. PCT/US89/01020 is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 07/010,440, filed on Feb. 3, 1987, now U.S. Pat. No. 4,813,057.
This above-named prior patent applications and patents are hereby incorporated by reference.
This invention relates generally to radio systems wherein time-spaced, essentially monocycle-like signals are created from DC pulses and transmitted into space wherein the resulting energy bursts are disposed in terms of frequency to where the spectral density essentially merges with ambient noise, and yet information relating to these bursts is recoverable.
Radio transmissions have heretofore been largely approached from the point of view of frequency channelling. Thus, coexistent orderly radio transmissions are permissible by means of assignment of different frequencies or frequency channels to different users, particularly as within the same geographic area. Essentially foregoing to this concept is that of tolerating transmission which are not frequency limited. While it would seem that the very notion of not limiting frequency response would create havoc with existing frequency denominated services, it has been previously suggested that such is not necessarily true, and that, at least theoretically, it is possible to have overlapping use of the radio spectrum. One suggested mode is that provided wherein very short (on the order of one nanosecond or less) radio pulses are applied to a broadband antenna which ideally would respond by transmitting short burst signals, typically comprising three or four polarity lobes, which comprise, energywise, signal energy over essentially the upper portion (above 100 megacycles) of the most frequently used radio frequency spectrum, that is, up to the mid-gigahertz region. A basic discussion of impulse effected radio transmission is contained in article entitled “Time Domain Electromagnetics and Its Application,” Proceedings of the IEEE, Volume 66, No. 3, March 1978. This article particularly suggests the employment of such technology for baseband radar, and ranges from 5 to 5,000 feet are suggested. As noted, this article appeared in 1978, and now, 16 years later, it is submitted that little has been accomplished by way of achieving commercial application of this technology.
From both a theoretical and an experimental examination of the art, it has become clear to the applicant that the lack of success has largely been due to several factors. One is that the extremely wide band of frequencies to be transmitted poses very substantial requirements on an antenna. Antennas are generally designed for limited frequency bandwidths, and traditionally when one made any substantial change in frequency, it became necessary to choose a different antenna or an antenna of different dimensions. That is not to say that broadband antennas do not, in general, exist; however, applicant has reviewed many types including bicone, horn, and log periodic types and has determined that none provided a practical antenna which will enable impulse radio and radar usage to spread beyond the laboratory. Of the problems experienced with prior art antennas, is to be noted that log periodic antennas generally produce an undesired frequency dispersion. Further, in some instances, elements of a dipole type antenna may be configured wherein there is a DC path between elements, and such is not operable for employment in applicant's transmitter.
A second problem which has plaqued advocates of the employment of impulse or time domain technology for radio is that of effectively receiving and detecting the presence of the wide spectrum that a monocycle burst produces, particularly in the presence of high levels of existing ambient radiation, presently nearly everywhere. Ideally, a necessary antenna would essentially evenly reproduce the spectrum transmitted, and the receiver it feeds would have special properties which enable it to be utilized despite the typically high noise level with which it must compete. The state of the art prior to applicant's entrance generally involved the employment of brute force detection, i.e., that of threshold or time threshold gate detection. Threshold detection simply enables passage of signals higher than a selected threshold level. The problem with this approach is obvious that if one transmits impulse generated signals which are of sufficient amplitude to rise above ambient signal levels, the existing radio services producing the latter may be unacceptably interferred with. For some reason, perhaps because of bias produced by the wide spectrum of signal involved, e.g., from 50 mHz to on the order of 5 gHz or ever higher, the possibility of coherent detection has been thought impossible.
Accordingly, it is an object of this invention to provide an impulse or time domain (or baseband) transmission system which attacks all of the above problems and to provide a complete impulse time domain transmission system which, in applicant's view, eliminates the known practical barriers to its employment, and, importantly, its employment for all important electromagnetic modes of radio, including communications, telemetry, navigation and radar.
With respect to the antenna problem, applicant has determined a truly pulse-responsive antenna which translated an applied DC impulse into essentially a monocycle. It is a dipole which is completely the reverse of the conventional bat wing antenna and wherein two triangular elements of the dipole are positioned with their bases closely adjacent but DC isolated. They are driven at near adjacent points on the bases bisected by a line between apexes of the two triangular elements. This bisecting line may mark a side or height dimension of the two triangular elements.
As a further consideration, power restraints in the past have been generally limited to the application of a few hundred volts of applied signal energy to the transmitting antenna. Where this is a problem, it may be overcome by a transmitter switch which is formed by a normally insulating crystalline structure, such as diamond material sandwiched between two metallic electrodes, which are then closely coupled to the elements of the antenna. This material is switched to a conductive, or less resistive, state by exciting it with an appropriate wavelength beam of light, ultraviolet in the case of diamond. In this manner, no metallic triggering communications line extends to the antenna which might otherwise pick up radiation and re-radiate it, adversely affecting signal coupling to the antenna and interfering with the signal radiated from it, both of which tend to prolong the length of a signal burst, a clearly adverse effect.
With respect to a radio receiver, a like receiving antenna is typically employed to that used for transmission as described above. Second, a locally generated, coordinately timed signal, to that of the transmitted signal, is either detected from the received signal, as in communications or telemetry, or received directly from the transmitter, as, for example, in the case of radar. Then, the coordinately timed signal, typically including a basic half cycle, or a few, up to 10 half cycles, of signal, is mixed or multiplied by a factor of 1 (as with sampling or gating of the received signals), or ideally, as where the coordinately locally generated signal is curved, the factor is greater than one, giving rise to amplification in the process of detection, a significant advantage. Thus, the modulation on a signal, or position of a target at a selected range, as the case may be, is determined. Such a detection is further effected by an integration of the detected signal, with enhanced detection being accomplished by both a short term and long term integration. In this latter process, individual pulse signals are integrated only during their existence to accomplish short term integration, and following this, the resultant short term integration signals are long term integrated by integrating a selected number of these and particularly by a method which omits the noise signal content which occurs between individual pulse signals, thereby effecting a very significant increase in signal-to-noise ratio.
It is acknowledged that coherent detection of frequency signals has been effected by the employment of coincidence detection, followed by only long term detection, but it is submitted that such coherent detection did not contemplate the local generation of a signal but contemplated storing of a portion of a transmitted signal which was then phase coordinated with the incoming signal, which on its face presents an essentially impossible task where there is the detection of a ultra wideband frequency pulse as in the present case.
Further, transmitted burst signals may be varied in time pattern (in addition to a modulation pattern for communications or telemetry). This greatly increases the security of the system and differentiates signals from nearly, if not all, ambient signals, that is, ambient signals which are not synchronous with transmitted burst signals. This also enables the employment of faster repetition rates with radar which would, absent such varying or dithering, create range ambiguities as between returns from successive transmission and therefore ranges. Burst signals are signals generated when a stepped, or near stepped, voltage change is applied to an impulse-responsive antenna as illustrated and discussed herein.
As still a further feature of this invention, the repetition rate of burst signals may be quite large, say, for example, up to 100 mHz, or higher, this enabling a very wide frequency dispersion; and thus for a given overall power level, the energy at any one frequency would be extremely small, thus effectively eliminating the problem of interference with existing radio frequency based services.
As still a further feature of this invention, moving targets are detected in terms of their velocity by means of the employment of a bandpass filter, following mixing and double integration of signals.
As a still further feature of the invention, when employed in this latter mode, two channels of reception are ideally employed wherein the incoming signal is multiplied by a selected range, or timed, locally generated signal in one channel, and mixing the same incoming signal by a slightly delayed, locally generated signal in another channel, delay being on the order of one-quarter to one-half the time of a monocycle. This accomplishes target differentiation without employing a separate series of transmissions.
As still another feature of this invention, multiple radiators or receptors would be employed in an array wherein their combined effect would be in terms of like or varied-in-time of sensed (or transmitted) output, to thereby accent either a path normal to the face of the antenna or to effect a steered path offset to a normal path accomplished by selected signal delay paths.
As still another feature of this invention, radio antenna elements would be positioned in front of a reflector wherein the distance between the elements and reflector is in terms of the time of transmission from an element or elements to reflector and back to element(s), typically up to about three inches, this being with tip-to-tip dimension of elements of somewhat below nine inches up to approximately nine inches.
FIG. 4T1, FIG. 4T2, FIG. 4Ta and FIG. 4Ea is a set of electrical waveforms illustrating aspects of operation of the circuitry shown in FIG. 2.
FIG. 8a and
The output of +4 divider 14 is employed as a signal base and as such is supplied through capacitor 20 to pulse position modulator 22. Pulse position modulator 22 includes in its input an RC circuit consisting of resistor 24 and capacitor 26 which convert the square wave input to an approximately triangular wave as shown in waveform B, it being applied across resistor 25 to the non-inverting input of comparator 28. A selected or reference positive voltage, filtered by capacitor 27, is also applied to the non-inverting input of comparator 28, it being supplied from +5-volt terminal 31 of DC bias supply 30 through resistor 32. Accordingly, for example, there would actually appear at the non-inverting input a triangular wave biased upward positively as illustrated by waveform C.
The actual conduction level of comparator 28 is determined by an input signal supplied through capacitor 36, across resistor 37, to the inverting input of comparator 28, as biased from supply 30 through resistor 38 and across resistor 32. The combined signal input bias is illustrated in waveform D.
With switches 39, 39a, and 39c open and switch 39b in the alternate position to that shown, signal input would be simply the audio output of microphone 34, amplitude, if needed, by amplifier 35. Alternately, by closing switch 39, the signal input to comparator 28 would be the sum of the audio output and a signal offset or dither voltage, for example, provided by the output of signal generator 33, these signals being summed across resistor 41. Signal generator 33 may, for example, provide a sine, binary, or other signal, and, as illustrated, it is labeled as providing a “binary sequence A.” Thus, generator 33 would provide a binary signal voltage as a sequence of discrete voltage pulses varying between zero voltage and some discrete voltage, which may be representative of letters or numerical values or simply a random value. Thus, the input to comparator 28 would be the sum of these voltages, and by virtue of this combination, the output of comparator 28 would rise to a positive saturation level when triangular wave signal 40 (waveform E) is of a higher value than the effective modulation signal 42 and drop to a negative saturation level when modulation signal 42 is of a greater value than the triangular wave signal 40. The output signal of comparator 28 is shown in waveform F, and the effect is to vary the turn-on and turn-off of the pulses shown in this waveform as a function of the combination of the intelligence and dither signals where one is employed. Thus, there is effected a pulse position modulation from an amplitude signal. The dither signal enables an added discrete pattern of time positions to be included with a transmitted signal, thus requiring that to receive and demodulator it, the dither signal must be accurately reproduced.
As the other alternative, with switches 39 and 39a closed and switch 39c open, the input to comparator 28 would be the sum of the dithered and digital source voltage. The digital source voltage is provided by digital source 29, and assuming that it is in parallel form, it would be converted to a serial form by parallel-to-serial converter 29a, and then with switch 39a closed, it would be provided along with the dithered output of generator 33 as an intelligence input to the inverting input of comparator 28. Thus, the output of comparator 28 would be the algebraic sum of the voltages applied to comparator 28 as previously described.
With respect to the output signal of comparator 28, we are interested in employing a negative going or trailing edge 44 of it, and it is to be noted that this trailing edge will vary in its time position as a function of the signal modulation. This trailing edge of the waveform, in waveform F, triggers “on” mono, or monostable multivibrator, 46 having an “on” time of approximately 50 nanoseconds ,and its output is shown in waveform G. For purposes of illustration, while the pertinent leading or trailing edges of related waveforms are properly aligned, pulse widths and spacings (as indicated by break lines, spacings are 40 microseconds) are not related in scale. Thus, the leading edge of pulse waveform G corresponds in time to the trailing edge 44 (waveform F), and its time position within an average time between pulses of waveform G is varied as a function of the input modulation signal to comparator 28.
The output of mono 46 is applied through diode 48 across resistor 50 to the base input of NPN transistor 52 operated as a triggering amplifier. It is conventionally biased through resistor 54, e.g, 1.5 K ohms, from +5-volt terminal 31 of b 5-volt power supply 30 to its collector. Capacitor 56, having an approximate capacitance of 01 mf, is connected between the collector and ground of transistor 52 to enable full bias potential to appear across the transistor for its brief turn-on interval, 50 nanoseconds. The output of transistor 52 is coupled between its emitter and ground to the primary 58 of trigger transformer 60. Additionally, transistor 52 may drive transformer 60 via an avalanche transistor connected in a common emitter configuration via a collector load resistor. In order to drive transformer 60 with a steep wave front, an avalanche mode operated transistor is ideal. Identical secondary windings 62 and 64 of trigger transformer 60 separately supply base-emitter inputs of NPN avalanche, or avalanche mode operated, transistors 66 and 68 of power output stage 18. Although two are shown, one or more than two may be employed when appropriately coupled.
With avalanche mode operated transistors 66 and 68, it has been found that such mode is possible from a number of types of transistors not otherwise labeled as providing it, such as a 2N2222, particularly those with a metal can. The avalanche mode referred to is sometimes referred to as a second breakdown mode, and when transistors are operated in this mode and are triggered “on,” their resistance rapidly goes quite low (internally at near the speed of light), and they will stay at this state until collector current drops sufficiently to cut off conduction (at a few microamperes). Certain other transistors, such as a type 2N4401, also display reliable avalanche characteristics.
As illustrated, impulse antenna 200 is charged by a DC source 65 through resistors 67 and 69 to an overall voltage which is the sum of the avalanche voltage of transistors 66 and 68 as discussed above. Resistors 67 and 69 together have a resistance value which will enable transistors 66 and 68 to be biased as described above. Resistors 71 and 73 are of relatively low value and are adjusted to receive energy below the frequency of cut-off of the antenna. In operation, when a pulse is applied to the primary 58 of pulse transformer 60, transistors 66 and 68 are turned “on,” effectively shorting, through resistors 71 and 73, antenna elements 204 and 206. This action occurs extremely fast, with the result that a signal is generated generally as shown in pulse waveform G (but somewhat rounded). Antenna 200 differentiates the pulse G to transmit essentially a monocycle of the general shape shown in waveform H.
Referring back to
The transmitted signal from transmitter 10 is received by antenna 200 (FIG. 2), and this signal is fed to two basic circuits, demodulation circuit 222 and template generator 234. In accordance with this system, a replica of the transmitted signal, waveform H (FIG. 3), is employed to effect detection of the received signal, basic detection being accomplished in multiplier or multiplying mixer 226. For maximum response, the template signal, reproduced as waveform
Oscillator 227 operates at a frequency which is substantially higher than the repetition rate of transmitter 10, and its output is divided down to the operation frequency of 25 kHz by frequency divider 230, thus equal to the output of divider 14 of transmitter 10.
In order to introduce a pattern of dither corresponding to that provided by binary sequences “A” generator 33, a like generator 228 provides a binary changing voltage to programmable delay circuit 232 which applies to the signal output of divider 230, a delay pattern corresponding to the one effected by binary sequence “A” generator 33 of
Either programmable delay 232 or a second delay device connected to its output would additionally provide a general circuit delay to take care of circuit delays which are inherent in the related circuitry with which it is operated, as will be described. In any event, the delayed output of delay 232, which is a composite of these, will be provided to the input of template generator 234, and it is adapted to generate a replica of the transmitted signal, illustrated in
In order to generate the nearest signal, the input signal Ea is multiplied by two spaced, in time, replicas of the template signal output of template generator 234. The first of these, indicated as T1, is multiplied in mixer 236 by input signal Ea in mixer 238. As will be noted in
The output of mixer 236 is integrated in integrator 242, and its output is sampled and held by sample and hold unit 244 as triggered by delay 232. The output of sample and hold unit 244, the integral of the product of the input signal Ea and T1, is applied to the non-inverting input of differential amplifier 246. Similarly, the output of mixer 238 is integrated by integrator 249 and sampled and held by sample and hold 259 as triggered by delay 232, and the integrated product of the input signal Ea and template signal T2 is applied to the inverting input of differential amplifier 246.
To examine the operation of differential amplifier 246, it will be noted that if the phase of the output of oscillator 227 should advance, signals T1 and Ea applied to mixer 236 would become closer in phase, and their product would increase, resulting in an increase in input signal to the non-inverting input of differential amplifier 246, whereas the advance effect. on template signal T2 relative to the input signal Ea would be such that their coincidence would decrease, causing a decrease in the product output of mixer 238 and therefore a decreased. voltage input to the inverting input of differential amplifier 246. As a result, the output of differential amplifier 246 would be driven in a positive direction, and this polarity signal would be such as to cause oscillator 227 to retard. If the change were in the opposite direction, the result would be such that higher voltages would be applied to the inverting input than to the non-inverting input of differential amplifier 246, causing the output signal to decrease and to drive oscillator 227 in an opposite direction. In this manner, the near average phase lock is effected between the input signal Ea and template signal Ta which is directly employed in the modulation of the input signal. The term “near” is used in that the output of differential amplifier 246 is passed through low pass filter 253 before being applied to the control input of oscillator 227. The cut-off frequency of low pass filter 253 is set such that it will take a fairly large number of pulses to effect phase shift (e.g., 10 Hz to perhaps down to 0.001 Hz). As a result, the response of oscillator 227 is such that it provides an output which causes waveform T1 and thus waveform Ta to be non-variable in position with respect to modulation effect. With this limitation in mind, and in order to obtain a synchronous detection of the input signal, the output T1 of template generator 234 is delayed by a period equal to essentially one-fourth the period P of the major lobe of the template and input signal, and this is applied as signal Ta with the input signal Ea, to multiplying mixer 226. As will be noted, the resulting delayed signal, Ta, is now near synchronization with the input signal Ea, and thus the output of multiplier 226 provides essentially a maximum signal output. In instances where there is simply no signal, or a noise signal, at the signal input of mixer 226, there would be between input signals Ea an elapsed time of exactly 40 milliseconds shown in
The signal output of mixer 226 is integrated in integrator 251, and the output signal is multiplied by a factor of 0.5 by amplifier 252. Then this one-half voltage output of amplifier 252 is applied to the inverting input of comparator 254, and this voltage represents one-half of the peak output of integrator 250. At the same time, a second output of integrator 251 is fed through delay 256 to the non-inverting input of comparator 254, delay being such as required for stabilization of the operation of amplifier 252 and comparator 254 in order to obtain an effective comparison signal level that will be essentially free of the variable operation of these two units. The output of comparator 254 represents an essentially precise time marker which varies with the position of input signal Ea. It is then fed to the reset input of flip-flop 258, a set input being provided from the output of delay 232 which represents, because of low pass filter 253, an averaged spacing between input signals, thus providing a reference against which the modulation controlled time variable output signal of comparator 254 may be related. It is related by virtue of the output delay 232 being provided as the set input of flip-flop 258. Thus, for example, the output of flip-flop 258 would rise at a consistent time related to the average repetition rate a essentially dictated by low pass filter 253. Thus, the output of flip-flop 258 would be brought back to zero at a time which reflected the intelligence modulation on the input signal. Thus, we would have a pulse height of a constant amplitude, but with a pulse width which varied directly with modulation. The output of flip-flop 258 is then fed through low pass filter 260, which translates the signal from pulse width demodulation to amplitude signal modulation, which is then reproduced by loudspeaker 262 with switch A in the upper position.
Where the intelligence transmission is in digital form, switch A is moved to the lower position wherein the output of comparator 261a and the thus parallel in form digital signal is fed to the non-inverting input of comparator 261a, a, potential being applied to the inverting input sufficient to block the transition of comparator 261a from an off state to an on state absent a significant “1” binary signal. Assuming that the digital signal is a converted analog signal and the signal is representative of an analog voice input as shown in
In the event that the digital transmission is derived from another digital source, such as illustrated by digital source 29 in
While the generation and detection of digital signals have been described in terms of binary encoding, it is to be appreciated that multi-level encoding might be employed and detected wherein discretely positioned bits would be represented by different effected delays and encoded in this manner.
Assuming that binary sequence “A” generator 33 of transmitter 10 and binary sequence “A” generator 228 for the receiver are operated essentially in synchronization, the effect of the time position dither effected by generator 33 of transmitter 10 will have no dislocating effect on the signal.
As suggested above, in order to ensure synchronization, some form of signaling between the transmitter and receiver as to the starting of the binary sequence generator, generator 33, is required. This may be done by an auxiliary transmitter or by a decoding arrangement wherein there would be provided at the conclusion of, say, one sequence of binary sequence generator 33, a start signal for binary sequence generator 228 of the receiver. Absent this, in the free running mode, there would be effected synchronization by the operation of template generator 234 which, for short codes, and with relatively low noise levels, would be relatively short; and for longer codes, or instances where noise was a significant problem, longer codes would be required for synchronization. Where needed, a receiving station might transmit back to the original transmitting station an acknowledgement that synchronization has been achieved.
From the foregoing, it should be appreciated that applicant has provided both an inexpensive and practical time domain system for communications. While a system has been described wherein a single short pulse, for example, a nanosecond, is transmitted at a repetition rate such that 40 microseconds is between pulses, the invention contemplates that a group of pulses might be sent which would be separated by the longer period. Thus, for example, an 8-bit set might be transmitted as a group wherein there was simply room between the pulses to detect their multiposition shifts with modulation. By this arrangement, it is to be appreciated that intelligence information transmitted would be increased by up to 256 times, or the immunity from noise could be substantially improved by this technique and related ones.
The transmitter is basically controlled by control 310. It includes a transmit sequence, or rate, control portion 312 which determines the timing of transmitted signal bursts, at, for example, 10,000 bursts per second, in which case transmit sequence control 312 generates an output at 10,000 Hz on lead 314. Oscillator 316 is operated at a higher rate, for example, 20 mHz.
The signal output of transmit sequence control 312 is employed to select particular pulse outputs of oscillator 316 to be the actual pulse which is used as a master pulse for controlling both the output of transmitter 329 and the timing of receiver functions, as will be further described. In order to unambiguously and repetitively select an operative pulse with low timing uncertainty from oscillator 316, the selection is one and some fraction of an oscillator pulse interval after an initial signal from control 312. The selection is made via a control sequence employing D-type flip-flops 318, 320, and 322. Thus, the transmit sequence control pulse on lead 314 is applied to the clock input of flip-flop 318. This causes the Q output of flip-flop 318 to transition to a high state, and this is applied to a D input of flip-flop 320. Subsequently, the output of oscillator 316 imposes a rising edge on the clock input of flip-flop 320. At that time, the high level of the D input of this flip-flop is transferred to the Q output. Similarly, the Q output of flip-flop 320 is provided to the D input of flip-flop 322, and the next rising edge of the pulse from oscillator 316 will cause the not Q output of flip-flop 322 to go low and thus initiate the beginning of the transmit-receive cycle.
For the transmit mode, the not Q output of flip-flop 322 is fed as an input to analog programmable delay 313 and to counter 315. Counter 315, for example, would respond to the not Q outputs of flip-flop 322 and count up to a selected number, for example, 356, and recycle to count again. Its binary output would be fed as an address to memory unit 317, ROM or RAM, which would have stored, either in numerical address order, or randomly selected order, a number. As a result, upon being addressed, a discrete output number would be fed to D/A converter unit 321. D/A converter unit 321 would then provide an analog signal output proportional to the input number. This output is employed to sequentially operate programmable delay unit 313 for delays of pulses from flip-flop 322 by an amount proportional to the signal from D/A converter 321. The range of delays would typically be up to the nominals timing between pulses, in this case, up to 300 nanoseconds, and practically up to 99 nanoseconds. The delayed output of programmable delay unit 313 is then fed to fixed delay unit 324, which provides a fixed delay of 200 nanoseconds to each pulse that it receives. The thus delayed pulses are then fed to trigger generator 323. Trigger generator 323, e.g., an avalanche mode operated transistor, would provide a sharply rising electrical output at the 10,000 Hz rate or a like response of light output, e.g., by laser, depending upon the transmitter to be driven. In accordance with one feature of this invention, trigger generator 323 would be an ultraviolet laser. In any event, a pulse of trigger generator 323 is fed to and rapidly turns “on” a switch, for example, diamond 335, which, for example, may again be an electrically operated or light operated switch, such as a diamond switch in response to the ultraviolet laser triggering device via fiber optic 327. Importantly, it must be capable of switching in a period of a nanosecond or less. It is then switched “on” to discharge antenna 200, having earlier been charged from power source B through resistors R1 and R2, source B being, for example, 100 to 5,000 volts.
Conformal impulse antenna 200 or 200a (
Signal returns from a target would be received by receiver 326, typically located near or together with transmitter 329, via receiving antenna 200, which would, for example, be like a transmitting antenna. The received signals are amplified in amplifier 328 and fed to mixer 330, together with a signal from template generator 332, driven by delay line 336, which is timed to produce signals, typically half cycles in configuration, and corresponding in time to the anticipated time of arrival of a signal from a target at a selected range.
Mixer 330 functions to multiply the two input signals, and where there are coincidence signals, timewise and with like or unlike polarity coincident signals, there is a significant and integratable output, indicating a target at the range. A mixer and the following circuitry may be reused for later arriving signals representative of different range, this range or time spacing being sufficient to complete processing time for reception and integration at a range as will be described. Additional like mixtures and following circuitry sets may be employed to fill in the range slots between that capable for one set.
Since the goal here is to determine the presence or absence of a target based on a number of signal samplings as effected by integration, where a true target does not exist, the appearance of signals received by mixer 330 corresponding to the time of receipt of signals from template generator 332 will typically produce signals which vary not only in amplitude, but also in polarity. It is to be borne in mind that the present system determines intelligence, not instantaneously, but after a period of time, responsive to a preponderance of coherent signals over time, a facet of time domain transmission. Next, it is significant that the template generator produce a template signal burst which is no longer than the effecting signal to be received and bear a consistent like or opposite polarity relationship in time with it. As suggested above, received signals which do not bear this relation to the template signal will be substantially attenuated. As one signal, the template signal is simply a one polarity burst signal. Assuming that it maintains the time relationship described, effective detection can be effected.
For purposes of illustration, we are concerned with looking at a single time slot for anticipated signal returns following signal bursts from transmitting and receiving antennas 200. Accordingly, template generator 332 is driven as a function of the timing of the transmitter. To accomplish this, coarse delay counter 335 and fine delay programmable delay line 336 are employed. Down counter 335 counts down the number of pulse outputs from oscillator 316 which occur subsequent to a control input of lead 338, the output of programmable delay unit 313. A discrete number of pulses thereafter received from oscillator 316 is programmable in down counter 335 by an output X from load counter 341 on lead 340 of control 310, a conventional device wherein a binary count is generated in control 310 which is loaded into down counter 335. As an example, we will assume that it is desired to look at a return which occurs 175 nanoseconds after the transmission of a signal from antenna 200. To accomplish this, we load into down counter 335 the number “7,” which means it will count seven of the pulse outputs of oscillator 316, each being spaced at 50 nanoseconds. So there is achieved a 350-nanosecond delay in down converter 335, but subtracting 200 nanoseconds as injected by delay unit 324, we will have really an output of down counter 335 occurring 150 nanoseconds after the transmission of a burst by transmitting antenna 200 or 200a. In order to obtain the precise timing of 175 nanoseconds, an additional delay is effected by programmable delay line 336, which is triggered by the output of down counter 335 when its seven count is concluded. It is programmed in a conventional manner by load delay 342 of control 310 of lead Y and, thus in the example described, would have programmed programmable delay line 336 to delay an input pulse provided to it by 25 nanoseconds. In this manner, programmable delay line 336 provides a pulse output to template generator 332, 175 nanoseconds after it is transmitted by transmitting antenna 200. Template generator 332 is thus timed to provide, for example, a positive half cycle or square wave pulse to mixer 330 or a discrete sequence or pattern of positive and negative excursions.
The output of mixer 330 is fed to analog integrator 350. Assuming that there is a discrete net polarity likeness or unlikeness between the template signal and received signal during the timed presence of the template signal, analog integrator 350, which effectively integrates over the period of template signal, will provide a discrete voltage output. If the signal received is not biased with a target signal imposed on it, it will generally comprise as much positive content as negative content on a time basis; and thus when multiplied with the template signal, the product will follow this; characteristic, and likewise, at the output of integrator 350, there will be as many discrete products which are positive as negative. On the other hand, with target signal content, there will be a bias in one direction or the other, that is, there will be more signal outputs of analog integrators 350 that are of one polarity than another. The signal output of analog integrator 350 is amplified in amplifier 352, and then, synchronously with the multiplication process, discrete signals emanating from analog integrator 350 are discretely sampled and held by sample and hold 354. These samples are then fed to A/D converter 356 which digitizes each sample, effecting this after a fixed delay of 40 nanoseconds provided by delay unit 358, which takes into account the processing time required by sample and hold unit 354. The now discrete, digitally calibrated positive and negative signal values are fed from A/D converter 356 to digital integrator 362, which then digitally sums them to determine whether or not there is a significant net voltage of one polarity or another, indicating, if such is the case, that a target is present at a selected range. Typically, a number of transmissions would be effected in sequence, for example, 10, 100, or even 1,000 transmissions, wherein the same signal transmit time of reception would be observed, and any signals occurring during like transmissions would then be integrated in digital integrator 362, and in this way enable recovery of signals from ambient, non-synchronized signals which, because of random polarities, do not effectively integrate.
The output of digital integrator 362 would be displayed on display 364, synchronized in time by an appropriate signal from delay line 336 (and delay 358) which would thus enable the time or distance position of a signal return to be displayed in terms of distance from the radar unit.
Alternately, antenna elements may be arranged in an end-fire format wherein each element is driven with or without a reflector. They may be arrayed as illustrated in
By this arrangement, each of the 1-mHz pulses from +16 divider 502 is delayed a discrete amount. The pulse is then fed to fixed delay unit 508 which, for example, delays each pulse by 60 nanoseconds in order to enable sufficient processing time of signal returns by receiver 510. The output of fixed delay unit 508 is fed to trigger generator 512, for example, an avalanche mode operated transistor, which provides a fast rise time pulse. Its output is applied to switch 514, typically an avalanche mode operated transistor as illustrated in
Considering now receiver 512, antenna 513, identical with antenna 200 or 200a, receives signal returns and supplies them to mixer 514. Mixer 514 multiplies the received signals from antenna 513 with locally generated ones from template generator 516. Template generator 516 is triggered via a delay chain circuitry of analog delay unit 506 and adjustable delay unit 518, which is set to achieve generation of a template signal at a time corresponding to the sum of the delays achieved by fixed delay 508 and elapsed time to and from a target at a selected distance. The output of mixer 514 is fed to short-term analog integrator 520 which discretely integrates for the period of each template signal. Its output is then fed to long-term integrator 522 which, for example, may be an active low pass filter and integrates over on the order of 50 milliseconds, or, in terms of signal transmissions, up to, for example, approximately 50,000 such transmissions. The output of integrator 522 is amplified in amplifier 524 and passed through adjustable high pass filter 526 to alarm 530. By this arrangement, only AC signals corresponding to moving targets are passed through the filters and with high pass filter 526 establishing the lower velocity limit for a target and low pass filter 522 determining the higher velocity of a target. For example, high pass filter 526 might be set to pass signals from targets at a greater velocity than 0.1 feet per second and integrator-low pass filter 522 adapted to pass signals representing targets moving less than 50 miles per hour. Assuming that the return signals pass both such filters, the visual alarm would be operated.
By this technique, there is achieved real time differentiation between broad boundary objects, such as trees, and sharp boundary objects, such as a person. Thus, assuming that in one instance the composite return provides a discrete signal and later, for example, half a nanosecond later, there was no charge in the scene, then there would be a constant difference in the outputs of mixers 650 and 652. However, in the event that a change occurred, as by movement of a person, there would be changes in difference between the signals occurring at the two different times, and thus there wold be a difference in the output of differential amplifier 664. This output would then be fed to high pass filter 526 (
In terms of a system as illustrated in
While the operation thus described involves a single perimeter, by a simple manual or automatic adjustment, observations at different ranges can be accomplished. Ranges can be in terms of a circular perimeter, or, as by the employment of directional antenna (antenna 200 with a reflector) or yagi-type array, effect observations at a discrete arc.
An echo or reflection from a target of the signal transmitted by sonic transducer 902 would be received by a similarly configured sonic transducer 910, and its output would then be coupled via plates 912 and 914 to amplifier 328 and thence onto mixer 330 as illustrated in
It is believed of perhaps greater significance that light modulator 924, a light frequency modulator, has many other applications, particularly as an intelligence modulator of a laser beam.
Referring now to
Of course, in a typical installation, there could be many, many separate signal discriminators, each providing a frequency modulated output of one set of intelligence. Thus in the system just described, there is provided a frequency modulated multiplex system which not only can carry many, many different signals, but also is quite cheap to construct, certainly much cheaper than the present system of high-speed digital communications.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2517951||20 Jun 1947||8 Aug 1950||Hazeltine Research Inc||Wide-band directive antenna|
|US2875438||10 Apr 1953||24 Feb 1959||Hings Donald L||Directional antenna array|
|US3166747||7 Feb 1961||19 Jan 1965||Adrian Donald J||Fm-am correlation radar system|
|US3175214||18 Mar 1960||23 Mar 1965||Lockheed Aircraft Corp||Doppler-free distance measuring system|
|US3195130||23 Feb 1961||13 Jul 1965||Adrian Donald J||Am radar with noise correlation|
|US3243722||28 Aug 1961||29 Mar 1966||Baird Atomic Inc||Maser frequency control systems using refractive index change|
|US3304428||18 Dec 1964||14 Feb 1967||Sylvania Electric Prod||Transmission line light modulator|
|US3330957||19 Sep 1963||11 Jul 1967||Runnels Russell W||Piezoelectric frequency modulated optical maser|
|US3331036||5 Oct 1964||11 Jul 1967||Bell Telephone Labor Inc||Optical wave modulators and attenuators|
|US3381242||28 Aug 1961||30 Apr 1968||Kollsman Instr Corp||Optical maser modulator and amplifier|
|US3406356||21 Dec 1964||15 Oct 1968||Sylvania Electric Prod||Optical frequency translator|
|US3423754||13 Jan 1967||21 Jan 1969||Ibm||Sampled radar system|
|US3475078||15 Nov 1965||28 Oct 1969||Bell Telephone Labor Inc||Gunn-effect light modulator|
|US3525940||18 Jul 1967||25 Aug 1970||Westinghouse Electric Corp||Radar transmitter|
|US3618098||24 Dec 1963||2 Nov 1971||Nall Hilary H||Wide band delay line|
|US3623097||17 Jul 1969||23 Nov 1971||Us Army||Modulation correlated fm ranging system|
|US3631351||19 Jan 1970||28 Dec 1971||Nasa||Signal phase estimator|
|US3641434||10 Oct 1968||8 Feb 1972||Bendix Corp||Wide-band crystal-controlled transceiver with remote digital tuning|
|US3659203||15 Jun 1970||25 Apr 1972||Sperry Rand Corp||Balanced radiator system|
|US3662316||12 Mar 1971||9 May 1972||Sperry Rand Corp||Short base-band pulse receiver|
|US3680100||15 Dec 1970||25 Jul 1972||Us Navy||Randomly phase coded antenna technique for search radar|
|US3710387||6 Sep 1960||9 Jan 1973||Us Navy||F.m. radar range system|
|US3720952||29 Dec 1964||13 Mar 1973||Lawsine L||Signal processing apparatus|
|US3728632||12 Mar 1971||17 Apr 1973||Sperry Rand Corp||Transmission and reception system for generating and receiving base-band pulse duration pulse signals without distortion for short base-band communication system|
|US3739392||29 Jul 1971||12 Jun 1973||Sperry Rand Corp||Base-band radiation and reception system|
|US3750025||26 Apr 1971||31 Jul 1973||Sperry Rand Corp||Energy amplifying selector gate for base-band signals|
|US3792358||15 Dec 1972||12 Feb 1974||Us Air Force||Single cycle transmitter|
|US3794996||12 Jul 1972||26 Feb 1974||Sperry Rand Corp||Stable base-band superregenerative selective receiver|
|US3806795||3 Jan 1972||23 Apr 1974||Geophysical Survey Sys Inc||Geophysical surveying system employing electromagnetic impulses|
|US3868694||9 Aug 1973||25 Feb 1975||Us Air Force||Dielectric directional antenna|
|US3997843||20 Jun 1975||14 Dec 1976||Calspan Corporation||Monocycle pulse generator|
|US4070550||28 Jun 1961||24 Jan 1978||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy||Quantized pulse modulated nonsynchronous clipped speech multi-channel coded communication system|
|US4070621||23 Jul 1976||24 Jan 1978||The United States Of America As Represented By The Department Of Health, Education And Welfare||Antenna with electro-optical modulator|
|US4117405||2 Nov 1976||26 Sep 1978||Louis Martinez||Narrow-band radio communication system|
|US4128299||12 May 1977||5 Dec 1978||Xerox Corporation||Waveguide optical modulator|
|US4241346||11 Jul 1979||23 Dec 1980||The Secretary Of State For Defence In Her Britannic Majesty's Government Of The United Kingdom Of Great Britain And Northern Ireland||Pulse radar altimeters|
|US4291410||24 Oct 1979||22 Sep 1981||Rockwell International Corporation||Multipath diversity spread spectrum receiver|
|US4323898||23 Jun 1980||6 Apr 1982||Sperry Corporation||Polarization detector|
|US4323899||23 Jun 1980||6 Apr 1982||Sperry Corporation||Polarization detector|
|US4324002||18 Mar 1960||6 Apr 1982||Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc.||Delay-modulated random energy intelligence communication system|
|US4357610||29 Sep 1980||2 Nov 1982||Sperry Corporation||Waveform encoded altitude sensor|
|US4369518||28 Nov 1980||18 Jan 1983||Tanner Electronic Systems Technology, Inc.||Compact antenna system|
|US4380746||3 Mar 1981||19 Apr 1983||Westinghouse Electric Corp.||Pulse modulator using capacitor charging and discharging circuits|
|US4438331||2 Dec 1981||20 Mar 1984||Power Spectra, Inc.||Bulk semiconductor switch|
|US4438519 *||4 May 1981||20 Mar 1984||General Electric Company||Methods, and apparatus, for transmitting high-bit-rate digital data in power line communication media having high harmonic noise content|
|US4443799||2 Jul 1981||17 Apr 1984||Sperry Corporation||Spread spectrum radar|
|US4485385||15 Jun 1982||27 Nov 1984||Rca Corporation||Broadband diamond-shaped antenna|
|US4527276||16 Jan 1984||2 Jul 1985||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army||Digital pulse position modulation communications system with threshold extension|
|US4593289||18 Apr 1983||3 Jun 1986||Butternut Electronics Co.||Multi-band dipole antenna with matching stubs|
|US4641317||3 Dec 1984||3 Feb 1987||Charles A. Phillips||Spread spectrum radio transmission system|
|US4673948||2 Dec 1985||16 Jun 1987||Gte Government Systems Corporation||Foreshortened dipole antenna with triangular radiators|
|US4695752||11 Jan 1982||22 Sep 1987||Sperry Corporation||Narrow range gate baseband receiver|
|US4725841||30 Jun 1983||16 Feb 1988||X-Cyte, Inc.||System for interrogating a passive transponder carrying phase-encoded information|
|US4743906||3 Jun 1986||10 May 1988||Charles A. Phillips||Time domain radio transmission system|
|US4759034||2 Dec 1986||19 Jul 1988||General Research Of Electronics, Inc.||Multi-step spread spectrum communication apparatus|
|US4813057||3 Feb 1987||14 Mar 1989||Charles A. Phillips||Time domain radio transmission system|
|US4885589||14 Sep 1988||5 Dec 1989||General Electric Company||Optical distribution of transmitter signals and antenna returns in a phased array radar system|
|US4979186||13 Mar 1989||18 Dec 1990||Charles A. Phillips||Time domain radio transmission system|
|US5337054||18 May 1992||9 Aug 1994||Anro Engineering, Inc.||Coherent processing tunnel diode ultra wideband receiver|
|US5353303||4 Oct 1993||4 Oct 1994||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force||Technique for increasing the data rate in a spread spectrum data link|
|US5361070||12 Apr 1993||1 Nov 1994||Regents Of The University Of California||Ultra-wideband radar motion sensor|
|US5363108||5 Mar 1992||8 Nov 1994||Charles A. Phillips||Time domain radio transmission system|
|US5365543||27 Sep 1993||15 Nov 1994||Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.||Transmitting circuit and receiving circuit|
|US5519400||6 Jun 1995||21 May 1996||The Regents Of The University Of California||Phase coded, micro-power impulse radar motion sensor|
|US5610907||29 Jul 1994||11 Mar 1997||Barrett; Terence W.||Ultrafast time hopping CDMA-RF communications: code-as-carrier, multichannel operation, high data rate operation and data rate on demand|
|US5675608||19 Jun 1995||7 Oct 1997||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Synchronous transmitter and receiver of spread spectrum communication method|
|US5677927||20 Sep 1994||14 Oct 1997||Pulson Communications Corporation||Ultrawide-band communication system and method|
|US5687169||27 Apr 1995||11 Nov 1997||Time Domain Systems, Inc.||Full duplex ultrawide-band communication system and method|
|US5812081||7 Jun 1995||22 Sep 1998||Time Domain Systems, Inc.||Time domain radio transmission system|
|US5952956||7 Jun 1995||14 Sep 1999||Time Domain Corporation||Time domain radio transmission system|
|US5969663||25 Nov 1997||19 Oct 1999||Time Domain Corporation||Time domain radio transmission system|
|US6606051||18 Oct 1999||12 Aug 2003||Time Domain Corporation||Pulse-responsive dipole antenna|
|DE2748746A1||31 Oct 1977||3 May 1978||Louis Martinez||Ultraschmalbandiges nachrichtensystem|
|DE3542693C2||3 Dec 1985||29 Jan 1998||Larry W Fullerton||Breitband-Radioübertragungseinrichtung|
|GB581581A||Title not available|
|GB581811A||Title not available|
|JPS593894A||Title not available|
|JPS4529445B1||Title not available|
|JPS6035837A||Title not available|
|JPS6093839A||Title not available|
|JPS6224536A||Title not available|
|JPS51121389A||Title not available|
|JPS58117741A||Title not available|
|JPS61136321A||Title not available|
|1||Adler, R.B. et al., "Electromagnetic Energy Trsnamission and Radiation", John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 555-612 (1960).|
|2||Artym, AD., "Class D Amplifiers and Switching Generators in Radio Communications and Radio Broadcasting", Moscow, Syvaz Publishing House, pp. 10(1980). Original Russian version also incluided.|
|3||Astanin, L. Yu et al., "Principles of Superwideband Radar Measurements", Radio I Syvaz Moscow, 1989, pp. 104 and 108-109.|
|4||Bennett, C.L. et al., "Time-Domain Electromagnetics and Its Applications", Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 66, No. 3, Mar. 1978, pp. 299-318.|
|5||Bertoni et al., "Ultra-Wideband Short-Pulse Electromagnetics", Proceedings Of An International Conference On Ultra-Wideband, Short-Pulsed Electromagnetics, Oct. 1992, Plenum Press, 1993, pgs.|
|6||Cook, J.C., "Monocycle Radar Pulses as Environmental Probes," Institute of Science and Technology, The University of Michigan, pgs. 9.|
|7||Harmuth H.F., "Transmission of Information by Orthogonal Functions", Second Edition, Springer-Verlag, 1972, pgs. 17.|
|8||Harmuth, H.F., "Antennas and Waveguides for Nonsinusoidal Waves", Academic, 1984, pgs. 17.|
|9||Harmuth, H.F., "Nonsinusoidal Waves for Radar and Radio Communication", Academic, 1981, pgs. 9.|
|10||Harmuth, H.F., "Range-Doppler Resolution of Electromagnetic Walsh Waves of radar", IEEE Trasnsactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. EMC-17, No. 2, May 1975, pp. 106-111.|
|11||Harmuth, H.F., "Selective Reception of Periodic Electromagnetic Waves with General Time Variation", IEEE Transaction on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. EMC-19, No. 3, Aug. 1977, pp. 137-144.|
|12||Harmuth, Henning F., "Range-Doppler Resolution of Electromagnetic Walsh Waves of Radar", IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. EMC-17, No. 2, May 1975, pp. 106-111.|
|13||Harmuth, Henning F., Antennas and Waveguides for Non-sinusoidal Waves, Academic, 1984, pp. 2-27.|
|14||Harmuth, Henning F., Nonsinusoidal Waves for Radar and Radio Communication, Academic, 1981, pp. 142-143, 288-289, 292-293, 296-297 and 302-305.|
|15||Harmuth, Henning F., Sequency Theory: Foundations and Applications, Academic, 1977, pp. 122-123, 126-135, 235-239, 284-285, 294-295, 300-301, 316-319 and 340-341.|
|16||Harnuth, H.F., "Sequency Theory: Foundations and Applications", Academic, 1977, pgs. 20.|
|17||Hartmuth Henning R., Transmission of Information by Orthogonal Funcitions, Second Edition, Springer-Verlag, 1972, pp. 244-245, 228-291.|
|18||Ho et al., "A Diamond Opto-Electronic Switch", Optics Communication, vol. 46, No. 3,4, Jul. 1983, pp. 202-204.|
|19||Meleshko, E.A., "Nanosecond Electronics in Experimental Physics", Ehnergoatomizdat Press, Moscow, 1987, pgs. 12.|
|20||Meleshko, E.A., Nanosecond Electronics in Experimental Physics, Ehnergoatomizdat Press, Moscow, 1987, pp. 58-68.|
|21||Miller, Edmund K., "Time-Domain Measurements in Electromagnetics", Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1986, pgs. 46.|
|22||Nemirovsky, A.S. et al., "Communications Systems and Radio Rely Lines", Moscow, Syvaz Publishing House, pgs. 3 (1980). Original Russian version also included.|
|23||PCT application, PCT/US89/01020, filed Mar. 10, 1989.|
|24||PCT application, PCT/US90/01174, filed Mar. 2, 1990.|
|25||Pender et al., "Electric Power", Electrical Engineers Handbook, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1936, pgs. 9.|
|26||Scholtz, R.A., "Multiple Access with Time-Hopping Impulse Modulation," Communication Sciences Institute, Invited Paper, IEEE Milcom '93, Boston, MA, Oct. 11-14, pgs. 4.|
|27||Skonik, "Introduction To Radar Systems", pgs. 4 (McGraw-Hill, 1980).|
|28||Varganov et al., "Radar Response of Flight Vehicles", Radio I Svyaz' Press, Moscow, 1985, pgs. 2.|
|29||Varganov et al., Radar Response of Flight Vehicles, Radio I svyaz' Press, Moscow, 1985, p.5.|
|30||Venediktov, M.D. et al., "Asynchronous Address Communications Systems", Syvas Publishing House, Moscow, pp. 14 (1968).Original Russian version also included.|
|31||Withington, P., "Impulse Radio Overview," Jan. 27, 1998, http://www.time-domain.comm/pulson/overview/overview.html>, pgs. 7.|
|U.S. Classification||342/27, 375/130, 342/21, 375/239, 375/256, 380/34, 375/E01.001|
|International Classification||H04B1/69, H04B14/02, H01Q21/06, G01S13/02, H01Q9/28, G01S13/04, H04L27/30|
|Cooperative Classification||H01Q9/28, H04B1/7163, G01S13/0209, H01Q21/061, H04B14/026, H04L27/103|
|European Classification||H04B1/7163, H01Q9/28, H04B14/02B, H01Q21/06B|