CA2116242C - Combined relative and absolute positioning method and apparatus - Google Patents

Combined relative and absolute positioning method and apparatus Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CA2116242C
CA2116242C CA002116242A CA2116242A CA2116242C CA 2116242 C CA2116242 C CA 2116242C CA 002116242 A CA002116242 A CA 002116242A CA 2116242 A CA2116242 A CA 2116242A CA 2116242 C CA2116242 C CA 2116242C
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
rps
current
vehicle
aps
loran
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
CA002116242A
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
CA2116242A1 (en
Inventor
Darrell L. Mathis
Richard F. Poppen
Kenneth A. Milnes
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
TomTom North America Inc
Original Assignee
Tele Atlas North America Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Tele Atlas North America Inc filed Critical Tele Atlas North America Inc
Publication of CA2116242A1 publication Critical patent/CA2116242A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CA2116242C publication Critical patent/CA2116242C/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01CMEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
    • G01C21/00Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in groups G01C1/00 - G01C19/00
    • G01C21/26Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in groups G01C1/00 - G01C19/00 specially adapted for navigation in a road network
    • G01C21/28Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in groups G01C1/00 - G01C19/00 specially adapted for navigation in a road network with correlation of data from several navigational instruments
    • G01C21/30Map- or contour-matching
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S19/00Satellite radio beacon positioning systems; Determining position, velocity or attitude using signals transmitted by such systems
    • G01S19/38Determining a navigation solution using signals transmitted by a satellite radio beacon positioning system
    • G01S19/39Determining a navigation solution using signals transmitted by a satellite radio beacon positioning system the satellite radio beacon positioning system transmitting time-stamped messages, e.g. GPS [Global Positioning System], GLONASS [Global Orbiting Navigation Satellite System] or GALILEO
    • G01S19/42Determining position
    • G01S19/48Determining position by combining or switching between position solutions derived from the satellite radio beacon positioning system and position solutions derived from a further system
    • G01S19/49Determining position by combining or switching between position solutions derived from the satellite radio beacon positioning system and position solutions derived from a further system whereby the further system is an inertial position system, e.g. loosely-coupled

Abstract

A navigation system (1) comprising a rela-tive positioning system (RPS) (2) with dead reckon-ing and map matching and an absolute positioning system (APS) (3) is provided and operated in such a manner that APS position information is used for updating RPS (2) position and contour of equal probability (CEP) information as required. The APS (3) may comprise a Loran-C or a global posi-tioning system (GPS). Different criteria are used for resetting the RPS (2) depending on whether or not the navigation system comprises a Loran-C or a GPS due to the different levels of precision of the Loran-C and the GPS. When the RPS (2) is reset or updated, it is updated to the current APS (3) posi-tion with its offset, if any. Its contour of equal probability (CEP) may also be adjusted.

Description

COMBINED RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE POSITIONING
METHOD AND APPARATUS
2I1~24~
BACRGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention ' The present invention relates in general to land-based vehicular navigation apparatus and in particular to a method and apparatus comprising the combination of a relative positioning system (RPS), such as a vehicular dead reckoning navigation system with map-matching .and an absolute positioning system (APS), such as a Loran-C system or a Global Positioning System (GPS), the latter systems being used to automatically reposition and recalibrate the RPS as required.
gescrigtion of Prior Art Generally, there are several methods and systems used to navigate a vehicle over land, each with its advantages and disadvantages. Examgles include a relative positioning I5 system (RPS), such as a dead reckoning system or a dead reckoning system with map matching, and an absolute positioning system (APS), such as a Loran-C system or a Global Positioning System (GPS).
A conventional dead reckoning system with map matching, such as disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,79,191, entitled Vehicle Navigational System and Method, and assigned to the assignee of the present application, has a number of advantages. It can operate in a fully self contained way, requiring no equipment outside the vehicle in which it is used. It typically has high accuracy over significant intervals of time. It is linked to an electronic map of roads which can automatically eliminate minor vehicular position errors and measurement noise and provide a graphical user display. For example, as a ~~~~~~x~ .. .
vehicle using such a system moves, onboard wheel sensors, a magnetic compass and/or other sensing means computes the vehicle's position using dead reckoning techniques. The computed position is compared frequently with an electronically stored map of roads. If the computed position does not correspond to a location on the nearest appropriate road, the system automatically corrects the vehicle's position to place it on that~nearest road.
The above-described dead reckoning navigation apparatus, however, has a number of disadvantages. One of the disadvantages is that sometimes navigation performance can degrade if the map matching relocates the vehicle's position to an incorrect road. This can occur because of an extreme anomalous magnetic~field, wheel slippage or map errors. Another disadvantage arises if the difference between the computed vehicle position and the nearest appropriate road is too large, i.e. exceeds a predetermined allowable error estimate. Under these circumstances the dead reckoning system will not update its position. Once an incorrect update has been made or the errors become too large, precision navigation may not be automatically regained without manual intervention.
Another disadvantage of conventional dead reckoning navigation apparatus is that it typically requires that the operation of the system be visually monitored by the operator and manually calibrated and that, after calibration, correct initial position information be entered manually.
Some absolute navigation systems, such as those based on reception of Loran-C or GPS signals, have the advantage of providing high precision, at least some of the time, the ability to regain high precision position information after the loss of a signal, the ability to provide correct initial position information and the capability to be automatically calibrated.
Such systems, however, also have a number of WO 93/05587 ~ PCT/US92/06442 21,~G_2~2 disadvantages. For example, signal dropouts can leave a vehicle without any navigation information beyond the position computed before the dropout. There can be an offset, such as imposed by the selective availability of GPS, as well as transmitter and receiver clock timing differences and the like which can be quite large, e.g.
hundreds of meters in the case of Loran-C. Moreover, there is no link to a map database. Thus, even if positions are plotted on a map electronically or otherwise, measurement errors, e.g. jitter, will be apparent. Also, without a link to a map database, no link to a road network is available to provide path computations and advanced user interfaces.
~L~tM~RY OF THE INVENTION
In view of the foregoing, principal objects of the present invention are a method and apparatus comprising a relative positioning system (RPS), such as the above-described dead reckoning system with map matching and an absolute positioning system (APS), such as Loran-C or GPS, which are combined in a way to use their advantages while minimizing their disadvantages.
An important feature of the RPS of the present invention is that it provides information on the validity of the RPS position information, such as a "lost" flag indicator as well as an RPS contour of equal probability (CEP) which is a measure of the precision of the RFS. Both of these features are used to advantage in operating the combined RPS and APS of the present invention.
While the combined RPS and APS of the present invention is not fully self-contained, i.e. wholly onboard the vehicle, it can operate in a self-contained mode and thereby eliminate the signal dropout disadvantage of a pure absolute positioning system while maintaining the high apparent accuracy of a map matching relative positioning system. Hy using the absolute position information of the APS, the system of the present invention has the ability to 2i~.~242 _ automatically reposition the RPS and its CEP if map matching update errors occur or if large errors occur.
Moreover the automatic calibration of the APS can be used to automatically calibrate the RPS and thereby increase its accuracy and to compute a correction that can eliminate APS
offsets and thus eliminate the need for operator intervention.
The present invention accomplishes the above advantages and others by using the absolute navigation apparatus to provide update information when the dead reckoning and map matching system determines that it has made an update error and/or is lost, e.g. generates a "lost" flag indicator, or the difference in position computed by the RPS and APS exceeds predetermined limits.
Specifically, when the dead reckoning and map matching system is updating to the correct road the combined system will perform with the accuracy of map matching without the need for operator intervention.
During the operation of the combined system, the AP
portion of the system is continuously monitored to check for error conditions which the receiver can detect and for stability. This typically includes an evaluation of various statistical parameters. The APS's position information is considered valid if it passes certain checks. In addition, the difference between the APS's position and the RPS's position is monitored over time to calculate an average offset. This average offset is updated periodically as long as the RPS's position is judged to be valid.
When the RPS's position is judged to be invalid, e:g.
due to an improper update or the lack of an update over a long distance, and/or a "host" flag indicator is generated and the current APS's position information is judged to be valid, a new vehicle RPS position and RPS CEP is computed from the current APS's position and the calculated offset.
If the RPS continues to provide invalid updates the above _ 5 _ process is repeated. Eventually, the vehicle will leave the conditions, e.g. extreme magnetic anomaly, tire slippage, or the like, that caused the problem. During the time of the problem, the errors are bounded by the accuracy of the APS. Beyond the problem time, the APS updates enable the RPS to automatically regain map matching performance. On the other hand, if the APS's receiver loses the signal the system still is able to use the RPS
positions.
A further advantage of the present invention is that it does not assign a weight to the current position information obtained from the RPS and the APS so as to compute a current position in between as is typically done in prior known navigation systems. Thus, the present invention either retains the current RPS position information and CEP or updates the current RPS position information and CEP to the current APS position information, including any offset, if the latter is deemed to be more accurate.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The above and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the accompanying drawings in which:
Fig 1. is a block diagram of a navigation system according to the present invention;
Fig. 2 is a diagram illustrating contours of equal probability (CEP) for an APS and an RPS;
Fig. 3 is a flow diagram of a method of operating a navigation system comprising a relative positioning system (RPS) and an absolute positioning system (APS) according to the present invention;
Fig. 4 is a flow diagram of statistical tests of validity for a Loran-C navigation system according to the present invention;
Fig. 5 is a table for computing a GPS CEP according to the gresent invention; and Fig. 6 is a table for computing a GPS area of uncertainty according to the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRTPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Referring to Fig. 1, there is provided in accordance with the present invention a navigation system designated generally as 1. In the system 1 there is provided a relative positioning system (RPS) 2 and an absolute positioning system (APS) receiver 3. The RPS 2 comprises a conventional dead-reckoning navigation system with map matching such as disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,796,191. The APS 3 comprises a conventional Loran-C or Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver. The APS receiver 3 is linked to ground-based transmitters or space-based satellite transmitters by means of an antenna 4.
In the RPS 2 there is provided a register 5 for storing and reporting RPS computed positions of a vehicle, typically in terms of latitude and longitude, a register 6 for storing RPS error estimate information (RPS CEP) associated with the RPS computed positions of a vehicle and a register 7 for storing RPS validity information, such as a "lost" flag indicator when the RPS computes it is lost.
In the APS 3 there is provided a register 8 for storing and reporting APS computed positions of a vehicle, typically in terms of latitude and longitude, a register 9 for storing an APS error estimate, sometimes identified as a dilution of position error estimate factor (DOP) associated with the APS computed positions of a vehicle, and a register 10 for storing APS validity information, such as an APS indicator indicating that the APS position information should 'or should not be relied on. The contents of the registers 5-10 are processed in a microprocessor 11, or the like, for providing outputs to registers 5 and 6 for updating the current RPS computed position of a vehicle and RPS CEP
data, as will be further described below. It may be noted, however, that the RPS 2 and/or the APS 3 or parts thereof Y WO 93/05587 2 ~ ~ ~ 2 ~
may be embodied within the microprocessor 11. That is, the microprocessor 11 can also be used to perform RPS and APS
computations.
As described above, the RPS computed position of a vehicle and the APS computed position of a vehicle each has associated therewith a contour of equal probability (CEP) and/or a dilution of precision of position error (DOP).
The DOP is a dimensionless factor, the magnitude of which depends on the arrangement of GPS transmitters used for obtaining a reported GPS position and its direction from the reported position. It is the factor by which a CEP, described below, associated with an ideal arrangement of APS signal transmitters is modified as a result of a less than ideal arrangement of said transmitters. For example, if the arrangement of transmitters used for obtaining a reported position is ideal, by definition, DOP
may be set equal to 1 in all c'irections from the reported position. If, on the other hand, the arrangement of transmitters used for obtaining a reported position is less than ideal, the magnitude of DOP may be equal to 1.3 in one direction from the reported position and may be equal to 2.0 in a direction 90 degrees therefrom.
Associated with and surrounding each reported APS and RPS position there is a probability distribution. The contour of equal probability (CEP) is a contour chosen so that the probability associated with the area inside the contour is some fixed fraction, e.g. 95~, of the probability distribution. For purposes of simplifying the mathematical computations, the CEP may be chosen to~be an ellipse, a rectangle, a parallelogram, or some other shape.
In general, the CEP associated with current position information from an RPS and an APS is a measure of the reliability, stability and precision of the RPS and the APS.
Referring to Fig. 2, there is shown a pair of box-shaped areas defined by the lines E1 and E2, a dot E3 and ~~~.6~42 -an arrowhead E4. The box-shaped area El represents the CEP
or contour of equal probability of a vehicle's position as determined by the APS. The box-shaped area E2 represents the CEP or contour of equal probability of the position of a vehicle as computed by the RPS. The dot E3 and arrowhead E4 represent the APS and RPS reported postions of a vehicle, respectively. Depending upon the validity, reliability, precision and stability, of the APS, the vehicle's RPS computed position may be relocated to correspond to the position given by the APS and any associated offset and its RPS CEP set to equal the CEP of the APS or some fraction or multiple thereof , as will be further described below.
Referring to Fig. 3, there is shown a flow diagram of a method of operating the navigation system of Fig. 1 . according to the present invention. As described above, in the navigation system 1 there is provided a relative positioning system (RPS) and an absolute position system (APS). In the RPS there is included a means for providing map-matching and current RPS position information. The RPS
position information includes the current RPS computed position of a vehicle, an indication of whether or not said current RPS position information is valid, e.g. an RPS
"lost" flag indicator when said RPS computes it is lost, and an RPS position error estimate (RPS CEP). The APS
includes a means for providing current APS position informa*ion. The APS position information includes the current APS computed position of a vehicle, an indication of whether or not said current APS position information is valid and a dilution of precision of position error factor (DOP). As will be seen the DOP is closely related to contours of equal probability (CEP).
In operating the navigation system according to the present invention current RPS position information and current APS position information is acquired from the RPS
and APS (Blocks 20,21). The current RPS position 'JHO 93/05587 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PGT/US92/06442 _ g _ information includes the current computed RPS position of a vehicle, an RPS validity indicator, for example, a "lost"
flag indicator, when said RPS computes it is lost, and an RPS position error estimate (RPS CEP). The APS position information includes the current computed APS position of a vehicle, an indication of whether or not said current APS
position information is valid and a dilution of precision of position error factor (DOP). After acquiring the current RPS and APS position information, the system checks the indication of whether or not said current APS
information is valid (Block 22). If the current APS
position information is not valid, the system waits for a predetermined interval of time, e.g. two seconds, (Block 23) then acquires the then current or new RPS and APS
position information (Block 20,21). If the then current APS position information is valid, the system computes an APS error estimate (APS CEP) which is equal to a function fl of APS validity and APS DOP (Block 24). At this time APS and RPS areas W1 and W2 which are centered about the reported APS and RPS positions of the vehicle, respectively, are also computed (Blocks 25,26). The magnitude of the APS area W1 is equal to a function W1 of APS validity, APS CEP, and RPS validity. The magnitude of the RPS area W2 is equal to a function W2 of RPS validity, RPS CEP and APS validity. It may be noted that, depending on the magnitude and/or nature of the factors on which they depend, either the APS area W1 or the RPS area W2 may comprise an area of zero extent, i . a . be a single point, namely, the APS or RPS reported position of the vehicle.
In this case, the question, "do the areas overlap?" (Block 27) means, "is the APS (or RPS) point (position of the vehicle) contained within the RPS (or APS) area?"
After the APS and RPS areas W1 and W2 are computed, a check is made to determine if the RPS area W2 overlaps the APS area W1 (Block 27). If it does, as shown in Fig. 2, it is assumed that the RPS does not require correction and the WO 93/05587 21 1 s 2 4 ~ . .

system 1 is operated to.wait said predetermined interval of time (Block 23) and then acquire the then current or new RPS and APS position information ( Blocks 20, 21 ) . If , on ~ the other hand, the RPS area does not overlap the APS area, the system 1 sets the current RPS computed position of the vehicle to correspond to the current APS computed position of a vehicle and sets the RPS CEP equal,to a function f2 of APS validity, APS DOP and RPS validity (Block 28), waits for said predetermined interval of time ( Block 23 ) and then acquires the then current RPS and APS position information (Blocks 20,21).
In Block 22 of Fig. 3 the validity of the APS position information is checked and it may be noted that a number of statistical tests can be used to validate the APS input .
The choice of which tests to apply will in general depend on the characteristics of the APS receiver, e.g. a Loran-C, a Global Positioning System (GPS) and the like.
Referring to Fig. 4, there is provided a flow diagram which illustrates a possible selection of statistical tests for an APS such as a Loran receiver.
Block 31 checks that the reported DOP is less than a value that is a function of the data collected from the receiver, such as signal to noise ratio. In its simplest form the value may be a constant . For example, in the case of a Loran receiver that reports DOP in terms of an accuracy number in feet, this constant may be 1000 feet.
It may also be a dimensionless number.
Block 32 checks that the displacement between the current reported position and past reported positions is bounded bar a value that is a function of data collected from both the APS and RPS systems . This value may be a simple constant that is the maximum displacement between consecutive values of the APS system. For example, it may be 3000 feet. The bound could also be placed on the displacement between the current position and the average position of a number of past samples of the APS system.

WO 93/05587 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PGT/US92/06442 The bound could also take into account the velocity of the vehicle since the last sample and calculate a bound that represents the maximum displacement plus variability that could be expected in the APS position.
Block 33 .checks that the variance (or standard deviation) of the offsets between the APS and RPS positions over a certain number of recent samp~,es is bounded by a value that is a function of the data collected from the APS
and RPS systems. For example, this bound could be 500 feet on standard deviation over the most recent 16 samples.
Block 34 checks that current offset between the APS
position and the RPS position is reasonable given a certain number of recent samples. In general, the current sample should conform to the expected probability distribution of offset samples. For example, if the probability distribution is assumed to be normal about a mean or average value m with standard deviation s, then one could require that the current offset value fall within a three-standard-deviation range of the mean; that is, that abs(o-m) < 3*s where abs is the absolute value function and o is the current offset. Here the value s could be based, a priori, on the probability distribution or it could be computed from the recent sample data. In the latter case, s would change dynamically as the current data changed. Other probability models could be used, depending on what is known about the receiver. In any case, the current offset is validated against the recent data for consistent and expected behavior.
Block 35 checks that the current offset between the APS and RPS systems is bounded by a value that is a function of the data collected from the APS and RPS
systems. An unreasonably large value for the offset could indicate a failure of the APS receiver to provide accurate position data. The bound that is placed on the offset may depend on many factors, such as signal to noise ratios, 23.I~242 DOP, etc. In its simplest form the bound could be a constant, for example 1 mile.
In the case of a GPS, the current position information is considered valid if at least three satellites were available to acquire the information.
The functions illustrated in Blocks 25, 26 and 28 of Fig. 3 depend on RPS validity, e.g. the validity of a dead reckoning navigation system with map matching. The validity of the RPS is generally a function of whether or not the RPS computes it is lost, i . a . generates a "lost "
flag indicator. In a dead reckoning system with map matching, the "lost" flag indicator is typically generated if, while attempting several times to reposition a vehicle to a road, the dead reckoning system is unable to locate an appropriate road which passes through its CEP or area W2.
For example, an appropriate road would be one that extends substantially parallel to the vehicle's direction of travel and is near to the vehicle's computed position. Under these conditions, a "lost" flag indicator typically will be generated.
The importance of the presence or absence of an RPS
"lost" flag indicator depends on whether the navigation system comprises a Loran-C or a GPS.
At present, Loran-C signal transmission is subject to geographical terrain and other factors which frequently render the position information obtained therefrom unreliable. Accordingly, in the absence of a "lost" flag indicator from the RPS, a system of the present invention comprising a Loran-C will ignore the Loran-C position information and not relocate the RPS. This is done 'by setting the size of the Loran-C area W1 (Block 25) to infinity, thus insuring that the RPS area W2 will always overlap the APS area W1 (Block 27).
Referring to Block 24, in a navigation system according to the present invention comprising a Loran-C, the computed Loran-C CEP (Block 24) is typically the WO 93/05587 PCf/US92/06442 132~.~6~~2 product of a constant, e.g. 100 feet, and the Loran-C DOP.
As noted above, some Loran-C receivers report DOP in units of distance, e.g. feet or meters. This means that such receivers are already reporting an error estimate CEP
rather than true DOP. In such cases, the computing of the Loran-C CEP (Block 24) would be adjusted accordingly.
Referring to Block 28 of Fig. 3, past offsets in the Loran-C position information are used to update the RPS
computed position of a vehicle. In practice, three sets of the most recent Loran-C offsets are stored. Typically, each set comprises a predetermined number of previous Loran-C offsets, e.g. 30. When the RPS provides a "lost"
flag indicator, the average offset in the third previous set of Loran-C offsets is used to relocate the RPS computed position of the vehicle. The reason the third previous set of Loran-C offsetes is used is because it is believed that it comprises more accurate position information than the most recent Loran-C position information. With respect to the resetting of the RPS CEP, the function f2 is typically made equal to the function fl in Block 24 so that after relocating the vehicle, the Loran-C CEP and the RPS CEP are the same.
In navigation systems comprising a GPS, the setting of the GPS CEP and the GPS area Wl is considerably more complex than in the less precise Loran-C systems.
Referring to Fig. 5, there is shown a table for computing a GPS CEP (Block 24) as a function of the number of satellites available in acquiring the GPS position of tt~e vehicle. As shown in Fig. 5, if the number of satellites available is less than three, the function f~ is infinity. If the number of satellites is equal to three, the function fl is equal to the product of a first predetermined number, e.g. 60 meters, and GPS DOP. If the number of satellites available is greater than three, the GPS CEP is equal to the product of a second predetermined number, e.g. 30 meters, and GPS DOP. This means that when ~11~2~~
1~ -the number of available satellites exceeds three, the GPS
area W1 can be reduced because of the increased precision and reliability of the GPS position information.
Referring to Fig. 6, there is shown a table illustrating the function W1 of GPS validity, GPS CEP and RPS validity. As seen in Fig. 6, if the number of satellites available for obtaining the GPS position information is less than three, the GPS area W1 is infinite when the RPS is lost and when the RPS is not lost. When the number of satellites is equal to three, the GPS area W1 is infinite when the RPS is not lost and is equal to the GPS CEP as determined from the table in Fig. 5 when the RPS
is lost. When the number of satellites is greater than three, the GPS area W1 is Vequal to the GPS CEP as determined from the table in Fig. 5 when the RPS is lost and is twice the GPS CEP when the RPS is not lost. While specific figures have been given for computing the GPS CEP
and the GPS area W1, it should be understood that the magnitudes of fl and W1 can and should be changed from the magnitudes described, depending on the relative precision and reliability of the GPS and RPS systems being used.
Referring to Block 26 in a typical GPS embodiment, the RPS area W2 comprises an area of zero extent, that is, the function W2 is set to a point, i.e. the RPS position of the vehicle. .
Referring to Block 28 in a typical GPS embodiment, the function f2 is typically made equal to the function W1 of Block 25.
While a preferred embodiment of the present invention is described above, it is contemplated that numerous modifications may be made thereto for particular applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. For example, the magnitude or size of the APS CEP, the APS area W1, the RPS area w2 and the setting of the RPS CEP after a relocation of the RPS
position all depend variously on APS validity, APS CEP/DOP, WO 93/05587 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PCT/US92/06442 -' 15 -RPS validity and RPS CEP . Each of these factors can be changed depending on the APS and RPS systems employed and on the level of performance desired. Accordingly, it is intended that the embodiment described be considered only as illustrative of the present invention and that the scope thereof should not be limited thereto but be determined by reference to the claims hereinafter provided.

Claims (57)

1. A method of operating a navigation system comprising a relative positioning system (RPS), said RPS
including means for dead reckoning with map matching, and an absolute positioning system (APS) comprising the steps of:

a. acquiring current RPS position information, including information on the validity of the RPS position information, from the RPS;

b. acquiring current APS position information, including information on the validity of the APS position information, from the APS;

c. evaluating the RPS and the APS position information acquired in said steps (a) and (b);

d. updating the RPS position information such that the updated RPS position information is based on the then current APS position information without regard to the then current RPS position information if required by the results of said step (c); and e. repeating said steps (a) through (d).
2. A method of operating a navigation system comprising a relative positioning system (RPS), said RPS
including means for dead reckoning with map matching, and an absolute positioning system (APS) comprising the steps of:

a. acquiring current RPS position information, including information on the positional uncertainty of the RPS position information, from the RPS;

b. acquiring current APS position information, including information on the positional uncertainty of the APS position information, from the APS;

c. evaluating the RPS and the APS position information acquired in said steps (a) and (b);

d. updating the RPS position information such that the updated RPS position information is based on the then current APS position information without regard to the then current RPS position information if required by the results of said step (c); and e. repeating said steps (a) through (d).
3. A method according to claim 1 comprising the step of:
f. repeating said steps (a) through (c) if the APS
position information is not valid.
4. A method according to claim 1 comprising the step of:
f. relocating the current RPS position of the vehicle to the current APS position of the vehicle if the APS position information is valid.
5. A method according to claim 1 comprising the step of:
f. computing an offset between the RPS position of a vehicle and the APS position of a vehicle; and wherein said step (d) comprises the step of:

g. relocating the current RPS position of the vehicle to the current APS position of the vehicle including the offset computed in step (f) if the APS
position information is valid.
6. A method according to claim 1 wherein said step (c) comprises the step of:

f. generating a signal indicating that the current APS position information is valid when:

i. the APS receiver reports that the current reported position of a vehicle is valid;

ii. the current offset between the APS reported position of a vehicle and the current RPS reported position of a vehicle is within a predetermined multiple of the variance of a predetermined number of previous offsets; and iii. the current offset between the current APS
position of a vehicle and the current RPS position of the vehicle is less than a predetermined magnitude.
7. A method according to claim 1 wherein said step (a) comprises the steps of:
f. acquiring the current RPS position of a vehicle;
and g. acquiring information on the positional uncertainty of the RPS position position of a vehicle;
said step (b) comprises the steps of:

h. acquiring the current APS position of a vehicle;
and i. acquiring information on the positional uncertainty of the APS position of a vehicle; and said step (d) comprises the steps of:

j. relocating the current RPS position of the vehicle to the current APS position of the vehicle; and k. setting the RPS positional uncertainty of the vehicle to a function f2 of APS validity, APS positional uncertainty of the vehicle, and RPS validity.
8. A method according to claim 1 wherein said step (a) comprises the steps of:

f. acquiring the current RPS position of a vehicle;
and g. acquiring the RPS contour of equal probability (CEP);
said step (b) comprises the steps of:

h. acquiring the current APS position of a vehicle;
and i. acquiring the APS dilution of precision (DOP);
and said step (d) comprises the steps of:

j. relocating the current RPS position of the vehicle to the current APS position of the vehicle; and k. setting the RPS contour of equal probability (CEP) equal to a function f2 of APS validity, APS dilution of precision error factor (DOP), and RPS validity.
9. A method according to claim 1 wherein said step (a) comprises the steps of:

f. acquiring the RPS position of a vehicle; and g. acquiring the RPS contour of equal probability (CEP);
said step (b) comprises the steps of:

h. acquiring the APS position of a vehicle; and i. acquiring the APS dilution of precision (DOP);
said step (c) comprises the steps of:

j. computing an APS CEP as a function f1 of APS
validity and an APS dilution of precision error factor (DOP);
k. computing an APS area W1 as a function of APS
validity, the APS CEP, and the RPS validity;

l. computing an RPS area W2 as a function of RPS
validity, RPS CEP, and APS validity; and m. evaluating whether the RPS area W2 overlaps the APS area W1; and said step (d) comprises the steps of:

n. repeating said steps (a) through (m) when the RPS area W2 overlaps the APS area W1; and o. relocating the current RPS position of a vehicle to the current APS position of a vehicle if the RPS area W2 does not overlap the APS area W1; and p. setting the RPS CEP to a function f2 of APS
validity, APS DOP, and RPS validity if the RPS area W2 does not overlap the APS area W1.
10. A method according to claim 6 wherein said step (o) comprises the steps of:

q. computing an offset between the RPS position of a vehicle and the APS position of a vehicle; and r. relocating the current RPS position of the vehicle to the current APS position of the vehicle including the offset computed in said step (q).
11. A method of operating a navigation system comprising a relative positioning system (RPS), said RPS
including means for dead reckoning with map matching, and a Loran-C comprising the steps of:

a. acquiring current RPS position information, including information on the validity of the RPS position information, from the RPS;

b. acquiring current Loran-C position information, including information on the validity of the Loran-C
position information, from the Loran-C;

c. evaluating the RPS and the Loran-C position information acquired in said steps (a) and (b);

d. updating the RPS position information such that the updated RPS position information is based on the then current Loran-C position information without regard to the then current RPS position information if required by the results of said step (c); and e. repeating said steps (a) through (d).
12. A method of operating a navigation system comprising a relative positioning system (RPS), said RPS
including means for dead reckoning with map matching, and a Loran-C comprising the steps of:

a. acquiring current RPS position information, including information on the positional uncertainty of the RPS position information, from the RPS;

b. acquiring current Loran-C position information, including information on the positional uncertainty of the Loran-C position information, from the Loran-C;

c. evaluating the RPS and the Loran-C position information acquired in said steps (a) and (b);

d. updating the RPS position information such that the updated RPS position information is based on the then current Loran-C position information without regard to the then current RPS position information if required by the results of said step (c); and e. repeating said steps (a) through (d).
13. A method according to claim 11 comprising the step of:

f. repeating said steps (a) through (c) if the Loran-C
position information is not valid.
14. A method according to claim 11 comprising the step of:

f. relocating the current RPS position of the vehicle to the current Loran-C position of the vehicle if the Loran-C position information is valid.
15. A method according to claim 11 comprising the step of:

f. computing an offset between the RPS position of a vehicle and the Loran-C position of a vehicle; and wherein said step (d) comprises the step of:

g. relocating the current RPS position of the vehicle to the current Loran-C position of the vehicle including the offset computed in step (f) if the Loran-C
position information is valid.
16. A method according to claim 11 wherein said step (c) comprises the step of:

f. generating a signal indicating that the current Loran-C position information is valid when:

i. the Loran-C receiver reports that the current reported position of a vehicle is valid;

ii. the current offset between the Loran-C
reported position of a vehicle and the current RPS
reported position of a vehicle is within a predetermined multiple of the variance of a predetermined number of previous offsets; and iii. the current offset between the current Loran-C position of a vehicle and the current RPS
position of the vehicle is less than a predetermined magnitude.
17. A method according to claim 11 wherein said step (a) comprises the steps of:

f. acquiring the current RPS position of a vehicle;
and g. acquiring information on the positional uncertainty of the RPS position position of a vehicle;
said step (b) comprises the steps of:

h. acquiring the current Loran-C position of a vehicle; and i. acquiring information on the positional uncertainty of the Loran-C position of a vehicle; and said step (d) comprises the steps of:

j. relocating the current RPS position of the vehicle to the current Loran-C position of the vehicle; and k. setting the RPS positional uncertainty of the vehicle to a function f2 of Loran-C validity, Loran-C
positional uncertainty of the vehicle, and RPS validity.
18. A method according to claim 1 wherein said step (b) comprises the step of:

f. acquiring current Loran-C position information, including information on the validity of the Loran-C
position information, from a Loran-C; and said step (c) comprises the step of:

g. generating a signal indicating that the current Loran-C position information is valid when:

i. the Loran-C receiver reports that the current reported position of a vehicle is valid;

ii. the current offset between the Loran-C
reported position of a vehicle and the current RPS
reported position of a vehicle is within a predetermined multiple of the variance of a predetermined number of previous offsets; and iii. the current offset between the current Loran-C position of a vehicle and the current RPS
position of the vehicle is less than a predetermined magnitude; and h. generating a signal indicating whether or not the RPS is lost; and said step (d) comprises the step of:
i. relocating the current RPS position of a vehicle to the Loran-C position of the vehicle when the Loran-C
position information is reported to be valid and the RPS is reported as lost.
19. A method according to claim 1 wherein said step (b) comprises the step of:
f. acquiring current Loran-C position information, including information on the validity of the Loran-C
position information, from a Loran-C receiver; and said step (c) comprises the step of:
g. generating a signal indicating that the APS
position information is valid when:
i. the Loran-C receiver reports that the current reported position of a vehicle is valid;
ii. the current offset between the Loran-C
reported position of a vehicle is within three (3) times the variance of a predetermined number of previous offsets; and iii. the current offset between the current Loran-C position of a vehicle and the current RPS
position of the vehicle is less than 1000 feet; and h. generating a signal indicating whether or not the RPS is lost; and said step (d) comprises the step of:
i. relocating the current RPS position of a vehicle to the Loran-C position of the vehicle when the Loran-C
position information is reported to be valid and the RPS is reported as lost.
20. A method according to claim 1 wherein said step (a) comprises the steps of:
f. acquiring the RPS position of a vehicle; and g. acquiring the RPS contour of equal probability (CEP);
said step (b) comprises the steps of:
h. acquiring the Loran-C position of a vehicle; and i. acquiring the Loran-C dilution of precision (DOP);
said step (c) comprises the steps of:
j. computing a Loran-C CEP as,a function f1 of Loran-C validity and a Loran-C dilution of precision error factor (DOP);
k. computing a Loran-C area W1 as a function of Loran-C validity, the Loran-C CEP, and the RPS validity;
l. computing an RPS area W2 as a function of RPS
validity, RPS CEP, and Loran-C validity; and m. evaluating whether the RPS area W2 overlaps the Loran-C area W1; and said step (d) comprises the steps of:
n. repeating said steps (a) through (m) when the RPS
area W2 overlaps the Loran-C area W1 and o. relocating the current RPS position of a vehicle to the current Loran-C position of a vehicle if the RPS
area W2 does not overlap the Loran-C area W1; and p. setting the RPS CEP to a function f2 of Loran-C
validity, Loran-C DOP, and RPS validity if the RPS area W2 does not overlap the Loran-C area W1.
21. A method according to claim 20 wherein said step (j) comprises the step of:
q. computing a Loran-C CEP as a function of the product of a predetermined constant and the Loran-C DOP.
22. A method according to claim 20 wherein said step (k) and said step (l) comprise the step of:
q. computing Loran-C area W1 and RPS area W2 of zero extent, respectively.
23. A method according to claim 20 wherein said step (p) comprises the step of:
q. setting the RPS CEP to a function f2 which is equal to the funciton f1 of step (j).
24. A method of operating a navigation system comprising a relative positioning system (RPS), said RPS
including means for dead reckoning with map matching, and a Global Position System (GPS) comprising the steps of:
a. acquiring current RPS position information, including information on the validity of the RPS position information, from the RPS;
b. acquiring current GPS position information, including information on the validity of the GPS position information, from the GPS;
c. evaluating the RPS and the GPS position information acquired in said steps (a) and (b);
d. updating the RPS position information such that the updated RPS position information is based on the then current GPS position information without regard to the then current RPS position information if required by the results of said step (c); and e. repeating said steps (a) through (d).
25. A method of operating a navigation system comprising a relative positioning system (RPS), said RPS
including means for dead reckoning with map matching, and a Global Positioning System (GPS) comprising the steps of:
a. acquiring current RPS position information, including information on the positional uncertainty of the RPS position information, from the RPS;
b. acquiring current GPS position information, including information on the positional uncertainty of the GPS position information, from the GPS;
c. evaluating the RPS and the GPS position information acquired in said steps (a) and (b);
d. updating the RPS position information such that the updated RPS position information is based on the then current GPS position information without regard to the then current RPS position information if required by the results of said step (c); and e. repeating said steps (a) through (d).
26. A method according to claim 24 comprising the step of:
f. repeating said steps (a) through (c) if the GPS
position information is not valid.
27. A method according to claim 25 comprising the step of:
f. relocating the current RPS position of the vehicle to the current GPS position of the vehicle if the GPS position information is valid.
28. A method according to claim 24 comprising the step of:
f. computing an offset between the RPS position of a vehicle and the GPS position of a vehicle; and wherein said step (d) comprises the step of:
g. relocating the current RPS position of the vehicle to the current GPS position of the vehicle including the offset computed in step (f) if the GPS
position information is valid.
29. A method according to claim 24 wherein said step (c) comprises the step of:
f. generating a signal indicating that the current GPS position information is valid when:
i. the GPS receiver reports that the current reported position of a vehicle is valid;
ii. the current offset between the GPS reported position of a vehicle and the current RPS reported position of a vehicle is within a predetermined multiple of the variance of a predetermined number of previous offsets; and iii. the current offset between the current GPS
position of a vehicle and the current RPS position of the vehicle is less than a predetermined magnitude.
30. A method according to claim 24 wherein said step (a) comprises the steps of:
f. acquiring the current RPS position of a vehicle;
and g. acquiring information on the positional uncertainty of the RPS position position of a vehicle;
said step (b) comprises the steps of:
h. acquiring the current GPS position of a vehicle;
and i. acquiring information on the positional uncertainty of the GPS position of a vehicle; and said step (d) comprises the steps of:
j. relocating the current RPS position of the vehicle to the current GPS position of the vehicle; and k. setting the RPS positional uncertainty of the vehicle to a function f2 of GPS validity, GPS positional uncertainty of the vehicle, and RPS validity.
31. A method according to claim 1 wherein said step (a) comprises the steps of:
f. acquiring the RPS position of a vehicle; and g. acquiring the RPS contour of equal probability (CEP);
said step (b) comprises the steps of:
h. acquiring the Global Positioning System (GPS) position of a vehicle; and i. acquiring the GPS dilution of precision (DOP);
said step (c) comprises the steps of:
j. computing a GPS CEP as a function f1 of GPS
validity and a GPS dilution of precision error factor (DOP);
k. computing a GPS area W1 as a function of GPS
validity, the GPS CEP, and the RPS validity;
l. computing an RPS area W2 as a function of RPS
validity, RPS CEP, and GPS validity; and m. evaluating whether the RPS area W2 overlaps the GPS area W1; and said step (d) comprises the steps of:
n. repeating said steps (a) through (m) when the RPS
area W2 overlaps the GPS area W1 and o. relocating the current RPS position of a vehicle to the current GPS position of a vehicle if the RPS area W2 does not overlap the GPS area W1; and p. setting the RPS CEP to a function f2 of GPS
validity, GPS DOP, and RPS validity if the RPS area W2 does not overlap the GPS area W.
32. A method according to claim 1 wherein said step (c) comprises the step of:
s. generating a signal indicating that the GPS
position information is invalid when less than three satellites are used to acquire it and valid when three or more satellites are used to acquire it.
33. A method according to claim 31 wherein said step (j) comprises the step of:
s. computing a GPS CEP as a function f1 of the number of satellites used in said step (h).
34. A method according to claim 33 wherein said step (j) comprises the step of:
q. computing a GPS CEP as a function of f1 where f1 is:
i. infinity when the number of satellites is less than 3;
ii. equal to the product of a first predetermined number and the GPS DOP when the number of satellites is equal to 3; and iii. equal to the product of a second predetermined number and the GPS DOP when the number of satellites is qreater than 3.
35. A method according to claim 31 wherein said step (c) comprises the step of:
q. acquiring an indication of whether or not said RPS is lost or not lost;
said step (j) comprises the step of:
r. computing a (GPS) CEP as a function f1 of the number of satellites used in said step (h); and said step (k) comprises the step of:
s. computing a GPS area W1 as a function of W1 where W1 is:
i. infinity when the number of satellites is less than 3 and there is an indication that the RPS is lost;
ii. infinity when the number of satellites is less than 3 and there is an indication that the RPS is not lost;
iii. equal to the GPS CEP when the number of satellites is equal to three and there is an indication that the RPS is lost;
iv. infinity when the number of satellites is equal to three and there is an indication that the RPS
is not lost;
v. equal to the GPS CEP when the number of satellites is greater than three and there is an indication that the RPS is lost; and vi. equal to twice the GPS CEP when the number of satellites is greater than three and there is an indication that the RPS is not lost.
36. A method according to claim 31 wherein said step (l) comprises the step of:
q. computing an RPS area W2 of zero extent.
37. A method according to claim 31 wherein said step (p) comprises the step of:
q. setting a GPS CEP to a function f2 where f2 is equal to the GPS area W1.
38. A navigation system comprising a relative positioning system (RPS), said RPS including means for dead reckoning with map matching, and an absolute positioning system (APS) comprising:
means for acquiring current RPS position information, including information on the validity of the RPS position information, from the RPS;
means for acquiring current APS position information, including information on the validity of the APS position information, from the APS;
means for evaluating said RPS and said APS position information; and means for updating the RPS position information such that the updated RPS position information is based on the then current APS position information without regard to the then current RPS position information if required by said evaluating means.
39. A system according to claim 38 wherein said means for evaluating comprises:
means for acquiring new RPS and APS position information if the current APS position information is not valid.
40. A system according to claim 38 wherein said updating means comprises:
means for relocating the current RPS position of the vehicle to the current APS position of the vehicle if the APS position information is valid.
41. A system according to claim 38 wherein said means for evaluating comprises:
means for computing an offset between the RPS position of a vehicle and the APS position of a vehicle;
and said means for updating comprises:
means for relocating the current RPS position of the vehicle to the current APS position of the vehicle including said offset if the APS position information is valid.
42. A method according to claim 38 wherein said means for acquiring said current RPS position information comprises:
means for acquiring the current RPS position of a vehicle; and means for acquiring the RPS contour of equal probability (CEP);
said means for acquiring current APS position information comprises:
means for acquiring the current APS position of a vehicle; and means for acquiring the APS dilution of precision (DOP); and said updating means comprises:
means for relocating the current RPS position of the vehicle to the current APS position of the vehicle; and means for setting the RPS contour of equal probability (CEP) equal to a function f2 of APS validity, APS dilution of precision error factor (DOP), and RPS validity.
43. A system according to claim 38 wherein said means for acquiring said current RPS position information comprises:
means for acquiring the RPS position of a vehicle; and means for acquiring the RPS contour of equal probability (CEP);
said means for acquiring current APS position information comprises means for acquiring the APS position of a vehicle; and means for acquiring the APS dilution of precision (DOP);
said evaluating means comprises:
means for computing an APS CEP as a function f1 of APS

validity and an APS dilution of precision error factor (DOP);
means for computing an APS area W1 as a function of APS validity, the APS CEP, and the RPS validity;
means for computing an RPS area W2 as a function of RPS validity, RPS CEP, and APS validity; and means for evaluating whether the RPS area W2 overlaps the APS area W1; and said updating means comprises the steps of:
means for acquiring new RPS and APS position information when the RPS area W2 overlaps the APS area W1 and means for relocating the current RPS position of a vehicle to the current APS position of a vehicle if said RPS area W2 does not overlap the APS area W1; and means for setting the RPS CEP to a function f2 of APS
validity, APS DOP, and RPS validity if the RPS area W2 does not overlap the APS area W1.
44. A system according to claim 43 wherein said relocating means comprises:
means for computing an offset between the RPS position of a vehicle and the APS position of a vehicle; and means for relocating the current RPS position of the vehicle to the current APS position of the vehicle including said offset.
45. A system according to claim 38 wherein said means for acquiring current APS position information comprises:
means for acquiring current Loran-C position information from a Loran-C; and said evaluating means comprises:
means for generating a signal indicating that the current Loran-C position information is valid when:
i. the Loran-C receiver reports that the current reported position of a vehicle is valid;

ii. the current offset between the Loran-C
reported position of a vehicle and the current RPS
reported position of a vehicle is within a predetermined multiple of the variance of a predetermined number of previous offsets; and iii. the current offset between the current Loran-C position of a vehicle and the current RPS
position of the vehicle is less than a predetermined magnitude; and means for generating a signal indicating whether or not the RPS is lost; and said updating means comprises:
means for relocating the current RPS position of a vehicle to the Loran-C position of the vehicle when the Loran-C position information is reported to be valid and the RPS is reported as not lost.
46. A system according to claim 38 wherein said means for acquiring current APS position information comprises:
means for acquiring current Loran-C position information from a Loran-C; and said evaluating means comprises:
means for generating a signal indicating that the APS
position information is valid when:
i. the Loran-C receiver reports that the current reported position of a vehicle is valid;
ii. the current offset between the Loran-C
reported position of a vehicle is within three (3) times the variance of a predetermined number of previous offsets; and iii. the current offset between the current Loran-C position of a vehicle and the current RPS
position of the vehicle is less than 1000 feet; and means for generating a signal indicating whether or not the RPS is lost; and said updating means comprises:

means for relocating the current RPS position of a vehicle to the Loran-C position of the vehicle when the Loran-C position information is reported to be valid and the RPS is reported as not lost.
47. A system according to claim 38 wherein said means for acquiring said current RPS position information comprises:
means for acquiring the RPS position of a vehicle; and means for acquiring the RPS contour of equal probability (CEP);
said means for acquiring current APS position information comprises:
means for acquiring the Loran-C position of a vehicle;
and means for acquiring the Loran-C dilution of precision (DOP);
said evaluating means comprises:
means for computing a Loran-C CEP as a function f1 of Loran-C validity and a Loran-C dilution of precision error factor (DOP);
means for computing a Loran-C area W1 as a function of Loran-C validity, the Loran-C CEP, and the RPS validity;
means for computing an RPS area W2 as a function of RPS validity, RPS CEP, and Loran-C validity; and means for evaluating whether the RPS area W2 overlaps the Loran-C area W1; and said updating means comprises:
means for acquiring new RPS and APS position information when the RPS area W2 overlaps the Loran-C area W1; and means for relocating the current RPS position of a vehicle to the current Loran-C position of a vehicle if the RPS area W2 does not overlap the Loran-C area W1; and means for setting the RPS CEP to a function f2 of Loran-C validity, Loran-C DOP, and RPS validity if the RPS

area W2 does not overlap the Loran-C area W1.
48. A system according to claim 47 wherein said Loran-C CEP computing means comprises:
means for computing a Loran-C CEP as a function of the product of a predetermined constant and the Loran-C DOP.
49. A system according to claim 47 wherein said means for computing said Loran-C and said RPS areas W1 and W2 comprise:
means for computing Loran-C and RPS areas W1 and W2 of zero extent, respectively.
50. A system according to claim 47 wherein said setting means comprises:
means for setting the RPS CEP to a function f2 which is equal to the Loran-C CEP.
51. A system according to claim 38 wherein said means for acquiring said currrrent RPS position information comprises:
means for acquiring the RPS position of a vehicle; and means for acquiring the RPS contour of equal probability (CEP);
said means for acquiring current APS position information comprises:
means for acquiring the Global Positioning System (GPS) position of a vehicle; and means for acquiring the GPS dilution of precision (DOP);
said evaluating means comprises:
means for computing a GPS CEP as a function f1 of GPS
validity and an GPS dilution of precision error factor (DOP);
means for computing a GPS area W1 as a function of GPS
validity, the GPS CEP, and the RPS validity;

means for computing an RPS area W2 as a function of RPS validity, RPS CEP, and GPS validity; and means for evaluating whether the RPS area W2 overlaps the GPS area W1; and said updating means comprises:
means for acquiring new RPS and APS position information when the RPS area W2 overlaps the GPS area W1 and means for relocating the current RPS position of a vehicle to the current GPS position of a vehicle if the RPS
area W2 does not overlap the GPS area W1; and means for setting the RPS CEP to a function f2 of GPS
validity, GPS DOP, and RPS validity if the RPS area W2 does not overlap the GPS area W1.
52. A system according to claim 38 wherein said evaluating means comprises:
means for generating a signal indicating that the GPS
position information is invalid when less than three satellites are used to acquire it and valid when three or more satellites are used to acquire it.
53. A system according to claim 51 wherein said means for computing said GPS CEP comprises:
means for computing a GPS CEP as a function f1 of the number of satellites used to acquire said GPS position information.
54. A system according to claim 53 wherein said means for computing said GPS CEP comprises:
means for computing a GPS CEP as a function of f1 where f1 is:
i. infinity when the number of satellites is less than 3;
ii. equal to the product of a first predetermined number and the GPS DOP when the number of satellites is equal to 3; and iii. equal to the product of a second predetermined number and the GPS DOP when the number of satellites is greater than 3.
55. A system according to claim 53 wherein said means for acquiring information on the validity of said RPS
position information comprises:
means for acquiring an indication of whether or not said RPS is lost or not lost;
said means for computing said GPS CEP comprises:
means for computing a GPS CEP as a function f1 of the number of satellites used in said step (h); and said means for computing said GPS area W1 comprises:
means for computing a GPS area W1 as a function of W1 where W1 is:
i. infinity when the number of satellites is less than 3 and there is an indication that the RPS is lost;
ii. infinity when the number of satellites is less than 3 and there is an indication that the RPS is not lost;
iii. equal to the GPS CEP when the number of satellites is equal to three and there is an indication that the RPS is lost;
iv. infinity when the number of satellites is equal to three and there is an indication that the RPS
is not lost;
v. equal to the GPS CEP when the number of satellites is greater than three and there is an indication that the RPS is lost; and vi. equal to twice the GPS CEP when the number of satellites is greater than three and there is an indication that the RPS is not lost.
56. A system according to claim 51 wherein said means for computing an RPS area W2 comprises:
means for computing an RPS area W2 of zero extent.
57. A system according to claim 51 wherein said setting means comprises:
means for setting a GPS CEP to a function f2 where f2 is equal to GPS area W1.
CA002116242A 1991-08-30 1992-07-31 Combined relative and absolute positioning method and apparatus Expired - Lifetime CA2116242C (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US07/753,190 1991-08-30
US07/753,190 US5311195A (en) 1991-08-30 1991-08-30 Combined relative and absolute positioning method and apparatus
PCT/US1992/006442 WO1993005587A1 (en) 1991-08-30 1992-07-31 Combined relative and absolute positioning method and apparatus

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA2116242A1 CA2116242A1 (en) 1993-03-18
CA2116242C true CA2116242C (en) 2002-09-24

Family

ID=25029559

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA002116242A Expired - Lifetime CA2116242C (en) 1991-08-30 1992-07-31 Combined relative and absolute positioning method and apparatus

Country Status (10)

Country Link
US (1) US5311195A (en)
EP (1) EP0601037B1 (en)
JP (1) JP3273439B2 (en)
AT (1) ATE193126T1 (en)
AU (1) AU653257B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2116242C (en)
DE (1) DE69231061T2 (en)
HK (1) HK1014812A1 (en)
MD (1) MD960292A (en)
WO (1) WO1993005587A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (169)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5758313A (en) * 1992-10-16 1998-05-26 Mobile Information Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for tracking vehicle location
US5428546A (en) * 1992-10-16 1995-06-27 Mobile Information Systems Method and apparatus for tracking vehicle location
JPH06148307A (en) * 1992-11-04 1994-05-27 Pioneer Electron Corp Navigation device
US5563608A (en) * 1993-07-27 1996-10-08 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Position measuring system and method therefor
US5488559A (en) * 1993-08-02 1996-01-30 Motorola, Inc. Map-matching with competing sensory positions
US5983161A (en) 1993-08-11 1999-11-09 Lemelson; Jerome H. GPS vehicle collision avoidance warning and control system and method
DE4332945A1 (en) * 1993-09-28 1995-03-30 Bosch Gmbh Robert Positioning and navigation device with satellite support
US5559696A (en) * 1994-02-14 1996-09-24 The Regents Of The University Of Michigan Mobile robot internal position error correction system
GB9405210D0 (en) * 1994-03-17 1994-04-27 Univ Surrey Personal navigation system
US5512903A (en) * 1994-05-23 1996-04-30 Honeywell Inc. Integrity limit apparatus and method
DE4424412A1 (en) * 1994-07-12 1996-01-18 Esg Elektroniksystem Und Logis Radio telecommunication system with satellite navigation for both mobile telephony and VHF radio reception
US5959580A (en) * 1994-11-03 1999-09-28 Ksi Inc. Communications localization system
US5904727A (en) * 1995-05-17 1999-05-18 Mobile Information Systems, Inc. Graphical fleet management methods
US5922040A (en) * 1995-05-17 1999-07-13 Mobile Information System, Inc. Method and apparatus for fleet management
US5902351A (en) * 1995-08-24 1999-05-11 The Penn State Research Foundation Apparatus and method for tracking a vehicle
US5774824A (en) * 1995-08-24 1998-06-30 The Penn State Research Foundation Map-matching navigation system
US5702070A (en) * 1995-09-20 1997-12-30 E-Systems, Inc. Apparatus and method using relative GPS positioning for aircraft precision approach and landing
US7092369B2 (en) 1995-11-17 2006-08-15 Symbol Technologies, Inc. Communications network with wireless gateways for mobile terminal access
US5774829A (en) * 1995-12-12 1998-06-30 Pinterra Corporation Navigation and positioning system and method using uncoordinated beacon signals in conjunction with an absolute positioning system
US5991692A (en) * 1995-12-28 1999-11-23 Magellan Dis, Inc. Zero motion detection system for improved vehicle navigation system
US6029111A (en) * 1995-12-28 2000-02-22 Magellan Dis, Inc. Vehicle navigation system and method using GPS velocities
US5862511A (en) * 1995-12-28 1999-01-19 Magellan Dis, Inc. Vehicle navigation system and method
US5951620A (en) * 1996-01-26 1999-09-14 Navigation Technologies Corporation System and method for distributing information for storage media
US5842146A (en) * 1996-05-10 1998-11-24 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Method and apparatus of setting clock time and using time data in a vehicle navigation system
US5848364A (en) * 1996-05-10 1998-12-08 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Method and apparatus for vehicle navigation and guidance through a traffic circle
US6108555A (en) * 1996-05-17 2000-08-22 Ksi, Inc. Enchanced time difference localization system
DE19633884B4 (en) * 1996-08-19 2004-09-02 Siemens Ag Method for determining the object position of an object
US9134398B2 (en) 1996-09-09 2015-09-15 Tracbeam Llc Wireless location using network centric location estimators
US6236365B1 (en) 1996-09-09 2001-05-22 Tracbeam, Llc Location of a mobile station using a plurality of commercial wireless infrastructures
US7903029B2 (en) 1996-09-09 2011-03-08 Tracbeam Llc Wireless location routing applications and architecture therefor
WO1998010307A1 (en) 1996-09-09 1998-03-12 Dennis Jay Dupray Location of a mobile station
US7714778B2 (en) 1997-08-20 2010-05-11 Tracbeam Llc Wireless location gateway and applications therefor
US7274332B1 (en) 1996-09-09 2007-09-25 Tracbeam Llc Multiple evaluators for evaluation of a purality of conditions
DE19645209B4 (en) * 1996-11-02 2005-07-28 Robert Bosch Gmbh Locating device for a motor vehicle with a satellite receiver and locating method
US5948043A (en) * 1996-11-08 1999-09-07 Etak, Inc. Navigation system using GPS data
US6026346A (en) * 1996-11-27 2000-02-15 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Navigation system for indicating of optimum route
US5974357A (en) * 1996-12-19 1999-10-26 Alpine Electronics Sign text display for vehicle navigation system
US6308134B1 (en) 1996-12-27 2001-10-23 Magellan Dis, Inc. Vehicle navigation system and method using multiple axes accelerometer
US6092022A (en) * 1997-02-28 2000-07-18 Trimble Navigation Optimal survey map projection system
US6889139B2 (en) * 1997-03-07 2005-05-03 Sidewinder Holdings Ltd. System and method for mobile data processing and transmission
US6024655A (en) * 1997-03-31 2000-02-15 Leading Edge Technologies, Inc. Map-matching golf navigation system
US5873797A (en) * 1997-04-03 1999-02-23 Leading Edge Technologies, Inc. Remote golf ball locator
US6252605B1 (en) 1997-08-01 2001-06-26 Garmin Corporation System and method for packing spatial data in an R-tree
US5995970A (en) * 1997-08-01 1999-11-30 Garmin Corporation Method and apparatus for geographic coordinate data storage
US6707421B1 (en) * 1997-08-19 2004-03-16 Siemens Vdo Automotive Corporation Driver information system
US6680694B1 (en) * 1997-08-19 2004-01-20 Siemens Vdo Automotive Corporation Vehicle information system
US6531982B1 (en) 1997-09-30 2003-03-11 Sirf Technology, Inc. Field unit for use in a GPS system
DE19803662C2 (en) 1998-01-30 1999-12-02 Siemens Ag Navigation device and method for determining position using dead reckoning
US6016485A (en) * 1998-02-13 2000-01-18 Etak, Inc. System for pathfinding
US6327471B1 (en) 1998-02-19 2001-12-04 Conexant Systems, Inc. Method and an apparatus for positioning system assisted cellular radiotelephone handoff and dropoff
US6348744B1 (en) 1998-04-14 2002-02-19 Conexant Systems, Inc. Integrated power management module
US7711038B1 (en) 1998-09-01 2010-05-04 Sirf Technology, Inc. System and method for despreading in a spread spectrum matched filter
US7545854B1 (en) 1998-09-01 2009-06-09 Sirf Technology, Inc. Doppler corrected spread spectrum matched filter
US6693953B2 (en) 1998-09-30 2004-02-17 Skyworks Solutions, Inc. Adaptive wireless communication receiver
US8135413B2 (en) 1998-11-24 2012-03-13 Tracbeam Llc Platform and applications for wireless location and other complex services
US6606349B1 (en) 1999-02-04 2003-08-12 Sirf Technology, Inc. Spread spectrum receiver performance improvement
US6448925B1 (en) 1999-02-04 2002-09-10 Conexant Systems, Inc. Jamming detection and blanking for GPS receivers
US6192312B1 (en) 1999-03-25 2001-02-20 Navigation Technologies Corp. Position determining program and method
US6577271B1 (en) 1999-03-30 2003-06-10 Sirf Technology, Inc Signal detector employing coherent integration
US6304216B1 (en) 1999-03-30 2001-10-16 Conexant Systems, Inc. Signal detector employing correlation analysis of non-uniform and disjoint sample segments
DE19915212A1 (en) * 1999-04-03 2000-10-05 Bosch Gmbh Robert Method and device for determining the position of a vehicle
WO2000072225A1 (en) * 1999-05-21 2000-11-30 Etak, Inc. Computing sign text for branches of an electronic map network
US6351486B1 (en) 1999-05-25 2002-02-26 Conexant Systems, Inc. Accelerated selection of a base station in a wireless communication system
US20040215387A1 (en) * 2002-02-14 2004-10-28 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Method for transmitting location information on a digital map, apparatus for implementing the method, and traffic information provision/reception system
JP3481168B2 (en) * 1999-08-27 2003-12-22 松下電器産業株式会社 Digital map location information transmission method
US6285320B1 (en) 1999-09-03 2001-09-04 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Apparatus and method for mapping surfaces of an object
WO2001020260A1 (en) * 1999-09-15 2001-03-22 Sirf Technology, Inc. Navigation system and method for tracking the position of an object
US6278403B1 (en) * 1999-09-17 2001-08-21 Sirf Technology, Inc. Autonomous hardwired tracking loop coprocessor for GPS and WAAS receiver
EP1286735A1 (en) 1999-09-24 2003-03-05 Dennis Jay Dupray Geographically constrained network services
US6965397B1 (en) 1999-11-22 2005-11-15 Sportvision, Inc. Measuring camera attitude
US6526322B1 (en) 1999-12-16 2003-02-25 Sirf Technology, Inc. Shared memory architecture in GPS signal processing
US6931055B1 (en) 2000-04-18 2005-08-16 Sirf Technology, Inc. Signal detector employing a doppler phase correction system
US6714158B1 (en) * 2000-04-18 2004-03-30 Sirf Technology, Inc. Method and system for data detection in a global positioning system satellite receiver
US6952440B1 (en) 2000-04-18 2005-10-04 Sirf Technology, Inc. Signal detector employing a Doppler phase correction system
US6788655B1 (en) 2000-04-18 2004-09-07 Sirf Technology, Inc. Personal communications device with ratio counter
US7885314B1 (en) 2000-05-02 2011-02-08 Kenneth Scott Walley Cancellation system and method for a wireless positioning system
US7949362B2 (en) * 2000-05-18 2011-05-24 Sirf Technology, Inc. Satellite positioning aided communication system selection
US8116976B2 (en) 2000-05-18 2012-02-14 Csr Technology Inc. Satellite based positioning method and system for coarse location positioning
US7970411B2 (en) * 2000-05-18 2011-06-28 Sirf Technology, Inc. Aided location communication system
US7970412B2 (en) 2000-05-18 2011-06-28 Sirf Technology, Inc. Aided location communication system
US8078189B2 (en) 2000-08-14 2011-12-13 Sirf Technology, Inc. System and method for providing location based services over a network
US6778136B2 (en) * 2001-12-13 2004-08-17 Sirf Technology, Inc. Fast acquisition of GPS signal
US6462708B1 (en) 2001-04-05 2002-10-08 Sirf Technology, Inc. GPS-based positioning system for mobile GPS terminals
US6389291B1 (en) 2000-08-14 2002-05-14 Sirf Technology Multi-mode global positioning system for use with wireless networks
US7929928B2 (en) * 2000-05-18 2011-04-19 Sirf Technology Inc. Frequency phase correction system
US6427120B1 (en) 2000-08-14 2002-07-30 Sirf Technology, Inc. Information transfer in a multi-mode global positioning system used with wireless networks
US6671620B1 (en) 2000-05-18 2003-12-30 Sirf Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for determining global position using almanac information
US9875492B2 (en) 2001-05-22 2018-01-23 Dennis J. Dupray Real estate transaction system
US10684350B2 (en) 2000-06-02 2020-06-16 Tracbeam Llc Services and applications for a communications network
US10641861B2 (en) 2000-06-02 2020-05-05 Dennis J. Dupray Services and applications for a communications network
US7616705B1 (en) 2000-07-27 2009-11-10 Sirf Technology Holdings, Inc. Monolithic GPS RF front end integrated circuit
US6856794B1 (en) * 2000-07-27 2005-02-15 Sirf Technology, Inc. Monolithic GPS RF front end integrated circuit
US7236883B2 (en) * 2000-08-14 2007-06-26 Sirf Technology, Inc. Aiding in a satellite positioning system
US6529829B2 (en) * 2000-08-24 2003-03-04 Sirf Technology, Inc. Dead reckoning system for reducing auto-correlation or cross-correlation in weak signals
US7680178B2 (en) 2000-08-24 2010-03-16 Sirf Technology, Inc. Cross-correlation detection and elimination in a receiver
US6931233B1 (en) * 2000-08-31 2005-08-16 Sirf Technology, Inc. GPS RF front end IC with programmable frequency synthesizer for use in wireless phones
US6502033B1 (en) 2000-10-05 2002-12-31 Navigation Technologies Corp. Turn detection algorithm for vehicle positioning
US6317683B1 (en) 2000-10-05 2001-11-13 Navigation Technologies Corp. Vehicle positioning using three metrics
US7047023B1 (en) 2000-12-01 2006-05-16 Sirf Technology, Inc. GPS RF front end IC with frequency plan for improved integrability
JP5041638B2 (en) * 2000-12-08 2012-10-03 パナソニック株式会社 Method for transmitting location information of digital map and device used therefor
US7747236B1 (en) 2000-12-11 2010-06-29 Sirf Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for estimating local oscillator frequency for GPS receivers
US7113552B1 (en) 2000-12-21 2006-09-26 Sirf Technology, Inc. Phase sampling techniques using amplitude bits for digital receivers
US7671489B1 (en) 2001-01-26 2010-03-02 Sirf Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for selectively maintaining circuit power when higher voltages are present
JP4663136B2 (en) * 2001-01-29 2011-03-30 パナソニック株式会社 Method and apparatus for transmitting location information of digital map
US6680703B1 (en) 2001-02-16 2004-01-20 Sirf Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for optimally tuning a circularly polarized patch antenna after installation
US6703971B2 (en) * 2001-02-21 2004-03-09 Sirf Technologies, Inc. Mode determination for mobile GPS terminals
US7076256B1 (en) 2001-04-16 2006-07-11 Sirf Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for transmitting position data using control channels in wireless networks
JP4749594B2 (en) * 2001-04-27 2011-08-17 パナソニック株式会社 Digital map location information transmission method
JP4230132B2 (en) * 2001-05-01 2009-02-25 パナソニック株式会社 Digital map shape vector encoding method, position information transmission method, and apparatus for implementing the same
US8244271B2 (en) * 2001-05-21 2012-08-14 Csr Technology Inc. Distributed data collection of satellite data
US7925210B2 (en) * 2001-05-21 2011-04-12 Sirf Technology, Inc. Synchronizing a radio network with end user radio terminals
US7877104B2 (en) * 2001-05-21 2011-01-25 Sirf Technology Inc. Method for synchronizing a radio network using end user radio terminals
US7668554B2 (en) * 2001-05-21 2010-02-23 Sirf Technology, Inc. Network system for aided GPS broadcast positioning
US8082096B2 (en) 2001-05-22 2011-12-20 Tracbeam Llc Wireless location routing applications and architecture therefor
GB0117541D0 (en) * 2001-07-19 2003-08-06 Bae Systems Plc Automatic registration of images in digital terrain elevation data
GB2380793B (en) * 2001-10-10 2005-03-09 Roke Manor Research Positioning system
US6631321B1 (en) 2001-10-29 2003-10-07 Navigation Technologies Corp. Vehicle heading change determination using compensated differential wheel speed
US7221287B2 (en) 2002-03-05 2007-05-22 Triangle Software Llc Three-dimensional traffic report
US20040006424A1 (en) * 2002-06-28 2004-01-08 Joyce Glenn J. Control system for tracking and targeting multiple autonomous objects
KR100498987B1 (en) * 2002-10-11 2005-07-01 엘지전자 주식회사 Method for estimating location of vehicle in Global Positioning System Data's poor region
US7170447B2 (en) * 2003-02-14 2007-01-30 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for processing navigation data in position determination
US6839020B2 (en) * 2003-06-02 2005-01-04 Motorola, Inc. Aiding location determinations in satellite positioning system receivers
US7610145B2 (en) 2003-07-25 2009-10-27 Triangle Software Llc System and method for determining recommended departure time
US8138972B2 (en) * 2003-09-02 2012-03-20 Csr Technology Inc. Signal processing system for satellite positioning signals
US8164517B2 (en) 2003-09-02 2012-04-24 Csr Technology Inc. Global positioning system receiver timeline management
EP1664824B1 (en) * 2003-09-02 2015-01-14 SiRF Technology, Inc. Satellite positioning receiver and method of communicating between the signal processing and FFT subsystems of said satellite positioning receiver
KR100557081B1 (en) * 2003-12-18 2006-03-03 삼성전자주식회사 Method and apparatus for estimating time delay of gps receiver for hybrid navigation system
US7365680B2 (en) * 2004-02-10 2008-04-29 Sirf Technology, Inc. Location services system that reduces auto-correlation or cross-correlation in weak signals
JP4315832B2 (en) * 2004-02-17 2009-08-19 三菱電機株式会社 Thermal infrared sensor element and thermal infrared sensor array
US20050209762A1 (en) * 2004-03-18 2005-09-22 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Method and apparatus for controlling a vehicle using an object detection system and brake-steer
US20060021231A1 (en) * 2004-07-28 2006-02-02 Carey Nancy D Adaptive scissors
US7908080B2 (en) 2004-12-31 2011-03-15 Google Inc. Transportation routing
JP2008530531A (en) * 2005-02-07 2008-08-07 シーメンス ヴィディーオー オートモーティヴ コーポレイション Navigation system
US8370054B2 (en) * 2005-03-24 2013-02-05 Google Inc. User location driven identification of service vehicles
JP2010509585A (en) * 2006-11-06 2010-03-25 テレ アトラス ベスローテン フエンノートシャップ Apparatus and method for determining 2D and 3D accurate location and orientation
CN101688910A (en) 2007-05-24 2010-03-31 电子地图有限公司 Use absolute positioning system and relative positioning system to determine locating device and method, computer program and the data carrier of position
US20090177382A1 (en) * 2008-01-03 2009-07-09 Commscope, Inc. Of North Carolina Calibration of a Navigation System
US20090267832A1 (en) * 2008-04-29 2009-10-29 Texas Instruments Incorporated Systems and methods for dynamically determining position
US9208458B2 (en) 2008-10-02 2015-12-08 Certusview Technologies, Llc Methods and apparatus for analyzing locate and marking operations with respect to facilities maps
US8239133B2 (en) * 2008-07-02 2012-08-07 O2Micro, International Global positioning system and dead reckoning (GPSandDR) integrated navigation system
US8478617B2 (en) 2008-10-02 2013-07-02 Certusview Technologies, Llc Methods and apparatus for generating alerts on a locate device, based on comparing electronic locate information to facilities map information and/or other image information
US8510141B2 (en) 2008-10-02 2013-08-13 Certusview Technologies, Llc Methods and apparatus for generating alerts on a marking device, based on comparing electronic marking information to facilities map information and/or other image information
US20100188407A1 (en) 2008-10-02 2010-07-29 Certusview Technologies, Llc Methods and apparatus for displaying and processing facilities map information and/or other image information on a marking device
US20100198663A1 (en) 2008-10-02 2010-08-05 Certusview Technologies, Llc Methods and apparatus for overlaying electronic marking information on facilities map information and/or other image information displayed on a marking device
US8527308B2 (en) 2008-10-02 2013-09-03 Certusview Technologies, Llc Methods and apparatus for overlaying electronic locate information on facilities map information and/or other image information displayed on a locate device
CA2897462A1 (en) 2009-02-11 2010-05-04 Certusview Technologies, Llc Management system, and associated methods and apparatus, for providing automatic assessment of a locate operation
US8982116B2 (en) 2009-03-04 2015-03-17 Pelmorex Canada Inc. Touch screen based interaction with traffic data
US9046924B2 (en) 2009-03-04 2015-06-02 Pelmorex Canada Inc. Gesture based interaction with traffic data
US8619072B2 (en) 2009-03-04 2013-12-31 Triangle Software Llc Controlling a three-dimensional virtual broadcast presentation
CA2771286C (en) 2009-08-11 2016-08-30 Certusview Technologies, Llc Locating equipment communicatively coupled to or equipped with a mobile/portable device
US9538493B2 (en) 2010-08-23 2017-01-03 Finetrak, Llc Locating a mobile station and applications therefor
JP5464101B2 (en) * 2010-09-01 2014-04-09 カシオ計算機株式会社 POSITIONING DEVICE, POSITIONING METHOD, AND PROGRAM
CA2823827C (en) 2010-11-14 2018-08-28 Triangle Software Llc Crowd sourced traffic reporting
DE102010063702A1 (en) 2010-12-21 2012-06-21 Robert Bosch Gmbh location
WO2012159083A2 (en) 2011-05-18 2012-11-22 Triangle Software Llc System for providing traffic data and driving efficiency data
JP5879883B2 (en) * 2011-09-30 2016-03-08 カシオ計算機株式会社 Positioning device, positioning method and program
US8781718B2 (en) 2012-01-27 2014-07-15 Pelmorex Canada Inc. Estimating time travel distributions on signalized arterials
CN103675859A (en) * 2012-09-10 2014-03-26 迈实电子(上海)有限公司 Satellite navigation receiver and equipment as well as method for positioning satellite navigation receiver
US10223909B2 (en) 2012-10-18 2019-03-05 Uber Technologies, Inc. Estimating time travel distributions on signalized arterials
US9544741B2 (en) * 2013-01-18 2017-01-10 Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. Terminal
EP2793041A1 (en) 2013-04-15 2014-10-22 Nederlandse Organisatie voor toegepast -natuurwetenschappelijk onderzoek TNO Assured vehicle absolute localisation
US8768618B1 (en) * 2013-05-15 2014-07-01 Google Inc. Determining a location of a mobile device using a multi-modal kalman filter
US10311756B1 (en) 2013-06-28 2019-06-04 Google Llc Systems, methods, and computer-readable media for validating addresses
DE102013018807A1 (en) 2013-11-11 2015-05-13 Neusoft Technology Solutions Gmbh Radio navigation device and method for receiving, evaluating and editing erroneous navigation signals
WO2015072896A1 (en) * 2013-11-12 2015-05-21 Husqvarna Ab Improved navigation for a robotic working tool
CN103941272B (en) * 2014-04-09 2016-08-31 北极星云空间技术股份有限公司 The localization method of GPS, GLONASS and BDS Combined Calculation
SE540154C2 (en) * 2015-05-05 2018-04-17 Scania Cv Ab Device and method for managing communication for a vehicle
US9939514B2 (en) * 2015-06-30 2018-04-10 Here Global B.V. Determination of a statistical attribute of a set of measurement errors
DE102017211712A1 (en) * 2017-07-10 2019-01-10 Audi Ag A data generation method for generating and updating a topology map for at least one room of at least one building

Family Cites Families (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4232313A (en) * 1972-09-22 1980-11-04 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Tactical nagivation and communication system
US3940597A (en) * 1974-12-05 1976-02-24 Dynell Electronics Corporation Navigational error correcting system
JPS57159310A (en) * 1981-03-28 1982-10-01 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Running inductive device for car
US4796191A (en) * 1984-06-07 1989-01-03 Etak, Inc. Vehicle navigational system and method
JPH0621792B2 (en) * 1986-06-26 1994-03-23 日産自動車株式会社 Hybrid position measuring device
JPH0820504B2 (en) * 1987-09-22 1996-03-04 株式会社豊田中央研究所 GPS navigation device
US4876550A (en) * 1987-10-08 1989-10-24 Allied-Signal Inc. Ridge regression signal processing for position-fix navigation systems
CA1321418C (en) * 1988-10-05 1993-08-17 Joseph C. Mcmillan Primary land arctic navigation system
MX19222A (en) * 1989-01-23 1993-12-01 Pfizer ANSIOLYTIC AGENTS BIS-AZA-BICYCLIC
JPH0792388B2 (en) * 1989-04-17 1995-10-09 住友電気工業株式会社 Position detector
US4954833A (en) * 1989-07-05 1990-09-04 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Method for determining astronomic azimuth
GB2241623A (en) * 1990-02-28 1991-09-04 Philips Electronic Associated Vehicle location system
JP2979582B2 (en) * 1990-05-23 1999-11-15 ソニー株式会社 Transmission system
US5185610A (en) * 1990-08-20 1993-02-09 Texas Instruments Incorporated GPS system and method for deriving pointing or attitude from a single GPS receiver
JP2873872B2 (en) * 1990-09-06 1999-03-24 株式会社ソキア C / A code removal type frequency diversity correlation reception system in GPS

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE69231061D1 (en) 2000-06-21
EP0601037A4 (en) 1996-07-17
JP3273439B2 (en) 2002-04-08
HK1014812A1 (en) 1999-09-30
JPH07504971A (en) 1995-06-01
ATE193126T1 (en) 2000-06-15
EP0601037B1 (en) 2000-05-17
EP0601037A1 (en) 1994-06-15
CA2116242A1 (en) 1993-03-18
AU2492692A (en) 1993-04-05
WO1993005587A1 (en) 1993-03-18
MD960292A (en) 1998-11-30
AU653257B2 (en) 1994-09-22
US5311195A (en) 1994-05-10
DE69231061T2 (en) 2001-02-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2116242C (en) Combined relative and absolute positioning method and apparatus
US5394333A (en) Correcting GPS position in a hybrid naviation system
US7692583B2 (en) GPS position measuring device
US5119301A (en) Vehicle location detecting system
EP1012537B1 (en) Navigation system using gps data
US6618670B1 (en) Resolving time ambiguity in GPS using over-determined navigation solution
US6107939A (en) Lane change alarm for use in a highway vehicle
EP0534892B1 (en) Position-locating method
AU683240B2 (en) Position correction method for vehicle navigation system
US6029496A (en) Method and device for automatic calibration of an odometer
US5883595A (en) Method and apparatus for mitigating multipath effects and smoothing groundtracks in a GPS receiver
US20050010364A1 (en) Method for improving GPS integrity and detecting multipath interference using inertial navigation sensors and a network of mobile receivers
EP1738138B1 (en) System and method for creating accurate topographical maps using dgps
EP2081044A2 (en) Navigation system with apparatus for detecting accuracy failures
JP2000506604A (en) Improved vehicle navigation system and method
JP4652097B2 (en) Altitude calculation device and navigation device
KR20050045704A (en) Off-board navigation system and method for calibrating error using the same
KR100573955B1 (en) Method for correcting gps location information by error verification
Scott-Young et al. An intelligent navigation solution for land mobile location-based services
JP3439827B2 (en) Positioning device and moving object with positioning device
KR100579654B1 (en) Method for correcting gps position information using environmental weighting reference points and distant weighting reference points
Hunter et al. Vehicle navigation using differential GPS
JP2786309B2 (en) Vehicle position detection device
Liang et al. Low cost integrated marine navigation system
JPH0351783A (en) Navigation apparatus for automobile

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
EEER Examination request
MKEX Expiry