US20040061785A1 - Imaging of pixel defects in digital detectors - Google Patents

Imaging of pixel defects in digital detectors Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20040061785A1
US20040061785A1 US10/675,299 US67529903A US2004061785A1 US 20040061785 A1 US20040061785 A1 US 20040061785A1 US 67529903 A US67529903 A US 67529903A US 2004061785 A1 US2004061785 A1 US 2004061785A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
image
pixels
bad
display
bad pixels
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/675,299
Inventor
Richard Aufrichtig
Robert Kwasnick
John Lamberty
John French
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
General Electric Co
Original Assignee
General Electric Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by General Electric Co filed Critical General Electric Co
Priority to US10/675,299 priority Critical patent/US20040061785A1/en
Assigned to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY reassignment GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: FRENCH, JOHN C., LAMBERTY, JOHN R., AUFRICHTIG, RICHARD, KWASNICK, ROBERT FORREST
Publication of US20040061785A1 publication Critical patent/US20040061785A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/58Testing, adjusting or calibrating apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis
    • A61B6/582Calibration
    • A61B6/583Calibration using calibration phantoms
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N25/00Circuitry of solid-state image sensors [SSIS]; Control thereof
    • H04N25/60Noise processing, e.g. detecting, correcting, reducing or removing noise
    • H04N25/68Noise processing, e.g. detecting, correcting, reducing or removing noise applied to defects
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N5/00Details of television systems
    • H04N5/30Transforming light or analogous information into electric information
    • H04N5/32Transforming X-rays
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N17/00Diagnosis, testing or measuring for television systems or their details
    • H04N17/002Diagnosis, testing or measuring for television systems or their details for television cameras

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to imaging systems. More particularly, the present invention relates to a digital imaging system equipped to detect and display defects contained within the imaging detector.
  • Imaging systems include systems where images are generated by, x-ray, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound, computerized tomography (CT), or such nuclear medicine techniques as positron emission tomography (PET) or single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT).
  • MRI magnetic resonance imaging
  • CT computerized tomography
  • PET positron emission tomography
  • SPECT single photon emission computerized tomography
  • a source of electromagnetic radiation e.g., x-rays
  • Various structures of various densities in the body of interest absorb the radiation differently, such that the radiation detected by the detector provides information on the structures.
  • Imaging systems are often used to provide detailed information on structures inside the human body.
  • CT scans of the head are useful for evaluation of head injury and detection of tumor, stroke, or infection.
  • Imaging devices are also useful for the detection of pathologies, or manifestations of diseases such as cancer.
  • bad pixels are image elements which either do not respond electrically or have a behavior that is statistically different from surrounding pixels in the detector array.
  • detection of bad pixels in an imaging system is accomplished by imaging a standard set of test phantoms, such as flat fields, with predetermined imaging techniques. Depending on the number of bad pixels and their proximity to other bad pixels in the detected image, clusters of bad pixels may result and clinically relevant information may be lost.
  • One embodiment of the invention relates to a method for displaying an image generated by at least one detector of an imaging unit.
  • the method includes creating a pixel map identifying locations of bad pixels in an array of pixels in the image detected by the at least one detector, linking the pixel map to the image, and providing for selective display of the pixel map.
  • Bad pixels include pixels which do not respond electrically and/or pixels which are statistically different from surrounding pixels in the array of pixels.
  • Another embodiment of the invention relates to an apparatus for displaying an image generated by at least one detector of an imaging unit.
  • the apparatus includes means for creating a pixel map identifying locations of bad pixels in an array of pixels in the image detected by the at least one detector, means for linking the pixel map to the image, and means for providing for selective display of the pixel map.
  • Bad pixels include pixels which do not respond electrically and/or pixels which are statistically different from surrounding pixels in the array of pixels.
  • the apparatus includes an imaging unit, at least one detector unit, a processing unit, and a display.
  • the imaging unit generates x-rays which pass through a body of interest having a structure.
  • the at least one detector unit detects the x-rays which pass through the body of interest to form an image.
  • the image includes an array of pixels which contain information on the structure.
  • the processing unit is coupled to the at least one detector unit and identifies bad pixels within the array of pixels in the image formed by the at least one detector unit. Bad pixels include pixels which do not respond electrically and/or pixels which are statistically different from surrounding pixels in an array of pixels.
  • the display is coupled to the processing unit and provides visual display of the image and selectively displays the bad pixels.
  • FIG. 1 is a general block diagram of an x-ray imaging system in accordance with the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a display of an exemplary image in an embodiment of the x-ray detector system of FIG. 1;
  • FIG. 3 is a pixel map including detected bad pixels in the displayed image of FIG. 2;
  • FIG. 4 is the display of FIG. 2 including a grid showing the displayed image divided into an array of pixels
  • FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a file in a second embodiment of the x-ray detector system of FIG. 1;
  • FIG. 6 is a display of an exemplary image in a third embodiment of the x-ray detector system of FIG. 1;
  • FIG. 7 is a flow chart of an exemplary method used to visualize bad pixels in the image detected by the detector of the system shown in FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 1 is a general block diagram of an x-ray imaging system 100 .
  • System 100 includes an x-ray unit 110 , a digital x-ray detector 120 , a local computer or processing unit 130 , a local image review station 140 , a storage unit 150 , and a remote image review station 160 .
  • X-ray unit 110 is an x-ray generating unit which includes an x-ray generator and x-ray tube. X-ray unit 110 generates x-rays which pass through a body of interest (e.g., part of a human body).
  • imaging system 100 is any of a variety of imaging systems (e.g., ultrasound). Such alternative embodiments include components characteristic to the particular type of imaging system used.
  • the x-rays from x-ray unit 110 are detected by digital x-ray detector 120 , which forms an image from the x-rays.
  • the image detected by detector 120 includes an array of pixels, or image elements, which contain information on the detected x-rays and, thus, of the structures within the body of interest.
  • Detector 120 includes electronics for communicating data on the x-rays to other devices.
  • Processing unit 130 is any of a variety of programmable electronic machines which performs operations or assembles, stores, correlates, or otherwise processes information.
  • processing unit 130 is a computer.
  • Processing unit 130 processes the x-ray data from detector 120 .
  • Processing unit 130 is coupled to detector 120 and identifies bad pixels within the array of pixels in the image detected by detector 120 .
  • Bad pixels are pixels that either do not respond electronically or are statistically different from surrounding pixels in the array of pixels.
  • Local image review station 140 includes a display and controls. Local image review station 140 is coupled to processing unit 130 and provides graphical and/or textual display of x-ray imaging data from x-ray unit 110 and digital x-ray detector 120 . Controls on local image review station 140 allow a reviewer to change a variety of display options. For example, station 140 can be configured by the reviewer to selectively display a map of bad pixels superimposed on the image.
  • Storage unit 150 is coupled to any one of processing unit 130 and station 140 .
  • Storage unit 150 is preferably a disk drive for storing digital information.
  • Storage unit 150 is alternatively a solid state storage device or any other memory component capable of maintaining data displayed on local image review station 140 . Further still, storage unit 150 is alternatively integrated into processing unit 130 .
  • Storage unit 150 maintains x-ray imaging data in the form of an image file. Thus, x-ray imaging data is available for later retrieval either by local station 140 or remote station 160 .
  • Remote image review station 160 includes a display and controls. Remote image review station 160 is similar to local review station 140 in that station 160 provides graphical and/or textual display of x-ray imaging data from x-ray unit 110 . Further, controls allow a reviewer to change a variety of display options. For example, station 160 provides for the selective display of a map of bad pixels. Remote station 160 is coupled to local image review station 140 or storage unit 150 by a network 165 .
  • Network 165 is a local area network (LAN), wide area network (WAN), synchronous optical network (SONET), or any other interconnection of electronic components for sharing information.
  • LAN local area network
  • WAN wide area network
  • SONET synchronous optical network
  • Station 160 advantageously provides doctors or other trained personnel located remotely from x-ray unit 110 with access to graphical and textual display of x-ray imaging data.
  • Station 160 obtains x-ray imaging data either from local station 140 or from archived copies in storage unit 150 .
  • system 100 includes a plurality of detectors 120 , forming an array of detectors. Where an array of detectors is used, one image is obtained from the plurality of detectors. The one image from the plurality of detectors 120 is processed by processing unit 130 and displayed by station 140 or station 160 .
  • a CT device includes an array of detectors arranged along the inside perimeter of a slip ring. The one image from the plurality of detectors may include bad pixels in the image due to defects in one or multiple detectors.
  • local image review station 140 and remote image review station 160 each include a display unit 200 .
  • FIG. 2 illustrates display unit 200 including a display 210 , a defective pixel map overlay control 220 , a select area query control 230 , and a power switch 240 .
  • Display 210 is a cathode ray tube (CRT) display, thin film transistor (TFT) display, or any other device for displaying images.
  • Display 210 shows an image of a human chest using x-ray unit 110 in a defective pixel map overlay mode.
  • display unit 200 displays the clinical image of the chest with a defective pixel map overlay.
  • the overlay includes an operator selection of white, black, color-coded, or alternative symbols to identify bad pixel locations. Where color coding is used, different colors characterize different detector defects. A color coding index is available at station 140 .
  • display 210 is a black and white display that reveals detector pixel defects 250 in reverse color on the image.
  • pixel defects 250 are shown in black and, where the image on display 210 is black.
  • the image shown in display 210 (including defective pixels) can be output to a laser printer or other printing device.
  • Controls 220 and 230 are buttons on display unit 200 which allow the image reviewer to select one of two pixel defect display modes. In the first pixel defect display mode, the image reviewer is shown display 210 with a defective pixel map overlaying the image. In the second pixel defect display mode, the image reviewer is shown display 210 and allowed to select areas on the display in order to query whether those areas contain bad pixels. Controls 220 and 230 are alternatively included as touch-screen buttons on display 210 , selections in a menu bar on display 210 , or any other arrangement in the user interface of display unit 200 . Power switch 240 is an on/off button activating or deactivating display unit 200 .
  • FIG. 3 is a pixel map 300 which can be displayed on display unit 200 .
  • Pixel map 300 includes bad pixels 350 within an array of pixels.
  • Bad pixels 350 are identified by processing unit 130 as pixels which either do not respond electronically or behave in a manner which is statistically different from surrounding pixels in the array of pixels.
  • the locations of bad pixels 350 are included in the image file of storage unit 150 as row and column locations in the array of pixels.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a display unit 400 including a pixel grid 460 .
  • Pixel grid 460 is not displayed on display 410 , rather it is used in FIG. 4 to illustrate the division of the image displayed by display 410 into an array of pixels.
  • Pixel defects 450 are single bad pixels or clusters of bad pixels in the image. The locations of pixel defects 450 are included in an information header of the image file stored in storage unit 150 as row and column locations.
  • FIG. 5 is a block diagram of an exemplary file 500 of x-ray detector system 100 .
  • File 500 is a computer file, linked list, array, or any other data structure for arranging and storing information.
  • File 500 includes an image header 510 and image data 520 .
  • Image header 510 contains data representative of the locations of detected bad pixels and clusters (e.g., row and column indicia for each defect).
  • Image data 520 contains data representative of the clinical image, such as image data for the human chest of FIG. 2.
  • File 500 is formatted in text, HTML, ASCII, or any of a variety of file formats.
  • Image header 510 provides a link of bad pixel data to a corresponding image. Linking the bad pixel data with a corresponding image advantageously provides access to reliable image information for both currently displayed images and archived image files.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates a display unit 600 in another embodiment of x-ray detector system 100 .
  • Display unit 600 includes a display 610 , a defective pixel map overlay control 620 , a select area query control 630 , and a power switch 640 .
  • Display 610 , controls 620 and 630 , and power switch 640 are substantially the same as display 210 , controls 220 and 230 , and power switch 240 in FIG. 2.
  • Display 610 provides a graphical image of a human chest using x-ray unit 110 in a select area query mode.
  • a reviewer of the image selects an area using, for example, a mouse cursor 660 controlled by a mouse input device 670 .
  • a dashed box 680 is displayed to indicate the particular area selected.
  • the reviewer of the image selects an area on the image by touching the screen at that area, creating a box around the area using a computer mouse, or any of a variety of user interface arrangements.
  • display unit 600 displays whether the selected area contains a bad pixel or cluster of bad pixels, such as pixel defects 650 , by displaying a graphical area overlay similar to that used in defective pixel map overlay mode (FIG. 2) in the selected area or by giving a graphical or textual indication as to whether a bad pixel is present in the selected area. For example, a text message “NO DEFECTIVE PIXELS IN AREA” is alternatively displayed for selected areas without bad pixels.
  • Display 610 can be output to a laser printer or other printing device.
  • FIG. 7 is a flow chart 700 of an exemplary method used to visualize bad pixels in the image detected by detector 120 of x-ray detector system 100 .
  • standard imaging techniques are used to identify bad pixels, or image elements, within an array of pixels in the image detected by detector 120 .
  • Bad pixels are pixels that either do not respond electrically or have a behavior that is statistically different from surrounding pixels in the array of pixels.
  • a map of the detected bad pixels identified is stored in processing unit 130 .
  • Standard imaging techniques for identifying bad pixels include, for example, those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,657,400 issued to Granfors et al.; U.S. Pat. No.
  • a step 715 is performed in which the operator of local image review station 140 selects the desired type of bad pixel display.
  • the operator preferably chooses either an overlay display using control 220 , 420 or 620 or a selected area display using control 240 , 440 or 640 . If the operator chooses an overlay display, a step 720 is performed. If the operator chooses a selected area display, a step 730 is performed.
  • step 720 the bad pixel map is displayed overlaying the clinical image acquired by detector 120 on local image review station 140 .
  • An example of an overlay display is shown in FIG. 2.
  • step 730 the operator selects a clinically suspicious area on the clinical image using a mouse cursor, keyboard keys, or other types of controls.
  • a clinically suspicious area may be one which includes lone graphical aberrations in the image, inconsistent patterns in the image, or other image anomalies.
  • Defects in the selected area are preferably displayed using a graphical overlay for the selected area.
  • An example of a selected area display including mouse cursor 660 is shown in FIG. 6.
  • a text message is alternatively displayed indicating the presence or absence of defective pixels within the selected area.
  • a numerical value representing the quality of the detector in the selected area is displayed. The numerical value represents, for example, the number of bad pixels within the selected area.
  • a step 740 is performed in which the clinical image of x-ray unit 110 is archived locally onto storage unit 150 .
  • a bad pixel map identified by processing unit 130 is included with the clinical image as an information field in the information header of the image file and stored in storage unit 150 .
  • An example of an image file is shown in FIG. 5.
  • header information including the location of bad pixels in the array of pixels displayed is available for advanced imaging algorithms.
  • the algorithms use the location of bad pixel information to avoid mistaking a defect for a clinical pathology or enhancing a defect during manipulation by the algorithm.
  • Advanced imaging algorithms include algorithms for computer assisted diagnosis (CAD) or other digital image enhancement methods.
  • a step 745 is performed to determine if x-ray detector system 100 is networked to remote image review station 160 . If so, a step 750 is performed in which the clinical image, including the bad pixel map in the image header, is communicated to remote image review station 160 by network 165 . Steps 715 , 720 , and 730 are performed at remote image review station 160 to provide display of bad pixels in the clinical image in a similar fashion to the display at local review station 140 .
  • X-ray detector system 100 discussed in reference to FIGS. 1 - 6 and the method discussed with reference to FIG. 7 advantageously provide selective display of bad pixels (and/or clusters of bad pixels) in the image detected by detector 120 . Further, system 100 links images from x-ray unit 110 with a map of corresponding bad pixels detected on detector 120 by processing unit 130 .
  • FIG. 1 While the embodiments illustrated in the FIGURES and described above are presently preferred, it should be understood that these embodiments are offered by way of example only. Other embodiments may include, for example, data structures other than arrays to contain information from x-ray unit 110 .
  • the term pixel should be understood to include any image or picture element.
  • the use of the term “pixel” may be interpreted to include picture or image elements, and, depending on the application, may represent a voxel or predefined area or volume.
  • “Pixel” should not be limited to a single picture or image element, elements necessarily arranged in a matrix, or an element of a particular size or shape. The invention is not limited to a particular embodiment, but extends to various modifications, combinations, and permutations that nevertheless fall within the scope and spirit of the appended claims.

Abstract

A method and apparatus for displaying an image generated by at least one detector of an imaging unit are disclosed herein. The method includes creating a pixel map identifying locations of bad pixels in an array of pixels in the image detected by the at least one detector, linking the pixel map to the image, and providing for selective display of the pixel map. Bad pixels behave from a group including pixels which do not respond electrically and pixels which are statistically different from surrounding pixels in the array of pixels. The apparatus includes an imaging unit for generating x-rays which pass through a body of interest, at least one detector unit for detecting the x-rays, and a processing unit for identifying bad pixels within the detected image.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/303,190, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.[0001]
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates generally to imaging systems. More particularly, the present invention relates to a digital imaging system equipped to detect and display defects contained within the imaging detector. [0002]
  • Imaging systems include systems where images are generated by, x-ray, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound, computerized tomography (CT), or such nuclear medicine techniques as positron emission tomography (PET) or single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT). In each system, a source of electromagnetic radiation (e.g., x-rays) emits radiation which passes through a body of interest and is detected by some kind of detector. Various structures of various densities in the body of interest absorb the radiation differently, such that the radiation detected by the detector provides information on the structures. [0003]
  • Imaging systems are often used to provide detailed information on structures inside the human body. For example, CT scans of the head are useful for evaluation of head injury and detection of tumor, stroke, or infection. Imaging devices are also useful for the detection of pathologies, or manifestations of diseases such as cancer. [0004]
  • Conventional digital image detectors are, nevertheless, known to lose image information at locations in the detected image which contain a detector defect. These defects are typically called “bad pixels.” In general, bad pixels are image elements which either do not respond electrically or have a behavior that is statistically different from surrounding pixels in the detector array. [0005]
  • Generally, detection of bad pixels in an imaging system is accomplished by imaging a standard set of test phantoms, such as flat fields, with predetermined imaging techniques. Depending on the number of bad pixels and their proximity to other bad pixels in the detected image, clusters of bad pixels may result and clinically relevant information may be lost. [0006]
  • Thus, there is a need to alert the user of imaging systems as to the location of bad pixels and/or clusters of bad pixels in the displayed image. Further, there is a need to avoid medical misdiagnosis caused by unawareness of detector defects. Even further, there is a need to provide critical information to algorithms which are used to detect local statistical image variations which may mistakenly quantify detector defects as pathologies. [0007]
  • BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • One embodiment of the invention relates to a method for displaying an image generated by at least one detector of an imaging unit. The method includes creating a pixel map identifying locations of bad pixels in an array of pixels in the image detected by the at least one detector, linking the pixel map to the image, and providing for selective display of the pixel map. Bad pixels include pixels which do not respond electrically and/or pixels which are statistically different from surrounding pixels in the array of pixels. [0008]
  • Another embodiment of the invention relates to an apparatus for displaying an image generated by at least one detector of an imaging unit. The apparatus includes means for creating a pixel map identifying locations of bad pixels in an array of pixels in the image detected by the at least one detector, means for linking the pixel map to the image, and means for providing for selective display of the pixel map. Bad pixels include pixels which do not respond electrically and/or pixels which are statistically different from surrounding pixels in the array of pixels. [0009]
  • Another embodiment of the invention relates to an apparatus for displaying an image. The apparatus includes an imaging unit, at least one detector unit, a processing unit, and a display. The imaging unit generates x-rays which pass through a body of interest having a structure. The at least one detector unit detects the x-rays which pass through the body of interest to form an image. The image includes an array of pixels which contain information on the structure. The processing unit is coupled to the at least one detector unit and identifies bad pixels within the array of pixels in the image formed by the at least one detector unit. Bad pixels include pixels which do not respond electrically and/or pixels which are statistically different from surrounding pixels in an array of pixels. The display is coupled to the processing unit and provides visual display of the image and selectively displays the bad pixels. [0010]
  • Other principle features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon review of the following drawings, the detailed description, and the appended claims. [0011]
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The invention will become more fully understood from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals denote like elements, in which: [0012]
  • FIG. 1 is a general block diagram of an x-ray imaging system in accordance with the present invention; [0013]
  • FIG. 2 is a display of an exemplary image in an embodiment of the x-ray detector system of FIG. 1; [0014]
  • FIG. 3 is a pixel map including detected bad pixels in the displayed image of FIG. 2; [0015]
  • FIG. 4 is the display of FIG. 2 including a grid showing the displayed image divided into an array of pixels; [0016]
  • FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a file in a second embodiment of the x-ray detector system of FIG. 1; [0017]
  • FIG. 6 is a display of an exemplary image in a third embodiment of the x-ray detector system of FIG. 1; and [0018]
  • FIG. 7 is a flow chart of an exemplary method used to visualize bad pixels in the image detected by the detector of the system shown in FIG. 1.[0019]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • FIG. 1 is a general block diagram of an [0020] x-ray imaging system 100. System 100 includes an x-ray unit 110, a digital x-ray detector 120, a local computer or processing unit 130, a local image review station 140, a storage unit 150, and a remote image review station 160. X-ray unit 110 is an x-ray generating unit which includes an x-ray generator and x-ray tube. X-ray unit 110 generates x-rays which pass through a body of interest (e.g., part of a human body).
  • In alternative embodiments, [0021] imaging system 100 is any of a variety of imaging systems (e.g., ultrasound). Such alternative embodiments include components characteristic to the particular type of imaging system used.
  • After passing through the body of interest, the x-rays from [0022] x-ray unit 110 are detected by digital x-ray detector 120, which forms an image from the x-rays. The image detected by detector 120 includes an array of pixels, or image elements, which contain information on the detected x-rays and, thus, of the structures within the body of interest. Detector 120 includes electronics for communicating data on the x-rays to other devices.
  • [0023] Processing unit 130 is any of a variety of programmable electronic machines which performs operations or assembles, stores, correlates, or otherwise processes information. In one embodiment, processing unit 130 is a computer. Processing unit 130 processes the x-ray data from detector 120. Processing unit 130 is coupled to detector 120 and identifies bad pixels within the array of pixels in the image detected by detector 120. Bad pixels are pixels that either do not respond electronically or are statistically different from surrounding pixels in the array of pixels.
  • Local [0024] image review station 140 includes a display and controls. Local image review station 140 is coupled to processing unit 130 and provides graphical and/or textual display of x-ray imaging data from x-ray unit 110 and digital x-ray detector 120. Controls on local image review station 140 allow a reviewer to change a variety of display options. For example, station 140 can be configured by the reviewer to selectively display a map of bad pixels superimposed on the image.
  • [0025] Storage unit 150 is coupled to any one of processing unit 130 and station 140. Storage unit 150 is preferably a disk drive for storing digital information. Storage unit 150 is alternatively a solid state storage device or any other memory component capable of maintaining data displayed on local image review station 140. Further still, storage unit 150 is alternatively integrated into processing unit 130. Storage unit 150 maintains x-ray imaging data in the form of an image file. Thus, x-ray imaging data is available for later retrieval either by local station 140 or remote station 160.
  • Remote [0026] image review station 160 includes a display and controls. Remote image review station 160 is similar to local review station 140 in that station 160 provides graphical and/or textual display of x-ray imaging data from x-ray unit 110. Further, controls allow a reviewer to change a variety of display options. For example, station 160 provides for the selective display of a map of bad pixels. Remote station 160 is coupled to local image review station 140 or storage unit 150 by a network 165. Network 165 is a local area network (LAN), wide area network (WAN), synchronous optical network (SONET), or any other interconnection of electronic components for sharing information.
  • [0027] Station 160 advantageously provides doctors or other trained personnel located remotely from x-ray unit 110 with access to graphical and textual display of x-ray imaging data. Station 160 obtains x-ray imaging data either from local station 140 or from archived copies in storage unit 150.
  • Alternatively, [0028] system 100 includes a plurality of detectors 120, forming an array of detectors. Where an array of detectors is used, one image is obtained from the plurality of detectors. The one image from the plurality of detectors 120 is processed by processing unit 130 and displayed by station 140 or station 160. For example, a CT device includes an array of detectors arranged along the inside perimeter of a slip ring. The one image from the plurality of detectors may include bad pixels in the image due to defects in one or multiple detectors.
  • In an exemplary embodiment, local [0029] image review station 140 and remote image review station 160 each include a display unit 200. FIG. 2 illustrates display unit 200 including a display 210, a defective pixel map overlay control 220, a select area query control 230, and a power switch 240.
  • [0030] Display 210 is a cathode ray tube (CRT) display, thin film transistor (TFT) display, or any other device for displaying images. Display 210 shows an image of a human chest using x-ray unit 110 in a defective pixel map overlay mode. In defective pixel map overlay mode, display unit 200 displays the clinical image of the chest with a defective pixel map overlay. The overlay includes an operator selection of white, black, color-coded, or alternative symbols to identify bad pixel locations. Where color coding is used, different colors characterize different detector defects. A color coding index is available at station 140.
  • In the embodiment of FIG. 2, [0031] display 210 is a black and white display that reveals detector pixel defects 250 in reverse color on the image. For example, where the image on display 210 is white, pixel defects are shown in black and, where the image on display 210 is black, pixel defects are shown in white. The image shown in display 210 (including defective pixels) can be output to a laser printer or other printing device.
  • [0032] Controls 220 and 230 are buttons on display unit 200 which allow the image reviewer to select one of two pixel defect display modes. In the first pixel defect display mode, the image reviewer is shown display 210 with a defective pixel map overlaying the image. In the second pixel defect display mode, the image reviewer is shown display 210 and allowed to select areas on the display in order to query whether those areas contain bad pixels. Controls 220 and 230 are alternatively included as touch-screen buttons on display 210, selections in a menu bar on display 210, or any other arrangement in the user interface of display unit 200. Power switch 240 is an on/off button activating or deactivating display unit 200.
  • FIG. 3 is a [0033] pixel map 300 which can be displayed on display unit 200. Pixel map 300 includes bad pixels 350 within an array of pixels. Bad pixels 350 are identified by processing unit 130 as pixels which either do not respond electronically or behave in a manner which is statistically different from surrounding pixels in the array of pixels. The locations of bad pixels 350 are included in the image file of storage unit 150 as row and column locations in the array of pixels.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a [0034] display unit 400 including a pixel grid 460. Pixel grid 460 is not displayed on display 410, rather it is used in FIG. 4 to illustrate the division of the image displayed by display 410 into an array of pixels. Pixel defects 450 are single bad pixels or clusters of bad pixels in the image. The locations of pixel defects 450 are included in an information header of the image file stored in storage unit 150 as row and column locations.
  • FIG. 5 is a block diagram of an [0035] exemplary file 500 of x-ray detector system 100. File 500 is a computer file, linked list, array, or any other data structure for arranging and storing information. File 500 includes an image header 510 and image data 520. Image header 510 contains data representative of the locations of detected bad pixels and clusters (e.g., row and column indicia for each defect). Image data 520 contains data representative of the clinical image, such as image data for the human chest of FIG. 2. File 500 is formatted in text, HTML, ASCII, or any of a variety of file formats.
  • [0036] Image header 510 provides a link of bad pixel data to a corresponding image. Linking the bad pixel data with a corresponding image advantageously provides access to reliable image information for both currently displayed images and archived image files.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates a [0037] display unit 600 in another embodiment of x-ray detector system 100. Display unit 600 includes a display 610, a defective pixel map overlay control 620, a select area query control 630, and a power switch 640. Display 610, controls 620 and 630, and power switch 640 are substantially the same as display 210, controls 220 and 230, and power switch 240 in FIG. 2.
  • [0038] Display 610 provides a graphical image of a human chest using x-ray unit 110 in a select area query mode. In the select area query mode, a, reviewer of the image selects an area using, for example, a mouse cursor 660 controlled by a mouse input device 670. After selection of an area using input device 670, a dashed box 680 is displayed to indicate the particular area selected. Alternatively, the reviewer of the image selects an area on the image by touching the screen at that area, creating a box around the area using a computer mouse, or any of a variety of user interface arrangements.
  • Once the area in question is selected, [0039] display unit 600 displays whether the selected area contains a bad pixel or cluster of bad pixels, such as pixel defects 650, by displaying a graphical area overlay similar to that used in defective pixel map overlay mode (FIG. 2) in the selected area or by giving a graphical or textual indication as to whether a bad pixel is present in the selected area. For example, a text message “NO DEFECTIVE PIXELS IN AREA” is alternatively displayed for selected areas without bad pixels. Display 610 can be output to a laser printer or other printing device.
  • FIG. 7 is a [0040] flow chart 700 of an exemplary method used to visualize bad pixels in the image detected by detector 120 of x-ray detector system 100. In a step 710, standard imaging techniques are used to identify bad pixels, or image elements, within an array of pixels in the image detected by detector 120. Bad pixels are pixels that either do not respond electrically or have a behavior that is statistically different from surrounding pixels in the array of pixels. A map of the detected bad pixels identified is stored in processing unit 130. Standard imaging techniques for identifying bad pixels include, for example, those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,657,400 issued to Granfors et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,854,655 issued to Watanabe, et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,272,536 issued to Sudo et al.; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,047,863 issued to Pape, et al.
  • After [0041] step 710, a step 715 is performed in which the operator of local image review station 140 selects the desired type of bad pixel display. The operator preferably chooses either an overlay display using control 220, 420 or 620 or a selected area display using control 240, 440 or 640. If the operator chooses an overlay display, a step 720 is performed. If the operator chooses a selected area display, a step 730 is performed.
  • In [0042] step 720, the bad pixel map is displayed overlaying the clinical image acquired by detector 120 on local image review station 140. An example of an overlay display is shown in FIG. 2.
  • In [0043] step 730, the operator selects a clinically suspicious area on the clinical image using a mouse cursor, keyboard keys, or other types of controls. A clinically suspicious area may be one which includes lone graphical aberrations in the image, inconsistent patterns in the image, or other image anomalies.
  • Defects in the selected area are preferably displayed using a graphical overlay for the selected area. An example of a selected area display including [0044] mouse cursor 660 is shown in FIG. 6. Further, a text message is alternatively displayed indicating the presence or absence of defective pixels within the selected area. Alternatively, a numerical value representing the quality of the detector in the selected area is displayed. The numerical value represents, for example, the number of bad pixels within the selected area.
  • After [0045] step 720 or 730, a step 740 is performed in which the clinical image of x-ray unit 110 is archived locally onto storage unit 150. A bad pixel map identified by processing unit 130 is included with the clinical image as an information field in the information header of the image file and stored in storage unit 150. An example of an image file is shown in FIG. 5.
  • As such, header information including the location of bad pixels in the array of pixels displayed is available for advanced imaging algorithms. The algorithms use the location of bad pixel information to avoid mistaking a defect for a clinical pathology or enhancing a defect during manipulation by the algorithm. Advanced imaging algorithms include algorithms for computer assisted diagnosis (CAD) or other digital image enhancement methods. [0046]
  • After step [0047] 740, a step 745 is performed to determine if x-ray detector system 100 is networked to remote image review station 160. If so, a step 750 is performed in which the clinical image, including the bad pixel map in the image header, is communicated to remote image review station 160 by network 165. Steps 715, 720, and 730 are performed at remote image review station 160 to provide display of bad pixels in the clinical image in a similar fashion to the display at local review station 140.
  • [0048] X-ray detector system 100 discussed in reference to FIGS. 1-6 and the method discussed with reference to FIG. 7 advantageously provide selective display of bad pixels (and/or clusters of bad pixels) in the image detected by detector 120. Further, system 100 links images from x-ray unit 110 with a map of corresponding bad pixels detected on detector 120 by processing unit 130.
  • Thus, human reviewers of the image and computer algorithms analyzing the image are provided with information which identifies bad detector pixels. As such, bad pixels are not mistaken for clinical pathologies either by human reviewers or computer programs. Further, bad pixels are not enhanced by CAD algorithms. Therefore, [0049] x-ray defector system 100 and systems utilizing the method discussed above are more reliable and more effective imaging systems.
  • While the embodiments illustrated in the FIGURES and described above are presently preferred, it should be understood that these embodiments are offered by way of example only. Other embodiments may include, for example, data structures other than arrays to contain information from [0050] x-ray unit 110. Further, the term pixel should be understood to include any image or picture element. For purposes of the present invention, the use of the term “pixel” may be interpreted to include picture or image elements, and, depending on the application, may represent a voxel or predefined area or volume. “Pixel” should not be limited to a single picture or image element, elements necessarily arranged in a matrix, or an element of a particular size or shape. The invention is not limited to a particular embodiment, but extends to various modifications, combinations, and permutations that nevertheless fall within the scope and spirit of the appended claims.

Claims (16)

What is claimed is:
1. A method for displaying an image generated by at least one detector of an imaging unit, the method comprising:
creating a pixel map identifying locations of bad pixels in an array of pixels in the image detected by the at least one detector, the bad pixels behaving from a group including pixels which do not respond electrically and pixels which are statistically different from surrounding pixels in the array of pixels;
linking the pixel map to the image; and
providing for selective display of the pixel map over the image by a user selecting a display of at least a portion of the created pixel map.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the providing step includes providing a graphical overlay with graphical symbolic representations of the bad pixels superimposed on the image.
3. The method of claim 1, further comprising communicating the image to a storage unit, wherein information identifying the bad pixels is communicated as an image header.
4. The method of claim 1, further comprising communicating the image to a computer, wherein information identifying the bad pixels is communicated for use by image analysis algorithms executed by the computer, wherein the bad pixels are not mistaken for a clinical pathology.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the providing step includes providing a textual display with information identifying the bad pixels.
6. The method of claim 1, further comprising selecting an area of the image, wherein the providing step includes displaying the bad pixels within the selected area.
7. An apparatus for displaying an image generated by at least one detector of an imaging unit, the apparatus comprising:
means for creating a pixel map identifying locations of bad pixels in an array of pixels in the image detected by the at least one detector, the bad pixels behaving from a group including pixels which do not respond electrically and pixels which are statistically different from surrounding pixels in the array of pixels;
means for linking the pixel map to the image; and
means for providing for selective display of the pixel map. Over the image selected by a user selecting a display of at least a portion of the created pixel map.
8. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the means for providing includes means for providing graphical symbolic representations of the bad pixels superimposed on the image.
9. The apparatus of claim 7, further comprising means for communicating the image to a storage unit, wherein information identifying the bad pixels is communicated.
10. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the image is a clinical image.
11. The apparatus of claim 10, further comprising means for communicating the image to a computer wherein information identifying the bad pixels is communicated for use by image analysis algorithms executed by the computer, wherein the bad pixels are not mistaken for a clinical pathology.
12. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the means for providing includes means for providing a textual display with information identifying the bad pixels.
13. An apparatus for displaying an image, the apparatus comprising:
an imaging unit for generating x-rays which pass through a body of interest having a structure;
at least one detector unit for detecting the x-rays which pass through the body of interest to form an image, the image including an array of pixels which contain information on the structure;
a processing unit coupled to the at least one detector unit, the processing unit configured to identify bad pixels within the array of pixels in the image formed by the at least one detector unit, the bad pixels behaving from a group including pixels which do not respond electrically and pixels which are statistically different from surrounding pixels in the array of pixels; and
a display coupled to the processing unit and providing visual display of the image and selectively displaying the bad pixels over the image.
14. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the display selectively displays the bad pixels by providing a graphical overlay with graphical symbolic representations of the bad pixels superimposed on the image.
15. The apparatus of claim 13 further comprising an operator input device for selecting an area of the image, wherein the display selectively displays the bad pixels within the selected area of the image.
16. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the image is a clinical image and the processing unit is further configured to link information identifying the bad pixels to the image, wherein image analysis algorithms executed to analyze the image do not mistake the bad pixels for a clinical pathology.
US10/675,299 1999-04-30 2003-09-30 Imaging of pixel defects in digital detectors Abandoned US20040061785A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/675,299 US20040061785A1 (en) 1999-04-30 2003-09-30 Imaging of pixel defects in digital detectors

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/303,190 US6661456B1 (en) 1999-04-30 1999-04-30 Imaging of pixel defects in digital detectors
US10/675,299 US20040061785A1 (en) 1999-04-30 2003-09-30 Imaging of pixel defects in digital detectors

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/303,190 Continuation US6661456B1 (en) 1999-04-30 1999-04-30 Imaging of pixel defects in digital detectors

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20040061785A1 true US20040061785A1 (en) 2004-04-01

Family

ID=23170921

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/303,190 Expired - Fee Related US6661456B1 (en) 1999-04-30 1999-04-30 Imaging of pixel defects in digital detectors
US10/675,299 Abandoned US20040061785A1 (en) 1999-04-30 2003-09-30 Imaging of pixel defects in digital detectors

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/303,190 Expired - Fee Related US6661456B1 (en) 1999-04-30 1999-04-30 Imaging of pixel defects in digital detectors

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (2) US6661456B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2001008928A (en)

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2004114212A1 (en) * 2003-06-16 2004-12-29 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method for correcting image artefacts caused by defects in a fluorescent x-ray storage layer, and x-ray device
US20050190983A1 (en) * 2004-02-26 2005-09-01 Jibril Odogba Asynchronous calibration and correction of a solid-state detector
US20090092321A1 (en) * 2007-01-16 2009-04-09 Bae Systems Finformation And Electronic Systems Integration Inc Real-time pixel substitution for thermal imaging systems
US20100034481A1 (en) * 2008-08-05 2010-02-11 Qualcomm Incorporated Bad pixel cluster detection
US20110049374A1 (en) * 2009-08-28 2011-03-03 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Information processing method and information processing apparatus for displaying anomalous pixel, and radiographic system
US20110063469A1 (en) * 2009-09-16 2011-03-17 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing apparatus, image processing method, image processing system, and computer-accessible medium
US8208044B2 (en) 2008-09-18 2012-06-26 Qualcomm Incorporated Bad pixel cluster detection
US20120206611A1 (en) * 2006-03-03 2012-08-16 Acterna Llc Systems and methods for visualizing errors in video signals
US20120228486A1 (en) * 2009-12-21 2012-09-13 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Radiation detector assembly with test circuitry
US20130112850A1 (en) * 2009-02-04 2013-05-09 Jay V. Bixler System and method for generating a deselect mapping for a focal plane array
CN103905747A (en) * 2012-12-26 2014-07-02 深圳市蓝韵实业有限公司 Medical image bad pixel point repairing method and system
US20140184383A1 (en) * 2012-12-28 2014-07-03 General Electric Company Fault Tolerant Detector Assembly
CN108464845A (en) * 2018-01-22 2018-08-31 苏州佳世达电通有限公司 A kind of exception detecting method and ultrasonic diagnostic system of ultrasonic probe

Families Citing this family (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6744912B2 (en) * 1996-11-29 2004-06-01 Varian Medical Systems Technologies, Inc. Multiple mode digital X-ray imaging system
JP2001218115A (en) * 2000-01-31 2001-08-10 Sony Corp Solid-state image pickup device and its defective pixel recording method
US6903769B1 (en) * 2000-08-31 2005-06-07 Eastman Kodak Company Detecting hopping pixel defects in CCD image sensors
JP3824927B2 (en) * 2001-06-22 2006-09-20 株式会社リコー Reading apparatus, image forming apparatus, communication apparatus, and abnormal pixel data acquisition method
WO2003049029A1 (en) * 2001-12-04 2003-06-12 Pony Industry Co., Ltd. Image processing method and image processor
EP1408449A3 (en) * 2002-10-04 2006-02-01 Sony Corporation Method and apparatus for identifying a photographic camera by correlating two images
US6919568B2 (en) * 2003-04-08 2005-07-19 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company Llc Method and apparatus for identifying composite defective pixel map
JP4186699B2 (en) * 2003-05-16 2008-11-26 株式会社ニコン Imaging apparatus and image processing apparatus
US7499599B2 (en) * 2003-06-12 2009-03-03 General Electric Company Method of real-time correction of non-functioning pixels in digital radiography
EP1511001A1 (en) * 2003-08-25 2005-03-02 Agfa-Gevaert Method and user interface for detecting whether a pixel in a displayed image constitutes a dead pixel of a display device.
JP4914142B2 (en) * 2006-08-04 2012-04-11 キヤノン株式会社 Inspection device
JP2009178262A (en) * 2008-01-29 2009-08-13 Toshiba Corp Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus
WO2011024287A1 (en) * 2009-08-28 2011-03-03 キヤノン株式会社 Information processing apparatus, information processing system, information processing method, and computer program for executing information processing method
JP5586909B2 (en) * 2009-09-29 2014-09-10 キヤノン株式会社 Information processing apparatus, system, method, and program
JP6116899B2 (en) * 2012-01-16 2017-04-19 東芝メディカルシステムズ株式会社 Medical image diagnostic apparatus and control program
US9279893B2 (en) 2012-07-24 2016-03-08 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Radiation imaging control apparatus, radiation imaging system and radiation imaging apparatus, and method for controlling the same
EP3094075B1 (en) * 2014-01-10 2022-05-11 Hitachi Astemo, Ltd. In-vehicle-camera image processing device
WO2015145301A1 (en) 2014-03-28 2015-10-01 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Dead pixel compensation in positron emission tomography (pet)
JP7445513B2 (en) 2020-05-15 2024-03-07 キヤノンメディカルシステムズ株式会社 Ultrasound diagnostic equipment
WO2023047074A1 (en) * 2021-09-21 2023-03-30 Bae Systems Plc Integrity monitoring of image sensor data
EP4152738A1 (en) * 2021-09-21 2023-03-22 BAE SYSTEMS plc Integrity monitoring of image sensor data
GB2611034A (en) * 2021-09-21 2023-03-29 Bae Systems Plc Integrity monitoring of image sensor data

Citations (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4974248A (en) * 1986-07-23 1990-11-27 Picker International Gmbh X-ray system for X-ray diagnosis and/or X-ray treatment
US5047863A (en) * 1990-05-24 1991-09-10 Polaroid Corporation Defect correction apparatus for solid state imaging devices including inoperative pixel detection
US5272536A (en) * 1990-03-13 1993-12-21 Sony Corporation Dark current and defective pixel correction apparatus
US5438573A (en) * 1991-09-13 1995-08-01 Sundisk Corporation Flash EEPROM array data and header file structure
US5657400A (en) * 1995-01-31 1997-08-12 General Electric Company Automatic identification and correction of bad pixels in a large area solid state x-ray detector
US5854655A (en) * 1995-08-29 1998-12-29 Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd. Defective pixel detecting circuit of a solid state image pick-up device capable of detecting defective pixels with low power consumption and high precision, and image pick-up device having such detecting circuit
US5886353A (en) * 1995-04-21 1999-03-23 Thermotrex Corporation Imaging device
US6104839A (en) * 1995-10-16 2000-08-15 Eastman Kodak Company Method and apparatus for correcting pixel values in a digital image
US6118846A (en) * 1999-02-23 2000-09-12 Direct Radiography Corp. Bad pixel column processing in a radiation detection panel
US6340989B1 (en) * 1997-02-13 2002-01-22 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Monitoring method with a CCD imaging device and digital still camera using the same
US6381357B1 (en) * 1999-02-26 2002-04-30 Intel Corporation Hi-speed deterministic approach in detecting defective pixels within an image sensor
US6477262B2 (en) * 1993-09-29 2002-11-05 Shih-Ping Wang Computer-aided diagnosis method and system
US6497511B1 (en) * 1998-05-28 2002-12-24 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Zur Foerderung Der Angewandten Forschung E.V. Method and device for imaging in digital dental radioscopy

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH02306234A (en) * 1989-05-20 1990-12-19 Fujitsu Ltd Digital x-ray device
JPH06113211A (en) * 1992-09-28 1994-04-22 Sony Corp Defect correcting device for solid-state image pickup element
JP3128485B2 (en) * 1995-08-29 2001-01-29 三洋電機株式会社 Detecting device for defective pixels of solid-state image sensor
JPH1093867A (en) * 1996-09-13 1998-04-10 Sony Corp Correction data setting device/method

Patent Citations (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4974248A (en) * 1986-07-23 1990-11-27 Picker International Gmbh X-ray system for X-ray diagnosis and/or X-ray treatment
US5272536A (en) * 1990-03-13 1993-12-21 Sony Corporation Dark current and defective pixel correction apparatus
US5047863A (en) * 1990-05-24 1991-09-10 Polaroid Corporation Defect correction apparatus for solid state imaging devices including inoperative pixel detection
US5438573A (en) * 1991-09-13 1995-08-01 Sundisk Corporation Flash EEPROM array data and header file structure
US6477262B2 (en) * 1993-09-29 2002-11-05 Shih-Ping Wang Computer-aided diagnosis method and system
US5657400A (en) * 1995-01-31 1997-08-12 General Electric Company Automatic identification and correction of bad pixels in a large area solid state x-ray detector
US5886353A (en) * 1995-04-21 1999-03-23 Thermotrex Corporation Imaging device
US5854655A (en) * 1995-08-29 1998-12-29 Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd. Defective pixel detecting circuit of a solid state image pick-up device capable of detecting defective pixels with low power consumption and high precision, and image pick-up device having such detecting circuit
US6104839A (en) * 1995-10-16 2000-08-15 Eastman Kodak Company Method and apparatus for correcting pixel values in a digital image
US6340989B1 (en) * 1997-02-13 2002-01-22 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Monitoring method with a CCD imaging device and digital still camera using the same
US6497511B1 (en) * 1998-05-28 2002-12-24 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Zur Foerderung Der Angewandten Forschung E.V. Method and device for imaging in digital dental radioscopy
US6118846A (en) * 1999-02-23 2000-09-12 Direct Radiography Corp. Bad pixel column processing in a radiation detection panel
US6381357B1 (en) * 1999-02-26 2002-04-30 Intel Corporation Hi-speed deterministic approach in detecting defective pixels within an image sensor

Cited By (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2004114212A1 (en) * 2003-06-16 2004-12-29 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method for correcting image artefacts caused by defects in a fluorescent x-ray storage layer, and x-ray device
US20050190983A1 (en) * 2004-02-26 2005-09-01 Jibril Odogba Asynchronous calibration and correction of a solid-state detector
US7369711B2 (en) * 2004-02-26 2008-05-06 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc Asynchronous calibration and correction of a solid-state detector
US9549175B2 (en) 2006-03-03 2017-01-17 Viavi Solutions Inc. Systems and methods for visualizing errors in video signals
US20120206611A1 (en) * 2006-03-03 2012-08-16 Acterna Llc Systems and methods for visualizing errors in video signals
US8964858B2 (en) * 2006-03-03 2015-02-24 Jds Uniphase Corporation Systems and methods for visualizing errors in video signals
US20090092321A1 (en) * 2007-01-16 2009-04-09 Bae Systems Finformation And Electronic Systems Integration Inc Real-time pixel substitution for thermal imaging systems
US8228405B2 (en) * 2007-01-16 2012-07-24 Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Real-time pixel substitution for thermal imaging systems
US20100034481A1 (en) * 2008-08-05 2010-02-11 Qualcomm Incorporated Bad pixel cluster detection
US8971659B2 (en) 2008-08-05 2015-03-03 Qualcomm Incorporated Bad pixel cluster detection
US8208044B2 (en) 2008-09-18 2012-06-26 Qualcomm Incorporated Bad pixel cluster detection
US8445838B1 (en) * 2009-02-04 2013-05-21 Lawrence Livermore National Security, Llc System and method for generating a deselect mapping for a focal plane array
US20130112850A1 (en) * 2009-02-04 2013-05-09 Jay V. Bixler System and method for generating a deselect mapping for a focal plane array
US8564673B2 (en) 2009-08-28 2013-10-22 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Information processing method and information processing apparatus for displaying anomalous pixel, and radiographic system
US20110049374A1 (en) * 2009-08-28 2011-03-03 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Information processing method and information processing apparatus for displaying anomalous pixel, and radiographic system
US8610803B2 (en) 2009-09-16 2013-12-17 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing apparatus for acquiring an image using a specific image capturing method and acquiring an anomalous pixel using a different image capturing method
US20140079185A1 (en) * 2009-09-16 2014-03-20 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing apparatus, image processing method, image processing system, and computer-accessible medium
US20110063469A1 (en) * 2009-09-16 2011-03-17 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing apparatus, image processing method, image processing system, and computer-accessible medium
US20120228486A1 (en) * 2009-12-21 2012-09-13 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Radiation detector assembly with test circuitry
US9063240B2 (en) * 2009-12-21 2015-06-23 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Radiation detector assembly with test circuitry
CN103905747A (en) * 2012-12-26 2014-07-02 深圳市蓝韵实业有限公司 Medical image bad pixel point repairing method and system
US20140184383A1 (en) * 2012-12-28 2014-07-03 General Electric Company Fault Tolerant Detector Assembly
US9070278B2 (en) * 2012-12-28 2015-06-30 General Electric Company Fault tolerant detector assembly
CN108464845A (en) * 2018-01-22 2018-08-31 苏州佳世达电通有限公司 A kind of exception detecting method and ultrasonic diagnostic system of ultrasonic probe

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2001008928A (en) 2001-01-16
US6661456B1 (en) 2003-12-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6661456B1 (en) Imaging of pixel defects in digital detectors
US10438352B2 (en) Systems and methods for interleaving series of medical images
US5987345A (en) Method and system for displaying medical images
US7756314B2 (en) Methods and systems for computer aided targeting
EP0487110B1 (en) Computer-aided diagnosis system for medical use
US7155043B2 (en) User interface having analysis status indicators
US7162061B1 (en) Abnormal pattern detection processing method and system
US6687329B1 (en) Computer aided acquisition of medical images
US7593562B2 (en) Method and system for computer aided detection (CAD) cued reading of medical images
US20020012458A1 (en) Computer-aided diagnosis method and system
JP2008521468A (en) Digital medical image analysis
US7203350B2 (en) Display for computer-aided diagnosis of mammograms
JP2007083030A (en) Clinical investigation and analysis work flow for evaluating pulmonary nodule
US8401255B2 (en) Computer-assisted reconciliation of multiple image reads
JP3758894B2 (en) Mammogram image diagnosis support device
JP7183563B2 (en) Radiographic image display device and radiography system
US7890498B1 (en) User interface for a medical informatics system that incorporates an examination timeline
EP1431916A1 (en) System and method for computer assisted reconciliation of medical classification data
JP2006110202A (en) System and method for medical image diagnosis
JPH01147619A (en) Graph display device and improvement in visibility thereof
US20230410981A1 (en) Medical image display system, medical image display method, and recording medium
JP2008289901A (en) Computer aided diagnostic apparatus
CN116471993A (en) Medical image display system, medical image display method, and program
JP2021087729A (en) Medical image processing device and program

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, NEW YORK

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:AUFRICHTIG, RICHARD;KWASNICK, ROBERT FORREST;LAMBERTY, JOHN R.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:014574/0977;SIGNING DATES FROM 19990427 TO 19990428

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION