Publication number | US20070058850 A1 |
Publication type | Application |
Application number | US 11/556,226 |
Publication date | 15 Mar 2007 |
Filing date | 3 Nov 2006 |
Priority date | 10 Dec 2002 |
Also published as | EP1460584A2, EP1460584A3, US7221786, US20040109594 |
Publication number | 11556226, 556226, US 2007/0058850 A1, US 2007/058850 A1, US 20070058850 A1, US 20070058850A1, US 2007058850 A1, US 2007058850A1, US-A1-20070058850, US-A1-2007058850, US2007/0058850A1, US2007/058850A1, US20070058850 A1, US20070058850A1, US2007058850 A1, US2007058850A1 |
Inventors | Hui Luo, David Foos |
Original Assignee | Hui Luo, Foos David H |
Export Citation | BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan |
Patent Citations (8), Referenced by (5), Classifications (14), Legal Events (1) | |
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet | |
This is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 10/315,855 entitled “METHOD FOR AUTOMATIC CONSTRUCTION OF 2D STATISTICAL SHAPE MODEL FOR THE LUNG REGIONS”, and filed on Dec. 10, 2002 in the names of Luo et al., and which is assigned to the assignee of this application.
This invention relates in general to lung shape modeling, and in particular to a method for automatically constructing two-dimension (2D) statistical shape model of the lung regions from sets of chest radiographic images.
The use of shape as an anatomical object property is a rapidly increasing portion of research in the field of medical image analysis. Shape representations and shape models have been used in connection with segmentation of medical images, diagnosis, and motion analysis. Among different types of shape models, Active Shape Models (ASMs) have been frequently applied and proven a powerful tool for characterizing objects and segmenting medical images. In order to construct such models, sets of labeled training images are required. The labels in the training sets consist of landmark points defining the correspondences between similar structures in each image across the set. Manual definition of landmarks on 2D shapes has proven to be both time-consuming and error prone. To reduce the burden, semi-automatic systems have been developed. In these systems, a model is built from the current set of examples, and used to search the next image. The user can edit the result where necessary, then add the example to the training set. Though this can considerably reduce the time and effort required, labeling large sets of examples is still labor intensive.
Because of the importance of landmark labeling, a few attempts have been made to automate the shape alignment/average process. For example, Lorenz and Krahnstover automatically locate candidates for landmarks via a metric for points of high curvature, Lorenz C., Krahnstove N. Generation of point-based 3D statistical shape models for anatomical objects. CVIU, vol 77, no. 2, February 2000, pp. 175-191. Davatzikos et al. used curvature registration on contours produced by an active contour approach, (C. Davatzikos, M. Vaillant, S. M. Resnich, J. L. Prince, S. Letovsky, and R. N. Bryan, A Computerized Approach for Morphological Analysis of the Corpus Callosum, J. Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 20, 1996, pp. 88-97). Duncan et al. (J. Duncan, R. L. Owen, L. H. Staib, and F. Anandan, Measurement of non-rigid motion using contour shape descriptors, in IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1991, pp. 318-324). And Kambhamettu et al, (C. Kambhamettu and D. B. Goldgof, Point correspondence recovery in non-rigid motion, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1992, pp. 545-561), propose methods of correspondence based on the minimization of a cost function that involves the difference in the curvature of two boundaries. However, as pointed out by several studies, curvature is a rigid invariant of shape and its applicability is limited in case of nonlinear shape distortions. In addition, it is hard to find sufficient high curvature points on lung contours.
Hill et al. employed a sparse polygonal approximation to one of two boundaries which is transformed onto the other boundary via an optimization scheme, (A. Hill, C. J. Taylor, and A. D. Brett, A Framework for Automatic Landmark Identification Using a New Method of Nonrigid Correspondence, IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 22, no. 3, 2000, pp. 241-251). The polygonal matching is based on an assumption that arc path-lengths between consecutive points are equal. This assumption may be violated in case of severe shape difference and is especially difficult to satisfy in polygonal approximation of lung shape contours.
As a result, the prior art does not fit the lung shape modeling very well, therefore there exists a need for a method for automatically constructing 2D statistical shape model of lung regions in chest radiographs.
According to the present invention, a method is provided for automatic construction of 2-D statistical shape models for the lung regions in chest radiographic images. The method makes use of a set of shape instances of lung regions from chest images, and automatically aligns them to a pre-defined template shape using the L_{2 }distance and Procrustes distance analysis. Once the training shapes are appropriately aligned, a set of landmarks is automatically generated from each shape. Finally, a 2D statistical model is constructed by Principle Component Analysis. The statistical shape model consists of a mean shape vector to represent the general shape and variation modes in the form of the eigenvectors of the covariance matrix to model the differences between individuals.
The invention has the following advantages.
1. The entire alignment and labeling process is automatic.
2. The time and effort required to label sets of data is dramatically reduced.
3. User bias introduced by manual labeling is avoided.
Preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described below in more detail, with reference to the accompanying drawings:
FIG. (4 a) is a diagrammatic view of turning angle vs. arc-length showing the turning function θ_{Tp}(s) of the template shape.
FIGS. 7(a) and 7(b) are diagrammatic views respectively showing the corresponding landmark points on the template shape and the shape instance.
FIGS. 10(a) and 10(l) show some training shapes of the lung region selected from a database.
The present invention relates in general to the processing of chest radiographic images.
The digital radiographic image is processed according to the present invention by image processing system 1602. System 1602 is preferably a digital computer or digital microprocessor by can include hardware and firmware to carry out the various image processing operations.
The processed digital radiographic image is provided to image output 1604, such as a high resolution electronic display or a printer which produces a hard copy (film) of the processed radiographic image. The original as well as the processed image can be transmitted to a remote location, can be stored in a radiographic image storage system (PACS), etc.
The present invention discloses a method for automatically constructing 2D statistical shape models for lung regions, which is based on the combination of three processing steps as shown in
The most difficult issue in the alignment is the one-to-one correspondence between different shape instances. The present invention provides an efficient method to achieve this goal by first searching a set of landmarks related to the shape features along the shape contour, and then filling the segments between them with a fixed number of equidistant landmarks. The method includes two stages, as shown in
In the present invention, a polygonal shape approximation is computed to simplify the representation of a shape (box 22) and a turning function θ(s) is defined to measure the angle of the counter clockwise tangent from a reference point O on the shape approximation (box 23). The reference point orientation θ(O) is associated with the image coordinates (such as the x-axis). θ(s), as a function of the arc-length s, keeps track of the turning that takes place, increasing with left-hand turns and decreasing with right-hand turns, as shown in FIGS. 4(a) and 4(b). To ensure generality, the perimeter length of each polygon is normalized. Thus for a simple closed contour, θ(s) starts at θ(O) (assuming that the reference point O is placed at differential point along the contour) and increases to θ(1)=θ(O)+2π. The function θ(s) has several properties that make it especially suitable for shape alignment. It is piecewise constant for polygons, making computations particularly easy and fast. According to the definition, the function θ(s) is invariant under translation and scaling to the polygon. Rotation of the polygon corresponds to a simple shift of θ(s) in the θ direction (the vertical direction), while changing the location of the reference point O by an amount t∈[0,1] along the perimeter of polygon corresponds to a horizontal shift of the function θ(s).
In the implementation of coarse shape alignment, the method chooses one shape instance as the template shape T, whose size is close to the mean size of all shape instances. Then two polygonal shape approximations T_{p }and S_{p }are computed from the template shape 31 and a shape instances 32, respectively, as shown in FIGS. 3(a) and 3(b). The degree to which T_{p }and S_{p }are similar can be measured by taking the minimal L_{2 }distance between the turning functions θ_{Tp}(s) and θ_{Sp}(s), as defined by
where t represents the position of the reference point along the polygon, and θ corresponds to the rotation of polygon. Based on the proofs given by Arkin et al. (E. M. Arkin, L. P. Chew, D. P. Huttenlocher, K. Kedem, and J. S. Mitcheel, An efficiently computable Metric for Comparing Polygonal shapes. IEEE Trans. On Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. vol. 13, no. 3, 1991, pp. 209-215), this problem can be solved by
Where θ* is the optimal orientation for any fixed t which is given by
θ*=∫_{0} ^{1}θ_{S} _{ p }(s)ds−∫ _{0} ^{1}θ_{T} _{ p }(s)ds−2πt (3)
By solving the above equations, two matrices are obtained (box 24). One is D_{2 }matrix from Eq. (2) and the other is θ_{c }matrix from Eq. (3). The correct orientation of the shape instance can be found by searching the minimal L_{2 }distance in D_{2 }matrix and the corresponding element in θ_{c }matrix (box 25). As for the other two parameters, the scale is simply determined from the perimeters of two shapes.
s _{c} =P _{Sp} /P _{Tp } (4)
The translation can be calculated from the gravity centers of two shapes
t _{c} =t _{Tp} −t _{Sp } (5)
Once the coarse shape alignment is done (box 26), the shape instance 52 is well aligned with the template shape 51, as shown in
To compute the Procrustes distance, a crucial requirement is to correctly define point correspondence between the template shape and shape instance, which can be easily achieved after the coarse shape alignment. The idea is that, first of all, some landmarks related to the shape features are located along the shape contour. For example, in
Given the template shape vector X_{T }(63) and the shape instance vector X_{S}, (64) as shown respectively in FIGS. 7(a) and 7(b), an appropriate rotation θ_{d}, a scale s_{d }and a translation t_{d}=(t_{dx},t_{dy}) are chosen (box 28) and mapped onto M(X_{S})+t_{d }to minimize the weighted sum (box 29).
W is a diagonal matrix of weights for each landmark. In the present invention, the weights are chosen to give more significance to those landmarks related to anatomical structures.
After the shape alignment, there is a one-to-one correspondence between the vector elements of a given index, which ensures the vector element represents corresponding shape information. By taking the average of the coordinates of the corresponding vertices, a mean shape can be generated for left lung 91 and right lung 92, as shown in
For the 2D lung shape models in the present invention, there are N landmarks on the shape contour. So a 2N*2N covariance matrix S is calculated by using
Where x_{i }is a shape instance,
One particularly useful property of this matrix is that it can demonstrate variation in some directions more than in others. These variations' directions and importance may be derived from an eigen-decomposition of S by solving the equation
S _{p} _{ i } =λ _{i} p _{i } (9)
Solutions to Eq. (9) provide the eigenvector p_{i }and their eigenvalues λ_{i }of S. Conventionally, these eigenvalues are sorted in the decreasing order. It can be shown that the eigenvectors associated with larger eigenvalues correspond to the directions of larger variation in the underlying training data.
Note that any shape in the training set can be approximated using the mean shape and a weighted sum of these deviations obtained from the first t modes.
x˜
Where b=(b_{1},b_{2}, b_{3}, . . . b_{t}) is the vector of weights, which indicates how much variation is exhibited with respect to each of the eigenvectors.
The present invention has been used to generate 2D statistical shape models of lung regions from 65 training contours. FIGS. 10(a)-10(l) show some training shapes of the lung region selected from a database. Each shape contour is created by a user delineating the lung region boarders.
FIGS. 11(a) and 10(b) show the shape variation by varying the first two model parameters. In particular,
In summary, a method for automatically constructing a 2D statistical shape model for lung region in chest radiograph is provided. Given a set of lung region shape instances, the method generated the mean shape of lung region by automatically aligning the training shape instances, selecting landmarks, and finally deriving a statistical model by principle component analysis. This method has been successfully applied to a set of 65 lung region shape data sets. As expected, a large portion of total shape variability is captured with the first few eigenvectors. The present method can also be used to construct the shape models of other anatomical structures, such as bones and organs.
The invention has been described in detail with particular reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof, but it will be understood that variations and modifications can be effected within the spirit and scope of the invention.
Cited Patent | Filing date | Publication date | Applicant | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5435310 * | 23 Jun 1993 | 25 Jul 1995 | University Of Washington | Determining cardiac wall thickness and motion by imaging and three-dimensional modeling |
US5601084 * | 26 May 1995 | 11 Feb 1997 | University Of Washington | Determining cardiac wall thickness and motion by imaging and three-dimensional modeling |
US6249594 * | 29 May 1998 | 19 Jun 2001 | Computerized Medical Systems, Inc. | Autosegmentation/autocontouring system and method |
US6594378 * | 20 Oct 2000 | 15 Jul 2003 | Arch Development Corporation | Method, system and computer readable medium for computerized processing of contralateral and temporal subtraction images using elastic matching |
US6716175 * | 11 Jan 2002 | 6 Apr 2004 | University Of Florida | Autonomous boundary detection system for echocardiographic images |
US6873718 * | 12 Oct 2001 | 29 Mar 2005 | Siemens Corporate Research, Inc. | System and method for 3D statistical shape model for the left ventricle of the heart |
US20030095692 * | 20 Nov 2001 | 22 May 2003 | General Electric Company | Method and system for lung disease detection |
US20050207630 * | 14 Feb 2003 | 22 Sep 2005 | The Regents Of The University Of Michigan Technology Management Office | Lung nodule detection and classification |
Citing Patent | Filing date | Publication date | Applicant | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7747042 | 29 Dec 2005 | 29 Jun 2010 | John Bean Technologies Corporation | Defining and checking conformance of an object shape to shape requirements |
US8995757 * | 10 Jul 2014 | 31 Mar 2015 | Eagle View Technologies, Inc. | Automated roof identification systems and methods |
US9070018 * | 21 Nov 2013 | 30 Jun 2015 | Eagle View Technologies, Inc. | Automated roof identification systems and methods |
US9129376 | 31 Jul 2014 | 8 Sep 2015 | Eagle View Technologies, Inc. | Pitch determination systems and methods for aerial roof estimation |
US20060171581 * | 29 Dec 2005 | 3 Aug 2006 | George Blaine | Defining and checking conformance of an object shape to shape requirements |
U.S. Classification | 382/132, 382/203 |
International Classification | G06K9/00, G06T5/00 |
Cooperative Classification | G06T2207/20081, G06T2207/30061, G06T2207/30012, G06T7/0081, G06T7/0089, G06T2207/10116, G06T2207/20124, G06T2207/20104 |
European Classification | G06T7/00S5, G06T7/00S1 |
Date | Code | Event | Description |
---|---|---|---|
7 Mar 2008 | AS | Assignment | Owner name: CARESTREAM HEALTH, INC.,NEW YORK Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:020741/0126 Effective date: 20070501 Owner name: CARESTREAM HEALTH, INC.,NEW YORK Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:020756/0500 Effective date: 20070501 |