US20060293781A1 - Method of optimizing seasoning recipe for etch process - Google Patents

Method of optimizing seasoning recipe for etch process Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20060293781A1
US20060293781A1 US11/510,987 US51098706A US2006293781A1 US 20060293781 A1 US20060293781 A1 US 20060293781A1 US 51098706 A US51098706 A US 51098706A US 2006293781 A1 US2006293781 A1 US 2006293781A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
recipe
reproducibility
seasoning
critical value
preliminary
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/510,987
Inventor
Hong Cho
Chang-jin Kang
Kyeong-koo Chi
Cheol-kyu Lee
Hye-Jin Jo
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US11/510,987 priority Critical patent/US20060293781A1/en
Publication of US20060293781A1 publication Critical patent/US20060293781A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01LSEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H01L21/00Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/02Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/04Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof the devices having at least one potential-jump barrier or surface barrier, e.g. PN junction, depletion layer or carrier concentration layer
    • H01L21/18Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof the devices having at least one potential-jump barrier or surface barrier, e.g. PN junction, depletion layer or carrier concentration layer the devices having semiconductor bodies comprising elements of Group IV of the Periodic System or AIIIBV compounds with or without impurities, e.g. doping materials
    • H01L21/30Treatment of semiconductor bodies using processes or apparatus not provided for in groups H01L21/20 - H01L21/26
    • H01L21/302Treatment of semiconductor bodies using processes or apparatus not provided for in groups H01L21/20 - H01L21/26 to change their surface-physical characteristics or shape, e.g. etching, polishing, cutting
    • H01L21/306Chemical or electrical treatment, e.g. electrolytic etching
    • H01L21/3065Plasma etching; Reactive-ion etching
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01LSEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H01L21/00Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/67Apparatus specially adapted for handling semiconductor or electric solid state devices during manufacture or treatment thereof; Apparatus specially adapted for handling wafers during manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or electric solid state devices or components ; Apparatus not specifically provided for elsewhere
    • H01L21/67005Apparatus not specifically provided for elsewhere
    • H01L21/67242Apparatus for monitoring, sorting or marking
    • H01L21/67253Process monitoring, e.g. flow or thickness monitoring
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01LSEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H01L21/00Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/02Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/04Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof the devices having at least one potential-jump barrier or surface barrier, e.g. PN junction, depletion layer or carrier concentration layer
    • H01L21/18Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof the devices having at least one potential-jump barrier or surface barrier, e.g. PN junction, depletion layer or carrier concentration layer the devices having semiconductor bodies comprising elements of Group IV of the Periodic System or AIIIBV compounds with or without impurities, e.g. doping materials
    • H01L21/30Treatment of semiconductor bodies using processes or apparatus not provided for in groups H01L21/20 - H01L21/26
    • H01L21/31Treatment of semiconductor bodies using processes or apparatus not provided for in groups H01L21/20 - H01L21/26 to form insulating layers thereon, e.g. for masking or by using photolithographic techniques; After treatment of these layers; Selection of materials for these layers
    • H01L21/3205Deposition of non-insulating-, e.g. conductive- or resistive-, layers on insulating layers; After-treatment of these layers
    • H01L21/321After treatment
    • H01L21/3213Physical or chemical etching of the layers, e.g. to produce a patterned layer from a pre-deposited extensive layer
    • H01L21/32133Physical or chemical etching of the layers, e.g. to produce a patterned layer from a pre-deposited extensive layer by chemical means only
    • H01L21/32135Physical or chemical etching of the layers, e.g. to produce a patterned layer from a pre-deposited extensive layer by chemical means only by vapour etching only
    • H01L21/32136Physical or chemical etching of the layers, e.g. to produce a patterned layer from a pre-deposited extensive layer by chemical means only by vapour etching only using plasmas
    • H01L21/32137Physical or chemical etching of the layers, e.g. to produce a patterned layer from a pre-deposited extensive layer by chemical means only by vapour etching only using plasmas of silicon-containing layers
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01LSEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H01L21/00Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
    • H01L21/67Apparatus specially adapted for handling semiconductor or electric solid state devices during manufacture or treatment thereof; Apparatus specially adapted for handling wafers during manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or electric solid state devices or components ; Apparatus not specifically provided for elsewhere
    • H01L21/67005Apparatus not specifically provided for elsewhere
    • H01L21/67011Apparatus for manufacture or treatment
    • H01L21/67017Apparatus for fluid treatment
    • H01L21/67063Apparatus for fluid treatment for etching
    • H01L21/67069Apparatus for fluid treatment for etching for drying etching
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01LSEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H01L22/00Testing or measuring during manufacture or treatment; Reliability measurements, i.e. testing of parts without further processing to modify the parts as such; Structural arrangements therefor
    • H01L22/20Sequence of activities consisting of a plurality of measurements, corrections, marking or sorting steps

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a dry etching method for fabricating a semiconductor device, and more particularly, to a method of optimizing a seasoning recipe for a dry etch process.
  • a “seasoning process” is performed to prevent these problems by using a test wafer before a main etch process.
  • seasoning process means a process of etching a test wafer before performing a main etch process in the same chamber.
  • a recipe for a seasoning process is the same as that of a main etch process. However, immediately after finishing the seasoning process, the ambient atmosphere in the chamber may still not be stabilized, which results in an unsteady etch rate in the main etch process.
  • FIG. 1 is a graph showing experimental results obtained using a conventional dry etch process.
  • a seasoning process was performed using a test wafer with an oxide layer in a dry etch chamber.
  • a main etch process was performed in the same chamber using a run wafer having a polysilicon layer and a tungsten silicide layer sequentially stacked on the wafer.
  • the run wafer included a hard mask pattern formed on the tungsten silicide layer.
  • the tungsten silicide layer was etched using the hard mask pattern by supplying Cl 2 and SF 6 .
  • An end-point detection time was determined as the time when the tungsten silicide layer was completely etched, as measured using an optical emission spectroscopy.
  • the polysilicon layer was etched by supplying HBr and O 2 .
  • a seasoning process (which was performed before the main etch process)
  • a test wafer with an oxide layer was etched by supplying the same etch gases, under the same conditions and with the same sequences, as in the main etch process.
  • case 2 the same main etch process was used as in case 1 . However, in the seasoning process of case 2 , a test wafer having a polysilicon layer was etched. Further, the main etch recipe used in case 2 was identical with that of case 1 . In case 1 and case 2 , each of the main etches were repeatedly performed on multiple wafers of at least one lot.
  • an end-point detection time in the first main etch process was determined to be greater than the end-point detection times of subsequently processed wafers. As subsequent wafers were processed through the main etch process, the end-point detection time gradually decreased and stabilized. Furthermore, in case 2 , after performing a seasoning process with respect to the test wafer with the polysilicon layer, an end-point detection time of a first main etch process was determined to be less than the end-point detection times of subsequently processed wafers. As subsequent wafers were processed through the main etch process, the end-point detection time gradually increased and stabilized. Thus, as is apparent from FIG. 1 , although a seasoning process was performed in the conventional dry etch process with respect to a test wafer by using the same etch recipe with that of the main etch process, the conventional method did not provide a constant etch rate for the main etch process.
  • the present invention is directed to methods for providing a reproducible dry etch process by optimizing a seasoning recipe.
  • a method for determining an optimized seasoning recipe for a dry etch process. The method comprises (a) selecting a critical value of reproducibility; (b) selecting a main etch recipe; (c) selecting a preliminary seasoning recipe; (d) etching a test wafer using the preliminary seasoning recipe in a dry etch chamber; (e) performing a main etch process for a plurality of run wafers in the dry etch chamber using the main etch recipe, and determining an end-point detection time of each run wafer; (f) determining an initial dispersion and a standard deviation using the determined end-point detection times; (g) comparing the initial dispersion to the critical value of reproducibility; and (h) selecting the preliminary seasoning recipe as a seasoning recipe for the etch process, if the initial dispersion is less than or equal to the critical value of reproducibility.
  • the method comprises (a) selecting a critical value
  • the critical value of reproducibility is set to be proportional to the standard deviation.
  • the critical value of reproducibility is 1 to 6 time(s) of the standard deviation.
  • the initial dispersion is an absolute value of difference between an end-point detection time of a first run wafer and a third run wafer.
  • the standard deviation is calculated by using end-point detection times of a fourth run wafer through at least a tenth run wafer.
  • the test wafer may include an oxide layer or a polysilicon layer formed on a substrate.
  • the run wafer may include a polysilicon layer and a tungsten silicide layer which are sequentially stacked on a substrate.
  • the end-point detection time is determined when the tungsten silicide layer is substantially or completely etched.
  • the main etch recipe and the preliminary seasoning recipe use the same etch gas.
  • the same etch gas may be a mixed gas of HBr and O 2 . Flow rates of the HBr and O 2 may be changed when resetting a preliminary seasoning recipe.
  • a method for optimizing a seasoning recipe for a dry etch process comprises the steps of (a) selecting a preliminary seasoning recipe; (b) etching one or more test wafers using the preliminary seasoning recipe in a dry etch chamber and then performing a main etch process for a plurality of run wafers in the dry etch chamber using a main etch recipe to determine an end-point detection time of each run wafer; and (c) processing the end-point detection times of the run wafers to determine one or more optimization parameters; and (d) evaluating the optimization parameters to determine whether to (i) use the preliminary seasoning recipe as a seasoning recipe for the dry etch process or to (ii) modify the preliminary seasoning recipe and repeat steps (b)-(d) using the modified seasoning recipe.
  • FIG. 1 is a graph showing experimental results obtained by performing a conventional dry etch process.
  • FIG. 2 is a flow chart showing a method of optimizing a seasoning recipe according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a graph showing experimental results obtained using a dry etch method with an optimal seasoning recipe, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for optimizing a seasoning recipe for a dry etch process according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • a critical value of reproducibility A is set (step 1 ).
  • the critical value of reproducibility A is proportional to a standard deviation of measured end-point detection times (as explained below), and preferably corresponds to about 1 to 6 times the standard deviation.
  • a main etch recipe is set (step 2 ).
  • the main etch recipe means etch conditions such as kinds of etch gases, flow rates of etch gases, process pressure, process temperature and an etch sequence, which are used in the main etch process.
  • a preliminary seasoning recipe is set (step 3 ).
  • the preliminary seasoning recipe can be modified on the basis of the main etch recipe.
  • a preliminary seasoning process is then performed in a dry etch chamber using the preliminary seasoning recipe to etch about 1 to 2 test wafers (step 4 ).
  • a preliminary main etch process is then performed to etch run wafers in the dry etch chamber using the main etch recipe (step 5 ).
  • the preliminary main etch process is repeatedly performed for at least ten run wafers, and an end-point detection time is determined for each run wafer.
  • an initial dispersion B and a standard deviation are determined based on the measured end-point detection times (step 6 ).
  • the initial dispersion B is preferably determined as an absolute value of the difference between the measured end-point detection time of the first run wafer and that of the third run wafer.
  • the standard deviation is preferably determined using the measured end-point detection times for the fourth through tenth run wafers. The critical value of reproducibility A is then determined based on the computed standard deviation.
  • the initial dispersion B is then compared to the critical value of reproducibility A (step 7 ). If the initial dispersion B is less than or equal to the critical value of reproducibility A (affirmative determination in step 7 ), the preliminary seasoning recipe (set in step 3 ) will be used as the seasoning recipe for the etch process (step 8 ). On the other hand, if the initial dispersion B is greater than the critical value of reproducibility A (negative determination in step 7 ), then the process flow returns to step 3 to reset/modify the preliminary seasoning recipe. The process (steps 4 - 7 ) is repeated using the new preliminary seasoning recipe. The process (step 3 - 7 ) will be repeated until the initial dispersion B is determined to be less than or equal to the critical value of reproducibility A.
  • FIG. 3 A method of obtaining a seasoning recipe in a dry etch process for forming a gate electrode according to an exemplary embodiment of the invention will now be explained with reference to the flow diagram of FIG. 2 . Experimental results obtained based on such exemplary embodiment are shown in FIG. 3 .
  • a critical value of reproducibility A is selected to be four times (4 ⁇ ) the standard deviation (step 1 ).
  • a main etch recipe is preferably set (step 2 ) as follows.
  • a pad oxide layer, a polysilicon layer, and a tungsten silicide layer are sequentially stacked on a run wafer, and a hard mask pattern is formed on the tungsten silicide layer on the run wafer.
  • the run wafer is then loaded into a dry etch chamber. In the dry etch chamber, the tungsten silicide layer is etched using the hard mask pattern by supplying Cl 2 at about 100 sccm and SF 6 at about 5 sccm at about 3 mTorr and at about 50° C.
  • the Cl 2 and SF 6 gases are exhausted.
  • completion of the etch process of the tungsten silicide is determined by using an optical emission spectroscopy (OES).
  • OES optical emission spectroscopy
  • the polysilicon layer is then etched by supplying HBr at about 60 sccm and O2 at about 3 sccm at about 20 mTorr and at about 50° C. in the dry etch chamber for a predetermined amount of time. After the predetermined amount of time, the HBr and O 2 gases are exhausted, and the run wafer is unloaded.
  • the main etch process can be repeatedly performed with respect to one lot of like run wafers.
  • a preliminary seasoning recipe is initially selected (step 3 ) to be identical to the main etch recipe.
  • a test wafer is loaded in the dry etch chamber and the test wafer is etched using the preliminary seasoning recipe (step 4 ).
  • the test wafer comprises a polysilicon layer is stacked on a semiconductor substrate. After finishing the preliminary seasoning process, the test wafer is unloaded.
  • a run wafer is then loaded into the dry etch chamber to perform a preliminary main etch process (as described above).
  • the run wafer is identical to the wafer that is to be treated in the actual main etch process, and includes a polysilicon layer and a tungsten silicide which are sequentially stacked.
  • the polysilicon layer is etched for a predetermined amount of time.
  • the preliminary main etch process is performed repeatedly with respect to 15 run wafers, and end-point detection times were measured.
  • FIG. 3 illustrate measured end-point detection times for Experiments 1 and 2 that were obtained by simulating the above exemplary process.
  • an initial dispersion and a standard deviation were determined (step 6 ) using the end-point detection time data of experiment 1 in FIG. 3 .
  • the initial dispersion B (the absolute value of difference between the first datum and the third datum) was determined to be 1.4.
  • the standard deviation using the fourth through fifteenth data was determined to be 0.182.
  • the critical value of reproducibility A was about 0.726.
  • the initial dispersion B (1.4) is greater than the critical value of reproducibility A (0.726)
  • a new preliminary seasoning recipe is set (return to step 3 ).
  • the seasoning recipe is modified by setting the flow rate of oxygen to be twice that of the seasoning recipe for Experiment 1.
  • the new (reset) preliminary seasoning recipe is the same as the original preliminary seasoning recipe, except that the flow rate of oxygen is 6 sccm instead of 3 sccm.
  • the preliminary seasoning process (step 4 ) is repeated in the same dry etch chamber using the reset preliminary seasoning recipe.
  • the preliminary main etch process (step 5 ) is repeatedly performed for about 15 similar run wafers using the main etch recipe, and the end-point detection times are determined for the run wafers, which are shown in FIG. 3 for Experiment 2.
  • the initial dispersion B and a standard deviation were determined to be about 0.3 and about 0.083, respectively.
  • the critical value of reproducibility was determined to be about 0.334, which is 4 ⁇ the standard deviation, 0.083.
  • the initial dispersion (0.3) is less than the critical value of reproducibility A (0.334). Since the initial dispersion is in a tolerance limit (step 7 ), the preliminary seasoning recipe of the Experiment 2 can be used as the actual seasoning recipe (step 8 ).
  • a seasoning recipe is optimized to embody a reproducible dry etch process.
  • the present invention may be implemented using any suitable automated etching system (as is known in the art), which operates under the control of a computer-based system comprising various forms of hardware, software, firmware, special purpose processors, or any combination thereof.
  • the method steps described herein may be implemented in software as an application comprising program instructions that are tangibly embodied on one or more program storage devices (e.g., hard disk, magnetic floppy disk, RAM, CD ROM, ROM and Flash memory), wherein such instructions are executable by any device or machine comprising suitable architecture to perform the method steps.

Abstract

A method for optimizing a seasoning recipe for a dry etch process. The method includes setting a critical value of reproducibility, a main etch recipe, and a preliminary seasoning recipe. A test wafer is then etched using the preliminary seasoning recipe in a dry etch chamber. Next, a main etch process is performed with respect to at least 10 run wafers in the dry etch chamber using the main etch recipe and an end-point detection time for each wafer is determined. An initial dispersion and a standard deviation are then determined using the determined end-point detection times. The critical value of reproducibility is then compared to the initial dispersion. If the initial dispersion is equal to or less than the critical value of reproducibility, the preliminary seasoning recipe is used as the seasoning recipe, otherwise the preliminary seasoning recipe is modified and the process is repeated until an optimal seasoning recipe is determined.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/652,403 filed on Aug. 29, 2003, which claims priority to Korean Application No. 2002-57194, filed on Sep. 19, 2002, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
  • TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to a dry etching method for fabricating a semiconductor device, and more particularly, to a method of optimizing a seasoning recipe for a dry etch process.
  • BACKGROUND
  • As semiconductor devices become more highly integrated, the design rules are reduced. Thus, in a dry etch process, it is important to have a high etch selectivity and a high anisotropy to properly etch a wafer. Also, it is important to be able to reproduce the same etch for each wafer that passes through the dry etch process.
  • In a dry etch process, the initial set of wafers that are processed can be spoiled when the dry etch processing chamber is not stabilized. In other words, if the ambient atmosphere within the chamber has not reached steady state, an unsteady etch rate can result. This problem also occurs after a series of wafers have been processed or the dry etch process remains idle for a period of time between etch processes. Thus, a “seasoning process” is performed to prevent these problems by using a test wafer before a main etch process. Here, “seasoning process” means a process of etching a test wafer before performing a main etch process in the same chamber. In a conventional method, a recipe for a seasoning process is the same as that of a main etch process. However, immediately after finishing the seasoning process, the ambient atmosphere in the chamber may still not be stabilized, which results in an unsteady etch rate in the main etch process.
  • FIG. 1 is a graph showing experimental results obtained using a conventional dry etch process. In FIG. 1, the results of two test cases are shown. In case 1, a seasoning process was performed using a test wafer with an oxide layer in a dry etch chamber. Then, a main etch process was performed in the same chamber using a run wafer having a polysilicon layer and a tungsten silicide layer sequentially stacked on the wafer. Further, the run wafer included a hard mask pattern formed on the tungsten silicide layer. In the main etch process, the tungsten silicide layer was etched using the hard mask pattern by supplying Cl2 and SF6. An end-point detection time was determined as the time when the tungsten silicide layer was completely etched, as measured using an optical emission spectroscopy. Next, the polysilicon layer was etched by supplying HBr and O2. In a seasoning process (which was performed before the main etch process), a test wafer with an oxide layer was etched by supplying the same etch gases, under the same conditions and with the same sequences, as in the main etch process.
  • In case 2, the same main etch process was used as in case 1. However, in the seasoning process of case 2, a test wafer having a polysilicon layer was etched. Further, the main etch recipe used in case 2 was identical with that of case 1. In case 1 and case 2, each of the main etches were repeatedly performed on multiple wafers of at least one lot.
  • As illustrated in FIG. 1, with case 1, after the seasoning process was performed with respect to the test wafer with the oxide layer, an end-point detection time in the first main etch process was determined to be greater than the end-point detection times of subsequently processed wafers. As subsequent wafers were processed through the main etch process, the end-point detection time gradually decreased and stabilized. Furthermore, in case 2, after performing a seasoning process with respect to the test wafer with the polysilicon layer, an end-point detection time of a first main etch process was determined to be less than the end-point detection times of subsequently processed wafers. As subsequent wafers were processed through the main etch process, the end-point detection time gradually increased and stabilized. Thus, as is apparent from FIG. 1, although a seasoning process was performed in the conventional dry etch process with respect to a test wafer by using the same etch recipe with that of the main etch process, the conventional method did not provide a constant etch rate for the main etch process.
  • Therefore, a need exists for a reproducible dry etch process that reduces the number of wafers that are spoiled during the start-up of a dry etch process.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention is directed to methods for providing a reproducible dry etch process by optimizing a seasoning recipe. According to one embodiment of the present invention, a method is provided for determining an optimized seasoning recipe for a dry etch process. The method comprises (a) selecting a critical value of reproducibility; (b) selecting a main etch recipe; (c) selecting a preliminary seasoning recipe; (d) etching a test wafer using the preliminary seasoning recipe in a dry etch chamber; (e) performing a main etch process for a plurality of run wafers in the dry etch chamber using the main etch recipe, and determining an end-point detection time of each run wafer; (f) determining an initial dispersion and a standard deviation using the determined end-point detection times; (g) comparing the initial dispersion to the critical value of reproducibility; and (h) selecting the preliminary seasoning recipe as a seasoning recipe for the etch process, if the initial dispersion is less than or equal to the critical value of reproducibility. In addition, the method comprises changing the preliminary seasoning recipe and repeating steps (c)-(h), if the initial dispersion is greater than the critical value of reproducibility.
  • According to another embodiment of the present invention, the critical value of reproducibility is set to be proportional to the standard deviation. The critical value of reproducibility is 1 to 6 time(s) of the standard deviation. The initial dispersion is an absolute value of difference between an end-point detection time of a first run wafer and a third run wafer. The standard deviation is calculated by using end-point detection times of a fourth run wafer through at least a tenth run wafer.
  • According to another embodiment of the present invention, the test wafer may include an oxide layer or a polysilicon layer formed on a substrate. The run wafer may include a polysilicon layer and a tungsten silicide layer which are sequentially stacked on a substrate. The end-point detection time is determined when the tungsten silicide layer is substantially or completely etched. The main etch recipe and the preliminary seasoning recipe use the same etch gas. In addition, the same etch gas may be a mixed gas of HBr and O2. Flow rates of the HBr and O2 may be changed when resetting a preliminary seasoning recipe. In yet another embodiment of the invention, a method for optimizing a seasoning recipe for a dry etch process comprises the steps of (a) selecting a preliminary seasoning recipe; (b) etching one or more test wafers using the preliminary seasoning recipe in a dry etch chamber and then performing a main etch process for a plurality of run wafers in the dry etch chamber using a main etch recipe to determine an end-point detection time of each run wafer; and (c) processing the end-point detection times of the run wafers to determine one or more optimization parameters; and (d) evaluating the optimization parameters to determine whether to (i) use the preliminary seasoning recipe as a seasoning recipe for the dry etch process or to (ii) modify the preliminary seasoning recipe and repeat steps (b)-(d) using the modified seasoning recipe.
  • These and other embodiments, features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will be described and become apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a graph showing experimental results obtained by performing a conventional dry etch process.
  • FIG. 2 is a flow chart showing a method of optimizing a seasoning recipe according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a graph showing experimental results obtained using a dry etch method with an optimal seasoning recipe, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • The present invention will now be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which preferred embodiments of the invention are shown. The invention may be embodied in many different forms and nothing herein should be construed as any limitation to the scope of the invention. The embodiments described herein are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art.
  • FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for optimizing a seasoning recipe for a dry etch process according to an embodiment of the present invention. Initially, a critical value of reproducibility A is set (step 1). Preferably, the critical value of reproducibility A is proportional to a standard deviation of measured end-point detection times (as explained below), and preferably corresponds to about 1 to 6 times the standard deviation. Next, a main etch recipe is set (step 2). The main etch recipe means etch conditions such as kinds of etch gases, flow rates of etch gases, process pressure, process temperature and an etch sequence, which are used in the main etch process.
  • Next, a preliminary seasoning recipe is set (step 3). The preliminary seasoning recipe can be modified on the basis of the main etch recipe. A preliminary seasoning process is then performed in a dry etch chamber using the preliminary seasoning recipe to etch about 1 to 2 test wafers (step 4).
  • A preliminary main etch process is then performed to etch run wafers in the dry etch chamber using the main etch recipe (step 5). Preferably, the preliminary main etch process is repeatedly performed for at least ten run wafers, and an end-point detection time is determined for each run wafer.
  • Then, an initial dispersion B and a standard deviation are determined based on the measured end-point detection times (step 6). In one embodiment, the initial dispersion B is preferably determined as an absolute value of the difference between the measured end-point detection time of the first run wafer and that of the third run wafer. Moreover, the standard deviation is preferably determined using the measured end-point detection times for the fourth through tenth run wafers. The critical value of reproducibility A is then determined based on the computed standard deviation.
  • The initial dispersion B is then compared to the critical value of reproducibility A (step 7). If the initial dispersion B is less than or equal to the critical value of reproducibility A (affirmative determination in step 7), the preliminary seasoning recipe (set in step 3) will be used as the seasoning recipe for the etch process (step 8). On the other hand, if the initial dispersion B is greater than the critical value of reproducibility A (negative determination in step 7), then the process flow returns to step 3 to reset/modify the preliminary seasoning recipe. The process (steps 4-7) is repeated using the new preliminary seasoning recipe. The process (step 3-7) will be repeated until the initial dispersion B is determined to be less than or equal to the critical value of reproducibility A.
  • A method of obtaining a seasoning recipe in a dry etch process for forming a gate electrode according to an exemplary embodiment of the invention will now be explained with reference to the flow diagram of FIG. 2. Experimental results obtained based on such exemplary embodiment are shown in FIG. 3.
  • In this exemplary embodiment, a critical value of reproducibility A is selected to be four times (4×) the standard deviation (step 1). Next, a main etch recipe is preferably set (step 2) as follows. A pad oxide layer, a polysilicon layer, and a tungsten silicide layer are sequentially stacked on a run wafer, and a hard mask pattern is formed on the tungsten silicide layer on the run wafer. The run wafer is then loaded into a dry etch chamber. In the dry etch chamber, the tungsten silicide layer is etched using the hard mask pattern by supplying Cl2 at about 100 sccm and SF6 at about 5 sccm at about 3 mTorr and at about 50° C. After etching the tungsten silicide layer, the Cl2 and SF6 gases are exhausted. Preferably, completion of the etch process of the tungsten silicide is determined by using an optical emission spectroscopy (OES). The polysilicon layer is then etched by supplying HBr at about 60 sccm and O2 at about 3 sccm at about 20 mTorr and at about 50° C. in the dry etch chamber for a predetermined amount of time. After the predetermined amount of time, the HBr and O2 gases are exhausted, and the run wafer is unloaded. The main etch process can be repeatedly performed with respect to one lot of like run wafers.
  • In this exemplary embodiment, a preliminary seasoning recipe is initially selected (step 3) to be identical to the main etch recipe. A test wafer is loaded in the dry etch chamber and the test wafer is etched using the preliminary seasoning recipe (step 4). The test wafer comprises a polysilicon layer is stacked on a semiconductor substrate. After finishing the preliminary seasoning process, the test wafer is unloaded.
  • A run wafer is then loaded into the dry etch chamber to perform a preliminary main etch process (as described above). The run wafer is identical to the wafer that is to be treated in the actual main etch process, and includes a polysilicon layer and a tungsten silicide which are sequentially stacked. The polysilicon layer is etched for a predetermined amount of time. The preliminary main etch process is performed repeatedly with respect to 15 run wafers, and end-point detection times were measured.
  • FIG. 3 illustrate measured end-point detection times for Experiments 1 and 2 that were obtained by simulating the above exemplary process. For Experiment 1, an initial dispersion and a standard deviation were determined (step 6) using the end-point detection time data of experiment 1 in FIG. 3. Based on such data, the initial dispersion B (the absolute value of difference between the first datum and the third datum) was determined to be 1.4. Moreover, the standard deviation (using the fourth through fifteenth data) was determined to be 0.182. By multiplying the calculated standard deviation by 4, the critical value of reproducibility A was about 0.726. In this instance, since the initial dispersion B (1.4) is greater than the critical value of reproducibility A (0.726), a new preliminary seasoning recipe is set (return to step 3).
  • Continuing with the exemplary embodiment, the seasoning recipe is modified by setting the flow rate of oxygen to be twice that of the seasoning recipe for Experiment 1. In other words, the new (reset) preliminary seasoning recipe is the same as the original preliminary seasoning recipe, except that the flow rate of oxygen is 6 sccm instead of 3 sccm.
  • The preliminary seasoning process (step 4) is repeated in the same dry etch chamber using the reset preliminary seasoning recipe. The preliminary main etch process (step 5) is repeatedly performed for about 15 similar run wafers using the main etch recipe, and the end-point detection times are determined for the run wafers, which are shown in FIG. 3 for Experiment 2.
  • Using the data of Experiment 2, the initial dispersion B and a standard deviation were determined to be about 0.3 and about 0.083, respectively. The critical value of reproducibility was determined to be about 0.334, which is 4× the standard deviation, 0.083. With Experiment 2, the initial dispersion (0.3) is less than the critical value of reproducibility A (0.334). Since the initial dispersion is in a tolerance limit (step 7), the preliminary seasoning recipe of the Experiment 2 can be used as the actual seasoning recipe (step 8).
  • Thus, according to the present invention, a seasoning recipe is optimized to embody a reproducible dry etch process.
  • It is to be understood that the present invention may be implemented using any suitable automated etching system (as is known in the art), which operates under the control of a computer-based system comprising various forms of hardware, software, firmware, special purpose processors, or any combination thereof. The method steps described herein (FIG. 2) may be implemented in software as an application comprising program instructions that are tangibly embodied on one or more program storage devices (e.g., hard disk, magnetic floppy disk, RAM, CD ROM, ROM and Flash memory), wherein such instructions are executable by any device or machine comprising suitable architecture to perform the method steps.
  • While the present invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the following claims.

Claims (7)

1. A program storage device readable by machine, tangibly embodying a program of instructions executable by the machine to perform method steps for optimizing a seasoning recipe for an etching process, the method steps comprising:
(a) selecting a critical value of reproducibility;
(b) selecting a main etch recipe;
(c) selecting a preliminary seasoning recipe;
(d) etching a test wafer using the preliminary seasoning recipe in a dry etch chamber;
(e) performing a main etch process for a plurality of run wafers in the dry etch chamber using the main etch recipe, and determining an end-point detection time of each run wafer;
(f) determining an initial dispersion and a standard deviation using the determined end-point detection times;
(g) comparing the initial dispersion to the critical value of reproducibility; and
(h) selecting the preliminary seasoning recipe as a seasoning recipe for the etch process, if the initial dispersion is less than or equal to the critical value of reproducibility.
2. The program storage device of claim 1, further comprising instructions for changing the preliminary seasoning recipe and repeating steps (c)-(h), if the initial dispersion is greater than the critical value of reproducibility.
3. The program storage device of claim 1, wherein the critical value of reproducibility is proportional to the standard deviation.
4. The program storage device of claim 1, wherein the critical value of reproducibility is about 1 to 6 time(s) the standard deviation.
5. The program storage device of claim 1, wherein the initial dispersion is determined as an absolute value of the difference between the end-point detection time of a first run wafer and the end-point detection time of a third run wafer.
6. The program storage device of claim 5, wherein the standard deviation is determined using the end-point detection times of a fourth run wafer through at least a tenth run wafer.
7. The program storage device of claim 1, wherein the main etch recipe and the preliminary seasoning recipe are selected to use the same etch gas.
US11/510,987 2002-09-19 2006-08-28 Method of optimizing seasoning recipe for etch process Abandoned US20060293781A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/510,987 US20060293781A1 (en) 2002-09-19 2006-08-28 Method of optimizing seasoning recipe for etch process

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR2002-57194 2002-09-19
KR10-2002-0057194A KR100476931B1 (en) 2002-09-19 2002-09-19 Method of optimizing seasoning recipe
US10/652,403 US7118926B2 (en) 2002-09-19 2003-08-29 Method of optimizing seasoning recipe for etch process
US11/510,987 US20060293781A1 (en) 2002-09-19 2006-08-28 Method of optimizing seasoning recipe for etch process

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/652,403 Division US7118926B2 (en) 2002-09-19 2003-08-29 Method of optimizing seasoning recipe for etch process

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20060293781A1 true US20060293781A1 (en) 2006-12-28

Family

ID=31987485

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/652,403 Expired - Fee Related US7118926B2 (en) 2002-09-19 2003-08-29 Method of optimizing seasoning recipe for etch process
US11/510,987 Abandoned US20060293781A1 (en) 2002-09-19 2006-08-28 Method of optimizing seasoning recipe for etch process

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/652,403 Expired - Fee Related US7118926B2 (en) 2002-09-19 2003-08-29 Method of optimizing seasoning recipe for etch process

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (2) US7118926B2 (en)
KR (1) KR100476931B1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080157234A1 (en) * 2006-12-27 2008-07-03 Ji Ho Hong Semiconductor device and method of manufacturing the same
CN103199040A (en) * 2013-03-14 2013-07-10 上海华力微电子有限公司 Seasoning control method

Families Citing this family (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
TWI256083B (en) * 2004-06-02 2006-06-01 Lam Res Co Ltd Seasoning method for etch chamber
KR100699841B1 (en) * 2005-05-04 2007-03-27 삼성전자주식회사 Method for seasoning Chamber used in semiconductor process
CN101213640B (en) * 2006-02-07 2010-08-04 东京毅力科创株式会社 Apparatus for controlling substrate processing apparatus and method for controlling substrate processing apparatus
JP5128080B2 (en) * 2006-03-29 2013-01-23 東京エレクトロン株式会社 Control device for substrate processing apparatus and control method thereof
KR100842481B1 (en) * 2006-11-15 2008-07-01 동부일렉트로닉스 주식회사 Method of seasoning recipe
KR100859640B1 (en) * 2006-12-26 2008-09-23 동부일렉트로닉스 주식회사 method of production test wafer for seasoning in semi-conductor
JP2010003807A (en) * 2008-06-19 2010-01-07 Toshiba Corp Method of manufacturing semiconductor apparatus
US8355810B2 (en) * 2009-01-29 2013-01-15 Applied Materials, Inc. Method and system for estimating context offsets for run-to-run control in a semiconductor fabrication facility
KR101794069B1 (en) * 2010-05-26 2017-12-04 삼성전자주식회사 equipment for manufacturing semiconductor device and seasoning process optimization method of the same
CN102593041B (en) * 2011-01-07 2015-07-15 上海华虹宏力半导体制造有限公司 Etching method
DE112016007041B4 (en) * 2016-07-04 2022-09-29 Mitsubishi Electric Corporation MANUFACTURING PROCESS FOR A SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5767018A (en) * 1995-11-08 1998-06-16 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Method of etching a polysilicon pattern
JP3568749B2 (en) * 1996-12-17 2004-09-22 株式会社デンソー Dry etching method for semiconductor
US6046796A (en) * 1998-04-22 2000-04-04 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Methodology for improved semiconductor process monitoring using optical emission spectroscopy
US5964980A (en) * 1998-06-23 1999-10-12 Vlsi Technology, Inc. Fitted endpoint system
KR20010005085A (en) * 1999-06-30 2001-01-15 김영환 A method for fabricating semiconductor device
KR100319894B1 (en) * 1999-07-13 2002-01-10 윤종용 Etching method of material fim formed on semiconductor wafer using surface wave coupled plasma etching apparatus
US6399507B1 (en) * 1999-09-22 2002-06-04 Applied Materials, Inc. Stable plasma process for etching of films
US6274500B1 (en) * 1999-10-12 2001-08-14 Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd. Single wafer in-situ dry clean and seasoning for plasma etching process
WO2003081216A2 (en) * 2002-03-20 2003-10-02 Tokyo Electron Limited Process monitoring using infrared optical diagnostics
US7505879B2 (en) * 2002-06-05 2009-03-17 Tokyo Electron Limited Method for generating multivariate analysis model expression for processing apparatus, method for executing multivariate analysis of processing apparatus, control device of processing apparatus and control system for processing apparatus
US7147747B2 (en) * 2003-03-04 2006-12-12 Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation Plasma processing apparatus and plasma processing method

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080157234A1 (en) * 2006-12-27 2008-07-03 Ji Ho Hong Semiconductor device and method of manufacturing the same
CN103199040A (en) * 2013-03-14 2013-07-10 上海华力微电子有限公司 Seasoning control method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20040058459A1 (en) 2004-03-25
US7118926B2 (en) 2006-10-10
KR20040025288A (en) 2004-03-24
KR100476931B1 (en) 2005-03-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20060293781A1 (en) Method of optimizing seasoning recipe for etch process
US7456110B2 (en) Method and apparatus for controlling etch selectivity
JP2666768B2 (en) Dry etching method and apparatus
JP4579611B2 (en) Dry etching method
US4613400A (en) In-situ photoresist capping process for plasma etching
US6849556B2 (en) Etching method, gate etching method, and method of manufacturing semiconductor devices
US5968374A (en) Methods and apparatus for controlled partial ashing in a variable-gap plasma processing chamber
US6461878B1 (en) Feedback control of strip time to reduce post strip critical dimension variation in a transistor gate electrode
US7064085B2 (en) Feed forward spacer width control in semiconductor manufacturing
US5338395A (en) Method for enhancing etch uniformity useful in etching submicron nitride features
US5908791A (en) Method of forming a polycide gate of a semiconductor device
US8492174B2 (en) Etch tool process indicator method and apparatus
US6372151B1 (en) Storage poly process without carbon contamination
Lercel et al. Etching processes and characteristics for the fabrication of refractory x-ray masks
KR100842481B1 (en) Method of seasoning recipe
US7029593B2 (en) Method for controlling CD during an etch process
JPH10177997A (en) Instant etching process of barc and nitride
TWI431685B (en) Plasma processing device and plasma processing method
KR20010005085A (en) A method for fabricating semiconductor device
KR20050072316A (en) Method of forming gate pattern in semiconductor device
JP2002025977A (en) Dry-etching method
Sin et al. Sub-0.1/spl mu/m MOSFET fabrication using 248 nm lithography by resist trimming technique in high density plasmas
Schulte Development of an Anisotropic, Highly Selective Tungsten Suicide Dry Etch Process
KR20050064209A (en) Method for forming a semiconductor device and method for etching a processed object using the same
JP2001217250A (en) Method for manufacturing semiconductor device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION