Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20050131619 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 11/044,005
Publication date16 Jun 2005
Filing date28 Jan 2005
Priority date26 May 1999
Also published asUS6721769, US6850946, US7711687, US20040162840, US20040177085, US20040181374, US20040186847, WO2000073874A2, WO2000073874A3
Publication number044005, 11044005, US 2005/0131619 A1, US 2005/131619 A1, US 20050131619 A1, US 20050131619A1, US 2005131619 A1, US 2005131619A1, US-A1-20050131619, US-A1-2005131619, US2005/0131619A1, US2005/131619A1, US20050131619 A1, US20050131619A1, US2005131619 A1, US2005131619A1
InventorsTheodore Rappaport, Roger Skidmore
Original AssigneeRappaport Theodore S., Skidmore Roger R.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Method and system for a building database manipulator
US 20050131619 A1
A Building Database Manipulator to build databases for a variety of physical environments including definitions of buildings, terrain and other site parameters, by scanning in or rapidly editing data. Raster scans may be entered or object files in various formats may be used as input. Detailed information is stored in the drawing database about the object's location, radio frequency attenuation, color, and other physical information such as electrical characteristics and intersections of the object with the ground, floors, ceilings, and other objects when objects are formatted in a drawing. The formatting process is strictly two-dimensional in nature, but the resulting drawing is a true three-dimensional environment. The user sees the three-dimensional building structure by altering the views. The resulting database may be used in a variety of modeling applications, but is especially useful for engineering, planning and management tools for in-building or microcell wireless systems.
Previous page
Next page
1-12. (canceled)
13. A computerized apparatus for formatting, editing, or entering data that represents radio attenuation characteristics of at least one or more of walls, floors, partitions, obstructions, and building perimeter walls within one or more buildings that are will be used with one or more wireless communications systems, comprising:
a computer or network of computers; and
a computer implemented program operating on said computer or network of computers which either receives input for, uses or contains radio attenuation characteristics of said at least one or more walls, floors, partitions, obstructions, and building perimeter walls, and which provides radio performance computations for a wireless communication management application.
14. The computerized apparatus of claim 13 wherein said radio performance computations use either two dimensional or three dimensional information about said one or more buildings.
15. The computerized apparatus of claim 13 further comprising a display, and wherein said at least one or more of walls, floors, partitions, obstructions, and building perimeters are rendered on said display as either a two dimensional or three dimensional view.
16. The computerized apparatus of claim 15 wherein said two dimensional or three dimensional view includes at least a portion of at least one floor plan of at least one of said one or more buildings.
17. The computerized apparatus of claim 13 wherein said computer implemented program can be used to modify, delete or add said radio attenuation characteristics for one or more of said walls, floors, partitions, obstructions, and building perimeter walls, and wherein said radio performance computations consider modifications, deletions or additions of said radio attenuation characteristics.
18. The computerized apparatus of claim 13 wherein said computer implemented program can be used to modify, delete or add data for one or more wireless communication components which are associated with or to be used in said one or more wireless communications systems, and wherein said radio performance computations consider modifications, deletions or additions of said data for said one or more wireless communications components.
19. The computerized apparatus of claim 18 wherein said data includes performance attributes or settings.
  • [0001]
    This application is related to concurrently filed application Ser. No. ______, entitled “Method and System for Managing a Real Time Bill of Materials,” filed by T. S. Rappaport and R. R. Skidmore (Docket 256016AA) and Ser. No. ______, entitled “Method and System for Automated Optimization of Antenna Positioning in 3-D,” filed by T. S. Rappaport and R. R. Skidmore (Docket 256017AA), and copending application Ser. No. 09/221,985, entitled “System for Creating a Computer Model and Measurement Database of a Wireless Communication Network” filed by T. S. Rappaport and R. R. Skidmore and assigned to a common assignee, the subject matter of which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • [0002]
    1. Field of the Invention
  • [0003]
    The present invention generally relates to database development using computer aided design and, more particularly, to manipulating data from any environment in the world (e.g. cities, buildings, campuses, floors within a building, objects in an outdoor setting, etc.) to construct an electronic building database that can be used to generate definitions of the user's building and site parameters and used with wireless communication system modeling and engineering planning products.
  • [0004]
    2. Background Description
  • [0005]
    As wireless communications use increases, radio frequency (RF) coverage within buildings and signal penetration into buildings from outside transmitting sources has quickly become an important design issue for wireless engineers who must design and deploy cellular telephone systems, paging systems, or new wireless systems and technologies such as personal communication networks or wireless local area networks. Designers are frequently requested to determine if a radio transceiver location, or base station cell site can provide reliable service throughout an entire city, an office, building, arena or campus. A common problem for wireless systems is inadequate coverage, or a “dead zone,” in a specific location, such as a conference room. It is now understood that an indoor wireless PBX (private branch exchange) system or wireless local area network (WLAN) can be rendered useless by interference from nearby, similar systems. The costs of in-building and microcell devices which provide wireless coverage within a 2 kilometer radius are diminishing, and the workload for RF engineers and technicians to install these on-premises systems is increasing sharply. Rapid engineering design and deployment methods for microcell and in-building wireless systems are vital for cost-efficient build-out.
  • [0006]
    Analyzing radio signal coverage penetration and interference is of critical importance for a number of reasons. A design engineer must determine if an existing outdoor large scale wireless system, or macrocell, will provide sufficient coverage throughout a building, or group of buildings (i.e., a campus). Alternatively, wireless engineers must determine whether local area coverage will be adequately supplemented by other existing macrocells, or whether indoor wireless transceivers, or picocells, must be added. The placement of these cells is critical from both a cost and performance standpoint. If an indoor wireless system is being planned that interferes with signals from an outdoor macrocell, the design engineer must predict how much interference can be expected and where it will manifest itself within the building, or group of buildings. Also, providing a wireless system that minimizes equipment infrastructure cost as well as installation cost is of significant economic importance. As in-building and microcell wireless systems proliferate, these issues must be resolved quickly, easily, and inexpensively, in a systematic and repeatable manner.
  • [0007]
    There are many computer aided design (CAD) products on the market that can be used to design the environment used in one's place of business or campus. WiSE from Lucent Technology, Inc., SignalPro from EDX, PLAnet by Mobile Systems International, Inc., and TEMS and TEMS Light from Ericsson are examples of wireless CAD products. In practice, however, a pre-existing building or campus is designed only on paper and a database of parameters defining the environment does not readily exist. It has been difficult, if not generally impossible, to gather this disparate information and manipulate the data for the purposes of planning and implementation-of indoor and outdoor RF wireless communication systems, and each new environment requires tedious manual data formatting in order to run with computer generated wireless prediction models. Recent research efforts by AT&T Laboratories, Brooklyn Polytechnic, and Virginia Tech, are described in papers and technical reports entitled “Radio Propagation Measurements and Prediction Using Three-dimensional Ray Tracing in Urban Environments at 908 MHZ and 1.9 GHz,” (IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, VOL. 48, No. 3, May 1999), by S. Kim, B. J. Guarino, Jr., T. M. Willis III, V. Erceg, S. J. Fortune, R. A. Valenzuela, L. W. Thomas, J. Ling, and J. D. Moore, (hereinafter “Radio Propagation”); “Achievable Accuracy of Site-Specific Path-Loss Predictions in Residential Environments,” (IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, VOL. 48, No. 3, May 1999), by L. Piazzi and H. L. Bertoni; “Measurements and Models for Radio Path Loss and Penetration Loss In and Around Homes and Trees at 5.85 Ghz,” (IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 46, No. 11, November 1998), by G. Durgin, T. S. Rappaport, and H. Xu; “Radio Propagation Prediction Techniques and Computer-Aided Channel Modeling for Embedded Wireless Microsystems,” ARPA Annual Report, MPRG Technical Report MPRG-TR-94-12, July 1994, 14 pp., Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, by T. S. Rappaport, M. P. Koushik, J. C. Liberti, C. Pendyala, and T. P. Subramanian; “Radio Propagation Prediction Techniques and Computer-Aided Channel Modeling for Embedded Wireless Microsystems,” MPRG Technical Report MPRG-TR-95-08, July 1995, 13 pp., Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, by T. S. Rappaport, M. P. Koushik, C. Carter, and M. Ahmed; “Use of Topographic Maps with Building Information to Determine Antenna Placements and GPS Satellite Coverage for Radio Detection & Tracking in Urban Environments,” MPRG Technical Report MPRG-TR-95-14, Sep. 15, 1995, 27 pp., Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, by T. S. Rappaport, M. P. Koushik, M. Ahmed, C. Carter, B. Newhall, and N. Zhang; “Use of Topographic Maps with Building Information to Determine Antenna Placement for Radio Detection and Tracking in Urban Environments,” MPRG Technical Report MPRG-TR-95-19, November 1995, 184 pp., Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, by M. Ahmed, K. Blankenship, C. Carter, P. Koushik, W. Newhall, R. Skidmore, N. Zhang and T. S. Rappaport; “A Comprehensive In-Building and Microcellular Wireless Communications System Design Tool,” MPRG-TR-97-13, June 1997, 122 pp., Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, by R. R. Skidmore and T. S. Rappaport; “Predicted Path Loss for Rosslyn, Va.,” MPRG-TR-94-20, Dec. 9, 1994, 19 pp., Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, by S. Sandhu, P. Koushik, and T. S. Rappaport; “Predicted Path Loss for Rosslyn, Va., Second set of predictions for ORD Project on Site Specific Propagation Prediction” MPRG-TR-95-03, Mar. 5, 1995, 51 pp., Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, by S. Sandhu, P. Koushik, and T. S. Rappaport. These papers and technical reports are illustrative of the state of the art in site-specific propagation modeling and show the difficulty in obtaining databases for city environments, such as Rosslyn, Va. While the above papers describe a research comparison of measured vs. predicted signal coverage, the works do not demonstrate a systematic, repeatable and fast methodology for creating an environmental database, nor do they report a method for visualizing and placing various environmental objects that are required to model the propagation of RF signals in the deployment of a wireless system in that environment.
  • [0008]
    It is therefore an object of the invention to provide a method for manipulating drawings and electronic files to build databases for use in planning the positioning of components and for designing, installing and optimizing a wireless communication system. In the method, raster scanned images of an environment may be entered or object files in various formats may be used as input to define an environment in which a wireless system is to be implemented. Detailed information about the location, radio frequency attenuation, color, and other physical information of an object, such as intersections of the object with the ground, floors, ceilings, and other objects in the environment is stored in a drawing database.
  • [0009]
    It is another object of the invention to provide a computerized drawing in a true three-dimensional environment based on input data which is strictly two-dimensional in nature. The user sees the three-dimensional drawing structure on a computer display by altering the views.
  • [0010]
    It is another object of the invention to provide the resulting database of the inventive method in a form easily used in a variety of modeling applications, especially forms useful for engineering, planning and management tools for wireless systems.
  • [0011]
    It is another object of the invention to support a universal method for creating and editing and transporting environmental databases for wireless communication system design, prediction, measurement and optimization. A systematic and automated method for producing a 3-D environmental database that is reproduceable and transportable between many different wireless system prediction models, measurement devices, and optimization methods has value and is a marked improvement over present day systems.
  • [0012]
    According to the invention, pre-existing data for a desired environment may be scanned in, traced or translated from another electronic format as a short-cut to provide a partial definition for the environment. The partial or empty environment is then refined using a specialized drawing program to enter entities and objects that fully define the environment in terms of floors, partitions, obstructions, and other data required for engineering planning of a wireless communications network in the environment. The input data are generally two dimensional (2D) representations of the environment. When ceiling height, elevation above sea level, or partition height data is entered, the drawing may then automatically be viewed in three-dimensions (3D). This 3D representation enables the design engineer to visually verify any parameters incorrectly entered. The definition of the environment, or drawings, maps or other data are verified and the design engineer is automatically prompted to enter missing or inconsistent information. Once the drawing(s) have been verified, the data defining the environment may be used by a variety of tools, models, wireless propagation prediction methods, measurement products or optimization procedures that require information about an environment's terrain levels, physical make up, and specific location of floors, walls, foliage or other obstruction and partition structures. Anything that impedes or otherwise affects the propagation of radio wave energy must be considered when predicting the performance of a wireless communication system in the environment, and the present methodology provides a simplified mechanism for collecting and editing this information in a readily usable form. The method for constructing and manipulating an indoor or outdoor environment is useful not only for wireless communication designers, but may also be useful for other applications, as well.
  • [0013]
    The foregoing and other objects, aspects and advantages will be better understood from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the invention with reference to the drawings, in which:
  • [0014]
    FIG. 1 is a flow diagram of the general method of the invention;
  • [0015]
    FIG. 2 is a representation of a typical building floor plan;
  • [0016]
    FIG. 3 is a representation of a raster image of a house;
  • [0017]
    FIG. 4 is flow diagram of a method for generating drawings from pre-existing computer aided design (CAD) drawings;
  • [0018]
    FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of a method for creating a drawing without pre-existing information;
  • [0019]
    FIG. 6A is a flow diagram of a method for generating drawings from pre-existing raster images to be used only with distant dependent wireless system performance prediction models;
  • [0020]
    FIG. 6B is a flow diagram of a method for generating drawings from pre-existing raster images to be used with any number of wireless system performance prediction models; and
  • [0021]
    FIGS. 7A through 7F show examples of methods for snapping an object to a grid, or other desired location on a drawing.
  • [0022]
    The present invention is used to build databases for use with modeling and engineering planning and automated design products. The current embodiment permits repeatable, reproduceable computer representation that may be transported or exported into many standard file formats and is designed specifically for use with the SitePlanner suite of products available from Wireless Valley Communications, Inc. of Blacksburg, Va. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the method could be practiced with other products either now known or to be developed in the future. (SitePlanner is a trademark of Wireless Valley Communications, Inc.)
  • [0023]
    Referring now to the drawings, and more particularly to FIG. 1, there is shown a flow diagram for the method of the present invention. In order to build a specially formatted database that contains data necessary and sufficient for input into an engineering model, a definition of the desired environment must first be built. First, existing data is entered into the system database in function block 101. This data may be in a variety of formats, as described in detail later. Because this existing data may be in a format which embodies unnecessary additional data, legends, map layers or text, unneeded objects are removed from the database in function block 102. The existing objects are then formatted and embellished with additional information in function block 103. Objects may include simple lines, representing walls or the sides of buildings or they may be polygons or polylines which represent trees, foliage, buildings, or other obstructions. An arbitrary number of objects may be drawn, traced, or moved using CAD commands which have a specific representation. In the preferred embodiment, each object or the group of objects saved in a file format known as “.DWG” which is developed by AutoDesk, Inc. However, it would be apparent to one skilled in the art how to practice this invention with other applications and tools using other formats. If additional objects are needed to describe the environment, they are also added to the database here. In the event that there is no pre-existing data, and the database must be built from scratch, the process may begin at this point, skipping steps 101 and 102.
  • [0024]
    Once the data has been entered, the user may optionally display the 2D data as a 3D representation in function block 105. The 3D view can be displayed at any time after entering height data, at the user's discretion.
  • [0025]
    Once the user has entered all of the data, a verification of the drawing may be performed in function block 104. At this point the process does a step-by-step analysis of the environment defined in the database to determine whether any data is missing. The invention provides an interactive feedback to the engineer and prompts the user as to where scaling and alignment are required, etc. While the preferred embodiment is described in detail, it should be evident to one skilled in the art that alternative methods such as totally automated verification may be possible. Because any engineering planning tool requires a specific set of information to operate optimally and efficiently, verification is important. The user is prompted to affirmatively declare that each piece of desired data has been entered and verified for proper format. If there are missing data, the user may then return to step 103 to enter additional necessary objects before running the verification procedure in function block 104, again. This step provides automatic verification guidance and prompts the user with feedback.
  • [0026]
    Once the drawing has been verified, the data is stored in the database in function block 106 or can be exported for use in an application that does not read directly from the database. This specially formatted data includes all information necessary to describe the building, site or campus environment.
  • [0027]
    While the above description generally describes the method of the invention, a more detailed description follows. The current embodiment, Building Database Manipulator (BDM), has been designed to operate integrally with the SitePlanner suite of products. Therefore, a detailed example of how each step is performed will use this embodiment as a foundation for discussion. However, it should be understood that the BDM could be used with other wireless communications propagation models (e.g. ray-tracing models or statistical models), other wireless prediction tools (e.g., Lucent Technologies WiSE, EDX SignalPro™, Ericsson TEMS, MSI PLAnet), or measurement tools now available (e.g., a wireless LAN transceiver, a spectrum analyzer, or any wireless measurement device such as a ZK Celltest 836 or a Berkeley Varitronics Champ receiver), or developed in the future. (BDM is a trademark of Wireless Valley Communications, Inc. SignalPro is a Trademark of EDX. PLAnet is a trademark of Mobile Systems International.)
  • [0028]
    Wireless prediction modeling software will typically utilize a site-specific database format, meaning that the database is specific to the area/environment it represents. This database can be thought of as being a collection of buildings and terrain, properly scaled and positioned in three-dimensional (3D) space relative to one another. In turn, each building is a collection of the floors that it houses (e.g., a nine story building has nine floors). FIG. 2 shows a typical building floor plan as it may be entered into the database. Each floor is a collection of obstructions/partitions. An obstruction/partition is anything that impedes or otherwise affects the propagation of radio wave energy, and thus must be considered when predicting the performance of a wireless communication system in the environment. For example, concrete walls, brick walls, sheetrock walls, doors, windows, large filing cabinets, and many others are all obstructions/partitions. At the same time, a large crowd of people, varying terrain, or foliage could also be considered obstruction/partitions.
  • [0029]
    The SitePlanner products, specifically, utilize a specially formatted vector database format, meaning that it consists of lines and polygons rather than individual pixels (as in a raster format). The arrangement of lines and polygons in the database corresponds to obstructions/partitions in the environment. For example, a line in the database could represent a wall, a door, or some other obstruction/partition in the modeled environment.
  • [0030]
    Obstructions/partitions are classified into categories. The user may define different categories of obstructions/partitions. A category is defined by a textual description (e.g., “External Brick Walls”), a vertical height (i.e., how tall is the wall), a color (to quickly distinguish it from entities belonging to other categories while viewing the drawing), and electromagnetic properties (discussed in further detail later). The category to which a given drawing entity (where an entity is either a line or polygon) has been assigned defines the type of obstruction/partition it represents. For example, if a given line has been assigned to the user-defined category of “Sheetrock Walls,” then it shares the characteristics given by the user to all other entities within that category throughout the entire database drawing. The process of either creating new entities or changing the category to which the entity belongs is a simple point-and-click process using a mouse or other positioning device, by linking entities to a particular user defined category of partitions. The preferred embodiment allows the physical, electrical, and aesthetic characteristics of entities of the same category to be individually or collectively edited. Category designation is carried out by assigning a particular numerical value to the field of each entity, wherein the field is specified as part of the drawing database.
  • [0031]
    From the standpoint of radio wave propagation, each obstruction/partition in an environment (i.e., each entity in the drawing, or the equivalent thereof), has several electromagnetic properties that directly affect it. When a radio wave signal intersects a physical surface, several things occur. A certain percentage of the radio wave reflects off of the surface and continues along an altered trajectory. A certain percentage of the radio wave penetrates through the surface and continues along its course. A certain percentage of the radio wave is scattered once it strikes the surface. The electromagnetic properties given to the obstruction/partition categories, when used in conjunction with known electromagnetic theory, define this interaction within the environment. Each category has parameters that include an attenuation factor, surface roughness, and reflectivity. The attenuation factor determines the amount of power a radio signal loses when it penetrates through an entity of the given type. The reflectivity determines the amount of the radio signal that is reflected from the entity (as opposed to penetrating through it). The surface roughness provides information used to determine how much of the radio signal is scattered upon striking an entity of the given type.
  • [0032]
    As mentioned above, the parameters given to each category fully define the entities contained within it. Altering the parameters of a category directly affects all entities assigned to it. This greatly simplifies the tedium of database creation for site-specific modeling.
  • [0033]
    The method used to predict and optimize antenna positioning in a desired environment uses a number of models, such as those described in the papers: “Interactive Coverage Region and System Design Simulation for Wireless Communication Systems in Multi-floored Indoor Environments, SMT Plus,” IEEE ICUPC '96 Proceedings, by R. R. Skidmore, T. S. Rappaport, and L. Abbott; “Achievable Accuracy of Site-Specific Path-Loss Predictions in Residential Environments,” (IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, VOL. 48, No. 3, May 1999), by L. Piazzi and H. L. Bertoni (hereinafter “Achievable Accuracy”); “Wireless Propagation in Buildings: A Statistical Scattering Approach,” (IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, VOL. 48, No. 3, May 1999), by D. Ullmo and H. U. Baranger; “Site-Specific Propagation Prediction for Wireless In-Building Personal Communication System Design,” (IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, VOL. 43, No. 4, November 1994), by S. Y. Seidel and T. S. Rappaport; “Antenna Effects on Indoor Obstructed Wireless Channels and a Deterministic Image-Based Wide-Band Propagation Model for In-Building Personal Communication Systems,” (International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1994), by C. M. P. Ho, T. S. Rappaport and M. P. Koushik; and “Interactive Computation of Coverage Regions for Wireless Communication in Multifloored Indoor Environments,” (IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication, Vol 14, No. 3, April 1996), by M. A. Panjwani, A. L. Abbott and T. S. Rappaport, “Measurements and Models for Radio Path Loss and Penetration Loss In and Around Homes and Trees at 5.85 Ghz,” (IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 46, No. 11, November 1998), by G. Durgin, T. S. Rappaport, and H. Xu, and previously cited references, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Some simple models are also briefly described in “SitePlanner 3.16 for Windows 95/98/NT User's Manual” (Wireless Valley Communications, Inc. 1999), hereby incorporated by reference. It would be apparent to one skilled in the art how to apply other models to this method.
  • [0034]
    In order to build a database that can be used in site-specific modeling, as done, for instance, in SitePlanner, or in equivalent programs now known or later developed, or similarly in other applications, one can either build each entity from scratch or start with a full or partial definition of the environment in some format. The present invention offers many solutions to ease the incorporation of previously drawn or scanned images of building floor plans to accomplish step 101 of the method, as shown in FIG. 1. A wide variety of pre-existing formats such as a paper map, an electronic map, a blueprint, and existing CAD drawing, a bitmap image, or some other representation, are used to obtain environmental information. Most commonly, this information is available in some form of electronic building blueprint or map information and in the case of buildings, is often supplied one floor at a time. That is, a building blueprint usually involves a separate blueprint or other piece of information for each building floor. Two possible formats for this information are raster and vector. The present invention extracts environmental data from both formats. One skilled in the art would see how both raster and vector data (e.g., USGS raster terrain data with vector building overlays) could be combined using the present invention.
  • [0035]
    Raster drawings or maps are collections of individually colored points (or “pixels”) that, when viewed as a whole, form a picture representation of the environment. FIG. 3 shows a photograph of a house 10 made up of a series of colored pixels to represent the appearance of a house (appearing here in black and white). A raster image or map references the pixels in a specific grid rather than vectors. Therefore, raster images do not contain detailed information about objects.
  • [0036]
    The present invention allows raster images to be copied, moved, or clipped. Using the present invention, one can modify an image with grip modes, adjust an image for contrast, clip the image with a rectangle or polygon, or use an image as a cutting edge for a trim. Examples of raster formats processed by the preferred embodiment of the present invention include, but are not limited to, Windows Bitmaps (BMP), Joint Photographic Experts Group format (JPEG), Graphical Interchange Format (GIF), Tagged-Image File Format (TIFF), Targa format (TGA), PICT, and Postscript. Raster drawings of any type may be converted into vector drawings, or other vector data based representations. The process involves using the imported raster drawing (which is really just an image) as a backdrop, and then tracing over it with a mouse or other positioning device, and adding new entities (lines and polygons), to generate a formatted database/drawing.
  • [0037]
    Vector drawings are collections of individual lines and polygons. Examples of vector formats include AutoCAD drawing files (DWG), Autodesk Drawing Exchange files (DXF), and Windows Metafiles (WMF). Because vector drawings already consist of lines and polygons, converting them into a format used by the present invention is straightforward. In the preferred embodiment, vector drawings are converted into BDM format drawings by simply loading them, selecting lines and/or polygons within the drawing, and then assigning the selected entities to a given category.
  • [0038]
    When using pre-existing data formats, it is probable that the map or drawing will contain information that is unneeded for the modeling and prediction steps. Therefore, one should remove unneeded objects from the drawing, as shown in step 102 of FIG. 1.
  • [0039]
    In addition to importing images and drawings, a collection of commands that permit users to draw new floor plans to accomplish step 103 of the method is provided. Multiple floor plans may be combined into three-dimensional, multi-floored drawing databases for use in the method, also in step 103.
  • [0040]
    During the process of creating and formatting building databases, one may view the current drawing in 3D, as shown in step 105 of FIG. 1. Each obstruction/partition category has an associated height parameter that defines the vertical dimension of each entity in the given category. By creating a new entity of a given category or converting an entity from or between categories, the vertical dimension of the new entity is automatically adjusted to match that specified for the category. Thus, if the invention processes a 2D vector drawing (i.e., a drawing with individually selectable lines and polygons), selecting an entity and assigning it to a given category carries out the conversion between 2D and 3D automatically. If the invention processes a raster drawing (i.e., a bitmap or similar format drawing that consists of individual colored pixels), the drawing can be imported and “traced over”, where with the creation of each new entity, the category again defines the vertical dimension given to the entity.
  • [0041]
    Each building floor can itself be thought of as a category that encapsulates the obstruction/partition categories defined by the user. Each floor of a building has an associated ceiling height. Alternatively, entire buildings may be represented with a building height. For the case of a multifloor building, the ceiling heights given to each floor in a building defines the vertical separation between them. Thus, the ceiling height parameter of a given floor is used to correctly position, vertically in space, each entity located on the floor relative to the entities located on other floors of the building.
  • [0042]
    Once the height of a given obstruction/partition category and/or the ceiling height of a given floor is adjusted, the 3D structure or the drawing database is altered automatically, as appropriate. This is a major improvement over other 3D techniques simply from a speed and ease of use point of view. It is much easier to construct a building in 2D using lines and polygons whose vertical dimension is handled automatically, as in the present invention, than to model the same building in 3D using slanted or vertical planes, as is done in other systems, such as suggested in the “Radio Propagation” and “Achievable Accuracy” papers, cited above. The 3D view enables the user to verify the building structure (i.e., that the vertical dimension of an obstruction/partition category has not been inadvertently specified incorrectly) and provides a unique perspective that is ultimately useful when viewing wireless prediction or measurement data for evaluation of the performance of the communication system being modeled.
  • [0043]
    Once an environment has been specified and defined as objects, and a visual verification of the 3D drawing is complete, a full verification of this definition is performed in step 104, as shown in FIG. 1. The engineer or designer selects the Final Drawing Check procedure to ensure that all of the steps necessary to create a fully functional model of the desired building environment have been correctly performed. These steps include ensuring that the modeled environment is properly scaled and that the separate floors of the building are visually aligned in 3D space. Certain drawing structures and information can also be automatically detected. For example, the number of floors in a given building, the number and types of obstruction/partition categories and the entities assigned to each type, whether or not the user has already verified the drawing previously, and what (if any) activity has been done to the drawing database by the other SitePlanner-tool suite members can be automatically detected and reported to the user.
  • [0044]
    To obtain wireless system performance predictions using data generated with the present invention, as disclosed in the concurrently filed, copending application Ser. No. ______ (Docket 256016AA) and Ser. No. ______, (Docket 256017AA), one preferably uses the present method for the preparation of building databases. Depending on the chosen wireless system propagation or performance prediction model, important information is needed such as physical distances, partition locations, floor locations, and the numbers of floors and partitions. Standard architectural drawings, like scanned images, do not contain the necessary database information. Therefore, building a verified database for use in the selected wireless system propagation or performance prediction model is essential to ensure the best results.
  • [0045]
    Computer Aided Design (CAD) programs create vector graphics, made of lines and curves defined by mathematical objects called vectors. Vectors describe graphics according to their geometric characteristics. For example, a wheel in a vector graphic is made up of a mathematical definition of a circle drawn with a certain radius, thickness, color, and specific location. A user can move, resize, or change the color of the wheel without losing the quality of the graphic.
  • [0046]
    The present invention utilizes the vector information of imported maps, drawings or electronic images and file formats, as well as information input by users, to build complex 3-D representations and vector based databases. The preferred embodiment utilizes the drawing commands from AutoCAD, a product of AutoDesk, Inc. of San Rafael, Calif. It would be apparent to one skilled in the art that any other vectorized drawing tool, either now known or to be invented could be used as an alternative in the practice of the present invention. The process of inputting and converting the environmental information into a database is referred to as formatting. The present invention facilitates the formatting of objects in a drawing, and also stores detailed information in the drawing database about the object's location, attenuation factor, color, and other physical and electrical information such as reflectivity, or intersections of the object with floors, ceilings, and other objects.
  • [0047]
    The present invention may scan and format environmental information if a vector drawing of the environment does not exist. If formatted vector drawings do exist, the method of the invention provides many ways for these drawings to be formatted into a useful format. Generally, two “starting points” exist when working with vector drawings. These starting points are briefly discussed in the following bulleted list.
      • Starting with a previously drawn (CAD) floor plan, and
      • Starting from scratch.
  • [0050]
    In order to create a vectorized drawing of a desired environment, it is desired to utilize a number of drawing tools. The present method provides the user with a wide range of commands which have been crafted for rapid database creation and manipulation, as described below. Many of these commands rely on specific combinations of AutoCAD drawing commands which are sequentially executed without the user having to know the specific CAD commands. It should be apparent to one skilled in art that the method for creating drawings, as described below, could be practiced with other products either now known or to be developed in the future.
      • View Formatted Information command—This command invokes a list box that contains a list of formatted floors in a drawing.
      • Hide Formatted Information command—This command allows a user to hide partitions that have been previously formatted.
      • View Unformatted Information command—This command works in a similar manner as the View Formatted Information command. A list box of available layers in the drawing that are not formatted layers is displayed.
      • Toggle Orthogonal Draw On/Off command—With the default cursor snap setup, ORTHO mode (ON) constrains cursor movement to horizontal and vertical directions (90 degrees).
      • Display Grid command—This command allows the user to specify grid spacing, or to turn on/off snap and aspect options. It also allows the user to specify the spacing value between grid lines. The user may turn the grid on or off.
        • Snap—Sets the grid spacing to the current snap interval.
        • Aspect—Sets the grid to a different spacing in X and Y directions.
      • Cursor Snap command—This command prompts the user with “Snap spacing or ON/OFF/Aspect/Rotate/Style <0.5000>:”
      • Spacing—Activates Snap mode with the specified value.
      • ON—Activates Snap mode using the current snap grid resolution, rotation, and style.
      • OFF—Tums off Snap mode but retains the values and modes.
      • Aspect—Specifies differing X and Y spacing for the snap grid. This option is not available if the current snap style is Isometric.
      • Rotate—Sets the rotation of the snap grid with respect to the drawing and the display screen. The user specifies a rotation angle between −90 and 90 degrees. A positive angle rotates the grid counterclockwise about its base point. A negative angle rotates the grid clockwise.
        • Base point <current>: The user specifies a point
        • Rotation angle ˜current>: The user specifies an angle
      • Style—The user specifies the format of the Snap grid, which is standard or isometric.
        • Standard—Displays a rectangular grid that is parallel to the XY plane of the current Universal Coordinate System of the drawing database. X and Y spacing may differ.
        • Isometric—Displays an isometric grid, in which the grid points are initially at 30- and 150-degree angles. Isometric snap can be rotated but cannot have different Aspect values.
      • Object Selection Snap command—This command allows the user to select points in the drawing. One should note that when more than one check box option is selected, the invention applies the selected snap modes to return a point closest to the center of the aperture box.
  • [0070]
    The Snap procedure is especially useful in drawing the floors of the environment when tracing raster images and drawing from scratch. FIGS. 7A through 7F illustrate the various snapping procedures which are used by AutoCAD and known to those skilled in the art. For instance, the Endpoint option snaps to the closest endpoint of an entity as shown in FIG. 7A. The Midpoint option snaps to the midpoint of an entity as shown in FIG. 7B. The Perpendicular Node Nearest Intersection option snaps to a point perpendicular to an entity as shown in FIG. 7C. The node option snaps to a point object as shown in FIG. 7D. The Nearest option snaps to the nearest point on an entity. The Intersection option snaps the intersection of two or more entities as shown in FIG. 7E. The Apparent Intersection option includes two separate snap modes: Apparent Intersection and Extended Apparent Intersection. The user can locate Intersection and Extended Intersection snap points while running Apparent Intersection object snap mode.
  • [0071]
    Apparent Intersection snaps to the apparent intersection of two entities that do not intersect in 3D space, but might appear to intersect onscreen. Extended Apparent Intersection snaps to the imaginary intersection of two objects that would appear to intersect if the objects were extended along their natural paths, as shown in FIG. 7F.
  • [0072]
    The Quick option snaps to the first snap point on the first object found. Quick must be used in conjunction with other object snap modes.
  • [0073]
    Other useful commands are described below:
      • Show Distance Between Points command—This command prompts the user to select two points in a drawing, after which the distance the points are display.
      • Break/Ungroup Entities command—This command allows the user to ungroup and break apart objects.
      • Purge command—In addition to the graphic objects used by the present method, there are several types of non-graphical objects that are stored in drawing files. These objects have descriptive designations associated with them; for example blocks, layers, groups, and dimension styles. In most cases the user names objects as they are created, and they can later be renamed. Names are stored in symbol tables. When a named object is specified on the command line or selected from a dialog box, the name and associated data of the object is referenced in the symbol table. Unused, unreferenced named objects can be purged from a drawing at any time during an editing session. Purging reduces drawing size, and therefore, the memory requirements for working with the drawing. Objects that are referenced by other objects cannot be purged. All objects may be purged at once, or the user can select a category of object to purge such as: Linetypes, Text Styles, Dimension Styles, Multiline Styles, Blocks, and Shapes.
      • Drawing Utilities command—This command allows the user to audit the drawing or recover from a corrupted drawing.
  • [0078]
    Referring now to FIG. 4, if the user starts with a previously drawn CAD drawing, the following steps outline typical procedures for formatting drawings. Methods for implementing this outline are discussed below.
  • [0079]
    First, the CAD drawing is input in function block 201. The user then decides what extraneous drawing objects to remove (e.g., doors, labels, borders, drawing scales, stairs, etc.) in function block 202. Remaining objects are formatted using drawing commands, as described above, in function block 203. Partition colors and descriptions are adjusted, as desired in function block 204. After formatting all objects, the drawing is verified in function block 206.
  • [0080]
    In the preferred embodiment, verification is an automated sequential process that takes the user through a series of procedures, as listed below, to determine that all necessary data has been entered consistently. In alternative embodiments, the order of the procedures and functions of each procedure can be altered, merged, expanded, modified, or even omitted depending on the judgment of one skilled in the art. The verification process can also be fully automated, without requiring user interaction. The preferred embodiment currently provides for the following steps:
      • Scale Drawing is used to scale a drawing to the proper size based on the known size of a particular object in the drawing.
      • Align Building Floors assists in aligning floors in a drawing after the different floors have been assembled in the drawing.
      • Ceiling Height allows the user to adjust the heights of ceilings in either meters or feet.
      • Set Partition Labels and Colors permits the user to set and modify the partition labels and the colors of the partitions. The height may also be modified. If the partitions already exist in a drawing, the user can use this command to globally change the color of partitions or the partition's name.
      • Set Origin of Building Coordinate System allows the user to specify a reference point which to be stored in the drawing database. This point is important for assembling drawings so that the point can automatically align the drawings.
      • Set Environmental/Path Loss Parameters allows modification of partition labels, path loss parameters, and electrical characteristics such as attenuation parameters.
      • Create Boundary creates an invisible boundary around a drawing to guide the predictive models so that the predictions/calculations are reasonably bounded in the space within the database.
      • Create Legend allows the user to enter pertinent information about a drawing, and gives the user options to size the legend relative to the current window and options to add additional information to the legend such as a partition color legend, a contour color legend, and a measurement data color legend.
        The Remove-Purge Unnecessary Drawing Information command must be selected manually to ensure appropriate purging of unused drawing objects.
  • [0089]
    If the format definition of the database is modified, it would be apparent to one skilled in the art how to change the method of verification to accommodate these modifications. It would also be apparent to one skilled in the art how to modify and extend existing drawing or CAD packages to perform the method of the invention.
  • [0090]
    Referring to FIG. 5, if the user starts from scratch and intends to implement a complete vector database, formatting a drawing will consist, only of drawing entities in function block 203, and assigning partition information to the drawing in function block 204.
  • [0091]
    In the preferred embodiment, partitions are drawn and existing partitions can be modified. Any entity or drawing object can be converted into a formatted partition on a particular floor. The type of partition of a previously formatted entity can be modified. The floor on which a particular formatted object resides can also be changed. Objects will still remain visible in the drawing after converting them to partitions on other floors. These objects may be hidden at the user's discretion. A user can display partition information by selecting objects in the drawing requesting partition information in the command menu. A text window containing the returned information regarding the object's type, location, length, and electrical attributes such as attenuation factor is displayed.
  • [0092]
    If more than one drawing is used to define the environment, they must be assembled before final verification. An automated procedure combining several separate single floor drawings into one multi-floored drawing may be executed.
  • [0093]
    Finally, the drawing is verified in function block 206, as described above. This verification will automatically make corrections to the legend that may have been corrupted after assembling several drawings into one file. Methods for formatting a drawing from scratch are discussed below.
  • [0094]
    Referring now to FIG. 6, a method is shown to format a raster image into a drawing that can be used for modeling. Because computer monitors represent images by displaying them on a grid, both vector and raster images are displayed on screen as small squares or dots known as pixels. Raster images only consist of a rectangular grid of pixels.
  • [0095]
    The image file formats supported by the present invention include the most common formats used in major technical imaging application areas: computer graphics, document management, and mapping and geographic information systems (GIS). The present invention determines the file format from the file contents, not from the file extension. Thus, additional formats could be added easily by including their translation parameters in the method.
  • [0096]
    Often times only a scanned image of a floor plan is available, as shown in FIG. 2. A user can insert a raster or bitmapped black and white, 8-bit gray, 8-bit color, or 24-bit color image file into the drawing. Users can insert images in a variety of formats, currently including BMP, TIF, RLE, JPG, GIF, and TGA. More than one image can be displayed in any viewport, and the number and size of images is not limited. Once the raster image is no longer needed, the user can detach the image from the drawing.
  • [0097]
    There are two preferred ways that a scanned image can be formatted. The first approach for formatting a raster image is shown in FIG. 6A. First the current floor is set in function block 401. In a new drawing, this creates the necessary floor layers based upon the user's selection. Therefore, any newly drawn partitions will reside on the current floor as chosen by the user. Then the image is imported in function block 402 and scaled in function block 403. Finally the drawing is verified in function block 404. Since this drawing originally did not contain any vector objects, the drawing database consists only of an image of the given environment that has been scaled to the proper dimensions. It does not contain information with regard to physical objects within the environment. Depending on the application, this may be sufficient for engineering use, for instance, when a wireless propagation prediction model only uses distance and does not rely on knowledge of the physical environment.
  • [0098]
    The second approach for formatting a raster image is shown in FIG. 6B. This method is similar to the method shown in FIG. 6A with the addition of function block 405. The scanned image is “traced” by the user to draw partitions and other obstructions prior to verification in function block 404. This method is similar to drawing a vector based drawing from scratch, except that the scanned image provides a trace guide. The end result is a drawing that can be used by all wireless system prediction models, including those which rely on knowledge of the physical environment.
  • [0099]
    A distinct advantage of the present invention is that a true three-dimensional environment is rendered from the drawings and stored in the database. The ceiling heights (or building heights) that are specified are used to determine the vertical height of any partitions found on a given floor. A height is defined for a category of partitions and this defines the object's height for each entity in that category. This is done automatically during the formatting process. Thus, even though the formatting process was strictly two-dimensional in nature, when the formatting of a drawing is completed, the resulting drawing is a true three-dimensional environment. The user can see the three-dimensional building structure by altering the viewpoint.
  • [0100]
    The present invention can be used to create single floor drawings that can later be assembled into one multi-floored drawing or it can be used to create one or several multi-floored drawings all at once. After creating a single floor, all entities that are not partitions should be removed from the drawing. Thus, if a raster image was used as a reference for tracing partitions, it should be erased once the tracing is complete. The method provides assistance to the user to distinguish between partition and non-partition objects. Typically, objects referred to as formatted objects are partition objects and objects referred to as unformatted objects are non-partition objects.
  • [0101]
    The final stage of formatting a drawing involves several verification steps. These steps are automatically sequenced, as described above. Before each step is performed, the user is asked whether that step has yet been performed. If the user answers “Yes”, then that step is skipped and the user is asked about the next step. Otherwise, the current step is performed and the user is prompted for any necessary information. When all steps have been completed, the drawing is saved. Unnecessary drawing information should then be purged. The formatted drawing should then be saved again.
  • [0102]
    This formatted drawing can now be used in any number of applications. Specifically, it may be used in wireless communication system engineering, planning and management tools for in-building or microcell wireless system, for instance as described in the concurrently filed and copending applications: Ser. No. ______, entitled “Method and System for Managing a Real Time Bill of Materials, filed by T. S. Rappaport and R. R. Skidmore (Docket 256016AA; Ser. No. ______, entitled “Method and System for Automated Optimization of Antenna Positioning in 3-D,” filed by T. S. Rappaport and R. R. Skidmore (Docket 256017AA); and copending application Ser. No. 09/221,985, entitled “System for Creating a Computer Model and Measurement Database of a Wireless Communication Network” filed by T. S. Rappaport and R. R. Skidmore. It may also be useful in any other number of applications that require a 3-D model of a building, campus or urban environment.
  • [0103]
    While the invention has been described in terms of a single preferred embodiment, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4675147 *6 Apr 198323 Jun 1987Westinghouse Electic Corp.Generating an integrated graphic display of the safety status of a complex process plant
US4736453 *10 Dec 19855 Apr 1988Schloemer Gerald RMethod and apparatus for making frequency channel assignment in a cellular or non-cellular radiotelephone communications system
US5091869 *16 Apr 199025 Feb 1992Expert Technologies, Inc.Computer integrated floor plan system
US5111392 *9 Jun 19895 May 1992Steelcase Inc.Design system for creating furniture layouts
US5119307 *22 Dec 19892 Jun 1992General Electric CompanyMethod and system for automated bill-of-material generation
US5239487 *24 Oct 199024 Aug 1993International Business Machines CorporationComputer integrated manufacturing rework apparatus and method
US5293640 *26 Feb 19908 Mar 1994TeleverketMethod for planning radio cells
US5307261 *28 Jun 199126 Apr 1994International Business Machines CorporationMethod and system for product configuration management in a computer based manufacturing system
US5337149 *12 Nov 19929 Aug 1994Kozah Ghassan FComputerized three dimensional data acquisition apparatus and method
US5339184 *15 Jun 199216 Aug 1994Gte Laboratories IncorporatedFiber optic antenna remoting for multi-sector cell sites
US5394522 *13 Sep 199328 Feb 1995International Business Machines CorporationSelecting and locating graphical icon objects to define and configure the workstations in data processing networks
US5450615 *22 Dec 199312 Sep 1995At&T Corp.Prediction of indoor electromagnetic wave propagation for wireless indoor systems
US5458123 *29 Apr 199417 Oct 1995Siemens Medical Systems, Inc.System for monitoring patient location and data
US5465390 *12 Feb 19937 Nov 1995France TelecomMethod for laying out the infrastructure of a cellular communications network
US5467441 *6 Oct 199414 Nov 1995Xerox CorporationMethod for operating on objects in a first image using an object-based model data structure to produce a second contextual image having added, replaced or deleted objects
US5482050 *17 Feb 19949 Jan 1996Spacelabs Medical, Inc.Method and system for providing safe patient monitoring in an electronic medical device while serving as a general-purpose windowed display
US5485568 *8 Oct 199316 Jan 1996Xerox CorporationStructured image (Sl) format for describing complex color raster images
US5491644 *7 Sep 199313 Feb 1996Georgia Tech Research CorporationCell engineering tool and methods
US5491837 *7 Mar 199413 Feb 1996Ericsson Inc.Method and system for channel allocation using power control and mobile-assisted handover measurements
US5493679 *29 Oct 199320 Feb 1996Hughes Aircraft CompanyAutomated logistical relational database support system for engineering drawings and artwork
US5515269 *8 Nov 19937 May 1996Willis; Donald S.Method of producing a bill of material for a configured product
US5528518 *25 Oct 199418 Jun 1996Laser Technology, Inc.System and method for collecting data used to form a geographic information system database
US5539665 *25 Jul 199423 Jul 1996Xerox CorporationRecording and retrieval of information relevant to the activities of a user
US5553312 *20 Jun 19943 Sep 1996Acs Wireless, Inc.Data transfer and communication network
US5553620 *2 May 199510 Sep 1996Acuson CorporationInteractive goal-directed ultrasound measurement system
US5555354 *23 Mar 199310 Sep 1996Silicon Graphics Inc.Method and apparatus for navigation within three-dimensional information landscape
US5561841 *21 Jan 19931 Oct 1996Nokia Telecommunication OyMethod and apparatus for planning a cellular radio network by creating a model on a digital map adding properties and optimizing parameters, based on statistical simulation results
US5564070 *30 Jul 19938 Oct 1996Xerox CorporationMethod and system for maintaining processing continuity to mobile computers in a wireless network
US5594946 *28 Feb 199514 Jan 1997Motorola, Inc.Method and apparatus for mitigating interference produced by a communication unit in a communication system
US5598532 *21 Oct 199328 Jan 1997Optimal NetworksMethod and apparatus for optimizing computer networks
US5625827 *23 Dec 199429 Apr 1997Gary M. KrauseMethod and system of blueprint document manipulation
US5636344 *22 Aug 19913 Jun 1997Hewlett-Packard CompanyNetwork fault analysis system
US5755072 *13 May 199626 May 1998Lingafelter; KennethConstruction method
US5761093 *8 May 19972 Jun 1998Motorola, Inc.Quality forecasting engine
US5774669 *28 Jul 199530 Jun 1998The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space AdministrationScalable hierarchical network management system for displaying network information in three dimensions
US5794128 *20 Sep 199511 Aug 1998The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The ArmyApparatus and processes for realistic simulation of wireless information transport systems
US5799154 *27 Jun 199625 Aug 1998Mci Communications CorporationSystem and method for the remote monitoring of wireless packet data networks
US5802146 *22 Nov 19951 Sep 1998Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc.Maintenance operations console for an advanced intelligent network
US5809282 *7 Jun 199515 Sep 1998Grc International, Inc.Automated network simulation and optimization system
US5815395 *29 Jun 199529 Sep 1998Interface Definition Systems, Inc.Diagnostic method and apparatus for configuration errors
US5821937 *12 Aug 199613 Oct 1998Netsuite Development, L.P.Computer method for updating a network design
US5825759 *24 Jul 199520 Oct 1998Telefonaktiebolaget Lm EricssonDistributing network services and resources in a mobile communications network
US5828960 *31 Mar 199527 Oct 1998Motorola, Inc.Method for wireless communication system planning
US5861887 *5 Dec 199519 Jan 1999Electronic Data Systems CorporationGraphic image compression and storage system
US5867112 *14 May 19972 Feb 1999Kost; James F.Software method of compressing text and graphic images for storage on computer memory
US5877777 *7 Apr 19972 Mar 1999Colwell; Tyler G.Fluid dynamics animation system and method
US5878328 *21 Dec 19952 Mar 1999At&T Wireless Services, Inc.Method and apparatus for wireless communication system organization
US5907850 *21 Jan 199725 May 1999Gary Matthew KrauseMethod and system for manipulating construction blueprint documents with hypermedia hotspot reference links from a first construction document to a related secondary construction document
US5917808 *17 Jan 199729 Jun 1999Fluke CorporationMethod of identifying device types on a local area network using passive monitoring
US5923850 *28 Jun 199613 Jul 1999Sun Microsystems, Inc.Historical asset information data storage schema
US5926762 *17 May 199620 Jul 1999Internet Mobility CorporationCellular telephone interference prediction and frequency reuse planning
US5940196 *16 May 199717 Aug 1999Harmonic Lightwaves, Inc.Optical communications system with wavelength division multiplexing
US5945976 *10 Dec 199631 Aug 1999Hitachi, Ltd.Graphic data processing system
US5948055 *29 Aug 19967 Sep 1999Hewlett-Packard CompanyDistributed internet monitoring system and method
US5949335 *14 Apr 19987 Sep 1999Sensormatic Electronics CorporationRFID tagging system for network assets
US5949988 *3 Apr 19977 Sep 1999Lucent Technologies Inc.Prediction system for RF power distribution
US5953669 *11 Dec 199714 Sep 1999Motorola, Inc.Method and apparatus for predicting signal characteristics in a wireless communication system
US5963867 *16 Aug 19955 Oct 1999Qualcomm Inc.Graphic tools for interactively planning a wireless network
US5970406 *31 Dec 199619 Oct 1999Airnet Communication Corp.Translator for time division multiple access wireless system having selective diversity circuits
US6018625 *27 Aug 199725 Jan 2000Northern Telecom LimitedManagement system architecture and design method to support reuse
US6021316 *20 May 19971 Feb 2000Nokia Telecommunications OyMethod and apparatus for determining path attenuation of radio waves
US6032105 *31 Jul 199729 Feb 2000Airtouch Communications, Inc.Computer-implemented microcell prediction modeling with terrain enhancement
US6038547 *7 Jan 199814 Mar 2000Casto; Robin L.Construction tracking and payment method and system
US6044273 *10 Dec 199628 Mar 2000Northern Telecom LimitedMethod and apparatus for designing a communication system by modeling spatial and temporal behavior of user mobility demand
US6058102 *6 Nov 19982 May 2000Visual Networks Technologies, Inc.Method and apparatus for performing service level analysis of communications network performance metrics
US6058262 *18 Apr 19972 May 2000Geargarage.Com Inc.Computer-aided-design method and apparatus for networks
US6059842 *14 Apr 19989 May 2000International Business Machines Corp.System and method for optimizing computer software and hardware
US6061722 *23 Dec 19969 May 2000T E Network, Inc.Assessing network performance without interference with normal network operations
US6075541 *7 Nov 199713 Jun 2000Trimble Naviagtion LimitedTopographic triangulation in reduced time
US6085335 *31 Dec 19974 Jul 2000Nortel Networks LimitedSelf engineering system for use with a communication system and method of operation therefore
US6088522 *31 Jul 199711 Jul 2000Airtouch Communications, Inc.Computer-implemented inbuilding prediction modeling for cellular telephone systems
US6104699 *12 Jun 199515 Aug 2000Telefonaktiebolget Lm EricssonMethod and device for partitioning physical network resources
US6108309 *8 Dec 199722 Aug 2000Mci Communications CorporationSONET network element simulator
US6111857 *11 Sep 199729 Aug 2000Soliman; Samir S.Wireless network planning tool
US6119009 *18 Sep 199712 Sep 2000Lucent Technologies, Inc.Method and apparatus for modeling the propagation of wireless signals in buildings
US6122083 *3 Oct 199419 Sep 2000Fujitsu LimitedMobile communication system having a small base station and equipment for its system
US6199032 *22 Jul 19986 Mar 2001Edx Engineering, Inc.Presenting an output signal generated by a receiving device in a simulated communication system
US6204813 *20 Feb 199820 Mar 2001Trakus, Inc.Local area multiple object tracking system
US6208833 *24 Jun 199727 Mar 2001The Whitaker CorporationEcho cancellation for a broadband distribution system
US6215495 *30 May 199710 Apr 2001Silicon Graphics, Inc.Platform independent application program interface for interactive 3D scene management
US6229540 *13 Oct 19988 May 2001Visionael CorporationAuditing networks
US6243772 *31 Jan 19975 Jun 2001Sharewave, Inc.Method and system for coupling a personal computer with an appliance unit via a wireless communication link to provide an output display presentation
US6253086 *25 Mar 199926 Jun 2001Nokia Telecommunications OyAdaptive frequency planning in a cellular network
US6272447 *6 May 19997 Aug 2001Scottsdale Building Systems LimitedFabrication and design of structural members
US6285377 *26 Jun 19974 Sep 2001Bayer CorporationMethod and apparatus for generating a smooth normalized star diagram
US6289203 *25 Feb 199811 Sep 2001Motorola, Inc.Method of calculating signal propagation loss and creating a data base therefor
US6311144 *31 Jul 199830 Oct 2001Nabil A. Abu El AtaMethod and apparatus for designing and analyzing information systems using multi-layer mathematical models
US6337688 *29 Jan 19998 Jan 2002International Business Machines CorporationMethod and system for constructing a virtual reality environment from spatially related recorded images
US6338021 *28 Sep 20008 Jan 2002Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Route selection method and system
US6338031 *23 Sep 19998 Jan 2002Cellco PartnershipComputer-implemented inbuilding prediction modeling for cellular telephone systems
US6356758 *31 Dec 199712 Mar 2002Nortel Networks LimitedWireless tools for data manipulation and visualization
US6384823 *5 Jan 19997 May 2002C. Michael DonoghueSystem and method for real-time mapping and transfer of coordinate position data from a virtual computer-aided design workspace to the real workspace
US6393432 *2 Jun 199921 May 2002Visionael CorporationMethod and system for automatically updating diagrams
US6408312 *30 Aug 199918 Jun 2002Visionael CorporationMethod and system for supporting multiple, historical, and future designs in a relational database
US6442507 *29 Dec 199827 Aug 2002Wireless Communications, Inc.System for creating a computer model and measurement database of a wireless communication network
US6470195 *31 Oct 200022 Oct 2002Raytheon CompanyMethod and apparatus for modeling a smart antenna in a network planning tool
US6505045 *10 Apr 20007 Jan 2003Carnegie Mellon UniversityMethod for configuring and assigning channels for a wireless network
US6509906 *29 Apr 199921 Jan 2003Autodesk, Inc.Display representations and streams for objects having authorable and dynamic behaviors and appearances
US6710758 *19 Dec 200223 Mar 2004Corning IncorporatedSpatial light modulators with improved inter-pixel performance
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US743712728 Jul 200514 Oct 2008Symbol Technologies, Inc.Method and system for determining existence of a predetermined wireless network coverage condition in a wireless network
US768064431 Oct 200316 Mar 2010Wireless Valley Communications, Inc.Method and system, with component kits, for designing or deploying a communications network which considers frequency dependent effects
US793360518 Jan 200726 Apr 2011Motorola Solutions, Inc.Method and system, with component kits for designing or deploying a communications network which considers frequency dependent effects
US7978182 *19 Dec 200712 Jul 2011Apple Inc.Screen rotation gestures on a portable multifunction device
US829049925 Apr 201116 Oct 2012Wireless Valley Communications Inc.Method and system to model frequency dependent effects of a communciations network
US84415021 May 200814 May 2013M.E.P. Cad, Inc.Methods and apparatuses for resolving a CAD drawing conflict with an arm around
US850333620 Jul 20056 Aug 2013Wireless Valley Communications, IncSystem and method for design, tracking, measurement, prediction and optimization of data communication networks
US85545203 Mar 20108 Oct 2013Auto Prep, LlcSystems and methods for differentiating and associating multiple drawings in a CAD environment
US86007063 Mar 20103 Dec 2013Auto Prep, LlcSystems and methods for identifying crash sources in a CAD environment
US87325991 May 200820 May 2014M.E.P. CAD Inc.Methods and apparatuses for handling a conflict in a CAD drawing
US87734255 Mar 20108 Jul 2014M.E.P. CAD Inc.Methods and apparatuses for proposing resolutions to conflicts in a CAD drawing with reflections
US20070025287 *28 Jul 20051 Feb 2007Goren David PMethod and system for determining existence of a predetermined wireless network coverage condition in a wireless network
US20080211778 *19 Dec 20074 Sep 2008Bas OrdingScreen Rotation Gestures on a Portable Multifunction Device
US20080309678 *1 May 200818 Dec 2008M.E.P. Cad, Inc.Methods and apparatuses for resolving a CAD drawing conflict with an arm around
US20090273598 *1 May 20085 Nov 2009M.E.P. Cad, Inc.Methods and apparatuses for automatically converting objects in CAD drawing from two-dimensions to three-dimensions
US20100138762 *1 May 20083 Jun 2010M.E.P. Cad, Inc.Methods and Apparatuses for Handling a Conflict in a CAD Drawing
US20100223032 *5 Mar 20102 Sep 2010M.E.P. CAD Inc.Methods and Apparatuses for Proposing Resolutions to Conflicts in a CAD Drawing with Reflections
US20100250615 *3 Mar 201030 Sep 2010Reghetti Joseph PSystems and methods for differentiating and associating multiple drawings in a cad environment
US20100251028 *3 Mar 201030 Sep 2010Reghetti Joseph PSystems and methods for identifying crash sources in a cad environment
US20140278283 *3 Jun 201418 Sep 2014M.E.P. CAD Inc.Editable clipping planes for cad systems
US20150339418 *31 Jul 201526 Nov 2015Ruckus Wireless, Inc.Modeling Radio Frequency Coverage
WO2014121136A1 *31 Jan 20147 Aug 2014Ruckus Wireless, Inc.Modeling radio frequency coverage
U.S. Classification701/101, 707/E17.019
International ClassificationG06F17/30
Cooperative ClassificationY10S707/915, Y10S707/959, Y10S707/99942, Y10S707/99956, Y10S707/921, Y10S707/955, Y10S707/957, Y10S707/922, G06F17/30244
European ClassificationG06F17/30M