Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUSRE38614 E1
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 10/225,282
Publication date5 Oct 2004
Filing date22 Aug 2002
Priority date30 Jan 1998
Fee statusPaid
Publication number10225282, 225282, US RE38614 E1, US RE38614E1, US-E1-RE38614, USRE38614 E1, USRE38614E1
InventorsDavid C. Paul, Hansjuerg W. Emch, Beat Schenk
Original AssigneeSynthes (U.S.A.)
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Intervertebral allograft spacer
US RE38614 E1
Abstract
An allogenic intervertebral implant for fusing vertebrae is disclosed. The implant is a piece of allogenic bone conforming in size and shape with a portion of an end plate of a vertebra. The implant has a wedge-shaped profile to restore disc height and the natural curvature of the spine. The top and bottom surfaces of the implant have a plurality of teeth to resist expulsion and provide initial stability. The implant according to the present invention provides initial stability need for fusion without stress shielding.
Images(8)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(12)
What is claimed is:
1. An intervertebral implant comprising a piece of allogenic bone conforming in size and shape with a portion of an end plate of a vertebra and having a wedge-shaped profile, wherein top and bottom surfaces of the implant have a plurality of teeth in combination with a discrete spacer comprising a piece of allogenic bone conforming in size and shape with a second portion of an end plate of a vertebra and having a wedge-shaped profile, wherein top and bottom surfaces of the second member discrete spacer are substantially smooth and regions between top and bottom surfaces and anterior and lateral sides of the spacer have curved edges to facilitate implantation of the spacer.
2. The implant of claim 1, wherein at least one side has a channel for receiving a surgical instrument.
3. The implant of claim 1, wherein the channel runs in an anterior-posterior direction.
4. The implant of claim 1, wherein the teeth have a pyramid shape.
5. The implant of claim 1, wherein the teeth have a saw tooth shape.
6. The implant of claim 1, wherein at least one side of the implant has at least one hole for attachment of an inserter.
7. The implant of claim 6, wherein the at least one hole is threaded.
8. The implant of claim 6, wherein the at least one hole is provided in an anterior, posterior, posterior-lateral, or lateral side.
9. The implant of claim 1, wherein the top and bottom surfaces are defined by flat planar surfaces.
10. The implant of claim 9, wherein a region between the top and bottom surfaces and an anterior side of the implant is a curved edge to facilitate implantation of the implant.
11. The implant of claim 1, wherein the top and bottom surfaces are defined by curved surfaces, said curved surfaces contoured to mimic surfaces of the end plates of the vertebrae.
12. The implant of claim 1, wherein the implant has an interior space for receiving an osteoconductive material.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This is a reissue application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/363,844, filed on Jul. 30, 1999, which is now U.S. Pat. No. 6,258,125 B1, which application is, in turn, a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/219,439, filed on Dec. 23, 1998, which is now U.S. Pat. No. 6,143,033. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/363,844 claims benefit to Provisional Application No. 60/095,209, filed on Aug. 3, 1998, under 35 U.S.C. § 119 (e). U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/219,439 claims benefit to Provisional Application No. 60/095,425, filed on Aug. 5, 1998, and claims benefit to Provisional Application No. 60/073,271, filed on Jan. 30, 1998, under 35 U.S.C. § 119 (e).

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to an allogenic implant and, more particularly, to an allogenic intervertebral implant.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

A number of medical conditions such as compression of spinal cord nerve roots, degenerative disc disease, and spondylolisthesis can cause severe low back pain. Intervertebral fusion is a surgical method of alleviating low back pain. In posterior lumbar interbody fusion (“PLIF”), two adjacent vertebral bodies are fused together by removing the affected disc and inserting an implant that would allow for bone to grow between the two vertebral bodies to bridge the gap left by the disc removal.

A number of different implants and implant materials have been used in PLIF with varying success. Current implants used for PLIF include threaded titanium cages and allografts. Threaded titanium cages suffer from the disadvantage of requiring drilling and tapping of the vertebral end plates for insertion. In addition, the incidence of subsidence in long term use is not known. Due to MRI incompatibility of titanium, determining fusion is problematic. Finally, restoration of lordosis, i.e., the natural curvature of the lumbar spine is very difficult when a cylindrical titanium cage is used.

Allografts are sections of bone taken from a long bone of a donor. A cross section of the bone is taken and processed using known techniques to preserve the allograft until implantation and reduce the risk of an adverse immunological response when implanted. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,678,470 discloses a method for processing a bone grafting material which uses glutaraldehyde tanning to produce a non-antigenic, biocompatible material. Allografts have mechanical properties which are similar to the mechanical properties of vertebrae even after processing. This prevents stress shielding that occurs with metallic implants. They are also MRI compatible so that fusion can be more accurately ascertained and promote the formation of bone, i.e., osteo-conductive. Although the osteoconductive nature of the allograft provides a biological interlocking between the allograft and the vertebrae for long term mechanical strength, initial and short term mechanical strength of the interface between the allograft and the vertebrae are lacking as evidenced by the possibility of the allograft being expelled after implantation.

Currently commercially available allografts are simply sections of bone not specifically designed for use in PLIF. As a result, the fusion of the vertebral bodies does not occur in optimal anatomical position. A surgeon may do some minimal intraoperative shaping and sizing to customize the allograft for the patient's spinal anatomy. However, significant shaping and sizing of the allograft is not possible due to the nature of the allograft. Even if extensive shaping and sizing were possible, a surgeon's ability to manually shape and size the allograft to the desired dimensions is severely limited.

Most PLIF implants, whether threaded cages or allograft, are available in different sizes and have widths that vary with the implant height. For example, the width of a cylindrical cages will be substantially equivalent to the height. Although larger heights may be clinically indicated, wider implants are generally not desirable since increased width requires removal of more of the facet, which can lead to decreases stability, and more retraction of nerve roots, which can lead to temporary or permanent nerve damage.

As the discussion above illustrates, there is a need for an improved implant for fusing vertebrae.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to an allogenic intervertebral implant for use when surgical fusion of vertebral bodies is indicated. The implant comprises a piece of allogenic bone conforming in size and shape with a portion of an end plates of the vertebrae and has a wedge-shaped profile with a plurality of teeth located on top and bottom surfaces. The top and bottom surfaces can be flat planar surfaces or curved surfaces to mimic the topography of the end plates. The implant has a channel on at least one side for receiving a surgical tool. This channel runs in the anterior direction to accommodate a variety of surgical approaches. A threaded hole on the anterior, posterior, posterior-lateral, or lateral side can be provided for receiving a threaded arm of an insertion tool.

In another embodiment, the implant has an interior space for receiving an osteoconductive material to promote the formation of new bone.

In another embodiment, the implant is made of a plurality of interconnecting sections with mating sections. Preferably, the implant is made in two halves: a top portion having a top connecting surface and a bottom portion having a bottom connecting surface. The top connecting surface mates with the bottom connecting surface when the top and bottom portions are joined. The top and bottom portions have holes that align for receiving a pin to secure the top and bottom portions together. The pin can be made of allogenic bone.

In a different embodiment, the medial side of the implant has a scalloped edge such that when a first implant is implanted with a second implant with the medial sides facing each other, the scalloped edges define a cylindrical space.

The present invention also relates to a discrete spacer used in conjunction with any of the other embodiments of the implant. The spacer comprises a piece of allogenic bone conforming in size and shape with a portion of an end plates of the vertebrae and has a wedge-shaped profile with substantially smooth top and bottom surfaces. The intersecting regions between the top and bottom surfaces and at least one of the lateral sides and the intersecting regions between the anterior and posterior sides and the same lateral side are curved surfaces to facilitate implantation of the spacer. Thus, the spacer can be implanted through an opening on one side of the spinal canal and moved with a surgical instrument to the contralateral side.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a top view of a first embodiment of the implant according to the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a side view of the implant of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a back view of the implant of FIG. 1;

FIG. 4 is a top view of a second embodiment of the implant;

FIG. 5 is a side view of the implant of FIG. 4;

FIG. 6 is a top view of a third embodiment of the implant;

FIG. 7 is a side view of the implant of FIG. 6;

FIG. 8A is a top view of a top connecting surface of a top portion of the implant of FIG. 6;

FIG. 8B is a top view of a bottom connecting surface of a bottom portion of the implant of FIG. 6;

FIG. 9 is a perspective view of a fourth embodiment of the implant;

FIG. 10A is a side view of one embodiment of the teeth on the implant;

FIG. 10B is a side view of a second embodiment of the teeth of the implant;

FIG. 11 is a side view of an embodiment of the implant similar to the embodiment of FIGS. 6-8;

FIG. 12 is a top view of a vertebral bone characteristic of those of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine;

FIG. 13 is a side view of sequentially aligned vertebral bones, such as are found in the cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spine;

FIG. 14 is a posterior view of a sequence of vertebrae; and

FIG. 15 is an end view of another embodiment of the implant.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

FIG. 1 shows a top view of a first embodiment of intervertebral allograft spacer or implant 10 according to the present invention. Implant 10 conforms in size and shape with a portion of end plants of the vertebrae between which implant 10 is to be implanted. Because implant 10 is an allograft, implant 10 promotes the formation of new bone to fuse the two vertebral bodies together. Although implant 10 will probably be predominantly used in the lumbar region of the spine, implant 10 can be configured for implantation in any region of the spine. Implant 10 has a plurality of teeth 12 on superior and inferior surfaces 14, 16 which provide a mechanical interlock between implant 10 and the end plates. Teeth 12 provide the mechanical interlock by penetrating the end plates. The initial mechanical stability afforded by teeth 12 minimizes the risk of post-operative expulsion of implant 10. Teeth 12 can be pyramid-shaped (FIG. 10A). Preferably, the angle formed from the tip of the base is approximately 60°. Alternatively, teeth 12 have a saw tooth shape with the saw tooth running in the anterior-posterior direction (FIG. 10B).

As shown in FIG. 2 and FIG. 3, a first lateral side 18 has a channel 20 and a second lateral side 22 also has a channel 20. Channels 20 are sized to receive a surgical instrument such as an inserter for implantation of implant 10. If the inserter has a threaded arm, implant 10 can be provided with a threaded hole 24. In FIG. 2, channel 20 is shown extended only partially along first lateral side 18. Channel 20 can extend along the entire length of first lateral side 18 as shown in the embodiment of FIG. 5. In FIG. 3, channels 20 are shown on both first and second lateral sides 18, 22. It should be noted that implant 10 can also have no channels or channels on one lateral side only as shown in the embodiment of FIG. 9.

The dimensions of implant 10 can be varied to accommodate a patient's anatomy. Typically, implant 10 would have a width between 6-15 mm (in the medial-lateral direction), a length between 15-30 mm (in the anterior-posterior direction), and a height between 4-30 mm (maximum height in the superior-inferior direction). The size of implant 10 allows implant 10 to be implanted using conventional open surgical procedures or minimally invasive procedures, such as laparoscopic surgery. Additionally, because the width is kept to a restricted size range and does not necessarily increase with implant height, taller implants can be used without requiring wider implants. Thus, facet removal and retraction of nerve roots can remain minimal.

In order to restore the natural curvature of the spine after the affected disc has been removed, implant 10 has a wedge-shaped profile. As shown in FIG. 2, this wedge shape results from a gradual decrease in height from an anterior side 26 to a posterior side 28. In anatomical terms, the natural curvature of the lumbar spine is referred to as lordosis. When implant 10 is to be used in the lumbar region, the angle formed by the wedge should be approximately between 4.2° and 15° so that the wedge shape is a lordotic shape which mimics the anatomy of the lumbar spine.

In order to facilitate insertion of implant 10, anterior side 26 transitions to superior and inferior surfaces 14, 16 with rounded edges 30. Rounded edges 30 enable implant 10 to slide between the end plates while minimizing the necessary distraction of the end plates.

Although implant 10 is typically a solid piece of allogenic bone, implant 10 can be provided with a hollow interior to form an interior space. This interior space can be filled with bone chips or any other osteoconductive material to further promote the formation of new bone.

FIG. 4 shows a top view of a second embodiment of an implant 40 according to the present invention. In general, most of the structure of implant 40 is like or comparable to the structure of implant 10. Accordingly, discussion of the like components is not believed necessary. The superior and inferior surfaces 14, 16 of implant 10 are flat planar surfaces. As seen best in FIG. 5, superior and inferior surfaces 14, 16 of implant 40 are curved surfaces which still retain the wedge-shaped profile. The curved surfaces of superior and inferior surfaces 14, 16 of implant 40 are a mirror-image of the topography of the vertebral end plates. Thus, the curved surfaces conform to the contours of the end plates.

FIG. 6 shows a top view of a third embodiment of an implant 50 according to the present invention. In general, most of the structure of implant 50 is like or comparable to the structure of implants 10, 40. Accordingly, discussion of the like components is not believed necessary. As best seen in FIG. 7, implant 50 comprises a top portion 52 joined to a bottom portion 54. As it may be difficult to obtain a single section of allogenic bone from which implant 50 is to be made, fabricating implant 50 in two pieces, i.e. top and bottom portions 52, 54, allows smaller sections of allogenic bone to be used. A top connecting surface 56 and a bottom connecting surface 58 define the interface between top and bottom portions 52, 54. As shown in FIGS. 8A and 8B, top and bottom surfaces 56, 58 have ridges 60 that mate with grooves 62 to interlock top and bottom portions 52, 54. Preferably, ridges 60 and grooves 62 are formed by milling top and bottom surfaces 56, 58 in a first direction and then milling a second time with top and bottom surfaces 56, 58 oriented 90° with respect to the first direction.

A pin 64 passing through aligned holes 66 in top and bottom portions 52, 54 serves to retain top and bottom portions 52, 54 together. Although pin 64 can be made of any biocompatible material, pin 64 is preferably made of allogenic bone. The number and orientation of pins 64 can be varied.

FIG. 11 shows an embodiment of an implant 80 which, like implant 50, is made in multiple pieces. In general, most of the structure of implant 80 is like or comparable to the structure of implants 10, 40, 50. Accordingly, discussion of the like components is not believed necessary. Implant 80 has a top portion 82, a middle portion 84, and a bottom portion 86. As was the case for implant 80, the surfaces between the portions are mating surfaces with interlocking surface features, such as ridges and grooves. One or more pins preferably hold top, middle, and bottom portions 82, 84, 86 together.

FIG. 9 shows a perspective view of a fourth embodiment of a first implant 70 according to the present invention. A second implant 70′, which is substantially similar to first implant 70, is also shown. In general, most of the structure of first and second implants 70, 70′ is like or comparable to the structure of implants 10, 40, 50. Accordingly, discussion of the like components is not believed necessary. First lateral sides 18 of first and second implants 70, 70′ are scalloped to have a C-shape. When first and second implants 70, 70′ are placed side by side with the first lateral sides 18 facing each other, a cylindrical space 72 is formed. When first and second implants 70, 70′ are implanted together, cylindrical space 72 can be filled with osteoconductive material to help promote the formation of new bone. First and second implants 70, 70′ can be provided with locking pins 74 which engage apertures 76 to maintain the spatial relationship between first and second implants 70, 70′.

The use of the implant according to the present invention will now be described with reference to FIGS. 12-14 and using posterior lumbar interbody fusion as an example. As the implant according to the present invention conforms in size and shape to a portion of end plates 100, preoperative planning is recommended for proper sizing. Determine the appropriate implant height by measuring adjacent intervertebral discs 102 on a lateral radiograph. The implant must be seated firmly with a tight fit between end plates 100 when the segment is fully distracted. The tallest possible implant should be used to maximize segmental stability. Due to variability in degrees of magnification from radiographs, the measurements are only an estimate.

With the patient in a prone position on a lumbar frame, radiographic equipment can assist in confirming the precise intraoperative position of the implant. The surgeon incises and dissects the skin from the midline laterally and locates spinous process 104, lamina 106, dura 108, and nerve roots of the appropriate level(s). As much as facets 110 as possible should be preserved to provide stability to the intervertebral segment. The surgeon performs a laminotomy to the medial aspect of facet 110 and reflects dura 108 to expose an approximately 13 mm window to the disc space. Disc 102 is removed through the window until only anterior 112 and lateral 114 annulus remain. The superficial layers of the entire cartilaginous end plates 100 are also removed to expose bleeding bone. Excessive removal of the subchondral bone may weaken the anterior column. Furthermore, if the entire end plate is removed, this may result in subsidence and a loss of segmental stability.

Distraction can be done with either a surgical distractor or a trial spacer implant. In the first method, the distractor blades are placed into the disc space lateral to dura 108. The curve on the neck of the distractor should be oriented toward the midline. The distractor blades should be completely inserted into the disc space so that the ridges at the end of the blades rest on vertebral body 116. Fluoroscopy can assist in confirming that the distractor blades are parallel to end plates 100. Correct placement will angle the handles of the distractor cranially, particularly at L5-S1. The handle of the distractor is squeezed to distract the innerspace. The distraction is secured by tightening the speed nut on the handle.

Using the preoperatively determined size, a trial spacer is inserted in the contralateral disc space with gentle impaction. Fluoroscopy and tactile judgement can assist in confirming the fit of the trial spacer until a secure fit is achieved. Using either the slots or threader hole on the implant, the selected implant is inserted in the contralateral disc space. Alternatively, the channels on the implant allow distraction and insertion to occur on the same side. Regardless of the side the implant is inserted in, autogenous cancellous bone or a bone substitute should be placed in the anterior and medial aspect of the vertebral disc space prior to placement of the second implant. The distractor is removed and a second implant of the same height as the first implant is inserted into the space, using gentle impaction as before. Preferably, the implants are recessed 2-4 mm beyond the posterior rim of the vertebral body.

As previously noted, the implant according to the present invention can be inserted using minimally invasive procedures. In some of these procedures, only one side of the spinal cord needs to be approached. This minimizes muscle stripping, scar tissue in the canal, and nerve root retraction and handling. In clinical situations in which bilateral implant placement is required, proper implantation on the side opposite the incision can be difficult. FIG. 15 shows a beveled spacer 120 that facilitates placement on the side contralateral to the incision. In general and unless otherwise described, most of the structure of beveled spacer 120 is like or comparable to the structure of implants 10, 40, 50, and 80. Accordingly, discussion of the like components is not believed necessary. First lateral side 18 transitions to superior and inferior surfaces 14, 16 with rounded edges 30. First lateral side 18 also transitions to anterior and posterior sides 26, 28 with rounded edges 30. Additionally, spacer 120 has no teeth. The lack of teeth and rounded edges 30 enable spacer 120 to slide between the end plate and across the evacuated disc space (from one lateral annulus to the other) to the contralateral side. As first lateral side 18 is the side that must promote movement of spacer 120, the use of rounded edges 30 on second lateral side 22 is optionally. Once spacer 120 has been placed on the side contralateral to the single incision using a surgical instrument to push spacer 120, bone graft on other osteoconductive material is packed in the disc space. Finally, an implant (any of implant 10, 40, 50, 70, or 70′ can be used) is implanted in the side proximal to the incision.

While it is apparent that the illustrative embodiments of the invention herein disclosed fulfill the objectives stated above, it will be appreciated that numerous modifications and other embodiments may be devised by those skilled in the art. Therefore, it will be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and embodiments which come within the spirit and scope of the present invention.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US384860114 Jun 197219 Nov 1974G MaMethod for interbody fusion of the spine
US405911514 Jun 197622 Nov 1977Georgy Stepanovich JumashevSurgical instrument for operation of anterior fenestrated spondylodessis in vertebral osteochondrosis
US4627853 *29 May 19859 Dec 1986American Hospital Supply CorporationMethod of producing prostheses for replacement of articular cartilage and prostheses so produced
US4678470 *29 May 19857 Jul 1987American Hospital Supply CorporationBone tanned with glutaraldehyde
US478172119 May 19861 Nov 1988S+G ImplantsBone-graft material and method of manufacture
US483475728 Mar 198830 May 1989Brantigan John WProsthetic implant
US48586036 Jun 198822 Aug 1989Johnson & Johnson Orthopaedics, Inc.Bone pin
US487702024 May 198831 Oct 1989Vich Jose M OApparatus for bone graft
US493297321 Apr 198812 Jun 1990El GendlerCartilage and bone induction by artificially perforated organic bone matrix
US493684822 Sep 198926 Jun 1990Bagby George WImplant for vertebrae
US4950296 *13 Jun 198921 Aug 1990Mcintyre Jonathan LBone grafting units
US496174017 Oct 19889 Oct 1990Surgical Dynamics, Inc.V-thread fusion cage and method of fusing a bone joint
US50263736 Nov 198925 Jun 1991Surgical Dynamics, Inc.Surgical method and apparatus for fusing adjacent bone structures
US5053049 *29 May 19851 Oct 1991Baxter InternationalFlexible prostheses of predetermined shapes and process for making same
US506285016 Jan 19905 Nov 1991University Of FloridaAxially-fixed vertebral body prosthesis and method of fixation
US5092893 *4 Sep 19903 Mar 1992Smith Thomas EHuman orthopedic vertebra implant
US511235416 Nov 198912 May 1992Northwestern UniversityTexturing, demineralizing in protease inhibitor
US514151029 May 198925 Aug 1992Shigehide TakagiSintered calcium phosphate having spherical pores with hollow connecting tubes to allow for blood flow which promotes strong bonding to tissues
US519232722 Mar 19919 Mar 1993Brantigan John WSurgical prosthetic implant for vertebrae
US5275954 *5 Mar 19914 Jan 1994LifenetProcess for demineralization of bone using column extraction
US529825417 Dec 199129 Mar 1994Osteotech, Inc.Shaped, swollen demineralized bone and its use in bone repair
US5306303 *19 Nov 199126 Apr 1994The Medical College Of Wisconsin, Inc.Implanting a ceramic and leaving in place until new bone growth is induced
US5306308 *23 Oct 199026 Apr 1994Ulrich GrossIntervertebral implant
US5306309 *4 May 199226 Apr 1994Calcitek, Inc.Spinal disk implant and implantation kit
US532064430 Jul 199214 Jun 1994Sulzer Brothers LimitedIntervertebral disk prosthesis
US540126910 Mar 199328 Mar 1995Waldemar Link Gmbh & Co.Intervertebral disc endoprosthesis
US540539116 Feb 199311 Apr 1995Hednerson; Fraser C.Fusion stabilization chamber
US5425772 *20 Sep 199320 Jun 1995Brantigan; John W.Prosthetic implant for intervertebral spinal fusion
US543968421 Jan 19948 Aug 1995Osteotech, Inc.Shaped, swollen demineralized bone and its use in bone repair
US5443514 *1 Oct 199322 Aug 1995Acromed CorporationMethod for using spinal implants
US54586386 Nov 199217 Oct 1995Spine-Tech, Inc.Non-threaded spinal implant
US548443710 Jun 199316 Jan 1996Michelson; Gary K.Apparatus and method of inserting spinal implants
US54893071 Sep 19946 Feb 1996Spine-Tech, Inc.Spinal stabilization surgical method
US54893081 Sep 19946 Feb 1996Spine-Tech, Inc.For insertion into a bone
US5514180 *14 Jan 19947 May 1996Heggeness; Michael H.Prosthetic intervertebral devices
US55228997 Jun 19954 Jun 1996Sofamor Danek Properties, Inc.Artificial spinal fusion implants
US5534030 *25 Apr 19949 Jul 1996Acromed CorporationTo replace a damaged spinal disc
US555419123 Jan 199510 Sep 1996BiomatIntersomatic vertebral cage
US5556379 *27 Feb 199517 Sep 1996Lifenet Research FoundationProcess for cleaning large bone grafts and bone grafts produced thereby
US557119011 Aug 19945 Nov 1996Heinrich UlrichImplant for the replacement of vertebrae and/or stabilization and fixing of the spinal column
US55711923 Jul 19955 Nov 1996Heinrich UlrichProsthetic vertebral implant
US559123515 Mar 19957 Jan 1997Kuslich; Stephen D.Spinal fixation device
US559340917 Feb 199514 Jan 1997Sofamor Danek Group, Inc.Interbody spinal fusion implants
US56096357 Jun 199511 Mar 1997Michelson; Gary K.Lordotic interbody spinal fusion implants
US560963611 Jan 199611 Mar 1997Spine-Tech, Inc.Spinal implant
US5609637 *17 Apr 199611 Mar 1997Biedermann; LutzSpace keeper, in particular for an intervertebral disk
US564559815 Apr 19968 Jul 1997Smith & Nephew, Inc.Spinal fusion device with porous material
US5658337 *17 Apr 199619 Aug 1997Spine-Tech, Inc.Intervertebral fusion implant
US568339429 Sep 19954 Nov 1997Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Fusion mass constrainer
US568346327 Jul 19944 Nov 1997Advanced Technical FabricationIntersomatic vertebral column implant
US5683464 *7 Jun 19954 Nov 1997Sulzer Calcitek Inc.Spinal disk implantation kit
US5702449 *7 Jun 199530 Dec 1997Danek Medical, Inc.Reinforced porous spinal implants
US5702455 *3 Jul 199630 Dec 1997Saggar; RahulExpandable prosthesis for spinal fusion
US570968319 Dec 199520 Jan 1998Spine-Tech, Inc.Interbody bone implant having conjoining stabilization features for bony fusion
US5716415 *8 Mar 199610 Feb 1998Acromed CorporationSpinal implant
US5722977 *24 Jan 19963 Mar 1998Danek Medical, Inc.Method and means for anterior lumbar exact cut with quadrilateral osteotome and precision guide/spacer
US5725579 *6 Dec 199510 Mar 1998BiolandProcess for treating bone tissue and corresponding implantable biomaterials
US5728159 *2 Jan 199717 Mar 1998Musculoskeletal Transplant FoundationSerrated bone graft
US5741253 *29 Oct 199221 Apr 1998Michelson; Gary KarlinMethod for inserting spinal implants
US576625224 Jan 199516 Jun 1998Osteonics Corp.Interbody spinal prosthetic implant and method
US5766253 *16 Jan 199616 Jun 1998Surgical Dynamics, Inc.Implant for insertion into a bore
US5776199 *2 May 19977 Jul 1998Sofamor Danek PropertiesArtificial spinal fusion implants
US578283010 Jul 199621 Jul 1998Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Implant insertion device
US5785710 *7 Jun 199528 Jul 1998Sofamor Danek Group, Inc.Interbody spinal fusion implants
US5797871 *7 May 199625 Aug 1998Lifenet Research FoundationUltrasonic cleaning of allograft bone
US579809612 Aug 199425 Aug 1998Maloe Vnedrencheskoe Predpriyatie "Interfall"Biocompatible hydrogel
US5814084 *16 Jan 199629 Sep 1998University Of Florida Tissue Bank, Inc.Diaphysial cortical dowel
US5820581 *21 Mar 199613 Oct 1998Lifenet Research FoundationRemoving the bone marrow by applying vacuum to draw a detergent solution through bone cavity to dissolve the bone marrow and discharging it for preventing potential virus transmission
US5865845 *5 Mar 19962 Feb 1999Thalgott; John S.Prosthetic intervertebral disc
US5865848 *12 Sep 19972 Feb 1999Artifex, Ltd.Dynamic intervertebral spacer and method of use
US588529914 Mar 199623 Mar 1999Surgical Dynamics, Inc.Apparatus and method for implant insertion
US5888222 *9 Oct 199730 Mar 1999Sdgi Holding, Inc.Intervertebral spacers
US58882245 Sep 199730 Mar 1999Synthesis (U.S.A.)Implant for intervertebral space
US5888227 *3 Oct 199630 Mar 1999Synthes (U.S.A.)Inter-vertebral implant
US58954266 Sep 199620 Apr 1999Osteotech, Inc.Fusion implant device and method of use
US5897593 *29 Jul 199727 Apr 1999Sulzer Spine-Tech Inc.Lordotic spinal implant
US5899939 *21 Jan 19984 May 1999Osteotech, Inc.Bone-derived implant for load-supporting applications
US5899941 *9 Dec 19974 May 1999Chubu Bearing Kabushiki KaishaArtificial intervertebral disk
US590471924 Jul 199718 May 1999Techsys Medical, LlcInterbody fusion device having partial circular section cross-sectional segments
US591031518 Jul 19978 Jun 1999Stevenson; SharonAllograft tissue material for filling spinal fusion cages or related surgical spaces
US596809822 Oct 199619 Oct 1999Surgical Dynamics, Inc.Apparatus for fusing adjacent bone structures
US5972368 *11 Jun 199726 Oct 1999Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Bone graft composites and spacers
US59761876 Oct 19972 Nov 1999Spinal Innovations, L.L.C.Fusion implant
US598492216 Dec 199616 Nov 1999Mckay; Douglas WilliamSpinal fixation device and method
US598496719 Feb 199616 Nov 1999Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Osteogenic fusion devices
US59892899 Oct 199723 Nov 1999Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Bone grafts
US600843323 Apr 199828 Dec 1999Stone; Kevin R.Osteotomy wedge device, kit and methods for realignment of a varus angulated knee
US6025538 *20 Nov 199815 Feb 2000Musculoskeletal Transplant FoundationCompound bone structure fabricated from allograft tissue
US6033438 *3 Jun 19977 Mar 2000Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Open intervertebral spacer
US603976211 Jun 199721 Mar 2000Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Reinforced bone graft substitutes
US6045579 *1 May 19974 Apr 2000Spinal Concepts, Inc.Adjustable height fusion device
US60455809 Oct 19984 Apr 2000Osteotech, Inc.Fusion implant device and method of use
US605979016 Jul 19989 May 2000Sulzer Spine-Tech Inc.Apparatus and method for spinal stabilization
US6080158 *23 Aug 199927 Jun 2000Lin; Chih-IIntervertebral fusion device
US6080193 *15 Sep 199827 Jun 2000Spinal Concepts, Inc.Adjustable height fusion device
US609099827 Oct 199718 Jul 2000University Of FloridaSegmentally demineralized bone implant
US6096080 *10 Feb 19991 Aug 2000Cortek, Inc.Apparatus for spinal fusion using implanted devices
US609608116 Jan 19971 Aug 2000University Of Florida Tissue Bank, Inc.Diaphysial cortical dowel
US61111642 Jan 199729 Aug 2000Musculoskeletal Transplant FoundationBone graft insert
US614303323 Dec 19987 Nov 2000Synthes (Usa)Allogenic intervertebral implant
US618732923 Dec 199713 Feb 2001Board Of Regents Of The University Of Texas SystemVariable permeability bone implants, methods for their preparation and use
US62003473 Aug 199913 Mar 2001LifenetComposite bone graft, method of making and using same
US62069238 Jan 199927 Mar 2001Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Flexible implant using partially demineralized bone
US62417696 May 19985 Jun 2001Cortek, Inc.Implant for spinal fusion
US624510831 Jan 200012 Jun 2001SpinecoSpinal fusion implant
US625812530 Jul 199910 Jul 2001Synthes (U.S.A.)Intervertebral allograft spacer
US626158631 Aug 199917 Jul 2001Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Synergistic mixture of deactivated bone and bone stimulant
US62705286 Aug 19997 Aug 2001Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Composited intervertebral bone spacers
US62771498 Jun 199921 Aug 2001Osteotech, Inc.Ramp-shaped intervertebral implant
US637198818 Jan 200016 Apr 2002Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Bone grafts
US65115097 May 199828 Jan 2003LifenetTextured bone allograft, method of making and using same
US200100011295 Dec 200010 May 2001Mckay William F.Osteogenic fusion device
US200100100212 Feb 200126 Jul 2001Boyd Lawrence M.Flexible implant using partially demineralized bone
US2001001483116 Mar 200116 Aug 2001Scarborough Nelson L.Bone graft, method of making bone graft and guided bone regeneration method
US200100167758 Jun 199923 Aug 2001Nelson ScarboroughIntervertebral implant
US2001001677725 Apr 200123 Aug 2001SpinecoSpinal fusion implant
US200200914475 Nov 200111 Jul 2002Osteotech, Inc.Spinal intervertebral implant and method of making
US2002010639327 Aug 20018 Aug 2002Bianchi John R.Assembled implant, including mixed-composition segment
US200201075708 Dec 20008 Aug 2002Sybert Daryl R.Biocompatible osteogenic band for repair of spinal disorders
DE2910627A117 Mar 197925 Sep 1980Schuett & Grundei SanitaetImplantat als ersatz fuer spongioes aufgebaute knochen
DE4242889A118 Dec 199223 Jun 1994Merck Patent GmbhHohlendoprothesen mit Knochenwachstumsfördernder Füllung
DE4423257A12 Jul 19944 Jan 1996Ulrich HeinrichImplantat zum Einsetzen zwischen Wirbelkörper der Wirbelsäule als Platzhalter
DE29913200U128 Jul 199923 Sep 1999Tutogen Medical GmbhImplantat aus Knochenmaterial
EP0505634A126 Apr 199130 Sep 1992Kyocera CorporationA prosthesis
EP0517030A219 May 19929 Dec 1992MAN Ceramics GmbHVertebral implant
EP0538183A1 *31 Jul 199221 Apr 1993SULZER Medizinaltechnik AGProsthetic intervertebral disc
EP0577178A118 Jun 19935 Jan 1994ESKA Implants GmbH & Co.An implant having an open-cell or open-pore metal structure
EP0639351A217 Jun 199422 Feb 1995ULRICH, HeinrichImplant for the replacement of a vertebra and/or stabilisation and fixation of the spinal column
EP0646366A1 *4 Oct 19945 Apr 1995Acromed CorporationSpinal implant
EP0966930A123 Jun 199929 Dec 1999Biomet Merck LimitedVertebral body replacement
FR2552659A3 Title not available
FR2717068A1 * Title not available
JPH0614947A Title not available
WO1994026213A1 *9 Mar 199424 Nov 1994Franz BobstVertebral body implant
WO1995008964A2 *7 Sep 19946 Apr 1995John W BrantiganProsthetic implant for intervertebral spinal fusion
WO1995015133A1 *2 Dec 19948 Jun 1995Calcitek IncSpinal disk implant and kit
WO1996011642A117 Oct 199525 Apr 1996Raymedica IncProsthetic spinal disc nucleus
WO1996039988A26 Jun 199619 Dec 1996Michelson Gary KTranslateral spinal implant
WO1997014378A2 *8 Oct 199624 Apr 1997Danek Medical IncIntervertebral spacers
WO1997015248A1 *3 Oct 19961 May 1997William CottleInter-vertebral implant
WO1997025945A1 *16 Jan 199724 Jul 1997Univ Florida Tissue Bank IncDiaphysial cortical dowel
WO1997032547A1 *5 Mar 199712 Sep 1997John S ThalgottProsthetic intervertebral disc
WO1998017209A2 *21 Oct 199730 Apr 1998Sdgi Holdings IncSpinal spacer
WO1998055052A1 *3 Jun 199810 Dec 1998Sdgi Holdings IncOpen intervertebral spacer
WO1998056319A1 *11 Jun 199817 Dec 1998Sdgi Holdings IncReinforced bone graft sustitutes
WO1998056433A1 *11 Jun 199817 Dec 1998Sdgi Holdings IncBone graft composites and spacers
WO1999009914A1 *27 Aug 19984 Mar 1999Kevin C CarterCortical bone cervical smith-robinson fusion implant
WO1999013806A1 *10 Sep 199825 Mar 1999Bhc Engineering L PDynamic intervertebral spacer
WO1999029271A110 Dec 199817 Jun 1999Sdgi Holdings IncOsteogenic fusion device
WO1999032055A123 Dec 19981 Jul 1999Depuy Acromed IncSpacer assembly for use in spinal surgeries
WO1999038461A222 Jan 19995 Aug 1999Synthes AgAllogenic intervertebral implant
WO2000007527A130 Jul 199917 Feb 2000Synthes AgIntervertebral allograft spacer
WO2000007528A16 Aug 199917 Feb 2000William F MckayComposited intervertebral bone spacers
WO2000030568A119 Nov 19992 Jun 2000Musculoskeletal TransplantCompound bone structure fabricated from allograft tissue
WO2000040177A118 Dec 199913 Jul 2000LifenetComposite bone graft, method of making and using same
WO2000040179A15 Jan 200013 Jul 2000Sdgi Holdings IncFlexible implant using partially demineralized bone
WO2000041654A211 Jan 200020 Jul 2000Lawrence M BoydTruncated open intervertebral spacers
WO2000042954A224 Jan 200027 Jul 2000Osteotech IncIntervertebral implant
WO2000059412A14 Apr 200012 Oct 2000Raymedica IncProsthetic spinal disc nucleus having a shape change characteristic
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1Fred H. Albee, "Bone Surgery With Machine Tools," Scientific American, Apr. 1936, pp. 178-181.
2Fred H. Albee, Bone Graft Surgery in Disease, Injury and Deformity, D. Appleton-Century Company, Inc., New York, 1940, pp. 22, 30, 114, 151, 155, 164, 212, 256-257, 311-313.
3Fred H. Albee, Bone-Graft Surgery, W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1915, pp. 145, 165-166, 171, 368-369.
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US790145816 Dec 20058 Mar 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Intervertebral spacer and insertion tool
US8128700 *12 Sep 20076 Mar 2012Synthes Usa, LlcAllograft intervertebral implant and method of manufacturing the same
US84092902 Apr 20102 Apr 2013Seaspine, Inc.Interbody device for spinal applications
US846038927 Jan 201211 Jun 2013DePuy Synthes Products, LLCAllograft intervertebral implant and method of manufacturing the same
US85799802 Oct 201212 Nov 2013DePuy Synthes Products, LLCAllograft intervertebral implant and method of manufacturing the same
Classifications
U.S. Classification623/17.11, 623/23.63, 623/925
International ClassificationA61F2/00, B29C43/00, A61F2/28, A61F2/30, B29C33/26, A61F2/46, A61F2/44, A61F2/02
Cooperative ClassificationA61F2002/30909, A61F2310/00011, A61F2002/3082, A61F2/30942, A61F2230/0015, A61F2220/005, A61F2002/30714, A61F2/4611, A61F2/3094, A61F2002/30057, A61F2002/30472, A61F2002/30382, A61F2250/0063, A61F2002/30434, A61F2/447, A61F2002/30787, A61F2002/30957, A61F2002/4475, A61F2220/0041, A61F2002/30387, A61F2002/30599, A61F2230/0008, A61F2310/00353, A61F2002/30593, A61F2002/3024, A61F2002/3028, A61F2250/0036, A61F2002/30604, A61F2002/30011, A61F2002/30971, A61F2002/30329, A61F2230/0069, A61F2002/4635, A61F2220/0033, A61F2002/3051, A61F2002/30354, A61F2002/30133, A61F2002/30492, B29C43/006, A61F2002/30477, A61F2002/30481, A61F2002/30383, A61F2002/30153, A61F2002/30843, A61F2002/30075, A61F2230/0063, A61F2/30724, A61F2002/30112, A61F2220/0075, A61F2002/30126, A61F2002/30462, A61F2002/30327, A61F2002/30441, A61F2002/30494, A61F2002/2835, A61F2002/30841, A61F2002/30062, A61F2/4644, A61F2/4465, A61F2250/0089, A61F2002/30892, A61F2/30965, A61F2002/30616, A61F2002/30904, A61F2002/4649, A61F2002/30433, A61F2002/30377, A61F2002/30448, A61F2002/30436, A61F2/4455, A61F2250/0023, A61F2002/30158, A61F2002/30233, A61F2002/30894, A61F2002/30733, A61F2230/0026, A61F2002/30459, A61F2002/2839, A61F2002/30782, A61F2002/3038, A61F2220/0025, A61F2002/30828, A61F2002/2817, B29L2031/3041, A61F2002/30331, A61F2/28, A61F2230/0065, A61F2210/0004, A61F2230/0019, A61F2002/30515, A61F2002/30324, A61F2002/30785, A61F2002/30772, A61F2002/30507, A61F2310/00293, A61F2002/30617, A61F2002/30774, A61F2/442, A61F2002/30238, A61F2002/30975, B29C33/26, A61F2310/00179, A61F2210/0061, A61F2002/30228, A61F2230/0004, A61F2220/0066, A61F2250/0039, A61F2/30744, A61F2250/0097, A61F2002/302
European ClassificationA61F2/30M2, A61F2/28, A61F2/44F, B29C43/00C, A61F2/44F6, A61F2/44F4
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
12 Dec 2012FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 12
12 Jun 2009ASAssignment
Owner name: SYNTHES USA, LLC, PENNSYLVANIA
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:SYNTHES (U.S.A.);REEL/FRAME:022826/0140
Effective date: 20081223