US20050081378A1 - Arrangement for crankshaft straightening - Google Patents

Arrangement for crankshaft straightening Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20050081378A1
US20050081378A1 US10/685,766 US68576603A US2005081378A1 US 20050081378 A1 US20050081378 A1 US 20050081378A1 US 68576603 A US68576603 A US 68576603A US 2005081378 A1 US2005081378 A1 US 2005081378A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
crankshaft
rehardening
tolerance
tolerance condition
condition
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/685,766
Inventor
Anthony Bustamante
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Old Carco LLC
Original Assignee
DaimlerChrysler Co LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by DaimlerChrysler Co LLC filed Critical DaimlerChrysler Co LLC
Priority to US10/685,766 priority Critical patent/US20050081378A1/en
Assigned to DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION reassignment DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BUSTAMANTE, ANTHONY T
Publication of US20050081378A1 publication Critical patent/US20050081378A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B21MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21DWORKING OR PROCESSING OF SHEET METAL OR METAL TUBES, RODS OR PROFILES WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21D3/00Straightening or restoring form of metal rods, metal tubes, metal profiles, or specific articles made therefrom, whether or not in combination with sheet metal parts
    • B21D3/16Straightening or restoring form of metal rods, metal tubes, metal profiles, or specific articles made therefrom, whether or not in combination with sheet metal parts of specific articles made from metal rods, tubes, or profiles, e.g. crankshafts, by specially adapted methods or means
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D1/00General methods or devices for heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D9/00Heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering, adapted for particular articles; Furnaces therefor
    • C21D9/30Heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering, adapted for particular articles; Furnaces therefor for crankshafts; for camshafts
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D1/00General methods or devices for heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering
    • C21D1/06Surface hardening
    • C21D1/09Surface hardening by direct application of electrical or wave energy; by particle radiation
    • C21D1/10Surface hardening by direct application of electrical or wave energy; by particle radiation by electric induction
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D2221/00Treating localised areas of an article
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P10/00Technologies related to metal processing
    • Y02P10/25Process efficiency
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T29/00Metal working
    • Y10T29/49Method of mechanical manufacture
    • Y10T29/49229Prime mover or fluid pump making
    • Y10T29/49231I.C. [internal combustion] engine making
    • Y10T29/49233Repairing, converting, servicing or salvaging
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T29/00Metal working
    • Y10T29/49Method of mechanical manufacture
    • Y10T29/49229Prime mover or fluid pump making
    • Y10T29/49286Crankshaft making
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T29/00Metal working
    • Y10T29/49Method of mechanical manufacture
    • Y10T29/49718Repairing
    • Y10T29/49748Repairing by shaping, e.g., bending, extruding, turning, etc.

Definitions

  • the present invention relates in general to manufacturing of a crankshaft for an internal combustion engine. More specifically, the present invention relates to an arrangement for straightening out of tolerance crankshafts.
  • a typical automotive crankshaft for an internal combustion engine includes a plurality transition radii or corner areas located along various points of the crankshaft periphery such as among the transitions between counterweights, crankpins and main journals. These corner or transition radii areas are known as fillets and, under engine loads, may act as stress risers. If these stress risers are not properly treated, they can result in cracking of the crankshaft. Therefore, a hardening process is typically used for automotive crankshafts to deform these fillets and thereby increase the strength characteristics of these particular regions. As is known in the art, two commonly used hardening processes are fillet rolling and induction hardening.
  • the present invention provides an arrangement for straightening an out of tolerance crankshaft after hardening.
  • a process is provided for straightening a bent crankshaft after hardening that includes generating data indicative of a condition of crankshaft straightness. The data is then compared to a predetermined tolerance specification to detect an out of tolerance condition. In response to a detected out of tolerance condition, data is generated indicative of location and quantity of the out of tolerance condition. The crankshaft is then selectively rehardened as a function of the data indicative of location and quantity of the out of tolerance condition to remedy the detected out of tolerance condition.
  • a system for straightening a bent crankshaft after hardening.
  • the system includes a processing station with a hardening system and a measuring system.
  • a controller is arranged to receive information from the measuring system and provide instructions as a function of the measurement data to the hardening system to selectively reharden the crankshaft to remedy an out of tolerance condition.
  • residual stresses resulting from the induction hardening process are used to selectively induction reharden the crankshaft in strategic areas to offset bending that occurred during the typical induction hardening process of the fillet region areas.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic of a system for crankshaft straightening in accordance with the present invention
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a flowchart of a methodology for crankshaft straightening in accordance with the present invention.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a system for straightening an out of tolerance crankshaft in accordance with the present invention.
  • the system represented in FIG. 1 would typically be used in a manufacturing assembly line.
  • Station 10 includes a fixture 15 for securing a crankshaft in preparation for hardening and measuring.
  • Station 10 also includes a typical crankshaft measuring apparatus 20 capable of measuring straightness and detecting bent or warped crankshafts and a typical induction hardening apparatus 30 including multi-axis electromagnetic induction hardening heads 40 .
  • the crankshaft is induction hardened in the fillet region areas using the induction hardening apparatus 30 in accordance with known principles.
  • the crankshaft is then measured using measuring apparatus 20 .
  • measurement data 50 is generated and stored for a comparison to reference tolerance specifications. If the measurement data falls within an acceptable tolerance specification range, controller 60 allows for release of the crankshaft from station 10 to be transported to a next station in the crankshaft manufacturing line. If the measurement data does not fall within the acceptable tolerance specification range, controller 60 directs station 10 to retain the crankshaft for selective induction rehardening to remedy an out of tolerance condition.
  • the controller 60 sends rehardening control data 70 to the hardening system 30 .
  • the control data 70 includes predetermined rehardening parameters for use by hardening system 30 to selectively induction reharden the crankshaft to remedy the out of tolerance condition. More specifically, upon receiving measurement data indicative of location and quantity of the out of tolerance condition, controller 60 will match this measurement data to predetermined rehardening parameters correlated to the location and quantity of the out of tolerance condition.
  • Controller 60 contains these predetermined rehardening parameters as well as a conventional algorithm that provides for controller 60 to continuously collect and store in memory 80 empirical data results from testing, experimentation, and actual production manufacturing of out of tolerance crankshafts in the selective induction rehardening process.
  • memory 80 is continuously populated with measurement data indicative of an out of tolerance condition, the resultant rehardening parameters selected for use in the corresponding selective rehardening process, and whether the selected rehardening parameters were successful in remedying the out of tolerance condition.
  • the measurement apparatus 20 Upon selectively rehardening the crankshaft, the measurement apparatus 20 measures the crankshaft and compares it to the reference tolerance specifications. If the measurement data falls within the acceptable tolerance specification range, controller 60 allows for release of the crankshaft from station 10 to be transported to a next station in the crankshaft manufacturing line. If the measurement data does not fall within the acceptable tolerance specification range, controller 60 directs station 10 to again retain the crankshaft for selective induction rehardening to remedy the out of tolerance condition.
  • step 100 involves induction hardening the crankshaft in the fillet region.
  • step 110 involves measuring the crankshaft after the induction hardening process.
  • Step 120 involves comparing the measurement data of step 110 to reference tolerance specifications.
  • Step 130 is the next step and involves determining if the measurement data is within the reference tolerance specifications.
  • step 130 If the result of step 130 is “YES”, the crankshaft was not distorted during the induction hardening of the fillet region in step 100 and the method continues to step 150 where the crankshaft leaves station 10 and proceeds to the next processing station.
  • step 130 determines data indicative of location and quantity of the out of tolerance condition.
  • step 180 memory is accessed where predetermined sets of rehardening parameters are stored. These parameters are correlated to data indicative of a particular location and quantity of out of tolerance condition.
  • step 190 a set of rehardening parameters correlated to the measurement data indicative of the particular location and quantity of the out of tolerance condition is identified.
  • step 200 the identified set for rehardening parameters is sent to the hardening system as instructions for selectively induction rehardening the crankshaft.
  • step 210 the bent crankshaft is then selectively induction rehardened based on the data and instructions sent to the hardening system from step 200 .
  • the crankshaft is then remeasured in step 220 and compared to reference tolerance specifications in step 230 .
  • the method then returns to step 130 and repeats the process until the crankshaft is determined to be within the reference tolerance specifications.

Abstract

An arrangement for straightening a bent crankshaft is provided. In a crankshaft manufacturing process, a hardened crankshaft is measured and compared to reference tolerance specifications. If the crankshaft is determined to be out tolerance, data identifying the out of tolerance location and quantity is generated and the crankshaft is selectively induction rehardened in predetermined areas as a function of the measurement data to remedy the out of tolerance condition. The crankshaft is then remeasured and the process repeated until the crankshaft is within the reference tolerance specifications. The results can be logged to facilitate matching of subsequent detected out of tolerance conditions.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates in general to manufacturing of a crankshaft for an internal combustion engine. More specifically, the present invention relates to an arrangement for straightening out of tolerance crankshafts.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • A typical automotive crankshaft for an internal combustion engine includes a plurality transition radii or corner areas located along various points of the crankshaft periphery such as among the transitions between counterweights, crankpins and main journals. These corner or transition radii areas are known as fillets and, under engine loads, may act as stress risers. If these stress risers are not properly treated, they can result in cracking of the crankshaft. Therefore, a hardening process is typically used for automotive crankshafts to deform these fillets and thereby increase the strength characteristics of these particular regions. As is known in the art, two commonly used hardening processes are fillet rolling and induction hardening. Although these hardening processes are necessary to increase the fatigue strength and thus the durability of the crankshaft, these processes can result in distortion of the crankshaft beyond the dimensional specifications required for today's automotive engines. More specifically, with induction hardening, residual stresses are created in the crankshaft that can result in bending and distorting the crankshaft. As a result, a certain percentage of crankshafts intended for the automotive industry are bent during the manufacturing process and are therefore not usable and scrapped.
  • Thus, there is a need for a process to reduce crankshaft scrap inherent in today's automotive crankshaft manufacturing processes.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • Accordingly, the present invention provides an arrangement for straightening an out of tolerance crankshaft after hardening. In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, a process is provided for straightening a bent crankshaft after hardening that includes generating data indicative of a condition of crankshaft straightness. The data is then compared to a predetermined tolerance specification to detect an out of tolerance condition. In response to a detected out of tolerance condition, data is generated indicative of location and quantity of the out of tolerance condition. The crankshaft is then selectively rehardened as a function of the data indicative of location and quantity of the out of tolerance condition to remedy the detected out of tolerance condition.
  • In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a system is provided for straightening a bent crankshaft after hardening. The system includes a processing station with a hardening system and a measuring system. A controller is arranged to receive information from the measuring system and provide instructions as a function of the measurement data to the hardening system to selectively reharden the crankshaft to remedy an out of tolerance condition.
  • In accordance with yet another aspect of this invention, residual stresses resulting from the induction hardening process are used to selectively induction reharden the crankshaft in strategic areas to offset bending that occurred during the typical induction hardening process of the fillet region areas.
  • Additional benefits and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art to which this invention relates from a reading of the subsequent description of the preferred embodiment and the appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
  • BREIF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Other aspects, features, and advantages of the present invention will become more fully apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment, the appended claims, and in the accompanying drawings in which:
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic of a system for crankshaft straightening in accordance with the present invention; and
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a flowchart of a methodology for crankshaft straightening in accordance with the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMIENT
  • Referring now to the drawings, FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a system for straightening an out of tolerance crankshaft in accordance with the present invention. The system represented in FIG. 1 would typically be used in a manufacturing assembly line. Station 10 includes a fixture 15 for securing a crankshaft in preparation for hardening and measuring. Station 10 also includes a typical crankshaft measuring apparatus 20 capable of measuring straightness and detecting bent or warped crankshafts and a typical induction hardening apparatus 30 including multi-axis electromagnetic induction hardening heads 40.
  • The crankshaft is induction hardened in the fillet region areas using the induction hardening apparatus 30 in accordance with known principles. The crankshaft is then measured using measuring apparatus 20. During the measuring process, measurement data 50 is generated and stored for a comparison to reference tolerance specifications. If the measurement data falls within an acceptable tolerance specification range, controller 60 allows for release of the crankshaft from station 10 to be transported to a next station in the crankshaft manufacturing line. If the measurement data does not fall within the acceptable tolerance specification range, controller 60 directs station 10 to retain the crankshaft for selective induction rehardening to remedy an out of tolerance condition.
  • In the selective induction rehardening process, the controller 60 sends rehardening control data 70 to the hardening system 30. The control data 70 includes predetermined rehardening parameters for use by hardening system 30 to selectively induction reharden the crankshaft to remedy the out of tolerance condition. More specifically, upon receiving measurement data indicative of location and quantity of the out of tolerance condition, controller 60 will match this measurement data to predetermined rehardening parameters correlated to the location and quantity of the out of tolerance condition.
  • Controller 60 contains these predetermined rehardening parameters as well as a conventional algorithm that provides for controller 60 to continuously collect and store in memory 80 empirical data results from testing, experimentation, and actual production manufacturing of out of tolerance crankshafts in the selective induction rehardening process. Thus, memory 80 is continuously populated with measurement data indicative of an out of tolerance condition, the resultant rehardening parameters selected for use in the corresponding selective rehardening process, and whether the selected rehardening parameters were successful in remedying the out of tolerance condition.
  • Upon selectively rehardening the crankshaft, the measurement apparatus 20 measures the crankshaft and compares it to the reference tolerance specifications. If the measurement data falls within the acceptable tolerance specification range, controller 60 allows for release of the crankshaft from station 10 to be transported to a next station in the crankshaft manufacturing line. If the measurement data does not fall within the acceptable tolerance specification range, controller 60 directs station 10 to again retain the crankshaft for selective induction rehardening to remedy the out of tolerance condition.
  • Referring now to FIG. 2, a methodology for straightening an out of tolerance crankshaft is illustrated in accordance with the present invention. In the exemplary embodiment, step 100 involves induction hardening the crankshaft in the fillet region. Step 110 involves measuring the crankshaft after the induction hardening process. Step 120 involves comparing the measurement data of step 110 to reference tolerance specifications. Step 130 is the next step and involves determining if the measurement data is within the reference tolerance specifications.
  • If the result of step 130 is “YES”, the crankshaft was not distorted during the induction hardening of the fillet region in step 100 and the method continues to step 150 where the crankshaft leaves station 10 and proceeds to the next processing station.
  • If the result of step 130 is “NO”, the crankshaft is distorted beyond the tolerance specifications and the method proceeds to step 170 where the controller determines data indicative of location and quantity of the out of tolerance condition. In step 180, memory is accessed where predetermined sets of rehardening parameters are stored. These parameters are correlated to data indicative of a particular location and quantity of out of tolerance condition. In step 190, a set of rehardening parameters correlated to the measurement data indicative of the particular location and quantity of the out of tolerance condition is identified. In step 200, the identified set for rehardening parameters is sent to the hardening system as instructions for selectively induction rehardening the crankshaft.
  • In step 210, the bent crankshaft is then selectively induction rehardened based on the data and instructions sent to the hardening system from step 200. The crankshaft is then remeasured in step 220 and compared to reference tolerance specifications in step 230. The method then returns to step 130 and repeats the process until the crankshaft is determined to be within the reference tolerance specifications.
  • The foregoing description constitutes the embodiments devised by the inventors for practicing the invention. It is apparent, however, that the invention is susceptible to modification, variation, and change that will become obvious to those skilled in the art such as using different methods and processes for hardening the crankshafts. Inasmuch as the foregoing description is intended to enable one skilled in the pertinent art to practice the invention, it should not be construed to be limited thereby but should be construed to include such aforementioned obvious variations and be limited only by the proper scope or fair meaning of the accompanying claims.

Claims (10)

1. A process for straightening a bent crankshaft after hardening, the process comprising:
generating data indicative of a condition of crankshaft straightness;
comparing the data to a predetermined tolerance specification to detect an out of tolerance condition;
in response to a detected out of tolerance condition, generating data indicative of location and quantity of the out of tolerance condition; and
selectively rehardening the crankshaft as a function of the data indicative of location and quantity of the out of tolerance condition to remedy the detected out of tolerance condition.
2. The process of claim 1, wherein selectively rehardening the crankshaft further comprises:
accessing a plurality of predetermined sets of rehardening parameters to identify a set of rehardening parameters correlated to the location and quantity of the out of tolerance condition; and
applying these identified predetermined parameters in the selective rehardening process.
3. The process of claim 1, further comprising:
measuring the rehardened crankshaft to detect any out of tolerance condition;
if an out of tolerance condition is detected, applying a set of predetermined rehardening parameters correlated to the newly detected out of tolerance condition; and
logging information regarding unsuccessful rehardening attempt as historical record for use in correlating subsequent out of tolerance conditions.
4. The process of claim 1, further comprising:
measuring the rehardened crankshaft to detect any out of tolerance condition; and
if an out of tolerance condition is not detected, log information regarding successful rehardening attempt as historical record for use in correlating subsequent out of tolerance conditions.
5. The process of claim 1, wherein selectively rehardening the crankshaft comprises selectively induction rehardening the crankshaft.
6. A system for straightening a bent crankshaft after hardening, the system comprising:
a processing station including a hardening apparatus and a measurement apparatus; and
a controller coupled to the hardening apparatus and the measuring apparatus, wherein the controller is arranged to receive data from the measurement apparatus, compare the measurement data to predetermined tolerance specifications to detect an out of tolerance condition, and control operation of the hardening apparatus as a function of the data to selectively reharden the crankshaft to remedy an out of tolerance condition.
7. The system of claim 6, wherein the controller is further arranged to:
instruct the measurement apparatus to measure the rehardened crankshaft;
detect any out of tolerance condition as a result of the measurement;
if an out of tolerance condition is detected, apply a set of predetermined rehardening parameters correlated to the newly detected out of tolerance condition; and
log information regarding unsuccessful rehardening attempt as historical record for use in correlating subsequent out of tolerance conditions.
8. The system of claim 6, wherein the controller is further arranged to:
instruct the measurement apparatus to measure the rehardened crankshaft;
detect any out of tolerance condition as a result of the measurement; and
if an out of tolerance condition is not detected, log information regarding successful rehardening attempt as historical record for use in correlating subsequent out of tolerance conditions.
9. The system of claim 6, wherein the controller is arranged to correlate the received measurement data to a plurality of sets of predetermined rehardening parameters to identify a set of rehardening parameters correlated to the location and quantity of the out of tolerance condition, and apply the identified predetermined parameters as instructions for the hardening system to use in the selective rehardening process.
10. The system of claim 6, wherein selectively rehardening the crankshaft comprises selectively induction rehardening the crankshaft.
US10/685,766 2003-10-15 2003-10-15 Arrangement for crankshaft straightening Abandoned US20050081378A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/685,766 US20050081378A1 (en) 2003-10-15 2003-10-15 Arrangement for crankshaft straightening

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/685,766 US20050081378A1 (en) 2003-10-15 2003-10-15 Arrangement for crankshaft straightening

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20050081378A1 true US20050081378A1 (en) 2005-04-21

Family

ID=34520667

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/685,766 Abandoned US20050081378A1 (en) 2003-10-15 2003-10-15 Arrangement for crankshaft straightening

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20050081378A1 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007147930A1 (en) * 2006-06-22 2007-12-27 Wärtsilä Finland Oy Method of treating a crankshaft
US20080041844A1 (en) * 2006-08-04 2008-02-21 Ajax Tocco Magnethermic Corporation Apparatus and method for hardening bearing surfaces of a crankshaft
US20090130746A1 (en) * 2007-10-25 2009-05-21 Canon U.S. Life Sciences, Inc. Microchannel surface coating
CN108620451A (en) * 2017-03-18 2018-10-09 四川省宜宾普什汽车零部件有限公司 A kind of crankshaft journal aligning method

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5235838A (en) * 1987-07-13 1993-08-17 W. Hegenscheidt Gesellschaft Mbh Method and apparatus for truing or straightening out of true work pieces
US5906691A (en) * 1996-07-02 1999-05-25 The Timken Company Induction hardened microalloy steel having enhanced fatigue strength properties
US6638379B1 (en) * 1999-07-22 2003-10-28 Elotherm Gmbh Method and device for hardening bearing surfaces of crankshafts

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5235838A (en) * 1987-07-13 1993-08-17 W. Hegenscheidt Gesellschaft Mbh Method and apparatus for truing or straightening out of true work pieces
US5906691A (en) * 1996-07-02 1999-05-25 The Timken Company Induction hardened microalloy steel having enhanced fatigue strength properties
US6638379B1 (en) * 1999-07-22 2003-10-28 Elotherm Gmbh Method and device for hardening bearing surfaces of crankshafts

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007147930A1 (en) * 2006-06-22 2007-12-27 Wärtsilä Finland Oy Method of treating a crankshaft
US20100012648A1 (en) * 2006-06-22 2010-01-21 Wärtsilä Finland Oy Method of treating a crankshaft
US8222577B2 (en) 2006-06-22 2012-07-17 Wärtsilä Finland Oy Method of treating a crankshaft
US20080041844A1 (en) * 2006-08-04 2008-02-21 Ajax Tocco Magnethermic Corporation Apparatus and method for hardening bearing surfaces of a crankshaft
US8399815B2 (en) * 2006-08-04 2013-03-19 Ajax Tocco Magnethermic Corporation Apparatus and method for hardening bearing surfaces of a crankshaft
US20090130746A1 (en) * 2007-10-25 2009-05-21 Canon U.S. Life Sciences, Inc. Microchannel surface coating
CN108620451A (en) * 2017-03-18 2018-10-09 四川省宜宾普什汽车零部件有限公司 A kind of crankshaft journal aligning method

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Dobmann et al. Industrial applications of 3MA–micromagnetic multiparameter microstructure and stress analysis
US8082090B2 (en) Method and device for operation of the glow plugs of a Diesel engine
US8082114B2 (en) Method for characterizing the endurance limit of a part from its surface profile
US20150231710A1 (en) Method for machining center holes of forged rotary body and system for machining center holes of forged rotary body
CN110349199B (en) Object roundness measuring method
US11813895B2 (en) Tire wear measuring apparatus using irregularity of tire acceleration signal and tire wear measuring method using same
US20050081378A1 (en) Arrangement for crankshaft straightening
US20150276684A1 (en) Method and Device for Avoiding and/or Detecting Stress Cracks in a Component as a Result of Hardening or Straightening
US20150061647A1 (en) Method for calibrating a measuring device for inspecting surfaces on the basis of barkhausen noises for a specified component geometry
Gapinski et al. Measurement of diameter and roundness on incomplete outline of element with three-lobbing deviation
CN104777169B (en) Bent axle remanufactures life appraisal test method
JP2018141703A (en) Fatigue intensity estimation method
Thompson et al. A comparative analysis of step loading and staircase testing for fatigue strength estimation of an engine component
US20070107180A1 (en) System and method for verifying the dimensions of airfoils
Wolter et al. Micromagnetic testing at Fraunhofer IZFP: highlights and experiences of more than 3 decades of research
Zanni et al. Development and validation of a probabilistic model for notch fatigue strength prediction of tool steels based on surface defects
JP4880412B2 (en) Induction induction tempering method and induction induction tempering program
CN114397151B (en) Panel surface quality control method, device, equipment and storage medium
Hoier et al. On assessing grindability of recycled and ore-based crankshaft steel: an approach combining data analysis with material science
US6474135B1 (en) Laser peening to provide design credit for improved fatigue properties
CN117648825B (en) High-strength plate rebound quantity estimation method
CN109945823B (en) Method for detecting deformation of steel part in machining process
Lee et al. An estimation of failure stress condition in rocker arm shaft through FEA and microscopic fractography
JP5365938B2 (en) Metal material dissimilarity judgment method and apparatus
Kishore et al. A General Workflow for Static Failure Criteria and Allowable Defect Size Calculation in Presence of Defects due to Manufacturing Process and Abusive Loads

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, MICHIGAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BUSTAMANTE, ANTHONY T;REEL/FRAME:014276/0545

Effective date: 20031014

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION