CA2145165C - Handoff monitoring in cellular communication networks using slow frequency hopping - Google Patents
Handoff monitoring in cellular communication networks using slow frequency hoppingInfo
- Publication number
- CA2145165C CA2145165C CA002145165A CA2145165A CA2145165C CA 2145165 C CA2145165 C CA 2145165C CA 002145165 A CA002145165 A CA 002145165A CA 2145165 A CA2145165 A CA 2145165A CA 2145165 C CA2145165 C CA 2145165C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- base station
- base
- handoff
- stations
- mobile station
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 title claims description 57
- 230000010267 cellular communication Effects 0.000 title description 7
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 38
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 230000002457 bidirectional effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract 2
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 claims description 27
- 125000004122 cyclic group Chemical group 0.000 claims description 18
- 235000008694 Humulus lupulus Nutrition 0.000 claims description 12
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000005562 fading Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000013078 crystal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 101100238304 Mus musculus Morc1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000003190 augmentative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001276 controlling effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005315 distribution function Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- VJYFKVYYMZPMAB-UHFFFAOYSA-N ethoprophos Chemical compound CCCSP(=O)(OCC)SCCC VJYFKVYYMZPMAB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000009432 framing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 101150115956 slc25a26 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W36/00—Hand-off or reselection arrangements
- H04W36/24—Reselection being triggered by specific parameters
- H04W36/30—Reselection being triggered by specific parameters by measured or perceived connection quality data
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B1/00—Details of transmission systems, not covered by a single one of groups H04B3/00 - H04B13/00; Details of transmission systems not characterised by the medium used for transmission
- H04B1/69—Spread spectrum techniques
- H04B1/713—Spread spectrum techniques using frequency hopping
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W36/00—Hand-off or reselection arrangements
- H04W36/24—Reselection being triggered by specific parameters
- H04W36/30—Reselection being triggered by specific parameters by measured or perceived connection quality data
- H04W36/302—Reselection being triggered by specific parameters by measured or perceived connection quality data due to low signal strength
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W24/00—Supervisory, monitoring or testing arrangements
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W36/00—Hand-off or reselection arrangements
- H04W36/08—Reselecting an access point
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W84/00—Network topologies
- H04W84/02—Hierarchically pre-organised networks, e.g. paging networks, cellular networks, WLAN [Wireless Local Area Network] or WLL [Wireless Local Loop]
- H04W84/10—Small scale networks; Flat hierarchical networks
- H04W84/12—WLAN [Wireless Local Area Networks]
Abstract
Methods for handoff in a wireless communication network comprised of a local area network connected to a plurality of base stations, each of which has a geographic area, defined as a cell, within which mobile stations can communicate with a base station, with each such base station being capable of performing bidirectional wireless communication with one or more of said mobile stations under control of a controller, with communication between base stations and mobile stations being performed by frequency hopping, with there being n available frequency hopping channels in a fixed frequency band, with each channel being of a same fixed duration and having a fixed frequency different than another channel. The handoff method employs structure and techniques for determining by a mobile station that the quality of transmission between it and a current base station has degraded below a predetermined performance level, structure and technique for said mobile station to listen to each of successive frequency channels for a duration substantially less than said fixed duration of a channel until it senses a transmission from another base station, and structure and techniques for transferring control of said mobile station to said another base station in response to the sensed transmission.
Description
21~5165 HANDOFF MONITORING IN CELLULAR COMMUNICATION
NETWORKS USING SLOW FREQUENCY HOPPING
s 1. Field of the Il1~,QIiOn The present invention relates to wireless cellular communication networks having a local area network connected to a number of base stations, each of which can communicate with and 10 control mobile stations, and more particularly to a cellular communication network wherein control of a mobile station is handed off to another base station.
NETWORKS USING SLOW FREQUENCY HOPPING
s 1. Field of the Il1~,QIiOn The present invention relates to wireless cellular communication networks having a local area network connected to a number of base stations, each of which can communicate with and 10 control mobile stations, and more particularly to a cellular communication network wherein control of a mobile station is handed off to another base station.
2. D~.,liplio~ of the Prior Art U.S. Patent 5, 181,200 issued January 19, 1993 to Harrison entitled "HANDOFF METHOD
AND APPARATUS FOR MOBILE WIRELESS WORKSTATION" describes a system which, in response to a data processor breaking a wireless link with a first, original, link adapter a first step deletes the data processor from an active group of the first link adapter and re-directs network datagrams intended for the data processor subsequently establishing a link with a 20 second, new, link adapter a next step adds the data processor to the active group associated with the second link adapter and transmits stored datagrams in a First In/First Out order from the spooler to the second link adapter for transmission to the data processor. In response to the storage device transmitting all of the stored datagrams to the second link adapter the method includes the further steps of terminating the re-direction of datagrams from the first link adapter 25 to the storage device and, receiving, from the network with the second link adapter, further datagrams addressed to the data processor.
U.S. Patent 5,123,029 issued .June 16,1992 to Bantz et al. entitled "BROADCAST-INITIATED
21~516S
BIPARTITE FRAMI~ MULTI-ACCESS PROTOCOL" discloses a hybrid of controlled access and random access schemes using frequency hopping spread spectrum communication techniques is implemented in an indoor digital data radio communication system between mobile stations and a computer system. A hop in the frequency hopping spread spectrum communication system 5 is subdivided into two intervals so that different media-access protocols can be used in each interval. The protocol uses a centralized control scheme and the intervals may be varied depending on the load of the system.
SUMMARY OF T~E INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to provide a cellular communication network having base stations and mobile stations wherein a mobile station can determine that the quality of transmission to its home base station has degraded below a prcdetermined performance level.
15 Another object of the present invention is to provide a cellular communications network wherein a mobile station can monitor and scnse transmissions from base stations other than its home base station.
A further object of the present invention is to provide a cellular communication system wherein 20 control of a mobile station is transferrcd from a first home base station to a new home base station in response to sensed transmissions.
BRIEF DESCR~PTION OF THE DRAWINGS
25 The foregoing and other objects, aspects and advantages will be better understood from the following detailed description of a prefcrred cmbodiment of the invention with reference to the drawings, in which:
21~516S
FIG. I is a pictorial diagram showing radio a data communication system of the type in which the invention is implemented.
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the system shown in Fig. I illustrating the basic components of a mobile station and a base station;
S FIG. 3 is a data framing d;agram showing a superframe structure implemented by the preferred embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of the logic of the process by which a mobile station monitors neighbouring bases;
FIG. 5 illustrates a tables of bases for the process of Fig. 4;
FIG. 6 is a flow diagram showing more detail of the logic of the process of Fig. 4;
FIG. 7 is a flow diagram of the process for using hand off indicators to select a home base;
FIG. 8 is an illustration of a super frame containing neighbouring bases synchronized with each other but offset in frame time;
FIG. 9 is an illustration of a simple base location index structure; and FIG. 10 is an illustration of an example of a remote station signal indication.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
The present invention generally relates to indoor digital data radio communication between a plurality of stations for the purpose of communicating among the stations and accessing various resources attached to the stations. A l~lurality of mobile stations communicate with one or more rlxed base stations attached to a computcr sy~tem, such as a local area network. The base station e~ercises control over access to the radio channel by periodically broadcasting messages that demarcate rlxed intervals of time, called "frames".
Referring to Fig. 1, there is shown a radio system allowing communication between a plurality of mobile stations 10, 12~ 14 and 16 and applications and data residing in a computing system.
21~5165 ¢~
The computing system typically includes a Wireless Network Manager (WNM~ or Wireless Network Controller 18, with attached monitor 20 and keyboard 22, of a local area network (LAN), generally indicated by reference number 24, having a plurality of attached workstations or personal computers (not shown for simplicity). Also attached to the LAN are one or more gateways 26, and 28 with which the mobile stations 10, 12, 14, and 16 to communicate. These gateways, referred to as ba~e stations, are augmented according to the invention to provide certain radio system management functions which coordinate the mobile stations' access to the common radio channel. Communications bctween mobile stations are supported via relay through the base stations 26 and 2g.
As shown in more detail in Fig. 2, a base station 26 or 28, which may be a conventional microcomputer, has a LAN adaptcr 30 inserted in a bus slot and connected to LAN cabling 32.
The WNM 18, typically also a convcntional microcomputer and including one or more direct access storage devices (DASDs) such as hard disks (not shown), also has a LAN cabling 32 together with LAN software constitutc the LAN 24. The LAN 24 is of conventional design and does not form part of the invention. Thc base station 2fi or 28 also has an RF transceiver adapter 36 implemented as a printed circuit card which is inserted in a bus slot of the base station. The transceiver adapter 36 has an antcnna 38 by which a radio link 40 is established with one or more remote or mobile stations, 10, 12, 14, or 16. The mobile station may itself be a hand held or lap top computer of conventional design and, like the base station, it is provided with an antenna 42 and a transcciver adapter 44, also implemented as a printed circuit card which is inserted in a bus slot of the computcr. Thc tran~ceiver adapter 44, like transceiver adapter 36, includes a spread spectrum Iransceivcr of similal design. The base station and the mobile stations are further provided with softwarc, gcncrally indicated by reference numerals 46 and 48, respectively, which support their rcspectivc transccivcr adapters.
The present invention is embodied in a radio communication network based on slow frequency hopping operation wherein control of thc radio frequency of thc radio transceivers determines 21~516~
a sequenee of operating radio frequencies and their durations, appropriate to a mode of radio operation known in the radio art as "slow frequency-hopping." This mode of operation is deseribed in the book Spread Speetrum Communieations by Cooper and MeGillem, published by MeGraw-Hill for example. A partieular instance of use of this mode of operation is regulated by part 15.247 of the regulations of the United States Federal Communieations Commission.
Fig. 3 illustrates a partieular instanee of the use of radio earrier frequeneies by a slow frequeney-hopping system.
In multieellular radio eommunieation networks, a remote station gains wireless aeeess to the network by first requesting the serviees of a base station within its range. This proeess, ealled "Registration" is well known in the art. If a remote station is within the range of multiple base stations, it will register with exaetly one base station, ealled its Home Base. Within a eell, the base station and all remote stations registered with it hop in synehronism and eommunieate with eaeh other using the same earrier frequeney. When a remote station ehanges its physieal loeation, the signal quality to its home base ean cleeline rapidly (due to wear signals or from interferenee) and eventually the remote station may lose access to its home base. Even when a remote station is stationary, eommunieation path to the home base may be lost due to fading conditions. To retain eontinuity of wireless access, the remote station must re-register with another base station that can be reached along a propagation path of adequate signal quality. This process is called "handoff".
Time evolves as a sequence of frcquency hops with each hop of a specified duration as shown in Fig. 3. The duration of such hops must satisfy the applicable regulatory constraints (such as FCC Part 15.247 rules in the U.S., and similar rules in other countries that may allow frequeney-hopping based cellular radio operation). The base station will follow a cyclic frequency hopping pattern. A period of this cyclic hopping pattern structure will be ealled a superfrarne. Fig. 3 shows a superframe strueture whieh consists of a finite number of frequency hops. For the rest ~ 21gS16S
-of this example, it is assumed that all the hops within a superframe have the same length and all the base stations have the same number of hops within a superframe.
Each cell has its frequency hop pattern. The present invention relates to methods for the 5 monitoring of base stations under three cellular network architectures. The first is tightly synchronized systems, where thc superframe structurc of a base station has a fixed timing offset relationship with respect to another base station. The second ;s loosely synchronized systems, where the superframe structure of a base station has a coarse timing offset relationship with respect to another base station. The timing offset is a bounded random variable. The third is 10 unsynchronized systems, where each basc station operates independently of other base stations.
No f;~ed timing offset relationship exists in the superframe structures among the base stations.
Methods for achieving synchronization are known in the art. The present invention provides methods and techniques for solving the following problems in a multicell network.
15 (1) The selection of a home base by a remote station. (2) The identification of the measurements to be made for the purpose of selecting a home base. Such measurements are classified into those performed at i) the remote stations and ii) the base stations. (3) The initiation of the process of handoff. (4) The execution of handoM in multicellular networks in which the cells of the network are tightly synchronized or loose]y synchronized or not synchronized at all. The first 20 consideration in the in the implementation of the present invention is a discussion of handoff indicators.
In a multicellular slow frequency hopping-hased radio systcm, an important problem is identifying a home base for a remote station when it is first turncd on. This process begins with 25 the remote station learning about the radio cnvironmcnt in which it is situated. Learning involves listening to the control messages broadcast by various basc stations and the acquisition of variables of interest pertaining to them. Artcr Icarning (i.e., acquiring the list of candidate home base stations), the remote station c~ecutes a sclection algorithm on the measured variables. It ~ 2145165 chooses a home base to register with and acquires wireless access.
The header of a frame provides the following information for a remote station to monitor. Three different pieces of information, collectively referred to here as Handoff Indicators, are measured.
5 They are (I) RSSI: Received Signal Strength Indicator. (2) HOR: Header Observation Rate, i.e., the rate of detected headers. (3) LV: Load Vector.
RSSI, the Received Signal Strength Indicator, is the primary handoff indicator. In a frequency hopping system, the measured value of RSSI varies from hop to hop as a result of frequency 10 dependent fading. For stable system operation, the RSSI is sampled at multiple, different frequencies. The mean value of the multiple sample values of RSSI is used for making handoff decisions instead of a single measured value of RSSI. Sometimes, however, interference level is so high that RSSI can produce misleading results if used alone. Therefore, the following auxiliary handoff indicators are used.
HOR, the Header Observation Rate, is defined as the ratio of the number of headers received correctly divided by the total number of headers. For every frequency used for monitoring the radio environment, at least one header is expected from each base station within the range of the remote station. However, headers may be missed because of frequency dependent fading and/or 20 other interference sources. With respect to a base station, a low HOR together with high RSSI
usually indicates high interference level. HOR can he easily calculated in data transmissions if for instance, cyclic redundancy checks (CRC) are use<l for error cletection purposes.
LV, the Load Vector, is a characteristic of the base station. It includes a vector of performance-25 oriented information relevant to the base station, such as the nurnber of remote stations registered with it, the number of active remote stations, CPU utilization, buffer utilization etc.
LV is included as part of the hea<ler information an<l used for the purpose of load balancing.
By monitoring the header transmissions from a base station, a remote station is able to accumulate knowledge of RSSI, HOR, and LV. Of these, both RSSI and HOR are characteristic of the channel and LV represents the tramc load at thc base station.
5 The next consideration is a discussion of initial home base identirlcation and methods for the selection of an initial home base station. In the following discussion it is assumed that a remote station has been synchronized to the frame structurc and thc frequency hopping pattern from its home base. A header for a framc structure can be transmitted from each base after the transmitting frequency has becn switchcd (hopped) to a new frcquency. The header message is 10 used by a remote station to achieve both framc and superframe synchronization.
When a remote station is first powered up, it listens at a rlxed frequency and searches for valid header messages from neighbouring bases (see Fig. 4). All the aforesaid handoff indicators are monitored. After a fixed period of time, it switchcs to another frequency and keeps on IS monitoring. During this monitoring process, the remote station keeps a record of RSSI, HOR, and LV from each base station. A table as illustrated in Fig. 5 is constructed for all the bases which have been heard during the last N monitoring cycles (assuming K bases heard during the last N cycles).
20 After a fixed number of frequencies have been examined, the remote station selects a home base station and locks into its frequency hopping pattcrn. Thc algorithm used for selecting a home base using the information in Table I is described latcr.
A number (N) of frequencies are monitored prior to choosing an initial home base station 25 because a single frequency transmission may suffcr from frequency dependent fading. The frequency dependent fading has a Rayleigh distribution. Therefore, a remote station should depend on average RSSI observed at several frequencics in choosing an initial home base station.
21g5165 RSSI is collected only when a header packet is received without error. A header will not be received correctly either due to very low received signal strength or interference. Therefore, use of HOR as an auxiliary indicator is important in making initial home base selection.
5 Another factor that is useful in selecting an initial home base is traffic load at the candidate bases. It may be preferable, for load balancing purposes, to choose a lightly loaded base instead of a heavily loaded base station even if the latter provides stronger received signal strength.
Fig. 6 is a more detailed view of radio monitoring steps shown in Fig. 4. When a new base is 10 found, the two indicators RSSI (received signal strength indication) and HOR (header observation rate) are rnonitored during a fixed listening period ( = the length of a superframe).
A number (N = 5) of frequencies are monitored in Fig. 7. Let the number of distinct frequency channels in the FH Spread Spectrum system be T. Let g = T/N. Let the bandwidth of each channel be ~. The frequencies to be monitored, Fj, F2, , FN are chosen with respect to Fl as 1 5 follows:
Fi = Fl + (i-l)g~
If a remote station does not hear from any base in the wireless network, then it is out of the 20 range of the wireless communication system.
The actual algorithm for selecting among several candidate home bases is a multicriteria based (lecision problem. A specific algorithm ror using thc handorf indicators to select a home base from candidate bases is set forth in Figure 7. Alternate selection algorithms for utilizing the 25 handoffindicators in a different manner are possible and are considered within the scope of this nventlon.
If at least one candidate base has bcen heard, the remote must choose it as its home base. If 21g516~
more than one candidate exists, then the chosen base will be the one, if any, which complies the most to some criteria, as described in Fig. 8.
Technique for monitoring for handoff will now be discussed. The first consideration is monitoring 5 neighbouring bases for accomplishing handoff. In order to accomplish handoff, the remote station is responsible for monitoring its home base as well as monitoring the connections from neighbouring bases. Handoff decisions arc based on the collected information.
In order to collect handoff indicator information from neighbouring bases, a remote station has 10 to know the answers to the following questions:
HQ_I) Who are the neighbouring bases? How many of them should be monitored?
HQ_2) For each neighbouring base, when does its header occur?
15HQ_3) For each neighbouring base, what frequency it will be on when its header data can be collected?
- The next consideration is monitoring in a tightly synclltonized system. In a tightly synchronized system, the superframe structure of a base has a fixed timing offset relationship with that of 20 another base, i.e., frame synchronization among the bases are required. In such a system, if different bases use different cyclic shifts of the samc frequcncy hopping pattern, then mutual interference can be greatly minimized.
For handoff monitoring of neighbouring bascs, thc questions raised before can be answered 25 together when the following conditions are ~atisficd:
(I) When all the neighbouring bases are synchronized with each other in the superframe structure, but offset in frame time a.s shown in Fig. 8. The frame time of each base is offset by an integer multiple of a fixed delay D and their header messages only occur in non-overlapped time slots. In Fig. 8, m headers can be monitored in a frame whosc duration is mD.
(2) When both the frame delay and the frcquency hopping pattern for each base can be associated with the base's location index. Fig. 9 illustrates a simple base location index structure. Which is assumed as a square-shaped cell.
In the example of Fig. 9, nine cells form a section and four sections (separatcd by solid lines) are 10 shown. Assuming there are eight neighbouring bascs needed to monitor besides the home base, i.e., m = 9, the index of the basc location is used to reprcsent a unique frequ~ncy hopping pattern (or a uni~ue cyclic shift of the same pattcrn) and a unique delay time in the delay structure as shown in Fig. 8. For example, in a clustcr of 9 cells bounded by dot lines in Fig. 9, the remainder of the base location index dividing by 9 can be used to represcnt the ideal delay 15 of the frame (or hop) of each base in the delay structure Fig. 8. It can be guaranteed by this location indexing scheme that in any square-shaped cluster of 9 bases no overlap of header transmission will occur.
Under the two conditions, a home base can figure out the answers to the three handoff 20 monitoring questions and pass the needcd handoff monitoring information to a portable remote.
The information includes both time offset (i.e., thc phasc cliffcrence) and frequency hopping patterns of all the neighbouring bascs. It is also possiblc that a portable remote can derive this information itself from the knowled~e Or indexcs or ncighbouring bases. In this case, there is no need for message passing from thc homc basc at all.
A synchronized system is more complicatcd to implement because it requires tight frame synchronization among the bases. Methods for achieving tight frame synchronization, among bases connected by a LAN, are known in the art. An important advantage of tight synchronization is that it facilitates handoff monitoring. In a synchronized system, portable remotes have exact knowledge of thc frequencies thc neighbouring bases will use and their timing. It can also be assured that no two bases will transm;t their headers at the same time. As a result, an ordered and fast handoff monitoring se4uence can be established. For example, for 5 a frame length of 50 msec and 9 bases to monitor (including thc home base), an observation time slot for the header has a length of 5.5 msec. This slot length is long enough for a portable to switch frequency to monitor another basc. In this case, 20 handoff indicator measurements per base per second can be achieved.
10 When monitoring in an unsynchronized system cach base opcrates independently of other bases.
No f~lxed timing offset relationship exists in the superframe structures among the bases. Although the bases can use quite accurate crystal oscillators lo control their superframe timing, their superframe boundaries will still drift slowly with respect to each other. In this case, if neighbouring bases use different phases (cyclic shifts) of the same frequency hopping pattern, 15 the patterns could potentially overlap once in a while and interfercnce would last for long periods of time. As a result, only frequency pattcrns with low probability of overlapping after random cyclic shifts should be used.
For example, assuming there are only 8 hopping frequencies, the patterns shown in Table I
20 below can be used in an unsynchronizcd system.
Tablc I
AND APPARATUS FOR MOBILE WIRELESS WORKSTATION" describes a system which, in response to a data processor breaking a wireless link with a first, original, link adapter a first step deletes the data processor from an active group of the first link adapter and re-directs network datagrams intended for the data processor subsequently establishing a link with a 20 second, new, link adapter a next step adds the data processor to the active group associated with the second link adapter and transmits stored datagrams in a First In/First Out order from the spooler to the second link adapter for transmission to the data processor. In response to the storage device transmitting all of the stored datagrams to the second link adapter the method includes the further steps of terminating the re-direction of datagrams from the first link adapter 25 to the storage device and, receiving, from the network with the second link adapter, further datagrams addressed to the data processor.
U.S. Patent 5,123,029 issued .June 16,1992 to Bantz et al. entitled "BROADCAST-INITIATED
21~516S
BIPARTITE FRAMI~ MULTI-ACCESS PROTOCOL" discloses a hybrid of controlled access and random access schemes using frequency hopping spread spectrum communication techniques is implemented in an indoor digital data radio communication system between mobile stations and a computer system. A hop in the frequency hopping spread spectrum communication system 5 is subdivided into two intervals so that different media-access protocols can be used in each interval. The protocol uses a centralized control scheme and the intervals may be varied depending on the load of the system.
SUMMARY OF T~E INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to provide a cellular communication network having base stations and mobile stations wherein a mobile station can determine that the quality of transmission to its home base station has degraded below a prcdetermined performance level.
15 Another object of the present invention is to provide a cellular communications network wherein a mobile station can monitor and scnse transmissions from base stations other than its home base station.
A further object of the present invention is to provide a cellular communication system wherein 20 control of a mobile station is transferrcd from a first home base station to a new home base station in response to sensed transmissions.
BRIEF DESCR~PTION OF THE DRAWINGS
25 The foregoing and other objects, aspects and advantages will be better understood from the following detailed description of a prefcrred cmbodiment of the invention with reference to the drawings, in which:
21~516S
FIG. I is a pictorial diagram showing radio a data communication system of the type in which the invention is implemented.
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the system shown in Fig. I illustrating the basic components of a mobile station and a base station;
S FIG. 3 is a data framing d;agram showing a superframe structure implemented by the preferred embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of the logic of the process by which a mobile station monitors neighbouring bases;
FIG. 5 illustrates a tables of bases for the process of Fig. 4;
FIG. 6 is a flow diagram showing more detail of the logic of the process of Fig. 4;
FIG. 7 is a flow diagram of the process for using hand off indicators to select a home base;
FIG. 8 is an illustration of a super frame containing neighbouring bases synchronized with each other but offset in frame time;
FIG. 9 is an illustration of a simple base location index structure; and FIG. 10 is an illustration of an example of a remote station signal indication.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
The present invention generally relates to indoor digital data radio communication between a plurality of stations for the purpose of communicating among the stations and accessing various resources attached to the stations. A l~lurality of mobile stations communicate with one or more rlxed base stations attached to a computcr sy~tem, such as a local area network. The base station e~ercises control over access to the radio channel by periodically broadcasting messages that demarcate rlxed intervals of time, called "frames".
Referring to Fig. 1, there is shown a radio system allowing communication between a plurality of mobile stations 10, 12~ 14 and 16 and applications and data residing in a computing system.
21~5165 ¢~
The computing system typically includes a Wireless Network Manager (WNM~ or Wireless Network Controller 18, with attached monitor 20 and keyboard 22, of a local area network (LAN), generally indicated by reference number 24, having a plurality of attached workstations or personal computers (not shown for simplicity). Also attached to the LAN are one or more gateways 26, and 28 with which the mobile stations 10, 12, 14, and 16 to communicate. These gateways, referred to as ba~e stations, are augmented according to the invention to provide certain radio system management functions which coordinate the mobile stations' access to the common radio channel. Communications bctween mobile stations are supported via relay through the base stations 26 and 2g.
As shown in more detail in Fig. 2, a base station 26 or 28, which may be a conventional microcomputer, has a LAN adaptcr 30 inserted in a bus slot and connected to LAN cabling 32.
The WNM 18, typically also a convcntional microcomputer and including one or more direct access storage devices (DASDs) such as hard disks (not shown), also has a LAN cabling 32 together with LAN software constitutc the LAN 24. The LAN 24 is of conventional design and does not form part of the invention. Thc base station 2fi or 28 also has an RF transceiver adapter 36 implemented as a printed circuit card which is inserted in a bus slot of the base station. The transceiver adapter 36 has an antcnna 38 by which a radio link 40 is established with one or more remote or mobile stations, 10, 12, 14, or 16. The mobile station may itself be a hand held or lap top computer of conventional design and, like the base station, it is provided with an antenna 42 and a transcciver adapter 44, also implemented as a printed circuit card which is inserted in a bus slot of the computcr. Thc tran~ceiver adapter 44, like transceiver adapter 36, includes a spread spectrum Iransceivcr of similal design. The base station and the mobile stations are further provided with softwarc, gcncrally indicated by reference numerals 46 and 48, respectively, which support their rcspectivc transccivcr adapters.
The present invention is embodied in a radio communication network based on slow frequency hopping operation wherein control of thc radio frequency of thc radio transceivers determines 21~516~
a sequenee of operating radio frequencies and their durations, appropriate to a mode of radio operation known in the radio art as "slow frequency-hopping." This mode of operation is deseribed in the book Spread Speetrum Communieations by Cooper and MeGillem, published by MeGraw-Hill for example. A partieular instance of use of this mode of operation is regulated by part 15.247 of the regulations of the United States Federal Communieations Commission.
Fig. 3 illustrates a partieular instanee of the use of radio earrier frequeneies by a slow frequeney-hopping system.
In multieellular radio eommunieation networks, a remote station gains wireless aeeess to the network by first requesting the serviees of a base station within its range. This proeess, ealled "Registration" is well known in the art. If a remote station is within the range of multiple base stations, it will register with exaetly one base station, ealled its Home Base. Within a eell, the base station and all remote stations registered with it hop in synehronism and eommunieate with eaeh other using the same earrier frequeney. When a remote station ehanges its physieal loeation, the signal quality to its home base ean cleeline rapidly (due to wear signals or from interferenee) and eventually the remote station may lose access to its home base. Even when a remote station is stationary, eommunieation path to the home base may be lost due to fading conditions. To retain eontinuity of wireless access, the remote station must re-register with another base station that can be reached along a propagation path of adequate signal quality. This process is called "handoff".
Time evolves as a sequence of frcquency hops with each hop of a specified duration as shown in Fig. 3. The duration of such hops must satisfy the applicable regulatory constraints (such as FCC Part 15.247 rules in the U.S., and similar rules in other countries that may allow frequeney-hopping based cellular radio operation). The base station will follow a cyclic frequency hopping pattern. A period of this cyclic hopping pattern structure will be ealled a superfrarne. Fig. 3 shows a superframe strueture whieh consists of a finite number of frequency hops. For the rest ~ 21gS16S
-of this example, it is assumed that all the hops within a superframe have the same length and all the base stations have the same number of hops within a superframe.
Each cell has its frequency hop pattern. The present invention relates to methods for the 5 monitoring of base stations under three cellular network architectures. The first is tightly synchronized systems, where thc superframe structurc of a base station has a fixed timing offset relationship with respect to another base station. The second ;s loosely synchronized systems, where the superframe structure of a base station has a coarse timing offset relationship with respect to another base station. The timing offset is a bounded random variable. The third is 10 unsynchronized systems, where each basc station operates independently of other base stations.
No f;~ed timing offset relationship exists in the superframe structures among the base stations.
Methods for achieving synchronization are known in the art. The present invention provides methods and techniques for solving the following problems in a multicell network.
15 (1) The selection of a home base by a remote station. (2) The identification of the measurements to be made for the purpose of selecting a home base. Such measurements are classified into those performed at i) the remote stations and ii) the base stations. (3) The initiation of the process of handoff. (4) The execution of handoM in multicellular networks in which the cells of the network are tightly synchronized or loose]y synchronized or not synchronized at all. The first 20 consideration in the in the implementation of the present invention is a discussion of handoff indicators.
In a multicellular slow frequency hopping-hased radio systcm, an important problem is identifying a home base for a remote station when it is first turncd on. This process begins with 25 the remote station learning about the radio cnvironmcnt in which it is situated. Learning involves listening to the control messages broadcast by various basc stations and the acquisition of variables of interest pertaining to them. Artcr Icarning (i.e., acquiring the list of candidate home base stations), the remote station c~ecutes a sclection algorithm on the measured variables. It ~ 2145165 chooses a home base to register with and acquires wireless access.
The header of a frame provides the following information for a remote station to monitor. Three different pieces of information, collectively referred to here as Handoff Indicators, are measured.
5 They are (I) RSSI: Received Signal Strength Indicator. (2) HOR: Header Observation Rate, i.e., the rate of detected headers. (3) LV: Load Vector.
RSSI, the Received Signal Strength Indicator, is the primary handoff indicator. In a frequency hopping system, the measured value of RSSI varies from hop to hop as a result of frequency 10 dependent fading. For stable system operation, the RSSI is sampled at multiple, different frequencies. The mean value of the multiple sample values of RSSI is used for making handoff decisions instead of a single measured value of RSSI. Sometimes, however, interference level is so high that RSSI can produce misleading results if used alone. Therefore, the following auxiliary handoff indicators are used.
HOR, the Header Observation Rate, is defined as the ratio of the number of headers received correctly divided by the total number of headers. For every frequency used for monitoring the radio environment, at least one header is expected from each base station within the range of the remote station. However, headers may be missed because of frequency dependent fading and/or 20 other interference sources. With respect to a base station, a low HOR together with high RSSI
usually indicates high interference level. HOR can he easily calculated in data transmissions if for instance, cyclic redundancy checks (CRC) are use<l for error cletection purposes.
LV, the Load Vector, is a characteristic of the base station. It includes a vector of performance-25 oriented information relevant to the base station, such as the nurnber of remote stations registered with it, the number of active remote stations, CPU utilization, buffer utilization etc.
LV is included as part of the hea<ler information an<l used for the purpose of load balancing.
By monitoring the header transmissions from a base station, a remote station is able to accumulate knowledge of RSSI, HOR, and LV. Of these, both RSSI and HOR are characteristic of the channel and LV represents the tramc load at thc base station.
5 The next consideration is a discussion of initial home base identirlcation and methods for the selection of an initial home base station. In the following discussion it is assumed that a remote station has been synchronized to the frame structurc and thc frequency hopping pattern from its home base. A header for a framc structure can be transmitted from each base after the transmitting frequency has becn switchcd (hopped) to a new frcquency. The header message is 10 used by a remote station to achieve both framc and superframe synchronization.
When a remote station is first powered up, it listens at a rlxed frequency and searches for valid header messages from neighbouring bases (see Fig. 4). All the aforesaid handoff indicators are monitored. After a fixed period of time, it switchcs to another frequency and keeps on IS monitoring. During this monitoring process, the remote station keeps a record of RSSI, HOR, and LV from each base station. A table as illustrated in Fig. 5 is constructed for all the bases which have been heard during the last N monitoring cycles (assuming K bases heard during the last N cycles).
20 After a fixed number of frequencies have been examined, the remote station selects a home base station and locks into its frequency hopping pattcrn. Thc algorithm used for selecting a home base using the information in Table I is described latcr.
A number (N) of frequencies are monitored prior to choosing an initial home base station 25 because a single frequency transmission may suffcr from frequency dependent fading. The frequency dependent fading has a Rayleigh distribution. Therefore, a remote station should depend on average RSSI observed at several frequencics in choosing an initial home base station.
21g5165 RSSI is collected only when a header packet is received without error. A header will not be received correctly either due to very low received signal strength or interference. Therefore, use of HOR as an auxiliary indicator is important in making initial home base selection.
5 Another factor that is useful in selecting an initial home base is traffic load at the candidate bases. It may be preferable, for load balancing purposes, to choose a lightly loaded base instead of a heavily loaded base station even if the latter provides stronger received signal strength.
Fig. 6 is a more detailed view of radio monitoring steps shown in Fig. 4. When a new base is 10 found, the two indicators RSSI (received signal strength indication) and HOR (header observation rate) are rnonitored during a fixed listening period ( = the length of a superframe).
A number (N = 5) of frequencies are monitored in Fig. 7. Let the number of distinct frequency channels in the FH Spread Spectrum system be T. Let g = T/N. Let the bandwidth of each channel be ~. The frequencies to be monitored, Fj, F2, , FN are chosen with respect to Fl as 1 5 follows:
Fi = Fl + (i-l)g~
If a remote station does not hear from any base in the wireless network, then it is out of the 20 range of the wireless communication system.
The actual algorithm for selecting among several candidate home bases is a multicriteria based (lecision problem. A specific algorithm ror using thc handorf indicators to select a home base from candidate bases is set forth in Figure 7. Alternate selection algorithms for utilizing the 25 handoffindicators in a different manner are possible and are considered within the scope of this nventlon.
If at least one candidate base has bcen heard, the remote must choose it as its home base. If 21g516~
more than one candidate exists, then the chosen base will be the one, if any, which complies the most to some criteria, as described in Fig. 8.
Technique for monitoring for handoff will now be discussed. The first consideration is monitoring 5 neighbouring bases for accomplishing handoff. In order to accomplish handoff, the remote station is responsible for monitoring its home base as well as monitoring the connections from neighbouring bases. Handoff decisions arc based on the collected information.
In order to collect handoff indicator information from neighbouring bases, a remote station has 10 to know the answers to the following questions:
HQ_I) Who are the neighbouring bases? How many of them should be monitored?
HQ_2) For each neighbouring base, when does its header occur?
15HQ_3) For each neighbouring base, what frequency it will be on when its header data can be collected?
- The next consideration is monitoring in a tightly synclltonized system. In a tightly synchronized system, the superframe structure of a base has a fixed timing offset relationship with that of 20 another base, i.e., frame synchronization among the bases are required. In such a system, if different bases use different cyclic shifts of the samc frequcncy hopping pattern, then mutual interference can be greatly minimized.
For handoff monitoring of neighbouring bascs, thc questions raised before can be answered 25 together when the following conditions are ~atisficd:
(I) When all the neighbouring bases are synchronized with each other in the superframe structure, but offset in frame time a.s shown in Fig. 8. The frame time of each base is offset by an integer multiple of a fixed delay D and their header messages only occur in non-overlapped time slots. In Fig. 8, m headers can be monitored in a frame whosc duration is mD.
(2) When both the frame delay and the frcquency hopping pattern for each base can be associated with the base's location index. Fig. 9 illustrates a simple base location index structure. Which is assumed as a square-shaped cell.
In the example of Fig. 9, nine cells form a section and four sections (separatcd by solid lines) are 10 shown. Assuming there are eight neighbouring bascs needed to monitor besides the home base, i.e., m = 9, the index of the basc location is used to reprcsent a unique frequ~ncy hopping pattern (or a uni~ue cyclic shift of the same pattcrn) and a unique delay time in the delay structure as shown in Fig. 8. For example, in a clustcr of 9 cells bounded by dot lines in Fig. 9, the remainder of the base location index dividing by 9 can be used to represcnt the ideal delay 15 of the frame (or hop) of each base in the delay structure Fig. 8. It can be guaranteed by this location indexing scheme that in any square-shaped cluster of 9 bases no overlap of header transmission will occur.
Under the two conditions, a home base can figure out the answers to the three handoff 20 monitoring questions and pass the needcd handoff monitoring information to a portable remote.
The information includes both time offset (i.e., thc phasc cliffcrence) and frequency hopping patterns of all the neighbouring bascs. It is also possiblc that a portable remote can derive this information itself from the knowled~e Or indexcs or ncighbouring bases. In this case, there is no need for message passing from thc homc basc at all.
A synchronized system is more complicatcd to implement because it requires tight frame synchronization among the bases. Methods for achieving tight frame synchronization, among bases connected by a LAN, are known in the art. An important advantage of tight synchronization is that it facilitates handoff monitoring. In a synchronized system, portable remotes have exact knowledge of thc frequencies thc neighbouring bases will use and their timing. It can also be assured that no two bases will transm;t their headers at the same time. As a result, an ordered and fast handoff monitoring se4uence can be established. For example, for 5 a frame length of 50 msec and 9 bases to monitor (including thc home base), an observation time slot for the header has a length of 5.5 msec. This slot length is long enough for a portable to switch frequency to monitor another basc. In this case, 20 handoff indicator measurements per base per second can be achieved.
10 When monitoring in an unsynchronized system cach base opcrates independently of other bases.
No f~lxed timing offset relationship exists in the superframe structures among the bases. Although the bases can use quite accurate crystal oscillators lo control their superframe timing, their superframe boundaries will still drift slowly with respect to each other. In this case, if neighbouring bases use different phases (cyclic shifts) of the same frequency hopping pattern, 15 the patterns could potentially overlap once in a while and interfercnce would last for long periods of time. As a result, only frequency pattcrns with low probability of overlapping after random cyclic shifts should be used.
For example, assuming there are only 8 hopping frequencies, the patterns shown in Table I
20 below can be used in an unsynchronizcd system.
Tablc I
3 5 2 7 fi 4 0 ~ for basc No. I
0 6 1 4 5 7 3 for base No. 2 6 0 7 2 3 1 5 I ror basc No. 3 1 7 0 5 4 fi 2 for base No. 4 4 2 5 0 1 3 7 for base No. 5 3 4 1 0 2 6 I for base No. G
7 1 6 3 2 0 4 for base No. 7 2 4 3 6 7 5 1 for base No. 8 The 8 patterns can be assigned to 8 neighbouring bases. These patterns are generated using the known methods described in and have the property that for all the cyclic shifts among any two patterns, at most one frequency overlap occurs. Other methods for generating cyclically orthogonal patterns can also be used.
s For handoff monitoring purpose, a basc has to learn both the timing and the frequency hopping state of its neighbouring bases, i.e., the answers of questions HQ_2 and HQ_3 discussed herein above, even if a mapping mechanism cxists (as discussed herein above) which enables the base to derive another base's frequency hopping pattern from its location index. Assuming the 10 frequency hopping pattern of another base can bc derived from its location index, the only information needed for a portable remote in a ncarby cell to monitor it is the delay of its superframe boundary with respect to the superframe boundary of the portable's home base.
When the bases are connected by a LAN, sortware based methods for measuring the superframe delay (or the Timing Offset) at a base can be used.
After the superframe delay of a neighbouring base is measured, both the hopping state and the timing of the neighbour are calculated by a basc and passed to a portable. If there are neighbours, the base corlveys both the hopping pattern and the superframe delay of each neighbour. The base might need to updatc the handoff monitoring information as frequently as 20 needed. The update is needed because thc frame boundar;es of different bases will drift with respect to each other (the crystal oscillators in thosc bascs are not synchronized). A portable remote, after receiving the handoff monitoring information fiom its home base, begin to monitor neighbouring bases. The initial monitoring window Icngth for cach neighbouring base should be long enough to accommodatc the uncertainty of the superframe delay measurement. Howcver, 25 after the first successful monitoring, thc portablc remote will know morc precisely about the timing offset and can reduce its monitoring window length accordingly.
The advantage of an unsynchronized system lies in that no synchronization is needed among neighbouring bases and eonsequently its implementation will be much simpler. However, because the bases are uneoordinated, it is possible that their header messages will be overlapped in time and eannot all be monitored by a portable remote in the same frame. As a result, handoff monitoring will be slower.
It is, however, possible to reduce the header aequisition time, and hence, the handoff monitoring time, in several ways. For example, it was mentioned that each base transmits a header at the beginning of every frequency hop. This header could include a subset of the frequeney hopping pattern table for that base. Thus, a remote can considerably shorten its monitoring time. While 10 it is eoneeivable that the number of base header broaclcasts within a hop could exceed one, it can be easily shown that the reduction in acquisition time is negligible Another way to reduce the acquisition delay is to monitor more than one frequency during a hop interval This is advantageous if the hop interval is fairly large. This process has the effect of lS significantly reducing the average acquisition delay, but has drawback, in that the maximum aequisition delay has a finite probability of being infinite. This problem may be circumvented by introducing a fixed time delay into the frequency scanning process.
When monitoring in a loosely synchronized system the superframe structure of a base has a loose 20 timing offset relationship with that of other bases. More specirically, the timing offset can be abounded random variable. A.ssuming the timing orfset is always smaller than the amount that will cause interference to happen when noncontiguous cyclic shifts of the same frequency hopping patterns are used by different bases, we can greatly eliminate mutual interference.
25 For example, assuming synchronization errors among the bases are kept within the duration of a frame, then the following 4 patterns as shown in Table 11 below can be assigned to 4 neighbouring bases without causing mutual interference.
~ 2145165 Table II
0 l 2 3 4 5 6 7 for base No. I
2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 for base No. 2 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 for base No. 3 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 for base No. 4 Clearly, the number of patterns which can be used in a loosely synchronized system has been greatly reduced as compared to a synchronized system. The reduction factor depends on how 10 accurate the loose synchronization is.
A base in a loosely synchronized system also tries to lock into both the superframe structure and the delay structure as shown in Fig. 8. From handoff opcration point of view, a loosely synchronized system can be regarded as a combination of both a synchronized system and an 15 unsynchronized system. It is like a synchronized system in the sense that both bases and portables can deduce both the frequency hopping pattern and the superframe delay of a neighbouring base from the base's location index. On the other hand, it is more like an unsynchronized system in the sense that the knowledge of superframe delay is not precise.
Therefore, initial monitoring window Iength for each neighbouring bases should be long enough 20 to accommodate the uncertainty in the superframe delay. After the first successful monitoring, the portable remote can reduce its monitoring window length in the subsequent monitorings.
The following discussion provides a simple example of handoff. lt is assumed that a portable remote has obtained handoff monitoring informalion about its neighbouring bases. This 25 information can be very precise for a synchronized system and nOt precise for an unsynchronized system or a loosely synchronized system. In this section, a simple handoff example for a slow frequency hopping based indoor cellular radio network is described. The handoff example is general enough so that it can be applied to all the three systems described above. Here, RSSI is used as the major handoff indicator. The applications of other handoff indicators such as HOR
30 and LV will be discussed in the next section.
Fig. 10 shows an example of RSSI (a sample mean as discusscd before) measured at a portable remote about its home base as a function of time. The variation of RSSI is basically due to the movement of the portable remote in the building around its home base. At tO, the RSSI of the home base drops below a level called "monitoring threshold". At this point, the portable remote 5 enters into handoff monitoring stage. That is, the portable remote begins to monitor all the potential new bases. At tl, the RSSl riscs above the mon;toring again. A monitor threshold is set up such that a portable remote can forget about handoff monitoring and does useful work when channel conditions are very good.
10 At t3, the RSSI further drops below a level called "handoff thrcshold". At this point, it is assumed that the portable remote has obtained cnough information to make a handoff decision.
The portable remote then sends a mcssagc to its home base and indicates that it has chosen a certain base for handoff. The home base thcn sends back an acknowledgement message to the portable remote.
No matter whether the portable remotc reccives the acknowledgement or not, it begins to register to its new base. This handoff registration can be realized by sending a message from the portable remote to the new home base. The new home basc thcn hanclshakes with the old home base to update their routing tables ancl the status of communication. Then the new home base can 20 acknowledge to the portable remote that handoff has been accomplished.
The e~act levels of the monitoring thrcshold and the handoff threshold are system parameters and can be ~djusted accclrding to systc~ln o~cration nccds. For cxamplc, a conservative handoff threshold can be set at a level which is 30 dB abovc the radio noise level. Assuming a 10 dB
25 signal-to-noise ratio is needed to achieve a bit crror rate of 10-5, there is less than I percent of time encountering higher than 10-5 bit error ratc for a Rayleigh clistributed RSSI at this handoff threshold level (result calculated from cumulativc distribution function of Rayleigh distribution).
A less conservative handoff threshold lcvcl can bc 20 dB above thc noise level. In this caset there 21~516~
is less than 10 percent of time encountcring higher than 10-5 bit error rate when the RSSI is at this level.
For a system which needs fast handoff, it will be appropriate to set level of monitoring threshold 5 well above the level of handoff threshold. As a result, a portable remote knows exactly which new base to choose when it crosses the handoff threshold. An implication of this handoff strategy is that a portable remote might spend valuable time and powcr in monitoring other bases rather than transmitting or receiving useful data. On the other hand, for a system which does not need fast handoff, the level of monitoring threshold can bc sct lower. In the extreme case, the level of 10 monitoring threshold can be set to be at the same levcl as the handoff threshold. In this case7 a portable remote begins to monitor other bases only when its RSSI drops below the handoff threshold.
A way to achieve more efficient handoff monitoring is to adapt the monitoring speed with the 15 speed of change in the observed handoff indicators. ~or a portable remote which does not move or moves very slowly, the handoff monitoring speed can be much lower than the case when a portable remote moves fast. When people are using portablc remotes, they usually come to standstill or move very slowly. As a portahle remote does not need to spend much time in monitoring, it can spend most of the timc doing uscful work. On the other hand, when people 20 move fast, they seldom do any work on portable remotes. The portable remotes then can spend more time in monitoring other bascs. Thcrefore, it may be dcsirable to set the level of monitoring threshold well above the level of handoff threshol(l when thc handoff monitoring speed can be adapted.
25 In this section, the applications of the other two handoff indicators: HOR and LV are discussed.
In radio data transmission modems, RSSI is usually collected whcn a packet is received without error. Therefore, a packet error can be rcgarded cquivalently as having a very bad RSSI level (say at the radio sensitivity level). This equivalent RSSI level can be used together with other 219516~
measured RSSI levels in the RSSI sample mean calculation. Another way to use HOR is to treat it as a totally separate indicator. When the HOR of the home base measured at a portable exceeds a certain threshold, the portablc begins the handoff monitoring process, just as the case when RSSI drops below the monitoring threshold. In the same way, when the HOR exceeds a 5 higher threshold, the portable begins to enact handoff, regardless the level of the RSSI indicator.
Handoff decisions depend on both RSSI and HOR information gathered from neighbouring bases. A combined cost function based on the two indicators for selecting a new home base can be constructed. For example, HOR can be used as the first criteria in choosing a new base. If there are several bases with the same low HOR, thc base with the highest RSSI can be chosen 10 as the new base.
LV, as discussed before, is a handoff indicator used for load balancing purpose. It can be used to achieve load balance in the following two ways:
(1) During handoff, a portable remote can choose a less heavily loaded base as a new base if other handoff indicators are similar among several candidates.
(2) If a cell is heavily loaded with data traffic, the base associated with the cell can send a load control message to all the active portable remotes in the cell. The load control message contains a suggested handoff RSSI level which is higher than thehandoff threshoid level discussc(l before. Those active portable remotes with RSSI
level from the base bclow thc suggestc(l RSSI lcvcl begin to handoff to other bases.
By controlling the suggcsted handoff RSSI levcl, a base can dispersed its traffic load to neighbouring bascs to various dcgree.
What has been described are three system architectures which can be used to establish a slow frequency hopping based indoor cellular radio application. Thcse three systems differ in their different requirement on synchronization among the bases on a LAN. In one system, bases are tightly synchronized in their superframe structures with respect to cach other. This system is more difficult to implement. However, it allows for fast handoff monitoring and the possibility of interference elimination when different phases of the same frequency hopping pattern are used at the bases. In another system, each base operates independently of other bases. This system 5 is the simplest in implementation. However, handoff monitoring is slower and interference can be a serious problem. In this system, diffcrent frequency patterns with low overlapping probability after random cyclic shifts should be used. In the last system, base are loosely synchronized with each other. This system climinatcs the potential interference problem when noncontiguous cyclic shifts of the same frequency hopping pattern are used at different bases.
10 Nevertheless, its handoff monitoring is still slower than a synchronized system due to the looseness in synchronization.
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with respect to a preferred embodiment thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that changes in form and 15 details may be made therein without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.
0 6 1 4 5 7 3 for base No. 2 6 0 7 2 3 1 5 I ror basc No. 3 1 7 0 5 4 fi 2 for base No. 4 4 2 5 0 1 3 7 for base No. 5 3 4 1 0 2 6 I for base No. G
7 1 6 3 2 0 4 for base No. 7 2 4 3 6 7 5 1 for base No. 8 The 8 patterns can be assigned to 8 neighbouring bases. These patterns are generated using the known methods described in and have the property that for all the cyclic shifts among any two patterns, at most one frequency overlap occurs. Other methods for generating cyclically orthogonal patterns can also be used.
s For handoff monitoring purpose, a basc has to learn both the timing and the frequency hopping state of its neighbouring bases, i.e., the answers of questions HQ_2 and HQ_3 discussed herein above, even if a mapping mechanism cxists (as discussed herein above) which enables the base to derive another base's frequency hopping pattern from its location index. Assuming the 10 frequency hopping pattern of another base can bc derived from its location index, the only information needed for a portable remote in a ncarby cell to monitor it is the delay of its superframe boundary with respect to the superframe boundary of the portable's home base.
When the bases are connected by a LAN, sortware based methods for measuring the superframe delay (or the Timing Offset) at a base can be used.
After the superframe delay of a neighbouring base is measured, both the hopping state and the timing of the neighbour are calculated by a basc and passed to a portable. If there are neighbours, the base corlveys both the hopping pattern and the superframe delay of each neighbour. The base might need to updatc the handoff monitoring information as frequently as 20 needed. The update is needed because thc frame boundar;es of different bases will drift with respect to each other (the crystal oscillators in thosc bascs are not synchronized). A portable remote, after receiving the handoff monitoring information fiom its home base, begin to monitor neighbouring bases. The initial monitoring window Icngth for cach neighbouring base should be long enough to accommodatc the uncertainty of the superframe delay measurement. Howcver, 25 after the first successful monitoring, thc portablc remote will know morc precisely about the timing offset and can reduce its monitoring window length accordingly.
The advantage of an unsynchronized system lies in that no synchronization is needed among neighbouring bases and eonsequently its implementation will be much simpler. However, because the bases are uneoordinated, it is possible that their header messages will be overlapped in time and eannot all be monitored by a portable remote in the same frame. As a result, handoff monitoring will be slower.
It is, however, possible to reduce the header aequisition time, and hence, the handoff monitoring time, in several ways. For example, it was mentioned that each base transmits a header at the beginning of every frequency hop. This header could include a subset of the frequeney hopping pattern table for that base. Thus, a remote can considerably shorten its monitoring time. While 10 it is eoneeivable that the number of base header broaclcasts within a hop could exceed one, it can be easily shown that the reduction in acquisition time is negligible Another way to reduce the acquisition delay is to monitor more than one frequency during a hop interval This is advantageous if the hop interval is fairly large. This process has the effect of lS significantly reducing the average acquisition delay, but has drawback, in that the maximum aequisition delay has a finite probability of being infinite. This problem may be circumvented by introducing a fixed time delay into the frequency scanning process.
When monitoring in a loosely synchronized system the superframe structure of a base has a loose 20 timing offset relationship with that of other bases. More specirically, the timing offset can be abounded random variable. A.ssuming the timing orfset is always smaller than the amount that will cause interference to happen when noncontiguous cyclic shifts of the same frequency hopping patterns are used by different bases, we can greatly eliminate mutual interference.
25 For example, assuming synchronization errors among the bases are kept within the duration of a frame, then the following 4 patterns as shown in Table 11 below can be assigned to 4 neighbouring bases without causing mutual interference.
~ 2145165 Table II
0 l 2 3 4 5 6 7 for base No. I
2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 for base No. 2 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 for base No. 3 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 for base No. 4 Clearly, the number of patterns which can be used in a loosely synchronized system has been greatly reduced as compared to a synchronized system. The reduction factor depends on how 10 accurate the loose synchronization is.
A base in a loosely synchronized system also tries to lock into both the superframe structure and the delay structure as shown in Fig. 8. From handoff opcration point of view, a loosely synchronized system can be regarded as a combination of both a synchronized system and an 15 unsynchronized system. It is like a synchronized system in the sense that both bases and portables can deduce both the frequency hopping pattern and the superframe delay of a neighbouring base from the base's location index. On the other hand, it is more like an unsynchronized system in the sense that the knowledge of superframe delay is not precise.
Therefore, initial monitoring window Iength for each neighbouring bases should be long enough 20 to accommodate the uncertainty in the superframe delay. After the first successful monitoring, the portable remote can reduce its monitoring window length in the subsequent monitorings.
The following discussion provides a simple example of handoff. lt is assumed that a portable remote has obtained handoff monitoring informalion about its neighbouring bases. This 25 information can be very precise for a synchronized system and nOt precise for an unsynchronized system or a loosely synchronized system. In this section, a simple handoff example for a slow frequency hopping based indoor cellular radio network is described. The handoff example is general enough so that it can be applied to all the three systems described above. Here, RSSI is used as the major handoff indicator. The applications of other handoff indicators such as HOR
30 and LV will be discussed in the next section.
Fig. 10 shows an example of RSSI (a sample mean as discusscd before) measured at a portable remote about its home base as a function of time. The variation of RSSI is basically due to the movement of the portable remote in the building around its home base. At tO, the RSSI of the home base drops below a level called "monitoring threshold". At this point, the portable remote 5 enters into handoff monitoring stage. That is, the portable remote begins to monitor all the potential new bases. At tl, the RSSl riscs above the mon;toring again. A monitor threshold is set up such that a portable remote can forget about handoff monitoring and does useful work when channel conditions are very good.
10 At t3, the RSSI further drops below a level called "handoff thrcshold". At this point, it is assumed that the portable remote has obtained cnough information to make a handoff decision.
The portable remote then sends a mcssagc to its home base and indicates that it has chosen a certain base for handoff. The home base thcn sends back an acknowledgement message to the portable remote.
No matter whether the portable remotc reccives the acknowledgement or not, it begins to register to its new base. This handoff registration can be realized by sending a message from the portable remote to the new home base. The new home basc thcn hanclshakes with the old home base to update their routing tables ancl the status of communication. Then the new home base can 20 acknowledge to the portable remote that handoff has been accomplished.
The e~act levels of the monitoring thrcshold and the handoff threshold are system parameters and can be ~djusted accclrding to systc~ln o~cration nccds. For cxamplc, a conservative handoff threshold can be set at a level which is 30 dB abovc the radio noise level. Assuming a 10 dB
25 signal-to-noise ratio is needed to achieve a bit crror rate of 10-5, there is less than I percent of time encountering higher than 10-5 bit error ratc for a Rayleigh clistributed RSSI at this handoff threshold level (result calculated from cumulativc distribution function of Rayleigh distribution).
A less conservative handoff threshold lcvcl can bc 20 dB above thc noise level. In this caset there 21~516~
is less than 10 percent of time encountcring higher than 10-5 bit error rate when the RSSI is at this level.
For a system which needs fast handoff, it will be appropriate to set level of monitoring threshold 5 well above the level of handoff threshold. As a result, a portable remote knows exactly which new base to choose when it crosses the handoff threshold. An implication of this handoff strategy is that a portable remote might spend valuable time and powcr in monitoring other bases rather than transmitting or receiving useful data. On the other hand, for a system which does not need fast handoff, the level of monitoring threshold can bc sct lower. In the extreme case, the level of 10 monitoring threshold can be set to be at the same levcl as the handoff threshold. In this case7 a portable remote begins to monitor other bases only when its RSSI drops below the handoff threshold.
A way to achieve more efficient handoff monitoring is to adapt the monitoring speed with the 15 speed of change in the observed handoff indicators. ~or a portable remote which does not move or moves very slowly, the handoff monitoring speed can be much lower than the case when a portable remote moves fast. When people are using portablc remotes, they usually come to standstill or move very slowly. As a portahle remote does not need to spend much time in monitoring, it can spend most of the timc doing uscful work. On the other hand, when people 20 move fast, they seldom do any work on portable remotes. The portable remotes then can spend more time in monitoring other bascs. Thcrefore, it may be dcsirable to set the level of monitoring threshold well above the level of handoff threshol(l when thc handoff monitoring speed can be adapted.
25 In this section, the applications of the other two handoff indicators: HOR and LV are discussed.
In radio data transmission modems, RSSI is usually collected whcn a packet is received without error. Therefore, a packet error can be rcgarded cquivalently as having a very bad RSSI level (say at the radio sensitivity level). This equivalent RSSI level can be used together with other 219516~
measured RSSI levels in the RSSI sample mean calculation. Another way to use HOR is to treat it as a totally separate indicator. When the HOR of the home base measured at a portable exceeds a certain threshold, the portablc begins the handoff monitoring process, just as the case when RSSI drops below the monitoring threshold. In the same way, when the HOR exceeds a 5 higher threshold, the portable begins to enact handoff, regardless the level of the RSSI indicator.
Handoff decisions depend on both RSSI and HOR information gathered from neighbouring bases. A combined cost function based on the two indicators for selecting a new home base can be constructed. For example, HOR can be used as the first criteria in choosing a new base. If there are several bases with the same low HOR, thc base with the highest RSSI can be chosen 10 as the new base.
LV, as discussed before, is a handoff indicator used for load balancing purpose. It can be used to achieve load balance in the following two ways:
(1) During handoff, a portable remote can choose a less heavily loaded base as a new base if other handoff indicators are similar among several candidates.
(2) If a cell is heavily loaded with data traffic, the base associated with the cell can send a load control message to all the active portable remotes in the cell. The load control message contains a suggested handoff RSSI level which is higher than thehandoff threshoid level discussc(l before. Those active portable remotes with RSSI
level from the base bclow thc suggestc(l RSSI lcvcl begin to handoff to other bases.
By controlling the suggcsted handoff RSSI levcl, a base can dispersed its traffic load to neighbouring bascs to various dcgree.
What has been described are three system architectures which can be used to establish a slow frequency hopping based indoor cellular radio application. Thcse three systems differ in their different requirement on synchronization among the bases on a LAN. In one system, bases are tightly synchronized in their superframe structures with respect to cach other. This system is more difficult to implement. However, it allows for fast handoff monitoring and the possibility of interference elimination when different phases of the same frequency hopping pattern are used at the bases. In another system, each base operates independently of other bases. This system 5 is the simplest in implementation. However, handoff monitoring is slower and interference can be a serious problem. In this system, diffcrent frequency patterns with low overlapping probability after random cyclic shifts should be used. In the last system, base are loosely synchronized with each other. This system climinatcs the potential interference problem when noncontiguous cyclic shifts of the same frequency hopping pattern are used at different bases.
10 Nevertheless, its handoff monitoring is still slower than a synchronized system due to the looseness in synchronization.
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with respect to a preferred embodiment thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that changes in form and 15 details may be made therein without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.
Claims (10)
1. A method for handoff monitoring in a wireless communication system including a local area network connected to a plurality of base stations, each of which has a geographic area, defined as a cell, within which a plurality of mobile stations having transceivers can communicate with a base station within each of a plurality of said cells, with each such base station being capable of performing bidirectional wireless communication with one or more of said mobile stations under control of a controller, with communication between base stations and mobile stations being performed by frequency hopping, with there being n available frequency hopping channels in a fixed frequency band, with each channel being of a same fixed time duration and having a fixed frequency different than another channel, the base station in each of said cells having receivers each tuned to respective ones of the channels assigned to the cell for receiving signals of the mobile stations within the cell, a cluster of said cells having a network control system through which said mobile stations within said cells communicate with each other, said network control system operating in conjunction with hand-off apparatus for handling off a mobile station from a first of said base stations to a second of said base stations as the mobile station travels from the first cell to the second cell, said hand-off apparatus being responsive to the strength or quality of signals monitored at a mobile station, said method for handoff monitoring comprising the steps of:
step 1; determining for a given mobile station that the quality of transmission between said given mobile station and a current base station has degraded below a predetermined performance level;
step 2; said given mobile station listening to each of successive ones of said n frequency channels for a time duration substantially less than said fixed time duration of a channel until said given mobile station senses a transmission from another of said base stations above said predetermined performance level; and step 3; transferring control of said mobile station by hand off to said another one of said base stations in response to said sensed transmission above said predetermined performance level.
step 1; determining for a given mobile station that the quality of transmission between said given mobile station and a current base station has degraded below a predetermined performance level;
step 2; said given mobile station listening to each of successive ones of said n frequency channels for a time duration substantially less than said fixed time duration of a channel until said given mobile station senses a transmission from another of said base stations above said predetermined performance level; and step 3; transferring control of said mobile station by hand off to said another one of said base stations in response to said sensed transmission above said predetermined performance level.
2. A method according to claim 1 wherein said Step 1 includes each of said base stations in said wireless communication system generating and transmitting a wireless signal composed of a cyclic time sequence of frequencies hops in a superframe wherein each hop is of the same duration and length, wherein said transmitted wireless signal includes header information including Received Signal Strength Indicator data, Header Observation Rate data and Load Vector data.
3. A method according to claim 2 wherein, in said Step 2, said Received Signal Strength Indicator data is sampled by said mobile stations at multiple different transmitted frequencies and the mean value of said sampled samples is measured.
4. A method according to claim 2 wherein, in Step 2 said Header Observation Rate data is the number of transmitted headers received correctly by said mobile station divided by the total number of possible headers.
5. A method according to claim 4, wherein, in Step 2 said Load Vector data indicates the number of remote stations communicating with said base station.
6. A method according to claim 5 wherein, in Step 3 said mobile station selects and transfers control to a base station, referred to as a home base station, in accordance with the values of said Received Signal Strength Indicator data, said Header Observation Rate data and Load Vector data received by said mobile station.
7. A method according to claim 6 wherein, in said Step 3, said control of said mobile station is transferred by handoff from said home base station to another base station when said Received Signal Strength Indicator data and said Header Observation Rate data transmitted from said home base station decrease in strength and quality below a selected value.
8. A method according to claim 7 wherein the wireless signal composed of a cyclic time sequence of frequency hops in each cell of said plurality of cells is synchronized with the wireless signal composed of a cyclic time sequence of frequency hops in all of said other cells in said wireless communication system.
9. A method according to claim 7 wherein the wireless signal composed of a cyclic time sequence of frequency hops in each cell of said plurality of cells is loosely synchronized with the wireless signal composed of a cyclic time sequence of frequency hops of some or all of said other cells in said wireless communication system.
10. A method according to claim 7 wherein the wireless signal composed of a cyclic time sequence of frequency hops in each cell of said plurality of cells is not synchronized with any of the wireless signal composed of a cyclic time sequence of frequency hops of said other cells in said wireless communication system.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US226,724 | 1994-04-12 | ||
| US08/226,724 US5448569A (en) | 1994-04-12 | 1994-04-12 | Handoff monitoring in cellular communication networks using slow frequency hopping |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2145165A1 CA2145165A1 (en) | 1995-10-13 |
| CA2145165C true CA2145165C (en) | 1999-03-02 |
Family
ID=22850142
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002145165A Expired - Fee Related CA2145165C (en) | 1994-04-12 | 1995-03-20 | Handoff monitoring in cellular communication networks using slow frequency hopping |
Country Status (5)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US5448569A (en) |
| EP (1) | EP0677940B1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JP3202883B2 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2145165C (en) |
| DE (1) | DE69531076T2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (109)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5815811A (en) * | 1989-06-29 | 1998-09-29 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Preemptive roaming in a cellular local area wireless network |
| WO1995003657A1 (en) * | 1993-07-21 | 1995-02-02 | Fujitsu Limited | Atm exchange |
| DE69533831T2 (en) | 1994-05-05 | 2005-04-21 | Sprint Communications Co | METHOD, SYSTEM AND TRANSMISSION CONTROL DEVICE |
| US6633561B2 (en) | 1994-05-05 | 2003-10-14 | Sprint Communications Company, L.P. | Method, system and apparatus for telecommunications control |
| JP3326292B2 (en) * | 1994-05-24 | 2002-09-17 | 株式会社東芝 | Communication device and communication method thereof |
| JP3047767B2 (en) * | 1995-03-20 | 2000-06-05 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Wireless LAN system |
| US5873036A (en) * | 1995-04-12 | 1999-02-16 | Watkins-Johnson Company | Apparatus and method for improving cellular communication by associating users on a mobile platform with a common platform identifier |
| GB9508696D0 (en) * | 1995-04-28 | 1995-06-14 | At & T Corp | Method for connecting roaming stations in a source routed bridged local area network |
| US5781582A (en) * | 1995-05-04 | 1998-07-14 | Interwave Communications International Ltd. | Frequency agile transceiver with multiple frequency synthesizers per transceiver |
| JP2713228B2 (en) * | 1995-05-16 | 1998-02-16 | 日本電気株式会社 | Mobile wireless communication method |
| JP3036407B2 (en) * | 1995-09-12 | 2000-04-24 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | Mobile radio communication system |
| US6058289A (en) * | 1995-09-26 | 2000-05-02 | Pacific Communication Sciences, Inc. | Method and apparatus for low power mobile unit for cellular communications system |
| US6580700B1 (en) * | 1995-10-27 | 2003-06-17 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Data rate algorithms for use in wireless local area networks |
| US5841764A (en) * | 1995-10-30 | 1998-11-24 | Ericsson Inc. | Method and apparatus for permitting a radio to originate and receive data messages in a data communications network |
| US5812777A (en) * | 1995-12-28 | 1998-09-22 | Compaq Computer Corporation | Remote terminal operation |
| FI102447B (en) * | 1996-02-06 | 1998-11-30 | Nokia Telecommunications Oy | Method of establishing connection, subscriber terminal and radio system |
| GB2314734B (en) * | 1996-06-28 | 2000-11-01 | Motorola Ltd | Method and apparatus for monitoring channels |
| US5812930A (en) * | 1996-07-10 | 1998-09-22 | International Business Machines Corp. | Information handling systems with broadband and narrowband communication channels between repository and display systems |
| US6477374B1 (en) | 1997-01-03 | 2002-11-05 | Siemens Information And Communication Networks, Inc. | Apparatus and method for calendar based call routing |
| US6119006A (en) * | 1997-01-03 | 2000-09-12 | Siemens Information And Communication Systems, Inc. | System and method for calendar-based cellular smart switching |
| FI107008B (en) | 1997-04-22 | 2001-05-15 | Nokia Networks Oy | Multimode terminal network connection in a mobile communication system |
| US6141555A (en) * | 1997-06-09 | 2000-10-31 | Nec Corporation | Cellular communication system, and mobile and base stations used in the same |
| DE19738340C2 (en) * | 1997-09-02 | 2001-03-15 | Siemens Ag | Roaming of mobile parts in at least partially asynchronous wireless telecommunication networks, especially DECT networks |
| KR20000007433A (en) * | 1998-07-03 | 2000-02-07 | 윤종용 | Method for realizing preference of mobile radio combiner in frequency hopping system |
| US6311059B1 (en) * | 1999-02-05 | 2001-10-30 | Nec Corporation | Mobile radio station |
| US6490446B1 (en) * | 1999-04-09 | 2002-12-03 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Uncoordinated frequency hopping cellular system |
| US6556553B1 (en) * | 1999-04-12 | 2003-04-29 | Intermec Ip Corp. | Method for determining when a communication device should rate shift or roam in a wireless environment |
| US7180903B1 (en) * | 1999-05-10 | 2007-02-20 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Resource management in uncoordinated frequency hopping system |
| US7027773B1 (en) | 1999-05-28 | 2006-04-11 | Afx Technology Group International, Inc. | On/off keying node-to-node messaging transceiver network with dynamic routing and configuring |
| JP2003508939A (en) * | 1999-05-28 | 2003-03-04 | ベーシック・リソーシィズ・インコーポレイテッド | Wireless transceiver network using inter-node data messages |
| US8041359B1 (en) * | 1999-08-02 | 2011-10-18 | Alcatel Lucent | Method for maintaining a communication link in wireless network groups |
| US6430395B2 (en) * | 2000-04-07 | 2002-08-06 | Commil Ltd. | Wireless private branch exchange (WPBX) and communicating between mobile units and base stations |
| FI108769B (en) * | 2000-04-07 | 2002-03-15 | Nokia Corp | Connecting an access point in a wireless communication system |
| DE60026454T2 (en) * | 2000-05-19 | 2006-11-09 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Wireless local area network with load sharing |
| US7043286B1 (en) * | 2000-06-13 | 2006-05-09 | Leason Holding Company, Llc. | Extrinsic signal to shunt an acoustic driver in a cellular telephone, pager or the like |
| DE10061692C1 (en) * | 2000-12-12 | 2002-06-27 | Fraunhofer Ges Forschung | Base station, handset and communication network |
| US7065063B2 (en) * | 2001-04-11 | 2006-06-20 | Research In Motion Limited | System and method for balancing communication traffic loading between adjacent base stations in a mobile communications network |
| JP2002320260A (en) * | 2001-04-19 | 2002-10-31 | Toshiba Corp | Mobile communication terminal |
| JP4161782B2 (en) * | 2002-04-18 | 2008-10-08 | 松下電器産業株式会社 | Mobile node and mobile communication method |
| US7574519B2 (en) * | 2002-08-02 | 2009-08-11 | Broadcom Corporation | Interoperability of a network interface protocol with an internet interface protocol |
| US6993335B2 (en) * | 2002-11-15 | 2006-01-31 | Motorola, Inc. | Apparatus and method for mobile/IP handoff between a plurality of access technologies |
| KR100489683B1 (en) * | 2002-12-02 | 2005-05-17 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus for controlling the load balance in multi-access points and method thereof |
| DE10311967B4 (en) * | 2003-03-18 | 2005-06-23 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Method for field strength determination |
| US6980535B2 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2005-12-27 | Motorola, Inc. | Passive probing for handover in a local area network |
| US7092353B2 (en) * | 2003-10-17 | 2006-08-15 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Carrier search methods and apparatus |
| US7221927B2 (en) | 2004-02-13 | 2007-05-22 | Trapeze Networks, Inc. | Station mobility between access points |
| WO2006068556A1 (en) * | 2004-12-21 | 2006-06-29 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Blind handover using load compensated measurements |
| WO2006099540A2 (en) * | 2005-03-15 | 2006-09-21 | Trapeze Networks, Inc. | System and method for distributing keys in a wireless network |
| US8638762B2 (en) | 2005-10-13 | 2014-01-28 | Trapeze Networks, Inc. | System and method for network integrity |
| WO2007044986A2 (en) * | 2005-10-13 | 2007-04-19 | Trapeze Networks, Inc. | System and method for remote monitoring in a wireless network |
| US7724703B2 (en) | 2005-10-13 | 2010-05-25 | Belden, Inc. | System and method for wireless network monitoring |
| US7551619B2 (en) | 2005-10-13 | 2009-06-23 | Trapeze Networks, Inc. | Identity-based networking |
| US7573859B2 (en) | 2005-10-13 | 2009-08-11 | Trapeze Networks, Inc. | System and method for remote monitoring in a wireless network |
| ES2274716B1 (en) * | 2005-10-25 | 2008-05-01 | Vodafone España, S.A. | SYSTEM AND PROCEDURE TO ASSIST A MOBILE TERMINAL IN THE RESELECTION OR TRANSFER OF CELLS BETWEEN DIFFERENT TECHNOLOGIES. |
| US8250587B2 (en) | 2005-10-27 | 2012-08-21 | Trapeze Networks, Inc. | Non-persistent and persistent information setting method and system for inter-process communication |
| US8135407B2 (en) * | 2005-12-09 | 2012-03-13 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Network evaluated hard hardover using predictions |
| US20070160007A1 (en) * | 2006-01-11 | 2007-07-12 | Li-Chun Wang | Method and device for cost-function based handoff determination using wavelet prediction in vertical networks |
| US20070198682A1 (en) * | 2006-02-22 | 2007-08-23 | Pazhyannur Rajesh S | Method and system for seamless media handover across devices |
| KR101257110B1 (en) * | 2006-04-12 | 2013-04-22 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus and method for determining packet service reconnection time |
| US7558266B2 (en) | 2006-05-03 | 2009-07-07 | Trapeze Networks, Inc. | System and method for restricting network access using forwarding databases |
| US8966018B2 (en) | 2006-05-19 | 2015-02-24 | Trapeze Networks, Inc. | Automated network device configuration and network deployment |
| US7577453B2 (en) | 2006-06-01 | 2009-08-18 | Trapeze Networks, Inc. | Wireless load balancing across bands |
| US9191799B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2015-11-17 | Juniper Networks, Inc. | Sharing data between wireless switches system and method |
| US7912982B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2011-03-22 | Trapeze Networks, Inc. | Wireless routing selection system and method |
| US8818322B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2014-08-26 | Trapeze Networks, Inc. | Untethered access point mesh system and method |
| US9258702B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2016-02-09 | Trapeze Networks, Inc. | AP-local dynamic switching |
| US7844298B2 (en) | 2006-06-12 | 2010-11-30 | Belden Inc. | Tuned directional antennas |
| US7724704B2 (en) | 2006-07-17 | 2010-05-25 | Beiden Inc. | Wireless VLAN system and method |
| US8340110B2 (en) | 2006-09-15 | 2012-12-25 | Trapeze Networks, Inc. | Quality of service provisioning for wireless networks |
| US8072952B2 (en) | 2006-10-16 | 2011-12-06 | Juniper Networks, Inc. | Load balancing |
| US7974235B2 (en) * | 2006-11-13 | 2011-07-05 | Telecommunication Systems, Inc. | Secure location session manager |
| US7873061B2 (en) | 2006-12-28 | 2011-01-18 | Trapeze Networks, Inc. | System and method for aggregation and queuing in a wireless network |
| JP2008236079A (en) | 2007-03-16 | 2008-10-02 | Kyocera Corp | Wireless communication equipment and wireless communication method |
| WO2008122754A1 (en) * | 2007-04-05 | 2008-10-16 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Channel selection in a wireless network |
| US8902904B2 (en) | 2007-09-07 | 2014-12-02 | Trapeze Networks, Inc. | Network assignment based on priority |
| US8509128B2 (en) | 2007-09-18 | 2013-08-13 | Trapeze Networks, Inc. | High level instruction convergence function |
| US8780857B2 (en) * | 2007-10-09 | 2014-07-15 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus for mobility support between network domains |
| US8743887B2 (en) * | 2007-10-09 | 2014-06-03 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus for mobility support and IP multimedia subsystem (IMS) registration in a multimode network environment |
| KR101530806B1 (en) | 2007-11-20 | 2015-06-24 | 인터디지탈 패튼 홀딩스, 인크 | Method and apparatus of signaling and procedure for sequence hopping pattern change during handover |
| US8238942B2 (en) | 2007-11-21 | 2012-08-07 | Trapeze Networks, Inc. | Wireless station location detection |
| US8150357B2 (en) | 2008-03-28 | 2012-04-03 | Trapeze Networks, Inc. | Smoothing filter for irregular update intervals |
| US8474023B2 (en) | 2008-05-30 | 2013-06-25 | Juniper Networks, Inc. | Proactive credential caching |
| US8978105B2 (en) | 2008-07-25 | 2015-03-10 | Trapeze Networks, Inc. | Affirming network relationships and resource access via related networks |
| US8218600B2 (en) * | 2008-08-22 | 2012-07-10 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Frequency hopping network with a guaranteed handoff delay |
| US8238298B2 (en) | 2008-08-29 | 2012-08-07 | Trapeze Networks, Inc. | Picking an optimal channel for an access point in a wireless network |
| US8483129B2 (en) * | 2008-11-17 | 2013-07-09 | Xg Technology, Inc. | RTP voice packets for base station hand-off in mobile IP telephony |
| US20130121205A1 (en) * | 2009-01-26 | 2013-05-16 | Floyd Backes | Method for Selecting an Optimum Access Point in a Wireless Network on a Common Channel |
| KR101609393B1 (en) | 2009-11-19 | 2016-04-05 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Method and apparatus of allocating femto cell information for handover in a wireless communication |
| US8542836B2 (en) | 2010-12-01 | 2013-09-24 | Juniper Networks, Inc. | System, apparatus and methods for highly scalable continuous roaming within a wireless network |
| US9344935B2 (en) * | 2012-04-06 | 2016-05-17 | Suitable Technologies, Inc. | System for wireless connectivity continuity and quality |
| US9307568B2 (en) | 2012-04-06 | 2016-04-05 | Suitable Technologies, Inc. | System for wireless connectivity continuity and quality |
| US20130279472A1 (en) | 2012-04-06 | 2013-10-24 | Suitable Technologies, Inc. | System for wireless connectivity continuity and quality |
| US20130265958A1 (en) | 2012-04-06 | 2013-10-10 | Suitable Technolgies, Inc. | System for wireless connectivity continuity and quality |
| US20130279473A1 (en) | 2012-04-06 | 2013-10-24 | Suitable Technologies, Inc. | Method for wireless connectivity continuity and quality |
| US9320074B2 (en) | 2012-04-06 | 2016-04-19 | Suitable Technologies, Inc. | Method for wireless connectivity continuity and quality |
| US20130343344A1 (en) | 2012-04-06 | 2013-12-26 | Suitable Technologies, Inc. | Method for wireless connectivity continuity and quality |
| US20130265885A1 (en) | 2012-04-06 | 2013-10-10 | Suitable Technologies, Inc. | Method for wireless connectivity continuity and quality |
| US20130279411A1 (en) | 2012-04-06 | 2013-10-24 | Suitable Technologies, Inc. | Method for wireless connectivity continuity and quality |
| US20130279479A1 (en) | 2012-04-06 | 2013-10-24 | Suitable Technologies, Inc. | Method for wireless connectivity continuity and quality |
| US20130279487A1 (en) | 2012-04-06 | 2013-10-24 | Suitable Technologies, Inc. | System for wireless connectivity continuity and quality |
| US9320076B2 (en) | 2012-04-06 | 2016-04-19 | Suitable Technologies, Inc. | System for wireless connectivity continuity and quality |
| US20160164976A1 (en) | 2012-09-24 | 2016-06-09 | Suitable Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for remote presence |
| US10028160B2 (en) * | 2013-12-12 | 2018-07-17 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Network node, wireless device and methods for handling evaluation of a secondary cell for a wireless device |
| EP3700286B1 (en) * | 2015-12-08 | 2022-05-11 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Data sending method, base station, and terminal device |
| DE102017206236A1 (en) * | 2017-04-11 | 2018-10-11 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. | SPECIFIC HOPPING PATTERN FOR TELEGRAM SPLITTING |
| GB2567622B (en) | 2017-10-12 | 2022-02-09 | Airspan Ip Holdco Llc | Metrics using parameters for multiple radio configurations |
| US11714127B2 (en) | 2018-06-12 | 2023-08-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | On-chip spread spectrum characterization |
| US11146307B1 (en) * | 2020-04-13 | 2021-10-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Detecting distortion in spread spectrum signals |
| US11693446B2 (en) | 2021-10-20 | 2023-07-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | On-chip spread spectrum synchronization between spread spectrum sources |
Family Cites Families (11)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4829519A (en) * | 1987-06-09 | 1989-05-09 | Scotton Geoffrey R | Automatic cell transfer system with error rate assessment |
| US5042082A (en) * | 1989-06-26 | 1991-08-20 | Telefonaktiebolaget L. M. Ericsson | Mobile assisted handoff |
| SE466081B (en) * | 1990-04-26 | 1991-12-09 | Ericsson Telefon Ab L M | PROCEDURES FOR HANDOFFS IN A MOBILE RADIO SYSTEM |
| US5276906A (en) * | 1990-09-27 | 1994-01-04 | Motorola, Inc. | Radiotelephone system incorporating two thresholds for handoff |
| US5212806A (en) * | 1990-10-29 | 1993-05-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Distributed control methods for management of migrating data stations in a wireless communications network |
| US5181200A (en) * | 1990-10-29 | 1993-01-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Handoff method and apparatus for mobile wireless workstation |
| JP2679442B2 (en) * | 1991-04-17 | 1997-11-19 | 日本電気株式会社 | Digital mobile communication system |
| US5123029A (en) * | 1991-06-21 | 1992-06-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Broadcast-initiated bipartite frame multi-access protocol |
| US5267261A (en) * | 1992-03-05 | 1993-11-30 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Mobile station assisted soft handoff in a CDMA cellular communications system |
| US5287384A (en) * | 1992-10-15 | 1994-02-15 | Lxe Inc. | Frequency hopping spread spectrum data communications system |
| GB9226707D0 (en) * | 1992-12-22 | 1993-02-17 | Ncr Int Inc | Wireless local area network system with mobile station handover |
-
1994
- 1994-04-12 US US08/226,724 patent/US5448569A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1995
- 1995-02-10 JP JP02287895A patent/JP3202883B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1995-03-20 CA CA002145165A patent/CA2145165C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1995-04-03 DE DE69531076T patent/DE69531076T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1995-04-03 EP EP95104938A patent/EP0677940B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CA2145165A1 (en) | 1995-10-13 |
| JP3202883B2 (en) | 2001-08-27 |
| JPH07297841A (en) | 1995-11-10 |
| DE69531076T2 (en) | 2004-05-06 |
| DE69531076D1 (en) | 2003-07-24 |
| EP0677940B1 (en) | 2003-06-18 |
| EP0677940A2 (en) | 1995-10-18 |
| US5448569A (en) | 1995-09-05 |
| EP0677940A3 (en) | 1995-11-29 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2145165C (en) | Handoff monitoring in cellular communication networks using slow frequency hopping | |
| CN100508654C (en) | Dynamic frequency selection in a WLAN | |
| US5987062A (en) | Seamless roaming for wireless local area networks | |
| US6023622A (en) | Wireless communication system with dynamic channel allocation | |
| EP1156623B1 (en) | Wireless lan with load balancing | |
| US7493123B2 (en) | Integrated circuit for optimizing access point channel selection | |
| KR100291761B1 (en) | Cdma cellular radio transmission system | |
| EP0546720B1 (en) | Reduced interference through offset frequency partioning in cellular communication systems | |
| RU2521522C2 (en) | Pilot signals for use in multi-sector cells | |
| US7158759B2 (en) | Dynamic frequency selection in a wireless communication network | |
| US7016684B2 (en) | Wireless communication method and apparatus for implementing access point startup and initial channel selection processes | |
| EP0830765B1 (en) | Method of using an access point adjacency matrix to establish handoff in a wireless lan | |
| US6728540B1 (en) | Assisted handover in a wireless communication system | |
| US20060135191A1 (en) | Wireless device and wireless channel measurement controller | |
| US6490442B1 (en) | Pro-active estimation of interference signal ratio in a radiocommunication cellular network | |
| JP3389503B2 (en) | Base station equipment | |
| CN101103638B (en) | Wireless communication method and apparatus for optimizing access point channel selection | |
| JP2004320249A (en) | Radio communication system, apparatus and method for radio communicating and computer program | |
| EP0906673A1 (en) | Wireless communication system with dynamic channel allocation | |
| WO1997033394A9 (en) | Wireless communication system with dynamic channel allocation |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKLA | Lapsed | ||
| MKLA | Lapsed |
Effective date: 20100322 |