|Publication number||US5027436 A|
|Application number||US 07/515,983|
|Publication date||25 Jun 1991|
|Filing date||27 Apr 1990|
|Priority date||27 Apr 1990|
|Also published as||DE69117098D1, DE69117098T2, EP0456365A2, EP0456365A3, EP0456365B1|
|Publication number||07515983, 515983, US 5027436 A, US 5027436A, US-A-5027436, US5027436 A, US5027436A|
|Inventors||Jean-Marc P. Delavaux|
|Original Assignee||At&T Bell Laboratories|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (3), Non-Patent Citations (12), Referenced by (18), Classifications (12), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
E.sub.1 (t)=E.sub.MH (t)+jEsubLV(t),
E.sub.2 (t)=E.sub.LH (t)+jE.sub.MV (t);
E.sub.1 (t)=E.sub.MH (t)+jE.sub.LV (t),
E.sub.2 (t)=E.sub.LH (t)+jE.sub.MV (t),
The present invention relates to an optical hybrid for coherent detection systems and, more particularly, to an optical hydrid which utilizes only one polarization beam splitter and one polarization maintaining coupler to achieve polarization independent operation.
Coherent optical lightwave detection systems have been extensively described in the literature. Such systems offer nearly ideal detection sensitivity, as well as selectivity similar to that obtained at radio frequencies. In coherent lightwave systems which use heterodyne/homodyne techniques, the polarization state of the local oscillator must be matched to the polarization state of the incoming transmitted signal in order to achieve accurate recovery of the data. Any departure from polarization matching will result in degradation of the system performance. One solution to the problem of polarization matching is the utilization of a polarization diversity receiver arrangement which insures correct operation of the system despite any fluctuations in the polarization state of the received data signal. In general, a polarization diversity arrangement functions to split both signals into known, orthogonal polarization states and separately manipulate each orthogonal component.
Several variations of polarization diversity schemes have been proposed and demonstrated. One particular prior art scheme utilizes an optical hybrid including a single beam splitting cube and a set of three optical couplers to provide the required orthogonal signal components. A description of this particular arrangement is contained in an article entitled "Polarization diversity coherent optical receiver with a balanced receiver configuration", by M. Shibutani et al., appearing in the Proceedings of the ECOC88, September 1988, at pp. 151-3. In the Shibutani et al. arrangement, the message signal components, after polarization separation, are mixed with the local oscillator in a 3 dB fiber coupler. The local oscillator signal is divided equally by a 3 dB coupler and the polarization state of each local oscillator component is manipulated, using polarization adjusters, to match the polarization state of its paired message signal component. However, since the polarization state of each signal component is subject to drift, the polarization adjusters must be continuously monitored to insure optimum system performance.
An alternative technique which is truly polarization independent and requires no active monitoring is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,718,120 issued to L. D. Tzeng on Jan. 5, 1988. In the Tzeng arrangement, the transmitted signal and local oscillator are simultaneously applied as inputs to a 3 dB coupler. The coupler outputs are then directed into a pair of polarization beam splitters which perform the polarization diversity function on the combination of the transmitted signal and local oscillator. The polarization diversity outputs from the pair of beam splitters are then directed into a balanced receiver which converts the optical signals into electrical representations and performs an electrical demodulation to recover the transmitted data. This arrangement is a viable solution, but the ability to provide matched polarization beam splitters which maintain the orthogonality between the various signal components may be difficult to achieve in some applications.
Therefore, a need remains in the prior art for a coherent lightwave detection system which is truly polarization independent and requires a minimum number of sensitive components.
The need remaining in the prior art is addressed by the present invention which relates to an optical hybrid for coherent detection systems and, more particularly, to an optical hybrid which utilizes only one polarization beam splitter and one polarization maintaining coupler to achieve polarization independent operation.
In accordance with a particular embodiment of the present invention, the incoming message signal and local oscillator are applied as orthogonal inputs to a polarization beam splitter. The polarization beam splitter functions to separate each signal into orthogonal components. In particular, message signal EM (t) is divided into components EMH (t) and EMV (t), where the designation "H" refers to "horizontal" polarization and the designation "V" refers to "vertical" polarization. The local oscillator is similarly split. Since the two signals are applied as orthogonal inputs to the splitter, the pair of outputs from the splitter contain mutually orthogonal components. That is, a first output E1 (t) contains both a horizontal and a vertical component (e.g., E1 (t)=EMH (t)+jELV (t)). The second output E2 (t) from the splitter then contains the remaining components EMV (t) and ELH (t). The pair of outputs from the splitter are subsequently applied as inputs to a polarization maintaining coupler which functions to sum the components and provide as the optical hybrid output a pair of combined optical signals, denoted E3 (t) and E.sub. 4 (t), which are orthogonal vector sums of the polarization beam splitter first and second outputs. In particular, polarization maintaining coupler 18 functions according to the following relations: ##EQU1## The pair of combined optical signals are then applied as inputs to a balanced receiver which functions to convert the optical signals into electrical representations and demodulate the electrical signals to recover the transmitted data from the received message signal EM (t).
In one embodiment of the present invention, bulk optics may be used to form the hybrid. In particular, a polarization beam splitting cube may be used to receive the message signal and local oscillator, where the fiber carrying the local oscillator is attached to the appropriate cube face at an angle (for example, 45°) which provides for essentially equal power splitting of the local oscillator between the two output polarization states. The polarization maintaining coupler may comprise a lithium niobate-based device, with polarization maintaining optical fibers used to interconnect the beam splitting cube and coupler, as well as connecting the coupler output to the balanced receiver input.
In an alternative embodiment, the hybrid may be formed as a monolithic unit on a single substrate. In particular, the polarization beam splitter and polarization maintaining coupler may be formed as integrated components within an optical substrate. Polarization maintaining integrated optical waveguides formed in the substrate may be used to interconnect the devices. In one arrangement, the balanced receiver may be incorporated in the same substrate. Alternatively, the receiver may be formed on a separate substrate with polarization maintaining waveguides used to provide interconnection between the hybrid and the receiver.
An advantage of the arrangement of the present invention is the significant reduction in the number of components required to achieve a polarization independent optical hybrid, as compared with the prior art. In particular, a conventional optical hybrid may utilize a pair of polarization beam splitters (one for the message signal and one for the local oscillator), and/or a pair of polarization maintaining couplers (one for each polarization state). Most optical hybrids of conventional design produce as an output a set of at least four separate signals (two of each polarization state), thus requiring the use of at least two balanced receivers to recover the message signal. In contrast, the optical hybrid of the present invention uses only one polarization beam splitter and one polarization maintaining coupler to generate as the output of the optical hybrid a pair of signals. Therefore, a single balanced receiver may be used to recover the message signal from the pair of optical hybrid output signals.
Other and further advantages of the present invention will be apparent during the course of the following dicsussion and by reference to the accompanying drawing.
The sole FIGURE illustrates an exemplary coherent detection system utilizing an optical hybrid formed in accordance with the present invention.
Referring to the sole FIGURE, an exemplary coherent detection arrangement 10 is shown as including an exemplary optical hybrid 12 of the present invention and a balanced receiver 14 coupled thereto. As shown, optical hybrid 12 comprises a polarization beam splitter 16 and a polarization maintaining coupler 18 interconnected by a pair of polarization maintaining waveguides 20,22. A second pair of polarization maintaining waveguides 24,26 are used to connection the outputs of polarization maintaining coupler 18 (also defined as the output of hybrid 12) to the input of balanced receiver 14. As will be discussed in detail below, optical hybrid 10 may be formed with discrete devices, as a single monolithic structure, or with a mixture of both discrete and integrated components.
In operation, the received message signal EM (t) and local oscillator ELO (t) are applied as orthogonal inputs to polarization beam splitter 16. For the sake of the present discussion, message signal EM (t) is presumed to be a DPSK signal which can be expressed as follows: ##EQU2## where M(t) represents the DPSK modulation signal having values of either +1 (for a logic "1") or -1 (for a logic "0"). The term PM is defined as the message signal power and ωM is defined as the carrier frequency. It is to be noted that throughout this discussion any phase noise terms will be ignored, for the sake of simplicity. It can be shown that such terms do not affect the polarization independent operation of the hybrid of the present invention. Similarly, the local oscillator signal ELO (t) an be expressed as: ##EQU3## where PLO is defined as the local oscillator signal power and ωLO is the local oscillator carrier frequency.
Referring to the FIGURE, polarization beam splitter 16 functions to split the signals applied thereto into first and second components of orthogonal polarization states (hereinafter referred to as "vertical" (V) and "horizontal" (H) polarization states). When performing the polarization beam splitting on message signal EM (t), polarization beam splitter 16 divides the power PM of signal EM (t) into orthogonal components represented by:
P.sub.M =χ.sup.2 P.sub.M H+(1-χ.sup.2)P.sub.M V,
where χ2 represents the portions of message signal EM (t) which is of the horizontal polarization state and the term (1-χ2) represents the remaining portion of vertical polarization (where 0≦χ≦1, and χ may vary as a function of time). The message signal portions of the output from polarization beam splitter 16 may then be defined as: ##EQU4## where θ1 and θ2 are slowly varying phase signals which depend upon the polarization state of the message signal.
In accordance with the teachings of the present invention, local oscillator ELO (t) is applied as an input to polarization beam splitter 16 with a fixed, linear polarization such that the resultant output signals launched into waveguides 20,22 will have essentially equal power levels. In general, therefore, the local oscillator may be defined as: ##EQU5## where θLO is defined as the arbitrary phase of the local oscillator. For the remainder of the present discussion, it will be assumed that θLO =0.
The outputs signals from polarization beam splitter 16 will be launched into polarization maintaining waveguides 20 and 22, as illustrated in the FIGURE, with the signal propagating along polarization maintaining waveguide 20 defined as E1 (t) and the signal propagating along polarization maintaining waveguide 22 defined as E2 (t). In accordance with the properties of polarization beam splitter 16, E1 (t) and E2 (t) may be defined by the following relations:
E.sub.1 (t)=E.sub.MH (t)+jE.sub.LV (t),
E.sub.2 (t)=E.sub.LH (t)+jE.sub.MV (t).
Substituting the relations as defined above, signals E1 (t) and E2 (t) may be rewritten as follows: ##EQU6##
Referring to the FIGURE, signals E1 (t) and E2 (t) propagate along polarization maintaining waveguides 20,22 and are subsequently applied as inputs to polarization maintaining coupler 18. In general, polarization maintaining coupler 18 will provide a pair of output signals E3 (t) and E4 (t), where ##EQU7## As seen in the FIGURE, signals E3 (t) and E4 (t) are launched into polarization maintaining waveguides 24 and 26, respectively, to form the outputs from optical hybrid 12. Assuming the length l1 of the path defined by waveguides 20,24 is essentially equal to the length l2 of the path defined by waveguides 22,26, first output E3 (t) from hybrid 12 may be expressed as follows: ##EQU8## Similarly, signal E4 (t) can be written as: ##EQU9##
In order to provide recovery of the transmitted data signal, the pair of output optical signals E3 (t) and E4 (t) from hybrid 12 are applied as inputs to balanced receiver 14. In particular, signal E3 (t) is applied as an input to a first photodiode 28 and signal E4 (t) is applied as to a second photodiode 30. As is well-known in the art, each photodiode will develop an output current related to the applied input optical signal. In particular, the output current I1 (t) from first photodiode 28 may be expressed as:
I.sub.1 (t)=C[E.sub.3H.sup.2 (t)+E.sub.3V.sup.2 (t)],
where C is defined as the known constant ηe/hω. Substituting the expressions for E3H (t) and E3V (t), it can be shown that I1 (t) may be rewritten as follows: ##EQU10## where ωIF =ωLO -ωM. Similarly, the output current I2 (t) from second photodiode 30 can be expressed as:
I.sub.2 (t)=C[E.sub.4H.sup.2 (t)+E.sub.4V.sup.2 (t)],
which may be rewritten as the following: ##EQU11## Photocurrents I1 (t) and I2 (t) are subsequently applied as separate inputs to a differential amplifier 32. Differential amplifier 32 functions to subtract second photocurrent I2 (t) from first current I1 (t) to provide as an output the balanced receiver current IB (t). That is:
I.sub.B (t)=I.sub.1 (t)-I.sub.2 (t),
where substituting the relations for I1 (t) and I2 (t), IB (t) can be rewritten as: ##EQU12## This expression for IB (t) may be simplified by controlling the relationship between the terms θ1 and θ2. In particular, a phase modulator may be used in conjunction with the optical hybrid to provide this control. Referring to the FIGURE, a phase modulator 34 is illustrated as inserted in the incoming signal path of received message signal EM (t). Alternatively, phase modulator 34 may be disposed along either waveguide 20 or 22. Phase modulator 34 is utilized to maintain a predetermined phase difference Δθ between θ1 and θ2 (the slowly varying phase delays associated with the H and V polarizations of message signal EM (t), respectively). For example, phase modulator 34 may be used to provide a predetermined phase difference Δθ of π/2 such that ##EQU13## Therefore, the relation for IB (t) can be rewritten as follows: ##EQU14## since Alternatively, phase difference Δθ may be set at multiple values of ##EQU15## where k is a natural number, or any other suitable value capable of providing a well-controlled phase difference.
Referring to the FIGURE, current IB (t) from amplifier 32 is subsequently applied to a delay means 36 which functions to square the balanced receiver current. In particular, current IB (t) is split along two branches, where the current along one branch is delayed by a predetermined time period τ. The delayed signal IB (t-τ) and signal IB (t) are both applied as inputs to a multiplier 37 which then forms the output from delay means 36, denoted D'(t). Thus, D'(t) can be expressed as follows:
Substituting for IB (t) and IB (t-τ), it can be shown that: ##EQU16## where Ω=ωIF τ+2θ1. At this point in the data recovery process, the signal D'(t) remains polarization dependent, due to the presence of "χ" terms in the above relation. In accordance with the teachings of the present invention, the polarization dependence may be eliminated by removing the terms at the frequency 2ωIF t-Ω. Referring to the FIGURE, a filter 38 is coupled to the output of demodulating means 36. Filter 38 may be any suitable arrangement including, for example, a bandpass filter designed to pass only those frequencies near ωIF, or alternatively, a low pass filter capable of removing components near 2ωIF. Depending upon the value of 2ωIF, these higher-order harmonic terms may simply be ignored. In either case, the recovered data signal may be defined as ##EQU17## which in accordance with the teachings of the present invention is independent of χ.
As mentioned above, the optical hybrid of the present invention may be formed with discrete components or, alternatively, formed as a monolithic structure. An embodiment utilizing discrete devices may include, for example, a beam splitting cube as polarization beam splitter 16. Polarization maintaining coupler 18 may comprise a fused fiber coupler, formed using polarization maintaining optical fiber. Additionally, interconnecting waveguides 20,22,24 and 26 may all comprise polarization maintaining fibers appropriately attached to the appropriate endfaces of the discrete devices. In a monolithic embodiment, the polarization beam splitter may comprise a device including a silicon substrate with appropriate waveguides formed therein. A polarization maintaining coupler may also be formed in such a substrate. Advantages with the latter embodiment in terms of, for example, size, stability, alignment, and cost are obvious.
It is to be understood that there exist a number of modifications to the above-described embodiments which are considered to fall within the scope of the present invention. In particular, another embodiment of the present invention may utilize an alternative demodulating arrangement including a single photodiode receiver, instead of the pair of photodiodes in the balanced receiver configuration of the FIGURE. Additionally, the present invention is not considered to be limited to systems utilizing DPSK modulation, since alternative signaling schemes, including but not limited to FSK (frequency-shift keyed) or ASK (amplitude-shift keyed) modulation, could also be utilized with the optical hybrid of the present invention. In particular, the use of FSK signaling would result in a received message signal EM (t) of the form: ##EQU18## where Δω=0 for a first logic value and is fixed at a constant for a second logic value. Alternatively, the use of ASK would result in a received message signal EM (t) of the form: ##EQU19## where M(t)=0 for a first logic value and M(t)=M for a second logic value.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4718120 *||24 Nov 1986||5 Jan 1988||American Telephone And Telegraph Company, At&T Bell Laboratories||Polarization insensitive coherent lightwave detector|
|US4723315 *||24 Jun 1986||2 Feb 1988||Itek Corporation||Polarization matching mixer|
|US4723317 *||8 May 1986||2 Feb 1988||American Telephone And Telegraph Company, At&T Bell Laboratories||Optical heterodyne mixers providing image-frequency rejection|
|1||"Active Controlled Fiber Optical 90° Hybrid . . . ", G. Berenbrock et al., IEEE Photonics Tech. Lett., vol. 1, No. 4, Apr. 1989, pp. 86-87.|
|2||"Integrated Optics 90° Hybrid . . . ", Electr. Lett., vol. 24, No. 22, Oct. 1988, D. Hoffman et al., pp. 1324-1325.|
|3||"Integrated Optics Eight-Port 90° Hybrid . . . ", D. Hoffmann et al., IEEE J. Lightwave Tech., vol. 7, No. 5, May 1989, pp. 794-798.|
|4||"Polarization Diversity Coherent Optical . . . ", ECOC 88, Sep. 1988, M. Shibutani et al., pp. 151-154.|
|5||*||Active Controlled Fiber Optical 90 Hybrid . . . , G. Berenbrock et al., IEEE Photonics Tech. Lett., vol. 1, No. 4, Apr. 1989, pp. 86 87.|
|6||*||Demodulation of Optical DPSK Using In Phase and Quadrature Detection, Hodgkinson et al., Jul. 31, 1985.|
|7||Demodulation of Optical DPSK Using In-Phase and Quadrature Detection, Hodgkinson et al., Jul. 31, 1985.|
|8||*||Integrated Optics 90 Hybrid . . . , Electr. Lett., vol. 24, No. 22, Oct. 1988, D. Hoffman et al., pp. 1324 1325.|
|9||*||Integrated Optics Eight Port 90 Hybrid . . . , D. Hoffmann et al., IEEE J. Lightwave Tech., vol. 7, No. 5, May 1989, pp. 794 798.|
|10||*||Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. LT 5, No. 2, Feb. 1987, pp. 274 276.|
|11||Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. LT-5, No. 2, Feb. 1987, pp. 274-276.|
|12||*||Polarization Diversity Coherent Optical . . . , ECOC 88, Sep. 1988, M. Shibutani et al., pp. 151 154.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5170275 *||14 Jun 1991||8 Dec 1992||Northern Telecom Limited||Optical mixing for heterodyne detection|
|US5903393 *||4 Dec 1997||11 May 1999||Kalibjian; Ralph||Optical-hybrid etalons for simultaneous phase- and polarization-diversity operations|
|US6407848||27 Dec 2000||18 Jun 2002||All Optical Networks, Inc.||Servo-stabilized-phase, differential coherence detector|
|US6473222||27 Dec 2000||29 Oct 2002||John N. Hait||Hyper-heterodyning, expanded bandpass apparatus and method|
|US7363018 *||18 Jan 2005||22 Apr 2008||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology||High speed electrical interconnect using an optically distributed carrier signal|
|US7809284 *||23 Jun 2006||5 Oct 2010||Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc.||System and method for receiving coherent, polarization-multiplexed optical signals|
|US8204378||23 Mar 2009||19 Jun 2012||Tektronix, Inc.||Coherent optical signal processing|
|US8300229 *||11 Dec 2009||30 Oct 2012||Celight, Inc.||Chemical sensing with coherent detection of optical signal|
|US8391712||8 Mar 2012||5 Mar 2013||Tektronix, Inc.||Coherent optical signal processing|
|US8588612||13 Aug 2010||19 Nov 2013||Kt Corporation||Optical detection device in WDM-PON and method for same|
|US8653432||8 Mar 2012||18 Feb 2014||Tektronix, Inc.||Coherent optical signal processing|
|US8655192 *||28 Mar 2011||18 Feb 2014||Oclaro Japan, Inc.||Polarization diversity optical system device, demodulator and transceiver|
|US20060160574 *||18 Jan 2005||20 Jul 2006||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology||High speed electrical interconnect using an optically distributed carrier signal|
|US20070297806 *||23 Jun 2006||27 Dec 2007||Lucent Technologies, Incorporated||System and method for receiving coherent, polarizaztion-multiplexed optical signals|
|US20100303462 *||13 Aug 2010||2 Dec 2010||Soo-Jin Park||Optical detection device in wdm-pon and method for same|
|US20110249976 *||28 Mar 2011||13 Oct 2011||Opnext Japan, Inc.||Polarization diversity optical system device, demodulator and transceiver|
|WO2009102164A3 *||13 Feb 2009||26 Nov 2009||Kt Corporation||Optical detection device in wdm-pon and method for same|
|WO2013179118A1 *||29 May 2013||5 Dec 2013||Politecnico Di Milano||Synoptic fiber optic sensor|
|U.S. Classification||398/202, 398/204, 398/205|
|International Classification||G02F1/00, H04B10/00, H04B10/148|
|Cooperative Classification||H04B10/614, H04B10/611, H04B10/61|
|European Classification||H04B10/61, H04B10/611, H04B10/614|
|27 Apr 1990||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, NEW YORK
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:DELAVAUX, JEAN-MARC P.;REEL/FRAME:005298/0290
Effective date: 19900427
|28 Oct 1994||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|1 Oct 1998||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|30 Sep 2002||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12