Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20080150889 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 11/818,206
Publication date26 Jun 2008
Filing date13 Jun 2007
Priority date7 Oct 1999
Also published asUS7233312, US20020047828
Publication number11818206, 818206, US 2008/0150889 A1, US 2008/150889 A1, US 20080150889 A1, US 20080150889A1, US 2008150889 A1, US 2008150889A1, US-A1-20080150889, US-A1-2008150889, US2008/0150889A1, US2008/150889A1, US20080150889 A1, US20080150889A1, US2008150889 A1, US2008150889A1
InventorsRoger A. Stern, Jory E. Moon, Sherwyne Bakar
Original AssigneeStern Roger A, Moon Jory E, Sherwyne Bakar
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
System and method for optimal viewing of computer monitors to minimize eyestrain
US 20080150889 A1
Abstract
A system and method for helping ensure that a user of a computer is set up to optimally view the computer monitor under optimal conditions in order to minimize eyestrain. The system includes determining an optimal viewing distance and monitoring the distance of a user from the computer monitor during use of the computer. The system further includes notifying the user when they stray from the optimal viewing distance and further may include testing various aspects of the user's eyesight during use of the computer monitor.
Images(5)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(34)
1. A system for monitoring the use of a display by a user, the system comprising:
a display used by the user for performance of a task; and
a first sensor positioned relative to the display and being a distance sensor or a light sensor.
2. The system of claim 1, further comprising a communication link between the system and a computer system accessible using a hypertext protocol.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the display is selected from the group consisting of a CRT monitor, an LCD monitor and a flat panel.
4. The system of claim 3, wherein the first sensor is incorporated into a bezel of the display or a structure supporting the display.
5. The system of claim 1, further comprising at least three light sensors positioned relative to the display to determine a source of multidirectional light.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein the first sensor includes a camera or imaging sensor.
7. The system of claim 6, wherein the camera or imaging sensor is capable of monitoring blink rate of the user.
8. The system of claim 1, further comprising a computer coupled for processing inputs from the first sensor.
9. The system of claim 1, further comprising a cable coupling the first sensor to other portions of the system.
10. The system of claim 1, wherein the first sensor is positioned to monitor the display.
11. The system of claim 1, wherein the first sensor is positioned on top of the display.
12. The system of claim 1, further comprising a remote input device coupled to other portions of the system.
13-14. (canceled)
15. A method for determining a viewing distance between a user and a display, comprising:
positioning the user in front of the display to perform a task using the display;
providing a distance sensor to measure a viewing distance between the distance sensor and the user; and
receiving an analysis of the measurement.
16. A method for determining a viewing distance between a user and a display, comprising:
positioning the user in front of the display to perform a task using the display;
providing a distance sensor to measure a viewing distance between the distance sensor and the user;
receiving an analysis of the measurement; and
providing a light sensor to measure ambient light near the user.
17. A method for determining a viewing distance between a user and a display, comprising:
providing a distance sensor to measure a viewing distance between the distance sensor and the user while the user performs a task using the display;
providing a software program that accepts input from the distance sensor of a measured distance; and
providing a software program that notifies the user of the measured distance.
18. A method for determining a light setting for a user using a display, comprising:
positioning the user in front of the display to perform a task using the display;
providing a light sensor to measure light near the user; and
receiving an analysis of the light measurement.
19. The method of claim 18, wherein the method further comprises suggesting a change in light amount near the display.
20. A method for determining a recommended viewing distance for a user using a display, the method comprising:
presenting a test pattern on the display;
positioning the user in front of the display;
displaying a query on the display;
accepting a response to the query; and
displaying after the response a suggestion regarding recommended viewing distance.
21. A method for testing a user's vision using a display, comprising:
positioning the user in front of the display to perform a task using the display;
displaying a test pattern on the display for testing vision according to a test selected from the group consisting of an acuity test, a color test, a test for amplitude of accommodation and a test for visual field defect;
selecting a result of the selected test; and
receiving an analysis of the result.
22. A system for monitoring the use of a display by a user, comprising:
a display used by the user for performance of a task; and
a first sensor positioned close to the display and being a distance sensor or a light sensor; and
a second sensor positioned relative to the display and distinct from the first sensor.
23. The system of claim 22, wherein the second sensor is selected from the group consisting of a distance sensor, a noise sensor, a temperature sensor, a humidity sensor and a light sensor.
24. The system of claim 22, wherein the second sensor is incorporated into the first sensor.
25. The system of claim 22, wherein the first sensor is a distance sensor and the second sensor is a light sensor.
26. A system for monitoring the use of a display by a user using the display for performance of a task, the system comprising:
a display;
a first sensor positioned close to the display and being a distance sensor or a light sensor;
a second sensor positioned relative to the display and distinct from the first sensor; and
a third sensor positioned relative to the display and distinct from the first sensor and distinct from the second sensor.
27. A system for monitoring the use of a display by a user using the display for performance of a task, the system comprising:
a display;
a first sensor positioned close to the display; and
three light sensors positioned relative to the display to determine a source of multidirectional light relative to the user.
28. A system for monitoring the use of a display by a user using the display for performance of a task, the system comprising:
a display;
a first sensor positioned close to the display and being a distance sensor or a light sensor; and
a software program coupled for processing inputs from the first sensor.
29. The system of claim 28, wherein the first sensor is a distance sensor and the software program includes program instructions for determining a user's viewing distance from an output of the distance sensor.
30. The system of claim 28, wherein the software program includes program instructions for accepting sensor inputs representing distance and light measurements over time.
31. The system of claim 28, wherein the software program includes program instructions for accepting inputs from one input source selected from the group consisting of a sensor, a mouse and a keyboard.
32. A system for monitoring the use of a display by a user using the display for performance of a task, the system comprising:
a display;
a first sensor positioned close to the display and being a distance sensor or a light sensor, and
a software program coupled for processing inputs from the first sensor and for displaying a test pattern on the display.
33. The system of claim 32, wherein the test pattern is for at least one test selected from the group consisting of a visual acuity test, a visual field test, an amplitude of accommodation test, and a color sensitivity test.
34. A system for monitoring the use of a display by a user using the display for performance of a task, the system comprising:
a display;
a first sensor positioned close to the display and being a distance sensor or a light sensor;
a second sensor positioned relative to the display and distinct from the first sensor; and
a software program coupled for processing inputs from the first sensor and for displaying a test pattern on the display.
35. A system for monitoring the use of a display by a user using the display for performance of a task, the system comprising:
a display;
a first sensor positioned close to the display and being a distance sensor or a light sensor;
a second sensor positioned relative to the display and distinct from the first sensor,
a third sensor positioned relative to the display and distinct from the first sensor and distinct from the second sensor; and
a software program coupled for processing inputs from at least the first sensor and for displaying a test pattern on the display.
Description
    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0001]
    1. Field of the Invention
  • [0002]
    The present invention relates to systems and methods for helping ensure that a user of a computer is properly positioned to view a monitor, and more particularly, to systems and methods for helping ensure that a user of a computer is set up to optimally view the computer monitor under optimal conditions.
  • [0003]
    2. Description of the Prior Art
  • [0004]
    A common problem of many computer users is that they often sit too close to the computer monitor. This is especially true of young children. It is well known that if one sits too close to the computer monitor, the eye will intently focus on what is many times a stationary image. This can lead to eyestrain.
  • [0005]
    Additionally, many users sit too long in front of a computer without taking a break. This is true for many workers who must operate a computer for almost the entire work day. It is often difficult to ascertain when one has spent too much time in front of a computer without taking a break. Additionally, many times the lighting in the room where the computer is located may not be optimal. This may lead to glare and other problems that also result in eyestrain.
  • [0006]
    Recent medical literature clearly shows an increase in eyestrain-related problems, especially in children. Use of computers is rapidly growing among children and improper use of computers is thought to be a contributing factor to the increase in eyestrain related problems in children.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0007]
    In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, a user of a computer monitor determines a proper viewing distance. This may be accomplished by an installation program that will ask the user to select a viewing distance by displaying any one of a number of standard test patterns and asking the user to identify them. The optimal viewing distance would then be selected based upon the identification of the test patterns and would preferably be slightly close than the farthest distance at which the user can correctly identify the test pattern.
  • [0008]
    In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, the user will be notified when he is not at the proper viewing distance. This may be accomplished by switching the computer monitor's display to a “screensaver” type program, sounding an alarm, or even turning off the computer monitor. A sensor may be provided for monitoring the actual distance of the user. Preferably, the sensor would be “piggybacked” onto an existing device, such as, for example, a keyboard or mouse, thus not requiring any additional computer resources or requiring any other source of electrical power.
  • [0009]
    In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, statistics about a user's viewing distance are recorded. This may be especially useful in work situations where almost continuous use of the computer is anticipated. For example, there might be trend toward closer viewing as the length of time the computer is being used increases. In such a situation, this may indicate that a break is in order, and in a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the system, would so notify the user.
  • [0010]
    In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, the measured viewing distance may be used for a periodic test of the user's eyesight. For example, test patterns may be displayed and the user may be “scored” at some predetermined fixed distance. If the user scores too low on the tests, use of the computer may be inhibited.
  • [0011]
    In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, the level of ambient light in the user's environment may be measured and suggestions may be provided by the system to either increase or decrease the amount of ambient light. In such an embodiment, a light level sensor may be incorporated into the system that would feed information regarding the ambient light into the computer through the shared interface as previously discussed.
  • [0012]
    In accordance with yet another embodiment of the present invention, the system may determine “amplitude of accommodation,” which is the minimum distance between the eye and a viewing surface below which the surface is blurry.
  • [0013]
    In accordance with yet another embodiment of the present invention, a user may be presented with color tests and asked to respond to them. This may be done over a period of time to determine the user's interpretation of colors as use of the computer over the period of time progresses.
  • [0014]
    In yet another embodiment of the present invention, the system monitors the number of times or rate at which an individual blinks their eyes. The individual may be viewing a monitor and with a sensor, the rate of blinking of the eyes is monitored. By monitoring the rate at which the individual blinks their eyes, or by monitoring the rate of changes in a baseline eye blink rate, early detection of visual fatigue is possible.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0015]
    FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a system in accordance with the present invention with a computer system;
  • [0016]
    FIG. 2 is a side view of the system illustrated in FIG. 1;
  • [0017]
    FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of an internet-based model of a system in accordance with the present invention;
  • [0018]
    FIG. 4 is a schematic illustration of a circuit for a motherboard in accordance with the present invention; and
  • [0019]
    FIG. 5 is a schematic block diagram of a possible arrangement of a control system for a system in accordance with the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS
  • [0020]
    FIGS. 1 and 2 schematically illustrate a possible arrangement of a system 10 in accordance with the present invention. System 10 is depicted as a computer system 11 including a computer monitor 12. Those skilled in the art will understand that other monitors will also benefit from the methods and system of the present invention. However, for simplicity and clarity, a computer system will be used to describe the present invention.
  • [0021]
    System 10 further includes computer inputs, such as, for example keyboard 14 and mouse 15. System 10 further includes at least one distance sensor 16. Preferably, distance sensor 16 is piggybacked with, for example, the keyboard or the mouse via a shared interface 17. Thus, the distance sensor does not take up additional computer resources or require any additional source of electrical power. More distance sensors may be used and may be arranged in various configurations as needed.
  • [0022]
    Distance sensor 16 may be one of any of well-known distance sensors in the art. In a preferred embodiment, the use of echolocation with high frequency sound waves is used. As stated previously, preferably, distance sensor 16 is piggybacked with an existing computer peripheral with a shared interface. However, distance sensor 16 may be interfaced to the computer through its own interface port, such as, for example, an RS 232 serial port. Distance sensor 16 may be mounted on the monitor using an adhesive tape attachment and aimed such that the spatial volume where the distance measurements are made extend from a point very close to the monitor, for example, within 6 inches and extend out to what may be considered the farthest practical viewing distance, for example, 36 inches. Generally, optimal viewing distance is believed to be approximately 18 to 21 inches from computer monitor 12. The distance information from the sensor may be sampled, for example, once per second, and such real-time distance data is then fed directly into the computer through the interface.
  • [0023]
    In an initial step, a user 20 determines their proper viewing distance. This may be accomplished with an installation program that will ask the user to select a viewing distance. In a preferred embodiment, the optimal viewing distance would be user specific for computers used by more than one person. Preferably, the method includes displaying any one of a number of standard test patterns that are known in the art and asking the user to identify them. Preferably the optimal viewing distance is then set slightly closer then the farthest distance at which the user is able to correctly identify the test pattern.
  • [0024]
    System 10 will preferably-then notify user 20 when they are not at the proper viewing distance as measured by distance sensor 16. One way in which user 20 may be notified is by switching the display to a “screensaver” type of program when the user gets too close to the screen. Preferably, the switching algorithm used to switch to the screensaver would be intelligent and, for example, ignore momentary infrequent violations of distance limits. The type of screensaver may be selected by the user and, for example, may consist of a message indicating that the user is too close or the image may consist of a relaxing image that is pleasant to view. In any event, normal use of the computer is suspended until the user returns to the proper viewing distance or until sometime when it expires. If user 20 is a child, the screensaver may be some type of gentle reminder to move back from the computer, either visual or auditory, or it may be done with animated characters, or by motivation such as a game where the child receives points or a “gold star” if the proper viewing distance is maintained.
  • [0025]
    In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, statistics are recorded about user 20's viewing distance, as measured by distance sensor 16. The statistics may then be monitored or analyzed in order to determine if there is a trend toward closer viewing and the length of time that the computer monitor is being viewed. This information may be used to indicate that a break is in order and, preferably, the system would notify user 20, for example, either visually or audibly.
  • [0026]
    Furthermore, the measured viewing distance may be used for a periodic test of the user's eyesight. This may be used by displaying test patterns already known in the art similar to those used above for determining optimal viewing, and “scoring” the user at some predetermined fixed distance. If user 20 scores too low on such a test, use of the computer may be inhibited. Additionally, in a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a light sensor 30 is provided that measures the level of ambient light in the user's environment and provides suggestions as to either increasing or decreasing the amount of ambient light. Light level sensor 30 may be incorporated into distance sensor 16 or may be a separate sensor all together. If it were a separate sensor, light level sensor 30 once again would preferably be piggybacked with another device in the system or may have a dedicated interface, such as, for example, an RS 232 serial port.
  • [0027]
    Additionally, system 10 preferably measures a user's “amplitude of accommodation,” which is generally defined as the minimum distance between the eye and a viewing surface below which the surface is blurry. Such a test for amplitude of accommodation preferably is performed by having the user lean forward until the screen becomes fuzzy. While the user is at this distance where the screen has become fuzzy, the user clicks the mouse and the software measures the distance to the user via the distance sensor 16. Such a test may be performed over a period of time in order to determine the variance of the amplitude of accommodation over a period of time of use of the computer monitor.
  • [0028]
    In another embodiment of the present invention, system 10 performs color testing of the user. User 20 is preferably presented with color tests, which are known in the art, and is asked to respond to them. As with the amplitude of accommodation test, this may be performed over a period of time in order to determine the variance of the user's “interpretation” of colors over a period of time of use of the computer monitor.
  • [0029]
    System 10 also preferably monitors a user's number of times of blinking, or rate at which the user blinks their eyes. In such an embodiment, system 10 includes a small imaging sensor or camera 40 pointed at the user's face. An image analysis and pattern recognition algorithm is used to identify the user's face from other objects in a room, identify the eyes on the face and make a decision as to whether the eyes are open or not. Small digital image sensors and powerful digital signal processing circuitry is available to perform these functions and is well known in the art. Performance of the system may be improved or made user specific, for example, by having the computer user let the system take reference images of the face with their eyes both open and closed. These reference images then serve as templates in a pattern matching algorithm.
  • [0030]
    In a further embodiment of the present invention, system 10 includes testing or determining a user's visual acuity. Such testing, which may commonly be referred to as rapid visual acuity testing (RVAT) would be useful for determining the visual acuity of a user at the user's working distance from the computer monitor. The visual acuity may be monitored periodically in order to determine changes over a period of time. In a preferred embodiment, user 20 would sit at their normal working distance at the computer and the screen would be blank except for arrows on an outer portion of the screen that act as indicators for a band or ring or “C.” The “C” appears on the screen as a 20/10 letter (i.e., a size of a letter that at 20 feet would appear to a user as being at 10 feet) and would slowly increase in size, for example, 20/11, 20/12. 20/13, etc., until first discernable by the user. At the point the user detects the “C,” the user clicks the mouse or the enter key. The progression of the C pauses and a message appear instructing the user to identify the position of the C. If the answer is correct, the “C” is rotated randomly in two more positions. If the individual again correctly identifies the orientation of the “C,” then the test is ended. Preferably, a predetermined amount of time, for example, up to five seconds for each decision, is provided.
  • [0031]
    By accurately knowing the distance of the eye from the computer, size of the “C” angular subtends, and the correct response, a software program within the computer will be able to calculate an individual's visual acuity. If improper responses are made, then the progression of size of the “C” slowly increases until the right answers are given.
  • [0032]
    By calculating the level of illumination, the testing of visual acuity may be performed at the same level of light.
  • [0033]
    FIG. 3 illustrates a schematic illustration of an Internet based model of the system in accordance with the present invention. A central web site 50 is provided for receiving data 51 from a user at a local site 52 that includes computer users. The computer user's data is sent to the central web site over the Internet and then forwarded to an analysis location 53 that analyzes the user's data. The data analysis site also provides a central web site international users' database 54 and sends back analyses and recommendations regarding the user data to the central web site. The central web site then distributes the data analysis and recommendations to a corporate ergonomic staff and/or users' OD 55 and, if desired, to the actual user itself.
  • [0034]
    FIG. 4 schematically illustrates a possible circuit for a motherboard that would be included in a computer system that utilizes the present invention. FIG. 5 is an electronic block diagram of a possible control system for a system in accordance with the present invention.
  • [0035]
    The present invention may also be used for vision testing in the home for those patients who have recently undergone ocular surgery, require monitoring before surgery, are taking pharmaceuticals that may affect their vision, or have an ongoing medical problem that is vision related.
  • [0036]
    Preferably, the system resembles a laptop computer incorporating the appropriate hardware features plus a keyboard for user input and a remote input device for distance vision testing. The system also preferably includes a built-in modem configured to automatically access a web site on the click of the mouse.
  • [0037]
    Software features preferably include user medical history, medications, and vision profiling, real time measurement of viewing distance while vision testing, adjusting test pattern size relative to viewing distance, recommendations for optimizing environmental lighting prior to vision testing, recording and tracking real time user vision performance over time, and transmitting patient information and analysis to eyecare and/or medical doctor.
  • [0038]
    In the software, preferably an icon in the utility tray will be incorporated to activate onscreen directions, comments and recommendations based upon the system's data analysis. Furthermore, the software will preferably make productivity measurements by evaluating typing speed, mouse clicks, engagement time and errors. Additionally, the view size will preferably increase automatically, over time, based upon collected parameters and analyzed data provided by the software.
  • [0039]
    The system preferably allows a patient's professional caregiver to prescribe the type and frequency of vision testing. Upon test completion, the patient plugs the device into a standard phone outlet to transmit the data to the web site where it is stored in the patient's file and transmitted either by e-mail or fax to their doctor(s).
  • [0040]
    Preferably, the system includes three or more light meters in order to determine the source of multi-directional light relative to the user. This will allow for the analysis of glare. Preferably, one separate attachable sensor will be used to measure various parameters of the monitor screen.
  • [0041]
    Preferably, the system will include sensors to measure ambient noise, temperature and humidity. Such information will allow for proper operation of the equipment and also allow for the analysis to take into account the effects of these conditions.
  • [0042]
    While the system has been described throughout with the use of software, in an alternative embodiment, the system will be in communication with a central website. Such communication may be provided, for example, via the Internet. The website would thus control the system and various parameters may be automatically changed within the system as directed from the website, such as, for example, the viewer distance from the monitor.
  • [0043]
    The system also preferably includes a leveling device for proper positioning of the individual in front of the computer. LEDs may be incorporated into the system in order to determine the correct viewing angle for the individual.
  • [0044]
    Additionally, the system preferably includes a mechanical apparatus situated under a user's monitor or incorporated into a user's desk. The apparatus automatically moves the computer monitor (including flat panel displays) in a forward or backward direction to adjust for accommodative and visual changes of the user throughout the day. The image size or view size on the user's screen will also adjust automatically in accordance with the direction of monitor display movement. The mechanical apparatus also preferably will control the height of the monitor and the viewing angle of the monitor.
  • [0045]
    In some embodiments, the position of the monitor in one, two or three dimensions is controlled to reduce eyestrain, improve viewing, relax or exercise head, neck or other muscles or relieve or ameliorate strain on muscles. The position might be changed to an identified optimal position or might change among several positions to provide variability or exercise of selected muscles or reduction of strain on body parts.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3880501 *17 May 197429 Apr 1975TropelOptical system for objective refractor for the eye
US4437032 *22 Sep 198213 Mar 1984Egon GelhardSensor for distance measurement by ultrasound
US4832419 *2 Sep 198823 May 1989Compaq Computer CorporationAdjustable display panel for portable computer
US4861156 *8 Sep 198729 Aug 1989Terry Clifford MVisual acuity testing system
US5078486 *13 Oct 19897 Jan 1992Evans David WSelf-calibrating vision test apparatus
US5121981 *3 Nov 198716 Jun 1992Mentor O & O, Inc.Visual acuity tester
US5187506 *28 Sep 199016 Feb 1993Fairville Medical Optics Inc.Method and apparatus for determining physiological parameters based on pupil response
US5223864 *14 Jun 199029 Jun 1993J. D. Moller Optische Werke GmbhPhoropter
US5250888 *31 Jan 19925 Oct 1993Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Apparatus for and process of rotating a display
US5271590 *31 Jan 199221 Dec 1993Rosen John BArticulable projecting plug
US5329322 *26 May 199212 Jul 1994Yancey Don RPalm size autorefractor and fundus topographical mapping instrument
US5331394 *10 Apr 199219 Jul 1994Metaphase CorporationAutomated lensometer
US5355180 *17 Dec 199211 Oct 1994Goldstar Co., Ltd.Apparatus for and method of a television receiver incorporating audio/visual warning of viewing distance and audio message record/playback features
US5367315 *15 Nov 199022 Nov 1994Eyetech CorporationMethod and apparatus for controlling cursor movement
US5367614 *1 Apr 199222 Nov 1994Grumman Aerospace CorporationThree-dimensional computer image variable perspective display system
US5483689 *7 May 19939 Jan 1996Bose CorporationRadio receiving with microprocessor control
US5592285 *12 Dec 19957 Jan 1997Pund; Marvin L.Optical source position and direction sensor
US5596379 *24 Oct 199521 Jan 1997Kawesch; Gary M.Portable visual acuity testing system and method
US5668743 *2 Aug 199516 Sep 1997Optitest Ltd.Method for vision testing
US5686940 *23 Dec 199411 Nov 1997Rohm Co., Ltd.Display apparatus
US5777719 *23 Dec 19967 Jul 1998University Of RochesterMethod and apparatus for improving vision and the resolution of retinal images
US5777720 *17 Oct 19967 Jul 1998Sharp Kabushiki KaishaMethod of calibrating an observer tracking display and observer tracking display
US5838424 *26 Feb 199717 Nov 1998Welch Allyn, Inc.View port for eye test apparatus
US5854661 *30 Sep 199729 Dec 1998Lucent Technologies Inc.System and method for subtracting reflection images from a display screen
US5877841 *3 Dec 19962 Mar 1999Lg Electronics, Inc.Application and method for self eye examination using a video appliance
US5914772 *9 Dec 199722 Jun 1999Eyelogic Inc.Method and device for testing eyes
US5963300 *17 Feb 19985 Oct 1999Amt Technologies, Corp.Ocular biometer
US5966197 *21 Apr 199812 Oct 1999Visx, IncorporatedLinear array eye tracker
US6007038 *18 Dec 199828 Dec 1999Daewoo Electronics Co., Ltd.Tilt and swivel apparatus for a display monitor
US6033076 *2 Dec 19987 Mar 2000Virtual-Eye.Com, Inc.Visual field testing via telemedicine
US6076928 *15 Jun 199820 Jun 2000Fateh; SinaIdeal visual ergonomic system for computer users
US6134335 *30 Dec 199717 Oct 2000Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Display device with microphone
US6148331 *25 Apr 199714 Nov 2000Parry; Rhys EvanDestination website access and information gathering system
US6244711 *4 Jan 200012 Jun 2001Vega Vista, Inc.Ergonomic systems and methods for operating computers
US6350032 *9 Feb 200026 Feb 2002Titmus Optical, Inc.Vision testing apparatus
US6433759 *26 Apr 200013 Aug 2002Eye Control Technologies, Inc.Video processing methods and apparatus for gaze point tracking
US6450643 *30 May 200017 Sep 2002Ralph C. WilsonSystems and methods for performing an eye examination
US6501515 *13 Oct 199831 Dec 2002Sony CorporationRemote control system
US6533418 *15 May 199818 Mar 2003Hoya CorporationSystem for making spectacles to order
US6538649 *1 Dec 199825 Mar 2003Intel CorporationComputer vision control variable transformation
US6592223 *6 Oct 200015 Jul 2003Panaseca, Inc.System and method for optimal viewing of computer monitors to minimize eyestrain
US6594607 *14 Feb 200115 Jul 2003Kevin T. LaveryMedical screening apparatus and method
US6606130 *30 Jun 199912 Aug 2003Thomson Licensing S.A.Projection video display with multiple photo sensors
US6687389 *23 Oct 19983 Feb 2004British Telecommunications Public Limited CompanyImaging apparatus
US6687515 *7 Sep 19993 Feb 2004Denso CorporationWireless video telephone with ambient light sensor
US6690351 *6 Apr 200010 Feb 2004Xybernaut CorporationComputer display optimizer
US6726633 *14 Jun 200127 Apr 2004Colin CorporationAdvertising method using automatic blood pressure measuring apparatus, and automatic blood pressure measuring apparatus having advertising function
US6761453 *11 Oct 200113 Jul 2004Ralph C. WilsonSystems and methods for performing an eye examination
US6792401 *31 Oct 200014 Sep 2004Diamond Visionics CompanyInternet-based modeling kiosk and method for fitting and selling prescription eyeglasses
US7233312 *31 Jul 200119 Jun 2007Panaseca, Inc.System and method for optimal viewing of computer monitors to minimize eyestrain
US7350921 *22 Mar 20041 Apr 2008Phillip V. RidingsiQueVision: animated / vision testing system
US20020080329 *14 Nov 200127 Jun 2002Tatsuya KasaharaCorneal endothelium analysis system
US20030065636 *21 Dec 20013 Apr 2003L'orealUse of artificial intelligence in providing beauty advice
US20030228901 *18 Apr 200311 Dec 2003Walker Jay S.Method and apparatus for providing a time based payment from a gaming device
US20040141152 *29 Sep 200322 Jul 2004Marino Joseph A.Apparatus and method for conducting vision screening
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US792619221 May 200919 Apr 2011Dordick Scott DScreen alignment tool
US7949244 *19 Feb 200824 May 2011Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.Method for measuring subject distance
US8810413 *15 Oct 201019 Aug 2014Hewlett Packard Development Company, L.P.User fatigue
US9462977 *14 Feb 201411 Oct 2016Saudi Arabian Oil CompanySystems, computer medium and computer-implemented methods for monitoring and improving health and productivity of employees
US9492120 *2 Jul 201215 Nov 2016Saudi Arabian Oil CompanyWorkstation for monitoring and improving health and productivity of employees
US9526455 *2 Jul 201227 Dec 2016Saudi Arabian Oil CompanySystems, computer medium and computer-implemented methods for monitoring and improving health and productivity of employees
US96157462 Jul 201211 Apr 2017Saudi Arabian Oil CompanyFloor mat system and associated, computer medium and computer-implemented methods for monitoring and improving health and productivity of employees
US969373414 Feb 20144 Jul 2017Saudi Arabian Oil CompanySystems for monitoring and improving biometric health of employees
US972247211 Dec 20131 Aug 2017Saudi Arabian Oil CompanySystems, computer medium and computer-implemented methods for harvesting human energy in the workplace
US20090123142 *19 Feb 200814 May 2009Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.Method for measuring subject distance
US20100289783 *1 Feb 201018 Nov 2010Marc LepplaSensor for measuring light intensity and the process of calibrating a monitor
US20120092172 *15 Oct 201019 Apr 2012Wong Glenn AUser Fatigue
US20130012786 *2 Jul 201210 Jan 2013Saudi Arabian Oil CompanyChair Pad System and Associated, Computer Medium and Computer-Implemented Methods for Monitoring and Improving Health and Productivity of Employees
US20130012790 *2 Jul 201210 Jan 2013Saudi Arabian Oil CompanySystems, Computer Medium and Computer-Implemented Methods for Monitoring and Improving Health and Productivity of Employees
US20140163335 *14 Feb 201412 Jun 2014Saudi Arabian Oil CompanySystems, computer medium and computer-implemented methods for monitoring and improving health and productivity of employees
Classifications
U.S. Classification345/156
International ClassificationG09G5/00, A61B3/06, A61B3/024, G06F3/00, G06F3/14, A61B3/028, G06F3/01, G06F1/16, A61B3/032, A61B5/00
Cooperative ClassificationG06F3/011, A61B3/028, A61B3/032, A61B5/0002, A61B3/06, G06F3/013, G06F2200/1611, A61B3/024, G06F1/1601, G06F3/14
European ClassificationG06F3/01B4, A61B3/032, G06F3/01B, G06F1/16D, A61B5/00B, A61B3/028
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
22 Sep 2008ASAssignment
Owner name: PANASECA, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:STERN, ROGER A.;MOON, JORY E.;BAKAR, SHERWYNE R.;REEL/FRAME:021566/0741;SIGNING DATES FROM 20010124 TO 20010126
25 Aug 2010ASAssignment
Owner name: EYEFINITY, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:PANASECA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:024879/0289
Effective date: 20100818
8 Aug 2011ASAssignment
Owner name: EYEFINITY, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: BANKRUPTCY ORDER;ASSIGNOR:PANASECA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:026717/0493
Effective date: 20110802