US20050267367A1 - Protocol controller for a medical diagnostic imaging system - Google Patents
Protocol controller for a medical diagnostic imaging system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20050267367A1 US20050267367A1 US11/176,875 US17687505A US2005267367A1 US 20050267367 A1 US20050267367 A1 US 20050267367A1 US 17687505 A US17687505 A US 17687505A US 2005267367 A1 US2005267367 A1 US 2005267367A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- protocol
- imaging system
- clip
- user
- sequence
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S7/00—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
- G01S7/52—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S15/00
- G01S7/52017—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S15/00 particularly adapted to short-range imaging
- G01S7/52098—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S15/00 particularly adapted to short-range imaging related to workflow protocols
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B8/00—Diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves
Definitions
- Protocols to support a stress echo exam are now standard within the ultrasound industry.
- the common practice is to step the user through pre-defined series of clip acquisitions that allow the clinician to compare left ventricular motion from a variety of views, with and without stressing the heart.
- pre-defined protocols e.g., two-stage exercise stress, four-stage exercise stress, etc.
- the Sequoia® Echocardiography Platform offers some degree of user customization of protocol factors such as the number of stages, the number of views, and the clip capture parameters used for each stage/view.
- the Phillips 5500 system extends the protocol concept to imaging parameters in a limited way by providing the ability to remember image parameter settings changed by the user in one stage and then recall those settings in a subsequent stage.
- the embodiments described below relate to a protocol controller for a medical diagnostic imaging system.
- two or more distinct study protocols are active on a medical diagnostic imaging system at the same time.
- control of a medical diagnostic imaging system is changed at each stage of a study protocol sequence to optimize study performance.
- a protocol is created from a collection of macros that control a medical diagnostic imaging system.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a medical diagnostic ultrasound imaging system of an embodiment.
- FIG. 2 is a stress echo state transition diagram of an embodiment.
- FIG. 3 is a contrast state transition diagram of an embodiment.
- an ultrasound system 100 typically comprises a transducer probe 105 , a beamformer 110 , a processor 120 , a display device 130 , a storage device 140 , and a user interface 150 .
- the term “processor” is being used to broadly refer to the hardware components and/or software components (i.e., computer-readable program code) of the ultrasound system 100 that are used to implement the functionality described herein. Any suitable hardware/software components can be used. Further, it should be noted that multiple processors can be used and that the functionality described herein can be performed by a single processor or can be distributed among several processors. Additionally, some or all of the functionality described herein can be implemented purely with hardware.
- the ultrasound system 100 During an ultrasound examination, a sonographer contacts the transducer probe 105 with a patient, and the ultrasound system 100 generates an ultrasound image.
- the ultrasound system's processor 120 causes the beamformer 110 to apply a voltage to the transducer 105 to cause it to vibrate and emit an ultrasonic beam into the portion of the patient's body in contact with the transducer 105 .
- Ultrasonic energy reflected from the patient's body impinges on the transducer 105 , and the resulting voltages created by the transducer 105 are received by the beamformer 110 .
- the processor 120 processes the sensed voltages to create an ultrasound image that is displayed on the display device 130 .
- the ultrasound system 100 can be used to perform any number of exams (or “studies”) of a patient. Some studies require a user to follow a defined “protocol.”
- a “protocol” is a sequence of steps performed by a user (e.g., a sonographer or physician) to perform a particular ultrasound study.
- a protocol is often used with a “staged” study, although a protocol can also be used with a non-staged study.
- a staged study contains a set of images acquired under specified conditions during two or more time intervals called “stages” with a consistent set of images called “views” acquired during each stage of the study. The protocol for a staged study dictates the actions a user must perform to complete the study.
- a user proceeds through a staged protocol exam one stage at a time, acquiring images with the capture settings of each stage.
- a staged study is a stress echo ultrasound study, which allows a clinician to compare left ventricular motion from a variety of views, with and without stressing the heart.
- a typical stress echo protocol consists of the user imaging and capturing clips of the patient's heart while the patient's heart is at its resting heart rate.
- the standard views of the heart that are imaged and captured are Parasternal Long Axis (PLAX), Parasternal Short Axis (PSAX), Apical Four Chamber (A4C), and Apical Two Chamber (A2C).
- the patient's heart rate is increased to its maximum, either by exercise (e.g., treadmill, bicycle) or with the use of drugs (for those patients who are unable to exercise).
- the user will image and capture clips (standard views) of the patient's heart while the patient's heart rate is at its maximum increase, before the heart rate slows down (images are typically captured within 60-90 seconds after exercise has stopped).
- the standard has been to capture at least four clips of each view and only keep the best clip for each view of each stage.
- An ultrasound imaging system can assist a user in performing a staged protocol study of a patient by automatically controlling various system parameters in accordance with the protocol to guide the user through a pre-defined series of clip acquisitions.
- an ultrasound system can be programmed with a series of preset, defined protocols (e.g., a two-stage exercise stress echo protocol, a four-stage exercise stress echo protocol, etc.) that a user can select for a particular study. Based on the selected protocol, the ultrasound system automatically moves through stages and views, moves between imaging and review of captured images, provides automatic movement to the next stage, and performs automatic storage and retrieval of each view.
- the ultrasound system would also know how to capture and playback clips and can automate system actions where appropriate, such as automatically performing a system transition, to help eliminate the number of steps (i.e., button hits) the user must perform, thereby reducing the user's workload.
- the protocol in those systems is for the same application (e.g., a stress echo protocol).
- the concept of protocol is expanded beyond its use in stress echo.
- the processor 120 in the ultrasound system 100 can be configured to run a protocol controller 160 that allows two or more different protocols to be active simultaneously and be executed together in an integrated fashion. By allowing multiple protocols to be active and work together, imaging modes can be changed in a user-customizable, pre-defined way as the protocol proceeds. This allows the protocol to drive the basic imaging of the system.
- an emerging application in ultrasound is the use of contrast agents during imaging. This typically involves imaging the target organ before contrast, injecting contrast media, and imaging the target organ after contrast. At the point of injection, the user often would like to initiate a timer to keep track of elapsed time from injection.
- a different imaging mode is typically used with a completely different suite of imaging parameters. To document, this procedure, a different set of clip capture parameters are typically used for pre-injection vs. post-injection clips.
- a user can nest a pre-defined stress echo protocol with a pre-defined contrast protocol to define one integrated protocol that combines the two protocols.
- pre-defined protocols can be combined, almost like building blocks, and work together to create new and novel applications.
- Table 1 shows this combination of stress echo and contrast protocols conceptually, from the user's point of view: TABLE 1 User Input System Response Start the “rest” phase of Initiate the stress protocol. a stress exam. Capture clips to document resting Capture clips. phase without contrast. Inject contrast media. Initiate the contrast protocol within the context of the stress echo protocol. Capture clips to document resting A new suite of capture parameters phase with contrast.
- Tables 2 and 3 set forth the protocol parameter definition values for pharmacologic stress echo and contrast protocols
- Table 4 provides a description of the actions taken by the user and the ultrasound system's response for each stage in the protocol. It should be noted that this is merely an example, and the details set forth in this example should not be read into the claims.
- the system provides the user with the Stress Echo exam with the capability to choose a Stress Echo use of a Contrast agent.
- the exam type (exercise or pharmacologic).
- use of the Contrast agent for This example assumes a Pharmacologic MP (myocardial perfusion) Stress Echo exam has been chosen. is to identify perfusion defects from induced ischemia.
- the purpose is to document a change in the contrast bubble delivery at rest (patient heart rate at rest) compared with stress (patient heart rate at maximum increase).
- the user plugs the The system performs system initializa- appropriate cardiac tion for the Stress Echo exam.
- This transducer into the system entails initializing parameter values and selects the for the selected transducer and the Pharmacologic Stress Echo Stress Echo exam, such as imaging exam. parameters, calculation package(s), and the Stress Echo protocol. Additionally, it initializes the Contrast protocol, so that a Contrast protocol can be used during a Stress Echo (“SE”) exam.
- SE Protocol Controller is the current active protocol in the Imaging state, Baseline stage, PLAX view. The user images the patients The system changes the Protocol Clip heart and decides to capture Capture definitions from the a clip of the heart in BC Pharmacologic Stress Echo Protocol mode before beginning the Clip Capture definitions to the Stress Echo - Contrast Pharmacologic Stress Echo Protocol exam. Alternate Capture Clip Capture The user selects the definitions.
- the user disables the The system changes the Protocol Clip Alternate Capture, so they Capture definitions from the can start the SE - Contrast Pharmacologic Stress Echo Protocol exam. Alternate Capture Clip Capture definitions to the Pharmacologic Stress Echo Protocol Clip Capture definitions.
- the user enables Contrast The Contrast Protocol Controller by selecting the Contrast becomes active in addition to the SE button and begins image Protocol Controller. The Contrast acquisition. Protocol Controller is in the Normal Acquisition, Sequence 1 state.
- the system will flow through the SE protocol using the SE protocol defined parameter values and, since Contrast was enabled by selecting the Contrast button, the system will additionally flow through the Contrast protocol using its defined parameter values.
- the user selects the clips he
- the Protocol Controller knows the wants to keep, the ones that View Sequence of this Pharmacologic captured the anatomy Stress Echo exam.
- the protocol will clearly.
- View label as the user assigns View the clip with the appropriate labels to their selected clips.
- View label (i.e., PLAX, etc).
- the user is ready to System transitions from review to continue the exam.
- the SE Protocol user selects to exit Review Controller is in Imaging state, and return to live image Low Dose stage, A2C view. acquisition.
- the user injects The Contrast protocol acquisition pharmacological drug to sequence will transmit using the increase the patients heart defined parameters above. Every N + rate.
- the user selects the clips he
- the Protocol Controller knows the View wants to keep, the ones that Sequence of this Pharmacologic Stress captured the anatomy Echo exam. The protocol will default clearly.
- the user will label as the user assigns View labels to the clip with the appropriate their selected clips.
- View label i.e., PLAX, etc.
- the user is ready to System transitions from review to live continue the exam.
- the SE Protocol Controller is user selects to exit Review in Imaging state, Peak Dose stage, and return to live image PLAX view. acquisition.
- the user moves the transducer Dose stage. through all 4 views to capture clips of each view.
- the user selects Review to The system transitions from live view all clips captured for imaging mode to review of the clips the exam. that were captured.
- the concept of nested protocols can be used to automatically change the control of the ultrasound system at each stage of a multi-stage study protocol sequence.
- Such optimization can be used to improve image quality and study workflow and can involve changing annotations and/or DICOM settings.
- nesting two or more different protocols so that a segment of one study protocol is inserted into another study protocol can be viewed as a particular example of changing the control of the ultrasound system at each stage of a multi-stage study protocol sequence.
- the Protocol Controller 160 be implemented as a software-implemented finite state machine.
- Finite state machines are known in the art and are described in, for example, chapter 5 of “Dynamic Modeling in Object-Oriented Modeling and Design” by Rumbaugh, Blaha, Premerlani, Eddy and Lorensen, which is hereby incorporated by reference. It is preferred that the finite state machine design pattern be implemented in such a way that the finite state machine software allows the Protocol Controller 160 to implement a state model diagram in a highly configurable way.
- a state model diagram relates events and states. When an event is received, the next state depends on the current state as well as the event.
- a change of state caused by an event is called a transition.
- a state model diagram is a graph whose nodes are states and whose directed arcs are transitions labeled with event names. There can be guards and actions associated with state transitions, as well as state entry and state exit actions.
- the finite state machine represents a collection of hierarchical states, where only one sub-state is current at any time.
- An application can have multiple states by having multiple finite state machines.
- the state model diagram of a given protocol is used to initiate the execution of the application functionality. It is driven by events, which are due to user actions. There can be concurrent finite state machines active at the same time, and they can communicate by sending messages, which may cause state transitions and actions to be executed.
- the finite state machine model definition is defined in a file using a state model meta-language. This allows a concise definition of all the information represented in the state model diagram. No software coding is required to define the states or their relationships and transitions of the state model diagram. The states and some of their relationships and transitions can be changed without having to recompile and re-build the software.
- Each protocol has its own set of parameters that are defined by the protocol and get initialized when the protocol finite state machine is created and initialized.
- the parameters define to the system how to perform or respond to certain user actions (e.g., selections).
- the protocol finite state machine always knows what state the protocol is in and defines the sequences of operations that occur in response to external stimuli (e.g., user actions, such as button presses or selections).
- the external stimuli (user actions) generates system events, and the finite state machine's response to an event depends on the state of the finite state machine receiving the event. It can include a change of state or the sending of another event.
- the Protocol Controller 160 can have one or more protocol finite state machines created and running concurrently. The protocol finite state machines can send events to each other, so they can be synchronized.
- FIGS. 2 and 3 are stress echo and contrast state transition diagrams, respectively.
- the lines with arrows represent Events. Events are labeled using “Event” in the name.
- Event There are entry functions that get executed as the corresponding state is entered. As events are received, the finite state machine may change states. Events can have guards or action functions. These diagrams show guards and are functions that get called when transitioning to the state.
- the guard function checks some conditions, such as checking a parameter for a specific value. The guard function must return true before the transition to that state will actually occur (i.e., if the guard function does not return true, then the new state is not entered).
- the stress echo protocol finite state machine 200 comprises three concurrent finite state machine: SystemStates 210 , Stages 220 , and Views 230 .
- the SystemStates finite state machine 210 comprises two states: Imaging 212 and Review 214 .
- the Imaging state 212 is when the system is in live image acquisition
- the Review state 214 is when the system is in review of captured images (still images or multi-frame images (clips)).
- the Stages finite state machine 220 has as many stages as the system allows. In one embodiment, a maximum of ten stages is used because most stress echo studies will use four to seven stages. Of course, fewer or more stages can be used. These stages correspond with the user stages (e.g., Stage1 would be Baseline, Stage2 would be Low Dose, and Stage 3 would be Peak Dose).
- the entry guard function When a Stage is entered, the entry guard function, displayStageTimer, will display the Stage timer if the presets had set the parameter to tell the system to display it; otherwise, it will not be displayed.
- the SelectStageEvent When the SelectStageEvent is received, it has a parameter of Stage. This tells the finite state machine to go to the Stage passed in. For example, SelectStageEvent(Stage2) tells the finite state machine to go to Stage2. The user would have a selection on the display that would allow him to select a specific stage to go to. That is how this event would be sent out. There could be other ways that the SelectStageEvent gets sent out. When a Clip capture is finished, an EndOfCaptureEvent would be sent out. If the guard functions indicated that the Clip Auto Review parameter was not set to End of Capture or End of Stage and that the Auto Next Stage parameter was set to On, then the finite state machine would automatically move to the next Stage.
- View are the same as Stages, only for Views (View1, View2 . . . View10). As with Stages, a maximum of ten views were selected for this example since most Stress Echo studies use four to six views. These correspond with the user views such as View1 would be the stress echo PLAX view, View2 would be the PSAX view, etc.
- the entry function, doContrastAcquisition has a guard function of isContrastOn. If contrast is enabled for this view, then the system could automatically activate the Contrast protocol by sending an event (ContrastAcquisitionEvent).
- the Contrast protocol finite state machine 300 comprises two concurrent finite state machines: AcquisitionStates 310 and ContrastAquisitionSequences 320 .
- the AcquisitionStates finite state machine 310 has two states: NormalAquisition 312 and ContrastAcquisition 314 .
- the NormalAquisition state 312 is when the system is in live image acquisition and a contrast acquisition sequence is not active.
- the ContrastAcquisition state 314 is when the system is in live image acquisition and a contrast acquisition sequence is active.
- the ContrastAcquisitionSequences finite state machine 319 has as many contrast sequences as desired.
- a contrast sequence may transmit each time the patient's r-wave occurs for some number of r-waves (e.g., 5), and the first transmit may use a high mechanical index (MI), and the subsequent transmissions may use low MI.
- MI mechanical index
- a user can select a factory-defined protocol, modify a factory-defined protocol (thereby, making it a user-defined protocol), or create a new protocol.
- the storage device 140 stores a collection of macros for controlling one or more of the following: imaging system settings, the user interface, a display area, and a system peripheral.
- the processor 120 displays a list of macros on the display device 130 and receives a user selection of two or more of the macros via the user interface 150 .
- the processor 120 then creates a study protocol from the selected macros. In this way, the user can select portions of already-defmed protocols (via the list of macros) and put them together to form a new, user-defined group protocol. This eliminates the need for a user to redefine a whole new protocol.
- the term “macro” is often used to describe a segment, script, or skeleton that can be used by another process, preferably repeatedly and in more than one way.
- a macro preferably in Visual C
- the macro can be used repeatedly with a given spreadsheet or moved easily to another spreadsheet and be used there, potentially in a significantly different context.
- the term “macro” means any sequence of instructions that can be interpreted by another process, causing that process to execute or have executed a sequence of instructions. Macros can be exceedingly useful as building blocks for the Protocol Controller 160 . With respect to the Protocol Controller 160 , consider a macro to be a set of parameter definitions that define specific ultrasound system behavior.
- Each macro can be used as ultrasound preset data values or ultrasound system controlling parameters. Every protocol will consist of some set of macros. Once a macro has been defined, it belongs to a pool of defined macros. A new protocol can be created by combining a unique set of macros from this pool of already-defined macros.
- the Protocol Controller 160 itself can then be implemented as an engine used to drive a series of macros. This development is particularly useful in that the engine (i.e., the Protocol Controller 160 ) can run multiple protocols concurrently and/or one protocol can be suspended, its exit point marked, then another protocol activated, and later return to the exit point of the original protocol and continue with the first protocol. This is illustrated in the above example showing the concurrent use of pharmacologic stress echo and contrast protocols.
- a macro can be a code snippet. That is, a macro can be any sequence of instructions that can be interpreted by another process, causing that process to execute a sequence of instructions. In this sense, a “macro” is any sequence of instructions that can be interpreted by another process, causing that process to execute or have executed a sequence of instructions.
- a protocol can have a data or image capture segment. Each instantiation of capture can be built as a macro, such as “store image to disk” or “store clip to VCR.” Of particular usefulness might be an instantiation of a macro for storing data utilizing parameters for a data type and device type: Store ⁇ datatype> to ⁇ devicetype>.
- each segment of the protocol can be written as a macro utilizing parameter.
- the protocol itself can then be implemented as an engine used to drive a series of macros.
- This development is particularly useful in that the engine (i.e., the Protocol Controller 160 ) can be interrupted after execution of a macro, the sequence can be marked to indicate where to re-enter, and the user can run another sequence of macros (protocol) before returning to the exit point and continuing execution of the original protocol.
- the collection of macros controls one or more of the following: imaging system settings, the user interface, a display area, and a system peripheral. More specifically, the macros can control one or more of the following: transmit parameters and settings, receive parameters and settings, imaging mode, imaging parameters and settings, filters and processing specifics, signal processing options, post-processing options, frequency, harmonic, mode, pulse repetition frequency, frame-rate, display control, number of views, annotation, a user interface page displayed in the display area, an active tool displayed in the display area, a cursor in the display area, a number of views in the display area, system control, measurements and reports, annotations, pictograms, review and display features, user preferences, which user interface page is displayed, and which tool/cursor is active, a DICOM device, a CD, a DVD, a VCR, an MO drive, a printer, and a networked device.
- the macros can control one or more of the following: transmit parameters and settings, receive parameters and settings, imaging mode, imaging parameters and settings, filters and processing specifics
- Suitable protocol macros include a clip capture macro, a clip playback macro, a workflow macro, and an acquisition sequence macro. The following are examples of these types of macros:
- Duration/length of each clip to be captured (in seconds, microseconds, heartbeats, etc).
- R-wave trigger clip capture enabled/disabled capture clips based on patients heartbeat or not.
- Clip capture delay time (a delay time after an r-wave trigger occurs to start capturing the clip, in microseconds).
- Clip capture size (full screen, quarter screen, or some other derivative size).
- Clip playback mode (align heartbeats of multiple captured clips or just play each clip or start each clip together at the same time).
- Imaging parameters a defined set such as transmit/receive settings, imaging mode, filters and processing settings, etc.
- some defmed event such as the first view of each stage of a staged protocol, or at the beginning of a defined acquisition sequence, etc.
- Enable/disable to automatically transfer specifically defined types of data to specifically defined devices or locations such as transfer clips over the network at the end of each clip capture, transfer still images to a CD at the end of exam, etc.
- Enable/disable system guidance such as a guidance to the user on the next step to perform for a specific type of exam.
- the system could automatically move through the acquisition steps or could move through the acquisition steps based upon the occurrence of some user/system event.
- an automated exam measurement sequence icon is presented to improve work flow of examinations.
- Ultrasound systems usually provide a menu for the selection of measurements to be performed during an exam. Once invoked, the menu provides a free-style measurement selection and execution that requires the user to revisit the menu for each successive measurement.
- a standard set of measurements are routinely performed in a standard sequence. There may be several such sets of measurements at any specific site or clinic.
- an ultrasound system provides an icon that represents an automated sequence of exam measurement.
- the icon and associated keys provide user control of the sequence including pause, repeat, and skip capabilities.
- the icon displays the name of the currently active measurement and a tool tip that displays the next measurement in the sequence.
- a menu is displayed that allows the user to select a particular sequence (e.g., a uterus or abdominal sequence).
- a sequence is selected from the menu, the first measurement of the sequence is started (i.e., the system enters the proper measurement state and the appropriate measurement tool(s) are displayed). The user then performs the measurement. Once the measurement is completed and its value committed, the next measurement in the sequence begins.
- a sequence may be terminated by completing the sequence or by repeating the action that invoked the sequence (e.g., pressing the auto-sequence key).
- Setup facilities allow the user to customize the sequences by changing the order of measurements and by adding or removing measurements.
- the setup facilities provide for any number of sequences to be stored in memory, each with a specific name that is displayed on the sequence selection menu. The user may also designate a particular subset of the sequences to be displayed on the menu, along with the order in which they appear.
- the icon While a sequence is active, the icon displays the name of the current measurement.
- a tool tip appears that displays the name of the next measurement in the sequence, and the cursor is changed to the shape of a hand with the index finger pointing to the right. This represents skipping directly to the next measurement in the sequence if the cursor is clicked.
- the cursor is instead moved to the left, the cursor changes to a hand with the index finger pointing to the left, indicating a repeat of the previous measurement, and the tool tip text changes to the name of the previous measurement.
- the icon will change in a recognizable way to indicate that the sequence is paused (e.g., change color).
- a dedicated key on the ultrasound console may be used to invoke the auto sequence icon. In this case, pressing the key during a sequence will terminate the sequence.
- the sequence menu may also be invoked by another menu on the ultrasound system.
- a set of console buttons may be used to advance, repeat, and pause the sequence.
- the auto sequences may also include prompts for the user to adjust the transducer or make adjustments to the machine state or image settings, etc.
- each of the embodiments described herein can be used alone or in combination with one another.
- these embodiments can be used with image modalities other than ultrasound imaging, and the claims should not be limited to any particular type of image modality unless explicitly recited therein.
- CT computed tomography
- MRI magnetic resonance imaging
- radiography magnetic resonance
- angioscopy angioscopy
- color flow Doppler cystoscopy
- cystoscopy diaphanography
- echocardiography fluoresosin angiography
- laparoscopy magnetic resonance angiography
- positron emission tomography single-photon emission computed tomography
- x-ray angiography computed tomography
- nuclear medicine biomagnetic imaging, culposcopy, duplex Doppler, digital microscopy, endoscopy, fundoscopy, laser surface scan, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, radiographic imaging, thermography, and radio fluroscopy.
Abstract
The embodiments described herein relate to a protocol controller for a medical diagnostic imaging system. In one embodiment, two or more distinct study protocols are active on a medical diagnostic imaging system at the same time. In another embodiment, control of a medical diagnostic imaging system is changed at each stage of a study protocol sequence to optimize study performance. In yet another embodiment, a protocol is created from a collection of macros that control a medical diagnostic imaging system. Other embodiments are provided, and each of the embodiments described herein can be used alone or in combination with one another.
Description
- The use of protocols to support a stress echo exam is now standard within the ultrasound industry. The common practice is to step the user through pre-defined series of clip acquisitions that allow the clinician to compare left ventricular motion from a variety of views, with and without stressing the heart. Within the industry, there are some very standard pre-defined protocols (e.g., two-stage exercise stress, four-stage exercise stress, etc.). The Sequoia® Echocardiography Platform offers some degree of user customization of protocol factors such as the number of stages, the number of views, and the clip capture parameters used for each stage/view. Additionally, the Phillips 5500 system extends the protocol concept to imaging parameters in a limited way by providing the ability to remember image parameter settings changed by the user in one stage and then recall those settings in a subsequent stage.
- The present invention is defined by the following claims, and nothing in this section should be taken as a limitation on those claims.
- By way of introduction, the embodiments described below relate to a protocol controller for a medical diagnostic imaging system. In one embodiment, two or more distinct study protocols are active on a medical diagnostic imaging system at the same time. In another embodiment, control of a medical diagnostic imaging system is changed at each stage of a study protocol sequence to optimize study performance. In yet another embodiment, a protocol is created from a collection of macros that control a medical diagnostic imaging system. Other embodiments are provided, and each of the embodiments described herein can be used alone or in combination with one another.
- The embodiments will now be described with reference to the attached drawings.
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a medical diagnostic ultrasound imaging system of an embodiment. -
FIG. 2 is a stress echo state transition diagram of an embodiment. -
FIG. 3 is a contrast state transition diagram of an embodiment. - By way of introduction, the embodiments described below relate generally to protocols used in a medical diagnostic imaging system. Although any type of imaging system can be used, these embodiments will be illustrated in conjunction with an ultrasound imaging system. Turning now to
FIG. 1 , anultrasound system 100 typically comprises atransducer probe 105, abeamformer 110, aprocessor 120, adisplay device 130, astorage device 140, and auser interface 150. The term “processor” is being used to broadly refer to the hardware components and/or software components (i.e., computer-readable program code) of theultrasound system 100 that are used to implement the functionality described herein. Any suitable hardware/software components can be used. Further, it should be noted that multiple processors can be used and that the functionality described herein can be performed by a single processor or can be distributed among several processors. Additionally, some or all of the functionality described herein can be implemented purely with hardware. - During an ultrasound examination, a sonographer contacts the
transducer probe 105 with a patient, and theultrasound system 100 generates an ultrasound image. In general, the ultrasound system'sprocessor 120 causes thebeamformer 110 to apply a voltage to thetransducer 105 to cause it to vibrate and emit an ultrasonic beam into the portion of the patient's body in contact with thetransducer 105. Ultrasonic energy reflected from the patient's body impinges on thetransducer 105, and the resulting voltages created by thetransducer 105 are received by thebeamformer 110. Theprocessor 120 processes the sensed voltages to create an ultrasound image that is displayed on thedisplay device 130. - The
ultrasound system 100 can be used to perform any number of exams (or “studies”) of a patient. Some studies require a user to follow a defined “protocol.” A “protocol” is a sequence of steps performed by a user (e.g., a sonographer or physician) to perform a particular ultrasound study. A protocol is often used with a “staged” study, although a protocol can also be used with a non-staged study. A staged study contains a set of images acquired under specified conditions during two or more time intervals called “stages” with a consistent set of images called “views” acquired during each stage of the study. The protocol for a staged study dictates the actions a user must perform to complete the study. A user proceeds through a staged protocol exam one stage at a time, acquiring images with the capture settings of each stage. One example of a staged study is a stress echo ultrasound study, which allows a clinician to compare left ventricular motion from a variety of views, with and without stressing the heart. A typical stress echo protocol consists of the user imaging and capturing clips of the patient's heart while the patient's heart is at its resting heart rate. The standard views of the heart that are imaged and captured are Parasternal Long Axis (PLAX), Parasternal Short Axis (PSAX), Apical Four Chamber (A4C), and Apical Two Chamber (A2C). Next, the patient's heart rate is increased to its maximum, either by exercise (e.g., treadmill, bicycle) or with the use of drugs (for those patients who are unable to exercise). The user will image and capture clips (standard views) of the patient's heart while the patient's heart rate is at its maximum increase, before the heart rate slows down (images are typically captured within 60-90 seconds after exercise has stopped). The user reviews the captured clips and selects the clips he wants to keep. The rest of the clips are deleted when the study has ended. The standard has been to capture at least four clips of each view and only keep the best clip for each view of each stage. - An ultrasound imaging system can assist a user in performing a staged protocol study of a patient by automatically controlling various system parameters in accordance with the protocol to guide the user through a pre-defined series of clip acquisitions. For example, an ultrasound system can be programmed with a series of preset, defined protocols (e.g., a two-stage exercise stress echo protocol, a four-stage exercise stress echo protocol, etc.) that a user can select for a particular study. Based on the selected protocol, the ultrasound system automatically moves through stages and views, moves between imaging and review of captured images, provides automatic movement to the next stage, and performs automatic storage and retrieval of each view. The ultrasound system would also know how to capture and playback clips and can automate system actions where appropriate, such as automatically performing a system transition, to help eliminate the number of steps (i.e., button hits) the user must perform, thereby reducing the user's workload.
- While some existing ultrasound systems offer some degree of user customization of a protocol (such as the number of stages, the number of views, and the clip capture parameters used for each stage/view or remembering image parameter settings changed by the user in one stage and then recalling those settings in a subsequent stage), the protocol in those systems is for the same application (e.g., a stress echo protocol). In one embodiment, the concept of protocol is expanded beyond its use in stress echo. More generally, the
processor 120 in theultrasound system 100 can be configured to run aprotocol controller 160 that allows two or more different protocols to be active simultaneously and be executed together in an integrated fashion. By allowing multiple protocols to be active and work together, imaging modes can be changed in a user-customizable, pre-defined way as the protocol proceeds. This allows the protocol to drive the basic imaging of the system. - For example, an emerging application in ultrasound is the use of contrast agents during imaging. This typically involves imaging the target organ before contrast, injecting contrast media, and imaging the target organ after contrast. At the point of injection, the user often would like to initiate a timer to keep track of elapsed time from injection. During imaging and after contrast injection, a different imaging mode is typically used with a completely different suite of imaging parameters. To document, this procedure, a different set of clip capture parameters are typically used for pre-injection vs. post-injection clips.
- By allowing aspects of system operation to be coordinated in a user-customizable, pre-defined way, a user can nest a pre-defined stress echo protocol with a pre-defined contrast protocol to define one integrated protocol that combines the two protocols. In this way, pre-defined protocols can be combined, almost like building blocks, and work together to create new and novel applications. Table 1 shows this combination of stress echo and contrast protocols conceptually, from the user's point of view:
TABLE 1 User Input System Response Start the “rest” phase of Initiate the stress protocol. a stress exam. Capture clips to document resting Capture clips. phase without contrast. Inject contrast media. Initiate the contrast protocol within the context of the stress echo protocol. Capture clips to document resting A new suite of capture parameters phase with contrast. is used, optimized for contrast. Move the stress protocol to the Return to standard imaging using next stage: peak exercise. clip capture parameters optimized for peak stress. Capture clips to document peak Capture clips. stress without contrast. Inject contrast media. Initiate the contrast protocol within the context of the stress echo protocol. Capture clips to document resting A new suite of capture parameters phase with contrast. is used, optimized for contrast. - The following shows, in more detail, how two different protocols (here, pharmacologic stress echo and contrast) can be active and used together at the same time. Tables 2 and 3 set forth the protocol parameter definition values for pharmacologic stress echo and contrast protocols, and Table 4 provides a description of the actions taken by the user and the ultrasound system's response for each stage in the protocol. It should be noted that this is merely an example, and the details set forth in this example should not be read into the claims.
TABLE 2 Protocol Parameter Definition Values for Pharmacologic Stress Echo Protocol Stage Sequence: Baseline, Low Dose, Peak Dose Clip Auto Delete: On Auto Next Stage: On Clip Playback Speed: 50% Clip Playback Mode: Loop aligned Clip Capture parameter values for Baseline Stage View Sequence: PLAX, PSAX, A4C, A2C Clips per Capture: 4 Clip Capture Method: Prospective Compression Rate: Medium Duration per Clip: 1 heart beat Clip Auto Review: End of Stage Clip Capture Size: ¼ ROI R-Wave Trigger: On Clip Capture parameter values for Low Dose Stage View Sequence: A2C, A4C, PSAX, PLAX Clips per Capture: 4 Clip Capture Method: Prospective Compression Rate: Medium Duration per Clip: 1 heart beat Clip Auto Review: End of Stage Clip Capture Size: ¼ ROI R-Wave Trigger: On Clip Capture parameter values for Peak Dose Stage View Sequence: PLAX, PSAX, A4C, A2C Clips per Capture: Continuous Clip Capture Method: Prospective Compression Rate: Medium Duration per Clip: 1 heart beat Clip Auto Review: Off Clip Capture Size: ¼ ROI R-Wave Trigger: On Clip Capture parameter values for an Alternate Capture Definition Clips per Capture: 1 Clip Capture Method: Prospective Compression Rate: Medium Duration per Clip: 1 minute Clip Auto Review: Off Clip Capture Size: ¼ ROI R-Wave Trigger: Off -
TABLE 3 Protocol Parameter Definition Values for Contrast (Sequence for Myocardial Perfusion (MP)) Protocol Trigger: R-wave Burst Duration: 5 frames (at high MI) Transmit Duration: Continuous (except during Burst) (at low MI) Transmit Transition Delay: 0 Restart Sequence after: N + 1, where N = r-wave to r-wave interval Duration per Clip: 2 heart beats -
TABLE 4 User Input System Response User wants to perform a The system provides the user with the Stress Echo exam with the capability to choose a Stress Echo use of a Contrast agent. The exam type (exercise or pharmacologic). use of the Contrast agent for This example assumes a Pharmacologic MP (myocardial perfusion) Stress Echo exam has been chosen. is to identify perfusion defects from induced ischemia. The purpose is to document a change in the contrast bubble delivery at rest (patient heart rate at rest) compared with stress (patient heart rate at maximum increase). The user plugs the The system performs system initializa- appropriate cardiac tion for the Stress Echo exam. This transducer into the system entails initializing parameter values and selects the for the selected transducer and the Pharmacologic Stress Echo Stress Echo exam, such as imaging exam. parameters, calculation package(s), and the Stress Echo protocol. Additionally, it initializes the Contrast protocol, so that a Contrast protocol can be used during a Stress Echo (“SE”) exam. The SE Protocol Controller is the current active protocol in the Imaging state, Baseline stage, PLAX view. The user images the patients The system changes the Protocol Clip heart and decides to capture Capture definitions from the a clip of the heart in BC Pharmacologic Stress Echo Protocol mode before beginning the Clip Capture definitions to the Stress Echo - Contrast Pharmacologic Stress Echo Protocol exam. Alternate Capture Clip Capture The user selects the definitions. (These Alternate Capture Alternate Capture via a UI definitions allow the user to selection, to active the temporarily capture clips in a non-SE Alternate Capture capture method without leaving the SE definitions. The user exam or having to change any Protocol changes the system from B definitions.) mode to BC mode. The user selects the Clip When the Clip Capture button is Capture button to start a selected, the system captures 1 Clip Clip capture. (Clips per Capture = 1), where the Clip is up to 1 minute long. The Clip size is full screen (Clip Capture Size = Full Screen). When finished, the user The system will NOT transition from selects the Clip Capture live imaging mode to review (Clip button to stop the Clip Auto Review = Off) of the clip capture. just captured. The user disables the The system changes the Protocol Clip Alternate Capture, so they Capture definitions from the can start the SE - Contrast Pharmacologic Stress Echo Protocol exam. Alternate Capture Clip Capture definitions to the Pharmacologic Stress Echo Protocol Clip Capture definitions. The user enables Contrast The Contrast Protocol Controller by selecting the Contrast becomes active in addition to the SE button and begins image Protocol Controller. The Contrast acquisition. Protocol Controller is in the Normal Acquisition, Sequence 1 state. The system will flow through the SE protocol using the SE protocol defined parameter values and, since Contrast was enabled by selecting the Contrast button, the system will additionally flow through the Contrast protocol using its defined parameter values. Since the parameter ‘Duration per Clip’ is defined for both protocols, the Contrast value of 2 heart beats will be used. If Contrast was disabled, then the Contrast Protocol Controller would not be active, and its parameter values would not be used. The user injects the patient The Contrast protocol acquisition with the Contrast agent and sequence will transmit using the invokes the Contrast defined parameters above. Every N + acquisition sequence. 1 (N = 0 initially) heart beats, the system will transmit a burst of 5 frames of high power followed by transmitting low power. The user selects the Clip Each time the Clip Capture button Capture button to capture is selected, the system captures 4 clips for each of the 4 views clips (Clips per Capture = 4), (PLAX, PSAX, A4C, A2C) where each clip is 2 heart beats for the Baseline stage. long, ¼ ROI size (Duration per Clip = 2 heart beats, Clip Capture Size = ¼ ROI) for all Views (View Sequence) of the Baseline stage. Following the capture of 4 clips for the last view, A2C, the system will transition from live imaging mode to review (Clip Auto Review = End of Stage) of the clips that were captured. The user selects the clips he The Protocol Controller knows the wants to keep, the ones that View Sequence of this Pharmacologic captured the anatomy Stress Echo exam. The protocol will clearly. As part of selecting default the clip label to the next the clip, the user will label View label as the user assigns View the clip with the appropriate labels to their selected clips. View label (i.e., PLAX, etc). The user is ready to System transitions from review to continue the exam. The live imaging. The SE Protocol user selects to exit Review Controller is in Imaging state, and return to live image Low Dose stage, A2C view. acquisition. The user injects The Contrast protocol acquisition pharmacological drug to sequence will transmit using the increase the patients heart defined parameters above. Every N + rate. 1 (N = 0 initially) heart beats, The user injects the patient the system will transmit a burst of with the Contrast agent and 5 frames of high power followed by invokes the Contrast transmitting low power. acquisition sequence and begins image acquisition. The user selects the Clip Each time the Clip Capture button is Capture button to capture selected, the system captures 4 clips clips for each of the 4 views (Clips per Capture = 4) where each (A2C, A4C, PSAX, PLAX) clip is 2 heart beats long, ¼ ROI for the Low Dose stage. size (Duration per Clip = 2 heart beats, ¼ ROI size) for all Views (View Sequence) of the Low Dose stage. Following the capture of 4 clips for the last view, PLAX, the system will transition from live imaging mode to review (Clip Auto Review = End of Stage) of the clips that were captured. The user selects the clips he The Protocol Controller knows the View wants to keep, the ones that Sequence of this Pharmacologic Stress captured the anatomy Echo exam. The protocol will default clearly. As part of selecting the clip label to the next View label the clip, the user will label as the user assigns View labels to the clip with the appropriate their selected clips. View label (i.e., PLAX, etc). The user is ready to System transitions from review to live continue the exam. The imaging. The SE Protocol Controller is user selects to exit Review in Imaging state, Peak Dose stage, and return to live image PLAX view. acquisition. The user increases the The Contrast protocol acquisition injected amount of sequence will transmit using the pharmacological drug to defined parameters above. Every N + increase the patient's heart 1 (N = 0 initially) heart beats, rate even higher the system will transmit a burst of 5 When the patient's heart rate frames of high power followed by is where the physician wants transmitting low power. it to be, the user injects the patient with the Contrast agent and invokes the Contrast acquisition sequence and begins image acquisition. The user selects the Clip The system begins a Continuous Clip Capture button once for a capture (Clips per Capture = continuous capture. This Continuous) where each clip is 2 heart captures clips for each of the beats long, ¼ ROI size (Duration 4 views (PLAX, PSAX, per Clip = 2 heart beats, ¼ ROI A4C, A2C) for the Peak size). The user moves the transducer Dose stage. through all 4 views to capture clips of each view. When finished, the user The system will NOT transition from selects the Clip Capture live imaging mode to review (Clip Auto button to stop the Review = Off) of the clips that Continuous Clip capture. were captured. The user selects Review to The system transitions from live view all clips captured for imaging mode to review of the clips the exam. that were captured. The user selects the clips he The Protocol Controller knows the View wants to keep, the ones that Sequence of this Pharmacologic Stress captured the anatomy Echo exam. The protocol will default clearly. As part of selecting the clip label to the next View label the clip, the user will label as the user assigns View labels to the clip with the appropriate their selected clips. View label (i.e., PLAX, etc). The user selects to end the The Protocol Controller was initialized exam. for the Pharmacologic Stress Echo protocol to delete all clips that are not selected as clips to keep at the end of the exam (Clip Auto Delete = On). The clips not selected as clips to keep are deleted when the patient record is closed. - In the examples set forth above, two different protocols were active and used together at the same time. In a more general embodiment, the concept of nested protocols can be used to automatically change the control of the ultrasound system at each stage of a multi-stage study protocol sequence. Such optimization can be used to improve image quality and study workflow and can involve changing annotations and/or DICOM settings. In this way, nesting two or more different protocols so that a segment of one study protocol is inserted into another study protocol can be viewed as a particular example of changing the control of the ultrasound system at each stage of a multi-stage study protocol sequence.
- It is presently preferred that the
Protocol Controller 160 be implemented as a software-implemented finite state machine. Of course, other implementations can be used. Finite state machines are known in the art and are described in, for example, chapter 5 of “Dynamic Modeling in Object-Oriented Modeling and Design” by Rumbaugh, Blaha, Premerlani, Eddy and Lorensen, which is hereby incorporated by reference. It is preferred that the finite state machine design pattern be implemented in such a way that the finite state machine software allows theProtocol Controller 160 to implement a state model diagram in a highly configurable way. A state model diagram relates events and states. When an event is received, the next state depends on the current state as well as the event. A change of state caused by an event is called a transition. A state model diagram is a graph whose nodes are states and whose directed arcs are transitions labeled with event names. There can be guards and actions associated with state transitions, as well as state entry and state exit actions. The finite state machine represents a collection of hierarchical states, where only one sub-state is current at any time. An application can have multiple states by having multiple finite state machines. The state model diagram of a given protocol is used to initiate the execution of the application functionality. It is driven by events, which are due to user actions. There can be concurrent finite state machines active at the same time, and they can communicate by sending messages, which may cause state transitions and actions to be executed. The finite state machine model definition is defined in a file using a state model meta-language. This allows a concise definition of all the information represented in the state model diagram. No software coding is required to define the states or their relationships and transitions of the state model diagram. The states and some of their relationships and transitions can be changed without having to recompile and re-build the software. - Each protocol has its own set of parameters that are defined by the protocol and get initialized when the protocol finite state machine is created and initialized. The parameters define to the system how to perform or respond to certain user actions (e.g., selections). The protocol finite state machine always knows what state the protocol is in and defines the sequences of operations that occur in response to external stimuli (e.g., user actions, such as button presses or selections). The external stimuli (user actions) generates system events, and the finite state machine's response to an event depends on the state of the finite state machine receiving the event. It can include a change of state or the sending of another event. The
Protocol Controller 160 can have one or more protocol finite state machines created and running concurrently. The protocol finite state machines can send events to each other, so they can be synchronized. -
FIGS. 2 and 3 are stress echo and contrast state transition diagrams, respectively. In these figures, the lines with arrows represent Events. Events are labeled using “Event” in the name. There are entry functions that get executed as the corresponding state is entered. As events are received, the finite state machine may change states. Events can have guards or action functions. These diagrams show guards and are functions that get called when transitioning to the state. The guard function checks some conditions, such as checking a parameter for a specific value. The guard function must return true before the transition to that state will actually occur (i.e., if the guard function does not return true, then the new state is not entered). - Turning now to
FIG. 2 , the stress echo protocol finite state machine 200, comprises three concurrent finite state machine:SystemStates 210,Stages 220, and Views 230. The SystemStatesfinite state machine 210 comprises two states: Imaging 212 andReview 214. The Imaging state 212 is when the system is in live image acquisition, and theReview state 214 is when the system is in review of captured images (still images or multi-frame images (clips)). The Stagesfinite state machine 220 has as many stages as the system allows. In one embodiment, a maximum of ten stages is used because most stress echo studies will use four to seven stages. Of course, fewer or more stages can be used. These stages correspond with the user stages (e.g., Stage1 would be Baseline, Stage2 would be Low Dose, andStage 3 would be Peak Dose). - When a Stage is entered, the entry guard function, displayStageTimer, will display the Stage timer if the presets had set the parameter to tell the system to display it; otherwise, it will not be displayed. When the SelectStageEvent is received, it has a parameter of Stage. This tells the finite state machine to go to the Stage passed in. For example, SelectStageEvent(Stage2) tells the finite state machine to go to Stage2. The user would have a selection on the display that would allow him to select a specific stage to go to. That is how this event would be sent out. There could be other ways that the SelectStageEvent gets sent out. When a Clip capture is finished, an EndOfCaptureEvent would be sent out. If the guard functions indicated that the Clip Auto Review parameter was not set to End of Capture or End of Stage and that the Auto Next Stage parameter was set to On, then the finite state machine would automatically move to the next Stage.
- View are the same as Stages, only for Views (View1, View2 . . . View10). As with Stages, a maximum of ten views were selected for this example since most Stress Echo studies use four to six views. These correspond with the user views such as View1 would be the stress echo PLAX view, View2 would be the PSAX view, etc. The entry function, doContrastAcquisition has a guard function of isContrastOn. If contrast is enabled for this view, then the system could automatically activate the Contrast protocol by sending an event (ContrastAcquisitionEvent).
- Turning now to
FIG. 3 , the Contrast protocolfinite state machine 300 comprises two concurrent finite state machines:AcquisitionStates 310 andContrastAquisitionSequences 320. The AcquisitionStatesfinite state machine 310 has two states:NormalAquisition 312 andContrastAcquisition 314. TheNormalAquisition state 312 is when the system is in live image acquisition and a contrast acquisition sequence is not active. TheContrastAcquisition state 314 is when the system is in live image acquisition and a contrast acquisition sequence is active. - The ContrastAcquisitionSequences finite state machine 319 has as many contrast sequences as desired. There are different ways that the live image acquisition is performed. For example, instead of Normal acquisition where the system just transmits, a contrast sequence may transmit each time the patient's r-wave occurs for some number of r-waves (e.g., 5), and the first transmit may use a high mechanical index (MI), and the subsequent transmissions may use low MI. The purpose being that the first transmit with high MI is to burst the contrast bubbles, and the following transmits are to allow the system to capture an image but not burst any contrast bubbles. This allows the user to see and capture reflow or perfusion of blood into an area in the anatomy (e.g., liver, heart muscle or ventricle).
- In another embodiment, a user can select a factory-defined protocol, modify a factory-defined protocol (thereby, making it a user-defined protocol), or create a new protocol. Preferably, the
storage device 140 stores a collection of macros for controlling one or more of the following: imaging system settings, the user interface, a display area, and a system peripheral. Theprocessor 120 displays a list of macros on thedisplay device 130 and receives a user selection of two or more of the macros via theuser interface 150. Theprocessor 120 then creates a study protocol from the selected macros. In this way, the user can select portions of already-defmed protocols (via the list of macros) and put them together to form a new, user-defined group protocol. This eliminates the need for a user to redefine a whole new protocol. - In software, the term “macro” is often used to describe a segment, script, or skeleton that can be used by another process, preferably repeatedly and in more than one way. For example, in Excel, one can build a macro (preferably in Visual C) to perform a sequence of instructions. Once built, the macro can be used repeatedly with a given spreadsheet or moved easily to another spreadsheet and be used there, potentially in a significantly different context. Accordingly, the term “macro” means any sequence of instructions that can be interpreted by another process, causing that process to execute or have executed a sequence of instructions. Macros can be exceedingly useful as building blocks for the
Protocol Controller 160. With respect to theProtocol Controller 160, consider a macro to be a set of parameter definitions that define specific ultrasound system behavior. Each macro (or set of parameters) can be used as ultrasound preset data values or ultrasound system controlling parameters. Every protocol will consist of some set of macros. Once a macro has been defined, it belongs to a pool of defined macros. A new protocol can be created by combining a unique set of macros from this pool of already-defined macros. TheProtocol Controller 160 itself can then be implemented as an engine used to drive a series of macros. This development is particularly useful in that the engine (i.e., the Protocol Controller 160) can run multiple protocols concurrently and/or one protocol can be suspended, its exit point marked, then another protocol activated, and later return to the exit point of the original protocol and continue with the first protocol. This is illustrated in the above example showing the concurrent use of pharmacologic stress echo and contrast protocols. - Instead of being a set of parameters, a macro can be a code snippet. That is, a macro can be any sequence of instructions that can be interpreted by another process, causing that process to execute a sequence of instructions. In this sense, a “macro” is any sequence of instructions that can be interpreted by another process, causing that process to execute or have executed a sequence of instructions. For example, a protocol can have a data or image capture segment. Each instantiation of capture can be built as a macro, such as “store image to disk” or “store clip to VCR.” Of particular usefulness might be an instantiation of a macro for storing data utilizing parameters for a data type and device type: Store <datatype> to <devicetype>. In this way, each segment of the protocol can be written as a macro utilizing parameter. The protocol itself can then be implemented as an engine used to drive a series of macros. This development is particularly useful in that the engine (i.e., the Protocol Controller 160) can be interrupted after execution of a macro, the sequence can be marked to indicate where to re-enter, and the user can run another sequence of macros (protocol) before returning to the exit point and continuing execution of the original protocol.
- As mentioned above, the collection of macros controls one or more of the following: imaging system settings, the user interface, a display area, and a system peripheral. More specifically, the macros can control one or more of the following: transmit parameters and settings, receive parameters and settings, imaging mode, imaging parameters and settings, filters and processing specifics, signal processing options, post-processing options, frequency, harmonic, mode, pulse repetition frequency, frame-rate, display control, number of views, annotation, a user interface page displayed in the display area, an active tool displayed in the display area, a cursor in the display area, a number of views in the display area, system control, measurements and reports, annotations, pictograms, review and display features, user preferences, which user interface page is displayed, and which tool/cursor is active, a DICOM device, a CD, a DVD, a VCR, an MO drive, a printer, and a networked device.
- Suitable protocol macros include a clip capture macro, a clip playback macro, a workflow macro, and an acquisition sequence macro. The following are examples of these types of macros:
- Clip Capture
- Number of clips to capture per clip capture activation (1, 2, 4, etc).
- Duration/length of each clip to be captured (in seconds, microseconds, heartbeats, etc).
- R-wave trigger clip capture enabled/disabled (capture clips based on patients heartbeat or not).
- Clip capture delay time (a delay time after an r-wave trigger occurs to start capturing the clip, in microseconds).
- Clip compression level.
- Clip capture size (full screen, quarter screen, or some other derivative size).
- Clip Playback
- Clip playback speed.
- Clip playback mode (align heartbeats of multiple captured clips or just play each clip or start each clip together at the same time).
- Workflow
- Enable/disable to automatically delete unselected clips at end of exam.
- Enable/disable to automatically move the system to the next stage of a staged protocol.
- Enable/disable to automatically start and stop VCR recording based upon some defined event.
- Enable/disable to automatically save and recall imaging parameters (a defined set such as transmit/receive settings, imaging mode, filters and processing settings, etc.) upon some defmed event such as the first view of each stage of a staged protocol, or at the beginning of a defined acquisition sequence, etc.).
- Enable/disable to automatically transfer specifically defined types of data to specifically defined devices or locations, such as transfer clips over the network at the end of each clip capture, transfer still images to a CD at the end of exam, etc.
- Enable/disable annotations or pictograms upon the occurrence of some user or system event.
- Enable/disable automatically performing a specific measurement upon the occurrence of some user or system event.
- Enable/disable entry into a specific measurement and/or report package upon the occurrence of some user or system event.
- Enable/disable system guidance, such as a guidance to the user on the next step to perform for a specific type of exam.
- Enable/disable to automatically change the imaging mode based upon the occurrence of some user or system event.
- Acquisition Sequence
- Define a set of imaging acquisition steps where each step would have varying imaging acquisition parameter definitions, the system could automatically move through the acquisition steps or could move through the acquisition steps based upon the occurrence of some user/system event.
- In yet another embodiment, an automated exam measurement sequence icon is presented to improve work flow of examinations. Ultrasound systems usually provide a menu for the selection of measurements to be performed during an exam. Once invoked, the menu provides a free-style measurement selection and execution that requires the user to revisit the menu for each successive measurement. However, for the majority of exams, a standard set of measurements are routinely performed in a standard sequence. There may be several such sets of measurements at any specific site or clinic. In this embodiment, an ultrasound system provides an icon that represents an automated sequence of exam measurement. The icon and associated keys provide user control of the sequence including pause, repeat, and skip capabilities. The icon displays the name of the currently active measurement and a tool tip that displays the next measurement in the sequence.
- Upon invocation, a menu is displayed that allows the user to select a particular sequence (e.g., a uterus or abdominal sequence). When a sequence is selected from the menu, the first measurement of the sequence is started (i.e., the system enters the proper measurement state and the appropriate measurement tool(s) are displayed). The user then performs the measurement. Once the measurement is completed and its value committed, the next measurement in the sequence begins. A sequence may be terminated by completing the sequence or by repeating the action that invoked the sequence (e.g., pressing the auto-sequence key). Setup facilities allow the user to customize the sequences by changing the order of measurements and by adding or removing measurements. The setup facilities provide for any number of sequences to be stored in memory, each with a specific name that is displayed on the sequence selection menu. The user may also designate a particular subset of the sequences to be displayed on the menu, along with the order in which they appear.
- While a sequence is active, the icon displays the name of the current measurement. When the cursor is moved over the icon, a tool tip appears that displays the name of the next measurement in the sequence, and the cursor is changed to the shape of a hand with the index finger pointing to the right. This represents skipping directly to the next measurement in the sequence if the cursor is clicked. If the cursor is instead moved to the left, the cursor changes to a hand with the index finger pointing to the left, indicating a repeat of the previous measurement, and the tool tip text changes to the name of the previous measurement. A double click on the icon at any point pauses the sequence. During a pause, the user may take any actions or measurements desired. The sequence is resume by double clicking on the icon. The icon will change in a recognizable way to indicate that the sequence is paused (e.g., change color).
- A dedicated key on the ultrasound console may be used to invoke the auto sequence icon. In this case, pressing the key during a sequence will terminate the sequence. The sequence menu may also be invoked by another menu on the ultrasound system. As an alternative to, or in addition to, the above cursor behavior, a set of console buttons may be used to advance, repeat, and pause the sequence. In addition to measurements, the auto sequences may also include prompts for the user to adjust the transducer or make adjustments to the machine state or image settings, etc.
- As noted above, each of the embodiments described herein can be used alone or in combination with one another. As also noted above, these embodiments can be used with image modalities other than ultrasound imaging, and the claims should not be limited to any particular type of image modality unless explicitly recited therein. Examples of different types of image modalities that can be used with these embodiments include, but are not limited to, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed radiography, magnetic resonance, angioscopy, color flow Doppler, cystoscopy, diaphanography, echocardiography, fluoresosin angiography, laparoscopy, magnetic resonance angiography, positron emission tomography, single-photon emission computed tomography, x-ray angiography, computed tomography, nuclear medicine, biomagnetic imaging, culposcopy, duplex Doppler, digital microscopy, endoscopy, fundoscopy, laser surface scan, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, radiographic imaging, thermography, and radio fluroscopy.
- It is intended that the foregoing detailed description be understood as an illustration of selected forms that the invention can take and not as a definition of the invention. It is only the following claims, including all equivalents, that are intended to define the scope of this invention.
Claims (20)
1-8. (canceled)
9. A medical diagnostic imaging system comprising:
a storage device storing a study protocol comprising two or more stages; and a processor operative to change control of the medical diagnostic imaging system to optimize study performance at each stage of the study protocol.
10. The invention of claim 9 , wherein the optimization improves image quality.
11. The invention of claim 9 , wherein the optimization improves study workflow.
12. The invention of claim 9 , wherein the optimization changes annotations.
13. The invention of claim 9 , wherein the optimization changes DICOM settings.
14. The invention of claim 9 , wherein the change of control of the medical diagnostic imaging system comprises inserting a segment of a second study protocol into the first-mentioned study protocol.
15. The invention of claim 14 , wherein one of the first-mentioned and second study protocols comprises a stress echo protocol and the other comprises a contrast protocol.
16. The invention of claim 9 , wherein the medical diagnostic imaging system comprises an ultrasound imaging system.
17. The invention of claim 9 , wherein the processor implements a finite state machine.
18. The invention of claim 9 , wherein the medical diagnostic imaging system further comprises a display device, and wherein the processor is operative to display an icon on the display device that represents an automated sequence of exam measurements, wherein the icon displays a name of a currently active measurement and a tool tip that displays a next measurement in the sequence.
19. A medical diagnostic imaging system comprising:
a user interface;
a storage device storing a collection of macros for controlling one or more of the following: imaging system settings, the user interface, a display area on a display device, and
a system peripheral; and
a processor operative to receive user selection of two or more macros via the user interface and create a study protocol from the selected macros.
20. The invention of claim 19 , wherein the collection of macros comprises at least one of the following: a clip capture macro, a clip playback macro, a workflow macro, and an acquisition sequence macro.
21. The invention of claim 19 , wherein at least one of the macros controls one or more of the following: transmit parameters and settings, receive parameters and settings, imaging mode, imaging parameters and settings, filters and processing specifics, signal processing options, post-processing options, frequency, harmonic, mode, pulse repetition frequency, and frame-rate.
22. The invention of claim 19 , wherein at least one of the macros controls one or more of the following: display control, number of views, annotation, a user interface page displayed in the display area, an active tool displayed in the display area, a cursor in the display area, and a number of views in the display area.
23. The invention of claim 19 , wherein at least one of the macros controls one or more of the following: system control, measurements and reports, annotations, pictograms, review and display features, user preferences, which user interface page is displayed, and which tool/cursor is active.
24. The invention of claim 19 , wherein at least one of the macros controls one or more of the following: a DICOM device, a CD, a DVD, a VCR, an MO drive, a printer, and a networked device.
25. The invention of claim 19 , wherein the medical diagnostic imaging system comprises an ultrasound imaging system.
26. The invention of claim 19 , wherein the processor implements a finite state machine.
27. The invention of claim 19 , wherein the medical diagnostic imaging system further comprises a display device, and wherein the processor is operative to display an icon on the display device that represents an automated sequence of exam measurements, wherein the icon displays a name of a currently active measurement and a tool tip that displays a next measurement in the sequence.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/176,875 US20050267367A1 (en) | 2003-08-29 | 2005-07-06 | Protocol controller for a medical diagnostic imaging system |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/651,374 US6953433B2 (en) | 2003-08-29 | 2003-08-29 | Protocol controller for a medical diagnostic imaging system |
US11/176,875 US20050267367A1 (en) | 2003-08-29 | 2005-07-06 | Protocol controller for a medical diagnostic imaging system |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/651,374 Division US6953433B2 (en) | 2003-08-29 | 2003-08-29 | Protocol controller for a medical diagnostic imaging system |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20050267367A1 true US20050267367A1 (en) | 2005-12-01 |
Family
ID=34217377
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/651,374 Expired - Lifetime US6953433B2 (en) | 2003-08-29 | 2003-08-29 | Protocol controller for a medical diagnostic imaging system |
US11/176,875 Abandoned US20050267367A1 (en) | 2003-08-29 | 2005-07-06 | Protocol controller for a medical diagnostic imaging system |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/651,374 Expired - Lifetime US6953433B2 (en) | 2003-08-29 | 2003-08-29 | Protocol controller for a medical diagnostic imaging system |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US6953433B2 (en) |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20080306385A1 (en) * | 2005-12-19 | 2008-12-11 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Automatic Ultrasound Scanning Initiated by Protocol Stage |
US20090124904A1 (en) * | 2007-11-14 | 2009-05-14 | Chi Young Ahn | Ultrasound System And Method For Forming BC-Mode Image |
US20090124905A1 (en) * | 2007-11-14 | 2009-05-14 | Chi Young Ahn | Ultrasound System And Method For Forming BC-Mode Image |
US20090182575A1 (en) * | 2008-01-11 | 2009-07-16 | General Electric Company | System and method to manage a workflow in delivering healthcare |
US20090182576A1 (en) * | 2008-01-11 | 2009-07-16 | General Electric Company | System and method to manage a workflow in delivering healthcare |
US8006183B1 (en) * | 2006-12-08 | 2011-08-23 | Trading Technologies International Inc. | System and method for using a curser to convey information |
CN109464162A (en) * | 2018-12-14 | 2019-03-15 | 深圳开立生物医疗科技股份有限公司 | A kind of processing method and processing device of stress echocardiography |
Families Citing this family (44)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7386339B2 (en) * | 1999-05-18 | 2008-06-10 | Mediguide Ltd. | Medical imaging and navigation system |
US7840252B2 (en) * | 1999-05-18 | 2010-11-23 | MediGuide, Ltd. | Method and system for determining a three dimensional representation of a tubular organ |
US9833167B2 (en) | 1999-05-18 | 2017-12-05 | Mediguide Ltd. | Method and system for superimposing virtual anatomical landmarks on an image |
US8442618B2 (en) * | 1999-05-18 | 2013-05-14 | Mediguide Ltd. | Method and system for delivering a medical device to a selected position within a lumen |
US7778688B2 (en) | 1999-05-18 | 2010-08-17 | MediGuide, Ltd. | System and method for delivering a stent to a selected position within a lumen |
US9572519B2 (en) * | 1999-05-18 | 2017-02-21 | Mediguide Ltd. | Method and apparatus for invasive device tracking using organ timing signal generated from MPS sensors |
EP1454585B1 (en) * | 2001-11-22 | 2012-02-29 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Ultrasonograph, work flow edition system, and ultrasonograph control method |
US7221972B2 (en) * | 2003-08-29 | 2007-05-22 | Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. | Ultrasound system with protocol-driven user interface |
US6953433B2 (en) * | 2003-08-29 | 2005-10-11 | Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. | Protocol controller for a medical diagnostic imaging system |
US20050054927A1 (en) * | 2003-09-10 | 2005-03-10 | Scott Love | System and method for using scheduled protocol codes to automatically configure ultrasound imaging systems |
US8126861B2 (en) * | 2004-01-02 | 2012-02-28 | Cerner Innovation, Inc. | System and method for managing large data sets |
US20050187472A1 (en) * | 2004-01-30 | 2005-08-25 | Peter Lysyansky | Protocol-driven ultrasound examination |
US20050281444A1 (en) * | 2004-06-22 | 2005-12-22 | Vidar Lundberg | Methods and apparatus for defining a protocol for ultrasound imaging |
US7706343B2 (en) * | 2004-09-10 | 2010-04-27 | Tekelec | Methods and systems for wireless local area network (WLAN)-based signaling network monitoring |
JP2006197967A (en) * | 2005-01-18 | 2006-08-03 | Toshiba Corp | Ultrasonic diagnostic equipment and ultrasonic image display device |
DE102005028873B4 (en) * | 2005-06-22 | 2014-07-24 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for conducting an examination and diagnostic device therefor |
EP1934864B1 (en) * | 2005-09-30 | 2013-12-11 | Koninklijke Philips N.V. | Method for creating and managing ultrasound measurment-based calculations in ultrasound imaging systems |
EP1934626A1 (en) * | 2005-09-30 | 2008-06-25 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | User interface system and method for creating, organizing and setting-up ultrasound imaging protocols |
US8117549B2 (en) * | 2005-10-26 | 2012-02-14 | Bruce Reiner | System and method for capturing user actions within electronic workflow templates |
DE102005055657A1 (en) * | 2005-11-22 | 2007-05-24 | Siemens Ag | Medical diagnostic unit e.g. computer tomography unit, operating method, involves determining examination processes with required examination steps based on additional information that are assigned to each examination step |
DE102005061796A1 (en) * | 2005-12-23 | 2007-06-28 | Siemens Ag | Process control protocols modifying method for controlling medical system, involves displaying control parameter variations and automatically implementing variations with respect to selected protocols, when authentication signal is detected |
JP4982146B2 (en) * | 2006-10-17 | 2012-07-25 | ジーイー・メディカル・システムズ・グローバル・テクノロジー・カンパニー・エルエルシー | Workflow notification system for medical imaging device |
US20080147453A1 (en) * | 2006-12-19 | 2008-06-19 | Kogan Sandra L | System and method for end users to create a workflow from unstructured work |
JP5085158B2 (en) * | 2007-02-23 | 2012-11-28 | ジーイー・メディカル・システムズ・グローバル・テクノロジー・カンパニー・エルエルシー | Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus and ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus system |
KR101055589B1 (en) * | 2007-03-23 | 2011-08-23 | 삼성메디슨 주식회사 | Ultrasound System and Method for Forming Ultrasound Images |
JP2008259738A (en) * | 2007-04-13 | 2008-10-30 | Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Co Llc | Ultrasonic diagnostic equipment and ultrasonic diagnostic equipment system |
JP5037216B2 (en) * | 2007-05-08 | 2012-09-26 | ジーイー・メディカル・システムズ・グローバル・テクノロジー・カンパニー・エルエルシー | Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus main unit, operation unit, and ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus |
US20090043203A1 (en) * | 2007-08-10 | 2009-02-12 | Laurent Pelissier | Power management in portable ultrasound devices |
US8088070B2 (en) * | 2007-08-10 | 2012-01-03 | Ultrasonix Medical Corporation | Hand-held ultrasound imaging device having removable transducer arrays |
US8226562B2 (en) * | 2007-08-10 | 2012-07-24 | Ultrasonix Medical Corporation | Hand-held ultrasound system having sterile enclosure |
US20090043199A1 (en) * | 2007-08-10 | 2009-02-12 | Laurent Pelissier | Wireless network having portable ultrasound devices |
US20090198132A1 (en) * | 2007-08-10 | 2009-08-06 | Laurent Pelissier | Hand-held ultrasound imaging device having reconfigurable user interface |
JP2009050372A (en) * | 2007-08-24 | 2009-03-12 | Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Co Llc | Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus |
US20090093719A1 (en) | 2007-10-03 | 2009-04-09 | Laurent Pelissier | Handheld ultrasound imaging systems |
JP5361184B2 (en) * | 2007-12-25 | 2013-12-04 | 株式会社東芝 | Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus, stress echo browsing apparatus, and stress echo browsing program |
JP2009261657A (en) * | 2008-04-25 | 2009-11-12 | Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Co Llc | Ultrasonic imaging apparatus |
CN101862204A (en) * | 2009-04-14 | 2010-10-20 | Ge医疗系统环球技术有限公司 | Power saving method of ultrasonic medical diagnosis system and ultrasonic medical diagnosis system |
US9262587B2 (en) * | 2011-12-23 | 2016-02-16 | Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd. | Systems and methods for collecting medical images |
EP2936365A4 (en) * | 2012-12-20 | 2016-08-31 | Volcano Corp | System and method for multi-modality workflow management using hierarchical state machines |
KR101623834B1 (en) * | 2013-08-09 | 2016-05-24 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus and method for providing contents related to taking a medical image |
WO2015092567A1 (en) * | 2013-12-20 | 2015-06-25 | Koninklijke Philips N.V. | Ultrasound imaging system with stress-echocardiography protocol and method of operation thereof |
US10182790B2 (en) * | 2015-03-30 | 2019-01-22 | Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. | Adaptive timing guidance in stress echocardiography |
US20190388060A1 (en) * | 2018-06-22 | 2019-12-26 | General Electric Company | Imaging system and method with live examination completeness monitor |
CN110694149B (en) * | 2019-10-16 | 2021-06-22 | 山东大学齐鲁医院 | Ultrasonic-assisted muscle identification method and system and auxiliary injection device |
Citations (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4796634A (en) * | 1985-08-09 | 1989-01-10 | Lawrence Medical Systems, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for monitoring cardiac output |
US5544654A (en) * | 1995-06-06 | 1996-08-13 | Acuson Corporation | Voice control of a medical ultrasound scanning machine |
US5690114A (en) * | 1995-06-29 | 1997-11-25 | Teratech Corporation | Portable ultrasound imaging system |
US5831612A (en) * | 1996-08-13 | 1998-11-03 | General Electric Company | Cell overlap detection and correction in a medical imaging system |
US6141398A (en) * | 1998-08-25 | 2000-10-31 | General Electric Company | Protocol driven image reconstruction, display, and processing in a multislice imaging system |
US6139498A (en) * | 1998-12-29 | 2000-10-31 | Ge Diasonics Israel, Ltd. | Ultrasound system performing simultaneous parallel computer instructions |
US6148095A (en) * | 1997-09-08 | 2000-11-14 | University Of Iowa Research Foundation | Apparatus and method for determining three-dimensional representations of tortuous vessels |
US6275869B1 (en) * | 1994-11-22 | 2001-08-14 | Eastman Kodak Company | System for network communication of image information between imaging devices according to multiple protocols |
US20020035326A1 (en) * | 2000-09-18 | 2002-03-21 | Naohisa Kamiyama | Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus and operating sequence determining method of the ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus |
US6397098B1 (en) * | 1994-09-21 | 2002-05-28 | Medrad, Inc. | Data communication and control for medical imaging systems |
US6458081B1 (en) * | 1999-04-23 | 2002-10-01 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus |
US6488629B1 (en) * | 2001-07-31 | 2002-12-03 | Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc | Ultrasound image acquisition with synchronized reference image |
US20030191389A1 (en) * | 2000-11-01 | 2003-10-09 | Akihiro Sano | Ultrasonic diagnostic device, function extending method related to ultrasonic diagnosis, and method of providing extension function related to ultrasonic diagnosis |
US6641538B2 (en) * | 2001-11-22 | 2003-11-04 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus and method of controlling a ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus |
US6773398B2 (en) * | 2001-11-21 | 2004-08-10 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Ultrasonic diagnosis apparatus and operation device |
US6786869B2 (en) * | 2002-11-01 | 2004-09-07 | Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc | Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus |
US6953433B2 (en) * | 2003-08-29 | 2005-10-11 | Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. | Protocol controller for a medical diagnostic imaging system |
US7221972B2 (en) * | 2003-08-29 | 2007-05-22 | Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. | Ultrasound system with protocol-driven user interface |
-
2003
- 2003-08-29 US US10/651,374 patent/US6953433B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2005
- 2005-07-06 US US11/176,875 patent/US20050267367A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4796634A (en) * | 1985-08-09 | 1989-01-10 | Lawrence Medical Systems, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for monitoring cardiac output |
US6397098B1 (en) * | 1994-09-21 | 2002-05-28 | Medrad, Inc. | Data communication and control for medical imaging systems |
US6275869B1 (en) * | 1994-11-22 | 2001-08-14 | Eastman Kodak Company | System for network communication of image information between imaging devices according to multiple protocols |
US5544654A (en) * | 1995-06-06 | 1996-08-13 | Acuson Corporation | Voice control of a medical ultrasound scanning machine |
US5690114A (en) * | 1995-06-29 | 1997-11-25 | Teratech Corporation | Portable ultrasound imaging system |
US5831612A (en) * | 1996-08-13 | 1998-11-03 | General Electric Company | Cell overlap detection and correction in a medical imaging system |
US6148095A (en) * | 1997-09-08 | 2000-11-14 | University Of Iowa Research Foundation | Apparatus and method for determining three-dimensional representations of tortuous vessels |
US6141398A (en) * | 1998-08-25 | 2000-10-31 | General Electric Company | Protocol driven image reconstruction, display, and processing in a multislice imaging system |
US6139498A (en) * | 1998-12-29 | 2000-10-31 | Ge Diasonics Israel, Ltd. | Ultrasound system performing simultaneous parallel computer instructions |
US6458081B1 (en) * | 1999-04-23 | 2002-10-01 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus |
US20020035326A1 (en) * | 2000-09-18 | 2002-03-21 | Naohisa Kamiyama | Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus and operating sequence determining method of the ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus |
US20030191389A1 (en) * | 2000-11-01 | 2003-10-09 | Akihiro Sano | Ultrasonic diagnostic device, function extending method related to ultrasonic diagnosis, and method of providing extension function related to ultrasonic diagnosis |
US6488629B1 (en) * | 2001-07-31 | 2002-12-03 | Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc | Ultrasound image acquisition with synchronized reference image |
US6773398B2 (en) * | 2001-11-21 | 2004-08-10 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Ultrasonic diagnosis apparatus and operation device |
US6641538B2 (en) * | 2001-11-22 | 2003-11-04 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus and method of controlling a ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus |
US6786869B2 (en) * | 2002-11-01 | 2004-09-07 | Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc | Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus |
US6953433B2 (en) * | 2003-08-29 | 2005-10-11 | Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. | Protocol controller for a medical diagnostic imaging system |
US7221972B2 (en) * | 2003-08-29 | 2007-05-22 | Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. | Ultrasound system with protocol-driven user interface |
Cited By (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20080306385A1 (en) * | 2005-12-19 | 2008-12-11 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Automatic Ultrasound Scanning Initiated by Protocol Stage |
US8732578B2 (en) | 2006-12-08 | 2014-05-20 | Trading Technologies International, Inc. | System and method for using a cursor to convey information |
US8006183B1 (en) * | 2006-12-08 | 2011-08-23 | Trading Technologies International Inc. | System and method for using a curser to convey information |
US20110239165A1 (en) * | 2006-12-08 | 2011-09-29 | Trading Technologies International Inc. | System and Method for Using a Cursor to Convey Information |
US20090124904A1 (en) * | 2007-11-14 | 2009-05-14 | Chi Young Ahn | Ultrasound System And Method For Forming BC-Mode Image |
US20090124905A1 (en) * | 2007-11-14 | 2009-05-14 | Chi Young Ahn | Ultrasound System And Method For Forming BC-Mode Image |
US9322902B2 (en) | 2007-11-14 | 2016-04-26 | Samsung Medison Co., Ltd. | Ultrasound system and method for forming combined BC-mode image |
US8216141B2 (en) * | 2007-11-14 | 2012-07-10 | Medison Co., Ltd. | Ultrasound system and method for forming BC-mode image |
US8235904B2 (en) * | 2007-11-14 | 2012-08-07 | Medison Co., Ltd. | Ultrasound system and method for forming BC-mode image |
US20090182575A1 (en) * | 2008-01-11 | 2009-07-16 | General Electric Company | System and method to manage a workflow in delivering healthcare |
US8706516B2 (en) | 2008-01-11 | 2014-04-22 | General Electric Company | System and method to manage a workflow in delivering healthcare |
US8682686B2 (en) | 2008-01-11 | 2014-03-25 | General Electric Company | System and method to manage a workflow in delivering healthcare |
US20090182576A1 (en) * | 2008-01-11 | 2009-07-16 | General Electric Company | System and method to manage a workflow in delivering healthcare |
CN109464162A (en) * | 2018-12-14 | 2019-03-15 | 深圳开立生物医疗科技股份有限公司 | A kind of processing method and processing device of stress echocardiography |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20050049493A1 (en) | 2005-03-03 |
US6953433B2 (en) | 2005-10-11 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6953433B2 (en) | Protocol controller for a medical diagnostic imaging system | |
US7221972B2 (en) | Ultrasound system with protocol-driven user interface | |
US6503203B1 (en) | Automated ultrasound system for performing imaging studies utilizing ultrasound contrast agents | |
JP4733821B2 (en) | Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus and ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus control program | |
JP4125099B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for managing workflow for instructing and processing medical images | |
CN1820711B (en) | Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus | |
US20040077952A1 (en) | System and method for improved diagnostic image displays | |
JP4209177B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for instructing imaging scan and confirming validity of user input information | |
JP5411421B2 (en) | System for adaptively controlling contrast-enhanced diagnostic imaging procedures | |
EP1559373B1 (en) | Protocol-driven ultrasound examination | |
JP5161574B2 (en) | Ultrasonic diagnostic system with flexible inspection procedure and report generation and method of operating the same | |
US20040267122A1 (en) | Medical image user interface | |
JP2004208858A (en) | Ultrasonograph and ultrasonic image processing apparatus | |
US20090149749A1 (en) | Method and system for synchronized playback of ultrasound images | |
CN100484480C (en) | Ultrasonic diagnosis apparatus and ultrasonic diagnosis apparatus control method | |
KR20030036902A (en) | Diagnostic device, ultrasonic diagnostic device, and their operation control method | |
JP2006141997A (en) | Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus | |
US20060084871A1 (en) | Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus | |
CN1644169A (en) | Ultrasonic diagnostic equipment | |
JP4594512B2 (en) | X-ray image diagnostic apparatus and X-ray image processing method | |
US20120010496A1 (en) | medical image diagnosis apparatus and a controlling method | |
JP2006175219A (en) | Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus and controlling method thereof | |
Burgess et al. | Performing an echocardiographic examination with a contrast agent: a series on contrast echocardiography, article 2 | |
Marangelli et al. | Digital cine loop technology: A new tool for the evaluation of wall motion abnormalities | |
WO2023031070A1 (en) | Interface for time-based imaging protocols |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |