CA2256507A1 - Real-time process control simulation method and apparatus - Google Patents
Real-time process control simulation method and apparatus Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2256507A1 CA2256507A1 CA002256507A CA2256507A CA2256507A1 CA 2256507 A1 CA2256507 A1 CA 2256507A1 CA 002256507 A CA002256507 A CA 002256507A CA 2256507 A CA2256507 A CA 2256507A CA 2256507 A1 CA2256507 A1 CA 2256507A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- real
- operating system
- software
- time
- control
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 title claims description 46
- 238000004886 process control Methods 0.000 title claims description 3
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title description 19
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 43
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 abstract description 8
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 abstract description 6
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 9
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000003278 mimic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011017 operating method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 2
- 241000408529 Libra Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003780 insertion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000037431 insertion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010076 replication Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B17/00—Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems
- G05B17/02—Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems electric
Abstract
An industrial plant controller device's control algorithm is ported from a real-time proprietary operating environment (an industrial control plant) to a non-proprietary environment such as an ethernet running TCP/IP. In combination with an application programmer's interface, the invention allows manipulation of the actual device controller's control algorithms including the capability to arbitrarily stop and start the controller algorithm's operation, exercise the controller algorithm at a rate slower and faster than real-time, restore the controller algorithm to a known state, and store the configuration of the algorithm controller state. The increased fidelity provided by the invention allows an operator to design, test, and verify control system strategies in a more comprehensive manner than possible in prior art systems. An added benefit of the invention is that it can be used in an improved operator training system.
Description
CA 022~6~07 1998-ll-26 Real-Time Proc~ss Control SimulAtion Method and Apparatus l.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates in general to the field of industrial control and, more particularly, to a method and apparatus for running control software developed to run on a process controller having a proprietary real-time operating system within a non-proprietary operating system such that the control software may be tested and modified in a non-real-time environment.
As shown in FIG. 1, a typical industrial control system 100 comprises a plant 105, at least one device controller 110, a man-machine interface (M~) unit 115, and a proprietary communication network 120 that links the control system's different elements. (Hereinafter, the terln data highway will be used to refer to the proprietary communication network 120 so as to distinguish it from an open, or non-proprietary computer network such as an ethernet running TCP/IP
protocols.) The plant 105 consists of the actual machinery and/or devices that constitute the industrial system being monitored and controlled. The device controller 110 is a combination of control software 125 running within a proprietary real-time tied operating system and hardware 130 elements which, together, implement the control of a plant device or machine. The MMI 115 provides an operator interface through which the plant conditions and, in particular, the device controller 110 can be monitored and/or controlled.
One of ordinary skill in the field of industrial plant control design will recognize that an operational plant 10S will typically comprise a large number of different devices (machines) and that many of these devices will have their own SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022=,6=,07 1998-ll-26 device controller. It will further be understood that a device controller's 110 software 125 and hardware 130 elements are designed to monitor and control a specific device (for example, a motor or evaporator) and are limited to real-time operations. That is, because a device controller's software 125 element is designed to monitor and control a specific machine via its hardware 130 element, the device controller is limited to two operational modes: off and real-time.
To design and test either a part or the overall control of an industrial plant, as well as to train individuals to operate those plants, it is often necessary to be able to (1) arbitrarily set the configuration of a plant, (2) run the control procedures of a plant at a rate faster or slower than real-time, and (3) repeatedly cycle through a given control configuration. Plant simulation techniques have been developed to provide these capabilities without disrupting the operations of a working plant.
As shown in FIG. 2, a typical plant simulation system 200 comprises a plant model (PM) 205, at least one device controller simulator 210, a man-machine interface (M~) unit 215, and a communication network that links the simulation system ' s dirrel~"l elements. The plant model 205 is typically a software application designed to mimic the process/plant under study and is available from a variety of vendors. The device controller simulator 210 is a software application that is designed to simulate both the device controller's software element 125 and its hardware element 130. The actual control software that would actually run on the device controller is not used in such simulation environments, but rather a program developed to mimic key performance aspects of the actual control SlJb;~ .ITE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~6~07 1998-ll-26 software.
The simulation system' s MMI 215 serves an analogous function as does the MMI 115 in an operational plant, that is, to monitor and control plant simulation.
By separating the simulation system 200 from the actual plant 100, the ability to arbitrarily set the plant's control configuration, or run the plant's control procedures at a rate faster or slower than real-time, or to repeatedly cycle through a given control configuration can be achieved. In addition, many plant simulators allow an operator to download control parameters 225 from the simulation system's MMI 215 to a device controller 110. (This latter feature must account for the control system's proprietary communication network or data highway 120.) The device controller simulator 210 comprises a software design engineer' s "best guess" replication of the control device's operational characteristics and environment. That is, the device controller simulator 210 is comprised of computer program code that attempts to mimic the controller's actual software control algorithms 125 and the operation or interaction of the software control algorithms with the controller's hardware element 130 and underlying proprietary operating system (i.e., the software environment in which a device controller's software element 12S executes) while also providing the ability to run the control algorithm in non-real-time. Rec~llce both the actual hardware element 130 and the interactions between the device controller's hardware element 130 and software element 125 are complex, the simulator can not realistically accomplish this goal.
As a result, the device controller simulator 210 only roughly approximates the SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) , .. . . . ~
CA 022~6~07 1998-ll-26 WO 97/4~778 PCT/US97/07461 behavior of the actual device controller 110; the device controller simulator 210 has a lower than desired fidelity in its ability to model the actual/real device controller 110. Such rough approximations may be of limited utility in designing and testing process control systems, and training individuals to run such systems, because of the unrealistic, estim~tecl nature of such "best guess" systems.
The invention relates in general to the field of industrial control and, more particularly, to a method and apparatus for running control software developed to run on a process controller having a proprietary real-time operating system within a non-proprietary operating system such that the control software may be tested and modified in a non-real-time environment.
As shown in FIG. 1, a typical industrial control system 100 comprises a plant 105, at least one device controller 110, a man-machine interface (M~) unit 115, and a proprietary communication network 120 that links the control system's different elements. (Hereinafter, the terln data highway will be used to refer to the proprietary communication network 120 so as to distinguish it from an open, or non-proprietary computer network such as an ethernet running TCP/IP
protocols.) The plant 105 consists of the actual machinery and/or devices that constitute the industrial system being monitored and controlled. The device controller 110 is a combination of control software 125 running within a proprietary real-time tied operating system and hardware 130 elements which, together, implement the control of a plant device or machine. The MMI 115 provides an operator interface through which the plant conditions and, in particular, the device controller 110 can be monitored and/or controlled.
One of ordinary skill in the field of industrial plant control design will recognize that an operational plant 10S will typically comprise a large number of different devices (machines) and that many of these devices will have their own SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022=,6=,07 1998-ll-26 device controller. It will further be understood that a device controller's 110 software 125 and hardware 130 elements are designed to monitor and control a specific device (for example, a motor or evaporator) and are limited to real-time operations. That is, because a device controller's software 125 element is designed to monitor and control a specific machine via its hardware 130 element, the device controller is limited to two operational modes: off and real-time.
To design and test either a part or the overall control of an industrial plant, as well as to train individuals to operate those plants, it is often necessary to be able to (1) arbitrarily set the configuration of a plant, (2) run the control procedures of a plant at a rate faster or slower than real-time, and (3) repeatedly cycle through a given control configuration. Plant simulation techniques have been developed to provide these capabilities without disrupting the operations of a working plant.
As shown in FIG. 2, a typical plant simulation system 200 comprises a plant model (PM) 205, at least one device controller simulator 210, a man-machine interface (M~) unit 215, and a communication network that links the simulation system ' s dirrel~"l elements. The plant model 205 is typically a software application designed to mimic the process/plant under study and is available from a variety of vendors. The device controller simulator 210 is a software application that is designed to simulate both the device controller's software element 125 and its hardware element 130. The actual control software that would actually run on the device controller is not used in such simulation environments, but rather a program developed to mimic key performance aspects of the actual control SlJb;~ .ITE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~6~07 1998-ll-26 software.
The simulation system' s MMI 215 serves an analogous function as does the MMI 115 in an operational plant, that is, to monitor and control plant simulation.
By separating the simulation system 200 from the actual plant 100, the ability to arbitrarily set the plant's control configuration, or run the plant's control procedures at a rate faster or slower than real-time, or to repeatedly cycle through a given control configuration can be achieved. In addition, many plant simulators allow an operator to download control parameters 225 from the simulation system's MMI 215 to a device controller 110. (This latter feature must account for the control system's proprietary communication network or data highway 120.) The device controller simulator 210 comprises a software design engineer' s "best guess" replication of the control device's operational characteristics and environment. That is, the device controller simulator 210 is comprised of computer program code that attempts to mimic the controller's actual software control algorithms 125 and the operation or interaction of the software control algorithms with the controller's hardware element 130 and underlying proprietary operating system (i.e., the software environment in which a device controller's software element 12S executes) while also providing the ability to run the control algorithm in non-real-time. Rec~llce both the actual hardware element 130 and the interactions between the device controller's hardware element 130 and software element 125 are complex, the simulator can not realistically accomplish this goal.
As a result, the device controller simulator 210 only roughly approximates the SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) , .. . . . ~
CA 022~6~07 1998-ll-26 WO 97/4~778 PCT/US97/07461 behavior of the actual device controller 110; the device controller simulator 210 has a lower than desired fidelity in its ability to model the actual/real device controller 110. Such rough approximations may be of limited utility in designing and testing process control systems, and training individuals to run such systems, because of the unrealistic, estim~tecl nature of such "best guess" systems.
2.SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A method and apparatus in accordance with the invention overcomes the fidelity problems associated with device control simulators by using, in a non-proprietary opt;l~ling system environment, the actual control algolilhm program code of a target device controller. In addition, the invention provides an API
(application program interface) to exercise the control algorithm program code.
The API is designed to allow the actual device controller software to operate in a non-proprietary communication's environment while also providing the capability to arbitrarily stop and start the controller software' s operation, exercise the controller software at a rate slower and faster than real-time, restore the controller software to a known state, and store the configuration of the software controller state.
The invention provides a very high fidelity simulation of a control device while avoiding the need for users to design/engineer around their current control system's proprietary communication's network or data highway. The increased fidelity provided by the invention allows an operator to design, test, and verify control system strategies in a more comprehensive manner than possible in prior art systems. An added benefit of the invention is that it can be used as an SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~6~07 l998-ll-26 improved operator training system.
A method and apparatus in accordance with the invention overcomes the fidelity problems associated with device control simulators by using, in a non-proprietary opt;l~ling system environment, the actual control algolilhm program code of a target device controller. In addition, the invention provides an API
(application program interface) to exercise the control algorithm program code.
The API is designed to allow the actual device controller software to operate in a non-proprietary communication's environment while also providing the capability to arbitrarily stop and start the controller software' s operation, exercise the controller software at a rate slower and faster than real-time, restore the controller software to a known state, and store the configuration of the software controller state.
The invention provides a very high fidelity simulation of a control device while avoiding the need for users to design/engineer around their current control system's proprietary communication's network or data highway. The increased fidelity provided by the invention allows an operator to design, test, and verify control system strategies in a more comprehensive manner than possible in prior art systems. An added benefit of the invention is that it can be used as an SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~6~07 l998-ll-26 improved operator training system.
3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
Figure 1 shows a simplified schematic diagram of a prior art industrial control system.
Figure 2 shows a simplified schematic diagram of a prior art industrial control plant simulation system.
Figure 3 shows a simplified schematic of an industrial control plant emulation system in accordance with the invention.
Figure 1 shows a simplified schematic diagram of a prior art industrial control system.
Figure 2 shows a simplified schematic diagram of a prior art industrial control plant simulation system.
Figure 3 shows a simplified schematic of an industrial control plant emulation system in accordance with the invention.
4.DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A SPECIFIC EMBODIMENT
For purposes of illustration, a speci~lc embodiment of the invention is described below. It will be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation (as in any engineering design and development project), numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' speci~lc goals, which will vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time-consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of control systems design for those of ordinary skill having the bene~lt of this disclosure.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~6~07 1998-ll-26 WO 97/45778 PCTfUS97/07461 4.1 Ov~l ~li.,.
As shown in FIG. 3, an industrial control system 300 in accordance with the invention is comprised of a process model (PM) 205, a simul~tion engineering environment unit 305, a MMI (man-machine interface) unit 355, and a non-proprietary network 310 conn~cting these elements together. In addition, a communication link 315 from non-proprietary network 310 to the industrial control system's 100 proprietary network or data highway 120 can be provided. The simulation unit 305 is comprised of controller software 320, an API (application program interface) 325, a means to process I/O (input/output) 330 to and from the simulation unit, a communications server 335, and a communications application 340.
The simulation unit 305 may be housed in a single VME chassis which provides backplane communication between each of the unit's functional elements, 320 through 340 which can be implemented on VME cards. In addition, an illustrative simulation unit 305 executes under a standard operating system (such as, for example, "UNIX," "WINDOWS NT," or "OpenVMS") to provide communications capability to the non-proprietary network 310 via the TCP/IP
communication's protocol.
In addition, a simulation unit 305 in accordance with the invention could also contain one or more stora~e means such as, for example, magnetic hard disks, magnetic tape units, or any other suitable storage device. Such tape drives may be used to allow the simulation unit 305 to read/write "configuration tapes"
readable by the control software 320, that contain configuration data used by the SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~6~07 1998-11-26 control software 320 to implement various control processess.
Further, each simulation unit 305 may also comprise an operator console including a video display, keyboard, and a suitable input/output device. Each of the simulation unit's 305 other elements (controller software 320, API 32S, communication's server 335, and communication's application 340 will be described in more detail below.
Plant model 205 can be either a stand-alone element or incorporated within the simulation unit 305.
4.2 Controller Software and API
The simulation unit's controller software 320 is a direct port of a device controller's 110 software control algorithms/program code 125 so that it executes in a non-proprietary operating system such as, for example, "UNIX" or "VMS."
One of ordinary skill in the field of software design will recognize that because the controller software 320 is a direct port of the actual device controller software 125 it is not a simulation or emulation - the controller software 320 responds to data input in precisely the same way as the actual device controller software 125.
The precise form that the ported control software will take will depend on the nature of the control software prior to rehosting on the simulation unit 305.
In one embodiment the software comprises a rehosted version of the PROVOX
process management software available from Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc., the assignee of the present invention. In this embodiment, the ported control software could comprise ported versions of: the SRx controller software; operator workplace console software to provide a graphical interface for the user;
SU~5 ~ JTE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~6507 1998-ll-26 W O 97/45778 PCT~US97/07461 configuration software for configuring the various control devices; shared memory applications; external I/O interface software; a highway data link server; and an API libra~ for software manipulation applications. Alternate embodiments are envisioned wherein other process management software, e.g., the RS3 software available from the ~s~ignP~ of the present invention, are rehosted on to the simulation unit 305.
Standard porting and re-hosting techniques may be used to rehost the control software from the real-time tied operating system to the non-real-time tied, non-proprietary operating system running on simulation unit 305. Such techniques may involve the creation of software "layers" that surround the re-hosted control software and act as intermediaries between the re-hosted software and the non-proprietary, non-real-time tied operating system running on the simulation unit.
The precise form and number of layers that may be required to accomplish the port will depend on the nature of the original control software and on the specific non-proprietary, non-real-time tied operating system running on simulation unit 305. One of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure should be able to port original control software to a non-proprietary operating system without undue experimentation.
The API 32~ is a function library that allows manipulation of the controller software algoriLhllls 320, including: ~1) freeze/unfreeze (e.g., start/stop) capability, (2) store/restore capability, (3) fast/slow execution capability, relative to real-tirne (e.g., 1/4 time, 1/2 time, 2X time 3X time, 4X time, and 5X time), and (4) the insertion/retrieval of controller values such as setpont, pv, and controller SlJ~S 1 1 1 UTE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~6~07 1998-11-26 tuning constraints. In particular, the API 325 is used to communicate with the controller software 320 in the same manner as prior art systems communicate (i.e., pass information) with control device ~simul~tors 210. In one embodiment the API
325 is written in the C progr~mming language.
A significant feature of the controller software 320 - API 325 combination is that it provides an operator with the capability to exercise an actual control device's software algorithms in non-real-time and in a platform (computer system) independent manner; that is, at rates both slower and faster than real-time. This capability flows from the fact that the control software algorithms 320 are functionally identical to those run in the actual control plant (i.e., 125). Thus, an operator can, with very high fidelity, verify plant operating procedures, test new plant operating procedures, and train in an environment which more accurately reflects the behavior of an operational control plant 105.
The API 325 also provides a set of function calls by which the MMI 355 communicates with the simulation unit 305 as well as function calls to allow the communication server 335 to interact with both the system's non-proprietary network 310 and the real-time proprietary data highway 120. Both the MMI 355 and communication server 335 is discussed in more detail below.
SUBSTITUTESHEET(RULE26) CA 022~6~07 1998-11-26 4.3 Communication Server The communication server 335 provides a means for two-way communication between the simulation unit 305 and the industrial plant's 10S data highway 120. Rec~llse each vendor's data highway network is proprietary, the precise implementation of this element will depend upon the type of control network being used.
Those of ordinary skill in the art of computer communication network design will recognize that the communication server 335 provides functions such as the capability to receive, process, and transmit messages for the purposes of establishing, verifying, and releasing one or more communication ports (e.g., TCP/IP sockets) between the non-proprietary 310 and proprietary 120 computer networks. Self-testing capability is another common feature of cross-network communication servers.
One benefit of the communication server 335 is the ability to provide the plant model (PM) 205 and the controller software 320 with real-time information about the operational plant's 105 behavior. This data can be used to compare, update, and correct the PM's 205 operation. Additionally, plant configuration data from an operational plant 105 can be obtained via the communication server 335 to establish a baseline for future simulation. Further, the communication server 335 can be used to transfer configuration and control information from the simulation unit 305 to an operational control plant's 105 device controller 110.
Thus, a control routine or process may be developed and refined through the use of the simulation unit 305 and then downloaded to the controller 110. This SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~6~07 1998-ll-26 potentially minimi7es the downtime normally associated with such development and may reduce the potential for introducing errors into an operational industrial control system 100.
4.4 Communication's Application The comml-nication application 340 provides a means for each of the individual components of the simulation unit 305 to communicate with one another and the ability of the M~ 355 to communicate with each of the individual components of the simulation unit 305. (In one embodiment, all communication is in binary file format lltili7in~ big endian/little endian byte swapping, and all data is handled in I.E.E.E. floating point format.) In an illustrative implementation, the communication's application 340 is implemented as a shared memory application. In this embodiment, the MMI 355 reads and writes to the shared memory application which is then responsible for notifying the other simulation unit 305 elements that new data and/or comm~nds have been received. Alternatively, each of the other simulation unit 305 elements can be designed to periodically query or inspect the status of the communication's application 340. Further, it is via the communication's application 340 that information is transferred between the simulation unit's 305 individual elements on the VME backplane.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~6~07 1998-ll-26 4.5 MMI Unit A MMI unit 355 in accordance with the invention is essenti~lly the same as prior art M~ units 215 with the exception that it has been modi~led to allow it to communicate with the simulation unit's 305 communication application 340.
As such, the MMI 355 will typically have a graphical display and appropliate input/output device (such as, for example, a mouse), a keyboard, and a graphical user interface.
4.6 Program Stor~ge Device Any of the foregoing variations may be implemented by progr~mming a suitable general-purpose computer that has the requisite network connections. The progr~mming may be accomplished through the use of a program storage device readable by the computer and encoding a program of instructions executable by the computer for performing the operations described above. The program storage device may take the form of, e.g., one or more floppy disks; CD ROMs or other optical disks; magnetic tapes; read-only memory chips (ROM); and other forms of the kind well-known in the art or subsequently developed. The program of instructions may be "object code," i.e., in binary form that is executable more-or-less directly by the computer; in "source code" that requires compilation or interpretation before execution; or in some intermediate form such as partially compiled code. The precise forms of the program storage device and of the encoding of instructions is immaterial here.
SUc~S 1 l l UTE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~6~07 1998-11-26 4.7 Comm~nt~
Some of the benefits provided by the invention include the ability to exercise the actual control algorithms used in an operational plant in non-real-time.
This, in turn, allows for advanced and accurate evaluation of control plant operating and training procedures.
It will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill having the benefit of this disclosure that numerous variations from the foregoing illustration will be possible without departing from the inventive concept described herein. Accordingly, it is the claims set forth below, and not merely the foregoing illustration, which are inten~ed to define the exclusive rights claimed in this application program.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) .
For purposes of illustration, a speci~lc embodiment of the invention is described below. It will be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation (as in any engineering design and development project), numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' speci~lc goals, which will vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time-consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of control systems design for those of ordinary skill having the bene~lt of this disclosure.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~6~07 1998-ll-26 WO 97/45778 PCTfUS97/07461 4.1 Ov~l ~li.,.
As shown in FIG. 3, an industrial control system 300 in accordance with the invention is comprised of a process model (PM) 205, a simul~tion engineering environment unit 305, a MMI (man-machine interface) unit 355, and a non-proprietary network 310 conn~cting these elements together. In addition, a communication link 315 from non-proprietary network 310 to the industrial control system's 100 proprietary network or data highway 120 can be provided. The simulation unit 305 is comprised of controller software 320, an API (application program interface) 325, a means to process I/O (input/output) 330 to and from the simulation unit, a communications server 335, and a communications application 340.
The simulation unit 305 may be housed in a single VME chassis which provides backplane communication between each of the unit's functional elements, 320 through 340 which can be implemented on VME cards. In addition, an illustrative simulation unit 305 executes under a standard operating system (such as, for example, "UNIX," "WINDOWS NT," or "OpenVMS") to provide communications capability to the non-proprietary network 310 via the TCP/IP
communication's protocol.
In addition, a simulation unit 305 in accordance with the invention could also contain one or more stora~e means such as, for example, magnetic hard disks, magnetic tape units, or any other suitable storage device. Such tape drives may be used to allow the simulation unit 305 to read/write "configuration tapes"
readable by the control software 320, that contain configuration data used by the SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~6~07 1998-11-26 control software 320 to implement various control processess.
Further, each simulation unit 305 may also comprise an operator console including a video display, keyboard, and a suitable input/output device. Each of the simulation unit's 305 other elements (controller software 320, API 32S, communication's server 335, and communication's application 340 will be described in more detail below.
Plant model 205 can be either a stand-alone element or incorporated within the simulation unit 305.
4.2 Controller Software and API
The simulation unit's controller software 320 is a direct port of a device controller's 110 software control algorithms/program code 125 so that it executes in a non-proprietary operating system such as, for example, "UNIX" or "VMS."
One of ordinary skill in the field of software design will recognize that because the controller software 320 is a direct port of the actual device controller software 125 it is not a simulation or emulation - the controller software 320 responds to data input in precisely the same way as the actual device controller software 125.
The precise form that the ported control software will take will depend on the nature of the control software prior to rehosting on the simulation unit 305.
In one embodiment the software comprises a rehosted version of the PROVOX
process management software available from Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc., the assignee of the present invention. In this embodiment, the ported control software could comprise ported versions of: the SRx controller software; operator workplace console software to provide a graphical interface for the user;
SU~5 ~ JTE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~6507 1998-ll-26 W O 97/45778 PCT~US97/07461 configuration software for configuring the various control devices; shared memory applications; external I/O interface software; a highway data link server; and an API libra~ for software manipulation applications. Alternate embodiments are envisioned wherein other process management software, e.g., the RS3 software available from the ~s~ignP~ of the present invention, are rehosted on to the simulation unit 305.
Standard porting and re-hosting techniques may be used to rehost the control software from the real-time tied operating system to the non-real-time tied, non-proprietary operating system running on simulation unit 305. Such techniques may involve the creation of software "layers" that surround the re-hosted control software and act as intermediaries between the re-hosted software and the non-proprietary, non-real-time tied operating system running on the simulation unit.
The precise form and number of layers that may be required to accomplish the port will depend on the nature of the original control software and on the specific non-proprietary, non-real-time tied operating system running on simulation unit 305. One of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure should be able to port original control software to a non-proprietary operating system without undue experimentation.
The API 32~ is a function library that allows manipulation of the controller software algoriLhllls 320, including: ~1) freeze/unfreeze (e.g., start/stop) capability, (2) store/restore capability, (3) fast/slow execution capability, relative to real-tirne (e.g., 1/4 time, 1/2 time, 2X time 3X time, 4X time, and 5X time), and (4) the insertion/retrieval of controller values such as setpont, pv, and controller SlJ~S 1 1 1 UTE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~6~07 1998-11-26 tuning constraints. In particular, the API 325 is used to communicate with the controller software 320 in the same manner as prior art systems communicate (i.e., pass information) with control device ~simul~tors 210. In one embodiment the API
325 is written in the C progr~mming language.
A significant feature of the controller software 320 - API 325 combination is that it provides an operator with the capability to exercise an actual control device's software algorithms in non-real-time and in a platform (computer system) independent manner; that is, at rates both slower and faster than real-time. This capability flows from the fact that the control software algorithms 320 are functionally identical to those run in the actual control plant (i.e., 125). Thus, an operator can, with very high fidelity, verify plant operating procedures, test new plant operating procedures, and train in an environment which more accurately reflects the behavior of an operational control plant 105.
The API 325 also provides a set of function calls by which the MMI 355 communicates with the simulation unit 305 as well as function calls to allow the communication server 335 to interact with both the system's non-proprietary network 310 and the real-time proprietary data highway 120. Both the MMI 355 and communication server 335 is discussed in more detail below.
SUBSTITUTESHEET(RULE26) CA 022~6~07 1998-11-26 4.3 Communication Server The communication server 335 provides a means for two-way communication between the simulation unit 305 and the industrial plant's 10S data highway 120. Rec~llse each vendor's data highway network is proprietary, the precise implementation of this element will depend upon the type of control network being used.
Those of ordinary skill in the art of computer communication network design will recognize that the communication server 335 provides functions such as the capability to receive, process, and transmit messages for the purposes of establishing, verifying, and releasing one or more communication ports (e.g., TCP/IP sockets) between the non-proprietary 310 and proprietary 120 computer networks. Self-testing capability is another common feature of cross-network communication servers.
One benefit of the communication server 335 is the ability to provide the plant model (PM) 205 and the controller software 320 with real-time information about the operational plant's 105 behavior. This data can be used to compare, update, and correct the PM's 205 operation. Additionally, plant configuration data from an operational plant 105 can be obtained via the communication server 335 to establish a baseline for future simulation. Further, the communication server 335 can be used to transfer configuration and control information from the simulation unit 305 to an operational control plant's 105 device controller 110.
Thus, a control routine or process may be developed and refined through the use of the simulation unit 305 and then downloaded to the controller 110. This SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~6~07 1998-ll-26 potentially minimi7es the downtime normally associated with such development and may reduce the potential for introducing errors into an operational industrial control system 100.
4.4 Communication's Application The comml-nication application 340 provides a means for each of the individual components of the simulation unit 305 to communicate with one another and the ability of the M~ 355 to communicate with each of the individual components of the simulation unit 305. (In one embodiment, all communication is in binary file format lltili7in~ big endian/little endian byte swapping, and all data is handled in I.E.E.E. floating point format.) In an illustrative implementation, the communication's application 340 is implemented as a shared memory application. In this embodiment, the MMI 355 reads and writes to the shared memory application which is then responsible for notifying the other simulation unit 305 elements that new data and/or comm~nds have been received. Alternatively, each of the other simulation unit 305 elements can be designed to periodically query or inspect the status of the communication's application 340. Further, it is via the communication's application 340 that information is transferred between the simulation unit's 305 individual elements on the VME backplane.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~6~07 1998-ll-26 4.5 MMI Unit A MMI unit 355 in accordance with the invention is essenti~lly the same as prior art M~ units 215 with the exception that it has been modi~led to allow it to communicate with the simulation unit's 305 communication application 340.
As such, the MMI 355 will typically have a graphical display and appropliate input/output device (such as, for example, a mouse), a keyboard, and a graphical user interface.
4.6 Program Stor~ge Device Any of the foregoing variations may be implemented by progr~mming a suitable general-purpose computer that has the requisite network connections. The progr~mming may be accomplished through the use of a program storage device readable by the computer and encoding a program of instructions executable by the computer for performing the operations described above. The program storage device may take the form of, e.g., one or more floppy disks; CD ROMs or other optical disks; magnetic tapes; read-only memory chips (ROM); and other forms of the kind well-known in the art or subsequently developed. The program of instructions may be "object code," i.e., in binary form that is executable more-or-less directly by the computer; in "source code" that requires compilation or interpretation before execution; or in some intermediate form such as partially compiled code. The precise forms of the program storage device and of the encoding of instructions is immaterial here.
SUc~S 1 l l UTE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~6~07 1998-11-26 4.7 Comm~nt~
Some of the benefits provided by the invention include the ability to exercise the actual control algorithms used in an operational plant in non-real-time.
This, in turn, allows for advanced and accurate evaluation of control plant operating and training procedures.
It will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill having the benefit of this disclosure that numerous variations from the foregoing illustration will be possible without departing from the inventive concept described herein. Accordingly, it is the claims set forth below, and not merely the foregoing illustration, which are inten~ed to define the exclusive rights claimed in this application program.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) .
Claims (11)
1. An improved process control system comprising:
a first communications network utilizing a first communications protocol;
a real-time device controller coupled to the first communications network, the real-time device controller comprising a digital processor running a first operating system and process control software, the hardware and operating system of the real-time device controller allowing the process control software to run only in a real-time mode;
a second communications network utilizing a second communications protocol, the second communications network being coupled to the first communications network by a communications link; and a simulation unit coupled to the second communications network, the simulation unit comprising a digital processor running a second operating system and a version of the process control software that has been rehosted to run in conjunction with the second operating system.
a first communications network utilizing a first communications protocol;
a real-time device controller coupled to the first communications network, the real-time device controller comprising a digital processor running a first operating system and process control software, the hardware and operating system of the real-time device controller allowing the process control software to run only in a real-time mode;
a second communications network utilizing a second communications protocol, the second communications network being coupled to the first communications network by a communications link; and a simulation unit coupled to the second communications network, the simulation unit comprising a digital processor running a second operating system and a version of the process control software that has been rehosted to run in conjunction with the second operating system.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein the second operating system is not a real-time tied operating system and where a user can cause the rehosted software to run at a rate that is faster than real-time.
3. The system of claim 1 wherein the second operating system is not a real-time tied operating system and where a user can cause the rehosted software to run at a rate that is slower than real-time.
4. The system of claim 1 wherein a user can freeze execution of the rehosted software.
5. The system of claim 1 wherein the first communications protocol is a proprietary protocol and wherein the second communications protocol is a non-proprietary protocol.
6. The system of claim 1 wherein the first operating system is a proprietary operating system and wherein the second operating system is a non-proprietary operating system.
7. The system of claim 6 wherein the second operating system is UNIX.
8. A simulation unit for running plant process control software originally written to run in conjunction with a first real-time tied operating system, the simulation unit comprising:
a digital processor;
a second operating system running on said digital processor; and a version of the plant process control software that has been rehosted to run in conjunction with the second operating system.
a digital processor;
a second operating system running on said digital processor; and a version of the plant process control software that has been rehosted to run in conjunction with the second operating system.
9. The simulation unit of claim 8 wherein the second operating system is not tied to real-time.
10. The simulation unit of claim 8 wherein the second operating system is UNIX.
11. The simulation unit of claim 9 wherein the second operating unit is Windows-NT.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/654,355 | 1996-05-28 | ||
| US08/654,355 US5752008A (en) | 1996-05-28 | 1996-05-28 | Real-time process control simulation method and apparatus |
| PCT/US1997/007461 WO1997045778A1 (en) | 1996-05-28 | 1997-05-02 | Real-time process control simulation method and apparatus |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2256507A1 true CA2256507A1 (en) | 1997-12-04 |
Family
ID=24624529
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002256507A Abandoned CA2256507A1 (en) | 1996-05-28 | 1997-05-02 | Real-time process control simulation method and apparatus |
Country Status (8)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US5752008A (en) |
| AU (1) | AU2825497A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2256507A1 (en) |
| DE (2) | DE19781804B4 (en) |
| GB (1) | GB2328523B (en) |
| MY (1) | MY119998A (en) |
| TW (1) | TW494356B (en) |
| WO (1) | WO1997045778A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (104)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6017143A (en) | 1996-03-28 | 2000-01-25 | Rosemount Inc. | Device in a process system for detecting events |
| US7949495B2 (en) | 1996-03-28 | 2011-05-24 | Rosemount, Inc. | Process variable transmitter with diagnostics |
| US6654697B1 (en) | 1996-03-28 | 2003-11-25 | Rosemount Inc. | Flow measurement with diagnostics |
| US8290721B2 (en) | 1996-03-28 | 2012-10-16 | Rosemount Inc. | Flow measurement diagnostics |
| US6539267B1 (en) | 1996-03-28 | 2003-03-25 | Rosemount Inc. | Device in a process system for determining statistical parameter |
| EP0825506B1 (en) | 1996-08-20 | 2013-03-06 | Invensys Systems, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for remote process control |
| US6449574B1 (en) | 1996-11-07 | 2002-09-10 | Micro Motion, Inc. | Resistance based process control device diagnostics |
| US6601005B1 (en) | 1996-11-07 | 2003-07-29 | Rosemount Inc. | Process device diagnostics using process variable sensor signal |
| US6519546B1 (en) | 1996-11-07 | 2003-02-11 | Rosemount Inc. | Auto correcting temperature transmitter with resistance based sensor |
| US6754601B1 (en) | 1996-11-07 | 2004-06-22 | Rosemount Inc. | Diagnostics for resistive elements of process devices |
| US6434504B1 (en) | 1996-11-07 | 2002-08-13 | Rosemount Inc. | Resistance based process control device diagnostics |
| US5997167A (en) * | 1997-05-01 | 1999-12-07 | Control Technology Corporation | Programmable controller including diagnostic and simulation facilities |
| CA2306767C (en) | 1997-10-13 | 2007-05-01 | Rosemount Inc. | Communication technique for field devices in industrial processes |
| US6317706B1 (en) * | 1998-03-31 | 2001-11-13 | Sony Corporation | Simulation development tool for an embedded system |
| US6691183B1 (en) | 1998-05-20 | 2004-02-10 | Invensys Systems, Inc. | Second transfer logic causing a first transfer logic to check a data ready bit prior to each of multibit transfer of a continous transfer operation |
| DE19832531A1 (en) * | 1998-07-22 | 2000-02-10 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Control for a plurality of electrical consumers of a motor vehicle |
| US6615149B1 (en) | 1998-12-10 | 2003-09-02 | Rosemount Inc. | Spectral diagnostics in a magnetic flow meter |
| US6611775B1 (en) | 1998-12-10 | 2003-08-26 | Rosemount Inc. | Electrode leakage diagnostics in a magnetic flow meter |
| US7257523B1 (en) * | 1999-05-06 | 2007-08-14 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Integrated distributed process control system functionality on a single computer |
| US7089530B1 (en) | 1999-05-17 | 2006-08-08 | Invensys Systems, Inc. | Process control configuration system with connection validation and configuration |
| AU5025600A (en) | 1999-05-17 | 2000-12-05 | Foxboro Company, The | Process control configuration system with parameterized objects |
| US6754885B1 (en) | 1999-05-17 | 2004-06-22 | Invensys Systems, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for controlling object appearance in a process control configuration system |
| US6788980B1 (en) | 1999-06-11 | 2004-09-07 | Invensys Systems, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for control using control devices that provide a virtual machine environment and that communicate via an IP network |
| US6501995B1 (en) | 1999-06-30 | 2002-12-31 | The Foxboro Company | Process control system and method with improved distribution, installation and validation of components |
| DE59913062D1 (en) * | 1999-06-11 | 2006-04-06 | Ivyteam Ag Zug | Information technology system for the definition, optimization and control of processes |
| US6356191B1 (en) | 1999-06-17 | 2002-03-12 | Rosemount Inc. | Error compensation for a process fluid temperature transmitter |
| AU5780300A (en) | 1999-07-01 | 2001-01-22 | Rosemount Inc. | Low power two-wire self validating temperature transmitter |
| US6505517B1 (en) | 1999-07-23 | 2003-01-14 | Rosemount Inc. | High accuracy signal processing for magnetic flowmeter |
| US6510352B1 (en) | 1999-07-29 | 2003-01-21 | The Foxboro Company | Methods and apparatus for object-based process control |
| US6654950B1 (en) * | 1999-08-24 | 2003-11-25 | Bae Systems Mission Solutions Inc. | Software rehosting system and method |
| US6701274B1 (en) | 1999-08-27 | 2004-03-02 | Rosemount Inc. | Prediction of error magnitude in a pressure transmitter |
| US6556145B1 (en) | 1999-09-24 | 2003-04-29 | Rosemount Inc. | Two-wire fluid temperature transmitter with thermocouple diagnostics |
| US6473660B1 (en) | 1999-12-03 | 2002-10-29 | The Foxboro Company | Process control system and method with automatic fault avoidance |
| US20020019891A1 (en) * | 1999-12-30 | 2002-02-14 | James Morrow | Generic device controller unit and method |
| US9235955B2 (en) * | 2000-12-22 | 2016-01-12 | Bally Gaming, Inc. | Universal game monitoring unit and system |
| WO2001053841A1 (en) * | 2000-01-24 | 2001-07-26 | Fluor Corporation | Control system simulation, testing, and operator training |
| US6779128B1 (en) | 2000-02-18 | 2004-08-17 | Invensys Systems, Inc. | Fault-tolerant data transfer |
| US6735484B1 (en) | 2000-09-20 | 2004-05-11 | Fargo Electronics, Inc. | Printer with a process diagnostics system for detecting events |
| DE10106504A1 (en) * | 2001-02-13 | 2002-08-29 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Method and device for emulating control and / or regulating functions of a control or regulating device |
| EP1373998A2 (en) * | 2001-03-29 | 2004-01-02 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Maintenance method and device with a simulation model |
| US20050187663A1 (en) * | 2001-03-29 | 2005-08-25 | Luder Heidemann | Maintenance method and device |
| EP1374037A2 (en) * | 2001-03-29 | 2004-01-02 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method and device for automatically generating simulation programs |
| US6629059B2 (en) | 2001-05-14 | 2003-09-30 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Hand held diagnostic and communication device with automatic bus detection |
| US7254524B1 (en) * | 2001-07-12 | 2007-08-07 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Method and system for a simulation authoring environment implemented in creating a simulation application |
| EP1286322A1 (en) * | 2001-08-07 | 2003-02-26 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Simulation system, in particular for a power plant |
| US6772036B2 (en) | 2001-08-30 | 2004-08-03 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Control system using process model |
| US6895299B2 (en) * | 2001-10-16 | 2005-05-17 | Brigham Young University | Systems and methods for representing complex n-curves for direct control of tool motion |
| US6975914B2 (en) | 2002-04-15 | 2005-12-13 | Invensys Systems, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for process, factory-floor, environmental, computer aided manufacturing-based or other control system with unified messaging interface |
| DE10348563B4 (en) * | 2002-10-22 | 2014-01-09 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Integration of graphic display elements, process modules and control modules in process plants |
| US7146231B2 (en) * | 2002-10-22 | 2006-12-05 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.. | Smart process modules and objects in process plants |
| US9983559B2 (en) * | 2002-10-22 | 2018-05-29 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Updating and utilizing dynamic process simulation in an operating process environment |
| US7409711B1 (en) * | 2002-12-24 | 2008-08-05 | The Chamberlain Group, Inc. | Method and apparatus for troubleshooting a security gate system remotely |
| AU2003900854A0 (en) * | 2003-02-26 | 2003-03-13 | Sesay, Sahid | General purpose electronic controller software |
| DE10341325B4 (en) * | 2003-09-08 | 2006-01-26 | Siemens Ag | Test device and test method for testing of tool or production machines |
| DE502004010765D1 (en) * | 2003-12-22 | 2010-04-01 | Siemens Ag | Control or regulating device of a tool or production machine |
| US7761923B2 (en) | 2004-03-01 | 2010-07-20 | Invensys Systems, Inc. | Process control methods and apparatus for intrusion detection, protection and network hardening |
| JP2007536634A (en) * | 2004-05-04 | 2007-12-13 | フィッシャー−ローズマウント・システムズ・インコーポレーテッド | Service-oriented architecture for process control systems |
| US7729789B2 (en) | 2004-05-04 | 2010-06-01 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Process plant monitoring based on multivariate statistical analysis and on-line process simulation |
| FR2875931B1 (en) * | 2004-09-28 | 2006-12-29 | Prosyst Soc Par Actions Simpli | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR ANALYZING AND DIAGNOSING A SYSTEM E |
| US7991602B2 (en) * | 2005-01-27 | 2011-08-02 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Agent simulation development environment |
| US7613595B2 (en) | 2005-03-01 | 2009-11-03 | The Math Works, Inc. | Execution and real-time implementation of a temporary overrun scheduler |
| US8112565B2 (en) | 2005-06-08 | 2012-02-07 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Multi-protocol field device interface with automatic bus detection |
| US7835295B2 (en) * | 2005-07-19 | 2010-11-16 | Rosemount Inc. | Interface module with power over Ethernet function |
| RU2427019C2 (en) * | 2005-07-20 | 2011-08-20 | Роузмаунт Инк. | Operational device electrically powered through ethernet |
| US20070068225A1 (en) | 2005-09-29 | 2007-03-29 | Brown Gregory C | Leak detector for process valve |
| CN101322083A (en) | 2005-12-05 | 2008-12-10 | 费舍-柔斯芒特系统股份有限公司 | Multi-objective predictive process optimization with concurrent process simulation |
| US7860857B2 (en) | 2006-03-30 | 2010-12-28 | Invensys Systems, Inc. | Digital data processing apparatus and methods for improving plant performance |
| EP1857896A1 (en) * | 2006-05-16 | 2007-11-21 | Ansaldo Energia S.P.A. | Emulator of a controller of an industrial plant |
| US8527252B2 (en) * | 2006-07-28 | 2013-09-03 | Emerson Process Management Power & Water Solutions, Inc. | Real-time synchronized control and simulation within a process plant |
| US7953501B2 (en) | 2006-09-25 | 2011-05-31 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Industrial process control loop monitor |
| US8788070B2 (en) | 2006-09-26 | 2014-07-22 | Rosemount Inc. | Automatic field device service adviser |
| CN101517377B (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2012-05-09 | 罗斯蒙德公司 | Magnetic flowmeter with verification |
| US20080168092A1 (en) * | 2007-01-10 | 2008-07-10 | General Electric Company | Systems and methods for turbine control simulation |
| US8898036B2 (en) | 2007-08-06 | 2014-11-25 | Rosemount Inc. | Process variable transmitter with acceleration sensor |
| DE102007043794B4 (en) * | 2007-09-13 | 2010-04-01 | Siemens Ag | Control system for a technical system and method for operating a process control system |
| US20090089029A1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2009-04-02 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Enhanced execution speed to improve simulation performance |
| US20090089234A1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2009-04-02 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Automated code generation for simulators |
| US20090089031A1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2009-04-02 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Integrated simulation of controllers and devices |
| US8548777B2 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2013-10-01 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Automated recommendations from simulation |
| US7801710B2 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2010-09-21 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Simulation controls for model variability and randomness |
| US7643892B2 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2010-01-05 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Historian integrated with MES appliance |
| US8069021B2 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2011-11-29 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Distributed simulation and synchronization |
| US20090271169A1 (en) * | 2008-04-29 | 2009-10-29 | General Electric Company | Training Simulators for Engineering Projects |
| CN104407518B (en) | 2008-06-20 | 2017-05-31 | 因文西斯系统公司 | The system and method interacted to the reality and Simulation Facility for process control |
| JPWO2010064459A1 (en) * | 2008-12-02 | 2012-05-10 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Operation training system and plant operation support system |
| US8881039B2 (en) | 2009-03-13 | 2014-11-04 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Scaling composite shapes for a graphical human-machine interface |
| US7921734B2 (en) * | 2009-05-12 | 2011-04-12 | Rosemount Inc. | System to detect poor process ground connections |
| US8463964B2 (en) | 2009-05-29 | 2013-06-11 | Invensys Systems, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for control configuration with enhanced change-tracking |
| US8127060B2 (en) | 2009-05-29 | 2012-02-28 | Invensys Systems, Inc | Methods and apparatus for control configuration with control objects that are fieldbus protocol-aware |
| US8825183B2 (en) * | 2010-03-22 | 2014-09-02 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Methods for a data driven interface based on relationships between process control tags |
| US20120239374A1 (en) * | 2011-03-18 | 2012-09-20 | General Electric Company | System and method of simulating input/output modules in a control system |
| US9207670B2 (en) | 2011-03-21 | 2015-12-08 | Rosemount Inc. | Degrading sensor detection implemented within a transmitter |
| US9052240B2 (en) | 2012-06-29 | 2015-06-09 | Rosemount Inc. | Industrial process temperature transmitter with sensor stress diagnostics |
| US9207129B2 (en) | 2012-09-27 | 2015-12-08 | Rosemount Inc. | Process variable transmitter with EMF detection and correction |
| US9602122B2 (en) | 2012-09-28 | 2017-03-21 | Rosemount Inc. | Process variable measurement noise diagnostic |
| US9292012B2 (en) * | 2012-11-05 | 2016-03-22 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Secure models for model-based control and optimization |
| US9259657B2 (en) | 2012-12-03 | 2016-02-16 | Dynamic Motion Group Gmbh | Motion simulation system and associated methods |
| US9242181B2 (en) | 2012-12-03 | 2016-01-26 | Dynamic Motion Group Gmbh | Amusement park elevator drop ride system and associated methods |
| US9536446B2 (en) * | 2012-12-03 | 2017-01-03 | Dynamic Motion Group Gmbh | Motion simulation system controller and associated methods |
| EP2778816B1 (en) * | 2013-03-12 | 2015-10-07 | ABB Technology AG | System and method for testing a distributed control system of an industrial plant |
| JP6219059B2 (en) * | 2013-04-11 | 2017-10-25 | 株式会社東芝 | Driving training simulator system and driving training simulation method |
| US10878140B2 (en) | 2016-07-27 | 2020-12-29 | Emerson Process Management Power & Water Solutions, Inc. | Plant builder system with integrated simulation and control system configuration |
| US11604459B2 (en) | 2019-07-12 | 2023-03-14 | Emerson Process Management Power & Water Solutions, Inc. | Real-time control using directed predictive simulation within a control system of a process plant |
| US11418969B2 (en) | 2021-01-15 | 2022-08-16 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Suggestive device connectivity planning |
Family Cites Families (28)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3786242A (en) * | 1971-09-23 | 1974-01-15 | H Brooks | Process control simulator |
| US3719812A (en) * | 1971-11-01 | 1973-03-06 | Martin Marietta Corp | Dynamic electromagnetic environment simulator |
| ES423536A1 (en) * | 1973-02-23 | 1977-11-01 | Westinghouse Electric Corp | Engineered safeguards systems and method in nuclear power plant training simulator |
| US3930233A (en) * | 1974-04-11 | 1975-12-30 | Richard E Morley | Data transfer and manipulation apparatus for industrial computer controllers |
| US4025763A (en) * | 1975-10-06 | 1977-05-24 | Phillips Petroleum Company | Process control including simulating a derivative |
| FR2448190B1 (en) * | 1979-01-31 | 1985-09-27 | Philips Data Syst | REMOTE SIMULATION BY REMOTE CONTROL OF A COMPUTER DESK |
| FR2476349A1 (en) * | 1980-02-15 | 1981-08-21 | Philips Ind Commerciale | DISTRIBUTED DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM |
| JPS5884305A (en) * | 1981-11-12 | 1983-05-20 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Simulation device |
| US4613952A (en) * | 1983-07-11 | 1986-09-23 | Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation | Simulator for an industrial plant |
| JPS60247680A (en) * | 1984-05-23 | 1985-12-07 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Sumilator for training operator |
| US4794534A (en) * | 1985-08-08 | 1988-12-27 | Amoco Corporation | Method of drilling a well utilizing predictive simulation with real time data |
| US4920481A (en) * | 1986-04-28 | 1990-04-24 | Xerox Corporation | Emulation with display update trapping |
| US4796194A (en) * | 1986-08-20 | 1989-01-03 | Atherton Robert W | Real world modeling and control process |
| JPS63236103A (en) * | 1987-03-25 | 1988-10-03 | Toshiba Corp | Plant control system |
| US4914567A (en) * | 1987-11-02 | 1990-04-03 | Savoir | Design system using visual language |
| US5202976A (en) * | 1988-12-30 | 1993-04-13 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Method and apparatus for coordinating measurement activity upon a plurality of emulators |
| US5247650A (en) * | 1989-08-30 | 1993-09-21 | Industrial Technology Institute | System for combining originally software incompatible control, kinematic, and discrete event simulation systems into a single integrated simulation system |
| US5495417A (en) * | 1990-08-14 | 1996-02-27 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | System for automatically producing different semiconductor products in different quantities through a plurality of processes along a production line |
| US5287489A (en) * | 1990-10-30 | 1994-02-15 | Hughes Training, Inc. | Method and system for authoring, editing and testing instructional materials for use in simulated trailing systems |
| US5542047A (en) * | 1991-04-23 | 1996-07-30 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Distributed network monitoring system for monitoring node and link status |
| US5347466A (en) * | 1991-07-15 | 1994-09-13 | The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Arkansas | Method and apparatus for power plant simulation and optimization |
| FR2686714B1 (en) * | 1992-01-24 | 1994-04-29 | Prosyst Sa | METHOD FOR SIMULATING AN INDUSTRIAL PROCESS AND USE FOR TESTING THE FUNCTIONING OF AN AUTOMATION. |
| US5446868A (en) * | 1992-09-11 | 1995-08-29 | R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company | Network bridge method and apparatus |
| US5412756A (en) * | 1992-12-22 | 1995-05-02 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Artificial intelligence software shell for plant operation simulation |
| JP2546159B2 (en) * | 1993-08-05 | 1996-10-23 | 日本電気株式会社 | production management system |
| DE4330218A1 (en) * | 1993-09-07 | 1995-03-09 | Traub Ag | Synchronization method and device for comparing machining processes on a dialog-oriented programming device for creating function and control data for a CNC machine with n subsystems |
| US5678044A (en) * | 1995-06-02 | 1997-10-14 | Electronic Data Systems Corporation | System and method for improved rehosting of software systems |
| US5826060A (en) * | 1996-04-04 | 1998-10-20 | Westinghouse Electric Corporation | Stimulated simulator for a distributed process control system |
-
1996
- 1996-05-28 US US08/654,355 patent/US5752008A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1997
- 1997-05-02 WO PCT/US1997/007461 patent/WO1997045778A1/en active Application Filing
- 1997-05-02 DE DE19781804A patent/DE19781804B4/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1997-05-02 CA CA002256507A patent/CA2256507A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1997-05-02 DE DE19781804T patent/DE19781804T1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1997-05-02 GB GB9825598A patent/GB2328523B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1997-05-02 AU AU28254/97A patent/AU2825497A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1997-05-14 TW TW086106432A patent/TW494356B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1997-05-20 MY MYPI97002191A patent/MY119998A/en unknown
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| GB9825598D0 (en) | 1999-01-13 |
| GB2328523A (en) | 1999-02-24 |
| GB2328523B (en) | 2000-02-02 |
| MY119998A (en) | 2005-08-30 |
| DE19781804B4 (en) | 2008-09-25 |
| AU2825497A (en) | 1998-01-05 |
| US5752008A (en) | 1998-05-12 |
| DE19781804T1 (en) | 1999-05-12 |
| WO1997045778A1 (en) | 1997-12-04 |
| TW494356B (en) | 2002-07-11 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US5752008A (en) | Real-time process control simulation method and apparatus | |
| CN109831354B (en) | Virtual debugging system based on OPC UA industrial communication protocol | |
| JP7298973B2 (en) | I/O virtualization for commissioning | |
| JP2008170998A (en) | System and method for turbine control simulation | |
| US5847955A (en) | System and method for controlling an instrumentation system | |
| US7315807B1 (en) | System and methods for storage area network simulation | |
| US20080046227A1 (en) | Emulator of a controller of an industrial plant, in particular of an electric energy generating plant | |
| JP2001034596A (en) | Decentralized type process control system functionally integrated on single computer | |
| US20120036275A1 (en) | Message traffic interception system | |
| US20160014238A1 (en) | System and Method for Testing Applications with a Load Tester and Testing Translator | |
| US5161116A (en) | System for evaluating the performance of a large scale programmable machine capable of having a plurality of terminals attached thereto | |
| KR20100108582A (en) | Program test device and program | |
| CN106325242A (en) | MES system based on modularized control units | |
| JPH03224037A (en) | Architecture for server expansion | |
| CN113162948B (en) | Modularized industrial control honey pot system | |
| Chang et al. | Web-based distance experiments: design and implementation | |
| Weiss et al. | Automated integration tests for mobile applications in java 2 micro edition | |
| Tomak et al. | RAST: Evaluating Performance of a Legacy System Using Regression Analysis and Simulation | |
| CN110990252A (en) | Method for testing quality and efficiency of embedded flight control software | |
| Virzonis et al. | Design of the embedded software using flexible hardware-in-the-loop simulation scheme | |
| US20030033131A1 (en) | System level simulation method and device | |
| Schofield et al. | Continuous Integration for PLC-based Control System Development | |
| CN114047948A (en) | Reconfigurable trusted cryptographic module simulator, implementation method and simulation reconstruction method | |
| O'Keefe et al. | Discrete visual simulation with Pascal_SIM | |
| Delgado et al. | Remote Laboratory for Industrial Automation. |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FZDE | Discontinued |