|Publication number||USRE36568 E|
|Application number||US 08/920,112|
|Publication date||15 Feb 2000|
|Filing date||26 Aug 1997|
|Priority date||29 Dec 1993|
|Also published as||US5446359|
|Publication number||08920112, 920112, US RE36568 E, US RE36568E, US-E-RE36568, USRE36568 E, USRE36568E|
|Inventors||Gary E. Horst|
|Original Assignee||Emerson Electric Co.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (52), Non-Patent Citations (29), Referenced by (14), Classifications (7), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a Reissue application of U.S. Pat. No. 5,446,359, issued on Aug. 29, 1995 from the application Ser. No. 08/175,268, filed Dec. 29, 1993. .Iaddend.
This invention relates to switched reluctance (SRM) motors and, more particularly, to a current decay control circuit for such motors.
Switched reluctance, or SRM motors are well-known in the art. One problem with operating these motors is noise caused by the recovery of current in the motor phase windings as each phase is switched at the end of its cycle. It will be understood that the current representing the energy input of a particular phase is supplied to the phase windings during that phase's active portion of a switching cycle. As the motor is switched from one phase to another, the residual energy in the deactivated winding decays off. This energy typically represents approximately thirty percent (30% ) of the energy supplied to the phase winding during its active period and is referred to as the "tail decay energy". Since the phase winding is an inductive element, it attempts to maintain the current flow through the winding; even though the energy must be substantially dissipated before the winding is re-energized during the next phase cycle. Accordingly, the decay must be a rapid decay. One effect of this energy reduction is the ringing effect which is caused at the transition between the active and inactive portions of the phase current curve. This can be seen as the abrupt transition in slope in the current curve between the shallow slope representing the active portion of the cycle and the steep slope where the current is driving to zero when the phase becomes inactive. The result of this ringing or transfer of forces into the motor frame causes noise, and this noise is on the order of 50 dBa.
Commutation circuits are used to control switching between motor phases as a function of various motor operating parameters. Such circuits typically employ a pulse width modulator (PWM). PWM circuits, in addition to controlling the application of voltage to the motor phases can also be used to control the residual current decay. These circuits operate to control this decay in accordance with a defined algorithm. However, it is a drawback of these decay control circuits that they use a conventional 100% forced commutation decay; and, as such, they tend to aggravate the noise problem. One attempt at decay is suggested by C. Y. Wu and C. Pollock in their paper Analysis and Reduction of Vibration and Acoustic Noise in the Switched Reluctance Drive; (IEEE Proceedings, Industrial applications Section, 28th, Annual Meeting, October 1993). The approach described in this paper involves a zero voltage decay of the current in a phase winding, when the phase is switched "off", over a period equal to one-half the resonant time period of the motor, and with a subsequent forced commutation of the remainder of the "off" time. The drawback with this approach is that there is but one decay interval divided into two segments. As a result, the degree of control over the slope of the curve as the current is driven to zero is not as flexible in significantly reducing the noise.
While the above approach may be effective, there are nonetheless other approaches which may be more effective to facilitate tail decay while reducing noise.
Among the several objects of the present invention may be noted the provision of a control circuit for controlling the residual or tail current decay in a motor winding; the provision of such a control circuit which controls tail current decay so as to lessen motor noise at least 10 dBA from current noise levels; the provision of such a control circuit which integrates both hard chopping and soft chopping current decay control techniques; the provision of such a current control circuit which provides both types of chopping using but a single gate drive; the provision of such a control circuit which is usable with both 2-phase and 3-phase SRM's such as a 12-6, 2-phase SRM and a 6-4, 3-phase SRM; the provision of such a control circuit which is readily incorporated into a PWM type controller for controlling overall average voltage applied to the respective phases of a SRM; the provision of such a control circuit which reverses the pulse width characteristics of a PWM signal used to control current flow when a winding phase is inactive thereby to help slow the rate at which current goes to zero while the phase is inactive; the provision of such a control circuit employing two sets of switches one set of which is either activated or deactivated as the motor phases are switched and the other set of which is modulated by PWM signals; the provision of such a control circuit to control both the frequency and/or duty cycle of PWM signals when a phase is switched from active to inactive thereby to better control the slope of the curve of the decay current; the provision of such a control circuit which controls switching of the winding between energy recovery and energy dissipation circuits to drive the residual current to zero; the provision of such tail current control circuit which is additionally effective to help reduce noise in SRM's operating at low speed/high torque conditions where normalized ovalizing forces which also produce noise in SRM's are lower than at high speed/low torque motor operating conditions; the provision of such a control circuit to employ a microprocessor which can produce a wide range of decay schedules based upon particular motor conditions; the provision of such a control circuit which can operate at frequencies at least twice the resonant frequency of the motor; and, the provision of such a control circuit which is a low cost, reliable circuit which functions to reduce noise throughout the range of SRM operation.
In accordance with the invention, generally stated, a control circuit is used for controlling residual or tail current decay in a single or polyphase SRM. A Hall-effect type magnetic sensor senses rotor position of the SRM. Current flows through the winding when the motor phase represented by the winding is active; and, current flow into the winding ceases when the phase becomes inactive. Semiconductor switches direct current flow into the winding when the phase is active and also help recover or dissipate residual energy in the winding when the phase becomes inactive. This is accomplished by switching the winding between an energy recovery circuit and an energy dissipation circuit in a defined manner. A PWM signal generator provides PWM operating signals to the switches to control current flow into the winding and its subsequent recovery or dissipation. A PWM control module, or microprocessor with PWM output, is responsive to the Hall sensor for controlling operation of the PWM signal generator. As a result, the signal generator provides PWM signals having signal characteristics which differ between when there is current flow to the winding and when there is not. The frequency and duty cycle of the PWM signals when the phase is inactive are variable to control the slope of current decay and reduce motor noise. Other objects and features will be in part apparent and in part pointed out hereinafter.
FIG. 1 is a graph depicting the current waveform in one phase of a SRM and illustrates tail current decay in the current waveform;
FIGS. 2A and 2B are graphs of SRM phase current and voltage waveforms respectively and illustrate a soft chopping operation of a current controller for the SRM;
FIGS. 3A and 3B are graphs similar to FIGS. 2A and 2B but for hard chopping operation of the current controller;
FIGS. 4A-4C illustrate a gate signal used for soft chopping during the power "on" portion of a SRM phase (FIG. 4A), as well a simplified schematic of the circuit for both the power "on" (FIG. 4B), and power "off" or current decay portions (FIG. 4C) of the phase;
FIGS. 5A-5C represent an inverted gate signal used during the phase "off" mode of motor operation (FIG. 5A) and simplified schematics of soft chop (FIG. 5B) and hard chop (FIG. 5C) circuits for current decay;
FIG. 6 is a schematic of a first embodiment of a tail current decay control circuit of the present invention;
FIG. 7A is a schematic of a portion of the signal generating modules for producing operating signals used to provide hard and soft chopping of the tail current;
FIG. 7B represents a microprocessor with PWM output capability for producing operating signals used to provide the hard and soft chopping;
FIG. 8 is a graph similar to FIG. 1 and represents a prior art tail current decay scheme;
FIG. 9A is another graph similar to FIG. 1 and represents the tail current decay scheme as implemented by the present invention, and FIG. 9B represents an enlarged portion of the tail current decay;
FIG. 10 is a graph illustrating the reduction in motor ringing achievable with the present invention; and,
FIGS. 11A-11D represent various PWM frequency and duty cycle combinations by which current decay is controlled.
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the drawings.
Referring to the drawings, a switched reluctance motor (not shown) is a motor having 1,2,3,4, or 5 phases and is typically a multiple pole motor. Examples of such motors are a 12-6, 2-phase motor, or a 6-4, 3-phase motor. In operation, each respective phase is energized and de-energized in a sequential manner. The length of time each phase is active is based on various operating parameters and various control schemes have been implemented to determine when switching should occur from one phase to the next. During the interval a phase is active a phase winding W of that phase is supplied current. An idealized current profile for the winding is shown in FIG. 1. As depicted in the graph, power to the phase (current to the winding) commences at time T0. Current is then applied to winding W until a time T1 at which time the particular phase is deactivated or de-energized. As indicated in FIG. 1, there is a significant amount of energy in winding W at this time, and this residual energy must now be recovered or dissipated prior to the phase being reactivated. The current flow which occurs through the phase at this time is a zero volt, tail current decay flow of current and the current flow takes place during the interval from T1 -T2.
As shown in FIG. 1, when current input into the phase stops at time T1, the slope of the curve is relatively shallow. However, the slope of the curve as the tail current is driven to zero is very steep. It is known that as the rotor teeth of a motor sweep past the motor's stator teeth, a deflection is caused by the ovalizing forces generated within the motor. When this deflection is accompanied by the abrupt transition in energy which occurs at time T1, the result is a pronounced ringing which is shown by the solid line curve in FIG. 10. This ringing produces noise. There are two ways of reducing the residual or tail current to zero. One such way is to reduce the current gradually; i.e., try to create a shallow slope of the curve from T1 to T2. The other way is to drive the current down abruptly; i.e., to effect a steep curve. The first technique is referred to as soft chopping and the latter as hard chopping. The problem with using soft chopping exclusively is that although it results in less noise, it takes too long. Residual current cannot reach zero before time T2. The problem with hard chopping is that although current is driven to zero by time T2, this approach creates the ringing referred to above.
In FIG. 2A, a current waveform similar to that shown in FIG. 1, shows current chopped in accordance with the "soft" chopping technique. That is, a pulse width modulated signal having an amplitude range of 0 v.-+Vv. is applied to the phase current. It will be noted that a ripple is produced on the current even during the active portion of the phase. Again, a drawback with this approach is the very slow rate at which current is driven to zero.
In FIGS. 3A and 3B, the approach known as "hard" chopping is represented. As shown in FIG. 3B, hard chopping differs from soft chopping in that the pulse width modulated signal has an amplitude ranging from -Vv.-+Vv. Application of this signal to the phase has the effect of driving the current toward zero faster than is possible with the soft chopping signal approach. However, a greater ripple is imposed on the current supplied to the phase winding even during the active portion of the phase; and, the forces produced by this increased down driving of the current increases motor noise.
A third approach is shown in FIG. 8 and reflects the approach by Messers Wu and Pollock in their paper referred to above. As before, current is applied to a phase winding W from time T0 -T1. From time T1 to a time Tx, current is allowed to zero volt decay (i.e., there is no signal applied to the phase to drive the current toward zero) which corresponds to soft chopping. From time Tx to time T2, a forced commutation signal is applied to the phase to complete driving the current to zero. This corresponds to hard chopping. The interval from T1 -Tx is a period equal to one-half the resonant time period of the motor. The effect of this approach is to make the slope of the curve from time T1 -Tx shallower than would occur if the current were merely hard chopped to zero. This has the effect of reducing the ringing. After this initial period, the current is hard driven to zero. However, because some of the energy in the phase is dissipated by the time hard driving occurs, the noise produced by the ringing is less pronounced. While beneficial, this approach is limited because there is only one soft driving and one hard driving period within the interval T1 -T2. This limits the degree of control which could be effected to further reduce ringing and noise.
A circuit of the present invention for controlling residual or tail current decay in a phase winding W of a polyphase SRM is indicated generally 10 in FIG. 6. It will be understood that while the following description relates to tail current decay control for one motor phase, circuit 10 is operable with respect to all motor phases. As described, current and voltage are applied to the phase winding during each interval when the phase is active, the voltage and current being cut-off from the phase winding when the phase becomes inactive. The remaining energy in the phase winding is then recovered or dissipated depending upon a circuit configuration in which the winding is connected. A first circuit configuration includes the bus capacitor C, which is connected to phase winding W when the phase is inactive, to recover energy from the phase winding. The capacitor is connected in parallel with a series connected resistor and capacitor R1 and C2. These circuit elements are also parallel connected with a resistor R2. Resistor R1 is, for example, a 10 ohm resistor, resistor R2 a 100K ohm resistor, and capacitor C2 a 0.22 microfarad capacitor. Resistor R2 is used to trickle down energy in the capacitor C when the drive is off. Resistor R1 and capacitor C2 form a high frequency filter against voltage spikes which otherwise cause noise in the circuit.
In FIG. 6, winding W is shown connected between rails L1 and L2 via diodes D1 and D2. The diodes and winding form a forced commutation or energy dissipation loop when switches of a switch means 16 are open. Lines L1 and L2 are connected across the output of a full-wave bridge rectifier 12 which is used to rectify the 115VAC input to the motor. The bridge output and bus capacitor are commonly connected at respective nodes 14a and 14b.
To further help in understanding tail current decay, FIG. 4A illustrates a PWM gate signal in which the "on" interval of the signal is substantially less than the "off" portion of the signal. During the "on" portion, a d.c. voltage is applied to the phase winding W (see FIG. 4B). During the "off" portion of the signal, no voltage is applied to the winding. Rather, during this interval, the winding is connected in a closed-loop circuit with a diode D1 (see FIG. 4C) to produce a zero voltage current decay of the current impressed across the winding. In FIG. 5A, the signal used to produce tail current decay in the phase is also a PWM signal. Now, the "on" interval of the pulse is longer than the "off" interval. During the longer "on" interval, a switch S1 is closed to allow the winding W current to circulate through diode D1. During the "off" interval of each pulse, respective switches S1 and S2 on opposite sides of the winding are open. The winding is now connected through two diodes D1 and D2 to a bus capacitor C which is associated with the upper rail of the power input to the motor. Capacitor C is a storage capacitor which is charged with the tail decay current. With respect to FIGS. 5B and 5C, FIG. 5B represents a soft chopping circuit configuration, and FIG. 5C a hard chopping circuit configuration.
Next, circuit 10 includes the switch means 16 for connecting phase winding W into a circuit including capacitor C when the phase becomes inactive. Switch means 16 includes respective first and second sets 18, 20 of switches with set 18 of switches being connected on one side of the phase winding and the set 20 of switches on the other side thereof. Both sets of switches are comprised of two semiconductor switches which are shown in FIG. 6 to be MOSFET's 22. It will be understood that other semiconductor switches could also be used without departing from the scope of the invention. In each set of switches, the pair of switches is connected in parallel, this being done to increase switching capability. Also, each MOSFET has a gate circuit which includes a resistor R3 connected in parallel with a diode D3. Each resistor R3 is, for example, a 100 ohm resistor. The input side of each pair of gate input elements is connected together at respective nodes 24a, 24b. As is described hereinafter, input signals to each set of switches is supplied through modes 24a, 24b.
A sensing means 28 is provided for sensing the motor's rotor position. Means 28 includes a Hall effect sensor 30 which operates in the conventional manner. Each set of switches has an associated power supply 32, 34. Hall effect sensor 30 is connected to the power supply 34 which is associated with set 20 of switches. Both power supplies are similar in configuration. Each power supply includes a step down transformer 36 one side of which is connected to the 115 VAC input power. Rectifying diodes D4 are connected across the output side of the transformer and are commonly connected at respective nodes 38a, 38b. The transformed, rectified input voltage is then impressed across a zener diode Z1 through a resistor R4. The zener diode clamps to the input voltage to the sets of switches to 18 V., for example. A filter capacitor C3 is connected in parallel across each zener diode. The resultant voltage output of power supply 32 is connected to the gate-source portion of the respective MOSFET's 22 of switch set 18, one side of capacitor C3 being connected to node 24a on the gate input side of the set through a resistor R5. One side of capacitor C3 of power supply 34 is connected to an integrated circuit (IC) 40 of a control means 42 which controls routing of operating signals which are generated as described hereinafter. The other side of this second capacitor C3 is connected to the node 24b of switch set 20 again through a resistor R5.
Referring to FIGS. 6 and 7A, a signal generating means 44 provides operating signals to switch means 16 to switch phase winding W into the circuit including bus capacitor C. As shown in FIG. 7A, means 44 includes two interconnected model number 555, IC timing chips 46a, 46b. Means 44 is connected across nodes 48, 50 of power supply 34 to provide power to the chips. Chip 46a has pins 1 and 5 which are connected together through a capacitor C4. Pins 1 and 8 of the chip are connected to one side of the power input at a node 52a, pin 1 being so connected through a capacitor C5. A voltage divider network comprising a resistor R6, potentiometer P1, and capacitor C6 extends across the power lines to signal generating means 44. Pin 6 of chip 46a is connected to one side of the potentiometer, with pin input 7 being connected to the wiper arm of the potentiometer. A diode D5 is connected across these two pins. Pin 3 of the chip is connected to the base of a transistor Q1 through a resistor R7. Pins 2 and 6 are commonly connected as are pins 4 and 8. The output of transistor Q1 is connected to pin 2 of chip 46b. This pin is also connected to the one side of the power to the signal generating means through a resistor R8. As with chip 46a, pins 1 and 8 of chip 46b are connected to one side of the power input of the signal generating means through a capacitor C7. Pin 1 is also connected to pin 5 through a capacitor C8. Pin 7 has as its input the voltage derived from a voltage divider comprising a resistor R9 and a potentiometer P2. The Pin 6 of the chip is connected to the other side of the power input through a capacitor C9. Finally, pins 6 and 7 are tied together as are pins 2 and 4.
Signal generating means 46 functions as a pulse width modulation signal generator whose output from pin 3 of chip 46b is supplied as an input of an IC 50 of control means 42. Alternatively, the operating signal can be produced by a microprocessor 52 as shown in FIG. 7B. Microprocessor 52 is programmed to control the pulse width modulation of the signal produced by means 44 as a function of various SRM operating parameters such as motor speed, torque, etc. The microprocessor is programmed with an algorithm which incorporates various monitored parameters into a calculation which determines desired characteristics (frequency, duty cycle, amplitude, etc.) of the operating signal supplied to the control means.
Control means 42 is responsive to current sensing means 28 to control the operation of signal generating means 44. Both chips 40 and 50 are 14 pin chips; chip 40 having the model designation CD4001, and chip 50 the designation CD4011BE. The operating signal output of signal generating means 44 or 52 is supplied to control means 42 as an input to pin 13 of chip 50. The power to the chips is provided from node 48a to pin 14 on each chip, and from node 48b to pin 7 of each chip, Hall effect sensor 30 provides an input to commonly connected pins 8 and 9 of chip 50 and to the normally open contact 54 of a switch 56. If desired, switch 56 can be used to disengage the current control means controlling operation of circuit 10.
In addition to supplying its output to control means 42, the output of sensor 30 is also provided to the base of a transistor Q2 through the a base biasing network comprising resistors R9-R11. Transistor Q2, in turn, provides an input to an opto-isolator means 58 through a resistor R12. Means 58 includes a model 4N35 type isolator 60 one side of which draws power from power supply means 32 through a resistor R13. The opto-isolator controls switching of a transistor Q3 through a biasing resistor R14. The state of transistor Q3 controls application of power to set 18 of MOSFET switches 22. Switch set 18 is operated so that the switches are either "on" or "off". The switches are turned "on" when the phase is active, and "off" when the phase is inactive.
Control means 42 is responsive to the output of the Hall effect sensor to modify the signal characteristics of the operating signals provided by means 44 so these signals have one set of signal characteristics when the phase is active, and a different set of characteristics when the phase is inactive. Operation of control means 42 is that in response to the Hall effect sensor indicating the phase has become inactive, the control means reverses the duty cycle of the operating signal. Thus, if the operating signals, when the phase is active, is "on" 10% of a pulse period and "off" 90%, when the Hall sensor indicates the phase is now inactive, the indication provided to pins 8 and 9 of chip 50 results in the control means providing an operating signal which is "on" 90% of the time, and "off" 10%. When the phase again becomes active, the Hall sensor output causes a reversal back to the initial duty cycle conditions. It will be understood that the relative "on/off" periods at any one time may differ from those at a different period. Also, the microprocessor can override operation of the control circuit so that under certain defined motor conditions (a period range of motor speeds, for example) the control means will produce a particular set of characteristics so when the "on/off" periods are reversed, the resulting operating signal still has desired characteristics.
The inverted PWM operating signal is produced at pin 3 of chip 40. This signal is applied to the base of a transistor Q4 through a base resistor R15. The ouput of this transistor is supplied to node 24bat the gate input of the MOSFET's 22 of switch set 20. Because the operating signal has "on" and "off" portions, it effectively modulates the elements of switch set 20 so they alternately provide a hard chopping and a soft chopping interval of tail current decay. Accordingly the zero voltage, current chopping dissipation of the tail current is effected with a single set of switches producing both the hard chopping and soft chopping decay strategies described above. This is shown in FIGS. 10A and 10B. At time T1, there is an initial zero voltage soft chopping interval, followed by a shorter duration hard chopping interval. As seen in FIG. 9A, this process is repeated as the tail current is driven to zero. The longer soft chopping interval corresponds to the longer "on" interval of the operating signal, and the shorter hard chopping interval to the shorter "off" period. It will be understood that the relative intervals shown in FIGS. 9A and 9B are illustrative only.
It will be appreciated from the above discussion that one set of operating characteristics of circuit 10 is a reversal of duty cycle of the operating signal for a specified PWM frequency. However, with microprocessor 52 generating PWM signals it is possible to vary either the duty cycle, frequency, or both within the tail current decay time. Referring to FIGS. 11A-11D examples are presented in which the duty cycle or frequency, or both is varied so that the soft chopping and hard chopping portions of an interval are controlled over the several intervals during which the residual current decays to zero. The ability to vary both frequency and duty cycle is important because it provides a greater degree of control over the current slope which permits better noise control over the motor during residual current decay. In the control scheme of FIG. 11A, there is a constant duty cycle of the PWM operating signal during each interval I. Accordingly, the "on" portion of each duty cycle is constant throughout the current decay period T1 -T2.
In FIG. 11B, the interval I is constant; however; the duty cycle is varied from one interval to the next. This, for example effects a soft chopping portion which gets progressively shorter during succeeding intervals while the hard chopping portion becomes progressively longer.
In FIG. 11C, the intervals are variable in duration so that interval I1, is longer the interval I2, etc. However, the duty cycle is constant so that even though the soft and hard chopping portions of each interval are of different lengths, this ratio is constant over the entire current decay period.
Finally, in FIG. 11D, both the interval I and duty cycle of the PWM operating signals are variable. As noted, the particular PWM characteristics selected to control current decay are a function of the particular SRM operating conditions and as such the chosen set of characteristics may be employed each time the phase become inactive, or a different set may be chosen each time.
Regardless of the actual intervals at which hard chopping and soft chopping occur, the frequency of the signals may be at least twice the resonant frequency of the motor. This prevents noise from being created due to harmonics within the motor frame. It has been found that the effect of circuit 10, in addition to efficiently producing tail current decay is to reduce the motor noise by approximately 10 dBA from a level of some 50 dB. Further, it has been found that circuit 10 is usable with a variety of SRM's, including 2-phase and 3-phase SRM's.
What has been described is a control circuit for controlling tail current decay in a SRM. The circuit operates to control tail current decay so as to lessen motor noise at least 10 dB from the 50 dB levels currently found in SRM's. As shown by the dashed line curve in FIG. 10, the motor ringing which occurs when circuit 10 is used is substantially reduced from the previous level of ringing. To accomplish this, the control circuit combines both hard chopping and soft chopping current decay control techniques, doing so with but a single gate drive. The control circuit is usable with both 2-phase and 3-phase SRM's including 12-6, 2-phase SRM's, and 6-4, 3-phase SRM's. The control circuit is readily incorporated into a PWM type controller for controlling overall phase switching between the respective phases of a SRM. As part of its operation, the control circuit which reverses the pulse width of generated PWM signals used to control current flow when a phase is inactive, this helping drive the tail current to zero while the phase is inactive. The control circuit employs two sets of switches; one set being either activated or deactivated as the motor phases are switched, and the other set of which is modulated by PWM signals. It is a feature of the control circuit to reverse the "on" and "off" portions of the PWM signals when a phase is switched from active to inactive. The control circuit switches the phase winding into a path including a bus capacitor which is charged by the tail current using the PWM modulation of the switches. The tail current control circuit is particularly effective in reducing noise in SRM's operating at low speed/high torque because normal ovalizing forces which produce noise in SRM's are lower at high speed motor operation. This is because the control circuit varies both frequency and duty cycle to effect a desired soft chopping/hard chopping strategy. Also, the control circuit operates at a frequency at least twice the resonant frequency of the motor. Finally, the control circuit provides a low cost, reliable way of reducing noise throughout the range of SRM operation.
In view of the foregoing, it will be seen that the several objects of the invention are achieved and other advantageous results are obtained.
As various changes could be made in the above constructions without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description or shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US34609 *||4 Mar 1862||Improvement in tanning|
|US747698 *||28 Aug 1901||22 Dec 1903||Gen Electric||Dynamo-electric machine.|
|US4164696 *||10 Aug 1977||14 Aug 1979||Teletype Corporation||Stepping motor excitation|
|US4213070 *||10 Aug 1978||15 Jul 1980||Danfoss A/S||Connecting device for the stator winding of an electric machine|
|US4249116 *||23 Mar 1979||3 Feb 1981||Nasa||Controller for computer control of brushless DC motors|
|US4253053 *||28 Mar 1978||24 Feb 1981||Chloride Group Limited||Reluctance electric motor drive systems|
|US4427910 *||1 Mar 1982||24 Jan 1984||General Electric Company||Magnetic slot wedge with low average permeability and high mechanical strength|
|US4447771 *||31 Aug 1981||8 May 1984||Kollmorgen Technologies Corporation||Control system for synchronous brushless motors|
|US4488101 *||23 Dec 1982||11 Dec 1984||Borg-Warner Corporation||Starting system for chopper controlled motor-commutated thyristor inverter|
|US4500824 *||21 May 1984||19 Feb 1985||General Electric Company||Method of commutation and converter circuit for switched reluctance motors|
|US4520302 *||12 Mar 1984||28 May 1985||National Research Development Corporation||Stepping motors and drive circuits therefor|
|US4563619 *||31 Aug 1982||7 Jan 1986||Chloride Group Public Limited Company||Electric power converter circuit|
|US4661756 *||18 Oct 1985||28 Apr 1987||Kollmorgen Technologies Corporation||Servomotor control systems|
|US4670696 *||18 Oct 1985||2 Jun 1987||Kollmorgen Technologies Corporation||Variable speed variable reluctance electrical machines|
|US4691038 *||16 Oct 1986||1 Sep 1987||Union Carbide Corporation||Novel room temperature vulcanizable polydiorganosiloxane compositions|
|US4712050 *||30 Jan 1987||8 Dec 1987||Hitachi, Ltd.||Control system for brushless DC motor|
|US4731570 *||8 Sep 1986||15 Mar 1988||Caterpillar Inc.||Electrical drive circuit for a variable-speed switched reluctance motor|
|US4761580 *||17 Jun 1987||2 Aug 1988||Magnetek, Inc.||Magnetic top wedge|
|US4849873 *||5 Nov 1987||18 Jul 1989||Medar, Inc.||Active snubber for an inverter|
|US4859921 *||10 Mar 1988||22 Aug 1989||General Electric Company||Electronic control circuits, electronically commutated motor systems, switching regulator power supplies, and methods|
|US4868477 *||23 Jun 1987||19 Sep 1989||The Superior Electric Company||Method and apparatus for controlling torque and torque ripple in a variable reluctance motor|
|US4933621 *||12 May 1989||12 Jun 1990||General Electric Company||Current chopping strategy for switched reluctance machines|
|US4943760 *||2 Nov 1988||24 Jul 1990||Kollmorgen Corporation||Control systems for variable reluctance electrical machines|
|US5072166 *||18 Jun 1990||10 Dec 1991||The Texas A&M University System||Position sensor elimination technique for the switched reluctance motor drive|
|US5075610 *||28 Mar 1991||24 Dec 1991||Honeywell Inc.||Switched reluctance motor control circuit with energy recovery capability|
|US5097191 *||27 Apr 1990||17 Mar 1992||Kabushikigaisha Sekogiken||Reluctance type electric motor|
|US5119000 *||25 Feb 1991||2 Jun 1992||Motorola, Inc.||Low noise motor drive circuit|
|US5124604 *||5 Nov 1990||23 Jun 1992||Areal Technology Corp.||Disk drive motor|
|US5124607 *||19 May 1989||23 Jun 1992||General Electric Company||Dynamoelectric machines including metal filled glass cloth slot closure wedges, and methods of making the same|
|US5140207 *||12 Apr 1989||18 Aug 1992||Swf Auto-Electric Gmbh||Electric motor, especially wiper motor for driving a windshield wiper system in a motor vehicle|
|US5144209 *||28 Jun 1991||1 Sep 1992||Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.||Brushless dc motor|
|US5175458 *||4 Sep 1991||29 Dec 1992||Onan Corporation||Insulator for terminating electrodynamic stator coils|
|US5196775 *||20 Feb 1991||23 Mar 1993||Honeywell Inc.||Switched reluctance motor position by resonant signal injection|
|US5239217 *||18 May 1992||24 Aug 1993||Emerson Electric Co.||Redundant switched reluctance motor|
|US5239220 *||26 Aug 1992||24 Aug 1993||Mitsubishi Denki K.K.||Stator wedge and guide jig therefor|
|US5270603 *||22 Apr 1992||14 Dec 1993||Sawafuji Electric Co., Ltd.||Coil-end supporting apparatus and a rotary-machinery stator equipped with same|
|US5296785 *||25 Aug 1993||22 Mar 1994||Ford Motor Company||Fail-safe vehicle suspension system including switched reluctance motor|
|US5343105 *||29 Jan 1993||30 Aug 1994||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||AC generator for vehicles|
|US5373206 *||17 Feb 1993||13 Dec 1994||Goldstar Co., Ltd.||Position detection of rotors for switched reluctance motor|
|US5461295 *||28 Jan 1994||24 Oct 1995||Emerson Electric Co.||Noise reduction in a switched reluctance motor by current profile manipulation|
|US5479080 *||23 Jul 1993||26 Dec 1995||General Electric Company||Simultaneous multiple voltage level bridge-type inverter/converter unit for an electronically commutated electrical machine|
|US5487213 *||2 May 1994||30 Jan 1996||Emerson Electric Co.||Method of assembling an electric motor|
|US5563488 *||7 Jun 1995||8 Oct 1996||Switched Reluctance Drives Limited||Control of switched reluctance machines|
|US5589752 *||25 Apr 1995||31 Dec 1996||Aisin Seiki Kabushiki Kaisha||Controller for switched reluctance motor|
|*||DE4036565A1||Title not available|
|EP0557811A1 *||11 Feb 1993||1 Sep 1993||Quantum Corporation||Digital-analog driver for brushless D.C. spindle motor|
|EP0749202A1 *||12 Jun 1995||18 Dec 1996||Emerson Electric Co.||Current decay control in switched reluctance motor|
|GB2167253A *||Title not available|
|GB2167910A *||Title not available|
|JPH0389897A *||Title not available|
|WO1993005564A1 *||27 Aug 1992||18 Mar 1993||Platt Saco Lowell Corporation||Improved apparatus for commutation of an electric motor|
|WO1994028618A1 *||27 May 1994||8 Dec 1994||The University Of Warwick||Electric motor drive|
|1||*||Abstract of Japanese patent application No. 06 086769 published as 07 298669 Nov. 10, 1995.|
|2||Abstract of Japanese patent application No. 06-086769 published as 07-298669 Nov. 10, 1995.|
|3||*||Analysis and Reduction of Vibration and Acoustic Noise in Switched Reluctance Device, C.Y. Wu and C. Pollock, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV47AL, U.K.|
|4||C. Pollock and C. Y. Wu, "Acoustic Noise Cancellation Techniques for Switched Reluctance Drives," Record of the Industry Applications Conference (IAS), vol. 1, pp. 448-455, Orlando, Florida, Oct. 8-12, 1995.|
|5||*||C. Pollock and C. Y. Wu, Acoustic Noise Cancellation Techniques for Switched Reluctance Drives, Record of the Industry Applications Conference ( IAS ), vol. 1, pp. 448 455, Orlando, Florida, Oct. 8 12, 1995.|
|6||C. Y. Wu and C. Pollock, "Analysis and Reduction of Vibration and Acoustic Noise in the Switched Reluctance Drive," 1993, Proceedings of the IAS '93, pp. 106-113.|
|7||C. Y. Wu and C. Pollock, "Analysis and Reduction of Vibration and Acoustic Noise in the Switched Reluctance Drive," IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 31, No. 1 pp. 91-98, Jan./Feb. 1995.|
|8||*||C. Y. Wu and C. Pollock, Analysis and Reduction of Vibration and Acoustic Noise in the Switched Reluctance Drive, 1993, Proceedings of the IAS 93, pp. 106 113.|
|9||*||C. Y. Wu and C. Pollock, Analysis and Reduction of Vibration and Acoustic Noise in the Switched Reluctance Drive, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications , vol. 31, No. 1 pp. 91 98, Jan./Feb. 1995.|
|10||Charles Pollock and Barry W. Williams, "A Unipolar Converter for a Switched Reluctance Motor," Conference Record of the 1988 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting, pp. 44-49, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, Oct. 2-7, 1988.|
|11||*||Charles Pollock and Barry W. Williams, A Unipolar Converter for a Switched Reluctance Motor, Conference Record of the 1988 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting , pp. 44 49, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, Oct. 2 7, 1988.|
|12||D. E. Cameron et al., "The Origin and Reduction of Acoustic Noise in Doubly Salient Variable-Reluctance Motors," Nov./Dec. 1992, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 28 No. 6, pp. 1250-1255.|
|13||*||D. E. Cameron et al., The Origin and Reduction of Acoustic Noise in Doubly Salient Variable Reluctance Motors, Nov./Dec. 1992, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 28 No. 6, pp. 1250 1255.|
|14||F. Blaabjerg et al., "Investigative and Reduction of Acoustical Noise from Switched Reluctance Drives in Current and Voltage Control," Sep. 5-71994, Proc. ICEM '94, pp. 589-594.|
|15||*||F. Blaabjerg et al., Investigative and Reduction of Acoustical Noise from Switched Reluctance Drives in Current and Voltage Control, Sep. 5 71994, Proc. ICEM 94, pp. 589 594.|
|16||Frede Blaabjerg and John K. Pedersen, "Digital Implemented Random Modulation Strategies for AC and Switched Reluctance Drives," Proceedings of the IECON'93, pp. 676-682, International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation, Maui, Hawaii, Nov. 15-19, 1993.|
|17||*||Frede Blaabjerg and John K. Pedersen, Digital Implemented Random Modulation Strategies for AC and Switched Reluctance Drives, Proceedings of the IECON 93 , pp. 676 682, International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation, Maui, Hawaii, Nov. 15 19, 1993.|
|18||Richard S. Wallace and David G. Taylor, "A Balanced Commutator for Switched Reluctance Motors to Reduce Torque Ripple," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 617-626, Oct. 1992.|
|19||Richard S. Wallace and David G. Taylor, "Low-Torque-Ripple Switched Reluctance Motors for Direct-Drive Robotics," IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 7, No. 6, pp. 733-742, Dec. 1991.|
|20||*||Richard S. Wallace and David G. Taylor, A Balanced Commutator for Switched Reluctance Motors to Reduce Torque Ripple, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics , vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 617 626, Oct. 1992.|
|21||*||Richard S. Wallace and David G. Taylor, Low Torque Ripple Switched Reluctance Motors for Direct Drive Robotics, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation , vol. 7, No. 6, pp. 733 742, Dec. 1991.|
|22||Richard S. Wallace, Jr., "Design and Control of Switched Reluctance Motors to Reduce Torque Ripple," Georgia Institute of Technology, Nov. 1990.|
|23||*||Richard S. Wallace, Jr., Design and Control of Switched Reluctance Motors to Reduce Torque Ripple, Georgia Institute of Technology, Nov. 1990.|
|24||S. Chan et al., "Performance Enhancement of Single-Phase Switched-Reluctance Motor by DC Link Voltage Boosting," Sep. 1993, IEEE Proceedings-B, vol. 140, pp. 316-322.|
|25||*||S. Chan et al., Performance Enhancement of Single Phase Switched Reluctance Motor by DC Link Voltage Boosting, Sep. 1993, IEEE Proceedings B, vol. 140, pp. 316 322.|
|26||*||Shi Ping Hsu et al., Modeling and Analysis of Switching DC to DC Converters in Constant Frequency Current Programmed Mode, 1979, IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, pp. 284 301.|
|27||Shi-Ping Hsu et al., "Modeling and Analysis of Switching DC-to-DC Converters in Constant-Frequency Current-Programmed Mode," 1979, IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, pp. 284-301.|
|28||Stephenson and Blake, "The Characteristics, Design and Applications of Switched Reluctance Motors and Drives," PCIM Conference & Exhibition, Jun. 21-24, 1993, Nuremberg, Germany.|
|29||*||Stephenson and Blake, The Characteristics, Design and Applications of Switched Reluctance Motors and Drives, PCIM Conference & Exhibition, Jun. 21 24, 1993, Nuremberg, Germany.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6720686||3 Oct 2000||13 Apr 2004||Emerson Electric Co.||Reduced noise dynamoelectric machine|
|US6906485||28 Jun 2002||14 Jun 2005||Seagate Technology Llc||Spindle motor control using a current profile to taper current transitions|
|US8421368||16 Apr 2013||Lsi Industries, Inc.||Control of light intensity using pulses of a fixed duration and frequency|
|US8461789||11 Jun 2013||Melexis Technologies Nv||Control of sinusoidally driven brushless DC (BLDC) motors|
|US8593098||10 Dec 2009||26 Nov 2013||Melexis Technologies Nv||Operation of BLDC motors|
|US8604709||13 May 2010||10 Dec 2013||Lsi Industries, Inc.||Methods and systems for controlling electrical power to DC loads|
|US8674639 *||26 Aug 2009||18 Mar 2014||Melexis Technologies Nv||Accuracy of rotor position detection relating to the control of brushless DC motors|
|US8903577||30 Oct 2009||2 Dec 2014||Lsi Industries, Inc.||Traction system for electrically powered vehicles|
|US9007005 *||14 Dec 2012||14 Apr 2015||Hyundai Motor Company||Inverter controlling system and method for reducing noise in eco-friendly vehicle|
|US20090261746 *||15 May 2009||22 Oct 2009||Lsi Industries, Inc.||Control of light intensity using pulses of a fixed duration and frequency|
|US20100141192 *||10 Dec 2009||10 Jun 2010||Melexis Tessenderlo Nv||Operation of bldc motors|
|US20110074327 *||21 Sep 2010||31 Mar 2011||Melexis Tessenderlo Nv||Control of sinusoidally driven brushless dc (bldc) motors|
|US20110221371 *||26 Aug 2009||15 Sep 2011||Melexis Nv, Microelectronic Integrated Systems||Accuracy of rotor position detection relating to the control of brushless dc motors|
|US20140084829 *||14 Dec 2012||27 Mar 2014||Kia Motors Corporation||Inverter controlling system and method for reducing noise in eco-friendly vehicle|
|U.S. Classification||318/701, 318/400.01, 318/696|
|International Classification||B60C15/02, H02P25/08|
|26 Sep 2002||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|28 Feb 2007||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12
|18 Jan 2011||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: NIDEC MOTOR CORPORATION, MISSOURI
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:EMERSON ELECTRIC CO.;REEL/FRAME:025651/0747
Effective date: 20100924