| Publication number | US8094630 B2 | | Publication type | Grant | | Application number | 11/303,773 | | Publication date | 10 Jan 2012 | | Filing date | 16 Dec 2005 | | Priority date | 16 Dec 2005 | | Also published as | | |
| Inventors | | | Original Assignee | | |
| U.S. Classification | | | International Classification | | | Cooperative Classification | | | European Classification | | |
| References | | | |
| External Links | | |
Radio frequency dragging prevention US 8094630 B2 A device receives information about signals detected by an access terminal, a first one of the signals corresponds to a radio node with which the access terminal is in communication, and if a second signal detected by the access terminal does not correspond to signals in use by the radio node and the access terminal, and if a condition is met, the devise causes the access terminal to alter communication with the radio node.
1. A method performed by at least one of a radio network controller or a radio node, comprising:
receiving information about signals detected by an access terminal, a first signal of the signals being generated by the radio node with which the access terminal is in communication, the radio node, the radio network controller, and the access terminal being in a radio access network, the radio access network comprising sectors, the radio network controller being in communication with the radio node, the radio network controller and the access terminal being different entities and the radio node and the access terminal being different entities;
if a second signal of the signals detected by the access terminal does not correspond to a signal between the radio node and the access terminal, and if a condition is met, instructing the radio node to instruct the access terminal to alter communication with the radio node;
evaluating the condition by comparing a quality of the second signal to a threshold;
transmitting second information for each of the sectors, wherein selection of the second information is based on criteria that are not same in each of the sectors; and
repeatedly transmitting a message to the access terminal,
wherein the message instructs the access terminal to send the information about signals,
wherein the condition comprises that the second signal detected by the access terminal has a quality greater than a threshold, and
wherein instructing the radio node to instruct the access terminal to alter communication comprises instructing the radio node to instruct the access terminal to transition between sectors.
2. A method, comprising:
receiving information about signals detected by an access terminal, a first signal of the signals being generated by a radio node with which the access terminal is in communication, the radio node and the access terminal being in a radio access network, the radio access network comprising sectors;
if a second signal of the signals detected by the access terminal does not correspond to a signal between the radio node and the access terminal, and if a condition is met, causing the access terminal to alter communication with the radio node;
transmitting second information for each sector, in which selection of the second information is based on criteria that are not same in each sector,
wherein the second information for each sector comprises an identification of a carrier used in that sector, and
wherein if two sectors are co-located in a first area, second information for one of the two sectors comprises an identification of a carrier used by another of the two sectors unless there is a neighboring second area in which no sector uses the carrier used by the other of the two sectors.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein if there is a first sector in the first area using a first carrier, and the access terminal is in the first sector using the first carrier, and there is the neighboring second area in which no sector uses the first carrier, then causing the access terminal to alter communication comprises:
instructing the access terminal to disconnect from the radio node and to connect to a second radio node using the second information transmitted for a second sector.
4. A method, comprising:
receiving information about signals detected by an access terminal, a first signal of the signals being generated by a radio node with which the access terminal is in communication, the radio node and the access terminal being in a radio access network, the radio access network comprising sectors;
if a second signal of the signals detected by the access terminal does not correspond to a signal between the radio node and the access terminal, and if a condition is met, causing the access terminal to alter communication with the radio node;
transmitting second information for each of the sectors, in which selection of the second information is based on criteria that are not the same in each of the sectors,
wherein the second information for each of the sectors comprises an identification of one or more sectors in a neighboring area that uses a same carrier as one or more of the sectors, and
wherein if a first sector in a first area uses a first carrier, and a second sector in a neighboring second area uses a second carrier, and there is no sector in the neighboring second area using the first carrier, then the second information for the first sector comprises an identification of the second sector.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein if there is the first sector in the first area using the first carrier, and the access terminal is in the first sector, and there is the neighboring second area in which no sector uses the first carrier, then causing the access terminal to alter communication comprises:
instructing the access terminal to disconnect from the radio node and to connect to a second radio node using the second information transmitted for the first sector.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the quality of the second signal comprises a power of the second signal.
7. The method of claim 6, further comprising:
increasing a rate at which the message is repeatedly transmitted if the power of the second signal increases.
8. The method of claim 6, further comprising:
increasing a rate at which the message is repeatedly transmitted if the power of the second signal is above a threshold.
9. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
increasing a rate at which the message is repeatedly transmitted if the access terminal is in a sector that uses a carrier that is not used by a neighboring sector.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the second information for each of the sectors comprises a first list and a second list, the first list for each of the sectors comprising an identification of a carrier used in at least one of the sectors, and the second list for each of the sectors comprising an identification of one or more sectors in a neighboring area that uses a same carrier as one or more of the sectors:
wherein if two sectors are co-located in a first area, a first list for one of the two sectors comprises an identification of a carrier used by another of the two sectors unless there is a neighboring second area in which no sector uses the carrier used by the other of the two sectors, and
wherein if a first sector in the first area uses a first carrier, and a second sector in the neighboring second area uses a second carrier, and there is no sector in the neighboring second area using the first carrier, then the second list for the first sector comprises an identification of the second sector.
11. A method performed by at least one of a radio network controller or a radio node, the method comprising:
receiving information about signals detected by an access terminal, a first signal of the signals being generated by a radio node with which the access terminal is in communication, the radio node and the access terminal being in a radio access network, the radio access network comprising sectors;
if a second signal of the signals detected by the access terminal does not correspond to a signal between the radio node and the access terminal, and if a condition is met, causing the access terminal to alter communication with the radio node;
evaluating the condition by comparing a power of the second signal to a threshold;
transmitting lists of second information for each of the sectors, wherein selection of the second information is based on criteria that are not same in each of the sectors; and
repeatedly transmitting a message to the access terminal,
wherein at least some of the information about the signals detected by the access terminal are received in response to the message, and
wherein the condition comprises that the second signal has a power greater than a threshold.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein the second information for each of the sectors comprises a list, the list for each of the sectors comprising an identification of a carrier used in at least one of the sectors, and
wherein if two sectors are co-located in a first area, the list for each one of the two sectors comprises an identification of a carrier used by another of the two sectors unless there is a neighboring second area in which no sector uses the carrier used by the other of the two sectors.
13. The method of claim 1, wherein the second information for each of the sectors comprises a list, the list for each of the sectors comprising an identification of one or more sectors in a neighboring area that uses the same carrier as one or more of the sectors, and
wherein if a first sector in a first area uses a first carrier, and a second sector in a neighboring second area uses a second carrier, and there is no sector in the neighboring second area using the first carrier, then the list for the first sector comprises an identification of the second sector.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS This application is related to U.S. application Ser. No. 11/037,896 filed on Jan. 18, 2005, Ser. No. 09/891,103, filed on Jun. 25, 2001, Ser. No. 10/848,597, filed on May 18, 2004, and Ser. No. 11/243,405, filed on Oct. 4, 2005, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
This application is also related to U.S. application Ser. No. 11/305,286, filed on Dec. 16, 2005, and U.S. application Ser. No. 11/303,774, filed on Dec. 16, 2005, which are also incorporated herein by reference.
TECHNICAL FIELD This invention relates to radio frequency dragging prevention.
BACKGROUND High Data Rate (HDR) is an emerging mobile wireless access technology that enables personal broadband Internet services to be accessed anywhere, anytime (see P. Bender, et al., “CDMA/HDR: A Bandwidth-Efficient High-Speed Wireless Data Service for Nomadic Users”, IEEE Communications Magazine, July 2000, and 3GPP2, “Draft Baseline Text for 1xEV-DO,” Aug. 21, 2000). Developed by Qualcomm, HDR is an air interface optimized for Internet Protocol (IP) packet data services that can deliver a shared forward link transmission rate of up to 2.46 Mbit/s per sector using only (1×) 1.25 MHz of spectrum. Compatible with CDMA2000 radio access (TIA/EIA/IS-2001, “Interoperability Specification (IOS) for CDMA2000 Network Access Interfaces,” May 2000) and wireless IP network interfaces (TIA/EIA/TSB-115, “Wireless IP Architecture Based on IETF Protocols,” Jun. 6, 2000, and TIA/EIA/IS-835, “Wireless IP Network Standard,” 3rd Generation Partnership Project 2 (3GPP2), Version 1.0, Jul. 14, 2000), HDR networks can be built entirely on IP technologies, all the way from the mobile Access Terminal (AT) to the global Internet, thus taking full advantage of the scalability, redundancy and low-cost of IP networks.
An EVolution of the current 1xRTT standard for high-speed data-only (DO) services, also known as the 1xEV-DO protocol has been standardized by the Telecommunication Industry Association (TIA) as TLA/EIA/IS-856, “CDMA2000 High Rate Packet Data Air Interface Specification”, 3GPP2 C.S0024-0, Version 4.0, Oct. 25, 2002, which is incorporated herein by reference. Revision A to this specification has been standardized as TIA/EIA/IS-856, “CDMA2000 High Rate Packet Data Air Interface Specification”, 3GPP2 C.S0024-A, Version 2.0, June 2005. Revision A is also incorporated herein by reference.
FIG. 1A shows a 1xEV-DO radio access network 100 with radio network controllers 102 and 104 connected to radio nodes 108, 110, and 112 over a packet network 114. The packet network 114 can be implemented as an IP-based network that supports many-to-many connectivity between the radio nodes and the radio network controllers. The packet network is connected to the Internet 116 via a packet data serving node 106. Other radio nodes, radio network controllers, and packet networks (not shown in FIG. 1) can be included in the radio access network. The packet network 114 may be several distinct networks connecting individual radio network controllers to their associated radio nodes, or it may be a single network as shown in FIG. 1, or a combination.
Typically, each radio network controller controls 25-100 radio nodes and each radio node supports 1-4 carriers each of 1.25 MHz of bandwidth. A carrier is a band of radio frequencies used to establish airlinks with access terminals. The geographic area of the radio access network that is served by any given radio node is referred to as a cell. Each cell can be divided into multiple sectors (typically 3 or 6) by using multiple sectorized antennas (the term “sector” is used both conventionally and in this document, however, even when there is only one sector per cell).
Access terminals, e.g., devices 118, 120, and 122, communicate with the radio nodes of the network 100 over airlinks, e.g., links 124, 126, and 128. Each access terminal may be a laptop computer, a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), a dual-mode voice/data handset, or another device, with built-in 1xEV-DO Rev-0 or Rev-A support. As 1xEvDO Rev-A is backwards compatible with 1xEvDO Rev-0, Rev-A capable access terminals can operate in either Rev-0 mode or Rev-A mode, depending on whether its serving radio node is Rev-0 or Rev-A capable. A Rev-0 device in communication with a Rev-A radio node will only be able to use Rev-0 services.
When an active access terminal moves from one sector to another, it asks for airlinks on new sectors via Route Update messages. In certain cases, the access terminal may not be able to obtain an airlink on a sector—as a result, the access terminal may remain in communication with the radio node of the sector it is leaving longer (instead of transitioning to the radio node of the sector it is entering). For example, in FIG. 1B, an access terminal 120 has moved from sector 1, where it was in communication with a radio node 110, into sector 2, served by radio node 112. The access terminal 120 is still in communication with the radio node 110 over an airlink 126, instead of establishing a new airlink 130 with the radio node 112. Each radio node transmits a pilot signal to identify itself and inform access terminals of the carriers the radio node uses and which revisions it supports. The access terminal 120 monitors pilot signals in its environment to determine which radio nodes it should establish communication with. An access terminal may be limited in its ability to receive or interpret pilot signals that are transmitted on different carriers or using different revisions than the access terminal is currently using. Likewise it may fail to recognize a pilot signal from a radio node on a different subnet than the radio node with which it is presently communicating. If the access terminal 100 does not recognize that it could use any of the signals it is detecting, or if it fails to detect signals it could use, it may remain in communication with the radio node 110 long after it could have established a better connection to the radio node 112. This condition is referred to as RF Dragging. RF Dragging can cause a degradation in the quality of service the user experiences, for example, a reduced rate of data transmission or an increased number of errors in transmission; in some cases, the connection may be dropped. In such a case, it may be desirable to disconnect the access terminal 120 from the radio node 110 serving the sector it is leaving to force it to transition to the radio node 112 serving the sector it is entering.
SUMMARY In general, in one aspect, a device receives information about signals detected by an access terminal, a first one of the signals corresponds to a radio node with which the access terminal is in communication, and if a second signal detected by the access terminal does not correspond to signals in use by the radio node and the access terminal, and if a condition is met, the devise causes the access terminal to alter communication with the radio node.
Implementations may include one or more of the following features. The altering includes closing communication with the radio node. The altering also includes opening communication with a radio node that is generating the second signal. The first and second signals originate from different radio access networks. The different radio access networks comprise radio access sub-networks. The different radio access networks are operated by different radio network operators. The first and second signals use different carriers. The first and second signals operate in different modes. The different modes comprise revision levels. Evaluating the condition comprises comparing a quality of the second signal to a threshold. The threshold is based on a quality of the first signal. The condition is met if the quality of the second signal is greater than the threshold. The information is received repeatedly, and the condition is met if the quality of the second signal is greater than the threshold during a number of sequential times that the information is received. The quality of the second signal is the power of the second signal. The quality of the first signal is the power of the first signal. The information is received from the access terminal. Sending a message instructing the access terminal to send the information. Sending the message repeatedly. A rate at which the message is repeated depends on a quality of the second signal. The quality is a power of the second signal. Increasing the rate if the power of the second signal is greater than a threshold. The threshold is based on a power of the first signal. A value to which the rate is increased is based on a number of times the condition must be met. The radio node and the access terminal are in a radio access network comprising sectors, and a rate at which the message is repeated depends on a location of the access terminal. A rate at which the message is repeated is increased if the access terminal is in a sector that uses a carrier that is not used by a neighboring sector. A value to which the rate is increased is based on a number of times the condition must be met.
Implementations may also include one or more of the following features. The radio node and the access terminal are in a radio access network comprising sectors. Transmitting information for each sector, in which selection of the information is based on criteria that are not the same in each sector. The criteria for the selection of information for a sector comprise resources available in the sector, in co-located sectors, and in neighboring sectors. The information for each sector includes an identification of a carrier used in that sector, and if two sectors are co-located in a first area, the information for each sector includes an identification of a carrier used by the other sector unless there is a neighboring second area in which no sector uses the carrier used by the other sector. If there is a first sector in a first area using a first carrier, and the access terminal is in the first sector using the first carrier, and there is a neighboring second area in which no sector uses the first carrier, then causing the access terminal to alter communication comprises instructing the access terminal to disconnect from the radio node and to connect to a second radio node using the information transmitted for a second sector. The information for each sector includes an identification of any sector in a neighboring area that uses the same carrier as that sector, and if a first sector in a first area uses a first carrier, and a second sector in a neighboring second area uses a second carrier, and there is no sector in the second area using the first carrier, then the information for the first sector includes an identification of the second sector. If there is a first sector in a first area using a first carrier, and the access terminal is in the first sector, and there is a neighboring second area in which no sector uses the first carrier, causing the access terminal to alter communication comprises instructing the access terminal to disconnect from the radio node and to connect to a second radio node using the information transmitted for the first sector. Causing the access terminal to alter communication comprises instructing the access terminal to transition between sectors. The information for each sector includes a first list and a second list. The first list for each sector includes an identification of a carrier used in that sector. The second list for each sector includes an identification of any sector in a neighboring area that uses the same carrier as that sector. If two sectors are co-located in a first area, then the first list for each sector includes an identification of a carrier used by the other sector unless there is a neighboring second area in which no sector uses the carrier used by the other sector. If a first sector in a first area uses a first carrier, and a second sector in a neighboring second area uses a second carrier, and there is no sector in the second area using the first carrier, then the second list for the first sector includes an identification of the second sector.
In general, in one aspect, a device receives information about at least two signals detected by an access terminal, places the signals into at least two groups, in which a first group comprises signals corresponding to a radio node with which the access terminal is in communication, and a second group comprises signals not corresponding to signals is use by the radio node and the access terminal, and if a signal in the second group meets a condition, causes the access terminal to alter communication with the radio node.
Among the advantages of the invention are one or more of the following. A radio network controller is able to determine that an access terminal is in a border area. The radio network controller can cause the access terminal to change its communications parameters so that it will minimize or prevent RF dragging. A user may experience a higher quality of service including fewer transmission errors, a higher data rate, and fewer lost connections.
Other general aspects include other combinations of the aspects and features described above and other aspects and features expressed as methods, apparatus, systems, program products, and in other ways.
The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS FIGS. 1A, 1B, and 4 are diagrams of parts of radio access networks.
FIG. 2 is a diagram of several sectors in a radio access network.
FIG. 3 is a diagrams of several sectors and an access terminal in a radio access network.
Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION In one example, the 1xEvDO radio access network 100 of FIG. 1A is implemented as a multi-revision, multi-carrier network having two subnets. Each subnet has a radio network controller and a number of radio nodes. The radio nodes of a subnet can be Rev-0-capable radio nodes, Rev-A-capable radio nodes, or a combination of both. Each radio node transmits signals to each sector of its cell using one or more carriers.
Suppose an access terminal 120 has a connection 126 with the radio network controller 102 through its serving radio node 110. As the access terminal 120 moves away from a coverage area of the serving radio node 110 and towards the coverage areas of other radio nodes 108 or 112, the access terminal detects the pilot signals transmitted by these radio nodes and reports its findings back to the radio network controller 102 in a Route Update message. The radio network controller 102 uses the information provided in the Route Update message to identify border situations in which it would be preferable to close the connection 126 to the access terminal 120 and trigger a connection re-establishment on a different carrier and/or mode of operation, such as revision level. In so doing, the radio network controller prevents or otherwise minimizes RF dragging.
The radio network controller can use a signal categorization approach, a route update approach, and/or a pilot beacon approach to identify border situations. Each approach is discussed below.
Signal Categorization Approach In the signal categorization approach, the radio network controller 120 categorizes the pilot signals reported in the Route Update message according to several criteria, as illustrated in FIG. 4. The radio network controller attempts to identify each pilot signal reported in the Route Update message by looking at a list of neighboring sectors iteratively for each pilot signal. Pilot signals can be resolved into two categories, known or unknown. known signals can be further categorized as eligible or ineligible. Known signals (e.g., 418 and 420) are those that originate from a radio node (e.g., 410 and 412) in the same subnet as the radio node currently serving access terminal 120. The radio network controller can identify these signals based on their presence in a database of such signals. Unknown signals, those not in the database, (e.g., signal 416) may originate from a radio node on a different subnet or a radio access network operated by a different service provider, e.g., radio node 414. Eligible signals are known signals that are also on the same carrier and using the same revision as the existing communications link between access terminal 120 and radio node 110, e.g., signal 420 transmitted by radio node 412. Ineligible signals are those that are on a different carrier, revision, or both, e.g. signal 418 transmitted by radio node 410. Although an access terminal may communicate with a radio node using a different revision, some services may not be available, though a lowest common denominator of services can be supported. For this reason, a pilot signal using a different revision is treated similarly to one using a different carrier.
To avoid the degraded service that can result from RF dragging, the radio network controller 102 may command the access terminal 120 to disconnect from the radio node 110. This condition can be triggered when certain criteria are met. In one example, the signal strength of the pilot signals ranges between 0 and 63, in units of −0.5 dB, such that 0 is the strongest and 63 is the weakest possible signal strength. The connection is closed if the strength of the strongest unknown pilot signal exceeds the strength of the strongest known pilot signal by a value of 4 (2 dB) repeatedly over a configurable number of consecutive Route Update messages generated by the access terminal. The value set for the threshold could be higher or lower depending on the preferences of the network operator. The number of consecutive times that the condition must be met can also be configured according to the operator's preferences. When the conditions are met and the disconnect command is sent, the access terminal 120 will switch carriers, revisions, subnets, or service providers, as appropriate, so that it can establish a new link using the best available signal. Alternatively, it may be instructed in which parameter to change by the radio network controller 102 before it is disconnected. Not all access terminals can use all carriers or revisions, so the best available signal is not necessarily the strongest. Which signal is best may be influenced by such factors as services available with a particular revision, interference present on a particular carrier, load on each subnet, and the current service provider's relationship with the service provider of an unknown signal. Decisions about whether to disconnect and what services to use to reconnect may also be influenced by the geographical relationships between radio nodes, as explained below.
If an access terminal is moving towards another sector, but the unknown pilot signal from that sector was not yet sufficiently strong to trigger the conditions discussed above, the access terminal under normal conditions might not send another Route Update message until after entering the new sector. To prevent this, the radio network controller may request Route Update messages more frequently than the access terminal would normally send them. For example, if the strength of the unknown pilot signal is above 28, in the units of the previous example, but below or within 4 units above the strongest known pilot signal, the radio network controller may begin requesting Route Update messages every 60 ms. This will continue until either the strength of the unknown pilot signal exceeds that of the strongest known pilot signal by 4 units for the set number of times, or until it drops below 28 units. Other values could, of course, be used for the threshold strength values and the time between requests, based upon the preferences of the network operator.
Requests for Route Update messages may be paced by inserting quiet periods between two bursts (a burst consists of several requests), for example a burst of four requests separated by 20 ms repeated every 60 ms. By inserting quiet periods (of varying time periods), peculiar situations wherein the access terminal is stationary can be handled without excessive burden of generating Route Updates & processing Route Updates. In one example, the number of requests in a burst is greater than or equal to the number of sequential route update messages that would be required to report a sufficiently strong unknown pilot signal to trigger a disconnect. This will assure that the radio network controller is informed as soon as the access terminal moves sufficiently far into the range of the unknown pilot signal that it should be transitioned to that signal.
Border Detection As illustrated in FIG. 2, the geographic regions serviced by radio nodes are referred to as cells, and the geographic relationship between cells may be considered in controlling a radio area network. Within a cell, there may be multiple sectors, based on the carriers used by the radio nodes, e.g. sectors 2A, 2B, and 2C in cell 2. Sectors may overlap, if two different carriers are used over the same area of a cell, for example, sectors 1A and 1B in cell 1. These are referred to as co-located sectors For the purposes of these examples, sectors in different cells using the same carrier will be labeled with the same letter in each cell. Carrier A is in use throughout cells 1 and 3 (sectors 1A and 3A), and in sector 2A of cell 2. Carrier B is in use throughout cells 1 and 4 (sectors 1B and 4B), and in sector 2B of cell 2. Border sectors are those that use a carrier that is not used in a neighboring sector. For example, sectors 1A and 3A are border sectors because carrier A is not used in an adjacent cell, cell 4. Likewise, sectors 1B and 4B are border sectors because carrier B is not used in cell 3 or in the area of cell 2 which is adjacent to sector 1B, i.e., the area covered by sector 2A. If an access terminal is in a border sector, e.g., sector 3A, communicating with the sector's radio node on its respective carrier, e.g., carrier A, and it moves into a neighboring sector that doesn't use that carrier, e.g., sector 4B, the access terminal may remain in communication with its old radio node rather than switching to the alternative radio node which is now closer. The identification of border cells can be useful in preventing this RF Dragging in several different ways.
Pilot Beacon Approach One example, as illustrated in FIG. 3, is the pilot beacon approach to preventing RF Dragging. “Pilot beacon” is another term for the pilot signals discussed above. Under this approach, the pilot signal transmitted for each sector includes a channel list which lists the carriers available in that sector and in any co-located sectors. In FIG. 3, the channel list for each of sectors 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B will ordinarily include carriers A and B, because both carriers are available in the area covered by each sector. Likewise, the channel list for sector 4 will only include carrier B because there is no co-located sector using carrier A. When an access terminal, e.g., access terminal 120, moves into a new sector, it consults the channel list for that sector to determine which carriers it can use to communicate with the radio node in that sector. This has advantages over relying upon the access terminal to detect the carriers in use, since if it is in active communication with the radio node from the sector it is leaving, it may only detect pilot signals on the carrier that it is currently using. Since the channel list is transmitted on each carrier, the active access terminal will still discover that it could be using a different carrier. The problem of RF Dragging is still present, however, when an active access terminal moves from a border sector to a sector that doesn't support the carrier the access terminal is presently using. For example, if the access terminal 120 is in sector 1A, and therefore using carrier A, and it moves to cell 4, where there is no sector using carrier A, it may remain connected to the radio node supporting sector 1A instead of switching to the radio node supporting sector 4B. The access terminal 120 will be expecting a channel list on its present carrier, A, but since sector 4B only uses carrier B, that is the only carrier on which it is transmitting any channel list. If the access terminal 120 had been in sector 1B, and therefore using carrier B, it would have made the transition to sector 4B without difficulty.
This problem is addressed in this example by modifying the channel list of the sector co-located with the border sector, that is, sector 1B. As shown in Table 302 of FIG. 3, sector 1B will only list carrier B in its channel list, even though carrier A is also available in that sector. As the access terminal 120 moves through cell 1 toward cell 4, using carrier A in sector 1A, the quality of signals from sector 4B will increase and the quality of signals from sectors 1A and 1B will decrease. When signals from sector 4B reach a certain threshold quality for a certain amount of time, indicating that the access terminal 120 might move to that sector, the radio network controller for these sectors (not shown) instructs the access terminal 120 to change carriers. The quality of the signal used to make this determination may be its power, data rate, or some other factor. Since the channel list from sector 1A told the access terminal 120 that carrier B was available, it will switch to that carrier and join sector 1B. Once in 1B, however, the channel list only lists carrier B, so the access terminal 120 will remain on carrier B rather than switching back to carrier A, which it might have otherwise done for a variety of reasons, such as to avoid interference with other devices using carrier B, or because sector 1A had fewer users than sector 1B. When it moves in to sector 4B, the access terminal 120 will be on the right carrier to get the channel list for the new sector and properly transition to the radio node for that sector. As in other examples, the momentary disruption from switching carriers may be less significant to a user of the access terminal 120 than the degradation of service that the user would experience if the access terminal experienced RF dragging as it moved into sector 4B. If the conditions triggering the switch require that the new sector's signal must reach the threshold quality for a certain amount of time, or for a certain number of periodic samples, a hysteresis will occur, such that once switched, the access terminal 120 will remain on its new carrier for at least that same amount of time, rather than continually switching back and forth while it is in an area where switch-over criteria are met.
Route Update Approach A second example, also illustrated in FIG. 3, is the route update approach to preventing RF Dragging. Under this approach, the channel list is not modified as in the pilot beacon approach, but a second list, a neighbor list, transmitted separately from the pilot beacon, is modified to allow the access terminal to report appropriate pilot signals. Normally, the neighbor list for a given sector lists the neighboring sectors that use the same carrier. For example as shown in Table 304, the neighbor list for sector 1B includes 2B and 4B, since both of those sectors neighbor sector 1B and use the same carrier. Using the neighbor list, an active access terminal moving through a sector looks for new sectors only on the carrier it is already using. In the example of FIG. 3, if an access terminal 120 is using carrier B, as it moves through sector 1B, it references sector 1B's neighbor list and therefore monitors pilot signals from sectors 2B and 4B so that it can switch to them when it moves into the corresponding sectors.
In a border sector, e.g., sector 1A, the neighbor list is modified to include neighboring sectors that use different carriers. Since carrier A is not used in the area of sector 4B, sector 1A is a border sector, and its neighbor list will include 2A and 4B. This way, if an access terminal 120 is active on carrier A as it moves through sector 1A, it will monitor pilot signals on both carriers A and B, looking for sectors 2A or 4B. As it draws near to sector 4B, the pilot signal on carrier B will be better than either the current signal or the pilot signal from sector 2A. Observing this, the radio network controller (not shown) for these sectors will instruct the access terminal 120 to close its connection. When the access terminal re-opens its connection, it will do so on channel B since that is the better signal, and it will be able to move smoothly between sectors 1B (if its still in cell 1) and 4B. If the neighbor list for sector 1A had not included 4B, the access terminal would only have been monitoring pilot signals on carrier A and would not have found sector 4B. As in other examples, the momentary disconnection required to switch carriers is less disruptive than remaining on carrier A as its signal faded. The radio network controller will require that the criteria for switching are met for a minimum amount of time or number of cycles, so that an access terminal remaining in a transition area will not continually switch back and forth between carriers.
The same approaches can be used with parameters other than carriers, for example channel lists or neighbor lists could list which revisions or subnets are available, so that that information can be used in determining when to disconnect & reestablish a connection and what parameters to change when doing so.
In the examples of FIGS. 3 and 4, the radio network controller 102 (FIG. 4) may poll the access terminal 120 periodically to determine which pilot signals it is receiving. To improve the decision-making process, the radio network controller may poll the access terminal more often when it is in a border cell or is detecting unknown or ineligible signals, so that the decision to switch carriers or other parameters may be made at the optimum time. This increase in polling frequency also helps the radio network controller to maintain a hysteresis, that is, making sure that an access terminal doesn't continually switch back and forth while it is in an area where criteria might otherwise be met to switch back to its previous settings as soon as it switched as instructed.
Any of the examples above may be combined to provide even more robust prevention of RF Dragging. For example, categorization of signals into known or unknown and eligible or ineligible may be combined with channel lists as in the pilot beacon approach so that both the fact that an access terminal is in a border sector and the usefulness of the various signals from the neighboring cells can be used to determine when to switch carriers, revisions, or other parameters. Similarly, both channel lists and neighbor lists in border sectors may be modified so that access terminals in border sectors are informed as to both what channels are available and which neighboring sectors use those channels.
Although the techniques described above employ the 1xEV-DO air interface standard, the techniques are also applicable to other CDMA and non-CDMA air interface technologies.
The techniques described above can be implemented in digital electronic circuitry, or in computer hardware, firmware, software, or in combinations of them. The techniques can be implemented as a computer program product, i.e., a computer program tangibly embodied in an information carrier, e.g., in a machine-readable storage device or in a propagated signal, for execution by, or to control the operation of, data processing apparatus, e.g., a programmable processor, a computer, or multiple computers. A computer program can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network.
Method steps of the techniques described herein can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing a computer program to perform functions of the invention by operating on input data and generating output. Method steps can also be performed by, and apparatus of the invention can be implemented as, special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit). Modules can refer to portions of the computer program and/or the processor/special circuitry that implements that functionality.
Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read-only memory or a random access memory or both. The essential elements of a computer are a processor for executing instructions and one or more memory devices for storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from or transfer data to, or both, one or more mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto-optical disks, or optical disks. Information carriers suitable for embodying computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile memory, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices; magnetic disks, e.g., internal hard disks or removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and CD-ROM and DVD-ROM disks. The processor and the memory can be supplemented by, or incorporated in special purpose logic circuitry.
A number of embodiments of the invention have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, pilot signals from different subnets might be categorized as known, rather than unknown, if those subnets have a particular relationship. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
| Cited Patent | Filing date | Publication date | Applicant | Title |
|---|
| US5128938 | 6 Mar 1991 | 7 Jul 1992 | Motorola, Inc. | Energy saving protocol for a communication system | | US5239675 | 10 Apr 1991 | 24 Aug 1993 | Motorola, Inc. | Reduced noise interference during handoff | | US5377224 | 7 Oct 1993 | 27 Dec 1994 | Northern Telecom Limited | Acquisition of frequency bursts in PCN | | US5574996 | 6 Jun 1995 | 12 Nov 1996 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson | Enhanced sleep mode in radiocommunication systems | | US5754945 | 18 Jan 1996 | 19 May 1998 | Northern Telecom Limited | Fuzzy logic control of cellular handoff | | US5790528 | 27 Jan 1994 | 4 Aug 1998 | Nokia Telecommunications Oy | Semi-hard handoff in a cellular telecommunications systems | | US5815813 | 24 Nov 1995 | 29 Sep 1998 | Northern Telecom Limited | Multipath tolerant cellular communication system and method | | US5828661 | 22 May 1996 | 27 Oct 1998 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for providing a cone of silence in a cellular communication system | | US5852630 | 30 Mar 1998 | 22 Dec 1998 | Globespan Semiconductor, Inc. | Method and apparatus for a RADSL transceiver warm start activation procedure with precoding | | US5857154 | 16 Jul 1996 | 5 Jan 1999 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Multiprotocol mobile telephone network having high tier and low tier systems | | US5884177 | 25 Oct 1995 | 16 Mar 1999 | Northern Telecom Limited | Cellular communication system and method providing improved handoff capability | | US5930714 | 24 Oct 1996 | 27 Jul 1999 | Northern Telecom Limited | CDMA inter-mobile switching center soft hand-off | | US5937345 | 2 May 1997 | 10 Aug 1999 | Nortel Networks Corporation | Method and apparatus for intercepting calls in a communications system | | US5940762 | 1 May 1996 | 17 Aug 1999 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Inter-system calling supporting inter-system soft handoff | | US5960349 | 20 May 1997 | 28 Sep 1999 | Northern Telecom | Enhanced cellular layout for CDMA networks having six-sectored cells | | US5974318 | 9 Jul 1997 | 26 Oct 1999 | Northern Telecom Limited | Method and system for increasing capacity and improving performance of a cellular network | | US5983282 | 11 Mar 1998 | 9 Nov 1999 | 3Com Corporation | Method and system for computer network access using cooperating non-dedicated remote access servers | | US5991635 | 18 Dec 1996 | 23 Nov 1999 | Ericsson, Inc. | Reduced power sleep modes for mobile telephones | | US6011970 | 23 Jul 1997 | 4 Jan 2000 | Nortel Networks Corporation | Method and system for assuring near uniform capacity and quality of channels in cells of wireless communications systems having cellular architectures | | US6014564 | 15 Jul 1997 | 11 Jan 2000 | Nortel Networks Corporation | Method and apparatus for determining virtual cell area | | US6016429 | 28 May 1997 | 18 Jan 2000 | Northern Telecom Limited | Method and apparatus for minimizing cellular network costs when upgrading the electronics in an existing cellular system | | US6023625 | 18 Feb 1997 | 8 Feb 2000 | Ericsson Inc. | System and method for reducing multicast interference in a distributed antenna network | | US6032033 | 3 Dec 1996 | 29 Feb 2000 | Nortel Networks Corporation | Preamble based selection diversity in a time division multiple access radio system using digital demodulation | | US6047186 | 6 Oct 1997 | 4 Apr 2000 | Nortel Networks Corporation | Method and system for solving cellular communications frequency planning problem | | US6049715 | 20 Feb 1997 | 11 Apr 2000 | Nortel Networks Corporation | Method and apparatus for evaluating a received signal in a wireless communication utilizing long and short term values | | US6052594 | 30 Apr 1997 | 18 Apr 2000 | At&T Corp. | System and method for dynamically assigning channels for wireless packet communications | | US6061560 | 30 Apr 1997 | 9 May 2000 | Nortel Networks Corporation | Method and apparatus for delivering and presenting calling name information in a wireless communications system | | US6069871 | 6 Mar 1998 | 30 May 2000 | Nortel Networks Corporation | Traffic allocation and dynamic load balancing in a multiple carrier cellular wireless communication system | | US6091953 | 16 Nov 1998 | 18 Jul 2000 | Nortel Networks Limited | Distributed signaling message routing in a scalable wireless communication system | | US6101394 | 24 Dec 1997 | 8 Aug 2000 | Nortel Networks Corporation | CDMA multiple carrier paging channel optimization | | US6111857 | 11 Sep 1997 | 29 Aug 2000 | Reynolds; Sheila M. | Wireless network planning tool | | US6112089 | 9 Apr 1999 | 29 Aug 2000 | Northern Telecom Limited | Method and system for increasing capacity and improving performance of a cellular network | | US6119024 | 27 Jul 1998 | 12 Sep 2000 | Nec Corporation | Mobile radio system | | US6122513 | 6 Nov 1997 | 19 Sep 2000 | Nortel Networks Corporation | Method for extending hard-handoff boundaries within a mobile telephone communications network | | US6151512 | 28 May 1997 | 21 Nov 2000 | Nortel Networks Corporation | Communication system having optimum resource arrangements in a multi-sectored environment and method therefor | | US6167036 | 24 Nov 1998 | 26 Dec 2000 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and apparatus for a sectored cell of a cellular radio communications system | | US6178328 | 11 Jun 1998 | 23 Jan 2001 | Nortel Networks Corporation | Method and system for solving cellular communications frequency planning problem | | US6192246 | 9 Apr 1999 | 20 Feb 2001 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and system for increasing capacity and improving performance of a cellular network | | US6198719 | 27 Feb 1998 | 6 Mar 2001 | Nortel Networks Limited | Bi-orthogonal code division multiple access system | | US6198910 | 28 Apr 1999 | 6 Mar 2001 | Nortel Networks Limited | Cellular network having improved method for managing RF channels | | US6208615 | 29 May 1998 | 27 Mar 2001 | Northern Telecom Limited | Broadband wireless access based on code division parallel access | | US6219539 | 8 Apr 1997 | 17 Apr 2001 | Nortel Networks Corporation | Systems and methods for implementing private wireless communications | | US6223047 | 26 Aug 1998 | 24 Apr 2001 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Extended sleep mode method and apparatus | | US6233247 | 12 Mar 1998 | 15 May 2001 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and system for avoiding communication failure in CDMA systems | | US6252862 | 20 May 1999 | 26 Jun 2001 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus for routing packet data in a communications system | | US6256300 | 11 Apr 2000 | 3 Jul 2001 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Mobility management for a multimedia mobile network | | US6266529 | 13 May 1998 | 24 Jul 2001 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method for CDMA handoff in the vicinity of highly sectorized cells | | US6272148 | 22 Sep 1998 | 7 Aug 2001 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Scheme for reliable communications via radio and wire networks using transport layer connection | | US6285875 | 28 Jun 1996 | 4 Sep 2001 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson | Traffic management system for use in mobile communications network | | US6289220 | 22 Jun 2000 | 11 Sep 2001 | Motorola, Inc. | Multiple controller identities for neighbor lists | | US6320898 | 30 Nov 1998 | 20 Nov 2001 | Nortel Networks Limited | CDMA pseudo-smart antenna selection | | US6345185 | 31 Dec 1998 | 5 Feb 2002 | Lg Information And Communications, Ltd. | Method for transmitting a PSMM in a communication system | | US6366961 | 3 Mar 1999 | 2 Apr 2002 | Nokia Telecommunications, Oy | Method and apparatus for providing mini packet switching in IP based cellular access networks | | US6370357 | 21 Dec 1998 | 9 Apr 2002 | Nortel Networks Limited | Mobile speed estimation for digital cellular radio systems | | US6370381 | 29 Jan 1999 | 9 Apr 2002 | Siemens Transportation Systems, Inc. | Multiple channel communications system | | US6393482 | 24 Aug 1998 | 21 May 2002 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Inter-working function selection system in a network | | US6400712 | 26 May 1998 | 4 Jun 2002 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Fast circuit switched data architecture and method | | US6404754 | 31 Dec 1998 | 11 Jun 2002 | Lg Information & Communications, Ltd. | Radio packet data terminal and method of determining internet interworking protocol address | | US6408182 | 16 Jul 1999 | 18 Jun 2002 | Ericsson, Inc. | Redundant mobile switching center (MSC) architecture for a radio telecommunications network | | US6418306 | 19 Jul 1999 | 9 Jul 2002 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Common message waiting notification across landline and wireless telecommunications networks | | US6424834 | 31 Jul 1999 | 23 Jul 2002 | Nortel Networks Corporation | Precision hard handoff method using pilot beacon distributors | | US6430168 | 18 Oct 1999 | 6 Aug 2002 | Nortel Networks Limited | CDMA base station lantern application | | US6438376 | 11 May 1999 | 20 Aug 2002 | Nortel Networks Limited | Wireless communications management and control system using mobile station position and movement information | | US6438377 | 21 Feb 1997 | 20 Aug 2002 | Nokia Telecommunications Oy | Handover in a mobile communication system | | US6445922 | 15 Dec 1999 | 3 Sep 2002 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and system for support of overlapping IP addresses between an interworking function and a mobile IP foreign agent | | US6459696 | 22 Jun 1998 | 1 Oct 2002 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and system for avoiding data loss in communications systems | | US6473399 | 30 Nov 1998 | 29 Oct 2002 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Method and apparatus for determining an optimum timeout under varying data rates in an RLC wireless system which uses a PDU counter | | US6477159 | 6 Jul 1999 | 5 Nov 2002 | Nec Corporation | Mobile communication system and a method thereof | | US6480476 | 23 Oct 1998 | 12 Nov 2002 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Variable sleep mode for mobile stations in a mobile communications | | US6480718 | 12 Jul 1999 | 12 Nov 2002 | Nortel Networks Limited | Automatic frequency planning for a wireless network | | US6507741 | 17 Dec 1997 | 14 Jan 2003 | Nortel Networks Limited | RF Repeater with delay to improve hard handoff performance | | US6522885 | 29 Sep 2000 | 18 Feb 2003 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and system for solving cellular communications frequency planning problem | | US6539030 | 7 Feb 2000 | 25 Mar 2003 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for providing configurable layers and protocols in a communications system | | US6542481 | 31 Jan 2001 | 1 Apr 2003 | Tantivy Communications, Inc. | Dynamic bandwidth allocation for multiple access communication using session queues | | US6542752 | 3 May 2000 | 1 Apr 2003 | Nortel Networks Limited | CDMA multiple carrier paging channel optimization | | US6545984 | 17 Dec 1998 | 8 Apr 2003 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method for topology analysis in the verification of neighbor and target lists in a CDMA network | | US6560453 | 9 Feb 2000 | 6 May 2003 | Ericsson Inc. | Systems, methods, and computer program products for dynamically adjusting the paging channel monitoring frequency of a mobile terminal based on the operating environment | | US6580699 | 27 Mar 2000 | 17 Jun 2003 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method for updating an R-P connection for a roaming mobile station | | US6590879 | 5 Mar 1999 | 8 Jul 2003 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method, mobile station, basestation and mobile communications system for performing handoff independently for groups of physical direct sequence-code division multiple access channels | | US6611695 | 20 Dec 1999 | 26 Aug 2003 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and apparatus for assigning frequency channels to a beam in a multi-beam cellular communications system | | US6618585 | 14 Dec 1999 | 9 Sep 2003 | Nortel Networks Limited | Internet-enable broadcast receiving apparatus | | US6621811 | 31 Jul 1999 | 16 Sep 2003 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and system for generating multiple pilot beacons of different frequencies from a single pilot beacon | | US6628637 | 15 Dec 1999 | 30 Sep 2003 | Nortel Networks Limited | Spread-spectrum carrier transmission power control in wireless telecommunications systems | | US6651105 | 12 Nov 1999 | 18 Nov 2003 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for seamless networking support for mobile devices using serial communications | | US6687237 | 1 Apr 1999 | 3 Feb 2004 | Nortel Networks Limited | Methods and systems for facilitating a multi-mode multi-pilot hard handoff | | US6701148 | 21 Dec 1999 | 2 Mar 2004 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and apparatus for simultaneous radio and mobile frequency transition via “handoff to self” | | US6701149 | 17 Jul 2000 | 2 Mar 2004 | Nortel Networks Limited | Handoff framework to support real-time delay-critical services in a next generation network | | US6711144 | 15 Sep 2000 | 23 Mar 2004 | Airvana, Inc. | Multi-user communication of voice and data | | US6731618 | 20 Oct 2000 | 4 May 2004 | Airvana, Inc. | Coding for multi-user communication | | US6738625 | 11 May 2000 | 18 May 2004 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Rehoming and resource sharing in communications networks | | US6741862 | 7 Feb 2001 | 25 May 2004 | Airvana, Inc. | Enhanced reverse-link rate control in wireless communication | | US6754191 | 22 Jun 2000 | 22 Jun 2004 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and apparatus for supplemental channel soft hand off in CDMA systems | | US6757319 | 28 Nov 2000 | 29 Jun 2004 | Golden Bridge Technology Inc. | Closed loop power control for common downlink transport channels | | US6768903 | 21 May 2001 | 27 Jul 2004 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method of controlling a channel between a radio terminal and a cellular radiocommunication infrastructure, and access network implementing such a method | | US6771962 | 30 Mar 2001 | 3 Aug 2004 | Nokia Corporation | Apparatus, and an associated method, by which to provide temporary identifiers to a mobile node involved in a communication handover | | US6781999 | 23 Jul 2001 | 24 Aug 2004 | Airvana, Inc. | Broadcasting and multicasting in wireless communication | | US6813498 | 27 Oct 2000 | 2 Nov 2004 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Apparatus, method and system for detection and recovery of missing wireless devices in communication systems | | US6826402 | 20 Feb 2001 | 30 Nov 2004 | Nortel Networks Limited | Pilot beacon trigger enhancement with hysterisis | | US6834050 | 8 Sep 2000 | 21 Dec 2004 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Packet core function and method of selecting a packet data service node/foreign agent in a packet data network | | US6842630 | 30 May 2003 | 11 Jan 2005 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and apparatus for assigning frequency channels to a beam in a multi-beam cellular communications system | | US6847821 | 14 Sep 1998 | 25 Jan 2005 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and system in a wireless communications network for the simultaneous transmission of both voice and non-voice data over a single radio frequency channel | | US6877104 | 27 Mar 2000 | 5 Apr 2005 | Nec Infiontia Corporation | Wireless local area network system, fault recovery method, and recording medium stored therein a computer program executing the fault recovery process | | US6909887 | 21 May 2001 | 21 Jun 2005 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method of controlling a channel between a radio terminal and a cellular radiocommunication infrastructure, and access network implementing such a method | | US6944452 | 26 Dec 2000 | 13 Sep 2005 | Nortel Networks Limited | Apparatus and method for hard handoff of data packet transmissions | | US6975869 | 23 Jun 1999 | 13 Dec 2005 | Nortel Matra Cellular | Method and apparatus for selecting parameters in a cellular radio communication network | | US6996056 | 31 May 2001 | 7 Feb 2006 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and apparatus for orthogonal code management in CDMA systems using smart antenna technology | | US6999784 | 5 Sep 2000 | 14 Feb 2006 | Lg Information & Communications, Ltd. | Method for controlling power of base station | | US7035636 | 30 Dec 1999 | 25 Apr 2006 | Lg Electronics Inc. | System and method for controlling packet data service in mobile communication network | | US7042858 | 22 Mar 2002 | 9 May 2006 | Microsoft Corporation | Soft handoff for OFDM | | US7047009 | 14 Oct 2004 | 16 May 2006 | Flarion Technologies, Inc. | Base station based methods and apparatus for supporting break before make handoffs in a multi-carrier system | | US7072663 | 9 Oct 2001 | 4 Jul 2006 | Nokia Corporation | Radio resource management | | US7079511 | 6 Dec 2000 | 18 Jul 2006 | Qualcomm, Incorporated | Method and apparatus for handoff of a wireless packet data services connection | | US7085251 | 4 Nov 2002 | 1 Aug 2006 | Qualcom Incorporated | Method and apparatus for handoff of a wireless packet data services connection | | US7110785 | 25 Oct 2000 | 19 Sep 2006 | Nortel Networks Limited | Performing power control in a mobile communications system | | US7130626 | 6 Oct 2004 | 31 Oct 2006 | Qualcomm, Inc. | Access terminal identification management | | US7130668 | 30 Jun 2004 | 31 Oct 2006 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method and system for controlling sleep mode in broadband wireless access communication system | | US7139575 | 27 Dec 2004 | 21 Nov 2006 | Nortel Networks Limited | Trigger for hard handoff from an overlay carrier to an underlying carrier | | US7162247 | 17 Apr 2001 | 9 Jan 2007 | Toshiba America Research, Inc. | Autonomous base station set up and soft handoff | | US7200391 | 6 Dec 2002 | 3 Apr 2007 | Airvana, Inc. | Capacity enhancement schemes for forward and reverse links of distributed cellular base stations | | US7242958 | 8 Sep 2005 | 10 Jul 2007 | Airvana, Inc. | Boosting a signal-to-interference ratio of a mobile station | | US7277446 | 2 Nov 2000 | 2 Oct 2007 | Airvana, Inc. | Communication of digital data over a wireless transmission medium | | US7299278 | 16 Jan 2002 | 20 Nov 2007 | Airvana, Inc. | Managing network faults | | US7408887 | 27 Oct 2004 | 5 Aug 2008 | Intel Corporation | Methods and apparatus for operating a wireless electronic device based on usage pattern | | US7408901 | 29 Dec 2004 | 5 Aug 2008 | Sprint Spectrum L.P. | Method and system for predictive handoff of a data session between entities | | US7486696 | 25 Jun 2002 | 3 Feb 2009 | Avaya, Inc. | System and method for providing bandwidth management for VPNs | | US7512110 | 14 Sep 2005 | 31 Mar 2009 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus to facilitate inter-AN HRPD hard handoff | | US20020067707 | 21 Sep 2001 | 6 Jun 2002 | Ericsson Ab | Method and apparatus to control handoff between different wireless systems | | US20020145990 | 11 Mar 2002 | 10 Oct 2002 | Motorola Mobility Llc | Apparatus and method for supporting common channel packet data service in a cdma2000 RAN | | US20020193110 | 16 Nov 2001 | 19 Dec 2002 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Mobility management entity for high data rate wireless communication networks | | US20030003913 | 6 Aug 2002 | 2 Jan 2003 | Chen Tao | Method of handoff within a telecommunications system containing digital base stations with different spectral capabilities | | US20030100311 | 12 Oct 2001 | 29 May 2003 | Airvana Network Solutions Inc. | Boosting a signal-to-interference ratio of a mobile station | | US20040218556 | 29 Apr 2004 | 4 Nov 2004 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | System and method for controlling state transition in sleep mode and awake mode in a broadband wireless access communication system | | US20040224687 | 8 May 2003 | 11 Nov 2004 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | System and method for paging a mobile station in a wireless network | | US20050025116 | 30 Aug 2004 | 3 Feb 2005 | Chen Ning Nicholas | System and method for packet data servicing node (PDSN) initial assignment and reselection | | US20050124343 | 28 Jun 2002 | 9 Jun 2005 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Radio communication apparatus and common control channel reception method | | US20050181795 | 10 Mar 2005 | 18 Aug 2005 | George Mason University | Cellular network handoff decision mechanism | | US20050233746 | 14 Oct 2004 | 20 Oct 2005 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus for selecting between multiple carriers based on signal energy measurements | | US20050243749 | 28 Apr 2004 | 3 Nov 2005 | Airvana Network Solutions Inc. | Reverse link power control | | US20050245279 | 28 Apr 2004 | 3 Nov 2005 | Airvana Network Solutions Inc. | Reverse link power control | | US20060030323 | 11 Oct 2005 | 9 Feb 2006 | Fujitsu Limited | Base station apparatus and mobile communication system | | US20060067422 | 30 Sep 2004 | 30 Mar 2006 | Airvana Network Solutions Inc. | Modulation for broadcasting from multiple transmitters | | US20060067451 | 30 Sep 2004 | 30 Mar 2006 | Airvana Network Solutions Inc. | Providing global positioning system timing signals to remote cellular base stations | | US20060126509 | 9 Dec 2004 | 15 Jun 2006 | Abi-Nassif Firas | Traffic management in a wireless data network | | US20060126554 | 18 Nov 2003 | 15 Jun 2006 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Mobile communication system, line concentrator, radio base station, mobile station, and communication method | | US20060159045 | 18 Jan 2005 | 20 Jul 2006 | Airvana Network Solutions Inc. | Reverse link rate and stability control | | US20060203766 | 23 Dec 2005 | 14 Sep 2006 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Notification of channel descriptor transmission for a mobile station in idle or sleep mode in a wireless access system | | US20060240782 | 26 Apr 2005 | 26 Oct 2006 | Airvana Network Solutions Inc. | Measuring interference in radio networks | | US20060294214 | 23 Jun 2005 | 28 Dec 2006 | Chou Joey | Event logging techniques for broadband wireless access networks | | US20070026884 | 28 Jul 2005 | 1 Feb 2007 | Airvana Network Solutions Inc. | Controlling usage capacity in a radio access network | | US20070058628 | 15 Sep 2005 | 15 Mar 2007 | Airvana Network Solutions Inc. | Broadcasting in wireless systems | | US20070115896 | 18 Nov 2005 | 24 May 2007 | Airvana Network Solutions Inc. | Resource allocation in a radio access network | | US20080009328 | 5 Jul 2006 | 10 Jan 2008 | Motorola, Inc. | Sleep mode optimization for reducing battery life in broadband wireless communication devices | | US20080287130 | 19 May 2008 | 20 Nov 2008 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Base Station Base Methods and Apparatus For Supporting Break Before Making Handoffs In A Multi-Carrier System |
| Reference |
|---|
| 1 | 3GPP2, "3GPP2 Access Network Interfaces Interoperability Specification 2, Release A," Jun. 2000. | | 2 | 3GPP2, "Wireless IP Network Standard", 3rd Generation Partnership Project 2 (3GPP2), Version 1.0.0, Jul. 14, 2000. | | 3 | 3rd Generation Partnership Project "3GPP2", cdma2000 High Rate Packet Data Interface Specification, C.S0024-A, version 1.0, Mar. 2004. | | 4 | 3rd Generation Partnership Project "3GPP2", cdma2000 High Rate Packet Data Interface Specification, C.S0024-A, version 2.0, Jul. 2005. | | 5 | 3rd Generation Partnership Project "3GPP2", cdma2000 High Rate Packet Data Interface Specification, C.S0024-A, version 4.0, Oct. 25, 2002. | | 6 | 3rd Generation Partnership Project "3GPP2", cdma2000 High Rate Packet Data Interface Specification, C.S0024-B, version 1.0, Apr. 2006. | | 7 | 3rd Generation Partnership Project 2 "3GPP2", "cdma2000 High Rate Packet Data Interface Specification", C.S0024, version 2, Oct. 27, 2000 (441 pages). | | 8 | 3rd Generation Partnership Project 2 "3GPP2", "cdma2000 High Rate Packet Data Interface Specification", C.S0024-B, version 2, Mar. 2007 (1627 pages). | | 9 | Australian (AU) Examination Report for Application No. 2005426813, Jun. 4, 2009 (18 pages). | | 10 | Chinese Office action Chinese application No. 200580024230.0 sent Nov. 20, 2009 with English translation (6 pages). | | 11 | Chinese Office action of Chinese application No. 200580024230.0 mailed Mar. 15, 2009 (13 pages). | | 12 | Chinese Office action of Chinese application No. 200580024230.0 mailed Nov. 20, 2009 (4 pages). | | 13 | Chinese Office action response of Chinese application No. 200580024230.0 filed Feb. 5, 2010, along with instructions for response and associate recommendation (12 pages). | | 14 | Chinese Office action response of Chinese application No. 200580024230.0 sent Jul. 22, 2009 (8 pages). | | 15 | Chinese Office action with English translation of Chinese application No. 200580024230.0 dated May 17, 2010 (6 pages). | | 16 | EP Examination Report for Application No. 05750705.5, Jan. 9, 2007 (2 pages). | | 17 | EP Examination Report for Application No. 06785637.7, Feb. 6, 2008, 2 pages. | | 18 | European Patent Office communication mailed Jun. 18, 2009 and response to Jun. 18, 2009 communication of European application No. 06836082.5 filed Jul. 21, 2009 (21 pages). | | 19 | Examiner Interview Summary in U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,893, dated Dec. 17, 2010, 3 pages. | | 20 | Examiner Interview Summary in U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,893, dated Jun. 30, 2010, 4 pages. | | 21 | Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/640,619, dated Jan. 7, 2011, 24 pages. | | 22 | Fish & Richardson, P.C., Amendment in reply to Action dated Jun. 16, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/037,896, dated Jun. 28, 2010, 21 pages. | | 23 | Fish & Richardson, P.C., Amendment in Reply to Action dated Jun. 24, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/305,286, filed Oct. 25, 2010, 31 pages. | | 24 | Fish & Richardson, P.C., Amendment in Reply to Action dated Mar. 25, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,893, filed Jun. 28, 2010, 19 pages. | | 25 | Fish & Richardson, P.C., Amendment in Reply to Action dated Mar. 30, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,744, filed Aug. 30, 2010, 12 pages. | | 26 | Fish & Richardson, P.C., Amendment in Reply to Final Office Action dated Nov. 12, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,744, filed on Feb. 14, 2011, 12 pages. | | 27 | Fish & Richardson, P.C., Amendment in Reply to Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,744, filed on Jun. 30, 2011, 13 pages. | | 28 | Fish & Richardson, P.C., Amendment in Reply to Office Action dated Sep. 2, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,893, filed on Jan. 3, 2011, 18 pages. | | 29 | Fish & Richardson, P.C., Supplemental Amendment in Reply to Action dated Jun. 18, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/640,619, filed Oct. 18, 2010, 20 pages. | | 30 | GB Examination Report for Application No. 0811839.0, mailed Jan. 22, 2010 (2 pages). | | 31 | GB Examination Report for Application No. 0811839.0, mailed Jun. 3, 2010 (3 pages). | | 32 | Goran Janevski, "IP-Based Mobile Wireless Access Network Architecture", Nortel Networks-MWIF Contribution, Draft dated Sep. 7, 2000. | | 33 | International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2005/017385, Dec. 7, 2006, 8 pages. | | 34 | International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2006/024958, Jan. 17, 2008, 7 pages. | | 35 | International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2006/25018, Mar. 19, 2009 (8 pages). | | 36 | International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT international application No. PCT/US2006/047524, mailed Apr. 28, 2011 (8 pages). | | 37 | International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT international application No. PCT/US2006/047963, mailed Dec. 11, 2008 (5 pages). | | 38 | International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT international application No. PCT/US2006/047524, mailed May 26, 2009 (13 pages). | | 39 | International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT international application No. PCT/US2006/047963, mailed Sep. 26, 2008 (9 pages). | | 40 | International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT international application No. PCT/US2006/25018, mailed Jan. 29, 2008 (11 pages). | | 41 | International Search Report, Patent Cooperation Treaty, Apr. 26, 2007, 10 pages. | | 42 | International Search Report, Patent Cooperation Treaty, Oct. 26, 2006, 6 pages. | | 43 | International Search Report, Patent Cooperation Treaty, Oct. 29, 2002, 5 pages. | | 44 | Japanese Office action of application No. 2007-527408 issued Nov. 24, 2010, mailed Nov. 29, 2010 with English translation (21 pages). | | 45 | Library Search for Nortel and frequency handoff. Search results dated Aug. 28, 2009 (85 pages). | | 46 | Notice of Allowability in U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,545, dated Mar. 11, 2011, 9 pages. | | 47 | Notice of Allowability in U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,545, dated Nov. 8, 2010, 6 pages. | | 48 | Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 11/037,896, dated Jan. 5, 2011, 5 pages. | | 49 | Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 11/037,896, dated May 17, 2011, 8 pages. | | 50 | Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,774, dated Apr. 4, 2011, 7 pages. | | 51 | Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,774, dated Aug. 31, 2010, 4 pages. | | 52 | Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,774, dated Dec. 21, 2010, 8 pages. | | 53 | Office Action and response from European Patent Office for Application No. 06836082.5 mailed Jun. 18, 2009 and sent Jul. 21, 2009 (21 pages). | | 54 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl No. 10/848,597 to May 18, 2004. | | 55 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl No. 11/037,896 to May 27, 2009. | | 56 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl No. 11/243,405 to May 27, 2009. | | 57 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl No. 11/303,774 to Sep. 17, 2009. | | 58 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl No. 11/305,286 to Jun. 1, 2009. | | 59 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 09/891,103 to Aug. 11, 2009. | | 60 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 09/891,103 to Dec. 13, 2009. | | 61 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 09/891,103 to Dec. 8, 2009. | | 62 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 09/891,103 to Jun. 14, 2010. | | 63 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 09/891,103 to May 27, 2009. | | 64 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 09/891,103 to Nov. 10, 2009. | | 65 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/037,896 to Dec. 8, 2009. | | 66 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/037,896 to Jan. 11, 2010. | | 67 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/037,896 to Jun. 16, 2010. | | 68 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/037,896 to Sep. 17, 2009. | | 69 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,893 to Apr. 13, 2010. | | 70 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,893 to Aug. 11, 2009. | | 71 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,893 to Dec. 8, 2009. | | 72 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,893 to May 27, 2009. | | 73 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/167,785 to Apr. 28, 2010. | | 74 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/167,785 to Aug. 11, 2009. | | 75 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/167,785 to Jan. 11, 2010. | | 76 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/167,785 to May 27, 2009. | | 77 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/167,785 to Sep. 22, 2009. | | 78 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/243,405 to Aug. 11, 2009. | | 79 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/243,405 to Dec. 8, 2009. | | 80 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/243,405 to Jan. 6, 2010. | | 81 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/243,405 to Jun. 17, 2010. | | 82 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/243,405 to Nov. 9, 2009. | | 83 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,774 to Aug. 13, 2009. | | 84 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,774 to Dec. 11, 2009. | | 85 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,774 to Jun. 30, 2010. | | 86 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,774 to May 27, 2009. | | 87 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/305,286 to Aug. 11, 2008. | | 88 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/305,286 to Jan. 11, 2010. | | 89 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/305,286 to Jun. 24, 2010. | | 90 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/305,286 to Sep. 30, 2009. | | 91 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,744 to Aug. 17, 2009. | | 92 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,744 to Mar. 30, 2010. | | 93 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,744 to May 27, 2009. | | 94 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,744 to Nov. 30, 2009. | | 95 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,545 to Aug. 26, 2009. | | 96 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,545 to Dec. 8, 2009. | | 97 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,545 to May 28, 2010. | | 98 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/640,619 to Jun. 18, 2010. | | 99 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/640,619 to Nov. 9, 2009. | | 100 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/955,644 to Aug. 11, 2009. | | 101 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/955,644 to Dec. 8, 2009. | | 102 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/955,644 to Jun. 3, 2010. | | 103 | Office action and response history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/955,644 to May 27, 2009. | | 104 | Office action of U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,774 dated Jun. 12, 2009. | | 105 | Paul Bender & Ramin Rezalifar, "Draft Baseline Text for the 1xEV-DO Upper Layers (excluding Physical Layer)", 3GPP2, Aug. 17, 2000. | | 106 | Paul Bender, et al., "CDMA/HDR: A Bandwidth-Efficient High-Speed Wireless Data Service for Nomadic Users", IEEE Communications Magazine, Jul. 2000. | | 107 | PCT application No. PCT/US2002/020380 filed on Jun. 25, 2002, with Publication No. WO2003/001820, including application as filed. | | 108 | PCT application No. PCT/US2005/17385 filed on May 17, 2005, with Publication No. WO2005/115026, including application as filed. | | 109 | PCT application No. PCT/US2006/025018 filed on Jun. 26, 2006, with Publication No. WO2007/044099, including application as filed. | | 110 | PCT application No. PCT/US2006/24958 filed on Jun. 27, 2006, with Publication No. WO2007/002659, including application as filed. | | 111 | PCT application No. PCT/US2006/47524 filed on Dec. 13, 2006, with Publication No. WO2007/078766, including application as filed. | | 112 | PCT application No. PCT/US2006/47963 filed on Dec. 15, 2006, with Publication No. WO2007/075446, including application as filed. | | 113 | Rashid Attar et al., "Evolution of cdma2000 Cellular Networks: Multicarrier EV-DO", IEEE Communications Magazine, Mar. 2006. pp. 46-53. | | 114 | Response filed Aug. 2, 2010 to Chinese office action for Chinese application No. 200580024230.0 dated May 17, 2010 (41 pages). | | 115 | Response filed Aug. 9, 2010 to GB Examination Report for Application No. 0811839.0, dated Jun. 3, 2010 (10 pages). | | 116 | Response filed May 21, 2010 to GB Examination Report for Application No. 0811839.0, dated Jan. 22, 2010 (12 pages). | | 117 | Response filed May 30, 2011 to Japanese Office action issued in application No. 2007-527408, Nov. 24, 2010, mailed Nov. 29, 2010 (31 pages). | | 118 | Supplemental Notice of Allowability in U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,774, dated Nov. 22, 2010, 9 pages. | | 119 | TIA/EIA/IS-2001, Interoperability Specification (IOS) for CDMA2000 Network Access Interfaces, Aug. 2001 (revised version of May 2000). | | 120 | TIA/EIA/TSB-115, "Wireless IP Architecture Based on IETF Protocols", Jun. 6, 2000. | | 121 | U.S. Appl. No. 08/057,970, filed May 7, 1993, Willhoff et al. | | 122 | U.S. Appl. No. 08/859,197, filed May 20, 1997, Chheda et al. | | 123 | U.S. Appl. No. 09/036,191, filed Mar. 6, 1998, Sharma et al. | | 124 | U.S. Appl. No. 09/198,387, filed Nov. 24, 1998, Bevan. | | 125 | U.S. Appl. No. 09/213,523, filed Dec. 17, 1998, Simmons. | | 126 | U.S. Appl. No. 09/217,064, filed Dec. 21, 1998, Xia et al. | | 127 | U.S. Appl. No. 09/283,151, filed Apr. 1, 1999, Lee et al. | | 128 | U.S. Appl. No. 09/461,454, filed Dec. 14, 1999, Robinson. | | 129 | U.S. Appl. No. 09/797,273, filed Mar. 1, 2001, Periyalwar et al. | | 130 | U.S. Appl. No. 09/871,581, filed May 2001, Chheda et al. | | 131 | U.S. Appl. No. 09/891,103, filed Jun. 25, 2001, including application as filed, and pending claims. | | 132 | U.S. Appl. No. 10/013,562, filed Dec. 11, 2001, Hashem et al. | | 133 | U.S. Appl. No. 10/104,399, filed Mar. 22, 2002, Ma et al. | | 134 | U.S. Appl. No. 10/848,597, filed May 18, 2004, now U.S. Patent No. 7,170,871, issued Jan. 30, 2007, including application as filed. | | 135 | U.S. Appl. No. 11/037,896, filed Jan. 18, 2005, including application as filed, and pending claims. | | 136 | U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,893, filed Jun. 24, 2005, including application as filed, and pending claims. | | 137 | U.S. Appl. No. 11/167,785, filed Jun. 27, 2005, including application as filed, and pending claims. | | 138 | U.S. Appl. No. 11/243,405, filed Oct. 4, 2005, including application as filed, and pending claims. | | 139 | U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,773, filed Dec. 16, 2005, including application as filed, and pending claims. | | 140 | U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,774, filed Dec. 16, 2005, including application as filed, and pending claims. | | 141 | U.S. Appl. No. 11/305,286, filed Dec. 16, 2005, including application as filed. | | 142 | U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,744, filed Apr. 12, 2006, including application as filed, and pending claims. | | 143 | U.S. Appl. No. 11/640,619, filed Dec. 18, 2006, including application as filed. | | 144 | U.S. Appl. No. 11/955,644, filed Dec. 13, 2007, including application as filed. | | 145 | U.S. Appl. No. 60/019,459, filed Jun. 13, 1996, Graves et al. | | 146 | USPTO Advisory Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,774, dated Jun. 30, 2010, 2 pages. | | 147 | USPTO Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/167,785, dated Oct. 15, 2010, 10 pages. | | 148 | USPTO Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,773, dated Aug. 18, 2010, 12 pages. | | 149 | USPTO Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/305,286, dated Jun. 24, 2010, 39 pages. | | 150 | USPTO Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,744, dated Nov. 12, 2010, 22 pages. | | 151 | USPTO Non-Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/402,744, dated Apr. 1, 2011, 14 pages. | | 152 | USPTO Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,893, dated Mar. 18, 2011, 21 pages. | | 153 | USPTO Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 11/486,545, dated Jul. 28, 2010, 8 pages. | | 154 | USPTO Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,893, dated Sep. 2, 2010, 31 pages. | | 155 | USPTO Supplemental Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 09/891,103, dated Mar. 14, 2011, 6 pages. | | 156 | USPTO Supplemental Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 09/891,103, dated Oct. 15, 2010, 4 pages. | | 157 | USPTO Supplemental Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,893, dated Apr. 22, 2011, 17 pages. | | 158 | Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, Patent Cooperation Treaty, Oct. 26, 2006, 8 pages. |
|