Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Advanced Patent Search | Web History | Sign in

Patents

Publication numberUS5674294 A
Publication typeGrant
Application number08/306,158
Publication date7 Oct 1997
Filing date14 Sep 1994
Priority date
14 Sep 1993
Also published as
Inventors
Original Assignee
U.S. Classification
International Classification
Cooperative Classification
European Classification
A61F2/44D
References
External Links
Intervertebral disk prosthesis
US 5674294 A
Abstract

A disk prosthesis for replacing a damaged spinal disk has two metal half-envelopes which confine between them a compression cushion having a controlled differential compression. The structure employs a membrane or diaphragm surrounding the compression cushion in order to insure a seal between the cushion and the environment and also has an anti-expulsion system for shaping the compression cushion in order to limit the expansion of the cushion out of the volume defined by the two metal cups and the membrane.

Claims
We claim:

1. Preshaped prosthesis for replacing a deteriorated intervertebral disk without friction or sliding, comprising:

two rigid half-envelopes shaped like cups, each half-envelope being adapted to be integrally fixed to one of two vertebrae adjacent to the intervertebral disk to be replaced,

flexible means positioned between the two half-envelopes and incorporating a compression cushion having at least a central layer and an outer layer which are concentric and formed of materials having different relative rigidities, the central layer being deformable and relatively volume compressible for elastically absorbing the deformation of the outer layer which is deformable and only slightly volume compressible; and anti-expulsion means bordering the compression cushion for preventing the expansion of the outer layer beyond the volume defined by the two half-envelopes, the deformation of the outer layer being absorbed by the central layer.

2. Prosthesis according to claim 1, wherein the materials constituting the compression cushion are fixed to the half-envelope by adhesion and ribs.

3. Prosthesis according to claim 1, and comprising a membrane fixed to each of the half-envelopes and surrounding the compression cushion in order to ensure the sealing thereof.

4. Prosthesis according to claim 1, wherein the anti-expulsion means comprises annular means for shaping the compression cushion.

5. Prosthesis according to claim 4, wherein the annular shaping means incorporate a plurality of rings each having a circular section and a shape adapted to the contour of the compression cushion and which are maintained together by a lattice means, two of the said rings being crimped on the border of the two half-envelopes so as to ensure a maximum distance between said half-envelopes.

6. Prosthesis according to claim 4, wherein the annular shaping means incorporate a strip having a shape adapted to the contour of the compression cushion and two rings each with a circular section, said rings being crimped on the border of the two half-envelopes and a lattice means connecting the strip to the rings and ensuring a maximum distance between said half-envelopes.

7. Prosthesis according to claim 4, wherein the annular shaping means incorporate a wire wound helically around the compression cushion.

8. Preshaped prosthesis for replacing a deteriorated intervertebral disk without friction or sliding, comprising:

two rigid half-envelopes shaped like cups, each half-envelope being adapted to be integrally fixed to one of two vertebrae adjacent to the intervertebral disk to be replaced;

flexible means positioned between the two half-envelopes and incorporating a compression cushion having at least two layers of materials having different relative rigidities for absorbing deformations resulting from a displacement of one of the adjacent vertebrae with respect to the other, at least one material layer being relatively volume compressible for elastically absorbing the deformations of the adjacent material layer; and anti-expulsion means incorporating annular means for shaping the compression cushion in order to limit the expansion of the latter out of the volume defined by the two half-envelopes, said annular means incorporating a plurality of metal rings each having a circular section and a shape adapted to the contour of the compression cushion and which are maintained together by a lattice means, two of the said metal rings being crimped on the border of the two half-envelopes so as to ensure a maximum distance between said half-envelopes, bordering the compression cushion.

9. Prosthesis according to claim 8, characterized in that the annular shaping means incorporate a metal strip having a shape adapted to the contour of the compression cushion, two metal rings each with a circular section and crimped on the border of the two half-envelopes, and a lattice means connecting the strip to the rings and ensuring a maximum distance between said half-envelopes.

Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a prosthesis for replacing a damaged intervertebral disk of the vertebral column. It is used in the field of orthopedic surgery.

PRIOR ART

The vertebral column is constituted by a group of superimposed vertebrae interconnected by fibrocartilaginous disks, known as intervertebral disks. The latter have a fundamental function in the statics and dynamics of the vertebral column, ensuring the mobility between the different vertebrae.

Intervertebral disks are often subject to disorders linked with a compression of the vertebrae, a disk hernia, a displacement of the vertebrae or intervertebral degenerative arthritis. These disorders frequently give rise to pain or functional genes prejudicial to medical treatments and in certain cases can be of an invalidating nature.

The process used for relieving patients suffering from such disorders generally consists of surgery. Several surgical procedures are at present known.

The first method consists of a simple disk excision. The damaged area of the intervertebral disk is eliminated, which as a result eliminates the normal biomechanics of the disk. The two vertebrae adjacent to said disk then have a reduced reciprocal mobility. In addition, such an excision is not a final remedy to the patient's disorder and the deterioration of the disk can continue to evolve.

The second surgical method consists of an intervertebral arthrodesis by which the two vertebrae adjacent to the damaged disk are fused. This is a definitive remedy blocking arthrosis evolution, i.e. deterioration within the disk. The main disadvantage of this method is that it eliminates all disk mobility.

The third method and that which is most widely used at present consists of an intervertebral arthroplastic surgery for replacing the damaged disk by a prosthesis. Numerous disk prosthesis types are known and described in the work entitled "The Artificial Disc", published by Mario BROCK, H. Mickael MAYER and Klaus WEIGEL, SPRINGER-VERLAG 1991.

According to this work, the known disk prostheses can be placed in two major categories. These are prostheses for which the fibrous part of the natural disk is retained and used as a prosthesis envelope. The internal core of the natural disk is then replaced, either by a polymerizing product injected into the envelope, or by elastic parts introduced into the envelope, or by a bag inserted in the envelope and inflated by means of a liquid or a polymer. Such a prosthesis is more particularly described in U.S. Pat. No. 4 772 287 and EP-A-277 282. The main difficulty in obtaining such a prosthesis is that it is necessary to rediscover the geometry and compressive strength of the natural disk. Moreover, such a prosthesis cannot be looked upon as a definitive remedy for the patient, because the retained fibrous part of the disk may continue to deteriorate. The second category consists of entirely artificial prosthesis, which take the place of a completely removed natural disk.

A first procedure for producing these entirely artificial prostheses consists of introducing a sliding joint between the two vertebrae. This joint can be in direct contact with the vertebral plates. It can also consists of a centred swivel joint, as described in FR-A-2 372 622. Such a centred swivel joint prosthesis suffers from the disadvantage that the displacement of one vertebra with respect to another leads to friction at the swivel joint. Relatively rapidly such friction can give rise to irritation and after a certain time to migrating wear debris. Such debris can give rise to a foreign body reaction which, if it develops in contact with the medullary canal, can give rise to neurological disorders.

The second process for producing entirely artificial prostheses consists of using a deformable architecture rigidly connected to adjacent vertebral plates. Such a prosthesis is e.g. described in FR-A-2 124 815. This prosthesis more specifically comprises an element having the shape of an intervertebral disk and made from an elastomer material of the silicone type. It suffers from the disadvantage of only ensuring a limited mobility of the adjacent vertebrae, it having a relatively limited capacity to deform. This prosthesis also fails to prevent the radial expansion of the elastomer material during stresses exerted on the prosthesis, so that there is a risk of expulsion to the medullary canal.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention aims at obviating these disadvantages by proposing a disk prosthesis having two half-envelopes rigidly fixed to the vertebrae and connected by means of a compressible cushion able to absorb the deformations.

More specifically, the invention relates to a preshaped prosthesis for replacing a deteriorated intervertebral disk without friction or sliding. This prosthesis comprises two rigid half-envelopes shaped like cups and each cup being integrally fixed to one of the two vertebrae adjacent to the intervertebral disk to be replaced. A flexible means is positioned between the two half-envelopes and incorporates a compression cushion for absorbing deformations resulting from a displacement of one of the adjacent vertebrae with respect to the other. The compression cushion has at least two layers of materials having different rigidities. At least one of these two materials is volume compressible so as to elastically absorb the deformations of the adjacent material layer. An anti-expulsion system bordering the compression cushion completes the structure.

In a preferred form of the invention, the materials forming the compression cushion are fixed to the half-envelopes by adhesion and by means of substantially circular, radial ribs.

The prosthesis according to the invention has a membrane or diaphragm fixed to each of the half-envelopes and surrounding the compression cushion in order to ensure a seal between said cushion and the environment. Advantageously, the anti-expulsion system has annular means for shaping the compression cushion in order to limit the expansion of said cushion out of the volume defined by the two half-envelopes.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a general, perspective view of a portion of the vertebral column showing the location of a disk prosthesis according to the invention.

FIG. 2 shows in a sectional view one preferred embodiment of the disk prosthesis according to the invention.

FIG. 3 is a sectional view of another embodiment of the disk prosthesis according to the invention.

FIG. 4 is a sectional view of still another embodiment of the disk prosthesis according to the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

FIG. 1 shows a vertebral column portion having four vertebrae 1, 2, 3, 4 interconnected by intervertebral disks. According to the embodiment shown in FIG. 1, the vertebrae 1, 2 and the vertebrae 2, 3 are respectively connected by the intervertebral disk 5, 6. In this case, the vertebrae 3, 4 are connected by a disk prosthesis 7, which is shown in hatched form in FIG. 1. FIG. 1 shows the vertebral foramen 8 filled by the spinal cord. It is also possible to see on each vertebra 1, 2, 3, 4, the vertebral body, respectively 1a, 2a, 3a, 4a, as well as the apophyses 1b, 2b, 3b, 4b.

Like the intervertebral disks 5, 6, the disk prosthesis 7 has an external "bean" shape and is positioned between the vertebral bodies 3a, 4a of the vertebrae 3 and 4.

FIG. 2 is a sectional view of a first embodiment of the disk prosthesis 7, which has two cup-shaped half-envelopes 9, 10. These cups 9, 10 are metallic and each is fixed to the vertebral body of one of the two adjacent vertebrae. They can e.g. be made from an alloyed titanium or from chromium molybdenum alloy.

According to the embodiment of FIG. 1, the cup 9 is fixed to the body 3a of the vertebra 3 and the cup 10 to the body 4a of the vertebra 4. Each of these cups 9, 10 is in contact, by its convex wall, with one of the adjacent vertebrae, the concave walls of the cups 9, 10 facing one another. Thus, the disk prosthesis 7 in overall manner reproduces the shape of the intervertebral disk which it replaces.

The fixing of the metal cups 9, 10 to the adjacent vertebrae can take place by standard orthopedic surgery methods, namely fixing by screwing or by using pins. This fixing can also take place by means of cement, by rehabitation by the tissues of the specially treated surface (hydroxyapatite) or by a combination of these processes. No matter what connecting method is adopted, said connection is rigid and joins each cup 9, 10 to one of the adjacent vertebrae.

Between said cups 9, 10 are introduced flexible means consisting of a compression cushion 11 formed from several layers of materials having different compressibility coefficients. According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, said materials are polymers able to adhere to the concave wall of each cup.

According to this preferred embodiment of the invention, the concave wall of each cup 9, 10 has circular ribs 12 which extend radially with respect to the cups and form between them, grooves 13 into which partly penetrates a multi element compression cushion 11. The said ribs 12 maintain the compression cushion in the volume defined by the two cups 9, 10.

Radial ribs can also make it possible to limit the relative rotation of the cups 9, 10 by means of the compression cushion 11. Moreover, the concave walls of the cups 9, 10 can previously undergo treatments able to increase the adhesion capacity of the polymers of the cushion to the metal of the cups 9, 10.

According to the embodiment shown in FIG. 2, the multi element cushion 11 incorporates three layers of polymers which can either be moulded in situ between the two cups, or joined between the cups. These polymers preferably have different compressibility coefficients (i.e. different rigidities) and are distributed so as to obtain the desired prosthesis flexibility. More specifically, said flexibility is dependent on the mechanical characteristics (modulus of elasticity, volume compressibility, etc.) of the polymers used and the arrangement of the polymer layers.

The polymer layers constituting the cushion 11 can be arranged so as to form superimposed, substantially planar layers parallel to the plane of the cups 9, 10 (see FIG. 4).

According to the embodiment shown in FIG. 2, the layers of polymers are arranged so as to be concentric and perpendicular to the plane of the cups. In known manner, the function of the disk to be replaced varies according to its location in the vertebral column. A disk of lumbar vertebrae has functions differing from those of a disk of the dorsal vertebrae or cervical vertebrae. Thus, the disk prosthesis according to the invention reproduces these different functions by varying the overall modulus of elasticity of the prosthesis. To do this, different arrangements of the polymer layers can be used:

- an arrangement such that the overall modulus of elasticity increases from the centre of the prosthesis towards the outside,

- an arrangement such that the overall modulus of elasticity decreases from the centre of the prosthesis to the outside,

- an arrangement such that the overall modulus of elasticity is alternately increasing and decreasing.

According to the embodiment of FIG. 2, the layers of polymers of the cushion 11 are arranged concentrically to one another. The "core" layer C1, which is the most central layer of the cushion 11, is made from a polymer which is only slightly volume compressible. The central layer C2, i.e. that adjacent to the core layer G1, is made from a filled polymer, which is compressible in volume and therefore able to absorb deformations undergone by the adjacent layers. The outermost layer C3 in the embodiment of FIG. 2 is made from a polymer which is only slightly volume compressible.

According to the invention, a membrane or diaphragm 14 surrounds the compression cushion 11 on its periphery, thus providing a tight barrier for preventing any migration of particles of compressible materials from the cushion 11 to the outside of the prosthesis. In FIG. 2, said membrane 14 is concentric to the layers C1, C2 and C3.

According to an embodiment, said membrane 14 is a polyethylene film.

The membrane can also assume the form of a bellows, thus making it possible to improve the fatigue strength during bending movements.

The membrane 14 is fixed on either side to the cups 9 and 10 in order to seal the cushion. Such a tightness of the cushion 11 and therefore the prosthesis limits the transfer to the organism of particles resulting from fatigue of the materials of the cushion 11. This ensures a better tolerance of the prosthesis by the organism and therefore a longer implantation period.

According to the invention, the flexible means also incorporate annular means for shaping the cushion 11. These annular means are radially rigid and ensure that there is no radial expansion of the materials of the cushion 11 outside the volume defined by the cups 9 and 10. These annular means ensure an identical geometry of the prosthesis, no matter what deformations are suffered by the cushion 11. Therefore said annular means constitute an anti-expulsion system with respect to the medullary canal.

According to the embodiment shown in FIG. 2, said annular means comprise a plurality of metal rings 15 having a circular section and a shape adapted to the contour of the compression cushion. They also incorporate two metal rings 16 arranged on either side of the plurality of rings 15 and in contact with each of the cups 9, 10. These rings 16 can e.g. be crimped on the border of the cups 9, 10, so as to ensure the closing of the membrane 14 around the cushion 11.

According to the embodiment of FIG. 2, a lattice 17 maintains the rings 15 and the positioning of the rings 16 on the border of the cups. This lattice 17 is positioned substantially perpendicular to the plane of the cups 9, 10 and over the entire periphery of the cushion 11. This lattice can e.g. be made from nylon.

According to an embodiment of the invention, the membrane 14, the rings 16 and the lattice 17 can be integrated, namely the rings 16 and the lattice 17 by braiding and the membrane 14 by potting.

FIG. 3 is a sectional view of a second embodiment of the disk prosthesis 7. As in the embodiment of the disk prosthesis shown in FIG. 2, the disk prosthesis 7 of FIG. 3 has:

- two cups 9, 10 with ribs 12 forming grooves 13,

- a compression cushion 11 having several polymer layers C1, C2, C3 with different compression capacities,

- a membrane 14 surrounding the cushion 11.

This disk prosthesis 7 also has annular means for shaping the cushion 11. According to this second embodiment, these annular means consist of a circular metal strip 18 having a shape adapted to the contour of the cushion 11 and connected to the two rings 16 by means of the lattice 17. This assembly of the strip 18, rings 16 and lattice 17 has an identical function to the annular means described in the first embodiment of the prosthesis according to FIG. 2.

According to a third embodiment of the invention illustrated in FIG. 4, the layers of materials forming the compression cushion are arranged approximately parallel to the plane of the half-envelopes. In this embodiment the membrane 14 and shaping means 15 are the same as in FIG. 2.

According to a fourth (unillustrated) embodiment of the disk prosthesis, the annular shaping means for the cushion consist of a wire or thread helically wound around the compression cushion. The advantage of this embodiment is that it is easy to implement. Moreover, these annular means permit a stability in the positioning of the individual turns, limits the relative rotation of the cup and contributes to the tensile and compressive strength of the prosthesis.

Thus, it is easily understandable that such a disk prosthesis permits movements of a vertebra with respect to its adjacent vertebra by deformation of the compression cushion 11, whilst sealing the prosthesis with respect to the organism. Therefore such a prosthesis limits the risk of the prosthesis being rejected by the organism.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US38677285 Apr 197325 Feb 1975Cutter Laboratories, Inc.Prosthesis for spinal repair
US430977713 Nov 198012 Jan 1982Patil; Arun A.Artificial intervertebral disc
US48743897 Dec 198717 Oct 1989Collins, Eileen E., BeneficiaryReplacement disc
US491171810 Jun 198827 Mar 1990Johnson & JohnsonFunctional and biocompatible intervertebral disc spacer
US493296917 Dec 198712 Jun 1990Sulzer Brothers LimitedJoint endoprosthesis
US50025766 Jun 198926 Mar 1991Mecron Medizinische Produkte GmbhIntervertebral disk endoprosthesis
US512392622 Feb 199123 Jun 1992Perumala CorporationArtificial spinal prosthesis
DE2263842A1 Title not available
DE9000094U1 Title not available
EP0277282A124 Oct 198710 Aug 1988Gebrüder Sulzer AktiengesellschaftJoint endoprosthesis
EP0346269A21 Jun 198913 Dec 1989Fuhrmann, Gerhard, Dr.Intervertebral disk endoprothesis
EP0356112A115 Aug 198928 Feb 1990Rutgers UniversityBiocompatible elastomeric intervertebral disc
EP0610837A17 Feb 199417 Aug 1994Acromed CorporationSpine disc
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US586584615 May 19972 Feb 1999Bryan; VincentHuman spinal disc prosthesis
US60011306 Oct 199714 Dec 1999Bryan; VincentHuman spinal disc prosthesis with hinges
US602237616 Mar 19988 Feb 2000Raymedica, Inc.Percutaneous prosthetic spinal disc nucleus and method of manufacture
US613603117 Jun 199824 Oct 2000Surgical Dynamics, Inc.Artificial intervertebral disc
US615606715 May 19975 Dec 2000Spinal Dynamics CorporationHuman spinal disc prosthesis
US629666417 Jun 19982 Oct 2001Surgical Dynamics, Inc.Artificial intervertebral disc
US63950329 Dec 199928 May 2002Dimso (Distribution Medicale Du Sud-Ouest)Intervertebral disc prosthesis with liquid chamber
US64197048 Oct 199916 Jul 2002Anova Corp.Artificial intervertebral disc replacement methods and apparatus
US641970618 Dec 199816 Jul 2002Sofamor S.N.C.Partial disc prosthesis
US645480416 Oct 200024 Sep 2002Anova Corp.Engineered tissue annulus fibrosis augmentation methods and apparatus
US648223518 Aug 200019 Nov 2002Intrinsic Orthopedics, Inc.Devices and methods of vertebral disc augmentation
US652099329 Dec 200018 Feb 2003Depuy Acromed, Inc.Spinal implant
US65209965 Jun 200018 Feb 2003Depuy Acromed, IncorporatedOrthopedic implant
US65278049 Dec 19994 Mar 2003Dimso (Distribution Medicale Du Sud-Quest)Intervertebral disk prosthesis
US653381826 Jul 200018 Mar 2003Pearl Technology Holdings, LlcArtificial spinal disc
US655842428 Jun 20016 May 2003Depuy AcromedModular anatomic fusion device
US656204522 Aug 200113 May 2003Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Machining apparatus
US65793209 Dec 199917 Jun 2003Stryker SpineIntervertebral disc prosthesis with contact blocks
US65824669 Dec 199924 Jun 2003Stryker SpineIntervertebral disc prosthesis with reduced friction
US65824689 Dec 199924 Jun 2003Spryker SpineIntervertebral disc prosthesis with compressible body
US659262416 Nov 200015 Jul 2003Depuy Acromed, Inc.Prosthetic implant element
US662019630 Aug 200016 Sep 2003Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Intervertebral disc nucleus implants and methods
US662694323 Aug 200230 Sep 2003Sulzer Orthopedics Ltd.Artificial intervertebral disc
US664524823 Aug 200211 Nov 2003Sulzer Orthopedics Ltd.Artificial intervertebral disc
US664891913 Jun 200218 Nov 2003Ferree Bret A.Transplantation of engineered meniscus tissue to the intervertebral disc
US664892013 Jun 200218 Nov 2003Ferree Bret A.Natural and synthetic supplements to engineered annulus and disc tissues
US66562243 Aug 20012 Dec 2003Howmedica Osteonics Corp.Artificial intervertebral disc
US672672027 Mar 200227 Apr 2004Depuy Spine, Inc.Modular disc prosthesis
US673353120 Oct 200011 May 2004Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Anchoring devices and implants for intervertebral disc augmentation
US67335329 Dec 199911 May 2004Stryker SpineIntervertebral disc prosthesis with improved mechanical behavior
US673685028 Dec 200118 May 2004Spinal Concepts, Inc.Vertebral pseudo arthrosis device and method
US674325721 Nov 20011 Jun 2004Cortek, Inc.Dynamic implanted intervertebral spacer
US67496353 Sep 199915 Jun 2004Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Peanut spectacle multi discoid thoraco-lumbar disc prosthesis
US675586313 Jun 200229 Jun 2004Ferree Bret A.Rotator cuff repair using engineered tissues
US676451229 Mar 200120 Jul 2004Link Spine Group, Inc.Plastic implant with channel for radiographic contrast wire
US677009426 Jun 20023 Aug 2004Fehling GeraldIntervertebral disc prosthesis
US680286720 Dec 200212 Oct 2004Depuy Acromed, Inc.Orthopedic implant
US683300623 May 200221 Dec 2004Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Expandable intervertebral spacers
US68835205 Sep 200226 Apr 2005Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Methods and apparatus for dynamically stable spinal implant
US689346624 Sep 200217 May 2005Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Intervertebral disc nucleus implants and methods
US69491057 Aug 200127 Sep 2005Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Method and apparatus for stereotactic implantation
US696023225 Apr 20031 Nov 2005Blackstone Medical, Inc.Artificial intervertebral disc
US696693121 May 200322 Nov 2005Tain-Yew ShiArtificial intervertebral disc with reliable maneuverability
US696940411 Apr 200229 Nov 2005Ferree Bret AAnnulus fibrosis augmentation methods and apparatus
US697447921 Apr 200313 Dec 2005Sdgi Holdings, Inc.System and method for blocking and/or retaining a prosthetic spinal implant
US69842465 Jun 200410 Jan 2006Tain-Yew ShiArtificial intervertebral disc flexibly oriented by spring-reinforced bellows
US69867896 Jul 200417 Jan 2006Aesculap Ag & Co. KgIntervertebral implant
US700845226 Jun 20037 Mar 2006Depuy Acromed, Inc.Dual durometer elastomer artificial disc
US702578725 Nov 200211 Apr 2006Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Implantable joint prosthesis and associated instrumentation
US706010016 Jul 200413 Jun 2006Anova Corp.Artificial disc and joint replacements with modular cushioning components
US710140014 Aug 20035 Sep 2006Jeffery ThramannShaped memory artificial disc and methods of engrafting the same
US711222327 Dec 200226 Sep 2006Abbott Spine Inc.Pseudo arthrosis device
US712876110 Dec 200331 Oct 2006Axiomed Spine CorporationMethod and apparatus for replacing a damaged spinal disc
US712876226 Sep 200331 Oct 2006Howmedica Osteonics Corp.Artificial intervertebral disc
US713799729 Dec 200321 Nov 2006Globus Medical, Inc.Spinal fusion implant
US714766522 Jul 199912 Dec 2006Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Threaded cylindrical multidiscoid single or multiple array disc prosthesis
US71792624 Dec 200320 Feb 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Method and apparatus for stereotactic implantation
US719864429 Jun 20043 Apr 2007Aesculap Ag & Co. KgIntervertebral implant
US72017744 Apr 200310 Apr 2007Ferree Bret AArtificial intervertebral disc replacements incorporating reinforced wall sections
US720177625 Nov 200210 Apr 2007Ferree Bret AArtificial intervertebral disc replacements with endplates
US720485120 Nov 200317 Apr 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Method and apparatus for delivering an intervertebral disc implant
US72172918 Dec 200315 May 2007St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.System and method for replacing degenerated spinal disks
US723820412 Jul 20013 Jul 2007Abbott SpineShock-absorbing intervertebral implant
US725006027 Jan 200431 Jul 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Hybrid intervertebral disc system
US72676909 Mar 200611 Sep 2007Vertebral Technologies, Inc.Interlocked modular disc nucleus prosthesis
US73262503 May 20025 Feb 2008Ldr MedicalIntervertebral disc prosthesis and fitting tools
US732925917 Nov 200412 Feb 2008Transl Inc.Articulating spinal implant
US741950618 Nov 20052 Sep 2008Zimmer Spine, Inc.Artificial spinal discs and methods
US743526025 Jun 200414 Oct 2008Anova Corp.Use of morphogenetic proteins to treat human disc disease
US74945084 Apr 200524 Feb 2009Ldr MedicalIntervertebral disc prosthesis
US750393623 Sep 200417 Mar 2009Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Methods for forming and retaining intervertebral disc implants
US752090011 Jul 200521 Apr 2009Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Intervertebral disc nucleus implants and methods
US753761210 Sep 200426 May 2009Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Lumbar composite nucleus
US75499957 Jul 200423 Jun 2009Aesculap AgSurgical instrument for handling an implant
US756328411 Feb 200521 Jul 2009Synthes Usa, LlcIntervertebral disc implant
US756328611 Feb 200521 Jul 2009Synthes Usa, LlcControlled artificial intervertebral disc implant
US758532515 Jun 20058 Sep 2009Aesculap AgIntervertebral implant
US758860010 Dec 200315 Sep 2009Axiomed Spine CorporationMethod for replacing a damaged spinal disc
US760117420 Jun 200313 Oct 2009Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Wear-resistant endoprosthetic devices
US761153812 Dec 20033 Nov 2009Zimmer Spine S.A.S.Intervertebral disk prosthesis
US761846123 Sep 200417 Nov 2009Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Composite intervertebral disc implants and methods for forming the same
US76288141 Sep 20058 Dec 2009Synthes Usa, LlcIntervertebral disc prosthesis
US763228213 Jul 200515 Dec 2009Ldr MedicalInstrumentation and methods for inserting an intervertebral disc prosthesis
US76416928 Aug 20015 Jan 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Implantable joint prosthesis
US765504230 Nov 20042 Feb 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Expandable intervertebral spacers
US765504527 Jul 20062 Feb 2010Aesculap Implant Systems, LlcArtificial intervertebral disc
US76662287 May 200723 Feb 2010Zimmer SpineShock-absorbing intervertebral implant
US768239631 Oct 200323 Mar 2010Ldr MedicalIntervertebral disc prosthesis
US769551515 Jul 200313 Apr 2010Spinal Generations, LlcSpinal disc prosthesis system
US769551618 Apr 200513 Apr 2010Ldr MedicalIntervertebral disc prosthesis
US769551710 Dec 200313 Apr 2010Axiomed Spine CorporationApparatus for replacing a damaged spinal disc
US770877616 Jan 20034 May 2010Nuvasive, Inc.Intervertebral disk replacement system and methods
US770877820 May 20054 May 2010Flexuspine, Inc.Expandable articulating intervertebral implant with cam
US77539583 Feb 200513 Jul 2010Gordon Charles RExpandable intervertebral implant
US776307524 Feb 200627 Jul 2010Theken Spine, LlcArtificial disc prosthesis
US776307624 Feb 200627 Jul 2010Theken Spine, LlcArtificial disc prosthesis
US776696627 Jul 20063 Aug 2010Aesculap Implant Systems, LlcArtificial intervertebral disc
US77714782 Apr 200410 Aug 2010Theken Spine, LlcArtificial disc prosthesis
US777148024 Feb 200610 Aug 2010Theken Spine, LlcArtificial disc prosthesis
US777609219 Jan 200617 Aug 2010Nexgen Spine, Inc.Elastomeric intervertebral disc prosthesis
US778067610 Jul 200724 Aug 2010Ebi, LlcIntervertebral implantation apparatus
US77853518 Mar 200631 Aug 2010Flexuspine, Inc.Artificial functional spinal implant unit system and method for use
US77944808 Mar 200614 Sep 2010Flexuspine, Inc.Artificial functional spinal unit system and method for use
US77990828 Mar 200621 Sep 2010Flexuspine, Inc.Artificial functional spinal unit system and method for use
US780693524 Feb 20065 Oct 2010Theken Spine, LlcArtificial disc prosthesis
US782884715 Feb 20079 Nov 2010Abdou, SamyDevices and methods for inter-vertebral orthopedic device placement
US783240919 Oct 200716 Nov 2010Aesculap Implant Systems, LlcMethod of inserting an artificial intervertebral disc
US783773412 Apr 200723 Nov 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.System and method for replacing degenerated spinal disks
US784208827 Jan 200630 Nov 2010Ldr MedicalIntervertebral disc prosthesis
US784208917 Dec 200430 Nov 2010Fournitures Hospitalieres Industrie-F.H. IndustrieIntervertebral disc prosthesis
US785781830 Mar 200728 Dec 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Method and apparatus for delivering an intervertebral disc implant
US78578529 Jun 200328 Dec 2010Axiomed Spine CorporationArtificial disc
US787910113 Feb 20041 Feb 2011SpinevisionIntervertebral prosthesis
US788758929 Jul 200515 Feb 2011Glenn Bradley JMinimally invasive spinal disc stabilizer and insertion tool
US78969197 Oct 20091 Mar 2011Zimmer Spine S.A.S.Method of implanting intervertebral disk prosthesis
US790590531 Oct 200715 Mar 2011Trans1, Inc.Spinal mobility preservation apparatus
US790590831 Oct 200715 Mar 2011Trans1, Inc.Spinal mobility preservation method
US790592220 Dec 200615 Mar 2011Zimmer Spine, Inc.Surgical implant suitable for replacement of an intervertebral disc
US790986912 Feb 200422 Mar 2011Flexuspine, Inc.Artificial spinal unit assemblies
US791458210 Dec 200729 Mar 2011Vertebral Technologies, Inc.Method and system for mammalian joint resurfacing
US792737413 Nov 200619 Apr 2011Synergy Disc Replacement, Inc.Artificial spinal disc
US79388581 Apr 200510 May 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Spinal implant system
US795967719 Jan 200714 Jun 2011Flexuspine, Inc.Artificial functional spinal unit system and method for use
US795967815 Apr 200514 Jun 2011Zimmer GmbhIntervertebral disk implant
US799340314 Jan 20109 Aug 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Expandable intervertebral spacers
US800283523 Feb 200923 Aug 2011Ldr MedicalIntervertebral disc prosthesis
US802142421 Jan 200920 Sep 2011Aesculap AgIntervertebral implant
US803871630 Sep 200818 Oct 2011Synergy Disc Replacement, IncArtificial spinal disc
US803871819 Jul 200618 Oct 2011Vertebral Technologies, Inc.Multi-composite disc prosthesis
US80527238 Mar 20068 Nov 2011Flexuspine Inc.Dynamic posterior stabilization systems and methods of use
US805275428 Sep 20078 Nov 2011Zimmer GmbhIntervertebral endoprosthesis
US80667506 Oct 200629 Nov 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, IncPort structures for non-rigid bone plates
US806677329 Dec 200629 Nov 2011F3 Technologies, LlcArtificial intervertebral disc
US810097430 Jun 200524 Jan 2012Synergy Disc Replacement, Inc.Artificial spinal disc
US810097710 Sep 200724 Jan 2012Vertebral Technologies, Inc.Interlocked modular disc nucleus prosthesis
US81009795 Jun 200924 Jan 2012Vertebral Technologies, Inc.Method and system for mammalian joint resurfacing
US81188698 Mar 200621 Feb 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Dynamic interbody device
US811887020 May 200521 Feb 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Expandable articulating intervertebral implant with spacer
US811887120 May 200521 Feb 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Expandable articulating intervertebral implant
US812381020 May 200528 Feb 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Expandable intervertebral implant with wedged expansion member
US814755020 May 20053 Apr 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Expandable articulating intervertebral implant with limited articulation
US815784422 Oct 200717 Apr 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Dampener system for a posterior stabilization system with a variable length elongated member
US816299422 Oct 200724 Apr 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Posterior stabilization system with isolated, dual dampener systems
US81728805 Nov 20078 May 2012Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Intervertebral stabilising device
US817290216 Jul 20098 May 2012Spinemedica, LlcSpinal interbody spacers
US817290320 May 20058 May 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Expandable intervertebral implant with spacer
US817290421 Sep 20068 May 2012Synergy Disc Replacement, Inc.Artificial spinal disc
US818251422 Oct 200722 May 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Dampener system for a posterior stabilization system with a fixed length elongated member
US818253426 Sep 200822 May 2012K2M, Inc.Orthopedic device assembly with elements coupled by a retaining structure
US818733022 Oct 200729 May 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Dampener system for a posterior stabilization system with a variable length elongated member
US822672128 Feb 201124 Jul 2012Zimmer Spine S.A.S.Method of implanting intervertebral disk prosthesis
US823167715 Nov 201031 Jul 2012Synergy Disc Replacement, Inc.Artificial spinal disc
US823605711 Jun 20077 Aug 2012Globus Medical, Inc.Inflatable multi-chambered devices and methods of treatment using the same
US825744020 May 20054 Sep 2012Southwest Research InstituteMethod of insertion of an expandable intervertebral implant
US826796522 Oct 200718 Sep 2012Flexuspine, Inc.Spinal stabilization systems with dynamic interbody devices
US827750817 Jul 20062 Oct 2012Warsaw OrthopedicHybrid intervertebral disc system
US830366023 Apr 20076 Nov 2012Abdou SamyInter-vertebral disc prosthesis with variable rotational stop and methods of use
US83375603 Oct 200825 Dec 2012Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Intervertebral prosthesis
US833756111 Mar 201025 Dec 2012Spinal Generations, LlcSpinal disc prosthesis system
US83490164 Jan 20108 Jan 2013Zimmer SpineShock-absorbing intervertebral implant
US83539644 Nov 201015 Jan 2013 Anatomic total disc replacement
US837709819 Jan 200719 Feb 2013Flexuspine, Inc.Artificial functional spinal unit system and method for use
US201002173973 Oct 200826 Aug 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Intervertebral prosthesis
US201200467505 Mar 201023 Feb 2012Dsm Ip Assets B.V.Spinal fusion cage
USRE4248014 Dec 200121 Jun 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Human spinal disc prothesis with hinges
USRE425762 Feb 200126 Jul 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Human spinal disc prosthesis
CN100560038C15 Aug 200318 Nov 2009Hfsc CompanyControlled artificial intervertebral disc implant
EP1103237A223 Nov 200030 May 2001DePuy Acromed, Inc.Prosthetic implant element
EP1287794A124 Aug 20015 Mar 2003Sulzer Orthopedics Ltd.Artificial spinal disc
EP1295577A218 Sep 200226 Mar 2003DePuy Acromed, Inc.Device for verifying the alignment of an endoprosthesis
EP1905390A226 Apr 20042 Apr 2008Aesculap Implant Systems, Inc.Artificial intervertebral disc
WO2000004851A122 Jul 19993 Feb 2000Bryan, VincentThreaded cylindrical multidiscoid single or multiple array disc prosthesis
WO2001080786A126 Apr 20011 Nov 2001Pearl Technology Holdings, LlcProsthetic spinal disc
WO2001093785A25 Jun 200113 Dec 2001Hamilton, John, V.Orthopedic implant and method of making metal articles
WO2001093786A25 Jun 200113 Dec 2001Hamilton, John, V.Orthopedic implant and method of making metal articles
WO2003057088A127 Dec 200217 Jul 2003Spinal Concepts Inc.Spinal disc implant
WO2003090650A125 Apr 20036 Nov 2003Blackstone Medical, Inc.Artificial intervertebral disc
WO2004016217A215 Aug 200326 Feb 2004Angelucci, Christopher, M.Controlled artificial intervertebral disc implant
WO2004073561A113 Feb 20042 Sep 2004Droulout, ThomasIntervertebral prosthesis
WO2004084774A124 Mar 20037 Oct 2004Mathys Medizinaltechnik AgVertebral disc or intervertebral disc prosthesis
WO2004105655A116 Dec 20039 Dec 2004Arnin, UriSpinal disc prosthesis
WO2005007043A115 Jul 200427 Jan 2005Sweeney, PatrickSpinal disc prosthesis system
WO2007028096A231 Aug 20068 Mar 2007Ashley, John, E.Prosthetic intervertebral discs