Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20060028479 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 11/176,482
Publication date9 Feb 2006
Filing date7 Jul 2005
Priority date8 Jul 2004
Also published asUS8042094, US20060010454, US20120050300, US20120050301, WO2006014480A2, WO2006014480A3, WO2006017198A2, WO2006017198A3, WO2006017198A9
Publication number11176482, 176482, US 2006/0028479 A1, US 2006/028479 A1, US 20060028479 A1, US 20060028479A1, US 2006028479 A1, US 2006028479A1, US-A1-20060028479, US-A1-2006028479, US2006/0028479A1, US2006/028479A1, US20060028479 A1, US20060028479A1, US2006028479 A1, US2006028479A1
InventorsWon-Suk Chun, Joshua Napoli, Thomas Purtell
Original AssigneeWon-Suk Chun, Joshua Napoli, Purtell Thomas J Ii
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Architecture for rendering graphics on output devices over diverse connections
US 20060028479 A1
Abstract
A system for displaying graphical information. The system includes an asset server for storing information and a rendering server in communication with the asset server. The rendering server receives a graphics command and renders graphic display data in response to the graphics command and to the information. The rendering server is independently addressable from the asset server.
Images(10)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(21)
1. A system for displaying graphical information, the system comprising:
an asset server for storing information; and
a rendering server in communication with the asset server for receiving a graphics command and for rendering graphic display data in response to the graphics command and to the information, wherein the rendering server is independently addressable from the asset server.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein the asset server and the rendering server are in communication via a network.
3. The system of claim 1 wherein the asset server is located in a different geographic location than the rendering server.
4. The system of claim 1 wherein the information includes one or more of rendering resources, geometry data, images and shader programs.
5. The system of claim 1 wherein the rendering server further transmits the graphic display data to a display device that is independently addressable from the asset server and the rendering server.
6. The system of claim 5 wherein the graphic display data is transmitted to the display device via a network.
7. The system of claim 5 wherein the display device is located in a different geographic location than one or more of the rendering server and the asset server.
8. The system of claim 5 wherein the display device includes one or more of a two-dimensional (2-D) display and a three-dimensional (3-D) display.
9. The system of claim 5 wherein the display device includes one or more of a 2-D printer and a 3-D printer.
10. The system of claim 1 wherein the graphics command is generated by a client application.
11. The system of claim 10 wherein the client application transmits the graphics command to the rendering server via a network.
12. The system of claim 10 wherein the client application is located in a different geographic location than the rendering server.
13. The system of claim 1 wherein the graphics command is generated by a plurality of client applications.
14. The system of claim 1 wherein the rendering server further transmits the graphic display data to a plurality of independently addressable display devices.
15. A method for displaying graphical information, the method comprising:
receiving a graphics command at a rendering server;
accessing information responsive to the graphics command, wherein the information is located in an asset server that is separately addressable from the rendering sever; and
rendering graphic display data in response to the graphics command and to the information.
16. The method of claim 15 wherein the asset server is located in a different geographic location than the rendering server and the asset server and the rendering server communicate via a network.
17. The method of claim 15 further comprising transmitting the graphic display data to a display device.
18. The method of claim 17 wherein the display device is located in a different geographic location from one or more of the asset server and the rendering server.
19. An architecture for displaying graphical information, the architecture comprising:
an asset resource layer for storing information; and
a rendering layer for receiving a graphics command and rendering graphic display data in response to the graphics command and to the information, wherein the communication server is independently addressable from the asset server.
20. The architecture of claim 19 further comprising a display layer for receiving the graphic display data and displaying the graphic display data on a display device, wherein the display layer in independently addressable from the asset layer and the rendering layer.
21. A computer program product for displaying graphical information, the computer program product comprising:
a storage medium readable by a processing circuit and storing instructions for execution by the processing circuit for performing a method comprising:
receiving a graphics command at a rendering server;
accessing information responsive to the graphics command, wherein the information is located in an asset server that is separately addressable from the rendering sever; and
rendering graphic display data in response to the graphics command and to the information.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/586,327, filed Jul. 8, 2004, the contents of which are herein incorporated by reference.

GOVERNMENT RIGHTS

The U.S. Government may have certain rights in this invention pursuant to Grant No. 70NANB3H3028 awarded by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).

BACKGROUND

The present disclosure relates generally to imaging and visualization, and, more particularly, to an architecture for rendering graphics on output devices over diverse connections. Example output devices are two-dimensional displays, three-dimensional displays such as volumetric, multi-view, and holographic displays, and two- and three-dimensional printers.

Three-dimensional (3-D) information is used in a variety of tasks, such as radiation treatment planning, mechanical computer-aided design, computational fluid dynamics, and battlefield visualization. As computational power and the capability of sensors improve, the user is forced to comprehend more information in less time. For example, a rescue team has limited time to discover a catastrophic event, map the structure of the context (i.e., a skyscraper), and deliver accurate instructions to team members. Just as an interactive computer screen is better than a paper map, a spatial 3-D display offers rescue planners the ability to see the entire scenario at once. The 3-D locations of the injured are more intuitively known from a spatial display than from a flat screen, which would require rotating the “perspective view” in order to build a mental model of the situation.

Display technologies now exist which are designed to cope with these large datasets. Spatial 3-D displays (e.g., Actuality Systems Inc.'s Perspecta® Spatial 3-D Display) create imagery that fills a volume of space—such as inside a transparent dome—and that appears 3-D without any cumbersome headwear.

It is expected that a variety of spatial displays will come into existence in the near future. Furthermore, software applications will emerge that will exploit the unique properties of spatial displays. In order to allow every type of display to be compatible with every application, a standard is needed which dictates how (electronically and with what protocol) spatial 3-D information is transmitted to the display device. In addition, software applications and display devices that are not specialized for spatial 3-D rendering will continue to be utilized. Many customer computer environments will contain a mix of 3-D and non-3-D display devices and software applications. It would be desirable for application programmers to be able to write and execute a single application program to produce graphics on a variety of 3-D and non-3-D displays.

Further, modern graphics environments must solve the problem that the application software generally runs on separate hardware from the rendering algorithms. Since off-the-shelf personal computers (PCs) are not yet specialized for spatial 3-D rendering, the process separation is generally more complicated than sending the data across the peripheral component interface (PCI)-express bus. The Chromium architecture is a prior attempt to solve this problem. Chromium abstracts a graphical execution environment. However, the binding between an application, rendering resource and display is statically determined by a configuration file. Therefore, applications cannot address specific rendering resources. Current 3-D display architectures and applications cannot address remote or distributed resources. Such resources are necessary for displays where ready-made rendering hardware is not available for PCs.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Referring now to the figures, which are exemplary embodiments and wherein like elements are numbered alike:

FIG. 1 depicts an overview of an architecture that may be implemented by exemplary embodiments of the present invention;

FIG. 2 depicts an more detailed view of an architecture that may be implemented by exemplary embodiments of the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an exemplary spatial graphics language implementation;

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an exemplary compatibility module structure;

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of an exemplary rendering module;

FIG. 6 is an exemplary process flow diagram for processing a command from a ported application;

FIG. 7 depicts a system that may be implemented by exemplary embodiments of the present invention;

FIG. 8 depicts a system that may be implemented by exemplary embodiments of the present invention;

FIG. 9 depicts a system that may be implemented by exemplary embodiments of the present invention; and

FIG. 10 depicts a system that may be implemented by exemplary embodiments of the present invention.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Exemplary embodiments of the present invention are directed to a system for displaying graphical information. The system includes an asset server for storing information and a rendering server in communication with the asset server. The rendering server receives a graphics command and renders graphic display data in response to the graphics command and to the information. The rendering server is independently addressable from the asset server.

Other exemplary embodiments of the present invention are directed to a method for displaying graphical information. The method includes receiving a graphics command at a rendering server. Information responsive to the graphics command is accessed. The information is located in an asset server that is separately addressable from the rendering server. Graphic display data is rendered in response to the graphics command and the information.

Further exemplary embodiments of the present invention are directed to an architecture for displaying graphical information. The architecture includes an asset resource layer for storing information and a rendering layer. The rendering layer receives a graphics command and renders graphic display data in response to the graphics command and to the information. The communication server is independently addressable from the asset resource layer.

Still further exemplary embodiments of the present invention include a computer program product for displaying graphical information. The computer program product includes a storage medium readable by a processing circuit for performing a method. The method includes receiving a graphics command at a rendering server. Information responsive to the graphics command is accessed. The information is located in an asset server that is separately addressable from the rendering server. Graphic display data is rendered in response to the graphics command and the information.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Exemplary embodiments of the present invention include a spatial 3-D architecture to support separate asset servers and rendering servers in a graphics environment. The architecture also has a spatial visualization environment (SVE), that includes a 3-D rendering API and a display virtualization layer that enables application developers to universally exploit the unique benefits (such as true volumetric rendering) of 3-D displays. SVE supports the cooperative execution of multiple software applications. As part of the SVE, a new API is defined, referred to herein as the spatial graphics language (SpatialGL), to provide an optional, display-agnostic interface for 3-D rendering. SpatialGL is a graphical language that facilitates access to remote displays and graphical data (e.g., rendering modules and assets). The architecture further has core rendering software which includes a collection of high-performance rendering algorithms for a variety of 3-D displays. The architecture also includes core rendering electronics including a motherboard that combines a graphics processing unit (GPU) with a 64-bit processor and double-buffered video memory to accelerate 3-D rendering for a variety of high-resolution, color, multiplanar and/or multiview displays. Many of today's 3-D software applications use the well-known OpenGL API. To provide compatibility with those applications, exemplary embodiments of the present invention include an OpenGL driver for the Actuality Systems, Incorporated Perspecta Spatial 3-D Display product. Embodiments of the Perspecta Spatial 3-D Display product are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,554,430 to Dorval et al., of common assignment herewith.

Currently, a volume manager is available to manage cooperative access to display resources from one or more simultaneous software applications (see for example, U.S. Patent Application No. 2004/0135974 A1 to Favalora et al., of common assignment herewith). Current implementations of the volume manager have asset and rendering resources that are not abstracted separately from the display. The display rendering and storage system are considered as a single concept. Therefore, the display and rendering system must be designed together. Effectively, the display must be designed with the maximum image complexity in mind. Exemplary embodiments of the SVE, as described herein, remove this restriction by providing separately named asset, computation (rendering), and display resources. Unlike other rendering systems, the application has the flexibility to combine these resources by addressing each one independently. These resources may be independently addressed, and therefore may be located in one or more servers and accessed via one or more networks. In addition, these resources (e.g., two or more computation resources) may be combined to create output for a single graphics display. The resources may also be located in different geographic locations (e.g., different rooms in the same building, different cities, different countries) and in communication via a network.

FIG. 1 depicts an overview of an architecture that may be implemented by exemplary embodiments of the present invention. One or more means is also provided for interfacing one or more central applications with a local, remote or distributed rendering or display systems and for interfacing external databases with a rendering system.

The architecture depicted in FIG. 1 includes four layers, an application software layer 102, an SVE layer 104, a rendering architecture layer 106 and a display-specific rendering module layer 108. The application software layer 102 includes legacy applications 110, ported applications 112 and native applications 116. The legacy applications 110 and the ported applications 112 are written to the OpenGL API and converted into the SpatialGL API 118 by the OpenGL compatibility module 114 in the SVE layer 104. OpenGL and SpatialGL are examples of API types. Exemplary embodiments are not limited to these two types of APIs and may be extended to support any graphics APIs such as the Direct3D API. The native applications 116 are written to the SpatialGL API 118 which is in communication with the volume manager 120. The rendering architecture layer 106 depicted in FIG. 1 includes core rendering software (CRS) 122, which is a device independent management layer for performing computations/renderings based on commands received from the SpatialGL API 118 and data in the volume manager 120. The display-specific rendering module layer 108 includes a Perspecta rendering module 124 for converting data from the CRS 122 for output to a Perspecta Spatial 3-D Display and a multiview rendering module 126 for converting data from the CRS 122 into output to other 3-D and 2-D display devices.

Unlike prior architectures, the architecture depicted in FIG. 1 transforms commands (e.g., graphics commands) from several API types into a single graphical language, SpatialGL. This permits the architecture to provide consistent access to display and rendering resources to both legacy and native application software. This is contrasted with the currently utilized device-specific rendering drivers. Each driver manages rendering hardware, visual assets (display lists, textures, vertex buffers, etc.), and display devices. The architecture depicted in FIG. 1 includes a rendering architecture layer 106 that is a device-independent management layer that with core rendering software 122. This rendering architecture layer 106 gives the graphics language (SpatialGL 118) access to diverse, high-level resources, such as multiple display geometries, rendering clusters and image databases. Each class of resources: asset (e.g., volume manager 120); computational (e.g., core rendering software 122); and display (e.g., Perspecta rendering 124 and multiview rendering 126) is enabled by an independent module.

FIG. 2 depicts a more detailed view of an architecture that may be implemented by exemplary embodiments of the present invention. The SVE layer 104 includes a collection of compatibility strategies between emerging displays and application software. One aspect of SVE provides compatibility with software applications to diverse display types through SpatialGL APIs and OpenGL APIs. The SVE concept extends in three additional directions: application software development can be accelerated by producing higher-level graphical programming toolkits; a spatial user interface (UI) library can provide applications with a consistent and intuitive UI that works well with 3-D displays; and a streaming content library allows the SVE to work with stored or transmitted content. This may be utilized to enable “appliance” applications and “dumb terminals.”

In addition, the SVE is a display-agnostic and potentially remote-rendering architecture. The SVE can communicate with 2-D and very different 3-D displays (multiplanar, view-sequential, lenticular, stereoscopic, holographic). The rendering server does not need to be local to the display(s).

The CRS 122 is a collection of rendering strategies. The cost of implementing a rendering engine for a new display geometry breaks down into a system integration effort and an algorithm implementation effort. CRS 122 eliminates the system integration effort by providing a portable communication framework to bridge the client and server domains and by abstracting computation assets. The CRS 122 creates output for a Perspecta rendering module 124, a multiview rendering module 126 and can be tailored to create output for future rendering modules 206. In addition, the architecture depicted in FIG. 2 may be utilized to support future graphics display architectures and third-party architectures 210.

The spatial transport protocol (STP) describes the interaction between the Spatial Visualization Environment and Core Rendering Software. The spatial transport protocol comprises a set of commands. The STP may optionally comprise a physical definition of the bus used to communicate STP-formatted information. The STP commands are divided into several groups. One group of commands is for operating the rendering hardware, and frame buffer associated with the display. Another group of commands is for synchronizing the STP command stream with events on the host device, rendering hardware and frame buffer. Another group of commands is for operating features specific to the display hardware, such as changing to a low power mode or reading back diagnostic information.

Different streams of graphics commands from different applications may proceed through the architecture to be merged into a single STP stream. Due to multitasking, the STP is able to coherently communicate overlapping streams of graphics commands. STP supports synchronization objects between the applications (or any layer below the application) and the display hardware. The application level of the system typically generates sequential operations for the display drivers to process. Graphics commands may be communicated with a commutative language. For efficiency, the display hardware completes the commands out of order. Occasionally, order is important; one graphics operation may refer to the output of a previous graphics operation, or an application may read information back from the hardware, expecting to receive a result from a sequence of graphics operations.

Application Layer

Exemplary embodiments of the SVE include a 3-D rendering API and display virtualization layer that enables application developers to universally exploit the unique benefits (such as true volumetric rendering) of 3-D displays. It consists of several subsystems: SpatialGL 118, OpenGL compatibility module 114, streaming content library and volume manager 120. Future development may expand SVE to include scene-graph, rendering engine and application-specific plug-in subsystems.

SpatialGL

Just as OpenGL API implementations are video-card-specific, implementations of the SpatialGL API 118 are display, or output-device-specific. Examples of “targets” for SpatialGL implementations are: 2-D displays, volumetric displays, view-sequential displays, and lenticular multi-view displays. Exemplary embodiments of the SVE can communicate with a broad range of output devices whose underlying physics are quite different.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an exemplary SpatialGL implementation that may be utilized by exemplary embodiments of the present invention. The blocks include a NativeApp block 116 which is written to take full advantage of spatial displays by using the SpatialGL API. The NativeApp block 116 may transmit data to the client 308, SpatialEngine 304, SceneGraph 306 and the volume manager 310. In alternate exemplary embodiments, applications can also take advantage of higher level APIs such as SceneGraph 306 and SpatialEngine 304 from Actuality Systems, Incorporated. SceneGraph 306 provides an interface for encoding scene graphs in SpatialGL. SceneGraph 306 implements features such as: assemble shapes into objects; transform the positions of an objects; and animation node. The SpatialEngine 304 implements high level functions such as draw volume and overlaying a scene-graph. SpatialEngine 304 is extensible. For example, an OilToolkit can be added, which adds functions such as: draw porosity volume, overlay drill path and animate path plan.

As depicted in FIG. 3, SpatialGL is input to the client 308. In exemplary embodiments of the present invention, the native API, or SpatialGL API, provides an object oriented front-end to the STP byte code. The SpatialGL API exposes features such as, but not limited to: define fragment program, define vertex program, bind geometry source, bind texture source, swap buffer and synchronize. The client 308 sends SpatialGL commands to the volume manager 310. The SpatialGL commands may include commands for retrieving persistent objects to be displayed on a graphical display device. The persistent objects include, but are not limited to, 2-D and 3-D textures and vertex buffers. The persistent objects may be stored on one or more of a database, a storage medium and a memory buffer. In addition, the SpatialGL commands may include commands for retrieving display nodes to be displayed on a graphical display device. Display nodes refer to an instance of any display that can be individually referenced (e.g., a Perspecta display, a 2-D display). STP commands from the volume manger 310 are sent to the core rendering client 312. The core rendering client 312 is the first computation resource available to the STP execution environment. Early data reducing filter stages can also execute here. Stream compression and volume overlay are processes that may be assigned computation resources at this point. The core rendering client 312 formats the remainder of the filter graph to take into account the physical transport 314 layer between the core rendering client 312 and the core rendering server. At the STP interpreter block 316, API calls are converted into STP. Each STP node is a computation resource. STP procedures get bound to STP nodes as the program is processed. The node executes any procedure that has been bound to it by a previous node.

Spatial Transport Protocol may be converted for persistent storage and written to a disk. This can be accomplished by storing the serialized Spatial Transport Protocol byte code to disk, along with a global context table. The global context table allows context-specific assets to be resolved when the STP file is later read back from disk. The global context table establishes correspondences between local context handles referenced by the STP byte code and persistent forms of the referenced data. For example, a STP byte code may reference texture image number 5. The texture image number is associated with specific data in the original local context of the byte code. When saved to disk, texture image number 5 is associated with a particular texture image by the local context table. This can be accomplished by storing in table position 5, a copy of the texture image, or by storing a GUID or URL that identifies a persistent source for the texture image.

Compatibility Module Structure

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an exemplary compatibility module structure. Ported applications 112 and/or legacy applications 110 can provide input to the compatibility module structure depicted in FIG. 4. Ported applications 112 are applications originally written using OpenGL, but have been extended by programmers to interface with spatial displays. Legacy applications 110 are applications written with no knowledge of spatial displays or vendor APIs (e.g., Actuality Systems, Incorporated APIs). OpenGL support is provided through two dynamic link libraries. The main library is called the GLAS library 412. It provides drawing methods similar to the industry-standard OpenGL API, and also contains specialized initialization and state management routines for spatial displays. The GLAS library 412 converts OpenGL API calls into SpatialGL 118 calls. SpatialGL 118 is a low level graphics language utilized by exemplary embodiments of the present invention. The OGLStub library 414 exports an interface similar to the OpenGL32.dll system library 408. The behavior of the library can be customized on a per-application basis. The OGLStub library 414 intercepts and redirects OpenGL API calls in a customizable manner. Calls are optionally forwarded to the OpenGL32.dll system library 408 and/or the GLAS library 412 for translation.

OpenGL is an industry standard low-level 3-D graphics API for, scientific and computer aided design (CAD) applications. OpenGL supplies a language that expresses static information. The application must explicitly break down dynamic scenes into discrete frames and render each one. OpenGL expresses commands such as: input a vertex; draw a triangle; apply a texture; engage a lighting model; and show the new rendering.

Referring to FIG. 3, OpenGL calls are duplicated for both the system library 408 (to render on the 2-D monitor) and for the GLAS library 412. By default, the first scene is analyzed to determine the depth center of the application's implied coordinate system. Since the depth center is not known until the first swap-buffers call, it may take until the second scene for the image in Perspecta to render properly.

The first scene is analyzed to determine the depth center of the application's coordinate system. Once the depth center is calculated, a fix-up transform is calculated. This transform is applied consistently to the projection specified by the application, so that the application's further transformations the projection (such as scaling and zooming) are reflected properly in the spatial rendering. After the depth center is determined, the Stub library 414 issues a redraw call to the application to ensure that the first scene is drawn properly in Perspecta.

The two main configurations are “ghost mode” 406 and “extended mode” 410. Ghost mode 406 automatically duplicates OpenGL calls for both the system library 408 and for the GLAS library 412. In ghost mode 406, depth centering is based on x and y scale and centered to get the majority of the vertices within the display. Ghost mode 406 provides an unextended OpenGL interface and attempts to make a spatial display appear as a 2-D display to the application. Extended mode 410 allows the application to control the call forwarding behavior. Extended mode 410 exposes an extended OpenGL interface. A few commands are added to help the application control a spatial display separately from a 2-D display. Example commands include: create a context for a spatial display and draw to a spatial display context. Output from the GLAS library 412, in SpatialGL, is sent to the client 308 and then to the volume manager 310. The volume manager 310 assigns display resources. It filters the STP stream to reformat the data according to the display resource assigned to the given context. The core rendering block 312, which contains the mechanisms for decoding and executing procedures in the STP language, receives STP commands.

The configuration is controllable for each application, based on a central control repository. Parameters that may configured include, but are not limited to: context selection strategy (allows the controller to change the context selection while the application is running); projection fix-up strategy that overrides the projection that that application specifies, in order to fit the image in the actual display geometry; texture processing strategy; context STP preamble (e.g., resolution hints); and scene STP preamble.

Some spatial displays physically realize view-dependent lighting effects. In this case, lighting is calculated based on the actual view directions, rather than the master direction given by the projection matrix.

Specific rasterization constraints and rules can only be specified relative to the unique geometry of each display type. In general, only fragments that intersect the projection of an element into the display's native coordinate system may be lit. When rendering polygons, elements must not contain holes. When rendering connected polygons where exact vertex positions are shared, the rendered figure must not contain holes.

When anti-aliasing is used, the partial ordering of the color value of the fragments must agree with the partial ordering of the intersection (area or length) between the fragment and pixels of the display's native coordinate system, when normalized for variation in area or volume of the pixels.

Streaming Content Library

The streaming content library permits spatial stream assets. A spatial stream asset is a time-varying source of spatial imagery. Optionally, the spatial stream may be synchronized with one or more audio streams. A spatial stream may either consist of a real-time stream, a recorded stream, or a dynamically generated stream. An example of a ream-time spatial stream is a multi-view stream that is fed from an array of cameras. An example of a recorded stream is a spatial movie stored on a removable disk. An example of a dynamically generated stream is a sequence of dynamically rendered 3-D reconstructions from a PACS database.

Each stream is associated with a spatial codec. The intended interpretation of the stream is determined by the associated spatial codec. The spatial codec is comprised of a stream encoding specification and a reconstruction specification. The stream encoding specification determines the mapping from the raw binary stream to a time-varying series of pixel arrays. The stream encoding specification may also identify an audio stream, synchronized with the pixel arrays. The reconstruction specification determines the intended mapping from pixel arrays to physical light fields. Examples of stream encoding specifications include MPEG coded representations. The reconstruction specification can be defined using the persistent form of Spatial Transport Protocol.

A client of the streaming content library receives the raw binary stream and the spatial codec. The client proceeds to reconstruct an approximation of the intended physical light field, by calculating pixel arrays using the stream encoding specification. At each time step, the client consumes one or more pixel arrays and interprets an intended light field, using the reconstruction specification. The intended light field is rendered into the local display's specific geometry, using Core Rendering Software. Finally, Core Rendering Software moves the rendered image into the spatial frame buffer, causing the display to generate a physical manifestation of a light field.

The streaming content library includes spatial stream asset servers. Each spatial stream asset is published by a spatial asset server. An asset server may publish one or more streams, each with a unique URL. A software application using SpatialGL (such as a spatial media player) can call up a particular spatial stream asset using its associated URL.

Spatial stream assets may be transmitted with unidirectional signaling: for example several TV channels may be jointly used to transmit a multi-view recording. In this case, the spatial codec can be continuously or periodically transmitted. Spatial content may also be broadcast with bidirectional signaling: for example, a spatial movie may be downloaded from an Internet-based asset server and viewed using a spatial media player using SpatialGL. In this case, the client could potentially negotiate an optimal spatial codec to match the client's display geometry. Bidirectional signaling can also be used to allow a client to remotely control a dynamically generated stream. For example, a client may continuously send updates to a server about the desired view direction and region of interest, while the server continuously returns rendered images to the client through the streaming library. Alternately, a client may receive notifications from the spatial stream asset server when new data is available. Based on the notifications, the client may choose to download and render the new data or else the client may skip the new data. When receiving a notification, the client may decide whether to download or skip the new data, based on factors such as the currently available buffer space, communication bandwidth, processing power, or desired level of image quality.

Pseudo-Code Reconstruction Specification for a Multi-View Stream

  • Define n views V1, . . . Vn, each comprised of a projection Pi and an aperture Qi
  • For each time step t
    • For each view Vi,
      • Render a plane, textured with pixel array t*n+i, using projection Pi
      • Render aperture Qi
    • Swap the rendered image into the active frame buffer
      Pseudo-Code Reconstruction Specification for a Volumetric Stream
  • Define a local 3-D texture asset T
  • For each time step t
    • For each pixel array i in 1 . . . n
      • Load pixel array i into slice i of texture T
      • Render a solid cube, textured with T
    • Swap the rendered image into the active frame buffer
      Network Layer

In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the CRS 122 has the character of a slave peripheral and communication to the CRS 122 is limited to proprietary channels. Alternate exemplary embodiments of the CRS 122 have an expanded role as a network device. In addition, it can communicate with a host over a network, and it supports standard protocols for network configuration. The CRS 122 has both a client part and a server part.

In exemplary embodiments of the present invention, a host PC runs an application and is in communication with a single multiplanar 3-D display which contains an embedded core rendering electronics system. The client part is embodied on the host PC, while the server part is embodied on the core rendering electronics. CRS 122 is distinct from the SVE because the CRS 122 is meant primarily to provide a rendering engine for specific display types that is compatible with the display-independent graphical commands generated in the SVE.

The client side of the CRS 122 interfaces to the SVE using the STP language. STP is used to package and transport SpatialGL API calls. A core rendering client connects the volume manager 120 to the physical transport by acting as an STP interpreter. The core rendering client interpreter exposes procedures (with STP linkage) that allow an STP program to address specific servers. Exemplary embodiments of the present invention only function when a single server is present. Alternate exemplary embodiments of the core rendering client communicate with servers over a network, and are able to list and address the set of available servers.

The client also provides a boot service. This provides the boot-image used by the net-boot feature of the servers. The boot-image is stored in a file that can be updated by Perspecta Software Suite upgrade disks (or via web upgrade). The boot service can be enabled and disabled by the SVE. After the boot-image file is upgraded, the installer must enable the boot service to allow the display to update.

In the current example, in which there is one host PC and one Perspecta display, all input to the system arrives through the gigabit Ethernet connections. The embedded system acts as a normal Internet Protocol (IP) device. The embedded system acts as a server, while the host PC acts as a client. The server acts as a normal IP device. In exemplary embodiments of the present invention, the client and server must be directly connected. In alternate exemplary embodiments of the present invention, clients and servers are connected through a gigabit switch. This configuration removes the requirement that the client PC contains two Ethernet controllers, and it allows multiple clients to connect to a single server. The server obtains an IP address using dynamic host configuration protocol (DHCP) (unless it has been configured to use a static address). Once an IP address has been obtained, the CRS 122 and the client must be made aware of the identity of the server. This is done by a symmetric system where a node (client or server) broadcasts a datagram when it starts. The node that starts first obtains the identity of the later node. If the server is started first, and encounters a client datagram broadcast, it opens a connection to the client to communicate the server's identity. A client may simultaneously communicate with multiple servers. Each server may only communicate with a single client at a time.

In alternate exemplary embodiments of the present invention, the servers have a user interface and policy for attaching to specific clients when more than one client is available. The CRS 122 provides a simple network management protocol (SNMP) interface to manage the network settings of the server. The SNMP interface configures the IP address, broadcast settings and security settings. The security settings include client allow and deny lists.

In exemplary embodiments of the present invention the host and client support a single gigabit Ethernet connection. In alternate exemplary embodiments, the host and client employ an additional protocol to support two gigabit Ethernet connections.

Once a client knows the identity of a server, the client may open the server. The client and server communicate through datagrams. The server is single-threaded; the client may only open a single connection to the server and it is guaranteed exclusive access to the entire display resource. Once the client has opened the server, it may begin transacting rendering commands. Rendering commands are moved between the client and server using a command stream and a remote memory protocol.

Since the network graphics service is meant to communicate only over a local network segment, a very low level of packet loss is expected. The details of the communication scheme can be arranged to ensure that the system degrades gracefully under packet loss. Device allocation and context creation must be guaranteed to operate correctly under packet loss. The bulk graphics data transfer is not protected, except that a frame that is rendered without packet loss must not be degraded by packet loss in previous frames. Persistent texture map data is protected against packet loss by a checksum and a failure/retry scheme.

Core Rendering Software (CRS)

CRS 122 uses the STP language as a form for communicating graphics commands and procedures. STP allows the interfaces between the major components of the Core Rendering Software system to be uniform. In the initial version of Core Rendering Software, STP serves as the inter-process-communication mechanism. STP is used to communicate a sequence of graphics commands from the client to the server. The initial version of STP will include conditional execution and parallel branching prototype features. In later versions of Core Rendering Software, modules will be written within the STP language, thus flattening the hardware-native part of the architecture. Conditional execution and parallel branching features will be optimized in later versions of Core Rendering Software.

Rendering Modules

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of an exemplary rendering module. The pipeline system structure, or pipeline framework, subsystem provides the generic structure that is common to rendering pipelines for the CRS 122. A rendering pipeline is implemented through a pipeline system class 502. A pipeline system class 502 is composed of a rendering pipeline and a fixed set of active objects. An active object models a device that can trade time for data movement or transformation, such as a bus, a GPU or a CPU. The pipeline system class 502 binds stages to scheduler threads 510 (i.e., to active objects). The scheduler thread 510 is the binding between stages and active objects.

An instance of a pipeline 504 operates on a single input stream of homogeneous elements. An exemplary pipeline constructor includes: initiate first-in-first-out (FIFO) length; and initialize stage connections. As depicted in FIG. 5, fixed length FIFOs 506 constrain the resource usage of the system.

Rendering pipelines are implemented as a series of stages 508 that communicate with tasks. A stage 508 is an algorithmic unit that transforms one stream of tasks into another stream of tasks. Although a stage 508 may be designed to be compatible with a specific active object 512, the binding to the active object 512 is external to the stage 508. For example, a stage 508 may implicitly require a binding with a GPU by making OpenGL calls, but it must not own or manipulate an OpenGL context.

Stage objects have an unusually complicated life cycle. They are typically created in one thread but work in a second thread. The lifetime of a stage 508 consists of these distinct transitions: construction, initialization, execution, de-initialization, and destruction. A stage 508 transforms a stream of homogeneous elements. A stage 508 utilizes the resources of a single active object and executes several hundreds of times a second. The biding between a stage 508 and an active object 512 is external to the stage class. Therefore, a pipeline 504 may be considered a stage 508, but a pipeline system 502 may not be considered a stage 508. The remote active object 512 depicted in FIG. 5 models a thread of execution that exists outside of the CPU. Input to the active object 512 includes data from the GL context block 514 and the voxel engine context block 516.

Task objects are not strongly structured, outside of their specific implementation domain. In exemplary embodiments of the present invention, the pipeline framework includes a Fence class, which is utilized to provide a main stream synchronization pattern. A pipeline system 502 operates asynchronously from its enclosing system. The enclosing system can insert a Fence into the command stream of a pipeline 504. A pipeline passes a fence when all processing due to tasks issued before the fence have completed. The enclosing system can query whether the pipeline 504 has passed the fence, or it can block until the fence has been passed.

SpatialGL Graphics Pipeline for Other Displays

As described above, a key feature of the SVE is display-independence (or “display-agnosticism”). Implementations of the SpatialGL API can be made for a variety of 2-D and 3-D displays. The SpatialGL API may be utilized with a Perspecta multiplanar volumetric display. In addition, the SpatialGL API may be utilized with other types of displays.

Because multi-view rendering is very similar to single-view rendering, the SpatialGL implementation is substantially simpler than the SpatialGL implementation for multiplanar rendering. For example, on flat, horizontal-parallax multi-view displays, such as the Stereographics 9-view lenticular display or Actualty System's quasi-holographic video display, a slice volume could be created as part of the rendering process. A slice volume contains a slice for each rendered view direction. Rendered views use sheared versions of standard projection matrices, corresponding to the viewing angles. “Final views” correspond to the views that are physically generated by the display hardware. Final views are sampled from the slice volume (for example, using texture mapping). The number of final views may be different than the number of rendered views.

Rendering tetrahedra requires special treatment because, at the time of writing, GPUs lack native volumetric rendering support. In this case, SpatialGL wraps an efficient volume rendering implementation such as ray casting.

Depending on the multiview display, image formatting can be different. Because Stereographics' lenticular display interfaces via digital visual interface (DVI), it does not require special formatting hardware (such as the Voxel Engine in Actuality Systems, Incorporated's Core Rendering Electronics). However, the distribution of pixels and views is somewhat irregular, and requires a reformatting process known as “interzigging.” Additionally, view anti-aliasing can occur during this step. On the other hand, Actuality Systems' holovideo display was designed to use the same Core Rendering Electronics as Perspecta, and can share the same implementation.

Because SpatialGL is display-agnostic, SpatialGL can also be used for non-3D displays. Examples include tiled display walls, displays with heterogeneous interfaces (e.g. the Sunnybrook HDR LCD, foveated resolution displays), and displays with unusual geometries (e.g. dome, sphere or cube shaped displays). Finally, an obvious example would be a standard 2-D display such as a desktop cathode ray tube (CRT) or liquid crystal display (LCD). This would allow the use of SpatialGL programs on standard computer hardware without an exotic display configuration. For the most part, the rendering of these displays only requires changes in the image reformatting stage, and minor changes elsewhere.

FIG. 6 is an exemplary process flow diagram of a command from a ported application. A ported application 112 renders a scene by issuing function calls via the compatibility module 114 to the GLAS Extended API (similar to OpenGL). These API calls specify features of the scene, such as texture images, the position and shape of primitive elements (such as lines points and triangles) and the mappings between elements textures and colors. The GLAS extended stub library 612 receives the API calls and issues them to the GLAS translation library 412. The GLAS translation library manages the OpenGL state machine to interpret the GLAS Extended API calls. Interpreted calls are translated into SpatialGL API calls.

Legacy applications invoke a similar command flow. In this case, a legacy application 110 renders a scene by issuing function calls via the compatibility module 114 to the GLAS Ghost API (similar to OpenGL). The GLAS ghost stub library 613 receives the API calls and reformats the scene in preparation for translation to SpatialGL. For example, the stub library may apply a heuristic that inspects the Ghost API calls to estimate the intended depth center of the scene. This additional information is passed to the GLAS translation library 412, along with the API calls generated by the legacy application. Interpreted calls are translated into SpatialGL API calls.

The SpatialGL client library 308 directs the API calls to the volume manager 310, along with association information to identify the software application instance that generated the commands (the ported application).

The volume manager 310 modifies the API call stream. For example, it may map the application's rendering output to a specific potion of the graphics volume generated by the display device. It may also apply an overlay to the rendering output, such as a sprite that marks the location of a 3-D pointer.

After the volume manager 310, the core rendering client library 312 marshals the API calls and transmits them (for example, using Spatial Transport Protocol 314) to the server execution environment. The core rendering software (instantiated in the server execution environment) receives and unmarshals API calls.

The core rendering server 604 operates rendering algorithms, based on the API calls. The rendering algorithms are defined by a renderer module 606. In general, there is a specialized renderer module for each distinct class of display geometry. The rendering algorithms cause rendered image bitmaps to be moved into the spatial frame-buffer 611, using the voxel engine driver 610.

Distributed Configurations

Typically, graphics libraries allow multiple client applications to share access to a single rendering server (via, for example, the Windows Graphics Library [WGL] for OpenGL Windows). In exemplary embodiments of the present invention, the SVE volume manger provides this meta-service for the SpatialGL API. The SpatialGL API is also designed to allow a single client application to access multiple servers. Often, this will be to provide multiple views to an application (e.g., standard 2-D view with a Perspecta volumetric view).

However, for the SpatialGL API, servers do not necessarily represent access to rendering/display resources; instead they may also represent access to graphical assets. This includes geometry data, images, shader programs, and their combinations. Like web pages, SpatialGL objects can be referenced by Uniform Resource Locators (URLs). These URLs may represent local resources or shared resources. Exemplary implementations of the present invention can distribute different parts of the rendering pipeline to different servers that may specialize in various tasks.

A simple configuration that may be implemented by the network layer 202 of the architecture described previously herein includes having a host computer attached directly to a display (e.g., a spatial display). In this configuration, the client application on the host computer may open multiple contexts (virtual servers) that are shared on the display. Another configuration that may be implemented by exemplary embodiments of the present invention is a typical client/server configuration. In this case, multiple host computers are attached to a display over a network and client applications on different host computers can each open multiple contexts (e.g., via the SpatialGL API) that are shared on the display. Other exemplary configurations include a buffered display configuration with a host computer that is attached to a SpatialGL rendering server. In this configuration the rendering server can only perform rendering, and does not actually display images. When the client application sends scenes to the rendering server, they are rendered and stored. The stored results can be played back on a display at a later time.

FIGS. 7-10 depict further example configurations that may be implemented by the network layer 202 of the architecture described previously herein. In FIG. 7, multiple host computers 702 are attached to various displays 704 over one or more networks 706. The displays 704 may be a mixture of various types (e.g., 2-D and 3-D). In exemplary embodiments of the present invention, the host computers 702 discover displays 704 through the Domain Name System (DNS). The host computer systems 702 include one or more graphics applications that communicate with one or more displays 704 via the network using an API (e.g., the SpatialGL API).

The network 706 may be implemented by any type of known network including, but not limited to, a wide area network (WAN), a local area network (LAN), storage area network (SAN), a global network (e.g. Internet, cellular), a virtual private network (VPN), and an intranet. The network 706 may be implemented using a wireless network or any kind of physical network implementation. SpatialGL servers (e.g., asset server, rendering server) may be attached to the network 706 in a wireless fashion.

FIG. 8 depicts a system that may be implemented by exemplary embodiments of the present invention. The configuration depicted in FIG. 8 includes a dedicated asset server 802. In FIG. 8 a host computer is attached to a SpatialGL asset server 802, a SpatialGL rendering server 804 and a display on a thin client 806. The client application accesses assets from the asset server 802 by URL. These assets are forwarded to the rendering server 804 (which may have the asset locally cached). The client application sends SpatialGL commands to the rendering server 804, which renders the SpatialGL scenes (also referred to herein as graphic display data) and sends the results to the display. In exemplary embodiments of the present invention, the assets are very large compared to the bandwidth between the host computer and the SpatialGL server (e.g., host/display is a doctor's home PC connected over the Internet and the asset server 802 is SpatialGL/DICOM bridge that creates SpatialGL volumetric textures from a hospital's picture archiving and communication system (PACS).

FIG. 9 depicts a system that may be implemented by exemplary embodiments of the present invention. The configuration depicted in FIG. 8 may be referred to as a remote rendering implementation. In FIG. 9, a host computer is in communication with a SpatialGL rendering server 804 and a display server through a network. In the system depicted in FIG. 9, the host computer and display server on located on the same machine (e.g., host/display is a thin client 806 such as a table PC or cellular telephone) and the rendering algorithms are performed remotely by the rendering server 804. The rendering server may access the asset server 802 via the network 706. The client application, located on the thin client 806, sends SpatialGL commands to the rendering server 804. The rendering server 804 then renders the SpatialGL scenes and sends the results to the Spatial GL display on the thin client 806.

FIG. 10 depicts a system that may be implemented by exemplary embodiments of the present invention to provide distributed rendering. Multiple host computers 702 are attached to various SpatialGL rendering servers 1004 and displays 1002 over a network. 706. Client applications from the host computers 702 send SpatialGL commands to the pool of rendering servers 1004 that load-balances and distributes the rendering tasks amongst themselves, possibly through an arbiter. Scenes are rendered in parallel across available and easily accessible rendering servers 1004 and sent to the appropriate displays 1002. Interesting (though not mutually exclusive) distributions of rendering servers 1004 include workstations that perform SpatialGL rendering during idle cycles or centrally deployed cluster of dedicated rendering servers 1004. The latter case is particularly interesting when combined with dedicated asset servers 802.

The system configurations described above and depicted in FIGS. 7-10 are exemplary in nature. In general, the asset resources (e.g., asset server 802), computation resources (e.g., rendering server 804) and/or display resources (e.g., displays 704) may be distributed across one or more networks 706 or co-located. In addition, one or more assets resources and/or computation resources may create input to one or more displays. Particular use-cases and specific examples that may be implemented using the configurations described above include, but are not limited to:

A customer's PC connected directly to a 3-D display (for example, a mechanical engineer running SolidWorks application software on a desktop IBM PC workstation, containing elements of Spatial Visualization Environment, in physical connection to a multiplanar three-dimensional display over gigabit Ethernet.)

One or more mobile devices with rendered 3-D graphics on its 2-D display (i.e. 3-D-on-2-D) that call upon remote rendering computational horsepower to draw animated 3-D graphics for games.

One or more mobile devices with rendered 3-D graphics on its 3-D display (i.e. a cellphone with a lenticular 9-view autostereoscopic 3-D display) that call upon remote rendering computational horsepower.

Several displays of various types distributed through an oil exploration enterprise, such as 17″ desktop LCDs, a 9-panel 2-D video wall, ten stereoscopic displays, and a volumetric 3-D display, all rendering projections of a 3-D application's graphical output, where the 3-D application resides in a computer not necessarily local to the displays.

Several displays of various types, such as 2-D and panoramagram 3-D, throughout one or many movie retail locations, which in response to a potentially remote source of data provides content in a synchronized manner. For example, when a new product is offered, all of the displays can show up-to-date advertising content.

Exemplary embodiments of the present invention allow applications to have access to a wider variety of assets, rendering algorithms and displays. The assets, rendering algorithms and displays may be located in the same geographic location or located in separate geographic locations and in communication via a network.

As described above, the embodiments of the invention may be embodied in the form of hardware, software, firmware, or any processes and/or apparatuses for practicing the embodiments. Embodiments of the invention may also be embodied in the form of computer program code containing instructions embodied in tangible media, such as floppy diskettes, CD-ROMs, hard drives, or any other computer-readable storage medium, wherein, when the computer program code is loaded into and executed by a computer, the computer becomes an apparatus for practicing the invention. The present invention can also be embodied in the form of computer program code, for example, whether stored in a storage medium, loaded into and/or executed by a computer, or transmitted over some transmission medium, such as over electrical wiring or cabling, through fiber optics, or via electromagnetic radiation, wherein, when the computer program code is loaded into and executed by a computer, the computer becomes an apparatus for practicing the invention. When implemented on a general-purpose microprocessor, the computer program code segments configure the microprocessor to create specific logic circuits.

While the invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims. Moreover, the use of the terms first, second, etc. do not denote any order or importance, but rather the terms first, second, etc. are used to distinguish one element from another.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US5913032 *30 Sep 199615 Jun 1999Inprise CorporationSystem and methods for automatically distributing a particular shared data object through electronic mail
US5933778 *4 Jun 19963 Aug 1999At&T Wireless Services Inc.Method and apparatus for providing telecommunication services based on a subscriber profile updated by a personal information manager
US6163749 *5 Jun 199819 Dec 2000Navigation Technologies Corp.Method and system for scrolling a map display in a navigation application
US6249294 *21 Aug 199819 Jun 2001Hewlett-Packard Company3D graphics in a single logical sreen display using multiple computer systems
US6330858 *9 Nov 200018 Dec 2001Navigation Technologies CorporationMethod and system for scrolling a map display in a navigation application
US6337689 *3 Apr 19998 Jan 2002Hewlett-Packard CompanyAdaptive buffering of computer graphics vertex commands
US6373488 *18 Oct 199916 Apr 2002Sierra On-LineThree-dimensional tree-structured data display
US6490626 *17 Nov 19983 Dec 2002Hewlett Packard CompanyBrowser system
US6608628 *5 Nov 199919 Aug 2003The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration (Nasa)Method and apparatus for virtual interactive medical imaging by multiple remotely-located users
US6611264 *13 Jun 200226 Aug 2003Interval Research CorporationDeferred scanline conversion architecture
US6621500 *17 Nov 200016 Sep 2003Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.Systems and methods for rendering graphical data
US6621918 *5 Nov 199916 Sep 2003H Innovation, Inc.Teleradiology systems for rendering and visualizing remotely-located volume data sets
US6704024 *29 Nov 20009 Mar 2004Zframe, Inc.Visual content browsing using rasterized representations
US6799318 *5 Jun 200028 Sep 2004Microsoft CorporationMethod having multiple interfaces with distinguished functions and commands for providing services to a device through a transport
US6803912 *2 Aug 200112 Oct 2004Mark Resources, LlcReal time three-dimensional multiple display imaging system
US6847366 *1 Mar 200225 Jan 2005Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.System and method utilizing multiple processes to render graphical data
US7016949 *20 Nov 200021 Mar 2006Colorado Computer Training InstituteNetwork training system with a remote, shared classroom laboratory
US7136042 *29 Oct 200214 Nov 2006Microsoft CorporationDisplay controller permitting connection of multiple displays with a single video cable
US7162528 *1 Oct 20029 Jan 2007The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The NavyCollaborative environment implemented on a distributed computer network and software therefor
US7170521 *3 Apr 200230 Jan 2007Ultravisual Medical Systems CorporationMethod of and system for storing, communicating, and displaying image data
US7188347 *24 May 20026 Mar 2007Nokia CorporationMethod, apparatus and system for connecting system-level functionality of domestic OS of a mobile phone to any application operating system
US7266616 *8 Aug 20014 Sep 2007Pasternak Solutions LlcMethod and system for digital rendering over a network
US7274368 *31 Jul 200025 Sep 2007Silicon Graphics, Inc.System method and computer program product for remote graphics processing
US7339939 *29 Jun 20014 Mar 2008Nokia CorporationApparatus, method and system for an object exchange bridge
US7346689 *20 Apr 199818 Mar 2008Sun Microsystems, Inc.Computer architecture having a stateless human interface device and methods of use
US7475419 *19 Sep 20036 Jan 2009Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.System and method for controlling access in an interactive grid environment
US7783695 *30 Jun 200024 Aug 2010Graphics Properties Holdings, Inc.Method and system for distributed rendering
US20020141405 *20 Dec 20013 Oct 2002Stephane BouetTransferring objects within an ongoing file transfer operation
US20020154214 *2 Nov 200124 Oct 2002Laurent ScallieVirtual reality game system using pseudo 3D display driver
US20020158865 *4 Oct 200131 Oct 2002Dye Thomas A.Graphics system and method for rendering independent 2D and 3D objects using pointer based display list video refresh operations
US20020173857 *7 May 200121 Nov 2002Ecritical, Inc.Method and apparatus for measurement, analysis, and optimization of content delivery
US20020191018 *31 May 200119 Dec 2002International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for implementing a graphical user interface across dissimilar platforms yet retaining similar look and feel
US20030046432 *25 May 20016 Mar 2003Paul ColemanReducing the amount of graphical line data transmitted via a low bandwidth transport protocol mechanism
US20030055896 *31 Aug 200120 Mar 2003Hui HuOn-line image processing and communication system
US20030164832 *4 Mar 20024 Sep 2003Alcorn Byron A.Graphical display system and method
US20030189574 *5 Apr 20029 Oct 2003Ramsey Paul R.Acceleration of graphics for remote display using redirection of rendering and compression
US20030189578 *9 May 20039 Oct 2003Alcorn Byron A.Systems and methods for rendering graphical data
US20030234790 *24 Jun 200225 Dec 2003Hochmuth Roland M.System and method for grabbing frames of graphical data
US20040001095 *1 Jul 20021 Jan 2004Todd MarquesMethod and apparatus for universal device management
US20040024846 *22 Aug 20015 Feb 2004Stephen RandallMethod of enabling a wireless information device to access data services
US20040080533 *23 Oct 200229 Apr 2004Sun Microsystems, Inc.Accessing rendered graphics over the internet
US20040125130 *26 Feb 20011 Jul 2004Andrea FlaminiTechniques for embedding custom user interface controls inside internet content
US20040221004 *30 Apr 20034 Nov 2004Alexander ChalfinSystem, method, and computer program product for applying different transport mechanisms for user interface and image portions of a remotely rendered image
US20040239681 *23 Jan 20042 Dec 2004Zframe, Inc.Visual content browsing using rasterized representations
US20040255005 *27 Aug 200216 Dec 2004David SpoonerWeb server resident on a mobile computing device
US20050021656 *21 Jul 200327 Jan 2005Callegari Andres C.System and method for network transmission of graphical data through a distributed application
US20050022139 *3 Dec 200327 Jan 2005David GettmanInformation display
US20050081161 *10 Oct 200314 Apr 2005Macinnes CathrynThree-dimensional interior design system
US20050108364 *10 Dec 200319 May 2005Callaghan David M.Systems and methods that utilize scalable vector graphics to provide web-based visualization of a device
US20050138193 *19 Dec 200323 Jun 2005Microsoft CorporationRouting of resource information in a network
US20050166214 *29 Jul 200228 Jul 2005Silicon Graphics, Inc.System and method for managing graphics applications
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7647129 *23 Nov 200512 Jan 2010Griffin Technology, Inc.Digital music player accessory interface
US7716685 *30 Aug 200511 May 2010Microsoft CorporationPluggable window manager architecture using a scene graph system
US7791559 *14 Sep 20067 Sep 2010Citrix Systems, Inc.System and method for multiple display support in remote access software
US7930004 *21 Aug 200719 Apr 2011Belkin International, Inc.Holder, electrical supply, and RF transmitter unit for electronic devices
US8004516 *31 Aug 200523 Aug 2011Ziosoft, Inc.Image processing system for volume rendering
US80542412 Oct 20068 Nov 2011Citrix Systems, Inc.Systems and methods for multiple display support in remote access software
US8284204 *30 Jun 20069 Oct 2012Nokia CorporationApparatus, method and a computer program product for providing a unified graphics pipeline for stereoscopic rendering
US8314804 *10 Jan 201120 Nov 2012Graphics Properties Holdings, Inc.Integration of graphical application content into the graphical scene of another application
US831978121 Nov 200827 Nov 2012Pme Ip Australia Pty LtdMulti-user multi-GPU render server apparatus and methods
US84717827 Nov 201125 Jun 2013Citrix Systems, Inc.Systems and methods for multiple display support in remote access software
US8605081 *24 Aug 200910 Dec 2013Zebra Imaging, Inc.Converting 3D data to hogel data
US862489215 Nov 20127 Jan 2014Rpx CorporationIntegration of graphical application content into the graphical scene of another application
US20090138544 *21 Nov 200728 May 2009Rainer WegenkittlMethod and System for Dynamic Image Processing
US20090284583 *19 May 200919 Nov 2009Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Apparatus and method for creatihng and displaying media file
US20100220098 *24 Aug 20092 Sep 2010Zebra Imaging, Inc.Converting 3D Data to Hogel Data
US20110227934 *19 Mar 201022 Sep 2011Microsoft CorporationArchitecture for Volume Rendering
WO2008118065A1 *20 Feb 20082 Oct 2008Agency 9 AbGraphics rendering system
WO2011065929A1 *21 Nov 20083 Jun 2011Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.Multi-user multi-gpu render server apparatus and methods
Classifications
U.S. Classification345/531
International ClassificationG06T15/00, G09G5/39
Cooperative ClassificationG06F3/14, G09G3/003, G06T2210/32, G06T15/00
European ClassificationG06T15/00, G09G3/00B4, G06F3/14
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
29 Jan 2009ASAssignment
Owner name: STRAGENT, LLC, TEXAS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ACTUALITY SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022176/0935
Effective date: 20090129
20 Jul 2005ASAssignment
Owner name: ACTUALITY SYSTEMS, INC., MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:NAPOLI, JOSHUA;CHUN, WON-SUK;PURTELL II, THOMAS J.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:016548/0097
Effective date: 20050719