CA2345732A1 - Load sharing for mcpa-equipped base stations - Google Patents
Load sharing for mcpa-equipped base stations Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2345732A1 CA2345732A1 CA002345732A CA2345732A CA2345732A1 CA 2345732 A1 CA2345732 A1 CA 2345732A1 CA 002345732 A CA002345732 A CA 002345732A CA 2345732 A CA2345732 A CA 2345732A CA 2345732 A1 CA2345732 A1 CA 2345732A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- time slot
- threshold
- user
- base station
- handoff
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 48
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 claims 4
- 101710150834 Metallocarboxypeptidase A Proteins 0.000 abstract description 15
- 101710099847 Probable metallocarboxypeptidase A Proteins 0.000 abstract description 15
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 abstract description 7
- 239000005574 MCPA Substances 0.000 abstract 7
- WHKUVVPPKQRRBV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Trasan Chemical compound CC1=CC(Cl)=CC=C1OCC(O)=O WHKUVVPPKQRRBV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 abstract 7
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 9
- 239000000969 carrier Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000903 blocking effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W36/00—Hand-off or reselection arrangements
- H04W36/16—Performing reselection for specific purposes
- H04W36/22—Performing reselection for specific purposes for handling the traffic
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W52/00—Power management, e.g. TPC [Transmission Power Control], power saving or power classes
- H04W52/04—TPC
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W36/00—Hand-off or reselection arrangements
- H04W36/06—Reselecting a communication resource in the serving access point
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W36/00—Hand-off or reselection arrangements
- H04W36/08—Reselecting an access point
Abstract
The present invention provides a method by which users may be moved between time slots or between base stations in order to better utilize the MCPA output power resources. According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the power of all transceivers served by a certain MCPA is compared to a threshold value X. The value X is at least related to the capability of the MCPA in terms of output power. If at no times (i.e., at all time slots), the sum of the output power exceeds the threshold value X, it is assumed that the MCPA can handle all simultaneous transmissions. If, during at least one time slot it is found that the required output power exceeds the capability of the serving MCPA, then a reallocation or load sharing algorithm is invoked.
The reallocation algorithm searches for time slots to which a reallocation could be performed within the same base station or number of transceivers served by the MCPA. If no time slots can handle users from the time slot in which the MCPA limit is exceeded, then a load sharing algorithm is activated and one starts to look for transmission resources in transceivers served by other MCPAs, e.g., other cells. A number of alternative embodiments of the invention is described, which relates to the way in which the reallocation or load sharing is performed. By reallocating or moving users of a particular kind, e.g., single slot users, and avoiding reallocation of users of other particular kinds, the load sharing and reallocation are further improved.
The reallocation algorithm searches for time slots to which a reallocation could be performed within the same base station or number of transceivers served by the MCPA. If no time slots can handle users from the time slot in which the MCPA limit is exceeded, then a load sharing algorithm is activated and one starts to look for transmission resources in transceivers served by other MCPAs, e.g., other cells. A number of alternative embodiments of the invention is described, which relates to the way in which the reallocation or load sharing is performed. By reallocating or moving users of a particular kind, e.g., single slot users, and avoiding reallocation of users of other particular kinds, the load sharing and reallocation are further improved.
Description
2 PCT/SE99/01745 LOAD SHARING FOR MCPA-EQUIPPED BASE STATIONS
BACKGROUND
The present invention relates generally to cellular systems that employ a time division multiple access (TDMA) channel strategy. More precisely, the present invention relates to a load sharing method for a base station equipped with a mufti-carrier power amplifier (MCPA).
A base station architecture employing a mufti-carrier power amplifier (MCPA) is illustrated in Figure 1. In Figure 1, the base station 100 includes N
transceivers 110,-l I0N which send and receive signals on a predetermined frequency. The transceivers 110,-110N send signals to be transmitted to the multi-carrier power amplifier (MCPA) 120 where they are amplified and linearized.
Base station 100 also includes a sensor 150 which measures the power output from the antenna 140. Controller 130 controls the power output from MCPA 120 in response to the output power measured by the sensor I50. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the base station 100 includes additional circuitry which aids in the sending, receiving and processing of data.
Designing MCPAs with a high output power is a difficult and expensive task. As the MCPA is designed to have a higher maximum output power, design costs become increasingly more expensive. For a base station operating using time division multiple access (TDMA), the maximum total output power of the base station limits the total output power of the frequency carriers at any time slot.
TDMA, as one skilled in the art will appreciate, is a communication technique whereby different signals are assigned to different time slots on the same frequencies. One problem commonly associated with MCPAs designed for a particular output power and operating in a TDMA environment occurs when the desired total output power for any time slot exceeds the maximum allotted power for that time slot. In such an event, the MCPA loses linearity resulting in a decrease in link quality.
WO 00/2 t 322 PCT/SE99/0 t 745 The following example illustrates the above-identified problem. Consider the time chart set forth in Figure 2. In Figure 2, seven frequencies (1-7) in use by an exemplary base station are illustrated over eight time slots. The numbers in the time chart indicate the required output power, in watts, for a mobile unit which is operating at a particular frequency and assigned to a particular time slot.
For example, at frequency 1 and time slot 1, the mobile unit requires 4 watts (W).
The total power for each time slot is depicted below the time chart. For time slot 1, for example, the total output power for frequencies 1-7 is 15 W. Assume, for this example, that the MCPA has been designed such that the total maximum output power for any time slot is 30 W. Now suppose that the user that is currently using frequency number 7 and time slot number 1 wants to increase its output power from 3 W to 8 W. This increase would increase the total power for time slot 1 to 20 W which would still be within allowable limits. If, however, the user at frequency 7 and time slot 7 wanted to increase its output power from 4 W
to 8 W, the total power for time slot 7 would exceed the maximum allotted output power of 30 W. In such an event, the user requesting the higher power would likely not be granted the requested increase in output power thereby resulting in a decrease in the quality of the link associated with that user.
Several techniques have been developed in order to prevent systems, such as the MCPA described above, from exceeding the maximum capacity for which they have been dimensioned. Load sharing is one such technique. Conventional load sharing is basically a type of load balancing where a user is transferred from one cell which has reached its maximum capacity to another cell which can accommodate the user. This technique avoids overload situations. The following patents illustrate conventional load sharing techniques.
A method of balancing the Ioad among cells which are operating at maximum capacity is described in U.S. Patent No. 4,670,899, by Brody et al., and entitled "Load Balancing for Cellular Radio Telephone System" . In Brody et al., the loading of various cells is dynamically redistributed by selectively
BACKGROUND
The present invention relates generally to cellular systems that employ a time division multiple access (TDMA) channel strategy. More precisely, the present invention relates to a load sharing method for a base station equipped with a mufti-carrier power amplifier (MCPA).
A base station architecture employing a mufti-carrier power amplifier (MCPA) is illustrated in Figure 1. In Figure 1, the base station 100 includes N
transceivers 110,-l I0N which send and receive signals on a predetermined frequency. The transceivers 110,-110N send signals to be transmitted to the multi-carrier power amplifier (MCPA) 120 where they are amplified and linearized.
Base station 100 also includes a sensor 150 which measures the power output from the antenna 140. Controller 130 controls the power output from MCPA 120 in response to the output power measured by the sensor I50. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the base station 100 includes additional circuitry which aids in the sending, receiving and processing of data.
Designing MCPAs with a high output power is a difficult and expensive task. As the MCPA is designed to have a higher maximum output power, design costs become increasingly more expensive. For a base station operating using time division multiple access (TDMA), the maximum total output power of the base station limits the total output power of the frequency carriers at any time slot.
TDMA, as one skilled in the art will appreciate, is a communication technique whereby different signals are assigned to different time slots on the same frequencies. One problem commonly associated with MCPAs designed for a particular output power and operating in a TDMA environment occurs when the desired total output power for any time slot exceeds the maximum allotted power for that time slot. In such an event, the MCPA loses linearity resulting in a decrease in link quality.
WO 00/2 t 322 PCT/SE99/0 t 745 The following example illustrates the above-identified problem. Consider the time chart set forth in Figure 2. In Figure 2, seven frequencies (1-7) in use by an exemplary base station are illustrated over eight time slots. The numbers in the time chart indicate the required output power, in watts, for a mobile unit which is operating at a particular frequency and assigned to a particular time slot.
For example, at frequency 1 and time slot 1, the mobile unit requires 4 watts (W).
The total power for each time slot is depicted below the time chart. For time slot 1, for example, the total output power for frequencies 1-7 is 15 W. Assume, for this example, that the MCPA has been designed such that the total maximum output power for any time slot is 30 W. Now suppose that the user that is currently using frequency number 7 and time slot number 1 wants to increase its output power from 3 W to 8 W. This increase would increase the total power for time slot 1 to 20 W which would still be within allowable limits. If, however, the user at frequency 7 and time slot 7 wanted to increase its output power from 4 W
to 8 W, the total power for time slot 7 would exceed the maximum allotted output power of 30 W. In such an event, the user requesting the higher power would likely not be granted the requested increase in output power thereby resulting in a decrease in the quality of the link associated with that user.
Several techniques have been developed in order to prevent systems, such as the MCPA described above, from exceeding the maximum capacity for which they have been dimensioned. Load sharing is one such technique. Conventional load sharing is basically a type of load balancing where a user is transferred from one cell which has reached its maximum capacity to another cell which can accommodate the user. This technique avoids overload situations. The following patents illustrate conventional load sharing techniques.
A method of balancing the Ioad among cells which are operating at maximum capacity is described in U.S. Patent No. 4,670,899, by Brody et al., and entitled "Load Balancing for Cellular Radio Telephone System" . In Brody et al., the loading of various cells is dynamically redistributed by selectively
-3-transferring ongoing calls to adjacent cells in accordance with tragic levels in order to reserve channels for handoffs and for new calls. A channel occupancy level for a cell is periodically determined by comparing the number of channels utilized to the number of channels available within the cell. Calls are handed off before all the channels are utilized, thereby allowing at least one or more channels to be reserved for new or incoming calls.
According to the Brody et al. patent, if there is a mobile unit on the periphery of the cell which is also within the range of a neighboring cell, the mobile unit will be transferred to the neighboring cell in order to make room for a new call or an ongoing call associated with a mobile unit which will be handed off to the cell. While Brody et al. provides traffic-based control for call handoffs from one cell to an adjacent cell, handoffs due to load balancing are handled differently from handoffs due to mobile units leaving the cell. This creates a very complex system.
In U.S. Patent No. 5,625,868 to Jan et al., and entitled "Dynamic Traffic Load Distribution Method", the control over a call is transferred from a first satellite to a second satellite having a partially overlapping coverage area with the first satellite when the power consumption level in the first satellite exceeds a certain predetermined level. This is accomplished by switching the channel off in the first satellite and on in the second satellite.
In commonly assigned U.S. Patent No. 5,241,685 to Bodin et al., and entitled "Load Sharing Control for a Mobile Cellular Radio System", the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein, a load sharing method is set forth which is based upon the occupancy of the channels defined by the ratio between the number of used occupied channels to the number of available channels.
The present invention distinguishes over the above-identified patents by providing a load sharing method which is invoked based on a power measurement of the base station's associated MCPA. The present invention recognizes that one may want to limit the maximum output power from an MCPA in order to reduce
According to the Brody et al. patent, if there is a mobile unit on the periphery of the cell which is also within the range of a neighboring cell, the mobile unit will be transferred to the neighboring cell in order to make room for a new call or an ongoing call associated with a mobile unit which will be handed off to the cell. While Brody et al. provides traffic-based control for call handoffs from one cell to an adjacent cell, handoffs due to load balancing are handled differently from handoffs due to mobile units leaving the cell. This creates a very complex system.
In U.S. Patent No. 5,625,868 to Jan et al., and entitled "Dynamic Traffic Load Distribution Method", the control over a call is transferred from a first satellite to a second satellite having a partially overlapping coverage area with the first satellite when the power consumption level in the first satellite exceeds a certain predetermined level. This is accomplished by switching the channel off in the first satellite and on in the second satellite.
In commonly assigned U.S. Patent No. 5,241,685 to Bodin et al., and entitled "Load Sharing Control for a Mobile Cellular Radio System", the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein, a load sharing method is set forth which is based upon the occupancy of the channels defined by the ratio between the number of used occupied channels to the number of available channels.
The present invention distinguishes over the above-identified patents by providing a load sharing method which is invoked based on a power measurement of the base station's associated MCPA. The present invention recognizes that one may want to limit the maximum output power from an MCPA in order to reduce
-4-costs. The load sharing method of the present invention enables for a lower cost, lower power MCPA to be employed in a base station.
SUMMARY
The present invention seeks to overcome the problems of congestion and call blocking in a system employing under-dimensioned MCPAs by reallocating transmission resources in an intelligent manner such that the sum of the output power from a number of transceivers utilizing the same MCPA does not exceed the limit of the MCPA output power.
According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the power of all transceivers served by a certain MCPA is compared to a threshold value X. The value X is at least related to the capability of the MCPA in terms of output power. If at no times (i.e., at all time slots), the sum of the output power exceeds the threshold value X, it is assumed that the MCPA can handle all simultaneous transmissions. If, during at least one time slot it is found that the required output power exceeds the capability of the serving MCPA, then a reallocation or load sharing algorithm is invoked. The reallocation algorithm searches for time slots to which a reallocation could be performed within the same base station or number of transceivers served by the MCPA. If no time slots can handle users from the time slot in which the MCPA limit is exceeded, then a load sharing algorithm is activated and one starts to look for transmission resources in transceivers served by other MCPAs, e.g., other cells. A number of alternative embodiments of the invention is described, which relates to the way in which the reallocation or load sharing is performed. By reallocating or moving users of a particular kind, e.g., single slot users, and avoiding reallocation of users of other particular kinds, the load sharing and reallocation are further improved.
SUMMARY
The present invention seeks to overcome the problems of congestion and call blocking in a system employing under-dimensioned MCPAs by reallocating transmission resources in an intelligent manner such that the sum of the output power from a number of transceivers utilizing the same MCPA does not exceed the limit of the MCPA output power.
According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the power of all transceivers served by a certain MCPA is compared to a threshold value X. The value X is at least related to the capability of the MCPA in terms of output power. If at no times (i.e., at all time slots), the sum of the output power exceeds the threshold value X, it is assumed that the MCPA can handle all simultaneous transmissions. If, during at least one time slot it is found that the required output power exceeds the capability of the serving MCPA, then a reallocation or load sharing algorithm is invoked. The reallocation algorithm searches for time slots to which a reallocation could be performed within the same base station or number of transceivers served by the MCPA. If no time slots can handle users from the time slot in which the MCPA limit is exceeded, then a load sharing algorithm is activated and one starts to look for transmission resources in transceivers served by other MCPAs, e.g., other cells. A number of alternative embodiments of the invention is described, which relates to the way in which the reallocation or load sharing is performed. By reallocating or moving users of a particular kind, e.g., single slot users, and avoiding reallocation of users of other particular kinds, the load sharing and reallocation are further improved.
-5-BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The above objects and features of the present invention will be more apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiments with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Figure 1 illustrates a conventional base station employing a MCPA;
Figure 2 illustrates an exemplary time chart which may be associated with a base station;
Figure 3 illustrates an exemplary cellular mobile radio system; and Figure 4 illustrates the load sharing method according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Figure 3 illustrates an exemplary cellular mobile radio system. In Figure 3, the cellular mobile radio system is illustrated as comprising ten cells.
One skilled in the art will appreciate that a typical cellular mobile radio system commonly includes more than ten cells; however, for the sake of brevity, the present invention is explained using the simplified representation illustrated in Figure 3.
Each cell C1-C10 has a corresponding base station B1-B10. Figure 3 illustrates the base stations as situated in the vicinity of the cell center and having omni-directional antennas. The cells C1-C10 are, therefore, schematically represented as hexagons. The base stations of adjacent cells may, however, be co-located in the vicinity of cell borders and have directional antennas as is well known to those skilled in the art. The base stations, according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention, are equipped with MCPAs and operate using time division multiple access (TDMA) techniques.
Figure 3 also illustrates nine mobile stations M1-M9, moveable within a cell and among a plurality of cells. In a typical cellular radio system there would normally be more than nine cellular mobile stations. In fact, there are typically
The above objects and features of the present invention will be more apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiments with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Figure 1 illustrates a conventional base station employing a MCPA;
Figure 2 illustrates an exemplary time chart which may be associated with a base station;
Figure 3 illustrates an exemplary cellular mobile radio system; and Figure 4 illustrates the load sharing method according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Figure 3 illustrates an exemplary cellular mobile radio system. In Figure 3, the cellular mobile radio system is illustrated as comprising ten cells.
One skilled in the art will appreciate that a typical cellular mobile radio system commonly includes more than ten cells; however, for the sake of brevity, the present invention is explained using the simplified representation illustrated in Figure 3.
Each cell C1-C10 has a corresponding base station B1-B10. Figure 3 illustrates the base stations as situated in the vicinity of the cell center and having omni-directional antennas. The cells C1-C10 are, therefore, schematically represented as hexagons. The base stations of adjacent cells may, however, be co-located in the vicinity of cell borders and have directional antennas as is well known to those skilled in the art. The base stations, according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention, are equipped with MCPAs and operate using time division multiple access (TDMA) techniques.
Figure 3 also illustrates nine mobile stations M1-M9, moveable within a cell and among a plurality of cells. In a typical cellular radio system there would normally be more than nine cellular mobile stations. In fact, there are typically
-6-many times the number of mobile stations as there are base stations. However, , for the purpose of explaining the invention, the reduced number of mobile stations is sufficient.
Also illustrated in Figure 3 is an exemplary number of base station controllers BSC1-BSC3 and a mobile switching center MSC. The base station controllers BSC 1-BSC3 control the operation of the base stations. The mobile switching center MSC is connected to each of the base station controllers BSC 1-BSC3 and to a fixed public switching telephone network or similar fixed network (not shown). While only one mobile switching center is illustrated in Figure 3, one skilled in the art will appreciate that additional mobile switching centers may be employed.
As mentioned above, the present invention is most applicable to a TDMA
environment where the power of a system is limited. An exemplary base station in which the load sharing method of the present invention may be implemented was set forth above with respect to Figure 1. Such a base station, operating in a TDMA environment, is commonly associated with a plurality of frequency carriers. Each frequency carrier is divided into a plurality of time slots to which mobile stations are assigned. Returning to Figure 2, for example, the frequencies associated with an exemplary base station are depicted. Each of the seven frequencies is divided, for explanatory purposes, into eight time slots.
Mobile users would be assigned to one or more time slots for transmission purposes.
When the MCPA has been dimensioned to a particular maximum output power, exceeding that maximum limit results in a loss in linearity and leads to a break of the specification (GSM, IS-136, etc.). As set forth in detail above, it is desirable to limit the maximum output power of the MCPA in order to, for example, reduce costs. The load sharing method of the present invention allows for a lower power, and, therefore, a lower cost MCPA to be employed by a base station.
According to exemplary embodiments of the present invention, a reduced output power MCPA can be employed if users, whose power requirements for any particular time slot exceed the limit of the MCPA output power for that time slot, are moved between time slots and frequencies in the same cell (infra-cell handoff) or between cells (inter-cell handoff). Figure 4 illustrates the load sharing method of the present invention.
In Figure 4, the total power for each time slot for the base station is determined, for example, via measuring (step 410). The sum of the powers from all frequencies at each time slot (TS) is then compared to a threshold value X
(step 420). The threshold value X can be set to the maximum allotted power for each time slot (i.e., the maximum power allowed by the MCPA for that time slot) or, in the alternative, to some value lower than that maximum allotted power.
In order to illustrate the comparison in step 420, consider the time chart in Figure 2. As set forth above, the sum of the powers from all frequencies at each time slot is provided below the time chart. For example, for time slot 1, the sum of the powers equals 15 W and for time slot 3, the sum of the powers equals 30 W. If the exemplary MCPA has been dimensioned to allow for a maximum power of 30 W per time slot, then the threshold value X may be selected to be 30 W
or some lower value. If the threshold value X is selected.as 30 W, then for the total output powers depicted in Figure 2, the comparison in step 420 would result in a "NO" answer for all time slots since the sum of the powers for each time slot does not exceed the threshold value of 30 W. If, however, the mobile user at frequency 3 and time slot 3 wants to increase its power from 4 W to 6 W, the threshold value would be exceeded for that time slot, resulting in a "YES"
answer to the comparison in step 420.
If the comparison in step 420 indicates that there are no time slots having a total power greater than the threshold value X, then it is assumed that the MCPA
can handle all simultaneous transmissions and the system returns to step 410.
If, in the alternative, it is determined that one or more time slots exist that are above _g_ the threshold value X, then the total power of each of the remaining time slots (i.e., those time slots whose total output power does not exceed the threshold value X) is compared to a second threshold value Y (step 430}. The threshold value Y is a "guard" so that a moved user will not cause problems to other users on that same time slot. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the threshold value Y could be a fixed value or a function of a variety of parameters, such as the requested increase in power, the absolute value of the requested power, the maximum allotted power, etc.
In order to illustrate the comparison in step 430, consider again the time chart illustrated in Figure 2. Assume again that time slot 3 has exceeded the threshold value X (30 W), as set forth in the example above, when the user at frequency 3 and time slot 3 wants to increase its power from 4 W to 6 W. The total power of each of the remaining time slots (i.e., time slots 1, 2 and 4-8) is then compared to the threshold value Y. The threshold value Y should be at least equal to or less than the threshold value X (30 W) minus the desired output power (i.e., 6 W). Therefore, the total power of each of the remaining time slots is compared to a threshold value of 24 W. It is evident from the time chart in Figure 2 that time slots 1, 2, 4-6 and 8 would satisfy this requirement thereby resulting in a "YES" answer to the comparison in step 430.
If no time slot can be found in step 430 having a total power less than the threshold value Y, then a modified version of the cell load sharing algorithm as described in U.S. Patent No. 5,241,685 to Bodin et al., which is incorporated by reference herein, is invoked (step 440) and an inter-cell handoff is initiated.
The difference between the present invention and the cell load sharing algorithm described in U.S. Patent No. 5,241,685 is that the load sharing method of the present invention is triggered by an output power criterion as opposed to an occupancy level criterion. Prior to determining whether the occupancy of a particular cell exceeds a predetermined occupancy threshold value, the sum of the powers from all frequencies for each time slot associated with that cell are determined and compared to the threshold value Y. If it is determined that one or more time slots exist that are less than the threshold value Y, then the algorithm described in Bodin et al. continues. If all time slots in the cell under consideration equal or exceed the threshold value Y, then the next neighboring cell is considered.
If it is determined that multiple cells have time slots that are less than the threshold value Y, then the highest ranked cell is selected. The concept of "load sharing" is to change the threshold value for a handoff so that mobile stations on the periphery of a cell make an earlier handoff to another cell (i.e., the rankings of the other cells are increased compared to the own cell). This means that when the load sharing algorithm is invoked, due to either the number of mobile stations in a cell or the total power on a time slot, the own cell will "shrink" and the mobile stations on the periphery of the own cell will make an inter-cell handoff to the highest ranked cell.
IS One skilled in the art will appreciate that, in certain situations, it may be advantageous to move a user other than the one requesting the increase in output power..~~This may be due to, for example, the position of the other user within the cell, the number of time slots to which the other user has been allotted, the velocity of the other user, the amount of output power required by the other user, the signal strength, the signal quality and/or the type of service (i.e., speech or data). By moving this other user to another cell, enough power may be freed up on one time slot in the same cell so that an intra-cell handoff can be made, either with the user that requested the higher output power or some other mobile station on that specific time slot.
If one or more time slots with a lower total power than the threshold value Y are found, then the time slot with the lowest total power is selected (step 450) and the system makes an intra-cell handoff of one of the users on the high output power time slot to the time slot with the lowest total power (step 460).
As set forth above with respect to an inter-cell handoff, it may, in certain situations, be advantageous to move a user other than the one requesting the increase in output power. Some factors to be considered in determining which user to move in the intra-cell handoff include, but are not limited to, the number of time slots to which the user has been assigned, the power requirements for that user, signal strength, signal quality, type of service (i.e., speech or data), etc.
Moreover, it may be desirable to move multiple users around so as to free up enough power at a particular time slot for a user requesting an increase in output power. For example, in Figure 2, assume that a new user requires an output power of 27 W. No time slot would be able to accommodate the new user without exceeding the maximum threshold value of 30 W. If, however, in time slot 1, the users at frequency 1 and frequency 4 were moved to either time slot 5 or 8, then the new user could be accommodated at time slot 1 and the users at time slot 1 could be accommodated at either time slot 5 or 8 without exceeding the threshold value of 30 W.
When it is determined that no intra-cell or inter-cell handoff can be performed in order to provide a user with a requested increase in output power, the output power of the base station remains constant on that time slot and the request for a higher output power is denied. One skilled in the art will appreciate, however, that such can endanger communications between the base station and the mobile station or at least decrease the performance of the link. One possible solution is to increase the output power for the requesting user up to the maximum allotted for that time slot even though the increase is not to the requested level.
Alternatively, the user could be moved to a time slot which could provide the highest increase in output power for the user. Irrespective of whether the output power is increased to the maximum allotted value in the time slot in which the user is currently assigned or another time slot to which the user is moved, the load sharing method illustrated in Figure 4 would be restarted in order to determine if an alternative time slot within the same cell or different cell has become available which is capable of supplying the requested output power.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, a third threshold value which is a function of the total power consumption in the MCPA
is provided. Suppose that all time slots are within the power limit, so that the invention is not invoked, i.e., the total powers for all time slots are less than the threshold value X, but very close to X on every time slot. If a user wants to increase power, invoking an inter-cell handoff is the only solution if the total power would be greater than the threshold Y for all time slots. There would be some delay before some of the users have made the handoff to another cell and during this time, the links that want to increase the output power are denied the increase. If a third threshold value Z is introduced that is a percentage of ttie maximum power consumption on the MCPA, the above-described delay could be avoided. The absolute total power that is possible in the MCPA is known (i.e., the maximum power for which the MCPA is dimensioned or the sum of the maximum allotted power for each time slot is known) and if the total power in the MCPA (all time slots and all frequencies) are more than Z % of the maximum value, the cell load sharing algorithm is invoked and an inter-cell handoff is immediately commenced. As a result, the above-described delay is avoided.
While the above-described embodiments set forth that each cell in the radio communication system is associated with a single MCPA, one skilled in the art will appreciate that multiple MCPAs may be associated with a single cell. As a result, the intra-cell handoff technique is equally applicable to a single cell having multiple MCPAs wherein a user from a time slot associated with a first MCPA in a first cell is handed off to a time slot associated with a second MCPA in that same first cell.
The foregoing has described the principles, preferred embodiments and modes of operation of the present invention. However, the invention should not be construed as being limited to the particular embodiments discussed above.
Thus, the above-described embodiments should be regarded as illustrative rather than restrictive, and it should be appreciated that variations may be made in those embodiments by workers skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the present invention as defined by the following claims.
Also illustrated in Figure 3 is an exemplary number of base station controllers BSC1-BSC3 and a mobile switching center MSC. The base station controllers BSC 1-BSC3 control the operation of the base stations. The mobile switching center MSC is connected to each of the base station controllers BSC 1-BSC3 and to a fixed public switching telephone network or similar fixed network (not shown). While only one mobile switching center is illustrated in Figure 3, one skilled in the art will appreciate that additional mobile switching centers may be employed.
As mentioned above, the present invention is most applicable to a TDMA
environment where the power of a system is limited. An exemplary base station in which the load sharing method of the present invention may be implemented was set forth above with respect to Figure 1. Such a base station, operating in a TDMA environment, is commonly associated with a plurality of frequency carriers. Each frequency carrier is divided into a plurality of time slots to which mobile stations are assigned. Returning to Figure 2, for example, the frequencies associated with an exemplary base station are depicted. Each of the seven frequencies is divided, for explanatory purposes, into eight time slots.
Mobile users would be assigned to one or more time slots for transmission purposes.
When the MCPA has been dimensioned to a particular maximum output power, exceeding that maximum limit results in a loss in linearity and leads to a break of the specification (GSM, IS-136, etc.). As set forth in detail above, it is desirable to limit the maximum output power of the MCPA in order to, for example, reduce costs. The load sharing method of the present invention allows for a lower power, and, therefore, a lower cost MCPA to be employed by a base station.
According to exemplary embodiments of the present invention, a reduced output power MCPA can be employed if users, whose power requirements for any particular time slot exceed the limit of the MCPA output power for that time slot, are moved between time slots and frequencies in the same cell (infra-cell handoff) or between cells (inter-cell handoff). Figure 4 illustrates the load sharing method of the present invention.
In Figure 4, the total power for each time slot for the base station is determined, for example, via measuring (step 410). The sum of the powers from all frequencies at each time slot (TS) is then compared to a threshold value X
(step 420). The threshold value X can be set to the maximum allotted power for each time slot (i.e., the maximum power allowed by the MCPA for that time slot) or, in the alternative, to some value lower than that maximum allotted power.
In order to illustrate the comparison in step 420, consider the time chart in Figure 2. As set forth above, the sum of the powers from all frequencies at each time slot is provided below the time chart. For example, for time slot 1, the sum of the powers equals 15 W and for time slot 3, the sum of the powers equals 30 W. If the exemplary MCPA has been dimensioned to allow for a maximum power of 30 W per time slot, then the threshold value X may be selected to be 30 W
or some lower value. If the threshold value X is selected.as 30 W, then for the total output powers depicted in Figure 2, the comparison in step 420 would result in a "NO" answer for all time slots since the sum of the powers for each time slot does not exceed the threshold value of 30 W. If, however, the mobile user at frequency 3 and time slot 3 wants to increase its power from 4 W to 6 W, the threshold value would be exceeded for that time slot, resulting in a "YES"
answer to the comparison in step 420.
If the comparison in step 420 indicates that there are no time slots having a total power greater than the threshold value X, then it is assumed that the MCPA
can handle all simultaneous transmissions and the system returns to step 410.
If, in the alternative, it is determined that one or more time slots exist that are above _g_ the threshold value X, then the total power of each of the remaining time slots (i.e., those time slots whose total output power does not exceed the threshold value X) is compared to a second threshold value Y (step 430}. The threshold value Y is a "guard" so that a moved user will not cause problems to other users on that same time slot. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the threshold value Y could be a fixed value or a function of a variety of parameters, such as the requested increase in power, the absolute value of the requested power, the maximum allotted power, etc.
In order to illustrate the comparison in step 430, consider again the time chart illustrated in Figure 2. Assume again that time slot 3 has exceeded the threshold value X (30 W), as set forth in the example above, when the user at frequency 3 and time slot 3 wants to increase its power from 4 W to 6 W. The total power of each of the remaining time slots (i.e., time slots 1, 2 and 4-8) is then compared to the threshold value Y. The threshold value Y should be at least equal to or less than the threshold value X (30 W) minus the desired output power (i.e., 6 W). Therefore, the total power of each of the remaining time slots is compared to a threshold value of 24 W. It is evident from the time chart in Figure 2 that time slots 1, 2, 4-6 and 8 would satisfy this requirement thereby resulting in a "YES" answer to the comparison in step 430.
If no time slot can be found in step 430 having a total power less than the threshold value Y, then a modified version of the cell load sharing algorithm as described in U.S. Patent No. 5,241,685 to Bodin et al., which is incorporated by reference herein, is invoked (step 440) and an inter-cell handoff is initiated.
The difference between the present invention and the cell load sharing algorithm described in U.S. Patent No. 5,241,685 is that the load sharing method of the present invention is triggered by an output power criterion as opposed to an occupancy level criterion. Prior to determining whether the occupancy of a particular cell exceeds a predetermined occupancy threshold value, the sum of the powers from all frequencies for each time slot associated with that cell are determined and compared to the threshold value Y. If it is determined that one or more time slots exist that are less than the threshold value Y, then the algorithm described in Bodin et al. continues. If all time slots in the cell under consideration equal or exceed the threshold value Y, then the next neighboring cell is considered.
If it is determined that multiple cells have time slots that are less than the threshold value Y, then the highest ranked cell is selected. The concept of "load sharing" is to change the threshold value for a handoff so that mobile stations on the periphery of a cell make an earlier handoff to another cell (i.e., the rankings of the other cells are increased compared to the own cell). This means that when the load sharing algorithm is invoked, due to either the number of mobile stations in a cell or the total power on a time slot, the own cell will "shrink" and the mobile stations on the periphery of the own cell will make an inter-cell handoff to the highest ranked cell.
IS One skilled in the art will appreciate that, in certain situations, it may be advantageous to move a user other than the one requesting the increase in output power..~~This may be due to, for example, the position of the other user within the cell, the number of time slots to which the other user has been allotted, the velocity of the other user, the amount of output power required by the other user, the signal strength, the signal quality and/or the type of service (i.e., speech or data). By moving this other user to another cell, enough power may be freed up on one time slot in the same cell so that an intra-cell handoff can be made, either with the user that requested the higher output power or some other mobile station on that specific time slot.
If one or more time slots with a lower total power than the threshold value Y are found, then the time slot with the lowest total power is selected (step 450) and the system makes an intra-cell handoff of one of the users on the high output power time slot to the time slot with the lowest total power (step 460).
As set forth above with respect to an inter-cell handoff, it may, in certain situations, be advantageous to move a user other than the one requesting the increase in output power. Some factors to be considered in determining which user to move in the intra-cell handoff include, but are not limited to, the number of time slots to which the user has been assigned, the power requirements for that user, signal strength, signal quality, type of service (i.e., speech or data), etc.
Moreover, it may be desirable to move multiple users around so as to free up enough power at a particular time slot for a user requesting an increase in output power. For example, in Figure 2, assume that a new user requires an output power of 27 W. No time slot would be able to accommodate the new user without exceeding the maximum threshold value of 30 W. If, however, in time slot 1, the users at frequency 1 and frequency 4 were moved to either time slot 5 or 8, then the new user could be accommodated at time slot 1 and the users at time slot 1 could be accommodated at either time slot 5 or 8 without exceeding the threshold value of 30 W.
When it is determined that no intra-cell or inter-cell handoff can be performed in order to provide a user with a requested increase in output power, the output power of the base station remains constant on that time slot and the request for a higher output power is denied. One skilled in the art will appreciate, however, that such can endanger communications between the base station and the mobile station or at least decrease the performance of the link. One possible solution is to increase the output power for the requesting user up to the maximum allotted for that time slot even though the increase is not to the requested level.
Alternatively, the user could be moved to a time slot which could provide the highest increase in output power for the user. Irrespective of whether the output power is increased to the maximum allotted value in the time slot in which the user is currently assigned or another time slot to which the user is moved, the load sharing method illustrated in Figure 4 would be restarted in order to determine if an alternative time slot within the same cell or different cell has become available which is capable of supplying the requested output power.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, a third threshold value which is a function of the total power consumption in the MCPA
is provided. Suppose that all time slots are within the power limit, so that the invention is not invoked, i.e., the total powers for all time slots are less than the threshold value X, but very close to X on every time slot. If a user wants to increase power, invoking an inter-cell handoff is the only solution if the total power would be greater than the threshold Y for all time slots. There would be some delay before some of the users have made the handoff to another cell and during this time, the links that want to increase the output power are denied the increase. If a third threshold value Z is introduced that is a percentage of ttie maximum power consumption on the MCPA, the above-described delay could be avoided. The absolute total power that is possible in the MCPA is known (i.e., the maximum power for which the MCPA is dimensioned or the sum of the maximum allotted power for each time slot is known) and if the total power in the MCPA (all time slots and all frequencies) are more than Z % of the maximum value, the cell load sharing algorithm is invoked and an inter-cell handoff is immediately commenced. As a result, the above-described delay is avoided.
While the above-described embodiments set forth that each cell in the radio communication system is associated with a single MCPA, one skilled in the art will appreciate that multiple MCPAs may be associated with a single cell. As a result, the intra-cell handoff technique is equally applicable to a single cell having multiple MCPAs wherein a user from a time slot associated with a first MCPA in a first cell is handed off to a time slot associated with a second MCPA in that same first cell.
The foregoing has described the principles, preferred embodiments and modes of operation of the present invention. However, the invention should not be construed as being limited to the particular embodiments discussed above.
Thus, the above-described embodiments should be regarded as illustrative rather than restrictive, and it should be appreciated that variations may be made in those embodiments by workers skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the present invention as defined by the following claims.
Claims (34)
1. A method for performing a handoff in a radio communication system, said method comprising the steps of:
determining per time slot a sum of output power of simultaneously transmitted signals from a first base station; and initiating, if said sum exceeds a first threshold, a handoff process.
determining per time slot a sum of output power of simultaneously transmitted signals from a first base station; and initiating, if said sum exceeds a first threshold, a handoff process.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein said handoff process is an intra-cell handoff.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein said handoff process is an inter-cell handoff.
4. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of:
determining if at least one alternative time slot exists on said first base station which has a sum of output power below a second threshold; and performing, if at least one alternative time slot exists, an infra-cell handoff from a first time slot having a sum of output power which exceeds the first threshold to one of said at least one alternative time slot.
determining if at least one alternative time slot exists on said first base station which has a sum of output power below a second threshold; and performing, if at least one alternative time slot exists, an infra-cell handoff from a first time slot having a sum of output power which exceeds the first threshold to one of said at least one alternative time slot.
5. The method of claim 4 wherein said one of said at least one alternative time slot is selected based on a lowest total output power.
6. The method of claim 4 further comprising the step of:
determining, when an infra-cell handoff is to be performed, which user to move to said one of said at least one alternative time slot.
determining, when an infra-cell handoff is to be performed, which user to move to said one of said at least one alternative time slot.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein said user determining step is based on one or more of a number of time slots to which a user is assigned, a power requirement of said user, signal strength, signal quality and type of service.
8. The method of claim 2 wherein said intra-cell handoff involves moving multiple users to different time slots.
9. The method of claim 4 wherein said second threshold is a function of an available output power per time slot and a desired output power of a user selected for handoff.
10. The method of claim 4 further comprising the steps of:
initiating, if at least one alternative time slot fails to exist, an inter-cell handoff process;
determining if at least one alternative time slot on a second base station exists which has a sum of output power below said second threshold;
and performing, if at least one alternative time slot on a second base station exists, an inter-cell handoff of a user from one time slot on said first base station which has a sum exceeding said first threshold to one of said at least one alternative time slots on said second base station.
initiating, if at least one alternative time slot fails to exist, an inter-cell handoff process;
determining if at least one alternative time slot on a second base station exists which has a sum of output power below said second threshold;
and performing, if at least one alternative time slot on a second base station exists, an inter-cell handoff of a user from one time slot on said first base station which has a sum exceeding said first threshold to one of said at least one alternative time slots on said second base station.
11. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of:
determining if at least one alternative time slot exists on at least one other base station which has a sum of output power below a second threshold;
and performing, if at least one alternative time slot exists on at least one other base station, an inter-cell handoff of a user from one time slot on said first base station which has a sum exceeding said first threshold to one of said at least one alternative time slots on one of said at least one other base station.
determining if at least one alternative time slot exists on at least one other base station which has a sum of output power below a second threshold;
and performing, if at least one alternative time slot exists on at least one other base station, an inter-cell handoff of a user from one time slot on said first base station which has a sum exceeding said first threshold to one of said at least one alternative time slots on one of said at least one other base station.
12. The method of claim 11 further comprising the step of:
determining, when an inter-cell handoff is to be performed, which user to move to said one of said at least one alternative time slots on one of said at least one other base station.
determining, when an inter-cell handoff is to be performed, which user to move to said one of said at least one alternative time slots on one of said at least one other base station.
13. The method of claim 12 wherein said user determining step is based on one or more of position of the user within a cell covered by said first base station, velocity of said user, number of time slots to which the user has been assigned, amount of power required by the user, signal quality, signal strength, and type of service.
14. A method for performing a handoff of a user in a radio communication system, said method comprising the steps of:
comparing a total power of each time slot to a first threshold;
comparing, in response to a determination that at least one time slot exceeds said first threshold, each time slot which does not exceed said first threshold to a second threshold; and performing one of an intra-cell handoff and an inter-cell handoff in response to said comparison to said second threshold.
comparing a total power of each time slot to a first threshold;
comparing, in response to a determination that at least one time slot exceeds said first threshold, each time slot which does not exceed said first threshold to a second threshold; and performing one of an intra-cell handoff and an inter-cell handoff in response to said comparison to said second threshold.
15. The method of claim 14 wherein said intra-cell handoff is performed when a total power of a time slot is determined to be below said second threshold.
16. The method of claim 14 wherein said inter-cell handoff is performed when the total power of each time slot equals or exceeds said second threshold.
17. The method of claim 14 further comprising the steps of:
comparing, prior to said step of comparing to a second threshold, a sum of the total power of all time slots to a third threshold; and performing, if said sum exceeds said third threshold, an inter-cell handoff.
comparing, prior to said step of comparing to a second threshold, a sum of the total power of all time slots to a third threshold; and performing, if said sum exceeds said third threshold, an inter-cell handoff.
18. A system for performing a handoff in a radio communication system, said system comprising:
means for determining per time slot a sum of output power of simultaneously transmitted signals from a first base station; and means for initiating a handoff process if said sum exceeds a first threshold.
means for determining per time slot a sum of output power of simultaneously transmitted signals from a first base station; and means for initiating a handoff process if said sum exceeds a first threshold.
19. The system of claim 18 wherein said handoff process is an intra-cell handoff.
20. The system of claim 18 wherein said handoff process is an inter-cell handoff.
21. The system of claim 18 further comprising:
means for determining if at least one alternative time slot exists on said first base station which has a sum of output power below a second threshold;
and means for performing, if at least one alternative time slot exists, an intra-cell handoff from a first time slot having a sum of output power which exceeds the first threshold to one of said at least one alternative time slot.
means for determining if at least one alternative time slot exists on said first base station which has a sum of output power below a second threshold;
and means for performing, if at least one alternative time slot exists, an intra-cell handoff from a first time slot having a sum of output power which exceeds the first threshold to one of said at least one alternative time slot.
22. The system of claim 21 wherein said one of said at least one alternative time slot is selected based on a lowest total output power.
23. The system of claim 22 further comprising:
means for determining, when an intra-cell handoff is to be performed, which user to move to said one of said at least one alternative time slot.
means for determining, when an intra-cell handoff is to be performed, which user to move to said one of said at least one alternative time slot.
24. The system of claim 23 wherein said means for determining which user to move makes the determination based on one or more of a number of time slots to which a user is assigned, a power requirement of said user, signal strength, signal quality and type of service.
25. The system of claim 19 wherein said intra-cell handoff involves moving multiple users to different time slots.
26. The system of claim 21 wherein said second threshold is a function of an available output power per time slot and a desired output power of a user selected for handoff.
27. The system of claim 21 further comprising:
means for initiating, if at least one alternative time slot fails to exist, an inter-cell handoff process;
means for determining if at least one alternative time slot on a second base station exists which has a sum of output power below said second threshold; and means for performing, if at least one alternative time slot on a second base station exists, an inter-cell handoff of a user from one time slot on said first base station which has a sum exceeding said first threshold to one of said at least one alternative time slots on said second base station.
means for initiating, if at least one alternative time slot fails to exist, an inter-cell handoff process;
means for determining if at least one alternative time slot on a second base station exists which has a sum of output power below said second threshold; and means for performing, if at least one alternative time slot on a second base station exists, an inter-cell handoff of a user from one time slot on said first base station which has a sum exceeding said first threshold to one of said at least one alternative time slots on said second base station.
28. The system of claim 18 further comprising:
means for determining if at least one alternative time slot exists on at least one other base station which has a sum of output power below a second threshold; and means for performing, if at least one alternative time slot exists on at least one other base station, an inter-cell handoff of a user from one time slot on said first base station which has a sum exceeding said first threshold to one of said at least one alternative time slots on one of said at least one other base station.
means for determining if at least one alternative time slot exists on at least one other base station which has a sum of output power below a second threshold; and means for performing, if at least one alternative time slot exists on at least one other base station, an inter-cell handoff of a user from one time slot on said first base station which has a sum exceeding said first threshold to one of said at least one alternative time slots on one of said at least one other base station.
29. The system of claim 28 further comprising:
means for determining, when an inter-cell handoff is to be performed, which user to move to said one of said at least one alternative time slots on one of said at least one other base station.
means for determining, when an inter-cell handoff is to be performed, which user to move to said one of said at least one alternative time slots on one of said at least one other base station.
30. The method of claim 29 wherein said means for determining which user to move makes the determination based on one or more of position of the user within a cell covered by said first base station, velocity of said user, number of time slots to which the user has been assigned, amount of power required by the user, signal quality, signal strength, and type of service.
31. A system for performing a handoff of a user in a radio communication system, said system comprising:
means for comparing a total power of each time slot to a first threshold;
means for comparing, in response to a determination that at least one time slot exceeds said first threshold, each time slot which does not exceed said first threshold to a second threshold; and means for performing one of an intra-cell handoff and an inter-cell handoff in response to said comparison to said second threshold.
means for comparing a total power of each time slot to a first threshold;
means for comparing, in response to a determination that at least one time slot exceeds said first threshold, each time slot which does not exceed said first threshold to a second threshold; and means for performing one of an intra-cell handoff and an inter-cell handoff in response to said comparison to said second threshold.
32. The system of claim 31 wherein said intra-cell handoff is performed when a total power of a time slot is determined to be below said second threshold.
33. The system of claim 31 wherein said inter-cell handoff is performed when the total power of each time slot equals or exceeds said second threshold.
34. The system of claim 31 further comprising:
means for comparing a sum of the total power of all time slots to a third threshold; and means for performing, if said sum exceeds said third threshold, an inter-cell handoff.
means for comparing a sum of the total power of all time slots to a third threshold; and means for performing, if said sum exceeds said third threshold, an inter-cell handoff.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/166,159 | 1998-10-05 | ||
| US09/166,159 US6542482B1 (en) | 1998-10-05 | 1998-10-05 | Load sharing for MCPA-equipped base station |
| PCT/SE1999/001745 WO2000021322A1 (en) | 1998-10-05 | 1999-10-01 | Load sharing for mcpa-equipped base stations |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2345732A1 true CA2345732A1 (en) | 2000-04-13 |
Family
ID=22602064
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002345732A Abandoned CA2345732A1 (en) | 1998-10-05 | 1999-10-01 | Load sharing for mcpa-equipped base stations |
Country Status (8)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US6542482B1 (en) |
| EP (1) | EP1120000B1 (en) |
| KR (1) | KR20010080000A (en) |
| CN (1) | CN1149887C (en) |
| AU (1) | AU754661B2 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2345732A1 (en) |
| DE (1) | DE69932171T2 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2000021322A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (21)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6570861B1 (en) * | 1998-11-20 | 2003-05-27 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus for assigning use of a radio frequency communication resource |
| EP1224745A1 (en) | 1999-07-08 | 2002-07-24 | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | Transmit power control for mcpa-equipped base stations |
| GB2357647A (en) * | 1999-12-24 | 2001-06-27 | Nokia Networks Oy | Multi-carrier TDMA base station where uniform transmission power across time slots is achieved by a method of allocation of new calls |
| GB2357670A (en) * | 1999-12-24 | 2001-06-27 | Nokia Networks Oy | Controlling a base station transmitter comprising a multi-carrier power amplifier |
| DE10021862B4 (en) * | 2000-05-05 | 2005-09-15 | Siemens Ag | Method for dynamic resource allocation in a radio communication system and corresponding device |
| US6584330B1 (en) * | 2000-07-18 | 2003-06-24 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Adaptive power management for a node of a cellular telecommunications network |
| US6819934B1 (en) * | 2000-11-03 | 2004-11-16 | Nortel Networks, Limited | System and method for power management in a multi-channel power amplifier (MCPA) environment |
| SE0004921A0 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2002-06-30 | Ericsson Telefon Ab L M | Energy managing routine for a cellular telecommunication system |
| WO2002087176A2 (en) * | 2001-04-18 | 2002-10-31 | Skypilot Network, Inc. | Network channel access protocol - interference and load adaptive |
| US7016364B2 (en) * | 2001-05-04 | 2006-03-21 | Alcatel Canada Inc. | Power pooling in network downstream data transmission |
| DE10323191B4 (en) * | 2003-05-22 | 2005-04-07 | Siemens Ag | Method for operating a mobile radio system, mobile radio system and base station |
| US20050083879A1 (en) * | 2003-10-21 | 2005-04-21 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus to improve quality of service in a wireless network |
| WO2006026891A1 (en) * | 2004-09-08 | 2006-03-16 | Utstarcom Telecom Co., Ltd. | Centrailzed base-station system based on atca architeture platform |
| US20110116468A1 (en) * | 2005-01-04 | 2011-05-19 | Yuan Zhu | Handover of user equipment |
| EP1895801A1 (en) * | 2006-08-30 | 2008-03-05 | Nokia Siemens Networks Gmbh & Co. Kg | Method to balance traffic load between nearby LTE/WiMAX cells grouped into inner and border constellations |
| US8305991B1 (en) | 2007-11-14 | 2012-11-06 | Sprint Spectrum L.P. | Method and system for sector switching during packet transmission |
| US20090233644A1 (en) * | 2008-03-11 | 2009-09-17 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Multiple carrier radio systems and methods employing polar active antenna elements |
| US8301156B2 (en) * | 2008-09-25 | 2012-10-30 | Optimi Corporation | Load balancing for capacity improvement in mobile wireless communication networks |
| US20100159948A1 (en) * | 2008-12-19 | 2010-06-24 | Taproot Systems, Inc. | Adaptive Networking For Power Savings |
| US8547842B2 (en) | 2009-02-20 | 2013-10-01 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Transmit power control for base stations using multiple carrier power amplifiers |
| CN101969688B (en) * | 2009-07-28 | 2014-04-16 | 华为技术有限公司 | Carrier processing method, communication device and communication system |
Family Cites Families (17)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4670899A (en) | 1985-05-31 | 1987-06-02 | Northern Telecom Limited | Load balancing for cellular radiotelephone system |
| US5241685A (en) | 1991-03-15 | 1993-08-31 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson | Load sharing control for a mobile cellular radio system |
| US5175867A (en) * | 1991-03-15 | 1992-12-29 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson | Neighbor-assisted handoff in a cellular communications system |
| US5164958A (en) * | 1991-05-22 | 1992-11-17 | Cylink Corporation | Spread spectrum cellular handoff method |
| US5367559A (en) * | 1992-05-11 | 1994-11-22 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Sequential power estimation for cellular system handoff |
| US5625868A (en) | 1994-03-30 | 1997-04-29 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus for load sharing in a satellite communication system |
| US5574974A (en) | 1995-03-20 | 1996-11-12 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson | Adaptive channel allocation in a mobile communications system |
| US6272325B1 (en) * | 1995-07-13 | 2001-08-07 | Globalstar L.P. | Method and apparatus for considering user terminal transmitted power during operation in a plurality of different communication systems |
| US5732076A (en) * | 1995-10-26 | 1998-03-24 | Omnipoint Corporation | Coexisting communication systems |
| KR0170190B1 (en) * | 1995-12-06 | 1999-03-30 | 정선종 | Control method of traffic load of cdma mobile communication system |
| GB2310108B (en) * | 1996-02-06 | 2000-04-26 | Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd | Handoff |
| US5924015A (en) | 1996-04-30 | 1999-07-13 | Trw Inc | Power control method and apparatus for satellite based telecommunications system |
| US5805995A (en) * | 1996-10-28 | 1998-09-08 | Northern Telecom Limited | Channel reservation and power control for improved handoff performance |
| KR100211739B1 (en) * | 1997-05-21 | 1999-08-02 | 서평원 | Handoff control method using virtual cell border under the multi-frequency environment |
| US6160999A (en) * | 1997-08-18 | 2000-12-12 | Nortel Networks Limited | Wireless communication system providing improved forward link management and method of operation |
| US5956641A (en) * | 1998-03-30 | 1999-09-21 | Motorola, Inc. | System and method for facilitating a handoff of at least one mobile unit in a telecommunication system |
| US6216004B1 (en) * | 1998-06-23 | 2001-04-10 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Cellular communication system with common channel soft handoff and associated method |
-
1998
- 1998-10-05 US US09/166,159 patent/US6542482B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1999
- 1999-10-01 CA CA002345732A patent/CA2345732A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1999-10-01 KR KR1020017004303A patent/KR20010080000A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1999-10-01 DE DE69932171T patent/DE69932171T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1999-10-01 CN CNB998141151A patent/CN1149887C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1999-10-01 AU AU13031/00A patent/AU754661B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1999-10-01 EP EP99956411A patent/EP1120000B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1999-10-01 WO PCT/SE1999/001745 patent/WO2000021322A1/en active IP Right Grant
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US6542482B1 (en) | 2003-04-01 |
| AU754661B2 (en) | 2002-11-21 |
| KR20010080000A (en) | 2001-08-22 |
| CN1329801A (en) | 2002-01-02 |
| WO2000021322A1 (en) | 2000-04-13 |
| CN1149887C (en) | 2004-05-12 |
| DE69932171T2 (en) | 2007-05-24 |
| EP1120000B1 (en) | 2006-06-28 |
| DE69932171D1 (en) | 2006-08-10 |
| AU1303100A (en) | 2000-04-26 |
| EP1120000A1 (en) | 2001-08-01 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| EP1120000B1 (en) | Load sharing for mcpa-equipped base stations | |
| US5448750A (en) | Segregation method of dynamic channel allocation in a mobile radio system | |
| EP0819363B1 (en) | Automatic control channel planning in adaptive channel allocation systems | |
| US5081671A (en) | Method of reducing blockages in handing over calls in a mobile, cellular telephone system | |
| US4794635A (en) | Two-way radio communication system with max-minimum call assignment method | |
| US5771454A (en) | Base station allocation method for mobile radio communication system | |
| EP0819364B1 (en) | Stabilized control channel planning using loosely coupled dedicated traffic channels | |
| KR19990082078A (en) | Method and circuit for selectively allowing communication in multi-user communication system | |
| EP1739988A1 (en) | Method of microcell management in mobile communication system using centralized basestation | |
| EP0505105A2 (en) | Communication request retry in cellular telecommunications networks and methods therefor | |
| WO1992011736A1 (en) | Quality check for a mobile cellular radio system | |
| WO1998003029A2 (en) | Improved flow control in cellular radio networks for reducing traffic congestion | |
| AU6995500A (en) | Method, device and program unit for improving the transmission quality in a CDMA system | |
| US8412225B1 (en) | Multi-carrier load balancing scheme for voice and data | |
| US5802456A (en) | Method and apparatus to mitigate interference caused by an overlay communication system | |
| GB2292655A (en) | Dynamic channel allocation in a radio telephone communications sytem | |
| EP1310122B1 (en) | Load sharing in cellular communication system | |
| WO1998000995A1 (en) | Congestion relief for cellular radio communication systems | |
| JP2850619B2 (en) | Transmission power control method for mobile communication system | |
| WO1995022876A1 (en) | Quality check for a mobile cellular radio system | |
| CA2217192C (en) | Stabilized control channel planning using loosely coupled dedicated traffic channels |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FZDE | Discontinued |