CA2167407C - An improved non-particulating compact adsorbent filter - Google Patents
An improved non-particulating compact adsorbent filter Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2167407C CA2167407C CA002167407A CA2167407A CA2167407C CA 2167407 C CA2167407 C CA 2167407C CA 002167407 A CA002167407 A CA 002167407A CA 2167407 A CA2167407 A CA 2167407A CA 2167407 C CA2167407 C CA 2167407C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- sorbent
- filter
- core
- enclosure
- contaminants
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D53/00—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
- B01D53/02—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by adsorption, e.g. preparative gas chromatography
- B01D53/04—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by adsorption, e.g. preparative gas chromatography with stationary adsorbents
- B01D53/0407—Constructional details of adsorbing systems
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J20/00—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
- B01J20/28—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof characterised by their form or physical properties
- B01J20/28014—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their form
- B01J20/2805—Sorbents inside a permeable or porous casing, e.g. inside a container, bag or membrane
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2251/00—Reactants
- B01D2251/30—Alkali metal compounds
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2251/00—Reactants
- B01D2251/40—Alkaline earth metal or magnesium compounds
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2251/00—Reactants
- B01D2251/60—Inorganic bases or salts
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2253/00—Adsorbents used in seperation treatment of gases and vapours
- B01D2253/10—Inorganic adsorbents
- B01D2253/102—Carbon
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2253/00—Adsorbents used in seperation treatment of gases and vapours
- B01D2253/20—Organic adsorbents
- B01D2253/202—Polymeric adsorbents
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2253/00—Adsorbents used in seperation treatment of gases and vapours
- B01D2253/20—Organic adsorbents
- B01D2253/206—Ion exchange resins
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2253/00—Adsorbents used in seperation treatment of gases and vapours
- B01D2253/25—Coated, impregnated or composite adsorbents
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2257/00—Components to be removed
- B01D2257/70—Organic compounds not provided for in groups B01D2257/00 - B01D2257/602
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2257/00—Components to be removed
- B01D2257/80—Water
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D53/00—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
- B01D53/02—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by adsorption, e.g. preparative gas chromatography
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D53/00—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
- B01D53/26—Drying gases or vapours
- B01D53/261—Drying gases or vapours by adsorption
Abstract
A compact sorbent filter for selectively sorbing contaminants and method of removing contamination from an enclosure with a filter is disclosed The filter comprises a sorbent core including contaminant adsorbing material therein an outer protective cover wrapped around the inner sorbent core so as to completely contain the sorbent core, with the exposed end(s) of the core being capped so as to encapsulate the sorbent core present within the filter while not limiting the amount of material contained therein. A sorbing filter isplaced within an enclosure to remove gaseous contamination therein. The filter is particularly suitable for use in a computer disk drive or similar enclosure where out-gassing contamination may be a problem.
Description
TITLE OF THE INVENTION
An Improved Non-Particulating Compact Adsorbent Filter FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to devices for filtering or removing contaminants from a confined environment, such as gaseous contaminants in electronic or optical devices (e.g., computer disk drives).
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Many enclosures that contain sensitive instrumentation must maintain very dean environments in order to operate properly. Examples include:
enclosures with sensitive optical surfaces or electronic connections that are sensitive to particulates and gaseous contaminants which can interfere with mechanical or electrical operation; data recording devices, such as computer hard disk drives that are sensitive to particles, organic vapors, and corrosive vapors; and electronic control boxes such as those used in automobiles that are sensitive to moisture buildup and corrosion as well as contamination from fluids and vapors. Contamination in such enclosures originate from both inside and outside the enclosures. For example, in computer hard drives, damage may result from external contaminates as well as out-gassing from internal components.
One serious contaminatior~related failure mechanism in computer disk drives is static friction or "stiction." Stiction is the adhesion of a drive head to a disk while the disk is stopped. Newer high density disks are more sensitive to contamination caused stidion because they are smoother and only thin layers of lubricants aro used. Contaminants on the disk change the surface energy and the adhesive forces between the disk and the head which causes sticnon.
Also, vapors which condense in the gap between the head and disk can cause stiction. Further exacerbating these effects, new disk drives have smaller, low energy motors with k~rer torque.
-In addition, disk drives must be protected against a large number of contaminants in the surrounding environmer>t. This is true for drives used in small to medium sized computer systems which may not be used in the typical data processing environment and is especially true in drives that are removable and transportable to any environment, such as disk drives that are :is _2_ used in Personal Computer Memory Card International Association (PCMCIA) slots.
One successful approach in controlling contamination has been with the use of sorbent filters. Sorbent filters must keep the enclosures free of contamination from both internal and external sources. In addition to requirements to provide leaner environments, filters must be made smaller to fit into small enclosures. An excellent example of space constraints in modem electronic components is in the area of computer disk drives. Today, PCMCIA
computer disk drives have up to 170 MB storage and are only approximately 5 cm wide and 7.5 cm long. Current production Type 3 PCMCIA drives have a maximum thickness of 10.5 mm. In the near future extremely compact Type 2 drives, which have a maximum thickness of 5 mm, and Type 1 drives, which have a maximum thickness of 3.3 mm are planned.
Sorbent breather filters used to keep particulates and vapors from entering enclosures are well known. These can be made by filling a cartridge of polycarbonate, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), a similar material with sortient and securing filter media on both ends of the cartridge. Examples of such filters are described in U.S. Patents 4,883;489, issued to Osendorf, (an anti-diffusion chemical breather assembly for disk drives with filter media having a layer with impregnated adyvated charcoal granules); 5,030,260 issued to Beck et al., (a disk drive breather fitter including an assembly with an extended diffusion path); 5,124,856 issued to Brown et al., (a unitary filter medium impregnated with activated carbon fibers to protect against organic and inorganic pollutants). Unfortunately, none of these devices is believed suitable for today's moro demanding applications. For instance, many of these kinds of devices present their own contamination risks, such as out-gassing from adhesives or chemicals, or partiurlation. Further, in order to supply adequate quantities of sorbent materials, most existing breather filters are too large to fit within increasingly smaller electronic components.
In a distinctly different use, U.S. Patent 4,208,194 issued to Nelson discloses a personal monitoring device that collects chemicals to be tested.
The collecting layer is composed of a porous polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) sheet containing a partiarlate sorbent. Again, the collecting layer of this device may particulate and is not designed for use in small enclosures.
A commercially successful "tube" filter is disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,830,643 issued to Sassy et al. This patent teaches a sorbent fitter where a powdered sort>ent is encapsulated in an outer expanded PTFE tube. This tube filter is manufactured by W. L. Gore and Assodates, Inc. Elkton, Maryland, and is commercially available under the trademark GORE
SORBER~ module. While this apparatus is highly effective, the filter is currently available only in large and medium sizes (e.g., filter volumes down to about 3 cc). In its present form, this filler is incapable of fully addressing growing needs for even smaller and more compact sorbent filters containing a higher sorbent density.
Sorbent filter manufacturers have encountered several obstades in producing very small tube sorbent filters. First, as tube size (diameter) decreases, filling the tube with sorbent powder becomes more difficult. This problem is compounded by the common use of larger granular sorbent powders to avoid "dusting" contamination.
Second, as tube size decreases, it is more difficult to fill the tube filters without having the powder setae on the external tube surfaces and the seal areas. The powder on the outside tube can contaminate the devices near the tube and also prevent the outer tube from sealing, which may also present dusting problems through leakage.
Third, as diameters are reduced, the ratio of the volume occupied by the sortient material to the volume occupied by the sorbent filter assembly substantially and disproportionately decreases. This disproportional volume decrease occurs because the volume ocarpied by the tubing wall thickness and the volume consumed by the crimping of the tube ends becomes a larger percentage of the total tube fitter volume. Using a thinner tubing thidcnesses could increase aorbent volume, but this increases tube filling difficulties and makes seal formation. more difficult ~ Fourth, many new applications for sorbent filtea require spill proof sorbent materials. However, the use of loose parhdes in existing filled tube fitters, if brokw~, could spill the loosely packed adsorbent material into the endoaune, damaging the integral components.
Another sorbent fitter commercially available from W. L. Gore 8~
Associates, Inc., called a GORE-TEXTS Stand Alone Adsorbent Assembly, consists of a composite sortient-filled PTFE planar core which is laminated on its top and bottom surfaces with a porous expanded PTFE membrane. This filter fits into slots in an enclosure interior. The sorbent-filled PTFE core can be filled with various sorbent materials selected to adsorb hydrocarbons, moisture, out-gassed plastidzers, corrosives, etc. Although this sorbent assembly provides a k~w profile compact sorbent assembly, concern has been expressed that the unsealed sides of this device may not provide adequate protection from shedding of sort>ent material partides.
Accordingly, it is a primary purpose of the present invention to provide an improved compact sorbent filter that effectively removes contaminants from an enclosed environment while occupying minimal space.
It is a further purpose of the present invention to provide a sorbent filter that is quite compact while having a high ratio of sorbent material to overall filter volume.
It is an additional purpose of the present invention to provide a sorbent filter which is non-out-gassing and non-particulating.
Still another purpose of the present invention is to provide a sorbent filter that is readily handled and installed.
These and other purposes of the present invention will become evident from review of the following specification.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is a compact sorbent assembly for reduction of contamination in enGosed areas.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention comprises a sorbent core containing contaminant adsorbing material, and a very thin outer protective cover wrapped around the inner sorbent core so as to completely contain the sorbent core, while leaving its two ends exposed. Partiurlarly preferred is a cigarette or spiral wrap of the cover around the core. The two exposed ends of the container are sealed, such as with separate end caps, so as to encapsulate the sorbent core present within the container while not limiting the amount of material contained therein.
The present invention solves marry of the previously mentioned problems with existing sortient filters. In extremely small filter sizes, the sorbent filter of the present invention is believed to have a higher ratio of sorbent material to overall fitter volume than any previously available. The fitter can be made in small sizes, but still contains sufficient sorbertt material to adsorb high volumes of c~ntaminabon. Moreover, the fitter is non-particulating, non-out-gassing, and easy to handle and instaA.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The operation of the present invention should become apparent from the following descxiption when considered in conjunction with the s~ompanying drawings, in which:
_5..
Figure lA is a top view of a first embodiment of the filter unit of the present invention, where the sorbent core is wrapped longitudinally by a thin protective cover and the core ends are sealed.
Figure 1 B is a side view of the embodiment shown in Figure 1A.
Figure 1C is an end view of the embodiment shown in Figure 1A.
Figure 2A is a cross-section view of the embodiment of the present invention along line 2-2 of Figure 1A.
Figure 28 is a thn3e-quarter isometric view of the filter unit of the present invention, with its core shown in partial cut-away.
Figure 3 is a side view of a second embodiment of the filter unit of the present invention where the protective cover is spirally wrapped around the solvent core with overlapped edges.
Figure 4A is a side view of a third embodiment of the fitter unit of the present invention where the protective cover is agarette wrapped around the sorbent core and the ends are sealed with an end cap.
Figure 4B is an end view of the third embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 5A is a side view of a fourth embodiment of the filter unit of the present invention where the sorbent core is surrounded by a continuous protective cover .
Figure 5B is an end view of the fourth embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 8A is a side view of a fifth embodiment of the filter unit of the present invention where filter material is attached to two sides of a sorbent core.
Figure 6B is an end view of the fifth embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 7A is a top view a filter of the present invention positioned in computer disk drive assembly.
Figure 7B is a cross-section view along line 7-7 of Figure 7A.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is a compact sorbent filter capable of removing vapor contaminants from within an enclosure to protect sensitive equipment present within the interior of the enclosure. The present invention also provides a method for sorbing contaminates from an enclosure with a sorbent filter and more particularly, removing contaminates from a disk drive enclosure.
The filter of the present invention differs significantly from previous attempts to produce compact sorbent filters. The filter of the present invention achieves a very high loading of sortaent material in a small space by employing a very thin porous protective cover that is wrapped around the sorbent material. As is explained in greater detail below, when constructed in accordance with the present invention, the protective cover thoroughly seals side walls of the fitter device, avoiding risk of particulation or other contamination from the filter unit, while avoiding wasted space often encountered with overly thick tubes and other previous devices that could not pack effective amounts of sorbent materi8t into very small containers. To avoid further wasted space in the ends of the filter unit, such as that occupied by crimped ends in some previous products, the present invention further includes a thin yet effective end cap or sealing procedure that avoids contamination risks while again maximizing the amount of sorbent material the filter can contain.
Various examples of the filter unit of the present invention are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. As shown in Figures 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A and 2B, the fitter 10 of the present invention comprises a sorbent core 12 wrapped with a thin proted3ve cover 14. Each end 13a and 13b of the sorbent core 12 is ~PP~ ~h end seals 18. In this first embodiment of the present invention, ~ ~P ~nprises a "agarette wrap," where the protective cover 14 is IongttudinaNy wrapper v,i~ a single seam 18 running the length of the fitter 10.
By employing a thin, porous tape as the protective cover, as is explained in detail below, this construction delivers an extremely thin protective cover that is quite effective at sealing the contents of the filter 10 while occupyinfl minimal space with non-sorbing material.
The thin outer protective cover layer 14 may comprise any porous, material that allows vapor contaminants to diffuse through it to the sorbent core layer. The outer protective cover layer 14 also keeps the sor~ent material within the filter assembly 10. The cover 14 may include any porous material _7_ that allows gas to permeate into the core while thoroughly retaining the care material within the cover. Suitable cover materials may inGude: polymeric non-shedding filter paper or laminated filter material, porous membrane of polypropylene, nylon, a composite of polycarbonate and polyester, mined cellulose esters, cellulose triacetate, or porous laminate thereof.
The preferred protective cover material for use in the present invention comprises a membrane of porous expanded polytetrafluroethylene (PTFE), a porous thermoplastic, or thertnoset filled PTFE membrane with a thickness in the range of 0.0001 to 0.040 inch.
Additionally, as is disclosed in United States Patent 3,953,566 to Gore, PTFE
provides a number of improved processing advantages, such as being able to be formed in extremely thin dimensions while remaining coherent and pin-hole free, and being able to be made into wide widths that can be slit or extruded to the desired width. As is disclosed in United States Patent 4,732,626 to Cooper and PCT Application PCT/LJK91/00661 to Gellan et al, thin tapes of filled PTFE may be formed to a thickness of 0.005 to 0.001 inches or less. As has been explained, the thinner the protective covering, while remaining impermeable to dust particles form the core, the more effective the filter of the present invention will be when very small dimensions are produced.
The most preferred outer proted'rve cover material is a porous PTFE
membrane filled with a themnoplastic perfluoroalkyl copolymer (PFA). This material is formed around the coro to provide s proted'rve cover 14 and is heat sealable td form th seam 18. The PFA is partiarlariy suitable for use in the , present invention because it is inert, withstands reasonably high temperatures, and is non-outgassing. Moreover, this method of producing a seam is quite effective at ~cealing the core while requiring no additional material and cxcupyf~ g no addiitieonal space to produce the seal.
Once the coro 12 is wrapped with the protective cover 14, protecting the sides of the core from particulating, it is then important that the ends 13a, 13b of the filter 10 likewise be thoroughly sealed. As has been discussed, one presently employed method for sealing a tube around sortient material simply crimps the ends together and adhering the cximped ends in the gimped position. Unfortunately, this limits the amount of sorbent material that can be contained in a filter of any given volume. In the present invention, one of a number of effective sealing techniques have been employed to maintain full sorbent loading up to the ends of the filter unit 10.
-&
In its simplest form, the ends 13a, 13b may be sealed by applying a liquid sealant, such as thermoplastic or thermoset resin or adhesive, over the ends to produce essentially flat end seals 16. Suitable materials inGude, but are not limited to: polyethylene, polypropylene, polyester, perfluoroalkyl copolymer (PFA), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), urethane, nylon, epoxy, or any other polymer capable of bonding to the ends of the filter 10 to seal and prevent sorbent partiGes from escaping. The advantage of this approach is that partiGes are effectively contained v~ithin the filter, but no loss of overall filter holding capacity occurs in the sealing procedure.
Alternatively, exposed ends 13a, 13b of the filter 10 can be encapsulated by injection-molding or insert-molding a plastic material. The plastic material may be, but not limited to, acxylo butadiene styrene (ABS), polybutyiene teraphthalate (PBT), nylon, polyester, polycarbonate, or any other moldable material.
The most preferred end seal 16 comprises a polyethylene or polyester polymer. These materials are non-out-gassing and flow adequately to seal the cut ends that are exposed after cutting a length of material to the desired filter lengths. The polyester sealed fitter ends can be formed by dipping the filter ends into a less than 0.08 cm deep layer of finely ground polyester powder.
The ends are then sealed by plating in front of a 550°C hot air stream. This process should be performed repeatedly to produce a uniform bead of polyester encapsulating the ends.
In another method, a "dip coating" method, the filter ends are dipped into ~ a molten thermoplastic material such as polyethylene, polypropylene, polyester, perfluoroalkyl copolymer (PFA), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), nylon, or any other polymer capable of melting and sealing an edge. More particularly, an acceptable seal can be cxeated by foaming thin layer (0.05 mm) of polyester on the tip of a soldering iron by passing the soldering iron through a 0.025 mm thick polyester film. The ends of the filter are then pressed against the coated soldering iron tip, transfeaing an approximately 0.025 mm coating of polyester to the filter ends, thus sealing the filter.
Another sealing method comprises produang a "transfer coating" on each exposed end. This method forms polyethylene seals over each end by placing a layer of 0.025 mm aluminum foil coated with 0.025 mm of polyethylene in front of a soldering gun tip heated to about 370°C. An end 13 of a filter is then pushed into the polyethylene side of the laminate, creating contact of the aluminum with the heated soldering tip. The heat from the tip transfers through the aluminum and melts the polyethylene which transfers to the filter ends, thus sealing the ends.
It sho~~ld be evident from the above examples of sealing techniques that the important consideration is to ueate a thin, flat seal on the end of the filter that does not diminish sorbent holding capacity while assuring that particles do not escape from the unit. The type of seal employed , and the amount of risk of particle contamination, is in no small part dependent upon the type of sorbent core used.
The sorbent core material 12 may comprise any number of materials which may range from loosely packed particles to filled or highly filled porous materials. As the terms "sorbent" and "sorbing" are used herein, they are intended to encompass any material that removes contaminants from surrounding air, whether through a process of absorbing, adsorbing, or othervvise. A core formed of loosely packed particles preferably contains a binder which holds the particles together. Suitable binders include but are not limited to fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), acrylics and other commonly used binders as is well known in the art In addition, the core can comprise one or more layers of an adsorbent or adsorbent filled material such as a scaffold of porous polymeric material in which void spaces are filled with a sorbent. Other possible car's constructions include sorbent impregnated wvvens or non-wovens, such as cellulose or polymeric non-woven that may include latex or other binders, as well as, porous castings of sorbents and fillers that ars polymeric or ceramic. The sorbent core may include a single particular sorbent or may include a mixture of different types of sorbents, the selection of which is dependent on the ~peafic applkation. The core can also be a woven or nonwover~ fabric of carbonized material, such as the (KYNOL"") activated carbon fa~ic products made by American Kynol, Inc.
A preferred embodiment of the sorbent core 12 utifrzes a sorbent filled F~TFE sheet wherein the sorbent particles are entrapped wrthrn t~ ~lar PTFE stnx~ure as taught by U.S. Patent No. 4,985,298 issued to Matimer, Jr., Ideally, particles are packed in an mufti-modal (e.g., bi-modal or tri-modal) manner, with particles of different sizes interspersed around one another to fill as much of the available void space between particles as is possible so as to maximize the amount of active material contained in the core. This technique also allows a number of sorbents to be filled into a single layer.
:~_ '~ '~ ~ ~a ' By using PTFE as a binder material for the core, a number of additional advantages are further imparted. PTFE is a non-tinting, non-out-gassing inert binder that effectively reduces dusting of sorbent material during manufacturing and during the life of the filter. Additionally, processing advantages of this material include the ability to make a relatively thin, highly loaded material, per United States Patent 4,985,296, that can be produced in a wide sheet and then cut (or cut and folded) into desired final widths. In this manner, thin cores can be produced for very low profile sorbent filters.
Perhaps the biggest advantage of using a sorbent filled PTFE core is the core's capacity to achieve high sorbent loading densities. By controlling the sorbent partite sizes and by compression of the extruded sort~ent filled PTFE
core, very high density sorbent loadings can be achieved. The PTFE structure still allows vapors to penetrate even very densely packed formulations.
Examples of high loading densities using the present invention are illustrated below in Table 1:
TABLE 1: Sorbent Packing Density for the Fitter of The Present Invention Filter VolumeOverall Filter 96 Sorbent/ Sorbent Mass inGuding wrapSorbent density PTFE in core (gms) 8 (gms/cm3) seals (cm3) 70 1.59 2.9 0.548 80 2.27 2.9 0.783 ' 70 2.39 2.9 0.824 ' 80 2.73 2.9 0.941 70 0.032 0.061 0.525 80 0.046 0.081 0.754 ' 70 0.048 0.061 0.787 ' 80 0.055 0.061 0.902 ' indicates predicted values Even higher packing densities are believed possible by increasing core sortient loading percent and total sorbent packing densities.
The effectiveness in packing density of the filter of the present invention compares very favorably with the best sorbent filters commercially available today. Table 2 illustrates the sorbent material packing densities for a GORE-SORBER~ module, commercially available from W. L. Gore and Associates, Inc., Elkton, MD:
r~~~t.~~~~
_11_ TABLE 2: Sorbent Packinfl Density for the GORE-SORBER~ M D LE
Tubing Fitter Overall FilterSorbent Sorbent Outer Diameter(Tubing) (tube) Material Material (mm) Mass Dens Length (cm) Volume (cm3) (grams) (gm/cm ) 19 5.08 10.25 5.700 .556 11 3.~ 2.90 1.500 .517 11 2.95 2.50 1.050 .420 9 3.38 1.15 0.500 .435 4 ~ 1.24 0.05 0.015 300 A comparison of Tables 1 and 2 shows that the sorbent density achieved by the present invention is significantly greater than of the commercially available product. Comparing both fitters with a volume of 2.9 cc, the commercial product has a sort~ent material density is 0.517 gm/cc compared to 0.941 gm/cc for the filter product of the present invention. The sorbent density difference between the filter of the present invention and the commercial filter module is even greater at smaller fitter volumes. For example, the present invention can achieve a 0.902 gm/cc sorbent density at a filter volume of 0.061 cc verses a sorbent density of 0.30 gm/cc at a filter volume of 0.05 cc for the commeraal product The high sorbent densities (such as greater than 0.6 g/cc) of the present invention are achieved due to the unique combination of materials and consbu~ion of the present invention, maximizing of the core volume as a percentage of the overall filter volume and the use of a highly filled PTFE core.
Examples of sorbent material that may be contained within the core may inGude: physisorbents (e.g., silica gel, activated carbon, activated alumina, or molecular sieves); chemisort~ents (e.g., potassium permanganate, salts, calaum carbonate, calaum sulfate, powdered metals or other reactants for scavenging gas phase contaminants depending on the known contaminants desired to be removed); ion exchange materials; catalytic fillers; as well as mixtures of some of these materials. For some applications it may be desirable to employ multiple layers of sorbent materials, with each layer containing a different sorbent to selectively remove diffen3nt contaminants as they pass through the filter.
Another embodiment of the present invention is shown in Figure 3. In this instance, the filter 20 inGudes a protective cover 22 that is helically or spiral wrapped around sorbent core 24. The protective cover 22 may comprise the same porous tape material as that used and described in the cigarette wrapped embodiment described above. By spiral wrapping, the cover forms a tight fit around the core 24, leaving a spiraling seam 26 along its length. Each of the layers of the spiral wrapped material partially overlaps a previous wrap to form the seam 26 in the manner shown. The seam 28 may then be sealed in one of the same manner as that described in the previous embodiment. Ends 28a, 28b may be sealed in the manner previously described, such as with injection molded end caps 30a, 30b.
Figures 4A and 4B show yet another embodiment of a filter 32 of the present invention having a protective cover 34 wrapped in a "cigarette"
manner around sorbent core 38 and sealed along seam 38. The ends 40a, 40b are sealed with end cap seals 42a, 42b. Each of the end caps 42 fit over the ends and are molded onto the ends or sealed in place, such as with the use of adhesive. Suitable materials for the end caps 42 inGude injection molded or insertion molded plastics.
Figures 5A and 5B illustrate still another embodiment of a filter 48 of the present invention. A continuous (i.e., seamless) protective cover 48 is employed over sorbent core 50. The continuous protective cover 48 may comprise a tube into which sorbent material is loaded or the protective cover 48 may be extruded over the sorbent core 50. Each of the ends 52a, 52b of this unit may be sealed by any of the methods previously described.
Figures 6A and 6B illustrate yet another embodiment of a fitter 54 of the present invention. Two flat protective covers 56a, 56b are attached to top and bottom surfaces 58, 60 of a sorbent core 82. Each exposed side of the filter 54 is sealed with seals 64a, 64b, 64c, 64d.
In each embodiment of the present invention, the sorbent filter may be constructed in virtually any desired dimensions. For use as a fitter in disk drives, typical dimensions may comprise: a length in the range of 0.0625 to 4 inches {1.58 to 101.6 mm) (preferably about 0.125 inches (3.18 mm) in length or above); thickness of about 0.001" (0.025 mm) or above; width of about 0.010" (0.25 mm) or above; an internal volume of down to 0.025 cc (or less);
and a sorbent core comprising at least 15 mg (at least 0.60 gm/cc) of sorbent material.
Ideally the volume of the filter comprises about 0.05 to 0.5 cm3, with a ratio of sorbent material to filter volume in the range of 0.25 to 2.0 gm/cc.
With the use of expanded PTFE protective covers in the forth of tapes wrapped around the sorbent core, preferred thicknesses of the cover comprises about 0.00005 to 0.020 inches (0.00127 to 0.508 mm).
Given today's handling techniques, perhaps the smallest part manufacturable in accordance with the present invention is one that is about 0.125 mm thick, 0.25 mm wide and 1.5 mm long for a total volume of 4.7 x 105 cm3. By producing such a product in accordance with the present invention, such a filter may still contain about 40 micrograms of sorbent. With a typical sorbent adsorbing 4096 to over 10096 of its weight in contaminants, a 40 microgram sorbent can sorb 20 to 40 micrograms of contaminants. This should be sufficient to provide substantial protection of an endosure that is about 10 to 12 cc in total volume.
Figures 7A and 7B show an example of the placement of a filter assembly 68 of the present invention mounted in a conventional disk drive assembly 68. As can be seen, the filter assembly 86 of the present invention is small enough that it may be placed virtually anywhere in the disk drive assembly 68, especally in those kxations in the drive where contamination sorption may be considered uitical. If desired, the filter 68 may be held in place through any suitable means, inducting within a slot, with dips, with adhesive, or, as shown, with brackets 70a, 70b.
Suggested kxations within the disk drive 68 where the filter of the present invention may be mounted indude near: magnetic storage disk 72, read/write head 74, or armature 78. Gaseous contaminants that may be of concern in this environment indude without limitation dioctylpthalate;
chlorine;
hydrogen sulfide; nitrous oxide; mineral aad gases; anionic and catiranic spades; vapors from silicone; hydrocarbon based artting oils; and other hydrocarbon pollutants.
EXAMPLES
Without intending to limit the scope of the present invention, the following examples illustrate how the present inventjoc~ may be made and used:
Examcle 1 A 70 wt % adyvated carbon and 30 wt % PTFE adsorbent core was made by the following method: 6874 g. of Calgon PCB-G carbon and 89, 800 g. of deionized H20 was mixed in a 115 liter baffled stainless container.
While the slurty was agitating, 2610 g. of PTFE in the forth of a 24.8 %
aqueous dispersion was rapidly poured into the vessel. The PTFE dispersion used was AD-059 obtained from ICI Americas, Inc. The mixture coagulated TRADEMARK
within 1 minute and after 2 1/2 minutes, the mixer was stopped. The coagulum settled to the bottom and the effluent was Gear.
The coagulum was dried at 180°C in a convection oven. The dried cake was chilled 'slow 0°C. It was hand ground through a 835 cm stainless mesh screen. Next, 0.701 g of mineral spirits was added per gram of filled powder.
The mixture was chilled, passed through a screen again, tumbled then allowed to sit for greater than 18 hours at ambient.
A 10.8 cm diameter pellet was formed in a cylinder at 860 psi. The pellet was heated approximately 18 hours at 49°C. The pellet was then extruded into tape. The tape was then calendered between heated rolls to a thickness of 0.127 cm. The bulk of the lubricant was evaporated by running the tape across heated rollers. The partially dried tape was then solvent extracted in isopropanol in a sonicated bath. The isopropanol was removed in a vacuum oven.
The tape was then slit to 0.358 cm width by running a 10 cm width through a blade box. The final tape density was 0.75 g/cc.
A protective cover tape was made in accordance with the above procedure except 1453 g of PFA solids in,the forth of a 22.796 aqueous dispersion was added to 50,000 g of H20. 7247 g of PTFE solids in the form of 23.796 aqueous dispersion was rapidly poured into the vessel. The PFA
used was type AD-059 obtained from ICI Americas, Inc. After 1 minute of mixing, 14.8 g of polyethylene imine was added to induce co-coagulation.
Total mixing time was one minute and forty seconds.
The cake was dried at 185°C, chilled screened, and lubricated at 0.175 g of mineral spirits per gram of filled powder. The mixture was chilled, screened, left at ambient for 18 hours and then palletized. The pellet was heated to 49°C for 18 hours and extruded into tape forth. The tape was calendered through rolls to 0.048 cm. The lubricant was removed by evaporating across heated rolls in 2 passes. On the second pass, the tape was expanded at a 2:1 ratio at 105 feet per minute and a maximum temp of 275°C. The tape was then stretched across two heated surfaces at 340°C at 25:1 and 2:1 expansion ratios and an output speed of 75 ft/min. The expanded tape was 0.0025 cm thick and approximately 0.7 g/cc.
A filter assembly of the present invention was made by slitting the covering tape to approximately a 1.27 cm width and hand wrapped around slit carbon filled strips such that a single overlap was formed down the length of the strip. This overlap was then sealed using a 345°C heated blade with mild pressure. The wrapped composite was then cut into 1.194 cm sections.
The filter ends were sealed by dipping them into a less than 0.08 an deep layer of finely ground polyester powder. The ends were then sealed by placing in from of a 550°C hot air stream. This process was performed three times to produce a uniform bead of polyester encapsulating the ends.
Exam le Process for Example 1 except 9835 g of 9296 dry ameby SutGiffe YF
activated carbon was added to 55,000 g of deionized H20. Next, 2264 g of PTFE solids in the forth of aqueous dispersion was rapidly poured in the agitating slurry.
After powder preparation, 0.693 g of mineral spirits was added per gram of filled powder. The extruded paste was calendered through heated rollers to 0.107 cm. After lubricant removal; the tape was compressed to 0.084 cm.
The bulk density was 1.0 g/cc.
A filter assembly of the present invention was then formed by sl'iiting this tape to 0.358 mm in width and wrapping it with a protective cover type similar to that used in Example 1, forming an overlapped seam down the length of the core. The seam and filter ends were sealed as in Example 1.
Examcle 3 A wrapped adsorbent core was made as taught in Example 1. The filter ends were sealed by a thin layer of about 0.025 mm of polyester that was transferred onto the ends by pressing a soldering iron heated to about 370°C
through a 0.025" thick polyester film. The soldering iron was coated with the polyester film and transferred polyester coating onto the ends, sealing the ends when the soldering iron was pressed against them. ., Examcle 4 A wrapped adsorbent core was made as taught in Example 1. The filter ends were sealed with a thin layer at about 0.025 mm of polyethylene in the following manner. A soldering iron heated to about 370°C was pressed against a 0.025" thick aluminum foil coated with a 0.025" thick polyethylene layer and the ends were pressed against the polyethylene sides heat transferred through the aluminum foil melting the polyethylene onto the end to seal end.
In summary, the present invention provides a very thin sorbent filter assembly that is easy to manufacture, non-particulating, non-out-gassing, compact, manufadurable in small sizes, and is able to hold proportionately TRADEMARK
~~ I
-1&
large amounts of densely packed sorbent material. Although the above description was primarily directed to production of a filter for use in a computer disk drive application, the present invention can be used in many other application, for example, electronic control boxes, automobiles, optical equipment, optical cable, etc.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described herein, the present invention should not be limited to such illustrations and descriptions. It should be apparent that changes and modification may be incorporated and embodied as part of the present invention within the scope of the following Gaims.
An Improved Non-Particulating Compact Adsorbent Filter FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to devices for filtering or removing contaminants from a confined environment, such as gaseous contaminants in electronic or optical devices (e.g., computer disk drives).
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Many enclosures that contain sensitive instrumentation must maintain very dean environments in order to operate properly. Examples include:
enclosures with sensitive optical surfaces or electronic connections that are sensitive to particulates and gaseous contaminants which can interfere with mechanical or electrical operation; data recording devices, such as computer hard disk drives that are sensitive to particles, organic vapors, and corrosive vapors; and electronic control boxes such as those used in automobiles that are sensitive to moisture buildup and corrosion as well as contamination from fluids and vapors. Contamination in such enclosures originate from both inside and outside the enclosures. For example, in computer hard drives, damage may result from external contaminates as well as out-gassing from internal components.
One serious contaminatior~related failure mechanism in computer disk drives is static friction or "stiction." Stiction is the adhesion of a drive head to a disk while the disk is stopped. Newer high density disks are more sensitive to contamination caused stidion because they are smoother and only thin layers of lubricants aro used. Contaminants on the disk change the surface energy and the adhesive forces between the disk and the head which causes sticnon.
Also, vapors which condense in the gap between the head and disk can cause stiction. Further exacerbating these effects, new disk drives have smaller, low energy motors with k~rer torque.
-In addition, disk drives must be protected against a large number of contaminants in the surrounding environmer>t. This is true for drives used in small to medium sized computer systems which may not be used in the typical data processing environment and is especially true in drives that are removable and transportable to any environment, such as disk drives that are :is _2_ used in Personal Computer Memory Card International Association (PCMCIA) slots.
One successful approach in controlling contamination has been with the use of sorbent filters. Sorbent filters must keep the enclosures free of contamination from both internal and external sources. In addition to requirements to provide leaner environments, filters must be made smaller to fit into small enclosures. An excellent example of space constraints in modem electronic components is in the area of computer disk drives. Today, PCMCIA
computer disk drives have up to 170 MB storage and are only approximately 5 cm wide and 7.5 cm long. Current production Type 3 PCMCIA drives have a maximum thickness of 10.5 mm. In the near future extremely compact Type 2 drives, which have a maximum thickness of 5 mm, and Type 1 drives, which have a maximum thickness of 3.3 mm are planned.
Sorbent breather filters used to keep particulates and vapors from entering enclosures are well known. These can be made by filling a cartridge of polycarbonate, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), a similar material with sortient and securing filter media on both ends of the cartridge. Examples of such filters are described in U.S. Patents 4,883;489, issued to Osendorf, (an anti-diffusion chemical breather assembly for disk drives with filter media having a layer with impregnated adyvated charcoal granules); 5,030,260 issued to Beck et al., (a disk drive breather fitter including an assembly with an extended diffusion path); 5,124,856 issued to Brown et al., (a unitary filter medium impregnated with activated carbon fibers to protect against organic and inorganic pollutants). Unfortunately, none of these devices is believed suitable for today's moro demanding applications. For instance, many of these kinds of devices present their own contamination risks, such as out-gassing from adhesives or chemicals, or partiurlation. Further, in order to supply adequate quantities of sorbent materials, most existing breather filters are too large to fit within increasingly smaller electronic components.
In a distinctly different use, U.S. Patent 4,208,194 issued to Nelson discloses a personal monitoring device that collects chemicals to be tested.
The collecting layer is composed of a porous polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) sheet containing a partiarlate sorbent. Again, the collecting layer of this device may particulate and is not designed for use in small enclosures.
A commercially successful "tube" filter is disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,830,643 issued to Sassy et al. This patent teaches a sorbent fitter where a powdered sort>ent is encapsulated in an outer expanded PTFE tube. This tube filter is manufactured by W. L. Gore and Assodates, Inc. Elkton, Maryland, and is commercially available under the trademark GORE
SORBER~ module. While this apparatus is highly effective, the filter is currently available only in large and medium sizes (e.g., filter volumes down to about 3 cc). In its present form, this filler is incapable of fully addressing growing needs for even smaller and more compact sorbent filters containing a higher sorbent density.
Sorbent filter manufacturers have encountered several obstades in producing very small tube sorbent filters. First, as tube size (diameter) decreases, filling the tube with sorbent powder becomes more difficult. This problem is compounded by the common use of larger granular sorbent powders to avoid "dusting" contamination.
Second, as tube size decreases, it is more difficult to fill the tube filters without having the powder setae on the external tube surfaces and the seal areas. The powder on the outside tube can contaminate the devices near the tube and also prevent the outer tube from sealing, which may also present dusting problems through leakage.
Third, as diameters are reduced, the ratio of the volume occupied by the sortient material to the volume occupied by the sorbent filter assembly substantially and disproportionately decreases. This disproportional volume decrease occurs because the volume ocarpied by the tubing wall thickness and the volume consumed by the crimping of the tube ends becomes a larger percentage of the total tube fitter volume. Using a thinner tubing thidcnesses could increase aorbent volume, but this increases tube filling difficulties and makes seal formation. more difficult ~ Fourth, many new applications for sorbent filtea require spill proof sorbent materials. However, the use of loose parhdes in existing filled tube fitters, if brokw~, could spill the loosely packed adsorbent material into the endoaune, damaging the integral components.
Another sorbent fitter commercially available from W. L. Gore 8~
Associates, Inc., called a GORE-TEXTS Stand Alone Adsorbent Assembly, consists of a composite sortient-filled PTFE planar core which is laminated on its top and bottom surfaces with a porous expanded PTFE membrane. This filter fits into slots in an enclosure interior. The sorbent-filled PTFE core can be filled with various sorbent materials selected to adsorb hydrocarbons, moisture, out-gassed plastidzers, corrosives, etc. Although this sorbent assembly provides a k~w profile compact sorbent assembly, concern has been expressed that the unsealed sides of this device may not provide adequate protection from shedding of sort>ent material partides.
Accordingly, it is a primary purpose of the present invention to provide an improved compact sorbent filter that effectively removes contaminants from an enclosed environment while occupying minimal space.
It is a further purpose of the present invention to provide a sorbent filter that is quite compact while having a high ratio of sorbent material to overall filter volume.
It is an additional purpose of the present invention to provide a sorbent filter which is non-out-gassing and non-particulating.
Still another purpose of the present invention is to provide a sorbent filter that is readily handled and installed.
These and other purposes of the present invention will become evident from review of the following specification.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is a compact sorbent assembly for reduction of contamination in enGosed areas.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention comprises a sorbent core containing contaminant adsorbing material, and a very thin outer protective cover wrapped around the inner sorbent core so as to completely contain the sorbent core, while leaving its two ends exposed. Partiurlarly preferred is a cigarette or spiral wrap of the cover around the core. The two exposed ends of the container are sealed, such as with separate end caps, so as to encapsulate the sorbent core present within the container while not limiting the amount of material contained therein.
The present invention solves marry of the previously mentioned problems with existing sortient filters. In extremely small filter sizes, the sorbent filter of the present invention is believed to have a higher ratio of sorbent material to overall fitter volume than any previously available. The fitter can be made in small sizes, but still contains sufficient sorbertt material to adsorb high volumes of c~ntaminabon. Moreover, the fitter is non-particulating, non-out-gassing, and easy to handle and instaA.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The operation of the present invention should become apparent from the following descxiption when considered in conjunction with the s~ompanying drawings, in which:
_5..
Figure lA is a top view of a first embodiment of the filter unit of the present invention, where the sorbent core is wrapped longitudinally by a thin protective cover and the core ends are sealed.
Figure 1 B is a side view of the embodiment shown in Figure 1A.
Figure 1C is an end view of the embodiment shown in Figure 1A.
Figure 2A is a cross-section view of the embodiment of the present invention along line 2-2 of Figure 1A.
Figure 28 is a thn3e-quarter isometric view of the filter unit of the present invention, with its core shown in partial cut-away.
Figure 3 is a side view of a second embodiment of the filter unit of the present invention where the protective cover is spirally wrapped around the solvent core with overlapped edges.
Figure 4A is a side view of a third embodiment of the fitter unit of the present invention where the protective cover is agarette wrapped around the sorbent core and the ends are sealed with an end cap.
Figure 4B is an end view of the third embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 5A is a side view of a fourth embodiment of the filter unit of the present invention where the sorbent core is surrounded by a continuous protective cover .
Figure 5B is an end view of the fourth embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 8A is a side view of a fifth embodiment of the filter unit of the present invention where filter material is attached to two sides of a sorbent core.
Figure 6B is an end view of the fifth embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 7A is a top view a filter of the present invention positioned in computer disk drive assembly.
Figure 7B is a cross-section view along line 7-7 of Figure 7A.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is a compact sorbent filter capable of removing vapor contaminants from within an enclosure to protect sensitive equipment present within the interior of the enclosure. The present invention also provides a method for sorbing contaminates from an enclosure with a sorbent filter and more particularly, removing contaminates from a disk drive enclosure.
The filter of the present invention differs significantly from previous attempts to produce compact sorbent filters. The filter of the present invention achieves a very high loading of sortaent material in a small space by employing a very thin porous protective cover that is wrapped around the sorbent material. As is explained in greater detail below, when constructed in accordance with the present invention, the protective cover thoroughly seals side walls of the fitter device, avoiding risk of particulation or other contamination from the filter unit, while avoiding wasted space often encountered with overly thick tubes and other previous devices that could not pack effective amounts of sorbent materi8t into very small containers. To avoid further wasted space in the ends of the filter unit, such as that occupied by crimped ends in some previous products, the present invention further includes a thin yet effective end cap or sealing procedure that avoids contamination risks while again maximizing the amount of sorbent material the filter can contain.
Various examples of the filter unit of the present invention are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. As shown in Figures 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A and 2B, the fitter 10 of the present invention comprises a sorbent core 12 wrapped with a thin proted3ve cover 14. Each end 13a and 13b of the sorbent core 12 is ~PP~ ~h end seals 18. In this first embodiment of the present invention, ~ ~P ~nprises a "agarette wrap," where the protective cover 14 is IongttudinaNy wrapper v,i~ a single seam 18 running the length of the fitter 10.
By employing a thin, porous tape as the protective cover, as is explained in detail below, this construction delivers an extremely thin protective cover that is quite effective at sealing the contents of the filter 10 while occupyinfl minimal space with non-sorbing material.
The thin outer protective cover layer 14 may comprise any porous, material that allows vapor contaminants to diffuse through it to the sorbent core layer. The outer protective cover layer 14 also keeps the sor~ent material within the filter assembly 10. The cover 14 may include any porous material _7_ that allows gas to permeate into the core while thoroughly retaining the care material within the cover. Suitable cover materials may inGude: polymeric non-shedding filter paper or laminated filter material, porous membrane of polypropylene, nylon, a composite of polycarbonate and polyester, mined cellulose esters, cellulose triacetate, or porous laminate thereof.
The preferred protective cover material for use in the present invention comprises a membrane of porous expanded polytetrafluroethylene (PTFE), a porous thermoplastic, or thertnoset filled PTFE membrane with a thickness in the range of 0.0001 to 0.040 inch.
Additionally, as is disclosed in United States Patent 3,953,566 to Gore, PTFE
provides a number of improved processing advantages, such as being able to be formed in extremely thin dimensions while remaining coherent and pin-hole free, and being able to be made into wide widths that can be slit or extruded to the desired width. As is disclosed in United States Patent 4,732,626 to Cooper and PCT Application PCT/LJK91/00661 to Gellan et al, thin tapes of filled PTFE may be formed to a thickness of 0.005 to 0.001 inches or less. As has been explained, the thinner the protective covering, while remaining impermeable to dust particles form the core, the more effective the filter of the present invention will be when very small dimensions are produced.
The most preferred outer proted'rve cover material is a porous PTFE
membrane filled with a themnoplastic perfluoroalkyl copolymer (PFA). This material is formed around the coro to provide s proted'rve cover 14 and is heat sealable td form th seam 18. The PFA is partiarlariy suitable for use in the , present invention because it is inert, withstands reasonably high temperatures, and is non-outgassing. Moreover, this method of producing a seam is quite effective at ~cealing the core while requiring no additional material and cxcupyf~ g no addiitieonal space to produce the seal.
Once the coro 12 is wrapped with the protective cover 14, protecting the sides of the core from particulating, it is then important that the ends 13a, 13b of the filter 10 likewise be thoroughly sealed. As has been discussed, one presently employed method for sealing a tube around sortient material simply crimps the ends together and adhering the cximped ends in the gimped position. Unfortunately, this limits the amount of sorbent material that can be contained in a filter of any given volume. In the present invention, one of a number of effective sealing techniques have been employed to maintain full sorbent loading up to the ends of the filter unit 10.
-&
In its simplest form, the ends 13a, 13b may be sealed by applying a liquid sealant, such as thermoplastic or thermoset resin or adhesive, over the ends to produce essentially flat end seals 16. Suitable materials inGude, but are not limited to: polyethylene, polypropylene, polyester, perfluoroalkyl copolymer (PFA), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), urethane, nylon, epoxy, or any other polymer capable of bonding to the ends of the filter 10 to seal and prevent sorbent partiGes from escaping. The advantage of this approach is that partiGes are effectively contained v~ithin the filter, but no loss of overall filter holding capacity occurs in the sealing procedure.
Alternatively, exposed ends 13a, 13b of the filter 10 can be encapsulated by injection-molding or insert-molding a plastic material. The plastic material may be, but not limited to, acxylo butadiene styrene (ABS), polybutyiene teraphthalate (PBT), nylon, polyester, polycarbonate, or any other moldable material.
The most preferred end seal 16 comprises a polyethylene or polyester polymer. These materials are non-out-gassing and flow adequately to seal the cut ends that are exposed after cutting a length of material to the desired filter lengths. The polyester sealed fitter ends can be formed by dipping the filter ends into a less than 0.08 cm deep layer of finely ground polyester powder.
The ends are then sealed by plating in front of a 550°C hot air stream. This process should be performed repeatedly to produce a uniform bead of polyester encapsulating the ends.
In another method, a "dip coating" method, the filter ends are dipped into ~ a molten thermoplastic material such as polyethylene, polypropylene, polyester, perfluoroalkyl copolymer (PFA), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), nylon, or any other polymer capable of melting and sealing an edge. More particularly, an acceptable seal can be cxeated by foaming thin layer (0.05 mm) of polyester on the tip of a soldering iron by passing the soldering iron through a 0.025 mm thick polyester film. The ends of the filter are then pressed against the coated soldering iron tip, transfeaing an approximately 0.025 mm coating of polyester to the filter ends, thus sealing the filter.
Another sealing method comprises produang a "transfer coating" on each exposed end. This method forms polyethylene seals over each end by placing a layer of 0.025 mm aluminum foil coated with 0.025 mm of polyethylene in front of a soldering gun tip heated to about 370°C. An end 13 of a filter is then pushed into the polyethylene side of the laminate, creating contact of the aluminum with the heated soldering tip. The heat from the tip transfers through the aluminum and melts the polyethylene which transfers to the filter ends, thus sealing the ends.
It sho~~ld be evident from the above examples of sealing techniques that the important consideration is to ueate a thin, flat seal on the end of the filter that does not diminish sorbent holding capacity while assuring that particles do not escape from the unit. The type of seal employed , and the amount of risk of particle contamination, is in no small part dependent upon the type of sorbent core used.
The sorbent core material 12 may comprise any number of materials which may range from loosely packed particles to filled or highly filled porous materials. As the terms "sorbent" and "sorbing" are used herein, they are intended to encompass any material that removes contaminants from surrounding air, whether through a process of absorbing, adsorbing, or othervvise. A core formed of loosely packed particles preferably contains a binder which holds the particles together. Suitable binders include but are not limited to fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), acrylics and other commonly used binders as is well known in the art In addition, the core can comprise one or more layers of an adsorbent or adsorbent filled material such as a scaffold of porous polymeric material in which void spaces are filled with a sorbent. Other possible car's constructions include sorbent impregnated wvvens or non-wovens, such as cellulose or polymeric non-woven that may include latex or other binders, as well as, porous castings of sorbents and fillers that ars polymeric or ceramic. The sorbent core may include a single particular sorbent or may include a mixture of different types of sorbents, the selection of which is dependent on the ~peafic applkation. The core can also be a woven or nonwover~ fabric of carbonized material, such as the (KYNOL"") activated carbon fa~ic products made by American Kynol, Inc.
A preferred embodiment of the sorbent core 12 utifrzes a sorbent filled F~TFE sheet wherein the sorbent particles are entrapped wrthrn t~ ~lar PTFE stnx~ure as taught by U.S. Patent No. 4,985,298 issued to Matimer, Jr., Ideally, particles are packed in an mufti-modal (e.g., bi-modal or tri-modal) manner, with particles of different sizes interspersed around one another to fill as much of the available void space between particles as is possible so as to maximize the amount of active material contained in the core. This technique also allows a number of sorbents to be filled into a single layer.
:~_ '~ '~ ~ ~a ' By using PTFE as a binder material for the core, a number of additional advantages are further imparted. PTFE is a non-tinting, non-out-gassing inert binder that effectively reduces dusting of sorbent material during manufacturing and during the life of the filter. Additionally, processing advantages of this material include the ability to make a relatively thin, highly loaded material, per United States Patent 4,985,296, that can be produced in a wide sheet and then cut (or cut and folded) into desired final widths. In this manner, thin cores can be produced for very low profile sorbent filters.
Perhaps the biggest advantage of using a sorbent filled PTFE core is the core's capacity to achieve high sorbent loading densities. By controlling the sorbent partite sizes and by compression of the extruded sort~ent filled PTFE
core, very high density sorbent loadings can be achieved. The PTFE structure still allows vapors to penetrate even very densely packed formulations.
Examples of high loading densities using the present invention are illustrated below in Table 1:
TABLE 1: Sorbent Packing Density for the Fitter of The Present Invention Filter VolumeOverall Filter 96 Sorbent/ Sorbent Mass inGuding wrapSorbent density PTFE in core (gms) 8 (gms/cm3) seals (cm3) 70 1.59 2.9 0.548 80 2.27 2.9 0.783 ' 70 2.39 2.9 0.824 ' 80 2.73 2.9 0.941 70 0.032 0.061 0.525 80 0.046 0.081 0.754 ' 70 0.048 0.061 0.787 ' 80 0.055 0.061 0.902 ' indicates predicted values Even higher packing densities are believed possible by increasing core sortient loading percent and total sorbent packing densities.
The effectiveness in packing density of the filter of the present invention compares very favorably with the best sorbent filters commercially available today. Table 2 illustrates the sorbent material packing densities for a GORE-SORBER~ module, commercially available from W. L. Gore and Associates, Inc., Elkton, MD:
r~~~t.~~~~
_11_ TABLE 2: Sorbent Packinfl Density for the GORE-SORBER~ M D LE
Tubing Fitter Overall FilterSorbent Sorbent Outer Diameter(Tubing) (tube) Material Material (mm) Mass Dens Length (cm) Volume (cm3) (grams) (gm/cm ) 19 5.08 10.25 5.700 .556 11 3.~ 2.90 1.500 .517 11 2.95 2.50 1.050 .420 9 3.38 1.15 0.500 .435 4 ~ 1.24 0.05 0.015 300 A comparison of Tables 1 and 2 shows that the sorbent density achieved by the present invention is significantly greater than of the commercially available product. Comparing both fitters with a volume of 2.9 cc, the commercial product has a sort~ent material density is 0.517 gm/cc compared to 0.941 gm/cc for the filter product of the present invention. The sorbent density difference between the filter of the present invention and the commercial filter module is even greater at smaller fitter volumes. For example, the present invention can achieve a 0.902 gm/cc sorbent density at a filter volume of 0.061 cc verses a sorbent density of 0.30 gm/cc at a filter volume of 0.05 cc for the commeraal product The high sorbent densities (such as greater than 0.6 g/cc) of the present invention are achieved due to the unique combination of materials and consbu~ion of the present invention, maximizing of the core volume as a percentage of the overall filter volume and the use of a highly filled PTFE core.
Examples of sorbent material that may be contained within the core may inGude: physisorbents (e.g., silica gel, activated carbon, activated alumina, or molecular sieves); chemisort~ents (e.g., potassium permanganate, salts, calaum carbonate, calaum sulfate, powdered metals or other reactants for scavenging gas phase contaminants depending on the known contaminants desired to be removed); ion exchange materials; catalytic fillers; as well as mixtures of some of these materials. For some applications it may be desirable to employ multiple layers of sorbent materials, with each layer containing a different sorbent to selectively remove diffen3nt contaminants as they pass through the filter.
Another embodiment of the present invention is shown in Figure 3. In this instance, the filter 20 inGudes a protective cover 22 that is helically or spiral wrapped around sorbent core 24. The protective cover 22 may comprise the same porous tape material as that used and described in the cigarette wrapped embodiment described above. By spiral wrapping, the cover forms a tight fit around the core 24, leaving a spiraling seam 26 along its length. Each of the layers of the spiral wrapped material partially overlaps a previous wrap to form the seam 26 in the manner shown. The seam 28 may then be sealed in one of the same manner as that described in the previous embodiment. Ends 28a, 28b may be sealed in the manner previously described, such as with injection molded end caps 30a, 30b.
Figures 4A and 4B show yet another embodiment of a filter 32 of the present invention having a protective cover 34 wrapped in a "cigarette"
manner around sorbent core 38 and sealed along seam 38. The ends 40a, 40b are sealed with end cap seals 42a, 42b. Each of the end caps 42 fit over the ends and are molded onto the ends or sealed in place, such as with the use of adhesive. Suitable materials for the end caps 42 inGude injection molded or insertion molded plastics.
Figures 5A and 5B illustrate still another embodiment of a filter 48 of the present invention. A continuous (i.e., seamless) protective cover 48 is employed over sorbent core 50. The continuous protective cover 48 may comprise a tube into which sorbent material is loaded or the protective cover 48 may be extruded over the sorbent core 50. Each of the ends 52a, 52b of this unit may be sealed by any of the methods previously described.
Figures 6A and 6B illustrate yet another embodiment of a fitter 54 of the present invention. Two flat protective covers 56a, 56b are attached to top and bottom surfaces 58, 60 of a sorbent core 82. Each exposed side of the filter 54 is sealed with seals 64a, 64b, 64c, 64d.
In each embodiment of the present invention, the sorbent filter may be constructed in virtually any desired dimensions. For use as a fitter in disk drives, typical dimensions may comprise: a length in the range of 0.0625 to 4 inches {1.58 to 101.6 mm) (preferably about 0.125 inches (3.18 mm) in length or above); thickness of about 0.001" (0.025 mm) or above; width of about 0.010" (0.25 mm) or above; an internal volume of down to 0.025 cc (or less);
and a sorbent core comprising at least 15 mg (at least 0.60 gm/cc) of sorbent material.
Ideally the volume of the filter comprises about 0.05 to 0.5 cm3, with a ratio of sorbent material to filter volume in the range of 0.25 to 2.0 gm/cc.
With the use of expanded PTFE protective covers in the forth of tapes wrapped around the sorbent core, preferred thicknesses of the cover comprises about 0.00005 to 0.020 inches (0.00127 to 0.508 mm).
Given today's handling techniques, perhaps the smallest part manufacturable in accordance with the present invention is one that is about 0.125 mm thick, 0.25 mm wide and 1.5 mm long for a total volume of 4.7 x 105 cm3. By producing such a product in accordance with the present invention, such a filter may still contain about 40 micrograms of sorbent. With a typical sorbent adsorbing 4096 to over 10096 of its weight in contaminants, a 40 microgram sorbent can sorb 20 to 40 micrograms of contaminants. This should be sufficient to provide substantial protection of an endosure that is about 10 to 12 cc in total volume.
Figures 7A and 7B show an example of the placement of a filter assembly 68 of the present invention mounted in a conventional disk drive assembly 68. As can be seen, the filter assembly 86 of the present invention is small enough that it may be placed virtually anywhere in the disk drive assembly 68, especally in those kxations in the drive where contamination sorption may be considered uitical. If desired, the filter 68 may be held in place through any suitable means, inducting within a slot, with dips, with adhesive, or, as shown, with brackets 70a, 70b.
Suggested kxations within the disk drive 68 where the filter of the present invention may be mounted indude near: magnetic storage disk 72, read/write head 74, or armature 78. Gaseous contaminants that may be of concern in this environment indude without limitation dioctylpthalate;
chlorine;
hydrogen sulfide; nitrous oxide; mineral aad gases; anionic and catiranic spades; vapors from silicone; hydrocarbon based artting oils; and other hydrocarbon pollutants.
EXAMPLES
Without intending to limit the scope of the present invention, the following examples illustrate how the present inventjoc~ may be made and used:
Examcle 1 A 70 wt % adyvated carbon and 30 wt % PTFE adsorbent core was made by the following method: 6874 g. of Calgon PCB-G carbon and 89, 800 g. of deionized H20 was mixed in a 115 liter baffled stainless container.
While the slurty was agitating, 2610 g. of PTFE in the forth of a 24.8 %
aqueous dispersion was rapidly poured into the vessel. The PTFE dispersion used was AD-059 obtained from ICI Americas, Inc. The mixture coagulated TRADEMARK
within 1 minute and after 2 1/2 minutes, the mixer was stopped. The coagulum settled to the bottom and the effluent was Gear.
The coagulum was dried at 180°C in a convection oven. The dried cake was chilled 'slow 0°C. It was hand ground through a 835 cm stainless mesh screen. Next, 0.701 g of mineral spirits was added per gram of filled powder.
The mixture was chilled, passed through a screen again, tumbled then allowed to sit for greater than 18 hours at ambient.
A 10.8 cm diameter pellet was formed in a cylinder at 860 psi. The pellet was heated approximately 18 hours at 49°C. The pellet was then extruded into tape. The tape was then calendered between heated rolls to a thickness of 0.127 cm. The bulk of the lubricant was evaporated by running the tape across heated rollers. The partially dried tape was then solvent extracted in isopropanol in a sonicated bath. The isopropanol was removed in a vacuum oven.
The tape was then slit to 0.358 cm width by running a 10 cm width through a blade box. The final tape density was 0.75 g/cc.
A protective cover tape was made in accordance with the above procedure except 1453 g of PFA solids in,the forth of a 22.796 aqueous dispersion was added to 50,000 g of H20. 7247 g of PTFE solids in the form of 23.796 aqueous dispersion was rapidly poured into the vessel. The PFA
used was type AD-059 obtained from ICI Americas, Inc. After 1 minute of mixing, 14.8 g of polyethylene imine was added to induce co-coagulation.
Total mixing time was one minute and forty seconds.
The cake was dried at 185°C, chilled screened, and lubricated at 0.175 g of mineral spirits per gram of filled powder. The mixture was chilled, screened, left at ambient for 18 hours and then palletized. The pellet was heated to 49°C for 18 hours and extruded into tape forth. The tape was calendered through rolls to 0.048 cm. The lubricant was removed by evaporating across heated rolls in 2 passes. On the second pass, the tape was expanded at a 2:1 ratio at 105 feet per minute and a maximum temp of 275°C. The tape was then stretched across two heated surfaces at 340°C at 25:1 and 2:1 expansion ratios and an output speed of 75 ft/min. The expanded tape was 0.0025 cm thick and approximately 0.7 g/cc.
A filter assembly of the present invention was made by slitting the covering tape to approximately a 1.27 cm width and hand wrapped around slit carbon filled strips such that a single overlap was formed down the length of the strip. This overlap was then sealed using a 345°C heated blade with mild pressure. The wrapped composite was then cut into 1.194 cm sections.
The filter ends were sealed by dipping them into a less than 0.08 an deep layer of finely ground polyester powder. The ends were then sealed by placing in from of a 550°C hot air stream. This process was performed three times to produce a uniform bead of polyester encapsulating the ends.
Exam le Process for Example 1 except 9835 g of 9296 dry ameby SutGiffe YF
activated carbon was added to 55,000 g of deionized H20. Next, 2264 g of PTFE solids in the forth of aqueous dispersion was rapidly poured in the agitating slurry.
After powder preparation, 0.693 g of mineral spirits was added per gram of filled powder. The extruded paste was calendered through heated rollers to 0.107 cm. After lubricant removal; the tape was compressed to 0.084 cm.
The bulk density was 1.0 g/cc.
A filter assembly of the present invention was then formed by sl'iiting this tape to 0.358 mm in width and wrapping it with a protective cover type similar to that used in Example 1, forming an overlapped seam down the length of the core. The seam and filter ends were sealed as in Example 1.
Examcle 3 A wrapped adsorbent core was made as taught in Example 1. The filter ends were sealed by a thin layer of about 0.025 mm of polyester that was transferred onto the ends by pressing a soldering iron heated to about 370°C
through a 0.025" thick polyester film. The soldering iron was coated with the polyester film and transferred polyester coating onto the ends, sealing the ends when the soldering iron was pressed against them. ., Examcle 4 A wrapped adsorbent core was made as taught in Example 1. The filter ends were sealed with a thin layer at about 0.025 mm of polyethylene in the following manner. A soldering iron heated to about 370°C was pressed against a 0.025" thick aluminum foil coated with a 0.025" thick polyethylene layer and the ends were pressed against the polyethylene sides heat transferred through the aluminum foil melting the polyethylene onto the end to seal end.
In summary, the present invention provides a very thin sorbent filter assembly that is easy to manufacture, non-particulating, non-out-gassing, compact, manufadurable in small sizes, and is able to hold proportionately TRADEMARK
~~ I
-1&
large amounts of densely packed sorbent material. Although the above description was primarily directed to production of a filter for use in a computer disk drive application, the present invention can be used in many other application, for example, electronic control boxes, automobiles, optical equipment, optical cable, etc.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described herein, the present invention should not be limited to such illustrations and descriptions. It should be apparent that changes and modification may be incorporated and embodied as part of the present invention within the scope of the following Gaims.
Claims (24)
1. A sorbent filter for selectively sorbing contaminants present in an enclosure that houses sensitive equipment to protect the sensitive equipment within the enclosure from damage caused by the contaminants, the filter having a height, depth and length, which comprises:
an inner sorbent core including contaminant sorbent material therein;
an outer protective cover wrapped around the inner sorbent core so as to completely contain the sorbent core along its length, and leaving exposed at least one end, the protective cover having a thickness ranging from about 0.00005 to about 0.040 inches (0.00127 to 1.02 mm) and being porous to allow vapor contaminants to diffuse through to the sorbent core;
a sealed seam retaining the protective cover around the sorbent core; and an end seal for each at least one exposed end, completely encapsulating the sorbent core with the filter, the end seal sealing the sorbent filter such that the sorbent material holding capacity of the filter is not diminished along the length of the filter; and wherein the sorbent filter is operable to protect the sensitive equipment with the enclosure from damage caused by the contaminants.
an inner sorbent core including contaminant sorbent material therein;
an outer protective cover wrapped around the inner sorbent core so as to completely contain the sorbent core along its length, and leaving exposed at least one end, the protective cover having a thickness ranging from about 0.00005 to about 0.040 inches (0.00127 to 1.02 mm) and being porous to allow vapor contaminants to diffuse through to the sorbent core;
a sealed seam retaining the protective cover around the sorbent core; and an end seal for each at least one exposed end, completely encapsulating the sorbent core with the filter, the end seal sealing the sorbent filter such that the sorbent material holding capacity of the filter is not diminished along the length of the filter; and wherein the sorbent filter is operable to protect the sensitive equipment with the enclosure from damage caused by the contaminants.
2. The sorbent filter of Claim 1 wherein the filter has an internal volume of less than 0.5 cc and the sorbent core comprises at least 0.60 mg/cc of sorbent material.
3. The sorbent filter of Claim 1 wherein the protective comprises a thin tape formed of a sheet of microporous material that is longitudinally wrapped and sealed around the sorbent core.
4. The sorbent filter of Claim 1 wherein the protective cover comprises a thin tape formed of a sheet of microporous material that is spiral wrapped around the sorbent core, each turn of wrap at least partially overlapping the previous turn and sealed onto itself so as to seal the sorbent core.
5. The sorbent filter of Claim 1 wherein the outer cover comprises a thin tape formed of a membrane from the group consisting of polypropylene, nylon, composites of polycarbonate and polyesters, mixed cellulose esters, cellulose acetate.
6. The sorbent filter of Claim 1 wherein the outer protective cover comprises an expanded pomus polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane.
7. The sorbent filter of Claim 6 wherein the cover comprises a thickness in the range of 0.00005 0.020 inches.
8. The sorbent filter of Claim 1 wherein the sorbent core comprises a microporous polymeric material with sorbent particles contained within the microporous structure of the polymeric material.
9. The sorbent filter of Claim 8 wherein the sorbent core comprises a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane filled with a sorbent material.
10. The sorbent filter of Claim 1 wherein the sorbent material comprises a chemisorber.
11. The sorbent filter of Claim 1 wherein the sorbent material comprises an ion exchange resin or catalytic material.
12. The sorbent filter of Claim 1 wherein the sorbent material comprises a physisorber.
13. The sorbent filter of Claim 1 wherein the end seal for the at least one exposed end comprises a coating selected from the group consisting of polyethylene, polypropylene, polyester, nylon, perfluoroalkyl copolymer (PFA), and polyvinylidence fluoride (PVDF).
14. The sorbent filter of Claim 1 wherein the sorbent core comprises a sorbent filled polytetrafluoroethylene and the outer wrap is formed of a polytetrafluoroethylene membrane is fusion bonded to the sorbent core.
15. The sorbent filter of Claim 1 wherein the end seal for the at least one exposed end comprise polytetrafluoroethylene fusion bonded to the sorbent core and to the protective cover.
16. The sorbent filter of Claim 1 wherein the inner sorbent core includes a packing density of sorbent material greater than 0.6 g/cc.
17. A sorbent filter for selectively adsorbing contaminants present in an enclosure that houses sensitive equipment to protect the sensitive equipment within the enclosure from damage caused by the contaminants, comprising:
a sorbent core including contaminant sorbent material therein;
two layers of protective membrane laminate on two opposing sides of the sorbent core, leaving sides of the core exposed, each layer of the protective membrane having a thickness ranging from about 0.00005 to about 0.040 inches and being porous such that it allows vapor contaminants to diffuse through to the sorbent core; and seals on each exposed side of the filter, completely encapsulating the sorbent core within the filter, the seals sealing the sorbent filter such that the sorbent material holding capacity of the filter is not diminished along the length of the filter; and wherein the sorbent filter is operable to protect the sensitive equipment within the enclosure from damage caused by the contaminants.
a sorbent core including contaminant sorbent material therein;
two layers of protective membrane laminate on two opposing sides of the sorbent core, leaving sides of the core exposed, each layer of the protective membrane having a thickness ranging from about 0.00005 to about 0.040 inches and being porous such that it allows vapor contaminants to diffuse through to the sorbent core; and seals on each exposed side of the filter, completely encapsulating the sorbent core within the filter, the seals sealing the sorbent filter such that the sorbent material holding capacity of the filter is not diminished along the length of the filter; and wherein the sorbent filter is operable to protect the sensitive equipment within the enclosure from damage caused by the contaminants.
18. The sorbent filter of Claim 17 wherein the sorbent core comprises a sorbent filled porous polytetrafluoroethylene.
19. The sorbent filter of Claim 17 wherein the seals comprise a coating of a thermoplastic material.
20. The sorbent filter of Claim 17 wherein the seals comprise a thermoset material.
21. The sorbent filter of Claim 17 wherein the seals comprise injection molded material adhered to the exposed sides.
22. The sorbent filter of Claim 17 wherein the sorbent core comprises a polymeric porous structure with sorbent contained within the microporous structure and the outer layers are formed of a polymeric porous material.
23. A method of removing gases from an enclosure that houses sensitive equipment to protect the sensitive equipment within the enclosure from damage caused by the contaminants comprising:
providing a sorbent core material;
wrapping a porous, protective cover around the sorbent core material, leaving at least one end exposed, the protective cover having a thickness ranging from about 0.00005 to about 0.040 inches (0.00127 to 1.02 mm) and allowing vapor contaminants to diffuse through to the sorbent core;
sealing the protective cover around the sorbent core material;
capping each at least one exposed end of the sorbent core with a seal, the end seal sealing the sorbent filter such that the sorbent material holding capacity of the filter is not diminished along the length of the filter;
placing the sorbent core material inside the enclose; and sorbing gases into the core from the inside of the enclosure.
providing a sorbent core material;
wrapping a porous, protective cover around the sorbent core material, leaving at least one end exposed, the protective cover having a thickness ranging from about 0.00005 to about 0.040 inches (0.00127 to 1.02 mm) and allowing vapor contaminants to diffuse through to the sorbent core;
sealing the protective cover around the sorbent core material;
capping each at least one exposed end of the sorbent core with a seal, the end seal sealing the sorbent filter such that the sorbent material holding capacity of the filter is not diminished along the length of the filter;
placing the sorbent core material inside the enclose; and sorbing gases into the core from the inside of the enclosure.
24. A sorbent filter for selectively filtering and adsorbing components present in an enclosure that houses sensitive equipment to protect the sensitive equipment with the enclosure from damage caused by the contaminants, which comprises:
an extruded outer protective layer of expanded porous PTFE
and an inner sorbent material comprising a PTFE membrane filled with at least one sorbent, the protective layer having a thickness ranging from about 0.00005 to about 0.040 inches, the extruded outer protective layer and the inner sorbent material core having at least one exposed end;
the filter having a length no more than 4.0 inches (101.6 mm), a width no more than 1.0 inches (25.4 mm) and a height int he range of 0.02 to 0.250 inches (0.5 to 6.35 mm), a volume in the range of .001 to 1 cubic inches (0.016 cc to 16/4 cc), the ratio of sorbent material to filter volume being in the range of 0.25 to 2.0 gm/cc;
an end seal for each at least one exposed end, completely encapsulating the sorbent core within the outer protective layer, the end seal sealing the sorbent filter such that the sorbent material holding capacity of the filter is not diminished along the length of the filter; and wherein the sorbent filter is operable to protect the sensitive equipment within the enclosure from damage caused by the contaminants.
an extruded outer protective layer of expanded porous PTFE
and an inner sorbent material comprising a PTFE membrane filled with at least one sorbent, the protective layer having a thickness ranging from about 0.00005 to about 0.040 inches, the extruded outer protective layer and the inner sorbent material core having at least one exposed end;
the filter having a length no more than 4.0 inches (101.6 mm), a width no more than 1.0 inches (25.4 mm) and a height int he range of 0.02 to 0.250 inches (0.5 to 6.35 mm), a volume in the range of .001 to 1 cubic inches (0.016 cc to 16/4 cc), the ratio of sorbent material to filter volume being in the range of 0.25 to 2.0 gm/cc;
an end seal for each at least one exposed end, completely encapsulating the sorbent core within the outer protective layer, the end seal sealing the sorbent filter such that the sorbent material holding capacity of the filter is not diminished along the length of the filter; and wherein the sorbent filter is operable to protect the sensitive equipment within the enclosure from damage caused by the contaminants.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/298,484 | 1994-08-30 | ||
| US08/298,484 US5500038A (en) | 1994-08-30 | 1994-08-30 | Non-particulating compact adsorbent filter |
| PCT/US1994/011702 WO1996006669A1 (en) | 1994-08-30 | 1994-10-14 | An improved non-particulating compact adsorbent filter |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2167407A1 CA2167407A1 (en) | 1996-03-01 |
| CA2167407C true CA2167407C (en) | 2000-04-18 |
Family
ID=23150725
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002167407A Expired - Lifetime CA2167407C (en) | 1994-08-30 | 1994-10-14 | An improved non-particulating compact adsorbent filter |
Country Status (6)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US5500038A (en) |
| EP (1) | EP0735915A1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JP3153245B2 (en) |
| AU (1) | AU8017994A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2167407C (en) |
| WO (1) | WO1996006669A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (59)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5676909A (en) * | 1995-08-11 | 1997-10-14 | Hollinger, Jr.; William K. | Archival preservation coatings and adhesives |
| US5980616A (en) * | 1993-02-16 | 1999-11-09 | Donaldson Company, Inc. | Filter media for preventing carbon migration |
| US6004522A (en) * | 1993-12-15 | 1999-12-21 | Purafil, Inc. | Solid filtration media incorporating elevated levels of permanganate and water |
| SE9401094L (en) * | 1994-03-31 | 1995-03-27 | Bror Gustafsson | Moisture absorbing device |
| US5942323A (en) * | 1995-01-27 | 1999-08-24 | Purafil, Inc. | Fiber filter and methods of use thereof |
| CA2221872A1 (en) * | 1995-06-20 | 1997-01-09 | Donaldson Company, Inc. | Filter and method for making a filter |
| JP2658993B2 (en) * | 1995-07-13 | 1997-09-30 | 日本電気株式会社 | Magnetic disk drive |
| DE19527638A1 (en) * | 1995-07-28 | 1997-01-30 | Behr Gmbh & Co | Air drying device, in particular for motor vehicles |
| US5620669A (en) * | 1995-08-15 | 1997-04-15 | W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. | Catalytic filter material and method of making same |
| US5624478A (en) * | 1995-09-14 | 1997-04-29 | Patapanian; Edward | Ethylene absorption device |
| AU2320997A (en) * | 1996-04-08 | 1997-10-29 | W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. | An improved clean, stiff, washable, compact adsorbent filter assembly |
| US6143058A (en) * | 1997-03-17 | 2000-11-07 | Donaldson Company, Inc. | Adsorbent construction and method |
| US5876487A (en) * | 1997-03-17 | 1999-03-02 | Donaldson Company, Inc. | Adsorbent construction; and, method |
| AU8576898A (en) * | 1997-07-22 | 1999-02-16 | Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. | High flow absorbent breather filter |
| US5909337A (en) * | 1997-08-12 | 1999-06-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Magnetic recording device |
| US5893945A (en) * | 1997-10-14 | 1999-04-13 | Shawndra Products, Inc. | End structures for filter canisters |
| US6139749A (en) * | 1997-11-20 | 2000-10-31 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Method for radioactive species analysis using a self-scintillating sheet material |
| DE19753956A1 (en) * | 1997-12-05 | 1999-06-17 | Draeger Sicherheitstech Gmbh | Scent cartridge distributing aroma for commercial and entertainment applications |
| US6168651B1 (en) | 1998-10-08 | 2001-01-02 | Donaldson Company, Inc. | Filter assembly with shaped adsorbent article; and devices and methods of use |
| US6146446A (en) * | 1998-10-08 | 2000-11-14 | Donaldson Company, Inc. | Filter assembly with shaped adsorbent article; and devices and methods of use |
| US6270609B1 (en) * | 1999-01-11 | 2001-08-07 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Hard disk drive filter |
| US6214095B1 (en) | 1999-07-06 | 2001-04-10 | Donaldson Company, Inc. | Adsorbent pouch for removal of gaseous contaminants |
| AU6926100A (en) | 1999-08-23 | 2001-03-19 | Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. | Improved multi-functional filter for removing contaminants from an enclosure |
| US6296691B1 (en) | 1999-09-21 | 2001-10-02 | Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. | Multi-functional molded filter for removing contaminants from an enclosure |
| US6238467B1 (en) | 1999-09-24 | 2001-05-29 | Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. | Rigid multi-functional filter assembly |
| KR20020039681A (en) | 1999-10-12 | 2002-05-27 | 추후 | Photocatalytic device for disk drive contamination reduction |
| US6428612B1 (en) * | 2001-04-19 | 2002-08-06 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Hydrogen getter package assembly |
| US6998155B2 (en) * | 2001-05-23 | 2006-02-14 | Traptek Llc | Woven materials with incorporated solids and processes for the production thereof |
| US20030136267A1 (en) * | 2001-12-28 | 2003-07-24 | Ku Joseph P. | Air deodorizer |
| US7149053B2 (en) * | 2002-02-07 | 2006-12-12 | Seagate Technology Llc | Disc drive turbulent wind management |
| US6831830B2 (en) * | 2002-03-20 | 2004-12-14 | Convergent Systems Solutions, Llc | Digital storage element in a host device and method |
| JP2003340233A (en) * | 2002-05-30 | 2003-12-02 | Japan Gore Tex Inc | Moisture absorbent unit and quasi-hermetic container having the unit |
| WO2004065001A1 (en) * | 2003-01-22 | 2004-08-05 | Camfil Ab | Filter structure, filter panel comprising the filter structure and method for manufactuirng the filter structure. |
| US6929682B2 (en) * | 2003-09-11 | 2005-08-16 | Multisorb Technologies, Inc. | Sorbent capsule |
| US7125433B2 (en) | 2003-12-31 | 2006-10-24 | Donaldson Company, Inc. | Dual diffusion channel filter |
| US7166142B2 (en) * | 2003-12-31 | 2007-01-23 | Donaldson Company, Inc. | Filter constructions containing breather and recirculation filter elements |
| BRPI0510042B8 (en) | 2004-04-20 | 2021-06-22 | Genzyme Corp | implant similar to surgical mesh |
| US7306659B2 (en) * | 2004-08-13 | 2007-12-11 | Gore Enterprise Holdings | Adsorbent breather filter |
| US7291208B2 (en) * | 2004-08-13 | 2007-11-06 | Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. | Grooved active and passive adsorbent filters |
| US7318859B2 (en) * | 2004-10-18 | 2008-01-15 | Gore Enterprise Holdings | Modular adsorbent filters |
| US7505225B2 (en) * | 2005-06-16 | 2009-03-17 | Seagate Technology Llc | Activated carbon fiber filter for a data storage system |
| US7811539B2 (en) * | 2005-11-03 | 2010-10-12 | Seagate Technology Llc | Device and method for filtering contaminants |
| US7727297B2 (en) * | 2006-01-10 | 2010-06-01 | Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. | Reduced fiber disk/shroud filter for removing contaminants from an enclosure |
| US20080226534A1 (en) * | 2007-03-13 | 2008-09-18 | Gidumal Rajan H | Adsorbent Articles for Disk Drives |
| CN104941385B (en) * | 2007-07-13 | 2017-10-31 | 唐纳森公司 | Contaminant control filter with charging port |
| US8573407B2 (en) * | 2008-08-01 | 2013-11-05 | Puradyn Filter Technologies, Inc. | Air and contaminant isolation and removal apparatus and method |
| US8159778B2 (en) | 2009-04-06 | 2012-04-17 | Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, Netherlands B.V. | Hard disk drive contamination control |
| US7758836B1 (en) | 2009-04-14 | 2010-07-20 | Huggins Ronald G | System and method for removing sulfur-containing contaminants from indoor air |
| US20100310441A1 (en) * | 2009-06-05 | 2010-12-09 | Basf Corporation | Catalytic Article for Removal of Volatile Organic Compounds in Low Temperature Applications |
| US9913998B2 (en) * | 2011-03-10 | 2018-03-13 | Adc Tech International Ltd | Air purifier having an electret module |
| US9352267B2 (en) | 2012-06-20 | 2016-05-31 | Hollingsworth & Vose Company | Absorbent and/or adsorptive filter media |
| EP3408007A4 (en) | 2016-01-28 | 2020-01-01 | Imerys Filtration Minerals, Inc. | Acid-treated filter aid blend |
| MX2019009019A (en) | 2017-01-31 | 2019-11-12 | Calgon Carbon Corp | Sorbent devices. |
| KR20200024289A (en) | 2017-07-06 | 2020-03-06 | 더블유.엘. 고어 앤드 어소시에이트스, 인코포레이티드 | Renewable desiccant products comprising bentonite materials and polymers |
| US11697580B2 (en) | 2018-08-01 | 2023-07-11 | Calgon Carbon Corporation | Apparatus for hydrocarbon vapor recovery |
| US11703016B2 (en) | 2018-08-02 | 2023-07-18 | Calgon Carbon Corporation | Sorbent devices |
| WO2020028839A1 (en) * | 2018-08-02 | 2020-02-06 | Calgon Carbon Corporation | Sorbent devices |
| US11911743B2 (en) | 2019-04-03 | 2024-02-27 | Calgon Carbon Corporation | Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl sorbent materials and methods of use |
| CA3189498A1 (en) | 2020-08-31 | 2022-03-03 | Jason P. Mazzoccoli | Copper and nitrogen treated sorbent and method for making same |
Family Cites Families (30)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US2214925A (en) * | 1937-08-26 | 1940-09-17 | Peoples Gas By Products Corp | Adsorptive body and method of making the same |
| SU148151A1 (en) * | 1961-07-19 | 1961-11-30 | Н.А. Иофис | Getter for electrovacuum appliances |
| US3616604A (en) * | 1968-01-02 | 1971-11-02 | Tri Mer Corp | Liquid recovery apparatus |
| CA962021A (en) * | 1970-05-21 | 1975-02-04 | Robert W. Gore | Porous products and process therefor |
| US4208194A (en) * | 1977-09-26 | 1980-06-17 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Monitoring device |
| US4208371A (en) * | 1978-07-07 | 1980-06-17 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Gaseous contaminant dosimeter with diffusion device therefor and method |
| FR2479014A1 (en) * | 1980-03-31 | 1981-10-02 | Matburn Holdings Ltd | SURGICAL DRAINAGE BAGS |
| NO811717L (en) * | 1980-05-22 | 1981-11-23 | Gubela Hans Erich | SYNTHETIC CHEMICAL ABSORBENT. |
| US4308041A (en) * | 1981-02-09 | 1981-12-29 | Cambridge Filter Corp. | Air filter cartridge |
| DK147275C (en) * | 1982-02-23 | 1984-12-03 | Coloplast As | FILTER FOR OSTOMIPOS |
| GB2126123B (en) * | 1982-09-04 | 1986-08-06 | John Charles Cornforth | Adsorbent element |
| JPS6226899A (en) * | 1985-07-29 | 1987-02-04 | 株式会社東芝 | Moisture adjustor |
| US4684510A (en) * | 1985-12-20 | 1987-08-04 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Method and apparatus for prevention of atmospheric corrosion of electronic equipment |
| US4732629A (en) * | 1986-07-25 | 1988-03-22 | Cooper Peter B | Method for manufacturing an insulated conductor having a high cut-through resistance |
| FR2615099B1 (en) * | 1987-05-14 | 1996-08-23 | Biotrol Sa Lab | FILTER SYSTEM WITH INCORPORATED DEGASSING VENT FOR MOUNTING IN DRAINAGE POCKETS OF ARTIFICIAL ANUSES DURING THEIR MANUFACTURE |
| US4830643A (en) * | 1988-07-13 | 1989-05-16 | W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. | Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene tubular container |
| US4863499A (en) * | 1988-07-29 | 1989-09-05 | Donaldson Company, Inc. | Anti-duffusion chemical breather assembly for disk drives |
| US4889542A (en) * | 1988-11-14 | 1989-12-26 | Hayes William J | Computer air filter device and method |
| US5308665A (en) * | 1989-02-28 | 1994-05-03 | Baxter Diagnostics Inc. | Impurity scavenger pillow |
| US4985296A (en) * | 1989-03-16 | 1991-01-15 | W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. | Polytetrafluoroethylene film |
| US4957522A (en) * | 1989-06-06 | 1990-09-18 | Brassell Gilbert W | Combination of a filter and a material permeable to gases but impermeable to liquids |
| US4957518A (en) * | 1989-06-06 | 1990-09-18 | Brassell Gilbert W | Assembly useful for retaining components such as a filter to a container and a corresponding combination |
| US5030260A (en) * | 1989-12-04 | 1991-07-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Disk drive breather filter |
| WO1991014496A1 (en) * | 1990-03-20 | 1991-10-03 | W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. | An adsorbent assembly for removing gaseous contaminants |
| EP0526556B1 (en) * | 1990-04-27 | 1998-08-26 | W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. | Electrical insulating material |
| US5124856A (en) * | 1990-08-03 | 1992-06-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Magnetic recording device with unitary filter medium to trap organic and inorganic chemical pollutants |
| DE4040104A1 (en) * | 1990-12-16 | 1992-06-17 | Behr Gmbh & Co | FILTERS FOR AN AIR CONDITIONING OR HEATING SYSTEM FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE |
| FR2671492B1 (en) * | 1991-01-11 | 1994-07-22 | Benzaria Jacques | CONTAINER FOR GRANULAR SOLID MATERIALS, ITS MANUFACTURE AND ITS APPLICATIONS, IN PARTICULAR IN CATALYSIS AND ADSORPTION. |
| DE4118129A1 (en) * | 1991-06-03 | 1992-12-10 | Kimmerle Hans Joachim | AIR FILTER |
| US5360469A (en) * | 1993-09-09 | 1994-11-01 | Baron Robert A | Apparatus for air filtration and sound masking |
-
1994
- 1994-08-30 US US08/298,484 patent/US5500038A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1994-10-14 CA CA002167407A patent/CA2167407C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1994-10-14 JP JP50870496A patent/JP3153245B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1994-10-14 WO PCT/US1994/011702 patent/WO1996006669A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1994-10-14 EP EP94931376A patent/EP0735915A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1994-10-14 AU AU80179/94A patent/AU8017994A/en not_active Abandoned
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP3153245B2 (en) | 2001-04-03 |
| JPH09500326A (en) | 1997-01-14 |
| CA2167407A1 (en) | 1996-03-01 |
| WO1996006669A1 (en) | 1996-03-07 |
| AU8017994A (en) | 1996-03-22 |
| US5500038A (en) | 1996-03-19 |
| EP0735915A1 (en) | 1996-10-09 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2167407C (en) | An improved non-particulating compact adsorbent filter | |
| CA2584403C (en) | Modular adsorbent filters | |
| US6146446A (en) | Filter assembly with shaped adsorbent article; and devices and methods of use | |
| US6726745B2 (en) | Filter assembly with shaped adsorbent article; and devices and methods of use | |
| US5538545A (en) | Nonparticulating adsorbent recirculating filter | |
| US8864884B2 (en) | Contaminant control filter with fill port | |
| US5009308A (en) | Controlled rate adsorbent unit and method of fabrication thereof | |
| CA2576529C (en) | Grooved active and passive adsorbent filters | |
| CA2577148C (en) | Adsorbent breather filter | |
| CA2381130C (en) | Filter for removing contaminants from an enclosure | |
| EP1224666A1 (en) | Improved multi-functional molded filter for removing contaminants from an enclosure | |
| WO1990000438A1 (en) | Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene tubular container | |
| US6270609B1 (en) | Hard disk drive filter | |
| WO1999004884A1 (en) | High flow absorbent breather filter | |
| WO1997037756A1 (en) | An improved clean, stiff, washable, compact adsorbent filter assembly | |
| EP1911030A2 (en) | Improved filter construction for removing contaminants from an enclosure | |
| WO2010036351A1 (en) | Improved filter construction for removing contaminants from an enclosure |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKEX | Expiry |
Effective date: 20141014 |