US20050281224A1 - Proximity-based automatic ID code reconfiguration of wireless input/output systems - Google Patents
Proximity-based automatic ID code reconfiguration of wireless input/output systems Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20050281224A1 US20050281224A1 US11/209,599 US20959905A US2005281224A1 US 20050281224 A1 US20050281224 A1 US 20050281224A1 US 20959905 A US20959905 A US 20959905A US 2005281224 A1 US2005281224 A1 US 2005281224A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- code
- transmitter
- receiver
- configuration
- power level
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W8/00—Network data management
- H04W8/22—Processing or transfer of terminal data, e.g. status or physical capabilities
- H04W8/24—Transfer of terminal data
- H04W8/245—Transfer of terminal data from a network towards a terminal
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L41/00—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
- H04L41/08—Configuration management of networks or network elements
- H04L41/0803—Configuration setting
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to wireless input/output (I/O) systems for computer systems, and more specifically to reconfiguring an ID code associated with a receiver to enable a receiver to respond to data packets tagged with the ID code sent from a desired transmitter.
- I/O input/output
- Wireless input/output systems have proliferated over the last few years.
- the systems typically include a transmitter associated with a device, such as a keyboard or mouse.
- a receiver is coupled to the appropriate I/O port on a computer system, and the device communicates to the computer system by broadcasting data signals from the transmitter to the receiver.
- Wireless I/O solutions developed a solution to this problem of associating data packets sent from each transmitter with a unique ID code.
- a receiver that was to operate with a particular transmitter would be matched by associating the receiver with the same ID code. The receiver would accept only those data packets having the associated ID code and reject all other data packets.
- the solution was effective, but introduced yet another complication in that users wanted to be able to use a device on different computer systems or otherwise change the interrelationship between various device(s) and the one or more computer systems.
- the solution that was developed was to provide each receiver with a reconfiguration button. When activated, the reconfiguration button would put the receiver into a reconfiguration mode and a subsequent transmission from a transmitter with a particular ID would cause the receiver to associate itself with the newly transmitted ID code embedded in the data packet.
- the solution did not require a change to the transmitter data packets or use of different transmitted information.
- a system and method for reconfiguring an ID code associated with a receiver to enable a receiver to respond to data packets tagged with the ID code sent from a desired transmitter.
- a preferred embodiment includes a transmitter for broadcasting a data packet at a first power level, the data packet including an ID code, the transmitter broadcasting an ID configuration command having a configuration ID code at a second power level less than the first power level.
- a receiver in range of the ID configuration command adopts the configuration ID as the ID code to use to qualify tagged data packets, which may be different from the ID code that the receiver used previously. When the receiver changes ID codes, the receiver is reconfigured.
- the preferred embodiment of a method for operating a transmitter includes the steps of broadcasting a data packet at a first power level when an enable signal is asserted, the data packet including an ID code; and broadcasting an ID configuration command at a second power level less than the first power level when the enable signal is deasserted, the ID configuration command including a configuration ID code.
- the transmitter and system of the preferred embodiment simply and efficiently permit a user to unambiguously and simply reconfigure a wireless receiver to work with a transmitter of the user's choice.
- a user may unambiguously, simply and efficiently configure a receiver to work with a particular transmitter by just moving the desired receiver and transmitter close enough together to touch or practically touch depending upon the desired application.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of an application for the preferred embodiment
- FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram for a transmitter according to the preferred embodiment.
- FIG. 3 is a flowchart of the preferred embodiment for a transmitter method in an ID code reconfiguration process for wireless devices.
- the present invention relates to wireless input/output (I/O) systems for computer systems, and more specifically to reconfiguring an ID code associated with a receiver to enable a receiver to respond to data packets tagged with the ID code sent from a desired transmitter.
- I/O input/output
- the following description is presented to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention and is provided in the context of a patent application and its requirements. Various modifications to the preferred embodiment and the generic principles and features described herein will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiment shown but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features described herein.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of a system 100 of the preferred embodiment.
- Each system 100 includes a processing unit 105 , a monitor 110 , a wireless keyboard 115 , a wireless pointing device (e.g., mouse) 120 , and two receivers (a keyboard receiver 125 and a mouse receiver 130 ).
- System 100 operates much like a conventional computing system with processing unit 105 including conventional central processing unit (CPU), memory (both volatile and non-volatile including hard drives, floppy drives, etc., for example) and input/output systems for interfacing to monitor 110 , keyboard 115 and pointing device 120 in well-known fashion.
- the present invention addresses configuring keyboard receiver 125 to work with keyboard 115 and mouse receiver 130 to work with pointing device 120 , for each system 100 .
- Keyboard 115 and pointing device 120 both include radiofrequency (RF) transmitters though other wireless transmissions systems (e.g., IR systems or acoustic systems) could be employed with the invention.
- RF radiofrequency
- keyboard 115 and pointing device 120 each broadcast data packets tagged with a unique ID code.
- This code is also preferably a ten-bit ID code.
- Each receiver includes, in the preferred embodiment, a non-volatile memory for associating an ID code with the receiver.
- This non-volatile memory is preferably a writeable memory, such as NVRAM or EEPROM and includes a ten-bit ID code that corresponds to the ID code in the transmitter.
- the ID code in keyboard receiver 125 corresponds to the ID code tagged to data packets transmitted from wireless keyboard 115 .
- the ID code in mouse receiver 130 corresponds to the ID code tagged to data packets transmitted from pointing device 120 .
- Each system 100 has unique ID codes for each receiver, keyboard, mouse or other. Correspondence for purposes of the present application means shat the ID codes are related to each other to enable the receiver to process the tagged data packet. In the preferred embodiment, correspondence is achieved upon matching the ID code of a transmitted data packet to the stored ID code of the receiver. In other embodiments, the ID codes may be supersets or subsets of one other, or have other defined relationships.
- the corresponding receiver does not reject data packets that are transmitted with a corresponding ID code. As long as data transactions are occurring, transmitters and receivers continue to decode and act upon properly tagged data packets, while rejecting the others. Thus a user of one system 100 could use both keyboard 115 and pointing device 120 at the same time and at the same time that another user of another computer system 100 is using both keyboard 115 and pointing device 120 , as the corresponding receivers will reject data packets from the other wireless device. This is true for additional receivers in the same or additional systems.
- the transmitters in the wireless devices also include a second operational mode: a receiver reconfiguration mode.
- a receiver reconfiguration mode In this mode, the transmitters will issue an ID code reconfiguration command at a reduced power level. Any receiver in range of the transmitter sending this reconfiguration command has the associated ID code stored in the respective nonvolatile memory rewritten to the commanded ID code.
- the transmitter modes are discrete, with the transmitter in one mode or the other at any time. In some applications, it may be that the transmitter modes overlap for all or a portion of the time.
- the ID code reconfiguration command includes a transmission of fifteen reconfiguration signals, along with a configuration ID code. Any receiver picking up ten or more of the reconfiguration signals is caused to associate itself with the newly transmitted ID code.
- a reconfiguration command may not transmit directly a configuration ID code for the receiver to use. Rather, it may cause the receiver to write a new predetermined, or determinable, value to the nonvolatile memory.
- the reconfiguration command may cause the old ID value to be incremented or decremented by one and used as the new associated ID code for the receiver.
- the ID code reconfiguration command may be a single signal or other specially recognized message to the receiver.
- each transmitter has an associated ID code, and it is this ID code that is used in the ID reconfiguration command.
- the associated ID code is typically permanently set in the transmitter, but in some applications it may be desirable to have the user associate a new ID code with a transmitter. Such as where multiple transmitters attempt to use the same ID code. In other instances, a transmitter may automatically detect the use of the same ID code by another transmitter and reconfigure itself to use another ID code.
- the reconfiguration is aborted until data transactions between the transmitter and receiver are complete. Thereafter, transmitters may attempt to retransmit the reconfiguration command if reconfiguration is still desired.
- the reduced power level of the transmitters is set to be detectable from receivers placed within a six to twelve inch radius of the transmitter.
- the normal, full power operation of the wireless transmitters makes the data packets detectable at about six to nine feet from a transmitter.
- the low power mode transmission is about 62 decibels down from the full power mode.
- FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram for a transmitter block 200 according to the preferred embodiment.
- Transmitter block 200 includes a crystal oscillator 205 driven by data present at a data input. Output from oscillator 205 is amplified and processed through a serial succession of output stages 210 .
- Each output stage 210 includes an amplifier 215 and a bandpass filter 220 , with an output of a final stage coupled to an antenna 225 .
- Each output stage 210 (particularly the active component amplifier 215 of each stage) is responsive to a high power enable signal. Assertion of the enable signal activates the output stages, while deassertion of the high power enable signal deactivates the output stages.
- each output stage 210 When the high power enable signal is asserted, each output stage 210 is enabled and transmitter block 200 broadcasts data packets at full power. As discussed above, the preferred reception range is about six to nine feet.
- the output stages When the high power enable signal is deasserted, the output stages are disabled with oscillator 205 operational. Oscillator 205 , in cooperation with other components and PCB traces, is sufficient to broadcast at low power to a range of about six to twelve inches. Oscillator 205 is functionally disconnected from antenna 225 and broadcasts without amplification.
- FIG. 3 is a flowchart of the preferred embodiment for transmitter method 300 in an ID code reconfiguration process for a wireless system such as shown in FIG. 1 .
- Process 300 starts at a high power data transaction step 305 .
- a data transaction of the preferred embodiment is when a receiver and a transmitter are in communication and exchanging data, and in which transmitter block 200 of FIG. 200 is operating at full power.
- Process 300 periodically tests, at step 310 , whether the data transaction is complete. If it is not, process 300 loops back to step 305 for process 300 to loop through steps 305 and 310 until step 310 tests that the data transaction is complete. When complete, process 300 advances to step 315 from step 310 to enable the low power mode of transmitter block 200 .
- Process 300 next, at step 320 , transmits the ID code configuration command in low power mode.
- Process 300 tests whether there is a state change in the wireless device/transmitter at step 325 . If so, process 300 branches to step 330 to abort the reconfiguration command and return to step 305 to begin a data transaction. If instead at test step 325 there is no state change, process 300 tests at step 335 whether the ID code reconfiguration command is complete. If not, process 300 cycles through step 320 , step 325 and step 335 until step 335 determines that the ID code reconfiguration command has been completely transmitted. When done, process 300 returns to step 305 from step 335 to begin a high power data transaction or to send another ID code configuration command, as appropriate.
- reconfiguration of an ID code of a receiver is a matter of positioning a transmitter close (i.e., within the low power range) to a receiver, and operating the wireless device associated with the transmitter. Thereafter the receiver will have its ID code updated automatically.
- the present invention has been described in accordance with the embodiments shown, one of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that there could be variations to the embodiments and those variations would be within the spirit and scope of the present invention.
- the preferred embodiment has been implemented between a transmitter and a receiver.
- the present invention is applicable to pairs of transceivers that exchange configuration information (e.g., enumeration and interrogation commands such as used in Bluetooth systems).
- configuration information e.g., enumeration and interrogation commands such as used in Bluetooth systems.
- transceiving systems could be used to configure devices that are ‘closer’ together than the full operational range of the devices.
- the invention makes it easier for a user to appropriately configure the devices with the appropriate computing system. In these close quarters, it may be that a user does not have access to a transmitter/receiver/transceiver or its associated system to respond to inappropriate configuration signals directed to other, undesired, systems.
- the preferred embodiment employs an enable signal to configure a transmitter to selectively send the ID configuration signal with a configuration ID code.
- an enable signal to configure a transmitter to selectively send the ID configuration signal with a configuration ID code.
- a transmitter may be in an operational mode, a configuration mode, or a combination of the two at any particular time, depending upon the application.
- the preferred embodiment provides that the receiver be configured/reconfigured responsive to an ID configuration signal and that the receiver be used to discriminate data packets with mismatching ID codes. Only valid data packets with appropriate ID code tags are sent to the associated computing system. In some applications, it may be preferable to have the receiver pass ID configuration signals and all valid data packets to the associated computing system to have the operating system or a software/hardware/firmware driver operating with the receiver be appropriately configured and/or perform the necessary discrimination.
- the receiver has a single valid ID code at any time.
- a receiver in range of a transmitter when the transmitter issues the configuration change signal uses the configuration ID code included in the transmitter ID configuration signal.
Abstract
Description
- NOT APPLICABLE
- NOT APPLICABLE
- NOT APPLICABLE
- The present invention relates generally to wireless input/output (I/O) systems for computer systems, and more specifically to reconfiguring an ID code associated with a receiver to enable a receiver to respond to data packets tagged with the ID code sent from a desired transmitter.
- Wireless input/output systems have proliferated over the last few years. The systems typically include a transmitter associated with a device, such as a keyboard or mouse. A receiver is coupled to the appropriate I/O port on a computer system, and the device communicates to the computer system by broadcasting data signals from the transmitter to the receiver. This solution is simple and efficient, yet has problems when multiple devices are used on one or more computer systems.
- Wireless I/O solutions developed a solution to this problem of associating data packets sent from each transmitter with a unique ID code. A receiver that was to operate with a particular transmitter would be matched by associating the receiver with the same ID code. The receiver would accept only those data packets having the associated ID code and reject all other data packets.
- The solution was effective, but introduced yet another complication in that users wanted to be able to use a device on different computer systems or otherwise change the interrelationship between various device(s) and the one or more computer systems. The solution that was developed was to provide each receiver with a reconfiguration button. When activated, the reconfiguration button would put the receiver into a reconfiguration mode and a subsequent transmission from a transmitter with a particular ID would cause the receiver to associate itself with the newly transmitted ID code embedded in the data packet. The solution did not require a change to the transmitter data packets or use of different transmitted information.
- One disadvantage to these solutions is that it is not always readily apparent to a user which transmitter it is associating with the receiver. Additionally, the reconfiguration buttons can at times be small and hard to access/activate, making the reconfiguration of the receiver inconvenient at times.
- A system and method is disclosed for reconfiguring an ID code associated with a receiver to enable a receiver to respond to data packets tagged with the ID code sent from a desired transmitter. A preferred embodiment includes a transmitter for broadcasting a data packet at a first power level, the data packet including an ID code, the transmitter broadcasting an ID configuration command having a configuration ID code at a second power level less than the first power level. A receiver in range of the ID configuration command adopts the configuration ID as the ID code to use to qualify tagged data packets, which may be different from the ID code that the receiver used previously. When the receiver changes ID codes, the receiver is reconfigured.
- The preferred embodiment of a method for operating a transmitter includes the steps of broadcasting a data packet at a first power level when an enable signal is asserted, the data packet including an ID code; and broadcasting an ID configuration command at a second power level less than the first power level when the enable signal is deasserted, the ID configuration command including a configuration ID code.
- The transmitter and system of the preferred embodiment simply and efficiently permit a user to unambiguously and simply reconfigure a wireless receiver to work with a transmitter of the user's choice. In the case that there are several transmitters and receivers each operating in a limited space, all within the normal operational distance of the transmitters, a user may unambiguously, simply and efficiently configure a receiver to work with a particular transmitter by just moving the desired receiver and transmitter close enough together to touch or practically touch depending upon the desired application.
- The novel features which are characteristic of the invention, as to organization and method of operation, together with further objects and advantages thereof, will be better understood from the following description considered in connection with the accompanying drawings in which one or more preferred embodiments of the invention are illustrated by way of example. It is to be expressly understood, however, that the drawings are for the purpose of illustration and description only and are not intended as a definition of the limits of the invention. These drawings include the following figures, with like numerals indicating like parts.
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of an application for the preferred embodiment; -
FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram for a transmitter according to the preferred embodiment; and -
FIG. 3 is a flowchart of the preferred embodiment for a transmitter method in an ID code reconfiguration process for wireless devices. - The present invention relates to wireless input/output (I/O) systems for computer systems, and more specifically to reconfiguring an ID code associated with a receiver to enable a receiver to respond to data packets tagged with the ID code sent from a desired transmitter. The following description is presented to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention and is provided in the context of a patent application and its requirements. Various modifications to the preferred embodiment and the generic principles and features described herein will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiment shown but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features described herein.
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of asystem 100 of the preferred embodiment. Eachsystem 100 includes aprocessing unit 105, amonitor 110, awireless keyboard 115, a wireless pointing device (e.g., mouse) 120, and two receivers (akeyboard receiver 125 and a mouse receiver 130). System 100 operates much like a conventional computing system withprocessing unit 105 including conventional central processing unit (CPU), memory (both volatile and non-volatile including hard drives, floppy drives, etc., for example) and input/output systems for interfacing to monitor 110,keyboard 115 andpointing device 120 in well-known fashion. The present invention addresses configuringkeyboard receiver 125 to work withkeyboard 115 andmouse receiver 130 to work with pointingdevice 120, for eachsystem 100. -
Keyboard 115 andpointing device 120 both include radiofrequency (RF) transmitters though other wireless transmissions systems (e.g., IR systems or acoustic systems) could be employed with the invention. To unambiguously communicate with their respective devices,keyboard 115 and pointingdevice 120 each broadcast data packets tagged with a unique ID code. This code is also preferably a ten-bit ID code. Each receiver includes, in the preferred embodiment, a non-volatile memory for associating an ID code with the receiver. This non-volatile memory is preferably a writeable memory, such as NVRAM or EEPROM and includes a ten-bit ID code that corresponds to the ID code in the transmitter. That is, the ID code inkeyboard receiver 125 corresponds to the ID code tagged to data packets transmitted fromwireless keyboard 115. Similarly, the ID code inmouse receiver 130 corresponds to the ID code tagged to data packets transmitted from pointingdevice 120. Eachsystem 100, in the preferred embodiment, has unique ID codes for each receiver, keyboard, mouse or other. Correspondence for purposes of the present application means shat the ID codes are related to each other to enable the receiver to process the tagged data packet. In the preferred embodiment, correspondence is achieved upon matching the ID code of a transmitted data packet to the stored ID code of the receiver. In other embodiments, the ID codes may be supersets or subsets of one other, or have other defined relationships. - The corresponding receiver does not reject data packets that are transmitted with a corresponding ID code. As long as data transactions are occurring, transmitters and receivers continue to decode and act upon properly tagged data packets, while rejecting the others. Thus a user of one
system 100 could use bothkeyboard 115 and pointingdevice 120 at the same time and at the same time that another user of anothercomputer system 100 is using bothkeyboard 115 andpointing device 120, as the corresponding receivers will reject data packets from the other wireless device. This is true for additional receivers in the same or additional systems. - The transmitters in the wireless devices (e.g.,
wireless keyboard 115 and wireless pointing device 120) of the preferred embodiment also include a second operational mode: a receiver reconfiguration mode. In this mode, the transmitters will issue an ID code reconfiguration command at a reduced power level. Any receiver in range of the transmitter sending this reconfiguration command has the associated ID code stored in the respective nonvolatile memory rewritten to the commanded ID code. In the preferred embodiment, the transmitter modes are discrete, with the transmitter in one mode or the other at any time. In some applications, it may be that the transmitter modes overlap for all or a portion of the time. - In the preferred embodiment, the ID code reconfiguration command includes a transmission of fifteen reconfiguration signals, along with a configuration ID code. Any receiver picking up ten or more of the reconfiguration signals is caused to associate itself with the newly transmitted ID code. In other embodiments, a reconfiguration command may not transmit directly a configuration ID code for the receiver to use. Rather, it may cause the receiver to write a new predetermined, or determinable, value to the nonvolatile memory. For example, the reconfiguration command may cause the old ID value to be incremented or decremented by one and used as the new associated ID code for the receiver. In other embodiments, the ID code reconfiguration command may be a single signal or other specially recognized message to the receiver.
- In the preferred embodiment, each transmitter has an associated ID code, and it is this ID code that is used in the ID reconfiguration command. The associated ID code is typically permanently set in the transmitter, but in some applications it may be desirable to have the user associate a new ID code with a transmitter. Such as where multiple transmitters attempt to use the same ID code. In other instances, a transmitter may automatically detect the use of the same ID code by another transmitter and reconfigure itself to use another ID code.
- If the wireless device becomes active during the reconfiguration command, the reconfiguration is aborted until data transactions between the transmitter and receiver are complete. Thereafter, transmitters may attempt to retransmit the reconfiguration command if reconfiguration is still desired.
- In the preferred embodiment, the reduced power level of the transmitters is set to be detectable from receivers placed within a six to twelve inch radius of the transmitter. In contrast, the normal, full power operation of the wireless transmitters makes the data packets detectable at about six to nine feet from a transmitter. In the preferred embodiment, the low power mode transmission is about 62 decibels down from the full power mode.
-
FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram for atransmitter block 200 according to the preferred embodiment.Transmitter block 200 includes acrystal oscillator 205 driven by data present at a data input. Output fromoscillator 205 is amplified and processed through a serial succession of output stages 210. Eachoutput stage 210 includes anamplifier 215 and abandpass filter 220, with an output of a final stage coupled to anantenna 225. Each output stage 210 (particularly theactive component amplifier 215 of each stage) is responsive to a high power enable signal. Assertion of the enable signal activates the output stages, while deassertion of the high power enable signal deactivates the output stages. - When the high power enable signal is asserted, each
output stage 210 is enabled andtransmitter block 200 broadcasts data packets at full power. As discussed above, the preferred reception range is about six to nine feet. When the high power enable signal is deasserted, the output stages are disabled withoscillator 205 operational.Oscillator 205, in cooperation with other components and PCB traces, is sufficient to broadcast at low power to a range of about six to twelve inches.Oscillator 205 is functionally disconnected fromantenna 225 and broadcasts without amplification. -
FIG. 3 is a flowchart of the preferred embodiment fortransmitter method 300 in an ID code reconfiguration process for a wireless system such as shown inFIG. 1 . Process 300 starts at a high powerdata transaction step 305. A data transaction of the preferred embodiment is when a receiver and a transmitter are in communication and exchanging data, and in whichtransmitter block 200 ofFIG. 200 is operating at full power.Process 300 periodically tests, atstep 310, whether the data transaction is complete. If it is not, process 300 loops back to step 305 forprocess 300 to loop throughsteps step 310 tests that the data transaction is complete. When complete,process 300 advances to step 315 fromstep 310 to enable the low power mode oftransmitter block 200.Process 300 next, atstep 320, transmits the ID code configuration command in low power mode. Process 300 tests whether there is a state change in the wireless device/transmitter atstep 325. If so, process 300 branches to step 330 to abort the reconfiguration command and return to step 305 to begin a data transaction. If instead attest step 325 there is no state change,process 300 tests atstep 335 whether the ID code reconfiguration command is complete. If not,process 300 cycles throughstep 320,step 325 and step 335 untilstep 335 determines that the ID code reconfiguration command has been completely transmitted. When done,process 300 returns to step 305 fromstep 335 to begin a high power data transaction or to send another ID code configuration command, as appropriate. - From a user's perspective, reconfiguration of an ID code of a receiver is a matter of positioning a transmitter close (i.e., within the low power range) to a receiver, and operating the wireless device associated with the transmitter. Thereafter the receiver will have its ID code updated automatically.
- Although the present invention has been described in accordance with the embodiments shown, one of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that there could be variations to the embodiments and those variations would be within the spirit and scope of the present invention. For example, the preferred embodiment has been implemented between a transmitter and a receiver. In some applications, the present invention is applicable to pairs of transceivers that exchange configuration information (e.g., enumeration and interrogation commands such as used in Bluetooth systems). By appropriately and consistently reducing an effective range for certain of the configuration signals, transceiving systems could be used to configure devices that are ‘closer’ together than the full operational range of the devices. For many devices used in close quarters, the invention makes it easier for a user to appropriately configure the devices with the appropriate computing system. In these close quarters, it may be that a user does not have access to a transmitter/receiver/transceiver or its associated system to respond to inappropriate configuration signals directed to other, undesired, systems.
- Additionally, the preferred embodiment employs an enable signal to configure a transmitter to selectively send the ID configuration signal with a configuration ID code. In some applications, it may be appropriate to continuously send configuration ID codes, which may be interspersed with data packets For example, a transmitter may be in an operational mode, a configuration mode, or a combination of the two at any particular time, depending upon the application.
- Further, the preferred embodiment provides that the receiver be configured/reconfigured responsive to an ID configuration signal and that the receiver be used to discriminate data packets with mismatching ID codes. Only valid data packets with appropriate ID code tags are sent to the associated computing system In some applications, it may be preferable to have the receiver pass ID configuration signals and all valid data packets to the associated computing system to have the operating system or a software/hardware/firmware driver operating with the receiver be appropriately configured and/or perform the necessary discrimination.
- Additionally, in the preferred embodiment, the receiver has a single valid ID code at any time. A receiver in range of a transmitter when the transmitter issues the configuration change signal uses the configuration ID code included in the transmitter ID configuration signal. In other applications, it may be desirable to have a receiver have capacity to accept multiple ID codes, and any configuration ID code that is received that does not match any current ID code associated with the receiver will be additionally written rather than being replaced in the receiver.
- Accordingly, many modifications may be made by one of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Claims (10)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/209,599 US20050281224A1 (en) | 2002-10-23 | 2005-08-22 | Proximity-based automatic ID code reconfiguration of wireless input/output systems |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/278,749 US6989762B2 (en) | 2002-10-23 | 2002-10-23 | Proximity-based automatic ID code reconfiguration of wireless input/output systems |
US11/209,599 US20050281224A1 (en) | 2002-10-23 | 2005-08-22 | Proximity-based automatic ID code reconfiguration of wireless input/output systems |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/278,749 Continuation US6989762B2 (en) | 2002-10-23 | 2002-10-23 | Proximity-based automatic ID code reconfiguration of wireless input/output systems |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20050281224A1 true US20050281224A1 (en) | 2005-12-22 |
Family
ID=32106605
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/278,749 Expired - Fee Related US6989762B2 (en) | 2002-10-23 | 2002-10-23 | Proximity-based automatic ID code reconfiguration of wireless input/output systems |
US11/209,599 Abandoned US20050281224A1 (en) | 2002-10-23 | 2005-08-22 | Proximity-based automatic ID code reconfiguration of wireless input/output systems |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/278,749 Expired - Fee Related US6989762B2 (en) | 2002-10-23 | 2002-10-23 | Proximity-based automatic ID code reconfiguration of wireless input/output systems |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US6989762B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1554828A2 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2003284903A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2004038969A2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
ATE416552T1 (en) | 2002-07-26 | 2008-12-15 | Koninkl Philips Electronics Nv | SECURING ACCESS TO MULTIMEDIA CONTENT THROUGH AUTHENTICATED DISTANCE MEASUREMENT |
US20060143317A1 (en) * | 2004-12-27 | 2006-06-29 | Behavior Tech Computer Corp. | Starting method of wireless input apparatus and the apparatus thereof |
US8989561B1 (en) | 2008-05-29 | 2015-03-24 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for alerting users of the postponed recording of programs |
US9807172B2 (en) * | 2013-10-18 | 2017-10-31 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Mobile device intermediary for vehicle adaptation |
US9203843B2 (en) | 2013-11-08 | 2015-12-01 | At&T Mobility Ii Llc | Mobile device enabled tiered data exchange via a vehicle |
Citations (19)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4686529A (en) * | 1984-01-06 | 1987-08-11 | Kiekert Gmbh & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft | Remote-control lock system |
US5365225A (en) * | 1989-05-18 | 1994-11-15 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Transmitter-receiver system with (re-)initialization |
US5602535A (en) * | 1994-07-15 | 1997-02-11 | The Friedkin Corporation | Vehicle security system based on two step communication range between transmitter and receiver |
US6294992B1 (en) * | 1995-08-17 | 2001-09-25 | Pittway Corp. | High power control signal transmission and low power data signal transmission in a wireless security system |
US20020016153A1 (en) * | 2000-08-04 | 2002-02-07 | Masahiko Sato | Authenticating method for short-distance radio devices and a short-distance radio device |
US20020083351A1 (en) * | 2000-12-22 | 2002-06-27 | Intel Corporation | Port-based packet filter |
US20030003905A1 (en) * | 2001-06-20 | 2003-01-02 | Shvodian William M. | System and method for providing signal quality feedback in a wireless network |
US6549119B1 (en) * | 1995-02-15 | 2003-04-15 | International Computers Limited | Electronic identification system |
US20030071927A1 (en) * | 2001-10-17 | 2003-04-17 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Remote controller, remote controlled electronic device, remote control system for electronic device and method thereof |
US20030080850A1 (en) * | 2001-10-30 | 2003-05-01 | Kline David R. | Method and apparatus for causing a remote device to implement a user profile and system that operates therewith |
US6617961B1 (en) * | 1999-11-15 | 2003-09-09 | Strattec Security Corporation | Security system for a vehicle and method of operating same |
US20030220765A1 (en) * | 2002-05-24 | 2003-11-27 | Overy Michael Robert | Method and apparatus for enhancing security in a wireless network using distance measurement techniques |
US20040036575A1 (en) * | 2002-08-09 | 2004-02-26 | Patterson Hubert A. | Pulsed power method for increased read range for a radio frequency identification reader |
US6718240B1 (en) * | 2002-08-28 | 2004-04-06 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Remote keyless entry system |
US6735448B1 (en) * | 2000-11-07 | 2004-05-11 | Hrl Laboratories, Llc | Power management for throughput enhancement in wireless ad-hoc networks |
US7062512B1 (en) * | 2002-09-27 | 2006-06-13 | Danger, Inc. | System and method for processing identification codes |
US7080405B2 (en) * | 2002-01-16 | 2006-07-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Limiting device function |
US20060205354A1 (en) * | 2005-03-11 | 2006-09-14 | Pirzada Fahd B | Systems and methods for managing out-of-band device connection |
US7187655B1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2007-03-06 | Sony Corporation | Information communication method and apparatus |
-
2002
- 2002-10-23 US US10/278,749 patent/US6989762B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2003
- 2003-10-23 AU AU2003284903A patent/AU2003284903A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2003-10-23 EP EP03779224A patent/EP1554828A2/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2003-10-23 WO PCT/US2003/033738 patent/WO2004038969A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
2005
- 2005-08-22 US US11/209,599 patent/US20050281224A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (19)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4686529A (en) * | 1984-01-06 | 1987-08-11 | Kiekert Gmbh & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft | Remote-control lock system |
US5365225A (en) * | 1989-05-18 | 1994-11-15 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Transmitter-receiver system with (re-)initialization |
US5602535A (en) * | 1994-07-15 | 1997-02-11 | The Friedkin Corporation | Vehicle security system based on two step communication range between transmitter and receiver |
US6549119B1 (en) * | 1995-02-15 | 2003-04-15 | International Computers Limited | Electronic identification system |
US6294992B1 (en) * | 1995-08-17 | 2001-09-25 | Pittway Corp. | High power control signal transmission and low power data signal transmission in a wireless security system |
US7187655B1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2007-03-06 | Sony Corporation | Information communication method and apparatus |
US6617961B1 (en) * | 1999-11-15 | 2003-09-09 | Strattec Security Corporation | Security system for a vehicle and method of operating same |
US20020016153A1 (en) * | 2000-08-04 | 2002-02-07 | Masahiko Sato | Authenticating method for short-distance radio devices and a short-distance radio device |
US6735448B1 (en) * | 2000-11-07 | 2004-05-11 | Hrl Laboratories, Llc | Power management for throughput enhancement in wireless ad-hoc networks |
US20020083351A1 (en) * | 2000-12-22 | 2002-06-27 | Intel Corporation | Port-based packet filter |
US20030003905A1 (en) * | 2001-06-20 | 2003-01-02 | Shvodian William M. | System and method for providing signal quality feedback in a wireless network |
US20030071927A1 (en) * | 2001-10-17 | 2003-04-17 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Remote controller, remote controlled electronic device, remote control system for electronic device and method thereof |
US20030080850A1 (en) * | 2001-10-30 | 2003-05-01 | Kline David R. | Method and apparatus for causing a remote device to implement a user profile and system that operates therewith |
US7080405B2 (en) * | 2002-01-16 | 2006-07-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Limiting device function |
US20030220765A1 (en) * | 2002-05-24 | 2003-11-27 | Overy Michael Robert | Method and apparatus for enhancing security in a wireless network using distance measurement techniques |
US20040036575A1 (en) * | 2002-08-09 | 2004-02-26 | Patterson Hubert A. | Pulsed power method for increased read range for a radio frequency identification reader |
US6718240B1 (en) * | 2002-08-28 | 2004-04-06 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Remote keyless entry system |
US7062512B1 (en) * | 2002-09-27 | 2006-06-13 | Danger, Inc. | System and method for processing identification codes |
US20060205354A1 (en) * | 2005-03-11 | 2006-09-14 | Pirzada Fahd B | Systems and methods for managing out-of-band device connection |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1554828A2 (en) | 2005-07-20 |
US6989762B2 (en) | 2006-01-24 |
US20040080426A1 (en) | 2004-04-29 |
AU2003284903A8 (en) | 2004-05-13 |
WO2004038969A2 (en) | 2004-05-06 |
WO2004038969A3 (en) | 2004-08-05 |
AU2003284903A1 (en) | 2004-05-13 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6493104B1 (en) | Data processing system and method for permitting a computer to automatically detect a presence of and establish a communications link with a printer | |
CN100530224C (en) | RFID interrogator and data communication method thereof | |
EP0796472B1 (en) | Method in an electronic locating device | |
US6928301B2 (en) | Distributed architecture wireless RF modem | |
US20050281224A1 (en) | Proximity-based automatic ID code reconfiguration of wireless input/output systems | |
CN1965323A (en) | Dynamic configuration of a radio frequency transponder | |
US20120021686A1 (en) | Frequency selection system including a wireless microphone and a receiver | |
US7546147B2 (en) | Electronic apparatus capable of executing wireless communication, and program applied to the apparatus | |
US7728731B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for modifying RFID tag data in portable terminal | |
JPH0544717B2 (en) | ||
US20060238304A1 (en) | System and method for adapting an FRID tag reader to its environment | |
US20070254674A1 (en) | Location Determination With A Wireless System | |
US6516204B1 (en) | Combination internal modem and PC card radio operable in multiple modes | |
KR20110037110A (en) | System and method for controlling near filed communication using radio frequency identification technology | |
US8274610B2 (en) | RFID-based wireless remote control using variable ID field | |
CN101556332A (en) | Life detecting ball life searching device used for earthquake rescue | |
WO2006116238A2 (en) | System and method for adapting an rfid tag reader to its environment | |
TWI260819B (en) | Radio frequency antenna module | |
CN112383953A (en) | Portable networking assisting device and wireless sensor networking system | |
US8228174B2 (en) | Radio IC tag reader, its controller, and radio IC tag reading system | |
US20040198226A1 (en) | Method and system for dynamically managing wireless communications system protocols | |
CN113156842A (en) | Communication remote monitoring and control host | |
KR20030094580A (en) | Laser pointing system | |
WO2001061964A1 (en) | Method and system for dynamically managing wireless communications system protocols | |
KR200304658Y1 (en) | Laser Pointing System |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ACCO BRANDS USA LLC, DELAWARE Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:ACCO BRANDS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:016664/0410 Effective date: 20050727 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CITIBANK NORTH AMERICA, INC., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AG Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:ACCO BRANDS CORPORATION;ACCO BRANDS USA LLC;GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:022203/0848;SIGNING DATES FROM 20080130 TO 20090130 Owner name: CITIBANK NORTH AMERICA, INC., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AG Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:ACCO BRANDS CORPORATION;ACCO BRANDS USA LLC;GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION;SIGNING DATES FROM 20080130 TO 20090130;REEL/FRAME:022203/0848 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ACCO BRANDS CORPORATION, ILLINOIS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CITICORP NORTH AMERICA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023312/0784 Effective date: 20090930 Owner name: ACCO BRANDS USA LLC, ILLINOIS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CITICORP NORTH AMERICA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023312/0784 Effective date: 20090930 Owner name: BOONE INTERNATIONAL, INC., ILLINOIS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CITICORP NORTH AMERICA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023312/0784 Effective date: 20090930 Owner name: GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION, ILLINOIS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CITICORP NORTH AMERICA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023312/0784 Effective date: 20090930 Owner name: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ILLINOIS Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:ACCO BRANDS CORPORATION;ACCO BRANDS USA LLC;DAY-TIMERS INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:023312/0902 Effective date: 20090930 Owner name: ACCO BRANDS CORPORATION,ILLINOIS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CITICORP NORTH AMERICA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023312/0784 Effective date: 20090930 Owner name: ACCO BRANDS USA LLC,ILLINOIS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CITICORP NORTH AMERICA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023312/0784 Effective date: 20090930 Owner name: BOONE INTERNATIONAL, INC.,ILLINOIS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CITICORP NORTH AMERICA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023312/0784 Effective date: 20090930 Owner name: GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION,ILLINOIS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CITICORP NORTH AMERICA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023312/0784 Effective date: 20090930 Owner name: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,ILLINOIS Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:ACCO BRANDS CORPORATION;ACCO BRANDS USA LLC;DAY-TIMERS INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:023312/0902 Effective date: 20090930 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH, NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:ACCO BRANDS CORPORATION;ACCO BRANDS USA LLC;DAY-TIMERS INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:023449/0180 Effective date: 20090930 Owner name: DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH,NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:ACCO BRANDS CORPORATION;ACCO BRANDS USA LLC;DAY-TIMERS INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:023449/0180 Effective date: 20090930 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ACCO BRANDS CORPORATION, ILLINOIS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL TRUSTEE;REEL/FRAME:028168/0713 Effective date: 20120430 Owner name: ACCO BRANDS CORPORATION, ILLINOIS Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:028168/0738 Effective date: 20120430 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION, ILLINOIS Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE MISSING ASSIGNEES ON THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 028168 FRAME 0738. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNEES ACCO BRANDS USA LLC, AND GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION ARE ADDITIONAL ASIGNEES;ASSIGNOR:DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANK, AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:028488/0056 Effective date: 20120430 Owner name: ACCO BRANDS USA LLC, ILLINOIS Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE THE MISSING ASSIGNEES ON THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 028168 FRAME 0713. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNEES ACCO BRANDS USA LLC AND GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION ARE ADDITIONAL ASSIGNEES;ASSIGNOR:U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL TRUSTEE;REEL/FRAME:028487/0671 Effective date: 20120430 Owner name: ACCO BRANDS USA LLC, ILLINOIS Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE MISSING ASSIGNEES ON THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 028168 FRAME 0738. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNEES ACCO BRANDS USA LLC, AND GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION ARE ADDITIONAL ASIGNEES;ASSIGNOR:DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANK, AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:028488/0056 Effective date: 20120430 Owner name: ACCO BRANDS CORPORATION, ILLINOIS Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE MISSING ASSIGNEES ON THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 028168 FRAME 0738. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNEES ACCO BRANDS USA LLC, AND GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION ARE ADDITIONAL ASIGNEES;ASSIGNOR:DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANK, AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:028488/0056 Effective date: 20120430 Owner name: ACCO BRANDS CORPORATION, ILLINOIS Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE THE MISSING ASSIGNEES ON THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 028168 FRAME 0713. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNEES ACCO BRANDS USA LLC AND GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION ARE ADDITIONAL ASSIGNEES;ASSIGNOR:U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL TRUSTEE;REEL/FRAME:028487/0671 Effective date: 20120430 Owner name: GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION, ILLINOIS Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE THE MISSING ASSIGNEES ON THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 028168 FRAME 0713. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNEES ACCO BRANDS USA LLC AND GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION ARE ADDITIONAL ASSIGNEES;ASSIGNOR:U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL TRUSTEE;REEL/FRAME:028487/0671 Effective date: 20120430 |