US20090167589A1 - Earth-penetrating radar with inherent near-field rejection - Google Patents

Earth-penetrating radar with inherent near-field rejection Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20090167589A1
US20090167589A1 US11/478,757 US47875706A US2009167589A1 US 20090167589 A1 US20090167589 A1 US 20090167589A1 US 47875706 A US47875706 A US 47875706A US 2009167589 A1 US2009167589 A1 US 2009167589A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
sin
frequency
reflections
antenna
interfaces
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US11/478,757
Other versions
US7548181B1 (en
Inventor
Igor Bausov
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Stolar Inc
Original Assignee
Stolar Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Stolar Inc filed Critical Stolar Inc
Priority to US11/478,757 priority Critical patent/US7548181B1/en
Priority to US12/053,611 priority patent/US7659847B2/en
Assigned to STOLAR, INC. reassignment STOLAR, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BAUSOV, IGOR
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US7548181B1 publication Critical patent/US7548181B1/en
Publication of US20090167589A1 publication Critical patent/US20090167589A1/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S13/00Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
    • G01S13/02Systems using reflection of radio waves, e.g. primary radar systems; Analogous systems
    • G01S13/06Systems determining position data of a target
    • G01S13/08Systems for measuring distance only
    • G01S13/32Systems for measuring distance only using transmission of continuous waves, whether amplitude-, frequency-, or phase-modulated, or unmodulated
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S13/00Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
    • G01S13/88Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications
    • G01S13/89Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for mapping or imaging
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01VGEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
    • G01V3/00Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation
    • G01V3/12Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation operating with electromagnetic waves
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S13/00Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
    • G01S13/88Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications
    • G01S13/885Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for ground probing

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to ground penetrating radars, and more particularly to radars that are able to completely suppress media interface reflections occurring very close at the air-ground interface.
  • Earth-penetrating radars have been studied and applied by Stolar Horizon (Raton, N. Mex.) to coal mining and automated mining safety devices.
  • Conventional radars typically send out a radio pulse, and an echo will typically be returned by any objects with a contrast in their dielectric constant values. The time the echo takes to return is proportional to the distance the objects are from the radar antenna.
  • Unfortunately for earth penetrating radars a big echo reflection occurs at the adjacent interface of air and earth. The echo can be strong enough to swamp the echoes returning from deeper, smaller objects of interest. Burying the antenna or contacting the surface are very often not practical.
  • Frequency sweeping radars have an advantage in some applications.
  • the transmitted frequency is sweeped according to a time schedule. Any return echoes will have different frequencies that represent the time at which the original signals left the transmitter. Subtracting the current time results in a measurement that is proportional to the objects' distances from the antenna.
  • Tunable reject filters on the receiver can be used to suppress echoes from the air-earth interface.
  • Earth-penetrating radars have many practical and useful applications, especially in the military to find and locate bombs, landmines, weapons caches, and other threats.
  • earth-penetrating radars are useful in directional drilling and in continuous mining machines to guide automation through the coal seams and to avoid hazards and other problems.
  • Stolar Horizon has made a business out of using electromagnetic (EM) wave gradiometers to image deep into the earth to characterize coal deposits, anomalies, and to locate underground man-made facilities and installations.
  • EM electromagnetic
  • Such technology has depended on illuminating the ground with a continuous primary EM wave of 80 KHz to 1 MHz, and sensing the reflected secondary EM waves with phase and amplitude information.
  • Others have used more traditional radars that send out pulses and measure the echo returns. But all these suffer from strong reflections at the ground that can swamp the receiver and bury the echo signals deep in the noise floor.
  • a ground-penetrating radar embodiment of the present invention comprises a transmitter for launching pairs of widely separated and coherent continuous waves. Each pair is separated by a different amount, such as 10 MHz, 20 MHz, and 30 MHz. These are equivalent to modulation that have a phase range that starts at 0-degrees at the transmitter antenna which is near the ground surface. Deep reflectors at 90-degrees and 270-degrees will be illuminated with modulation signal peaks. Quadrature detection, mixing, and down-conversion result in 0-degree and 180-degree reflections effectively dropping out in demodulation.
  • An advantage of the present invention is that a radar is provided for efficient earth-penetrating imaging.
  • Another advantage of the present invention is that a ground-penetrating radar is provided that allows gain to be increased because unwanted signals from near reflections are zeroed out in demodulation.
  • FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram of earth-penetrating radar embodiment of the present invention with one pair of coherent transmitter frequencies to help describe the basic theory of modulation radar used here;
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram showing the primary EM waves entering a coal seam from the atmosphere and the reflections and losses that occur at the air-coal and coal-water interfaces where the dielectric constants will contrast;
  • FIG. 3 is a functional block diagram of multi-pair transmission earth-penetrating radar embodiment of the present invention with two pairs of coherent transmitter frequencies generated by direct digital synthesis, and to illustrate how at least five such pairs would be used in a practical implementation.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a radar embodiment of the present invention, and is referred to herein by the general reference numeral 100 .
  • the challenges in design are two fold, how to generate widely separated coherent frequencies, and how to transmit the two widely separated signals with equal amplitudes.
  • Radar 100 does both by using software defined radio (SDR) techniques to generate the two coherent baseband frequencies separated by 1 MHz, and then uses up-conversion to increase the separation to 30 MHz.
  • SDR software defined radio
  • This technique also makes it practical to use the current state-of-the-art SDR technology, since clock frequencies are limited to well below the 30 MHz carrier frequencies used here.
  • Adaptive digital predistortion techniques are used to equalize the magnitudes of the two frequencies by using feedback to calibrate for the compensation needed. Such then eliminates the expense of using low distortion power amplifiers and flat frequency response antennas.
  • the radar 100 comprises a software defined radio (SDR) 102 with an analog up-converter 104 , a transmitting antenna 106 , a receiving antenna 108 , and an analog downconverter 110 .
  • SDR software defined radio
  • the measured range to a buried reflector 112 is “R”.
  • Antennas are in air 114 , the reflector is in a solid material like earth soil/rock 116 , and an interface between 118 returns a strong near field echo 120 .
  • a single Tx/Rx antenna could be used if a directional coupler were included to separate the Rx from the Tx signal for the receiver.
  • R is the distance to the reflector
  • C is the speed of propagation in the media, e.g., roughly 300 ⁇ 10 6 meters per second.
  • the two transmitted frequencies resemble the upper and lower sidebands of a suppressed amplitude modulated (AM) carrier.
  • the frequency separation, ⁇ H ⁇ L can be increased to extend the range of detection for reflector 118 , e.g., 60 Mhz extends the wavelength of the modulation seen in the demodulator to twenty meters.
  • the strong near field echo 120 will be canceled in the first mixer.
  • S RX cos( ⁇ m (t ⁇ ))cos( ⁇ c (t ⁇ )).
  • the product after low-pass filtering is sin( ⁇ m ⁇ )cos( ⁇ c (t ⁇ )).
  • the first term depends only delay “ ⁇ ” and not “t”.
  • Quadrature mixing in the down-converter 110 eliminates “t” altogether, and produces demodulated signals sin( ⁇ m ⁇ )cos( ⁇ c ⁇ ) and sin( ⁇ m ⁇ )sin( ⁇ c ⁇ ).
  • the echo delay from interface 118 is defined as ⁇ 1 and will be near zero because Tx antenna 106 is placed very close to interface 118 .
  • the delay from reflector 112 is defined as ⁇ 2 . So, at the SDR receiver inputs I, Q,
  • FIG. 2 is an illustration of a useful application for radar 100 in a coal mining application.
  • Mining machines and radar antennas operate in an air atmosphere with a dielectric constant of one.
  • a transmitting radar antenna Tx will direct a primary EM wave (Ep) toward a coal seam with a dielectric constant of four.
  • the 1:4 contrast creates a secondary EM reflection (Esc).
  • Esc secondary EM reflection
  • Most of Ep will penetrate to encounter a water interface. Water has a dielectric constant of eighty-one, for a contrast of 4:81.
  • a strong secondary EM wave reflected from the water interface (Esw) will be returned to the receiver Rx.
  • the thickness or depth to the water interface is very important for mine safety. If mining can be stopped when there is still an adequately thick enough wall of coal, a catastrophic flooding can be avoided.
  • Radar 100 can measure the thickness of the coal seam.
  • FIG. 3 represents a multiple target software defined radar embodiment of the present invention, and is referred to herein by the general reference numeral 300 .
  • Two pairs of frequencies ⁇ H , ⁇ L are shown here for illustrative purposes, but practical systems will have at least five frequency pairs.
  • a very recently introduced semiconductor device makes the coherent frequency synthesis and predistortion functions much easier.
  • the Analog Devices AD9959 has four direct digital synthesis (DDS) cores providing for independent frequency, phase, and amplitude control on each channel. Such is used by radar 300 to correct antenna response, filtering, power amplification, PCB layout-related mismatches, and other analog processing imbalances between signals. All the channels share a common system clock, so they are inherently synchronized. The AD9959 provides for synchronization of multiple devices, and all channels can be coherent.
  • DDS direct digital synthesis
  • the AD9959 can do 16-level modulation of frequency, phase, or amplitude (FSK, PSK, ASK). Modulation is done by applying data to the profile pins. Linear frequency, phase, or amplitude sweeps enable radar, instrumentation, and other applications.
  • the AD9959 serial I/O port provides for multiple configurations.
  • the serial I/O port has an SPI-compatible mode of operation found in other Analog Device DDS products.
  • Four data pins control four programmable modes of serial I/O operation.
  • the AD9959 DDS technology provides low power dissipation and high performance. It incorporates four integrated high speed 10-bit DAC's with excellent wideband and narrowband SFDR. Each channel has a dedicated 32-bit frequency tuning word, 14-bits of phase offset, and a 10-bit output scale multiplier.
  • the DAC outputs are supply referenced and are terminated into AVDD by a resistor, or an AVDD center-tapped transformer.
  • Each DAC has its own programmable reference to enable different full-scale currents for each channel.
  • the DDS acts as a high resolution frequency divider with the REF_CLK as the input and the DAC providing the output.
  • the REF_CLK input source is common to all channels and can be driven directly or used in combination with an integrated REF_CLK multiplier (PLL) up to a maximum of 500 MSPS.
  • the PLL multiplication factor is programmable 4-20, in integer steps.
  • the REF_CLK input also has an oscillator circuit to support an external 20 MHz-30 MHz crystal as the REF_CLK source.
  • Radar 300 comprises a quad-DDS 302 , a quad mixer 304 , a transmitting antenna 306 , a receiving antenna 308 , and an analog downconverter 310 .
  • the measured range to a buried reflector 312 is “R”.
  • Antennas 306 and 308 are in an air environment 314 , the reflector is in a solid material like earth soil/rock 316 , and an interface between 318 returns a strong near field echo 320 .
  • a single Tx/Rx antenna could be used if a directional coupler were included to separate the Rx from the Tx signal for the down-converter 310 .
  • R is the distance to the reflector
  • C is the speed of propagation in the media, e.g., roughly 300 ⁇ 30 6 meters per second.
  • ⁇ m ⁇ ⁇ 1 ⁇ H ⁇ ⁇ 1 - ⁇ L ⁇ ⁇ 1 2
  • ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ m ⁇ ⁇ 2 ⁇ H ⁇ ⁇ 2 - ⁇ L ⁇ ⁇ 2 2 .
  • radar 300 simultaneously transmits ⁇ H1 , ⁇ L1 , ⁇ H2 , ⁇ L2 , as two pairs of coherent signals separated by, e.g., 30 MHz and 45 MHz respectively.
  • the phase separation between the two in each pair has a wavelength of ten meters and 7.5 meters.
  • a modulation maximum for example occurs for the first pair at 2.5 meters, and the second pair at 1.825 meters.
  • Simultaneous measurements for buried reflector 312 can be used to resolve wavelength integer ambiguities and arrange at a most probable solution, e.g., by paring a decision tree. as in system 100 ( FIG. 1 ), a minimum occurs just near 0.1 meters where interface 318 is located.
  • the frequency separation, ⁇ H ⁇ L can be increased to extend the range of detection for reflector 318 , and several pairs of simultaneously launched transmitter signals are preferred.
  • S RX cos( ⁇ m (t ⁇ ))cos( ⁇ c (t ⁇ )).
  • the general product after low-pass filtering is sin( ⁇ m ⁇ )cos( ⁇ c (t ⁇ )).
  • the first term depends only delay “ ⁇ ” and not “t”.
  • Quadrature mixing in the down-converter 310 eliminates “t” altogether, and produces demodulated signals sin( ⁇ m ⁇ )cos( ⁇ c ⁇ ) and sin( ⁇ m ⁇ )sin( ⁇ c ⁇ ).
  • the echo delay from interface 318 is defined as ⁇ 1 and will be near zero because Tx antenna 306 is placed very close to interface 318 .
  • the delay from reflector 312 is defined as ⁇ 2 . So, at the SDR receiver inputs I, Q,
  • a prototype implementation of the present invention used a highly integrated single board digital signal processing development platform with four major functional units, a 16-bit fixed point digital signal processor (DSP) with 40-bit arithmetic logical unit (ALU), an 8-bit host microcontroller with 256K on-chip flash memory, a Xilinx field programmable gate array (FPGA), and a Bluetooth and RS-232 serial communication link.
  • DSP fixed point digital signal processor
  • ALU arithmetic logical unit
  • FPGA Xilinx field programmable gate array
  • Bluetooth and RS-232 serial communication link a Bluetooth and RS-232 serial communication link.
  • the microcontroller is a processor optimized to for control tasks using bit operations on expanded peripheral ports, and it was not efficient for calculations.
  • DSP's are optimized for specific digital signal processing calculations with high performance.
  • the FPGA logic device replaces tens of standard logic devices and allows changes to the peripheral hardware functionality without any changes in the hardware. The combination of these three devices allowed optimum software and hardware task distribution.
  • the microcontroller, DSP and FPGA were combined through a host port interface (HPI) bus for data exchange between them. In such configuration, the microcontroller acts as a host processor governing DSP and FPGA.
  • DSP acts as a high speed co-processor and FPGA acts as a reconfigurable universal interface between the board and external devices. Processing software was downloaded into the DSP internal program memory and FPGA configuration memory.
  • microcontroller All software was stored in the on-chip flash memory of microcontroller. At startup, the microcontroller downloads to the FPGA and then to the DSP. Changes to the microcontroller software, DSP program, or FPGA configuration, required only the microcontroller to be reprogrammed.
  • the system programmable (ISP) on-chip flash memory of microcontroller could be reprogrammed through its JTAG interface, and through its serial communication link too.
  • IAP application programmable
  • DPD Adaptive digital predistortion
  • DDS 302 FIG. 3
  • Predistortion generally requires the insertion of a nonlinear module before the RF power amplifier.
  • the nonlinear module, a predistorter has the inverse response of the power amplifier (PA) and antenna, so the overall response is linear.
  • Adaptive digital predistortion involves a digital implementation of the predistorter and a feedback loop for adapting to the changes in the response of the PA and antenna.
  • the two main types of adaptation algorithms are the “blind adaptive” algorithms based on distance-gradient methods, and the “polynomial function” algorithms that attempt to directly model the nonlinearities.
  • the correction factors can be computed using an adaptation algorithm and can be stored in a look-up table (LUT). They are typically updated dynamically to reduce errors between the predistorter input and the Tx antenna output.
  • the blind adaptive LUT-based approach uses incoming samples (I and Q) with correction factors applied from a LUT and sent to a radio frequency (RF) module.
  • the LUT's address is derived from the input power and the LUT contains two values for each location, the real part, I, and the imaginary part, Q.
  • the feedback loop, samples of the radiated Tx signal are used to update the current values stored in the LUT.

Abstract

A ground-penetrating radar comprises a transmitter for launching pairs of widely separated and coherent continuous waves. Each pair is separated by a different amount, such as 10 MHz, 20 MHz, and 30 MHz. These are equivalent to modulation that have a phase range that starts at 0-degrees at the transmitter antenna which is near the ground surface. Deep reflectors at 90-degrees and 270-degrees will be illuminated with modulation signal peaks. Quadrature detection, mixing, and down-conversion result in 0-degree and 180-degree reflections effectively dropping out in demodulation.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to ground penetrating radars, and more particularly to radars that are able to completely suppress media interface reflections occurring very close at the air-ground interface.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART
  • Earth-penetrating radars have been studied and applied by Stolar Horizon (Raton, N. Mex.) to coal mining and automated mining safety devices. Conventional radars typically send out a radio pulse, and an echo will typically be returned by any objects with a contrast in their dielectric constant values. The time the echo takes to return is proportional to the distance the objects are from the radar antenna. Unfortunately for earth penetrating radars, a big echo reflection occurs at the adjacent interface of air and earth. The echo can be strong enough to swamp the echoes returning from deeper, smaller objects of interest. Burying the antenna or contacting the surface are very often not practical.
  • Frequency sweeping radars have an advantage in some applications. The transmitted frequency is sweeped according to a time schedule. Any return echoes will have different frequencies that represent the time at which the original signals left the transmitter. Subtracting the current time results in a measurement that is proportional to the objects' distances from the antenna. Tunable reject filters on the receiver can be used to suppress echoes from the air-earth interface.
  • Earth-penetrating radars have many practical and useful applications, especially in the military to find and locate bombs, landmines, weapons caches, and other threats. In coal mining, earth-penetrating radars are useful in directional drilling and in continuous mining machines to guide automation through the coal seams and to avoid hazards and other problems.
  • Stolar Horizon has made a business out of using electromagnetic (EM) wave gradiometers to image deep into the earth to characterize coal deposits, anomalies, and to locate underground man-made facilities and installations. Such technology has depended on illuminating the ground with a continuous primary EM wave of 80 KHz to 1 MHz, and sensing the reflected secondary EM waves with phase and amplitude information. Others have used more traditional radars that send out pulses and measure the echo returns. But all these suffer from strong reflections at the ground that can swamp the receiver and bury the echo signals deep in the noise floor.
  • What is needed is a fundamentally different approach that will naturally reject the surface reflections and that will allow more gain to be used to image the echo signals better.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • Briefly, a ground-penetrating radar embodiment of the present invention comprises a transmitter for launching pairs of widely separated and coherent continuous waves. Each pair is separated by a different amount, such as 10 MHz, 20 MHz, and 30 MHz. These are equivalent to modulation that have a phase range that starts at 0-degrees at the transmitter antenna which is near the ground surface. Deep reflectors at 90-degrees and 270-degrees will be illuminated with modulation signal peaks. Quadrature detection, mixing, and down-conversion result in 0-degree and 180-degree reflections effectively dropping out in demodulation.
  • An advantage of the present invention is that a radar is provided for efficient earth-penetrating imaging.
  • Another advantage of the present invention is that a ground-penetrating radar is provided that allows gain to be increased because unwanted signals from near reflections are zeroed out in demodulation.
  • These and other objects and advantages of the present invention will no doubt become obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art after having read the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments which are illustrated in the various drawing figures.
  • IN THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram of earth-penetrating radar embodiment of the present invention with one pair of coherent transmitter frequencies to help describe the basic theory of modulation radar used here;
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram showing the primary EM waves entering a coal seam from the atmosphere and the reflections and losses that occur at the air-coal and coal-water interfaces where the dielectric constants will contrast; and
  • FIG. 3 is a functional block diagram of multi-pair transmission earth-penetrating radar embodiment of the present invention with two pairs of coherent transmitter frequencies generated by direct digital synthesis, and to illustrate how at least five such pairs would be used in a practical implementation.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a radar embodiment of the present invention, and is referred to herein by the general reference numeral 100. The challenges in design are two fold, how to generate widely separated coherent frequencies, and how to transmit the two widely separated signals with equal amplitudes. Radar 100 does both by using software defined radio (SDR) techniques to generate the two coherent baseband frequencies separated by 1 MHz, and then uses up-conversion to increase the separation to 30 MHz. This technique also makes it practical to use the current state-of-the-art SDR technology, since clock frequencies are limited to well below the 30 MHz carrier frequencies used here. Adaptive digital predistortion techniques are used to equalize the magnitudes of the two frequencies by using feedback to calibrate for the compensation needed. Such then eliminates the expense of using low distortion power amplifiers and flat frequency response antennas.
  • The radar 100 comprises a software defined radio (SDR) 102 with an analog up-converter 104, a transmitting antenna 106, a receiving antenna 108, and an analog downconverter 110. The measured range to a buried reflector 112 is “R”. Antennas are in air 114, the reflector is in a solid material like earth soil/rock 116, and an interface between 118 returns a strong near field echo 120. A single Tx/Rx antenna could be used if a directional coupler were included to separate the Rx from the Tx signal for the receiver.
  • Each transmitted signal is defined as Stx=cos(ωt), and the received signal is defined as Srx=cos(ω(t−τ)), where,
  • τ = 2 R C ,
  • “R” is the distance to the reflector, and “C” is the speed of propagation in the media, e.g., roughly 300×106 meters per second.
  • If two signals are transmitted, ωHL, then the virtual carrier frequency is
  • ω c = ω H + ω L 2 ,
  • and the modulation is defined as
  • ω m = ω H - ω L 2
  • The two transmitted frequencies resemble the upper and lower sidebands of a suppressed amplitude modulated (AM) carrier. Summing together STX H=cos(ωHt) and STX L=cos(ωLt) produces, STX=cos(ωmt)cos(ωct).
  • Radar 100 is unique in its ability to cancel out or suppress the strong near field echo 120 while being able to increase sensitivity to a reflected signal 122. It does this by transmitting, ωHL, as two coherent signals separated by, e.g., 30 MHz. The phase separation between the two has a wavelength of ten meters if ωH−ωL=30 MHz. Relative to antenna 106, a modulation maximum for example occurs at 2.5 meters, where buried reflector 112 is located, and a minimum occurs just near 0.1 meters where interface 118 is located. The frequency separation, ωH−ωL, can be increased to extend the range of detection for reflector 118, e.g., 60 Mhz extends the wavelength of the modulation seen in the demodulator to twenty meters. In the receiver, the strong near field echo 120 will be canceled in the first mixer.
  • The received signal will be, SRX=cos(ωm(t−τ))cos(ωc(t−τ)). When mixed in a first mixer with sin ωmt, the product after low-pass filtering is sin(ωmτ)cos(ωc(t−τ)). Importantly, the first term depends only delay “τ” and not “t”. Quadrature mixing in the down-converter 110 eliminates “t” altogether, and produces demodulated signals sin(ωmτ)cos(ωcτ) and sin(ωmτ)sin(ωcτ).
  • Applying this to the case in FIG. 1, the echo delay from interface 118 is defined as τ1 and will be near zero because Tx antenna 106 is placed very close to interface 118. And, the delay from reflector 112 is defined as τ2. So, at the SDR receiver inputs I, Q,

  • I=sin(ωmτ1)sin(ωcτ1)+sin(ωmτ2)sin(ωcτ2), and

  • Q=sin(ωmτ1)cos(ωcτ1)+sin(ωmτ2)cos(ωcτ2).
  • FIG. 2 is an illustration of a useful application for radar 100 in a coal mining application. Mining machines and radar antennas operate in an air atmosphere with a dielectric constant of one. A transmitting radar antenna Tx will direct a primary EM wave (Ep) toward a coal seam with a dielectric constant of four. The 1:4 contrast creates a secondary EM reflection (Esc). But most of Ep will penetrate to encounter a water interface. Water has a dielectric constant of eighty-one, for a contrast of 4:81. A strong secondary EM wave reflected from the water interface (Esw) will be returned to the receiver Rx. The thickness or depth to the water interface is very important for mine safety. If mining can be stopped when there is still an adequately thick enough wall of coal, a catastrophic flooding can be avoided. Radar 100 can measure the thickness of the coal seam.
  • A problem arises using one single pair of frequencies as in system 100 (FIG. 1) in that multiple targets cannot be resolved. There is also an integer ambiguity problem with the short modulation wavelength, e.g., ten meters. If a measurement indicates the target seems to return a phase and amplitude signal corresponding to an “R” of 7.5 meters, it could also be at 17.5 m, 27.5 m, etc., because there is no way to resolve between each integer wave. The solution is to send multiple pairs of frequencies all with different degrees of separation between themselves. For example, ωH−ωL=15 MHz, 20 MHz, 30 MHz, 40 MHz, etc.
  • FIG. 3 represents a multiple target software defined radar embodiment of the present invention, and is referred to herein by the general reference numeral 300. Two pairs of frequencies ωHL are shown here for illustrative purposes, but practical systems will have at least five frequency pairs. A very recently introduced semiconductor device makes the coherent frequency synthesis and predistortion functions much easier.
  • The Analog Devices AD9959 has four direct digital synthesis (DDS) cores providing for independent frequency, phase, and amplitude control on each channel. Such is used by radar 300 to correct antenna response, filtering, power amplification, PCB layout-related mismatches, and other analog processing imbalances between signals. All the channels share a common system clock, so they are inherently synchronized. The AD9959 provides for synchronization of multiple devices, and all channels can be coherent.
  • The AD9959 can do 16-level modulation of frequency, phase, or amplitude (FSK, PSK, ASK). Modulation is done by applying data to the profile pins. Linear frequency, phase, or amplitude sweeps enable radar, instrumentation, and other applications.
  • The AD9959 serial I/O port provides for multiple configurations. The serial I/O port has an SPI-compatible mode of operation found in other Analog Device DDS products. Four data pins control four programmable modes of serial I/O operation.
  • The AD9959 DDS technology provides low power dissipation and high performance. It incorporates four integrated high speed 10-bit DAC's with excellent wideband and narrowband SFDR. Each channel has a dedicated 32-bit frequency tuning word, 14-bits of phase offset, and a 10-bit output scale multiplier.
  • The DAC outputs are supply referenced and are terminated into AVDD by a resistor, or an AVDD center-tapped transformer. Each DAC has its own programmable reference to enable different full-scale currents for each channel.
  • The DDS acts as a high resolution frequency divider with the REF_CLK as the input and the DAC providing the output. The REF_CLK input source is common to all channels and can be driven directly or used in combination with an integrated REF_CLK multiplier (PLL) up to a maximum of 500 MSPS. The PLL multiplication factor is programmable 4-20, in integer steps. The REF_CLK input also has an oscillator circuit to support an external 20 MHz-30 MHz crystal as the REF_CLK source.
  • Radar 300 comprises a quad-DDS 302, a quad mixer 304, a transmitting antenna 306, a receiving antenna 308, and an analog downconverter 310. The measured range to a buried reflector 312 is “R”. Antennas 306 and 308 are in an air environment 314, the reflector is in a solid material like earth soil/rock 316, and an interface between 318 returns a strong near field echo 320. A single Tx/Rx antenna could be used if a directional coupler were included to separate the Rx from the Tx signal for the down-converter 310.
  • Each transmitted signal is defined as Stx=cos(ωt), and the received signal is defined as Srx=cos(ω(t−τ)), where,
  • τ = 2 R C ,
  • “R” is the distance to the reflector, and “C” is the speed of propagation in the media, e.g., roughly 300×306 meters per second.
  • Four signals are transmitted, ωH1L1, ωH2L2, and the virtual carrier frequency is
  • ω c = ω H + ω L 2 ,
  • and the modulation is defined as
  • ω m 1 = ω H 1 - ω L 1 2 , and ω m 2 = ω H 2 - ω L 2 2 .
  • Summing together, each STX H=cos(ωHt) and STX L=cos(ωLt), produce a corresponding STX=cos(ωmt)cos(ωct).
  • For example, radar 300 simultaneously transmits ωH1L1, ωH2L2, as two pairs of coherent signals separated by, e.g., 30 MHz and 45 MHz respectively. The phase separation between the two in each pair has a wavelength of ten meters and 7.5 meters. Relative to antenna 306, a modulation maximum for example occurs for the first pair at 2.5 meters, and the second pair at 1.825 meters. Simultaneous measurements for buried reflector 312 can be used to resolve wavelength integer ambiguities and arrange at a most probable solution, e.g., by paring a decision tree. as in system 100 (FIG. 1), a minimum occurs just near 0.1 meters where interface 318 is located. The frequency separation, ωH−ωL, can be increased to extend the range of detection for reflector 318, and several pairs of simultaneously launched transmitter signals are preferred.
  • The received signal will be a complex of all the reflectors returning echoes and each having a respective value “τ”, e.g., SRX=cos(ωm(t−τ))cos(ωc(t−τ)). When mixed in a first mixer with sin ωmt, the general product after low-pass filtering is sin(ωmτ)cos(ωc(t−τ)). Again, the first term depends only delay “τ” and not “t”. Quadrature mixing in the down-converter 310 eliminates “t” altogether, and produces demodulated signals sin(ωmτ)cos(ωcτ) and sin(ωmτ)sin(ωcτ).
  • Applying this to the case in FIG. 3, the echo delay from interface 318 is defined as τ1 and will be near zero because Tx antenna 306 is placed very close to interface 318. And, the delay from reflector 312 is defined as τ2. So, at the SDR receiver inputs I, Q,

  • I=sin(ωmτ1)sin(ωcτ1)+sin(ωm1τ2)sin(ωcτ2)+sin(ωm2τ2)sin(ωcτ2), and

  • Q=sin(ωmτ1)cos(ωcτ1)+sin(ωm1τ2)cos(ωcτ2)+sin(ωm2τ2)cos(ωcτ2).
  • A prototype implementation of the present invention used a highly integrated single board digital signal processing development platform with four major functional units, a 16-bit fixed point digital signal processor (DSP) with 40-bit arithmetic logical unit (ALU), an 8-bit host microcontroller with 256K on-chip flash memory, a Xilinx field programmable gate array (FPGA), and a Bluetooth and RS-232 serial communication link.
  • The microcontroller is a processor optimized to for control tasks using bit operations on expanded peripheral ports, and it was not efficient for calculations. DSP's are optimized for specific digital signal processing calculations with high performance. The FPGA logic device replaces tens of standard logic devices and allows changes to the peripheral hardware functionality without any changes in the hardware. The combination of these three devices allowed optimum software and hardware task distribution. The microcontroller, DSP and FPGA were combined through a host port interface (HPI) bus for data exchange between them. In such configuration, the microcontroller acts as a host processor governing DSP and FPGA. DSP acts as a high speed co-processor and FPGA acts as a reconfigurable universal interface between the board and external devices. Processing software was downloaded into the DSP internal program memory and FPGA configuration memory. All software was stored in the on-chip flash memory of microcontroller. At startup, the microcontroller downloads to the FPGA and then to the DSP. Changes to the microcontroller software, DSP program, or FPGA configuration, required only the microcontroller to be reprogrammed. The system programmable (ISP) on-chip flash memory of microcontroller could be reprogrammed through its JTAG interface, and through its serial communication link too. In application programmable (IAP) capability could reprogram the whole board remotely through wireless Bluetooth communication link. IAP represented an advantage because the device functionality could be changed quickly and easily.
  • Adaptive digital predistortion (DPD) offers higher efficiency and greater flexibility at a lower cost. DDS 302 (FIG. 3) includes the predistortion function if an Analog Devices AD9959 is used. Predistortion generally requires the insertion of a nonlinear module before the RF power amplifier. The nonlinear module, a predistorter, has the inverse response of the power amplifier (PA) and antenna, so the overall response is linear. Adaptive digital predistortion involves a digital implementation of the predistorter and a feedback loop for adapting to the changes in the response of the PA and antenna.
  • The two main types of adaptation algorithms are the “blind adaptive” algorithms based on distance-gradient methods, and the “polynomial function” algorithms that attempt to directly model the nonlinearities. The correction factors can be computed using an adaptation algorithm and can be stored in a look-up table (LUT). They are typically updated dynamically to reduce errors between the predistorter input and the Tx antenna output.
  • The blind adaptive LUT-based approach uses incoming samples (I and Q) with correction factors applied from a LUT and sent to a radio frequency (RF) module. The LUT's address is derived from the input power and the LUT contains two values for each location, the real part, I, and the imaginary part, Q. The feedback loop, samples of the radiated Tx signal are used to update the current values stored in the LUT.
  • Although the present invention has been described in terms of the presently preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the disclosure is not to be interpreted as limiting. Various alterations and modifications will no doubt become apparent to those skilled in the art after having read the above disclosure. Accordingly, it is intended that the appended claims be interpreted as covering all alterations and modifications as fall within the “true” spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims (6)

1. An earth penetrating radar, comprising:
a software-defined transceiver (SDT) programmed as a geologic-media penetrating radar with multi-channel direct digital synthesizer (DDS) for synthesizing many coherent first and second frequency continuous waves ωH1L1, ωH2L2 etc., as individual pairs and each member of a separated from the other member in the pair in frequency by n-MHz, m-MHz, etc.;
a feedback enabled pre-distorter for dynamically predistorting each of said pairs of first and second frequency continuous waves to account for non-linearities in following stages and antennas;
a power amplifier and antenna for launching corrected versions of said coherent pairs of said first and second frequency continuous waves into the earth and a first interface;
a receiver and antenna for collecting a relatively strong signal reflected from said first interface and substantially weaker signals reflected from deeper buried objects and interfaces of material with contrasting dielectric constants;
a down-converter and demodulator disposed in the SDT and for demodulating in-phase, I=sin(ωmτ1)sin(ωcτ1)+sin(ωmτ2)sin(ωcτ2), and quadrature-phase Q=sin(ωmτ1)+cos(ωcτ1)+sin(ωmτ2)cos(ωcτ2) signals for each pair of transmitted first and second frequency continuous waves, wherein ωm represents a modulation frequency, ωc represents a virtual carrier frequency, Ti represents the echo delay time occurring for reflections from said first interface near the antenna, and τ2 represents the echo delay time occurring for more distant reflections from buried objects and interfaces; and
a computer and display for showing a user the depth of said buried objects and interfaces by simultaneously solving for all echo delay times τ2 for each differently separated pair of first and second frequencies;
wherein, echo delay time τ1 is near zero and near reflection surface terms including it are manipulated by a configuration of constituent parts to zero out in the step of computing and displaying.
2. The radar of claim 1, further comprising:
an up and down conversion quadrature mixer for translating said first and second frequency continuous waves.
3. A radar, comprising:
means for synthesizing coherent continuous waves at first and second frequencies as pairs separated in frequency by a constant or variable n-MHz;
means for predistorting the magnitudes and phases of each of said continuous waves at first and second frequencies to account for non-linearities in following stages and antennas;
means for launching corrected versions of said coherent pairs of said continuous waves at first and second frequencies from a power amplifier and antenna into the earth through a first interface to deeper objects and interfaces of materials with contrasting dielectric constants;
means for receiving relatively weaker signals reflected from buried said deeper objects and interfaces of material with contrasting dielectric constants in the presence of relatively stronger signals reflected from said first interface;
means for demodulating any signals received to produce an in-phase I=sin(ωmτ1)sin(ωcτ1)+sin(ωmτ2)sin(ωcτ2), and a quadrature phase, Q=sin(ωmτ1)cos(ωcτ1)+sin(ωmτ2)cos(ωcτ2), wherein ωm represents a modulation frequency, ωc represents a virtual carrier frequency, τ1 represents the echo delay time that is near zero and occurring for reflections from said first interface near the antenna, and τ2 represents the echo delay time occurring for more distant reflections from buried objects and interfaces;
means for suppressing said relatively stronger signals reflected from said first interface; and
means for computing and displaying the depth of said buried objects and interfaces by solving for echo delay times 12.
4. The radar of claim 3, further comprising:
means for up-conversion to allow the means for synthesizing to operate at lower frequencies than those radiated by the antenna.
5. A method of electronic imaging into the earth, comprising:
transmitting double-sideband, suppressed carrier signals, ωc, that comprise pairs of coherent continuous waves separated by different amounts by a modulation frequency, ωm;
coherently demodulating reflections of said double-sideband, suppressed carrier signals received from a plurality of interfaces of material near a transmitting and receiving antenna in which such materials have contrasting dielectric constants;
suppressing a strong near field echo with a delay time, τ1, in said reflections that approaches zero, wherein, quadrature detection, mixing, and down-conversion are combined so 0-degree and 180-degree reflections effectively drop out in demodulation;
preferring weaker near field echoes with delay times, τ2, in said reflections that are substantially removed from zero; and
producing radar images of objects outlined by reflections from said plurality of interfaces of material with delay times, τ2.
6. (canceled)
US11/478,757 2006-06-29 2006-06-29 Earth-penetrating radar with inherent near-field rejection Expired - Fee Related US7548181B1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/478,757 US7548181B1 (en) 2006-06-29 2006-06-29 Earth-penetrating radar with inherent near-field rejection
US12/053,611 US7659847B2 (en) 2006-06-29 2008-03-23 Radar mining guidance control system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/478,757 US7548181B1 (en) 2006-06-29 2006-06-29 Earth-penetrating radar with inherent near-field rejection

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/877,655 Continuation-In-Part US7656342B2 (en) 2006-06-29 2007-10-23 Double-sideband suppressed-carrier radar to null near-field reflections from a first interface between media layers

Related Child Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/877,655 Continuation-In-Part US7656342B2 (en) 2006-06-29 2007-10-23 Double-sideband suppressed-carrier radar to null near-field reflections from a first interface between media layers
US12/053,611 Continuation-In-Part US7659847B2 (en) 2006-06-29 2008-03-23 Radar mining guidance control system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US7548181B1 US7548181B1 (en) 2009-06-16
US20090167589A1 true US20090167589A1 (en) 2009-07-02

Family

ID=40748616

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/478,757 Expired - Fee Related US7548181B1 (en) 2006-06-29 2006-06-29 Earth-penetrating radar with inherent near-field rejection

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US7548181B1 (en)

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110211474A1 (en) * 2006-03-01 2011-09-01 Interdigital Technology Corporation Method and apparatus for calibration and channel state feedback to support transmit beamforming in a mimo system
US20110298647A1 (en) * 2010-06-04 2011-12-08 Brigham Young University Technology Transfer Office Method, Apparatus, and System to Remotely Acquire Information from Volumes in a Snowpack
US20120268307A1 (en) * 2011-04-19 2012-10-25 Raytheon Company Systems and Methods for Mapping the Crust of the Earth
US8629799B2 (en) 2011-03-30 2014-01-14 Sandia Research Corporation Surface penetrating radar system and target zone investigation methodology
US20140104979A1 (en) * 2012-08-09 2014-04-17 Stolar Research Corporation Ground-Penetrating Tunnel-Detecting Active Sonar
US9024815B2 (en) 2011-05-27 2015-05-05 Brooks Engineering International, Llc Direct-to-digital software-defined radar
US20160265347A1 (en) * 2015-03-13 2016-09-15 The Charles Machine Works, Inc. Horizontal Directional Drilling Crossbore Detector
CN109541586A (en) * 2018-11-08 2019-03-29 山东交通学院 A kind of Ground Penetrating Radar quick detection road engineering concrete cushion thickness analysis method
US20210132186A1 (en) * 2019-11-05 2021-05-06 Nxp Usa, Inc. Digitally modulated radar transmitter modules, systems and methods
US11442194B2 (en) 2017-04-14 2022-09-13 The Charles Machine Works, Inc. System for locating a utility with a downhole beacon
CN115129653A (en) * 2022-08-25 2022-09-30 中国电子科技集团公司第五十八研究所 FPGA and DSP communication system based on HPI

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8131239B1 (en) * 2006-08-21 2012-03-06 Vadum, Inc. Method and apparatus for remote detection of radio-frequency devices
US8059706B2 (en) * 2007-09-24 2011-11-15 Broadcom Corporation Method and system for transmission and/or reception of signals utilizing a delay circuit and DDFS
US8044838B1 (en) * 2008-08-13 2011-10-25 The Boeing Company Methods and systems for determining the phase constant for a dielectric medium
US8401600B1 (en) 2010-08-02 2013-03-19 Hypres, Inc. Superconducting multi-bit digital mixer
GB2484305A (en) * 2010-10-05 2012-04-11 Thales Holdings Uk Plc Dual frequency radar
US9582266B2 (en) * 2011-02-28 2017-02-28 Microsemi SoC Corporation Apparatus and methods for in-application programming of flash-based programable logic devices
WO2017091789A1 (en) 2015-11-25 2017-06-01 Seescan, Inc Utility locating systems, devices, and methods using radio broadcast signals
CN107045148B (en) * 2017-05-26 2023-06-13 无锡华测电子系统有限公司 Ground penetrating radar
US11726174B1 (en) * 2019-12-30 2023-08-15 Waymo Llc Methods and systems for removing transmit phase noise

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6664914B2 (en) * 2000-02-29 2003-12-16 Groundprobe Pty Ltd Ground penetrating radar
US6765527B2 (en) * 2000-09-27 2004-07-20 The Johns Hopkins University System and method of radar detection of non-linear interfaces
US20070013578A1 (en) * 2005-07-15 2007-01-18 The University Of Tokushima Distance measuring device, distance measuring method and distance measuring program
US7307575B2 (en) * 2004-09-14 2007-12-11 Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Through-the-wall frequency stepped imaging system utilizing near field multiple antenna positions, clutter rejection and corrections for frequency dependent wall effects
US7313199B2 (en) * 2002-03-21 2007-12-25 Hypres, Inc. Power amplifier linearization

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6664914B2 (en) * 2000-02-29 2003-12-16 Groundprobe Pty Ltd Ground penetrating radar
US6765527B2 (en) * 2000-09-27 2004-07-20 The Johns Hopkins University System and method of radar detection of non-linear interfaces
US7313199B2 (en) * 2002-03-21 2007-12-25 Hypres, Inc. Power amplifier linearization
US7307575B2 (en) * 2004-09-14 2007-12-11 Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Through-the-wall frequency stepped imaging system utilizing near field multiple antenna positions, clutter rejection and corrections for frequency dependent wall effects
US20070013578A1 (en) * 2005-07-15 2007-01-18 The University Of Tokushima Distance measuring device, distance measuring method and distance measuring program

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110211474A1 (en) * 2006-03-01 2011-09-01 Interdigital Technology Corporation Method and apparatus for calibration and channel state feedback to support transmit beamforming in a mimo system
US20110298647A1 (en) * 2010-06-04 2011-12-08 Brigham Young University Technology Transfer Office Method, Apparatus, and System to Remotely Acquire Information from Volumes in a Snowpack
US8581772B2 (en) * 2010-06-04 2013-11-12 Brigham Young University Method, apparatus, and system to remotely acquire information from volumes in a snowpack
US8629799B2 (en) 2011-03-30 2014-01-14 Sandia Research Corporation Surface penetrating radar system and target zone investigation methodology
US8884805B2 (en) * 2011-04-19 2014-11-11 Raytheon Company Systems and methods for mapping the crust of the earth
US20120268307A1 (en) * 2011-04-19 2012-10-25 Raytheon Company Systems and Methods for Mapping the Crust of the Earth
US9024815B2 (en) 2011-05-27 2015-05-05 Brooks Engineering International, Llc Direct-to-digital software-defined radar
US20140104979A1 (en) * 2012-08-09 2014-04-17 Stolar Research Corporation Ground-Penetrating Tunnel-Detecting Active Sonar
US20160265347A1 (en) * 2015-03-13 2016-09-15 The Charles Machine Works, Inc. Horizontal Directional Drilling Crossbore Detector
US11530605B2 (en) * 2015-03-13 2022-12-20 The Charles Machine Works, Inc. Horizontal directional drilling crossbore detector
US11442194B2 (en) 2017-04-14 2022-09-13 The Charles Machine Works, Inc. System for locating a utility with a downhole beacon
CN109541586A (en) * 2018-11-08 2019-03-29 山东交通学院 A kind of Ground Penetrating Radar quick detection road engineering concrete cushion thickness analysis method
US20210132186A1 (en) * 2019-11-05 2021-05-06 Nxp Usa, Inc. Digitally modulated radar transmitter modules, systems and methods
US11815620B2 (en) * 2019-11-05 2023-11-14 Nxp Usa, Inc. Digitally modulated radar transmitter modules, systems and methods
CN115129653A (en) * 2022-08-25 2022-09-30 中国电子科技集团公司第五十八研究所 FPGA and DSP communication system based on HPI

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7548181B1 (en) 2009-06-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7548181B1 (en) Earth-penetrating radar with inherent near-field rejection
US20080185903A1 (en) Look-ahead radar and horizon sensing for coal cutting drums and horizontal directional drills
CN103580716B (en) For reducing the system balance method of the self-interference effect in frequency modulation continuous wave height instrument system
US7656342B2 (en) Double-sideband suppressed-carrier radar to null near-field reflections from a first interface between media layers
EP2902799B1 (en) Doppler radar test system
CN106932765A (en) With the radar equipment that phase noise is estimated
EP3346284B1 (en) Synthesizer for radar sensing
CN105403870A (en) General signal generator for radar target simulation
US9810772B2 (en) Radar signal generator
Chan et al. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) signal generation
US11630185B2 (en) Cascaded radar system calibration of baseband imbalances
RU2349926C1 (en) Digital active jammer
CN109633578A (en) A kind of binary channels high-precision phase position Calibration System and method
KR100766414B1 (en) Data apparatus and method for compensating azimuth
CN109905184A (en) For testing the generation of the high frequency test signals of high frequency receiving circuit
CN109917344A (en) Corner reflector RCS single antenna measuring system and measurement method in a kind of Compact Range
US8010046B2 (en) Wireless communication apparatus
MacAsero et al. Underground target objects detection simulation using FMCW radar with SDR platform
CN105445706A (en) Same-frequency clutter interference cancellation apparatus and X wave band single antenna continuous wave radar system
Hyun et al. Development of 24GHz FMCW level measurement radar system
US20070063888A1 (en) Single side band radar
RU2419991C1 (en) Helicopter radio-electronic complex
CN109347539B (en) High-precision absolute time delay calibration method for USB measurement and control responder
Huuskonen-Snicker et al. A new microwave asphalt radar rover for thin surface civil engineering applications
RU2015143476A (en) METHOD OF ECOLOGICAL MONITORING AND SYSTEM FOR ITS IMPLEMENTATION

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: STOLAR, INC., NEW MEXICO

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BAUSOV, IGOR;REEL/FRAME:021101/0540

Effective date: 20080608

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

REMI Maintenance fee reminder mailed
LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees
STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20170616