|Publication number||US3067015 A|
|Publication date||4 Dec 1962|
|Filing date||29 Jan 1960|
|Priority date||29 Jan 1960|
|Publication number||US 3067015 A, US 3067015A, US-A-3067015, US3067015 A, US3067015A|
|Inventors||Ray F Lawdermilt|
|Original Assignee||Ray F Lawdermilt|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (4), Referenced by (105), Classifications (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
De@ 4, 1962 R. F. L AwDERMlLT 3,067,015
SPOILAGE INDICATOR FOR FOOD CONTAINERS Filed Jan. 29, Iseo a sheets-sheet 1 J A v INVENTOR Fiqh/afm Z'Z BY mgm# WW ATTORNEY Dec. 4, 1962 R. F. LAwDERMlLT 3,067,015
sPoILAGE INDICATOR FOR Foon CONTAINERS Filed Jan. 29, 1960 5 Sheets-Sheet 2 4 INVENTOR flan/67771712? ATTORNEYS Dec. 4, 1962 R. F. LAwDERMlLT 3,067,015
SPOILAGE INDICATOR FOR FOOD CONTAINERS Filed Jan. 29, 1960 3 Sheets-Sheet 3 y' f' 70 'Y (69 W Naf INVENTOR Fa/Wc/emz'llz ATTORNEYS some, such as buttermilk, sour cream and the like. -the other hand, it has been established by research that United States Patent O 3,067,035 SIFILAGE INEHCTR FR FOQD CNTAENERS Ray F. ihawdermiit, 225 Lincoin Ave., North Vernon, Ind. Fiied Jan. 29, 1960, Ser. No. 5,473 14- Ciaims. (Ci. 23--253) This invention relates to spoilage indicators for food containers, and more particularly to spoilage indicators for milk cartons, although, with suitable modifications, the indicator may be applied to various types of food containers.
In the dairy industry there has been considerable controversy as to what sanitary significance can be attached to the presence of large numbers of bacteria in milk. Many of the species which multiply most rapidly in milk are entirely harmless, and, in fact, certain fermented milks which contain enormous numbers of lactic acid bacteria are believed by many to be particularly wholen only as a result of insanitary methods or insufficient safeguards in the handling of milk can the large numbers of bacteria sometimes found in market milk be accounted for. It has become the accepted practice that, in general, the presence of large numbers'of ibacteria reects serious doubt upon the sanitary quality and wholesomeness of milk. The National Commission on Milk Standards, for example, specify that for raw milk the bacteria count shall not exceed 10,000 per cubic centimeter at the time of delivery to the consumer. count shall not exceed 200,000 per cubic centimeter in the raw stage, which is reduced to 10,000 per cubic centimeter at the time of delivery` to the customer.
The following resolutions have been adopted bythe National4 Commission on Milk Standards:
Whereas, milk is one of the most perishable foods, being extremely susceptible to contamination and decomposition; whereas the milk consumer is justified in demanding that milk should be clean, fresh, and cold, in addition to having the element of safety; whereas milk lwhich is from healthy cows and is clean, fresh, and which -has been kept cold will always have a low bacterial count; whereas milk that is dirty, stale, `or has been left warm, will have a high bacterial count, therefore it is resolved:
Firstz That the health officer is justified in using` the bacterial count as an indicator of the degree of care exercised by the producer and dealer in securing milk from healthy cows and in keeping the same clean, fresh, and cold.
Second: That the health officer is justified in condemning milk with a high bacterial count as being either unhealthy or decomposed, or containing dirt, filth, or decomposed material as a result of the multiplication of bacteria due to age and temperature.
Thirdz That the health officer is justified in ruling that large numbers of bacteria are a source of possible danger, and that milk containing large numbers of bacteria is to he classed as unwholesome, unless it can be shown that the bacteria present are of a harmless type, as for example, the lactic acid bacteria in buttermilk, or other especially soured milks.
In the dairy industry, various local controlling authorities have imposed rather stringent controls on dairy `farmers and collecting and processing plants, and regular tests, including bacterial counts, are run `on the milk at various stages in the bulk processing. These are on such a scale that large and complex equipment is customary and practical. However, under present conditions of distribution, when the milk has been bottled, tests are no longer made. `If the milk is stored for an unduly long period For pasteurized milk, the 4* Mice of time or has not been kept at a constant low degree of temperature, spoilage or bacteria multiplication may occur, and the consumer has unsafe or spoiled milk on his hands. The retailer has no way of assuring himself that he is sending safe, fresh milk to his customers. From the standpoint of the public authorities, this is an area over which there is no adequate control.
In milk in which an undue amount of bacterial multiplication has occurred, and wherein the milk has passed below the minimum quality for human consumption, it has been found that one of the products generated is carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide, upon contact with moisture, forms the hypothetical acid, carbonic acid. The acid is unstable but will react with potassium hydroxide, or similar bases, and this is measurable. Therefore, milk in a container, which has spoiled, has above the liquid body a substantial excess of carbon dioxide. Tests indicate that milk at the point of spoilage, which has ceased to be fit for human consumption, has a pH of v5.9. In its fresh state, milk has a pH of 6.5 to 6.6.
There is urgent need, therefore, for an indicator for spoilage of milk which will inform the consumer, retailer or the public authorities, without complex tests, the condition of a container of milk. This indicator must be low in cost and practical to apply. Further, the indicator itself must not contaminate the product in any way, and there must be no harmful effect on taste, color or container sealing.
It is an object of the invention to provide a spoilage indicator which may be placed on each milk or food container, and which will indicate at a glance whether the product in the container is lit for human consumption.
, Another object of the invention is to provide a'n indicator for food containers wherein a simple color change will signal that milk or food in the container is nolon'ger fresh, and is probably spoiled.
A further object of the` invention is to provide an indicator which is cheap and economical to make, which may be manufactured and distributed as a finished capsule, and which may be applied to milk or food containers in a simple operation either by hand or by machine.
Still another object of the invenion is to provide a vchemical spoilage indicator which will meet' all sanitary standards of the public health authorities, which will not affect the milk or food as to taste, color and purity, and in which the indicator material is not in direct contact with the milk or food product. i i
With the above and other objects inview, as will. be presently apparent, the invention consists in general f certain novel details of construction and combinations 'of parts hereinafter fully described, illustrated in the accom panying drawings, and particularly claimed. .1
In the accompanying drawings, like' characters of reference indicate like parts in the several views, and
FIGURE 1 is a fragmentary side elevation, partly broken away, showing the spoilage indicator of the invention mounted in the upper top panel of a milk carton;
FIGURE 2 is a fragmentary cross-sectional view of the spoilage indicator as mounted in a cap or top of a standard milk bottle;
FIGURE 3 is a fragmentary view, partly broken away, of a modification of the spoilage indicator, as applied to metallic food containers;
FIGURE 4 is an isometric view of the plastic hat which forms one element of the first form of the invention;
FIGURE 5 is an isometric View of the absorbent indicator disc of the first form of the invention;
FIGURE 6 is an isometric View of the diffusion dis of the first form of the invention;
VWhen formed, this crown has straight side walls 3S.
ace'aote FIGURE 7 is an isometric view of the rear protective plate of the first form of the invention;
FIGURES 8 through 12 show the successive steps linvolved in making the first form of the invention;
FIGURES 13 and 14 show the manner of fixing the spoilage indicator to a food carton;
FIGURE 15 is a cross-sectional View of a modified form adapted for mounting on a metallic container;
FIGURE 16 is a fragmentary view of the hat of FIG- URE 4, showing the manner in which the edges may be crimped, if desired, when forming the hat, to take up excess material.
In the drawings, FIGURES l and 2 show one form of the invention as applied to two different types of milk containers. In FIGURE 1, the carton C represents a standard, folded blank, -wax impregnated milk carton. When closed and sealed, as .shown in FIGURE 1, the carton contains milk up to approximately the top of the side wall panel. The peak or roof then forms an air space above the liuid level. The indicator capsule of the present invention is set into a circular aperture 32 formed in the roof panel 31 of the carton. In FIGURE 2, the indicator capsule is shown applied to a standard glass bottle B provided with disc cap 33. The indicator is mounted in a circular aperture 34 cut into the disc cap. It will be noted that normally the iiuid level of the milk M is kept slightly below the top of the bottle B. In a similar manner, the indicator could be mounted in the standard crimped cap of a milk bottle.
The specific details of the indicator capsule and the manner of making the same are best shown in FIGURES 4 through 14 of the drawings. The main part of the indicator is a circular plastic element 35 called a hat This hat comprises a circular tiange and a crown 37. In the crown is placed the indicator disc 39 of soft absorbent material. Certain chemicals are applied which render the disc capable of indicating spoilage. These will be discussed more in detail in a succeeding part of this disclosure.
As shown in FIGURE 1l, a diffusion disc 40 of porous parchment paper is placed upon the flange 36 of the hat. This disc, preferably smaller than the hat, must be capable of gas porosity but must retain excellent wet strength after intimate contact with water and be impermeable to water or other larger molecules.
yOne suitable paper for this disc was found to be a parchment paper identified in the trade as Patapar 27-81T. In a test for water retention or impermeability, this paper was draped over glass and water placed in the pocket so formed. After a period of two weeks, water had not passed through the parchment into the glass. In actual tests in an asembled unit, this paper demon- `strated excellent ability to pass gas molecules by diffu- -sion. If desired, a suitable nontoxic thermosetting cement 41 can be placed between the disc titl and flange 36 in order to provide an absolute water seal.
A protective backing 42 of plastic is then placed over the disc 40 and is larger than said disc. The backing is provided with perforations 43 so that the spoilage gas will have access to the diffusion disc. This protective backing is sealed to the flange 36 of the hat by an adhesive 44 or by any known heat sealing method for plastics.
As thus formed, the capsule is complete and ready for application to the container. As shown in FIG- URES 13 and 14, the crown 37 of the hat 35 is placed through the aperture 32 in the panel 31, which aperture is the same size as the crown. The carton and unit are then placed between the press jaws 45 and 46 which are suitablyheated Pressure forces the softened plastic d indicator capsule in place and also makes a proper seal so as to maintain the carton liquid proof and dirt proof.
A modification is shown in FIGURES 3 and 15, where in the capsule may be applied to metallic containers. The unit 4S is made of light metal having flange 49 and crown 50. A synthetic plastic or glass window 51 is set into the crown. The unit contains the absorbent disc insert 52 and the diffusion disc 53. A perforated protective backing 54 is soldered to the -llange 49. The unit 48 may be applied to the can K in the same manner as shown for the plastic unit in FIGURES 13 and 14, and if a tighter seal is desired, solder 55 may be app`ied. If desired, the pressure step may be eliminated and the undeformed crown soldered or brazed to the can.
A modification of the invention is found in FIGURES 17 through 2.0. In this form, the application of the capsule in a dairy or food processing plant is simpler, requiring less complicated machinery. The basic part of the capsule is a stud 56 which has an annular groove 57 adjacent the inner end. This stud also has a iiange 5S, the flange being recessed to define an annular shoulder 59.
On the shoulder 59 is placed the diffusion disc 60 of parchment paper. Overlying the diffusion disc is an absorbent pad 61 for the indicator chemical. An outer window 62 is fastened to the flange 58 by cement 63 or by heat sealing means.
For cooperating with the stud S6 is a cup 64. This cup has an outwardly turned flange 65 and an inwardly directed annular rib. The end wall 67 of the cup has perforations 68. When assembled, the stud 56 is inserted through an aperture '70 in the panel 69. The cup 64 is placed over the stud and the two pushed together. The rib 66 snaps into the groove 57 and the liang'es 65 and 58 grip the edge of the carton aperture. The 'resilience of the synthetic plastic material, which is preferably used, causes the panel 69 to be tightly gripped.
INDICATOR DISC The indicator disc, as pointed out above, is of porous paper. One type of paper found to be successful is No. 4 Whatman filter paper. A weak solution of an alkaline material, such as potassium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide,- ammonium hydroxide or sodium hydroxide, is made and in this is placed a suitable quantity of an indicator dye. These quantities and concentrations are adjusted so that the indicator turning point occurs approximately at the souring point of milk. When basic, the indicator dye is preferably colorless. The disc is saturated to wetness with the solution, and such disc is then sealed in the capsule.
Various indicator dyes may be used. Twelve indicators having a pH range of 11.0` to 14.0 were tested. These were: alizarin blue S, alkali blue, anilin blue WS, clayton yellow, alkali orange, alkali purple, fuchsine acid, indigo Carmine, malachite green, methyl blue, orange G and poirrier blue. Of those tested, fuchsine acid provided the sharpest contrast in changing from basic to acidic, and moved quickly into solution.
Tests with milk samples have been made, and two tests are reported as follows:
Test No. 1
Four indicator packets were made according to the following. Fuchsine acid changes at a pH of about 12, so an 0.2 N K OH solution was used as a starting point.
' Sample N o. Base and (or) acid Amount Fuchsine Acid Il* drops KOH (.206 N.) 3 drops KOH (.206 N.)
4 drops KOH l1 drop 0.106 N HC1 48 mg. fuchsine acid. 50 mg. fuchsine acid.
fi mg. fuehsine acid.
54 mg. fuchsine acid.
Test N o. 2
To check uniformity of Test No. 1, a second test was set up. In this test, four samples were also run n half pint bottles.
(l) 4 drops 0.206 N KOH, 48 mg. fuchsine acid (2) 4 drops N KOH, 5l mg. fuchsine acid (3) 4 drops N KOH, 1 drop .106y N HC1, 53 mg. fuchsine acid (4) Same as No. 3, 49 mg. fuchsine acid Results.--All four of these changed quite near to souring point. No. 4 changed quickest of all but was very close to l, 2 and 3.
Tests No. 1 and 2 indicate that 0.206I N KOH-fuchsine is very close to the correct concentration.
OPERATION All modifications of the indicator work in substantially the same manner. The indicator unit is positioned above the contents level. If spoilage occurs, as in the case of milk, carbon dioxide is formed. This gas occupies the air space above the fluid and the small light molecules of the gas move through the perforations and work by diffusion through the diffusion disc 40. The CO2 is absorbed by the wet indicator disc and carbonio acid is formed. This is unstable, but it will change the indicator` dye from base to acid to elect a color change from colorless to pink to red. The color change, viewed through the crown 37, indicates spoilage. Water in the milk or food cannot pass through the diffusion disc, nor can the large dye molecules or the potassium hydroxide, or other base, work back through said difusion disc to contaminate the carton contents.
The indicator capsule can be easily applied to any standard carton or cap, as a preassembled unit.
While there is herein shown and described the preferred embodiment of the invention, it is nevertheless to be understood that minor changes may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as claimed.
What is claimed is:
1. The combination with a walled food container of a spoilage indicator including a transparent window mounted in a wall of said container, an indicator element positioned in said container behind said window, a diiusion sheet behind said indicator element, said diffusion sheet being unidirectionally permeable to gases but impermeable to liquids and solids, said diffusion sheet further being attached to said window along its marginal edges, whereby said indicator element is sealed between said sheet and said window, said indicator element including a color changing chemical substance reactive to gases in said container resulting from the spoilage of food in said container, whereby said substance when spoilage occurs undergoes a color change observable through said window.
2. The combination with a walled food container of a spoilage indicator including a transparent window mounted in a wall of said container, an indicator element positioned in said container behind said window, a diifusion sheet behind said indicator element, said dilusion sheet being unidirectionally permeable to gases but impermeable to liquids and solids, said diffusion sheet further being attached to said window along its marginal edges, whereby 6 said indicator element is sealed between said sheet and said window, said indicator element including a solution of an alkaline material and an acid-reacting indicator dye and being reactive to gases in the container resulting from the spoilage of food therein, whereby .a color change is produced which is observable through said window.
3. The combination with a walled food container of a spoilage indicator including a transparent window mounted in a wall of said container, an absorbent indicator mass positioned in said container behind said window, a diffusion sheet behind said indicator mass, said diffusion sheet being unidirectionally permeable to gases but impermeable to liquids and solids, said diffusion sheet further being attached to said window at its marginal edges whereby said indicator mass is sealed between said sheet and said window, said indicator mass having a color changing chemical substance absorbed therein reactive to gases in said container resulting from the spoilage of food in said container, whereby said substance when spoilage occurs undergoes a color change observable through said window.
4. The combination of claim l wherein said spoilage indicator further includes a perforated protective sheet behind and covering said diifusion sheet wherein said sheet is protected against damage from the fluid contents of the container.
5. The combination with a walled food container of a spoilage indicator capsule, said capsule including a cupshaped window projecting through an opening in a wall of said container, said cup-shaped window being pressed down to form an annular bead gripping the marginal edge of said opening, an indicator element positioned in said container behind said window, a diffusion sheet behind said indicator element, said diffusion sheet being unidirectionally permeable to gases but impermeable to liquids and solids, said diffusion sheet further being attached to said window at its marginal edges whereby said indicator element is sealed between said sheet and said window, said indicator element including a color-changing chemical substance reactive to gases in said container resulting from the spoilage of food in said container, whereby said substance when spoilage occurs undergoes a color change observable through said window.
6. The combination of claim 5 wherein said spoilage indicator capsule further includes a perforated protective sheet behind and covering said diifusion sheet wherein said sheet is protected against damage from the fluid contents of the container.
7. A spoilage indicator capsule for food containers, including a cup-shaped window having an outwardly directed marginal flange, an indicator element in said cup-shaped window, a diifusion sheet covering the open end of said cup and secured to said flange, said diifusion sheet being unidirectionally permeable to gases but impermeable to liquids and solids, and a perforated protective sheet covering said diffusion sheet.
8. A spoilage indicator capsule for food containers including a cup-shaped window having an outwardly directed marginal flange, an indicator element in said cupshaped window, a diffusion sheet covering the open end of said cup and secured to said ange, said diffusion sheet being unidirectionally permeable to gases but impermeable to liquids and solids, said sheet being smaller than said cup-shaped window, and a perforated protective sheet and covering said difusion sheet having Iits marginal edges secured to said flange.
9. A spoilage indicator capsule for food containers including a cup-shaped window having an outwardly directed marginal flange, an absorbent indicator element in said cup-shaped window, said element being wetted with a solution of an alkaline material and an acid-reacting indicator dye, a diffusion sheet covering the open end of said cup and secured to said ange, said diffusion sheet being unidirectionally permeable to gases but impermeable 7 to liquidsA and solids, and a perforated protectivesheet covering theV diffusionsheet.
10. A spoilage indicator capsule for food containers including a hollow stud, a iiange on the outer end of said stud dening an inwardly directed annular shoulder, a recess in the outer face of said ange dening an outwardly directed annular shoulder, a dilusion sheet on said shoulder, said diffusion sheet being unidirectionally permeable to gases but impermeable to liquids and solids, a color changing indicator element outwardly of said diiusion sheet, a window covering said indicator element, said window being secured to said ange, and a perforated, cup-shaped cap member receiving the inner end of said stud.
11. A spoilage indicator as set forth in claim 10, wherein said cap member and said-stud member have interlocking `rib means for securing them in assembled position.
12. A spoilage indicator capsule for food containers including a frame, a color changing indicator element mountedv on said frame, said element being sealed between an outer transparent window and an inner diffusion sheet, said diffusion sheet being unidirectionally permeable to gases but impermeable to liquids and solids, a hollow stud projecting from said frame, the bore of said stud leading to said diiusion sheet, and a cup-shaped clamping member tightly receiving said stud.
13. The combination with a walled food container of a spoilage indicator capsule, said capsule including a frame positioned over an opening in said container, a
color-changing indicatorelement mounted on said frame, said element being sealed between an outer transparent window and an inner diiusion sheet, said diffusion sheet being unidirectionally permeableV to gases but impermeable to liquids and solids, ya hollow stud projecting from said frame, the bore of said stud leading to said diffusion sheet, and a clamping ring tightly received by said stud, said frame and said ring forming opposed jaws clamping the marginal edge of the opening in said container.
14. A spoilag'e indicator capsule for food containers, including a transparent facing, a color changing spoilage indicator element positioned behind and adjacent said facing, a diffusion sheet covering said indicator element in opposed relation to said facing and having its marginal edges in tightly sealed relationship with said transparent facing, said diffusion sheet being unidirectionally permeable to gases but impermeable to liquids and solids.
References Cited in the le of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,567,445 Parker Sept. 11, 1951 2,785,057 Schwab U. Mar. 12, 1957 3,000,706 Royce Sept. 19, 191611 FOREIGN PATENTS 631,482 Great ,Britain Nov. 3, 1949
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2567445 *||21 Aug 1946||11 Sep 1951||Elizabeth W Parker||Method of measuring the ph of aqueous liquids, moist foodstuffs, and the like|
|US2785057 *||8 Dec 1953||12 Mar 1957||Union Central Life Insurance C||Device for testing liquids|
|US3000706 *||17 Apr 1959||19 Sep 1961||Boots Pure Drug Co Ltd||Control of bacteriological sterilisation|
|GB631482A *||Title not available|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3177843 *||13 Feb 1964||13 Apr 1965||Robert S Geocaris||Frozen food indicator|
|US3198163 *||13 Feb 1963||3 Aug 1965||Cadillac Products||Indicator device|
|US3268345 *||30 Mar 1962||23 Aug 1966||Jr Merritt T Kennedy||Tell-tale devices containing pasty fermentable body for refrigerated package goods|
|US3420205 *||23 Mar 1966||7 Jan 1969||Miles Lab||Indicating device|
|US3786777 *||31 Dec 1970||22 Jan 1974||Artech Corp||Irreversible warm-up indicator|
|US3826221 *||13 Jun 1972||30 Jul 1974||Evans Medical Ltd||Closures for containers|
|US3890955 *||15 Jan 1974||24 Jun 1975||Elliott Angelika||Vacuum indicator|
|US3966414 *||16 Jan 1974||29 Jun 1976||Bio-Medical Sciences, Inc.||Time temperature indicators|
|US4003709 *||2 Oct 1975||18 Jan 1977||Visual Spoilage Indicator Company||Visual spoilage indicator for food containers|
|US4169811 *||15 Mar 1978||2 Oct 1979||Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Co., Inc.||Oxygen indicator|
|US4178499 *||21 Sep 1977||11 Dec 1979||Rincon Industries, Inc.||Heating unit indicator for disinfecting soft lenses, or the like|
|US4285697 *||26 Sep 1978||25 Aug 1981||Neary Michael P||Food spoilage indicator|
|US4526752 *||16 Dec 1982||2 Jul 1985||Daniel Perlman||Oxygen indicator for packaging|
|US4654309 *||9 Apr 1985||31 Mar 1987||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Co.||Test method and article for estimating the concentration of free acid in liquid|
|US4655763 *||30 Apr 1984||7 Apr 1987||Nutrapack, Inc.||Testing and dispensing apparatus for an enteral feeding system|
|US4728499 *||13 Aug 1986||1 Mar 1988||Fehder Carl G||Carbon dioxide indicator device|
|US4738823 *||7 Aug 1986||19 Apr 1988||Miles Laboratories, Inc.||Test strip with adjustable sample absorption capacity|
|US4746616 *||16 Jul 1986||24 May 1988||The Board Of Regents Of The University Of Washington||Method of treating a consumable product and packaging for consumable products to indicate the presence of contamination|
|US4945060 *||15 Mar 1988||31 Jul 1990||Akzo N. V.||Device for detecting microorganisms|
|US5094955 *||15 Feb 1990||10 Mar 1992||Akzo N.V.||Device and method for detecting microorganisms|
|US5162229 *||19 Jul 1991||10 Nov 1992||Akzo N.V.||Device and method for enhanced recovery and detection of microbial growth in the presence of antimicrobial substances|
|US5164796 *||1 Feb 1991||17 Nov 1992||Akzo N.V.||Apparatus and method for detection of microorganisms|
|US5217876 *||7 Apr 1992||8 Jun 1993||Akzo N.V.||Method for detecting microorganisms|
|US5306466 *||19 May 1993||26 Apr 1994||California South Pacific Investors||Detection of contaminants in food|
|US5407829 *||29 Jun 1993||18 Apr 1995||Avl Medical Instruments Ag||Method for quality control of packaged organic substances and packaging material for use with this method|
|US5518895 *||24 Mar 1995||21 May 1996||Akzo N.V.||Device for detecting microorganisms using piezoelectric means|
|US5653941 *||29 Jul 1996||5 Aug 1997||Veretto; Bobby||Food spoilage detector|
|US5749358 *||10 Oct 1996||12 May 1998||Nellcor Puritan Bennett Incorporated||Resuscitator bag exhaust port with CO2 indicator|
|US5839592 *||9 Jun 1995||24 Nov 1998||Anchor Hocking Packaging Co.||Plastic closure|
|US5856175 *||21 May 1996||5 Jan 1999||Akzo Nobel N.V.||Device for detecting microorganisms|
|US5858769 *||15 May 1996||12 Jan 1999||Akzo Nobel N.V.||Device for detecting microorganisms|
|US5869341 *||31 Mar 1998||9 Feb 1999||California South Pacific Investors||Detection of contaminants in food|
|US6270724||7 Apr 1999||7 Aug 2001||California South Pacific Investors||Detection of contaminants in food|
|US6325974 *||7 Nov 1997||4 Dec 2001||Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus||Package for decayable foodstuffs|
|US6376204||17 Apr 2000||23 Apr 2002||Toxin Alert, Inc.||Method and apparatus for selective biological material detection|
|US6379908||17 Apr 2000||30 Apr 2002||Toxin Alert, Inc.||Method and apparatus for selective biological material detection|
|US6428748||31 Jan 2001||6 Aug 2002||Grouptek, Inc.||Apparatus and method of monitoring an analyte|
|US6479016||24 Jul 2000||12 Nov 2002||California South Pacific Investors||Dual bar code for food contamination detection|
|US6576474||5 Aug 2002||10 Jun 2003||Grouptek, Inc.||Apparatus and method of monitoring an analyte|
|US6593142 *||9 Apr 2001||15 Jul 2003||The Johns Hopkins University||Polymeric food spoilage sensor|
|US6692973||28 Nov 2000||17 Feb 2004||Toxin Alert, Inc.||Surface binding of an immunoglobulin to a flexible polymer using a water soluble varnish matrix|
|US6696264||17 Apr 2001||24 Feb 2004||Toxin Alert, Inc.||Method and apparatus for detection of multiple biological materials with a heterogeneous antibody mixture|
|US6794191 *||25 Jun 2001||21 Sep 2004||Photonic Systems||Process for forming polymer structures containing an oxygen sensor|
|US6841392||15 Aug 2001||11 Jan 2005||Toxin Alert, Inc.||Method and apparatus for selective biological material detection|
|US6866832||20 Dec 2001||15 Mar 2005||Safefresh Technologies, Llc||Method and apparatus for sanitizing perishable goods in enclosed conduits|
|US6924147||15 Jul 2003||2 Aug 2005||The Johns Hopkins University||Method of making a polymeric food spoilage sensor|
|US6929008||8 Oct 2002||16 Aug 2005||Vital Signs, Inc.||Carbon dioxide indicating apparatus, particularly, disk-like carbon dioxide indicating apparatus|
|US7017578||4 Nov 2004||28 Mar 2006||Tresnak Rick J||Endotracheal tube system and method of use|
|US7066914||16 Mar 2005||27 Jun 2006||Bird Products Corporation||Catheter having a tip with an elongated collar|
|US7093734||7 Mar 2003||22 Aug 2006||Safefresh Technologies, Llc||Tray with side recesses and channels for gas transfer|
|US7107928||12 May 2004||19 Sep 2006||Ball Corporation||Selectively deformable container end closure|
|US7140370||21 Apr 2004||28 Nov 2006||Chrickemil, L.L.C.||Endotracheal tube system and method of use|
|US7156597||11 Feb 2003||2 Jan 2007||Sira Technologies, Inc.||Contamination detection system|
|US7157048||11 Feb 2003||2 Jan 2007||Sira Technologies, Inc.||Detection of contaminants|
|US7205016||7 Mar 2003||17 Apr 2007||Safefresh Technologies, Llc||Packages and methods for processing food products|
|US7246622 *||26 Aug 2004||24 Jul 2007||Vital Signs, Inc.||Carbon dioxide indicating apparatus, particularly, disk-like carbon dioxide indicating apparatus|
|US7319038 *||17 Sep 2003||15 Jan 2008||The Johns Hopkins University||Sensor for monitoring an analyte|
|US7415428||14 Feb 2003||19 Aug 2008||Safefresh Technologies, Llc||Processing meat products responsive to customer orders|
|US7575770||14 Feb 2003||18 Aug 2009||Safefresh Technologies, Llc||Continuous production and packaging of perishable goods in low oxygen environments|
|US7811276||20 Feb 2009||12 Oct 2010||Nellcor Puritan Bennett Llc||Medical sensor and technique for using the same|
|US7976518||13 Jan 2005||12 Jul 2011||Corpak Medsystems, Inc.||Tubing assembly and signal generator placement control device and method for use with catheter guidance systems|
|US7992561||25 Sep 2006||9 Aug 2011||Nellcor Puritan Bennett Llc||Carbon dioxide-sensing airway products and technique for using the same|
|US8012521||26 Oct 2006||6 Sep 2011||Safefresh Technologies, Llc||Method for controlling water content with decontamination in meats|
|US8062221||30 Sep 2005||22 Nov 2011||Nellcor Puritan Bennett Llc||Sensor for tissue gas detection and technique for using the same|
|US8109272||25 Sep 2006||7 Feb 2012||Nellcor Puritan Bennett Llc||Carbon dioxide-sensing airway products and technique for using the same|
|US8128574||25 Sep 2006||6 Mar 2012||Nellcor Puritan Bennett Llc||Carbon dioxide-sensing airway products and technique for using the same|
|US8396524||27 Sep 2006||12 Mar 2013||Covidien Lp||Medical sensor and technique for using the same|
|US8420405||25 Sep 2006||16 Apr 2013||Covidien Lp||Carbon dioxide detector having borosilicate substrate|
|US8431087||25 Sep 2006||30 Apr 2013||Covidien Lp||Carbon dioxide detector having borosilicate substrate|
|US8431088||25 Sep 2006||30 Apr 2013||Covidien Lp||Carbon dioxide detector having borosilicate substrate|
|US8449834||25 Sep 2006||28 May 2013||Covidien Lp||Carbon dioxide detector having borosilicate substrate|
|US8454526||25 Sep 2006||4 Jun 2013||Covidien Lp||Carbon dioxide-sensing airway products and technique for using the same|
|US9028441||7 Sep 2012||12 May 2015||Corpak Medsystems, Inc.||Apparatus and method used with guidance system for feeding and suctioning|
|US9121827 *||30 Jun 2011||1 Sep 2015||Mocon, Inc.||Method of contemporaneously monitoring changes in analyte concentration in a plurality of samples on individual schedules|
|US9131956||2 Jun 2011||15 Sep 2015||Corpak Medsystems, Inc.||Tubing assembly and signal generator placement control device and method for use with catheter guidance systems|
|US20040014235 *||15 Jul 2003||22 Jan 2004||Kelly Craig A.||Polymeric food spoilage sensor|
|US20040018640 *||11 Feb 2003||29 Jan 2004||Goldsmith Robert M.||Contamination detection system|
|US20040018641 *||11 Feb 2003||29 Jan 2004||Goldsmith Robert M.||Detection of contaminants|
|US20040072359 *||17 Sep 2003||15 Apr 2004||Southard Glen E.||Sensor for monitoring an analyte|
|US20040115319 *||10 Sep 2003||17 Jun 2004||Agcert International, Llc||Food-borne pathogen and spoilage detection device and method|
|US20040241789 *||12 May 2004||2 Dec 2004||Chasteen Howard C.||Selectively deformable container end closure|
|US20040265440 *||12 Mar 2004||30 Dec 2004||Agcert International, Llc||Food borne pathogen sensor and method|
|US20050016543 *||26 Aug 2004||27 Jan 2005||Vital Signs Inc.||Carbon dioxide indicating apparatus, particularly, disk-like carbon dioxide indicating apparatus|
|US20050153052 *||13 Jan 2004||14 Jul 2005||The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc.||Food and beverage quality sensor|
|US20050235997 *||4 Nov 2004||27 Oct 2005||Tresnak Rick J||Endotracheal tube system and method of use|
|US20050235998 *||28 Apr 2005||27 Oct 2005||Tresnak Rick J||Endotracheal tube system and method of use|
|US20060057022 *||13 Sep 2005||16 Mar 2006||Williams John R||Food quality indicator|
|US20060078658 *||4 Oct 2005||13 Apr 2006||Owens Megan M||Food quality sensor and methods thereof|
|US20060121165 *||6 Dec 2005||8 Jun 2006||Morris Roger J||Food freshness sensor|
|US20070254074 *||26 Oct 2006||1 Nov 2007||Safefresh Technologies, Llc||Method for controlling water content with decontamination in meats|
|US20130005046 *||30 Jun 2011||3 Jan 2013||Mayer Daniel W||Method of contemporaneously monitoring changes in analyte concentration in a plurality of samples on individual schedules|
|US20160054050 *||12 Aug 2015||25 Feb 2016||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Storage container and refrigerator having the same|
|USRE34515 *||24 Dec 1991||18 Jan 1994||Pymah Corporation||Steam sterilization indicator|
|DE19910962A1 *||12 Mar 1999||14 Sep 2000||Joachim Barzik||Plastic tub internal detector responds to pH changes in yoghurt tub and visible through transparent inspection window|
|EP0890835A1 *||9 Jul 1997||13 Jan 1999||Franke, Michael, Dr.||Indicator and method for identifying that milk as sealably contained has become sour|
|WO1982002251A1 *||9 Nov 1981||8 Jul 1982||Mining & Mfg Minnesota||Method and article for determining free acid concentration in liquid|
|WO1999002984A1 *||9 Jul 1998||21 Jan 1999||Franke, Michael||Indicator and method for identifying that milk as sealably contained has become sour|
|WO2001053826A1 *||17 Jan 2001||26 Jul 2001||Sira Technologies||Food contamination detection system for vacuum packaged food products|
|WO2002044026A1 *||28 Nov 2001||6 Jun 2002||Safefresh Technologies, Llc||Continuous production and packaging of perishable goods in low oxygen environments|
|WO2003016858A2 *||1 Apr 2002||27 Feb 2003||Toxin Alert, Inc.||Method and apparatus for selective biological material detection|
|WO2003016858A3 *||1 Apr 2002||11 Mar 2004||Toxin Alert Inc||Method and apparatus for selective biological material detection|
|WO2004025254A2 *||10 Sep 2003||25 Mar 2004||Agcert International, Llc||Food-borne pathogen and spoilage detection device and method|
|WO2004025254A3 *||10 Sep 2003||7 Oct 2004||Agcert International Llc||Food-borne pathogen and spoilage detection device and method|
|WO2005080964A1 *||14 Feb 2005||1 Sep 2005||Peters Daniel F||Food product condition indicator label|
|WO2005095635A1 *||15 Mar 2004||13 Oct 2005||Freshcert, Llc||Food borne pathogen sensor and method|