EP0589897B1 - Method of making membranes - Google Patents

Method of making membranes Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0589897B1
EP0589897B1 EP92908893A EP92908893A EP0589897B1 EP 0589897 B1 EP0589897 B1 EP 0589897B1 EP 92908893 A EP92908893 A EP 92908893A EP 92908893 A EP92908893 A EP 92908893A EP 0589897 B1 EP0589897 B1 EP 0589897B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
membranes
membrane
casting
polymer
solvent
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP92908893A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0589897A4 (en
EP0589897A1 (en
Inventor
Robert F. Zepf
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Pall Filtration and Separations Group Inc
Original Assignee
USF Filtration and Separations Group Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by USF Filtration and Separations Group Inc filed Critical USF Filtration and Separations Group Inc
Priority to EP98121352A priority Critical patent/EP0911074B1/en
Publication of EP0589897A1 publication Critical patent/EP0589897A1/en
Publication of EP0589897A4 publication Critical patent/EP0589897A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0589897B1 publication Critical patent/EP0589897B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D71/00Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by the material; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
    • B01D71/06Organic material
    • B01D71/66Polymers having sulfur in the main chain, with or without nitrogen, oxygen or carbon only
    • B01D71/68Polysulfones; Polyethersulfones
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/22Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by diffusion
    • B01D53/228Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by diffusion characterised by specific membranes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D67/00Processes specially adapted for manufacturing semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus
    • B01D67/0002Organic membrane manufacture
    • B01D67/0009Organic membrane manufacture by phase separation, sol-gel transition, evaporation or solvent quenching
    • B01D67/0011Casting solutions therefor
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D67/00Processes specially adapted for manufacturing semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus
    • B01D67/0002Organic membrane manufacture
    • B01D67/0009Organic membrane manufacture by phase separation, sol-gel transition, evaporation or solvent quenching
    • B01D67/0011Casting solutions therefor
    • B01D67/00113Pretreatment of the casting solutions, e.g. thermal treatment or ageing
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D67/00Processes specially adapted for manufacturing semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus
    • B01D67/0002Organic membrane manufacture
    • B01D67/0009Organic membrane manufacture by phase separation, sol-gel transition, evaporation or solvent quenching
    • B01D67/0013Casting processes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D69/00Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by their form, structure or properties; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
    • B01D69/02Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by their form, structure or properties; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor characterised by their properties
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2325/00Details relating to properties of membranes
    • B01D2325/02Details relating to pores or porosity of the membranes
    • B01D2325/022Asymmetric membranes

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to ultraporous and microporous membranes which are useful in materials separations, by filtration, dialysis, and the like, and as supports and containment media for materials, and related uses.
  • it relates to highly asymmetric, integral membranes with a skin and a porous sub-structure or support region.
  • a wide diversity of polymer membranes are known, and have attained wide applicability in diverse uses. Such membranes are characterized by a variety of properties and characteristics, and the selection of a membranes for a particular use is generally a function of the properties required or desired.
  • Ultraporous membranes are generally those with an effective controlling pore diameter of less than about 0.050 micrometers (or sometimes considered to be less than about 0.025 micrometers), down to as 0.005 micrometers, which is the realm of the size of a molecule of, for example, simple sugars and the like.
  • Microporous membranes are those with effective limiting pore diameters of greater than ultraporous, normally greater than about 0.050 micrometers, up to about 1 micrometer, or occasionally more.
  • pore diameter is employed to represent the span across skin pores or controlling pores of a membrane. It is not intended to suggest that all pores are circular and, indeed, most are not, as those of ordinary skill in the art will understand and as FIG. 2 illustrates.
  • Reverse osmosis membranes extend into the reverse osmosis region and below that into the gas separation region.
  • Reverse osmosis membranes are used for ionic separations, under high applied pressure differentials, sufficient to overcome osmotic pressure, and are sometimes said to be dependent on a mechanism which is often characterized as intermolecular dissolution.
  • Such membranes have a dense, non-porous surface skin, and do not function by effects dependent on sieve-like characteristics.
  • reverse osmosis is, in material part, dependent on the osmolarity of a solution as a determinant of the separatory characteristics of the reverse osmosis operation, while ultraporous and microporous membranes pass or retain materials predominantly on the basis of their size, at applied pressure differential which are commonly far less, often an order of magnitude less, than reverse osmosis operations, and are ordinarily considered to be substantially different in kind.
  • Gas separation membranes operate on a molecular scale and fractionate gas mixtures based on size and absorption/desorption characteristics.
  • porous membranes An important property of porous membranes is their permeability to flow. In the majority of applications, it is commonly desirable to process effectively the greatest volume of a feed material in the least amount of time. All other things being equal, the higher the flow rate of filtrate or related materials through the membrane, the higher the efficiency and economy of the procedure.
  • Membranes may have a skin or may be skinless, i.e., with an isotropic structure from one face to the other. If a cast liquid film of adequate polymer concentration is quenched in a strong non-solvent, as with polysulfone solutions (or dispersions) quenched in water, the result is a "skinned" membrane, i.e., one with considerably smaller pores on the "skin" side than on the opposite side. If the quench liquid is a weak non-solvent, e.g., by adding solvent to the water, a more open skin and ultimately a skinless membrane can be produced.
  • Membranes can have different structures, generally determined by the technique by which a membrane is synthesized. Examples include fibrous, granular, cellular, and spinodal, and they may be symmetrical, or asymmetric, isotropic or anisotropic (i.e., graded pore density).
  • Fibrous microstructure is most commonly associated with biaxial stretching of films of polymers. This is commonly employed, for example, in the production of porous membranes of polytetrafluoroethylene (TEFLON), in the microporous membranes commercially available as GORETEXTM, among others. It is inherent in the nature of the process that the result is a skinless, symmetrical membrane.
  • TEFLON polytetrafluoroethylene
  • GORETEXTM commercially available as GORETEXTM
  • Granular microstructure can be characteristic of membranes formed by the precipitation of polymer from certain formulations by a nucleation and growth mechanism. Globules or granules of precipitated polymer form and grow, and fuse with other such globules at their points of contact, leaving voids in the interstices which contribute the porosity of the granular mass. Such structures frequently contain "macrovoids” or "finger voids” in regions adjacent to skin imperfections which allow the quench liquid to penetrate the interior. The voids consequently are also skinned and lead to reduced membrane permeability. This occurs most commonly in ultraporous and reverse osmosis membranes. The techniques for the formation of such membranes are illustrated by Michaels, U.S. 3,615,024. The granular microstructure and characteristic "maorovoids" are illustrated by the photomicrographs shown in Wang, U.S. 3,988,245.
  • Cellular pore structures which are honeycombed or sponge-like in appearance, are dependent presumably on a precipitation rate that is slower than with granular structures containing macrovoids. They can be skinned or unskinned. The latter structure generally is formed when the precipitation agent is moisture in the air (no liquid quenching during the curing process).
  • a network of thin struts creates the system of contiguous polyhedral shaped cells. Liquid quenched membranes of this type are often associated with a dense or ultraporous skin.
  • Spinodal microstructure occurs when the polymer is precipitated by a spinodal decomposition mechanism, characterized by the formation of two separate liquid phases, one polymer rich and the other polymer poor, under conditions wherein each phase is continuous and dispersed in a characteristic pattern at the point at which the polymer precipitation occurs.
  • the resulting membrane may be, on the one hand, skinless, symmetrical, and uniform throughout, or skinned, asymmetric, and non-isotropic.
  • spinodal structure is intended to mean the characteristic structure attained when a membrane is precipitated by spinodal decomposition, and to reflect the features illustrated in FIG. 1 and, in different scale, FIG. 8 which illustrate, by SEM photomicroscopy the remaining structure when the two, intertangled and intermixed continuous phases of spinodal decomposition are achieved.
  • the spinodal structure represents one of the two continuous phases formed by the precipitated polymer, the other being the void volume within the structure.
  • the skinless symmetrical variety may be formed by thermal quench techniques or by solvent evaporation techniques. Thermal quenching techniques are illustrated by Castro, U.S. 4,247,498.
  • Skinned membranes with a highly asymmetric support structure are shown in Wrasidlo, U.S. 4,629,563, and Wrasidlo, U.S. 4,774,039. These membranes are formed by spinodal decomposition induced by solvent extraction from a cast metastable dispersion of two liquid phases, one polymer rich and the other polymer poor, in a liquid quench bath.
  • the spinodal microstructure has often been preferred in a number of applications.
  • the structure affords good mechanical properties, including tensile strength, elongation at break, and the like, the lowest hydraulic resistance to flow of any of the known microstructures, and offers opportunities to take advantage of the internal structure of the support as a depth filter, as a containment medium for materials, and other like advantages.
  • the skinless, symmetric varieties have rather different uses that the skinned, highly asymmetric membranes of Wrasidlo.
  • Some physical properties including tensile strength and elongation at break, are often lower than desirable, and lower than required for the integrity of some otherwise desirable uses of these membranes.
  • the present invention is intended as, and has as its primary object, an improvement on the process of Wrasidlo, cited above.
  • the present invention provides an improved method for making a highly asymmetric integrally skinned polymer membrane, said method comprising:
  • ultraporous and microporous membranes are produced which are substantially free of polymer spheres entrained in the support, have increased tensile strength and elongation at break, a materially reduced standard deviation in controlling pore diameter, and an increased population of skin pores, resulting in and demonstrated by exceptionally high flow rates in relation to the controlling pore diameter.
  • the present invention is directed to an improved method for making membranes.
  • a characterization of the method for making membranes is described and characterized initially.
  • the major elements which differ from Wrasidlo are found in the limitation of the interaction of the cast dispersion with the atmosphere prior to solvent extraction in a quench bath to less than 0.5 seconds, and preferably less than 0.25 seconds.
  • a casting temperature of the dispersion material is less than those commonly employed in the usual techniques, generally a casting temperature that is on the order of 6 to 14°C (or even more) less than those commonly used in the usual techniques.
  • Other process parameters may be subject to adjustment in relation to these parameters to assure the maintenance of the requisite properties in the membrane produced, but these are generally minor in degree and are reactive to and compensatory for the primary changes in the operating conditions and steps.
  • the lower casting temperature is an important benefit to the process. It has been learned that lower temperatures make the system less variable and less vulnerable to variation in substantially all parameters. AS the temperature gets closer to ambient temperatures, as one example, distortions of the casting equipment through thermal expansion and like effects are reduced, and it has proved simpler and more reliable to maintain working tolerances. This in turn provides better control over the casting and quenching operations, so that quality of the product is easier to establish and maintain. Utility costs of the operation are reduced and, in new installations, simpler temperature control equipment may prove effective.
  • the method of the present invention involves the essential steps of mixing a polymer, a solvent, and a non-solvent to produce a metastable liquid-liquid dispersion consisting of a polymer-rich phase and a solvent-rich (polymer-poor) phase within the binodal or spinodal at a casting temperature, casting the dispersion into a thin film at the casting temperature, passing the cast layer within a time of less than 0.5 seconds at the casting temperature into a solvent extraction quench bath of non-solvent quench liquid in which the solvent is freely miscible and in which the polymer is substantially insoluble, and effecting precipitation of the polymer by spinodal decomposition, and recovering the membrane from the quench bath.
  • MWCO molecular weight cutoff
  • pore diameters 0.1, 0.2 and 0.45 micrometers ( ⁇ m).
  • Table I Membrane BTS-25 BTS-30 BTS-45 BTS-55 BTS-65 Pore Diameter 10K 100K 0.1 ⁇ m 0.2 ⁇ m 0.45 ⁇ m
  • Time to Quench 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Notes:
  • the polysulfone is Amoco Udell P-3500. All proportions are in weight percent.
  • O.D. optical density of the dispersion as measured in the Wrasidlo patents Casting temperature is given in °C.
  • Time to quench is the dwell time in seconds between the doctor blade and the quench bath.
  • the residence time between the casting operation and the quench bath is reduced by one order of magnitude.
  • a reduction in casting temperature on the order of about 10°C is also imposed.
  • the dwell time should be kept below 0.5 seconds, and preferably below 0.25 seconds, and is desirably the minimum that can be achieved with the constraints of the casting equipment employed.
  • the casting dispersion should, as noted in the Tables, have an optical density of from 0.5 to 1, depending on the pore diameter sought; generally, higher optical densities produce higher pore diameters.
  • the casting dispersion is ordinarily cast onto a moving support by means of a doctor blade with a knife gap of typically 250 to 450 micrometers, often about 300 micrometers; after the quench, the membrane produced is typically 85 to 105 micrometers in thickness for ultraporous membranes, and 105 to 145 for microporous membranes.
  • the values may be increased or decreased as desired, as is well known in the art. While as described, the procedure produces flat sheet membrane, the present invention is equally applicable to casting hollow fiber membrane, and will indeed facilitate the dispersion casting operation by reducing or even eliminating the atmospheric exposure time previously thought to be necessary to such procedures.
  • the casting dispersion is spin cast through a hollow die rather than being cast onto a support in a flat film form.
  • the lumen of the hollow fiber is sometimes formed by air or inert gas and the outside quenched in non-solvent liquid, but usually the quench liquid flows through the center and skins the Lumen. If the lumen is formed by a gas, it should be introduced as close to the quench bath as possible.
  • the die may be immersed in the quench bath in some cases, reducing the atmospheric dwell time of the outer surface of the cast membrane to zero. It is possible, of course, to provide a hollow fiber with both inner and outer skins by employing the quench liquid in both the lumen and the quench bath.
  • the cast dispersion is passed into a quench bath, most commonly of water, frequently at or near the casting temperature.
  • the quench operation precipitates the polymer to produce a skin having the requisite pore sizes, and a support region having the characteristic spinodal structure with a high degree of asymmetry, increasing from the region immediately adjacent to the skin to the opposite face.
  • the resulting membrane is ordinarily washed to free it of entrained solvent, and may be dried to expel additional increments of solvent, diluent, and quench liquid, and thus recover the membrane.
  • the casting operation is amenable to a wide variety of known variations, familiar to those of ordinary skill in the art, as discussed by Wrasidlo and others in the prior art. So long as the criteria defined for the present invention are met, none of these are excluded.
  • the resulting membrane produced by the process of the present invention shares a number of characteristics in common with those taught by Wrasidlo and used in commerce in the practice of his technology. There are substantial differences which are attained, however.
  • the membrane is produced substantially free of the artifacts of discontinuous dispersion in the casting medium.
  • negligible numbers of polymer spheres have been observed in membranes cast by the method of the present invention. Compare the membrane of the present invention shown in FIG 8 with FIG. 7, showing the prior art problem, which is now largely resolved. The requirement for the removal of such materials as a part of the membrane wash operations is now eliminated or greatly reduced, reducing the time of the wash, the amount of water or other wash constituents is reduced substantially, and production of finished product are simplified.
  • pore diameter of the skin pores is far more consistent, as shown by bubble point testing.
  • Testing of membranes of the present invention shows that the bubble points desired are achieved far more readily and consistently at all points in the casting operation, from start-up to conclusion, with markedly reduced standard deviation in pore diameter for all pore sizes.
  • Pore diameter is the primary quality control parameter in such membranes, and bubble point is the convenient parameter for defining microporous membrane integrity, the ultimate criteria being bacterial or microsphere challenge tests.
  • Another feature of the membranes made by the method of the present invention is the material increase in flow rates for a given controlling pore size. While the relationships and physical features of the membrane made by the method of the present invention which determine flow rates have not been fully explored as yet, the data show a substantial increase in flow rate as a function of pore diameter (or pore radius, as discussed in Wrasidlo). The data suggest an increase in the total number of pores produced in the membrane skin, and possibly a narrower distribution of pore diameter, with few pores having a diameter materially less than the controlling pore diameter as determined by bubble point measurements. See FIG. 2.
  • FIG. 3 demonstrates flow rate plotted against pore diameter, for the membranes of the examples provided in the present application, including the comparative examples. It is apparent that at a given pore diameter, the flow rate is materially increased in the present invention, when compared to the historical values achieved by the Wrasidlo teachings.
  • the flow rates are less susceptible to variation during manufacture of the membrane, as reflected by a standard deviation in flow rate of normally about 120 or less, more often about 100 or less, and less than 75 except for the largest pore diameters.
  • This improved consistency at the higher flow rates is indicative of a material change in the utility of these membranes for the user, and enables the present invention to assure higher levels of quality assurance to users, particularly those with critical applications for such membranes.
  • covariance of flow rates of the membranes made by the new procedures of the present invention are less than 6, and for most pore diameters, less than 5.
  • FIG. 6 also demonstrates that flow rate covariance of membranes made by the Wrasidlo procedure has historically been greater than 12.5. Standard deviations are materially reduced as well,
  • the consistency achieved in the present invention is a per se benefit in the production and use of the membranes made by the method of the present invention, and represents a very substantial gain in productivity and the reduction of scrap or out-of specification materials.
  • the occurrence of scrap has been reduced to a level consistently less than 5% of production, and long production runs with no losses to scrap are now frequently attained.
  • the improved consistency is also of compelling import to the integrity of the membrane offered to users.
  • the improved consistency in pore diameter and in flow rate are accompanied by a material increase in the flow rate for each pore diameter, ranging from an increase in flow rate of from 110 ml/min. at a bubble point of about 65, up to about 500 ml/min. at a bubble point of about 30, representing a gain in flow rate of 10 to 20 percent at a given pore diameter.
  • FIG. 1 A photomicrograph showing the characteristics spinodal structure of the membranes made by the method of the present invention is shown in FIG. 1.
  • the structure is that produced by spinodal decomposition of the metastable dispersion in the membrane casting operation, and the figure illustrates the significant asymmetry which makes such membranes highly effective as depth filters, affording the gradual change in the apertures through the support region such that the changing effective pore diameter is progressive.
  • the skin of the membrane is quite thin, and difficult to delineate precisely by photomicroscopy in cross section. Where skin pores are directly observable, as shown in FIG. 2, the number of pores and their general regularity is directly observable.
  • the formulations employed are those set forth in Table I and Table II, above.
  • the conditions of casting are also those set forth in the tables.
  • Both the examples of the present invention and those based on the Wrasidlo teachings were performed on the same equipment, and under the same conditions; the only differences are those set forth in the above Tables.
  • no adjustments of the formulations to achieve specifically targeted pore diameters were made in most cases, with the results that some of the bubble point values are higher than desired. Further adjustments to achieve the desired bubble point, reflecting a specifically required pore diameter are known to the art, and are specifically taught by Wrasidlo.
  • each Example represents a roll of membrane, made as described above, bubble point is reported as the arithmetic mean of all quality control samples taken for each roll.
  • the bubble point represents the pressure, in psi [bar], of breakthrough of air applied to a 90 mm disc sample wetted with distilled water, common to the membrane art.
  • Flow is reported as the arithmetic mean of all samples for each roll and represents the flow of distilled water, in ml per minute, passing through a 90 mm disc at an applied pressure of 10 psi (0.69 bar).
  • BRK represents tensile strength at break in grams, while ELG is elongation at break, in percent.

Abstract

Ultraporous and microporous polymer membranes cast from metastable dispersions are signifcantly improved by limiting the time of environmental exposure to less than about 0.5, preferably less than 0.25 seconds, between casting and quenching, and reducing the casting temperatures about 10 to about 20 °C lower than the usual prior art values. The resulting membranes have far less debris entrained in the membrane, far more consistent and uniform pore sizes, a substantially greater number of skin pores, and greatly increased flow rates for any given pore diameter.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Technical Field of the Invention
  • The present invention relates to ultraporous and microporous membranes which are useful in materials separations, by filtration, dialysis, and the like, and as supports and containment media for materials, and related uses. In particular, it relates to highly asymmetric, integral membranes with a skin and a porous sub-structure or support region.
  • 2. Description of the Prior Art
  • A wide diversity of polymer membranes are known, and have attained wide applicability in diverse uses. Such membranes are characterized by a variety of properties and characteristics, and the selection of a membranes for a particular use is generally a function of the properties required or desired.
  • The most characteristic property of concern for most applications is the effective controlling pore diameter, which defines what materials may pass through the membrane, and which are retained. Ultraporous membranes are generally those with an effective controlling pore diameter of less than about 0.050 micrometers (or sometimes considered to be less than about 0.025 micrometers), down to as 0.005 micrometers, which is the realm of the size of a molecule of, for example, simple sugars and the like. Microporous membranes are those with effective limiting pore diameters of greater than ultraporous, normally greater than about 0.050 micrometers, up to about 1 micrometer, or occasionally more.
  • As used in the present application, the term "pore diameter" is employed to represent the span across skin pores or controlling pores of a membrane. It is not intended to suggest that all pores are circular and, indeed, most are not, as those of ordinary skill in the art will understand and as FIG. 2 illustrates.
  • Smaller pore membranes extend into the reverse osmosis region and below that into the gas separation region. Reverse osmosis membranes are used for ionic separations, under high applied pressure differentials, sufficient to overcome osmotic pressure, and are sometimes said to be dependent on a mechanism which is often characterized as intermolecular dissolution. Such membranes have a dense, non-porous surface skin, and do not function by effects dependent on sieve-like characteristics. As a distinguishing characteristic, reverse osmosis is, in material part, dependent on the osmolarity of a solution as a determinant of the separatory characteristics of the reverse osmosis operation, while ultraporous and microporous membranes pass or retain materials predominantly on the basis of their size, at applied pressure differential which are commonly far less, often an order of magnitude less, than reverse osmosis operations, and are ordinarily considered to be substantially different in kind. Gas separation membranes operate on a molecular scale and fractionate gas mixtures based on size and absorption/desorption characteristics.
  • An important property of porous membranes is their permeability to flow. In the majority of applications, it is commonly desirable to process effectively the greatest volume of a feed material in the least amount of time. All other things being equal, the higher the flow rate of filtrate or related materials through the membrane, the higher the efficiency and economy of the procedure.
  • It has long been known that flow rates are proportional to pore diameters, and pore population. Taken together, these define an effective area through which fluids may pass. In practice, the relationship is ordinarily very approximate and highly variable.
  • Membranes may have a skin or may be skinless, i.e., with an isotropic structure from one face to the other. If a cast liquid film of adequate polymer concentration is quenched in a strong non-solvent, as with polysulfone solutions (or dispersions) quenched in water, the result is a "skinned" membrane, i.e., one with considerably smaller pores on the "skin" side than on the opposite side. If the quench liquid is a weak non-solvent, e.g., by adding solvent to the water, a more open skin and ultimately a skinless membrane can be produced.
  • When a skin is present, as generally in the case with gas separation, reverse osmosis, and ultrafiltration membranes and sometimes with microporous membranes, it is most often a dense film of polymer material with very small pores that extend into a support region of larger pores. If the pores are large enough, they can be observed by electron scanning microscopy, and this is true in the microporous range. However, because of the limitations of SEM techniques pores may not always be directly observable at diameters of less than about 0.050 micrometers, but their presence can be confirmed by the retentivity characteristics of the membrane.
  • Membranes can have different structures, generally determined by the technique by which a membrane is synthesized. Examples include fibrous, granular, cellular, and spinodal, and they may be symmetrical, or asymmetric, isotropic or anisotropic (i.e., graded pore density).
  • Fibrous microstructure is most commonly associated with biaxial stretching of films of polymers. This is commonly employed, for example, in the production of porous membranes of polytetrafluoroethylene (TEFLON), in the microporous membranes commercially available as GORETEX™, among others. It is inherent in the nature of the process that the result is a skinless, symmetrical membrane.
  • Granular microstructure can be characteristic of membranes formed by the precipitation of polymer from certain formulations by a nucleation and growth mechanism. Globules or granules of precipitated polymer form and grow, and fuse with other such globules at their points of contact, leaving voids in the interstices which contribute the porosity of the granular mass. Such structures frequently contain "macrovoids" or "finger voids" in regions adjacent to skin imperfections which allow the quench liquid to penetrate the interior. The voids consequently are also skinned and lead to reduced membrane permeability. This occurs most commonly in ultraporous and reverse osmosis membranes. The techniques for the formation of such membranes are illustrated by Michaels, U.S. 3,615,024. The granular microstructure and characteristic "maorovoids" are illustrated by the photomicrographs shown in Wang, U.S. 3,988,245.
  • Cellular pore structures which are honeycombed or sponge-like in appearance, are dependent presumably on a precipitation rate that is slower than with granular structures containing macrovoids. They can be skinned or unskinned. The latter structure generally is formed when the precipitation agent is moisture in the air (no liquid quenching during the curing process). A network of thin struts creates the system of contiguous polyhedral shaped cells. Liquid quenched membranes of this type are often associated with a dense or ultraporous skin.
  • Spinodal microstructure, as mentioned earlier, occurs when the polymer is precipitated by a spinodal decomposition mechanism, characterized by the formation of two separate liquid phases, one polymer rich and the other polymer poor, under conditions wherein each phase is continuous and dispersed in a characteristic pattern at the point at which the polymer precipitation occurs. Depending on the specific characteristics of the technique for attaining the spinodal decomposition mechanism, the resulting membrane may be, on the one hand, skinless, symmetrical, and uniform throughout, or skinned, asymmetric, and non-isotropic.
  • In the present application, the term spinodal structure is intended to mean the characteristic structure attained when a membrane is precipitated by spinodal decomposition, and to reflect the features illustrated in FIG. 1 and, in different scale, FIG. 8 which illustrate, by SEM photomicroscopy the remaining structure when the two, intertangled and intermixed continuous phases of spinodal decomposition are achieved. As those of ordinary skill in the art will understand, the spinodal structure represents one of the two continuous phases formed by the precipitated polymer, the other being the void volume within the structure.
  • The skinless symmetrical variety may be formed by thermal quench techniques or by solvent evaporation techniques. Thermal quenching techniques are illustrated by Castro, U.S. 4,247,498.
  • Skinned membranes with a highly asymmetric support structure are shown in Wrasidlo, U.S. 4,629,563, and Wrasidlo, U.S. 4,774,039. These membranes are formed by spinodal decomposition induced by solvent extraction from a cast metastable dispersion of two liquid phases, one polymer rich and the other polymer poor, in a liquid quench bath.
  • All the various techniques involved, and the membranes produced, have achieved a measure of commercial success. The spinodal microstructure, however, has often been preferred in a number of applications. As a general rule, the structure affords good mechanical properties, including tensile strength, elongation at break, and the like, the lowest hydraulic resistance to flow of any of the known microstructures, and offers opportunities to take advantage of the internal structure of the support as a depth filter, as a containment medium for materials, and other like advantages. As is well known to the art, the skinless, symmetric varieties have rather different uses that the skinned, highly asymmetric membranes of Wrasidlo.
  • In the dispersion casting technique of Wrasidlo, a number of disadvantages have been encountered. These include the following:
  • When the polymer is precipitated from the dispersion, there are frequent occurrences of small discontinuities. The reason for this is not fully understood, but the result is the formation, within the microstructure of the membrane support, substantial number, and at time vast numbers of tiny polymer spheres. These discrete spheres are difficult to remove by washing, and substantial numbers may remain in the membrane. This is highly undesirable, in most uses of the membranes, since there are few applications where the introduction of these spheres into a filtrate is acceptable. See the spheres illustrated in FIG. 7, which represent a severe case, after normal washing of the membrane.
  • The procedure for the formation of the membranes taught by Wrasidlo has over time proved to be excessively variable in the controlling pore diameter, flow rate for a given pore diameter, and in the occurrence of macro flaws in the integrity of the skin, leading to the loss of an unacceptable proportion of the membranes to a failure to satisfy necessary quality control standards. Quality control rejection of such membranes often has been substantial.
  • Some physical properties, including tensile strength and elongation at break, are often lower than desirable, and lower than required for the integrity of some otherwise desirable uses of these membranes.
  • These membranes are often employed in critical applications in the electronics industry, food processing, processing of biological materials, as sterilizing filters, and the like. Deficiencies in meeting the quality control requirements of such sensitive fields of use are quite unacceptable.
  • OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • It is an object of the present invention to improve the technology by which skinned, asymmetric ultraporous and microporous membranes are produced having a support structure with an asymmetric spinodal structure and with improved properties and characteristics, and to satisfy the highest standards of quality control and product integrity.
  • The present invention is intended as, and has as its primary object, an improvement on the process of Wrasidlo, cited above.
  • The present invention provides an improved method for making a highly asymmetric integrally skinned polymer membrane, said method comprising:
  • A. mixing a polymer, a solvent and a non-solvent to produce a metastable liquid-liquid dispersion within the binodal or spinodal at a casting temperature, and having an optical density of from about 0.5 to about 1;
  • B. casting said dispersion into a thin layer at said casting temperature;
  • C. passing said cast layer at said casting temperature into a solvent extraction quench bath of non-solvent quench liquid in which said solvent is freely miscible and in which said polymer is substantially insoluble, and effecting precipitation of a major proportion of said polymer by spinodal decomposition; and
  • D. recovering from said quench bath a membrane;
    characterised in that said cast layer is passed at said casting temperature into said solvent extraction bath within a time of less than 0.5 seconds and that interaction of said cast layer with the atmosphere prior to solvent extraction in said solvent extraction bath is likewise limited to less than 0.5 seconds, and preferably less than 0.25 seconds, and even more preferably less than 0.1 seconds. Such a method permits the casting temperature of the dispersion to be materially reduced.
  • By use of the method of the invention, ultraporous and microporous membranes are produced which are substantially free of polymer spheres entrained in the support, have increased tensile strength and elongation at break, a materially reduced standard deviation in controlling pore diameter, and an increased population of skin pores, resulting in and demonstrated by exceptionally high flow rates in relation to the controlling pore diameter.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a reproduction of an SEM photomicrograph showing the characteristic asymmetric spinodal structure of the support region of membranes made by the method of the present invention, in a cross section of a fracture face at an enlargement of 650X.
  • FIG. 2 is a reproduction of an SEM photomicrograph showing the characteristic skin pores of a membrane made by the method of the present invention at an enlargement of 3,000X.
  • FIG. 3 is a graph showing the relationship of bubble point and flow for membranes made by the method of the present invention compared to comparable, historical values for membranes of the prior art, represented by the Wrasidlo patents cited above.
  • FIG. 4 is a graph showing the relationship of increase in flow rate of the membranes made by the method of the invention over the corresponding historical values of production of Wrasidlo membranes of comparable bubble point.
  • FIG. 5 is a graph of bubble point covariance for membranes made by the method of the present invention compared to historical, corresponding measurements of membranes of the prior art, represented by the Wrasidlo patents cited above.
  • FIG. 6 is a graph of flow rate covariance for membranes made by the method of the present invention compared to historical, corresponding measurements of membranes of the prior art, represented by the Wrasidlo patents cited above.
  • FIG. 7 is a reproduction of an SEM photomicrograph showing a membrane made in accordance with Example II of Wrasidlo, showing the high population of polymer spheres, in a section of the support region at an enlargement of 1,800X. A spinodal structure is apparent.
  • FIG. 8 is a reproduction of an SEM photomicrograph showing a membrane made in accordance with the present invention, showing the very low population of polymer spheres, in a section of the support region at an enlargement of 1,800X. The spinodal structure of the membrane is shown in detail.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • The present invention is directed to an improved method for making membranes. In the following discussion, a characterization of the method for making membranes is described and characterized initially.
  • In the method of the present invention, the process of the Wrasidlo patents, discussed and cited hereinabove, is the starting point of the work.
  • In the present method, the major elements which differ from Wrasidlo are found in the limitation of the interaction of the cast dispersion with the atmosphere prior to solvent extraction in a quench bath to less than 0.5 seconds, and preferably less than 0.25 seconds. In such a method it is preferred to employ a casting temperature of the dispersion materially less than those commonly employed in the usual techniques, generally a casting temperature that is on the order of 6 to 14°C (or even more) less than those commonly used in the usual techniques. Other process parameters may be subject to adjustment in relation to these parameters to assure the maintenance of the requisite properties in the membrane produced, but these are generally minor in degree and are reactive to and compensatory for the primary changes in the operating conditions and steps.
  • It has long been known that the cast film of the metastable dispersion in the Wrasidlo technology interacts with the atmosphere, and that the properties of the membrane, and particularly the skin pores of the membrane, are sensitive to variations in temperature and humidity, velocity and direction of air flow, and perhaps others. Controlling these parameters has received a considerable level of attention and, indeed, some have taken steps intended to take advantage of these interactions. See Fuji Photo Film Co. Ltd., G.B. 2, 199,786 A, wherein the exposure and dwell time in the atmosphere and the humidity are increased to attempt to achieve certain benefits. The conventional thinking has been that moisture in the atmosphere initiates the requisite pores at the immediate film/air interface which have diameters proportional to the water vapor concentration and exposure times.
  • The view in the art for liquid quenched hydrophobic membrane production has at least in part been influenced by the limitations of the commonly employed equipment used to cast and quench such membranes. In large measure, such equipment has been designed and built on the basis that relatively long exposure times in the atmosphere are generally beneficial. It has been common to employ residence times of atmospheric exposure greater than 1 second, and often longer than 5 seconds. Most equipment cannot attain dwell times between the casting operation and the quench bath of less than 1 second without specific modifications. Since such modifications run counter to the conventional wisdom in the art, there has never been any incentive to do so.
  • It has now been found that residence times of materially less than 1 second, employed with a materially reduced casting temperature, are of quite surprising and unexpected benefit. As discussed in detail below, the membrane product is quite substantially improved in a number of properties and parameters.
  • As Wrasidlo has previously pointed out, all the parameters of the casting procedure and the conditions of operation are mutually interdependent. A change of one parameter will require a correlating change in at least one other parameter. If the environmental residence time is reduced, as required in the present invention, to less than 0.5 seconds, and preferably less than 0.25 seconds, for a casting formulation and conditions which had been developed for a longer exposure time, of, say, 1 to 5 seconds, an unsuitable membrane will be obtained if no other parameters are adjusted to balance the effect on the system of the rapid passage into the quench liquid.
  • It has also been known in the art that for any given dispersion and any given set of casting conditions, there is a relatively narrow casting temperature variance which will be effective. This is generally monitored directly, and correlated with the optical density of the metastable dispersion, in order to produce the desired membrane. If the temperature of the casting dope is too high or too low, unsuitable membrane or even no membrane at all will be produced. In the context of the present invention, the appropriate temperature will be lower than that for the same dispersion when cast at longer environmental dwell times, but it is not possible to define the precise temperature without working trials of the system and confirmation of the results through analytical techniques common to the art. As a general rule, the necessary casting temperature will be on the order of 6 to 14 or more, often on the order of about 10 to 12, °C below the casting temperature appropriate to 1 second environmental dwell time.
  • The lower casting temperature is an important benefit to the process. It has been learned that lower temperatures make the system less variable and less vulnerable to variation in substantially all parameters. AS the temperature gets closer to ambient temperatures, as one example, distortions of the casting equipment through thermal expansion and like effects are reduced, and it has proved simpler and more reliable to maintain working tolerances. This in turn provides better control over the casting and quenching operations, so that quality of the product is easier to establish and maintain. Utility costs of the operation are reduced and, in new installations, simpler temperature control equipment may prove effective.
  • It is believed, although there is no wish to be bound thereby, that reduced casting temperature plays a direct role in the reduction of polymer spheres entrained in the membrane as an artifact of small proportions of a separately dispersed phase in the casting dispersion. See FIG. 7, which shows such polymer spheres in a prior art membrane. It appears that the spinodal decomposition mechanism operates more uniformly and exclusively at the lower temperatures employed in the present invention, resulting in substantially no incidence of such polymer spheres. It is possible that this result is partly or wholly attributable to some other factor involved in the system, of course, but it remains the case that the high temperature casting of the prior art consistently produced such polymer spheres, and few and often none are observed in the procedure of the present invention.
  • In practice, the method of the present invention involves the essential steps of mixing a polymer, a solvent, and a non-solvent to produce a metastable liquid-liquid dispersion consisting of a polymer-rich phase and a solvent-rich (polymer-poor) phase within the binodal or spinodal at a casting temperature, casting the dispersion into a thin film at the casting temperature, passing the cast layer within a time of less than 0.5 seconds at the casting temperature into a solvent extraction quench bath of non-solvent quench liquid in which the solvent is freely miscible and in which the polymer is substantially insoluble, and effecting precipitation of the polymer by spinodal decomposition, and recovering the membrane from the quench bath.
  • As noted in the Wrasidlo patents, cited above, a substantial number of polymers, solvents, non-solvents, and quench liquids have been employed, and have been formulated into casting dispersions suitable for casting membranes with a wide spectrum of pore diameters. All of these are contemplated in the present invention. For convenience, the present invention is discussed in the most common of these systems, where the polymer is a polysulfone, the solvent is dimethylformamide, the non-solvent diluent is t-amyl alcohol, and the quench liquid is water.
  • There are several standard pore diameters which have achieved common commercial acceptance for such polysulfone membranes. These include molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) values of 10,000 (10K) and 100,000 (100K) Daltons, and pore diameters of 0.1, 0.2 and 0.45 micrometers (µm). The basis for casting the commercially available membranes according to Wrasidlo is shown in Table I:
    Membrane BTS-25 BTS-30 BTS-45 BTS-55 BTS-65
    Pore Diameter 10K 100K 0.1µm 0.2µm 0.45µm
    Polysulfone 14-16 12-14 10-12 10-12 10-12
    DMF 80-82 74-76 72-74 72-74 72-74
    t-Amyl alcohol 3-5 11-13 14-16 14-16 14-16
    O.D. .08-.10 .10-.12 .17-.22 .20-.32 .32-.40
    Casting Temp. 49-52 49-52 49-52 49-52 49-52
    Time to Quench 1 1 1 1 1
    Notes:
    The polysulfone is Amoco Udell P-3500.
    All proportions are in weight percent.
    O.D. is optical density of the dispersion as measured in the Wrasidlo patents
    Casting temperature is given in °C.
    Time to quench is the dwell time in seconds between the doctor blade and the quench bath.
  • The corresponding parameters for the same membranes cast in accordance with the present invention are shown in Table II:
    Membrane BTS-25 BTS-30 BTS-45 BTS-55 BTS-65
    Pore Diameter 10K 100K 0.1µm 0.2µm 0.45µm
    Polysulfone 14-16 12-14 10-12 10-12 10-12
    DMF 80-82 74-76 73-75 72-74 72-74
    t-Amyl alcohol 3-5 11-13 14-16 14-16 14-16
    O.D. .08-.10 .10-.12 .24-.25 .33-.40 .60-.80
    Casting Temp. 35-43 35-43 35-40 35-39 35-39
    Time to Quench 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
    Notes:
    The polysulfone is Amoco Udell P-3500.
    All proportions are in weight percent.
    O.D. is optical density of the dispersion as measured in the Wrasidlo patents
    Casting temperature is given in °C.
    Time to quench is the dwell time in seconds between the doctor blade and the quench bath.
  • As those of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize, the residence time between the casting operation and the quench bath is reduced by one order of magnitude. A reduction in casting temperature on the order of about 10°C is also imposed. In a more general sense, the dwell time should be kept below 0.5 seconds, and preferably below 0.25 seconds, and is desirably the minimum that can be achieved with the constraints of the casting equipment employed.
  • The casting dispersion should, as noted in the Tables, have an optical density of from 0.5 to 1, depending on the pore diameter sought; generally, higher optical densities produce higher pore diameters.
  • The casting dispersion is ordinarily cast onto a moving support by means of a doctor blade with a knife gap of typically 250 to 450 micrometers, often about 300 micrometers; after the quench, the membrane produced is typically 85 to 105 micrometers in thickness for ultraporous membranes, and 105 to 145 for microporous membranes. The values may be increased or decreased as desired, as is well known in the art. While as described, the procedure produces flat sheet membrane, the present invention is equally applicable to casting hollow fiber membrane, and will indeed facilitate the dispersion casting operation by reducing or even eliminating the atmospheric exposure time previously thought to be necessary to such procedures.
  • In application of the present invention to the casting of hollow fiber, the casting dispersion is spin cast through a hollow die rather than being cast onto a support in a flat film form. The lumen of the hollow fiber is sometimes formed by air or inert gas and the outside quenched in non-solvent liquid, but usually the quench liquid flows through the center and skins the Lumen. If the lumen is formed by a gas, it should be introduced as close to the quench bath as possible. As those familiar with hollow fiber casting are aware, the die may be immersed in the quench bath in some cases, reducing the atmospheric dwell time of the outer surface of the cast membrane to zero. It is possible, of course, to provide a hollow fiber with both inner and outer skins by employing the quench liquid in both the lumen and the quench bath.
  • The cast dispersion is passed into a quench bath, most commonly of water, frequently at or near the casting temperature. In the bath, the quench operation precipitates the polymer to produce a skin having the requisite pore sizes, and a support region having the characteristic spinodal structure with a high degree of asymmetry, increasing from the region immediately adjacent to the skin to the opposite face. The resulting membrane is ordinarily washed to free it of entrained solvent, and may be dried to expel additional increments of solvent, diluent, and quench liquid, and thus recover the membrane.
  • The casting operation is amenable to a wide variety of known variations, familiar to those of ordinary skill in the art, as discussed by Wrasidlo and others in the prior art. So long as the criteria defined for the present invention are met, none of these are excluded.
  • The resulting membrane produced by the process of the present invention shares a number of characteristics in common with those taught by Wrasidlo and used in commerce in the practice of his technology. There are substantial differences which are attained, however.
  • It is a very great advantage of the improvements provided by the present invention that the membrane is produced substantially free of the artifacts of discontinuous dispersion in the casting medium. To date, only negligible numbers of polymer spheres have been observed in membranes cast by the method of the present invention. Compare the membrane of the present invention shown in FIG 8 with FIG. 7, showing the prior art problem, which is now largely resolved. The requirement for the removal of such materials as a part of the membrane wash operations is now eliminated or greatly reduced, reducing the time of the wash, the amount of water or other wash constituents is reduced substantially, and production of finished product are simplified.
  • It is another significant achievement of the present invention that the pore diameter of the skin pores is far more consistent, as shown by bubble point testing. Testing of membranes of the present invention shows that the bubble points desired are achieved far more readily and consistently at all points in the casting operation, from start-up to conclusion, with markedly reduced standard deviation in pore diameter for all pore sizes. Pore diameter is the primary quality control parameter in such membranes, and bubble point is the convenient parameter for defining microporous membrane integrity, the ultimate criteria being bacterial or microsphere challenge tests.
  • Indeed, for most pore diameters, it is now possible to maintain production at bubble point measurements having a standard deviation (σ) of less than 3, compared to a historical value of about 5 or more for such membranes, although in smaller pore sizes it may be necessary to accept a slightly higher standard deviation of less than 5, compared to a historical value of 9 or more for comparable membranes. Covariance in bubble point is less than 8, and ordinarily and preferably less than 5, compared to historic values of 9 or higher, and most often above 11 or even higher, as illustrated in FIG. 5. The skin pores are illustrated in FIG. 2, revealing both a high population of pores, a large proportion of which are at or near the effective controlling pore diameter.
  • Another feature of the membranes made by the method of the present invention is the material increase in flow rates for a given controlling pore size. While the relationships and physical features of the membrane made by the method of the present invention which determine flow rates have not been fully explored as yet, the data show a substantial increase in flow rate as a function of pore diameter (or pore radius, as discussed in Wrasidlo). The data suggest an increase in the total number of pores produced in the membrane skin, and possibly a narrower distribution of pore diameter, with few pores having a diameter materially less than the controlling pore diameter as determined by bubble point measurements. See FIG. 2.
  • What the data do show with certainty is represented in the data plotted in FIG. 3, which demonstrates flow rate plotted against pore diameter, for the membranes of the examples provided in the present application, including the comparative examples. It is apparent that at a given pore diameter, the flow rate is materially increased in the present invention, when compared to the historical values achieved by the Wrasidlo teachings.
  • In addition, the flow rates are less susceptible to variation during manufacture of the membrane, as reflected by a standard deviation in flow rate of normally about 120 or less, more often about 100 or less, and less than 75 except for the largest pore diameters. This improved consistency at the higher flow rates is indicative of a material change in the utility of these membranes for the user, and enables the present invention to assure higher levels of quality assurance to users, particularly those with critical applications for such membranes. As shown in FIG. 6, covariance of flow rates of the membranes made by the new procedures of the present invention are less than 6, and for most pore diameters, less than 5. FIG. 6 also demonstrates that flow rate covariance of membranes made by the Wrasidlo procedure has historically been greater than 12.5. Standard deviations are materially reduced as well,
  • The consistency achieved in the present invention is a per se benefit in the production and use of the membranes made by the method of the present invention, and represents a very substantial gain in productivity and the reduction of scrap or out-of specification materials. The occurrence of scrap has been reduced to a level consistently less than 5% of production, and long production runs with no losses to scrap are now frequently attained. The improved consistency is also of compelling import to the integrity of the membrane offered to users.
  • As shown in FIG. 4, the improved consistency in pore diameter and in flow rate are accompanied by a material increase in the flow rate for each pore diameter, ranging from an increase in flow rate of from 110 ml/min. at a bubble point of about 65, up to about 500 ml/min. at a bubble point of about 30, representing a gain in flow rate of 10 to 20 percent at a given pore diameter.
  • A photomicrograph showing the characteristics spinodal structure of the membranes made by the method of the present invention is shown in FIG. 1. As those of ordinary Skill in the art will recognize, the structure is that produced by spinodal decomposition of the metastable dispersion in the membrane casting operation, and the figure illustrates the significant asymmetry which makes such membranes highly effective as depth filters, affording the gradual change in the apertures through the support region such that the changing effective pore diameter is progressive.
  • The skin of the membrane is quite thin, and difficult to delineate precisely by photomicroscopy in cross section. Where skin pores are directly observable, as shown in FIG. 2, the number of pores and their general regularity is directly observable.
  • A number of membranes have been made and tested in accordance with the present invention, and compared with the commercially available embodiments of the Wrasidlo technology. These efforts and comparisons are set out in the following examples.
  • SPECIFIC EXAMPLES
  • In the following examples, the formulations employed are those set forth in Table I and Table II, above. The conditions of casting are also those set forth in the tables. Both the examples of the present invention and those based on the Wrasidlo teachings were performed on the same equipment, and under the same conditions; the only differences are those set forth in the above Tables. As inspection will show, no adjustments of the formulations to achieve specifically targeted pore diameters were made in most cases, with the results that some of the bubble point values are higher than desired. Further adjustments to achieve the desired bubble point, reflecting a specifically required pore diameter are known to the art, and are specifically taught by Wrasidlo.
  • A plurality of rolls of membrane were cast. Each was sampled at a plurality of predetermined locations, across the web and throughout the length of the cast membrane. The values for each sample were averaged, and the standard deviation (σ) determined, for both bubble point and flow rate. The results obtained are shown in the following Table III:
    Figure 00210001
    Figure 00220001
    Figure 00230001
  • In the foregoing data in Table III, each Example represents a roll of membrane, made as described above, bubble point is reported as the arithmetic mean of all quality control samples taken for each roll. The bubble point represents the pressure, in psi [bar], of breakthrough of air applied to a 90 mm disc sample wetted with distilled water, common to the membrane art. Flow is reported as the arithmetic mean of all samples for each roll and represents the flow of distilled water, in ml per minute, passing through a 90 mm disc at an applied pressure of 10 psi (0.69 bar). BRK represents tensile strength at break in grams, while ELG is elongation at break, in percent.
    COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES
    TYPE Flow σ BP σ BRK σ ELG σ
    BTS65-AVE 972 129.8 63.1 9.3 588 24.6 29.0 3.2
    BTS55-AVE 1278 181.9 51.0 6.9 512 19.8 24.7 2.2
    BTS45-AVE 2059 403.0 33.8 4.4 491 35.7 23.7 3.1
    BTS30-AVE 2518 322.6 29.2 2.6 467 26.0 21.8 2.4
    BTS25-AVE 3558 481.0 22.8 2.6 469 22.8 23.3 2.3
  • In Table IV, the values reported for each comparative example are the arithmetic mean of all values for actual commercial production of a substantial number of rolls of membrane, produced as indicated in Table I, under the same conditions as those employed in the present invention, except as noted above.

Claims (3)

  1. A method for making a highly asymmetric integrally skinned polymer membrane, said method comprising:
    A. mixing a polymer, a solvent and a non-solvent to produce a metastable liquid-liquid dispersion within the binodal or spinodal at a casting temperature, and having an optical density of from 0.5 to 1;
    B. casting said dispersion into a thin layer at said casting temperature;
    C. passing said cast layer at said casting temperature into a solvent extraction quench bath of non-solvent quench liquid in which said solvent is freely miscible and in which said polymer is substantially insoluble, and effecting precipitation of a major proportion of said polymer by spinodal decomposition; and
    D. recovering from said quench bath a membrane;
    characterized in that said cast layer is passed at said casting temperature into said solvent extraction bath within a time of less than 0.5 seconds and that interaction of said cast layer with the atmosphere prior to solvent extraction in said solvent extraction bath is likewise limited to less than 0.5 seconds
  2. A method according to claim 1. characterized in that said time is less than 0.25 seconds.
  3. A method according to claim 1 or claim 2, characterized in that said time is not more than 0.1 seconds.
EP92908893A 1991-03-26 1992-03-13 Method of making membranes Expired - Lifetime EP0589897B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP98121352A EP0911074B1 (en) 1991-03-26 1992-03-13 Ultraporous and microporous membranes

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US674907 1991-03-26
US07/674,907 US5171445A (en) 1991-03-26 1991-03-26 Ultraporous and microporous membranes and method of making membranes
PCT/US1992/001975 WO1992017265A1 (en) 1991-03-26 1992-03-13 Ultraporous and microporous membranes and method of making membranes

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP98121352A Division EP0911074B1 (en) 1991-03-26 1992-03-13 Ultraporous and microporous membranes

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0589897A1 EP0589897A1 (en) 1994-04-06
EP0589897A4 EP0589897A4 (en) 1994-07-06
EP0589897B1 true EP0589897B1 (en) 1999-08-25

Family

ID=24708376

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP92908893A Expired - Lifetime EP0589897B1 (en) 1991-03-26 1992-03-13 Method of making membranes
EP98121352A Expired - Lifetime EP0911074B1 (en) 1991-03-26 1992-03-13 Ultraporous and microporous membranes

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP98121352A Expired - Lifetime EP0911074B1 (en) 1991-03-26 1992-03-13 Ultraporous and microporous membranes

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US5171445A (en)
EP (2) EP0589897B1 (en)
JP (1) JP3416131B2 (en)
DE (2) DE69229861T2 (en)
ES (2) ES2256908T3 (en)
WO (1) WO1992017265A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (43)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3585175B2 (en) * 1994-03-04 2004-11-04 ポール・フィルトレイション・アンド・セパレイションズ・グループ・インコーポレイテッド Synthetic polymer membrane with large pores
US6277281B1 (en) * 1994-03-04 2001-08-21 Usf Filtration And Separations Group Inc. Large pore synthetic polymer membranes
CA2244180C (en) * 1996-01-22 2005-03-01 Memtec America Corporation Highly porous polyvinylidene difluoride membranes
US6391265B1 (en) * 1996-08-26 2002-05-21 Biosite Diagnostics, Inc. Devices incorporating filters for filtering fluid samples
US6045899A (en) * 1996-12-12 2000-04-04 Usf Filtration & Separations Group, Inc. Highly assymetric, hydrophilic, microfiltration membranes having large pore diameters
US6146747A (en) * 1997-01-22 2000-11-14 Usf Filtration And Separations Group Inc. Highly porous polyvinylidene difluoride membranes
US5886059A (en) * 1997-07-08 1999-03-23 Memtec America Corporation Highly asymmetric polyethersulfone filtration membranes
US6258272B1 (en) 1999-04-09 2001-07-10 Usf Filtrations And Separations Group, Inc. Internal hydrophilic membranes from blended anionic copolymers
US7108791B2 (en) * 1999-09-14 2006-09-19 Millipore Corporation High-resolution virus removal methodology and filtration capsule useful therefor
US6612447B1 (en) 2000-07-24 2003-09-02 Baxter International Inc. Blood collection systems and filters using a porous membrane element
BR0113256A (en) 2000-08-07 2003-07-01 Cuno Inc Process for forming a microporous membrane and microporous membrane with no support
US6994789B2 (en) * 2000-08-07 2006-02-07 Cuno Incorporated Pre-metered, unsupported multilayer microporous membrane
US6736971B2 (en) * 2000-08-07 2004-05-18 Cuno Incorporated Pre-metered, unsupported multilayer microporous membrane
US6605154B1 (en) * 2001-05-31 2003-08-12 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Stent mounting device
US6695920B1 (en) 2001-06-27 2004-02-24 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Mandrel for supporting a stent and a method of using the mandrel to coat a stent
US6673154B1 (en) * 2001-06-28 2004-01-06 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Stent mounting device to coat a stent
US6818063B1 (en) * 2002-09-24 2004-11-16 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Stent mandrel fixture and method for minimizing coating defects
US7335265B1 (en) * 2002-10-08 2008-02-26 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems Inc. Apparatus and method for coating stents
US7074276B1 (en) 2002-12-12 2006-07-11 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Clamp mandrel fixture and a method of using the same to minimize coating defects
US7354480B1 (en) * 2003-02-26 2008-04-08 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Stent mandrel fixture and system for reducing coating defects
US7323209B1 (en) 2003-05-15 2008-01-29 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Apparatus and method for coating stents
EP1666129B1 (en) * 2003-08-07 2017-06-21 Asahi Kasei Medical Co., Ltd. Composite porous membrane
US7517581B2 (en) * 2003-09-26 2009-04-14 Parker-Hannifin Corporation Semipermeable hydrophilic membrane
US7198675B2 (en) 2003-09-30 2007-04-03 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems Stent mandrel fixture and method for selectively coating surfaces of a stent
US8042485B1 (en) 2003-12-30 2011-10-25 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Stent mandrel fixture and method for coating stents
US8349388B1 (en) 2004-03-18 2013-01-08 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Method of coating a stent
US7648727B2 (en) 2004-08-26 2010-01-19 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Methods for manufacturing a coated stent-balloon assembly
US7892592B1 (en) 2004-11-30 2011-02-22 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Coating abluminal surfaces of stents and other implantable medical devices
US7823533B2 (en) 2005-06-30 2010-11-02 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Stent fixture and method for reducing coating defects
US7735449B1 (en) 2005-07-28 2010-06-15 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Stent fixture having rounded support structures and method for use thereof
US7867547B2 (en) 2005-12-19 2011-01-11 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Selectively coating luminal surfaces of stents
US8069814B2 (en) 2006-05-04 2011-12-06 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Stent support devices
US7985441B1 (en) 2006-05-04 2011-07-26 Yiwen Tang Purification of polymers for coating applications
US8603530B2 (en) 2006-06-14 2013-12-10 Abbott Cardiovascular Systems Inc. Nanoshell therapy
US8048448B2 (en) 2006-06-15 2011-11-01 Abbott Cardiovascular Systems Inc. Nanoshells for drug delivery
US8017237B2 (en) 2006-06-23 2011-09-13 Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Nanoshells on polymers
DE102007029444A1 (en) 2007-06-22 2008-12-24 Goedel, Werner A., Dr. Porous diaphragm for separating particles, liquid drop or mixture of both from gas or liquid, has pores with diameter depending on distance of one of two diaphragm surfaces
US8048441B2 (en) 2007-06-25 2011-11-01 Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Nanobead releasing medical devices
US8181794B2 (en) 2009-08-24 2012-05-22 Oasys Water, Inc. Forward osmosis membranes
US9156006B2 (en) 2009-12-03 2015-10-13 Yale University High flux thin-film composite forward osmosis and pressure-retarded osmosis membranes
WO2012108914A2 (en) 2010-10-04 2012-08-16 Oasys Water, Inc. Thin film composite heat exchangers
FR2992227B1 (en) * 2012-06-20 2022-04-01 Commissariat Energie Atomique FILTRATION ASSEMBLY FOR FILTERING NANOPARTICLES COMPRISING A FILTER AND A FILTER SUPPORT, ASSOCIATED APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR ASSEMBLING THE ASSEMBLY AND METHOD FOR COLLECTING AND ANALYZING ASSOCIATED NANOPARTICLES.
US11241657B2 (en) 2019-11-22 2022-02-08 Pall Corporation Filter for removing silica from ultra pure water and method of use

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1000038A (en) * 1960-12-06
US3709774A (en) * 1970-05-13 1973-01-09 Gen Electric Preparation of asymmetric polymer membranes
GB1391973A (en) * 1971-09-07 1975-04-23 Aqua Chem Inc Polyvinyl acetal membrane
DE2257697C3 (en) * 1972-11-21 1978-09-28 Asahi Kasei Kogyo K.K., Osaka (Japan) Cellulose acetate symmetry porous membrane filter and process for its manufacture
US4247498A (en) * 1976-08-30 1981-01-27 Akzona Incorporated Methods for making microporous products
JPS5856378B2 (en) * 1976-09-08 1983-12-14 旭化成株式会社 Acrylonitrile polymer dry membrane and its manufacturing method
JPS5440287A (en) * 1977-09-06 1979-03-29 Kuraray Co Ltd Ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer membrane of improved performance and preparation thereof
US4774039A (en) * 1980-03-14 1988-09-27 Brunswick Corporation Dispersing casting of integral skinned highly asymmetric polymer membranes
US4629563B1 (en) * 1980-03-14 1997-06-03 Memtec North America Asymmetric membranes
US4814082A (en) * 1986-10-20 1989-03-21 Memtec North America Corporation Ultrafiltration thin film membranes

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP3416131B2 (en) 2003-06-16
EP0911074B1 (en) 2005-12-21
ES2138597T3 (en) 2000-01-16
DE69233584T2 (en) 2006-08-10
EP0911074A1 (en) 1999-04-28
EP0589897A4 (en) 1994-07-06
DE69233584D1 (en) 2006-01-26
EP0589897A1 (en) 1994-04-06
DE69229861D1 (en) 1999-09-30
JPH06506146A (en) 1994-07-14
ES2256908T3 (en) 2006-07-16
DE69229861T2 (en) 2000-02-17
WO1992017265A1 (en) 1992-10-15
US5171445A (en) 1992-12-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0589897B1 (en) Method of making membranes
US5188734A (en) Ultraporous and microporous integral membranes
Soroko et al. Impact of TiO2 nanoparticles on morphology and performance of crosslinked polyimide organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN) membranes
EP1007195B1 (en) Highly asymmetric polyethersulfone filtration membrane
US5928774A (en) Highly asymmetric ultrafiltration membranes
EP0005536B1 (en) Process for preparing polyamide membrane filter media and products thereof
AU723265B2 (en) Highly porous polyvinylidene difluoride membranes
US6146747A (en) Highly porous polyvinylidene difluoride membranes
Ismail et al. Effects of phase inversion and rheological factors on formation of defect-free and ultrathin-skinned asymmetric polysulfone membranes for gas separation
US6056903A (en) Preparation of polyethersulfone membranes
WO1996040421A1 (en) Microfiltration membranes having high pore density and mixed isotropic and anisotropic structure
IE45467B1 (en) Semipermeable membranes and method for producing same
KR100321459B1 (en) Polyacrylonitrile-Based Filtration Membrane in a Hollow Fiber State
EP0147570B1 (en) Process for the manufacture of asymmetric, porous membranes and product thereof
AU735146B2 (en) Ultraporous and microporous membranes
WO1997026284A1 (en) Method for gas phase sulfonation of polymer membranes
US4968470A (en) Asymmetric permselective polyacetylene membranes and process for the formation thereof
EP1464477B1 (en) Method of preparing a highly porous polyvinylidene difluoride membrane
Kamide et al. An electromicrographical method for evaluating layer structure of polymeric hollow fiber membrane
WO2002005937A2 (en) Asymmetric, permanently hydrophilic filtration membranes
CN117482752A (en) Anisotropic micro-filtration membrane and preparation method and application thereof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19930923

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BE CH DE ES FR GB IT LI SE

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched
AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A4

Designated state(s): BE CH DE ES FR GB IT LI SE

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: ZEPF, ROBERT F.

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19940222

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: USF FILTRATION AND SEPARATIONS GROUP INC.

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): BE CH DE ES FR GB IT LI SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY

Effective date: 19990825

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19990825

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19990825

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69229861

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19990930

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: BIANCHETTI - BRACCO - MINOJA S.R.L.

ET Fr: translation filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2138597

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20110322

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20110317

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20110309

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20110311

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20110309

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20110414

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 69229861

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 69229861

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 69229861

Country of ref document: DE

BE20 Be: patent expired

Owner name: *USF FILTRATION AND SEPARATIONS GROUP INC.

Effective date: 20120313

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Expiry date: 20120312

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20120314

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20120604

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20120312

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20120314