Publication number | US20110130986 A1 |

Publication type | Application |

Application number | US 12/956,936 |

Publication date | 2 Jun 2011 |

Filing date | 30 Nov 2010 |

Priority date | 2 Dec 2009 |

Also published as | US8918299 |

Publication number | 12956936, 956936, US 2011/0130986 A1, US 2011/130986 A1, US 20110130986 A1, US 20110130986A1, US 2011130986 A1, US 2011130986A1, US-A1-20110130986, US-A1-2011130986, US2011/0130986A1, US2011/130986A1, US20110130986 A1, US20110130986A1, US2011130986 A1, US2011130986A1 |

Inventors | Gregory L. Plett |

Original Assignee | American Electric Vehicles, Inc. |

Export Citation | BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan |

Patent Citations (25), Referenced by (5), Classifications (7), Legal Events (3) | |

External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet | |

US 20110130986 A1

Abstract

A system and method for maximizing a battery pack total energy metric indicative of a total energy of a battery pack is provided. The method includes receiving battery cell charge capacity estimates for all cells in the battery pack, composing battery pack configurations comprising subsets of the totality of battery cells, evaluating a battery pack energy metric for every battery pack configuration that is composed, selecting the battery pack configuration that has the maximum battery pack energy metric, and storing values indicative of the selected battery pack configuration in a memory.

Claims(9)

receiving a battery cell charge capacity estimate indicative of a charge capacity of a battery cell for all battery cells in the battery pack;

determining an upper limit on battery-cell state-of-charge for all battery cells in the battery pack;

determining a lower limit on battery-cell state-of-charge for all battery cells in the battery pack;

determining an individual battery cell total energy value for every battery cell in the battery pack by integrating an open-circuit-voltage function between the lower limit on battery-cell state-of-charge and the upper limit on battery-cell state-of-charge, and multiplying the integral by the charge capacity estimate for that battery cell;

determining the battery pack total energy value indicative of the total energy that can be stored by a battery pack by summing all individual battery cell total energy values; and

storing a value corresponding to the battery pack total energy value in a memory.

receiving a battery cell charge capacity estimate indicative of a charge capacity of a battery cell for all battery cells in the battery pack;

composing battery pack configurations comprising subsets of the total N battery cells;

evaluating a battery pack energy metric for every battery pack configuration that is composed;

selecting the battery pack configuration that has the maximum battery pack energy metric; and

storing values representing the selected battery pack configuration in a memory.

sorting battery cell charge capacities in order from 1 to N; and

composing N different battery pack configurations denoted P_{k }for k=1 through N, such that configuration P_{k }comprises battery cells k through N.

a computer configured to receive a battery cell charge capacity estimate indicative of a charge capacity of a battery cell for all battery cells in the battery pack;

the computer further configured to compose battery pack configurations comprising subsets of the total N battery cells;

the computer further configured to evaluate a battery pack energy metric for every battery pack configuration that is composed;

the computer further configured to select the battery pack configuration that has the maximum battery pack energy metric; and

the computer further configured to store values representing the selected battery pack configuration in a memory.

Description

- [0001]This applications claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/283,325 filed Dec. 2, 2009, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
- [0002]This application relates generally to battery cells that can be used in electric vehicles, and more particularly to a method and system for maximizing a battery pack total energy metric.
- [0003]Battery cells are used in a wide variety of electronic and electrical devices. Very often, individual battery cells are connected electrically in series to form battery packs having higher total voltage and higher total energy capacity than individual battery cells. One consequence of connecting battery cells in series is that all of the battery cells will experience the same electrical current. Therefore, the number of ampere-hours added or subtracted from every battery cell's charge level will be the same. However, individual battery cells may have different charge capacity (in ampere hours). This is particularly true as the battery pack ages, because over time individual battery cells degrade: battery cell resistances tend to increase and battery cell charge capacities tend to decrease. If this process occurs at different rates in different battery cells in a battery pack, then at some point in time one or more battery cells may limit the battery pack total energy capacity. A battery cell having lower charge capacity is more quickly charged to the maximum design voltage, and is more quickly discharged to the minimum design voltage. Therefore, either not all battery cells will be fully charged when the battery cell having lower charge capacity is charged, or not all battery cells will be fully discharged when the battery cell having lower charge capacity is discharged. Not all of the possible energy capacity of the battery pack will be realized.
- [0004]At some point, a battery pack may be capable of higher total energy capacity if one or more of the battery cells having low charge capacity are removed from the battery pack so that they no longer limit the range of charge of the other battery cells. In some applications, these battery cells might be replaced with new battery cells. In other applications, that might not be practical, so the battery controller could then allow those battery cells to be abandoned—the lower voltage of these particular battery cells would no longer be restricted by the controller to the lower design voltage. This “undercharge condition” for some battery cell electro-chemistries causes the battery cell voltage to collapse to zero and the battery cell charge capacity to collapse to zero, effectively eliminating that battery cell from the battery pack without physically removing it. This is a safe operating condition, and can result in higher overall battery pack energy capacity.
- [0005]While abandoning a battery cell in this manner can result in higher overall battery pack energy capacity, it will also place greater stresses on the remaining battery cells in the battery pack, since they must provide greater power levels per battery cell than they did before. Therefore, in some applications it may be desirable to optimize the battery pack total energy capacity. Battery pack total energy capacity is one possible battery pack total energy metric. In other applications it may be desirable to optimize a different battery pack total energy metric that takes into account the total energy capacity and stress factors on remaining battery cells when some battery cells are abandoned.
- [0006]Accordingly, there is a need for a method for efficiently determining a battery pack configuration based on present battery cell charge capacities that maximizes a battery pack total energy metric. The embodiments disclosed herein perform this task.
- [0007]A method for maximizing a battery pack total energy metric in accordance with an exemplary embodiment is provided. The method includes receiving battery cell charge capacity estimates for all battery cells in the battery pack, and computing a battery pack total energy metric for zero or more of the battery cells having lowest charge capacity removed from consideration. The method further includes determining the configuration that results in a maximum battery pack total energy metric, and storing that configuration in a memory.
- [0008]A system for maximizing a battery pack total energy metric in accordance with an exemplary embodiment is provided. The system includes a subsystem configured to receive battery cell charge capacity estimates for all battery cells in the battery pack, and a subsystem configured to compute a battery pack total energy metric for zero or more of the battery cells having lowest charge capacity removed from consideration. The system is further configured to determine the configuration that results in a maximum battery pack total energy metric, and store that configuration in a memory.
- [0009]A computer readable medium having computer-executable instructions for performing a method for maximizing a battery pack total energy metric in accordance with an exemplary embodiment is provided. The method includes receiving battery cell charge capacity estimates for all battery cells in the battery pack, and computing a battery pack total energy metric for zero or more of the battery cells having lowest charge capacity removed from consideration. The method further includes determining the configuration that results in a maximum battery pack total energy metric, and storing that configuration in a memory.
- [0010]
FIG. 1 is a schematic of a system for maximizing a battery pack total energy metric in accordance with an exemplary embodiment; - [0011]
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an exemplary computational algorithm utilized by the system ofFIG. 1 to compute battery pack total energy; - [0012]
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an exemplary computational algorithm utilized by the system ofFIG. 1 to maximize a battery pack total energy metric; - [0013]
FIG. 4 is a result using an exemplary embodiment; and - [0014]
FIG. 5 is a result using an exemplary embodiment. - [0015]The charge capacity of a battery cell is a value, usually expressed in ampere hours (Ah) or milliampere hours (mAh), that indicates the maximum electrical charge that the battery cell is capable of holding. New battery cells are manufactured with certain nominal charge capacities, but as the battery cells age, their charge capacities generally decrease.
- [0016]When charging a battery cell, care must be taken so that its voltage does not exceed some maximum design voltage. When discharging a battery cell, care must be taken so that its voltage does not go below some minimum design voltage. For many battery cell electrochemical compositions, an over-voltage condition is a potential safety issue, and can cause fire or explosion. An under-voltage condition, while not a safety concern, can cause the battery cell to develop permanent degradation in charge capacity.
- [0017]Battery packs are often made by connecting individual battery cells in series to obtain higher total voltage and higher total energy storage capacity. One consequence of individual battery cells connected in series is that all battery cells so connected will experience the same electrical current and the number of ampere-hours added or subtracted from each individual battery cell charge level will be the same. However, since the battery cells will have different individual charge capacities, one or more battery cells may limit the battery pack total energy capacity. A battery cell having lower charge capacity than others in the battery pack is more quickly charged to the maximum design voltage, and is more quickly discharged to the minimum design voltage. Therefore, to maintain battery pack safety, not all battery cells will be fully charged when the battery cell having lowest charge capacity is fully charged, or not all battery cells will be fully discharged when the battery cell having lowest charge capacity is fully discharged. Not all of the possible energy capacity of the battery pack will be realized unless all charge capacities are identical and the pack is perfectly balanced.
- [0018]At some point, a battery pack may be capable of higher total energy capacity if one or more of the battery cells having low charge capacity are removed from the pack so that they no longer limit the range of charge of the other battery cells. In some applications, these battery cells might be replaced with new battery cells. In other applications, that might not be practical, so the battery controller could then allow those battery cells to be abandoned. Abandoning a battery cell means that that particular battery cell is ignored for the purposes of computing which battery cells to equalize, when determining maximum discharge power or energy, and when controlling the battery pack charging process (except inasmuch as safety issues are necessary to consider). That is, the lower voltage of these battery cells would no longer be restricted by the minimum design voltage during a discharge, and the battery cells' charge capacities would be allowed to collapse to zero (a short-circuit condition). This is a safe operating condition, and can result in higher overall battery pack energy capacity.
- [0019]Therefore, in some applications it may be desirable to determine battery pack configurations that optimize the battery pack total energy capacity, possibly abandoning battery cells having low charge capacity. However, while abandoning a battery cell in this manner can result in higher overall battery pack energy capacity, it will also place greater stresses on the remaining battery cells in the battery pack, since they must provide greater power levels per battery cell than they did before. Therefore, in other applications it may be desirable to optimize a different battery pack total energy metric that takes into account the battery pack total energy capacity and stress factors on remaining battery cells when some battery cells are abandoned.
- [0020]Accordingly, there is a need for a method for efficiently determining a battery pack configuration based on present battery cell charge capacities that maximizes a battery pack total energy metric. In some applications, this battery pack total energy metric may be equal to battery pack total energy; in other applications it may be equal to a modified function involving battery pack total energy. In every application, the goal is to maximize battery pack performance.
- [0021]To describe how the present embodiments determine which battery cells are limiting battery pack performance, the battery cell state-of-charge (SOC) is first defined, which is a value between 0% and 100% that indicates the relative level of charge held by the battery cell. A state-of-charge of 100% corresponds to a “full” battery cell, while a state-of-charge of 0% corresponds to an “empty” battery cell. Knowing this, the total energy capacity (in Watt hours) of an individual battery cell can be computed as
- [0000]
$\begin{array}{cc}\begin{array}{c}E=\ue89e{\int}_{{t}_{1}}^{{t}_{2}}\ue89ev\ue8a0\left(t\right)\ue89ei\ue8a0\left(t\right)\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0.2ex}}\ue89e\uf74ct\\ =\ue89eC\ue89e{\int}_{{t}_{1}}^{{t}_{2}}\ue89ev\ue8a0\left(t\right)\ue89e\frac{\uf74cz\ue8a0\left(t\right)}{\uf74ct}\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0.2ex}}\ue89e\uf74ct\approx \\ \ue89eC\ue89e{\int}_{{t}_{1}}^{{t}_{2}}\ue89e\mathrm{OCV}\ue8a0\left(z\right)\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0.2ex}}\ue89e\uf74ct\end{array}& \left(1\right)\end{array}$ - [0022]where v(t) is the battery cell voltage at time t, i(t) is battery cell current at time t, C is the charge capacity of the battery cell (in ampere hours), z
_{1 }is the lower design limit SOC value of the battery cell, z_{2 }is the upper design limit SOC of the battery cell, and OCV( ) is the open-circuit-voltage of the battery cell (in volts) as a function of SOC. (The second line of this equation relies on the relationship dz/dt=i(t)/C.) To compute battery cell energy, the battery cell charge capacity must be known, and the battery cell open-circuit-voltage function must be known. The battery cell open-circuit-voltage function is determined by the battery cell electrochemistry and may be measured using standard laboratory tests. Additionally, it may be stored in a table in pre-integrated form in order to quickly look-up the desired values. - [0023]Battery pack energy capacity can be computed in a similar way.
- [0000]
$\begin{array}{cc}\begin{array}{c}E=\ue89e{\int}_{{t}_{1}}^{{t}_{2}}\ue89e\left(\sum _{k}\ue89e{v}_{k}\ue8a0\left(t\right)\right)\ue89ei\ue8a0\left(t\right)\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0.2ex}}\ue89e\uf74ct\\ =\ue89e\sum _{k}\ue89e{\int}_{{t}_{1}}^{{t}_{2}}\ue89e{v}_{k}\ue8a0\left(t\right)\ue89ei\ue8a0\left(t\right)\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0.2ex}}\ue89e\uf74ct\\ =\ue89e\sum _{k}\ue89e{C}_{k}\ue89e{\int}_{{t}_{1}}^{{t}_{2}}\ue89e{v}_{k}\ue8a0\left(t\right)\ue89e\frac{\uf74c{z}_{k}\ue8a0\left(t\right)}{\uf74ct}\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0.2ex}}\ue89e\uf74ct\approx \\ \ue89e\sum _{k}\ue89e{C}_{k}\ue89e{\int}_{{z}_{1,k}}^{{z}_{2,k}}\ue89e\mathrm{OCV}\ue8a0\left(z\right)\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0.2ex}}\ue89e\uf74cz\end{array}& \left(2\right)\end{array}$ - [0024]Equation (2) recognizes that the charge capacities of each battery cell will be different, so denotes individual charge capacity values as C
_{k }where k is the index of the battery cell, from 1 to the number of battery cells in series. At any point in time, the voltages and states-of-charge of each battery cell will also differ, so are individually denoted as v_{k}(t) and z_{k}(t), respectively. The upper and lower limits on SOC will also differ, so are denoted as z_{2,k }and z_{1,k}, respectively. Battery pack total energy capacity will be maximized when all z_{2,k }values are identical, since the open-circuit-voltage is an increasing function of SOC. Therefore, it is assumed that z_{2,k}=z_{2 }for all k. (This is not a requirement for the present invention, but makes the discussion simpler.) As the battery pack is discharged, the minimum z_{1,k }may not go lower than z_{1}. If all battery cells begin at SOC level z_{2}, the first battery cell to reach the SOC level z_{1 }will be the battery cell with lowest charge capacity. Without loss of generality, assume that battery cells are sorted by index in terms of increasing charge capacity. That is, C_{1}≦C_{2}≦C_{3}. Therefore, it is concluded that z_{1,1}=z_{1}. The lower SOC limit for all other battery cells can be calculated by recognizing that the number of ampere-hours discharged from the battery cell with lowest charge capacity must be identical to the number of ampere-hours discharged from all other battery cells. - [0000]
$\begin{array}{cc}\left({z}_{2}-{z}_{1}\right)\ue89e{C}_{1}=\left({z}_{2}-{z}_{1,k}\right)\ue89e{C}_{k}\ue89e\text{}\ue89e{z}_{1,k}={z}_{2}-\left({z}_{2}-{z}_{1}\right)\ue89e\frac{{C}_{1}}{{C}_{k}},& \left(3\right)\end{array}$ - [0025]Therefore, there is now the capability of calculating the total energy capacity of a series-connected battery pack:
- [0026]1) Receive battery cell charge capacity estimates C
_{k }for all cells; - [0027]2) Determine the battery cell with lowest charge capacity, and label it as cell 1;
- [0028]3) Compute all z
_{1,k }values using Equation (3); and - [0029]4) Compute battery pack energy using Equation (2).
- [0000]
FIG. 2 gives a flow-chart for this method. - [0030]Knowing how to compute battery pack total energy allows for the embodiment using a method for maximizing a battery pack total energy metric. An exemplary embodiment receives battery cell charge capacity estimates C
_{k }for all cells, computes a battery pack total energy metric for hypothetical battery packs comprising subsets of the full set of battery cells, and selects the configuration having the largest battery pack total energy metric. - [0031]In one exemplary embodiment, the battery pack total energy metric is selected to equal the battery pack total energy. The following steps are performed:
- [0032]1) Receive battery cell charge capacity estimates for all battery cells;
- [0033]2) Sort battery cell charge capacities in ascending order, indexed from 1 to N, where N is the number of battery cells. That is, C
_{1}≦C_{2}≦L≦C_{N}. - [0034]3) Define battery pack configuration P
_{k }to comprise battery cells k through N. That is, P_{1 }comprises all battery cells, P_{2 }comprises all battery cells except the one with lowest charge capacity, and so forth. - [0035]4) Compute the battery pack total energy E
_{k }using battery pack configuration P_{k}. - [0036]5) Select battery pack configuration with maximum value of E
_{k}. Battery cells not included in this configuration are abandoned. - [0037]
FIG. 4 shows results for this exemplary embodiment for a battery pack comprising 50 battery cells (a lithium-ion battery chemistry is assumed for the OCV function, but the method works for any battery chemistry). Forty-eight of these cells have a capacity of 10 ampere hours, and two of the cells have a capacity of 9.5 ampere hours. In this example, the battery pack total energy is maximized if the two low-capacity battery cells are abandoned, and the pack is assumed to operate using only the remaining forty-eight battery cells. - [0038]Battery pack total energy might not be the only metric that is desired to be optimized. For example, by abandoning certain battery cells, greater stress is put on the remaining battery cells in the pack, potentially decreasing their lifetimes. An alternate embodiment optimizes a different battery pack total energy metric. The method receives battery cell charge capacity estimates C
_{k }for all battery cells, computes a different battery pack total energy metric ME_{k }for a hypothetical battery pack comprising subsets of the full set of battery cells, and selects the configuration having the largest modified battery pack total energy metric. - [0039]In one exemplary embodiment, the following steps are performed:
- [0040]1) Receive battery cell charge capacity estimates for all battery cells;
- [0041]2) Sort battery cell charge capacities in ascending order, indexed from 1 to N, where N is the number of battery cells. That is, C
_{1}≦C_{2}≦L≦C_{N}. - [0042]3) Define battery pack configuration P
_{k }to comprise battery cells k through N. That is, P_{1 }comprises all battery cells, P_{2 }comprises all battery cells except the one with lowest charge capacity, and so forth. - [0043]4) Compute the battery pack total energy metric ME
_{k }using battery pack configuration P_{k}. - [0044]5) Select battery pack configuration with maximum value of ME
_{k}. Battery cells not included in this configuration are abandoned. - [0045]
FIG. 5 shows results for this exemplary embodiment for a battery pack comprising 50 battery cells (a lithium-ion battery chemistry is assumed for the OCV function, but the method works for any battery chemistry). Forty-eight of these battery cells have a capacity of 10 ampere hours, and two of the battery cells have a capacity of 9.5 ampere hours. The battery pack total energy metric in this exemplary embodiment is ME_{k}=0.99^{k }E_{k}. This performance metric penalizes removing cells, such that they will be abandoned only if it significantly increases the battery pack total energy. In the figure, the unmodified energy function E_{k }is plotted as triangles, and the modified energy function ME_{k }is plotted as circles. In this example, the modified battery pack total energy is maximized by retaining all of the fifty battery cells and abandoning none of the battery cells. - [0046]The system and method for maximizing a battery pack total energy metric provides a substantial advantage over other systems and methods. In particular, the system and method provide a technical effect of accurately determining an optimal battery pack configuration that maximizes a battery pack total energy metric that is computationally efficient to compute, and can take into account battery cell lifetime stresses while maximizing battery pack total energy.
- [0047]The above-described methods can be embodied in the form of computer program code containing instructions embodied in tangible media, such as floppy diskettes, CD ROMs, hard drives, or any other computer-readable storage medium, wherein, when the computer program code is loaded into and executed by a computer, the computer becomes an apparatus for practicing the invention. The above-described methods can also be embodied in the form of computer program code, for example, whether stored in a storage medium, loaded into and/or executed by a computer, or transmitted over some transmission medium, loaded into and/or executed by a computer, or transmitted over some transmission medium, such as over electrical wiring or cabling, through fiber optics, or via electromagnetic radiation, wherein, when the computer program code is loaded into an executed by a computer, the computer becomes an apparatus for practicing the methods. When implemented on a general-purpose microprocessor, the computer program code segments configure the microprocessor to create specific logic circuits.
- [0048]While the invention is described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalent elements may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to the teachings of the invention to adapt to a particular situation without departing from the scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the embodiments disclosed herein, but that the invention include all embodiments falling with the scope of the appended claims.

Patent Citations

Cited Patent | Filing date | Publication date | Applicant | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|

US5789924 * | 20 Mar 1997 | 4 Aug 1998 | Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd. | Method of calculating rechargeable battery charge capacity |

US6534954 * | 10 Jan 2002 | 18 Mar 2003 | Compact Power Inc. | Method and apparatus for a battery state of charge estimator |

US6892148 * | 2 May 2003 | 10 May 2005 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Circuit and method for measurement of battery capacity fade |

US7193392 * | 19 Nov 2003 | 20 Mar 2007 | Tiax Llc | System and method for determining and balancing state of charge among series connected electrical energy storage units |

US7315789 * | 23 Nov 2004 | 1 Jan 2008 | Lg Chem, Ltd. | Method and system for battery parameter estimation |

US7321220 * | 25 Mar 2004 | 22 Jan 2008 | Lg Chem, Ltd. | Method for calculating power capability of battery packs using advanced cell model predictive techniques |

US7400115 * | 9 Feb 2006 | 15 Jul 2008 | Lg Chem, Ltd. | System, method, and article of manufacture for determining an estimated combined battery state-parameter vector |

US7446504 * | 10 Nov 2005 | 4 Nov 2008 | Lg Chem, Ltd. | System, method, and article of manufacture for determining an estimated battery state vector |

US7521895 * | 2 Mar 2006 | 21 Apr 2009 | Lg Chem, Ltd. | System and method for determining both an estimated battery state vector and an estimated battery parameter vector |

US7525285 * | 11 Nov 2004 | 28 Apr 2009 | Lg Chem, Ltd. | Method and system for cell equalization using state of charge |

US7589532 * | 23 Aug 2005 | 15 Sep 2009 | Lg Chem, Ltd. | System and method for estimating a state vector associated with a battery |

US7593821 * | 23 Nov 2004 | 22 Sep 2009 | Lg Chem, Ltd. | Method and system for joint battery state and parameter estimation |

US7656122 * | 21 Dec 2007 | 2 Feb 2010 | Lg Chem, Ltd. | Method for calculating power capability of battery packs using advanced cell model predictive techniques |

US7656123 * | 1 Oct 2008 | 2 Feb 2010 | Lg Chem, Ltd. | System, method, and article of manufacture for determining an estimated battery state vector |

US7723957 * | 30 Nov 2005 | 25 May 2010 | Lg Chem, Ltd. | System, method, and article of manufacture for determining an estimated battery parameter vector |

US7800375 * | 29 Jun 2009 | 21 Sep 2010 | Lg Chem, Ltd. | System and method for estimating a state vector associated with a battery |

US7884613 * | 1 Oct 2008 | 8 Feb 2011 | Lg Chem, Ltd. | System, method, and article of manufacture for determining an estimated battery state vector |

US7893694 * | 17 Jun 2008 | 22 Feb 2011 | Lg Chem, Ltd. | System, method, and article of manufacture for determining an estimated combined battery state-parameter vector |

US8339100 * | 4 May 2011 | 25 Dec 2012 | O2Micro Inc | Systems and methods for cell balancing |

US8344694 * | 12 Apr 2012 | 1 Jan 2013 | O2Micro International, Ltd. | Battery management system with energy balance among multiple battery cells |

US20060100833 * | 11 Nov 2004 | 11 May 2006 | Plett Gregory L | State and parameter estimation for an electrochemical cell |

US20080249725 * | 17 Jun 2008 | 9 Oct 2008 | Lg Twin Towers 20 | System, method, and article of manufacture for determining an estimated combined battery state-parameter vector |

US20090189613 * | 30 Jan 2008 | 30 Jul 2009 | Lg Chem Ltd. | System, method, and article of manufacture for determining an estimated battery cell module state |

US20100174500 * | 30 Dec 2009 | 8 Jul 2010 | Lg Chem Ltd. | Method for calculating power capability of battery packs using advanced cell model predictive techniques |

US20100191491 * | 8 Apr 2010 | 29 Jul 2010 | Lg Chem, Ltd. | System, method, and article of manufacture for determining an estimated battery parameter vector |

Referenced by

Citing Patent | Filing date | Publication date | Applicant | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|

US8972091 * | 12 Mar 2013 | 3 Mar 2015 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Reduced central processing unit load and memory usage battery state of charge calculation |

US9037426 * | 13 May 2011 | 19 May 2015 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Systems and methods for determining cell capacity values in a multi-cell battery |

US20120290234 * | 13 May 2011 | 15 Nov 2012 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Llc. | Systems and methods for determining cell capacity values in a multi-cell battery |

US20140277866 * | 12 Mar 2013 | 18 Sep 2014 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Reduced central processing unit load and memory usage battery state of charge calculation |

CN104569845A * | 31 Dec 2014 | 29 Apr 2015 | 普天新能源车辆技术有限公司 | Method and device for detecting capacity of waste power lithium battery |

Classifications

U.S. Classification | 702/63, 324/427 |

International Classification | G01N27/416, G01R31/36 |

Cooperative Classification | G01R31/362, H01M10/48 |

European Classification | H01M10/48 |

Legal Events

Date | Code | Event | Description |
---|---|---|---|

28 Dec 2010 | AS | Assignment | Owner name: AMERICAN ELECTRIC VEHICLES, INC., COLORADO Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PLETT, GREGORY L.;REEL/FRAME:025544/0276 Effective date: 20101202 |

6 Jul 2017 | AS | Assignment | Owner name: RIVERS & JOHNSON AEV, INC., COLORADO Free format text: NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT;ASSIGNOR:AMERICAN ELECTRIC VEHICLES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:042926/0651 Effective date: 20170705 Owner name: JOHNSON, BRUCE G., COLORADO Free format text: NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT;ASSIGNOR:RIVERS & JOHNSON AEV, INC.;REEL/FRAME:042926/0717 Effective date: 20170705 Owner name: RIVERS, DANIEL D., COLORADO Free format text: NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT;ASSIGNOR:RIVERS & JOHNSON AEV, INC.;REEL/FRAME:042926/0717 Effective date: 20170705 |

10 Aug 2017 | AS | Assignment | Owner name: NIKOLA, LLC, COLORADO Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:RIVERS, DANIEL D.;JOHNSON, BRUCE G.;REEL/FRAME:043260/0608 Effective date: 20170803 |

Rotate