|Publication number||US6033852 A|
|Application number||US 08/938,115|
|Publication date||7 Mar 2000|
|Filing date||26 Sep 1997|
|Priority date||27 Sep 1996|
|Publication number||08938115, 938115, US 6033852 A, US 6033852A, US-A-6033852, US6033852 A, US6033852A|
|Inventors||Jeffrey C. Andle, Ryszard M. Lec|
|Original Assignee||University Of Maine|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (10), Referenced by (88), Classifications (26), Legal Events (12)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The United States Government has rights in this invention pursuant to Contract No. DE-FG02-97PC82335 awarded by the United States Department of Energy, and Contract No. DAMD17-95C-5033 awarded by the United States Army.
This application claims benefit of provisional 60/026,795 Sep. 27, 1996.
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to sensing chemical, biochemical and physical measurands using piezoelectric sensors.
2. Description of the Related Art
There are a number of sensor applications that demand exceptional physically, chemically and environmentally stable sensing elements. Two classes of sensors which are frequently proposed to this end are the optical fiber based sensors and the piezoelectric sensors, both of which derive their chemical and physical stability from solid state construction of inert glassy or crystalline solids. One advantage of the piezoelectric sensors is their wide range of potential sensing mechanisms coupled with the exceptional temperature stability of the most common implementation, namely quartz crystal technology.
Various piezoelectric sensor geometries have been proposed and patented. The most widely considered of these is the quartz crystal microbalance, though other piezoelectric crystals, polymers and composites have also been used. Though the original patents in this field are expired, the technology is still not a mature technique for many sensing applications.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,760,351, issued to Newell et al., teaches the use of arrays of these devices which consist of a parallel plate capacitor employing a piezoelectric material as the dielectric support. While this structure has exhibited good sensing characteristics in the vapor phase, sensor performance is substantially impaired when fluid phase operation is pursued.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,374,521, issued to Kipling et al., discloses an alternative mode of operation of these sensors intended to overcome these difficulties; however, the method is not amenable to field deployment or mass production.
The preferred methods of operating the crystal sensor are (1) using an impedance analyzer in a laboratory setting or (2) incorporating the device into an oscillating circuit. Under vapor phase operation, both techniques are suitable; however, liquid phase operation incurs many difficulties in instrumentation, which substantially impair the reliability and sensitivity of the sensor.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,847,193, issued to Richards et al., discloses a signal amplification technique which partially overcomes this problem in selected assays. U.S. Pat. No. 5,179,028, issued to Vali et al. discloses an alternative structure which replaces the parallel plate capacitor with a tuning fork geometry. This geometry appears to offer other measurement methods but does not overcome the difficulties associated with liquid phase operation.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,735,906, issued to Bastiaans, discloses a surface wave device which supports two separate interdigital transducers which serve to convert energy between electrical and acoustic signals. These transducers employ arrays of electrodes which are periodically spaced on the surface of the crystal and are alternately connected to the positive and negative terminals of the electrical input or output.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,306,644, issued to Myerholtz et al. teaches an improvement on Bastiaans invention by employing a specific combination of materials and structural design to substantially reduce mechanical interactions with the fluid medium. Myerholtz et al. also discloses the expansion of a single sensor to an array.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,478,756, issued to Gizeli et al. teaches an alternative improvement on the Bastiaans structure which employs a thick film of dielectric material to help confine the acoustic signal to the surface.
All these approaches suffer from two significant limitations. The foremost of these is that the structures do not isolate the electrical connections from the sensing environment. One solution has been to employ an acoustic waveguide version of the Bastiaans structure. While this structure overcomes the most substantial limitations of the Bastiaans structure, it incurs additional spurious resonances which further complicate the sensor instrumentation. Finally, all of the Bastiaans-derived structures require micron scale lithography and teach towards complicated, surface-based devices. A simpler implementation is based upon the (quartz) crystal microbalance devices. The fundamental problem with these techniques, however, is that the sensing element is a simple reactive electrical component with a single electrical "port".
There is not found in the prior art a sensing apparatus which has no additional spurious resonances, separate input and output terminals, and isolates the electrical connections to the circuit from the sensing environment.
It is an aspect of the invention to provide a sensing apparatus which has separate input and output terminals.
It is another aspect of the invention to provide a sensing apparatus which isolates the electrical connections to the circuit from the sensing environment.
The invention is an improvement on the (quartz) crystal resonator which employs the parallel plate configuration while isolating the non-grounded electrical connections from the sensing medium and providing separate input and output electrical ports. Its relationship to the existing resonator is analogous to the relationship of the transistor to a diode.
Other aspects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent and obvious from a study of the following description and the accompanying drawings which are merely illustrative of the invention.
FIG. 1A illustrates a typical prior art piezoelectric sensor.
FIG. 1B is a schematic representation of the sensor illustrated in FIG. 1A.
FIG. 2 illustrates the monolithic piezoelectric sensor in accordance with the invention.
FIG. 3 is a graph showing electrical transmission and phase as a function of frequency of the sensor shown in FIG. 2.
FIG. 4 is a schematic representation of the MPS shown in FIG. 2.
The sensor is a novel piezoelectric apparatus that is useful for sensing chemical, biochemical and physical measurands. The sensor operates by measurement of the perturbations of the electrical parameters of a piezoelectric sensing element. The sensing element is capable of detecting both electrical (e.g. conductivity and permittivity) and mechanical (e.g. elasticity, viscosity and density) perturbations caused by a measurand. The sensing element consists of two or more acoustically coupled resonant structures on a single piezoelectric substrate or a substrate coated with a piezoelectric layer. The resulting structure, known as a monolithic filter, provides separate input and output electrical connections which are physically separated from the common ground electrode, allowing it to be incorporated into a large number of diverse measurement systems. The sensor is attractive for sensing a variety of physical, chemical and biochemical measurands, in particular for trace chemical analysis, including trace vapors, metals and biochemicals--either in solution or in gaseous mixtures--and physical measurands such as acceleration, pressure, etc.
The invention combines the best aspects of (quartz) crystal resonator and other piezoelectric sensor techniques and is a fundamental improvement to the well known quartz crystal microbalance (QCM). While the invention has some of the physical traits of the well known QCM, it also overcomes many limitations of the QCM, especially with respect to fluid phase sensing and sensing in highly corrosive environments.
FIG. 1A illustrates the structure of the traditional QCM device, as it would be employed for fluid-loaded or corrosive environment operation. The only relevant design parameters are the electrode shape, area and the plate thickness. The substrate material is almost always AT-cut quartz, which is chosen for its excellent temperature stability. As shown, the traditional crystal sensor consists of a piezoelectric crystal with metal electrodes on both surfaces. The region between the electrodes supports a mechanical standing wave (denoted by the parallel lines). Electrical connections are made to the grounded side through the case and to the positive side via a wire point contact.
FIG. 1B is a schematic of the equivalent electrical circuit, which consists of a series resonant circuit in parallel with a capacitance. For most frequencies the device appears to be a capacitor, except in a narrow band of frequencies near the resonant frequency of the series branch of the circuit.
The resonant frequency of the crystal is determined by the ratio of the mass (embodied in the equivalent circuit as the inductance) to the stiffness (embodied in the equivalent circuit as the capacitance) and the thickness of the plate. Added mass--which becomes bound to the face of the crystal--increases the inductive component and thus lowers the resonant frequency in a predictable and measurable fashion. It is possible to quantitatively detect nanogram per mm2 and lower levels of mass loading using this technology. The piezoelectric sensor is, itself, a nonspecific mass detector; however, excellent specificity is added by coating the crystal with a selective film, e.g., biochemical receptor film, such as monoclonal antibody, DNA oligonucleotide probes or other suitable bioreceptors or polymer or metallic films. Residual nonspecific binding may be compensated by employing a second, reference crystal which is coated with a different film having similar electrical (charge vs. pH) and mechanical properties. Typically, a second selective receptor is selected which is insignificant to the detection process at hand. Thus, specific tracts of bacterial DNA might be detected using a specific sequence on the sensor crystal while employing a nonsense sequence on the reference sensor.
The most common and cost-effective method of monitoring the resonant frequency employs the crystal as the stabilizing element in an oscillator circuit. The circuit depends on the unique characteristics of the crystal at its resonant frequency. In signal processing and frequency control applications the preferred oscillator circuit places the crystal as a shunt feedback element (between the input and output terminals of an amplifier) and oscillates on the series resonance. This arrangement places both electrodes of the QCM at an active electrical potential and incurs deleterious effects from packaging methods such as that depicted in FIG. 1. To eliminate these effects one of the electrodes must be connected to ground. While this is not inherently a problem, it severely limits the classes of oscillator circuits which may be employed to measure the resonant frequency. In fact, all of the well-known circuits which may be employed with the QCM having one electrode grounded operate as image impedance oscillators. These circuits employ a transistor or other active device in an unstable mode of operation and employ the crystal to control the instability. For example, an inductive component between a transistor's base and ground will induce instability. This class of circuits typically requires that the net electrical characteristics are inductive at the frequency of oscillation. This is difficult to ensure under fluid loading, in which case the resonant branch of the circuit is highly damped and the parallel capacitor dominates. Other instability-based oscillators employ a capacitive element between a transistor's emitter and ground. While the crystal can serve this role, it is capacitive at virtually all frequencies and is thus not a reliable method of stabilizing an oscillator.
As previously stated, oscillator circuits which employ the QCM as a shunt feedback element have excellent stability characteristics. Typically, these circuits employ unconditionally stable amplifiers which provide adequate gain to overcome the resistive losses in the QCM. When the electrical phase shift around the loop is a multiple of 2π radians, signals are successively amplified on each transit around the loop until the transistor saturates. Since noise signals are capable of starting this process, such a circuit invariably oscillates. Unfortunately, all of the circuits which employ this mode of operation require that two separate electrodes be electrically active with respect to ground. This has proven extremely problematic when using the packaging proposed in FIG. 1 or any suitable alternative. The fundamental constraint is that the QCM is a two-terminal device and one of the terminals must be placed in contact with the fluid. This fluid-loaded electrode must be grounded for reliable electrical operation.
FIG. 2 illustrates the monolithic piezoelectric sensor (MPS) invention, which is based on the (quartz) multi-resonator monolithic filter technology. The MPS employs two driven electrodes referenced to a grounded metal layer (top). The grounded metal layer (typically gold) may be coated with covalently attached bioreceptors (e.g. antibody, enzyme or DNA), or with any other materials that selectively bind their analyte. The added mass changes the frequency response in a predictable and measurable fashion. This shift is typically monitored by embedding the sensor in a series feedback oscillator. The three-terminal MPS may be employed in series feedback oscillators while still allowing sensing to occur on a grounded, physically-isolated electrode. The invention comprises two or more independent resonators placed in close proximity on the same crystal, such that some acoustic energy couples between them.
The net result is a sharp, well defined filter function, as shown in FIG. 3. Electrical transmission and phase is plotted as a function of frequency. When placed in the feedback path of an amplifier, the resulting circuit can be induced to oscillate at a fixed frequency for which there is net gain around the loop and the phase shift is a multiple of 360 degrees. Extremely stable oscillation occurs when the frequency is designed to be in the center of the resonance, in the area of high phase slope. Since the entire response shifts with mass loading, stable operation is maintained over all cases of sensor operation.
The electrical signal applied to the input appears at the output with a finite attenuation and a well-defined phase shift. By placing the device in the feedback path of a radio-frequency (RF) amplifier, the stable resonance of the crystal controls the frequency of oscillation in the circuit.
The only substantial effects of loading the crystal with a viscous fluid are to slightly increase the attenuation and to lower the oscillation frequency proportional to the viscoelastic properties of the liquid and the added mass due to accumulation of the target chemical in accordance with well-known mathematical models. It is known that during surface reactions, detectable levels of mass change occur on the face of the crystal. Therefore, by measuring the frequency change and the attenuation change of the oscillator, one can quantitate surface reactions and . . . using calibration data . . . determine solution titer.
In the case of loading the MPS with conductive materials, such as conductive liquids or thin solid films, the coupling impedance, Zc of FIG. 4, undergoes changes due to the changes of both the dielectric constant and the conductivity of a loading material. Several chemical, biochemical and physical processes change the electric properties of materials. Examples include sensing gas by thin metal oxide films or quantitating metal ions in water. As a result, the resonant frequency and the amplitude of the MPS vary accordingly allowing for determination of the acting measurands.
A MPS sensor offers a very attractive apparatus for sensing a variety of physical measurands such as pressure, acceleration, electric field, temperature, etc. In this case, the measurand of interest directly changes the MPS substrate parameters such as elastic, dielectric or piezoelectric constants. As a result, the frequency and amplitude of the MPS changes accordingly. For example, the pressure or electric field applied to the MPS changes the elastic constants of the substrate via nonlinear elasto-acoustic and electro-acoustic effects.
In its simplest form, the sensor comprises a piezoelectric plate with at least two resonators placed in proximity, as shown in FIG. 2. Each resonator comprises two electrodes--placed on opposite surfaces for in-line excitation, as shown, or on the same surface for parallel excitation (not shown). The electrodes consist of a conductor, such as gold, silver or aluminum. The selection of the electrode metal is determined by the environmental issues associated with the specific application and with the frequency of operation. Very high frequency devices tend to employ aluminum for its superior mechanical properties. Lower frequency devices typically prefer silver or gold for environmental stability (corrosion resistance). The design rules for electrode thickness are determined by energy trapping theory, as is the spacing between the adjacent resonators. A variety of electrode shapes are possible. Traditionally, rectangular electrodes are employed in analogous signal processing devices for mathematical simplicity; however, elliptical and circular electrodes are also known in these applications. Sensor elements are feasible with any possible electrode geometries, including elliptical, rectangular, toroidal, etc.
In this configuration, one resonator serves as an input port through which electrical energy is converted to mechanical energy within the sensor. The second resonator serves as an output port, through which a filtered (delayed and attenuated) replica of the input signal is detected as an electrical signal. Both the delay time and the attenuation at a given frequency may be affected by the measurand and may be measured as the sensor output.
The structure of FIG. 3 would be sensitive to physical (e.g. acceleration, pressure), electrical (e.g. conductivity, etc.) and mechanical (e.g. mass loading or viscoelastic loading) perturbations. Selective films may be employed on either surface of the sensor or on both surfaces simultaneously, allowing three configurations of the sensor. The sensor may be packaged so as to expose either or both surfaces to the test environment. Although any of these configurations is acceptable, the preferred approach is to place the film on the grounded surface and enclose the electrical connections (input and output electrodes) in isolation.
In some cases, it would be preferable to eliminate electrical perturbations, for example, in a mass-based sensor. This may be accomplished by employing a continuous ground electrode, as shown in FIG. 2, and encapsulating the active input and output electrodes. Since the electric field is shorted everywhere on the sensing surface, spurious changes in the conductivity of the test solution would not cause deleterious sensor drift.
Finally, in some applications and/or instrumentation methods it may be desirable to employ a multi-pole filter consisting of more than two resonators in proximity. The primary advantage of this approach is to increase the phase slope versus frequency, allowing better resolution. The ability to resolve phase changes increases approximately linearly with the number of resonators.
It is feasible to place different films over the different resonators and to employ spectroscopic measurements and neural network techniques to deconvolve the individual perturbations.
While there have been described what are at present considered to be the preferred embodiments of this invention, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the invention and it is, therefore, aimed to cover all such changes and modifications as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4236893 *||9 Apr 1979||2 Dec 1980||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Method for the assay of classes of antigen-specific antibodies|
|US4242096 *||14 Nov 1977||30 Dec 1980||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Immunoassay for antigens|
|US4735906 *||28 Nov 1984||5 Apr 1988||Texas A&M University||Sensor having piezoelectric crystal for microgravimetric immunoassays|
|US4789804 *||17 Sep 1986||6 Dec 1988||Seiko Instruments & Electronics Ltd.||Analytical device and method utilizing a piezoelectric crystal biosensor|
|US4847193 *||18 Jun 1987||11 Jul 1989||Gene-Trak Systems||Signal amplification in an assay employing a piezoelectric oscillator|
|US4905701 *||15 Jun 1988||6 Mar 1990||National Research Development Corporation||Apparatus and method for detecting small changes in attached mass of piezoelectric devices used as sensors|
|US4920296 *||2 Aug 1989||24 Apr 1990||Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.||Electronic component having a plate-shaped element|
|US4999284 *||6 Apr 1988||12 Mar 1991||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Enzymatically amplified piezoelectric specific binding assay|
|US5001053 *||12 Sep 1988||19 Mar 1991||Nihon Kohden Corporation||Method and apparatus for measuring the product of an antigen-antibody reaction|
|US5828159 *||4 Jun 1997||27 Oct 1998||Fujitsu Limited||Resonator device adapted for suppression of fluctuation in resonant resistance, and method of producing same|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6150748 *||1 Feb 1999||21 Nov 2000||Nec Corporation||Surface-acoustic-wave device|
|US6544478 *||2 Nov 1998||8 Apr 2003||Kabushiki Kaisha Meidensha||QCM sensor|
|US6589798 *||11 Jun 1999||8 Jul 2003||Biacore Ab||Method and system for analyte determination|
|US6851297||19 Dec 2002||8 Feb 2005||The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc.||Flexural plate wave sensor and array|
|US7002281||16 Jul 2003||21 Feb 2006||Biode Inc.||Multi-reflective acoustic wave device|
|US7105301||22 Sep 2003||12 Sep 2006||Intel Corporation||Detecting molecular binding by monitoring feedback controlled cantilever deflections|
|US7259499||28 Oct 2005||21 Aug 2007||Askew Andy R||Piezoelectric bimorph actuator and method of manufacturing thereof|
|US7270952||24 Sep 2002||18 Sep 2007||Intel Corporation||Detecting molecular binding by monitoring feedback controlled cantilever deflections|
|US7291466||20 Apr 2005||6 Nov 2007||Intel Corporation||Detecting molecular binding by monitoring feedback controlled cantilever deflections|
|US7300631||18 Jul 2005||27 Nov 2007||Bioscale, Inc.||Method and apparatus for detection of analyte using a flexural plate wave device and magnetic particles|
|US7304732||19 Nov 2003||4 Dec 2007||United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army||Microelectromechanical resonant photoacoustic cell|
|US7422724 *||7 Aug 2002||9 Sep 2008||Sandia Corporation||Biological preconcentrator|
|US7552619||22 Apr 2004||30 Jun 2009||Vectron International, Inc.||Measurement of density and viscoelasticity with a single acoustic wave sensor|
|US7566531 *||3 Mar 2004||28 Jul 2009||University Of Massachusetts||Selective whole cell quartz crystal microbalance biosensors|
|US7598094||2 May 2006||6 Oct 2009||Bioscale, Inc.||Methods and apparatus for detecting cardiac injury markers using an acoustic device|
|US7611908||2 May 2006||3 Nov 2009||Bioscale, Inc.||Method and apparatus for therapeutic drug monitoring using an acoustic device|
|US7615381||2 May 2006||10 Nov 2009||Bioscale, Inc.||Method and apparatus for detecting estradiol and metabolites thereof using an acoustic device|
|US7629137||2 May 2006||8 Dec 2009||Bioscale, Inc.||Methods and apparatus for detecting bacteria using an acoustic device|
|US7632638||2 May 2006||15 Dec 2009||Bioscale, Inc.||Methods and apparatus for detecting viruses using an acoustic device|
|US7648844||2 May 2006||19 Jan 2010||Bioscale, Inc.||Method and apparatus for detection of analyte using an acoustic device|
|US7749445||19 Dec 2006||6 Jul 2010||Bioscale, Inc.||Method and apparatus for analyzing bioprocess fluids|
|US7785001||15 Nov 2007||31 Aug 2010||Arizona Board Of Regents||Apparatus and method for sensing change in environmental conditions|
|US7814652||25 Jul 2008||19 Oct 2010||Bioscale, Inc.||Method of making through-hole vias in a substrate|
|US7989198 *||27 Jun 2008||2 Aug 2011||California Institute Of Technology||Active NEMS arrays for biochemical analyses|
|US8012210||11 Jan 2005||6 Sep 2011||Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.||Implant frames for use with settable materials and related methods of use|
|US8073640||17 Sep 2010||6 Dec 2011||Delaware Capital Formation Inc.||Controlled compressional wave components of thickness shear mode multi-measurand sensors|
|US8215170||10 May 2005||10 Jul 2012||Arizona Board Of Regents||Chemical and biological sensing using tuning forks|
|US8323985||7 Oct 2011||4 Dec 2012||Beckman Coulter, Inc.||Mixing device and mixing method for mixing small amounts of liquid|
|US8329452||14 Jul 2011||11 Dec 2012||California Institute Of Technology||Active NEMS arrays for biochemical analyses|
|US8349611 *||17 Feb 2010||8 Jan 2013||Leversense Llc||Resonant sensors and methods of use thereof for the determination of analytes|
|US8354280||5 Sep 2008||15 Jan 2013||Bioscale, Inc.||Reusable detection surfaces and methods of using same|
|US8409875||20 Oct 2011||2 Apr 2013||Rapid Diagnostek, Inc.||Measurement of binding kinetics with a resonating sensor|
|US8531090 *||13 Jul 2011||10 Sep 2013||ALD Nanosolutions Inc.||Crystal microbalance holder|
|US8581308||17 Feb 2005||12 Nov 2013||Rochester Institute Of Technology||High temperature embedded charge devices and methods thereof|
|US9034356||19 Jan 2007||19 May 2015||Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.||Porous osteoimplant|
|US9107751||19 Jan 2007||18 Aug 2015||Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.||Injectable and moldable bone substitute materials|
|US9333080||21 Aug 2013||10 May 2016||Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.||Injectable and moldable bone substitute materials|
|US20020131228 *||12 Mar 2002||19 Sep 2002||Potter Michael D.||Micro-electro-mechanical switch and a method of using and making thereof|
|US20020182091 *||31 May 2002||5 Dec 2002||Potter Michael D.||Micro fluidic valves, agitators, and pumps and methods thereof|
|US20030200823 *||19 Dec 2002||30 Oct 2003||Cunningham Brian T.||Flexural plate wave sensor and array|
|US20030215816 *||20 May 2002||20 Nov 2003||Narayan Sundararajan||Method for sequencing nucleic acids by observing the uptake of nucleotides modified with bulky groups|
|US20040023236 *||28 Oct 2002||5 Feb 2004||Potter Michael D.||Chemical and biological hazard sensor system and methods thereof|
|US20040058335 *||24 Sep 2002||25 Mar 2004||Xing Su||Detecting molecular binding by monitoring feedback controlled cantilever deflections|
|US20040115097 *||22 Mar 2002||17 Jun 2004||Achim Wixforth||Mixing deivce and mixing method for mixing small amounts of liquid|
|US20040115711 *||22 Sep 2003||17 Jun 2004||Xing Su||Detecting molecular binding by monitoring feedback controlled cantilever deflections|
|US20040145271 *||12 Nov 2003||29 Jul 2004||Potter Michael D||Electrostatic based power source and methods thereof|
|US20040155555 *||10 Nov 2003||12 Aug 2004||Potter Michael D.||Electrostatic based power source and methods thereof|
|US20040235198 *||3 Mar 2004||25 Nov 2004||Marx Kenneth A.||Selective whole cell quartz crystal microbalance biosensors|
|US20050026163 *||10 Nov 2003||3 Feb 2005||Narayanan Sundararajan||Method for sequencing nucleic acids by observing the uptake of nucleotides modified with bulky groups|
|US20050044955 *||24 Aug 2004||3 Mar 2005||Potter Michael D.||Methods for distributed electrode injection and systems thereof|
|US20050205966 *||17 Feb 2005||22 Sep 2005||Potter Michael D||High Temperature embedded charge devices and methods thereof|
|US20050209696 *||11 Jan 2005||22 Sep 2005||Jo-Wen Lin||Implant frames for use with settable materials and related methods of use|
|US20050244820 *||20 Apr 2005||3 Nov 2005||Intel Corporation||Detecting molecular binding by monitoring feedback controlled cantilever deflections|
|US20060138903 *||28 Oct 2005||29 Jun 2006||Askew Andy R||Piezoelectric bimorph actuator and method of manufacturing thereof|
|US20060188399 *||3 Feb 2006||24 Aug 2006||Jadi, Inc.||Analytical sensor system for field use|
|US20060286685 *||18 Jul 2005||21 Dec 2006||Bioscale, Inc.||Method and apparatus for detection of analyte using a flexural plate wave device and magnetic particles|
|US20070059733 *||2 Jun 2006||15 Mar 2007||Intel Corporation||Method for sequencing nucleic acids by observing the uptake of nucleotides modified with bulky groups|
|US20070074731 *||5 Oct 2005||5 Apr 2007||Nth Tech Corporation||Bio-implantable energy harvester systems and methods thereof|
|US20070152776 *||1 Mar 2007||5 Jul 2007||Nth Tech Corporation||Method for non-damaging charge injection and system thereof|
|US20070191963 *||19 Jan 2007||16 Aug 2007||John Winterbottom||Injectable and moldable bone substitute materials|
|US20070217973 *||10 May 2005||20 Sep 2007||Nongjian Tao||Chemical and Biological Sensing Using Tuning Forks|
|US20070224700 *||19 Dec 2006||27 Sep 2007||Bioscale, Inc.||Method and apparatus for analyzing bioprocess fluids|
|US20070251321 *||13 Nov 2003||1 Nov 2007||Holger Fritze||Sensor, Sensor Arrangement and Measuring Method|
|US20070281371 *||21 Feb 2007||6 Dec 2007||Bioscale, Inc.||Method and apparatus for detection of analyte using a flexural plate wave device and magnetic particles|
|US20080069852 *||19 Jan 2007||20 Mar 2008||Shimp Lawrence A||Porous osteoimplant|
|US20080205479 *||15 Nov 2007||28 Aug 2008||Arizona Board Of Regents For And On Behalf Of Arizona State University||Apparatus and Method For Sensing Change In Environmental Conditions|
|US20090054267 *||27 Jun 2008||26 Feb 2009||California Institute Of Technology||Active nems arrays for biochemical analyses|
|US20090068759 *||5 Sep 2008||12 Mar 2009||Bioscale, Inc.||Reusable detection surfaces and methods of using same|
|US20090074951 *||25 Jul 2008||19 Mar 2009||Bioscale, Inc.||Substrates having through-hole vias and method of making same|
|US20090148856 *||2 May 2006||11 Jun 2009||Bioscale, Inc.||Methods and apparatus for therapeutic drug monitoring using an acoustic device|
|US20090148857 *||2 May 2006||11 Jun 2009||Bioscale, Inc.||Method and apparatus for detection of analyte using an acoustic device|
|US20090236942 *||15 May 2006||24 Sep 2009||Vladimir Ivanovich Ivanov||Device with electroceramic/and variant/ and way of using the device with electroceramic/and variant/|
|US20100207602 *||17 Feb 2010||19 Aug 2010||Loverich Jacob J||Resonant sensors and methods of use thereof for the determination of analytes|
|US20100233031 *||25 May 2010||16 Sep 2010||Bioscale, Inc.||Method and Apparatus for Analyzing Bioprocess Fluids|
|US20110071776 *||17 Sep 2010||24 Mar 2011||Delaware Capital Formation Inc.||Controlled compressional wave components of thickness shear mode multi-measurand sensors|
|US20110266924 *||13 Jul 2011||3 Nov 2011||Spencer Ii Joseph Allen||Crystal microbalance holder|
|US20140197850 *||13 Jun 2012||17 Jul 2014||Universite De Cergy Pontoise||Piezoelectric Sensor for the Detection and Characterization of at Least One Biochemical Element|
|DE112010003713T5||17 Sep 2010||25 Oct 2012||Delaware Capital Formation, Inc.||Kontrollierte druckwellenkomponenten von dickenschermodus-mehrmessgrössensensoren|
|EP1466014A2 *||28 Oct 2002||13 Oct 2004||Integrated Nano-Technologies LLC||Chemical and biological hazard sensor system and methods thereof|
|EP1466014A4 *||28 Oct 2002||15 Mar 2006||Integrated Nano Tech Llc||Chemical and biological hazard sensor system and methods thereof|
|EP1745277A2 *||10 May 2005||24 Jan 2007||Arizona Board of Regents, acting for and||Chemical and biological sensing using tuning forks|
|EP1745277A4 *||10 May 2005||15 Jan 2014||Univ Arizona||Chemical and biological sensing using tuning forks|
|EP1788377A1 *||11 Aug 2005||23 May 2007||Nihon Dempa Kogyo Co., Ltd.||Sensing apparatus|
|EP1788377A4 *||11 Aug 2005||2 Apr 2014||Nihon Dempa Kogyo Co||Sensing apparatus|
|EP2093556A2||13 Feb 2009||26 Aug 2009||Delaware Capital Formation, Inc.||Measuring fluid properties using Multi-Mode Quasi-Shear-Horizontal Resonator|
|WO2003044530A1 *||19 Nov 2002||30 May 2003||Cantion A/S||Sensor system with a reference surface mimicking the detection surface but with low ligand binding capacity|
|WO2003104810A1 *||9 Jun 2003||18 Dec 2003||Sensor Research And Development Corporation||Biological warfare sensor using molecularly imprinted polymers|
|WO2006060032A3 *||10 May 2005||17 Aug 2006||Univ Arizona||Chemical and biological sensing using tuning forks|
|U.S. Classification||435/6.11, 310/348, 436/518, 436/525, 435/287.1, 422/82.01, 310/311, 436/524, 435/7.32, 310/312, 436/527, 435/7.21, 310/340, 435/287.2, 310/313.00R|
|International Classification||G01N29/036, G01N33/543|
|Cooperative Classification||G01N2291/011, G01N33/5438, G01N2291/0255, G01N2291/102, G01N29/036, G01N2291/02491, G01N2291/015|
|European Classification||G01N33/543K2B, G01N29/036|
|3 May 1999||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ENERGY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF, DISTRICT OF C
Free format text: CONFIRMATORY LICENSE;ASSIGNOR:BIODE, INC.;REEL/FRAME:009927/0127
Effective date: 19990324
|3 Aug 2001||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ARMY, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, SECRETARY OF THE A
Free format text: CONFIRMATORY LICENSE;ASSIGNOR:BIODE INCORPORATED;REEL/FRAME:012040/0952
Effective date: 19990323
|24 Sep 2003||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|29 Sep 2003||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, DISTRICT OF CO
Free format text: CONFIRMATORY LICENSE;ASSIGNOR:BIODE INC.;REEL/FRAME:014534/0338
Effective date: 19990324
|5 Mar 2004||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|5 Mar 2004||SULP||Surcharge for late payment|
|6 Mar 2007||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DOVER ELECTRONICS, INC., NEW HAMPSHIRE
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BIODE, INCORPORATED;REEL/FRAME:018961/0416
Effective date: 20070131
|5 Sep 2007||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|7 Jan 2008||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: VECTRON INTERNATIONAL, INC., NEW HAMPSHIRE
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:DOVER ELECTRONICS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:020325/0040
Effective date: 20071220
|25 Mar 2008||CC||Certificate of correction|
|21 Sep 2011||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12
|21 Sep 2011||SULP||Surcharge for late payment|
Year of fee payment: 11