US20020142172A1 - Inorganic dual-layer microporous supported membranes - Google Patents
Inorganic dual-layer microporous supported membranes Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20020142172A1 US20020142172A1 US10/104,551 US10455102A US2002142172A1 US 20020142172 A1 US20020142172 A1 US 20020142172A1 US 10455102 A US10455102 A US 10455102A US 2002142172 A1 US2002142172 A1 US 2002142172A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- inorganic
- membrane
- producing
- surfactant
- microporous
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 295
- 239000002355 dual-layer Substances 0.000 title abstract description 24
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 66
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 63
- 239000004094 surface-active agent Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 52
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 36
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 29
- 238000007873 sieving Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 239000012982 microporous membrane Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 102
- 238000001354 calcination Methods 0.000 claims description 55
- 239000000377 silicon dioxide Substances 0.000 claims description 51
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 claims description 22
- 238000000151 deposition Methods 0.000 claims description 21
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 claims description 15
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 15
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000009833 condensation Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000005494 condensation Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 229920000469 amphiphilic block copolymer Polymers 0.000 claims description 6
- PNEYBMLMFCGWSK-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium oxide Inorganic materials [O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[Al+3].[Al+3] PNEYBMLMFCGWSK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000000149 penetrating effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 239000010410 layer Substances 0.000 abstract description 50
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 69
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 53
- VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N methane Chemical compound C VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 48
- 239000002243 precursor Substances 0.000 description 29
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 23
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 18
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 17
- 230000004907 flux Effects 0.000 description 16
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 16
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 13
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 13
- 239000010408 film Substances 0.000 description 12
- 229920000592 inorganic polymer Polymers 0.000 description 12
- 239000012466 permeate Substances 0.000 description 12
- FOQJQXVUMYLJSU-UHFFFAOYSA-N triethoxy(1-triethoxysilylethyl)silane Chemical compound CCO[Si](OCC)(OCC)C(C)[Si](OCC)(OCC)OCC FOQJQXVUMYLJSU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 12
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 description 11
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 11
- 239000003960 organic solvent Substances 0.000 description 11
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 10
- 238000003618 dip coating Methods 0.000 description 10
- 239000001257 hydrogen Substances 0.000 description 10
- 229910052739 hydrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 10
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 10
- UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrogen Chemical compound [H][H] UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 9
- -1 Ti and Zr Chemical class 0.000 description 9
- 150000004703 alkoxides Chemical class 0.000 description 9
- 125000004432 carbon atom Chemical group C* 0.000 description 9
- 239000000178 monomer Substances 0.000 description 9
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000001179 sorption measurement Methods 0.000 description 9
- BOTDANWDWHJENH-UHFFFAOYSA-N Tetraethyl orthosilicate Chemical compound CCO[Si](OCC)(OCC)OCC BOTDANWDWHJENH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 8
- 239000003377 acid catalyst Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 7
- OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Methanol Chemical compound OC OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000000746 purification Methods 0.000 description 6
- RMAQACBXLXPBSY-UHFFFAOYSA-N silicic acid Chemical compound O[Si](O)(O)O RMAQACBXLXPBSY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 238000013019 agitation Methods 0.000 description 5
- 125000003545 alkoxy group Chemical group 0.000 description 5
- 229920001400 block copolymer Polymers 0.000 description 5
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000003446 ligand Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000012465 retentate Substances 0.000 description 5
- 229910052710 silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 5
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000032683 aging Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000003054 catalyst Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000010703 silicon Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000010409 thin film Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000004580 weight loss Effects 0.000 description 4
- 229910003158 γ-Al2O3 Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- CSCPPACGZOOCGX-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acetone Chemical compound CC(C)=O CSCPPACGZOOCGX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 229920002274 Nalgene Polymers 0.000 description 3
- GRYLNZFGIOXLOG-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nitric acid Chemical compound O[N+]([O-])=O GRYLNZFGIOXLOG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- YXFVVABEGXRONW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Toluene Chemical compound CC1=CC=CC=C1 YXFVVABEGXRONW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000005336 cracking Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000000354 decomposition reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000004455 differential thermal analysis Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000001747 exhibiting effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 3
- 125000005842 heteroatom Chemical group 0.000 description 3
- VLKZOEOYAKHREP-UHFFFAOYSA-N n-Hexane Chemical compound CCCCCC VLKZOEOYAKHREP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000003345 natural gas Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910017604 nitric acid Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000035699 permeability Effects 0.000 description 3
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 3
- 239000011550 stock solution Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000002604 ultrasonography Methods 0.000 description 3
- RZVAJINKPMORJF-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acetaminophen Chemical compound CC(=O)NC1=CC=C(O)C=C1 RZVAJINKPMORJF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- VHUUQVKOLVNVRT-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ammonium hydroxide Chemical compound [NH4+].[OH-] VHUUQVKOLVNVRT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- LZZYPRNAOMGNLH-UHFFFAOYSA-M Cetrimonium bromide Chemical compound [Br-].CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC[N+](C)(C)C LZZYPRNAOMGNLH-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrochloric acid Chemical compound Cl VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- KFZMGEQAYNKOFK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Isopropanol Chemical compound CC(C)O KFZMGEQAYNKOFK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- KDLHZDBZIXYQEI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Palladium Chemical compound [Pd] KDLHZDBZIXYQEI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000004642 Polyimide Substances 0.000 description 2
- NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfur Chemical compound [S] NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- WYURNTSHIVDZCO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Tetrahydrofuran Chemical compound C1CCOC1 WYURNTSHIVDZCO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- GWEVSGVZZGPLCZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Titan oxide Chemical compound O=[Ti]=O GWEVSGVZZGPLCZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- MCMNRKCIXSYSNV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Zirconium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Zr]=O MCMNRKCIXSYSNV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000919 ceramic Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000008367 deionised water Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000000635 electron micrograph Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000001307 helium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052734 helium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- SWQJXJOGLNCZEY-UHFFFAOYSA-N helium atom Chemical compound [He] SWQJXJOGLNCZEY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000007062 hydrolysis Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000006460 hydrolysis reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002209 hydrophobic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 125000002887 hydroxy group Chemical group [H]O* 0.000 description 2
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 2
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000002429 nitrogen sorption measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010943 off-gassing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000007353 oxidative pyrolysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229920001721 polyimide Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000005297 pyrex Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000009257 reactivity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004528 spin coating Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003756 stirring Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000035882 stress Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010897 surface acoustic wave method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003746 surface roughness Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910052719 titanium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 230000007723 transport mechanism Effects 0.000 description 2
- NAWZSHBMUXXTGV-UHFFFAOYSA-M triethyl(hexyl)azanium;bromide Chemical compound [Br-].CCCCCC[N+](CC)(CC)CC NAWZSHBMUXXTGV-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 229910052726 zirconium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 229910002706 AlOOH Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- UGFAIRIUMAVXCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon monoxide Chemical compound [O+]#[C-] UGFAIRIUMAVXCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- OTMSDBZUPAUEDD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethane Chemical compound CC OTMSDBZUPAUEDD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229920002449 FKM Polymers 0.000 description 1
- WSFSSNUMVMOOMR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Formaldehyde Chemical compound O=C WSFSSNUMVMOOMR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000321453 Paranthias colonus Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000004962 Polyamide-imide Substances 0.000 description 1
- QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfuric acid Chemical compound OS(O)(=O)=O QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 150000007513 acids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000002776 aggregation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004220 aggregation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012298 atmosphere Substances 0.000 description 1
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000903 blocking effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910002091 carbon monoxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000006555 catalytic reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003093 cationic surfactant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009920 chelation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005229 chemical vapour deposition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001246 colloidal dispersion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002301 combined effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006835 compression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920001577 copolymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229910052593 corundum Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 125000004122 cyclic group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007865 diluting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004821 distillation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000572 ellipsometry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002708 enhancing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003628 erosive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 125000001301 ethoxy group Chemical group [H]C([H])([H])C([H])([H])O* 0.000 description 1
- 238000001704 evaporation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008020 evaporation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007717 exclusion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007888 film coating Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009501 film coating Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003546 flue gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002737 fuel gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000005431 greenhouse gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000002431 hydrogen Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000003301 hydrolyzing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000004679 hydroxides Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011534 incubation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011261 inert gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008595 infiltration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001764 infiltration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910010272 inorganic material Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011147 inorganic material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229960004592 isopropanol Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000002386 leaching Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013335 mesoporous material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001000 micrograph Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012229 microporous material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003278 mimic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000002894 organic compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000013110 organic ligand Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052763 palladium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005191 phase separation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002574 poison Substances 0.000 description 1
- 231100000614 poison Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 238000005498 polishing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920002492 poly(sulfone) Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920002312 polyamide-imide Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920005862 polyol Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 150000003077 polyols Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229920001296 polysiloxane Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000010970 precious metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005086 pumping Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010926 purge Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011347 resin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920005989 resin Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000011369 resultant mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002356 single layer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007569 slipcasting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003980 solgel method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005507 spraying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011593 sulfur Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052717 sulfur Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000010408 sweeping Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- YLQBMQCUIZJEEH-UHFFFAOYSA-N tetrahydrofuran Natural products C=1C=COC=1 YLQBMQCUIZJEEH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000007669 thermal treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000003371 toe Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000012855 volatile organic compound Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910001845 yogo sapphire Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D69/00—Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by their form, structure or properties; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
- B01D69/12—Composite membranes; Ultra-thin membranes
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D69/00—Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by their form, structure or properties; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
- B01D69/12—Composite membranes; Ultra-thin membranes
- B01D69/1216—Three or more layers
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D53/00—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
- B01D53/22—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by diffusion
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D63/00—Apparatus in general for separation processes using semi-permeable membranes
- B01D63/06—Tubular membrane modules
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D67/00—Processes specially adapted for manufacturing semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus
- B01D67/0039—Inorganic membrane manufacture
- B01D67/0048—Inorganic membrane manufacture by sol-gel transition
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D67/00—Processes specially adapted for manufacturing semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus
- B01D67/0081—After-treatment of organic or inorganic membranes
- B01D67/0083—Thermal after-treatment
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D71/00—Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by the material; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
- B01D71/02—Inorganic material
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D71/00—Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by the material; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
- B01D71/02—Inorganic material
- B01D71/0213—Silicon
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D71/00—Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by the material; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
- B01D71/02—Inorganic material
- B01D71/024—Oxides
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D71/00—Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by the material; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
- B01D71/02—Inorganic material
- B01D71/024—Oxides
- B01D71/027—Silicium oxide
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C04—CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
- C04B—LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
- C04B35/00—Shaped ceramic products characterised by their composition; Ceramics compositions; Processing powders of inorganic compounds preparatory to the manufacturing of ceramic products
- C04B35/01—Shaped ceramic products characterised by their composition; Ceramics compositions; Processing powders of inorganic compounds preparatory to the manufacturing of ceramic products based on oxide ceramics
- C04B35/14—Shaped ceramic products characterised by their composition; Ceramics compositions; Processing powders of inorganic compounds preparatory to the manufacturing of ceramic products based on oxide ceramics based on silica
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C04—CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
- C04B—LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
- C04B35/00—Shaped ceramic products characterised by their composition; Ceramics compositions; Processing powders of inorganic compounds preparatory to the manufacturing of ceramic products
- C04B35/622—Forming processes; Processing powders of inorganic compounds preparatory to the manufacturing of ceramic products
- C04B35/624—Sol-gel processing
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C04—CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
- C04B—LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
- C04B38/00—Porous mortars, concrete, artificial stone or ceramic ware; Preparation thereof
- C04B38/0045—Porous mortars, concrete, artificial stone or ceramic ware; Preparation thereof by a process involving the formation of a sol or a gel, e.g. sol-gel or precipitation processes
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C04—CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
- C04B—LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
- C04B41/00—After-treatment of mortars, concrete, artificial stone or ceramics; Treatment of natural stone
- C04B41/009—After-treatment of mortars, concrete, artificial stone or ceramics; Treatment of natural stone characterised by the material treated
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C04—CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
- C04B—LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
- C04B41/00—After-treatment of mortars, concrete, artificial stone or ceramics; Treatment of natural stone
- C04B41/45—Coating or impregnating, e.g. injection in masonry, partial coating of green or fired ceramics, organic coating compositions for adhering together two concrete elements
- C04B41/52—Multiple coating or impregnating multiple coating or impregnating with the same composition or with compositions only differing in the concentration of the constituents, is classified as single coating or impregnation
- C04B41/526—Multiple coating or impregnation with materials having the same composition but different characteristics
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C04—CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
- C04B—LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
- C04B41/00—After-treatment of mortars, concrete, artificial stone or ceramics; Treatment of natural stone
- C04B41/80—After-treatment of mortars, concrete, artificial stone or ceramics; Treatment of natural stone of only ceramics
- C04B41/81—Coating or impregnation
- C04B41/85—Coating or impregnation with inorganic materials
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2313/00—Details relating to membrane modules or apparatus
- B01D2313/42—Catalysts within the flow path
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2323/00—Details relating to membrane preparation
- B01D2323/08—Specific temperatures applied
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2323/00—Details relating to membrane preparation
- B01D2323/24—Use of template or surface directing agents [SDA]
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B32—LAYERED PRODUCTS
- B32B—LAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
- B32B2315/00—Other materials containing non-metallic inorganic compounds not provided for in groups B32B2311/00 - B32B2313/04
- B32B2315/02—Ceramics
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C04—CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
- C04B—LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
- C04B2111/00—Mortars, concrete or artificial stone or mixtures to prepare them, characterised by specific function, property or use
- C04B2111/00474—Uses not provided for elsewhere in C04B2111/00
- C04B2111/00793—Uses not provided for elsewhere in C04B2111/00 as filters or diaphragms
- C04B2111/00801—Membranes; Diaphragms
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C04—CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
- C04B—LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
- C04B2111/00—Mortars, concrete or artificial stone or mixtures to prepare them, characterised by specific function, property or use
- C04B2111/00474—Uses not provided for elsewhere in C04B2111/00
- C04B2111/00862—Uses not provided for elsewhere in C04B2111/00 for nuclear applications, e.g. ray-absorbing concrete
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C04—CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
- C04B—LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
- C04B2235/00—Aspects relating to ceramic starting mixtures or sintered ceramic products
- C04B2235/02—Composition of constituents of the starting material or of secondary phases of the final product
- C04B2235/30—Constituents and secondary phases not being of a fibrous nature
- C04B2235/34—Non-metal oxides, non-metal mixed oxides, or salts thereof that form the non-metal oxides upon heating, e.g. carbonates, nitrates, (oxy)hydroxides, chlorides
- C04B2235/3418—Silicon oxide, silicic acids, or oxide forming salts thereof, e.g. silica sol, fused silica, silica fume, cristobalite, quartz or flint
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C04—CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
- C04B—LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
- C04B2235/00—Aspects relating to ceramic starting mixtures or sintered ceramic products
- C04B2235/02—Composition of constituents of the starting material or of secondary phases of the final product
- C04B2235/30—Constituents and secondary phases not being of a fibrous nature
- C04B2235/44—Metal salt constituents or additives chosen for the nature of the anions, e.g. hydrides or acetylacetonate
- C04B2235/441—Alkoxides, e.g. methoxide, tert-butoxide
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C04—CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
- C04B—LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
- C04B2235/00—Aspects relating to ceramic starting mixtures or sintered ceramic products
- C04B2235/70—Aspects relating to sintered or melt-casted ceramic products
- C04B2235/94—Products characterised by their shape
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C04—CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
- C04B—LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
- C04B2237/00—Aspects relating to ceramic laminates or to joining of ceramic articles with other articles by heating
- C04B2237/30—Composition of layers of ceramic laminates or of ceramic or metallic articles to be joined by heating, e.g. Si substrates
- C04B2237/32—Ceramic
- C04B2237/34—Oxidic
- C04B2237/341—Silica or silicates
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C04—CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
- C04B—LIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
- C04B2237/00—Aspects relating to ceramic laminates or to joining of ceramic articles with other articles by heating
- C04B2237/30—Composition of layers of ceramic laminates or of ceramic or metallic articles to be joined by heating, e.g. Si substrates
- C04B2237/32—Ceramic
- C04B2237/34—Oxidic
- C04B2237/343—Alumina or aluminates
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T428/00—Stock material or miscellaneous articles
- Y10T428/249921—Web or sheet containing structurally defined element or component
- Y10T428/249953—Composite having voids in a component [e.g., porous, cellular, etc.]
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T428/00—Stock material or miscellaneous articles
- Y10T428/26—Web or sheet containing structurally defined element or component, the element or component having a specified physical dimension
- Y10T428/263—Coating layer not in excess of 5 mils thick or equivalent
- Y10T428/264—Up to 3 mils
- Y10T428/265—1 mil or less
Definitions
- the present invention relates to membranes for use in molecular sieving, and more particularly to inorganic membranes providing high sieving flux and selectivity.
- Membrane-based separations are energy efficient and cost effective. They represent promising alternatives to energy-intensive distillation, cryogenic separation, or pressure swing adsorption in applications such as purification of sub-quality natural gas, air separation, removal of VOCs and NO X , and hydrogen recovery from processing gases and feed stocks.
- Microporous inorganic membranes have attracted considerable attention for gas separation due to their excellent thermal and chemical stability, good erosion resistance and high pressure stability compared to conventional polymeric membranes (e.g. cellulusic derivative, polysulfone, polyamide, or polyimide membrane).
- An inorganic membrane system generally consists of a macroporous support providing mechanical strength for an overlying thin, either dense or porous, separation membrane.
- Dense membranes prepared from palladium or perovskite only allow certain gases (such as H 2 or O 2 ) to transport via mechanisms such as solution-diffusion or solid-state ionic conduction.
- gases such as H 2 or O 2
- Such membranes require high capital investment due to the use of precious metals and/or extreme synthesis conditions.
- porous silica membranes with tunable pore sizes can be processed by a simple dip-coating or spin-coating procedure and can be used potentially in a large variety of gas separations. Microporous silica membranes have been demonstrated to show promising molecular sieving characteristics.
- sol-gel processing attracts the most attention do to its excellent processibility and its potential to precisely control pore size and pore structure.
- Strategies for the fundamental physical and chemical phenomena involved in the deposition of colloidal ceramic dispersions (sols) on porous supports for precise pore size and porosity control have been proposed and discussed in Brinker et al., “Sol-gel Strategies for Controlled Porosity Inorganic Materials,” J. Membr. Sci., 94 (1995) 85, incorporated herein by reference.
- Three keys to membrane production are 1) avoidance of cracks, pinholes or other defects that would reduce the selectivity; 2) precise pore size control (0.3- 0.4 nm in diameter) so that separation occurs on the basis of size by molecular filtration or “sieving”; and 3) maximization of the volume fraction porosity and minimization of the membrane thickness to maximize flux.
- the present invention provides for an inexpensive supported membrane capable of molecular sieving.
- the present invention further provides for a uniform intermediate layer on a substrate to allow the deposition of a second, top microporous layer which is relatively defect free and a method for producing the defect free layer.
- the present invention also provides for a supported membrane with precise pore size to achieve molecular sieving with maximized flux and selectivity.
- the inorganic microporous supported membrane includes a porous substrate which supports a first inorganic porous membrane having an average pore size of less than about 25 ⁇ and a second inorganic porous membrane coating the first inorganic membrane having an average pore size of less than about 6 ⁇ .
- the dual-layered membrane is produced by contacting the porous membrane support with a surfactant-containing inorganic polymeric sol, resulting in a surfactant/inorganic polymer coated membrane support.
- the surfactant/inorganic polymer coated membrane support is dried, producing a self-assembled surfactant-templated surfactant/inorganic polymer composite film.
- This supported composite film is calcined to remove the surfactant templates to produce a surfactant-templated micro- or mesoporous membrane substrate, which serves as an intermediate layer surfactant-templated membrane.
- the intermediate layer surfactant-templated membrane is then contacted with a second inorganic polymeric sol producing an inorganic polymeric sol coated substrate which is dried, producing a supported inorganic polymer coated dual layer structure.
- This supported dual-layered structure is then calcined to produce a dual-layered microporous supported membrane in accordance with the present invention.
- both of the polymeric sols include silica, aligomers or polymers.
- the first or intermediate layer of the dual-layer supported membrane generally has a thickness of less than 100 mn and the second or top layer has a thickness of less than about 100 ⁇ .
- the average pore diameter of the dual-layer supported membrane gradually decreases in size from about 40 to 60 ⁇ for the support, to about 10 to 25 ⁇ for the intermediate layer, to about 2 to 5 ⁇ for the top microporous layer.
- the calcining procedure of the second, top layer includes calcining under a vacuum of less than about 4 psia at a temperature of between 200 to 400° C. and further calcining at a temperature of between 300 to 600° C.
- the calcining of the first or intermediate layer involves calcining at a temperature between 100 to 150° C. and further heating between 500 to 600° C.
- the drying of the sols involves drying under conditions of low relative pressure of the liquid constituents.
- FIG. 1 is a graphical representation of weight loss and differential thermal analysis showing an endotherm peak corresponding to weight loss, indicating decomposition of the surfactant template and the oxidative pyrolysis of surfactant and residual organics.
- FIG. 2 is a graphical representation of nitrogen adsorption isotherms of three different calcined sol layers after removal of templates.
- FIG. 3A is an Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) cross-sectional electron micrograph of the dual-layer supported membrane of the present invention.
- FIG. 3B is a zoomed in Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) micrograph of the cross-sectional view of the dual-layer supported membrane of FIG. 3A.
- TEM Transmission Electron Microscope
- FIG. 4 shows a schematic diagram of the custom built automated flow system utilized in gas permeation measurements.
- FIG. 5A is a graphical representation of the separation factor versus temperature comparing microporous sieving A2** layer with and without a surfactant-templated intermediate layer.
- FIG. 5B is a graphical representation of gas permeances versus temperature comparing the A2** membrane with or without a mesoporous sublayer.
- FIG. 6 is a graphical representation of the CO 2 permeance and CO 2 /CH 4 separation factor ⁇ as a function of temperature for separation of 50/50 (v/v) CO 2 /CH 4 gas mixture.
- FIG. 7A is a graphical representation of the gas permeances versus temperature of the BTE/TEOS membranes with or without a surfactant-templated intermediate layer.
- FIG. 7B is a graphical representation of the selectivities versus temperature of the BTE/TEOS membranes with or without a surfactant-templated mesoporous C16STS intermediate layer.
- FIG. 8 is a graphical representation of the gas permeance versus molecular diameter of a variety of molecules of a dual-layer supported membrane after calcination at 450° C.
- FIG. 9 is a graphical representation of the separation factor versus permeance of the dual-layer supported membrane of the present invention in comparison to prior art membranes.
- FIG. 10A is a graphical representation of the %CO 2 in permeate and CO 2 /CH 4 separation factor versus stage cut of a dual-layer supported A2** membrane.
- FIG. 10B is a graphical representation of the CO 2 permeance and CO 2 /CH 4 separation factor versus feed flow-rate of a dual-layer supported A2** membrane.
- FIG. 11 is a graphical representation of the CO 2 permeance and CO 2 /CH 4 separation factor versus change in pressure of a dual-layer supported A2** membrane.
- FIG. 12 is a graphical representation of the CO 2 permeance and CO 2 /CH 4 separation factor versus time of operation of a dual-layer supported A2** membrane.
- the present invention provides for novel inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membranes and methods for fabricating the supported dual-layer membranes.
- the dual-layer membranes are constructed by utilizing an underlying support structure coated with a surfactant-templated micro or mesoporous intermediate layer, then coated with a top selective microporous layer.
- the quality of the underlying support determines, to a high degree, the properties and quality of the top selective microporous silica membrane. Supports with rough and large-pore surfaces can cause overlying derived membranes to crack due to stress development on uneven film coatings or serve to create pin-holes (areas not coated by the overlying microporous layer).
- the present invention provides a novel and efficient way for the modification of support surfaces to allow a stable, even, and substantially defect-free subsequently deposited overlying microporous membrane.
- Mechanical polishing to remove surface roughness is tedious, requiring repeated processes, and is difficult to perform within the interior of tubular supports.
- a membrane such as a tube-side ⁇ -alumina surface of a commercial asymmetric membrane support, is modified with a layer of surfactant-templated material, for example, surfactant-templated microporous or mesoporous silica (STS).
- the STS configured with high porosity and narrow pore diameter distribution ( ⁇ 1-2 nm), is designed to minimize additional flow resistance, surface roughness, and inherent support defects.
- the present invention provides for supported inorganic membranes capable of molecular sieving, as well as methods for their preparation and use.
- the subject inorganic membranes have pores with resulting average pore diameters of less than about 10 ⁇ and usually less than about 5 ⁇ and have a narrow pore diameter distribution.
- the subject membranes are prepared by initially coating a porous substrate with a surfactant-templated inorganic polymeric sol. After deposition, the surfactant sol coated substrate is dried and calcined to provide the intermediate inorganic membrane. The intermediate inorganic membrane is then coated by a second polymeric sol. After deposition, the inorganic polymeric sol coated substrate is dried, preferably under conditions of low relative pressure of the liquid constituents of the sol, and calcined to provide the subject inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membrane.
- the inorganic polymeric sols which find use in the present invention are those sols which are stable under the conditions in which they are employed, and have a viscosity which provides for deposition of a thin sol coating on the support.
- the viscosity of the sols will generally range from about 1 to 20 cps, usually from about 1 to 5 cps, more usually from about 1.2 to 1.5 cps.
- the polymeric sols will comprise a colloidal dispersion of inorganic polymers in a liquid, where the liquid may be a single component, e.g. H 2 O or an alcohol, or a multi-component, normally miscible, mixture, e.g. alcohol-water and the like.
- the inorganic polymers will often have a low mass fractal dimension (D f ) and be sufficiently large so that the inorganic polymers are captured, at least in part, on top of the underlying STS substrate.
- the diameter of the inorganic polymers as measured by small angle scattering will often be at least equal to, and will usually be greater than, the diameter of the pores in the underlying STS substrate, and may be up to 2 times the diameter, more usually up to 1.5 times the diameter of the pores of the underlying STS substrate.
- the concentration of the inorganic polymers in the liquid component of the sols will be sufficient to provide for a sol with the desired viscosity, as described above. Generally, the concentration of the inorganic polymers in the liquid component of the sols will range from 0.45 to 0.69, usually 0.59 to 0.63, more usually 0.60 to 0.62 moles/liter.
- the liquid component of the sols will often comprise water in combination with at least one, usually not more than three, more usually not more than two, organic solvents.
- Water present in the liquid component will usually be deionized and will be present in about 2.5% to 13% (v/v), usually 5.7 to 6.0% (v/v) of the total liquid component of the sols.
- a variety of organic solvents will normally be combined with the water to produce the liquid component of the sols.
- At least one of the organic solvents will be an alkanol, usually a lower alkanol of from 2 to 8 carbon atoms, usually 2 to 6 carbon atoms, more usually 2 to 4 carbon atoms.
- the alkanol may be an alcohol or polyol, where the number of hydroxy groups does not exceed the number of carbon atoms, and where there is usually not more than one hydroxy group for every 1.5 carbon atoms.
- Illustrative alkanols which find use as organic solvents in the subject sols are ethanol, usually absolute ethanol, methanol, iso-propanol, and the like.
- the alkanol will be present in the liquid component of the sols in an amount ranging from about 77 to 82% (v/v), usually from about 80 to 80.5%(v/v) of the liquid component in the sols.
- the ratio of alkanol to water in the liquid component of the sols will range from 6 to 32, usually from about 13.5 to 14.5.
- organic solvents in addition to the alkanol, may also be present in the subject sols, where the liquid component of the sols comprises more than one organic solvent.
- these other organic solvents may be straight chained, branched or cyclic, and will usually comprise from about 2 to 10 carbon atoms, more usually 4 to 8 carbon atoms.
- the organic solvents may comprise one or more heteroatoms, usually not more than three heteroatoms, where the heteroatom may be selected from oxygen, sulfur, nitrogen and the like.
- Illustrative non-alkanol organic solvents which may be present in the liquid component of the sols include hexane, toluene, tetrahydrofuran, acetone and the like. When present in the subject sols, these non-alkanol organic solvents will be present in amounts ranging from 5 to 99% (v/v) of the total liquid component.
- the subject inorganic polymeric coating sols are prepared by combining metal alkoxide monomers with the liquid components of the sols, as described above, in the presence of a catalyst, either acid or base, with agitation to provide a substantially uniform dispersion of the metal alkoxide monomers in the liquid components.
- Metal alkoxide monomers that find use in preparation of the subject sols are those monomers having the formula:
- M is a metal having a coordination number in excess of 3, i.e.>3, and is selected from the group comprising Si, Al, Ti, Zr and the like, preferably Si;
- OR is a hydrolyzable alkoxy ligand, where R usually has the formula:
- z is from 1 to 4, usually from 1 to 2;
- n is usually from 3 to 4.
- R′ is a non-hydrolyzable organic ligand or other oligomeric oxoalkoxide having from 1 to 4 carbon atoms, usually from 1 to 2 carbon atoms.
- the metal alkoxide monomer may be modified to reduce the effective functionality and/or rate of hydrolysis and condensation and thereby prevent particle formation under the sol preparation conditions.
- the metal alkoxides may be modified by any convenient means, such as chelation with slowly hydrolyzing multidentate ligands, e.g. actylacetonate, alcohol amines, and the like.
- Catalysts that find use include mineral acids and bases, including HCl, H 2 SO 4 , HNO 3 , NH 4 OH, and the like.
- the catalyst is added in sufficient concentration to cause the average condensation rate of the hydrolyzed alkoxide species to be minimized.
- the sol precursors Agitation of the metal alkoxide, water, catalyst and organic solvent(s), i.e. the sol precursors, is maintained for a sufficient time to provide for a uniform dispersion of the metal alkoxide in the liquid constituents.
- the sol precursors will be mixed for a period of time ranging from 5 to 20 min, more usually 14 to 15 min. Mixing may be accomplished by any convenient means, such as stirring, shaking and the like.
- the resultant mixture of sol precursors is then allowed to set or age for a sufficient time under conditions of low condensation rate to produce a sol comprising inorganic polymers having the desired cluster size.
- the condensation conditions i.e. the rate at which the monomers are hydrolyzed and then condensed into the polymeric clusters, depends on a variety of factors, such as the reactivity of the alkoxy ligands of the metal alkoxide monomers, the temperature at which the sol is maintained, the pH of the sol precursor, and the like.
- the temperature and pH of the combined sol precursors will be selected in view of the reactivity of the alkoxy ligands of the metal alkoxy monomers, to achieve conditions of low but finite condensation rate.
- the selected temperature and pH will vary depending on the particular metal alkoxy monomers employed, generally the temperature will range from about 35 to 70° C., usually from about 40 to 60° C., and more usually from about 48 to 52° C.
- the temperature of the aging precursor sol may be controlled using any convenient temperature control means, such as a heating or cooling means, or the like.
- the effective pH of the sol precursor composition will generally range from 0 to 5, usually from about 1 to 3, more usually from about 1.5 to 2.5.
- the pH of the precursor solution may be controlled by introducing to the precursor an acid or basic acatalyst, such as HCl, HNO 3 , NH 4 OH and the like, in sufficient amount to modulate the pH (specifically the ⁇ log[H 3 O + ]) of the precursor to the desired value.
- an acid or basic acatalyst such as HCl, HNO 3 , NH 4 OH and the like
- the precursor sol is sealed and allowed to set or age under the conditions of low condensation rate for a period of time sufficient to provide for the formation of extended polymeric networks capable of interpenetration and optionally having the desired fractal dimensions.
- the sols will be allowed to set in a closed container for a period of time ranging from about 0 to 140 hrs, more usually from about 10 to 24 hours.
- the preparation of a silica polymeric coating sols includes a two stage process, in which the pH of the sols is decreased from the first to the second stage.
- a silicon alkoxide e.g. tetraethoxysilane
- the amount of silicon alkoxide which is combined with the alkanol and water to produce the precursor sol will range from 1.0 to 2.0 mol/liter, usually from about 1.7 to 2.0 M mol/liter.
- the amount of alkanol present in the precursor sol will range from 30 to 70% (v/v), usually 45 to 50% (v/v), and the amount of water present in the precursor sol will range from 2 to 10% (v/v), usually 3.5 to 4.5% (v/v).
- agitation is continued for a period of 30 to 120 min., usually 60 to 90 min.
- the pH of the precursor sol is maintained at a value between 3 and 6, usually between 4 and 5 as measured by using an indicator strip, by including in the precursor sol a sufficient amount of an acid catalyst. Any convenient acid catalyst may be employed, including HNO 3 , HCl and the like.
- the molar ratio of the four components of the sol precursor i.e. silicon alkoxide: alkanol: water: acid catalyst, will be 0.8-1.2 : 3.5-4 : 0.8-1.2: 1.0 ⁇ 10 ⁇ 5 -9.0 ⁇ 10 ⁇ 5 .
- the pH of the precursor sol will be reduced by 1 ⁇ 3to 1 ⁇ 2.
- a sufficient amount of water and acid catalyst will be introduced to the precursor sol.
- the pH of the precursor sol will be reduced to between about 1 and 3, usually between about 1.5 and 2.5.
- a sufficient amount of water and acid precursor are added to the precursor sol to change the molar ratio of the four components to 0.8-1.2: 3.5-4: 4.5-5.5: 0.001-0.009.
- the precursor sol will be agitated for a period of time ranging from 10 to 30 min, usually from 10 to 20 min.
- the precursor sol will be allowed to set or age at an elevated temperature for a period of time sufficient for the coating sol to be produced.
- the incubation temperature will range from 40 to 60° C., usually from 45 to 55° C.
- the setting period will range from 12 to 36 hours, usually 12 to 24 hours.
- the resultant silica coating sol (referred to below as the A2** sol) may comprise silica polymers of low fractal dimension.
- the surfactant-template polymeric sol utilized to form the intermediate layer membrane is further prepared from the precursor sol following substantially similar steps as described above for creating the A2** sol.
- a sufficient amount of surfactant powder is added to the unaged precursor sol.
- Surfactant powders that are used are usually cationic surfactants, for example C6-surfactant of triethylhexylammonium bromide and C16-surfactant of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide.
- the amount of surfactant powder that is added is between 2 g and 8 g per 100 g sol, usually between 3 g and 5 g per 100 g/sol.
- precursor sol is agitated for a period of time between about 5-30 min., usually between about 10-20 min.
- the surfactant-template sol is completed following substantially similar steps as those of aging and the second stage, described above for the A2** sol.
- the polymeric sols utilized for both the intermediate layer and the top or outer layer are formed from the sol or a derivative of the sol labeled A2** and fully described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 5,772,735, incorporated herein by reference.
- a sol providing substantially similar sieving characteristics as the A2** sol is utilized as the top microporous membrane.
- the alternative sol consists of five components, i.e., Bis(Triethoxysilyl)Ethane (BTE):silicon alkoxide:alkanol:water:acid catalyst, with a molar ratio being 0.4-1.2:0.1-0.5:3.5-4:4.8-5.4:1.0 ⁇ 10 3 -9.0 ⁇ 10 3.
- BTE Bis(Triethoxysilyl)Ethane
- Sicon alkoxide:alkanol:water:acid catalyst with a molar ratio being 0.4-1.2:0.1-0.5:3.5-4:4.8-5.4:1.0 ⁇ 10 3 -9.0 ⁇ 10 3.
- alternatives to the STS sol include sols containing amphiphilic block-copolymers.
- amphiphilic block-copolymers for example Brij56,CH 3 (CH 2 ) 15 (CH 2 CH 2 O) 10 OH, 4 wt %, are utilized as the templating agent in replace of the surfactant in creating the intermediate sol layer, producing ordered mesoporous silica sublayer membranes.
- the block-copolymer templated silica provides both a high porosity of between 40 to 80%, usually between 50 to 60%, and an ordered cubic structure, resulting in a membrane having an average pore diameter of less than about 30 ⁇ , usually less than 25 ⁇ .
- foreign particles are removed from the sols (both the intermediate and top layer sols) through the filtering of the sols prior to being coated onto a substrate.
- the top layer or A2** sols are filtered with a 0.2 to 1.0 ⁇ m filter, more usually with a 0.45 82 m filter.
- the surfactant-template sols are filled with a 0.45 to 2.0 ⁇ m filter, usually with a 1.0 ⁇ m filter.
- a variety of substrates may be employed as porous supports for the inorganic membranes.
- Substrates that may be employed have pore sizes which are sufficiently large such that the substrate itself does not contribute to the sieving properties of the supported membrane.
- the pores of the substrate will have diameters at least 5 times larger than the pores of the inorganic films to be deposited on the substrate, normally at least 8 times larger, and not more than 15 times larger, usually not more than 12 times larger than the pores of the inorganic film to be deposited.
- the substrate pores usually have diameters ranging in size from about 30 to 70 ⁇ , usually from about 40 to 60 ⁇ .
- the substrate is constructed of any suitable material that is thermally, chemically and mechanically stable during sol deposition, thermal processing and membrane use including oxides, e.g. TiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 , ZrO 2 , hydroxides, e.g. AlOOH, as well as porous metals, such as stainless, and other materials know in the art.
- the substrates may have any convenient shape, such as square, rectangular and cylindrical, as well as other more complicated shapes, where the shape chosen will depend primarily on the intended use of the final supported inorganic membrane.
- the substrates may be prepared using methods known in the art, i.e. deposition of particulate sols, or obtained from commercial sources.
- substrates capable of acting as supports for the inorganic films of the subject invention include those available from U.S. Filter, e.g. Membralox® (a cylindrical substrate comprising a ⁇ -Al 2 O 3 inside layer having pores ranging in diameter from 40 to 50 ⁇ ), Golden Technologies, and the like.
- the substrate may be calcined to eliminate any organic compounds present on the support and to desorb any water from the support. Calcination will generally be carried out at temperatures ranging from 300 to 500° C., usually 350 to 450° C., for a period of time between 15 to 180 min., and usually between 45 to 75 min.
- the membrane supports Prior to depositing the STS sublayer onto the membrane supports, the membrane supports are cleaned, usually by ultrasound. The membrane supports are then washed with de-ionized water 1 to 7 times, usually 3 to 5 times. The membrane supports are then calcined at a temperature between 300 and 500° C., usually 350 to 450° C., for a period of time between 15 to 180 min., and usually between 45 to 75 min.
- the STS sol is then deposited onto the surface of the membrane support under substantially clean conditions, usually under Class 100 clean conditions, to produce a surfactant sol coated support that is then dried and calcined to yield an STS inorganic intermediate membrane.
- the drying is performed in an environment having between 10-30% relative humidity, usually having 15-25% relative humidity at a temperature between 10 and 40° C., usually between 20 and 30° C. for a period of time between 5 and 20 minutes, usually between 10 and 15 minutes resulting in a surfactant-template polymeric coated substrate.
- the calcination is performed by heating the surfactant-template polymeric coated support at a temperature between 50-200° C., usually between 100-150° C. for between 30-120 min., usually between 45-75 min.
- surfactant removal is then performed by heating the STS membrane support at a temperature between 300 to 700° C., usually between 500-600° C. for between 30-90 min., usually between 45-75 min. producing the intermediate layer surfactant membrane.
- Deposition of the surfactant intermediate or sublayer is achieved by contacting the membrane support with an STS sol-gel so that the STS sol coats the membrane support in a layer capable of collapsing with drying to produce a thin film.
- the support membrane may be contacted with the STS sol using any convenient means, such as dip-coating, infiltration, spin-coating, spraying and the like.
- the A2** silica top layer is then deposited onto the surface of the intermediate layer surfactant membrane, using a similar procedure as described above, producing an A2** polymeric sol coated substrate that is then dried and calcined.
- the drying is performed in an environment having between 10-30% relative humidity, usually having 15-25% relative humidity at a temperature between 10 and 40° C., usually between 20 and 30° C. for a period of time between 5 and 20 minutes, usually between 10 and 15 minutes producing an A2** inorganic polymer coated substrate.
- the calcination of the A2** coated substrate is performed under a vacuum of less than about 6 psia (pounds per square inch absolute), usually less than about 4 psia ( ⁇ 4 psia), at a temperature between 200 and 400° C., usually between 250 and 350° C.
- the rate at which the temperature is raised will range from 0.5 to 5° C./min., usually 0.5 to 2° C./min.
- the coated substrate will be held isothermally at the calcination temperature for a period of time ranging from about 4-8 hours, usually 5-7 hours after which the temperature will be decreased at a rate of 0.5 to 5.0° C./min., usually between about 0.5 to 3.0° C./min.
- a dual-layered inorganic supported membrane having the A2** top microporous membrane having the A2** top microporous membrane.
- further calcination or second calcination is performed on the A2** supported membrane at a temperature between 300-600° C., usually between 400-500° C. in air for 30 to 90 min., usually 45 to 75 min. producing the final A2** inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membrane.
- the ends or edges of the final permeable membrane are then sealed to prevent any defects or irregularities.
- the final porous inorganic membranes are capable of molecular sieving, and exhibit high flux and high selectivity.
- capable of molecular sieving is meant that the membranes are capable of exhibiting substantially molecular sieving behavior, where molecular sieving behavior exists when the separation factor for a pair of gases transported through the membrane is greater than the separation factor for the same pair of gases in a membrane characterized by Knudsen diffusion.
- ⁇ A/B ⁇ (molecular weight B/molecular weight A) 1 ⁇ 2
- ⁇ A/B is the separation factor of a membrane for a pair of gases
- the separation factor for the pair of gases does not typically exceed 10.
- the separation factor for pairs of gases will in general greatly exceed the Knudsen separation values.
- the supported inorganic membranes are substantially defect free, in that they are substantially free of cracks, pinholes and the like.
- substantially defect free is meant that the supported inorganic membranes are at least 95% defect free, usually at least 97% defect free, more usually at least 99% defect free.
- the supported inorganic membranes are thin, ranging in thickness from 10 to 200 nm, usually from 15 to 150 nm and more usually from 20 to 100 nm. Preferably, the thickness of the supported inorganic membranes will be less than about 100 nm.
- the supported inorganic membranes of the subject invention will have a narrow pore diameter distribution, i.e. there will be little variance in pore diameter.
- the pore diameter of the subject membranes will be sufficiently small to provide for size exclusion of molecules, i.e. sufficiently small to provide for selective passage of smaller molecules while blocking larger molecules.
- the STS intermediate layer membrane will have pores with an average diameter, dependent upon the surfactant utilized, generally in the range of about 5 to 30 ⁇ , more usually from about 10 to 25 ⁇ .
- the A2** membrane will have pores with an average diameters generally in the range of about 1 to 1 ⁇ , usually from about 2 to 5 ⁇ .
- Some of the critical issues in the processing of the sol-gel derived silica membranes include eliminating defect formation and controlling pore size. Described below are some of the strategies employed in one embodiment of the membrane formation to eliminate defect formation.
- STS intermediate layer is used to eliminate inherent defects on commercially-available supports and to facilitate the formation of subsequently deposited thin selective membranes (e.g. A2** membrane).
- the STS intermediate layer is designed with both high porosity and low tortuosity to avoid creating additional flow resistance.
- strategies for pore size control include solvent (water) templating, and surfactant-templating. Due to preferential alcohol evaporation during the film deposition or sol contacting process, water is the dominating solvent at the late drying stage. Water molecules confined in the stressed film are used as a template to create pores of molecular dimension needed for molecular sieving.
- surfactants for the surfactant-templating strategy, surfactants, agregates or liquid crystalline mesophases (amphiphilic molecules composed of a hydrophilic head group and hydrophobic tail) are used as templates.
- Surfactant-templated silicas are high surface area amorphous solids (up to approximately 1400 m 2 /g) characterized by monosized, often cylindrical pores organized into periodic arrays that often mimic the liquid crystalline mesophases exhibited by surfactant-water systems. Both water and surfactants can be removed by heating to create uniform pores with various dimensions depending on a choice of surfactant.
- the resulting inorganic dual-layer membranes find use in a variety of applications, including purification of sub-quality natural gas, removal of NO x from power-plant flue gas, reduction of greenhouse gases (e.g. CO 2 ) and hydrogen recovery from processing gases or hydrogen purification for fuel-cell applications.
- the highly : selective top layer will, for example, remove N 2 and CO 2 efficiently from natural gas without suffering from CO 2 plasticization commonly seen in dense polymeric membranes or purify H 2 from reformate for fuel-cell applications.
- a silica polymeric sol (labeled A2** ) was prepared as follows. Preparation of the A2** sol consists of two acid-catalyzed reaction steps designed to minimize the condensation rates of silica species in order to produce weakly branched polymeric clusters that interpenetrate and collapse during film deposition to produce membranes with molecular-sized pores. In the first step an A2** stock solution was prepared from tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) (Kodak), 200 proof ethanol (EtOH), deionized H 2 O, and 0.07 N HCl (diluted from ‘Baker Analyzed® 1 N HCl).
- TEOS tetraethoxysilane
- EtOH 200 proof ethanol
- H 2 O deionized H 2 O
- 0.07 N HCl diluted from ‘Baker Analyzed® 1 N HCl
- the four components were mixed in a molar ratio of 1.0:3.8:1.1:5.0 ⁇ 10 ⁇ 5 , respectively, and refluxed at 60° C. for 90 min. while stirring at 200 rpm (PMC 730 series DATAPLATE® or a Whatman DATAPLATE® model 440 P programmable digital hot plate/Stirrer, 500 ml Pyrex® resin reaction kettle with lid, Pyrex® 24/40 condenser).
- the pH of the prepared stock solution was measured using EM Science ColorpHast® pH paper and found to be 4.7. This A2** stock solution is very stable for approximately 90 to 180 days when stored at ⁇ 30° C.
- additional water and HCl were added into the stock sol. The sol was agitated or hand-shaken for 15 minutes.
- 1.A.4. An alternative silica species to the A2** sol which will also produce membranes with molecular-sized pores is a BTE/TEOS sol.
- the dip-coating BTE sol is prepared as described above in 1.A.1. with the sol comprising BTE(Bis(Triethoxysilyl)Ethane):TEOS:ethanol:H 2 O:HCl in a molar ratio of 0.8:0.2:3.8:5.1:5.3 ⁇ 10 ⁇ 3 .
- a surfactant-template silica (STS) sol containing 0.125M C6-surfactant (triethylhexylammonium bromide, Aldrich) silica sol is prepared by adding 0.4 g per 100 g/sol amount of surfactant powder into unaged A2** standard sol as prepared in 1.A.1.
- the C6STS sol is then aged according to the process of 1.A.2.
- the C6STS sol is then diluted as described in 1.A.3. with two times its volume of ethanol. The aggregation of the surfactant during drying does not cause any macroscopic phase separations.
- the C6STS sol is filtered with a 1.0 ⁇ m filter (Nalgene) prior to dip-coating.
- a surfactant-template silica sol containing a 4.2 wt % C16-surfactant cetyltrimethylammonium bromide is prepared by adding 0.4 g per 100 g/sol amount of surfactant powder into unaged A2** standard sol as prepared in 1.A.2. and follows the process described in preparing the C6STS sol in 1.B.1.
- Average pore diameters of the C6STS and C16STS were about 10-12 ⁇ and 18-20 ⁇ , respectively. Furthermore, the surface area and porosity of the C6STS materials were 575 m 2 /g and 28%, respectively. Porosity, determined by ellipsometry, agreed with the result calculated from N 2 adsorption isotherms.
- Membrane supports were prepared by sectioning a commercial 50 ⁇ ⁇ -Al 2 O 3 tube (US filter) into several 5.5 cm-long sections and cleaned by ultrasound. The supports were then washed with de-ionized water 5 times before calcining at 400° C. for 60 min.
- 1.C.1 Sudfactant Sublayer Coating of the Support.
- a sol-gel dip-coating process featuring aspects of slip casting was performed in a laminar flow (150 ft/min) chamber under clean conditions of Class 100.
- To prepare a C6STS sublayer the support tube as prepared and washed in 1.C. was lowered into the sol containing the C6-surfactant as prepared and described above in 1.B.1. at a rate of 8 inches/min. The support was held undisturbed for ten seconds, the support was then withdrawn at the rate of 3 inches/min.
- the surfactant coated support was then dried at a temperature of 25° C.
- the membrane was then calcined to 120° C. in a programmable furnace. In performing the calcination, the membrane support was heated at a rate of 1° C./min to the target temperature 120° C. and was held isothermally for 60 min. The coated membrane support was then cooled at a rate of 1° C./min. to 25° C. The cooled membrane support was then confirmed to be substantially impermeable to helium by performing the permeance measurements. The coated support was then subjected to surfactant removal by heating the membrane tube in the programmable furnace at a rate of 1° C./min. to a temperature of 500° C.
- 1.C.2 A2** Layer Coating of the Membrane Support.
- the support tube with the C6STS layer as prepared in 1.C.1. was lowered into the A2** sol as prepared in 1A. at a rate of 10 inches/min. and left undisturbed for 10 seconds.
- the membrane support was then withdrawn at a rate of 1 inch/min.
- the A2** polymeric sol coated substrate was then dried at a temperature of 25° C. in a 20% relative humidity environment for 15 minutes resulting in an A2** layered membrane support.
- the A2** layered membrane support was then calcined in a programmable furnace under a vacuum condition of less than 4 psia ( ⁇ 4 psia) at a heating rate of 1-2° C./min from room temperature to 300° C.
- the A2** coated membrane was held isothermally for six hours at 300° C. to evacuate solvents and also promote further pore shrinkage.
- the A2** coated membrane is then cooled at a rate of 1° C./min. to 25° C.
- the vacuum calcination procedure also results in the decomposition of surface ethoxy groups; therefore, a hydrophobic inner pore surface is formed as evidenced by an increase in the water contact angle of membrane surface from 17° to 41° C.
- the imperfections near both ends of the final A2** dual-layered tube membrane caused by being clamped in the laminar flow chamber were then sealed by dense silicone (Duraseal 1529, Cotronics Corp., N.Y.).
- the final permeable length of the A2** coated tube is 4 cm.
- the dual silica coated permeable tube results in both high flux and selectivity for the membranes with gradual changes of pore size from 50 ⁇ (commercial ⁇ -alumina support layer) to 10-12 ⁇ (surfactant-templated silica sublayer), and then to 3-4 ⁇ (ultramicroporous silica top-layer).
- Surfactant templates embedded in the silica framework are removed by calcination while solvent templates are evacuated by a low-temperature thermal treatment under vacuum.
- FIGS. 3A and 3B show an electron micrograph view of the cross-section and the surface of the supported dual-membrane.
- the thickness of the defect-free ultramicroporous A2** layer is about 30 nm.
- the gas permeation through the dual-layer membrane produced in 1.C. was measured using a custom built automated flow system as shown in FIG. 4. An outgassing procedure is performed prior to measuring the permeation because ambient moisture can easily condense inside silica micropores.
- the outgassing procedure was conducted at 80° C. for three hours with dry helium purging across the membrane.
- the procedure for determining gas permeance included evacuating both sides of the membrane and then introducing pure gas or mixed gas into the tube side of the membrane. Gases were chosen to give a range of gas molecule sizes. Single components of He, H 2 , CO 2 , CO 2 , N 2 , and CH 4 , and either its dual or multiple component mixture were tested.
- the pressure at the tube side was maintained at a constant pressure (6.5 bar). Meanwhile, the shell-side pressure was gradually built up due to permeated gases. Upon exceeding atmosphere pressure, the shell side was exposed to ambient pressure. To simulate practical operation, no sweeping gas was used in all experiments and, therefore, the problems of back diffusional flux were eliminated.
- J i is the steady-state flux of component i through the membrane.
- ( ⁇ P i ) I and ( ⁇ P i ) II are the partial-pressure differences of component i between the tube-side and shell-side pressures of the membrane at the gas entrance (I) and exit (II) ends, respectively.
- the separation factor defined by the ratio of permeabilities can be equivalent to the ratio of permeances if the membrane thickness is identical.
- the ideal separation factor ⁇ 1 could be defined by the ratio of permeances of individual pure gases.
- the true separation factor ⁇ t of mixed gas is defined by the ratio of permeances of constituent gases.
- a coated membrane support as produced in 1.C. utilizing the C6STS sol as prepared in 1.B.1. is characterized using a single gas permeability measurement system.
- the membrane ends were sealed using Viton® or Grafoil® gasket material, and the compression of the gasket avoided by-passing of the gases.
- a custom built automated flow system, as described above in 2.A. was used to measure the permeance (flux/pressure) of five different gases through the membrane.
- the gases were chosen to give a range of gas molecule sizes. These gases, along with their characteristic diameters, are: He (2.65 ⁇ ), H 2 (2.89 ⁇ ), CO 2 (3.3 ⁇ ), N 2 (3.64 ⁇ ), and CH 4 (3.8 ⁇ ).
- the inert gases have different chemical interactions with the membrane surface.
- the flow through the membrane will be a combination of Knudsen diffusion, surface diffusion and micropore diffusion.
- the relative contribution from each of the above flow mechanisms varies according to the gas, as well as the pore size of the membrane.
- the C6STS sublayer as prepared serves to eliminate intrinsic defects on commercial porous supports and promotes pore uniformity; therefore increasing selectivity, and preventing penetration of a subsequently deposited ultramicroporous membrane (e.g. A2** membrane with an average pore size of about 3-4 ⁇ as described in 1.D.), thus enhancing flux.
- Gas permeances and selectivities were compared for A2** membranes with and without a C6STS sublayer. Referring to FIG. 5A and 5B, at 60° C., the membrane with a sublayer exhibited four-fold higher CO 2 permeances and four-fold higher CO 2 /CH 4 selectivities than that without a sublayer in a single-component gas permeation measurement.
- a high CO 2 permeance (3.2 ⁇ 10 ⁇ 4 cm 3 (STP)/s/cm 2 /cmHg) and a high CO 2 /CH 4 separation factor of approximately 200 can be achieved with the dual layer membrane at 26° C. for separation of 50/50 (v/v) CO 2 /CH 4 gas mixture, as shown in FIG. 6.
- the combination of high permeance and high selectivity exceeded that of prior art gas separation membranes (e.g. asymmetric polyimide with a typical CO 2 /CH 4 separation factor of 55 and a CO 2 permeance of 1.7 ⁇ 10 ⁇ 4 cm 3 (STP)/s/cm 2 /cmHg).
- activation energies of CH 4 for both A2** membranes with and without a sublayer were 12.92 and 9.64 KJ/mol, respectively, which were higher than those of CO 2 .
- CH 4 diffused through both the membranes with low permeance via an activated transport mechanism. Referring back to FIG. 5A, the combination of CO 2 condensation effect and the activated transport mechanism help in explaining the increase in ideal separation factor of CO 2 /CH 4 upon the decrease in temperature for the membrane with a sublayer.
- a 5.5 cm commercial 50 ⁇ ⁇ -Al 2 O 3 membrane tube was initially cleaned by ultrasound, then washed and calcined as described in 1.C.
- the membrane tube was dip-coated into the surfactant-templated sol as described in 1.C.1. utilizing the C16STS sol as prepared in 1.B.2.
- the C16-surfactant was then removed by heating the C16STS coated support at a rate of 1° C./min. to the target temperature of 500° C.
- the coated support was held isothermally for three hours and then cooled at a rate of 1° C./min. to 25° C.
- a microporous membrane was then formed on the calcined membrane support with the C16STS intermediate layer by dip-coating the C16STS coated support into a BTE (Bis(Triethoxysilyl)Ethane) silica sol as prepared in 1.A.4. and filtered utilizing 0.45 ⁇ m filter (Nalgene) prior to dip-coating.
- the Ethane ligands (—CH 2 CH 2 —) of the BTE membrane embedded in the silica framework are removed by calcination at 280° C. by heating the BTE coated support at 1° C./min. to the target temperature.
- the coated support was held isothermally for three hours and then cooled at a rate of 1° C./min. to 25° C., leaving behind a microporous membrane.
- a comparison of the membranes with and without a mesoporous sublayer is shown in FIGS. 7A and 7B.
- the results show that membranes with a mesoporous sublayer exhibit significantly higher permeance and significantly better selectivity than those without a sublayer. This is consistent with the observation in Example 2.B., demonstrating the crucial role of the sublayer in improving flux and selectivity of an overlying microporous silica membrane.
- the block copolymer template silica results in a high porosity (50-65%) and ordered cubic structure having uniform pore size of about 23 ⁇ . Therefore, the block-copolymer is another candidate which can be used as the intermediate layer for a subsequently deposited effective separation layer, such as A2**.
- a dual layered membrane as prepared in 1.C.3. was calcined at the 450° C. for one hour in air and cooled at a rate of 1° C./min. to 25° C.
- Single-component gas permeation measurements were taken utilizing the measurement system as described in 2.A. at various temperatures ranging from 20° C. to 150° C. Pure-gas permeation results at 80° C. are shown in FIG. 8. Due to the extended calcination for one hour at 450° C., the pore size of the membrane was further reduced, resulting in a sharp molecular-size cut-off at about 3.5 ⁇ .
- the dual layer membrane support obtained through the extended calcination at 450° C.
- the CO concentration, (CO is a known PEM fuel cell poison) in the permeate reduced to at least fifty times lower than that in the feed.
- a high H 2 permeance (6 ⁇ 10 ⁇ 4 (STP)/cm 2 /s/cmHg) and a high H 2 /N 2 separation factor of over 270 for separation of a 50/50 (v/v) H 2 /N 2 gas mixture were achieved as shown in Table 2.
- the membrane can also be applied to NO x removal from fuel gas.
- a single-component permeation measurement was also performed in which NO/NO 2 selectivity was measured to be 9.3 cm 3 (STP)/cm 2 /s/cmHg and NO permeance reached 3 ⁇ 10 ⁇ 5 cm 3 (STP)/cm 2 /s/cmHg.
- a 5.5 cm commercial 50 ⁇ ⁇ -Al 2 O 3 membrane tube prepared as described in 1.C. was dip-coated into the surfactant-template sol as described in 1.C.1. utilizing the C6STS sol as prepared in 1.B.1. The C6STS coated membrane was then dip-coated in an A2** sol as described in 1.C.2.
- the stage cut ⁇ defined as the ratio of permeate flow rate to feed flow rate, represents the fraction of feed gas permeated through the membrane (gas recovery ratio).
- stage cut ⁇ decreases with the increase in the feed flow rate.
- the decrease in the stage cut ⁇ resulted in the increase in the CO 2 /CH 4 separation factor, ⁇ (CO 2 /CH 4 ), as shown in FIG. 10A.
- ⁇ (CO 2 /CH 4 ) the concentration of the fast permeating gas, CO 2
- the concentration of the fast permeating gas, CO 2 remained high at retentate, as shown in FIG. 10B. Therefore, a high CO 2 driving force across the membrane was maintained.
- CO 2 is allowed to pass through pores with little chance of being blocked by the larger CH 4 molecules.
- the CH 4 driving force across the membrane increases with the decrease in feed flow rate, resulting in a lower ⁇ (CO 2 /CH 4 ).
- High ⁇ (CO 2 /CH 4 ) can be obtained at high feed flow rates but at the expense of both low gas recovery ratio and pumping energy.
- the maximum ⁇ (CO 2 /CH 4 ) at a fixed temperature and pressure in the tubular membrane can be achieved when the retentate compositions are equivalent to the feed compositions.
- the mixed-gas ⁇ (CO 2 /CH 4 ) is higher than the single-component separation factor, ⁇ 1 (CO 2 /CH 4 ), under identical operating conditions.
- the selectively adsorbed CO 2 would either cover the pore entrance or further reduce the size of the pore opening, depending on the size of pores, thus preventing CH 4 from permeating through the pores.
- the value of the CO 2 permeance and the separation factor, ⁇ (CO 2 /CH 4 ), are inversely related as the temperature increases.
- FIG. 6 shows that the ⁇ (CO 2 /CH 4 ) decreases with the increase in temperature, while the CO 2 permeance increases slightly with the increase in temperature.
- the abrupt increase in the ⁇ (CO 2 /CH 4 ) at lower temperatures was due to the combined effects of activated transport and CO 2 selective adsorption where the capability of CO 2 adsorption on to silica surfaces diminishes at higher temperature. Due to the CO 2 selective adsorption effect, the ⁇ (CO 2 /CH 4 ) for mixed gas at lower temperature is higher than the CO 2 separation factor for a single-component gas, ⁇ 1 (CO 2 /CH 4 ). The difference between ⁇ (CO 2 /CH 4 ) and ⁇ 1 (CO 2 /CH 4 ) vanishes at higher temperatures as can be seen in comparing FIG. 5A to FIG. 6.
- the CO 2 permeance and separation factor, ⁇ (CO 2 /CH 4 ) gradually increase with time. This is due to a gradual removal of adsorbed pore fluid by an extensive gas permeation. Nevertheless, stable and continuous operation is achieved at a temperature of 26° C.
Abstract
The present invention provides for a dual-layer inorganic microporous membrane capable of molecular sieving, and methods for production of the membranes. The inorganic microporous supported membrane includes a porous substrate which supports a first inorganic porous membrane having an average pore size of less than about 25 Å and a second inorganic porous membrane coating the first inorganic membrane having an average pore size of less than about 6 Å. The dual-layered membrane is produced by contacting the porous substrate with a surfactant-template polymeric sol, resulting in a surfactant sol coated membrane support. The surfactant sol coated membrane support is dried, producing a surfactant-templated polymer-coated substrate which is calcined to produce an intermediate layer surfactant-templated membrane. The intermediate layer surfactant-templated membrane is then contacted with a second polymeric sol producing a polymeric sol coated substrate which is dried producing an inorganic polymeric coated substrate. The inorganic polymeric coated substrate is then calcined producing an inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membrane in accordance with the present invention.
Description
- This application claims priority to Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/141,148 filed Jun. 25, 1999.
- [0002] This invention was made with Government support at Sandia National Laboratories under Contract No. DE-AC04-94AL85000 awarded by the Department of Energy. The Government has certain rights in this invention.
- The present invention relates to membranes for use in molecular sieving, and more particularly to inorganic membranes providing high sieving flux and selectivity.
- Membrane-based separations are energy efficient and cost effective. They represent promising alternatives to energy-intensive distillation, cryogenic separation, or pressure swing adsorption in applications such as purification of sub-quality natural gas, air separation, removal of VOCs and NOX, and hydrogen recovery from processing gases and feed stocks. Microporous inorganic membranes have attracted considerable attention for gas separation due to their excellent thermal and chemical stability, good erosion resistance and high pressure stability compared to conventional polymeric membranes (e.g. cellulusic derivative, polysulfone, polyamide, or polyimide membrane).
- An inorganic membrane system generally consists of a macroporous support providing mechanical strength for an overlying thin, either dense or porous, separation membrane. Dense membranes prepared from palladium or perovskite only allow certain gases (such as H2 or O2) to transport via mechanisms such as solution-diffusion or solid-state ionic conduction. Such membranes require high capital investment due to the use of precious metals and/or extreme synthesis conditions. In contrast, porous silica membranes with tunable pore sizes can be processed by a simple dip-coating or spin-coating procedure and can be used potentially in a large variety of gas separations. Microporous silica membranes have been demonstrated to show promising molecular sieving characteristics.
- Certain techniques have been developed to process porous silica membranes. They include sol-gel synthesis, leaching, and chemical vapor deposition. Among these, sol-gel processing attracts the most attention do to its excellent processibility and its potential to precisely control pore size and pore structure. Strategies for the fundamental physical and chemical phenomena involved in the deposition of colloidal ceramic dispersions (sols) on porous supports for precise pore size and porosity control have been proposed and discussed in Brinker et al., “Sol-gel Strategies for Controlled Porosity Inorganic Materials,”J. Membr. Sci., 94 (1995) 85, incorporated herein by reference. Three keys to membrane production are 1) avoidance of cracks, pinholes or other defects that would reduce the selectivity; 2) precise pore size control (0.3- 0.4 nm in diameter) so that separation occurs on the basis of size by molecular filtration or “sieving”; and 3) maximization of the volume fraction porosity and minimization of the membrane thickness to maximize flux.
- Forming a microporous silica membrane on top of a home-made disk-shaped, double-coated γ-alumina support has been described in the article De Vos et al., “Improved Performance of Silica Membranes for as Separation,”J Membr. Sci., 143 (1-2) (1998) 37-51, incorporated herein by reference. The coating and calcination process was repeated once to minimize potential defects. Both silica sol preparation and membrane processing were similar to those developed by De Lange, Hekkink and Keizer, described in De Lange et al., “Formation and Characterization of Supported Microporous Ceramic Membranes Prepared by So-Gel Modification Techniques,” J. Membr. Sci., 99 (1995) 57-75, incorporated herein by reference. The improvement of membrane performance was attributed to the processing under class-10 clean room conditions, which increases the cost of manufacturing. Prior art membranes have employed repeated-coating processes to reduce intrinsic defects. The multi-step coating process results in reduction of the number of defect sites, thus increasing selectivity but at the expense of permeation flux and cost of manufacturing. Although high selectivity can significantly reduce either feed loss (single stage) or recompression costs (multiple stage), high permeation flux is necessary to achieve commercially satisfactory production rates. Therefore, the deadlock of tradeoff between selectivity and flux needs to be overcome.
- The present invention provides for an inexpensive supported membrane capable of molecular sieving.
- The present invention further provides for a uniform intermediate layer on a substrate to allow the deposition of a second, top microporous layer which is relatively defect free and a method for producing the defect free layer.
- The present invention also provides for a supported membrane with precise pore size to achieve molecular sieving with maximized flux and selectivity.
- There is described a dual-layer inorganic microporous membrane capable of molecular sieving, and methods for production of such membranes. The inorganic microporous supported membrane includes a porous substrate which supports a first inorganic porous membrane having an average pore size of less than about 25 Å and a second inorganic porous membrane coating the first inorganic membrane having an average pore size of less than about 6 Å.
- The dual-layered membrane is produced by contacting the porous membrane support with a surfactant-containing inorganic polymeric sol, resulting in a surfactant/inorganic polymer coated membrane support. The surfactant/inorganic polymer coated membrane support is dried, producing a self-assembled surfactant-templated surfactant/inorganic polymer composite film. This supported composite film is calcined to remove the surfactant templates to produce a surfactant-templated micro- or mesoporous membrane substrate, which serves as an intermediate layer surfactant-templated membrane. The intermediate layer surfactant-templated membrane is then contacted with a second inorganic polymeric sol producing an inorganic polymeric sol coated substrate which is dried, producing a supported inorganic polymer coated dual layer structure. This supported dual-layered structure is then calcined to produce a dual-layered microporous supported membrane in accordance with the present invention.
- In one embodiment, both of the polymeric sols include silica, aligomers or polymers. The first or intermediate layer of the dual-layer supported membrane generally has a thickness of less than 100 mn and the second or top layer has a thickness of less than about 100 Å. The average pore diameter of the dual-layer supported membrane gradually decreases in size from about 40 to 60 Å for the support, to about 10 to 25 Å for the intermediate layer, to about 2 to 5 Å for the top microporous layer.
- The calcining procedure of the second, top layer includes calcining under a vacuum of less than about 4 psia at a temperature of between 200 to 400° C. and further calcining at a temperature of between 300 to 600° C. The calcining of the first or intermediate layer involves calcining at a temperature between 100 to 150° C. and further heating between 500 to 600° C. The drying of the sols involves drying under conditions of low relative pressure of the liquid constituents.
- These and various other features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent upon reading of the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, where:
- FIG. 1 is a graphical representation of weight loss and differential thermal analysis showing an endotherm peak corresponding to weight loss, indicating decomposition of the surfactant template and the oxidative pyrolysis of surfactant and residual organics.
- FIG. 2 is a graphical representation of nitrogen adsorption isotherms of three different calcined sol layers after removal of templates.
- FIG. 3A is an Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) cross-sectional electron micrograph of the dual-layer supported membrane of the present invention.
- FIG. 3B is a zoomed in Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) micrograph of the cross-sectional view of the dual-layer supported membrane of FIG. 3A.
- FIG. 4 shows a schematic diagram of the custom built automated flow system utilized in gas permeation measurements.
- FIG. 5A is a graphical representation of the separation factor versus temperature comparing microporous sieving A2** layer with and without a surfactant-templated intermediate layer.
- FIG. 5B is a graphical representation of gas permeances versus temperature comparing the A2** membrane with or without a mesoporous sublayer.
- FIG. 6 is a graphical representation of the CO2 permeance and CO2/CH4 separation factor α as a function of temperature for separation of 50/50 (v/v) CO2/CH4 gas mixture.
- FIG. 7A is a graphical representation of the gas permeances versus temperature of the BTE/TEOS membranes with or without a surfactant-templated intermediate layer.
- FIG. 7B is a graphical representation of the selectivities versus temperature of the BTE/TEOS membranes with or without a surfactant-templated mesoporous C16STS intermediate layer.
- FIG. 8 is a graphical representation of the gas permeance versus molecular diameter of a variety of molecules of a dual-layer supported membrane after calcination at 450° C.
- FIG. 9 is a graphical representation of the separation factor versus permeance of the dual-layer supported membrane of the present invention in comparison to prior art membranes.
- FIG. 10A is a graphical representation of the %CO2 in permeate and CO2/CH4 separation factor versus stage cut of a dual-layer supported A2** membrane.
- FIG. 10B is a graphical representation of the CO2 permeance and CO2/CH4 separation factor versus feed flow-rate of a dual-layer supported A2** membrane.
- FIG. 11 is a graphical representation of the CO2 permeance and CO2/CH4 separation factor versus change in pressure of a dual-layer supported A2** membrane.
- FIG. 12 is a graphical representation of the CO2 permeance and CO2/CH4 separation factor versus time of operation of a dual-layer supported A2** membrane.
- In one embodiment, the present invention provides for novel inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membranes and methods for fabricating the supported dual-layer membranes. The dual-layer membranes are constructed by utilizing an underlying support structure coated with a surfactant-templated micro or mesoporous intermediate layer, then coated with a top selective microporous layer. In the production of supported membranes, the quality of the underlying support determines, to a high degree, the properties and quality of the top selective microporous silica membrane. Supports with rough and large-pore surfaces can cause overlying derived membranes to crack due to stress development on uneven film coatings or serve to create pin-holes (areas not coated by the overlying microporous layer). Therefore, the present invention provides a novel and efficient way for the modification of support surfaces to allow a stable, even, and substantially defect-free subsequently deposited overlying microporous membrane. Mechanical polishing to remove surface roughness is tedious, requiring repeated processes, and is difficult to perform within the interior of tubular supports. In the present invention, a membrane, such as a tube-side γ-alumina surface of a commercial asymmetric membrane support, is modified with a layer of surfactant-templated material, for example, surfactant-templated microporous or mesoporous silica (STS). The STS, configured with high porosity and narrow pore diameter distribution (˜1-2 nm), is designed to minimize additional flow resistance, surface roughness, and inherent support defects. It also reduces penetration of a subsequently deposited top layer into the support, thereby reducing the effective thickness of the top layer. This new dual-layer approach creates a thin defect-free microporous membrane with both higher selectivity and higher flux than achieved by the corresponding single-layer microporous membrane.
- The present invention provides for supported inorganic membranes capable of molecular sieving, as well as methods for their preparation and use. In one embodiment, the subject inorganic membranes have pores with resulting average pore diameters of less than about 10 Å and usually less than about 5 Å and have a narrow pore diameter distribution. The subject membranes are prepared by initially coating a porous substrate with a surfactant-templated inorganic polymeric sol. After deposition, the surfactant sol coated substrate is dried and calcined to provide the intermediate inorganic membrane. The intermediate inorganic membrane is then coated by a second polymeric sol. After deposition, the inorganic polymeric sol coated substrate is dried, preferably under conditions of low relative pressure of the liquid constituents of the sol, and calcined to provide the subject inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membrane.
- The inorganic polymeric sols which find use in the present invention are those sols which are stable under the conditions in which they are employed, and have a viscosity which provides for deposition of a thin sol coating on the support. The viscosity of the sols will generally range from about 1 to 20 cps, usually from about 1 to 5 cps, more usually from about 1.2 to 1.5 cps.
- The polymeric sols will comprise a colloidal dispersion of inorganic polymers in a liquid, where the liquid may be a single component, e.g. H2O or an alcohol, or a multi-component, normally miscible, mixture, e.g. alcohol-water and the like. The inorganic polymers will often have a low mass fractal dimension (Df) and be sufficiently large so that the inorganic polymers are captured, at least in part, on top of the underlying STS substrate. The diameter of the inorganic polymers as measured by small angle scattering will often be at least equal to, and will usually be greater than, the diameter of the pores in the underlying STS substrate, and may be up to 2 times the diameter, more usually up to 1.5 times the diameter of the pores of the underlying STS substrate. The concentration of the inorganic polymers in the liquid component of the sols will be sufficient to provide for a sol with the desired viscosity, as described above. Generally, the concentration of the inorganic polymers in the liquid component of the sols will range from 0.45 to 0.69, usually 0.59 to 0.63, more usually 0.60 to 0.62 moles/liter.
- The liquid component of the sols will often comprise water in combination with at least one, usually not more than three, more usually not more than two, organic solvents. Water present in the liquid component will usually be deionized and will be present in about 2.5% to 13% (v/v), usually 5.7 to 6.0% (v/v) of the total liquid component of the sols. A variety of organic solvents will normally be combined with the water to produce the liquid component of the sols. At least one of the organic solvents will be an alkanol, usually a lower alkanol of from 2 to 8 carbon atoms, usually 2 to 6 carbon atoms, more usually 2 to 4 carbon atoms. The alkanol may be an alcohol or polyol, where the number of hydroxy groups does not exceed the number of carbon atoms, and where there is usually not more than one hydroxy group for every 1.5 carbon atoms. Illustrative alkanols which find use as organic solvents in the subject sols are ethanol, usually absolute ethanol, methanol, iso-propanol, and the like. The alkanol will be present in the liquid component of the sols in an amount ranging from about 77 to 82% (v/v), usually from about 80 to 80.5%(v/v) of the liquid component in the sols. Generally, the ratio of alkanol to water in the liquid component of the sols will range from 6 to 32, usually from about 13.5 to 14.5. Other organic solvents, in addition to the alkanol, may also be present in the subject sols, where the liquid component of the sols comprises more than one organic solvent. These other organic solvents may be straight chained, branched or cyclic, and will usually comprise from about 2 to 10 carbon atoms, more usually 4 to 8 carbon atoms. The organic solvents may comprise one or more heteroatoms, usually not more than three heteroatoms, where the heteroatom may be selected from oxygen, sulfur, nitrogen and the like. Illustrative non-alkanol organic solvents which may be present in the liquid component of the sols include hexane, toluene, tetrahydrofuran, acetone and the like. When present in the subject sols, these non-alkanol organic solvents will be present in amounts ranging from 5 to 99% (v/v) of the total liquid component.
- The subject inorganic polymeric coating sols are prepared by combining metal alkoxide monomers with the liquid components of the sols, as described above, in the presence of a catalyst, either acid or base, with agitation to provide a substantially uniform dispersion of the metal alkoxide monomers in the liquid components. Metal alkoxide monomers that find use in preparation of the subject sols are those monomers having the formula:
- M(OR)n or MR′x(OR)n−x, usually M(OR)n,
- wherein:
- M is a metal having a coordination number in excess of 3, i.e.>3, and is selected from the group comprising Si, Al, Ti, Zr and the like, preferably Si;
- OR is a hydrolyzable alkoxy ligand, where R usually has the formula:
- CzH2z+1,
- wherein:
- z is from 1 to 4, usually from 1 to 2;
- n is usually from 3 to 4; and
- R′ is a non-hydrolyzable organic ligand or other oligomeric oxoalkoxide having from 1 to 4 carbon atoms, usually from 1 to 2 carbon atoms.
- For electropositive metals, e.g. Ti and Zr, the metal alkoxide monomer may be modified to reduce the effective functionality and/or rate of hydrolysis and condensation and thereby prevent particle formation under the sol preparation conditions. To reduce the effective functionality and/or rate of hydrolysis and condensation, the metal alkoxides may be modified by any convenient means, such as chelation with slowly hydrolyzing multidentate ligands, e.g. actylacetonate, alcohol amines, and the like.
- Catalysts that find use include mineral acids and bases, including HCl, H2SO4, HNO3, NH4OH, and the like. In the present invention, often the catalyst is added in sufficient concentration to cause the average condensation rate of the hydrolyzed alkoxide species to be minimized.
- Agitation of the metal alkoxide, water, catalyst and organic solvent(s), i.e. the sol precursors, is maintained for a sufficient time to provide for a uniform dispersion of the metal alkoxide in the liquid constituents. Usually the sol precursors will be mixed for a period of time ranging from 5 to 20 min, more usually 14 to 15 min. Mixing may be accomplished by any convenient means, such as stirring, shaking and the like.
- The resultant mixture of sol precursors is then allowed to set or age for a sufficient time under conditions of low condensation rate to produce a sol comprising inorganic polymers having the desired cluster size. The condensation conditions, i.e. the rate at which the monomers are hydrolyzed and then condensed into the polymeric clusters, depends on a variety of factors, such as the reactivity of the alkoxy ligands of the metal alkoxide monomers, the temperature at which the sol is maintained, the pH of the sol precursor, and the like. Thus, the temperature and pH of the combined sol precursors will be selected in view of the reactivity of the alkoxy ligands of the metal alkoxy monomers, to achieve conditions of low but finite condensation rate. Although the selected temperature and pH will vary depending on the particular metal alkoxy monomers employed, generally the temperature will range from about 35 to 70° C., usually from about 40 to 60° C., and more usually from about 48 to 52° C. The temperature of the aging precursor sol may be controlled using any convenient temperature control means, such as a heating or cooling means, or the like. The effective pH of the sol precursor composition will generally range from 0 to 5, usually from about 1 to 3, more usually from about 1.5 to 2.5. For silica sols, the pH of the precursor solution may be controlled by introducing to the precursor an acid or basic acatalyst, such as HCl, HNO3, NH4OH and the like, in sufficient amount to modulate the pH (specifically the −log[H3O+]) of the precursor to the desired value.
- The precursor sol is sealed and allowed to set or age under the conditions of low condensation rate for a period of time sufficient to provide for the formation of extended polymeric networks capable of interpenetration and optionally having the desired fractal dimensions. Usually, the sols will be allowed to set in a closed container for a period of time ranging from about 0 to 140 hrs, more usually from about 10 to 24 hours.
- The preparation of a silica polymeric coating sols includes a two stage process, in which the pH of the sols is decreased from the first to the second stage. In the first stage of this two stage sol production process, a silicon alkoxide, e.g. tetraethoxysilane, is combined with an alkanol and water with agitation to produce a precursor sol. The amount of silicon alkoxide which is combined with the alkanol and water to produce the precursor sol will range from 1.0 to 2.0 mol/liter, usually from about 1.7 to 2.0 M mol/liter. The amount of alkanol present in the precursor sol will range from 30 to 70% (v/v), usually 45 to 50% (v/v), and the amount of water present in the precursor sol will range from 2 to 10% (v/v), usually 3.5 to 4.5% (v/v). In this first stage, agitation is continued for a period of 30 to 120 min., usually 60 to 90 min. During this first stage, the pH of the precursor sol is maintained at a value between 3 and 6, usually between 4 and 5 as measured by using an indicator strip, by including in the precursor sol a sufficient amount of an acid catalyst. Any convenient acid catalyst may be employed, including HNO3, HCl and the like. In this first stage, the molar ratio of the four components of the sol precursor, i.e. silicon alkoxide: alkanol: water: acid catalyst, will be 0.8-1.2 : 3.5-4 : 0.8-1.2: 1.0×10−5-9.0×10−5.
- In the second stage of the two stage sol preparation process, the pH of the precursor sol will be reduced by ⅓to ½. To reduce the pH of the precursor sol, a sufficient amount of water and acid catalyst will be introduced to the precursor sol. Following introduction of the water and acid catalyst, the pH of the precursor sol will be reduced to between about 1 and 3, usually between about 1.5 and 2.5. In the second stage, a sufficient amount of water and acid precursor are added to the precursor sol to change the molar ratio of the four components to 0.8-1.2: 3.5-4: 4.5-5.5: 0.001-0.009. Following introduction of the acid catalyst and water, the precursor sol will be agitated for a period of time ranging from 10 to 30 min, usually from 10 to 20 min. Following agitation, the precursor sol will be allowed to set or age at an elevated temperature for a period of time sufficient for the coating sol to be produced. Generally, the incubation temperature will range from 40 to 60° C., usually from 45 to 55° C. The setting period will range from 12 to 36 hours, usually 12 to 24 hours. The resultant silica coating sol (referred to below as the A2** sol) may comprise silica polymers of low fractal dimension.
- In one embodiment of the present invention, the surfactant-template polymeric sol utilized to form the intermediate layer membrane is further prepared from the precursor sol following substantially similar steps as described above for creating the A2** sol. However, prior to aging and the second stage, a sufficient amount of surfactant powder is added to the unaged precursor sol. Surfactant powders that are used are usually cationic surfactants, for example C6-surfactant of triethylhexylammonium bromide and C16-surfactant of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide. The amount of surfactant powder that is added is between 2 g and 8 g per 100 g sol, usually between 3 g and 5 g per 100 g/sol. Following the addition of the surfactant powder, precursor sol is agitated for a period of time between about 5-30 min., usually between about 10-20 min. Following the addition of the surfactant powder, the surfactant-template sol is completed following substantially similar steps as those of aging and the second stage, described above for the A2** sol.
- In one embodiment, the polymeric sols utilized for both the intermediate layer and the top or outer layer are formed from the sol or a derivative of the sol labeled A2** and fully described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 5,772,735, incorporated herein by reference.
- In alternative embodiments, a sol providing substantially similar sieving characteristics as the A2** sol is utilized as the top microporous membrane. The alternative sol consists of five components, i.e., Bis(Triethoxysilyl)Ethane (BTE):silicon alkoxide:alkanol:water:acid catalyst, with a molar ratio being 0.4-1.2:0.1-0.5:3.5-4:4.8-5.4:1.0×103-9.0×103. Further, alternatives to the STS sol include sols containing amphiphilic block-copolymers. The amphiphilic block-copolymers, for example Brij56,CH3(CH2)15(CH2CH2O)10OH, 4 wt %, are utilized as the templating agent in replace of the surfactant in creating the intermediate sol layer, producing ordered mesoporous silica sublayer membranes. The block-copolymer templated silica provides both a high porosity of between 40 to 80%, usually between 50 to 60%, and an ordered cubic structure, resulting in a membrane having an average pore diameter of less than about 30 Å, usually less than 25 Å.
- In one embodiment, foreign particles are removed from the sols (both the intermediate and top layer sols) through the filtering of the sols prior to being coated onto a substrate. The top layer or A2** sols are filtered with a 0.2 to 1.0 μm filter, more usually with a 0.4582 m filter. The surfactant-template sols are filled with a 0.45 to 2.0 μm filter, usually with a 1.0 μm filter. Thus, potentially damaging foreign materials are removed from the sols to further ensure membranes with accurate sieving capabilities.
- A variety of substrates may be employed as porous supports for the inorganic membranes. Substrates that may be employed have pore sizes which are sufficiently large such that the substrate itself does not contribute to the sieving properties of the supported membrane. Generally, the pores of the substrate will have diameters at least 5 times larger than the pores of the inorganic films to be deposited on the substrate, normally at least 8 times larger, and not more than 15 times larger, usually not more than 12 times larger than the pores of the inorganic film to be deposited. The substrate pores usually have diameters ranging in size from about 30 to 70 Å, usually from about 40 to 60 Å.
- The substrate is constructed of any suitable material that is thermally, chemically and mechanically stable during sol deposition, thermal processing and membrane use including oxides, e.g. TiO2, Al2O3, ZrO2, hydroxides, e.g. AlOOH, as well as porous metals, such as stainless, and other materials know in the art. The substrates may have any convenient shape, such as square, rectangular and cylindrical, as well as other more complicated shapes, where the shape chosen will depend primarily on the intended use of the final supported inorganic membrane. The substrates may be prepared using methods known in the art, i.e. deposition of particulate sols, or obtained from commercial sources. Commercially available substrates capable of acting as supports for the inorganic films of the subject invention include those available from U.S. Filter, e.g. Membralox® (a cylindrical substrate comprising a γ-Al2O3 inside layer having pores ranging in diameter from 40 to 50 Å), Golden Technologies, and the like. As necessary and desirable, prior to use, the substrate may be calcined to eliminate any organic compounds present on the support and to desorb any water from the support. Calcination will generally be carried out at temperatures ranging from 300 to 500° C., usually 350 to 450° C., for a period of time between 15 to 180 min., and usually between 45 to 75 min.
- Prior to depositing the STS sublayer onto the membrane supports, the membrane supports are cleaned, usually by ultrasound. The membrane supports are then washed with
de-ionized water 1 to 7 times, usually 3 to 5 times. The membrane supports are then calcined at a temperature between 300 and 500° C., usually 350 to 450° C., for a period of time between 15 to 180 min., and usually between 45 to 75 min. - The STS sol is then deposited onto the surface of the membrane support under substantially clean conditions, usually under
Class 100 clean conditions, to produce a surfactant sol coated support that is then dried and calcined to yield an STS inorganic intermediate membrane. The drying is performed in an environment having between 10-30% relative humidity, usually having 15-25% relative humidity at a temperature between 10 and 40° C., usually between 20 and 30° C. for a period of time between 5 and 20 minutes, usually between 10 and 15 minutes resulting in a surfactant-template polymeric coated substrate. The calcination is performed by heating the surfactant-template polymeric coated support at a temperature between 50-200° C., usually between 100-150° C. for between 30-120 min., usually between 45-75 min. producing a surfactant-template membrane support. Surfactant removal is then performed by heating the STS membrane support at a temperature between 300 to 700° C., usually between 500-600° C. for between 30-90 min., usually between 45-75 min. producing the intermediate layer surfactant membrane. Deposition of the surfactant intermediate or sublayer is achieved by contacting the membrane support with an STS sol-gel so that the STS sol coats the membrane support in a layer capable of collapsing with drying to produce a thin film. The support membrane may be contacted with the STS sol using any convenient means, such as dip-coating, infiltration, spin-coating, spraying and the like. - In one embodiment, the A2** silica top layer is then deposited onto the surface of the intermediate layer surfactant membrane, using a similar procedure as described above, producing an A2** polymeric sol coated substrate that is then dried and calcined. The drying is performed in an environment having between 10-30% relative humidity, usually having 15-25% relative humidity at a temperature between 10 and 40° C., usually between 20 and 30° C. for a period of time between 5 and 20 minutes, usually between 10 and 15 minutes producing an A2** inorganic polymer coated substrate. The calcination of the A2** coated substrate is performed under a vacuum of less than about 6 psia (pounds per square inch absolute), usually less than about 4 psia (<4 psia), at a temperature between 200 and 400° C., usually between 250 and 350° C. During calcination, the rate at which the temperature is raised will range from 0.5 to 5° C./min., usually 0.5 to 2° C./min. The coated substrate will be held isothermally at the calcination temperature for a period of time ranging from about 4-8 hours, usually 5-7 hours after which the temperature will be decreased at a rate of 0.5 to 5.0° C./min., usually between about 0.5 to 3.0° C./min. to produce a dual-layered inorganic supported membrane having the A2** top microporous membrane. In an alternative embodiment, further calcination or second calcination is performed on the A2** supported membrane at a temperature between 300-600° C., usually between 400-500° C. in air for 30 to 90 min., usually 45 to 75 min. producing the final A2** inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membrane. The ends or edges of the final permeable membrane are then sealed to prevent any defects or irregularities.
- The final porous inorganic membranes are capable of molecular sieving, and exhibit high flux and high selectivity. By capable of molecular sieving is meant that the membranes are capable of exhibiting substantially molecular sieving behavior, where molecular sieving behavior exists when the separation factor for a pair of gases transported through the membrane is greater than the separation factor for the same pair of gases in a membrane characterized by Knudsen diffusion. Thus, in the formula where αA/B∝(molecular weight B/molecular weight A)½, where αA/B is the separation factor of a membrane for a pair of gases, in membranes exhibiting Knudsen separation behavior, the separation factor for the pair of gases does not typically exceed 10. As the subject membranes are capable of exhibiting substantially molecular sieving behavior, the separation factor for pairs of gases will in general greatly exceed the Knudsen separation values.
- The supported inorganic membranes are substantially defect free, in that they are substantially free of cracks, pinholes and the like. By substantially defect free is meant that the supported inorganic membranes are at least 95% defect free, usually at least 97% defect free, more usually at least 99% defect free. The supported inorganic membranes are thin, ranging in thickness from 10 to 200 nm, usually from 15 to 150 nm and more usually from 20 to 100 nm. Preferably, the thickness of the supported inorganic membranes will be less than about 100 nm. The supported inorganic membranes of the subject invention will have a narrow pore diameter distribution, i.e. there will be little variance in pore diameter. The pore diameter of the subject membranes will be sufficiently small to provide for size exclusion of molecules, i.e. sufficiently small to provide for selective passage of smaller molecules while blocking larger molecules. The STS intermediate layer membrane will have pores with an average diameter, dependent upon the surfactant utilized, generally in the range of about 5 to 30 Å, more usually from about 10 to 25 Å. The A2** membrane will have pores with an average diameters generally in the range of about 1 to 1 Å, usually from about 2 to 5 Å.
- Some of the critical issues in the processing of the sol-gel derived silica membranes include eliminating defect formation and controlling pore size. Described below are some of the strategies employed in one embodiment of the membrane formation to eliminate defect formation. First, drying-induced stress as high as 200 MPa in the silica sol system can result in film cracking unless the film thickness is below a critical cracking thickness hc. Through the adjustment of the sol concentration, withdrawal rate or sol aging time to maintain the membrane film thickness below the critical thickness hc (˜4000 Å for A2** sol), cracking is avoided. Second, the membrane is processed under clean conditions to substantially avoid foreign particles causing pinholes. Third, STS intermediate layer is used to eliminate inherent defects on commercially-available supports and to facilitate the formation of subsequently deposited thin selective membranes (e.g. A2** membrane). The STS intermediate layer is designed with both high porosity and low tortuosity to avoid creating additional flow resistance. Examples of strategies for pore size control, include solvent (water) templating, and surfactant-templating. Due to preferential alcohol evaporation during the film deposition or sol contacting process, water is the dominating solvent at the late drying stage. Water molecules confined in the stressed film are used as a template to create pores of molecular dimension needed for molecular sieving. For the surfactant-templating strategy, surfactants, agregates or liquid crystalline mesophases (amphiphilic molecules composed of a hydrophilic head group and hydrophobic tail) are used as templates. Surfactant-templated silicas are high surface area amorphous solids (up to approximately 1400 m2/g) characterized by monosized, often cylindrical pores organized into periodic arrays that often mimic the liquid crystalline mesophases exhibited by surfactant-water systems. Both water and surfactants can be removed by heating to create uniform pores with various dimensions depending on a choice of surfactant.
- The resulting inorganic dual-layer membranes find use in a variety of applications, including purification of sub-quality natural gas, removal of NOx from power-plant flue gas, reduction of greenhouse gases (e.g. CO2) and hydrogen recovery from processing gases or hydrogen purification for fuel-cell applications. The highly : selective top layer will, for example, remove N2 and CO2 efficiently from natural gas without suffering from CO2 plasticization commonly seen in dense polymeric membranes or purify H2 from reformate for fuel-cell applications.
- The following examples are offered by way of illustration and not by way of limitation.
- Synthesis of Micro-/Mesoporous Silica Materials
- 1.A. Preparation of Silica Polymeric Sols
- 1.A.1.—A silica polymeric sol (labeled A2** ) was prepared as follows. Preparation of the A2** sol consists of two acid-catalyzed reaction steps designed to minimize the condensation rates of silica species in order to produce weakly branched polymeric clusters that interpenetrate and collapse during film deposition to produce membranes with molecular-sized pores. In the first step an A2** stock solution was prepared from tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) (Kodak), 200 proof ethanol (EtOH), deionized H2O, and 0.07 N HCl (diluted from ‘Baker Analyzed® 1 N HCl). The four components were mixed in a molar ratio of 1.0:3.8:1.1:5.0×10−5, respectively, and refluxed at 60° C. for 90 min. while stirring at 200 rpm (PMC 730 series DATAPLATE® or a Whatman DATAPLATE® model 440 P programmable digital hot plate/Stirrer, 500 ml Pyrex® resin reaction kettle with lid, Pyrex® 24/40 condenser). The pH of the prepared stock solution was measured using EM Science ColorpHast® pH paper and found to be 4.7. This A2** stock solution is very stable for approximately 90 to 180 days when stored at −30° C. In the second step, additional water and HCl were added into the stock sol. The sol was agitated or hand-shaken for 15 minutes.
- 1.A.2.—The sol is then aged at 50° C. for 22 hours. The two-step procedure resulted in an A2** standard sol with a final molar ratio of TEOS: EtOH: H2O: HCl=1.0:3.8:5.0:0.004(pH=2.0).
- 1.A.3.—A dip-coating sol was prepared by diluting the A2** standard sol with two times its volume of ethanol. The dip-coating A2** sol was filtered with 0.45 μm filter (Nalgene) prior to dip-coating.
- 1.A.4.—An alternative silica species to the A2** sol which will also produce membranes with molecular-sized pores is a BTE/TEOS sol. The dip-coating BTE sol is prepared as described above in 1.A.1. with the sol comprising BTE(Bis(Triethoxysilyl)Ethane):TEOS:ethanol:H2O:HCl in a molar ratio of 0.8:0.2:3.8:5.1:5.3×10−3.
- 1.B.—Synthesis of Surfactant-Templated Micro-/Mesoporous Silica Materials
- 1.B.1.—Synthesis of a C6STS Microporous Silica Material. A surfactant-template silica (STS) sol containing 0.125M C6-surfactant (triethylhexylammonium bromide, Aldrich) silica sol is prepared by adding 0.4 g per 100 g/sol amount of surfactant powder into unaged A2** standard sol as prepared in 1.A.1. The C6STS sol is then aged according to the process of 1.A.2. The C6STS sol is then diluted as described in 1.A.3. with two times its volume of ethanol. The aggregation of the surfactant during drying does not cause any macroscopic phase separations. The C6STS sol is filtered with a 1.0 μm filter (Nalgene) prior to dip-coating.
- 1.B.2.—Synthesis of a C16STS Silica Material. A surfactant-template silica sol containing a 4.2 wt % C16-surfactant (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) is prepared by adding 0.4 g per 100 g/sol amount of surfactant powder into unaged A2** standard sol as prepared in 1.A.2. and follows the process described in preparing the C6STS sol in 1.B.1.
- 1 .B.3.—Characterization of the STS Intermediate Layer. Referring to FIG. 1, for the C6STS xerogel as prepared in 1.B.1., differential thermal analysis (DTA) showed an endothermic peak near 200° C. corresponding to the beginning of a drastic weight loss indicating the decomposition of the C6-surfactant template while an exothermic peak at around 350° C. accompanied by a weight loss of about 45%, signified the oxidative pyrolysis of surfactant and residual organics. Referring to FIG. 2, N2 sorption isotherms of the calcined C6STS thin film (calcined at 500° C. for one hour), characterized by a surface-acoustic wave (SAW) technique, appeared to be Type I, characteristic of microporous materials; while that of calcined C16STS thin film as prepared in 1.B.2. appeared to be Type II, characteristic of mesoporous materials. Still referring to FIG. 2, although N2 sorption isotherms of bulk calcined A2** xerogel powder appeared to be Type I with a very sharp increase of N2 volume adsorbed within a relative pressure of 0.0 to 0.01, indicating a narrow pore size and pore size distribution, a thin-film form was virtually inaccessible to N2 at 77K. due to differences in drying rates (films dry much more rapidly). Average pore diameters of the C6STS and C16STS were about 10-12 Å and 18-20 Å, respectively. Furthermore, the surface area and porosity of the C6STS materials were 575 m2/g and 28%, respectively. Porosity, determined by ellipsometry, agreed with the result calculated from N2 adsorption isotherms.
- 1.B.4.—Synthesis of a Block Copolymer templated Silica Material. A Brij56, CH3(CH2)15(CH2CH2O)10OH, 4 wt %, amphiphilic block copolymer silica sol is prepared by adding 4 g/100 g sol amount of amphiphilic block copolymer to the unaged A2** standard sol as prepared in 1.A.2. and follows the process described in preparing the C6STS sol in 1.B.1.
- 1.C.—Sol Deposition
- Membrane supports were prepared by sectioning a commercial 50 Å γ-Al2O3 tube (US filter) into several 5.5 cm-long sections and cleaned by ultrasound. The supports were then washed with
de-ionized water 5 times before calcining at 400° C. for 60 min. - 1.C.1—Surfactant Sublayer Coating of the Support. A sol-gel dip-coating process featuring aspects of slip casting was performed in a laminar flow (150 ft/min) chamber under clean conditions of
Class 100. To prepare a C6STS sublayer, the support tube as prepared and washed in 1.C. was lowered into the sol containing the C6-surfactant as prepared and described above in 1.B.1. at a rate of 8 inches/min. The support was held undisturbed for ten seconds, the support was then withdrawn at the rate of 3 inches/min. The surfactant coated support was then dried at a temperature of 25° C. in a 20% relative humidity environment for 15 minutes resulting in a surfactant-template polymeric layered membrane support. The membrane was then calcined to 120° C. in a programmable furnace. In performing the calcination, the membrane support was heated at a rate of 1° C./min to thetarget temperature 120° C. and was held isothermally for 60 min. The coated membrane support was then cooled at a rate of 1° C./min. to 25° C. The cooled membrane support was then confirmed to be substantially impermeable to helium by performing the permeance measurements. The coated support was then subjected to surfactant removal by heating the membrane tube in the programmable furnace at a rate of 1° C./min. to a temperature of 500° C. resulting in the intermediate surfactant membrane support. The membrane was held isothermally for 60 min. then cooled at a rate of 1° C./min. to 25° C. The same procedure could also be used to prepare membranes with other surfactant-templated silica sublayers. - 1.C.2—A2** Layer Coating of the Membrane Support. The support tube with the C6STS layer as prepared in 1.C.1. was lowered into the A2** sol as prepared in 1A. at a rate of 10 inches/min. and left undisturbed for 10 seconds. The membrane support was then withdrawn at a rate of 1 inch/min. The A2** polymeric sol coated substrate was then dried at a temperature of 25° C. in a 20% relative humidity environment for 15 minutes resulting in an A2** layered membrane support. The A2** layered membrane support was then calcined in a programmable furnace under a vacuum condition of less than 4 psia (<4 psia) at a heating rate of 1-2° C./min from room temperature to 300° C. The A2** coated membrane was held isothermally for six hours at 300° C. to evacuate solvents and also promote further pore shrinkage. The A2** coated membrane is then cooled at a rate of 1° C./min. to 25° C. The vacuum calcination procedure also results in the decomposition of surface ethoxy groups; therefore, a hydrophobic inner pore surface is formed as evidenced by an increase in the water contact angle of membrane surface from 17° to 41° C. The imperfections near both ends of the final A2** dual-layered tube membrane caused by being clamped in the laminar flow chamber were then sealed by dense silicone (Duraseal 1529, Cotronics Corp., N.Y.). The final permeable length of the A2** coated tube is 4 cm.
- 1 .C.3.—Further calcined A2** membrane. The dual layered membrane as prepared above in 1.C.2. was further calcined, prior to the coating of the imperfections near both ends, at 450° C. by heating the membrane at a rate of 1° C./min. to the target temperature of 450° C., then held isothermally for 60 min. in air and cooled at a rate of 1° C./min. to 25° C.
- The dual silica coated permeable tube results in both high flux and selectivity for the membranes with gradual changes of pore size from 50 Å (commercial γ-alumina support layer) to 10-12 Å (surfactant-templated silica sublayer), and then to 3-4 Å (ultramicroporous silica top-layer). Surfactant templates embedded in the silica framework are removed by calcination while solvent templates are evacuated by a low-temperature thermal treatment under vacuum. FIGS. 3A and 3B show an electron micrograph view of the cross-section and the surface of the supported dual-membrane. The thickness of the defect-free ultramicroporous A2** layer is about 30 nm.
- Sublayer Effect On Permeation And Separation
- 2.A.—Test Parameters
- The gas permeation through the dual-layer membrane produced in 1.C. was measured using a custom built automated flow system as shown in FIG. 4. An outgassing procedure is performed prior to measuring the permeation because ambient moisture can easily condense inside silica micropores. The outgassing procedure was conducted at 80° C. for three hours with dry helium purging across the membrane. The procedure for determining gas permeance included evacuating both sides of the membrane and then introducing pure gas or mixed gas into the tube side of the membrane. Gases were chosen to give a range of gas molecule sizes. Single components of He, H2, CO2, CO2, N2, and CH4, and either its dual or multiple component mixture were tested. The pressure at the tube side was maintained at a constant pressure (6.5 bar). Meanwhile, the shell-side pressure was gradually built up due to permeated gases. Upon exceeding atmosphere pressure, the shell side was exposed to ambient pressure. To simulate practical operation, no sweeping gas was used in all experiments and, therefore, the problems of back diffusional flux were eliminated.
- The flow rates of all inlet and outlet streams were directly measured by digital bubble flow meters (Humonics). If the permeate flow rate was below the detectable limit of the digital bubble flow meter (˜1 cc/min), it could be calculated from the rate of pressure increase at a pre-vacuumed permeate side with a closed outlet.
- For mixed-gas permeation measurement, a pre-mixed gas with known composition was used and the compositions of both effluent streams were analyzed as functions of time using an on-line gas chromatograph. The flow rate and the pressure of the tube-side stream as well as the temperature of the membrane separator were varied. The experiments were continued until steady-state conditions (no change in flow rates and compositions with time) were reached. The change of gas-phase driving force (the partial-pressure gradient of component i, ΔPi, across the membrane) along the membrane was taken into account; therefore, the permeance of the component i, Pm,i, was defined as:
- where Ji is the steady-state flux of component i through the membrane. (ΔPi)I and (ΔPi)II are the partial-pressure differences of component i between the tube-side and shell-side pressures of the membrane at the gas entrance (I) and exit (II) ends, respectively.
- The separation factor defined by the ratio of permeabilities can be equivalent to the ratio of permeances if the membrane thickness is identical. Thus, for pure-gas permeation, the ideal separation factor α1 could be defined by the ratio of permeances of individual pure gases. Analogous to the definition of αI, the true separation factor αt of mixed gas is defined by the ratio of permeances of constituent gases.
- 2.B.—Ultramicroporous Silica Membrane with Microporous C6STS Sublayer
- A coated membrane support as produced in 1.C. utilizing the C6STS sol as prepared in 1.B.1. is characterized using a single gas permeability measurement system. The membrane ends were sealed using Viton® or Grafoil® gasket material, and the compression of the gasket avoided by-passing of the gases. A custom built automated flow system, as described above in 2.A. was used to measure the permeance (flux/pressure) of five different gases through the membrane. The gases were chosen to give a range of gas molecule sizes. These gases, along with their characteristic diameters, are: He (2.65 Å), H2 (2.89Å), CO2 (3.3 Å), N2 (3.64 Å), and CH4 (3.8 Å). Apart from the different sizes, the inert gases have different chemical interactions with the membrane surface. Thus, the flow through the membrane will be a combination of Knudsen diffusion, surface diffusion and micropore diffusion. The relative contribution from each of the above flow mechanisms varies according to the gas, as well as the pore size of the membrane.
- The flow through the membranes was measured with two bubble meters installed on the exhaust line. The results obtained from the single gas permeability measurements were reported as permeance (cm3/cm2-s-cm-Hg) vs measurement temperature and the ideal selectivity α½(flux of
pure gas 1/flux of pure gas 2) vs. temperature. - The C6STS sublayer as prepared serves to eliminate intrinsic defects on commercial porous supports and promotes pore uniformity; therefore increasing selectivity, and preventing penetration of a subsequently deposited ultramicroporous membrane (e.g. A2** membrane with an average pore size of about 3-4 Å as described in 1.D.), thus enhancing flux. Gas permeances and selectivities were compared for A2** membranes with and without a C6STS sublayer. Referring to FIG. 5A and 5B, at 60° C., the membrane with a sublayer exhibited four-fold higher CO2 permeances and four-fold higher CO2/CH4 selectivities than that without a sublayer in a single-component gas permeation measurement. Ideal separation factors of various gas pairs (e.g. αI(CO2/CH4)=102 at 25° C.) largely exceeded Knudsen separation factors (e.g. αK(CO2/CH4)=0.6). The exceptional negative activation energy of CO2 (Ea=-3.37 KJ/mol) for the membrane with a C6STS sublayer indicated the occurrence of CO2 capillary condensation. Therefore, CO2 is transported with high density through narrow pores at lower temperatures. On the contrary, CO2 capillary condensation was insignificant for the membrane without a C6STS sublayer. Therefore, a gradual increase in CO2 permeance with temperature (activated transport) is observed (Ea=2.48 KJ/mol). Thus, a high CO2 permeance (3.2×10−4 cm3(STP)/s/cm2/cmHg) and a high CO2/CH4 separation factor of approximately 200 can be achieved with the dual layer membrane at 26° C. for separation of 50/50 (v/v) CO2/CH4 gas mixture, as shown in FIG. 6. The combination of high permeance and high selectivity exceeded that of prior art gas separation membranes (e.g. asymmetric polyimide with a typical CO2/CH4 separation factor of 55 and a CO2 permeance of 1.7×10−4 cm3(STP)/s/cm2/cmHg). Moreover, activation energies of CH4 for both A2** membranes with and without a sublayer were 12.92 and 9.64 KJ/mol, respectively, which were higher than those of CO2. CH4 diffused through both the membranes with low permeance via an activated transport mechanism. Referring back to FIG. 5A, the combination of CO2 condensation effect and the activated transport mechanism help in explaining the increase in ideal separation factor of CO2/CH4 upon the decrease in temperature for the membrane with a sublayer.
- 2.C.—BTE/TOES Microporous Silica Membrane with a Mesoporous C16STS Sublayer
- A membrane support prepared as described in 1.C. utilizing the mesoporous C16STS material as the surfactant-templated silica sublayer as prepared in 1.B.2. shows substantially the same substrate effects as the microporous C6STS materials described above in 2.B. A 5.5 cm commercial 50 Å γ-Al2O3 membrane tube was initially cleaned by ultrasound, then washed and calcined as described in 1.C. The membrane tube was dip-coated into the surfactant-templated sol as described in 1.C.1. utilizing the C16STS sol as prepared in 1.B.2. The C16-surfactant was then removed by heating the C16STS coated support at a rate of 1° C./min. to the target temperature of 500° C. The coated support was held isothermally for three hours and then cooled at a rate of 1° C./min. to 25° C. A microporous membrane was then formed on the calcined membrane support with the C16STS intermediate layer by dip-coating the C16STS coated support into a BTE (Bis(Triethoxysilyl)Ethane) silica sol as prepared in 1.A.4. and filtered utilizing 0.45 μm filter (Nalgene) prior to dip-coating. The Ethane ligands (—CH2CH2—) of the BTE membrane embedded in the silica framework are removed by calcination at 280° C. by heating the BTE coated support at 1° C./min. to the target temperature. The coated support was held isothermally for three hours and then cooled at a rate of 1° C./min. to 25° C., leaving behind a microporous membrane. A comparison of the membranes with and without a mesoporous sublayer is shown in FIGS. 7A and 7B. The results show that membranes with a mesoporous sublayer exhibit significantly higher permeance and significantly better selectivity than those without a sublayer. This is consistent with the observation in Example 2.B., demonstrating the crucial role of the sublayer in improving flux and selectivity of an overlying microporous silica membrane.
- 2.D.—Alternative Intermediate Layers
- The same concept of providing a microporous or mesoporous intermediate layer can be applied to the use of an ordered mesoporous silica membrane as a sublayer to minimize transport resistance. An amphiphilic block copolymer (Brij56, CH3(CH2)15(CH2 CH2O)10OH, 4 wt %) was used as a templating agent in replace of surfactants as prepared and described in 1.B.4. The copolyer sol is deposited onto substrate as described in 1.C.1. To facilitate re-organization of the block-copolymer template, the coating of the substrate with the copolymer sol is performed in a humid chamber of 40% relative humidity at a temperature of 25° C. The block copolymer template silica results in a high porosity (50-65%) and ordered cubic structure having uniform pore size of about 23 Å. Therefore, the block-copolymer is another candidate which can be used as the intermediate layer for a subsequently deposited effective separation layer, such as A2**.
- Effects Of The Ultramicroporous Silica Membrane Calcined At 450° C.
- 3A.—Ultramicroporous Silica Membrane for Hydrogen Purification
- A dual layered membrane as prepared in 1.C.3. was calcined at the 450° C. for one hour in air and cooled at a rate of 1° C./min. to 25° C. Single-component gas permeation measurements were taken utilizing the measurement system as described in 2.A. at various temperatures ranging from 20° C. to 150° C. Pure-gas permeation results at 80° C. are shown in FIG. 8. Due to the extended calcination for one hour at 450° C., the pore size of the membrane was further reduced, resulting in a sharp molecular-size cut-off at about 3.5 Å. The dual layer membrane support obtained through the extended calcination at 450° C. results in a superior hydrogen separation factor (H2/CH4=1265) as well as having a high hydrogen permeance (1×10−3 cm3(STP)/cm2/s/cmnHg). Such a selective membrane provides a great opportunity in applications such as hydrogen recovery from petrochemical plants and hydrogen purification for fuel cells. The membrane selectively separated hydrogen from a simulated reformate gas mixture consisting of 33.98% N2, 15.00% CO2, 0.997% CO, 50.023% H2 (composition produced by the partial oxidation of methanol) for fuel cells as evidenced by the high concentration of hydrogen recovered in the permeate side stream as shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1 Permeances of components of a gas mixture* at 80° C. Permeance × 106 Separation Pure gas (cm3 (STP)/s/cm2/ Factor permeance Permeate Retentate Gas i c/cmHg) (H2/Gas i) ratio (mole %) (mole %) H2 507 — — 92.19 42.25 CO 2101 5.0 5.2 7.36 16.89 N2 2.15 235.9 316.0 0.37 40.47 CO 3.83 132.2 198.6 0.0193 1.14 - A 92 mole % H2 purity was obtained in the permeate stream at a stage-cut of 8.2% (stage-cut=the ratio of permeate flow rate to feed flow rate). The CO concentration, (CO is a known PEM fuel cell poison) in the permeate reduced to at least fifty times lower than that in the feed. A high H2 permeance (6×10−4(STP)/cm2/s/cmHg) and a high H2/N2 separation factor of over 270 for separation of a 50/50 (v/v) H2/N2 gas mixture were achieved as shown in Table 2.
TABLE 2 The use of a AC450 silica membrane for separation of a 50/50 (v/v) H2/N2 gas mixture* at 80° C. Permeance × 106 Separation Pure gas (cm3 (STP)/s/cm2/ Factor permeance Permeate Retentate Gas i c/cmHg) (H2/Gas i) ratio (mole %) (mole %) H2 606 — — 99.41 37.43 N2 2.21 274.5 316.0 0.59 62.57 - Besides H2 purification, the membrane can also be applied to NOx removal from fuel gas. A single-component permeation measurement was also performed in which NO/NO2 selectivity was measured to be 9.3 cm3(STP)/cm2/s/cmHg and NO permeance reached 3×10−5 cm3(STP)/cm2/s/cmHg.
- 3.B.—Comparison of the Ultramicroporous Silica Membrane
- A dual-layer supported membrane as prepared in 3.A. was further compared to prior art molecular sieving methods and devices. Operating at 26° C., a moderate pressure gradient (ΔP=5.5 bar), and high feed flow rate (˜500 cm3 (STP)/min), a high CO2 permeance of about 3.2×10−4 cm3(STP)/s /cm2/cmHg and a high CO2/CH4 separation factor of over 200 was achieved for the separation of 50/50 (v/v) CO2/CH4 gas mixture, as shown in FIG. 9. Still referring to FIG. 9, the A2** membrane as prepared in 1.C.2. without further calcination, results in a combination of high permeance and high selectivity which is superior to prior art separation membranes. The A2** membrane as prepared in 3.A. with further calcination results in a higher CO2/CH4 separation factor (˜600) at the expense of CO2 permeance. The comparisons are made under the assumption that the best membrane performance was reported under their optimal operation conditions for each membrane.
- EXAMPLE 4
- Permeance And CO2CH4 Separation Factor As Function Of Feed Flow Rate, Temperature And Pressure Gradient
- The effect of temperature, flow rate and pressure gradient across the membrane on both CO2 permeance and CO2/CH4 separation factor was investigated via mixed-gas permeation experiments. Mixed-gas permeation experiments representing the true separation were conducted with 50/50 (v/v) CO2/CH4 feed gas under steady-state conditions.
- 4.A.—Feed Flow-Rate Effects
- A 5.5 cm commercial 50 Å γ-Al2O3 membrane tube prepared as described in 1.C. was dip-coated into the surfactant-template sol as described in 1.C.1. utilizing the C6STS sol as prepared in 1.B.1. The C6STS coated membrane was then dip-coated in an A2** sol as described in 1.C.2. The experiment for feed flow-rate effect was operated at a constant temperature of 26° C. and a constant pressure gradient of ΔP=5.5 bar across the membrane. The stage cut θ, defined as the ratio of permeate flow rate to feed flow rate, represents the fraction of feed gas permeated through the membrane (gas recovery ratio). Referring to FIGS. 10A and 10B, it is shown that the stage cut θ decreases with the increase in the feed flow rate. The decrease in the stage cut θ resulted in the increase in the CO2/CH4 separation factor, α(CO2/CH4), as shown in FIG. 10A. Thus, higher purity of CO2 was recovered at the permeate side at the lower stage cut θ. In a high feed flow rate (low stage cut), the concentration of the fast permeating gas, CO2, remained high at retentate, as shown in FIG. 10B. Therefore, a high CO2 driving force across the membrane was maintained. In addition, CO2 is allowed to pass through pores with little chance of being blocked by the larger CH4 molecules. Alternatively, the CH4 driving force across the membrane increases with the decrease in feed flow rate, resulting in a lower α(CO2/CH4). High α(CO2/CH4) can be obtained at high feed flow rates but at the expense of both low gas recovery ratio and pumping energy. The maximum α(CO2/CH4) at a fixed temperature and pressure in the tubular membrane can be achieved when the retentate compositions are equivalent to the feed compositions. Moreover, due to selective adsorption of CO2 at lower temperatures, the mixed-gas α(CO2/CH4) is higher than the single-component separation factor, α1(CO2/CH4), under identical operating conditions. The selectively adsorbed CO2 would either cover the pore entrance or further reduce the size of the pore opening, depending on the size of pores, thus preventing CH4 from permeating through the pores.
- 4.B.—Temperature Effects
- A dual-layer membrane as prepared in 4.A. was subjected to a constant feed flow-rate represented by a stage-cut of 9% and a constant pressure gradient of ΔP=5.5bar across the membrane while the temperature was varied from 26° C. to 120° C. The value of the CO2 permeance and the separation factor, α(CO2/CH4), are inversely related as the temperature increases. FIG. 6 shows that the α(CO2/CH4) decreases with the increase in temperature, while the CO2 permeance increases slightly with the increase in temperature. The abrupt increase in the α(CO2/CH4) at lower temperatures was due to the combined effects of activated transport and CO2 selective adsorption where the capability of CO2 adsorption on to silica surfaces diminishes at higher temperature. Due to the CO2 selective adsorption effect, the α(CO2/CH4) for mixed gas at lower temperature is higher than the CO2 separation factor for a single-component gas, α1(CO2/CH4). The difference between α(CO2/CH4) and α1(CO2/CH4) vanishes at higher temperatures as can be seen in comparing FIG. 5A to FIG. 6.
- 4.C.—The Effects Of Pressure
- The effects of pressure on CO2 permeance through a dual-layer membrane was determined. The membrane, as prepared in 4.A., was subjected to a constant feed flow-rate, represented by a stage-cut of 9%, and a constant temperature of 26° C. The retentate pressure was varied while permeate pressure was kept at ambient atmospheric pressure. Referring to FIG. 11 it can be seen that the α(CO2/CH4) is essentially independent of the pressure gradient while the CO2 permeance slightly increases with pressure gradient and then levels off at a higher pressure gradient. The increase in CO2 permeance at the lower pressure gradient is indicative of the startup of CO2 adsorption inside the pores. Once the CO2 is adsorbed on the pore walls, the CO2 permeance obeys Henry adsorption characteristics such that the CO2 permeance is independent of the pressure gradient across the membrane.
- 4.D.—Effects of Continuous Operation
- A membrane, as prepared in 4.A., was continuously operated for 150 hours at a constant temperature, pressure gradient, and feed flow rate conditions. Referring to FIG. 12, the CO2 permeance and separation factor, α(CO2/CH4), gradually increase with time. This is due to a gradual removal of adsorbed pore fluid by an extensive gas permeation. Nevertheless, stable and continuous operation is achieved at a temperature of 26° C.
- The foregoing description of a specific embodiment of the present invention is presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed; obviously many modifications and variations are possible in view of the above teachings. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical applications, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the following claims and their equivalents.
Claims (42)
1. An inorganic microporous supported membrane, comprising:
a macroporous support;
a templated porous intermediate layer coating the support; and
a microporous layer coating the templated porous intermediate layer such that the microporous layer is capable of molecular sieving.
2. The inorganic microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 1 , wherein:
the templated porous intermediate layer is an inorganic surfactant-templated silica layer; and
the microporous layer is an inorganic silica layer.
3. The inorganic microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 2 , wherein:
the surfactant-templated porous intermediate layer having an average pore size of less than about 20 Å; and
the microporous layer having an average pore size of less than about 5 Å.
4. The inorganic microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 1 , wherein:
the templated porous intermediate layer including an amphiphilic block copolymer.
5. An inorganic microporous supported membrane, comprising:
a porous substrate;
a first inorganic porous membrane coating the substrate having an average pore size of less than about 25 Å; and
a second inorganic porous membrane coating the first inorganic membrane having an average pore size of less than about 6 Å.
6. The inorganic microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 5 , wherein:
the first inorganic porous membrane has a pore diameter in a range of about 10 to 20 Å.
7. The inorganic microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 6 , wherein:
the first inorganic porous membrane includes a surfactant-templated material.
8. The inorganic microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 7 , wherein:
the surfactant-templated material is prepared from silica polymers and a surfactant powder.
9. The inorganic microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 5 , wherein:
the second inorganic porous membrane is an inorganic silica membrane.
10. The inorganic microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 5 , wherein:
the first inorganic porous membrane has a thickness of less than about 100 Å.
11. The inorganic microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 5 , wherein:
the second inorganic porous membrane has an average pore size of between 2 and 5 Å.
12. The inorganic microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 5 , wherein:
the second inorganic porous membrane has an average pore size of between 3 and 4 Å.
13. The inorganic microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 5 , wherein:
the second inorganic porous membrane has a thickness less than about 100 nm.
14. The inorganic microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 5 , wherein the porous substrate is an alumina substrate.
15. The inorganic microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 6 , wherein:
the porous substrate has an average pore diameter ranging between 30 to 60 Å.
16. A method for producing an inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membrane capable of molecular sieving, the method comprising:
contacting a porous substrate with a surfactant-template polymeric sol resulting in a surfactant sol coated membrane support;
drying the surfactant sol coated membrane support producing a surfactant-templated polymeric coated substrate;
calcining the surfactant-templated polymeric coated substrate to produce an intermediate layer surfactant membrane;
contacting the intermediate layer surfactant templated membrane with a second polymeric sol producing a polymeric sol coated substrate; and
drying the polymeric sol coated substrate producing an inorganic polymeric coated substrate;
calcining the inorganic polymeric coated substrate producing the inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membrane.
17. The method for producing the inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 16 , wherein:
the step of calcining the inorganic polymeric coated substrate includes:
calcining the inorganic polymeric coated substrate at a first temperature producing a dual-layered supported membrane;
further calcining the dual-layered supported membrane at a second temperature to produce the inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membrane.
18. The method for producing the inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 17 , wherein:
the step of calcining the inorganic polymeric coated substrate includes calcining under a vacuum.
19. The method for producing the inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 18 , wherein:
the step of calcining the inorganic polymeric coated substrate includes calcining under a vacuum of less than about 6 pounds per square inch absolute (psia).
20. The method for producing the inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 18 , wherein:
the step of calcining the inorganic polymeric coated substrate includes calcining under a vacuum of less than about 4 psia.
21. The method for producing the inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 17 , wherein:
the step of calcining the inorganic polymeric coated substrate includes calcining at a temperature ranging from 200 to 400° C.
22. The method for producing the inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 21 , wherein:
the step of calcining the inorganic polymeric coated substrate includes calcining at a temperature ranging from 250 to 350° C.
23. The method for producing the inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 17 , wherein:
the step of calcining the dual-layered inorganic supported membrane includes calcining at a temperature ranging from 300 to 600° C.
24. The method for producing the inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 23 , wherein:
the step of calcining the dual-layered inorganic supported membrane includes calcining at a temperature ranging from 400 to 500° C.
25. The method for producing the inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 24 , wherein:
the step of calcining the dual-layered inorganic supported membrane includes calcining for between about 30 to 90 minutes.
26. The method for producing the inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 16 , wherein:
the step of calcining the inorganic polymeric coated substrate includes calcining under a vacuum.
27. The method for producing the inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 26 , wherein:
the step of calcining the inorganic polymeric coated substrate includes calcining under a vacuum of less than about 6 pounds per square inch absolute (psia).
28. The method for producing the inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 27 , wherein:
the step of calcining the inorganic polymeric coated substrate includes calcining under a vacuum of less than about 4 pounds per square inch absolute (psia).
29. The method for producing the inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 16 , wherein:
the step of heating the surfactant-template membrane substrate includes heating at a temperature between 500 to 600° C.
30. The method for producing the inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 29 , wherein:
the step of heating the surfactant-template membrane substrate includes heating for between about 30 to 90 minutes.
31. The method for producing the inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 16 , wherein:
the step of calcining the surfactant-templated polymeric coated substrate includes calcining at a temperature between 100-150° C.
32. The method for producing the inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 16 , wherein:
the surfactant-template polymeric sol comprises silica polymers.
33. The method for producing the inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 16 , wherein:
the second polymeric sol comprises silica polymers.
34. The method for producing the inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 16 , wherein:
the surfactant-template polymeric sol is prepared and deposited under conditions of low condensation rate; and
the second polymeric sol is prepared and deposited under a condition of low condensation rate.
35. The method for producing an inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 16 , wherein the method is performed under Class 100 clean room conditions.
36. The method for producing an inorganic dual-layered microporous supported membrane as claimed in claim 16 , wherein the step of drying the surfactant sol coated membrane support is performed under conditions of low relative pressure of the liquid constituents.
37. A method for producing a supported membrane capable of molecular sieving, comprising:
preventing a subsequently deposited top microporous sol from penetrating further into the support including:
modifying a surface of the support; and
depositing the top microporous membrane on a modified support producing the supported membrane capable of molecular sieving.
38. The method for producing a supported membrane as claimed in claim 37 , wherein:
the step of modifying a surface of the support includes:
depositing an intermediate membrane on the surface.
39. The method for producing a supported membrane as claimed in claim 38 , wherein:
the step of depositing the intermediate membrane includes depositing an inorganic surfactant-templated silica intermediate layer having an average pore size of less than 25 Å.
40. The method for producing a supported membrane as claimed in claim 38 , wherein:
the step of depositing the intermediate membrane includes:
depositing a surfact-template sol onto the support;
drying the surfactant sol coated support;
calcining the dried surfactant sol coated support resulting in a surfactant supported membrane.
41. The method for producing a supported membrane as claimed in claim 38 , wherein:
the step of depositing an intermediate membrane including:
removing the surfactant-template by heating the surfactant supported membrane producing the modified support.
42. The method for producing a supported membrane as claimed in claim 38 , wherein:
the step of depositing the top microporous membrane includes:
depositing an inorganic polymeric sol on the modified support;
drying the polymeric sol coated support resulting in an inorganic polymeric sol coated support;
calcining the inorganic polymeric sol coated support resulting in a dual-layered supported membrane;
further calcining the dual-layered supported membrane resulting in the supported membrane capable of molecular sieving.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/104,551 US20020142172A1 (en) | 1999-06-25 | 2002-03-22 | Inorganic dual-layer microporous supported membranes |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US14114899P | 1999-06-25 | 1999-06-25 | |
US09/602,579 US6536604B1 (en) | 1999-06-25 | 2000-06-22 | Inorganic dual-layer microporous supported membranes |
US10/104,551 US20020142172A1 (en) | 1999-06-25 | 2002-03-22 | Inorganic dual-layer microporous supported membranes |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/602,579 Division US6536604B1 (en) | 1999-06-25 | 2000-06-22 | Inorganic dual-layer microporous supported membranes |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20020142172A1 true US20020142172A1 (en) | 2002-10-03 |
Family
ID=26838833
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/602,579 Expired - Lifetime US6536604B1 (en) | 1999-06-25 | 2000-06-22 | Inorganic dual-layer microporous supported membranes |
US10/104,551 Abandoned US20020142172A1 (en) | 1999-06-25 | 2002-03-22 | Inorganic dual-layer microporous supported membranes |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/602,579 Expired - Lifetime US6536604B1 (en) | 1999-06-25 | 2000-06-22 | Inorganic dual-layer microporous supported membranes |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US6536604B1 (en) |
Cited By (32)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20040087443A1 (en) * | 2002-10-30 | 2004-05-06 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Support for an exhaust gas purification catalyst and production method |
US20070026190A1 (en) * | 2003-03-31 | 2007-02-01 | Tatsuo Baba | Base for honeycomb filter, method for producing same and honeycomb filter |
US20070068382A1 (en) * | 2005-09-28 | 2007-03-29 | General Electric Company | Functionalized inorganic membranes for gas separation |
US20070072949A1 (en) * | 2005-09-28 | 2007-03-29 | General Electric Company | Methods and apparatus for hydrogen gas production |
US20070209506A1 (en) * | 2006-03-10 | 2007-09-13 | Chunqing Liu | Flexible Template-Directed Microporous Partially Pyrolyzed Polymeric Membranes |
EP2083941A1 (en) * | 2006-10-18 | 2009-08-05 | NGK Insulators, Ltd. | Ceramic porous membrane and ceramic filter |
CN102142348A (en) * | 2011-02-18 | 2011-08-03 | 南京大学 | Supporting membrane of transmission electron microscope sample and manufacturing method for transmission electron microscope sample |
EP2356260A2 (en) * | 2008-10-30 | 2011-08-17 | Cerahelix, Inc. | Structure for molecular separations |
EP2409756A1 (en) * | 2010-07-22 | 2012-01-25 | NGK Insulators, Ltd. | Silica membrane and method for manufacturing the same |
NL2009306C2 (en) * | 2012-08-09 | 2014-02-11 | Stichting Energie | Membranes for dewatering acid mixtures. |
US20140252276A1 (en) * | 2011-09-27 | 2014-09-11 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | System and method for syngas clean-up |
US8900344B2 (en) | 2010-03-22 | 2014-12-02 | T3 Scientific Llc | Hydrogen selective protective coating, coated article and method |
US20150151242A1 (en) * | 2012-07-03 | 2015-06-04 | Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd. | Helium gas separator material and method for producing the same |
US20150196872A1 (en) * | 2006-08-08 | 2015-07-16 | Sandia Corporation | Preparation of asymmetric porous materials |
WO2015141576A1 (en) * | 2014-03-18 | 2015-09-24 | 東洋ゴム工業株式会社 | Separation membrane for treating acidic gas-containing gas, and method for manufacturing separation membrane for treating acidic gas-containing gas |
JP5897334B2 (en) * | 2010-03-24 | 2016-03-30 | 日本碍子株式会社 | Method for producing silica film |
EP2083940B1 (en) * | 2006-10-18 | 2016-12-14 | NGK Insulators, Ltd. | Ceramic porous membrane and ceramic filter |
US9920268B2 (en) | 2010-11-05 | 2018-03-20 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Solids circulation system and method for capture and conversion of reactive solids having fluidized bed containing hollow engineered particles |
US10099200B1 (en) | 2017-10-24 | 2018-10-16 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Liquid fuel production system having parallel product gas generation |
US10215401B2 (en) | 2017-07-10 | 2019-02-26 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Pulse combustion heat exchanger system and method |
US10222060B2 (en) | 2016-02-16 | 2019-03-05 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Two-stage energy-integrated product gas generation system and method |
CN109521058A (en) * | 2018-11-05 | 2019-03-26 | 广州大学 | A kind of meshed nano resistance and preparation method thereof |
US10287519B2 (en) | 2016-03-25 | 2019-05-14 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Three-stage energy-integrated product gas generation system |
US10525417B2 (en) * | 2018-01-04 | 2020-01-07 | University Of Washington | Nanoporous ceramic membranes, membrane structures, and related methods |
US10605705B2 (en) | 2012-04-25 | 2020-03-31 | National Technology & Engineering Solutions Of Sandia, Llc | Cell-based composite materials with programmed structures and functions |
CN112642306A (en) * | 2020-12-01 | 2021-04-13 | 安徽鸿昌糖业科技有限公司 | Ultrafiltration membrane for purification of stevia rebaudiana and preparation method thereof |
CN112999890A (en) * | 2021-03-03 | 2021-06-22 | 大连理工大学 | Organic-inorganic hybrid SiO of flat plate2Composite membrane and preparation method and application thereof |
WO2021230820A1 (en) * | 2020-05-12 | 2021-11-18 | Agency For Science, Technology And Research | Ceramic membrane technology for molecule-range separation |
WO2022115438A1 (en) * | 2020-11-25 | 2022-06-02 | Mott Corporation | Engineered coating for filters and methods of manufacture thereof |
US11370982B2 (en) | 2016-08-30 | 2022-06-28 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Method of producing liquid fuel from carbonaceous feedstock through gasification and recycling of downstream products |
US11466223B2 (en) | 2020-09-04 | 2022-10-11 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Two-stage syngas production with separate char and product gas inputs into the second stage |
US11555157B2 (en) | 2020-03-10 | 2023-01-17 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | System and method for liquid fuel production from carbonaceous materials using recycled conditioned syngas |
Families Citing this family (25)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
AUPQ811300A0 (en) * | 2000-06-09 | 2000-07-06 | University Of Queensland, The | Improved silica membrane and process of production therefor |
MXPA04002508A (en) * | 2001-09-17 | 2004-05-31 | Ngk Insulators Ltd | Method for preparing ddr type zeolite film, ddr type zeolite film, and composite ddr type zeolite film, and method for preparation thereof. |
SE523260C2 (en) * | 2002-02-27 | 2004-04-06 | Volvo Teknisk Utveckling Ab | Hydrogen fuel generation system for a fuel cell |
US7109140B2 (en) * | 2002-04-10 | 2006-09-19 | Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. | Mixed matrix membranes |
US20070022877A1 (en) * | 2002-04-10 | 2007-02-01 | Eva Marand | Ordered mesopore silica mixed matrix membranes, and production methods for making ordered mesopore silica mixed matric membranes |
JP4171978B2 (en) * | 2002-05-27 | 2008-10-29 | ソニー株式会社 | Fuel reformer and manufacturing method thereof, electrode for electrochemical device, and electrochemical device |
JP3869318B2 (en) * | 2002-06-17 | 2007-01-17 | ダイムラークライスラー・アクチェンゲゼルシャフト | Proton conductive thin film and method for producing the same |
US20040124092A1 (en) * | 2002-12-30 | 2004-07-01 | Black Charles T. | Inorganic nanoporous membranes and methods to form same |
US7045851B2 (en) * | 2003-06-20 | 2006-05-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Nonvolatile memory device using semiconductor nanocrystals and method of forming same |
US7531209B2 (en) * | 2005-02-24 | 2009-05-12 | Michael Raymond Ayers | Porous films and bodies with enhanced mechanical strength |
WO2006119252A2 (en) * | 2005-04-29 | 2006-11-09 | University Of Rochester | Ultrathin nanoscale membranes, methods of making, and uses thereof |
US7717271B2 (en) * | 2005-12-07 | 2010-05-18 | General Electric Company | Membrane structure and method of making |
US20070131609A1 (en) * | 2005-12-08 | 2007-06-14 | General Electric Company | Membrane structure and method of making |
US20080011160A1 (en) * | 2006-07-17 | 2008-01-17 | General Electric Company | Carbon dioxide capture systems and methods |
US20080011161A1 (en) * | 2006-07-17 | 2008-01-17 | General Electric Company | Carbon dioxide capture systems and methods |
US8431509B2 (en) | 2007-10-30 | 2013-04-30 | Cerahelix, Inc. | Structure for molecular separations |
US20090107330A1 (en) * | 2007-10-30 | 2009-04-30 | Yunfeng Gu | Amorphous silica hybrid membrane structure |
US8709545B2 (en) * | 2009-01-30 | 2014-04-29 | The Boeing Company | Hybrid coatings and associated methods of application |
US8685755B2 (en) * | 2009-07-20 | 2014-04-01 | The Board Of Regents Of The University Of Texas System | Combinatorial multidomain mesoporous chips and a method for fractionation, stabilization, and storage of biomolecules |
US9486742B1 (en) | 2010-10-05 | 2016-11-08 | Sandia Corporation | Biomimetic membranes and methods of making biomimetic membranes |
WO2014156579A1 (en) * | 2013-03-28 | 2014-10-02 | 日本碍子株式会社 | Ceramic separation membrane structure and method for producing same |
US20150258502A1 (en) * | 2014-03-12 | 2015-09-17 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Coating of a porous substrate for disposition of graphene and other two-dimensional materials thereon |
US10538632B1 (en) | 2016-09-30 | 2020-01-21 | National Technology & Engineering Solutions Of Sandia, Llc | Shape-preserving polymeric replication of biological matter |
CN108033554B (en) * | 2017-10-11 | 2021-09-07 | 南京元凯生物能源环保工程有限公司 | High-efficiency microporous aerator |
WO2022026968A1 (en) * | 2020-07-29 | 2022-02-03 | Aspen Products Group, Inc. | Separation membrane and methods of preparation thereof |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5858457A (en) * | 1997-09-25 | 1999-01-12 | Sandia Corporation | Process to form mesostructured films |
US5922299A (en) * | 1996-11-26 | 1999-07-13 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Mesoporous-silica films, fibers, and powders by evaporation |
US6270846B1 (en) * | 2000-03-02 | 2001-08-07 | Sandia Corporation | Method for making surfactant-templated, high-porosity thin films |
US6309545B1 (en) * | 1997-09-20 | 2001-10-30 | Creavis Gesellschaft Fuer Technologie Und Innovation Mbh | Permeable composite material, method for producing said composite material, and use of the same |
US6329017B1 (en) * | 1998-12-23 | 2001-12-11 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Mesoporous silica film from a solution containing a surfactant and methods of making same |
US6535604B1 (en) * | 1998-09-04 | 2003-03-18 | Nortel Networks Limited | Voice-switching device and method for multiple receivers |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4778499A (en) | 1984-12-24 | 1988-10-18 | Ppg Industries, Inc. | Method of producing porous hollow silica-rich fibers |
JPH0739457B2 (en) * | 1986-05-14 | 1995-05-01 | タキロン株式会社 | Amphiphilic segment polyurethane |
US5772735A (en) | 1995-11-02 | 1998-06-30 | University Of New Mexico | Supported inorganic membranes |
US6037292A (en) * | 1998-07-02 | 2000-03-14 | Exxon Research And Engineering Co. | Compositions having two or more zeolite layers |
-
2000
- 2000-06-22 US US09/602,579 patent/US6536604B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2002
- 2002-03-22 US US10/104,551 patent/US20020142172A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5922299A (en) * | 1996-11-26 | 1999-07-13 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Mesoporous-silica films, fibers, and powders by evaporation |
US6309545B1 (en) * | 1997-09-20 | 2001-10-30 | Creavis Gesellschaft Fuer Technologie Und Innovation Mbh | Permeable composite material, method for producing said composite material, and use of the same |
US6340379B1 (en) * | 1997-09-20 | 2002-01-22 | Creavis Gesellschaft Fuer Technologie Und Innovation Mbh | Gas filter, method for producing a gas filter and use of said gas filter |
US5858457A (en) * | 1997-09-25 | 1999-01-12 | Sandia Corporation | Process to form mesostructured films |
US6535604B1 (en) * | 1998-09-04 | 2003-03-18 | Nortel Networks Limited | Voice-switching device and method for multiple receivers |
US6329017B1 (en) * | 1998-12-23 | 2001-12-11 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Mesoporous silica film from a solution containing a surfactant and methods of making same |
US6270846B1 (en) * | 2000-03-02 | 2001-08-07 | Sandia Corporation | Method for making surfactant-templated, high-porosity thin films |
Cited By (75)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20080220163A1 (en) * | 2002-10-30 | 2008-09-11 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Supporting for an exhaust gas purification catalyst and production method |
US20040087443A1 (en) * | 2002-10-30 | 2004-05-06 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Support for an exhaust gas purification catalyst and production method |
US20070026190A1 (en) * | 2003-03-31 | 2007-02-01 | Tatsuo Baba | Base for honeycomb filter, method for producing same and honeycomb filter |
US20070068382A1 (en) * | 2005-09-28 | 2007-03-29 | General Electric Company | Functionalized inorganic membranes for gas separation |
US20070072949A1 (en) * | 2005-09-28 | 2007-03-29 | General Electric Company | Methods and apparatus for hydrogen gas production |
WO2007037933A2 (en) * | 2005-09-28 | 2007-04-05 | General Electric Company | Functionalized inorganic membranes for gas separation |
WO2007037933A3 (en) * | 2005-09-28 | 2007-07-19 | Gen Electric | Functionalized inorganic membranes for gas separation |
US7396382B2 (en) | 2005-09-28 | 2008-07-08 | General Electric Company | Functionalized inorganic membranes for gas separation |
US8083833B2 (en) * | 2006-03-10 | 2011-12-27 | Uop Llc | Flexible template-directed microporous partially pyrolyzed polymeric membranes |
US20070209506A1 (en) * | 2006-03-10 | 2007-09-13 | Chunqing Liu | Flexible Template-Directed Microporous Partially Pyrolyzed Polymeric Membranes |
US10610822B2 (en) * | 2006-08-08 | 2020-04-07 | National Technology & Engineering Solutions Of Sandia, Llc | Preparation of asymmetric porous materials |
US20150196872A1 (en) * | 2006-08-08 | 2015-07-16 | Sandia Corporation | Preparation of asymmetric porous materials |
EP2083940B1 (en) * | 2006-10-18 | 2016-12-14 | NGK Insulators, Ltd. | Ceramic porous membrane and ceramic filter |
US9149771B2 (en) | 2006-10-18 | 2015-10-06 | Ngk Insulators, Ltd. | Ceramic porous membrane and ceramic filter |
EP2083941A1 (en) * | 2006-10-18 | 2009-08-05 | NGK Insulators, Ltd. | Ceramic porous membrane and ceramic filter |
EP2356260A4 (en) * | 2008-10-30 | 2015-01-28 | Cerahelix Inc | Structure for molecular separations |
EP2356260A2 (en) * | 2008-10-30 | 2011-08-17 | Cerahelix, Inc. | Structure for molecular separations |
US8900344B2 (en) | 2010-03-22 | 2014-12-02 | T3 Scientific Llc | Hydrogen selective protective coating, coated article and method |
JP5897334B2 (en) * | 2010-03-24 | 2016-03-30 | 日本碍子株式会社 | Method for producing silica film |
US9403130B2 (en) | 2010-03-24 | 2016-08-02 | Ngk Insulators, Ltd. | Method of manufacturing silica membrane |
US20120018370A1 (en) * | 2010-07-22 | 2012-01-26 | Ngk Insulators, Ltd. | Silica membrane and method for manufacturing the same |
US9108166B2 (en) * | 2010-07-22 | 2015-08-18 | Ngk Insulators, Ltd. | Silica membrane and method for manufacturing the same |
JP2012040549A (en) * | 2010-07-22 | 2012-03-01 | Ngk Insulators Ltd | Silica membrane and method for manufacturing the same |
EP2409756A1 (en) * | 2010-07-22 | 2012-01-25 | NGK Insulators, Ltd. | Silica membrane and method for manufacturing the same |
US9920268B2 (en) | 2010-11-05 | 2018-03-20 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Solids circulation system and method for capture and conversion of reactive solids having fluidized bed containing hollow engineered particles |
US9920267B2 (en) | 2010-11-05 | 2018-03-20 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Solids circulation system and method for capture and conversion of reactive solids with fluidized bed temperature control |
US10815440B2 (en) | 2010-11-05 | 2020-10-27 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Systems and methods for producing syngas from a solid carbon-containing substance using a reactor having hollow engineered particles |
CN102142348A (en) * | 2011-02-18 | 2011-08-03 | 南京大学 | Supporting membrane of transmission electron microscope sample and manufacturing method for transmission electron microscope sample |
US9783417B2 (en) | 2011-09-27 | 2017-10-10 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | System for syngas clean-up |
US9580315B2 (en) * | 2011-09-27 | 2017-02-28 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Method for syngas clean-up of semi-volatile organic compounds |
US11760631B2 (en) | 2011-09-27 | 2023-09-19 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Method of producing a cooled syngas of improved quality |
US11186483B2 (en) | 2011-09-27 | 2021-11-30 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Method of producing sulfur-depleted syngas |
US10800655B2 (en) | 2011-09-27 | 2020-10-13 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Conditioned syngas composition, method of making same and method of processing same to produce fuels and/or fischer-tropsch products |
US9499404B2 (en) * | 2011-09-27 | 2016-11-22 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | System and method for syngas clean-up |
US10011483B2 (en) | 2011-09-27 | 2018-07-03 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Method for syngas clean-up of semi-volatile organic compounds with carbonyl sulfide removal |
US10011482B2 (en) | 2011-09-27 | 2018-07-03 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Method for syngas clean-up of semi-volatile organic compounds with metal removal |
US10280081B2 (en) | 2011-09-27 | 2019-05-07 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Unconditioned syngas composition and method of cleaning up same for fischer-tropsch processing |
US10214418B2 (en) | 2011-09-27 | 2019-02-26 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Method for converting biomass into fischer-tropsch products with carbon dioxide recycling |
US10065858B2 (en) | 2011-09-27 | 2018-09-04 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Method for syngas clean-up of semi-volatile organic compounds with solids removal |
US9845240B2 (en) | 2011-09-27 | 2017-12-19 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | System for syngas clean-up of semi-volatile organic compounds |
US20160068392A1 (en) * | 2011-09-27 | 2016-03-10 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Method for Syngas Clean-Up of Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds |
US20140252276A1 (en) * | 2011-09-27 | 2014-09-11 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | System and method for syngas clean-up |
US10605705B2 (en) | 2012-04-25 | 2020-03-31 | National Technology & Engineering Solutions Of Sandia, Llc | Cell-based composite materials with programmed structures and functions |
US20150151242A1 (en) * | 2012-07-03 | 2015-06-04 | Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd. | Helium gas separator material and method for producing the same |
US9486734B2 (en) * | 2012-07-03 | 2016-11-08 | Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd. | Helium gas separator material and method for producing the same |
JP2015531674A (en) * | 2012-08-09 | 2015-11-05 | シュティヒティン・エネルギーオンデルツォイク・セントラム・ネーデルランド | Membrane for dehydrating acid mixtures |
CN104703680A (en) * | 2012-08-09 | 2015-06-10 | 荷兰能源建设基金中心 | Membranes for dewatering acid mixtures |
US10232323B2 (en) | 2012-08-09 | 2019-03-19 | Stichting Energieonderzoek Centrum Nederland | Membranes for dewatering acid mixtures |
NL2009306C2 (en) * | 2012-08-09 | 2014-02-11 | Stichting Energie | Membranes for dewatering acid mixtures. |
WO2014025259A1 (en) | 2012-08-09 | 2014-02-13 | Stichting Energieonderzoek Centrum Nederland | Membranes for dewatering acid mixtures |
WO2015141576A1 (en) * | 2014-03-18 | 2015-09-24 | 東洋ゴム工業株式会社 | Separation membrane for treating acidic gas-containing gas, and method for manufacturing separation membrane for treating acidic gas-containing gas |
JPWO2015141576A1 (en) * | 2014-03-18 | 2017-04-06 | 東洋ゴム工業株式会社 | Separation membrane for gas treatment containing acid gas and method for producing separation membrane for gas treatment containing acid gas |
CN106102886A (en) * | 2014-03-18 | 2016-11-09 | 东洋橡胶工业株式会社 | Processing by the gas treatment manufacture method separating film separating film and contain sour gas of gas containing sour gas |
EP3120921A4 (en) * | 2014-03-18 | 2017-11-29 | Toyo Tire & Rubber Co., Ltd. | Separation membrane for treating acidic gas-containing gas, and method for manufacturing separation membrane for treating acidic gas-containing gas |
US11242988B2 (en) | 2016-02-16 | 2022-02-08 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Two-stage energy-integrated product gas generation system and method |
US10222060B2 (en) | 2016-02-16 | 2019-03-05 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Two-stage energy-integrated product gas generation system and method |
US10766059B2 (en) | 2016-03-25 | 2020-09-08 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | System and method for recovering inert feedstock contaminants from municipal solid waste during gasification |
US10286431B1 (en) | 2016-03-25 | 2019-05-14 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Three-stage energy-integrated product gas generation method |
US10287519B2 (en) | 2016-03-25 | 2019-05-14 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Three-stage energy-integrated product gas generation system |
US10946423B2 (en) | 2016-03-25 | 2021-03-16 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Particulate classification vessel having gas distributor valve for recovering contaminants from bed material |
US11634650B2 (en) | 2016-08-30 | 2023-04-25 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Method of producing liquid fuel from carbonaceous feedstock through gasification and recycling of downstream products |
US11370982B2 (en) | 2016-08-30 | 2022-06-28 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Method of producing liquid fuel from carbonaceous feedstock through gasification and recycling of downstream products |
US10215401B2 (en) | 2017-07-10 | 2019-02-26 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Pulse combustion heat exchanger system and method |
US10350574B2 (en) | 2017-10-24 | 2019-07-16 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Method for producing a product gas having component gas ratio relationships |
US10099200B1 (en) | 2017-10-24 | 2018-10-16 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Liquid fuel production system having parallel product gas generation |
CN111867709A (en) * | 2018-01-04 | 2020-10-30 | 华盛顿大学 | Nano-selective sol-gel ceramic membranes, selective membrane structures, and related methods |
US10525417B2 (en) * | 2018-01-04 | 2020-01-07 | University Of Washington | Nanoporous ceramic membranes, membrane structures, and related methods |
CN109521058A (en) * | 2018-11-05 | 2019-03-26 | 广州大学 | A kind of meshed nano resistance and preparation method thereof |
US11555157B2 (en) | 2020-03-10 | 2023-01-17 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | System and method for liquid fuel production from carbonaceous materials using recycled conditioned syngas |
WO2021230820A1 (en) * | 2020-05-12 | 2021-11-18 | Agency For Science, Technology And Research | Ceramic membrane technology for molecule-range separation |
US11466223B2 (en) | 2020-09-04 | 2022-10-11 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Two-stage syngas production with separate char and product gas inputs into the second stage |
US11760949B2 (en) | 2020-09-04 | 2023-09-19 | Thermochem Recovery International, Inc. | Two-stage syngas production with separate char and product gas inputs into the second stage |
WO2022115438A1 (en) * | 2020-11-25 | 2022-06-02 | Mott Corporation | Engineered coating for filters and methods of manufacture thereof |
CN112642306A (en) * | 2020-12-01 | 2021-04-13 | 安徽鸿昌糖业科技有限公司 | Ultrafiltration membrane for purification of stevia rebaudiana and preparation method thereof |
CN112999890A (en) * | 2021-03-03 | 2021-06-22 | 大连理工大学 | Organic-inorganic hybrid SiO of flat plate2Composite membrane and preparation method and application thereof |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US6536604B1 (en) | 2003-03-25 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6536604B1 (en) | Inorganic dual-layer microporous supported membranes | |
Tsai et al. | Dual-layer asymmetric microporous silica membranes | |
KR101920716B1 (en) | Gas separation membrane and method for preparing the same | |
Nair et al. | Sol-gel synthesis of molecular sieving silica membranes | |
JP6723265B2 (en) | Carbon-containing membranes for water and gas separation | |
US7179325B2 (en) | Hydrogen-selective silica-based membrane | |
Li et al. | Boosting pervaporation performance by promoting organic permeability and simultaneously inhibiting water transport via blending PDMS with COF-300 | |
US6854602B2 (en) | Hydrogen-selective silica-based membrane | |
Kanezashi et al. | Hydrogen permeation characteristics and stability of Ni-doped silica membranes in steam at high temperature | |
Liu et al. | Gas transport properties and propylene/propane separation characteristics of ZIF-8 membranes | |
Castricum et al. | Hydrothermally stable molecular separation membranes from organically linked silica | |
US9216390B2 (en) | Systems, compositions, and methods for fluid purification | |
Fan et al. | Nanodisperse ZIF-8/PDMS hybrid membranes for biobutanol permselective pervaporation | |
US20100304953A1 (en) | Zeolite Membranes for Separation of Mixtures Containing Water, Alcohols, or Organics | |
Karakiliç et al. | Sol-gel processed magnesium-doped silica membranes with improved H2/CO2 separation | |
Su et al. | Metal based gels as versatile precursors to synthesize stiff and integrated MOF/polymer composite membranes | |
Paradis et al. | Amino-functionalized microporous hybrid silica membranes | |
Anisah et al. | Preparation, characterization, and evaluation of TiO2-ZrO2 nanofiltration membranes fired at different temperatures | |
Kanezashi et al. | Experimental and theoretical study on small gas permeation properties through amorphous silica membranes fabricated at different temperatures | |
Zhang et al. | A simple seed-embedded method to prepare ZIF-8 membranes supported on flexible PESf hollow fibers | |
CA2411201C (en) | Improved silica membranes and process of production thereof | |
Naito et al. | Process conditions on the preparation of supported microporous SiO2 membranes by sol-gel modification techniques | |
CN114340764B (en) | Hybrid inorganic oxide-carbon molecular sieve membrane | |
Li et al. | Preparation and characterization of supported dense oxygen permeating membrane of mixed conductor La2NiO4+ δ | |
Wang et al. | Synthesis of size-controlled boehmite sols: Application in high-performance hydrogen-selective ceramic membranes |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO PAY ISSUE FEE |