US8156996B2 - Casting apparatus and method - Google Patents

Casting apparatus and method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US8156996B2
US8156996B2 US13/108,402 US201113108402A US8156996B2 US 8156996 B2 US8156996 B2 US 8156996B2 US 201113108402 A US201113108402 A US 201113108402A US 8156996 B2 US8156996 B2 US 8156996B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
mold
gas
gas flow
droplet spray
gap
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
US13/108,402
Other versions
US20110214833A1 (en
Inventor
Robin M. Forbes Jones
Sterry A. Shaffer
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
ATI Properties LLC
Original Assignee
ATI Properties LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by ATI Properties LLC filed Critical ATI Properties LLC
Priority to US13/108,402 priority Critical patent/US8156996B2/en
Assigned to ATI PROPERTIES, INC. reassignment ATI PROPERTIES, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SHAFFER, STERRY A., FORBES JONES, ROBIN M.
Publication of US20110214833A1 publication Critical patent/US20110214833A1/en
Priority to US13/420,910 priority patent/US8302661B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US8156996B2 publication Critical patent/US8156996B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22DCASTING OF METALS; CASTING OF OTHER SUBSTANCES BY THE SAME PROCESSES OR DEVICES
    • B22D23/00Casting processes not provided for in groups B22D1/00 - B22D21/00
    • B22D23/003Moulding by spraying metal on a surface
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C4/00Coating by spraying the coating material in the molten state, e.g. by flame, plasma or electric discharge
    • C23C4/12Coating by spraying the coating material in the molten state, e.g. by flame, plasma or electric discharge characterised by the method of spraying
    • C23C4/123Spraying molten metal

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an apparatus and a method for casting metal and metal alloys.
  • the present invention is also directed to preforms and other articles produced by the method and/or apparatus of the present invention.
  • components must be manufactured from large diameter metal or metal alloy preforms which are substantially free of defects.
  • metal material is used herein to refer collectively to unalloyed metals and to metal alloys.
  • spray forming is essentially a “moldless” process using gas atomization to create a spray of droplets of liquid metal from a stream of molten metal. Spray forming, however, suffers from a number of disadvantages that make its application to the formation of large diameter preforms problematic.
  • an unavoidable byproduct of spray forming is overspray, wherein a portion of the metal spray misses the developing preform altogether or solidifies in flight without attaching to the preform.
  • Average yield losses due to overspray in spray forming can be 20-30%.
  • nucleated casting Another method for producing high quality preforms is nucleated casting, which is generally described in, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,496,529 and 7,154,932.
  • Nucleated casting is essentially a process involving using gas atomization to create a spray of droplets of liquid metal and depositing the droplet spray into a mold.
  • portions of the droplet spray i.e., the overspray
  • the overspray may accumulate on a top surface of the mold.
  • the overspray accumulated on the mold's top surface bonds with a preform being cast within the mold.
  • the nucleated casting process may have to be stopped in order to remove the overspray, and this may result in scrapping the preform. Accordingly, there are drawbacks associated with certain known techniques in which preforms are cast from a droplet spray. Thus, a need exists for an improved apparatus and method for nucleated casting of metallic materials.
  • a nucleated casting apparatus can include an atomizing nozzle configured to produce a droplet spray of a metallic material, a mold configured to receive the droplet spray and form a preform therein, and a gas injector which can limit, and possibly prevent, overspray from accumulating on the mold.
  • the gas injector can be configured to produce a gas flow which can impinge on the droplet spray to redirect the droplet spray away from a side wall of the mold.
  • the gas flow can push the droplet spray into the mold, thereby reducing the amount of the droplet spray which accumulates on top of the side wall.
  • the droplet spray may be directed by the atomizing nozzle in a generally downward direction, whereas the gas flow may be directed in a generally upward direction such that the gas flow forms a physical barrier, ‘curtain’, or ‘fence’ surrounding the perimeter of the mold and biases the droplet spray to a preferred path.
  • FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a nucleated casting apparatus in accordance with one non-limiting embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the nucleated casting apparatus of FIG. 1 illustrating a gas injector being used to limit the accumulation of overspray on the mold;
  • FIG. 3 is a partial cross-sectional view of the side wall of the mold of FIG. 1 ;
  • FIG. 4 is a partial cross-sectional view of a gas injector mounted to the side wall of a mold in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention
  • FIGS. 5-8 are partial cross-sectional views of various gas injectors and mold side walls in accordance with alternative embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIG. 9 is a schematic representation of Test Samples A-D and F and Control Sample E in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIG. 10 is a photograph of Test Samples A-D and F in fluid communication with a source of inert gas;
  • FIG. 11 includes photographs of Test Samples A-C after having been used to redirect a droplet spray of molten metallic material
  • FIG. 12 includes photographs of Test Samples D and F after having been used to redirect a droplet spray of molten metallic material, and photographs of Control Sample E after having been exposed to a droplet spray of the molten metallic material;
  • FIG. 13 includes photographs of various specimens of Test Sample A after having been used to redirect droplet sprays of molten metallic material, wherein the test samples were provided with inert gas supplies having different pressures;
  • FIG. 14 includes photographs of various specimens of Test Sample A after having been used to redirect droplet sprays of molten metallic material, wherein one of the test samples includes polished surfaces;
  • FIG. 15 includes photographs of various specimens of Test Sample B after having been used to redirect droplet sprays of molten metallic material, wherein one of the test samples includes polished surfaces;
  • FIG. 16 includes a graph depicting the velocity profiles of gas flows exiting Test Samples A-C;
  • FIG. 17 is a schematic representation of Test Samples G, H, and J in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIG. 18 includes photographs of Test Samples G, H, and J after having been used to redirect a droplet spray of molten metallic material
  • FIG. 19 includes photographs of various specimens of Test Sample J after having been used to redirect droplet sprays of molten metallic material, wherein the test samples were provided with inert gas supplies having different pressures;
  • FIG. 20 includes photomicrographs of the surface roughness of various specimens of Test Sample J;
  • FIG. 21 includes photographs of various specimens of Test Sample J after having been used to redirect droplet sprays of molten metallic material, wherein the test samples were exposed to the droplet spray for different lengths of time;
  • FIG. 22 includes photographs of additional specimens of Test Sample J after having been used to redirect droplet sprays of molten metallic material, wherein the test samples were exposed to the droplet spray for different lengths of time;
  • FIG. 23 includes photographs of Control Samples E after having been exposed to a droplet spray of a molten metallic material.
  • the present invention includes a process for casting a metallic material, such as 100Cr6, 1% C, 1.5% Cr AISI 52100 steel, for example.
  • the process can include melting and refining the metallic material and subsequently casting the material to create a preform by a nucleated casting technique. Melting and refining the material may be accomplished by, for example, electroslag remelting (ESR) or vacuum arc remelting (VAR).
  • ESR electroslag remelting
  • VAR vacuum arc remelting
  • the process can also include transferring the molten refined material to a nucleated casting apparatus through a passage so as to protect it from contamination.
  • the passage may be that formed through a cold induction guide (CIG) or another transfer apparatus.
  • CCG cold induction guide
  • a nucleated casting apparatus can include nozzle 22 , atomizer 19 , and mold 20 positioned within chamber 24 .
  • nozzle 22 can create a stream or flow of molten metallic material which can pass through atomizer 19 .
  • atomizer 19 can be configured to produce at least one jet of inert gas which can impinge on the stream of metallic material.
  • the jet, or jets, of inert gas can break up the stream into a plurality of droplets, such as droplet spray 26 , for example.
  • nozzle 22 and atomizer 19 can be configured to direct droplet spray 26 into mold 20 .
  • atomizer 19 can be pivoted, or otherwise moved, to change the direction and/or configuration of droplet spray 26 . More particularly, referring to FIG. 1 , atomizer 19 can include axis 18 which can be moved between a first position in which it is substantially perpendicular to axis 58 and a second position in which axis 18 is skew or oblique with respect to axis 58 . In at least one such embodiment, atomizer 19 can be oscillated over an approximately ⁇ 10 degree angle, for example.
  • the nucleated casting apparatus can further include at least one gas injector, such as gas injector 32 , for example, which can be configured to control droplet spray 26 and limit the amount of overspray which accumulates on top surface 28 , or other portions of mold 20 .
  • gas injector 32 can be configured to direct a flow of gas, such as gas flow 34 , for example, to substantially contain and/or re-direct droplet spray 26 such that it does not contact, or substantially contact, top surface 28 .
  • gas injector 32 can include plate 36 positioned adjacent to mold 20 such that passageway 38 is defined therebetween.
  • Gas injector 32 can further include at least one manifold 40 which can be configured to place at least one gas supply line 42 in fluid communication with passageway 38 and communicate a gas into passageway 38 to create gas flow 34 .
  • This gas can include nitrogen or any suitable inert gas, for example.
  • gas flow 34 can be configured to re-direct, or push, droplet spray 26 into mold 20 .
  • gas flow 34 can be configured such that it impinges on droplet spray 26 and deflects the outer perimeter of droplet spray 26 into mold 20 .
  • gas flow 34 can be configured such that it is directed parallel to the outer perimeter of droplet spray 26 .
  • gas flow 34 can act as a containment barrier or fence and can redirect the droplet spray if and when the droplet spray deviates from a desired path. In either event, as illustrated in FIG. 2 , the direction of droplet spray 26 can be generally downward and the direction of gas flow 34 can be generally upward.
  • the direction of droplet spray 26 can have a vertically downward component and the direction of gas flow 34 can have a vertically upward component.
  • Other embodiments are envisioned where the droplet spray and the gas flow have oppositely directed components whether or not such components are vertical.
  • gas flow 34 can be directed along an axis, such as axis 44 , for example, which can be transverse to outer surface 27 of droplet spray 26 .
  • axis 44 can define an angle of incidence 46 with normal axis 48 , where normal axis 48 is perpendicular to surface 27 of droplet spray 26 .
  • angle of incidence 46 can be either an acute, right or obtuse angle.
  • the direction of gas flow 34 can be measured with respect to a center axis of droplet spray 26 , such as center axis 50 , for example, and can define angle 52 therebetween.
  • angles 46 and 52 can be selected such that gas flow 34 impinges on droplet spray 26 and controls droplet spray 34 in a desired manner.
  • gas injector 32 may be configured such that the direction of axis 44 is adjustable.
  • gas injector 32 can include a portion which can articulate with respect to mold 20 .
  • the direction of gas flow 34 can be altered to accommodate variances and/or changes in the nucleated casting process, for example.
  • mold 20 and gas injector 32 can be configured to define passageway 38 therebetween.
  • the upper portion of mold 120 i.e., upper portion 123
  • the upper portion of gas injector 132 i.e., upper portion 133
  • passageway 138 such that gas flow 34 is directed along axis 144 as described above.
  • upper portions 123 and 133 can be configured to define axis 144 at an approximately 45 degree angle with respect to droplet spray axis 50 .
  • axis 144 may be defined at an angle with axis 50 which is either greater than or less than 45 degrees. Referring to FIG.
  • upper portions 223 and 233 of mold 220 and gas injector 232 can be configured to define axis 244 at an approximately 30 degree angle with respect to droplet spray axis 50 , i.e., an approximately 60 degree angle with respect to the horizon in the illustrated embodiment.
  • at least a portion of gas injector 232 and/or mold 220 can include a radiused or rounded edge surface 228 , wherein rounded edge 228 can be configured to affect the direction and profile of gas flow 34 .
  • upper portions 333 and 323 of gas injector 332 and/or mold 320 can include rounded edge 328 , where rounded edge 328 has a smaller radius of curvature than rounded edge 228 .
  • upper portions 423 and 433 can be configured to define axis 444 in a substantially perpendicular direction to droplet spray axis 50 and, referring to FIG. 8 , upper portions 523 and 533 can be configured to define axis 544 in a substantially parallel direction to droplet spray axis 50 .
  • the gas injectors can be oriented to maximize the contact of the inert gas with the droplet spray and thereby minimize the deposition of overspray on the mold.
  • the optimum angle between the axis of the gas flow and the droplet spray can be 23 degrees, i.e., 67 degrees with respect to the horizontal.
  • gas injector 32 and mold 20 can define passageway 38 such that it completely circumscribes, or extends around the entire perimeter of, mold 20 .
  • passageway 38 can include one continuous opening, or gap, 39 surrounding mold 20 such that gas flow 34 exiting passageway 38 can completely circumscribe, or enclose, droplet spray 26 .
  • the nucleated casting apparatus can include one or more gas supply lines 42 which communicate gas into passageway 38 .
  • the size and quantity of gas supply lines 42 can be selected such that the properties, i.e., density and velocity, for example, of gas flow 34 are substantially consistent around the perimeter of droplet spray 26 .
  • passageway 38 can be configured to create a gas flow 34 which circumscribes only a portion of droplet spray 26 .
  • the nucleated casting apparatus can include a plurality of passageways 38 which are not in fluid communication with each other.
  • each passageway 38 can include at least one opening 39 positioned around the perimeter of mold 20 where openings 39 can be configured to produce a desired gas flow 34 .
  • the velocity of gas flow 34 exiting passageway 38 can be controlled by changing the pressure and/or volumetric flow rate of the gas supplied to passageway 38 .
  • one or more of gas supply lines 42 can be restricted and/or completely obstructed by a valve, for example, to decrease the flow of gas to passageway 38 and thereby decrease the velocity, for example, of gas flow 34 .
  • the capacity of gas flow 34 to redirect droplet spray 26 for example, can also be decreased.
  • the flow of gas through lines 42 can be increased to increase the capacity for gas flow 34 to redirect droplet spray 26 .
  • Such embodiments can be particularly useful in circumstances where the properties of droplet spray 26 , such as size and density, for example, change during the operation of the nucleated casting process.
  • the gas flow can be configured to have sufficient velocity to change the direction of the molten spray particles.
  • Test Samples A-D and F various test samples, i.e., Test Samples A-D and F, were utilized to re-direct a droplet spray of molten metallic material as described above. The test samples were then examined to compare the ability of gas injectors having different configurations to reduce the adhesion or accumulation of overspray onto the test samples.
  • Test Sample A referring to FIGS. 9 and 10 , included a coupon which was configured to simulate at least a portion of a mold side wall and a gas injector as outlined above.
  • Test Sample A included a vertical surface (demarcated “A” in FIG.
  • the gap included an axis oriented at a 60 degree angle with respect to the horizontal, i.e., at a 30 degree angle with respect to an axis of the droplet spray.
  • Test Sample A was utilized to redirect a droplet spray for approximately 45 seconds.
  • FIG. 11 although some overspray accumulated on Test Sample A, the inert gas flow produced by Test Sample A was successful in reducing the accumulation of overspray on the top and vertical surfaces.
  • Test Sample B included a coupon having a gap oriented in a direction substantially parallel to the droplet spray axis.
  • Test Sample D again referring to FIGS. 9 and 10 , included a coupon having a gap oriented in a direction substantially perpendicular to the droplet spray axis.
  • Test Sample F included a coupon having a gap oriented at a 45 degree angle with respect to the droplet spray axis. As illustrated in FIGS. 11 and 12 , Test Samples B, D, and F had varying degrees of success in preventing overspray from accumulating thereon as compared to Control Sample E. Control Sample E, referring to FIGS.
  • Control Sample E unlike Test Samples B, D, and F, did not include a gas injector and, as a result, a substantial amount of overspray accumulated thereon as compared to Test Samples B, D, and F.
  • the gas flow produced by Test Sample B was particularly successful in substantially preventing overspray from accumulating on the top surface of Test Sample B.
  • Test Sample C similar to Test Sample A, included a gap having an axis oriented at a 60 degree angle with respect to the horizontal. As illustrated in Table 1, the thickness of the gap of Test Sample C, however, was much narrower than the gap of Test Sample A. Referring to FIG. 11 , it was observed that less overspray accumulated on Test Sample A than Test Sample C. At least in view of these examples, it is apparent that a larger gap can improve the ability of a gas injector to re-direct a droplet spray of molten metallic material and reduce the accumulation of overspray on the mold as compared to a narrower gap. Other samples have been evaluated where the gaps are approximately 1.5 mm and approximately 3.2 mm wherein a similar relationship was noticed. In other various examples have included gaps having a width between approximately 2.4 mm and approximately 3.2 mm.
  • a larger gap can produce a larger and/or faster gas flow.
  • a faster gas flow can impart more momentum and/or energy to the droplet spray and re-direct the droplets further away from the sidewall of the mold than a slower gas flow.
  • the velocity of the gas exiting the gap was substantially proportional to the pressure of the inert gas within the plenum of the coupon. In at least one embodiment, the relationship between the gas velocity and pressure was linearly proportional.
  • FIG. 16 it was observed with respect to Test Samples A and B that the velocity of the inert gas exiting the gap included a substantially symmetrical profile.
  • the velocity of the inert gas was determined to be greatest along an axis wherein the velocity gradually decreased with respect to the axis.
  • the velocity of the gas was reduced 50% when measured approximately ⁇ 7 or 8 degrees with respect to the axis.
  • the velocity of the gas exiting the gap of Test Sample C included a substantially asymmetrical profile which may indicate that the gap included an at least partially non-symmetrical profile or was otherwise occluded.
  • Test Samples G, H, and J were also utilized to re-direct a droplet spray of molten metallic material. Similar to the above, the test samples were then examined to compare the ability of the gas injectors to reduce the adhesion or accumulation of overspray onto the test samples.
  • Test Sample G, H, and J similar to Test Samples A-D and F, each included a coupon which was configured to simulate at least a portion of a mold side wall and a gas injector. As depicted in FIG.
  • the gas injector of Test Sample G included a gap having an axis oriented at an approximately 60 degree angle with respect to the horizontal, i.e., at an approximately 30 degree angle with respect to an axis of the droplet spray.
  • Test Sample H included a gap having an approximately 45 degree axis
  • Test Sample J included a gap having an approximately 67 degree axis.
  • Test Samples G, H, and J were exposed to a droplet spray for approximately 25 seconds and an inert gas was supplied to the gas injectors at approximately 1.9 bar. As illustrated in FIG. 18 , little, if any, overspray accumulated on Test Samples G and J while a small amount of overspray accumulated on Test Sample H. In fact, Test Sample J exhibited almost no accumulation thereon whatsoever. It is believed that such a result was related to the selection of the approximately 67 degree angle of the gap axis. More particularly, the approximately 67 degree gap axis was selected such that it substantially matched the angle of the atomized droplet spray at the edge of the mold/gas injector test sample. Such a result is further supported by the similar result exhibited with Test Sample G which included an approximately 60 degree gap axis.
  • the optimal angle in other embodiments may be different and may be dependent upon the distance between the nozzle and the top of the mold, the diameter of the mold, and the configuration of the droplet spray.
  • the droplet spray may be rastered and/or oscillated relative to the mold wherein, in such embodiments, the optimal gap axis angle may be selected based on an average and/or median configuration of the droplet spray, for example.
  • the inert gas flow produced by at least one gas injector impinged on the droplet spray so significantly that it overly disrupted the spray cone and caused portions of the droplet spray to accumulate on adjacent test samples. In view of the above, it was determined that the pressure and velocity of such gas flows could be controlled, or reduced, to prevent such gas injectors from producing an overly-disruptive gas flow.
  • test Sample A various specimens of Test Sample A were utilized to re-direct a droplet spray of molten metallic material as described above.
  • the test samples were then examined to compare the ability of various gas injectors having substantially the same configuration, but supplied with inert gas flows having different pressures, to reduce the adhesion or accumulation of overspray onto the test samples.
  • nitrogen gas having a pressure of approximately 0.2 bar was supplied to the test sample.
  • nitrogen gas having a pressure of approximately 1.0-1.2 bar was supplied to the second test sample and, in the third example, depicted in FIG.
  • test Sample J various specimens of Test Sample J were utilized to re-direct a droplet spray of molten metallic material for approximately 25 seconds as described above.
  • the test samples were then examined to compare the ability of various gas injectors having substantially the same configuration, but supplied with inert gas flows having different pressures, to reduce the adhesion or accumulation of overspray onto the test samples.
  • nitrogen gas having a pressure of approximately 1.9 bar (0.19 MPa) was supplied to a first test sample.
  • nitrogen gas having a pressure of approximately 1.0 bar (0.10 MPa) was supplied to a second test sample; in the third example, depicted in FIG.
  • a supply of gas having a higher pressure can produce a gas flow which can be better suited for reducing the accumulation of overspray on a mold as compared to a supply of gas having a lower pressure.
  • test Sample A various specimens of Test Sample A were utilized to re-direct a droplet spray of a molten metallic material as described above. The test samples were then examined to compare the ability of various gas injectors having substantially the same configuration, but different surface finishes, to reduce the adhesion or accumulation of overspray onto the test samples.
  • FIG. 14( a ) at least the vertical and top surfaces of the first specimen were comprised of 1018 cold-rolled steel which were left in a ‘as-rolled’ condition, i.e., they were not polished for the purposes of this example.
  • At least the vertical and top surfaces of the second specimen were also comprised of 1018 cold-rolled steel; however, the top surface and at least the upper portion of the vertical surface were polished.
  • such surfaces can be polished such that they posses a surface roughness, either Ra and/or Rq, of approximately 1 micrometer ( ⁇ m).
  • the surfaces can be polished such that they have a surface roughness, either Ra and/or Rq, of approximately 1.9 ⁇ m, approximately 0.8 ⁇ m, approximately 0.4 ⁇ m, approximately 0.1 ⁇ m, and/or approximately 0.012 ⁇ m, for example.
  • a gas injector can be polished with a surface grinder or drill, where the surface grinder or drill can include a rotating wheel configured to be moved over the surfaces of the gas injector.
  • a rotating wheel comprised of large grit particles, such as 80 grit, for example, can be initially used and, thereafter, wheels having smaller grit particles, such as 240 grit, for example, can be successively used until a ‘soft wheel’ is used.
  • the gas injector can be positioned against a rotating wheel extending from a stationary machine. In either event, the surfaces of the gas injector can then be wet polished with a rotating wheel and/or a fine polishing media.
  • the surfaces can also be manually polished with a natural brush and at least one polishing paste in order to attain the desired surface finish.
  • the gas injectors can be electro and/or chemical polished in addition to or in lieu of the mechanical polishing described above.
  • the surfaces can be polished such that they have a surface roughness, either Ra and/or Rq, of approximately 1.9 ⁇ m, approximately 0.8 ⁇ m, approximately 0.4 ⁇ m, approximately 0.1 ⁇ m, and/or approximately 0.012 ⁇ m, for example.
  • FIG. 14 it was observed that significantly less overspray accumulated on the polished portions of the second specimen as compared to the first specimen ( FIG. 14( a )) and the unpolished portions of the second specimen ( FIG. 14( b )).
  • FIG. 15 it was observed that significantly less overspray accumulated on the polished portions of the second specimen ( FIG. 15( b )) as compared to the first specimen ( FIG. 15( a )) and the unpolished portions of the second specimen ( FIG. 15( b )).
  • the polished surfaces exhibited the smoothest, or least rough, surfaces and the as-rolled surfaces exhibited the roughest surfaces.
  • droplet overspray was observed to be less likely to accumulate on gas injectors having polished surfaces than gas injectors having non-polished surfaces.
  • grinding or machining the surfaces of the gas injectors and/or mold side walls can reduce the roughness of the surfaces as compared to as-rolled surfaces.
  • the ground or machined surfaces can reduce the amount of overspray which accumulates thereon as compared to as-rolled surfaces.
  • the surfaces can be machined or ground such that they have a surface roughness, either Ra and/or Rq, of approximately 6.3 ⁇ m, approximately 3.2 ⁇ m, approximately 1.6 ⁇ m, approximately 0.2 ⁇ m, approximately 0.1 ⁇ m, approximately 0.05 ⁇ m, and/or approximately 0.025 ⁇ m, for example.
  • the tendency for the atomized droplets of metallic materials to accumulate on the as-rolled surfaces may be the result of, at least in part, a mechanical keying effect or interlocking between the atomized spray droplets and ridges extending from the as-rolled surfaces. While such a mechanical interlocking may occur on the machined and/or polished surfaces, it is believed that such surfaces have smaller and/or fewer ridges and, as a result, the atomized droplets are less likely to adhere to such surfaces.
  • At least a portion of a gas injector and/or mold wall can be coated with a material which can decrease the coefficient of friction between the overspray droplets and the surfaces of the gas injector or mold thereby increasing the possibility that the droplets will not ‘catch’ on the surfaces thereof.
  • FIGS. 21 and 22 various specimens of Test Sample J were utilized to re-direct a droplet spray of a molten metallic material as described above for different lengths of time.
  • at least the vertical and top surfaces of the specimens were comprised of 1018 cold-rolled steel and were polished in accordance with at least one of the techniques described herein.
  • a first Test Sample J FIG. 21( a )
  • a second Test Sample J FIG. 21( b )
  • FIG. 22 a first Test Sample J ( FIG. 22( a )) was exposed to a droplet spray for approximately 25 seconds and a second Test Sample J ( FIG. 22( b )) was exposed to the droplet spray for approximately 120 seconds where both test samples were provided with a supply of nitrogen gas having a pressure of approximately 0.5 bar. As illustrated in FIG. 22 , very little overspray accumulated on the first test sample ( FIG. 22( a )) while only somewhat more overspray accumulated on the second test sample ( FIG.
  • first and second Control Samples E i.e., samples which do not have gas injectors, were exposed to a droplet spray for approximately 120 seconds and, as illustrated in FIG. 23 , such control samples exhibited a significant accumulation of overspray thereon.
  • top surfaces of test samples which were oriented, or sloped, in a direction substantially parallel to the outside perimeter of the spray cone.
  • top surfaces oriented in directions which were increasingly closer to being transverse to the outside perimeter of the droplet spray accumulated more overspray thereon.
  • the top surface of the gas injector preferably should be angled so as to substantially match, if not exceed, the angle of the spray cone in order to reduce the accumulation of overspray.
  • the angle of the spray cone was determined to be approximately 67 degrees and, thus, the top surface would be optimally oriented at an approximately 67 degree, or greater, angle with respect to the horizontal, i.e., a plane perpendicular to the axis of the droplet spray.
  • Embodiments of the present invention are envisioned in which the configuration of passageway 38 can be changed.
  • upper portion 33 of gas injector 32 can be articulated with respect to plate 36 .
  • upper portion 33 can be moved relative to plate 36 to increase or decrease the size of passageway opening, or gap, 39 .
  • gas injector 32 can include elements which can be actuated to selectively constrict the flow of gas through passageway 38 .
  • the constriction of passageway 38 can affect the flow of gas therethrough, as described above.
  • a gas injector can be integrally formed with a mold.
  • the mold can include an opening, passageway, and/or plenum formed therein which can be configured to receive an inert gas as described above.
  • plate 36 of gas injector 32 can be welded to mold 20 .
  • Weld bead 37 can be configured to seal the end of passageway 38 such that gas flowing into passageway 38 from manifolds 40 will flow through opening 39 as described above.
  • a seal is created between gas injector 32 and mold 20 , for example.
  • bolts for example, can be utilized to mount plate 36 to mold 20 and compress a seal or gasket positioned intermediate plate 36 and mold 20 .
  • the casting apparatus can include at least one gas injector that is positioned near the mold but is not mounted or attached to the mold.
  • a nucleated casting apparatus can include gas injectors positioned at different distances relative to the droplet spray.
  • the casting apparatus can include a first, or inner, gas injector and a second, or outer, gas injector, for example.
  • the gas flow produced by the first gas injector can be oriented in a first direction and the gas flow produced by the second gas injector can be oriented in a second direction, where the first direction is different than the second direction.
  • the mold of the nucleated casting apparatus can be rotated relative to the gas injector. More particularly, in at least one embodiment, the casting apparatus can further include drive shaft 60 which can be integrally formed with, or otherwise connected to, side wall 21 of mold 20 . In operation, drive shaft 60 can rotate side wall 21 about axis of rotation 58 . In various embodiments, especially in embodiments where atomizing nozzle 22 is not directly centered above mold 20 along axis of rotation 58 , the rotation of side wall 21 can reduce the accumulation of overspray on top surface 28 .
  • gas injector 32 can include bearing portion 54 which can be configured to rotatably support side wall 21 of mold 20 .
  • the casting apparatus can further include a bearing positioned between side wall 21 and bearing portion 54 to facilitate relative movement between side wall 21 and bearing portion 54 .
  • a bearing can be comprised of any suitable material including, for example, brass.
  • bearing portion 54 and side wall 21 can each include a track configured to receive ball bearings 56 .
  • the mold of the nucleated casting apparatus can further include a base which is movable relative to the side wall of the mold. More particularly, in at least one embodiment, the casting apparatus can further include ram 62 connected to base 25 of mold 20 where, in operation, ram 62 can be configured to move base 25 relative to side wall 21 and withdraw preform 30 as it is being formed within mold 20 . In such embodiments, a relatively constant distance can be maintained between the top surface of preform 30 and atomizing nozzle 22 and, as a result, the properties of the preform being cast can be more easily controlled. Furthermore, such embodiments can permit longer preforms to be cast. While an exemplary withdrawal mold is illustrated in FIGS.
  • any other suitable withdrawal mold can be used, including those disclosed in the co-pending, commonly-owned United States patent application entitled REFINING CASTING APPARATUS AND METHOD filed on Oct. 30, 2007.
  • base 25 can also be rotated about axis 58 at the same speed as, or at a speed different than, side wall 21 .
  • gas injectors in accordance with the present invention can also be configured to direct a flow of gas which can dislodge overspray which has accumulated on top surface 28 , for example, and direct it into mold 20 .
  • the gas injectors can be configured to dislodge the overspray from top surface 28 such that it does not fall into mold 20 .
  • the gas injectors can be oriented to direct a gas flow at any suitable angle with respect to the top surface of the mold, for example, including a generally downward direction and/or a direction where the gas flow impinges on the side wall of the mold, for example.

Abstract

A nucleated casting apparatus including an atomizing nozzle configured to produce a droplet spray of a metallic material, a mold configured to receive the droplet spray and form a preform therein, and a gas injector which can limit, and possibly prevent, overspray from accumulating on the mold. The gas injector can be configured to produce a gas flow which can impinge on the droplet spray to redirect at least a portion of the droplet spray away from a side wall of the mold. In various embodiments, the droplet spray may be directed by the atomizing nozzle in a generally downward direction and the gas flow may be directed in a generally upward direction such that the gas flow circumscribes the perimeter of the mold.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
The present application is a continuation application claiming priority under 35 U.S.C. §120 to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/861,033, filed Aug. 23, 2010 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,963,314, entitled “CASTING APPARATUS AND METHOD”, which application is in turn a continuation application claiming priority under 35 U.S.C. §120 to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/949,808, filed Dec. 4, 2007, entitled “CASTING APPARATUS AND METHOD”, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,798,199 on Sep. 21, 2010. The entire disclosures of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/861,033 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,798,199 are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT
Certain of the research leading to the present invention was funded by the National Institute of Standards and Technology Advanced Technology Program (NIST ATP), Contract No. 70NANB1H3042. The United States may have certain rights in the invention.
TECHNICAL FIELD AND INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to an apparatus and a method for casting metal and metal alloys. The present invention is also directed to preforms and other articles produced by the method and/or apparatus of the present invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION BACKGROUND
In certain applications, components must be manufactured from large diameter metal or metal alloy preforms which are substantially free of defects. (For ease of reference, the term “metallic material” is used herein to refer collectively to unalloyed metals and to metal alloys.) One known method for producing high quality preforms is spray forming, which is generally described in, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,325,906 and 5,348,566. Spray forming is essentially a “moldless” process using gas atomization to create a spray of droplets of liquid metal from a stream of molten metal. Spray forming, however, suffers from a number of disadvantages that make its application to the formation of large diameter preforms problematic. Furthermore, an unavoidable byproduct of spray forming is overspray, wherein a portion of the metal spray misses the developing preform altogether or solidifies in flight without attaching to the preform. Average yield losses due to overspray in spray forming can be 20-30%.
Another method for producing high quality preforms is nucleated casting, which is generally described in, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,496,529 and 7,154,932. Nucleated casting is essentially a process involving using gas atomization to create a spray of droplets of liquid metal and depositing the droplet spray into a mold. In various circumstances, portions of the droplet spray, i.e., the overspray, may accumulate on a top surface of the mold. In some instances, the overspray accumulated on the mold's top surface bonds with a preform being cast within the mold. In these circumstances, the nucleated casting process may have to be stopped in order to remove the overspray, and this may result in scrapping the preform. Accordingly, there are drawbacks associated with certain known techniques in which preforms are cast from a droplet spray. Thus, a need exists for an improved apparatus and method for nucleated casting of metallic materials.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In one form of the invention, a nucleated casting apparatus can include an atomizing nozzle configured to produce a droplet spray of a metallic material, a mold configured to receive the droplet spray and form a preform therein, and a gas injector which can limit, and possibly prevent, overspray from accumulating on the mold. In various embodiments, the gas injector can be configured to produce a gas flow which can impinge on the droplet spray to redirect the droplet spray away from a side wall of the mold. In at least one such embodiment, the gas flow can push the droplet spray into the mold, thereby reducing the amount of the droplet spray which accumulates on top of the side wall. In various embodiments, the droplet spray may be directed by the atomizing nozzle in a generally downward direction, whereas the gas flow may be directed in a generally upward direction such that the gas flow forms a physical barrier, ‘curtain’, or ‘fence’ surrounding the perimeter of the mold and biases the droplet spray to a preferred path.
The reader will appreciate the foregoing details and advantages of the present invention, as well as others, upon consideration of the following detailed description of embodiments of the invention. The reader also may comprehend such additional advantages and details of the present invention upon carrying out or using the invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The features and advantages of the present invention may be better understood by reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a nucleated casting apparatus in accordance with one non-limiting embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the nucleated casting apparatus of FIG. 1 illustrating a gas injector being used to limit the accumulation of overspray on the mold;
FIG. 3 is a partial cross-sectional view of the side wall of the mold of FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 is a partial cross-sectional view of a gas injector mounted to the side wall of a mold in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention;
FIGS. 5-8 are partial cross-sectional views of various gas injectors and mold side walls in accordance with alternative embodiments of the present invention;
FIG. 9 is a schematic representation of Test Samples A-D and F and Control Sample E in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention;
FIG. 10 is a photograph of Test Samples A-D and F in fluid communication with a source of inert gas;
FIG. 11 includes photographs of Test Samples A-C after having been used to redirect a droplet spray of molten metallic material;
FIG. 12 includes photographs of Test Samples D and F after having been used to redirect a droplet spray of molten metallic material, and photographs of Control Sample E after having been exposed to a droplet spray of the molten metallic material;
FIG. 13 includes photographs of various specimens of Test Sample A after having been used to redirect droplet sprays of molten metallic material, wherein the test samples were provided with inert gas supplies having different pressures;
FIG. 14 includes photographs of various specimens of Test Sample A after having been used to redirect droplet sprays of molten metallic material, wherein one of the test samples includes polished surfaces;
FIG. 15 includes photographs of various specimens of Test Sample B after having been used to redirect droplet sprays of molten metallic material, wherein one of the test samples includes polished surfaces;
FIG. 16 includes a graph depicting the velocity profiles of gas flows exiting Test Samples A-C;
FIG. 17 is a schematic representation of Test Samples G, H, and J in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention;
FIG. 18 includes photographs of Test Samples G, H, and J after having been used to redirect a droplet spray of molten metallic material;
FIG. 19 includes photographs of various specimens of Test Sample J after having been used to redirect droplet sprays of molten metallic material, wherein the test samples were provided with inert gas supplies having different pressures;
FIG. 20 includes photomicrographs of the surface roughness of various specimens of Test Sample J;
FIG. 21 includes photographs of various specimens of Test Sample J after having been used to redirect droplet sprays of molten metallic material, wherein the test samples were exposed to the droplet spray for different lengths of time;
FIG. 22 includes photographs of additional specimens of Test Sample J after having been used to redirect droplet sprays of molten metallic material, wherein the test samples were exposed to the droplet spray for different lengths of time; and
FIG. 23 includes photographs of Control Samples E after having been exposed to a droplet spray of a molten metallic material.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
In various embodiments, the present invention includes a process for casting a metallic material, such as 100Cr6, 1% C, 1.5% Cr AISI 52100 steel, for example. The process can include melting and refining the metallic material and subsequently casting the material to create a preform by a nucleated casting technique. Melting and refining the material may be accomplished by, for example, electroslag remelting (ESR) or vacuum arc remelting (VAR). The process can also include transferring the molten refined material to a nucleated casting apparatus through a passage so as to protect it from contamination. The passage may be that formed through a cold induction guide (CIG) or another transfer apparatus. Such exemplary devices and methods are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,496,529, entitled REFINING AND CASTING APPARATUS AND METHOD, which issued on Dec. 17, 2002, U.S. Pat. No. 7,154,932, entitled REFINING AND CASTING APPARATUS, which issued on Dec. 26, 2006, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/564,021, entitled REFINING AND CASTING APPARATUS AND METHOD, which was filed on Nov. 28, 2006, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein. Other suitable devices and methods, however, can be used to provide a molten metallic material in connection with the devices and methods described below.
In various embodiments, referring to FIG. 1, a nucleated casting apparatus can include nozzle 22, atomizer 19, and mold 20 positioned within chamber 24. In use, nozzle 22 can create a stream or flow of molten metallic material which can pass through atomizer 19. In at least one embodiment, atomizer 19 can be configured to produce at least one jet of inert gas which can impinge on the stream of metallic material. In various embodiments, as a result of the above, the jet, or jets, of inert gas can break up the stream into a plurality of droplets, such as droplet spray 26, for example. To cast a preform of the metallic material, nozzle 22 and atomizer 19 can be configured to direct droplet spray 26 into mold 20. In various embodiments, atomizer 19 can be pivoted, or otherwise moved, to change the direction and/or configuration of droplet spray 26. More particularly, referring to FIG. 1, atomizer 19 can include axis 18 which can be moved between a first position in which it is substantially perpendicular to axis 58 and a second position in which axis 18 is skew or oblique with respect to axis 58. In at least one such embodiment, atomizer 19 can be oscillated over an approximately ±10 degree angle, for example.
In various circumstances, at least portions of droplet spray 26, i.e., the overspray, can accumulate on top surface 28 of mold 20. This overspray can become welded to a preform, such as preform 30, for example, being cast within mold 20 as the overspray solidifies. In such circumstances, the overspray can, as described in greater detail below, inhibit the proper formation of preform 30. In various embodiments, referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, the nucleated casting apparatus can further include at least one gas injector, such as gas injector 32, for example, which can be configured to control droplet spray 26 and limit the amount of overspray which accumulates on top surface 28, or other portions of mold 20. More particularly, gas injector 32 can be configured to direct a flow of gas, such as gas flow 34, for example, to substantially contain and/or re-direct droplet spray 26 such that it does not contact, or substantially contact, top surface 28. In at least one embodiment, referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, gas injector 32 can include plate 36 positioned adjacent to mold 20 such that passageway 38 is defined therebetween. Gas injector 32 can further include at least one manifold 40 which can be configured to place at least one gas supply line 42 in fluid communication with passageway 38 and communicate a gas into passageway 38 to create gas flow 34. This gas can include nitrogen or any suitable inert gas, for example.
As illustrated in FIG. 2, gas flow 34 can be configured to re-direct, or push, droplet spray 26 into mold 20. In the illustrated embodiment, gas flow 34 can be configured such that it impinges on droplet spray 26 and deflects the outer perimeter of droplet spray 26 into mold 20. In at least one alternative embodiment, gas flow 34 can be configured such that it is directed parallel to the outer perimeter of droplet spray 26. In such an embodiment, gas flow 34 can act as a containment barrier or fence and can redirect the droplet spray if and when the droplet spray deviates from a desired path. In either event, as illustrated in FIG. 2, the direction of droplet spray 26 can be generally downward and the direction of gas flow 34 can be generally upward. Stated another way, the direction of droplet spray 26 can have a vertically downward component and the direction of gas flow 34 can have a vertically upward component. Other embodiments are envisioned where the droplet spray and the gas flow have oppositely directed components whether or not such components are vertical.
Referring to FIG. 2, in order to redirect droplet spray 26 into mold 20, as described above, gas flow 34 can be directed along an axis, such as axis 44, for example, which can be transverse to outer surface 27 of droplet spray 26. In these embodiments, axis 44 can define an angle of incidence 46 with normal axis 48, where normal axis 48 is perpendicular to surface 27 of droplet spray 26. In various embodiments, angle of incidence 46 can be either an acute, right or obtuse angle. In at least one embodiment, the direction of gas flow 34 can be measured with respect to a center axis of droplet spray 26, such as center axis 50, for example, and can define angle 52 therebetween. In either event, angles 46 and 52, for example, can be selected such that gas flow 34 impinges on droplet spray 26 and controls droplet spray 34 in a desired manner. Although not illustrated, gas injector 32 may be configured such that the direction of axis 44 is adjustable. In various embodiments, gas injector 32 can include a portion which can articulate with respect to mold 20. In these embodiments, the direction of gas flow 34 can be altered to accommodate variances and/or changes in the nucleated casting process, for example.
As described above and referring to FIG. 2, mold 20 and gas injector 32 can be configured to define passageway 38 therebetween. In various embodiments, referring to FIG. 4, the upper portion of mold 120, i.e., upper portion 123, and the upper portion of gas injector 132, i.e., upper portion 133, can define passageway 138 such that gas flow 34 is directed along axis 144 as described above. In at least one embodiment, upper portions 123 and 133 can be configured to define axis 144 at an approximately 45 degree angle with respect to droplet spray axis 50. In alternative embodiments, axis 144 may be defined at an angle with axis 50 which is either greater than or less than 45 degrees. Referring to FIG. 5, upper portions 223 and 233 of mold 220 and gas injector 232, respectively, can be configured to define axis 244 at an approximately 30 degree angle with respect to droplet spray axis 50, i.e., an approximately 60 degree angle with respect to the horizon in the illustrated embodiment. In at least one embodiment, at least a portion of gas injector 232 and/or mold 220 can include a radiused or rounded edge surface 228, wherein rounded edge 228 can be configured to affect the direction and profile of gas flow 34. Similarly, referring to FIG. 6, upper portions 333 and 323 of gas injector 332 and/or mold 320, respectively, can include rounded edge 328, where rounded edge 328 has a smaller radius of curvature than rounded edge 228. Referring to FIG. 7, upper portions 423 and 433 can be configured to define axis 444 in a substantially perpendicular direction to droplet spray axis 50 and, referring to FIG. 8, upper portions 523 and 533 can be configured to define axis 544 in a substantially parallel direction to droplet spray axis 50. In various embodiments, the gas injectors can be oriented to maximize the contact of the inert gas with the droplet spray and thereby minimize the deposition of overspray on the mold. In at least one embodiment, the optimum angle between the axis of the gas flow and the droplet spray can be 23 degrees, i.e., 67 degrees with respect to the horizontal.
In various embodiments, gas injector 32 and mold 20 can define passageway 38 such that it completely circumscribes, or extends around the entire perimeter of, mold 20. In at least one embodiment, passageway 38 can include one continuous opening, or gap, 39 surrounding mold 20 such that gas flow 34 exiting passageway 38 can completely circumscribe, or enclose, droplet spray 26. In such embodiments, referring to FIG. 2, the nucleated casting apparatus can include one or more gas supply lines 42 which communicate gas into passageway 38. The size and quantity of gas supply lines 42 can be selected such that the properties, i.e., density and velocity, for example, of gas flow 34 are substantially consistent around the perimeter of droplet spray 26. In alternative embodiments, passageway 38 can be configured to create a gas flow 34 which circumscribes only a portion of droplet spray 26. In various embodiments, the nucleated casting apparatus can include a plurality of passageways 38 which are not in fluid communication with each other. In such embodiments, each passageway 38 can include at least one opening 39 positioned around the perimeter of mold 20 where openings 39 can be configured to produce a desired gas flow 34.
In various embodiments, referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, the velocity of gas flow 34 exiting passageway 38 can be controlled by changing the pressure and/or volumetric flow rate of the gas supplied to passageway 38. In at least one embodiment, one or more of gas supply lines 42 can be restricted and/or completely obstructed by a valve, for example, to decrease the flow of gas to passageway 38 and thereby decrease the velocity, for example, of gas flow 34. In various embodiments, when the velocity of gas flow 34 is decreased, the capacity of gas flow 34 to redirect droplet spray 26, for example, can also be decreased. Correspondingly, the flow of gas through lines 42 can be increased to increase the capacity for gas flow 34 to redirect droplet spray 26. Such embodiments can be particularly useful in circumstances where the properties of droplet spray 26, such as size and density, for example, change during the operation of the nucleated casting process. In any event, the gas flow can be configured to have sufficient velocity to change the direction of the molten spray particles.
The following actual examples confirm advantages provided by the apparatus and method of the present invention.
Example 1 Evaluation of Gas Injector Gap Configuration
Referring to FIG. 9, various test samples, i.e., Test Samples A-D and F, were utilized to re-direct a droplet spray of molten metallic material as described above. The test samples were then examined to compare the ability of gas injectors having different configurations to reduce the adhesion or accumulation of overspray onto the test samples. Test Sample A, referring to FIGS. 9 and 10, included a coupon which was configured to simulate at least a portion of a mold side wall and a gas injector as outlined above. Test Sample A included a vertical surface (demarcated “A” in FIG. 10), a top surface, a gap positioned intermediate the vertical surface and the top surface, and a plenum configured to place a source of inert gas in fluid communication with the gap. As depicted in FIG. 9, the gap included an axis oriented at a 60 degree angle with respect to the horizontal, i.e., at a 30 degree angle with respect to an axis of the droplet spray. In at least one evaluation, Test Sample A was utilized to redirect a droplet spray for approximately 45 seconds. As illustrated in FIG. 11, although some overspray accumulated on Test Sample A, the inert gas flow produced by Test Sample A was successful in reducing the accumulation of overspray on the top and vertical surfaces.
Further to the above, Test Sample B, referring to FIGS. 9 and 10, included a coupon having a gap oriented in a direction substantially parallel to the droplet spray axis. Test Sample D, again referring to FIGS. 9 and 10, included a coupon having a gap oriented in a direction substantially perpendicular to the droplet spray axis. Test Sample F included a coupon having a gap oriented at a 45 degree angle with respect to the droplet spray axis. As illustrated in FIGS. 11 and 12, Test Samples B, D, and F had varying degrees of success in preventing overspray from accumulating thereon as compared to Control Sample E. Control Sample E, referring to FIGS. 9 and 10, included a top surface oriented at a 45 degree angle relative to the axis of the droplet spray and was positioned such that the top surface was essentially facing away from the droplet spray. Referring to FIG. 12, Control Sample E, unlike Test Samples B, D, and F, did not include a gas injector and, as a result, a substantial amount of overspray accumulated thereon as compared to Test Samples B, D, and F. In fact, as illustrated in FIG. 11, the gas flow produced by Test Sample B was particularly successful in substantially preventing overspray from accumulating on the top surface of Test Sample B.
Test Sample C, similar to Test Sample A, included a gap having an axis oriented at a 60 degree angle with respect to the horizontal. As illustrated in Table 1, the thickness of the gap of Test Sample C, however, was much narrower than the gap of Test Sample A. Referring to FIG. 11, it was observed that less overspray accumulated on Test Sample A than Test Sample C. At least in view of these examples, it is apparent that a larger gap can improve the ability of a gas injector to re-direct a droplet spray of molten metallic material and reduce the accumulation of overspray on the mold as compared to a narrower gap. Other samples have been evaluated where the gaps are approximately 1.5 mm and approximately 3.2 mm wherein a similar relationship was noticed. In other various examples have included gaps having a width between approximately 2.4 mm and approximately 3.2 mm.
TABLE 1
Test Sample
A B C D F
Angle (degrees) 60 90 60 0 45
Gap (mm) 2.6 1.05 1.25 1.35 1.3
Gas Flow (kg/hr) 420 240 235 295 340
Plenum Pressure 2 3 3 3 3
(bar)
As outlined in Table 1, it was also observed that a larger gap can produce a larger and/or faster gas flow. In at least one such embodiment, a faster gas flow can impart more momentum and/or energy to the droplet spray and re-direct the droplets further away from the sidewall of the mold than a slower gas flow. In various embodiments, it was observed that, for a given test sample, the velocity of the gas exiting the gap was substantially proportional to the pressure of the inert gas within the plenum of the coupon. In at least one embodiment, the relationship between the gas velocity and pressure was linearly proportional. Furthermore, referring to FIG. 16, it was observed with respect to Test Samples A and B that the velocity of the inert gas exiting the gap included a substantially symmetrical profile. More particularly, the velocity of the inert gas was determined to be greatest along an axis wherein the velocity gradually decreased with respect to the axis. In at least one actual example, the velocity of the gas was reduced 50% when measured approximately ±7 or 8 degrees with respect to the axis. The velocity of the gas exiting the gap of Test Sample C included a substantially asymmetrical profile which may indicate that the gap included an at least partially non-symmetrical profile or was otherwise occluded.
Example 2 Further Evaluation of Gas Injector Gap Configuration
Referring to FIG. 17, various additional test samples, i.e., Test Samples G, H, and J, were also utilized to re-direct a droplet spray of molten metallic material. Similar to the above, the test samples were then examined to compare the ability of the gas injectors to reduce the adhesion or accumulation of overspray onto the test samples. Test Sample G, H, and J, similar to Test Samples A-D and F, each included a coupon which was configured to simulate at least a portion of a mold side wall and a gas injector. As depicted in FIG. 17, the gas injector of Test Sample G included a gap having an axis oriented at an approximately 60 degree angle with respect to the horizontal, i.e., at an approximately 30 degree angle with respect to an axis of the droplet spray. As also depicted in FIG. 17, Test Sample H included a gap having an approximately 45 degree axis and Test Sample J included a gap having an approximately 67 degree axis.
In at least one evaluation, Test Samples G, H, and J were exposed to a droplet spray for approximately 25 seconds and an inert gas was supplied to the gas injectors at approximately 1.9 bar. As illustrated in FIG. 18, little, if any, overspray accumulated on Test Samples G and J while a small amount of overspray accumulated on Test Sample H. In fact, Test Sample J exhibited almost no accumulation thereon whatsoever. It is believed that such a result was related to the selection of the approximately 67 degree angle of the gap axis. More particularly, the approximately 67 degree gap axis was selected such that it substantially matched the angle of the atomized droplet spray at the edge of the mold/gas injector test sample. Such a result is further supported by the similar result exhibited with Test Sample G which included an approximately 60 degree gap axis.
While an approximately 67 degree angle was determined to be optimal for these particular test samples, the optimal angle in other embodiments may be different and may be dependent upon the distance between the nozzle and the top of the mold, the diameter of the mold, and the configuration of the droplet spray. In at least one embodiment, the droplet spray may be rastered and/or oscillated relative to the mold wherein, in such embodiments, the optimal gap axis angle may be selected based on an average and/or median configuration of the droplet spray, for example. In various circumstances, including evaluations utilizing Test Sample H, for example, the inert gas flow produced by at least one gas injector impinged on the droplet spray so significantly that it overly disrupted the spray cone and caused portions of the droplet spray to accumulate on adjacent test samples. In view of the above, it was determined that the pressure and velocity of such gas flows could be controlled, or reduced, to prevent such gas injectors from producing an overly-disruptive gas flow.
TABLE 2
Coupon G H J
Angle (degrees) 60 45 67
Gap (mm) 2.75 2.75 2.7
Plenum Pressure 1.8 1.7 1.9
(bar)
Example 3 Evaluation of Inert Gas Pressure
Referring to FIG. 13, various specimens of Test Sample A were utilized to re-direct a droplet spray of molten metallic material as described above. The test samples were then examined to compare the ability of various gas injectors having substantially the same configuration, but supplied with inert gas flows having different pressures, to reduce the adhesion or accumulation of overspray onto the test samples. In the first example, depicted in FIG. 13( a), nitrogen gas having a pressure of approximately 0.2 bar was supplied to the test sample. In the second example, depicted in FIG. 13( b), nitrogen gas having a pressure of approximately 1.0-1.2 bar was supplied to the second test sample and, in the third example, depicted in FIG. 13( c), nitrogen gas having a pressure of approximately 2-3 bar was supplied to the third test sample. As illustrated in FIG. 13, it was observed that less overspray accumulated on the third test sample (2-3 bar) than on the first (0.2 bar) and second (1.0-1.2 bar) test samples. Likewise, it was also observed that less overspray accumulated on the second test sample (1.0-1.2 bar) than the first test sample (0.2 bar). Thus, at least for these examples, it is apparent that a supply of gas having a higher pressure can produce a gas flow which can be better suited for reducing the accumulation of overspray on a mold as compared to a supply of gas having a lower pressure.
Example 4 Further Evaluation of Inert Gas Pressure
Referring to FIG. 19, various specimens of Test Sample J were utilized to re-direct a droplet spray of molten metallic material for approximately 25 seconds as described above. The test samples were then examined to compare the ability of various gas injectors having substantially the same configuration, but supplied with inert gas flows having different pressures, to reduce the adhesion or accumulation of overspray onto the test samples. In the first example, depicted in FIG. 19( a), nitrogen gas having a pressure of approximately 1.9 bar (0.19 MPa) was supplied to a first test sample. In the second example, depicted in FIG. 19( b), nitrogen gas having a pressure of approximately 1.0 bar (0.10 MPa) was supplied to a second test sample; in the third example, depicted in FIG. 19( c), nitrogen gas having a pressure of approximately 0.5 bar (0.05 MPa) was supplied to a third test sample; and, in the fourth example, depicted in FIG. 19( d), nitrogen gas having a pressure of approximately 0.3 bar (0.03 MPa) was supplied to a fourth test sample. As illustrated in FIG. 19, it was observed that less overspray accumulated on the first test sample (1.9 bar) than on the other test samples which were supplied with a nitrogen gas having a lower pressure. Likewise, it was also observed that less overspray accumulated on the second test sample (1.0 bar) than the third test sample (0.5 bar) and the fourth test sample (0.3 bar). Thus, at least for these additional examples, it is also apparent that a supply of gas having a higher pressure can produce a gas flow which can be better suited for reducing the accumulation of overspray on a mold as compared to a supply of gas having a lower pressure.
Example 5 Evaluation of Surface Finishes
Referring to FIG. 14, various specimens of Test Sample A were utilized to re-direct a droplet spray of a molten metallic material as described above. The test samples were then examined to compare the ability of various gas injectors having substantially the same configuration, but different surface finishes, to reduce the adhesion or accumulation of overspray onto the test samples. Referring to FIG. 14( a), at least the vertical and top surfaces of the first specimen were comprised of 1018 cold-rolled steel which were left in a ‘as-rolled’ condition, i.e., they were not polished for the purposes of this example. Referring to FIG. 14( b), at least the vertical and top surfaces of the second specimen were also comprised of 1018 cold-rolled steel; however, the top surface and at least the upper portion of the vertical surface were polished. Generally, in various embodiments, such surfaces can be polished such that they posses a surface roughness, either Ra and/or Rq, of approximately 1 micrometer (μm). In other various embodiments, the surfaces can be polished such that they have a surface roughness, either Ra and/or Rq, of approximately 1.9 μm, approximately 0.8 μm, approximately 0.4 μm, approximately 0.1 μm, and/or approximately 0.012 μm, for example.
In various embodiments, a gas injector, or at least a portion thereof, can be polished with a surface grinder or drill, where the surface grinder or drill can include a rotating wheel configured to be moved over the surfaces of the gas injector. In such embodiments, a rotating wheel comprised of large grit particles, such as 80 grit, for example, can be initially used and, thereafter, wheels having smaller grit particles, such as 240 grit, for example, can be successively used until a ‘soft wheel’ is used. In at least one embodiment, the gas injector can be positioned against a rotating wheel extending from a stationary machine. In either event, the surfaces of the gas injector can then be wet polished with a rotating wheel and/or a fine polishing media. In various circumstances, the surfaces can also be manually polished with a natural brush and at least one polishing paste in order to attain the desired surface finish. In various embodiments, the gas injectors can be electro and/or chemical polished in addition to or in lieu of the mechanical polishing described above. In such embodiments, the surfaces can be polished such that they have a surface roughness, either Ra and/or Rq, of approximately 1.9 μm, approximately 0.8 μm, approximately 0.4 μm, approximately 0.1 μm, and/or approximately 0.012 μm, for example.
As illustrated in FIG. 14, it was observed that significantly less overspray accumulated on the polished portions of the second specimen as compared to the first specimen (FIG. 14( a)) and the unpolished portions of the second specimen (FIG. 14( b)). Similarly, referring to FIG. 15, various specimens of Test Sample B having substantially the same configuration, but different surface finishes, were utilized to re-direct a droplet spray of a molten metallic material as described above. As illustrated in FIG. 15, it was observed that significantly less overspray accumulated on the polished portions of the second specimen (FIG. 15( b)) as compared to the first specimen (FIG. 15( a)) and the unpolished portions of the second specimen (FIG. 15( b)).
In various examples, referring to the photomicrographs illustrated in FIG. 20, the surface roughness of gas injectors having “as rolled” surfaces (FIG. 20( a)), machined or ground surfaces (FIG. 20( b)), and polished surfaces (FIG. 20( c)) were measured and several commonly-used statistical values were calculated using techniques described in ISO standard 4287. For example, the Roughness Average (Ra), the Determined Roughness (Rz), the Root Mean Square Roughness (Rq), the Maximum Profile Peak Height (Rp), and the Maximum Height of the Profile (Rt) of the as-rolled, ground, and polished surfaces were measured. Such values are well understood and commonly used in the field of surface metrology and, as a result, no additional description of the methods used and the calculations performed to obtain these values is provided herein.
TABLE 3
(all values in micrometers (μm))
Surface Finish Ra Rz Rq Rp Rt
As-rolled 4.15 28.12 5.70 9.62 35.57
Machined/Ground 3.39 13.44 3.82 7.02 16.04
Polished 1.05 0.24 0.06 0.14 0.36
As can be seen from Table 3, the polished surfaces exhibited the smoothest, or least rough, surfaces and the as-rolled surfaces exhibited the roughest surfaces. As described above, droplet overspray was observed to be less likely to accumulate on gas injectors having polished surfaces than gas injectors having non-polished surfaces. Furthermore, grinding or machining the surfaces of the gas injectors and/or mold side walls can reduce the roughness of the surfaces as compared to as-rolled surfaces. In such embodiments, as a result, the ground or machined surfaces can reduce the amount of overspray which accumulates thereon as compared to as-rolled surfaces. In such embodiments, the surfaces can be machined or ground such that they have a surface roughness, either Ra and/or Rq, of approximately 6.3 μm, approximately 3.2 μm, approximately 1.6 μm, approximately 0.2 μm, approximately 0.1 μm, approximately 0.05 μm, and/or approximately 0.025 μm, for example.
In view of the above, it is believed that the tendency for the atomized droplets of metallic materials to accumulate on the as-rolled surfaces, for example, may be the result of, at least in part, a mechanical keying effect or interlocking between the atomized spray droplets and ridges extending from the as-rolled surfaces. While such a mechanical interlocking may occur on the machined and/or polished surfaces, it is believed that such surfaces have smaller and/or fewer ridges and, as a result, the atomized droplets are less likely to adhere to such surfaces. In various embodiments, further to the above, at least a portion of a gas injector and/or mold wall can be coated with a material which can decrease the coefficient of friction between the overspray droplets and the surfaces of the gas injector or mold thereby increasing the possibility that the droplets will not ‘catch’ on the surfaces thereof.
Example 6 Evaluation of Operating Duration
Referring to FIGS. 21 and 22, various specimens of Test Sample J were utilized to re-direct a droplet spray of a molten metallic material as described above for different lengths of time. In these evaluations, at least the vertical and top surfaces of the specimens were comprised of 1018 cold-rolled steel and were polished in accordance with at least one of the techniques described herein. Referring to FIG. 21, a first Test Sample J (FIG. 21( a)) was exposed to a droplet spray for approximately 25 seconds and a second Test Sample J (FIG. 21( b)) was exposed to the droplet spray for approximately 120 seconds where both test samples were provided with a supply of nitrogen gas having a pressure of approximately 1.9 bar. As illustrated in FIG. 21, there was minimal overspray deposit visible on the both of the gas injectors. Such a result indicates that the various gas injectors described herein could be operated for extended periods of time. In a similar evaluation, referring to FIG. 22, a first Test Sample J (FIG. 22( a)) was exposed to a droplet spray for approximately 25 seconds and a second Test Sample J (FIG. 22( b)) was exposed to the droplet spray for approximately 120 seconds where both test samples were provided with a supply of nitrogen gas having a pressure of approximately 0.5 bar. As illustrated in FIG. 22, very little overspray accumulated on the first test sample (FIG. 22( a)) while only somewhat more overspray accumulated on the second test sample (FIG. 22( b)) further supporting the use of the gas injectors for extended periods of time. By way of comparison, first and second Control Samples E, i.e., samples which do not have gas injectors, were exposed to a droplet spray for approximately 120 seconds and, as illustrated in FIG. 23, such control samples exhibited a significant accumulation of overspray thereon.
During at least several actual examples, it was observed that less overspray accumulated on the top surfaces of test samples which were oriented, or sloped, in a direction substantially parallel to the outside perimeter of the spray cone. Correspondingly, it was also observed that top surfaces oriented in directions which were increasingly closer to being transverse to the outside perimeter of the droplet spray accumulated more overspray thereon. Thus, it is apparent that the top surface of the gas injector preferably should be angled so as to substantially match, if not exceed, the angle of the spray cone in order to reduce the accumulation of overspray. In at least one such embodiment, as described above, the angle of the spray cone was determined to be approximately 67 degrees and, thus, the top surface would be optimally oriented at an approximately 67 degree, or greater, angle with respect to the horizontal, i.e., a plane perpendicular to the axis of the droplet spray.
Embodiments of the present invention are envisioned in which the configuration of passageway 38 can be changed. In various embodiments, referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, upper portion 33 of gas injector 32 can be articulated with respect to plate 36. In such embodiments, upper portion 33 can be moved relative to plate 36 to increase or decrease the size of passageway opening, or gap, 39. When the size of passageway opening 39 is altered, the pressure and the velocity of the gas exiting opening 39 will be affected. Such a relationship between pressure and velocity of a fluid is known as the “Venturi effect”. In various embodiments, gas injector 32 can include elements which can be actuated to selectively constrict the flow of gas through passageway 38. The constriction of passageway 38 can affect the flow of gas therethrough, as described above.
In various embodiments, a gas injector can be integrally formed with a mold. In at least one such embodiment, the mold can include an opening, passageway, and/or plenum formed therein which can be configured to receive an inert gas as described above. In various alternative embodiments, referring to FIG. 4, plate 36 of gas injector 32 can be welded to mold 20. Weld bead 37 can be configured to seal the end of passageway 38 such that gas flowing into passageway 38 from manifolds 40 will flow through opening 39 as described above. Various other embodiments are envisioned in which a seal is created between gas injector 32 and mold 20, for example. In at least one such embodiment, bolts, for example, can be utilized to mount plate 36 to mold 20 and compress a seal or gasket positioned intermediate plate 36 and mold 20. In various alternative embodiments, the casting apparatus can include at least one gas injector that is positioned near the mold but is not mounted or attached to the mold. In various embodiments, a nucleated casting apparatus can include gas injectors positioned at different distances relative to the droplet spray. In at least one such embodiment, the casting apparatus can include a first, or inner, gas injector and a second, or outer, gas injector, for example. In various embodiments, the gas flow produced by the first gas injector can be oriented in a first direction and the gas flow produced by the second gas injector can be oriented in a second direction, where the first direction is different than the second direction.
In various embodiments, referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, the mold of the nucleated casting apparatus can be rotated relative to the gas injector. More particularly, in at least one embodiment, the casting apparatus can further include drive shaft 60 which can be integrally formed with, or otherwise connected to, side wall 21 of mold 20. In operation, drive shaft 60 can rotate side wall 21 about axis of rotation 58. In various embodiments, especially in embodiments where atomizing nozzle 22 is not directly centered above mold 20 along axis of rotation 58, the rotation of side wall 21 can reduce the accumulation of overspray on top surface 28. Such nucleated casting devices and methods are disclosed in a co-pending, commonly-owned United States patent application entitled REFINING CASTING APPARATUS AND METHOD, filed on Oct. 30, 2007, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein. In various embodiments, gas injector 32 can include bearing portion 54 which can be configured to rotatably support side wall 21 of mold 20. In at least one embodiment, the casting apparatus can further include a bearing positioned between side wall 21 and bearing portion 54 to facilitate relative movement between side wall 21 and bearing portion 54. Such a bearing can be comprised of any suitable material including, for example, brass. Referring to the illustrated embodiment, bearing portion 54 and side wall 21 can each include a track configured to receive ball bearings 56.
In various embodiments, referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, the mold of the nucleated casting apparatus can further include a base which is movable relative to the side wall of the mold. More particularly, in at least one embodiment, the casting apparatus can further include ram 62 connected to base 25 of mold 20 where, in operation, ram 62 can be configured to move base 25 relative to side wall 21 and withdraw preform 30 as it is being formed within mold 20. In such embodiments, a relatively constant distance can be maintained between the top surface of preform 30 and atomizing nozzle 22 and, as a result, the properties of the preform being cast can be more easily controlled. Furthermore, such embodiments can permit longer preforms to be cast. While an exemplary withdrawal mold is illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2, any other suitable withdrawal mold can be used, including those disclosed in the co-pending, commonly-owned United States patent application entitled REFINING CASTING APPARATUS AND METHOD filed on Oct. 30, 2007. In various embodiments, base 25 can also be rotated about axis 58 at the same speed as, or at a speed different than, side wall 21.
In various circumstances, as indicated above, if overspray is permitted to accumulate on mold 20 and it is not sufficiently removed, the overspray may block at least a portion of droplet spray 26 from entering mold 20 and thereby impede the proper formation of preform 30. Furthermore, as described above, the overspray may become welded to preform 30 and prevent preform 30 from being withdrawn relative to side wall 21. Such circumstances can reduce the output and profitability of the nucleated casting process and negatively affect the quality of cast preforms. In view of the above, gas injectors in accordance with the present invention can also be configured to direct a flow of gas which can dislodge overspray which has accumulated on top surface 28, for example, and direct it into mold 20. In at least one embodiment, the gas injectors can be configured to dislodge the overspray from top surface 28 such that it does not fall into mold 20. In either case, the gas injectors can be oriented to direct a gas flow at any suitable angle with respect to the top surface of the mold, for example, including a generally downward direction and/or a direction where the gas flow impinges on the side wall of the mold, for example.
It is to be understood that the present description illustrates those aspects of the invention relevant to a clear understanding of the invention. Certain aspects of the invention that would be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art and that, therefore, would not facilitate a better understanding of the invention have not been presented in order to simplify the present description. Although the present invention has been described in connection with certain embodiments, those of ordinary skill in the art will, upon considering the foregoing description, recognize that many modifications and variations of the invention may be employed. All such variations and modifications of the invention are intended to be covered by the foregoing description and the following claims.

Claims (28)

1. An apparatus for producing a preform by nucleated casting, the apparatus comprising:
a mold in which a preform is formed, wherein the mold comprises a side wall, and a top surface, and wherein the side wall of the mold comprises a mold upper portion;
an atomizing nozzle, wherein the atomizing nozzle produces a droplet spray directed towards the mold; and
a gas injector producing a gas flow, wherein the gas injector comprises a plate and a gas injector upper portion;
wherein the plate and the mold define a passageway therebetween for gas flow;
wherein the mold top surface and the gas injector upper portion define a gap fluidly communicating with the passageway for gas flow; and
wherein the gap directs the gas flow in a direction that redirects at least a portion of the droplet spray away from the side wall of the mold.
2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein a configuration of the gap can be altered to change at least one of a size of the gap and a direction of the gas flow.
3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the gas injector upper portion comprises one of a rounded and a radiused edge surface that can be configured to affect at least one of a direction of the gas flow and a profile of the gas flow.
4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the gas injector upper portion is articulable to change at least one of a size of the gap and a direction of the gas flow.
5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the gas injector further comprises at least one actuated element to selectively constrict the gas flow through the passageway.
6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the gas injector further comprises at least one manifold and at least one gas supply line, wherein the at least one manifold is configured to selectively fluidly connect the at least one gas supply line and the passageway.
7. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein the gas injector further comprises at least one valve adapted to restrict gas flow from the at least one gas supply line into the at least one manifold.
8. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein the plate is welded to the mold with at least one weld bead configured to seal the passageway so that gas flowing through the at least one manifold into the passageway is directed to the gap.
9. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the mold defines a perimeter, and the gas flow produced by the gas injector circumscribes the perimeter.
10. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein:
the mold further comprises a base;
the side wall is selectively rotatable about an axis of rotation; and
the base is movable relative to the side wall along the axis of rotation to change a distance between the atomizing nozzle and the base.
11. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a melting and refining apparatus in fluid communication with the atomizing nozzle, wherein the melting and refining apparatus is selected from an electroslag remelting apparatus and a vacuum arc remelting apparatus.
12. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a chamber configured to maintain a protective gas atmosphere, wherein the mold is positioned in the chamber.
13. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein at least one of the mold and the gas injector comprises a polished surface adapted to inhibit accumulation of the droplet spray on the polished surface.
14. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the polished surface comprises an average surface roughness of approximately 1 micrometer.
15. An apparatus for producing a preform by nucleated casting, the apparatus comprising:
a mold comprising a top surface, a side wall, and a mold upper portion;
an atomizing nozzle producing a droplet spray directed towards the mold; and
a gas injector producing a gas flow and comprising a plate and a gas injector upper portion;
wherein the plate and the mold define a passageway therebetween for gas flow;
wherein the top surface of the mold and the gas injector upper portion define a gap in fluid communication with the passageway; and
wherein the gap directs the gas flow in a direction that redirects at least a portion of the droplet spray away from at least one of the top surface of the mold and the side wall of the mold.
16. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein a configuration of the gap is adjustable to change at least one of a size of the gap and a direction of the gas flow.
17. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the gas injector upper portion comprises one of a rounded and a radiused edge surface that can be configured to affect at least one of a direction of the gas flow and a profile of the gas flow.
18. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the gas injector upper portion is articulable to change at least one of a size of the gap and a direction of the gas flow.
19. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the gas injector further comprises at least one actuated element to selectively constrict the gas flow through the passageway.
20. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the gas injector further comprises at least one manifold and at least one gas supply line, wherein the at least one manifold is configured to selectively fluidly connect the at least one gas supply line and the passageway.
21. The apparatus of claim 20, wherein the at least one gas supply line further comprises at least one valve adapted to restrict gas flow from the at least one gas supply line into the at least one manifold.
22. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the plate is welded to the mold with at least one weld bead configured to seal the passageway so that gas flowing through the at least one manifold into the passageway is directed to the gap.
23. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the mold defines a perimeter and the gas flow produced by the gas injector circumscribes the perimeter.
24. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein:
the mold further comprises a base;
the side wall is selectively rotatable about an axis of rotation; and
the base is movable relative to the side wall along the axis of rotation to change a distance between the atomizing nozzle and the base.
25. The apparatus of claim 15, further comprising a melting and refining apparatus in fluid communication with the atomizing nozzle, wherein the melting and refining apparatus is selected from an electroslag remelting apparatus and a vacuum arc remelting apparatus.
26. The apparatus of claim 15, further comprising a chamber configured to maintain a protective gas atmosphere, wherein the mold is positioned in the chamber.
27. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein at least one of the mold and the gas injector comprises a polished surface adapted to inhibit accumulation of the droplet spray on the polished surface.
28. The apparatus of claim 27, wherein the polished surface comprises an average surface roughness of approximately 1 micrometer.
US13/108,402 2007-12-04 2011-05-16 Casting apparatus and method Active US8156996B2 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/108,402 US8156996B2 (en) 2007-12-04 2011-05-16 Casting apparatus and method
US13/420,910 US8302661B2 (en) 2007-12-04 2012-03-15 Casting apparatus and method

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/949,808 US7798199B2 (en) 2007-12-04 2007-12-04 Casting apparatus and method
US12/861,033 US7963314B2 (en) 2007-12-04 2010-08-23 Casting apparatus and method
US13/108,402 US8156996B2 (en) 2007-12-04 2011-05-16 Casting apparatus and method

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/861,033 Continuation US7963314B2 (en) 2007-12-04 2010-08-23 Casting apparatus and method

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/420,910 Continuation US8302661B2 (en) 2007-12-04 2012-03-15 Casting apparatus and method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20110214833A1 US20110214833A1 (en) 2011-09-08
US8156996B2 true US8156996B2 (en) 2012-04-17

Family

ID=40674547

Family Applications (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/949,808 Active 2029-03-31 US7798199B2 (en) 2007-12-04 2007-12-04 Casting apparatus and method
US12/861,033 Active US7963314B2 (en) 2007-12-04 2010-08-23 Casting apparatus and method
US13/108,402 Active US8156996B2 (en) 2007-12-04 2011-05-16 Casting apparatus and method
US13/420,910 Active US8302661B2 (en) 2007-12-04 2012-03-15 Casting apparatus and method

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/949,808 Active 2029-03-31 US7798199B2 (en) 2007-12-04 2007-12-04 Casting apparatus and method
US12/861,033 Active US7963314B2 (en) 2007-12-04 2010-08-23 Casting apparatus and method

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/420,910 Active US8302661B2 (en) 2007-12-04 2012-03-15 Casting apparatus and method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (4) US7798199B2 (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070124625A1 (en) * 2005-11-30 2007-05-31 Microsoft Corporation Predicting degradation of a communication channel below a threshold based on data transmission errors
US20070151695A1 (en) * 2000-11-15 2007-07-05 Ati Properties, Inc. Refining and Casting Apparatus and Method
US20080237200A1 (en) * 2007-03-30 2008-10-02 Ati Properties, Inc. Melting Furnace Including Wire-Discharge Ion Plasma Electron Emitter
US20100012629A1 (en) * 2007-03-30 2010-01-21 Ati Properties, Inc. Ion Plasma Electron Emitters for a Melting Furnace
US20120168110A1 (en) * 2007-12-04 2012-07-05 Ati Properties, Inc. Casting Apparatus and Method
US8747956B2 (en) 2011-08-11 2014-06-10 Ati Properties, Inc. Processes, systems, and apparatus for forming products from atomized metals and alloys
US10232434B2 (en) 2000-11-15 2019-03-19 Ati Properties Llc Refining and casting apparatus and method
WO2019183425A1 (en) * 2018-03-23 2019-09-26 Nova Engineering Films, Inc. Film deposition apparatus with gas entraining openings

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7803212B2 (en) 2005-09-22 2010-09-28 Ati Properties, Inc. Apparatus and method for clean, rapidly solidified alloys
US7803211B2 (en) 2005-09-22 2010-09-28 Ati Properties, Inc. Method and apparatus for producing large diameter superalloy ingots
US7578960B2 (en) * 2005-09-22 2009-08-25 Ati Properties, Inc. Apparatus and method for clean, rapidly solidified alloys
US10532402B2 (en) * 2011-06-30 2020-01-14 Persimmon Technologies Corporation System and method for making a structured magnetic material with integrated particle insulation
CN105451916B (en) 2014-05-13 2018-12-18 犹他大学研究基金会 The preparation of substantially spherically-shaped metal powder
KR20170101927A (en) 2014-12-02 2017-09-06 더 유니버시티 오브 유타 리서치 파운데이션 Deoxidation of molten salts of metal powders

Citations (162)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3005246A (en) 1958-12-24 1961-10-24 Union Carbide Corp Method of producing high-quality ingots of reactive metals
US3072982A (en) 1953-07-13 1963-01-15 Westinghouse Electric Corp Method of producing sound and homogeneous ingots
US3101515A (en) 1960-06-03 1963-08-27 Stauffer Chemical Co Electron beam furnace with magnetically guided axial and transverse beams
US3389208A (en) 1967-05-04 1968-06-18 Consarc Corp Consumable electrode furnace for electroslag refining
US3420977A (en) 1965-06-18 1969-01-07 Air Reduction Electron beam apparatus
US3519059A (en) 1967-07-12 1970-07-07 Viktor Grigorievich Voskoboini Method of vacuum slag refining of metal in the course of continuous casting
US3547622A (en) 1968-06-12 1970-12-15 Pennwalt Corp D.c. powered plasma arc method and apparatus for refining molten metal
US3576207A (en) 1968-04-23 1971-04-27 Steel Co Of Wales Ltd Formation of steel strip
US3627293A (en) 1969-03-14 1971-12-14 Leybold Heraeus Verwaltung Apparatus for purifying metals by pouring through slag
US3690635A (en) 1969-05-16 1972-09-12 Air Reduction Condensate collection means
US3702630A (en) 1971-01-05 1972-11-14 Centrifugation Soc Civ De Apparatus for casting solid cylindrical metallic objects
US3737305A (en) 1970-12-02 1973-06-05 Aluminum Co Of America Treating molten aluminum
US3817503A (en) 1973-06-13 1974-06-18 Carpenter Technology Corp Apparatus for making metal powder
US3825415A (en) 1971-07-28 1974-07-23 Electricity Council Method and apparatus for the production of liquid titanium from the reaction of vaporized titanium tetrachloride and a reducing metal
US3826301A (en) 1971-10-26 1974-07-30 R Brooks Method and apparatus for manufacturing precision articles from molten articles
US3868987A (en) 1972-02-24 1975-03-04 Air Liquide Method of electric refining of metals by slag, known as the E. S. R. method, using liquefied gas to isolate the slag and electrode from the ambient air
US3896258A (en) 1973-09-04 1975-07-22 Charles W Hanks Electron beam gun system
US3909921A (en) 1971-10-26 1975-10-07 Osprey Metals Ltd Method and apparatus for making shaped articles from sprayed molten metal or metal alloy
US3970892A (en) 1975-05-19 1976-07-20 Hughes Aircraft Company Ion plasma electron gun
US3972713A (en) 1974-05-30 1976-08-03 Carpenter Technology Corporation Sulfidation resistant nickel-iron base alloy
US3985177A (en) 1968-12-31 1976-10-12 Buehler William J Method for continuously casting wire or the like
US3988084A (en) 1974-11-11 1976-10-26 Carpenter Technology Corporation Atomizing nozzle assembly for making metal powder and method of operating the same
US3989091A (en) 1971-06-07 1976-11-02 Boris Izrailevich Medovar Method for electroslag remelting of titanium or its alloys and a device for effecting same
US4025818A (en) 1976-04-20 1977-05-24 Hughes Aircraft Company Wire ion plasma electron gun
US4058697A (en) 1972-10-09 1977-11-15 Boris Grigorievich Sokolov Electron beam unit for heat treatment by electron bombardment technique
US4062700A (en) 1974-12-30 1977-12-13 Nippon Steel Corporation Method for producing a steel sheet with dual-phase structure composed of ferrite- and rapidly-cooled-transformed phases
US4066117A (en) 1975-10-28 1978-01-03 The International Nickel Company, Inc. Spray casting of gas atomized molten metal to produce high density ingots
US4136527A (en) 1976-01-23 1979-01-30 Mannesmann Aktiengesellschaft Cooling continuously cast ingots
US4190404A (en) 1977-12-14 1980-02-26 United Technologies Corporation Method and apparatus for removing inclusion contaminants from metals and alloys
US4221587A (en) 1979-03-23 1980-09-09 Allied Chemical Corporation Method for making metallic glass powder
US4261412A (en) 1979-05-14 1981-04-14 Special Metals Corporation Fine grain casting method
US4264641A (en) 1977-03-17 1981-04-28 Phrasor Technology Inc. Electrohydrodynamic spraying to produce ultrafine particles
US4272463A (en) 1974-12-18 1981-06-09 The International Nickel Co., Inc. Process for producing metal powder
US4305451A (en) 1977-06-23 1981-12-15 Ksendzyk Georgy V Electroslag remelting and surfacing apparatus
US4343433A (en) 1977-09-29 1982-08-10 Ppg Industries, Inc. Internal-atomizing spray head with secondary annulus suitable for use with induction charging electrode
EP0073585A1 (en) 1981-08-26 1983-03-09 Special Metals Corporation Alloy remelting process
EP0095298A1 (en) 1982-05-24 1983-11-30 Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. Casting
US4426141A (en) 1981-04-23 1984-01-17 Holcomb Harry F Bright ring keratoscope
US4441542A (en) 1981-06-10 1984-04-10 Olin Corporation Process for cooling and solidifying continuous or semi-continuously cast material
US4449568A (en) 1980-02-28 1984-05-22 Allied Corporation Continuous casting controller
US4471831A (en) 1980-12-29 1984-09-18 Allied Corporation Apparatus for rapid solidification casting of high temperature and reactive metallic alloys
US4482376A (en) 1980-11-14 1984-11-13 Institutul De Cercetare Stiintifica, Inginerie Tehnologica Si Proiectare Pentru Sectoare Calde Method of and apparatus for melting and casting reactive metals
US4544404A (en) 1985-03-12 1985-10-01 Crucible Materials Corporation Method for atomizing titanium
WO1985005489A1 (en) 1984-05-14 1985-12-05 Hughes Aircraft Company Modulator switch with low voltage control
WO1986000466A1 (en) 1984-06-18 1986-01-16 Hughes Aircraft Company Radial geometry electron beam controlled switch utilizing wire-ion-plasma electron source
US4575325A (en) 1983-05-03 1986-03-11 Bbc Brown, Boveri & Co., Ltd. Device for atomizing liquid metals for the purpose of producing a finely granular powder
US4619597A (en) 1984-02-29 1986-10-28 General Electric Company Apparatus for melt atomization with a concave melt nozzle for gas deflection
US4619845A (en) 1985-02-22 1986-10-28 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Method for generating fine sprays of molten metal for spray coating and powder making
US4631013A (en) 1984-02-29 1986-12-23 General Electric Company Apparatus for atomization of unstable melt streams
US4642522A (en) 1984-06-18 1987-02-10 Hughes Aircraft Company Wire-ion-plasma electron gun employing auxiliary grid
US4689074A (en) 1985-07-03 1987-08-25 Iit Research Institute Method and apparatus for forming ultrafine metal powders
US4694222A (en) 1984-04-02 1987-09-15 Rpc Industries Ion plasma electron gun
US4738713A (en) 1986-12-04 1988-04-19 The Duriron Company, Inc. Method for induction melting reactive metals and alloys
US4755722A (en) 1984-04-02 1988-07-05 Rpc Industries Ion plasma electron gun
US4762975A (en) 1984-02-06 1988-08-09 Phrasor Scientific, Incorporated Method and apparatus for making submicrom powders
US4762553A (en) 1987-04-24 1988-08-09 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Method for making rapidly solidified powder
US4769064A (en) 1988-01-21 1988-09-06 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Method for synthesizing ultrafine powder materials
US4779802A (en) 1985-11-12 1988-10-25 Osprey Metals Limited Atomization of metals
GB2203889A (en) 1987-03-30 1988-10-26 Rpc Ind Wire ion plasma electron gun
US4788016A (en) 1986-06-16 1988-11-29 Imperial Chemical Industries Plc Apparatus and process for producing powders and other granular materials
US4801411A (en) 1986-06-05 1989-01-31 Southwest Research Institute Method and apparatus for producing monosize ceramic particles
US4801412A (en) 1984-02-29 1989-01-31 General Electric Company Method for melt atomization with reduced flow gas
US4838340A (en) 1988-10-13 1989-06-13 Axel Johnson Metals, Inc. Continuous casting of fine grain ingots
US4842704A (en) 1987-07-29 1989-06-27 Collins George J Magnetron deposition of ceramic oxide-superconductor thin films
US4842170A (en) 1987-07-06 1989-06-27 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Liquid metal electromagnetic flow control device incorporating a pumping action
WO1990001250A1 (en) 1988-07-20 1990-02-08 American International Technologies, Inc. Remote ion source plasma electron gun
US4916361A (en) 1988-04-14 1990-04-10 Hughes Aircraft Company Plasma wave tube
US4919335A (en) 1988-07-19 1990-04-24 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Method and apparatus for atomization and spraying of molten metals
US4926923A (en) 1985-03-25 1990-05-22 Osprey Metals Ltd. Deposition of metallic products using relatively cold solid particles
US4931091A (en) 1988-06-14 1990-06-05 Alcan International Limited Treatment of molten light metals and apparatus
US4932635A (en) 1988-07-11 1990-06-12 Axel Johnson Metals, Inc. Cold hearth refining apparatus
US4938275A (en) 1985-11-12 1990-07-03 Osprey Metals Limited Production of spray deposits
US4955045A (en) 1988-04-08 1990-09-04 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Plasma X-ray tube, in particular for X-ray preionization of gas lasers and method for produicng X-radiation with such an X-ray tube
US4961776A (en) 1988-07-11 1990-10-09 Axel Johnson Metals, Inc. Cold hearth refining
US5004153A (en) 1990-03-02 1991-04-02 General Electric Company Melt system for spray-forming
US5074933A (en) 1989-07-25 1991-12-24 Olin Corporation Copper-nickel-tin-silicon alloys having improved processability
US5084091A (en) 1989-11-09 1992-01-28 Crucible Materials Corporation Method for producing titanium particles
US5102620A (en) * 1989-04-03 1992-04-07 Olin Corporation Copper alloys with dispersed metal nitrides and method of manufacture
US5104634A (en) 1989-04-20 1992-04-14 Hercules Incorporated Process for forming diamond coating using a silent discharge plasma jet process
CA2048836A1 (en) 1990-10-22 1992-04-23 Thomas F. Sawyer Low flow rate nozzle and spray forming process
EP0486830A2 (en) 1990-11-17 1992-05-27 Eckart-Werke Standard Bronzepulver-Werke Carl Eckart Gmbh & Co. Process for the atomisation of molten metal to produce metal powders
US5142549A (en) 1989-09-05 1992-08-25 Bremer Siegfried M K Remelting apparatus and method for recognition and recovery of noble metals and rare earths
US5160532A (en) 1991-10-21 1992-11-03 General Electric Company Direct processing of electroslag refined metal
US5167915A (en) 1990-03-30 1992-12-01 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd. Process for producing a rare earth-iron-boron magnet
US5176874A (en) 1991-11-05 1993-01-05 General Electric Company Controlled process for the production of a spray of atomized metal droplets
US5222547A (en) 1990-07-19 1993-06-29 Axel Johnson Metals, Inc. Intermediate pressure electron beam furnace
US5226946A (en) 1992-05-29 1993-07-13 Howmet Corporation Vacuum melting/casting method to reduce inclusions
US5240067A (en) 1992-01-08 1993-08-31 Reynolds Metals Company Method and apparatus for continuous molten material cladding of extruded products
US5263044A (en) 1989-09-05 1993-11-16 Bremer Siegfried M K Remelting method for recognition and recovery of noble metals and rare metals
US5266098A (en) 1992-01-07 1993-11-30 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Production of charged uniformly sized metal droplets
US5268018A (en) 1991-11-05 1993-12-07 General Electric Company Controlled process for the production of a spray of atomized metal droplets
US5272718A (en) 1990-04-09 1993-12-21 Leybold Aktiengesellschaft Method and apparatus for forming a stream of molten material
US5291940A (en) 1991-09-13 1994-03-08 Axel Johnson Metals, Inc. Static vacuum casting of ingots
US5296274A (en) 1989-05-10 1994-03-22 Movchan Boris A Method of producing carbon-containing materials by electron beam vacuum evaporation of graphite and subsequent condensation
US5302881A (en) 1992-06-08 1994-04-12 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force High energy cathode device with elongated operating cycle time
US5310165A (en) 1992-11-02 1994-05-10 General Electric Company Atomization of electroslag refined metal
US5332197A (en) 1992-11-02 1994-07-26 General Electric Company Electroslag refining or titanium to achieve low nitrogen
US5346184A (en) 1993-05-18 1994-09-13 The Regents Of The University Of Michigan Method and apparatus for rapidly solidified ingot production
US5348566A (en) 1992-11-02 1994-09-20 General Electric Company Method and apparatus for flow control in electroslag refining process
US5366206A (en) 1993-12-17 1994-11-22 General Electric Company Molten metal spray forming atomizer
US5368897A (en) 1987-04-03 1994-11-29 Fujitsu Limited Method for arc discharge plasma vapor deposition of diamond
US5377961A (en) 1993-04-16 1995-01-03 International Business Machines Corporation Electrodynamic pump for dispensing molten solder
US5378957A (en) 1989-11-17 1995-01-03 Charged Injection Corporation Methods and apparatus for dispersing a fluent material utilizing an electron beam
US5381847A (en) 1993-06-10 1995-01-17 Olin Corporation Vertical casting process
US5384821A (en) 1993-01-15 1995-01-24 Ge Medical Systems Radiogenic unit
US5460851A (en) 1990-04-08 1995-10-24 Sprayforming Developments Limited Spray deposition of metals
US5472177A (en) 1993-12-17 1995-12-05 General Electric Company Molten metal spray forming apparatus
US5480097A (en) 1994-03-25 1996-01-02 General Electric Company Gas atomizer with reduced backflow
US5489820A (en) 1992-02-18 1996-02-06 Overseas Publishers Association Method of control of plasma stream and plasma apparatus
US5503655A (en) 1994-02-23 1996-04-02 Orbit Technologies, Inc. Low cost titanium production
US5527381A (en) 1994-02-04 1996-06-18 Alcan International Limited Gas treatment of molten metals
DE3810294C2 (en) 1987-03-30 1997-06-12 Rpc Ind Ion plasma electron gun
US5649993A (en) 1995-10-02 1997-07-22 General Electric Company Methods of recycling oversray powder during spray forming
US5649992A (en) 1995-10-02 1997-07-22 General Electric Company Methods for flow control in electroslag refining process
RU2089633C1 (en) 1992-02-24 1997-09-10 Верхнесалдинское металлургическое производственное объединение им.В.И.Ленина Device for melting and casting of metals and alloys
US5683653A (en) 1995-10-02 1997-11-04 General Electric Company Systems for recycling overspray powder during spray forming
US5699850A (en) 1993-01-15 1997-12-23 J. Mulcahy Enterprises Inc. Method and apparatus for control of stirring in continuous casting of metals
WO1997049837A1 (en) 1996-06-24 1997-12-31 General Electric Company Processing of electroslag refined metal
US5722479A (en) 1994-07-11 1998-03-03 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Directional electrostatic accretion process employing acoustic droplet formation
US5749989A (en) 1993-10-06 1998-05-12 The Procter & Gamble Company Continuous, high-speed method for producing a pant-style garment having a pair of elasticized leg openings
US5749938A (en) 1993-02-06 1998-05-12 Fhe Technology Limited Production of powder
US5769151A (en) 1995-12-21 1998-06-23 General Electric Company Methods for controlling the superheat of the metal exiting the CIG apparatus in an electroslag refining process
US5809057A (en) 1996-09-11 1998-09-15 General Electric Company Electroslag apparatus and guide
US5810066A (en) 1995-12-21 1998-09-22 General Electric Company Systems and methods for controlling the dimensions of a cold finger apparatus in electroslag refining process
US5894980A (en) 1995-09-25 1999-04-20 Rapid Analysis Development Comapny Jet soldering system and method
US5954112A (en) 1998-01-27 1999-09-21 Teledyne Industries, Inc. Manufacturing of large diameter spray formed components using supplemental heating
US5972282A (en) 1997-08-04 1999-10-26 Oregon Metallurgical Corporation Straight hearth furnace for titanium refining
US5985206A (en) 1997-12-23 1999-11-16 General Electric Company Electroslag refining starter
US6043451A (en) 1997-11-06 2000-03-28 Promet Technologies, Inc. Plasma spraying of nickel-titanium compound
US6068043A (en) 1995-12-26 2000-05-30 Hot Metal Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for nucleated forming of semi-solid metallic alloys from molten metals
US6103182A (en) 1998-06-27 2000-08-15 Alotech, Inc. Dispensing apparatus and method
US6135194A (en) * 1996-04-26 2000-10-24 Bechtel Bwxt Idaho, Llc Spray casting of metallic preforms
US6156667A (en) 1999-12-31 2000-12-05 Litmas, Inc. Methods and apparatus for plasma processing
US6162377A (en) 1999-02-23 2000-12-19 Alberta Research Council Inc. Apparatus and method for the formation of uniform spherical particles
US6168666B1 (en) 1998-05-22 2001-01-02 Sarnoff Corporation Focused acoustic bead charger/dispenser for bead manipulating chucks
EP1101552A2 (en) 1999-11-15 2001-05-23 General Electric Company Clean melt nucleated cast metal article
WO2001096028A1 (en) 2000-06-16 2001-12-20 Ati Properties, Inc. Methods and apparatus for spray forming, atomization and heat transfer
US6350293B1 (en) 1999-02-23 2002-02-26 General Electric Company Bottom pour electroslag refining systems and methods
WO2002040197A2 (en) 2000-11-15 2002-05-23 Ati Properties, Inc. Refining and casting apparatus and method
US6416564B1 (en) 2001-03-08 2002-07-09 Ati Properties, Inc. Method for producing large diameter ingots of nickel base alloys
US6427752B1 (en) 1999-02-23 2002-08-06 General Electric Company Casting systems and methods with auxiliary cooling onto a liquidus portion of a casting
US6460595B1 (en) 1999-02-23 2002-10-08 General Electric Company Nucleated casting systems and methods comprising the addition of powders to a casting
US6491737B2 (en) 2000-05-22 2002-12-10 The Regents Of The University Of California High-speed fabrication of highly uniform ultra-small metallic microspheres
US6562099B2 (en) 2000-05-22 2003-05-13 The Regents Of The University Of California High-speed fabrication of highly uniform metallic microspheres
US6613266B2 (en) * 1994-12-05 2003-09-02 Metallamics Method of manufacturing molds, dies or forming tools having a porous heat exchanging body support member having a defined porosity
US6631753B1 (en) 1999-02-23 2003-10-14 General Electric Company Clean melt nucleated casting systems and methods with cooling of the casting
DE4011392B4 (en) 1990-04-09 2004-04-15 Ald Vacuum Technologies Ag Process and device for forming a pouring jet
US6904955B2 (en) 2002-09-20 2005-06-14 Lectrotherm, Inc. Method and apparatus for alternating pouring from common hearth in plasma furnace
US20050173847A1 (en) 2004-02-05 2005-08-11 Blackburn Allan E. Method and apparatus for perimeter cleaning in cold hearth refining
US6975073B2 (en) 2003-05-19 2005-12-13 George Wakalopulos Ion plasma beam generating device
US7033444B1 (en) 1999-06-21 2006-04-25 Tokyo Electron Limited Plasma processing apparatus, and electrode structure and table structure of processing apparatus
US7114548B2 (en) 2004-12-09 2006-10-03 Ati Properties, Inc. Method and apparatus for treating articles during formation
US7150412B2 (en) 2002-08-06 2006-12-19 Clean Earth Technologies Llc Method and apparatus for electrostatic spray
US7337745B1 (en) 1999-04-06 2008-03-04 Tokyo Electron Limited Electrode, susceptor, plasma processing apparatus and method of making the electrode and the susceptor
US20080115905A1 (en) 2000-11-15 2008-05-22 Forbes Jones Robin M Refining and casting apparatus and method
US20080179034A1 (en) 2005-09-22 2008-07-31 Ati Properties, Inc. Apparatus and method for clean, rapidly solidified alloys
US20080179033A1 (en) 2005-09-22 2008-07-31 Ati Properties, Inc. Method and apparatus for producing large diameter superalloy ingots
US20080237200A1 (en) 2007-03-30 2008-10-02 Ati Properties, Inc. Melting Furnace Including Wire-Discharge Ion Plasma Electron Emitter
US7439188B2 (en) 1999-12-02 2008-10-21 Tegal Corporation Reactor with heated and textured electrodes and surfaces
US20090139682A1 (en) 2007-12-04 2009-06-04 Ati Properties, Inc. Casting Apparatus and Method
US7578960B2 (en) 2005-09-22 2009-08-25 Ati Properties, Inc. Apparatus and method for clean, rapidly solidified alloys
US20100012629A1 (en) 2007-03-30 2010-01-21 Ati Properties, Inc. Ion Plasma Electron Emitters for a Melting Furnace

Family Cites Families (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3157922A (en) 1960-06-25 1964-11-24 Heraeus Gmbh W C Method and apparatus for producing castings of metals having high melting points
US3343828A (en) 1962-03-30 1967-09-26 Air Reduction High vacuum furnace
US4061944A (en) 1975-06-25 1977-12-06 Avco Everett Research Laboratory, Inc. Electron beam window structure for broad area electron beam generators
JPS58140740A (en) 1982-02-15 1983-08-20 Konishiroku Photo Ind Co Ltd Photosensitive silver halide material
DE3571466D1 (en) 1984-12-21 1989-08-17 Mannesmann Ag Process and device for producing a metallic block
DE3513161A1 (en) * 1985-04-12 1986-10-16 Goetze Ag, 5093 Burscheid VALVE GAME COMPENSATION DEVICE
DE3527628A1 (en) 1985-08-01 1987-02-05 Leybold Heraeus Gmbh & Co Kg METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MELTING AND MELMELING PARTICULAR METALS TO STRENGTHEN, ESPECIALLY SLAVE
US4936375A (en) 1988-10-13 1990-06-26 Axel Johnson Metals, Inc. Continuous casting of ingots
US5102449A (en) 1989-05-11 1992-04-07 Societe Nationale D'etude Et De Construction De Moteurs D'aviation "S.N.E.C.M.A." Inclusion decanting process for nickel-based superalloys and other metallic materials
US5100463A (en) 1990-07-19 1992-03-31 Axel Johnson Metals, Inc. Method of operating an electron beam furnace
US5716874A (en) * 1996-02-20 1998-02-10 United Microelectronics Corporation Method of fabricating EPROM memory by individually forming gate oxide and coupling insulator
US6407399B1 (en) 1999-09-30 2002-06-18 Electron Vision Corporation Uniformity correction for large area electron source
DE10027140A1 (en) * 2000-05-31 2001-12-06 Linde Ag Multi-storey bathroom condenser
JP2002311877A (en) 2001-02-06 2002-10-25 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Method and device for driving picture tube
US20050224722A1 (en) 2004-03-30 2005-10-13 Applied Materials, Inc. Method and apparatus for reducing charge density on a dielectric coated substrate after exposure to large area electron beam

Patent Citations (186)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3072982A (en) 1953-07-13 1963-01-15 Westinghouse Electric Corp Method of producing sound and homogeneous ingots
US3005246A (en) 1958-12-24 1961-10-24 Union Carbide Corp Method of producing high-quality ingots of reactive metals
US3101515A (en) 1960-06-03 1963-08-27 Stauffer Chemical Co Electron beam furnace with magnetically guided axial and transverse beams
US3420977A (en) 1965-06-18 1969-01-07 Air Reduction Electron beam apparatus
US3389208A (en) 1967-05-04 1968-06-18 Consarc Corp Consumable electrode furnace for electroslag refining
US3519059A (en) 1967-07-12 1970-07-07 Viktor Grigorievich Voskoboini Method of vacuum slag refining of metal in the course of continuous casting
US3576207A (en) 1968-04-23 1971-04-27 Steel Co Of Wales Ltd Formation of steel strip
US3547622A (en) 1968-06-12 1970-12-15 Pennwalt Corp D.c. powered plasma arc method and apparatus for refining molten metal
US3985177A (en) 1968-12-31 1976-10-12 Buehler William J Method for continuously casting wire or the like
US3627293A (en) 1969-03-14 1971-12-14 Leybold Heraeus Verwaltung Apparatus for purifying metals by pouring through slag
US3690635A (en) 1969-05-16 1972-09-12 Air Reduction Condensate collection means
US3737305A (en) 1970-12-02 1973-06-05 Aluminum Co Of America Treating molten aluminum
US3702630A (en) 1971-01-05 1972-11-14 Centrifugation Soc Civ De Apparatus for casting solid cylindrical metallic objects
US3989091A (en) 1971-06-07 1976-11-02 Boris Izrailevich Medovar Method for electroslag remelting of titanium or its alloys and a device for effecting same
US3825415A (en) 1971-07-28 1974-07-23 Electricity Council Method and apparatus for the production of liquid titanium from the reaction of vaporized titanium tetrachloride and a reducing metal
US3826301A (en) 1971-10-26 1974-07-30 R Brooks Method and apparatus for manufacturing precision articles from molten articles
US3909921A (en) 1971-10-26 1975-10-07 Osprey Metals Ltd Method and apparatus for making shaped articles from sprayed molten metal or metal alloy
US3868987A (en) 1972-02-24 1975-03-04 Air Liquide Method of electric refining of metals by slag, known as the E. S. R. method, using liquefied gas to isolate the slag and electrode from the ambient air
US4058697A (en) 1972-10-09 1977-11-15 Boris Grigorievich Sokolov Electron beam unit for heat treatment by electron bombardment technique
US3817503A (en) 1973-06-13 1974-06-18 Carpenter Technology Corp Apparatus for making metal powder
US3896258A (en) 1973-09-04 1975-07-22 Charles W Hanks Electron beam gun system
US3972713A (en) 1974-05-30 1976-08-03 Carpenter Technology Corporation Sulfidation resistant nickel-iron base alloy
US3988084A (en) 1974-11-11 1976-10-26 Carpenter Technology Corporation Atomizing nozzle assembly for making metal powder and method of operating the same
US4272463A (en) 1974-12-18 1981-06-09 The International Nickel Co., Inc. Process for producing metal powder
US4062700A (en) 1974-12-30 1977-12-13 Nippon Steel Corporation Method for producing a steel sheet with dual-phase structure composed of ferrite- and rapidly-cooled-transformed phases
US3970892A (en) 1975-05-19 1976-07-20 Hughes Aircraft Company Ion plasma electron gun
US4066117A (en) 1975-10-28 1978-01-03 The International Nickel Company, Inc. Spray casting of gas atomized molten metal to produce high density ingots
US4136527A (en) 1976-01-23 1979-01-30 Mannesmann Aktiengesellschaft Cooling continuously cast ingots
US4025818A (en) 1976-04-20 1977-05-24 Hughes Aircraft Company Wire ion plasma electron gun
US4264641A (en) 1977-03-17 1981-04-28 Phrasor Technology Inc. Electrohydrodynamic spraying to produce ultrafine particles
US4305451A (en) 1977-06-23 1981-12-15 Ksendzyk Georgy V Electroslag remelting and surfacing apparatus
US4343433A (en) 1977-09-29 1982-08-10 Ppg Industries, Inc. Internal-atomizing spray head with secondary annulus suitable for use with induction charging electrode
US4190404A (en) 1977-12-14 1980-02-26 United Technologies Corporation Method and apparatus for removing inclusion contaminants from metals and alloys
US4221587A (en) 1979-03-23 1980-09-09 Allied Chemical Corporation Method for making metallic glass powder
US4261412A (en) 1979-05-14 1981-04-14 Special Metals Corporation Fine grain casting method
US4449568A (en) 1980-02-28 1984-05-22 Allied Corporation Continuous casting controller
US4482376A (en) 1980-11-14 1984-11-13 Institutul De Cercetare Stiintifica, Inginerie Tehnologica Si Proiectare Pentru Sectoare Calde Method of and apparatus for melting and casting reactive metals
US4471831A (en) 1980-12-29 1984-09-18 Allied Corporation Apparatus for rapid solidification casting of high temperature and reactive metallic alloys
US4426141A (en) 1981-04-23 1984-01-17 Holcomb Harry F Bright ring keratoscope
US4441542A (en) 1981-06-10 1984-04-10 Olin Corporation Process for cooling and solidifying continuous or semi-continuously cast material
EP0073585A1 (en) 1981-08-26 1983-03-09 Special Metals Corporation Alloy remelting process
EP0095298A1 (en) 1982-05-24 1983-11-30 Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. Casting
US4575325A (en) 1983-05-03 1986-03-11 Bbc Brown, Boveri & Co., Ltd. Device for atomizing liquid metals for the purpose of producing a finely granular powder
US4762975A (en) 1984-02-06 1988-08-09 Phrasor Scientific, Incorporated Method and apparatus for making submicrom powders
US4801412A (en) 1984-02-29 1989-01-31 General Electric Company Method for melt atomization with reduced flow gas
US4619597A (en) 1984-02-29 1986-10-28 General Electric Company Apparatus for melt atomization with a concave melt nozzle for gas deflection
US4631013A (en) 1984-02-29 1986-12-23 General Electric Company Apparatus for atomization of unstable melt streams
US4694222A (en) 1984-04-02 1987-09-15 Rpc Industries Ion plasma electron gun
US4755722A (en) 1984-04-02 1988-07-05 Rpc Industries Ion plasma electron gun
WO1985005489A1 (en) 1984-05-14 1985-12-05 Hughes Aircraft Company Modulator switch with low voltage control
US4596945A (en) 1984-05-14 1986-06-24 Hughes Aircraft Company Modulator switch with low voltage control
US4645978A (en) 1984-06-18 1987-02-24 Hughes Aircraft Company Radial geometry electron beam controlled switch utilizing wire-ion-plasma electron source
US4642522A (en) 1984-06-18 1987-02-10 Hughes Aircraft Company Wire-ion-plasma electron gun employing auxiliary grid
WO1986000466A1 (en) 1984-06-18 1986-01-16 Hughes Aircraft Company Radial geometry electron beam controlled switch utilizing wire-ion-plasma electron source
US4619845A (en) 1985-02-22 1986-10-28 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Method for generating fine sprays of molten metal for spray coating and powder making
US4544404A (en) 1985-03-12 1985-10-01 Crucible Materials Corporation Method for atomizing titanium
US4926923A (en) 1985-03-25 1990-05-22 Osprey Metals Ltd. Deposition of metallic products using relatively cold solid particles
US4689074A (en) 1985-07-03 1987-08-25 Iit Research Institute Method and apparatus for forming ultrafine metal powders
US4938275A (en) 1985-11-12 1990-07-03 Osprey Metals Limited Production of spray deposits
US4779802A (en) 1985-11-12 1988-10-25 Osprey Metals Limited Atomization of metals
EP0225732B1 (en) 1985-11-12 1992-01-22 Osprey Metals Limited Production of spray deposits
US4801411A (en) 1986-06-05 1989-01-31 Southwest Research Institute Method and apparatus for producing monosize ceramic particles
US4788016A (en) 1986-06-16 1988-11-29 Imperial Chemical Industries Plc Apparatus and process for producing powders and other granular materials
US4738713B1 (en) 1986-12-04 1994-01-04 Duriron Company, Inc.
US4738713A (en) 1986-12-04 1988-04-19 The Duriron Company, Inc. Method for induction melting reactive metals and alloys
US4786844A (en) 1987-03-30 1988-11-22 Rpc Industries Wire ion plasma gun
GB2203889A (en) 1987-03-30 1988-10-26 Rpc Ind Wire ion plasma electron gun
DE3810294C2 (en) 1987-03-30 1997-06-12 Rpc Ind Ion plasma electron gun
US5368897A (en) 1987-04-03 1994-11-29 Fujitsu Limited Method for arc discharge plasma vapor deposition of diamond
US4762553A (en) 1987-04-24 1988-08-09 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Method for making rapidly solidified powder
US4842170A (en) 1987-07-06 1989-06-27 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Liquid metal electromagnetic flow control device incorporating a pumping action
US4842704A (en) 1987-07-29 1989-06-27 Collins George J Magnetron deposition of ceramic oxide-superconductor thin films
US4769064A (en) 1988-01-21 1988-09-06 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Method for synthesizing ultrafine powder materials
US4955045A (en) 1988-04-08 1990-09-04 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Plasma X-ray tube, in particular for X-ray preionization of gas lasers and method for produicng X-radiation with such an X-ray tube
US4916361A (en) 1988-04-14 1990-04-10 Hughes Aircraft Company Plasma wave tube
EP0400089B1 (en) 1988-04-14 1993-06-09 Hughes Aircraft Company Improved plasma wave tube
US4931091A (en) 1988-06-14 1990-06-05 Alcan International Limited Treatment of molten light metals and apparatus
US4961776A (en) 1988-07-11 1990-10-09 Axel Johnson Metals, Inc. Cold hearth refining
US4932635A (en) 1988-07-11 1990-06-12 Axel Johnson Metals, Inc. Cold hearth refining apparatus
US4919335A (en) 1988-07-19 1990-04-24 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Method and apparatus for atomization and spraying of molten metals
EP0428527B1 (en) 1988-07-20 1996-08-14 American International Technologies, Inc Remote ion source plasma electron gun
US4910435A (en) 1988-07-20 1990-03-20 American International Technologies, Inc. Remote ion source plasma electron gun
WO1990001250A1 (en) 1988-07-20 1990-02-08 American International Technologies, Inc. Remote ion source plasma electron gun
US4838340A (en) 1988-10-13 1989-06-13 Axel Johnson Metals, Inc. Continuous casting of fine grain ingots
US5102620A (en) * 1989-04-03 1992-04-07 Olin Corporation Copper alloys with dispersed metal nitrides and method of manufacture
US5104634A (en) 1989-04-20 1992-04-14 Hercules Incorporated Process for forming diamond coating using a silent discharge plasma jet process
US5296274A (en) 1989-05-10 1994-03-22 Movchan Boris A Method of producing carbon-containing materials by electron beam vacuum evaporation of graphite and subsequent condensation
US5074933A (en) 1989-07-25 1991-12-24 Olin Corporation Copper-nickel-tin-silicon alloys having improved processability
US5142549A (en) 1989-09-05 1992-08-25 Bremer Siegfried M K Remelting apparatus and method for recognition and recovery of noble metals and rare earths
US5263044A (en) 1989-09-05 1993-11-16 Bremer Siegfried M K Remelting method for recognition and recovery of noble metals and rare metals
US5084091A (en) 1989-11-09 1992-01-28 Crucible Materials Corporation Method for producing titanium particles
US5378957A (en) 1989-11-17 1995-01-03 Charged Injection Corporation Methods and apparatus for dispersing a fluent material utilizing an electron beam
US5004153A (en) 1990-03-02 1991-04-02 General Electric Company Melt system for spray-forming
US5167915A (en) 1990-03-30 1992-12-01 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd. Process for producing a rare earth-iron-boron magnet
US5460851A (en) 1990-04-08 1995-10-24 Sprayforming Developments Limited Spray deposition of metals
DE4011392B4 (en) 1990-04-09 2004-04-15 Ald Vacuum Technologies Ag Process and device for forming a pouring jet
US5272718A (en) 1990-04-09 1993-12-21 Leybold Aktiengesellschaft Method and apparatus for forming a stream of molten material
US5222547A (en) 1990-07-19 1993-06-29 Axel Johnson Metals, Inc. Intermediate pressure electron beam furnace
CA2048836A1 (en) 1990-10-22 1992-04-23 Thomas F. Sawyer Low flow rate nozzle and spray forming process
EP0486830A2 (en) 1990-11-17 1992-05-27 Eckart-Werke Standard Bronzepulver-Werke Carl Eckart Gmbh & Co. Process for the atomisation of molten metal to produce metal powders
US5291940A (en) 1991-09-13 1994-03-08 Axel Johnson Metals, Inc. Static vacuum casting of ingots
US5325906A (en) 1991-10-21 1994-07-05 General Electric Company Direct processing of electroslag refined metal
US5160532A (en) 1991-10-21 1992-11-03 General Electric Company Direct processing of electroslag refined metal
US5268018A (en) 1991-11-05 1993-12-07 General Electric Company Controlled process for the production of a spray of atomized metal droplets
US5176874A (en) 1991-11-05 1993-01-05 General Electric Company Controlled process for the production of a spray of atomized metal droplets
US5266098A (en) 1992-01-07 1993-11-30 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Production of charged uniformly sized metal droplets
US5240067A (en) 1992-01-08 1993-08-31 Reynolds Metals Company Method and apparatus for continuous molten material cladding of extruded products
US5489820A (en) 1992-02-18 1996-02-06 Overseas Publishers Association Method of control of plasma stream and plasma apparatus
RU2089633C1 (en) 1992-02-24 1997-09-10 Верхнесалдинское металлургическое производственное объединение им.В.И.Ленина Device for melting and casting of metals and alloys
US5226946A (en) 1992-05-29 1993-07-13 Howmet Corporation Vacuum melting/casting method to reduce inclusions
US5302881A (en) 1992-06-08 1994-04-12 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force High energy cathode device with elongated operating cycle time
US5310165A (en) 1992-11-02 1994-05-10 General Electric Company Atomization of electroslag refined metal
US5332197A (en) 1992-11-02 1994-07-26 General Electric Company Electroslag refining or titanium to achieve low nitrogen
US5348566A (en) 1992-11-02 1994-09-20 General Electric Company Method and apparatus for flow control in electroslag refining process
US5384821A (en) 1993-01-15 1995-01-24 Ge Medical Systems Radiogenic unit
US5699850A (en) 1993-01-15 1997-12-23 J. Mulcahy Enterprises Inc. Method and apparatus for control of stirring in continuous casting of metals
US5749938A (en) 1993-02-06 1998-05-12 Fhe Technology Limited Production of powder
US5377961A (en) 1993-04-16 1995-01-03 International Business Machines Corporation Electrodynamic pump for dispensing molten solder
US5346184A (en) 1993-05-18 1994-09-13 The Regents Of The University Of Michigan Method and apparatus for rapidly solidified ingot production
US5381847A (en) 1993-06-10 1995-01-17 Olin Corporation Vertical casting process
US5749989A (en) 1993-10-06 1998-05-12 The Procter & Gamble Company Continuous, high-speed method for producing a pant-style garment having a pair of elasticized leg openings
US5472177A (en) 1993-12-17 1995-12-05 General Electric Company Molten metal spray forming apparatus
US5366206A (en) 1993-12-17 1994-11-22 General Electric Company Molten metal spray forming atomizer
US5527381A (en) 1994-02-04 1996-06-18 Alcan International Limited Gas treatment of molten metals
US5503655A (en) 1994-02-23 1996-04-02 Orbit Technologies, Inc. Low cost titanium production
US5480097A (en) 1994-03-25 1996-01-02 General Electric Company Gas atomizer with reduced backflow
US5722479A (en) 1994-07-11 1998-03-03 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Directional electrostatic accretion process employing acoustic droplet formation
US6613266B2 (en) * 1994-12-05 2003-09-02 Metallamics Method of manufacturing molds, dies or forming tools having a porous heat exchanging body support member having a defined porosity
US5894980A (en) 1995-09-25 1999-04-20 Rapid Analysis Development Comapny Jet soldering system and method
US5683653A (en) 1995-10-02 1997-11-04 General Electric Company Systems for recycling overspray powder during spray forming
US5649993A (en) 1995-10-02 1997-07-22 General Electric Company Methods of recycling oversray powder during spray forming
US5649992A (en) 1995-10-02 1997-07-22 General Electric Company Methods for flow control in electroslag refining process
US5769151A (en) 1995-12-21 1998-06-23 General Electric Company Methods for controlling the superheat of the metal exiting the CIG apparatus in an electroslag refining process
US5810066A (en) 1995-12-21 1998-09-22 General Electric Company Systems and methods for controlling the dimensions of a cold finger apparatus in electroslag refining process
US6068043A (en) 1995-12-26 2000-05-30 Hot Metal Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for nucleated forming of semi-solid metallic alloys from molten metals
US6135194A (en) * 1996-04-26 2000-10-24 Bechtel Bwxt Idaho, Llc Spray casting of metallic preforms
WO1997049837A1 (en) 1996-06-24 1997-12-31 General Electric Company Processing of electroslag refined metal
US5809057A (en) 1996-09-11 1998-09-15 General Electric Company Electroslag apparatus and guide
US5972282A (en) 1997-08-04 1999-10-26 Oregon Metallurgical Corporation Straight hearth furnace for titanium refining
US6043451A (en) 1997-11-06 2000-03-28 Promet Technologies, Inc. Plasma spraying of nickel-titanium compound
US5985206A (en) 1997-12-23 1999-11-16 General Electric Company Electroslag refining starter
US5954112A (en) 1998-01-27 1999-09-21 Teledyne Industries, Inc. Manufacturing of large diameter spray formed components using supplemental heating
US6168666B1 (en) 1998-05-22 2001-01-02 Sarnoff Corporation Focused acoustic bead charger/dispenser for bead manipulating chucks
US6103182A (en) 1998-06-27 2000-08-15 Alotech, Inc. Dispensing apparatus and method
US6162377A (en) 1999-02-23 2000-12-19 Alberta Research Council Inc. Apparatus and method for the formation of uniform spherical particles
US6631753B1 (en) 1999-02-23 2003-10-14 General Electric Company Clean melt nucleated casting systems and methods with cooling of the casting
US6350293B1 (en) 1999-02-23 2002-02-26 General Electric Company Bottom pour electroslag refining systems and methods
US6427752B1 (en) 1999-02-23 2002-08-06 General Electric Company Casting systems and methods with auxiliary cooling onto a liquidus portion of a casting
US6460595B1 (en) 1999-02-23 2002-10-08 General Electric Company Nucleated casting systems and methods comprising the addition of powders to a casting
US7337745B1 (en) 1999-04-06 2008-03-04 Tokyo Electron Limited Electrode, susceptor, plasma processing apparatus and method of making the electrode and the susceptor
US7033444B1 (en) 1999-06-21 2006-04-25 Tokyo Electron Limited Plasma processing apparatus, and electrode structure and table structure of processing apparatus
US6264717B1 (en) 1999-11-15 2001-07-24 General Electric Company Clean melt nucleated cast article
JP2001212662A (en) 1999-11-15 2001-08-07 General Electric Co <Ge> Clean metal nucleation casting article
EP1101552A2 (en) 1999-11-15 2001-05-23 General Electric Company Clean melt nucleated cast metal article
US7439188B2 (en) 1999-12-02 2008-10-21 Tegal Corporation Reactor with heated and textured electrodes and surfaces
US6156667A (en) 1999-12-31 2000-12-05 Litmas, Inc. Methods and apparatus for plasma processing
US6562099B2 (en) 2000-05-22 2003-05-13 The Regents Of The University Of California High-speed fabrication of highly uniform metallic microspheres
US6491737B2 (en) 2000-05-22 2002-12-10 The Regents Of The University Of California High-speed fabrication of highly uniform ultra-small metallic microspheres
WO2001096028A1 (en) 2000-06-16 2001-12-20 Ati Properties, Inc. Methods and apparatus for spray forming, atomization and heat transfer
US20080072707A1 (en) 2000-06-16 2008-03-27 Forbes Jones Robin M Methods and apparatus for spray forming, atomization and heat transfer
US6772961B2 (en) 2000-06-16 2004-08-10 Ati Properties, Inc. Methods and apparatus for spray forming, atomization and heat transfer
US7374598B2 (en) 2000-06-16 2008-05-20 Ati Properties, Inc. Methods and apparatus for spray forming, atomization and heat transfer
US20080223174A1 (en) 2000-06-16 2008-09-18 Forbes Jones Robin M Methods and apparatus for spray forming, atomization and heat transfer
US6496529B1 (en) 2000-11-15 2002-12-17 Ati Properties, Inc. Refining and casting apparatus and method
WO2002040197A2 (en) 2000-11-15 2002-05-23 Ati Properties, Inc. Refining and casting apparatus and method
US20080115905A1 (en) 2000-11-15 2008-05-22 Forbes Jones Robin M Refining and casting apparatus and method
US7154932B2 (en) 2000-11-15 2006-12-26 Ati Properties, Inc. Refining and casting apparatus
US20070151695A1 (en) 2000-11-15 2007-07-05 Ati Properties, Inc. Refining and Casting Apparatus and Method
US6416564B1 (en) 2001-03-08 2002-07-09 Ati Properties, Inc. Method for producing large diameter ingots of nickel base alloys
US7150412B2 (en) 2002-08-06 2006-12-19 Clean Earth Technologies Llc Method and apparatus for electrostatic spray
US6904955B2 (en) 2002-09-20 2005-06-14 Lectrotherm, Inc. Method and apparatus for alternating pouring from common hearth in plasma furnace
US6975073B2 (en) 2003-05-19 2005-12-13 George Wakalopulos Ion plasma beam generating device
US20050173847A1 (en) 2004-02-05 2005-08-11 Blackburn Allan E. Method and apparatus for perimeter cleaning in cold hearth refining
US7114548B2 (en) 2004-12-09 2006-10-03 Ati Properties, Inc. Method and apparatus for treating articles during formation
US7578960B2 (en) 2005-09-22 2009-08-25 Ati Properties, Inc. Apparatus and method for clean, rapidly solidified alloys
US20080179033A1 (en) 2005-09-22 2008-07-31 Ati Properties, Inc. Method and apparatus for producing large diameter superalloy ingots
US20080179034A1 (en) 2005-09-22 2008-07-31 Ati Properties, Inc. Apparatus and method for clean, rapidly solidified alloys
US20100258262A1 (en) 2005-09-22 2010-10-14 Ati Properties, Inc. Method and apparatus for producing large diameter superalloy ingots
US20100276112A1 (en) 2005-09-22 2010-11-04 Ati Properties, Inc. Apparatus and Method for Clean, Rapidly Solidified Alloys
US7803211B2 (en) 2005-09-22 2010-09-28 Ati Properties, Inc. Method and apparatus for producing large diameter superalloy ingots
US7803212B2 (en) 2005-09-22 2010-09-28 Ati Properties, Inc. Apparatus and method for clean, rapidly solidified alloys
US20080237200A1 (en) 2007-03-30 2008-10-02 Ati Properties, Inc. Melting Furnace Including Wire-Discharge Ion Plasma Electron Emitter
US20100012629A1 (en) 2007-03-30 2010-01-21 Ati Properties, Inc. Ion Plasma Electron Emitters for a Melting Furnace
US7963314B2 (en) 2007-12-04 2011-06-21 Ati Properties, Inc. Casting apparatus and method
US7798199B2 (en) 2007-12-04 2010-09-21 Ati Properties, Inc. Casting apparatus and method
US20090139682A1 (en) 2007-12-04 2009-06-04 Ati Properties, Inc. Casting Apparatus and Method

Non-Patent Citations (95)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"Electron-Beam Melting of Titanium," printed from http://www.antares.com.ua, Internet site, website accessed on Apr. 4, 2007, 6 pages.
A. J. Cohen, "Anomalous Diffusion in a Plasma Formed from the Exhaust Beam of an Electron-Bombardment Ion Thruster," published Aug. 1968.
A. Vizir, et al., "Recent Development and Applications of Electron, Ion and Plasma Sources Based on Vacuum Arc and Low Pressure Glow," IEEE Int. Conf. Plasma Sci., 2004, p. 286.
Alan Leatham, "Spray Forming: Alloys, Products, and Markets", JOM-e, Apr. 1999, vol. 51, No. 4, 13 pages.
ALD Vacuum Technologies: Electron Beam Melting (EB), printed from http://web.ald-vt.de/cms/vakuum-technologie/anlagen/electron-beam-melting-eb, website accessed on Aug. 25, 2009, 4 pages.
Ausmus, S.L. and R.A. Beall, "Electroslag Melting of Titanium Slabs", Trans. Internat., Vacuum Metallurgy Conf., Dec. 1967, pp. 675-694.
B. A. Knyazev, et al., "Pulsed Plasma Sources for the Production of Intense Ion Beams Based on "Catalytic" Resonance Ionization," 1994, 23 pages.
B. L. Fontaine, et al., "Performance Characteristics of a Long Pulse and High Average Power XeCI Discharge Laser," SPIE vol. 801, High Power Lasers, 1987, pp. 100-105.
B.Q. Li, "Solidification Processing of Materials in Magnetic Fields", JOM-e, Feb. 1998, vol. 50, No. 2, copyright held by The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 1998, 11 pages.
Bakish, R., "The Substance of Technology: Electron Beam Melting and Refining", JOM, Nov. 1998, pp. 28-30.
Cao, Wei-Di, "Solidification and Solid State Phase Transformation of Allvac® 718Plus(TM) Alloy", Journal of the Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 2005, pp. 165-177.
Cao, Wei-Di, "Solidification and Solid State Phase Transformation of Allvac® 718Plus™ Alloy", Journal of the Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 2005, pp. 165-177.
Chronister et al., "Induction Skull Melting of Titanium and Other Reactive Alloys", Journal of Metals, Sep. 1986, pp. 51-54.
Cobine, James Dillon, "Gaseous Conductors: Theory and Engineering Applications", Dover Publications, Inc. New York, 1958, 6 pages.
D.E. Tyler and W.G. Watson, "Nucleated Casting", Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Spray Forming, Sep. 1996, 11 pages.
E. M. Oks, et al., "Development of Plasma Cathode Electron Guns," Physics of Plasmas, vol. 6, No. 5, pp. 1649-1654, May 1999.
E.J. Lavernia and Y. Wu, "Spray Atomization and Deposition", John Wiley & Sons, 1996, pp. 311-314.
G. Sanchez, et al., "Thermal Effect of Ion Implantation with Ultra-Short Ion Beams," Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 70, 1995, pp. 181-186.
H. Tamura, et al., "A Plasma Ion Gun with Pierce Electrode," Japan J. Appl. Phys. 5, 1966, pp. 985-987.
Hasse, Rolf, "Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes", Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1990, 5 pages.
Kuiken, Gerard, "Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes: Applications to Diffusion and Rheology", John Wiley & Sons, Oct. 1994, 10 pages.
L. Arif, et al., "Waves Behaviour in a High Repetition High Average Power Excimer Laser," SPIE vol. 1031 GCL-Seventh International Symposium on Gas Flow and Chemical Lasers, 1988, pp. 392-399.
L. Arif, et al., "Waves Behaviour in a High Repetition High Average Power Excimer Laser," SPIE vol. 1031 GCL—Seventh International Symposium on Gas Flow and Chemical Lasers, 1988, pp. 392-399.
L. E. Weddle, "Ion Gun Generated Electromagnetic Interference on the Scatha Satellite," published Dec. 1987, 78 pages.
L. M. Smith, et al., "Interferometric Investigation of a Cablegun Plasma Injector," IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 28, No. 6, pp. 2272-2275, Dec. 2000.
L.A. Bertram et al., "Quantitative Simulations of a Superalloy VAR Ingot at the Macroscale", Proceedings of the 1997 International Symposium on Liquid Metal Processing and Casting, A. Mitchell and P. Auburtin, eds., Am. Vac. Soc., 1997, pp. 110-132.
M. L. Sentis, et al., "Parametric Studies of X-Ray Preionized Discharge XeCI Laser at Single Shot and at High Pulse Rate Frequency (1 kHz)," J. Appl. Phys., vol. 66, No. 5, Sep. 1, 1989, pp. 1925-1930.
Macky, W.A., "Some Investigations on the Deformation and Breaking of Water Drops in Strong Electric Fields", Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Series A, Jul. 2, 1931, pp. 565-587.
N. N. Semashko, et al. "Sources of Gas-Ion Beams with Current up to 60 A for Controlled Thermonuclear Fusion and Technological Applications," Atomic Energy, vol. 82, No. 1, 1997, pp. 21-27.
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 13, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/232,702.
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 23, 2002 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/726,720.
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 17, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,033.
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 14, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/913,361.
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 3, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,033.
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 2, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/053,238.
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 2, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/949,808.
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 22, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/502,558.
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 27, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/008,048.
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 9, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/053,245.
Notice of Allowance dated May 2, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/158,382.
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 22, 2003 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/882,248.
Office Action dated Apr. 27, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/564,021.
Office Action dated Aug. 25, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/158,382.
Office Action dated Aug. 29, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/008,048.
Office Action dated Aug. 3, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,402.
Office Action dated Dec. 12, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/232,702.
Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2002 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/158,382.
Office Action dated Dec. 21, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/232,702.
Office Action dated Dec. 29, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/158,382.
Office Action dated Dec. 6, 2001 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/726,720.
Office Action dated Dec. 9, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/053,245.
Office Action dated Feb. 13, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/841,941.
Office Action dated Jan. 21, 2003 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/882,248.
Office Action dated Jan. 21, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/564,021.
Office Action dated Jul. 12, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/841,941.
Office Action dated Jul. 14, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/978,923.
Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/232,702.
Office Action dated Jul. 8, 2003 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/882,248.
Office Action dated Jun. 25, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/502,558.
Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/913,361.
Office Action dated Jun. 3, 2003 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/158,382.
Office Action dated Jun. 3, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/053,238.
Office Action dated Mar. 11, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/933,361.
Office Action dated Mar. 18, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/158,382.
Office Action dated May 2, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/502,558.
Office Action dated Nov. 10, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/933,361.
Office Action dated Nov. 20, 2002 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/882,248.
Office Action dated Nov. 27, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/053,238.
Office Action dated Nov. 8, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/008,048.
Office Action dated Nov. 9, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/564,021.
Office Action dated Oct. 1, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/841,941.
Office Action dated Oct. 20, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/978,923.
Office Action dated Sep. 23, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/502,558.
Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/913,361.
P. F. McKay, "Development of a Twelve-Plasma Gun, Single-Pulser Combination for Use in the PBFA-1 Hybrid Ion Diode," published Oct. 1985, 30 pages.
R. C. Olsen, et al., "Plasma Wave Observations During Ion Gun Experiments," Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 95, No. A6, Jun. 1, 1990, pp. 7759-7771.
Response to Rule 312 Communication dated Aug. 16, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/008,048.
S. Humphries, Jr., et al., "Pulsed Plasma Guns for Intense Ion Beam Injectors," Rev. Sci. Instrum. vol. 52, No. 2, Feb. 1981, pp. 162-171.
S. Suckewer, "Spectral Measurements of Plasma Temperature in the Rod Plasma Injector (RPI)," Nukleonika, No. 1, 1970, 22 pages.
Sandia National Labs, "Particle Beam Fusion Progress Report, Jan.-Jun. 1980," published May 1981, 173 pages.
Sears, Francis Weston, An Introduction to Thermodynamics, The Kinetic Theory of Gases, and Statistical Mechanics, 2nd Edition, Addison-Wesley, 1959, pp. 335-337.
Supplemental Notice of Allowability dated Jun. 12, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/158,382.
Supplemental Notice of Allowability dated Jun. 29, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/158,382.
Tien et al., "Superalloys, Supercomposites and Superceramics", Academic Press, Inc., Dec. 1989, pp. 49, 76-84.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/207,629, filed Aug. 11, 2011.
V. A. Chernov, "The Powerful High-Voltage Glow Discharge Electron Gun and Power Unit on Its Base," 1994 Intern. Conf. on Electron Beam Melting (Reno, Nevada), pp. 259-267.
V. M. Chicherov, "Density Distribution of Hydrogen in the Interior of a Coaxial Plasma Injector Prior to the Application of High Voltage to its Electrodes," Journal of Technical Physics, vol. 36, No. 6, pp. 1055-1057, 1966.
W. Clark, "Electron Gun Technology," Hughes Research Laboratories, Final Report No. N00014-72-C-0496, 92 pages, Dec. 1976.
W. M. Clark, et al., "Ion Plasma Electron Gun Research," Dec. 1977, 43 pages.
W.T. Carter, Jr. et al. "The CMSF Process: The Spray Forming of Clean Metal", JOM-e, Apr. 1999, vol. 51, No. 4, 7 pages.
Wakalopulos, "Pulsed WIP Electron Gun. Final Report-Fabrication Phase 1 x 40 cm and 1 x 70 cm Cooled WIP Electron Gun," Mar. 1979-Dec. 1980, 33 pages.
Wakalopulos, "Pulsed WIP Electron Gun. Final Report—Fabrication Phase 1 x 40 cm and 1 x 70 cm Cooled WIP Electron Gun," Mar. 1979—Dec. 1980, 33 pages.
William T. Carter, Jr. and Robin M. Forbes-Jones, "Nucleated Casting for Land-Based Gas Turbines", Advanced Materials & Processes, Jul. 2002, pp. 27-29.
William T. Carter, Jr. and Robin M. Forbes-Jones, "Nucleated Casting for the Production of Large Superalloy Ingots", JOM, Apr. 2005, pp. 52-57.
Y. Kiwamoto, "Small Barium Rail Gun for Plasma Injection," Rev. Sci. Instrum., vol. 51. No. 3,Mar. 1980, pp. 285-287.

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9008148B2 (en) 2000-11-15 2015-04-14 Ati Properties, Inc. Refining and casting apparatus and method
US20070151695A1 (en) * 2000-11-15 2007-07-05 Ati Properties, Inc. Refining and Casting Apparatus and Method
US10232434B2 (en) 2000-11-15 2019-03-19 Ati Properties Llc Refining and casting apparatus and method
US20070124625A1 (en) * 2005-11-30 2007-05-31 Microsoft Corporation Predicting degradation of a communication channel below a threshold based on data transmission errors
US20080237200A1 (en) * 2007-03-30 2008-10-02 Ati Properties, Inc. Melting Furnace Including Wire-Discharge Ion Plasma Electron Emitter
US20100012629A1 (en) * 2007-03-30 2010-01-21 Ati Properties, Inc. Ion Plasma Electron Emitters for a Melting Furnace
US20130279533A1 (en) * 2007-03-30 2013-10-24 Ati Properties, Inc. Melting furnace including wire-discharge ion plasma electron emitter
US8642916B2 (en) 2007-03-30 2014-02-04 Ati Properties, Inc. Melting furnace including wire-discharge ion plasma electron emitter
US9453681B2 (en) * 2007-03-30 2016-09-27 Ati Properties Llc Melting furnace including wire-discharge ion plasma electron emitter
US8748773B2 (en) 2007-03-30 2014-06-10 Ati Properties, Inc. Ion plasma electron emitters for a melting furnace
US20120168110A1 (en) * 2007-12-04 2012-07-05 Ati Properties, Inc. Casting Apparatus and Method
US8302661B2 (en) * 2007-12-04 2012-11-06 Ati Properties, Inc. Casting apparatus and method
US8747956B2 (en) 2011-08-11 2014-06-10 Ati Properties, Inc. Processes, systems, and apparatus for forming products from atomized metals and alloys
WO2019183425A1 (en) * 2018-03-23 2019-09-26 Nova Engineering Films, Inc. Film deposition apparatus with gas entraining openings
US11091834B2 (en) 2018-03-23 2021-08-17 Nova Engineering Films, Inc. Film deposition apparatus with gas entraining openings
US11613810B2 (en) 2018-03-23 2023-03-28 Nova Engineering Films, Inc. Film deposition apparatus with gas entraining openings

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20120168110A1 (en) 2012-07-05
US7798199B2 (en) 2010-09-21
US7963314B2 (en) 2011-06-21
US8302661B2 (en) 2012-11-06
US20090139682A1 (en) 2009-06-04
US20110214833A1 (en) 2011-09-08
US20100314068A1 (en) 2010-12-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8156996B2 (en) Casting apparatus and method
RU2645636C2 (en) Methods for improving machinability of hot metal alloys
EP0504382B1 (en) A melt atomizing nozzle and process
AU729674B2 (en) Hot dip coating apparatus and method
US4657787A (en) Flow coating of metals
US5343926A (en) Metal spray forming using multiple nozzles
RU2393051C1 (en) Device for production of metal strap by continuous casting
JP6443138B2 (en) Method for forming zinc-containing coating
JPS60227952A (en) Manufacture of metallic strip and slab from spray
EP0444767A2 (en) An apparatus and method for atomising a liquid
US4901784A (en) Gas atomizer for spray casting
US5280884A (en) Heat reflectivity control for atomization process
USRE35411E (en) Belt casting of molten metal
US5393344A (en) Apparatus for molten metal plating
CN101637781B (en) Process and device for preparing thin strips by roller method sputtering forming
JP3637874B2 (en) Spungle refiner for hot-dip galvanized steel sheet and method for producing different spangled hot-dip galvanized steel sheet
US4907639A (en) Asymmetrical gas-atomizing device and method for reducing deposite bottom surface porosity
US4938278A (en) Substrate for use in spray-deposited strip
US6024778A (en) Production of iron or nickel-based products
CN117144100B (en) Production process of 48mm bimetal saw blade and saw blade sand blasting system
US4966224A (en) Substrate orientation in a gas-atomizing spray-depositing apparatus
US5143140A (en) Spray casting of molten metal
CN214813640U (en) Corrosion-resistant, wear-resistant and heat-resistant steel rolling guide device
JPH11350107A (en) Method for forming high-temperature wear-resistant film
JP2008069399A (en) Film deposition method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: ATI PROPERTIES, INC., OREGON

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:FORBES JONES, ROBIN M.;SHAFFER, STERRY A.;SIGNING DATES FROM 20071121 TO 20071128;REEL/FRAME:026749/0017

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 8

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 12