Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20110173205 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 13/073,257
Publication date14 Jul 2011
Filing date28 Mar 2011
Priority date26 Aug 2005
Also published asUS7779011, US7937394, US20070050337, US20100299358, US20130018880
Publication number073257, 13073257, US 2011/0173205 A1, US 2011/173205 A1, US 20110173205 A1, US 20110173205A1, US 2011173205 A1, US 2011173205A1, US-A1-20110173205, US-A1-2011173205, US2011/0173205A1, US2011/173205A1, US20110173205 A1, US20110173205A1, US2011173205 A1, US2011173205A1
InventorsSashikumar Venkataraman, Rakesh Barve, Murali Aravamudan, Ajit Rajasekharan
Original AssigneeVeveo, Inc.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Method and system for dynamically processing ambiguous, reduced text search queries and highlighting results thereof
US 20110173205 A1
Abstract
A method and system are provided of processing a search query entered by a user of a device having a text input interface with overloaded keys. The search query is directed at identifying an item from a set of items. Each of the items has a name including one or more words. The system receives from the user an ambiguous search query directed at identifying a desired item. The search query comprises a prefix substring of at least one word in the name of the desired item. The system dynamically identifies a group of one or more items from the set of items having one or more words in the names thereof matching the search query as the user enters each character of the search query. The system also orders the one or more items of the group in accordance with given criteria. The names of the one or more items of the identified group are output to be displayed on the device operated by the user as ordered with the characters of the one or more words in the names corresponding to the prefix substring of the search query being highlighted.
Images(8)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(1)
1. A method of processing unresolved keystroke entries by a user from a keypad with keys in which a given key is in fixed association with a number and at least one alphabetic character, the unresolved keystroke entries being directed at identifying an item from a set of items, each item of the set of items being associated with information describing the item, the information comprising one or more words, the method comprising:
providing access to an index of the items of the set of items, the index including an association between subsets of the items of the set of items and strings of one or more unresolved keystrokes so that the subsets of the items are mapped to corresponding ones of the strings of one or more unresolved keystrokes for various search query prefix substrings;
for at least one subset of the subsets, determining which letters and numbers present in information associated with and describing the items of the subset caused the items to be associated with the strings of one or more unresolved keystrokes that are mapped to the subset;
receiving from a user a search query for desired items composed of unresolved keystrokes, the search query comprising a prefix substring for at least one word in information associated with the desired item;
in response to each unresolved keystroke, identifying and displaying the subsets of items, and information associated therewith, that are associated with the strings of one or more unresolved keystrokes received from the user based on the mapping of strings of unresolved keystrokes to subsets of items; and
in response to each unresolved keystroke, as the identified items are displayed, highlighting the letters and numbers present in the one or more words in the information describing the identified items that were determined to have caused the displayed items to be associated with the strings of unresolved keystrokes that are mapped to the items so as to illustrate to the user how the unresolved keystrokes entered match the information associated with the displayed items.
Description
    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • [0001]
    This application is a continuation claiming the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 120 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/848,432, entitled Method And System For Dynamically Processing Ambiguous, Reduced Text Search Queries And Highlighting Results Thereof, filed Aug. 2, 2010, which is a continuation claiming the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 120 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/312,908, entitled Method And System For Dynamically Processing Ambiguous, Reduced Text Search Queries And Highlighting Results Thereof, filed Dec. 20, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,779,011, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/711,866 filed Aug. 26, 2005 and entitled A Dynamic Highlighting Interface of Multi Word Prefixes of Results Obtained by Incremental Search with Reduced Text Entry on Television and Mobile Devices Using a Keypad with Overloaded Keys and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/716,101 filed Sep. 12, 2005, and entitled Method and System for Incremental Search With Reduced Text Entry Using a Reduced Keypad With Overloaded Keys, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE DISCLOSURE
  • [0002]
    1. Field of Invention
  • [0003]
    The present invention generally relates to processing search queries and, more particularly, to methods and systems for processing ambiguous, reduced text, search queries and highlighting results thereof.
  • [0004]
    2. Description of Related Art
  • [0005]
    There are many user-operated devices such as mobile phones, PDAs (personal digital assistants), and television remote control devices that have small keypads, which a user can use for text entry. In many of these devices, largely because of device size constraints, the keypad is small and has only a small number of keys, which are overloaded with alpha-numeric characters. Text input using these keypads is cumbersome.
  • [0006]
    FIG. 1 illustrates a common twelve-key keypad interface found in many cell phones and other mobile devices, and also increasingly in devices like television remote control devices. The keypad 10 includes twelve keys 12, most of which are overloaded with multiple alpha-numeric characters or functions. The same key can be pressed to enter different characters. For instance, the “2” key can be used to enter the number “2” and the letters “A”, “B” and “C”. Text entry using such a keypad with overloaded keys can result in an ambiguous text entry, which requires some type of a disambiguation action. For instance, with a so-called multi-press interface, a user can press a particular key multiple times in quick succession to select a desired character (e.g., to choose “B”, the user would press the “2” key twice quickly, and to choose “C”, the user would press the key three times quickly). Alternatively, text entry can be performed using the so-called T9 and other text input mechanisms that provide vocabulary based completion choices for each word entered. Neither of these methods is however particularly suitable for use in performing searches because of the number of steps needed to get to the result. One deficiency of the multi-press interface is that too many key strokes are needed. A drawback of applying a vocabulary based word completion interface is the need for the additional step of making a choice from a list of all possible word matches generated by the ambiguous text input. Furthermore vocabulary based word disambiguation systems are designed typically for composition applications (as opposed to search applications) where user explicitly disambiguates each word by performing a word completion action to resolve that word before proceeding to the next word in the composition. This deficiency is even more apparent for a multi-word search system where results could ideally be obtained by the entry of just a few characters. These methods suffer from the fact that the fewer the number of characters entered, the greater the ambiguity of the input. (The ambiguity decreases as the input character count increases.) This has the undesirable consequence of reducing the usefulness of a search engine that has the potential to retrieve results with just a few input characters.
  • BRIEF SUMMARY OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
  • [0007]
    In accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention, a method and system are provided of processing a search query entered by a user of a device having a text input interface with overloaded keys. The search query is directed at identifying an item from a set of items. Each of the items has a name comprising one or more words. The system receives from the user an ambiguous search query directed at identifying a desired item. The search query comprises a prefix substring of at least one word in the name of the desired item. The system dynamically identifies a group of one or more items from the set of items having one or more words in the names thereof matching the search query as the user enters each character of the search query. The system also orders the one or more items of the group in accordance with given criteria. The names of the one or more items of the identified group are output to be displayed on the device operated by the user as ordered with the characters of the one or more words in the names corresponding to the prefix substring of the search query being highlighted.
  • [0008]
    These and other features will become readily apparent from the following detailed description wherein embodiments of the invention are shown and described by way of illustration. As will be realized, the invention is capable of other and different embodiments and its several details may be capable of modifications in various respects, all without departing from the invention. Accordingly, the drawings and description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not in a restrictive or limiting sense with the scope of the application being indicated in the claims.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEW OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0009]
    For a more complete understanding of various embodiments of the present invention, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:
  • [0010]
    FIG. 1 illustrates a keypad with overloaded keys in accordance with the prior art.
  • [0011]
    FIG. 2 illustrates a search system in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.
  • [0012]
    FIG. 3 illustrates exemplary device configuration options for various devices for performing searches in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.
  • [0013]
    FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating a method for finding and highlighting results of a reduced text, ambiguous search query made using an overloaded keypad in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.
  • [0014]
    FIG. 5A illustrates the different match possibilities for a single-word and multi-word prefix query in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.
  • [0015]
    FIG. 5B illustrates possible ordering criteria for search results in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.
  • [0016]
    FIGS. 6A and 6B illustrate an exemplary text input interface and a display interface, respectively. The display interface shows the results of a sample incremental search where the user has entered a single-word query in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.
  • [0017]
    FIGS. 7A and 7B illustrate an exemplary text input interface and a display interface, respectively. The display interface shows the results of a sample incremental search where the user has entered a multi-word query in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.
  • [0018]
    Like reference numerals generally refer to like elements in the drawings.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS
  • [0019]
    Briefly, methods and systems are provided in accordance with various embodiments of the invention for performing searches using ambiguous text input from devices having limited text input interfaces, and highlighting results of the searches.
  • [0020]
    As described in further detail below, in accordance with various embodiments of the invention, methods and systems are provided for processing a search query entered by a user of a device having a text input interface with overloaded keys. The search query is directed at identifying an item from a set of items. Each of the items has a name comprising one or more words.
  • [0021]
    Using the text input interface, the user can enter an ambiguous search query directed at identifying a desired item. The search query comprises a prefix substring of at least one word in the name of the desired item. A prefix substring of a word is a variable length string of characters that contains fewer than all the characters making up the word.
  • [0022]
    The system dynamically identifies a group of one or more items from the set of items having one or more words in the names thereof matching said search query as the user enters each character of said search query. The group of the one or more items is displayed on the device operated by the user with the characters of the one or more words in the names corresponding to the prefix substring of the search query being highlighted. The items are preferably displayed in an order of expected interest to the user.
  • [0023]
    The user types in the prefix input query by pressing overloaded keys of the text input interface once to form each character of an ambiguous query string. In accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention, the search space containing the searchable items is initially indexed by performing a many-to-many mapping from the alphanumeric space of terms to numeric strings corresponding to the various prefixes of each alphanumeric term constituting the query string. In a numeric string, each alphanumeric character in the string is replaced by its corresponding numeric equivalent based on the arrangement of characters on the keypad, e.g., the commonly used twelve-key reduced keypad shown in FIG. 1. This mapping scheme enables the system in accordance with one or more embodiments to incrementally retrieve results matching the ambiguous alphanumeric input query, as the user types in each character of the query. The user does not have to explicitly specify the termination of each word in the query to assist the system in disambiguating the input query; instead, the user only enters an input query that includes prefix substrings from the one or more words of the query. If multiple word prefixes are entered, the system can leverage off the multiple word prefixes to disambiguate it. A multiple word prefix based disambiguation method can reduce the amount of text and steps needed to enter a multiple word input query and retrieve results.
  • [0024]
    There are various possible applications for the search techniques described herein including, e.g., assisting television viewers in identifying desired television content items and channels, and assisting users of mobile devices such as cell phones and PDAs in performing searches for items in various databases (e.g., performing searches in directories of people or businesses, searching for and purchasing products/services like airline tickets, and searching for transportation schedules such as airline and train schedules, and for searching for audio and/or video content).
  • [0025]
    In the context of television systems, the term “television content items” can include a wide variety of video/audio content including, but not limited to, television shows, movies, music videos, or any other identifiable content that can be selected by a television viewer. Searching for television content items can be performed across disparate content sources including, but not limited to, broadcast television, VOD, IPTV, and PVR (local and network).
  • [0026]
    FIG. 2 schematically illustrates an overall system for performing searches with reduced text entry using various devices in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention. The system includes a server farm or system 202, a network 204, and a variety of devices 206, 208, 210 operated by users with text input interfaces. In accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention, the server 202 processes search queries received from the user devices 206, 208, 210. In other embodiments, the search queries are processed on the devices themselves. As discussed below, the server 202 can be the source of search data and relevance updates. If part of a television system, the server 202 can also be the source of or be linked to a source of at least some of the available television content (e.g., a cable or satellite television operator) from which the user can obtain content associated with search results.
  • [0027]
    The network 204 functions as the distribution framework for transmitting data from the server 202 to the devices operated by the users. The distribution network 204 could be wired or wireless connections or some combination thereof. Examples of possible networks include computer networks, cable television networks, satellite television networks, IP-based television networks, mobile communications networks (such as, e.g., wireless CDMA and GSM networks), wired telephone networks, and IP-based wired and wireless networks.
  • [0028]
    The search devices could have a wide range of interface capabilities. A device, e.g., could be a hand-held mobile communications device 206 such as a cellular phone or PDA having a limited display size and a reduced keypad with overloaded keys. Another type of search device is a television system 204 with a remote control device 208 having an overloaded keypad. Another possible search device is a desk telephone 210 with a reduced keyboard and a small display screen.
  • [0029]
    FIG. 3 illustrates multiple exemplary configurations for search devices in accordance with various embodiments of the invention. In one configuration, a search device (e.g., devices 206, 208, 210) can have a display 302, a processor 304, volatile memory 306, text input interface 308, remote connectivity 310 to the server 202 through the network 204, and a persistent storage 312. A device configuration for a device such as the hand-held device 206 might not include local persistent storage 312. In this case, the device 206 could have remote connectivity 310 to submit the query to the server 202 and retrieve results from it. Another configuration of the devices 206, 208, 210 may not have remote connectivity 310. In this case, the search database may be locally resident on a local persistent storage 312. The persistent storage 312 may be, e.g., a removable storage element such as SD, SmartMedia, CompactFlash card etc. In a configuration of the device with remote connectivity 310 and persistent storage 312 for performing searches (e.g., a television system 208), the device may use the remote connectivity for search relevance data update or for the case where the search database is distributed on the local storage 312 and on the server 202. A preferred configuration in a memory constrained device is the search data residing remotely on a server. Unlike composition applications where the “most frequently used or popular terms space” are small in size and can be maintained in a local vocabulary, search spaces are typically larger inherently because people instinctively use unique word “signatures” to recall an item of interest. Hence maintaining search spaces locally may not be practical in many devices that have limited local memory, making a network based search configuration preferable.
  • [0030]
    In one exemplary embodiment, a television system 208 may have a set-top box or other device with a one-way link to a satellite network. In this configuration, all search data including relevance updates may be downloaded to the device through a satellite link to perform local searching. In this case, the set-top box preferably has sufficient storage capacity to maintain search spaces locally. Local storage is preferably large in this case to circumvent the deficiency of a one-way link.
  • [0031]
    FIG. 4 illustrates a search process in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention. At step 402, the user enters a character using an ambiguous text input interface, e.g., using a keypad with overloaded keys where a single key press is performed for each character entered. At 404, an incremental search system determines and displays at least some of the results that match the input character entered at 402. Since the input is ambiguous, the match of results would include the matches for all the ambiguous input characters represented by the single key press (including those not of interest to the user). To address this increased set of matches, an ordering scheme is preferably used to order the results to improve accessibility to results expected to be more of interest to the user. The ordering of results can be based on a variety of criteria including, e.g., temporal relevance, location relevance, popularity and personal preferences (that may have been determined implicitly or explicitly) or some combination of these criteria. (In a television application, temporal relevance can be used to favor programs whose timing may be more of interest to the viewer. For example, if the user entered NBA, then the system would list the games in order of temporal relevance such as those in progress or are scheduled to begin in the near future are listed at the higher on the list. The popularity criterion can be used to favor programs or channels that are more popular than others. The personal preference criterion can be used to favor programs or channels that the user has indicated preference for in prior user selections. For example, if a user frequently scrolls down to “CNBC” and selects it, the system would over time place CNBC higher in the list of results over a more generally popular channel such as CNN. Furthermore, identity independent time-based usage pattern learning algorithms can be applied in conjunction with personalization to apply the results ordering rules in an appropriate context. Also, e.g., when using a PDA or cell phone to search for a business, the system may use location relevance as part of the ordering criteria.)
  • [0032]
    In addition, other ordering schemes can be used in addition to or instead of the schemes indicated above such as character count based subspace biasing. In a character count based subspace biasing scheme, items in the search space do not have a constant relevance value, but rather have a relevance value that is a function of the number of characters entered so far in the prefix substring. In such a scheme, the search space (i.e., set of items that can be searched for) can divided into multiple subspaces. The relative relevance of a given subspace (and all the items contained therein) is dynamically boosted or suppressed as a function of the number of characters in the search query. As an example, a subspace containing television channel names might be boosted when the character count is one because television viewers might expect to find a channel with a single key press. Various examples of character count based subspace biasing are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/246,432 entitled “Method And System For Incremental Search With Reduced Text Entry Where The Relevance Of Results Is A Dynamically Computed Function Of User Input Search String Character Count” and filed on Oct. 7, 2005, which is assigned to the assignee of the present application and is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
  • [0033]
    The ordering criteria can also give preference to the results matching the search query based on a lexical match of the type of query input, e.g., in the following order of preference: single term prefixes, multiple term prefixes, and lastly abbreviation matches.
  • [0034]
    In accordance with various embodiments of the invention and as will be described below with reference to FIGS. 6B and 7B, the characters in the search result items that match the search prefix substring characters are highlighted to provide the user with a visual indication of the relationship between the key or keys pressed and the incremental match results. This facilitates identification by the user of the item of interest from the group of items displayed.
  • [0035]
    If the user does not find the desired results at 406, he or she can continue to enter more characters to the search query at step 402. Then at step 404, the system will perform the search based on the cumulative substring of characters of the search query entered by the user up to that point.
  • [0036]
    In the scenario where user does not reach the result due to misspelling or due to the case of a word whose uniqueness (e.g., Tom Brown, Todd Brown) is embedded in the suffix of a word in the query (as opposed to the prefix), the user would have to either go back to the first word and enter more characters or erase one or more of the typed characters and re-enter characters to reach the desired result. The dynamic highlight of the prefix strings in the results for each character entry enables the user to recover from an error during the text entry process itself, in contrast to discovering that no results match after typing the entire text.
  • [0037]
    FIG. 5A illustrates the two broad categories of input queries and the various potential matches they could have in the results space. Input queries that do not include an explicit space or other break character form a single-word prefix query. A single-word query 501 can either match a single-word term 503 or an abbreviation representing multiple words 505. Input queries that explicitly include a space character or other break character between character entries form a multi-word prefix query. A multi-word prefix query 502 can match a multi-word term 504 or an abbreviation presenting multiple words. In an exemplary search of a movie database, the matches could be a direct match on terms representing a title (e.g., for the search query “go mu”, a match could be the movie title Gods Must Be Crazy) or it could be matches on terms representing different types of information (e.g., if a user is searching for a movie starring Tom Hanks that features volleyball, he or she may enter the search query “to vo” to get the result: Tom Hanks Volleyball). As described earlier, these matches are then ordered in decreasing relevance, and in one or more embodiments, in the following order: single-word term matches 506 and multi-word term matches 507 followed by multi-word abbreviation matches 508 as illustrated in FIG. 5B.
  • [0038]
    FIGS. 6A and 6B illustrate an example of highlighted search results in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention. FIG. 6A illustrates an overloaded keypad interface 602, which can in a television application, be an on-screen interface. In this example, the user has entered a single-word text input query “866” using the keypad 602. The results of the search input are shown in FIG. 6B, which shows single-word term matches 603 and 604 ordered before abbreviation matches 605 and 606. Because each key pressed by the user is overloaded and represents multiple possible search prefixes, simply displaying the text input “866” with the results will not provide the user sufficient information to associate his or her input with the match results. The “8” character entered initially by the user matches all items in the search database containing any word which begins with any of the alphanumeric characters “8”, “T”, “U” or “V”. Examples of matches to the first character would be “8MM” 604 and “Star Trek” (not shown here since what is shown is the result of the query 866, not 8). The “6” character next entered by the user limits these search results only to items containing words that begin with the alphanumeric characters “8”, “T”, “U” or “V” and whose second character is one of the alphanumeric characters “6”, “M”, “N” or “O” or to items containing words that begin with the alphanumeric characters “8”, “T”, “U” or “V” and that also contain subsequent words that begin with the alphanumeric characters “6”, “M”, “N” or “O”. The earlier match, “Star Trek”, would drop out of the match results when the user pressed the overloaded “6” key because the “r” following the “T” matched by the “8” character does not match “6”, “M”, “N” or “O” and there are no words following “Trek” to match the “6”, “M”, “N” or “O”.
  • [0039]
    The next “6” character entered by the user as the third overloaded character further limits the search result to only those matches that also contain the alphanumeric characters “6”, “M”, “N” or “O” immediately following one of the matched characters for the first “6” previously entered or that contain subsequent words that begin with the alphanumeric characters “6”, “M”, “N” or “O”. This relationship between the overloaded characters entered by the user and the match results is complicated and not necessarily intuitive to the user. In various embodiments of the invention, the characters in the search result that match the overloaded single-word search prefix characters are highlighted, providing the user with a visual indication of the relationship between the key pressed and the incremental match results. This facilitates identification by the user of the item of interest from the group of items displayed.
  • [0040]
    The term “highlighting” as used herein refers to making more prominent or otherwise making more distinct characters of interest in the search results relative to other characters. Non-limiting examples of highlighting include bolding, italicizing, coloring, underlining, or changing font of (or some combination thereof) the characters of interest relative to the others.
  • [0041]
    In another example, FIG. 7B illustrates the results for a multi-word text input “866 2” using a 12-key keypad 702 shown in FIG. 7A. As discussed earlier, the multi-word term matches 703 are preferably ordered ahead of multi-word abbreviation matches. The difference between the single-word search illustrated in FIG. 6B and the multi-word search illustrated in FIG. 7B is that the use of an explicit word separator in the user input (in this case a space character) before the “2” entry, further limits results of the search. Only the results of the search illustrated in FIG. 6B for prefix substring “866” that also contain at least two words and in which a subsequent word begins with “2”, “A”, “B”, or “C” are included in the results displayed to the user. A title such as “Tomb Raider” would not match the multi-word search even though the word “Tomb” matches the overloaded keys “8”, “6”, “6”, “2” because the “2” must match the first letter in a subsequent word. As in the FIG. 6B example, the characters in the ordered result that match the multi-word overloaded search prefix characters are highlighted to provide the user with immediate feedback relating the key pressed to the incremental match results.
  • [0042]
    Methods of processing ambiguous search query inputs from users and highlighting results in accordance with various embodiments of the invention are preferably implemented in software, and accordingly one of the preferred implementations is as a set of instructions (program code) in a code module resident in the random access memory of a computer. Until required by the computer, the set of instructions may be stored in another computer memory, e.g., in a hard disk drive, or in a removable memory such as an optical disk (for eventual use in a CD ROM) or floppy disk (for eventual use in a floppy disk drive), or downloaded via the Internet or some other computer network. In addition, although the various methods described are conveniently implemented in a general purpose computer selectively activated or reconfigured by software, one of ordinary skill in the art would also recognize that such methods may be carried out in hardware, in firmware, or in more specialized apparatus constructed to perform the specified method steps.
  • [0043]
    Having described preferred embodiments of the present invention, it should be apparent that modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
  • [0044]
    Method claims set forth below having steps that are numbered or designated by letters should not be considered to be necessarily limited to the particular order in which the steps are recited.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US1261167 *25 Oct 19172 Apr 1918Robert C RussellIndex.
US4453217 *4 Jan 19825 Jun 1984Bell Telephone Laboratories, IncorporatedDirectory lookup method and apparatus
US4893238 *17 Feb 19889 Jan 1990U.S. Philips CorporationText processing device for stenographic typing
US5224060 *29 Jul 199229 Jun 1993Ma Hsi KuangMobile computer with pen base/keyboard input modes
US5487616 *1 Jun 199530 Jan 1996Jean D. IchbiahMethod for designing an ergonomic one-finger keyboard and apparatus therefor
US5623406 *6 Mar 199522 Apr 1997Jean D. IchbiahMethod and system for entering text in computer equipment
US5635989 *13 Feb 19963 Jun 1997Hughes ElectronicsMethod and apparatus for sorting and searching a television program guide
US5745889 *9 Aug 199628 Apr 1998Digital Equipment CorporationMethod for parsing information of databases records using word-location pairs and metaword-location pairs
US5774588 *7 Jun 199530 Jun 1998United Parcel Service Of America, Inc.Method and system for comparing strings with entries of a lexicon
US5859662 *23 May 199612 Jan 1999International Business Machines CorporationApparatus and method for selectively viewing video information
US5880768 *6 Apr 19959 Mar 1999Prevue Networks, Inc.Interactive program guide systems and processes
US5912664 *10 Nov 199715 Jun 1999Lucent Technologies Inc.Program category selection with filtered data and displayed cascaded cards
US6011554 *26 Jul 19964 Jan 2000Tegic Communications, Inc.Reduced keyboard disambiguating system
US6041311 *28 Jan 199721 Mar 2000Microsoft CorporationMethod and apparatus for item recommendation using automated collaborative filtering
US6047300 *15 May 19974 Apr 2000Microsoft CorporationSystem and method for automatically correcting a misspelled word
US6075526 *9 Dec 199613 Jun 2000Hughes Electronics CorporationMethod and apparatus for sorting and searching a television program guide based on user profile
US6169984 *1 Apr 19982 Jan 2001Microsoft CorporationGlobal incremental type search navigation directly from printable keyboard character input
US6184877 *11 Dec 19966 Feb 2001International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for interactively accessing program information on a television
US6189002 *8 Dec 199913 Feb 2001Dolphin SearchProcess and system for retrieval of documents using context-relevant semantic profiles
US6223059 *22 Feb 200024 Apr 2001Nokia Mobile Phones LimitedCommunication terminal having a predictive editor application
US6377945 *9 Jul 199923 Apr 2002Fast Search & Transfer AsaSearch system and method for retrieval of data, and the use thereof in a search engine
US6529903 *26 Dec 20004 Mar 2003Google, Inc.Methods and apparatus for using a modified index to provide search results in response to an ambiguous search query
US6564213 *18 Apr 200013 May 2003Amazon.Com, Inc.Search query autocompletion
US6564313 *20 Dec 200113 May 2003Lsi Logic CorporationSystem and method for efficient instruction prefetching based on loop periods
US6721954 *23 Jun 199913 Apr 2004Gateway, Inc.Personal preferred viewing using electronic program guide
US6732369 *11 Apr 19974 May 2004Starsight Telecast, Inc.Systems and methods for contextually linking television program information
US6839702 *13 Dec 20004 Jan 2005Google Inc.Systems and methods for highlighting search results
US6839705 *10 Feb 19984 Jan 2005Gateway, Inc.Method for delivering and caching preprocessed search results to improve performance of background information searches on a convergence device
US6850693 *19 Mar 20031 Feb 2005Starsight Telecast, Inc.User interface for television schedule system
US6865575 *27 Jan 20038 Mar 2005Google, Inc.Methods and apparatus for using a modified index to provide search results in response to an ambiguous search query
US6865746 *30 Nov 19998 Mar 2005United Video Properties, Inc.Electronic program guide with related-program search feature
US7013304 *20 Oct 199914 Mar 2006Xerox CorporationMethod for locating digital information files
US7213256 *29 Dec 20001 May 2007Dan KikinisMethod and apparatus for finding the same of similar shows
US7225180 *28 Dec 200029 May 2007Aol LlcFiltering search results
US7225184 *18 Jul 200329 May 2007Overture Services, Inc.Disambiguation of search phrases using interpretation clusters
US7225455 *15 Jan 200329 May 2007United Video Properties, Inc.Electronic television program guide schedule system and method
US7487151 *15 Nov 20043 Feb 2009Sony CorporationInformation processing apparatus, information processing method, program for implementing information processing method, information processing system, and method for information processing system
US7536384 *14 Sep 200719 May 2009Veveo, Inc.Methods and systems for dynamically rearranging search results into hierarchically organized concept clusters
US20020002550 *7 Feb 20013 Jan 2002Berman Andrew P.Process for enabling flexible and fast content-based retrieval
US20020042791 *26 Dec 200011 Apr 2002Google, Inc.Methods and apparatus for using a modified index to provide search results in response to an ambiguous search query
US20020052873 *23 Jul 20012 May 2002Joaquin DelgadoSystem and method for obtaining user preferences and providing user recommendations for unseen physical and information goods and services
US20020059621 *9 Oct 200116 May 2002Thomas William L.Systems and methods for providing storage of data on servers in an on-demand media delivery system
US20020083448 *21 Dec 200027 Jun 2002Johnson Carolynn RaeDedicated channel for displaying programs
US20030005452 *13 Nov 20012 Jan 2003Rodriguez Arturo A.Graphic user interface alternate download options for unavailable PRM content
US20030005462 *27 Jul 20012 Jan 2003Broadus Charles R.Noise reduction for teleconferencing within an interactive television system
US20030011573 *16 Jul 200216 Jan 2003Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Information input method using wearable information input device
US20030014753 *20 Dec 200016 Jan 2003Brian BeachDistributed , interactive television program guide; system and method
US20030023976 *31 May 200230 Jan 2003Yakov KamenNovel method for making selections in search criteria in TV EPGs
US20030037043 *6 Apr 200120 Feb 2003Chang Jane WenWireless information retrieval
US20030037333 *5 Jul 200220 Feb 2003John GhashghaiAudience measurement system
US20030046698 *10 Jun 20026 Mar 2003Yakov KamenMethods and apparatuses for conducting a TV EPG search in various search time periods
US20030051240 *10 Sep 200113 Mar 2003Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.Four-way recommendation method and system including collaborative filtering
US20030066068 *28 Sep 20013 Apr 2003Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.Individual recommender database using profiles of others
US20030066079 *4 Sep 20023 Apr 2003Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaMethod and apparatus for program information search
US20030084270 *4 Feb 20021 May 2003Transmeta Corp.System and method for translating non-native instructions to native instructions for processing on a host processor
US20040013909 *14 Jul 200322 Jan 2004Showa Denko K.K.Magnetic recording medium, method of manufacture thereof, and magnetic read/write apparatus
US20040021691 *18 Oct 20015 Feb 2004Mark DostieMethod, system and media for entering data in a personal computing device
US20040024777 *30 Jul 20025 Feb 2004Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.Controlling the growth of a features frequency profile
US20040046744 *29 Aug 200311 Mar 2004Canesta, Inc.Method and apparatus for entering data using a virtual input device
US20040049783 *28 Aug 200311 Mar 2004Lemmons Thomas R.Interactive program guide systems and processes
US20040054520 *1 Jul 200318 Mar 2004Dehlinger Peter J.Text-searching code, system and method
US20040073926 *6 Oct 200315 Apr 2004Fujitsu Ten LimitedDigital broadcast reception apparatus
US20040078815 *21 Nov 200322 Apr 2004Lemmons Thomas R.Interactive program guide systems and processes
US20040078816 *28 Feb 200222 Apr 2004Johnson Carolynn RaeSystem and method for simplifying different types of searches in electronic program guide
US20040078820 *14 Oct 200322 Apr 2004Nickum Larry A.Personal preferred viewing using electronic program guide
US20040083198 *16 Jul 200329 Apr 2004Bradford Ethan R.Dynamic database reordering system
US20040093616 *28 Feb 200213 May 2004Johnson Carolynn RaeMethod for searching of an electronic program guide
US20050015366 *18 Jul 200320 Jan 2005Carrasco John Joseph M.Disambiguation of search phrases using interpretation clusters
US20050071874 *5 Aug 200331 Mar 2005Albert ElcockSystem and method for an interactive electronic program guide
US20050086234 *15 Oct 200321 Apr 2005Sierra Wireless, Inc., A Canadian CorporationIncremental search of keyword strings
US20050086691 *17 Oct 200321 Apr 2005Mydtv, Inc.Interactive program banners providing program segment information
US20050086692 *17 Oct 200321 Apr 2005Mydtv, Inc.Searching for programs and updating viewer preferences with reference to program segment characteristics
US20060010477 *7 Jul 200512 Jan 2006Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Method and system for providing VOD services in a digital cable TV network
US20060013487 *11 Jul 200519 Jan 2006Longe Michael RDisambiguating ambiguous characters
US20060036640 *28 Jul 200516 Feb 2006Sony CorporationInformation processing apparatus, information processing method, and program
US20060059044 *14 Sep 200416 Mar 2006Chan Wesley TMethod and system to provide advertisements based on wireless access points
US20060075429 *29 Apr 20056 Apr 2006Vulcan Inc.Voice control of television-related information
US20060090182 *27 Oct 200427 Apr 2006Comcast Interactive Capital, LpMethod and system for multimedia advertising
US20060090185 *11 Apr 200527 Apr 2006David ZitoSystem and method for providing time-based content
US20060101499 *9 Nov 200511 May 2006Veveo, Inc.Method and system for secure sharing, gifting, and purchasing of content on television and mobile devices
US20060101503 *24 May 200511 May 2006Veveo.Tv, Inc.Method and system for performing searches for television content using reduced text input
US20060101504 *15 Aug 200511 May 2006Veveo.Tv, Inc.Method and system for performing searches for television content and channels using a non-intrusive television interface and with reduced text input
US20060112162 *16 Jun 200325 May 2006Emmanuel MarotMethod, terminal and server for selecting a server address
US20070005526 *21 Jun 20054 Jan 2007Paul WhitneyScenario representation manipulation methods, scenario analysis devices, articles of manufacture, and data signals
US20070005563 *7 Oct 20054 Jan 2007Veveo, Inc.Method and system for incremental search with reduced text entry where the relevance of results is a dynamically computed function of user input search string character count
US20070016476 *28 Aug 200618 Jan 2007Blanding Hovenweep, LlcInternet appliance system and method
US20070027852 *12 Oct 20051 Feb 2007Microsoft CorporationSmart search for accessing options
US20070027861 *29 Jul 20051 Feb 2007Microsoft CorporationAutomated content categorization
US20070044122 *29 Oct 200422 Feb 2007Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.Program recommendation system
US20070050348 *30 Aug 20051 Mar 2007Microsoft CorporationProgrammatic query assistance
US20070061244 *8 May 200615 Mar 2007Jorey RamerIncreasing mobile interactivity
US20070061317 *8 May 200615 Mar 2007Jorey RamerMobile search substring query completion
US20070061321 *27 Sep 200515 Mar 2007Veveo.Tv, Inc.Method and system for processing ambiguous, multi-term search queries
US20070061754 *25 Aug 200615 Mar 2007Veveo, Inc.User interface for visual cooperation between text input and display device
US20070067272 *16 Jun 200622 Mar 2007Microsoft CorporationSearch interface for mobile devices
US20070088681 *17 Feb 200619 Apr 2007Veveo, Inc.Method and system for offsetting network latencies during incremental searching using local caching and predictive fetching of results from a remote server
US20070100650 *27 Oct 20063 May 2007Jorey RamerAction functionality for mobile content search results
US20080086704 *27 Sep 200710 Apr 2008Veveo, Inc.Methods and systems for a Linear Character Selection Display Interface for Ambiguous Text Input
US20080114743 *23 Jan 200815 May 2008Veveo, Inc.Method and system for incrementally selecting and providing relevant search engines in response to a user query
Classifications
U.S. Classification707/741, 707/E17.049
International ClassificationG06F17/30
Cooperative ClassificationG06F17/3064, G06F3/0237
European ClassificationG06F17/30T2F1, G06F3/023M8
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
10 May 2012ASAssignment
Owner name: VEVEO, INC., MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:VENKATARAMAN, SASHIKUMAR;BARVE, RAKESH D.;ARAVAMUDAN, MURALI;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20060221 TO 20060303;REEL/FRAME:028186/0162