US20070283419A1 - Method and system for protecting websites from public Internet threats - Google Patents
Method and system for protecting websites from public Internet threats Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20070283419A1 US20070283419A1 US11/841,006 US84100607A US2007283419A1 US 20070283419 A1 US20070283419 A1 US 20070283419A1 US 84100607 A US84100607 A US 84100607A US 2007283419 A1 US2007283419 A1 US 2007283419A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- content
- servers
- server
- origin server
- cdn
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
- H04L63/02—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for separating internal from external traffic, e.g. firewalls
- H04L63/0209—Architectural arrangements, e.g. perimeter networks or demilitarized zones
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
- H04L63/02—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for separating internal from external traffic, e.g. firewalls
- H04L63/0227—Filtering policies
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
- H04L63/02—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for separating internal from external traffic, e.g. firewalls
- H04L63/0227—Filtering policies
- H04L63/0263—Rule management
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
- H04L63/10—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for controlling access to devices or network resources
- H04L63/101—Access control lists [ACL]
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
- H04L63/14—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for detecting or protecting against malicious traffic
- H04L63/1441—Countermeasures against malicious traffic
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L65/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services for supporting real-time applications in data packet communication
- H04L65/1066—Session management
- H04L65/1101—Session protocols
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L65/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services for supporting real-time applications in data packet communication
- H04L65/60—Network streaming of media packets
- H04L65/61—Network streaming of media packets for supporting one-way streaming services, e.g. Internet radio
- H04L65/612—Network streaming of media packets for supporting one-way streaming services, e.g. Internet radio for unicast
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
- H04L67/1001—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to techniques for cloaking a Web site origin server from the public Internet while still ensuring that content otherwise available from the site is delivered quickly and without fail, regardless of a user location.
- firewalls do not adequately address the problem. While firewalls attempt to discard malicious packets, they are not a complete protection as they themselves are on the public Internet and are susceptible to DoS attacks. When a firewall filters packets, CPU resources are consumed by seemingly authentic requests. At best, a firewall can limit exposure, but some portion of the site's infrastructure is still publicly available and susceptible to attack
- the inventive technique substantially eliminates the public entry points found on Web servers today while delivering end users of a protected site unparalleled performance and reliability.
- an origin server shield is a collection of strategically-positioned content delivery network (CDN) server regions designed to complement an existing infrastructure protecting an origin site.
- CDN server region may include one or more content servers.
- the origin server shield resides at or near a data center at which the origin server is located, and that data center may be at a company's premises, a dedicated facility, or a co-location facility.
- the technical advantages of the present invention are achieved by deploying an origin server shield in the same data center as the origin Web server, typically behind upstream routers that provide Internet connectivity but in front of a firewall.
- This placement allows the shield to serve both as an external buffer for the origin site as well as the trusted party eligible to access the origin site.
- one or more dedicated content delivery network (CDN) server regions that comprise the shield handle communications with the “public” and connect to the origin server only when needed, preferably via a private connection.
- the shield protects the origin by effectively removing it from accessible Internet Protocol (IP) space.
- IP Internet Protocol
- an origin server uses a content delivery network to serve given site content, and an origin server “shield” is established for the origin.
- the shield comprises at least one CDN “shield” region upstream of an enterprise firewall and access router but downstream of the router connecting the origin server to the rest of the data center of the Internet.
- the “shield” region also preferably serves as a “parent” region to the CDN edge servers.
- two access controls are preferably implemented. First, an IP access control list (ACL) or equivalent access control is set downstream of the shield region so that the only IP traffic that can access the origin site is traffic originating from servers in the shield region.
- ACL IP access control list
- this is accomplished by setting an access control list (ACL) on the enterprise firewall to restrict access to the origin server except, e.g., from IP addresses of the CDN servers in the shield region(s).
- ACL access control list
- the router upstream of the shield e.g., the router connecting to the Internet
- IP spoof blocking upstream of the shield region is provisioned to implement IP spoof blocking upstream of the shield region to ensure that only the shield region is able to pass through the downstream ACL.
- Such access controls prevent any other machine on the Internet from spoofing the shield region server IP addresses in an attempt to masquerade as the shield server.
- no other machine on the Internet has the ability to communicate directly with the origin server.
- the CDN's other distributed edge servers continue to have complete access to the current content as long as that content is accessible via the CDN. This is because the shield region(s) are configured to serve as a “parent” region for the edge servers. If a CDN edge server ever needs content that it cannot find at one of its peers, it will direct that request at one of the shield regions. As a result, bona fide end-users will always be able to retrieve content from edge servers with maximal performance and reliability while the origin remains protected.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a known content delivery network in which the present invention may be implemented
- FIG. 2 illustrates a typical machine configuration for a CDN content edge server
- FIG. 3 is a simplified diagram illustrating a CDN tiered distribution scheme
- FIG. 4A is a diagram illustrating tiered distribution for a given customer Web site (WS);
- FIG. 4B is a diagram illustrating the use of a shield in conjunction with the tiered distribution scheme of FIG. 4B ;
- FIG. 4C is a diagram illustrating a preferred provisioning of the shield according to the present invention.
- FIG. 5 is a more detailed implementation of the shield at a given CDN customer site.
- a CDN is a network of geographically-distributed content delivery nodes that are arranged for efficient delivery of content on behalf of third party content providers.
- a CDN is implemented as a combination of a content delivery infrastructure, a request-routing mechanism, and a distribution infrastructure.
- the content delivery infrastructure usually comprises a set of “surrogate” origin servers that are located at strategic locations (e.g., Internet network access points, Internet Points of Presence, and the like) for delivering content to requesting end users.
- the request-routing mechanism allocates servers in the content delivery infrastructure to requesting clients in a way that, for web content delivery, minimizes a given client's response time and, for streaming media delivery, provides for the highest quality.
- the distribution infrastructure consists of on-demand or push-based mechanisms that move content from the origin server to the surrogates.
- An effective CDN serves frequently-accessed content from a surrogate that is optimal for a given requesting client.
- a single service provider operates the request-routers, the surrogates, and the content distributors.
- that service provider establishes business relationships with content publishers and acts on behalf of their origin server sites to provide a distributed delivery system.
- an Internet content delivery infrastructure usually comprises a set of “surrogate” origin servers 102 that are located at strategic locations (e.g., Internet network access points, and the like) for delivering copies of content to requesting end users 119 .
- a surrogate origin server is defined, for example, in IETF Internet Draft titled “Requirements for Surrogates in the HTTP” dated Aug. 9, 2000, which is incorporated herein by reference.
- the request-routing mechanism 104 allocates servers 102 in the content delivery infrastructure to requesting clients.
- the distribution infrastructure consists of on-demand or push-based mechanisms that move content from the origin server to the surrogates.
- a CDN service provider may organize sets of surrogate origin servers as a group or so-called “region.”
- a CDN region 106 typically comprises a set of one or more content servers that share a common back-end network, e.g., a LAN, and that are located at or near an Internet access point.
- a typical CDN region may be co-located within an Internet Service Provider (ISP) Point of Presence (PoP) 108 .
- ISP Internet Service Provider
- PoP Point of Presence
- a representative CDN content server is a Pentium-based caching appliance running an operating system (e.g., Linux, Windows NT, Windows 2000) and having suitable RAM and disk storage for CDN applications and content delivery network content (e.g., HTTP content, streaming media and applications).
- CDN applications are sometimes referred to as “edge” servers as they are located at or near the so-called outer reach or “edge” of the Internet.
- the CDN typically also includes network agents 109 that monitor the network as well as the server loads. These network agents are typically co-located at third party data centers or other locations.
- Mapmaker software 107 receives data generated from the network agents and periodically creates maps that dynamically associate IP addresses (e.g., the IP addresses of client-side local name servers) with the CDN regions.
- Content may be identified for delivery from the CDN using a content migrator or rewrite tool 106 operated, for example, at a participating content provider server.
- Tool 106 rewrites embedded object URLs to point to the CDNSP domain.
- a request for such content is resolved through a CDNSP-managed DNS to identify a “best” region, and then to identify an edge server within the region that is not overloaded and that is likely to host the requested content.
- a participating content provider may simply direct the CDNSP to serve an entire domain (or subdomain) by a DNS directive (e.g., a CNAME).
- a DNS directive e.g., a CNAME
- the CDNSP may provide object-specific metadata to the CDN content servers to determine how the CDN content servers will handle a request for an object being served by the CDN.
- Metadata refers to a set of control options and parameters for the object (e.g., coherence information, origin server identity information, load balancing information, customer code, other control codes, etc.), and such information may be provided to the CDN content servers via a configuration file, in HTTP headers, or in other ways.
- the Uniform Resource Locator (URL) of an object that is served from the CDN in this manner does not need to be modified by the content provider.
- a customer's DNS system directs the name query (for whatever domain is in the URL) to the CDNSP DNS request routing mechanism.
- the browser passes the object request to the server, which applies the metadata supplied from a configuration file or HTTP response headers to determine how the object will be handled.
- the CDNSP may operate a metadata transmission system 116 comprising a set of one or more servers to enable metadata to be provided to the CDNSP content servers.
- the system 116 may comprise at least one control server 118 , and one or more staging servers 120 a - n , each of which is typically an HTTP server (e.g., Apache).
- Metadata is provided to the control server 118 by the CDNSP or the content provider (e.g., using a secure extranet application) and periodically delivered to the staging servers 120 a - n .
- the staging servers deliver the metadata to the CDN content servers as necessary.
- FIG. 2 illustrates a typical machine configuration for a CDN content edge server.
- the content server 200 is a caching appliance running an operating system kernel 202 , a file system cache 204 , CDN software 206 , TCP connection manager 208 , and disk storage 210 .
- CDN software 206 creates and manages a “hot” object cache 212 for popular objects being served by the CDN. It may also provide other CDN-related functions, such as request routing, in-region load balancing, and the like.
- the content server 200 receives end user requests for content, determines whether the requested object is present in the hot object cache or the disk storage, serves the requested object via HTTP (if it is present) or establishes a connection to another content server or an origin server to attempt to retrieve the requested object upon a cache miss.
- FIG. 3 illustrates a tiered content distribution technique upon which the shield techniques of the present invention are based.
- the CDN (or other distributed delivery system, as the case may be) employs a tiered infrastructure using two or more tiers: a set of edge servers and a hierarchical set of “parent” or hub regions that service the edge servers.
- the CDN service provider operates a plurality of CDN edge servers 302 a - n and a set of tiered distribution hubs 304 a - n .
- the tiered distribution hubs accelerate content delivery to end users 306 a - n and buffer the origin server 308 .
- the tiered distribution hubs ensure that the edge servers have the information requested by the end users.
- a tiered distribution hub 304 maintains a persistent connection to the origin server 308 , although this is not a requirement.
- the distribution hubs ensure that end users 306 do not flood the origin site with requests if the site is experiencing high traffic load or if the content is stale, large, or infrequently accessed.
- the tiered distribution hubs act as accelerators for the end users, ensuring that the users obtain their desired content quickly and reliably, and the hubs acts as buffers for the origin site's internal infrastructure, guaranteeing that the site is not overwhelmed with requests for popular content or large files.
- attacks can come in many different forms, and most attacks are IP packet-based. They often employ known techniques (e.g., slow requests, SYN packet flooding), or exploit known (e.g., Microsoft IIS) vulnerabilities.
- Generalizing, attacks include, without limitation, attacks on service ports, IP-based operating system attacks, IP-based server attacks, targeted attacks, domain-based resource attacks, private content searches, hijack attacks, byte-range attacks, SYN packet flooding attacks, and others. Indeed, as more and complicated software runs on the origin, there are more opportunities for site vulnerability, and a given attack may be done simply to co-opt the machine to attack others.
- the present invention addresses the known vulnerabilities of Web site infrastructure in a novel way—by making an origin server substantially inaccessible via Internet Protocol traffic.
- the origin server is “shielded” from the publicly-routable IP address space.
- only given machines acting as clients
- these clients are the servers located in a “parent” region of a CDN tiered distribution hierarchy.
- the present invention implements an origin server shield that protects a site against security breaches and the high cost of Web site downtime by ensuring that the only traffic sent to an enterprise's origin infrastructure preferably originates from CDN servers.
- the inventive “shielding” technique protects a site's Web servers (as well as backend infrastructure, such as application servers, databases, and mail servers) from unauthorized intrusion—improving site uptime and in the process, customer loyalty.
- FIG. 4A illustrates a CDN customer Web site (WS) 400 that has been insulated from flash crowds using a set a tiered distribution nodes 402 and 404 intermediate CDN edge server regions 406 , 408 and 410 .
- a tiered distribution (TD) node is sometimes referred to as a “parent” region in the CDN.
- a given TD node typically includes a set of “parent” servers that, for illustrative purposes only, is located in a hosting data center in a well-connected “core” portion of the Internet web hosting infrastructure.
- Representative “core” locations include, without limitation, well-connected data centers in the Internet that have high-speed backbones (today these are optical networks running at multiple gigabits per second) and are connected to at least several (e.g., three (3)) other high-speed optical backbone networks. Connection to multiple backbone networks is very desirable to ensure requests can be routed quickly and reliably within the Internet. As seen in FIG.
- this known tiered distribution hierarchy is augmented according to the present invention to place a shield (SS) in front of the Web site (WS) so that only traffic originating from the tiered distribution (TD) nodes can access the Web site.
- the shield comprises a pair of machines 412 and 414 , for purposes of redundancy.
- FIG. 4C illustrates a preferred placement of the shield.
- the site infrastructure typically includes an upstream router 416 connectable to the network and a downstream firewall 418 .
- the shield machine 412 preferably runs in front of the firewall 418 but behind the upstream router 416 .
- an IP access control list (ACL) 420 is turned on at the firewall 418 to prevent IP addresses (except those identified in the ACL as originating from the TD nodes) from accessing the Web site.
- the upstream router is enabled to block IP spoofing for the IP addresses of the shield machines.
- the origin server is masked or hidden from the publicly-routable Internet.
- the content provider enables its content to be served by the CDN, preferably using the techniques described above with respect to FIG. 1 , although this is not meant to be limiting.
- object service metadata specified by customer, by directory, by object type, or in any other convenient manner, identifies that given content is served by the tiered distribution scheme.
- FIG. 5 illustrates a more detailed implementation for a typical site 500 .
- the site infrastructure includes a pair of routers 502 and 504 each of which connect to the Internet backbone preferably comprise the upstream router. These routers each connect to a hub 506 .
- the shield of the present invention is implemented as a set of redundant machines.
- each of the shield machines 508 and 510 are connected to the hub as illustrated.
- a packet shaping switch 512 interconnects hub 506 and hub 514 .
- First and second firewall machines 516 and 518 are connected to the hub 514 .
- Firewall machines 516 and 518 together with a firewall management server 520 preferably comprise the downstream firewall.
- IP ACLs are implemented on the downstream firewall.
- the firewall machine ACLs are then set to only accept packets from that /27 address space. This prevents any other IP addresses from communicating with the site's web (or other back-end infrastructure).
- the site is assured that no legitimate packets from these IP addresses will be received on the upstream interface of the routers.
- the upstream routers are then set to implement IP spoofing protection.
- IP ACLs or some other equivalent type of control mechanism
- the setting of IP ACLs is done on all ports. This generally requires that the site have dedicated servers running the web servers and that there be a separate firewall upstream of these servers. If this is not possible, then IP ACLs should be implemented for web server ports 80 and 443, and it is also desirable in such case to block any unnecessary ports.
- a typical site configuration has a server to be protected, a firewall, and an upstream router.
- at least one shield machine is provisioned between the firewall and the upstream router.
- two access controls are implemented.
- One control is to implement an IP ACL downstream of the shield machine. This ensures that only the IP addresses of the shield machine will be able to access the origin site.
- the other step is to implement IP spoofing blocking upstream of the shield machine, namely, at the upstream router. This ensures that only the shield machine is able to pass through the downstream ACL.
- the invention provides basic surge protection and filtering.
- a global distributed network such as a CDN provides flash crowd mitigation. As attackers are more and more relying on masking themselves as large flash crowds, this protection extends to mitigation of large-scale DDoS attacks.
- an origin site can be setup with an unknown name (a name that is not available on the publicly-routable Internet) to protect against attacks.
- a CDN server in a shield region can be configured to communicate with the origin server on ports other than standard HTTP or HTTPS ports in a manner invisible to end-users. This provides additional protection from standard “scan” based attacks.
- all non-essential IP services are disabled including FTP, telnet and rlogin.
- the present invention provides numerous advantages.
- the benefits to ensuring that a site's web server is not accessible to the Internet are significant. While firewalls play a key role in protecting systems, they must expose at least one port on one machine to the world. This means that viruses like Code Red, which cycled through IP addresses, or the Code Red attack, which performed an IP based CPU resource attack can still damage or hijack a site's mission-critical systems. With a shield in place, the origin server is protected against these attacks, as well as other similar attacks. Moreover, using a shield ensures that all requests flow through the content delivery network, enabling edge filtering, load protection, and assuring that all traffic back to the origin will be valid HTTP requests.
- Representative machines according to the present invention are Intel Pentium-based computers running a Linux or Linux-variant operating system and one or more applications to carry out the described functionality.
- One or more of the processes described above are implemented as computer programs, namely, as a set of computer instructions, for performing the functionality described.
- the shield is implemented using machines 412 and 414 .
- Such an embodiment may be considered a “local” shield wherein the origin server is not on the Internet (i.e., not reachable via the publicly-routable Internet).
- An alternative to this approach is to have the managed service provider acquire a new (unpublished) IP address for the site and assign that new IP address to the existing site hardware. The CDN edge servers are then controlled via metadata settings to go the new IP address as needed.
- the latter technique provides a “remote” shield wherein the origin server is on the Internet but only the managed service provider knows its IP address.
- the origin server's firewall is provided with a list of remote shield regions within the CDN from which all authorized requests will originate.
- Yet another approach is to place the origin server in a distinct (i.e., different) autonomous system (AS) so that, in effect, it has its own network. That network is then advertised (through any convenient routing protocol, such as Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP), OSPF (Open Shortest Path First (OSPF), or the like) to the network that contains the shield region.
- EIGRP Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol
- OSPF Open Shortest Path First
- this origin server network is not advertised to the public Internet and, thus, is not reachable via the Internet.
- the shield region can see this address space, but a third party—such as an attacker—cannot.
- the shield region preferably is in public-routable IP address space.
Abstract
The present invention addresses the known vulnerabilities of Web site infrastructure by making an origin server substantially inaccessible via Internet Protocol traffic. In particular, according to a preferred embodiment, the origin server is “shielded” from the publicly-routable IP address space. Preferably, only given machines (acting as clients) can access the origin server, and then only under restricted, secure circumstances. In a preferred embodiment, these clients are the servers located in a “parent” region of a content delivery network (CDN) tiered distribution hierarchy. The invention implements an origin server shield that protects a site against security breaches and the high cost of Web site downtime by ensuring that the only traffic sent to an enterprise's origin infrastructure preferably originates from CDN servers. The inventive “shielding” technique protects a site's Web servers (as well as backend infrastructure, such as application servers, databases, and mail servers) from unauthorized intrusion—improving site uptime and in the process, customer loyalty.
Description
- This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 10/191,309, filed Jul. 9, 2002.
- 1. Technical Field
- The present invention relates generally to techniques for cloaking a Web site origin server from the public Internet while still ensuring that content otherwise available from the site is delivered quickly and without fail, regardless of a user location.
- 2. Description of the Related Art
- Today's Web sites are a double-edged sword. They present enterprises with the opportunity for both resounding success and costly, dramatic failure. The possibility for either scenario to occur is chiefly due to the Internet's open design. Indeed, the ability to reach a global community of customers and partners via the Web comes with serious security risks. The open design means that enterprises must expose themselves by opening a public entry-point to get the global reach they need. Couple that with the inherent weaknesses of centralized infrastructure and there is a recipe for failure. Indeed, a growing number of threats can bring a site down daily. These threats include hacker attacks, viruses, Internet worms, content tampering and constant Denial of Service (DoS) attacks. DoS attacks are well known but few realize how rapidly they evolve, as witnessed by self-propagating worms, use of Internet Relay Chat (IRC) technology, attacks against routers and other techniques. The University of California at San Diego's Cooperative Association for Internet Data Analysis (CAIDA) estimates that over 4,000 Web sites are attacked in this way every week.
- Any one of these threats can produce unpredictable site disruptions that impede revenue operations, dilute brand investments, hamper productivity and reduce goodwill and reputation. In the past, an enterprise's only defense was to maintain vigilant and expensive system upgrades to current with constantly evolving assaults, as it has been considered impossible to eliminate public entry points into a site's Web servers.
- Enterprise firewalls do not adequately address the problem. While firewalls attempt to discard malicious packets, they are not a complete protection as they themselves are on the public Internet and are susceptible to DoS attacks. When a firewall filters packets, CPU resources are consumed by seemingly authentic requests. At best, a firewall can limit exposure, but some portion of the site's infrastructure is still publicly available and susceptible to attack
- It would be highly desirable to provide an additional layer of protection to ensure business continuity of an enterprise Web site.
- It is a primary object of the present invention for “cloaking” a Web site from the public Internet while still ensuring that content is delivered quickly and without fail, regardless of user location. The inventive technique substantially eliminates the public entry points found on Web servers today while delivering end users of a protected site unparalleled performance and reliability.
- A more specific object of the invention is to provide an origin server “shield” to render the server substantially inaccessible at a publicly-routable Internet Protocol (IP) address. In an illustrative embodiment, an origin server shield according to the present invention is a collection of strategically-positioned content delivery network (CDN) server regions designed to complement an existing infrastructure protecting an origin site. A CDN server region may include one or more content servers. Preferably, the origin server shield resides at or near a data center at which the origin server is located, and that data center may be at a company's premises, a dedicated facility, or a co-location facility.
- According to an illustrative embodiment, the technical advantages of the present invention are achieved by deploying an origin server shield in the same data center as the origin Web server, typically behind upstream routers that provide Internet connectivity but in front of a firewall. This placement allows the shield to serve both as an external buffer for the origin site as well as the trusted party eligible to access the origin site. In this fashion, one or more dedicated content delivery network (CDN) server regions that comprise the shield handle communications with the “public” and connect to the origin server only when needed, preferably via a private connection. As a consequence, the shield protects the origin by effectively removing it from accessible Internet Protocol (IP) space.
- In a given illustrative configuration, an origin server uses a content delivery network to serve given site content, and an origin server “shield” is established for the origin. The shield comprises at least one CDN “shield” region upstream of an enterprise firewall and access router but downstream of the router connecting the origin server to the rest of the data center of the Internet. The “shield” region also preferably serves as a “parent” region to the CDN edge servers. To provide maximum protection, two access controls are preferably implemented. First, an IP access control list (ACL) or equivalent access control is set downstream of the shield region so that the only IP traffic that can access the origin site is traffic originating from servers in the shield region. In an illustrative embodiment, this is accomplished by setting an access control list (ACL) on the enterprise firewall to restrict access to the origin server except, e.g., from IP addresses of the CDN servers in the shield region(s). In addition, the router upstream of the shield (e.g., the router connecting to the Internet) is provisioned to implement IP spoof blocking upstream of the shield region to ensure that only the shield region is able to pass through the downstream ACL.
- Such access controls (e.g., upstream ACLs and router configurations) prevent any other machine on the Internet from spoofing the shield region server IP addresses in an attempt to masquerade as the shield server. As a result, no other machine on the Internet has the ability to communicate directly with the origin server. At the same time, however, the CDN's other distributed edge servers continue to have complete access to the current content as long as that content is accessible via the CDN. This is because the shield region(s) are configured to serve as a “parent” region for the edge servers. If a CDN edge server ever needs content that it cannot find at one of its peers, it will direct that request at one of the shield regions. As a result, bona fide end-users will always be able to retrieve content from edge servers with maximal performance and reliability while the origin remains protected.
- The foregoing has outlined some of the more pertinent features of the present invention. These features should be construed to be merely illustrative. Many other beneficial results can be attained by applying the disclosed invention in a different manner or by modifying the invention as will be described.
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a known content delivery network in which the present invention may be implemented; -
FIG. 2 illustrates a typical machine configuration for a CDN content edge server; -
FIG. 3 is a simplified diagram illustrating a CDN tiered distribution scheme; -
FIG. 4A is a diagram illustrating tiered distribution for a given customer Web site (WS); -
FIG. 4B is a diagram illustrating the use of a shield in conjunction with the tiered distribution scheme ofFIG. 4B ; -
FIG. 4C is a diagram illustrating a preferred provisioning of the shield according to the present invention; and -
FIG. 5 is a more detailed implementation of the shield at a given CDN customer site. - By way of background, it is known in the prior art to deliver digital content (e.g., HTTP content, streaming media and applications) using an Internet content delivery network (CDN). A CDN is a network of geographically-distributed content delivery nodes that are arranged for efficient delivery of content on behalf of third party content providers. Typically, a CDN is implemented as a combination of a content delivery infrastructure, a request-routing mechanism, and a distribution infrastructure. The content delivery infrastructure usually comprises a set of “surrogate” origin servers that are located at strategic locations (e.g., Internet network access points, Internet Points of Presence, and the like) for delivering content to requesting end users. The request-routing mechanism allocates servers in the content delivery infrastructure to requesting clients in a way that, for web content delivery, minimizes a given client's response time and, for streaming media delivery, provides for the highest quality. The distribution infrastructure consists of on-demand or push-based mechanisms that move content from the origin server to the surrogates. An effective CDN serves frequently-accessed content from a surrogate that is optimal for a given requesting client. In a typical CDN, a single service provider operates the request-routers, the surrogates, and the content distributors. In addition, that service provider establishes business relationships with content publishers and acts on behalf of their origin server sites to provide a distributed delivery system.
- As seen in
FIG. 1 , an Internet content delivery infrastructure usually comprises a set of “surrogate”origin servers 102 that are located at strategic locations (e.g., Internet network access points, and the like) for delivering copies of content to requestingend users 119. A surrogate origin server is defined, for example, in IETF Internet Draft titled “Requirements for Surrogates in the HTTP” dated Aug. 9, 2000, which is incorporated herein by reference. The request-routing mechanism 104 allocatesservers 102 in the content delivery infrastructure to requesting clients. The distribution infrastructure consists of on-demand or push-based mechanisms that move content from the origin server to the surrogates. A CDN service provider (CDNSP) may organize sets of surrogate origin servers as a group or so-called “region.” In this type of arrangement, aCDN region 106 typically comprises a set of one or more content servers that share a common back-end network, e.g., a LAN, and that are located at or near an Internet access point. Thus, for example, a typical CDN region may be co-located within an Internet Service Provider (ISP) Point of Presence (PoP) 108. A representative CDN content server is a Pentium-based caching appliance running an operating system (e.g., Linux, Windows NT, Windows 2000) and having suitable RAM and disk storage for CDN applications and content delivery network content (e.g., HTTP content, streaming media and applications). Such content servers are sometimes referred to as “edge” servers as they are located at or near the so-called outer reach or “edge” of the Internet. The CDN typically also includesnetwork agents 109 that monitor the network as well as the server loads. These network agents are typically co-located at third party data centers or other locations.Mapmaker software 107 receives data generated from the network agents and periodically creates maps that dynamically associate IP addresses (e.g., the IP addresses of client-side local name servers) with the CDN regions. - Content may be identified for delivery from the CDN using a content migrator or
rewrite tool 106 operated, for example, at a participating content provider server.Tool 106 rewrites embedded object URLs to point to the CDNSP domain. A request for such content is resolved through a CDNSP-managed DNS to identify a “best” region, and then to identify an edge server within the region that is not overloaded and that is likely to host the requested content. Instead of using content provider-side migration (e.g., using the tool 106), a participating content provider may simply direct the CDNSP to serve an entire domain (or subdomain) by a DNS directive (e.g., a CNAME). In either case, the CDNSP may provide object-specific metadata to the CDN content servers to determine how the CDN content servers will handle a request for an object being served by the CDN. Metadata, as used herein, refers to a set of control options and parameters for the object (e.g., coherence information, origin server identity information, load balancing information, customer code, other control codes, etc.), and such information may be provided to the CDN content servers via a configuration file, in HTTP headers, or in other ways. The Uniform Resource Locator (URL) of an object that is served from the CDN in this manner does not need to be modified by the content provider. When a request for the object is made, for example, by having an end user navigate to a site and select the URL, a customer's DNS system directs the name query (for whatever domain is in the URL) to the CDNSP DNS request routing mechanism. Once an edge server is identified, the browser passes the object request to the server, which applies the metadata supplied from a configuration file or HTTP response headers to determine how the object will be handled. - As also seen in
FIG. 1 , the CDNSP may operate a metadata transmission system 116 comprising a set of one or more servers to enable metadata to be provided to the CDNSP content servers. The system 116 may comprise at least onecontrol server 118, and one or more staging servers 120 a-n, each of which is typically an HTTP server (e.g., Apache). Metadata is provided to thecontrol server 118 by the CDNSP or the content provider (e.g., using a secure extranet application) and periodically delivered to the staging servers 120 a-n. The staging servers deliver the metadata to the CDN content servers as necessary. -
FIG. 2 illustrates a typical machine configuration for a CDN content edge server. Typically, the content server 200 is a caching appliance running anoperating system kernel 202, afile system cache 204,CDN software 206,TCP connection manager 208, anddisk storage 210.CDN software 206 creates and manages a “hot”object cache 212 for popular objects being served by the CDN. It may also provide other CDN-related functions, such as request routing, in-region load balancing, and the like. In operation as an HTTP cache for example, the content server 200 receives end user requests for content, determines whether the requested object is present in the hot object cache or the disk storage, serves the requested object via HTTP (if it is present) or establishes a connection to another content server or an origin server to attempt to retrieve the requested object upon a cache miss. -
FIG. 3 illustrates a tiered content distribution technique upon which the shield techniques of the present invention are based. Preferably, the CDN (or other distributed delivery system, as the case may be) employs a tiered infrastructure using two or more tiers: a set of edge servers and a hierarchical set of “parent” or hub regions that service the edge servers. In this example, the CDN service provider operates a plurality of CDN edge servers 302 a-n and a set of tiered distribution hubs 304 a-n. The tiered distribution hubs accelerate content delivery to end users 306 a-n and buffer theorigin server 308. The tiered distribution hubs ensure that the edge servers have the information requested by the end users. If the edge servers do not have the appropriate file when it is requested, the servers in the tiered distribution hubs will provide the edge servers with the requested content. Preferably, a tiered distribution hub 304 maintains a persistent connection to theorigin server 308, although this is not a requirement. The distribution hubs ensure that end users 306 do not flood the origin site with requests if the site is experiencing high traffic load or if the content is stale, large, or infrequently accessed. In effect, the tiered distribution hubs act as accelerators for the end users, ensuring that the users obtain their desired content quickly and reliably, and the hubs acts as buffers for the origin site's internal infrastructure, guaranteeing that the site is not overwhelmed with requests for popular content or large files. - A representative tiered distribution scheme is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,133,905, and assigned to the assignee of this application.
- With the above as background, the present invention can now be described in detail. As is well known, a Web site and its infrastructure may come under frequent, dangerous attacks. Attacks can come in many different forms, and most attacks are IP packet-based. They often employ known techniques (e.g., slow requests, SYN packet flooding), or exploit known (e.g., Microsoft IIS) vulnerabilities. Generalizing, attacks include, without limitation, attacks on service ports, IP-based operating system attacks, IP-based server attacks, targeted attacks, domain-based resource attacks, private content searches, hijack attacks, byte-range attacks, SYN packet flooding attacks, and others. Indeed, as more and complicated software runs on the origin, there are more opportunities for site vulnerability, and a given attack may be done simply to co-opt the machine to attack others.
- The present invention addresses the known vulnerabilities of Web site infrastructure in a novel way—by making an origin server substantially inaccessible via Internet Protocol traffic. In particular, according to the preferred embodiment, the origin server is “shielded” from the publicly-routable IP address space. Preferably, only given machines (acting as clients) can access the origin server, and then only under restricted, secure circumstances. In a preferred embodiment, these clients are the servers located in a “parent” region of a CDN tiered distribution hierarchy. The present invention implements an origin server shield that protects a site against security breaches and the high cost of Web site downtime by ensuring that the only traffic sent to an enterprise's origin infrastructure preferably originates from CDN servers. The inventive “shielding” technique protects a site's Web servers (as well as backend infrastructure, such as application servers, databases, and mail servers) from unauthorized intrusion—improving site uptime and in the process, customer loyalty.
- Thus, in general, the invention works to protect Internet infrastructure by effectively hiding it from threats on the public Internet. In a preferred embodiment, a set of dedicated servers of a “parent” CDN region in a tiered distribution scheme form a protective layer between the enterprise origin site infrastructure and the Internet.
FIG. 4A illustrates a CDN customer Web site (WS) 400 that has been insulated from flash crowds using a set atiered distribution nodes edge server regions FIG. 4B , this known tiered distribution hierarchy is augmented according to the present invention to place a shield (SS) in front of the Web site (WS) so that only traffic originating from the tiered distribution (TD) nodes can access the Web site. Preferably, the shield comprises a pair ofmachines FIG. 4C illustrates a preferred placement of the shield. As illustrated inFIG. 4C , the site infrastructure typically includes anupstream router 416 connectable to the network and adownstream firewall 418. Theshield machine 412 preferably runs in front of thefirewall 418 but behind theupstream router 416. Preferably, an IP access control list (ACL) 420 is turned on at thefirewall 418 to prevent IP addresses (except those identified in the ACL as originating from the TD nodes) from accessing the Web site. In addition, the upstream router is enabled to block IP spoofing for the IP addresses of the shield machines. - In this arrangement, the origin server is masked or hidden from the publicly-routable Internet. The content provider enables its content to be served by the CDN, preferably using the techniques described above with respect to
FIG. 1 , although this is not meant to be limiting. Preferably, object service metadata, specified by customer, by directory, by object type, or in any other convenient manner, identifies that given content is served by the tiered distribution scheme. - The particular implementation of the shield will depend, of course, on the actual Web site infrastructure, although typically an installation will require implementation of IP ACLs on the downstream firewall and IP spoofing protection on the upstream router.
FIG. 5 illustrates a more detailed implementation for atypical site 500. In this example, the site infrastructure includes a pair ofrouters hub 506. As noted above, preferably the shield of the present invention is implemented as a set of redundant machines. InFIG. 5 , each of theshield machines packet shaping switch 512interconnects hub 506 andhub 514. First andsecond firewall machines hub 514.Firewall machines - Preferably, the setting of IP ACLs (or some other equivalent type of control mechanism) is done on all ports. This generally requires that the site have dedicated servers running the web servers and that there be a separate firewall upstream of these servers. If this is not possible, then IP ACLs should be implemented for web server ports 80 and 443, and it is also desirable in such case to block any unnecessary ports.
- Generalizing, a typical site configuration has a server to be protected, a firewall, and an upstream router. According to the invention, at least one shield machine is provisioned between the firewall and the upstream router. In addition, preferably two access controls are implemented. One control is to implement an IP ACL downstream of the shield machine. This ensures that only the IP addresses of the shield machine will be able to access the origin site. The other step is to implement IP spoofing blocking upstream of the shield machine, namely, at the upstream router. This ensures that only the shield machine is able to pass through the downstream ACL.
- The invention provides basic surge protection and filtering. A global distributed network such as a CDN provides flash crowd mitigation. As attackers are more and more relying on masking themselves as large flash crowds, this protection extends to mitigation of large-scale DDoS attacks. Through use of customer specific metadata, an origin site can be setup with an unknown name (a name that is not available on the publicly-routable Internet) to protect against attacks. If desired, a CDN server in a shield region can be configured to communicate with the origin server on ports other than standard HTTP or HTTPS ports in a manner invisible to end-users. This provides additional protection from standard “scan” based attacks. Preferably, all non-essential IP services are disabled including FTP, telnet and rlogin. Only remote access permitted is via encrypted and authenticated connections using RSA public key. No physical connections (keyboard, port monitors, and the like) are allowed with CDN servers. Each server continuously monitors its performance and feeds reports of anomalies to a Network Operations Control Center (NOCC).
- The present invention provides numerous advantages. The benefits to ensuring that a site's web server is not accessible to the Internet are significant. While firewalls play a key role in protecting systems, they must expose at least one port on one machine to the world. This means that viruses like Code Red, which cycled through IP addresses, or the Code Red attack, which performed an IP based CPU resource attack can still damage or hijack a site's mission-critical systems. With a shield in place, the origin server is protected against these attacks, as well as other similar attacks. Moreover, using a shield ensures that all requests flow through the content delivery network, enabling edge filtering, load protection, and assuring that all traffic back to the origin will be valid HTTP requests.
- Representative machines according to the present invention are Intel Pentium-based computers running a Linux or Linux-variant operating system and one or more applications to carry out the described functionality. One or more of the processes described above are implemented as computer programs, namely, as a set of computer instructions, for performing the functionality described.
- Variants
- In the embodiment described above such as in
FIG. 4 , the shield is implemented usingmachines - Yet another approach is to place the origin server in a distinct (i.e., different) autonomous system (AS) so that, in effect, it has its own network. That network is then advertised (through any convenient routing protocol, such as Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP), OSPF (Open Shortest Path First (OSPF), or the like) to the network that contains the shield region. Preferably, this origin server network is not advertised to the public Internet and, thus, is not reachable via the Internet. The shield region, however, can see this address space, but a third party—such as an attacker—cannot. The shield region preferably is in public-routable IP address space.
Claims (12)
1. In a content delivery network (CDN) operated by a content delivery network service provider on behalf of participating content providers, the content delivery network having a set of content servers organized into regions and that provide content delivery on behalf of the participating content providers, a method, comprising:
having the content delivery network service provider associate an unpublished IP address with a participating content provider origin server;
restricting authorized access to the participating content provider origin server except from one or more content servers in the content delivery network; and
in response to a request associated with an end user, serving content to the end user from one of the content servers in the content delivery network in lieu of serving the content from the origin server.
2. The method as described in claim 1 wherein content servers in the content delivery network comprise a tier of a CDN cache hierarchy.
3. The method as described in claim 1 further including providing a content server in the content delivery network with the unpublished IP address via metadata.
4. The method as described in claim 1 further including providing the participating content provider origin server with a list of CDN content server regions that are authorized to request access to the participating content provider origin server.
5. The method as described in claim 1 wherein a content server in the content delivery network is configured to communicate with the participating content provider origin server on a port other than HTTP or HTTPS.
6. The method as described in claim 1 further including disabling all non-essential IP services on the participating content provider server.
7. In a content delivery network (CDN) operated by a content delivery network service provider on behalf of participating content providers, the content delivery network having a set of content servers organized into regions and that provide content delivery on behalf of the participating content providers, a method, comprising:
associating a participating content provider origin server with a network that advertises its reachability only to one or more content servers in the content delivery network;
restricting authorized access to the participating content provider origin server except from one or more content servers in the content delivery network; and
in response to a request associated with an end user, serving content to the end user from one of the content servers in the content delivery network in lieu of serving the content from the origin server.
8. The method as described in claim 7 wherein the network advertises its reachability via one of EIGRP or OSPF.
9. The method as described in claim 7 wherein content servers in the content delivery network comprise a tier of a CDN cache hierarchy.
10. The method as described in claim 7 further including providing the participating content provider origin server with a list of CDN content server regions that are authorized to request access to the participating content provider origin server.
11. The method as described in claim 7 wherein a content server in the content delivery network is configured to communicate with the participating content provider origin server on a port other than HTTP or HTTPS.
12. The method as described in claim 7 further including disabling all non-essential IP services on the participating content provider server.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/841,006 US20070283419A1 (en) | 2002-07-09 | 2007-08-20 | Method and system for protecting websites from public Internet threats |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/191,309 US7260639B2 (en) | 2002-07-09 | 2002-07-09 | Method and system for protecting web sites from public internet threats |
US11/841,006 US20070283419A1 (en) | 2002-07-09 | 2007-08-20 | Method and system for protecting websites from public Internet threats |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/191,309 Continuation US7260639B2 (en) | 2002-07-09 | 2002-07-09 | Method and system for protecting web sites from public internet threats |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20070283419A1 true US20070283419A1 (en) | 2007-12-06 |
Family
ID=30114150
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/191,309 Expired - Lifetime US7260639B2 (en) | 2002-07-09 | 2002-07-09 | Method and system for protecting web sites from public internet threats |
US11/841,006 Abandoned US20070283419A1 (en) | 2002-07-09 | 2007-08-20 | Method and system for protecting websites from public Internet threats |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/191,309 Expired - Lifetime US7260639B2 (en) | 2002-07-09 | 2002-07-09 | Method and system for protecting web sites from public internet threats |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7260639B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1535176A4 (en) |
AU (2) | AU2003248856A1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2492158C (en) |
WO (1) | WO2004006113A1 (en) |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20110082785A1 (en) * | 2001-04-02 | 2011-04-07 | Weller Timothy N | Content delivery network service provider (CDNSP)-managed content delivery network (CDN) for network service provider (NSP) |
US20110107410A1 (en) * | 2009-11-02 | 2011-05-05 | At&T Intellectual Property I,L.P. | Methods, systems, and computer program products for controlling server access using an authentication server |
US20110154469A1 (en) * | 2009-12-17 | 2011-06-23 | At&T Intellectual Property Llp | Methods, systems, and computer program products for access control services using source port filtering |
US20110154468A1 (en) * | 2009-12-17 | 2011-06-23 | At&T Intellectual Property I, Lp | Methods, systems, and computer program products for access control services using a transparent firewall in conjunction with an authentication server |
US20120124372A1 (en) * | 2010-10-13 | 2012-05-17 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Protecting Websites and Website Users By Obscuring URLs |
US20130268616A1 (en) * | 2010-11-16 | 2013-10-10 | Edgecast Networks, Inc. | Discrete Mapping for Targeted Caching |
US8812727B1 (en) | 2011-06-23 | 2014-08-19 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | System and method for distributed load balancing with distributed direct server return |
US9055076B1 (en) | 2011-06-23 | 2015-06-09 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | System and method for distributed load balancing with load balancer clients for hosts |
US9667569B1 (en) * | 2010-04-29 | 2017-05-30 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | System and method for adaptive server shielding |
US10970644B1 (en) * | 2016-12-07 | 2021-04-06 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Estimating the conditional response time to a request for confidential data |
Families Citing this family (143)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8352400B2 (en) | 1991-12-23 | 2013-01-08 | Hoffberg Steven M | Adaptive pattern recognition based controller apparatus and method and human-factored interface therefore |
US7966078B2 (en) | 1999-02-01 | 2011-06-21 | Steven Hoffberg | Network media appliance system and method |
US7478148B2 (en) | 2001-01-16 | 2009-01-13 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Using virtual domain name service (DNS) zones for enterprise content delivery |
US8423662B1 (en) | 2003-04-28 | 2013-04-16 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Forward request queuing in a distributed edge processing environment |
US7143170B2 (en) * | 2003-04-30 | 2006-11-28 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Automatic migration of data via a distributed computer network |
US8473635B1 (en) | 2003-05-19 | 2013-06-25 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Provisioning tool for a distributed computer network |
US9027120B1 (en) * | 2003-10-10 | 2015-05-05 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Hierarchical architecture in a network security system |
US8015604B1 (en) | 2003-10-10 | 2011-09-06 | Arcsight Inc | Hierarchical architecture in a network security system |
US7978716B2 (en) * | 2003-11-24 | 2011-07-12 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing a VPN solution |
US8583739B2 (en) * | 2004-03-02 | 2013-11-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Facilitating the sending of mail from a restricted communications network |
US7757074B2 (en) | 2004-06-30 | 2010-07-13 | Citrix Application Networking, Llc | System and method for establishing a virtual private network |
US8495305B2 (en) | 2004-06-30 | 2013-07-23 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Method and device for performing caching of dynamically generated objects in a data communication network |
US8739274B2 (en) * | 2004-06-30 | 2014-05-27 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Method and device for performing integrated caching in a data communication network |
EP1771998B1 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2015-04-15 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for optimizing communications between network nodes |
KR20070037649A (en) | 2004-07-23 | 2007-04-05 | 사이트릭스 시스템스, 인크. | A method and systems for routing packets from a gateway to an endpoint |
US7748032B2 (en) | 2004-09-30 | 2010-06-29 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for associating tickets in a ticket hierarchy |
US7711835B2 (en) * | 2004-09-30 | 2010-05-04 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for reducing disclosure of proprietary data in a networked environment |
US8613048B2 (en) * | 2004-09-30 | 2013-12-17 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing authorized remote access to application sessions |
US8954595B2 (en) * | 2004-12-30 | 2015-02-10 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing client-side accelerated access to remote applications via TCP buffering |
US8700695B2 (en) * | 2004-12-30 | 2014-04-15 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing client-side accelerated access to remote applications via TCP pooling |
US8549149B2 (en) * | 2004-12-30 | 2013-10-01 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing client-side accelerated access to remote applications via TCP multiplexing |
US8706877B2 (en) * | 2004-12-30 | 2014-04-22 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing client-side dynamic redirection to bypass an intermediary |
US7810089B2 (en) | 2004-12-30 | 2010-10-05 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for automatic installation and execution of a client-side acceleration program |
US20060253605A1 (en) * | 2004-12-30 | 2006-11-09 | Prabakar Sundarrajan | Systems and methods for providing integrated client-side acceleration techniques to access remote applications |
US8255456B2 (en) | 2005-12-30 | 2012-08-28 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | System and method for performing flash caching of dynamically generated objects in a data communication network |
US8024568B2 (en) | 2005-01-28 | 2011-09-20 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Method and system for verification of an endpoint security scan |
US8060860B2 (en) * | 2005-04-22 | 2011-11-15 | Apple Inc. | Security methods and systems |
US7730536B2 (en) * | 2005-06-08 | 2010-06-01 | Verizon Business Global Llc | Security perimeters |
US7921184B2 (en) * | 2005-12-30 | 2011-04-05 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | System and method for performing flash crowd caching of dynamically generated objects in a data communication network |
US8301839B2 (en) * | 2005-12-30 | 2012-10-30 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | System and method for performing granular invalidation of cached dynamically generated objects in a data communication network |
US8151323B2 (en) * | 2006-04-12 | 2012-04-03 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing levels of access and action control via an SSL VPN appliance |
US8416691B1 (en) * | 2006-04-27 | 2013-04-09 | Alcatel Lucent | Associating hosts with subscriber and service based requirements |
JP2010507279A (en) * | 2006-10-13 | 2010-03-04 | フィリップス、マーク | Efficient and dynamically adaptable digitally encoded information distribution method and system |
US8533846B2 (en) * | 2006-11-08 | 2013-09-10 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Method and system for dynamically associating access rights with a resource |
US8028090B2 (en) | 2008-11-17 | 2011-09-27 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request routing utilizing client location information |
US7991910B2 (en) | 2008-11-17 | 2011-08-02 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Updating routing information based on client location |
US20090189892A1 (en) * | 2008-01-27 | 2009-07-30 | Nitin Desai | Methods and systems for detecting a dirty region within a frame encompassing three dimensional graphics |
US7962597B2 (en) | 2008-03-31 | 2011-06-14 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request routing based on class |
US8606996B2 (en) | 2008-03-31 | 2013-12-10 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Cache optimization |
US7970820B1 (en) | 2008-03-31 | 2011-06-28 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Locality based content distribution |
US8321568B2 (en) | 2008-03-31 | 2012-11-27 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Content management |
US8156243B2 (en) | 2008-03-31 | 2012-04-10 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request routing |
US8601090B1 (en) | 2008-03-31 | 2013-12-03 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Network resource identification |
US8533293B1 (en) | 2008-03-31 | 2013-09-10 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Client side cache management |
US8447831B1 (en) | 2008-03-31 | 2013-05-21 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Incentive driven content delivery |
US7991957B2 (en) * | 2008-05-27 | 2011-08-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Abuse detection using distributed cache |
US7925782B2 (en) | 2008-06-30 | 2011-04-12 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request routing using network computing components |
US9407681B1 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2016-08-02 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Latency measurement in resource requests |
US9912740B2 (en) | 2008-06-30 | 2018-03-06 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Latency measurement in resource requests |
US8122098B1 (en) | 2008-11-17 | 2012-02-21 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Managing content delivery network service providers by a content broker |
US8060616B1 (en) | 2008-11-17 | 2011-11-15 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Managing CDN registration by a storage provider |
US8065417B1 (en) | 2008-11-17 | 2011-11-22 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Service provider registration by a content broker |
US8521880B1 (en) | 2008-11-17 | 2013-08-27 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Managing content delivery network service providers |
US8073940B1 (en) | 2008-11-17 | 2011-12-06 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Managing content delivery network service providers |
US8732309B1 (en) | 2008-11-17 | 2014-05-20 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request routing utilizing cost information |
US8521851B1 (en) | 2009-03-27 | 2013-08-27 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | DNS query processing using resource identifiers specifying an application broker |
US8688837B1 (en) | 2009-03-27 | 2014-04-01 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Dynamically translating resource identifiers for request routing using popularity information |
US8412823B1 (en) | 2009-03-27 | 2013-04-02 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Managing tracking information entries in resource cache components |
US8756341B1 (en) | 2009-03-27 | 2014-06-17 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request routing utilizing popularity information |
US8732296B1 (en) * | 2009-05-06 | 2014-05-20 | Mcafee, Inc. | System, method, and computer program product for redirecting IRC traffic identified utilizing a port-independent algorithm and controlling IRC based malware |
US8782236B1 (en) | 2009-06-16 | 2014-07-15 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Managing resources using resource expiration data |
US8397073B1 (en) | 2009-09-04 | 2013-03-12 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Managing secure content in a content delivery network |
US8433771B1 (en) | 2009-10-02 | 2013-04-30 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Distribution network with forward resource propagation |
US8942549B2 (en) * | 2009-10-21 | 2015-01-27 | Media Ip, Llc | Resume point for digital media playback |
US9595300B2 (en) * | 2009-10-21 | 2017-03-14 | Media Ip, Llc | Contextual chapter navigation |
US8977783B2 (en) * | 2009-10-21 | 2015-03-10 | Media Ip, Llc | High-speed secure content transfer to SD card from kiosk |
US8458769B2 (en) * | 2009-12-12 | 2013-06-04 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Cloud based firewall system and service |
US8898803B1 (en) | 2010-01-11 | 2014-11-25 | Media Ip, Llc | Content and identity delivery system for portable playback of content and streaming service integration |
US9495338B1 (en) | 2010-01-28 | 2016-11-15 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Content distribution network |
US8468247B1 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2013-06-18 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Point of presence management in request routing |
US8577992B1 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2013-11-05 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request routing management based on network components |
US8930513B1 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2015-01-06 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Latency measurement in resource requests |
US10958501B1 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2021-03-23 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request routing information based on client IP groupings |
US9712484B1 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2017-07-18 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Managing request routing information utilizing client identifiers |
US10097398B1 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2018-10-09 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Point of presence management in request routing |
US8819283B2 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2014-08-26 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request routing in a networked environment |
US8938526B1 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2015-01-20 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request routing management based on network components |
US9003035B1 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2015-04-07 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Point of presence management in request routing |
US8924528B1 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2014-12-30 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Latency measurement in resource requests |
US8745749B2 (en) | 2010-11-15 | 2014-06-03 | Media Ip, Llc | Virtual secure digital card |
US8452874B2 (en) | 2010-11-22 | 2013-05-28 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request routing processing |
US9391949B1 (en) | 2010-12-03 | 2016-07-12 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request routing processing |
US8775827B2 (en) | 2011-03-28 | 2014-07-08 | Media Ip, Llc | Read and write optimization for protected area of memory |
US8949879B2 (en) * | 2011-04-22 | 2015-02-03 | Media Ip, Llc | Access controls for known content |
US8867337B2 (en) | 2011-04-26 | 2014-10-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Structure-aware caching |
US10467042B1 (en) | 2011-04-27 | 2019-11-05 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Optimized deployment based upon customer locality |
CN102447712B (en) * | 2012-01-20 | 2015-07-08 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method and system for interconnecting nodes in content delivery network (CDN) as well as nodes |
US8904009B1 (en) | 2012-02-10 | 2014-12-02 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Dynamic content delivery |
US10021179B1 (en) | 2012-02-21 | 2018-07-10 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Local resource delivery network |
US10623408B1 (en) | 2012-04-02 | 2020-04-14 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Context sensitive object management |
US9154551B1 (en) | 2012-06-11 | 2015-10-06 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Processing DNS queries to identify pre-processing information |
US9525659B1 (en) | 2012-09-04 | 2016-12-20 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request routing utilizing point of presence load information |
US9323577B2 (en) | 2012-09-20 | 2016-04-26 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Automated profiling of resource usage |
US10666620B1 (en) | 2012-11-30 | 2020-05-26 | United Services Automobile Association (Usaa) | Private network request forwarding |
US9930011B1 (en) | 2012-11-30 | 2018-03-27 | United Services Automobile Association (Usaa) | Private network request forwarding |
US10205698B1 (en) | 2012-12-19 | 2019-02-12 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Source-dependent address resolution |
US9654579B2 (en) | 2012-12-21 | 2017-05-16 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Scalable content delivery network request handling mechanism |
US9736271B2 (en) | 2012-12-21 | 2017-08-15 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Scalable content delivery network request handling mechanism with usage-based billing |
US9294391B1 (en) | 2013-06-04 | 2016-03-22 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Managing network computing components utilizing request routing |
US9958924B2 (en) | 2013-08-28 | 2018-05-01 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Configuration of energy savings |
US11134063B2 (en) | 2014-03-12 | 2021-09-28 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Preserving special characters in an encoded identifier |
US10091096B1 (en) | 2014-12-18 | 2018-10-02 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Routing mode and point-of-presence selection service |
US10033627B1 (en) | 2014-12-18 | 2018-07-24 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Routing mode and point-of-presence selection service |
US10097448B1 (en) | 2014-12-18 | 2018-10-09 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Routing mode and point-of-presence selection service |
US10225326B1 (en) | 2015-03-23 | 2019-03-05 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Point of presence based data uploading |
US9887932B1 (en) * | 2015-03-30 | 2018-02-06 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Traffic surge management for points of presence |
US9887931B1 (en) * | 2015-03-30 | 2018-02-06 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Traffic surge management for points of presence |
US9819567B1 (en) | 2015-03-30 | 2017-11-14 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Traffic surge management for points of presence |
CN107208390B (en) | 2015-04-30 | 2019-07-05 | P.V.防汛设备公司 | Improved receiving dykes and dams |
US10472786B2 (en) | 2015-04-30 | 2019-11-12 | P.V. Flood Control Corp. | Structure supported containment dike |
US9832141B1 (en) | 2015-05-13 | 2017-11-28 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Routing based request correlation |
US10616179B1 (en) | 2015-06-25 | 2020-04-07 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Selective routing of domain name system (DNS) requests |
US10044673B2 (en) * | 2015-07-22 | 2018-08-07 | Fastly, Inc. | Protecting communication link between content delivery network and content origin server |
US10097566B1 (en) | 2015-07-31 | 2018-10-09 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Identifying targets of network attacks |
US9742795B1 (en) | 2015-09-24 | 2017-08-22 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Mitigating network attacks |
US9774619B1 (en) | 2015-09-24 | 2017-09-26 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Mitigating network attacks |
US9794281B1 (en) | 2015-09-24 | 2017-10-17 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Identifying sources of network attacks |
US10270878B1 (en) | 2015-11-10 | 2019-04-23 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Routing for origin-facing points of presence |
US20170149821A1 (en) * | 2015-11-25 | 2017-05-25 | Le Holdings (Beijing) Co., Ltd. | Method And System For Protection From DDoS Attack For CDN Server Group |
US10049051B1 (en) | 2015-12-11 | 2018-08-14 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Reserved cache space in content delivery networks |
US10257307B1 (en) | 2015-12-11 | 2019-04-09 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Reserved cache space in content delivery networks |
US10348639B2 (en) | 2015-12-18 | 2019-07-09 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Use of virtual endpoints to improve data transmission rates |
US10237286B2 (en) * | 2016-01-29 | 2019-03-19 | Zscaler, Inc. | Content delivery network protection from malware and data leakage |
US10075551B1 (en) | 2016-06-06 | 2018-09-11 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Request management for hierarchical cache |
US10110694B1 (en) | 2016-06-29 | 2018-10-23 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Adaptive transfer rate for retrieving content from a server |
US9992086B1 (en) | 2016-08-23 | 2018-06-05 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | External health checking of virtual private cloud network environments |
US10033691B1 (en) | 2016-08-24 | 2018-07-24 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Adaptive resolution of domain name requests in virtual private cloud network environments |
US10469513B2 (en) | 2016-10-05 | 2019-11-05 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Encrypted network addresses |
US10372499B1 (en) | 2016-12-27 | 2019-08-06 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Efficient region selection system for executing request-driven code |
US10831549B1 (en) | 2016-12-27 | 2020-11-10 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Multi-region request-driven code execution system |
US10938884B1 (en) * | 2017-01-30 | 2021-03-02 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Origin server cloaking using virtual private cloud network environments |
US10503613B1 (en) | 2017-04-21 | 2019-12-10 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Efficient serving of resources during server unavailability |
US10673891B2 (en) | 2017-05-30 | 2020-06-02 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for automatically selecting an access control entity to mitigate attack traffic |
US10757105B2 (en) | 2017-06-12 | 2020-08-25 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | On-demand network security system |
US11075987B1 (en) | 2017-06-12 | 2021-07-27 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Load estimating content delivery network |
US10447648B2 (en) | 2017-06-19 | 2019-10-15 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Assignment of a POP to a DNS resolver based on volume of communications over a link between client devices and the POP |
US10742593B1 (en) | 2017-09-25 | 2020-08-11 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Hybrid content request routing system |
US10439925B2 (en) | 2017-12-21 | 2019-10-08 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Sandbox environment for testing integration between a content provider origin and a content delivery network |
US10592578B1 (en) | 2018-03-07 | 2020-03-17 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Predictive content push-enabled content delivery network |
US11019034B2 (en) | 2018-11-16 | 2021-05-25 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for proxying encrypted traffic to protect origin servers from internet threats |
US10862852B1 (en) | 2018-11-16 | 2020-12-08 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Resolution of domain name requests in heterogeneous network environments |
US11025747B1 (en) | 2018-12-12 | 2021-06-01 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Content request pattern-based routing system |
US11924088B2 (en) * | 2021-09-15 | 2024-03-05 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Packet routing with redundant network devices |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020138437A1 (en) * | 2001-01-08 | 2002-09-26 | Lewin Daniel M. | Extending an internet content delivery network into an enterprise environment by locating ICDN content servers topologically near an enterprise firewall |
US20040193695A1 (en) * | 1999-11-10 | 2004-09-30 | Randy Salo | Secure remote access to enterprise networks |
US7111006B2 (en) * | 2000-04-17 | 2006-09-19 | Circadence Corporation | System and method for providing distributed database services |
US7133905B2 (en) * | 2002-04-09 | 2006-11-07 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for tiered distribution in a content delivery network |
Family Cites Families (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5802320A (en) * | 1995-05-18 | 1998-09-01 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | System for packet filtering of data packets at a computer network interface |
US5918018A (en) * | 1996-02-09 | 1999-06-29 | Secure Computing Corporation | System and method for achieving network separation |
US6173311B1 (en) * | 1997-02-13 | 2001-01-09 | Pointcast, Inc. | Apparatus, method and article of manufacture for servicing client requests on a network |
US6993476B1 (en) * | 1999-08-26 | 2006-01-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for incorporating semantic characteristics into the format-driven syntactic document transcoding framework |
US6952737B1 (en) * | 2000-03-03 | 2005-10-04 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for accessing remote storage in a distributed storage cluster architecture |
US7032031B2 (en) * | 2000-06-23 | 2006-04-18 | Cloudshield Technologies, Inc. | Edge adapter apparatus and method |
US6925495B2 (en) * | 2000-07-13 | 2005-08-02 | Vendaria Media, Inc. | Method and system for delivering and monitoring an on-demand playlist over a network using a template |
EP1410215A4 (en) * | 2000-08-22 | 2006-10-11 | Akamai Tech Inc | Dynamic content assembly on edge-of-network servers in a content delivery network |
US20020035698A1 (en) * | 2000-09-08 | 2002-03-21 | The Regents Of The University Of Michigan | Method and system for protecting publicly accessible network computer services from undesirable network traffic in real-time |
-
2002
- 2002-07-09 US US10/191,309 patent/US7260639B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2003
- 2003-07-09 WO PCT/US2003/021326 patent/WO2004006113A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2003-07-09 CA CA2492158A patent/CA2492158C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2003-07-09 EP EP03763343A patent/EP1535176A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2003-07-09 AU AU2003248856A patent/AU2003248856A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2007
- 2007-08-20 US US11/841,006 patent/US20070283419A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2010
- 2010-06-17 AU AU2010202528A patent/AU2010202528A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20040193695A1 (en) * | 1999-11-10 | 2004-09-30 | Randy Salo | Secure remote access to enterprise networks |
US7111006B2 (en) * | 2000-04-17 | 2006-09-19 | Circadence Corporation | System and method for providing distributed database services |
US20020138437A1 (en) * | 2001-01-08 | 2002-09-26 | Lewin Daniel M. | Extending an internet content delivery network into an enterprise environment by locating ICDN content servers topologically near an enterprise firewall |
US7133905B2 (en) * | 2002-04-09 | 2006-11-07 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for tiered distribution in a content delivery network |
Cited By (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8108507B2 (en) * | 2001-04-02 | 2012-01-31 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Content delivery network service provider (CDNSP)-managed content delivery network (CDN) for network service provider (NSP) |
US20110082785A1 (en) * | 2001-04-02 | 2011-04-07 | Weller Timothy N | Content delivery network service provider (CDNSP)-managed content delivery network (CDN) for network service provider (NSP) |
US20110107410A1 (en) * | 2009-11-02 | 2011-05-05 | At&T Intellectual Property I,L.P. | Methods, systems, and computer program products for controlling server access using an authentication server |
US20110154469A1 (en) * | 2009-12-17 | 2011-06-23 | At&T Intellectual Property Llp | Methods, systems, and computer program products for access control services using source port filtering |
US20110154468A1 (en) * | 2009-12-17 | 2011-06-23 | At&T Intellectual Property I, Lp | Methods, systems, and computer program products for access control services using a transparent firewall in conjunction with an authentication server |
US8590031B2 (en) | 2009-12-17 | 2013-11-19 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Methods, systems, and computer program products for access control services using a transparent firewall in conjunction with an authentication server |
US9667569B1 (en) * | 2010-04-29 | 2017-05-30 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | System and method for adaptive server shielding |
US20120124372A1 (en) * | 2010-10-13 | 2012-05-17 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Protecting Websites and Website Users By Obscuring URLs |
US20130268616A1 (en) * | 2010-11-16 | 2013-10-10 | Edgecast Networks, Inc. | Discrete Mapping for Targeted Caching |
US9037690B2 (en) * | 2010-11-16 | 2015-05-19 | Edgecast Networks, Inc. | Discrete mapping for targeted caching |
US9055076B1 (en) | 2011-06-23 | 2015-06-09 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | System and method for distributed load balancing with load balancer clients for hosts |
US8812727B1 (en) | 2011-06-23 | 2014-08-19 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | System and method for distributed load balancing with distributed direct server return |
US9843630B2 (en) | 2011-06-23 | 2017-12-12 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | System and method for distributed load balancing with load balancer clients for hosts |
US10027712B2 (en) | 2011-06-23 | 2018-07-17 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | System and method for distributed load balancing with distributed direct server return |
US10970644B1 (en) * | 2016-12-07 | 2021-04-06 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Estimating the conditional response time to a request for confidential data |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1535176A1 (en) | 2005-06-01 |
US7260639B2 (en) | 2007-08-21 |
CA2492158A1 (en) | 2004-01-15 |
EP1535176A4 (en) | 2008-05-21 |
AU2003248856A1 (en) | 2004-01-23 |
WO2004006113A1 (en) | 2004-01-15 |
CA2492158C (en) | 2015-01-27 |
US20040010601A1 (en) | 2004-01-15 |
AU2010202528A1 (en) | 2010-07-08 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7260639B2 (en) | Method and system for protecting web sites from public internet threats | |
US7657940B2 (en) | System for SSL re-encryption after load balance | |
US8606898B1 (en) | Spread identity communications architecture | |
Bhosale et al. | The distributed denial of service attacks (DDoS) prevention mechanisms on application layer | |
JP2005502239A (en) | Method and apparatus for client side dynamic load balancing system | |
US11178108B2 (en) | Filtering for network traffic to block denial of service attacks | |
US10594706B2 (en) | Systems and methods for IP source address spoof detection | |
EP1284558B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for protecting electronic commerce sites from distributed denial-of-service attacks | |
US11895149B2 (en) | Selective traffic processing in a distributed cloud computing network | |
Rajendran | DNS amplification & DNS tunneling attacks simulation, detection and mitigation approaches | |
JP2003535560A (en) | Improvement of Agile Network Protocol for Secure Communication with Guaranteed System Availability | |
Al-Qudah et al. | DDoS protection as a service: hiding behind the giants | |
Geneiatakis et al. | A multilayer overlay network architecture for enhancing IP services availability against DoS | |
Ameyed et al. | A slow read attack using cloud | |
CN110581843B (en) | Mimic Web gateway multi-application flow directional distribution method | |
AT&T | 0.8-21shots.eps | |
Mahesh et al. | Research Article A Survey of DDOS Attacks in TCP/IP Stack | |
Parimala et al. | Achieving higher network security by preventing DDoS attack using honeypot | |
Khan | DNS Security | |
Krylov et al. | Limit analysis of the IPFH | |
Wilkinson | Secure Collective Defense (SCOLD) Network C. Edward Chow Yu Cai | |
Chow et al. | Secure Collective Defense (SCOLD) Network | |
Avramopoulos | How to Take Back Your Address Space | |
Sukanya | Attack Pattern Discovery for Autonomous System | |
Stepheny et al. | Refining Anomalistic Malicious Attacks in Sovereign Setup |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |