|Publication number||US3764540 A|
|Publication date||9 Oct 1973|
|Filing date||28 May 1971|
|Priority date||28 May 1971|
|Publication number||US 3764540 A, US 3764540A, US-A-3764540, US3764540 A, US3764540A|
|Inventors||Khalafalla S, Reimers G|
|Original Assignee||Us Interior|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (3), Referenced by (60), Classifications (7)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
United States Patent Khalafalla et a1.
Oct. 9, 1973 MAGNETOFLUIDS AND THEIR MANUFACTURE Inventors: Sanaa E. Khalafalla; George W.
Reimers, both of Minneapolis, Minn.
Assignee: The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Interior, Washington, DC.
Filed: May 28, 1971 Appl. No.: 148,206
U.S. Cl 252/62.55, 252/62.52, 252/62.56,
252/309, 252/314 Int. Cl. H0lf 1/28 Field of Search 252/62.56, 62.51,
References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 9/1970 Rosensweig 252/62.51 X
1/1972 Kaiser..... 9/1970 Lemke Primary Examiner-Oscar R. Vertiz Assistant Examiner-J. Cooper Att0rneyErnest S. Cohen and Roland H. Shubert  ABSTRACT 9 Claims, No Drawings MAGNETOFLUIDS AND THEIR MANUFACTURE BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Ferromagnetic liquids, commonly known as ferrofluids comprise a permanent suspension of ferromagnetic particles in a liquid carrier. Typical compositions consist of submicron-sized magnetite particles suspended in an organic liquid, such as kerosene, with a dispersing agent added to prevent flocculation of the particles. Properties of the fluids are highly dependent upon particle size and upon the concentration of ferromagnetic particles in the liquid. A detailed discussion of ferrofluids, their properties and their uses may be found in an article by R. E. Rosensweig published in International Science and Technology, July 1966, pages 45-56.
Ferromagnetic liquids are conventionally produced by the long-term grinding of magnetite in a carrier liquid. Grinding times required in order to obtain a true colloidal suspension range to l,000 hours or more. Grinding ferromagnetic'materials is complicated by interparticle magnetic flocculation arising from the attraction of one particle to another. This magnetic attraction is in addition to the usual interparticle attraction caused by van der Waals forces. Consequently, the conventional preparation processes are extremely inefficient.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION We have found that the grinding or comminuting time necessary to prepare magnetofluids may be greatly reduced by appropriate use of a non-magnetic precursor compound. The nonmagnetic precursor compound, preferably a suboxide of iron, is comminuted to colloidal size and dispersed in a carrier liquid. It is then converted to ferromagnetic forms while in suspension to form a stable magnetofluid.
A preferred embodiment comprises preparing submicron sized wustite particles by controlled reduction of ferric oxide and further comminuting the wustite particles in the presence of a dispersing agent until colloidal dimensions are obtained. The wustite particles are then converted to ferromagnetic forms by disproportionation to iron and magnetite.
Hence, it is an object of our invention to prepare magnetofluids from nonmagnetic precursor compounds.
Another object of our invention is to reduce the grinding time required in the production of stable magnetofluids.
Yet another object of our invention is to provide a magnetofluid of novel composition.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION We have discovered that ferromagnetic liquids, hereafter referred to as ferrofluids, may be produced in a simple fashion by comminuting a non-magnetic or antimagnetic precursor compound to produce a stable, colloidal suspension and thereafter converting the precursor compound to ferromagnetic forms. As used herein, the term nonmagnetic will be understood to include antimagnetic compounds. This technique reduces grinding time required to produce a stable, submicron sized particulate suspension to as little as 5 percent of that requiredby conventional methods.
Substitution of magnetite by a nonmagnetic precursor allows grinding or other comminution techniques to be accomplished without complications arising from interparticle magnetic attraction. Precursor compounds may comprise the lower or suboxides of iron or ferrous oxides generally. The preferred precursor is wustite which is FeO with a defect structure. Wustite is also commonly represented by formula Fe ,O wherein at will typically vary from about 0.01 to about 0.20.
Wustite has been the subject of a number of theoretical studies. It is thermodynamically unstable below its eutectoidal temperature of 570C but the mestable phase can be prepared by rapid quenching from higher temperatures to room temperature. Quenching will preserve or freeze the wustite structure due to extreme sluggishness of solid-solid transformations at ordinary temperatures. Heating the metastable phase to temperatures below the eutectoidal point causes wustite to disproportionate to the thermo-dynamically stable phases of a-iron and magnetite according to the following general formula:
The kinetics of this reaction were studied by llschner and Mlitake, who found that Fe O decomposes in the temperature range of 220 to 450C. They found that the apparent activation energy varied between 17 and 12 KCal per mole magnetite formed as x changed from 0.06 to 0.11, respectively. Growth of Fe O particle with a specific orientation relationship with respect to the matrix was controlled by an interfacial reaction. This work was reported in Acta Metallurgica, V. 13, pages 855-867 (1965).
It is also known that wustite has a sodium chloride structure and that the number of metal ion vacancies in Fe O is twice as large as the iron deficiency would indicate. The extra iron is located interstitially in tetrahedral sites while vacancies in the crystal lattice represent extra octahedral sites. As a result the crystal has a local configuration analogous to that of Fe O and magnetite resulting from partial decomposition of the wustite phase is oriented identically with and grows epitaxially on the parent substrate.
In practicing our invention, it is highly advantageous to obtain wustite of a very small particle size in order to substantially reduce the amount of grinding required to reach colloidal dimensions. Hence, we prefer to prepare wustite by the low temperature reduction of finely divided iron oxides such as hematite. It is known that metallic iron produced .by low temperature hydrogen reduction of iron oxides is pyrophoric. This form of iron ignites easily, even spontaneously in air and is reoxidized. Presumably when reduction proceeds at relatively low temperatures, only a skeleton framework of iron atoms remain where the iron oxide wasbefore', thermal motion of the atoms being too sluggish to cause crystallization into a denser and more stable form. Pyrophoric iron has been reported at reduction temperatures as high as 600C.
While nothing is known about pyrophoric iron oxides, it was hypothesized that low temperature reduction of hematite might yield wustite in the pyrophoric state. These predictions were verified by experiments in which reagent grade iron oxide powder (hematite) was reduced at 650C with 25% CO-% CO in one case and with 50% CO50% CO in a second case to yield magnetite and wustite respectively. Both products were found to be pyrophoric in the sense that they reoxidized spontaneously and caught fire when exposed to air. Hence, it was clear that wustite having a very small particle size could be prepared but the product could not be further processed by conventional means because of its pyrophoric nature.
We then found that wustite in the pyrophoric state could be protected from oxidation during further processinb by coating or covering it with a dispersing agent. A dispersing agent is a necessary component of any ferrofluid composition. Its purpose is to maintain a coating around each individual ferromagnetic particle of sufficient thickness to prevent agglomeration or flocculation induced by the attractive van der Waals force. Essentially, the dispersing agent acts as an elastic coating around each colloidal particle preventing the close approach of one particle to another. Dispersing agents generally useful in ferrofluid preparation comprise long-chain organic molecules having a reactive end group. Aliphatic monocarboxylic acids having from about eight to about 24 carbon atoms are typical of dispersing agents useful in ferrofluid preparation. Oleic acid in particular is commonly used and produces excellent results. Dispersing agents useful in ferrofluid stabilization were found to be completely satisfactory for protecting wustite from pyrophoric oxidation. Hence the dispersing agent performed a dual function; first to prevent pyrophoric oxidation and second to stabilize the ferrofluid product.
Broadly, our process comprises comminuting a non or antimagnetic suboxide of iron to colloidal dimensions, dispersing the oxide in a carrier liquid to form a stable non-settling suspension and thereafter converting the nonmagnetic iron oxide to ferromagnetic forms while maintaining the particles in stable suspension. Our preferred lower iron oxide precursor compound is wustite.
Our most preferred embodiment comprises first subjecting a higher oxide of iron, such as hematite, to low temperature reduction to produce wustite of similar particle size. The wustite is then quenched to a low temperature, ambient or somewhat above, to recover the wustite in a metastable but pyrophoric state. Next the pyrophoric wustite is protected against oxidation by coating it with a dispersing agent such oelic acid. The mixture is then added to a carrier liquid, typically a hydrocarbon such as kerosene, and subjected to grinding for a time sufficient to reduce the wustite particles to colloidal dimensions. After formation of a stable suspension, the wustite is converted to ferromagnetic forms, comprising metallic iron and magnetite, by refluxing at temperatures above about 200C. The resulting ferrofluid product displays a strong magnetic response and is stable and non-settling under the influence of gravitational or magnetic fields. It is to be noted that our ferrofluid compositions differ from those of the prior art in that they comprise a mixture of colloidal particles of magnetite and elemental iron. Ferrofluids of conventional manufacture comprise a suspension of ferrite material.
It is not necessary that the precursor compound be prepared or obtained in a finely divided form prior to the comminution step. Large particle, non-pyrophoric wustite could be used with substantial advantage over prior art methods. However, preparation of wustite in a finely divided form substantially decreases comminution or grinding time required to obtain a colloidal suspension. Ferric oxide having a median particle diameter substantially less than 1 micron is commerically available and controlled reduction of such products will given wustite particles of approximately the same size. A stable, colloidal suspension is formed when the maximum particle size is less than about 0.01 microns A), provided of course that flocculation of the particles is avoided. Advantages arising from production of the wustite precursor in a finely divided form are readily apparent.
Reduction of ferric oxides must be carried out at temperatures above the wustite eutectoidal temperature, or 570C. Temperatures within the general range of about 570 to 800C produce satisfactory results. A preferred reduction temperature is in the range of 600 to 700C. Gases are advantageously used as the reducing agents and a gaseous mixture of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide is preferred. Wustite composition may vary from a nominal Fe O to Fe O while a preferred composition range is from Fe ,,,,0 to Fe -,O. Conversion of the wustite precursor to ferromagnetic forms is most conveniently accomplished by refluxing the colloidal suspension at temperatures above about 200C and below 570C. Care must also be taken to avoid thermal decomposition of either the carrier liquid or the dispersing agent. Refluxing time required for substantially complete conversion of wustite to metallic iron and magnetite is temperature dependent but will typically range from about /2 to about 10 hours at temperatures ranging from 200 to 300C.
Carrier liquids useful in our ferrofluid compositions include hydrocarbons, fluorocarbons, silicone oils, or esters. Choice of carrier liquid does not affect the pro cess except that the dispersing agent chosen must be compatible with the carrier. Magnetic properties of the ferrofluid may be adjusted by varying the concentration of ferromagnetic particles suspended in the carrier liquid. This may readily be accomplished either by simple dilution or by evaporating a portion of the carrier. Concentrations of ferromagnetic particles as high as 40 to 50 g per 100 ml fluid are obtainable while retaining the liquid properties of the composition.
Ferrofluids produced by the method of this invention are useful in a host of different applications. For example, when a ferrofluid is subjected to an applied magnetic field, a magnetic levitation force is created within the ferrofluid thus giving the effect of an apparent increase in specific gravity. Nonmagnetic bodies immersed in the fluid may be levitated by the fluid even if they have substantially greater densities than the fluid. By adjusting the strength of the applied magnetic field, bodies of differing density may be selectively levitated thus providing a separation process based upon differing densities.
Other uses include accelerometers, attitude control devices, oscillation damping devices, rotating shaft seals and bearings. It has also been proposed to use hydrocarbon base or oil soluble ferrofluids for cleaning up oil spills. A relatively concentrated ferrofluid is sprayed on or otherwise mixed with an oil slick thus making the entire mixture magnetic. The oil slick is then skimmed from the water surface using a traveling magnet.
. The following examples serve to illustrate specific embodiments of our invention.
EXAMPLE 1 A 200 g sample of reagent grade ferric oxide powder was reduced at 650C using a 50 percent carbon monoxide 50 percent carbon dioxide mixture. According to the thermodynamic phase diagram of the ironoxygen system, the resulting product should comprise wustite having a composition of Fe O. A thermobalance was used to monitor the progress of reduction which was complete in about 1 hour. The resulting wustite, weighing 184 g, was removed from the furnace crucible and quenched to room temperature using an inert gas atmosphere of helium. One hundred ml of oleic acid, enough to cover the oxide phase, was then added. The resulting mixture was then transferred to a ball mill containing 1 liter of kerosene and 7.3 kg of steel balls. Grinding continued for a total of 40 hours.
At the end of that time, the fluid was separated from the balls, poured into a graduated cylinder and allowed to stand for 48 hours. No solid sedimentation occured after that time, indicating the fluid to be a true colloidal suspension. The fluid had a specific gravity of 0.806 g/ml and a viscosity of 2.87 cp compared to the carrier fluid (kerosene containing percent oleic acid) which had a specific gravity of 0.722 g/l and a viscosity of 1.46 cp. A negative magnetic response was exhibited by the fluid when placed near the poles of an electromagnet.
EXAMPLE 2 The antimagnetic colloidal wustite suspension of Example l was converted by disproportionation into magnetite and iron by refluxing at 250C. Refluxing was continued for 6 hours, resulting in a fluid which exhibited a strong magnetic response. This resulting ferrofluid had the same specific gravity, 0.806 g/ml, as did the wustite suspension but the viscosity decreased to 2.61 cp. The fluid was stable and non-settling thus indicating that no flocculation or agglomeration occurred during the conversion of the wustite particles to ferromagnetic forms.
EXAMPLE 3 Samples of the ferrofluid of Example 2 were concentrated by evaporation. Nitrogen was bubbled through the fluid at a temperature of 200C until the volume was reduced to 72.5% of that originally present. At this point the specific gravity (measured at 20C) was 0.820 g/ml and the viscosity was 3.50 cp. Evaporation was then continued as before until the volume was reduced to 50 percent of that originally present. Specific gravity increased at this point to 0.848 g/ml and the viscosity increased to 4.55 cp. The resulting fluid was again concentrated to a volume 25 percent of that originally present. This fluid, now concentrated 4-fold, had a specific gravity of 0.916 g/ml. Viscosity was not measured.
All of the ferrofluid concentrates retained the properties of a true colloidal suspension displayed by the original fluid. Progressively increasing magnetic response was noted as the concentration increased.
EXAMPLE 4 A comparative test was performed using the same reagent grade hematite powder as was utilized in Example 1. In this case, 190 grams of the powder was completely converted to magnetite by controlled reduction. Weight of the magnetite product was 184 g. The magnetite was cooled under an inert atmosphere and transferred under 100 ml oleic acid to the ball mill containing 1 liter of kerosene. Small samples of the product were intermittently withdrawn as grinding proceeded. These samples were centrifuged and the supernatant portion was tested for magnetic response. The first positive response was obtained after 300 hours of grinding time. At this point, the specific gravity of the fluid was 0.827 mg/l and its viscosity was 2.86 cp.
EXAMPLE 5 In another test ferric oxide, in the form of 'y -Fe O or maghemite, was used to prepare magnetite. The finely divided ferric oxide had an average particle size of 0.02 microns according to the manufacturer and displayed a surface area of 27 m /g. A particle diameter of 0.02 microns is approximately twice the particle diameter which will form a stable ferrofluid. The maghemite was reduced under controlled conditions and relatively low temperature in order to obtain particulate magnetite of approximately the same particle size. After reduction, the magnetite product was treated in a fashion identical to that set out in Examples 1 and 4.
After 56 hours of grinding, the resulting fluid gave a very feeble magnetic response. At this point the fluid had a specific gravity of 0.787 g/ml and a viscosity of 1.77 cp. Magnetite particles in the fluid settled out after 48 hours of standing in a graduated cylinder. Additional grinding was required in order to reach the colloidal state.
1. A process for the preparation of ferromagnetic fluids which comprises the steps of comminuting and dispersing a solid, nonmagnetic suboxide of iron having the formula Fe O wherein x has a value of 0.01 to 0.20 in a liquid chosen from the group consisting of hydrocarbons, fluorocarbons, silicone oils and esters to form a stable, colloidal suspension of the suboxide in the liquid and thereafter heating the liquid suspension to temperatures in the range of about 200C to about 570C but below the decomposition temperature of the liquid for a time sufficient to cause substantial conversion of the nonmagnetic suboxide to ferromagnetic forms.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein said dispersing step comprises agitation of the particulate suboxide and liquid mixture together with an aliphatic monocarboxylic acid dispersing agent having from about eight to about 24 carbon atoms.
3. The process of claim 1 wherein the suboxide of iron is wustite having a composition in the range of Fe 950 to 1 8 0.
4. The process of claim 3 wherein the wustite is converted to ferromagnetic forms by heating for a time greater than about one-half hour.
5. The process of claim 4 where the wustite is produced from finely divided ferric oxide by reduction at temperatures within the range of 570 to 800C.
6. The process of claim 5 wherein the wustite is recovered from the reduction step in pyrophoric form and is protected from reoxidation by coating it with an aliphatic monocarboxylic acid dispersing agent having from about eight to about 24 carbon atoms.
7. The process of claim 6 wherein the dispersing agent-coated wustite is comminuted by wet grinding in I the liquid.
8. The process of claim 7 wherein the liquid is a hydrocarbon and wherein the dispersing agent is oleic acid.
9. The process of claim 8 wherein the hydrocarbon is kerosene.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3526598 *||2 May 1968||1 Sep 1970||Bell & Howell Co||Manufacture of magnetic recording media|
|US3531413 *||22 Sep 1967||29 Sep 1970||Avco Corp||Method of substituting one ferrofluid solvent for another|
|US3635819 *||15 Jun 1970||18 Jan 1972||Avco Corp||Process for cleaning up oil spills|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4019994 *||28 Aug 1975||26 Apr 1977||Georgia-Pacific Corporation||Process for the preparation of aqueous magnetic material suspensions|
|US4025448 *||29 Dec 1975||24 May 1977||Union Carbide Corporation||Superparamagnetic wax compositions useful in magnetic levitation separations|
|US4064453 *||2 Jul 1976||20 Dec 1977||Xerox Corporation||Magnetic field detector|
|US4078392 *||29 Dec 1976||14 Mar 1978||Borg-Warner Corporation||Direct contact heat transfer system using magnetic fluids|
|US4100088 *||2 Jul 1976||11 Jul 1978||Xerox Corporation||Imaging composition|
|US4107063 *||2 Mar 1977||15 Aug 1978||International Business Machines Corporation||Water based selectable charge magnetic inks|
|US4108767 *||2 Sep 1975||22 Aug 1978||Georgia-Pacific Corporation||Separation of an aqueous or water-miscible liquid from a fluid mixture|
|US4208294 *||12 Feb 1979||17 Jun 1980||The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of The Interior||Dilution stable water based magnetic fluids|
|US4292615 *||24 Jul 1979||29 Sep 1981||Shigeo Ohashi||Switching element|
|US4315827 *||13 Feb 1981||16 Feb 1982||Ferrofluidics Corporation||Low-vapor-pressure ferrofluids and method of making same|
|US4554088 *||12 May 1983||19 Nov 1985||Advanced Magnetics Inc.||Magnetic particles for use in separations|
|US4576725 *||13 Jun 1984||18 Mar 1986||Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha||Magnetic fluid incorporating fine magnetic powder and method for making the same|
|US4599184 *||29 Jan 1985||8 Jul 1986||National Research Institute||Process for producing ferromagnetic liquid|
|US4604222 *||21 May 1985||5 Aug 1986||Ferrofluidics Corporation||Stable ferrofluid composition and method of making and using same|
|US4604229 *||20 Mar 1985||5 Aug 1986||Ferrofluidics Corporation||Electrically conductive ferrofluid compositions and method of preparing and using same|
|US4608186 *||30 Jul 1985||26 Aug 1986||Tdk Corporation||Magnetic fluid|
|US4624797 *||12 Sep 1985||25 Nov 1986||Tdk Corporation||Magnetic fluid and process for preparing the same|
|US4626370 *||12 Sep 1985||2 Dec 1986||Tdk Corporation||Magnetic fluid|
|US4664841 *||30 Oct 1984||12 May 1987||Ricoh Co., Ltd.||Fine particle substance-containing non-aqueous dispersions|
|US4687596 *||19 Jun 1986||18 Aug 1987||Ferrofluidics Corporation||Low viscosity, electrically conductive ferrofluid composition and method of making and using same|
|US4701276 *||31 Oct 1986||20 Oct 1987||Hitachi Metals, Ltd.||Super paramagnetic fluids and methods of making super paramagnetic fluids|
|US4732706 *||26 May 1987||22 Mar 1988||Ferrofluidics Corporation||Method of preparing low viscosity, electrically conductive ferrofluid composition|
|US4741850 *||30 Jul 1987||3 May 1988||Hitachi Metals, Ltd.||Super paramagnetic fluids and methods of making super paramagnetic fluids|
|US4783150 *||26 Oct 1987||8 Nov 1988||Commissariat A L'energie Atomique||Thermally electrically or magnetically controllable lyotropic liquid crystal optical devices|
|US4849120 *||2 May 1988||18 Jul 1989||Price John T||Magnetically controllable couplings containing ferrafluids|
|US4855079 *||27 Aug 1987||8 Aug 1989||Hitachi Metals, Ltd.||Super paramagnetic fluids and methods of making super paramagnetic fluids|
|US4938886 *||21 Sep 1988||3 Jul 1990||Skf Nova Ab||Superparamagnetic liquids and methods of making superparamagnetic liquids|
|US4946623 *||26 Oct 1987||7 Aug 1990||Commissariat A L'energie Atomique||Process for the production of a ferromagnetic composition, ferromagnetic liquid crystal obtained by this process and apparatus using said liquid crystal|
|US4957644 *||27 Jun 1989||18 Sep 1990||Price John T||Magnetically controllable couplings containing ferrofluids|
|US5049307 *||24 May 1990||17 Sep 1991||Commissariat A L'energie Atomique||Process for the production of a ferromagnetic composition, ferromagnetic liquid crystal obtained by this process and apparatus using said liquid crystal|
|US5069216 *||19 Sep 1989||3 Dec 1991||Advanced Magnetics Inc.||Silanized biodegradable super paramagnetic metal oxides as contrast agents for imaging the gastrointestinal tract|
|US5219554 *||31 Mar 1992||15 Jun 1993||Advanced Magnetics, Inc.||Hydrated biodegradable superparamagnetic metal oxides|
|US5320906 *||20 Dec 1991||14 Jun 1994||Vestar, Inc.||Delivery vehicles with amphiphile-associated active ingredient|
|US5578238 *||13 Apr 1994||26 Nov 1996||Lord Corporation||Magnetorheological materials utilizing surface-modified particles|
|US5599474 *||18 Apr 1994||4 Feb 1997||Lord Corporation||Temperature independent magnetorheological materials|
|US5645752 *||20 Dec 1995||8 Jul 1997||Lord Corporation||Thixotropic magnetorheological materials|
|US5656196 *||15 Dec 1994||12 Aug 1997||Ferrotec Corporation||Ferrofluid having improved oxidation resistance|
|US5670088 *||7 Jun 1995||23 Sep 1997||Ausimont S.P.A.||Preparation of mixed ultrafine particles from PFPE micro-emulsion|
|US5851416 *||12 Feb 1997||22 Dec 1998||Ferrofluidics Corporation||Stable polysiloxane ferrofluid compositions and method of making same|
|US5879580 *||3 Dec 1996||9 Mar 1999||Ferrotec Corporation||Ferrofluid having improved oxidation resistance|
|US6068785 *||10 Feb 1998||30 May 2000||Ferrofluidics Corporation||Method for manufacturing oil-based ferrofluid|
|US6491842 *||9 Feb 1999||10 Dec 2002||Studiengesellschaft Kohle Mbh||Anticorrosive magnetic nanocolloids protected by precious metals|
|US7208134||20 Dec 2004||24 Apr 2007||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology||Bioprocesses enhanced by magnetic nanoparticles|
|US7341757||10 Feb 2005||11 Mar 2008||Nanoproducts Corporation||Polymer nanotechnology|
|US7387673||20 May 2003||17 Jun 2008||Ppg Industries Ohio, Inc.||Color pigment nanotechnology|
|US7708974||10 May 2005||4 May 2010||Ppg Industries Ohio, Inc.||Tungsten comprising nanomaterials and related nanotechnology|
|US8058337||12 Jun 2007||15 Nov 2011||Ppg Industries Ohio, Inc.||Conductive nanocomposite films|
|US8389603||9 May 2003||5 Mar 2013||Ppg Industries Ohio, Inc.||Thermal nanocomposites|
|US8961878||7 Dec 2010||24 Feb 2015||Yale University||Label-free cellular manipulation and sorting via biocompatible ferrofluids|
|US9726592||25 May 2016||8 Aug 2017||Yale University||Label-free cellular manipulation and sorting via biocompatible ferrofluids|
|US20060040388 *||20 Dec 2004||23 Feb 2006||Bromberg Lev E||Bioprocesses enhanced by magnetic nanoparticles|
|DE2529053A1 *||30 Jun 1975||4 Mar 1976||Ibm||Magnetische tinte|
|EP0267122A1 *||5 Nov 1987||11 May 1988||Commissariat A L'energie Atomique||Process for producing a composition, in particular a ferromagnetic liquid crystal, liquid crystal obtained by the process and device using this liquid crystal|
|EP0328497A1 *||24 Jan 1989||16 Aug 1989||SKF Nova AB||Superparamagnetic liquid|
|EP0365498A1 *||15 Sep 1989||25 Apr 1990||SKF Nova AB||Electrically conductive fluids|
|EP0936635A1 *||18 Feb 1998||18 Aug 1999||Ferrofluidics Corporation||Method for manufacturing oil-based ferrofluid|
|WO1994010694A1 *||27 Oct 1993||11 May 1994||Lord Corporation||Magnetorheological materials utilizing surface-modified particles|
|WO1996019686A2 *||15 Dec 1995||27 Jun 1996||Ferrotec Corporation||Ferrofluid having oxidation resistance|
|WO1996019686A3 *||15 Dec 1995||17 Oct 1996||Ferrotec Corp||Ferrofluid having oxidation resistance|
|WO2008030862A2||5 Sep 2007||13 Mar 2008||Columbus Nanoworks, Inc.||Magnetic particles and methods of making and using the same|
|U.S. Classification||252/62.55, 516/33, 252/62.52, 252/62.56|