US20110307296A1 - Data Distribution Method and System - Google Patents

Data Distribution Method and System Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20110307296A1
US20110307296A1 US13/162,245 US201113162245A US2011307296A1 US 20110307296 A1 US20110307296 A1 US 20110307296A1 US 201113162245 A US201113162245 A US 201113162245A US 2011307296 A1 US2011307296 A1 US 2011307296A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
vehicle
dealer
vehicles
sales
make
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/162,245
Inventor
Stephen A. Hall
David G. Javdan
Robert B. Moore
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Landmark NV-S Ventures Group Inc
Original Assignee
Landmark NV-S Ventures Group Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Landmark NV-S Ventures Group Inc filed Critical Landmark NV-S Ventures Group Inc
Priority to US13/162,245 priority Critical patent/US20110307296A1/en
Assigned to PRICEDRIVE, INC. reassignment PRICEDRIVE, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: HALL, STEPHEN A., JAVDAN, DAVID G., MOORE, ROBERT B.
Assigned to LANDMARK VENTURES I, L.L.C. reassignment LANDMARK VENTURES I, L.L.C. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: PRICEDRIVE, INC.
Assigned to LANDMARK NV VENTURES GROUP, INC. reassignment LANDMARK NV VENTURES GROUP, INC. MERGER (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: LANDMARK VENTURES I, L.L.C.
Assigned to LANDMARK NV-S VENTURES GROUP, INC. reassignment LANDMARK NV-S VENTURES GROUP, INC. MERGER (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: LANDMARK NV VENTURES GROUP, INC.
Publication of US20110307296A1 publication Critical patent/US20110307296A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/04Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem"
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0637Strategic management or analysis, e.g. setting a goal or target of an organisation; Planning actions based on goals; Analysis or evaluation of effectiveness of goals
    • G06Q10/06375Prediction of business process outcome or impact based on a proposed change
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/08Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
    • G06Q10/087Inventory or stock management, e.g. order filling, procurement or balancing against orders
    • G06Q10/0875Itemisation or classification of parts, supplies or services, e.g. bill of materials
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G06Q30/0201Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G06Q30/0201Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
    • G06Q30/0202Market predictions or forecasting for commercial activities
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G06Q30/0201Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
    • G06Q30/0204Market segmentation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisements
    • G06Q30/0273Determination of fees for advertising
    • G06Q30/0275Auctions
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/0601Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
    • G06Q30/0611Request for offers or quotes
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/08Auctions
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
    • G06Q40/03Credit; Loans; Processing thereof
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
    • G06Q40/04Trading; Exchange, e.g. stocks, commodities, derivatives or currency exchange
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10Services
    • G06Q50/16Real estate

Definitions

  • the present invention generally relates to E-Commerce, and more specifically, to apparatuses, systems, and methods for distributing data.
  • TCP Transmission Control Protocol
  • IP Internet Protocol
  • the Web generally operates on a client/server model; that is, a user (e.g., a client) runs a piece of software on his/her personal computer to use the resources of a host (e.g., a server computer).
  • a host e.g., a server computer.
  • the host allows many different users to access its resources at the same time and need not be dedicated to providing resources to a single user.
  • the client software e.g., a browser
  • runs on the user's computer which contacts a Web server and requests information or resources.
  • the Web server locates and then sends the information or resources to the browser, which displays the results on the user's computer by interpreting the received Hypertext Markup Language (HTML) document.
  • HTML Hypertext Markup Language
  • the addressee reference information on the Web is known as the Uniform Resource Locator (URL).
  • a user's browser sends the URL using the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), which defines the way the browser and the Web server communicate with each other.
  • HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol
  • the server finds the requested document, it sends the document back to the user's browser.
  • the information is then presented to the user via the user's computer.
  • the user requests the services of the host, which may involve searching for information and sending it back to the user by querying a database on the Web, delivering requested Web pages, or doing business on-line.
  • An embodiment of the invention relates to a method for distributing data among users of the web site (including, e.g., automotive dealers, manufacturers, fleet lease companies), or anyone who may have a use for such data.
  • the method of the invention comprises selecting the data from the dealers, processing the data, and providing the processed data to the dealers while maintaining confidentiality of individual data of each automotive dealer.
  • the selecting of the data may include collecting data indicating, for example, which vehicles are in demand.
  • the data for vehicles may include a vehicle's make, a number of a vehicle's make a dealer has in stock, a vehicle identification number, a vehicle's year, a vehicle's model, a vehicle's body style, a vehicle's color, a vehicle's mileage, a vehicle's retail asking price, a vehicle's transactions cost, a vehicle's reconditioning cost, a vehicle's age, a vehicle's selling price, a vehicle's gross profit, an acquisition need of a vehicle, a selling need of a vehicle, a vehicle's image, a vehicle's turnover rate, or an aggregate of any of the above-listed data.
  • the shared data of the invention may enable dealers to improve return on investments (ROIs).
  • the invention may optionally create online trading communities, provide real-time market information, as well as access to a broader market of prospective buyers and sellers who are in need of the vehicles.
  • the invention may also allow dealers to provide each other with any product for which they have a desire for, and notify each other if the product becomes available.
  • an appraisal of the product may be provided on a web site.
  • the invention may earn revenue by charging member participants fees for usage of its services (e.g., based on a flat rate over a period of time or a per-vehicle rate), as well as earning fees from lenders, insurance companies, transportation companies, and the sales of market information to third parties.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram of a computer network representing an exemplary web site
  • FIG. 2 is a screenshot of a main menu including a “To Do List” category of the main menu of an exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 3( a ) is a screenshot listing vehicles for “Wholesale Today”, which is a link to a screenshot listing a dealership's vehicles under the “Wholesale Center” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 3( b ) is a screenshot showing “Wholesale Center Offers” under the “Wholesale Center” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 3( c ) is a screenshot showing how to “Make Your Offer” under the “Wholesale Center 7 ” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 4 is a screenshot of “Retail Sales Trend”, which is a link from “Review Retail Purchase Needs” under the “To Do List” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 5 is a screenshot of “Vehicles Near[ing] Wholesale Center Move Date (3 Days)”, which is a link from “Retail Today” under the “To Do List” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 6 is a screenshot showing “Vehicles to Watch” under the “To Do List” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 7 is a screenshot showing review wholesale “Purchase Offers” under the “To Do List” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 8 is a screenshot listing vehicles that are “Consider[ed] for Wholesale Center” under the “To Do List” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 9 is a screenshot listing “Wholesale Vehicles Needing Description”, which is a link from “Add Wholesale Description” under the “To Do List” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 10 is a screenshot of the “Action Plan” under the “To Do List” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 11 is a screenshot showing “Activity Summary for Baltimore-Washington Vehicles”, which is a link from “Review Activity Summary” under the “To Do List” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 12 is a screenshot of a “Retail Inventory Value Report” under the “Daily Reports” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 13 is a screenshot of a “Market Performance by Make and Model” report under the “Daily Reports” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 14 is a screenshot of an “Available Inventory Report” under the “Daily Reports” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 15 is a screenshot of a “Top Performing Vehicles” report under the “Daily Reports” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 16( a ) is a screenshot of an “Appraisal Activity” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 16( b ) is a screenshot showing how to place a vehicle to be appraised under the “Appraisal Activity” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 16( c ) is a screenshot showing a vehicle placed under an Appraisal Activity list of the exemplary web site
  • FIG. 17( a ) is a screenshot of a “Buy List” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site.
  • FIG. 17( b ) is a screenshot showing how to “Add [Vehicles] to [the] Buy List” under the “Buy List” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site.
  • the invention is directed to apparatuses, systems and methods for distributing data among dealers.
  • one of the most important factors in profitability is the efficiency with which vehicles are bought and sold.
  • the profit margin on every vehicle is reduced by cost incurred from depreciation, interest, repairs, and floor planning.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating one exemplary computer network on which an apparatus, system, and method for distributing data among dealers can be implemented.
  • sharing vehicle data with other dealers provides each dealer the ability to identify which dealers in a region have an immediate need for vehicles that they want to sell right away.
  • the ability to find and purchase the most desirable and available used vehicles as well as locate prospective retail customers in their region for specific vehicles give them a competitive financial advantage.
  • a computer network 100 representing an exemplary web site may include a first router 110 , a load balancing device 120 , front-end Web servers 140 a and 140 b , a second router 150 , clustered back-end servers 160 a and 160 b , an external data storage device 170 , a Wireless Protocol (WAP) server 180 , intelligence servers 190 a and 190 b , and a voice recognition server 195 .
  • the first router 110 allows communication between the web site and a publicly accessible network such as the Internet 130 .
  • the first router 110 is coupled to the load balancing device 120 , which is coupled to the front-end Web servers 140 a and 140 b (which mirror each other for fail-over routing), and the WAP server 180 .
  • the load balancing device 120 operates to balance data load and to direct data to the front-end Web servers 140 a and/or 140 b .
  • the front-end Web servers 140 a and 140 b operate to provide a user with requested information, and the WAP server 180 provides wireless capabilities to users as further described below.
  • the frontend Web servers 140 a and 140 b and the WAP server 180 are coupled to the second router 150 .
  • the second router 150 operates to connect the front-end Web servers 140 a and 140 b and the WAP server 180 to the clustered back-end servers 160 a and 160 b and to the intelligence servers 190 a and 190 b .
  • the clustered back-end servers 160 a and 160 b operate to process requests for data that is transactional in nature, while the intelligence servers 190 a and 190 b operate to process requests for data that is non-transactional or historical in nature. Of course, servers 160 a and 160 b could also process requests for data that is non-transactional or historical in nature eliminating the need for servers 190 a and 190 b .
  • the clustered back-end servers 160 a and 160 b are coupled to the external data storage device 170 , which stores users' data or information to be processed.
  • An example of the first and second routers 110 and 150 are CISCOC® routers.
  • the computer network 100 may provide for Web usage, WAP usage, voice recognition usage, pushing data, and other foreseeable functions as further discussed below.
  • the session e.g. general site navigation, page-to-page, etc.
  • the data is collected from the external data storage device 170 and is processed through the clustered back-end servers 160 a and/or 160 b .
  • the processed data is then returned to the user at the front-end Web servers 140 a and/or 140 b .
  • the data is processed via the intelligence servers 190 a and/or 190 b .
  • the intelligence servers 190 a and/or 190 b grab data from the external data storage device 170 through the clustered back-end servers 160 a and/or 160 b and process the request.
  • the intelligence servers 190 a and/or 190 b then send the processed request results (non-transactional or historical data) to the user at the front-end Web servers 140 a and/or 140 b.
  • the data When a user accesses the system through a WAP device, the data is transferred through the Internet 130 and the first router 110 to the WAP server 180 .
  • the session resides on the WAP server 180 .
  • Requested data is collected from the external data storage device 170 and is processed through the clustered back-end servers 160 a and/or 160 b .
  • the processed data is then returned to the user through the WAP server 180 .
  • the session would reside on the voice recognition server 195 .
  • the data is collected from the external data storage device 170 and is processed through the clustered backend servers 160 a and/or 160 b . The processed data is then returned to the user through voice recognition server 195 .
  • a user With WAP or telephone access, a user is able to perform many of the functions described below relative to access over the Internet. Such functions include locating vehicles; adding, modifying or deleting vehicles to/in/from the inventory; or monitoring recent transactions (e.g., last 24 hours).
  • any information that is pushed from the computer network 100 is processed on the front-end Web servers 140 a and/or 140 b .
  • Front-end Web servers 140 a and/or 140 b grab data from the external data storage device 170 through the clustered back-end servers 160 a and/or 160 b , process the grabbed data, and then send (push) the processed data out of the web site via the same Internet channels on which the user entered, or through a telephone network as a fax.
  • the users' data stored in the external data storage device 170 may be shared among users while maintaining the confidentiality of each individual user's data.
  • dealers managing systems (DMS) of competitive dealers can be networked while maintaining confidentiality of individual data of each dealer.
  • the web site aggregates data from the DMS's within its own system and provides the aggregate data in various market reports or other views to members. A process of obtaining this data is to dial-in to each member dealer's DMS a predetermined number of times a week (e.g., six times a week) to get the most up-to-date information.
  • This can be carried out by the web site owner or contracted out to a third party.
  • the third party can extract data from various fields within dealer systems to provide the web site with specific information required for its product.
  • the third party can process the data to eliminate duplicate data, check for new versus old data, and combine the data into a standard file format.
  • the standardized file is uploaded in the web site databases (back-end servers) where the data is aggregated in various market reports and becomes available to the web site's customers.
  • the aggregate data may be used by dealers to benchmark the dealers' market situations, to streamline their vehicles among the dealers' dealerships, and to better understand the dealers' marketplace.
  • the aggregate data includes aggregates of at least one of each dealer's sales history and inventory, other dealers' inventories, a list of vehicles a dealer needs to sell, data relating to how certain dealers do with specific vehicles, book values of vehicles, description of vehicles, and offers on vehicles from other dealers.
  • the requests by dealers may require determination of a Smart Score, which is a method of ranking prospective buyers to determine those with the greatest probability of making an offer on a vehicle. The method of determining Smart Score is further described below. If the requests do not require determination of a Smart Score, then router 150 routes data such as dealer data to the external data storage device 170 via back-end servers 160 a and 160 b for storage. Back-end servers 160 a and 160 b operate as a database interface to the external data storage device 170 .
  • FIG. 2 is a screenshot 200 of a main menu 202 of an exemplary web site providing dealers with an ability to view, for example, their daily “To Do List” 204 .
  • the main menu 202 includes the following categories: To Do List 204 ; Daily Reports 206 ; Dealer Inventory 208 ; Appraisal Activity 210 ; Retail Showroom 212 ; Wholesale Center 214 ; and a Buy List 216 .
  • a dealer elects a category by clicking on one of the categories and control then proceeds to carry out the selected category as illustrated and described in screenshots shown in FIGS. 2-17 .
  • Each screenshot or page of the web site provides a dealer with information, and some screenshots may link to other screenshots which can be accessed by clicking on the desired buttons.
  • the Screenshot 200 includes the To Do List 204 category of the main menu 202 .
  • the To Do List 204 provides an instant view of the dealership status and subsequent steps the dealership can take to attain higher productivity.
  • the To Do List 204 may include a number of Total Vehicles in Stock 220 , a Recommendation 230 to the dealership in order for the dealership to attain its goals, a Summary 240 of the dealership status, and a Day Supply 260 of the dealership.
  • the number of Total Vehicles in Stock 220 includes a number of Wholesale 222 vehicles in stock, a number of Retail 224 vehicles in stock, and a Total 226 number of vehicles in stock, which is the sum of the numbers of Wholesale 222 and Retail 224 vehicles.
  • the Recommendation 230 is a number of vehicles 232 the web site recommends the dealer to increase or decrease its retail inventory by.
  • This number of vehicles 232 is based on a dealer-specific Target Day Supply 264 (the dealer-determined number of days that it should take to sell the entire inventory given its historical sales data).
  • the system recommends the dealer to buy or sell its retail inventory by the number of vehicles 232 in order to meet its predetermined target retail inventory which matches the Target Day Supply 264 .
  • the number of vehicles 232 is determined by subtracting the number of Retail 224 vehicles from the predetermined target retail inventory to achieve the Target Day Supply 264 .
  • the Summary 240 includes the following categories: a number of vehicles in Wholesale Today 242 ; a number of vehicles needing Review (for) Retail Purchase Needs 244 , which links to Retail Sales Trend; a number of vehicles nearing Wholesale Center move date (Retail Today) 246 ; a number of Vehicles to Watch 248 ; a number of Wholesale Purchase Offers 250 needing review; a number of vehicles that should be Consider(ed) for Wholesale Center 252 ; a number of wholesale vehicles needing additional information (Add Wholesale Description) 254 ; an Action Plan 256 ; and a Review Activity Summary 258 .
  • the number of vehicles in Wholesale Today 242 is the same as the number of Wholesale vehicles 222 .
  • Clicking on the Wholesale Today 242 category links a dealership to FIG. 3( a ), which is a screenshot 300 of a listing of vehicles in the Wholesale Center 214 .
  • Vehicles in the Wholesale Center 214 are available for wholesale purchase.
  • the Wholesale Center 214 listing includes each vehicle's Year 302 , Make 304 , Model 306 , Stock number 308 , Mileage 310 , Color 312 , Number of Bids 314 , and Buyers 316 .
  • Clicking on the Buyers 16 provides the dealer with a list of potential buyers and their Smart Scores. The Smart Score is further described below.
  • the Wholesale Center list can be sorted by year, make, model, stock number, mileage, and color by clicking on the corresponding Sort buttons 318 .
  • FIG. 3( b ) is a screenshot of Wholesale Center Offers 350 for the vehicle 352 .
  • the Wholesale Center Offers 350 lists the VIN 354 , Year 356 , Make 358 , Model 360 , Mileage 362 , and Color 364 of the vehicle 352 .
  • Wholesale Center Offers 350 lists the offers for vehicle 352 including High Offer Amount(s) 366 , Site Area(s) 368 , Offer Date(s) 370 (and time), and Dealer Name(s) 372 .
  • Dealers can also make offers on the Wholesale Center vehicles as shown in FIG. 3( c ).
  • a dealer can enter a Minimum offer 375 and a Maximum offer 380 or just a Maximum offer 380 .
  • a dealer can also enter comments in box 385 and click on Submit button 390 to submit the offer. If a dealer enters both a Minimum offer and a Maximum offer 380 , then the offer will be displayed to the seller as the dealer's minimum offer or a predetermined amount of dollars (e.g., $50) more than a competing offer up to the maximum offer. The seller will notify the bidding dealer if the offer is accepted.
  • a predetermined amount of dollars e.g., $50
  • the number of vehicles needing to be considered under Review Retail Purchase Needs 244 in the To Do List 204 is the same as the number of vehicles 232 recommended to be bought or sold in order for a dealer to meet its target retail inventory.
  • Clicking on Review Retail Purchase Needs 244 links a dealership to FIG. 4 , which is a screenshot 400 listing Retail Sales Trends of vehicles, which include, for example, a vehicle's Make 402 , Model 404 , quantity of vehicles sold over a predetermined number of days and/or months (Quantity Sold) 406 , and current number of vehicles in stock (Current Stock) 408 .
  • the Retail Sales Trends review the dealership's volume dealers over multiple time periods and compare to the current retail inventory.
  • FIG. 5 is a screenshot 500 indicating Vehicles Near(ing) Wholesale Center Move Date 502 as defined by each dealer (e.g., three days).
  • Screenshot 500 provides a warning message that the vehicles under this list are nearing the Wholesale Center move date, and will automatically be moved to the Wholesale Center within a predetermined period as defined by each dealer.
  • the screenshot further provides a Stock number 504 , Year 506 , Make 508 , Model 510 , Mileage 512 , Age 514 , a query to edit Description 516 , and a query to move to Wholesale Center 518 for each vehicle.
  • a user may also sort the vehicles in screenshot 500 by Stock number, Year, Make, Model, and Age by clicking on corresponding Sort buttons 520 .
  • a dealer can click on Edit button 516 for that vehicle.
  • Move button 518 for that vehicle.
  • FIG. 6 is a screenshot 600 listing vehicles that do not meet the dealership's administered settings, for example, vehicles that are nearing a predetermined Wholesale Center move date based on the vehicles' current days in stock 602 , vehicles with no history available 604 , vehicles having a below minimum ROI 606 (the calculation of ROI is discussed below), vehicles needing description 608 , and/or vehicles that are overaged 610 .
  • this screenshot provides a Warning message 612 that these vehicles will be moved to the Wholesale Center 214 within a predetermined number of days.
  • screenshot 600 provides the vehicles to watch Stock Number 614 , Year 616 , Make 618 , Model 620 , Average Days in Stock 622 , Average Gross Profit 624 , and Average ROI 626 .
  • FIG. 7 is a screenshot 700 listing Purchase Offers 702 made for vehicles within a date and time range 704 to be reviewed.
  • Screenshot 700 further provides for each particular vehicle, the Year 706 , Make 708 , Model 710 , Stock number 712 , and Details 714 .
  • screenshot 700 lists for each vehicle 716 : Site(s) of the offers 718 ; amounts of the Offer(s) 720 ; Date(s) and time of the offers 722 ; and Dealer(s) that made the offers 724 .
  • a selling dealer can get more detailed information regarding each vehicle by clicking on details 714 .
  • a selling dealer can get more detailed information on the dealership making the offer by clicking on that dealership, e.g., Farrish Daewoo-Suzuki 726 in screenshot 700 .
  • FIG. 8 is a screenshot 800 listing vehicles that the dealership should consider moving to the Wholesale Center 214 because the vehicles fall under at least one of the following exemplary categories: the vehicle's make and model historic average ROI does not meet the dealership's minimum ROI; the vehicle's mileage exceeds the dealership's set maximum mileage; the dealership has no history available for this vehicle's make and model; the vehicle is considered surplus retail inventory (overstock); or the vehicle is within a set days of the default Wholesale Center move age, e.g., three days.
  • this feature of the system determines whether a vehicle meets its dealer's predefined goals; flags vehicles that do not meet their dealers' predefined gods; and places a Smart Score ranking of potential buying dealers for each of the flagged vehicles.
  • the Smart Score is described below and is based on a scoring model that a dealer or a potential buyer can update anytime and the scores that make up the Smart Score can be weighed and changed by a dealer or a potential buyer. It should be noted, however, that a selling dealer sets the scores that make up the Smart Score for a buying dealer.
  • Screenshot 800 provides for each vehicle considered for Wholesale Center a vehicle's Stock number 802 , a vehicle's Year' 804 , a vehicle's Make 806 , a vehicle's Model 808 , a vehicle's Mileage 810 , Current Days of vehicle In Stock 812 , a predetermined period Average Gross Profit 814 of a vehicle, a predetermined average ROI Percentage 816 of a vehicle, a Warning 818 of why a vehicle should be considered for Wholesale Center 214 , and a query whether to move the vehicle to the Wholesale Center 820 .
  • FIG. 9 is a screenshot 900 listing vehicles in the Wholesale Center that do not have a text or voice description.
  • the dealership can add text description of these vehicles by clicking on add button 902 on the screen.
  • Screenshot 900 further provides for each vehicle needing a description a Stock number 904 , Year 906 , Make 908 , Model 910 , Mileage 912 , and Text 914 .
  • the dealership may also add voice description of the vehicles through the telephone network 197 and voice recognition server 195 .
  • FIG. 10 is a screenshot 1000 providing the dealership with warnings of vehicles in retail inventory.
  • Screenshot 1000 provides each vehicle's Stock Number 1002 ; Year 1004 ; Make 1006 ; Model 1008 ; Warning 1010 such as add description to vehicles, vehicles are overaged, and/or vehicles are below minimum ROI; Current Days in Stock 1012 ; and status of ROI 1014 .
  • the dealership can take appropriate action such as moving the vehicles to the Wholesale Center as necessary.
  • FIG. 11 is a screenshot 1100 providing a summary of a total number of dealer inventory of a make 1102 of vehicles, a total number of offers 1104 , and a total number of recently added (new) vehicles 1106 and a total number of recently deleted vehicles 1108 .
  • the total number of dealer inventory of a make 1102 of vehicles includes a Retail Showroom number of vehicles 1110 , a Wholesale Center number of vehicles 1112 , and an Appraisal Activity number of vehicles 1114 .
  • the total number of offers 1104 includes a Retail Showroom number of offers 1116 , a Wholesale Center number of offers 1118 , and an Appraisal Activity number of offers 1120 .
  • the total number of recently added (new) vehicles 1106 and the total number of recently deleted vehicles 1108 each includes a number of Retail Showroom new vehicles 1122 and deleted vehicles 1124 , a number of Wholesale Center new vehicles 1126 and deleted vehicles 1128 , and a number of Appraisal Activity for the new vehicles 1130 and the deleted vehicles 1132 , respectively.
  • the Day Supply 260 under the To Do List 204 provides the number of Current Day Supply 262 and the number of Target Day Supply 264 .
  • the Current Day Supply 262 is the number of days it would take to sell a dealership's inventory based on the dealership's sales history and that dealership's current inventory. For example, the Current Day Supply 262 can be calculated by dividing the total retail inventory by the number of vehicles sold over the last predetermined number of days and multiplying the result by the predetermined number of days.
  • the Target Day Supply 264 is a dealership-specific setting established by the dealership as a goal for the number of days of inventory on hand. The system helps dealers make their Current Day Supply 262 match their Target Day Supply 264 .
  • the ROI is defined based on each vehicle, i.e., how much a dealership paid for a vehicle, the profit the dealership made from selling the vehicle, and the number of days the vehicle spent in inventory.
  • the Actual Cost of Vehicle (ACV) is calculated first, which is:
  • ACV (Purchase Price of the vehicle+Reconditioning Cost)
  • ACV (Selling Price ⁇ Gross Profit).
  • ROI (Gross Profit/ACV) ⁇ (365/Days in Stock).
  • the ROI can be utilized.
  • One way that this number is used is to average the ROIs for all the vehicles of each make/model/year/mileage range/price range, or any combination thereof of a given dealer.
  • the dealer's average ROI by make and model is calculated as follows:
  • Average ROI (Sum of ROIs of vehicles sold by dealer, make and model over last predetermined period of time)+(number of vehicles sold by dealer, make and model over last predetermined period of time)
  • Average ROI (Avg(Gross Profit)/Avg(ACV)) ⁇ (365/Avg(Days in Stock)).
  • the historical ROI may be based on at least one of a local marketplace, a regional marketplace (e.g., a county, a metropolitan area, a couple of states), or a national marketplace.
  • a regional marketplace e.g., a county, a metropolitan area, a couple of states
  • the system further allows the dealer to limit bids from any unwanted bidders. Thus, the dealers have control over what dealers and wholesalers they do business with.
  • Smart Score is a method of ranking prospective buyers by multiplying weight and rank.
  • Weights are values derived by applying the evaluation criteria under the categories as follows: how often a buyer bids on the web site; buyers with highest make and model sold in last 90 days; buyers with highest ROIs on any combination of make, model, year, price range, and/or mileage range; how often a buyer buys vehicles of the same year, make, and/or model; how often a dealer bids on a particular year, make, and/or model; whether a buyer is a member of a same dealer group; and whether a buyer has the year, make, and/or model on its Buy List.
  • Ranks are values a dealer may place on the categories above to add additional biases beyond the web site weights assigned. Ranks may be updated in the web site.
  • each dealer is scored based on how many bids it made in the last predetermined number of days. For example, all dealers with at least five bids in the last 30 days are assigned a score of one for every five bids, with a maximum score set to 10.
  • An exemplary weight calculation for this category is as follows:
  • each dealer is scored on how many vehicles of the same make and model it sold over the last, e.g., 90 days.
  • the score is then assigned according to the following exemplary ranges:
  • each dealer is scored based on what its ROI for the make, model, year, price range, and/or mileage range has been over the past predetermined period (e.g., 6 months). The scoring is then assigned according to the following exemplary ranges:
  • each dealer is scored based on how many and what combinations of the same year, make and model it has purchased over the last predetermined of days (e.g., 90 days).
  • the scoring is assigned according to the following exemplary criteria and combinations:
  • each dealer is scored based on how many and what combinations of the same year, make and model it has bid on over the past predetermined number of days (e.g., 90 days).
  • the scoring is assigned according to the following exemplary criteria and combinations:
  • each dealer is scored based on its membership to any group that the vehicle's dealer belongs to.
  • An exemplary scoring of this category is as follows:
  • a dealer is scored based on whether a vehicle the dealer is searching for matches an entry in its Buy List, scoring different values based on how close the match is.
  • the scoring is assigned, for example, according to the following combinations:
  • the Smart Score for each prospective buyer is the sum of the scores of any combination of the above categories based on: how often a buyer bids on the web site (quantity of bids made over the last predetermined number of days); how many vehicles of the same make and model a buyer (dealer) sold over the past predetermined period of time; buyers with the highest ROIs based on any combination of make, model, year, price range, and/or mileage range over the past predetermined period of time; how often a buyer buys vehicles of the same year, make, and/or model; how often a buyer (dealer) bids on a particular year, make, and/or model; whether a buyer is a member of a same dealer group; and whether a buyer has the year, make, and/or model on its Buy List.
  • the Daily Reports 206 of the main menu 202 is described next.
  • the Daily Reports 206 include a Retail Inventory Value Report 1200 as shown in FIG. 12 , the Action Plan report 1000 as shown in FIG. 10 , a Market Performance by Make and Model report 1300 as shown in FIG. 13 , a Dealership Performance by Make and Model report that is similar to the Market Performance by Make and Model report 1300 but shows dealership performance (not shown), an Available Inventory report 1400 as shown in FIG. 14 , the Retail Sales Trends report 400 as shown in FIG. 4 , the Vehicles to Watch report 600 as shown in FIG. 6 , and a Top Performing Vehicles report 1500 as shown in FIG. 15 .
  • the Retail Inventory Value Report 1200 provides a list of all the vehicles in a dealership's retail inventory.
  • the Retail Inventory Value Report 1200 provides the vehicles' Stock Number 1202 , Year 1204 , Make 1206 , Model 1208 , Mileage 1210 , Retail Price 1212 , Vehicle ACV 1214 , average Black Book Value 1216 , National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA) trade value 1218 , and Current Days in Stock 1220 .
  • the Action Plan report 1000 is described above with regard to the Action Plan 256 under the To Do List 204 .
  • the Market Performance by Make and Model report 1300 shows the make 1302 and model 1304 of a vehicle, and provides information regarding the number of vehicles sold of the make 1302 and model 1304 over the last predetermined period of time 1312 (e.g., months and/or days), the current number of the vehicles in stock 1314 , an average gross profit over a period of time 1316 (e.g. six months), an average days to retail over a period of time 1318 (e.g., six months), and an average ROI over a period of time 1320 (e.g., six months).
  • the information 1312 , 1314 , 1316 , 1318 , and 1320 are provided for each of the categories of price range 1306 , mileage 1308 , and year 1310. Moreover, each of the price range 1306 , mileage 1308 , year 1310, and the information 1312 , 1314 , 1316 , 1318 , and 1320 can be sorted by clicking on the corresponding sort buttons 1322 .
  • the Dealership Performance by Make and Model report (not shown) provides similar information to the Market Performance by Make and Model report 1300 except at a dealership level rather than the market level.
  • the Available Inventory Report 1400 is a list of Wholesale Center or Appraisal Activity vehicles that match the dealership's Buy List as described below with FIG. 17 , or vehicles that have an historic ROI higher than the minimum dealer ROI as well as a mileage under the dealer's maximum mileage setting.
  • the Available Inventory Report 1400 includes the vehicles' Year 1402 , Make 1404 , Model 1406 , Mileage 1408 , Color 1410 , Area 1412 , Dealership Name 1414 , Dealership Contact Name (e.g., salesperson) 1416 , and Dealership Contact Number (e.g., telephone number) 1418 .
  • Each of the information 1402 , 1404 , 1406 , 1408 , 1410 , 1412 , 1414 , 1416 and 1418 of the Available Inventory Report 1400 can be sorted by clicking on the corresponding sort buttons 1420 . Moreover, a dealership can also print the Available Inventory Report 1400 by clicking on the “Printer friendly version of this page” 1422 .
  • the Top Performing Vehicles report 1500 provides a list of top performing retail vehicles by dealership 1502 and a list of top performing retail vehicles by market 1520 .
  • Each of the top performing retail vehicles by dealership 1502 and top performing retail vehicles by market 1520 provides the vehicles' Year(s) 1504 and 1522 , Make(s) 1506 and 1524 , Model(s) 1508 and 1526 , Volume(s) Sold 1510 and 1528 , Average Gross Profit(s) 1512 and 1530 , Average Days to Retail 1514 and 1532 , and Average ROI(s) 1516 and 1534 , respectively.
  • the Top Performing Retail Vehicles by Dealership further provides a Click button 1518 to sort the Dealer Top Performance Report.
  • the Top Performing Retail Vehicles by Market provides a Click button 1536 to sort the Market Top Performance Report.
  • the Retail Sales Trends report, the Vehicles to Watch report, and the Action Plan report are described above and shown in FIGS. 4 , 6 , and 10 , respectively.
  • the Daily Reports 206 provide the dealers with important information to optimize their business. That is, the Daily Reports 206 provide the dealers with various reports and comparisons that are based on at least one of a local marketplace, a regional marketplace, a national marketplace, a like-size dealership (e.g., comparisons of similar-sized dealers), and a like-make dealership (e.g., comparisons of dealers selling similar or same make vehicles).
  • the Inventory Value Report 1200 and the Action Plan report 1000 provide the dealers with information to evaluate and manage their inventories, develop strategies to limit depreciation and retain maximum resale value, and determine which vehicles need to be sold most urgently.
  • Retail Price 1212 , Vehicle ACV 1214 , Black Book value 1216 , and NADA value 1218 together provide a dealership with real time market value of a used vehicle versus the book value of the vehicle.
  • the market value provides the dealership with a value a buyer is willing to purchase that vehicle for versus a book value that lets the dealer know what the average price buyers have been paying in the past predetermined number of days for a similar type vehicle. That is, a dealer can instantly see its cash value of every used vehicle in inventory.
  • FIG. 16( a ) illustrates an Appraisal Activity screenshot 1600 of the Appraisal Activity category 210 under the main menu 200 .
  • the Appraisal Activity screenshot 1600 displays vehicles that dealers need to value quickly, for example, vehicles that a dealership may need to take in trade to finalize a deal.
  • the list of vehicles includes each vehicle's Year 1606 , Make 1608 , Model 1610 , Mileage 1612 , Condition 1614 , number of Bids 1616 , and whether the vehicle has been removed or Deleted 1618 .
  • a dealership can view the list of vehicles submitted by it (Dealership Vehicles 1620 ) or vehicles submitted by all dealerships by clicking on Market Vehicles 1622 .
  • Appraisal Activity allows the dealership to have all of its trade-ins or in stock inventory instantly appraised by hundreds of dealers and wholesalers in a region by clicking on an “Appraise a Car” button 1602 , which provides a link to screenshot 1650 as shown in FIG. 16 ( b ) to be filled out in order to post a vehicle for view by other dealers.
  • Screenshot 1650 allows the dealership to enter all relevant information of the vehicle (e.g., VIN 1652 , Exterior Color 1654 , Mileage 1656 , Condition 1658 , etc.) and to click on Appraise a Car button 1660 in FIG. 16( b ) to enter the vehicle to be appraised as shown in FIG. 16( c ).
  • the appraisal list allows a dealer to determine the value of each vehicle based on how much other dealers are willing to bid for it. All bids are instantly sent to the selling dealership and a bidding dealership is notified if the selling dealership accepts the bid or offer from the bidding dealership.
  • Dealers can also obtain historical data on recent trade-in values for a particular vehicle in their market via book values and aggregate market performance, which minimizes the price risk of selling used vehicles. Many dealers do not have accurate market values for their vehicles and suffer large wholesale losses by overvaluing used vehicle trade-ins, and miss retail sales opportunities by undervaluing used vehicle retail prices. With the appraisal and get book values features, the undervaluing price risk problem is minimized.
  • a dealership can also get book values on a vehicle by pressing the “Get Book Value” 1604 , which provides the dealership with appraisals from, e.g., NADA and the Black Book.
  • the dealership can see various body type/options combinations available for the vehicle by following the prompts on subsequent pages. For example, the dealership can receive a Vehicle Appraisal Report adjusted for vehicle options (not shown since body types and options combinations are information owned by third parties and licensed to the web site).
  • FIG. 17( a ) is a Buy List screenshot 1700 of the Buy List category 216 under the main menu 200 of the exemplary web site.
  • the Buy List is a list of vehicles that a dealership wants to buy.
  • the Buy List 1700 provides a list of vehicles by their Make 1702 , Model 1704 , Year From 1706 a make of a vehicle, Year To 1708 a make of a vehicle, Miles From 1710 (minimum mileage of a vehicle), Miles To 1712 (maximum mileage of a vehicle), Notes 1714 on a vehicle, number of Hits 1716 on a vehicle, and Alert 1718 .
  • a dealership can add vehicles to the Buy List 1700 by clicking on Add Vehicle to Buy List 1720 .
  • FIG. 17( b ) shows a screenshot 1750 that is a link from Add Vehicle to Buy List 1720 .
  • Screenshot 1750 allows a dealership to add a vehicle to Buy List screenshot 1700 by querying the dealership to select a Make 1752 of the vehicle, Miles From 1754 (minimum mileage of a vehicle), Miles To 1756 (maximum mileage of a vehicle), Year From 1758 make of the vehicle, Year To 1760 make of the vehicle, Model 1762 of the vehicle, and Add to Buy List button 1764 .
  • Alert 1718 provides an alert to a dealership when any other dealer in the dealership's region adds to the web site a match either into their inventory or Appraisal Activity that the dealership has not reviewed.
  • the number of Hits 1716 indicates the total number of matching vehicles in the web site's database, including the dealership's vehicles. Moreover, the web site provides the dealership with information such as the other dealers' needs and their locations, etc., in order for the dealership to complete its transaction. The web site can also have the dealership's Buy List linked to a WAP device so the dealership will always know when a vehicle it needs is available.
  • a potential buyer of a used vehicle is alerted using at least a fax device, a desktop computing device, a portable message device, a portable voice device, a telephone, a pager, or the WAP device while maintaining confidentiality of individual data of each dealer.
  • This wireless capability allows dealers and re-marketers to communicate and transact with their business-to-business partners. The dealers and re-marketers can conduct all their daily operations wirelessly, thus achieving tremendous cost and time savings. Dealers will have access to real-time vehicle information anywhere and anytime.
  • the wireless extension provides dealers access to core functionalities of the web site using the WAP enable device.
  • each dealership is provided with a UserID and password, which it can use for both the desktop web site and wireless device.
  • a dealership can view a vehicle, offer details, and make and confirm vehicle offers via the desktop web site or a WAP device.
  • each dealership can use the UserID provided to go online and get or provide additional data on the vehicles.
  • Dealers and re-marketers can also conduct many of their daily operations wirelessly. Dealers may have access to real-time vehicle information anywhere and anytime.
  • the wireless extension provides dealers access to core functionalities of the web site using a WAP enable device.

Abstract

A method for distributing data among automotive dealers, including selecting the data from the dealers, processing the data, and providing the processed data to the dealers while maintaining confidentiality of individual data of each dealer. The selecting of the data further includes collecting data indicating which vehicles are in demand. The data includes at least one of a number of a vehicle's make a dealer has in stock, a vehicle identification number, a vehicle's year, a vehicle's make, a vehicle's model, a vehicle's body style, a vehicle's exterior color, a vehicle's interior color, a vehicle's mileage, a vehicle's retail asking price, a vehicle's transactions cost, a vehicle's reconditioning cost, a vehicle's age, a vehicle's selling price, a vehicle's gross profit, an acquisition need of a vehicle, a selling need of a vehicle, a vehicle's image, a vehicle's turnover rate, or an aggregate of any of the above-listed data. The distributed data may provide optimization on return on investments to the dealers.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
  • This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/244,522, filed Oct. 2, 2008, entitled Data Distribution Method and System, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/867,416, filed May 31, 2001, and entitled Data Distribution Method and System, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention
  • The present invention generally relates to E-Commerce, and more specifically, to apparatuses, systems, and methods for distributing data.
  • 2. Description of Related Art
  • Doing business on the World Wide Web (“Web”) has become increasingly popular and is one of the fastest growing uses of the Internet, which is a collection of numerous individual networks. Each network cooperates with other networks to direct Internet traffic so that information can pass among them. The protocols used on the Internet are the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) and the Internet Protocol (IP, which are frequently referred to as TCPIIP. TCP breaks down and reassembles packets of information, whereas IP ensures that the packets are sent to the right destination or network.
  • The Web generally operates on a client/server model; that is, a user (e.g., a client) runs a piece of software on his/her personal computer to use the resources of a host (e.g., a server computer). The host allows many different users to access its resources at the same time and need not be dedicated to providing resources to a single user. In this model, the client software—e.g., a browser—runs on the user's computer, which contacts a Web server and requests information or resources. The Web server locates and then sends the information or resources to the browser, which displays the results on the user's computer by interpreting the received Hypertext Markup Language (HTML) document.
  • The addressee reference information on the Web is known as the Uniform Resource Locator (URL). A user's browser sends the URL using the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), which defines the way the browser and the Web server communicate with each other. When the server finds the requested document, it sends the document back to the user's browser. The information is then presented to the user via the user's computer. In effect, the user requests the services of the host, which may involve searching for information and sending it back to the user by querying a database on the Web, delivering requested Web pages, or doing business on-line.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • An embodiment of the invention relates to a method for distributing data among users of the web site (including, e.g., automotive dealers, manufacturers, fleet lease companies), or anyone who may have a use for such data. The method of the invention comprises selecting the data from the dealers, processing the data, and providing the processed data to the dealers while maintaining confidentiality of individual data of each automotive dealer. The selecting of the data may include collecting data indicating, for example, which vehicles are in demand. The data for vehicles may include a vehicle's make, a number of a vehicle's make a dealer has in stock, a vehicle identification number, a vehicle's year, a vehicle's model, a vehicle's body style, a vehicle's color, a vehicle's mileage, a vehicle's retail asking price, a vehicle's transactions cost, a vehicle's reconditioning cost, a vehicle's age, a vehicle's selling price, a vehicle's gross profit, an acquisition need of a vehicle, a selling need of a vehicle, a vehicle's image, a vehicle's turnover rate, or an aggregate of any of the above-listed data. The shared data of the invention may enable dealers to improve return on investments (ROIs).
  • The invention may optionally create online trading communities, provide real-time market information, as well as access to a broader market of prospective buyers and sellers who are in need of the vehicles. The invention may also allow dealers to provide each other with any product for which they have a desire for, and notify each other if the product becomes available. In addition, an appraisal of the product may be provided on a web site. The invention may earn revenue by charging member participants fees for usage of its services (e.g., based on a flat rate over a period of time or a per-vehicle rate), as well as earning fees from lenders, insurance companies, transportation companies, and the sales of market information to third parties.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate exemplary embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, explain various aspects and principles of the invention. In the drawings:
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram of a computer network representing an exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 2 is a screenshot of a main menu including a “To Do List” category of the main menu of an exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 3( a) is a screenshot listing vehicles for “Wholesale Today”, which is a link to a screenshot listing a dealership's vehicles under the “Wholesale Center” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 3( b) is a screenshot showing “Wholesale Center Offers” under the “Wholesale Center” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 3( c) is a screenshot showing how to “Make Your Offer” under the “Wholesale Center 7” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 4 is a screenshot of “Retail Sales Trend”, which is a link from “Review Retail Purchase Needs” under the “To Do List” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 5 is a screenshot of “Vehicles Near[ing] Wholesale Center Move Date (3 Days)”, which is a link from “Retail Today” under the “To Do List” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 6 is a screenshot showing “Vehicles to Watch” under the “To Do List” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 7 is a screenshot showing review wholesale “Purchase Offers” under the “To Do List” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 8 is a screenshot listing vehicles that are “Consider[ed] for Wholesale Center” under the “To Do List” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 9 is a screenshot listing “Wholesale Vehicles Needing Description”, which is a link from “Add Wholesale Description” under the “To Do List” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 10 is a screenshot of the “Action Plan” under the “To Do List” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 11 is a screenshot showing “Activity Summary for Baltimore-Washington Vehicles”, which is a link from “Review Activity Summary” under the “To Do List” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 12 is a screenshot of a “Retail Inventory Value Report” under the “Daily Reports” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 13 is a screenshot of a “Market Performance by Make and Model” report under the “Daily Reports” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 14 is a screenshot of an “Available Inventory Report” under the “Daily Reports” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 15 is a screenshot of a “Top Performing Vehicles” report under the “Daily Reports” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 16( a) is a screenshot of an “Appraisal Activity” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 16( b) is a screenshot showing how to place a vehicle to be appraised under the “Appraisal Activity” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 16( c) is a screenshot showing a vehicle placed under an Appraisal Activity list of the exemplary web site;
  • FIG. 17( a) is a screenshot of a “Buy List” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site; and
  • FIG. 17( b) is a screenshot showing how to “Add [Vehicles] to [the] Buy List” under the “Buy List” category of the main menu of the exemplary web site.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention is directed to apparatuses, systems and methods for distributing data among dealers. As an example, in the automobile market, one of the most important factors in profitability is the efficiency with which vehicles are bought and sold. As vehicles for sale remain in inventories, the profit margin on every vehicle is reduced by cost incurred from depreciation, interest, repairs, and floor planning.
  • The following description refers to the accompanying drawings, which illustrate exemplary embodiments of the invention. Other embodiments are possible and modifications may be made to the exemplary embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Therefore, the following description is not meant to limit the invention. Rather, the scope of the invention is defined by the appended claims.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating one exemplary computer network on which an apparatus, system, and method for distributing data among dealers can be implemented. For example, in the used vehicles business, sharing vehicle data with other dealers provides each dealer the ability to identify which dealers in a region have an immediate need for vehicles that they want to sell right away. For auto dealers, the ability to find and purchase the most desirable and available used vehicles as well as locate prospective retail customers in their region for specific vehicles give them a competitive financial advantage.
  • As shown in FIG. 1, a computer network 100 representing an exemplary web site may include a first router 110, a load balancing device 120, front-end Web servers 140 a and 140 b, a second router 150, clustered back-end servers 160 a and 160 b, an external data storage device 170, a Wireless Protocol (WAP) server 180, intelligence servers 190 a and 190 b, and a voice recognition server 195. The first router 110 allows communication between the web site and a publicly accessible network such as the Internet 130.
  • The first router 110 is coupled to the load balancing device 120, which is coupled to the front-end Web servers 140 a and 140 b (which mirror each other for fail-over routing), and the WAP server 180. The load balancing device 120 operates to balance data load and to direct data to the front-end Web servers 140 a and/or 140 b. The front-end Web servers 140 a and 140 b operate to provide a user with requested information, and the WAP server 180 provides wireless capabilities to users as further described below. The frontend Web servers 140 a and 140 b and the WAP server 180 are coupled to the second router 150. The second router 150 operates to connect the front-end Web servers 140 a and 140 b and the WAP server 180 to the clustered back-end servers 160 a and 160 b and to the intelligence servers 190 a and 190 b. The clustered back-end servers 160 a and 160 b operate to process requests for data that is transactional in nature, while the intelligence servers 190 a and 190 b operate to process requests for data that is non-transactional or historical in nature. Of course, servers 160 a and 160 b could also process requests for data that is non-transactional or historical in nature eliminating the need for servers 190 a and 190 b. The clustered back-end servers 160 a and 160 b are coupled to the external data storage device 170, which stores users' data or information to be processed. An example of the first and second routers 110 and 150 are CISCOC® routers.
  • The computer network 100 may provide for Web usage, WAP usage, voice recognition usage, pushing data, and other foreseeable functions as further discussed below. When a user enters the web site, the session (e.g. general site navigation, page-to-page, etc.) resides in the front-end Web servers 140 a and/or 140 b. If a user makes a request for data that is transactional in nature, then the data is collected from the external data storage device 170 and is processed through the clustered back-end servers 160 a and/or 160 b. The processed data is then returned to the user at the front-end Web servers 140 a and/or 140 b. If, however, the user makes a request for data that is non-transactional or historical in nature, then the data is processed via the intelligence servers 190 a and/or 190 b. The intelligence servers 190 a and/or 190 b grab data from the external data storage device 170 through the clustered back-end servers 160 a and/or 160 b and process the request. The intelligence servers 190 a and/or 190 b then send the processed request results (non-transactional or historical data) to the user at the front-end Web servers 140 a and/or 140 b.
  • When a user accesses the system through a WAP device, the data is transferred through the Internet 130 and the first router 110 to the WAP server 180. The session resides on the WAP server 180. Requested data is collected from the external data storage device 170 and is processed through the clustered back-end servers 160 a and/or 160 b. The processed data is then returned to the user through the WAP server 180.
  • Similarly, when a user accesses the system through telephone network 197, the session would reside on the voice recognition server 195. When the user requests data via the telephone network 197, the data is collected from the external data storage device 170 and is processed through the clustered backend servers 160 a and/or 160 b. The processed data is then returned to the user through voice recognition server 195.
  • With WAP or telephone access, a user is able to perform many of the functions described below relative to access over the Internet. Such functions include locating vehicles; adding, modifying or deleting vehicles to/in/from the inventory; or monitoring recent transactions (e.g., last 24 hours).
  • As to pushing data, any information that is pushed from the computer network 100, e.g., alerts via fax or email, is processed on the front-end Web servers 140 a and/or 140 b. Front-end Web servers 140 a and/or 140 b grab data from the external data storage device 170 through the clustered back-end servers 160 a and/or 160 b, process the grabbed data, and then send (push) the processed data out of the web site via the same Internet channels on which the user entered, or through a telephone network as a fax.
  • The users' data stored in the external data storage device 170 may be shared among users while maintaining the confidentiality of each individual user's data. Also, dealers managing systems (DMS) of competitive dealers can be networked while maintaining confidentiality of individual data of each dealer. The web site aggregates data from the DMS's within its own system and provides the aggregate data in various market reports or other views to members. A process of obtaining this data is to dial-in to each member dealer's DMS a predetermined number of times a week (e.g., six times a week) to get the most up-to-date information. This can be carried out by the web site owner or contracted out to a third party. For example, the third party can extract data from various fields within dealer systems to provide the web site with specific information required for its product. Next, the third party can process the data to eliminate duplicate data, check for new versus old data, and combine the data into a standard file format. The standardized file is uploaded in the web site databases (back-end servers) where the data is aggregated in various market reports and becomes available to the web site's customers.
  • The aggregate data may be used by dealers to benchmark the dealers' market situations, to streamline their vehicles among the dealers' dealerships, and to better understand the dealers' marketplace. The aggregate data includes aggregates of at least one of each dealer's sales history and inventory, other dealers' inventories, a list of vehicles a dealer needs to sell, data relating to how certain dealers do with specific vehicles, book values of vehicles, description of vehicles, and offers on vehicles from other dealers.
  • Other organizations that would also benefit from the aggregate data or access to this group of dealers include credit unions, banks, leasing companies, auto auctions, automotive aftermarket suppliers, automotive insurance carriers, lenders who offer indirect lending programs to dealers, direct mail companies, and transportation and towing companies. For example, this feature allows dealers to use the aggregate data to determine which bank is most profitable to finance a vehicle. The aggregate data can also be put up for bid to dealers that do not participate in the DMS network.
  • The requests by dealers may require determination of a Smart Score, which is a method of ranking prospective buyers to determine those with the greatest probability of making an offer on a vehicle. The method of determining Smart Score is further described below. If the requests do not require determination of a Smart Score, then router 150 routes data such as dealer data to the external data storage device 170 via back-end servers 160 a and 160 b for storage. Back-end servers 160 a and 160 b operate as a database interface to the external data storage device 170.
  • FIG. 2 is a screenshot 200 of a main menu 202 of an exemplary web site providing dealers with an ability to view, for example, their daily “To Do List” 204. The main menu 202 includes the following categories: To Do List 204; Daily Reports 206; Dealer Inventory 208; Appraisal Activity 210; Retail Showroom 212; Wholesale Center 214; and a Buy List 216. A dealer elects a category by clicking on one of the categories and control then proceeds to carry out the selected category as illustrated and described in screenshots shown in FIGS. 2-17.
  • Each screenshot or page of the web site provides a dealer with information, and some screenshots may link to other screenshots which can be accessed by clicking on the desired buttons.
  • Screenshot 200 includes the To Do List 204 category of the main menu 202. The To Do List 204 provides an instant view of the dealership status and subsequent steps the dealership can take to attain higher productivity. The To Do List 204 may include a number of Total Vehicles in Stock 220, a Recommendation 230 to the dealership in order for the dealership to attain its goals, a Summary 240 of the dealership status, and a Day Supply 260 of the dealership. The number of Total Vehicles in Stock 220 includes a number of Wholesale 222 vehicles in stock, a number of Retail 224 vehicles in stock, and a Total 226 number of vehicles in stock, which is the sum of the numbers of Wholesale 222 and Retail 224 vehicles. The Recommendation 230 is a number of vehicles 232 the web site recommends the dealer to increase or decrease its retail inventory by. This number of vehicles 232 is based on a dealer-specific Target Day Supply 264 (the dealer-determined number of days that it should take to sell the entire inventory given its historical sales data). In particular, the system recommends the dealer to buy or sell its retail inventory by the number of vehicles 232 in order to meet its predetermined target retail inventory which matches the Target Day Supply 264. The number of vehicles 232 is determined by subtracting the number of Retail 224 vehicles from the predetermined target retail inventory to achieve the Target Day Supply 264.
  • The Summary 240 includes the following categories: a number of vehicles in Wholesale Today 242; a number of vehicles needing Review (for) Retail Purchase Needs 244, which links to Retail Sales Trend; a number of vehicles nearing Wholesale Center move date (Retail Today) 246; a number of Vehicles to Watch 248; a number of Wholesale Purchase Offers 250 needing review; a number of vehicles that should be Consider(ed) for Wholesale Center 252; a number of wholesale vehicles needing additional information (Add Wholesale Description) 254; an Action Plan 256; and a Review Activity Summary 258.
  • The number of vehicles in Wholesale Today 242 is the same as the number of Wholesale vehicles 222. Clicking on the Wholesale Today 242 category links a dealership to FIG. 3( a), which is a screenshot 300 of a listing of vehicles in the Wholesale Center 214. Vehicles in the Wholesale Center 214 are available for wholesale purchase. The Wholesale Center 214 listing includes each vehicle's Year 302, Make 304, Model 306, Stock number 308, Mileage 310, Color 312, Number of Bids 314, and Buyers 316. Clicking on the Buyers 16 provides the dealer with a list of potential buyers and their Smart Scores. The Smart Score is further described below. The Wholesale Center list can be sorted by year, make, model, stock number, mileage, and color by clicking on the corresponding Sort buttons 318.
  • Moreover, clicking on the Total Number of Bids 314 on a vehicle 352 with at least one bid links a dealership to FIG. 3( b), which is a screenshot of Wholesale Center Offers 350 for the vehicle 352. The Wholesale Center Offers 350 lists the VIN 354, Year 356, Make 358, Model 360, Mileage 362, and Color 364 of the vehicle 352. In addition, Wholesale Center Offers 350 lists the offers for vehicle 352 including High Offer Amount(s) 366, Site Area(s) 368, Offer Date(s) 370 (and time), and Dealer Name(s) 372. Clicking on a value amount 374 under the High Offer Amount(s) 366 provides information on the dealership that made the offer, and clicking “Sell Now-?” 376 under High Offer Amount(s) 366 to sell the vehicle under the elected bid. The dealer making the bid never sees bids from other dealers, so the dealership as the seller can select to whom the dealership wants to sell the vehicle. Thus, the dealership can maintain its wholesale relationships while ensuring that it always gets fair market value for every vehicle. Thus, dealers have the ability to offer vehicle inventory for wholesale much earlier in their inventory cycle (when the vehicle is, e.g., 15-30 days old, instead of the typical 60 days), while still continuing to offer the vehicle for retail sale. This allows dealers to analyze the wholesale value of all used vehicle inventories on a daily basis (wholesaling and retailing vehicles are not mutually exclusive). Accordingly, dealers will have the ability to sell their used vehicle inventory before they suffer large wholesale losses resulting from depreciation. Dealers can also view other regional dealer vehicles up for auction or bidding by clicking on Market Vehicles 320 on screenshot 300 (FIG. 3( a)).
  • Dealers can also make offers on the Wholesale Center vehicles as shown in FIG. 3( c). A dealer can enter a Minimum offer 375 and a Maximum offer 380 or just a Maximum offer 380. A dealer can also enter comments in box 385 and click on Submit button 390 to submit the offer. If a dealer enters both a Minimum offer and a Maximum offer 380, then the offer will be displayed to the seller as the dealer's minimum offer or a predetermined amount of dollars (e.g., $50) more than a competing offer up to the maximum offer. The seller will notify the bidding dealer if the offer is accepted.
  • The number of vehicles needing to be considered under Review Retail Purchase Needs 244 in the To Do List 204 is the same as the number of vehicles 232 recommended to be bought or sold in order for a dealer to meet its target retail inventory. Clicking on Review Retail Purchase Needs 244 links a dealership to FIG. 4, which is a screenshot 400 listing Retail Sales Trends of vehicles, which include, for example, a vehicle's Make 402, Model 404, quantity of vehicles sold over a predetermined number of days and/or months (Quantity Sold) 406, and current number of vehicles in stock (Current Stock) 408. The Retail Sales Trends review the dealership's volume dealers over multiple time periods and compare to the current retail inventory.
  • Clicking on Retail Today 246 under the To Do List 204 links a dealer to FIG. 5, which is a screenshot 500 indicating Vehicles Near(ing) Wholesale Center Move Date 502 as defined by each dealer (e.g., three days). Screenshot 500 provides a warning message that the vehicles under this list are nearing the Wholesale Center move date, and will automatically be moved to the Wholesale Center within a predetermined period as defined by each dealer. The screenshot further provides a Stock number 504, Year 506, Make 508, Model 510, Mileage 512, Age 514, a query to edit Description 516, and a query to move to Wholesale Center 518 for each vehicle. A user may also sort the vehicles in screenshot 500 by Stock number, Year, Make, Model, and Age by clicking on corresponding Sort buttons 520. To edit the description of a vehicle, a dealer can click on Edit button 516 for that vehicle. Similarly, to confirm a move of a vehicle to Wholesale Center, a dealer can click on Move button 518 for that vehicle.
  • Clicking on the Vehicles to Watch 248 under the To Do List 204 links a dealership to FIG. 6, which is a screenshot 600 listing vehicles that do not meet the dealership's administered settings, for example, vehicles that are nearing a predetermined Wholesale Center move date based on the vehicles' current days in stock 602, vehicles with no history available 604, vehicles having a below minimum ROI 606 (the calculation of ROI is discussed below), vehicles needing description 608, and/or vehicles that are overaged 610. In other words, this screenshot provides a Warning message 612 that these vehicles will be moved to the Wholesale Center 214 within a predetermined number of days. In addition, screenshot 600 provides the vehicles to watch Stock Number 614, Year 616, Make 618, Model 620, Average Days in Stock 622, Average Gross Profit 624, and Average ROI 626.
  • Clicking on the Review Wholesale Purchase Offers 250 under the To Do List 204 links a dealership to FIG. 7, which is a screenshot 700 listing Purchase Offers 702 made for vehicles within a date and time range 704 to be reviewed. Screenshot 700 further provides for each particular vehicle, the Year 706, Make 708, Model 710, Stock number 712, and Details 714. Moreover, screenshot 700 lists for each vehicle 716: Site(s) of the offers 718; amounts of the Offer(s) 720; Date(s) and time of the offers 722; and Dealer(s) that made the offers 724. A selling dealer can get more detailed information regarding each vehicle by clicking on details 714. Similarly, a selling dealer can get more detailed information on the dealership making the offer by clicking on that dealership, e.g., Farrish Daewoo-Suzuki 726 in screenshot 700.
  • Clicking on the Consider for Wholesale Center 252 under the To Do List 204 links a dealership to FIG. 8, which is a screenshot 800 listing vehicles that the dealership should consider moving to the Wholesale Center 214 because the vehicles fall under at least one of the following exemplary categories: the vehicle's make and model historic average ROI does not meet the dealership's minimum ROI; the vehicle's mileage exceeds the dealership's set maximum mileage; the dealership has no history available for this vehicle's make and model; the vehicle is considered surplus retail inventory (overstock); or the vehicle is within a set days of the default Wholesale Center move age, e.g., three days. In particular, this feature of the system determines whether a vehicle meets its dealer's predefined goals; flags vehicles that do not meet their dealers' predefined gods; and places a Smart Score ranking of potential buying dealers for each of the flagged vehicles.
  • The Smart Score is described below and is based on a scoring model that a dealer or a potential buyer can update anytime and the scores that make up the Smart Score can be weighed and changed by a dealer or a potential buyer. It should be noted, however, that a selling dealer sets the scores that make up the Smart Score for a buying dealer. Screenshot 800 provides for each vehicle considered for Wholesale Center a vehicle's Stock number 802, a vehicle's Year' 804, a vehicle's Make 806, a vehicle's Model 808, a vehicle's Mileage 810, Current Days of vehicle In Stock 812, a predetermined period Average Gross Profit 814 of a vehicle, a predetermined average ROI Percentage 816 of a vehicle, a Warning 818 of why a vehicle should be considered for Wholesale Center 214, and a query whether to move the vehicle to the Wholesale Center 820.
  • Clicking on the number of vehicles under Add Wholesale Description 254 under the To Do List 204 links a dealership to FIG. 9, which is a screenshot 900 listing vehicles in the Wholesale Center that do not have a text or voice description. The dealership can add text description of these vehicles by clicking on add button 902 on the screen. Screenshot 900 further provides for each vehicle needing a description a Stock number 904, Year 906, Make 908, Model 910, Mileage 912, and Text 914. The dealership may also add voice description of the vehicles through the telephone network 197 and voice recognition server 195.
  • Clicking on the Action Plan 256 under the To Do List 204 links a dealership to FIG. 10, which is a screenshot 1000 providing the dealership with warnings of vehicles in retail inventory. Screenshot 1000 provides each vehicle's Stock Number 1002; Year 1004; Make 1006; Model 1008; Warning 1010 such as add description to vehicles, vehicles are overaged, and/or vehicles are below minimum ROI; Current Days in Stock 1012; and status of ROI 1014. Based on the warnings of the vehicles in retail inventory, the dealership can take appropriate action such as moving the vehicles to the Wholesale Center as necessary.
  • Clicking on the (review) Activity Summary 258 (for a predetermined community, e.g., Baltimore-Washington) under the To Do List 204 links a dealership to FIG. 11, which is a screenshot 1100 providing a summary of a total number of dealer inventory of a make 1102 of vehicles, a total number of offers 1104, and a total number of recently added (new) vehicles 1106 and a total number of recently deleted vehicles 1108. The total number of dealer inventory of a make 1102 of vehicles includes a Retail Showroom number of vehicles 1110, a Wholesale Center number of vehicles 1112, and an Appraisal Activity number of vehicles 1114. Similarly, the total number of offers 1104 includes a Retail Showroom number of offers 1116, a Wholesale Center number of offers 1118, and an Appraisal Activity number of offers 1120. The total number of recently added (new) vehicles 1106 and the total number of recently deleted vehicles 1108 each includes a number of Retail Showroom new vehicles 1122 and deleted vehicles 1124, a number of Wholesale Center new vehicles 1126 and deleted vehicles 1128, and a number of Appraisal Activity for the new vehicles 1130 and the deleted vehicles 1132, respectively.
  • The Day Supply 260 under the To Do List 204 provides the number of Current Day Supply 262 and the number of Target Day Supply 264. The Current Day Supply 262 is the number of days it would take to sell a dealership's inventory based on the dealership's sales history and that dealership's current inventory. For example, the Current Day Supply 262 can be calculated by dividing the total retail inventory by the number of vehicles sold over the last predetermined number of days and multiplying the result by the predetermined number of days. The Target Day Supply 264 is a dealership-specific setting established by the dealership as a goal for the number of days of inventory on hand. The system helps dealers make their Current Day Supply 262 match their Target Day Supply 264.
  • The ROI is defined based on each vehicle, i.e., how much a dealership paid for a vehicle, the profit the dealership made from selling the vehicle, and the number of days the vehicle spent in inventory. In determining the ROI, the Actual Cost of Vehicle (ACV) is calculated first, which is:

  • ACV=(Purchase Price of the vehicle+Reconditioning Cost)

  • or

  • ACV=(Selling Price−Gross Profit).
  • Next, the Gross Profit is downloaded directly from the DMS or calculated as follows:

  • Gross Profit=(Selling Price of vehicle−ACV).
  • Finally, the ROI is calculated as follows:

  • ROI=(Gross Profit/ACV)×(365/Days in Stock).
  • There are a couple of different ways that the ROI can be utilized. One way that this number is used is to average the ROIs for all the vehicles of each make/model/year/mileage range/price range, or any combination thereof of a given dealer. The dealer's average ROI by make and model, for example, is calculated as follows:

  • Average ROI=(Sum of ROIs of vehicles sold by dealer, make and model over last predetermined period of time)+(number of vehicles sold by dealer, make and model over last predetermined period of time)

  • or

  • Average ROI=(Avg(Gross Profit)/Avg(ACV))×(365/Avg(Days in Stock)).
  • To extend the calculation of ROI to a market ROI, the dealer is removed from the above equation.
  • The historical ROI may be based on at least one of a local marketplace, a regional marketplace (e.g., a county, a metropolitan area, a couple of states), or a national marketplace. The system further allows the dealer to limit bids from any unwanted bidders. Thus, the dealers have control over what dealers and wholesalers they do business with.
  • Smart Score is a method of ranking prospective buyers by multiplying weight and rank. Weights are values derived by applying the evaluation criteria under the categories as follows: how often a buyer bids on the web site; buyers with highest make and model sold in last 90 days; buyers with highest ROIs on any combination of make, model, year, price range, and/or mileage range; how often a buyer buys vehicles of the same year, make, and/or model; how often a dealer bids on a particular year, make, and/or model; whether a buyer is a member of a same dealer group; and whether a buyer has the year, make, and/or model on its Buy List. Ranks are values a dealer may place on the categories above to add additional biases beyond the web site weights assigned. Ranks may be updated in the web site.
  • As to the category of how often a dealer bids on the web site, each dealer is scored based on how many bids it made in the last predetermined number of days. For example, all dealers with at least five bids in the last 30 days are assigned a score of one for every five bids, with a maximum score set to 10. An exemplary weight calculation for this category is as follows:
  • Quantity of Bids Made Over Last 30 Days Weight
    0-4 0
    5-9 1
    10-14 2
    15-19 3
    20-24 4
    25-29 5
    30-34 6
    35-39 7
    40-44 8
    45-49 9
    50+ 10
  • As to the category of which buyer has the highest number of make and model sold in the last predetermined number of day, each dealer is scored on how many vehicles of the same make and model it sold over the last, e.g., 90 days. The score is then assigned according to the following exemplary ranges:
  • Quantity Sold Last 90 Days Weight
    <=3 0.0* 10 * 5/3
    >3 and <=7 0.1* 10 * 5/3
    >7 and <=11 0.4* 10 * 5/3
    >11 and <=15 0.6* 10 * 5/3
    >15 and <=19 0.8* 10 * 5/3
    >19 1.0* 10 * 5/3
  • As to the category of which buyers have the highest ROIs on any combination of make, model, year, price range, and/or mileage range, each dealer is scored based on what its ROI for the make, model, year, price range, and/or mileage range has been over the past predetermined period (e.g., 6 months). The scoring is then assigned according to the following exemplary ranges:
  • 1. For Make and Model:
  • ROI: Make/Model Weight
    <75% 0.0* 10 * 5/3
    >75% and <100% 0.1* 10 * 5/3
    >100% and <125% 0.4* 10 * 5/3
    >125% and <150% 0.6* 10 * 5/3
    >150% and <175% 0.8* 10 * 5/3
    >=175% 1.0* 10 * 5/3
  • 2. For Make, Model, and Year:
  • ROI: Make/Model/Year Weight
    <75% 0.0* 10 * 5/3
    >75% and <100% 0.1* 10 * 5/3
    >100% and <125% 0.4* 10 * 5/3
    >125% and <150% 0.6* 10 * 5/3
    >150% and <175% 0.8* 10 * 5/3
    >=175% 1.0* 10 * 5/3
  • 3. For Make, Model, and Price Range:
  • ROI: Make/Model/Price Range Weight
    <75% 0.0* 10 * 5/3
    >75% and <100% 0.1* 10 * 5/3
    >100% and <125% 0.4* 10 * 5/3
    >125% and <150% 0.6* 10 * 5/3
    >150% and <175% 0.8* 10 * 5/3
    >=175% 1.0* 10 * 5/3
  • 4. For Make, Model, and Mileage Range:
  • ROI: Make/Model/Mileage Range Weight
    <75% 0.0* 10 * 5/3
    >75% and <100% 0.1* 10 * 5/3
    >100% and <125% 0.4* 10 * 5/3
    >125% and <150% 0.6* 10 * 5/3
    >150% and <175% 0.8* 10 * 5/3
    >=175% 1.0* 10 * 5/3
  • As to how often a buyer buys the same year, make, and/or mode, each dealer is scored based on how many and what combinations of the same year, make and model it has purchased over the last predetermined of days (e.g., 90 days). The scoring is assigned according to the following exemplary criteria and combinations:
  • Purchased Over
    Attribute Combination Last 90 Days Weight
    Year and Make and Model >=6 1.0* 10
    Year and Make >=6 0.7* 10
    Make and Model >=6 0.7* 10
  • As to how often a buyer bids on a particular year, make, and/or model, each dealer is scored based on how many and what combinations of the same year, make and model it has bid on over the past predetermined number of days (e.g., 90 days). The scoring is assigned according to the following exemplary criteria and combinations:
  • Bids Over Last
    Attribute Combination
    90 Days Weight
    Year and Make and Model >=6 1.0* 10
    Year and Make >=6 0.7* 10
    Make and Model >=6 0.7* 10
  • As to being a member of a same dealer group, each dealer is scored based on its membership to any group that the vehicle's dealer belongs to. An exemplary scoring of this category is as follows:
  • Common Dealer Group Weight
    Yes, Buyer is member of Seller's Group 10
    No, Buyer is not a member of Seller's Group 10
  • As to whether a buyer has the year, make, and/or model on its Buy List, a dealer is scored based on whether a vehicle the dealer is searching for matches an entry in its Buy List, scoring different values based on how close the match is. The scoring is assigned, for example, according to the following combinations:
  • Attribute Combination Weight
    Year and Make and Model 1.0* 10
    Year and Make 0.7* 10
    Make and Model 0.7* 10
  • The Smart Score for each prospective buyer is the sum of the scores of any combination of the above categories based on: how often a buyer bids on the web site (quantity of bids made over the last predetermined number of days); how many vehicles of the same make and model a buyer (dealer) sold over the past predetermined period of time; buyers with the highest ROIs based on any combination of make, model, year, price range, and/or mileage range over the past predetermined period of time; how often a buyer buys vehicles of the same year, make, and/or model; how often a buyer (dealer) bids on a particular year, make, and/or model; whether a buyer is a member of a same dealer group; and whether a buyer has the year, make, and/or model on its Buy List.
  • The Daily Reports 206 of the main menu 202 is described next. The Daily Reports 206 include a Retail Inventory Value Report 1200 as shown in FIG. 12, the Action Plan report 1000 as shown in FIG. 10, a Market Performance by Make and Model report 1300 as shown in FIG. 13, a Dealership Performance by Make and Model report that is similar to the Market Performance by Make and Model report 1300 but shows dealership performance (not shown), an Available Inventory report 1400 as shown in FIG. 14, the Retail Sales Trends report 400 as shown in FIG. 4, the Vehicles to Watch report 600 as shown in FIG. 6, and a Top Performing Vehicles report 1500 as shown in FIG. 15. The Retail Inventory Value Report 1200 provides a list of all the vehicles in a dealership's retail inventory. Specifically, the Retail Inventory Value Report 1200 provides the vehicles' Stock Number 1202, Year 1204, Make 1206, Model 1208, Mileage 1210, Retail Price 1212, Vehicle ACV 1214, average Black Book Value 1216, National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA) trade value 1218, and Current Days in Stock 1220. The Action Plan report 1000 is described above with regard to the Action Plan 256 under the To Do List 204.
  • The Market Performance by Make and Model report 1300 shows the make 1302 and model 1304 of a vehicle, and provides information regarding the number of vehicles sold of the make 1302 and model 1304 over the last predetermined period of time 1312 (e.g., months and/or days), the current number of the vehicles in stock 1314, an average gross profit over a period of time 1316 (e.g. six months), an average days to retail over a period of time 1318 (e.g., six months), and an average ROI over a period of time 1320 (e.g., six months). The information 1312, 1314, 1316, 1318, and 1320 are provided for each of the categories of price range 1306, mileage 1308, and year 1310. Moreover, each of the price range 1306, mileage 1308, year 1310, and the information 1312, 1314, 1316, 1318, and 1320 can be sorted by clicking on the corresponding sort buttons 1322.
  • The Dealership Performance by Make and Model report (not shown) provides similar information to the Market Performance by Make and Model report 1300 except at a dealership level rather than the market level.
  • The Available Inventory Report 1400 is a list of Wholesale Center or Appraisal Activity vehicles that match the dealership's Buy List as described below with FIG. 17, or vehicles that have an historic ROI higher than the minimum dealer ROI as well as a mileage under the dealer's maximum mileage setting. The Available Inventory Report 1400 includes the vehicles' Year 1402, Make 1404, Model 1406, Mileage 1408, Color 1410, Area 1412, Dealership Name 1414, Dealership Contact Name (e.g., salesperson) 1416, and Dealership Contact Number (e.g., telephone number) 1418. Each of the information 1402, 1404, 1406, 1408, 1410, 1412, 1414, 1416 and 1418 of the Available Inventory Report 1400 can be sorted by clicking on the corresponding sort buttons 1420. Moreover, a dealership can also print the Available Inventory Report 1400 by clicking on the “Printer friendly version of this page” 1422.
  • The Top Performing Vehicles report 1500 provides a list of top performing retail vehicles by dealership 1502 and a list of top performing retail vehicles by market 1520. Each of the top performing retail vehicles by dealership 1502 and top performing retail vehicles by market 1520 provides the vehicles' Year(s) 1504 and 1522, Make(s) 1506 and 1524, Model(s) 1508 and 1526, Volume(s) Sold 1510 and 1528, Average Gross Profit(s) 1512 and 1530, Average Days to Retail 1514 and 1532, and Average ROI(s) 1516 and 1534, respectively. The Top Performing Retail Vehicles by Dealership further provides a Click button 1518 to sort the Dealer Top Performance Report. Similarly, the Top Performing Retail Vehicles by Market provides a Click button 1536 to sort the Market Top Performance Report.
  • The Retail Sales Trends report, the Vehicles to Watch report, and the Action Plan report are described above and shown in FIGS. 4, 6, and 10, respectively.
  • The Daily Reports 206, either alone or in combination, provide the dealers with important information to optimize their business. That is, the Daily Reports 206 provide the dealers with various reports and comparisons that are based on at least one of a local marketplace, a regional marketplace, a national marketplace, a like-size dealership (e.g., comparisons of similar-sized dealers), and a like-make dealership (e.g., comparisons of dealers selling similar or same make vehicles). For example, the Inventory Value Report 1200 and the Action Plan report 1000 provide the dealers with information to evaluate and manage their inventories, develop strategies to limit depreciation and retain maximum resale value, and determine which vehicles need to be sold most urgently. Another example is the Retail Price 1212, Vehicle ACV 1214, Black Book value 1216, and NADA value 1218 together provide a dealership with real time market value of a used vehicle versus the book value of the vehicle. The market value provides the dealership with a value a buyer is willing to purchase that vehicle for versus a book value that lets the dealer know what the average price buyers have been paying in the past predetermined number of days for a similar type vehicle. That is, a dealer can instantly see its cash value of every used vehicle in inventory.
  • FIG. 16( a) illustrates an Appraisal Activity screenshot 1600 of the Appraisal Activity category 210 under the main menu 200. The Appraisal Activity screenshot 1600 displays vehicles that dealers need to value quickly, for example, vehicles that a dealership may need to take in trade to finalize a deal. The list of vehicles includes each vehicle's Year 1606, Make 1608, Model 1610, Mileage 1612, Condition 1614, number of Bids 1616, and whether the vehicle has been removed or Deleted 1618. A dealership can view the list of vehicles submitted by it (Dealership Vehicles 1620) or vehicles submitted by all dealerships by clicking on Market Vehicles 1622. Appraisal Activity allows the dealership to have all of its trade-ins or in stock inventory instantly appraised by hundreds of dealers and wholesalers in a region by clicking on an “Appraise a Car” button 1602, which provides a link to screenshot 1650 as shown in FIG. 16(b) to be filled out in order to post a vehicle for view by other dealers. Screenshot 1650 allows the dealership to enter all relevant information of the vehicle (e.g., VIN 1652, Exterior Color 1654, Mileage 1656, Condition 1658, etc.) and to click on Appraise a Car button 1660 in FIG. 16( b) to enter the vehicle to be appraised as shown in FIG. 16( c). This allows the dealership to quickly gauge interest in a particular vehicle before accepting it as a trade-in. That is, the appraisal list allows a dealer to determine the value of each vehicle based on how much other dealers are willing to bid for it. All bids are instantly sent to the selling dealership and a bidding dealership is notified if the selling dealership accepts the bid or offer from the bidding dealership.
  • Dealers can also obtain historical data on recent trade-in values for a particular vehicle in their market via book values and aggregate market performance, which minimizes the price risk of selling used vehicles. Many dealers do not have accurate market values for their vehicles and suffer large wholesale losses by overvaluing used vehicle trade-ins, and miss retail sales opportunities by undervaluing used vehicle retail prices. With the appraisal and get book values features, the undervaluing price risk problem is minimized.
  • A dealership can also get book values on a vehicle by pressing the “Get Book Value” 1604, which provides the dealership with appraisals from, e.g., NADA and the Black Book. The dealership can see various body type/options combinations available for the vehicle by following the prompts on subsequent pages. For example, the dealership can receive a Vehicle Appraisal Report adjusted for vehicle options (not shown since body types and options combinations are information owned by third parties and licensed to the web site).
  • FIG. 17( a) is a Buy List screenshot 1700 of the Buy List category 216 under the main menu 200 of the exemplary web site. The Buy List is a list of vehicles that a dealership wants to buy. The Buy List 1700 provides a list of vehicles by their Make 1702, Model 1704, Year From 1706 a make of a vehicle, Year To 1708 a make of a vehicle, Miles From 1710 (minimum mileage of a vehicle), Miles To 1712 (maximum mileage of a vehicle), Notes 1714 on a vehicle, number of Hits 1716 on a vehicle, and Alert 1718. A dealership can add vehicles to the Buy List 1700 by clicking on Add Vehicle to Buy List 1720.
  • FIG. 17( b) shows a screenshot 1750 that is a link from Add Vehicle to Buy List 1720. Screenshot 1750 allows a dealership to add a vehicle to Buy List screenshot 1700 by querying the dealership to select a Make 1752 of the vehicle, Miles From 1754 (minimum mileage of a vehicle), Miles To 1756 (maximum mileage of a vehicle), Year From 1758 make of the vehicle, Year To 1760 make of the vehicle, Model 1762 of the vehicle, and Add to Buy List button 1764. Alert 1718 provides an alert to a dealership when any other dealer in the dealership's region adds to the web site a match either into their inventory or Appraisal Activity that the dealership has not reviewed. The number of Hits 1716 indicates the total number of matching vehicles in the web site's database, including the dealership's vehicles. Moreover, the web site provides the dealership with information such as the other dealers' needs and their locations, etc., in order for the dealership to complete its transaction. The web site can also have the dealership's Buy List linked to a WAP device so the dealership will always know when a vehicle it needs is available.
  • Specifically, a potential buyer of a used vehicle is alerted using at least a fax device, a desktop computing device, a portable message device, a portable voice device, a telephone, a pager, or the WAP device while maintaining confidentiality of individual data of each dealer. This wireless capability allows dealers and re-marketers to communicate and transact with their business-to-business partners. The dealers and re-marketers can conduct all their daily operations wirelessly, thus achieving tremendous cost and time savings. Dealers will have access to real-time vehicle information anywhere and anytime. The wireless extension provides dealers access to core functionalities of the web site using the WAP enable device. Currently, WAP is available for cellular phones, but it is foreseeable that the wireless extension will also work for any wireless device such as Palm Pilots, Pocket PCs, etc. The feasibility of wireless development exists with the web site due to the scaleable nature in which the site is developed. That is, each dealership is provided with a UserID and password, which it can use for both the desktop web site and wireless device. For example, a dealership can view a vehicle, offer details, and make and confirm vehicle offers via the desktop web site or a WAP device. In addition, each dealership can use the UserID provided to go online and get or provide additional data on the vehicles.
  • Dealers and re-marketers can also conduct many of their daily operations wirelessly. Dealers may have access to real-time vehicle information anywhere and anytime. The wireless extension provides dealers access to core functionalities of the web site using a WAP enable device.
  • While this invention has been described in conjunction with the specific exemplary embodiments outlined above, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the exemplary embodiments of the invention, as set forth above, are intended to be illustrative, not limiting. Various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
  • It will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that the embodiments as described above may be implemented in many different embodiments of software, firmware and hardware in the entities illustrated in the figures. The actual software code or specialized control hardware used to implement the present invention is not limiting of the present invention. Thus, the operation and behavior of the embodiments were described without specific reference to the specific software code or specialized hardware components, it being understood that a person of ordinary skill in the art would be able to design software and control hardware to implement the embodiments based on the description herein.

Claims (20)

1. A method of ranking potential buyers within a network of competitive dealers, the method comprising:
(a) obtaining sales history data for each of the buyers in the network corresponding to vehicles comparable to a vehicle for sale, the sales history data including a plurality of sales indicators corresponding to sales made by the respective buyers;
(b) assigning a score to each of the sales indicators for each potential buyer based on the sales history; and
(c) generating a smart score for each potential buyer by aggregating the assigned scores for the sales indicators, wherein the smart score indicates the likelihood that each buyer will make a bid for the vehicle for sale.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the sales indicators are weighted.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the scores assigned to the sales indicators are assigned according to a normalized scale.
4. The method of claim, 1 wherein the scores assigned to the sales indicators for one of the buyers are relative to the sales history of the other buyers in the network.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the sales history data of each individual buyer is confidential to the other buyers.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the identity of each potential buyer is confidential to the other buyers.
7. The method of claim 1, where in the sales indicator scores for each potential buyer is confidential to the other buyers.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the smart score for each potential buyer is confidential to the other buyers.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the sales indicators used to calculate a smart score includes the number of bids a potential buyer made in the last predetermined number of days.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the sales indicators used to calculate the smart score includes a current day supply of a make and model of a vehicle for the potential buyer.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein the sales indicators used to calculate the smart score includes a current day supply of a make, model, and year of a vehicle for the potential buyer.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein the sales indicators used to calculate a smart score includes the number of the same make and model the buying dealer sold over a predetermined number of days.
13. The method of claim 1, wherein the sales indicators used to calculate a smart score includes the buying dealer's return on investment for the make and model vehicle purchased over a predetermined number of days, for the vehicle for sale.
14. The method of claim 1, wherein a potential buyer with a higher smart score is recommended to a selling dealer over a potential buyer with a lower smart score.
15. The method of claim 1, wherein a selling dealer selects at least one of the sales indicators used to generate the smart score for a potential buyer.
16. A method of making a recommendation to a dealer within a network of competitive dealers, the method comprising:
(a) monitoring the current inventories of the dealer and a plurality of other dealers in the network;
(b) obtaining a sales history of the dealer;
(c) obtaining the dealer's desired target day supply; and
(d) recommending an inventory adjustment to the dealer based on the current inventory of the dealer and other dealers to achieve the dealer's desired target day supply.
17. The method of claim 16 wherein the plurality of other dealer's sales history is monitored.
18. The method of claim 16 wherein the plurality of other dealer's current inventory is monitored.
19. The method of claim 16, wherein the identity of each potential buyer is confidential.
20. The method of claim 16, wherein the target day score of each potential buyer is confidential to the other buyers.
US13/162,245 2001-05-31 2011-06-16 Data Distribution Method and System Abandoned US20110307296A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/162,245 US20110307296A1 (en) 2001-05-31 2011-06-16 Data Distribution Method and System

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/867,416 US20020194051A1 (en) 2001-05-31 2001-05-31 Data distribution method and sytem
US12/244,522 US7966210B2 (en) 2001-05-31 2008-10-02 Data distribution method and system
US13/162,245 US20110307296A1 (en) 2001-05-31 2011-06-16 Data Distribution Method and System

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/244,522 Continuation US7966210B2 (en) 2001-05-31 2008-10-02 Data distribution method and system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20110307296A1 true US20110307296A1 (en) 2011-12-15

Family

ID=25349740

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/867,416 Abandoned US20020194051A1 (en) 2001-05-31 2001-05-31 Data distribution method and sytem
US12/244,522 Expired - Lifetime US7966210B2 (en) 2001-05-31 2008-10-02 Data distribution method and system
US13/162,245 Abandoned US20110307296A1 (en) 2001-05-31 2011-06-16 Data Distribution Method and System

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/867,416 Abandoned US20020194051A1 (en) 2001-05-31 2001-05-31 Data distribution method and sytem
US12/244,522 Expired - Lifetime US7966210B2 (en) 2001-05-31 2008-10-02 Data distribution method and system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (3) US20020194051A1 (en)

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100088158A1 (en) * 2007-03-16 2010-04-08 Dale Pollack System and method for providing competitive pricing for automobiles
US20130218636A1 (en) * 2009-11-25 2013-08-22 Hcd Software Llc System for determining a trade-in value of an item based on a match to a database of customers
US8538828B2 (en) 2011-10-18 2013-09-17 Autotrader.Com, Inc. Consumer-to-business exchange auction
US8595082B2 (en) 2011-10-18 2013-11-26 Autotrader.Com, Inc. Consumer-to-business exchange marketplace
WO2014130400A1 (en) * 2013-02-21 2014-08-28 International Business Machines Corporation Data distribution system, method and program product
CN107679918A (en) * 2017-10-17 2018-02-09 安徽机器猫电子商务股份有限公司 The business method for promoting off-line transaction to be shifted to online trading is serviced based on SaaS
US11190608B2 (en) 2018-03-21 2021-11-30 Cdk Global Llc Systems and methods for an automotive commerce exchange
US11501351B2 (en) 2018-03-21 2022-11-15 Cdk Global, Llc Servers, systems, and methods for single sign-on of an automotive commerce exchange
US11514021B2 (en) 2021-01-22 2022-11-29 Cdk Global, Llc Systems, methods, and apparatuses for scanning a legacy database
US11803535B2 (en) 2021-05-24 2023-10-31 Cdk Global, Llc Systems, methods, and apparatuses for simultaneously running parallel databases

Families Citing this family (100)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020198761A1 (en) * 2001-06-11 2002-12-26 First Look Networks, L.L.C. System and method for identifying a market by projecting demand and identifying supply
US7228298B1 (en) 2001-08-31 2007-06-05 Carfax, Inc. Apparatus and method for perusing selected vehicles having a clean title history
US7139809B2 (en) * 2001-11-21 2006-11-21 Clearcube Technology, Inc. System and method for providing virtual network attached storage using excess distributed storage capacity
US7592980B2 (en) * 2002-06-05 2009-09-22 Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. Semiconductor device
US7912792B2 (en) * 2002-07-12 2011-03-22 Vendavo, Inc. Systems and methods for making margin-sensitive price adjustments in an integrated price management system
US20040039646A1 (en) * 2002-08-22 2004-02-26 Reynolds And Reynolds Holdings, Inc. Automobile inventory engine
US7672984B2 (en) * 2003-06-02 2010-03-02 The Cobalt Group, Inc. Method and system of managing service reminders using mileage estimates
US20050015186A1 (en) * 2003-06-02 2005-01-20 John Kelly Method and system of managing service reminders using mileage estimates
US7617028B2 (en) * 2003-06-03 2009-11-10 The Cobalt Group, Inc. Method and system of managing service reminders and promotions using mileage estimates
US7542833B2 (en) 2003-06-03 2009-06-02 The Cobalt Group, Inc. Method and system of managing service reminders and scheduling service appointments using mileage estimates
US7636623B2 (en) 2003-06-03 2009-12-22 The Cobalt Group, Inc. Method and system of managing service reminders and scheduling service appointments using mileage estimates and recommended recall bulletins
US8306900B2 (en) * 2003-06-10 2012-11-06 Itg Software Solutions, Inc. System, method, and computer program product for executing a buy or sell order
US7778841B1 (en) 2003-07-16 2010-08-17 Carfax, Inc. System and method for generating information relating to histories for a plurality of vehicles
US7113853B2 (en) * 2003-07-16 2006-09-26 Carfax, Inc. System and method for generating vehicle history information
US9697544B1 (en) * 2003-07-16 2017-07-04 Carfax, Inc. System and method for generating information relating to a vehicle's history
US7418408B1 (en) * 2003-07-28 2008-08-26 Heppe George E Method for providing vehicle information at a live auction
US8595079B1 (en) 2003-11-26 2013-11-26 Carfax, Inc. System and method for determining vehicle price values
US7596512B1 (en) 2003-11-26 2009-09-29 Carfax, Inc. System and method for determining vehicle price adjustment values
US8606648B1 (en) 2003-12-05 2013-12-10 Carfax, Inc. System and method for determining potential for curbstoning and generating an advisory
US7783520B2 (en) * 2004-04-16 2010-08-24 Sap Ag Methods of accessing information for listing a product on a network based auction service
US20050234804A1 (en) * 2004-04-16 2005-10-20 Yue Fang Method and system for auto-mapping to network-based auctions
US7627500B2 (en) * 2004-04-16 2009-12-01 Sap Ag Method and system for verifying quantities for enhanced network-based auctions
US7860749B2 (en) * 2004-04-16 2010-12-28 Sap Ag Method, medium and system for customizable homepages for network-based auctions
US7788160B2 (en) * 2004-04-16 2010-08-31 Sap Ag Method and system for configurable options in enhanced network-based auctions
US7877313B2 (en) * 2004-04-16 2011-01-25 Sap Ag Method and system for a failure recovery framework for interfacing with network-based auctions
US20050256780A1 (en) * 2004-05-14 2005-11-17 Wired Logic, Inc. Electronically implemented vehicle marketing services
US20050261952A1 (en) * 2004-05-24 2005-11-24 Ford Motor Company Computer-implemented method and system for modeling and estimating vehicle sales
US20060004861A1 (en) * 2004-05-28 2006-01-05 Albanese Michael J System and method for displaying price modeling data
US7640198B1 (en) 2004-05-28 2009-12-29 Vendavo, Inc. System and method for generating and displaying indexed price modeling data
US8458060B2 (en) * 2004-05-28 2013-06-04 Vendavo, Inc. System and method for organizing price modeling data using hierarchically organized portfolios
US20050278227A1 (en) * 2004-05-28 2005-12-15 Niel Esary Systems and methods of managing price modeling data through closed-loop analytics
US8438084B1 (en) 2004-06-09 2013-05-07 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Method and system for inventory verification
US8725573B1 (en) * 2004-06-09 2014-05-13 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Method and system for creating and maintaining a virtual library
US8725595B1 (en) * 2004-06-09 2014-05-13 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Method and system for appraising a collection of products
US7505838B2 (en) * 2004-07-09 2009-03-17 Carfax, Inc. System and method for determining vehicle odometer rollback
US7577634B2 (en) * 2004-08-05 2009-08-18 First Look Networks Llc Method and apparatus for automatically providing expert analysis-based advice
US8396814B1 (en) 2004-08-09 2013-03-12 Vendavo, Inc. Systems and methods for index-based pricing in a price management system
US20060031179A1 (en) * 2004-08-09 2006-02-09 Vendavo, Inc. Systems and methods for making margin-sensitive price adjustments in an integrated price management system
US7613626B1 (en) 2004-08-09 2009-11-03 Vendavo, Inc. Integrated price management systems with future-pricing and methods therefor
US20060178973A1 (en) * 2005-01-18 2006-08-10 Michael Chiovari System and method for managing business performance
US8239535B2 (en) * 2005-06-06 2012-08-07 Adobe Systems Incorporated Network architecture with load balancing, fault tolerance and distributed querying
US20070038526A1 (en) * 2005-08-15 2007-02-15 The Cobalt Group, Inc. System and method to optimally clear non-selling inventory
US20070043770A1 (en) * 2005-08-22 2007-02-22 Redfin Discovery method for buyers, sellers of real estate
US8095428B2 (en) 2005-10-31 2012-01-10 Sap Ag Method, system, and medium for winning bid evaluation in an auction
US7895115B2 (en) 2005-10-31 2011-02-22 Sap Ag Method and system for implementing multiple auctions for a product on a seller's E-commerce site
US8095449B2 (en) 2005-11-03 2012-01-10 Sap Ag Method and system for generating an auction using a product catalog in an integrated internal auction system
US7835977B2 (en) * 2005-11-03 2010-11-16 Sap Ag Method and system for generating an auction using a template in an integrated internal auction system
US20070192180A1 (en) * 2006-02-10 2007-08-16 Lange William W Real estate media/prospect tracking system
US8301487B2 (en) 2006-05-02 2012-10-30 Vendavo, Inc. System and methods for calibrating pricing power and risk scores
CA2660493A1 (en) 2006-08-17 2008-02-21 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. System and method for providing a score for a used vehicle
US7680686B2 (en) * 2006-08-29 2010-03-16 Vendavo, Inc. System and methods for business to business price modeling using price change optimization
US10134086B2 (en) * 2012-12-06 2018-11-20 Xcira, Inc. Conversion enhanced auction environment
US7904355B1 (en) 2007-02-20 2011-03-08 Vendavo, Inc. Systems and methods for a revenue causality analyzer
US20090006118A1 (en) * 2007-03-16 2009-01-01 Dale Pollak System and method for providing competitive pricing for automobiles
US20100114955A1 (en) * 2007-08-02 2010-05-06 Marine Dealer Trader, Llc Method For Sharing Inventory
US8392280B1 (en) 2007-09-28 2013-03-05 Richard J. Kilshaw System for enabling consumers to evaluate automobile leases
US8515817B2 (en) * 2007-12-31 2013-08-20 Truecar, Inc. Systems and methods of matching purchase requests with consummated sales
US20090187513A1 (en) * 2008-01-22 2009-07-23 Zag.Com Inc., A Delaware Corporation Systems and methods for upfront vehicle pricing
US8412598B2 (en) 2008-02-06 2013-04-02 John Early Systems and methods for a causality analyzer
US9646308B1 (en) * 2008-06-06 2017-05-09 Carfax, Inc. Tool for selling and purchasing vehicle history reports
EP2913790A1 (en) 2008-09-09 2015-09-02 Truecar Inc. System and method for calculating and displaying price distributions based on analysis of transactions
US8612314B2 (en) 2008-09-09 2013-12-17 Truecar, Inc. System and method for the utilization of pricing models in the aggregation, analysis, presentation and monetization of pricing data for vehicles and other commodities
US20100191659A1 (en) * 2009-01-23 2010-07-29 Terry Hebron System, method and computer program product for calculating an appraisal price for a heavy truck
US20100198629A1 (en) * 2009-02-02 2010-08-05 Vuenu Media, LLC Motor vehicle valuation system and method with data filtering, analysis, and reporting capabilities
US20100241588A1 (en) * 2009-03-17 2010-09-23 Andrew Busby System and method for determining confidence levels for a market depth in a commodities market
US20110161206A1 (en) * 2009-12-30 2011-06-30 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. System and method for collection of data related to the sale of a vehicle
US20120005045A1 (en) 2010-07-01 2012-01-05 Baker Scott T Comparing items using a displayed diagram
US11301922B2 (en) 2010-11-18 2022-04-12 AUTO I.D., Inc. System and method for providing comprehensive vehicle information
US10977727B1 (en) 2010-11-18 2021-04-13 AUTO I.D., Inc. Web-based system and method for providing comprehensive vehicle build information
US8478665B1 (en) * 2011-01-21 2013-07-02 AutoSalesVelocity, Inc. Vehicle ordering system
US20120303474A1 (en) * 2011-05-24 2012-11-29 Nathan Sanel Vehicle trade banking system
US10296929B2 (en) 2011-06-30 2019-05-21 Truecar, Inc. System, method and computer program product for geo-specific vehicle pricing
US8589212B2 (en) * 2011-07-27 2013-11-19 Vauto, Inc. Vehicle desirability and stocking based on live markets
EP2710539A4 (en) 2011-07-28 2015-01-14 Truecar Inc System and method for analysis and presentation of used vehicle pricing data
US20150227942A1 (en) * 2012-01-05 2015-08-13 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Systems and methods for electronically determining eligibility of certified pre-owned status for vehicles
US10482494B2 (en) 2012-06-14 2019-11-19 Lotlinx Canada Manitoba, Inc. Steering distributions for connections from online campaigns of uniquely identifiable objects (UIOs) based on predicted distributions
US10089649B1 (en) 2012-06-14 2018-10-02 Long Tail Ventures, Inc. Advertising of uniquely identifiable objects
US10504159B2 (en) 2013-01-29 2019-12-10 Truecar, Inc. Wholesale/trade-in pricing system, method and computer program product therefor
US11270325B2 (en) * 2013-03-13 2022-03-08 Eversight, Inc. Systems and methods for collaborative offer generation
US10991001B2 (en) 2013-03-13 2021-04-27 Eversight, Inc. Systems and methods for intelligent promotion design with promotion scoring
US10984441B2 (en) 2013-03-13 2021-04-20 Eversight, Inc. Systems and methods for intelligent promotion design with promotion selection
US20140279176A1 (en) 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Redfin Corporation Provision of real-estate market information
US9505554B1 (en) 2013-09-24 2016-11-29 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Capturing packaging image via scanner
US9171278B1 (en) 2013-09-25 2015-10-27 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Item illumination based on image recognition
US9451674B1 (en) 2013-12-16 2016-09-20 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Inventory location illumination for designating operation path
US10832314B2 (en) * 2014-04-01 2020-11-10 NthGen Software Inc. System and method of automatic negotiation in vehicle auctions
US9940652B1 (en) * 2014-08-11 2018-04-10 Robert James Cole Restrictively exchanging and controlling vehicular data between communication devices of a private network
US20160092889A1 (en) * 2014-09-25 2016-03-31 Manheim Investments, Inc. Systems and methods for facilitating lead distribution
US10580054B2 (en) 2014-12-18 2020-03-03 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. System, method, apparatus and medium for simultaneously generating vehicle history reports and preapproved financing options
US10409867B1 (en) 2016-06-16 2019-09-10 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Systems and methods of managing a database of alphanumeric values
CN107085773A (en) * 2017-05-16 2017-08-22 交通运输部公路科学研究所 A kind of system and method for being used to evaluate vehicle in use technology status
US11210276B1 (en) 2017-07-14 2021-12-28 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Database system for automated event analysis and detection
US10878435B2 (en) * 2017-08-04 2020-12-29 Truecar, Inc. Method and system for presenting information for a geographically eligible set of automobile dealerships ranked based on likelihood scores
EP3738107A4 (en) 2018-01-09 2021-10-13 Archive Auto, Inc. Vehicle data acquisition and access system and method
US10740404B1 (en) 2018-03-07 2020-08-11 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Database system for dynamically generating customized models
US10565181B1 (en) 2018-03-07 2020-02-18 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Database system for dynamically generating customized models
US11238504B2 (en) * 2018-04-09 2022-02-01 Robert James Cole Systems and methods for restrictively exchanging and controlling product data between communication devices of a private network
US11157835B1 (en) 2019-01-11 2021-10-26 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Systems and methods for generating dynamic models based on trigger events
CN112101857A (en) * 2020-08-18 2020-12-18 优车库网络科技发展(深圳)有限公司 Vehicle transfer method and device
US11803800B2 (en) * 2020-10-30 2023-10-31 Truecar, Inc. Machine learning systems and methods for selection, filtering or presentation of available sales outlets in a distributed networked computing environment

Citations (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5237496A (en) * 1988-12-07 1993-08-17 Hitachi, Ltd. Inventory control method and system
US5615109A (en) * 1995-05-24 1997-03-25 Eder; Jeff Method of and system for generating feasible, profit maximizing requisition sets
US5635693A (en) * 1995-02-02 1997-06-03 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for tracking vehicles in vehicle lots
US5644725A (en) * 1989-11-20 1997-07-01 Deutsche Financial Services Computerized inventory monitoring and verification system and method
US5765143A (en) * 1995-02-28 1998-06-09 Triad Systems Corporation Method and system for inventory management
US5819232A (en) * 1996-03-22 1998-10-06 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Method and apparatus for inventory control of a manufacturing or distribution process
US5946662A (en) * 1996-03-29 1999-08-31 International Business Machines Corporation Method for providing inventory optimization
US5953707A (en) * 1995-10-26 1999-09-14 Philips Electronics North America Corporation Decision support system for the management of an agile supply chain
US6006201A (en) * 1996-03-29 1999-12-21 Adt Automotive, Inc. Electronic on-line motor vehicle auction and information system
US6092121A (en) * 1997-12-18 2000-07-18 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for electronically integrating data captured in heterogeneous information systems
US20010044769A1 (en) * 2000-03-06 2001-11-22 Chaves Jimmy Bernard Motor vehicle dealer e-tailing
US6341269B1 (en) * 1999-01-26 2002-01-22 Mercani Technologies, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture to optimize inventory and merchandising shelf space utilization
US6397226B1 (en) * 2000-06-07 2002-05-28 Mike Sage System and method for inventory control based on inventory aging
US20020091593A1 (en) * 2000-11-02 2002-07-11 Carl Fowler Electronic inventory movement and control device
US6470324B1 (en) * 1999-02-19 2002-10-22 Daimlerchrysler Corporation Dealer inventory management system
US6609101B1 (en) * 1999-03-26 2003-08-19 The Retail Pipeline Integration Group, Inc. Method and system for determining time-phased product sales forecasts and projected replenishment shipments for a retail stores supply chain
US6970841B1 (en) * 2000-04-17 2005-11-29 International Business Machines Corporation Large inventory-service optimization in configure-to-order systems
US7219080B1 (en) * 1999-03-31 2007-05-15 Autobytel.Com, Inc. Continuous online auction system and method
US7373323B1 (en) * 2000-04-13 2008-05-13 I2 Technologies Us, Inc. Method and system for multi-enterprise optimization using flexible trade contracts
US7702540B1 (en) * 1995-04-26 2010-04-20 Ebay Inc. Computer-implement method and system for conducting auctions on the internet
US7865420B1 (en) * 2001-01-22 2011-01-04 Voyager Technologies, Inc. Real time electronic commerce telecommunication system and method

Family Cites Families (40)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5504674A (en) * 1991-02-19 1996-04-02 Ccc Information Services, Inc. Insurance claims estimate, text, and graphics network and method
US5323315A (en) * 1991-08-02 1994-06-21 Vintek, Inc. Computer system for monitoring the status of individual items of personal property which serve as collateral for securing financing
US5402336A (en) * 1993-01-15 1995-03-28 Ss&D Corporation System and method for allocating resources of a retailer among multiple wholesalers
US5745882A (en) * 1995-01-09 1998-04-28 Us West Marketing Resources Group, Inc. Electronic classified advertising interface method and instructions with continuous search notification
US5765138A (en) * 1995-08-23 1998-06-09 Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. Apparatus and method for providing interactive evaluation of potential vendors
US6041310A (en) * 1996-12-12 2000-03-21 Green Ford, Inc. Method and system for automobile transactions
US6161099A (en) * 1997-05-29 2000-12-12 Muniauction, Inc. Process and apparatus for conducting auctions over electronic networks
US5978776A (en) * 1997-06-30 1999-11-02 Seretti; Harry Vehicular data exchange system and method therefor
US6055504A (en) * 1997-12-11 2000-04-25 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for accommodating electronic commerce in a communication network capacity market
US6341271B1 (en) * 1998-11-13 2002-01-22 General Electric Company Inventory management system and method
US6647373B1 (en) * 1998-12-24 2003-11-11 John Carlton-Foss Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic reverse auction information
US6868389B1 (en) * 1999-01-19 2005-03-15 Jeffrey K. Wilkins Internet-enabled lead generation
US6778968B1 (en) * 1999-03-17 2004-08-17 Vialogy Corp. Method and system for facilitating opportunistic transactions using auto-probes
US7383203B1 (en) * 1999-04-21 2008-06-03 Microsoft Corporation System and method for dynamically providing personalized tracked data and automatically updating the data
US7251609B1 (en) * 1999-04-29 2007-07-31 The Trustees Of Boston University Method for conducting clinical trials over the internet
US7013292B1 (en) * 1999-06-10 2006-03-14 Felicite.Com Inc. Method and system for universal gift registry
WO2000079460A1 (en) * 1999-06-23 2000-12-28 Webango, Inc. Method for buy-side bid management
JP2001076012A (en) * 1999-08-31 2001-03-23 Hitachi Ltd Method and device for gathering vehicle information
US7200571B1 (en) * 1999-09-21 2007-04-03 Schoeneckers, Inc. Computerized auction system for use with multiple purchasing media
US7577582B1 (en) * 1999-09-21 2009-08-18 Nextag, Inc. Methods and apparatus for facilitating transactions
US6980963B1 (en) * 1999-11-05 2005-12-27 Ford Motor Company Online system and method of status inquiry and tracking related to orders for consumer product having specific configurations
US7571131B1 (en) * 1999-11-05 2009-08-04 Ford Motor Company Method of conducting online competitive price quoting events
US7509261B1 (en) * 1999-12-06 2009-03-24 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Method for forecasting house prices using a dynamic error correction model
US20010032156A1 (en) * 1999-12-07 2001-10-18 Dan Candura System and method for evaluating work product
US7318042B2 (en) * 1999-12-22 2008-01-08 Amazon.Com, Inc. Selecting prospective bidders to whom to promote an online auction based upon bidding history
US7231363B1 (en) * 1999-12-29 2007-06-12 Wall Corporation Method and system for rebrokering orders in a trading system
US20010034631A1 (en) * 2000-01-21 2001-10-25 Kiselik Daniel R. Method and apparatus for the automatic selection of parties to an arrangement between a requestor and a satisfier of selected requirements
US7251630B1 (en) * 2000-02-17 2007-07-31 International Business Machines Corporation Distributed bid processing method for open-cry and descending price auctions
US7596509B1 (en) * 2000-06-30 2009-09-29 Jeffrey Bryson Computer system and method for negotiating the purchase and sale of goods or services using virtual sales
US7765140B1 (en) * 2000-08-08 2010-07-27 International Business Machines Corporation System for enhancing buyers performance in electronic commerce
US6647374B2 (en) * 2000-08-24 2003-11-11 Namita Kansal System and method of assessing and rating vendor risk and pricing of technology delivery insurance
US6877034B1 (en) * 2000-08-31 2005-04-05 Benchmark Portal, Inc. Performance evaluation through benchmarking using an on-line questionnaire based system and method
US20020082978A1 (en) * 2000-09-29 2002-06-27 Ahmed Ghouri System and method for soliciting bids
US20030158776A1 (en) * 2000-10-30 2003-08-21 Mark Landesmann Buyer-driven targeting of purchasing entities
US20020082882A1 (en) * 2000-12-21 2002-06-27 Accenture Llp Computerized method of evaluating and shaping a business proposal
US7133842B2 (en) * 2000-12-29 2006-11-07 International Business Machines Corporation System, method and program for bidding for best solution process execution in a heterogeneous network
US20020087473A1 (en) * 2000-12-29 2002-07-04 Shlomi Harif System, method and program for creating an authenticatable, non-repudiatable transactional identity in a heterogeneous network
US20020138334A1 (en) * 2001-03-22 2002-09-26 Decotiis Allen R. System, method and article of manufacture for propensity-based scoring of individuals
US20020194117A1 (en) * 2001-04-06 2002-12-19 Oumar Nabe Methods and systems for customer relationship management
US7216094B2 (en) * 2001-05-24 2007-05-08 Gelco Corporation Web vehicle ordering system

Patent Citations (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5237496A (en) * 1988-12-07 1993-08-17 Hitachi, Ltd. Inventory control method and system
US5644725A (en) * 1989-11-20 1997-07-01 Deutsche Financial Services Computerized inventory monitoring and verification system and method
US5635693A (en) * 1995-02-02 1997-06-03 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for tracking vehicles in vehicle lots
US5765143A (en) * 1995-02-28 1998-06-09 Triad Systems Corporation Method and system for inventory management
US7702540B1 (en) * 1995-04-26 2010-04-20 Ebay Inc. Computer-implement method and system for conducting auctions on the internet
US5615109A (en) * 1995-05-24 1997-03-25 Eder; Jeff Method of and system for generating feasible, profit maximizing requisition sets
US5953707A (en) * 1995-10-26 1999-09-14 Philips Electronics North America Corporation Decision support system for the management of an agile supply chain
US5819232A (en) * 1996-03-22 1998-10-06 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Method and apparatus for inventory control of a manufacturing or distribution process
US5946662A (en) * 1996-03-29 1999-08-31 International Business Machines Corporation Method for providing inventory optimization
US6006201A (en) * 1996-03-29 1999-12-21 Adt Automotive, Inc. Electronic on-line motor vehicle auction and information system
US6092121A (en) * 1997-12-18 2000-07-18 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for electronically integrating data captured in heterogeneous information systems
US6341269B1 (en) * 1999-01-26 2002-01-22 Mercani Technologies, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture to optimize inventory and merchandising shelf space utilization
US6470324B1 (en) * 1999-02-19 2002-10-22 Daimlerchrysler Corporation Dealer inventory management system
US6609101B1 (en) * 1999-03-26 2003-08-19 The Retail Pipeline Integration Group, Inc. Method and system for determining time-phased product sales forecasts and projected replenishment shipments for a retail stores supply chain
US7219080B1 (en) * 1999-03-31 2007-05-15 Autobytel.Com, Inc. Continuous online auction system and method
US20010044769A1 (en) * 2000-03-06 2001-11-22 Chaves Jimmy Bernard Motor vehicle dealer e-tailing
US7373323B1 (en) * 2000-04-13 2008-05-13 I2 Technologies Us, Inc. Method and system for multi-enterprise optimization using flexible trade contracts
US6970841B1 (en) * 2000-04-17 2005-11-29 International Business Machines Corporation Large inventory-service optimization in configure-to-order systems
US6397226B1 (en) * 2000-06-07 2002-05-28 Mike Sage System and method for inventory control based on inventory aging
US20020091593A1 (en) * 2000-11-02 2002-07-11 Carl Fowler Electronic inventory movement and control device
US7865420B1 (en) * 2001-01-22 2011-01-04 Voyager Technologies, Inc. Real time electronic commerce telecommunication system and method

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100088158A1 (en) * 2007-03-16 2010-04-08 Dale Pollack System and method for providing competitive pricing for automobiles
US20130218636A1 (en) * 2009-11-25 2013-08-22 Hcd Software Llc System for determining a trade-in value of an item based on a match to a database of customers
US8538828B2 (en) 2011-10-18 2013-09-17 Autotrader.Com, Inc. Consumer-to-business exchange auction
US8595082B2 (en) 2011-10-18 2013-11-26 Autotrader.Com, Inc. Consumer-to-business exchange marketplace
US9898479B2 (en) 2013-02-21 2018-02-20 International Business Machines Corporation Data distribution system, method and program product
WO2014130400A1 (en) * 2013-02-21 2014-08-28 International Business Machines Corporation Data distribution system, method and program product
US9092498B2 (en) 2013-02-21 2015-07-28 International Business Machines Corporation Data distribution system, method and program product
CN107679918A (en) * 2017-10-17 2018-02-09 安徽机器猫电子商务股份有限公司 The business method for promoting off-line transaction to be shifted to online trading is serviced based on SaaS
US11190608B2 (en) 2018-03-21 2021-11-30 Cdk Global Llc Systems and methods for an automotive commerce exchange
US11501351B2 (en) 2018-03-21 2022-11-15 Cdk Global, Llc Servers, systems, and methods for single sign-on of an automotive commerce exchange
US11616856B2 (en) 2018-03-21 2023-03-28 Cdk Global, Llc Systems and methods for an automotive commerce exchange
US11514021B2 (en) 2021-01-22 2022-11-29 Cdk Global, Llc Systems, methods, and apparatuses for scanning a legacy database
US11803535B2 (en) 2021-05-24 2023-10-31 Cdk Global, Llc Systems, methods, and apparatuses for simultaneously running parallel databases

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20020194051A1 (en) 2002-12-19
US20090083130A1 (en) 2009-03-26
US7966210B2 (en) 2011-06-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7966210B2 (en) Data distribution method and system
US10796362B2 (en) Used automobile transaction facilitation for a specific used automobile
US10262307B2 (en) Automated system for adapting market data for transaction cost analysis
US10223722B2 (en) Automobile transaction facilitation based on a customer selection of a specific automobile
US8095458B2 (en) System and method for matching loan consumers and lenders
US8046269B2 (en) Auction based procurement system
US20020138399A1 (en) Method and system for creating and using a peer-to-peer trading network
US20040128262A1 (en) Distributed processing systems
US8577780B2 (en) Method and system for identifying high probability trade matches
US20050187858A1 (en) Fixed income security offerings management techniques and related applications
US20060047598A1 (en) System and method for web-based procurement
US20060173773A1 (en) Systems and methods for automated offer-based negotiation
US20060080229A1 (en) Automated method and system for processing mortgage leads
US20020123937A1 (en) System and method for peer-to-peer commerce
KR100412345B1 (en) System and method for integrating stock issuing and trading
WO2006024136A1 (en) System and method for web-based procurement
WO2000070520A1 (en) Method for facilitating a continuous market auction system
JP2002140568A (en) Selling method of industrial vehicle and sales system to be used for the same
TW202341035A (en) Automated commodity/service offering system and method
WO2001063526A1 (en) Method and system for creating and using a peer-to-peer trading network
JP2002074060A (en) Idea application fund collecting method, idea application method and apparatus for them
AU2002225217A1 (en) Improvements relating to distributed processing systems

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: LANDMARK VENTURES I, L.L.C., NEVADA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PRICEDRIVE, INC.;REEL/FRAME:026466/0194

Effective date: 20050106

Owner name: LANDMARK NV-S VENTURES GROUP, INC., NEVADA

Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:LANDMARK NV VENTURES GROUP, INC.;REEL/FRAME:026466/0590

Effective date: 20051130

Owner name: LANDMARK NV VENTURES GROUP, INC., NEVADA

Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:LANDMARK VENTURES I, L.L.C.;REEL/FRAME:026466/0438

Effective date: 20051123

Owner name: PRICEDRIVE, INC., VIRGINIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HALL, STEPHEN A.;JAVDAN, DAVID G.;MOORE, ROBERT B.;REEL/FRAME:026466/0040

Effective date: 20010530

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION