US20100218081A1 - Method for ordering information - Google Patents

Method for ordering information Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20100218081A1
US20100218081A1 US11/626,064 US62606409A US2010218081A1 US 20100218081 A1 US20100218081 A1 US 20100218081A1 US 62606409 A US62606409 A US 62606409A US 2010218081 A1 US2010218081 A1 US 2010218081A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
list
item
designation
chain
items
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/626,064
Inventor
Michael D. Norman
Justin Ohmie
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
PROBUSOFT Inc
Original Assignee
PROBUSOFT Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Assigned to PROBUSOFT, INC. reassignment PROBUSOFT, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: NORMAN, MICHAEL D., OHMIE, JUSTIN
Application filed by PROBUSOFT Inc filed Critical PROBUSOFT Inc
Priority to US11/626,064 priority Critical patent/US20100218081A1/en
Publication of US20100218081A1 publication Critical patent/US20100218081A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q99/00Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for ordering items based on relative ordering information, and more particularly, the present invention provides a method for ordering and placement of fields on a form based on relative ordering information for each field.
  • the user of the system is required to place items in a specific order in a list, not allowing for flexibility or possible reordering when necessary, even when the user may not care about the order of some items in the list.
  • the list itself does not lend any contextual or intentional information about whether or not a specific order is required.
  • the present invention provides a method to order items on a form without losing user intent by providing a mechanism for capturing ordering intent through relative order designations for individual fields.
  • the items may be easily reordered by changing the relative order designation for one or more items without having to manually change the layout of the form.
  • items that are smaller may fit in smaller spaces, leaving larger items room to expand. Allowing some flexibility in the order based on intention allows for this more efficient use of the available space. Items may fit better in computer memory if ordered differently. This would allow for more efficient memory usage by programs if the ordering is not explicit.
  • items that fit in one place may not fit as well in another. The ability to shift these items around because of flexibility in order may allow all items to fit on one page rather than spill over onto another.
  • FIG. 1 is a table and display showing a prior art form built from fields designated in a specific order.
  • FIG. 2 is a table and display showing a form that is built from fields with only relative ordering information according to the method of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a high level flow diagram of the ordering algorithm of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of an algorithm for breaking an unordered list of items into a list of unbreakable chains of items of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of an algorithm for ordering items in a particular unbreakable chain of items of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 is a form created by the algorithm of the present invention.
  • FIG. 7 is a continuation of the form of FIG. 6 .
  • While the relative ordering system of the present invention may be adapted for use by any number of applications used in visual layout of items, it is particularly adapted for use with ProbuSoft Virtual Layout Artist.
  • the specific implementation described here is part of the ProbuSoft .NET Utilities runtime, used in ProbuSoft Virtual Layout Artist.
  • ProbuSoft Virtual Layout Artist is based on the concept of a hierarchical set of groups, fields, and text items. Users of the software can create groups to contain other groups, fields and text item. Users are then able to set the relative ordering information on items within each group. After this initial setup, the software will lay the items out on the page according to the method described hereinbelow.
  • Relative ordering information is used to gather the original intent from the user, rather than gathering just the end order. This ordering method allows the application to process the information, moving items to efficiently use the available space according to the user's requirements, if any.
  • a number of fields are defined in a table 20 , each with certain characteristics.
  • Title 22 is a text box with size of 2.5′′
  • Values 24 is a list box with size of 3.5′′ ⁇ 1.5′′
  • Completed 24 is a checkbox with size of 1′′. Because these fields are specified with absolute ordering (first Title 22 , second Values 24 , and third Completed 26 ), the image of the Dynamic Form 28 shows the three elements in the layout specified in table 20 .
  • a table 30 includes relative ordering information 32 , and any implicit order of the elements is ignored. Therefore, the only ordering information referred to is in the ordering info column 32 , because that is what the user deemed important enough to specify.
  • the Title entry 34 includes ordering information of First 36 . Because the other items were left without specific ordering information, the software is able to order the Values 38 and Completed 40 fields to better optimize the form based on the available space.
  • the image of Dynamic Form 42 shows the Completed checkbox 40 on the same line as Title 34 because it fit in the available space.
  • a high level flowchart of the algorithm for determining the absolute order at runtime is generally indicated by reference numeral 50 .
  • the process starts with an unordered item list 52 with relative ordering information attached to each item.
  • the process ends with an absolutely ordered item list block 62 .
  • the relative ordering information is still attached to each item so the process may be repeated.
  • FIG. 4 shows the algorithm 54 for breaking a collection of unordered items with relative ordering information into unbreakable chains.
  • Chains consist of one or more items with “immediately before” or “immediately after” references to other objects. These chains cannot be broken apart any further because the items in them all relate to one another using these “immediate” concepts.
  • the algorithm to break an unordered item list into chain 54 begins with a single unordered item list block 64 . If there are more items in the list, block 66 , a new chain is created, block 68 . The next item in the list is identified, block 70 , and added to the chain, block 72 . The item is removed from the original list, block 74 , and the next item is identified 76 . If the item N is related to the item 1 in the chain as being either “immediately before” or “immediately after” block 78 , it is added to the chain, block 80 , item N is removed from the list, block 82 .
  • next item is then read from the list 84 . Only when items are added to a chain are they removed from the original list. If additional items have not been read from the original list, processing returns to block 76 . If all items have been read, processing returns to block 66 . This process continues until all items are added to a chain and removed from the original list resulting in a list of chains 86 .
  • the unordered list of chains, block 86 is read, block 88 .
  • the first item in the chain is identified, block 90 , and added to the list of ordered chains, 92 .
  • the item is removed from the original claim 94 , and the process is repeated, block 88 , until all items are read resulting in an ordered chain a 96 .
  • each item is added to a completely new list, one by one, starting with the first item in the first chain, continuing to each item in the first chain, then to the first item in the second chain and so on until the last item from the last chain is added to the full list.
  • This new list is what is returned to the caller of the algorithm so it may be used as if it were a normal absolutely ordered list. All of the original relative ordering information is retained so that the items may be reordered using the same algorithm again.
  • an employment application form 100 may be arranged according to the present method. Referring to FIGS. 6 and 7 , employment application 100 is broken into two Fig. s to show the front 102 and back 104 of the form generated according to the present method.
  • the employment application 100 includes a number of items which are grouped together. These groups or sections include a Title 106 , Applicant Information 108 , Education 110 , Previous Employment 112 , References 114 , Military Service 116 , and Disclaimer and Signature 118 . Within each of these sections are related items.
  • the sections have a relative order based on the placement of another section.
  • the Education section 110 is defined to be placed immediately after the Applicant Information section 108 .
  • the Application Information section 108 is defined to be placed immediately after the Title section 106 .
  • These three sections are related to each other forming a chain.
  • the Title section 106 is defined to be placed first on the form.
  • the Disclaimer and Signature section 118 is defined to be placed last on the form and the Military Service section 116 is defined to be placed immediately before the Disclaimer and Signature section 118 forming another chain.
  • Previous Employment 112 and References 114 sections do not include relative order information and are thus independent chains. However, because the other chains previously defined include a first designation and a last designation, these chains will be placed between the other chain in alphabetical order or in an order that best fits on the page.
  • the items within each section are ordered.
  • the Applicant Information section 108 the following items are included: Address Block 120 , Question 122 , Date Available 124 , Date 126 , Desired Salary 128 , E-Mail 130 , First 132 , Last 134 , M.I. 136 , Name 138 , Phone 140 , Position Applied for 142 and Social Security No. 144 .
  • the first item, Address Block 120 is defined to be placed after the Date 126 .
  • Question 122 is defined to be placed last in the Applicant Information section 108 .
  • the Date Available item 124 has no relative order information.
  • Date 126 is defined to be placed after Name 138 .
  • Desired Salary 128 has no relative order information.
  • the E-Mail item 130 is included in a chain with Phone 140 and defined to fall immediately after Phone 140 which is placed after the Address Block 120 .
  • First 132 is defined as immediately after Last 134 .
  • M.I. 136 is defined as immediately after First 132 .
  • Name 138 is defined first resulting in an ordered chain of Name 138 , Last 134 , First 132 and M.I. 136 .
  • Position Applied for 142 is considered followed by Social Security No. 144 , neither of which include relative order information and are thus included in separate chains for ordering purposes and may be placed in alphabetical order.
  • the chains can now be ordered for the Applicant Information section 108 as follows: the Name chain including the items Name 138 , Last 134 , First 132 and M.I. 136 is defined as first in the section, followed by Date 126 , Address Block 120 , Date Available 124 , Desired Salary 128 , the Phone 140 and E-Mail 130 chain, Position Applied for 142 , Social Security No. 144 , and finally the Question 122 defined as last in the section and thus the last item in the chain.
  • Apt. # 146 is first considered followed by City 148 .
  • City 148 is immediately after Apt. # 146 and thus placed at the end of the chain.
  • State 150 is immediately after City 148 so it is placed at the end of the chain.
  • Apt. # 146 is defined as immediately after Street Address 152 , which is defined as first in the chain, thus Street Address 152 is added to the chain before Apt. # 146 .
  • Zip Code 154 is defined as last in the chain.
  • the Address Block 120 is ordered as shown in FIG. 6 .
  • Each section is ordered in turn until all items in all sections are part of a chain and the relative order of each is determined.
  • the Employment Application for 100 may be dynamically created and saved in the form shown in FIGS. 6 and 7 .
  • the items for the form along with the relative position information are preserved so that the form may be repeatedly recreated.
  • the complete ordering information for the Employment Application form 100 is included in the following table:
  • Non-visual items may also be ordered using the aforementioned algorithm. For example, priorities could have a relative ordering component to them. Instead of high, medium and low priorities, for example, items could be “prioritized” using before, after, immediately before, immediately after, first and last. These might equate to the following phrases: higher, lower, immediately higher, immediately lower, highest and lowest. By mapping the names to the previously defined concepts, the same algorithm may be used for many different applications.
  • nesting may be used to create hierarchical ordering.
  • One example is a group of items, whereas one or more items within a group could be groups themselves. Because the groups within a higher-level group can contain relative ordering information, these groups of items may be ordered independent of the items within them. All items at a higher level in the hierarchy may be ordered first, using the algorithm above then the items of each group at that level may be ordered, one group at a time, and so on for every group within a group. This hierarchical grouping of items and ordering of these items one by one creates an even more powerful system of ordering.
  • a combination of the hierarchical ordering and the remapping of phrases to the predefined ordering concepts give us the ability to visually lay out items on a page based on relative ordering information.
  • One way to do this is to consider a line to be a horizontal arrangement of items, whereas a page is a vertical arrangement of lines.
  • pages contain lines and lines contain items.
  • an absolutely ordered list may be mapped into this relative ordering paradigm simply by assigning immediately before or immediately after relative ordering information to each item in the collection based on the order it appears in the collection. For example, the first item could be left without additional information, but the next item would have relative ordering information that indicates it is immediately after the first item. The third item would be annotated as immediately after the second item, and so on down the line. This additional annotation may be done very quickly and allows the relative ordering algorithm to work on the absolutely ordered list.
  • the capabilities of the relative ordering algorithm may be extended to any ordered collection or hierarchy of items, simply by using the relative ordering information and repeating the algorithm for each collection at each level in the hierarchy.
  • the current implementation of the relative ordering scheme orders items alphabetically if there is no other information requiring that they be non-alphabetical. Also, the behavior is undefined if there are conflicts in the ordering information, though it will generally go with the most specific rule (e.g., first or last supersedes immediately before and immediately after, which supersedes before and after).
  • the user can give too much ordering information, thereby reducing the effectiveness of the relative ordering scheme. For example, if the user were to indicate that the Completed checkbox in FIG. 2 should be last, there would be no way to move the Completed checkbox onto the same line as the title field. For this reason, the mechanism may be extended to include the concept of priority. Again, the purpose is to get intent from the user rather than specific instructions. Using a priority allows conflicts to be resolved more effectively, and if space is limited, ordering information with a lower priority may be safely ignored.

Abstract

A relative ordering method is disclosed wherein generic items are ordered by using relative ordering information rather than explicit ordering information. The method allows items to be ordered relative to one another based on users' preferences.

Description

  • The present invention relates to a method for ordering items based on relative ordering information, and more particularly, the present invention provides a method for ordering and placement of fields on a form based on relative ordering information for each field.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Software programs have been created in the past to use lists of items to indicate order. These software programs are capable of using these lists of items directly, sorting them into an alphabetical or numerical ordering, or possibly randomizing the order.
  • In such systems, the user of the system is required to place items in a specific order in a list, not allowing for flexibility or possible reordering when necessary, even when the user may not care about the order of some items in the list. The list itself does not lend any contextual or intentional information about whether or not a specific order is required.
  • It is desirable to capture the intent of an ordered set of items rather than a simple list of items. In that way multiple orderings are possible, if necessary, without losing the original user intent.
  • SUMMARY
  • The present invention provides a method to order items on a form without losing user intent by providing a mechanism for capturing ordering intent through relative order designations for individual fields. The items may be easily reordered by changing the relative order designation for one or more items without having to manually change the layout of the form. When laying out items on a computer screen, items that are smaller may fit in smaller spaces, leaving larger items room to expand. Allowing some flexibility in the order based on intention allows for this more efficient use of the available space. Items may fit better in computer memory if ordered differently. This would allow for more efficient memory usage by programs if the ordering is not explicit. When placing items on a printed page, similarly to a computer screen, items that fit in one place may not fit as well in another. The ability to shift these items around because of flexibility in order may allow all items to fit on one page rather than spill over onto another.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a table and display showing a prior art form built from fields designated in a specific order.
  • FIG. 2 is a table and display showing a form that is built from fields with only relative ordering information according to the method of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a high level flow diagram of the ordering algorithm of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of an algorithm for breaking an unordered list of items into a list of unbreakable chains of items of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of an algorithm for ordering items in a particular unbreakable chain of items of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 is a form created by the algorithm of the present invention.
  • FIG. 7 is a continuation of the form of FIG. 6.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • While the relative ordering system of the present invention may be adapted for use by any number of applications used in visual layout of items, it is particularly adapted for use with ProbuSoft Virtual Layout Artist. The specific implementation described here is part of the ProbuSoft .NET Utilities runtime, used in ProbuSoft Virtual Layout Artist. ProbuSoft Virtual Layout Artist is based on the concept of a hierarchical set of groups, fields, and text items. Users of the software can create groups to contain other groups, fields and text item. Users are then able to set the relative ordering information on items within each group. After this initial setup, the software will lay the items out on the page according to the method described hereinbelow.
  • Relative ordering information is used to gather the original intent from the user, rather than gathering just the end order. This ordering method allows the application to process the information, moving items to efficiently use the available space according to the user's requirements, if any.
  • Referring initially to FIG. 1, a number of fields are defined in a table 20, each with certain characteristics. Title 22 is a text box with size of 2.5″, Values 24 is a list box with size of 3.5″×1.5″, and Completed 24 is a checkbox with size of 1″. Because these fields are specified with absolute ordering (first Title 22, second Values 24, and third Completed 26), the image of the Dynamic Form 28 shows the three elements in the layout specified in table 20.
  • Referring to FIG. 2 a table 30 includes relative ordering information 32, and any implicit order of the elements is ignored. Therefore, the only ordering information referred to is in the ordering info column 32, because that is what the user deemed important enough to specify. The Title entry 34 includes ordering information of First 36. Because the other items were left without specific ordering information, the software is able to order the Values 38 and Completed 40 fields to better optimize the form based on the available space. The image of Dynamic Form 42 shows the Completed checkbox 40 on the same line as Title 34 because it fit in the available space.
  • Referring to FIG. 3, a high level flowchart of the algorithm for determining the absolute order at runtime is generally indicated by reference numeral 50. The process starts with an unordered item list 52 with relative ordering information attached to each item.
  • There are generally three steps to the algorithm:
  • 1. Break unordered item list into chains, block 54
  • 2. Order chains, block 58
  • 3. Combine items from all chains, block 60
  • The process ends with an absolutely ordered item list block 62. The relative ordering information is still attached to each item so the process may be repeated.
  • FIG. 4 shows the algorithm 54 for breaking a collection of unordered items with relative ordering information into unbreakable chains. Chains consist of one or more items with “immediately before” or “immediately after” references to other objects. These chains cannot be broken apart any further because the items in them all relate to one another using these “immediate” concepts.
  • Depending on the relative ordering information, there may be only one chain created from this algorithm or there could be many. The algorithm to break an unordered item list into chain 54 begins with a single unordered item list block 64. If there are more items in the list, block 66, a new chain is created, block 68. The next item in the list is identified, block 70, and added to the chain, block 72. The item is removed from the original list, block 74, and the next item is identified 76. If the item N is related to the item 1 in the chain as being either “immediately before” or “immediately after” block 78, it is added to the chain, block 80, item N is removed from the list, block 82. The next item is then read from the list 84. Only when items are added to a chain are they removed from the original list. If additional items have not been read from the original list, processing returns to block 76. If all items have been read, processing returns to block 66. This process continues until all items are added to a chain and removed from the original list resulting in a list of chains 86.
  • Referring to FIG. 5, the unordered list of chains, block 86, is read, block 88. The first item in the chain is identified, block 90, and added to the list of ordered chains, 92. The item is removed from the original claim 94, and the process is repeated, block 88, until all items are read resulting in an ordered chain a96.
  • Once the chains are ordered and the items within them ordered, each item is added to a completely new list, one by one, starting with the first item in the first chain, continuing to each item in the first chain, then to the first item in the second chain and so on until the last item from the last chain is added to the full list. This new list is what is returned to the caller of the algorithm so it may be used as if it were a normal absolutely ordered list. All of the original relative ordering information is retained so that the items may be reordered using the same algorithm again.
  • In another example, an employment application form 100 may be arranged according to the present method. Referring to FIGS. 6 and 7, employment application 100 is broken into two Fig. s to show the front 102 and back 104 of the form generated according to the present method.
  • The employment application 100 includes a number of items which are grouped together. These groups or sections include a Title 106, Applicant Information 108, Education 110, Previous Employment 112, References 114, Military Service 116, and Disclaimer and Signature 118. Within each of these sections are related items.
  • Some of the sections have a relative order based on the placement of another section. For example, the Education section 110 is defined to be placed immediately after the Applicant Information section 108. And the Application Information section 108 is defined to be placed immediately after the Title section 106. These three sections are related to each other forming a chain. The Title section 106 is defined to be placed first on the form.
  • The Disclaimer and Signature section 118 is defined to be placed last on the form and the Military Service section 116 is defined to be placed immediately before the Disclaimer and Signature section 118 forming another chain.
  • The Previous Employment 112 and References 114 sections do not include relative order information and are thus independent chains. However, because the other chains previously defined include a first designation and a last designation, these chains will be placed between the other chain in alphabetical order or in an order that best fits on the page.
  • Once the relative order of each section is determined, the sections are linked together in a chain.
  • Next, the items within each section are ordered. For example, in the Applicant Information section 108, the following items are included: Address Block 120, Question 122, Date Available 124, Date 126, Desired Salary 128, E-Mail 130, First 132, Last 134, M.I. 136, Name 138, Phone 140, Position Applied for 142 and Social Security No. 144.
  • Each of the items is considered to determine its relationship to the other items, if any. The first item, Address Block 120, is defined to be placed after the Date 126. Question 122 is defined to be placed last in the Applicant Information section 108. The Date Available item 124 has no relative order information. Date 126 is defined to be placed after Name 138. Desired Salary 128 has no relative order information. The E-Mail item 130 is included in a chain with Phone 140 and defined to fall immediately after Phone 140 which is placed after the Address Block 120.
  • The items First 132, Last 134, M.I. 136 and Name 138 are included in a chain. First 132 is defined as immediately after Last 134. M.I. 136 is defined as immediately after First 132. Name 138 is defined first resulting in an ordered chain of Name 138, Last 134, First 132 and M.I. 136.
  • Next, Position Applied for 142 is considered followed by Social Security No. 144, neither of which include relative order information and are thus included in separate chains for ordering purposes and may be placed in alphabetical order.
  • Since all of the items have been processed into chains, the chains can now be ordered for the Applicant Information section 108 as follows: the Name chain including the items Name 138, Last 134, First 132 and M.I. 136 is defined as first in the section, followed by Date 126, Address Block 120, Date Available 124, Desired Salary 128, the Phone 140 and E-Mail 130 chain, Position Applied for 142, Social Security No. 144, and finally the Question 122 defined as last in the section and thus the last item in the chain.
  • Next, the items within the Address Block 120 are ordered and organized into chains. Apt. # 146 is first considered followed by City 148. City 148 is immediately after Apt. # 146 and thus placed at the end of the chain. State 150 is immediately after City 148 so it is placed at the end of the chain. Apt. # 146 is defined as immediately after Street Address 152, which is defined as first in the chain, thus Street Address 152 is added to the chain before Apt. # 146. Zip Code 154 is defined as last in the chain. Thus, the Address Block 120 is ordered as shown in FIG. 6.
  • Next the Questions 122 are ordered in a similar manner as described above for the Address Block 120 to achieve the layout shown in FIG. 6.
  • Each section is ordered in turn until all items in all sections are part of a chain and the relative order of each is determined. At this point the Employment Application for 100 may be dynamically created and saved in the form shown in FIGS. 6 and 7. The items for the form along with the relative position information are preserved so that the form may be repeatedly recreated.
  • The complete ordering information for the Employment Application form 100 is included in the following table:
  • Document Elements Ordering Information
    Acme Employment Application First
     Title Immediately After Title
     Application Information First
      Name Immediately After Name
      Last Immediately After Last
      First Immediately After First
      M.I. After Name
      Date After Date
      Address Block First
       Street Address Immediately After Street Address
       Apt # Immediately After Apt #
       City: Immediately After City
       State: Last
       Zip Code After Address Block
      Date Available Immediately After Phone
      Desired Salary Last
      Phone First
      E-mail Immediately After Are you a citizen of the United
      Position Applied for States?
      Social Security No: Last
      Questions First
       Citizen? Last
        Are you a citizen of the United States? First
        Yes Immediately After Felony?
        No Last
        Authorized to work in US? First
         If no... Immediately After Worked for company?
         Yes Last
         No Immediately After Application Information
       Felony? First
        Felony? First
        Yes Immediately After High School
        No Immediately After From
        If yes, explain Immediately Before Degree
       Worked for this company? First
        Worked for company? Last
        Yes Last
        No First
        If so, when? Immediately After College
     Education Immediately After From
     High School Immediately Before Degree
       High School First
       Address Last
       From Last
       To First
       Graduate? Immediately After College
        Graduate? Immediately After From
        Yes Immediately Before Degree
        No First
        Degree Last
      College Last
       College First
       Address After Company
       From Immediately After Address
       To After Company
       Graduate? After Supervisor
        Graduate? After Job Title
        Yes After Starting Salary
        No Immediately Before To
       Degree Immediately Before Contact
      College 2 Immediately Before Yes
        College Immediately Before No
        Address Last
        From First
        To After Company
        Graduate? Immediately After Address
         Graduate? After Company
         Yes After Supervisor
         No After Job Title
        Degree After Starting Salary
     Previous Employment Immediately Before To
      Group 1 Immediately Before Contact
        Company Immediately Before Yes
        Address Immediately Before No
        Phone Last
        Supervisor First
        Job Title After Company
        Starting Salary Immediately After Address
        Ending Salary After Company
        From After Supervisor
        To After Job Title
        Responsibilities After Starting Salary
        Reason for Leaving Immediately Before To
        Contact Immediately Before Contact
        Yes Immediately Before Yes
        No Immediately Before No
       Group 2 Last
        Company First
        Address First
        Phone After Full Name
        Supervisor After Relationship
        Job Title After Company
        Starting Salary Last
        Ending Salary First
        From After Full Name
        To After Relationship
       Responsibilities After Company
       Reason for Leaving Last
       Contact First
       Yes After Full Name
       No After Relationship
      Group 3 After Company
       Company Last
       Address Immediately Before Disclaimer and Signature
       Phone First, Immediately After No
       Supervisor First
       Job Title Immediately After Have you?
       Starting Salary Immediately After Yes
       Ending Salary Immediately After Branch
       From Immediately After From
       To Immediately Before Type of Discharge
       Responsibilities Immediately Before If other than honorable, explain
       Reason for Leaving Last
       Contact Last
       Yes First
       No Last
     References
      Instructions
      Group
    1
       Full Name
       Relationship
       Company
       Phone
       Address
      Group 2
       Full Name
       Relationship
       Company
       Phone
       Address
      Group 3
       Full Name
       Relationship
       Company
       Phone
       Address
     Military Service
      Branch
      Have you?
      Yes
      No
      From
      To
      Rank at Discharge
      Type of Discharge
      If other than honorable, explain
     Disclaimer and Signature
      Disclaimer
      Signature
      Date
  • Non-visual items may also be ordered using the aforementioned algorithm. For example, priorities could have a relative ordering component to them. Instead of high, medium and low priorities, for example, items could be “prioritized” using before, after, immediately before, immediately after, first and last. These might equate to the following phrases: higher, lower, immediately higher, immediately lower, highest and lowest. By mapping the names to the previously defined concepts, the same algorithm may be used for many different applications.
  • Furthermore, nesting may be used to create hierarchical ordering. One example is a group of items, whereas one or more items within a group could be groups themselves. Because the groups within a higher-level group can contain relative ordering information, these groups of items may be ordered independent of the items within them. All items at a higher level in the hierarchy may be ordered first, using the algorithm above then the items of each group at that level may be ordered, one group at a time, and so on for every group within a group. This hierarchical grouping of items and ordering of these items one by one creates an even more powerful system of ordering.
  • A combination of the hierarchical ordering and the remapping of phrases to the predefined ordering concepts give us the ability to visually lay out items on a page based on relative ordering information. One way to do this is to consider a line to be a horizontal arrangement of items, whereas a page is a vertical arrangement of lines. As in the groups above, pages contain lines and lines contain items. One can remap the following phrases for the lines in a page: above, below, immediately above, immediate below, top and bottom. One can also remap the following phrases for items in a line: to the left of, to the right of, immediately to the left of, immediately to the right of, leftmost and rightmost.
  • Even an absolutely ordered list may be mapped into this relative ordering paradigm simply by assigning immediately before or immediately after relative ordering information to each item in the collection based on the order it appears in the collection. For example, the first item could be left without additional information, but the next item would have relative ordering information that indicates it is immediately after the first item. The third item would be annotated as immediately after the second item, and so on down the line. This additional annotation may be done very quickly and allows the relative ordering algorithm to work on the absolutely ordered list.
  • The capabilities of the relative ordering algorithm may be extended to any ordered collection or hierarchy of items, simply by using the relative ordering information and repeating the algorithm for each collection at each level in the hierarchy.
  • The current implementation of the relative ordering scheme orders items alphabetically if there is no other information requiring that they be non-alphabetical. Also, the behavior is undefined if there are conflicts in the ordering information, though it will generally go with the most specific rule (e.g., first or last supersedes immediately before and immediately after, which supersedes before and after).
  • Even with this powerful tool, the user can give too much ordering information, thereby reducing the effectiveness of the relative ordering scheme. For example, if the user were to indicate that the Completed checkbox in FIG. 2 should be last, there would be no way to move the Completed checkbox onto the same line as the title field. For this reason, the mechanism may be extended to include the concept of priority. Again, the purpose is to get intent from the user rather than specific instructions. Using a priority allows conflicts to be resolved more effectively, and if space is limited, ordering information with a lower priority may be safely ignored.
  • It is to be understood that while certain forms of this invention have been illustrated and described, it is not limited thereto, except in so far as such limitations are included in the following claims and allowable equivalents thereof.

Claims (15)

1. A method for creating an ordered item list from an unordered item list based on associated relative ordering information comprising:
receiving an unordered item list selected by a user wherein said unordered item list includes at least three items and at least one of the items includes item relative ordering information,
separating said unordered item list into chains of related items, wherein at least one of said chains of items includes chain's relative ordering information,
ordering said related items within each chain according to said item relative ordering information,
combining said chains to form an ordered item list according to said chain relative ordering information presenting an absolutely ordered list.
2. The method as set forth in claim 1 wherein said item relative ordering information includes information to place each item in a list relative to other items in the list.
3. The method as set forth in claim 2 wherein said item relative ordering information includes placing the items in alphabetical order in the list.
4. The method as set forth in claim 2 wherein said item relative ordering information includes a First designation wherein an item having said First designation is placed first in said list relative to other related items in said list, a Last designation wherein an item having said Last designation is placed last in said list relative to other related items in said list, a Before designation wherein an item having said Before designation is placed before another related item in said list, an After designation wherein an item having said After designation is placed after another related item in said list, an Immediately Before designation wherein an item having said Immediately Before designation is placed immediately before another related item in said list, and/or an Immediately After designation wherein an item having said Immediately After designation is placed immediately after another related item in said list.
5. The method as set forth in claim 1 wherein said chain relative ordering information includes information to place each chain of items in a list relative to other chains of items in the list.
6. The method as set forth in claim 5 wherein said chain relative ordering information includes a First designation wherein a chain having said First designation is placed first in said list relative to other related chains in said list, a Last designation wherein a chain having said Last designation is placed last in said list relative to other related chains in said list, a Before designation wherein a chain having said Before designation is placed before another related chain in said list, an After designation wherein a chain having said After designation is placed after another related chain in said list, an Immediately Before designation wherein a chain having said Immediately Before designation is placed immediately before another related chain in said list, and/or an Immediately After designation wherein a chain having said Immediately After designation is placed immediately after another related chain in said list.
7. A method for creating an ordered item list from an unordered item list based on associated relative ordering information comprising:
while more items are in an unordered list of items, iteratively performing the following steps a-g:
a. selecting the first item from the unordered list of items having at least one item,
b. creating a new chain,
c. adding the item to the chain,
d. deleting the item from the unordered list of items,
e. iteratively repeating the following steps f and g until all items from the unordered list of items have been selected,
f. selecting the next item from the unordered list of items,
g. if the next item is related to the item, then adding the next item to the chain, and deleting the next item from the unordered list of items,
for each chain created in step b, ordering the items within the chain according to item relative ordering information associated with the items,
ordering said chains according to chain relative ordering information associated with the chain, and
presenting an absolutely ordered list.
8. The method as set forth in claim 7 wherein said item relative ordering information includes information to place each item in a list relative to other items in the list.
9. The method as set forth in claim 8 wherein said item relative ordering information includes placing the items in alphabetical order in the list.
10. The method as set forth in claim 8 wherein said item relative ordering information includes a First designation wherein an item having said First designation is placed first in said list relative to other related items in said list, a Last designation wherein an item having said Last designation is placed last in said list relative to other related items in said list, a Before designation wherein an item having said Before designation is placed before another related item in said list, an After designation wherein an item having said After designation is placed after another related item in said list, an Immediately Before designation wherein an item having said Immediately Before designation is placed immediately before another related item in said list, and/or an Immediately After designation wherein an item having said Immediately After designation is placed immediately after another related item in said list.
11. The method as set forth in claim 7 wherein said chain relative ordering information includes information to place each chain of items in a list relative to other chains of items in the list.
12. The method as set forth in claim 11 wherein said chain relative ordering information includes a First designation wherein a chain having said First designation is placed first in said list relative to other related chains in said list, a Last designation wherein a chain having said Last designation is placed last in said list relative to other related chains in said list, a Before designation wherein a chain having said Before designation is placed before another related chain in said list, an After designation wherein a chain having said After designation is placed after another related chain in said list, an Immediately Before designation wherein a chain having said Immediately Before designation is placed immediately before another related chain in said list, and/or an Immediately After designation wherein a chain having said Immediately After designation is placed immediately after another related chain in said list.
13. A method for creating an ordered item list from an unordered item list based on associated relative ordering information comprising:
while more items are in an unordered list of items, iteratively performing the following steps a-g:
a. selecting the first item from the unordered list of items having at least one item,
b. creating a new chain,
c. adding the item to the chain,
d. deleting the item from the unordered list of items,
e. iteratively repeating the following steps f and g until all items from the unordered list of items have been selected,
f. selecting the next item from the unordered list of items,
g. if the next item is related to the item, then adding the next item to the chain, and deleting the next item from the unordered list of items,
for each chain created in step b, ordering the items within the chain according to item relative ordering information associated with the items to place each item within the chain relative to other items in the chain,
ordering said chains according to chain relative ordering information associated with the chain, and
presenting an absolutely ordered list.
14. The method as set forth in claim 13 wherein said item relative ordering information includes a First designation wherein an item having said First designation is placed first in said list relative to other related items in said list, a Last designation wherein an item having said Last designation is placed last in said list relative to other related items in said list, a Before designation wherein an item having said Before designation is placed before another related item in said list, an After designation wherein an item having said After designation is placed after another related item in said list, an Immediately Before designation wherein an item having said Immediately Before designation is placed immediately before another related item in said list, and/or an Immediately After designation wherein an item having said Immediately After designation is placed immediately after another related item in said list.
15. The method as set forth in claim 13 wherein said chain relative ordering information includes a First designation wherein a chain having said First designation is placed first in said list relative to other related chains in said list, a Last designation wherein a chain having said Last designation is placed last in said list relative to other related chains in said list, a Before designation wherein a chain having said Before designation is placed before another related chain in said list, an After designation wherein a chain having said After designation is placed after another related chain in said list, an Immediately Before designation wherein a chain having said Immediately Before designation is placed immediately before another related chain in said list, and/or an Immediately After designation wherein a chain having said Immediately After designation is placed immediately after another related chain in said list.
US11/626,064 2009-02-23 2009-02-23 Method for ordering information Abandoned US20100218081A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/626,064 US20100218081A1 (en) 2009-02-23 2009-02-23 Method for ordering information

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/626,064 US20100218081A1 (en) 2009-02-23 2009-02-23 Method for ordering information

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20100218081A1 true US20100218081A1 (en) 2010-08-26

Family

ID=42631980

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/626,064 Abandoned US20100218081A1 (en) 2009-02-23 2009-02-23 Method for ordering information

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20100218081A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20150039987A1 (en) * 2013-07-30 2015-02-05 Plum Interfaces, LLC Systems and methods for data entry

Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5669007A (en) * 1994-06-16 1997-09-16 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for analyzing the logical structure of a document
US20020013788A1 (en) * 1998-11-10 2002-01-31 Pennell Mark E. System and method for automatically learning information used for electronic form-filling
US20020062342A1 (en) * 2000-11-22 2002-05-23 Sidles Charles S. Method and system for completing forms on wide area networks such as the internet
US20020198921A1 (en) * 2001-06-21 2002-12-26 Jameson Kevin Wade Collection command applicator
US20030126571A1 (en) * 2001-12-31 2003-07-03 Srinivasan Vinoo N. Method and apparatus for layout synthesis of regular structures using relative placement
US20030221165A1 (en) * 2002-05-22 2003-11-27 Microsoft Corporation System and method for metadata-driven user interface
US20050289114A1 (en) * 2004-06-28 2005-12-29 Bellamy Robert E Computerized system for automated completion of forms
US20060053168A1 (en) * 2004-09-03 2006-03-09 Accenture Global Services Gmbh Document processes of an organization
US20060161836A1 (en) * 2005-01-14 2006-07-20 Microsoft Corporation Method and apparatus for form automatic layout
US20060168509A1 (en) * 2005-01-27 2006-07-27 International Business Machines Corporation System and method to map favorite values for specific values during electronic form filling
US20070011355A1 (en) * 2001-04-02 2007-01-11 Levenberg Richard M Extensible transcoder annotation for transcoding proxy servers
US20080212845A1 (en) * 2007-02-26 2008-09-04 Emc Corporation Automatic form generation
US7734995B1 (en) * 2005-12-01 2010-06-08 Adobe Systems Incorporated Systems and methods for assembling form fragments and templates into a form package
US7840890B2 (en) * 2007-02-26 2010-11-23 Emc Corporation Generation of randomly structured forms

Patent Citations (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5669007A (en) * 1994-06-16 1997-09-16 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for analyzing the logical structure of a document
US6910179B1 (en) * 1998-11-10 2005-06-21 Clarita Corporation Method and apparatus for automatic form filling
US20020013788A1 (en) * 1998-11-10 2002-01-31 Pennell Mark E. System and method for automatically learning information used for electronic form-filling
US20020062342A1 (en) * 2000-11-22 2002-05-23 Sidles Charles S. Method and system for completing forms on wide area networks such as the internet
US20070011355A1 (en) * 2001-04-02 2007-01-11 Levenberg Richard M Extensible transcoder annotation for transcoding proxy servers
US20020198921A1 (en) * 2001-06-21 2002-12-26 Jameson Kevin Wade Collection command applicator
US20030126571A1 (en) * 2001-12-31 2003-07-03 Srinivasan Vinoo N. Method and apparatus for layout synthesis of regular structures using relative placement
US20030221165A1 (en) * 2002-05-22 2003-11-27 Microsoft Corporation System and method for metadata-driven user interface
US20050289114A1 (en) * 2004-06-28 2005-12-29 Bellamy Robert E Computerized system for automated completion of forms
US20060053168A1 (en) * 2004-09-03 2006-03-09 Accenture Global Services Gmbh Document processes of an organization
US20060161836A1 (en) * 2005-01-14 2006-07-20 Microsoft Corporation Method and apparatus for form automatic layout
US20060168509A1 (en) * 2005-01-27 2006-07-27 International Business Machines Corporation System and method to map favorite values for specific values during electronic form filling
US7734995B1 (en) * 2005-12-01 2010-06-08 Adobe Systems Incorporated Systems and methods for assembling form fragments and templates into a form package
US20080212845A1 (en) * 2007-02-26 2008-09-04 Emc Corporation Automatic form generation
US7840890B2 (en) * 2007-02-26 2010-11-23 Emc Corporation Generation of randomly structured forms

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20150039987A1 (en) * 2013-07-30 2015-02-05 Plum Interfaces, LLC Systems and methods for data entry

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP7420861B2 (en) System and method for website building system server
US7082576B2 (en) System and process for dynamically displaying prioritized data objects
Henley et al. The patchworks code editor: Toward faster navigation with less code arranging and fewer navigation mistakes
US20060149609A1 (en) Calendar rule definition, ranking, and expansion
WO2000060565A2 (en) Device and method for a lattice display
US9607054B2 (en) Displaying list of multiple contents
WO2012018357A1 (en) Method of and system for browsing and displaying items from a collection
RU2004119836A (en) SYSTEM AND METHOD OF FILTRATION AND ORGANIZATION OF ELEMENTS BASED ON GENERAL PROPERTIES
US10255233B2 (en) System and method for organizing, retrieving and displaying information using HTML indices
CN102722537A (en) Database test data generation method and system thereof
US20050166139A1 (en) System and method for managing legal documents
CN111314540B (en) Address book searching method, device, equipment and readable storage medium
Brumback et al. Flora Conservanda: New England 2012. The New England Plant Conservation Program (NEPCoP) list of plants in need of conservation
US20100218081A1 (en) Method for ordering information
JP2010015198A (en) Automatic composition system
US20190340305A1 (en) Automated event detection and photo product creation
CN101079065B (en) Method and system for displaying pictures comprising picture group
US8127227B1 (en) Computerized method for dynamic content placement in a document
CN1815443A (en) Methods for merging files and related systems and machine-readable medium thereof
Miksa The DDC relative index
JP5519655B2 (en) Information retrieval device based on a set of folded sheets and corresponding method
US9715748B2 (en) Method and apparatus for graphical data interaction and vizualization of graphs via paths
JP2006338602A (en) Production scheduling method
CN113987242A (en) File picture visualization method, device, equipment and medium
JP2004246582A (en) Display device for electronic document or file

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: PROBUSOFT, INC., KANSAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:NORMAN, MICHAEL D.;OHMIE, JUSTIN;REEL/FRAME:019670/0544

Effective date: 20070118

XAS Not any more in us assignment database

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:NORMAN, MICHAEL D.;OHMIE, JUSTIN;REEL/FRAME:019582/0790

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION