CA1319759C - Method for shared mail object user dependent status indication - Google Patents
Method for shared mail object user dependent status indicationInfo
- Publication number
- CA1319759C CA1319759C CA000612655A CA612655A CA1319759C CA 1319759 C CA1319759 C CA 1319759C CA 000612655 A CA000612655 A CA 000612655A CA 612655 A CA612655 A CA 612655A CA 1319759 C CA1319759 C CA 1319759C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- electronic mail
- mail object
- status
- computing system
- distributed computing
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
- G06Q10/107—Computer-aided management of electronic mailing [e-mailing]
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L51/00—User-to-user messaging in packet-switching networks, transmitted according to store-and-forward or real-time protocols, e.g. e-mail
- H04L51/04—Real-time or near real-time messaging, e.g. instant messaging [IM]
Abstract
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
A method is disclosed for providing a user dependent status indication for shared electronic mail objects within a distributed computing system. In certain electronic mail systems multiple users are permitted to share access to selected electronic mail objects in a so-called "affinity" relationship whereby selected end users are permitted to access identical address space within a computer. Within such systems it is difficult to ascertain a particular status of a selected electronic mail object with certainty due to the fact that multiple users may have access to that electronic mail object. In accordance with the method of the present invention an attribute list is associated with each electronic mail object which may contain multiple sets of attributes, each set associated with a group of recipients, a subgroup of recipients or an individual end user having access to that electronic mail object. Thereafter, the activities of each end user are utilized to modify each attribute list associated with that end user. An end user may then periodically determine and display the status of an individual mail object with regard to the entire group of recipients, a subgroup of recipients or an individual end user.
A method is disclosed for providing a user dependent status indication for shared electronic mail objects within a distributed computing system. In certain electronic mail systems multiple users are permitted to share access to selected electronic mail objects in a so-called "affinity" relationship whereby selected end users are permitted to access identical address space within a computer. Within such systems it is difficult to ascertain a particular status of a selected electronic mail object with certainty due to the fact that multiple users may have access to that electronic mail object. In accordance with the method of the present invention an attribute list is associated with each electronic mail object which may contain multiple sets of attributes, each set associated with a group of recipients, a subgroup of recipients or an individual end user having access to that electronic mail object. Thereafter, the activities of each end user are utilized to modify each attribute list associated with that end user. An end user may then periodically determine and display the status of an individual mail object with regard to the entire group of recipients, a subgroup of recipients or an individual end user.
Description
1 3 1 q759 BACKGROUND OF l~IE INVENTION
1. Technical Field:
This invention relates in general to electronic mail systems and in particular to electronic mail systems which permit multiple end users to share access to an electronic mail object. Still more particularly the present invention relates to methods for providing a user dependent status indication for such shared mail objects.
1. Technical Field:
This invention relates in general to electronic mail systems and in particular to electronic mail systems which permit multiple end users to share access to an electronic mail object. Still more particularly the present invention relates to methods for providing a user dependent status indication for such shared mail objects.
2. Background Art:
The electronic mail is rapidly supplanting Post Office mail as a means for communicating between individuals. One significant advantage of electronic mail is that the transmission time associated with each electronic mail message is ordinarily only seconds, or fractions of a second, as compared to Post Office mail which ordinarily requires several days.
.
The mailing time associated with Post Office mail often causes significant delay in the conduct of business and has been largely ignored, and consequently tolerated, until the advent of Express Mail services and electronic mail. Currently, this widespread delay of business is identified as "float" and the minimizing or eliminating of this float has become one goal of business managers, efficiency experts and others hoping to increase societal productivity.
, ,:
131975q . " , 1, .
The electronic mail is rapidly supplanting Post Office mail as a means for communicating between individuals. One significant advantage of electronic mail is that the transmission time associated with each electronic mail message is ordinarily only seconds, or fractions of a second, as compared to Post Office mail which ordinarily requires several days.
.
The mailing time associated with Post Office mail often causes significant delay in the conduct of business and has been largely ignored, and consequently tolerated, until the advent of Express Mail services and electronic mail. Currently, this widespread delay of business is identified as "float" and the minimizing or eliminating of this float has become one goal of business managers, efficiency experts and others hoping to increase societal productivity.
, ,:
131975q . " , 1, .
The widespread utilization and increased sophistication of electronic mail systems have given rise to a problem wherein multiple users are permitted to share access to a particular mail object. The difficulty associated with such systems revolves around the inability of end users within the system to determine the status of a particular mail object with regard to a particular end user due to the fact that the mail object may have been accessed by multiple users.
Thus, it should be obvious that a need exists for a method for providing a user dependent status indication suitable for utilization with shared electronic mail objects.
:, --' .
.. .
.
SUMMARY OF T~E INVENTION
It is therefore one object of the present invention to provide an improved electronic mail system.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an improved electronic mail system which permits multiple users to share access to a single electronic mail object.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide an improved electronic mail system which permits multiple users to share access to a single electronic mail object and which provides a user dependent status indication for such shared electronic mail objects.
The foregoing objects are achieved as is now described. In modern electronic mail systems multiple users are sometimes permitted to share access to selected electronic mail objects in := a so-called "affinity"
relationship wherein more than one user is permitted to access a designated address space within the computer.
Within such systems it is difficult to ascertain a particular status of a selected electronic mail object due to the fact that multiple users may have access to that object. In accordance with the method of the present invention an attribute list- is associated with each electronic mail object which may contain multiple sets of attributes, each set associated with a group of recipients, a subgroup of recipients or an individual end user.
Thoreaftor, the act.vlties of each end user are utilized to ~ , 131~75q modify each attribute list associated with that end user.
An end user may then periodically determine and display the status of an individual mail object with regard to the entire group of recipients, a subgroup of recipients or an 5 individual end user.~ -:.
' BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF TEIE: DRA~INGS
The novel features believed characteristic of the S invention are set forth in the appended claims. The invention itself however, as well as a preferred mode of use, further objects and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description of an illustrative embodiment when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
FIGURE 1 depicts a block diagram of a distributed computing system which may be utilized with the method of the present invention;
FIGURE 2 depicts a block diagram illustrating the different types of multiple status attribute lists associated with the method of the present invention;
.
FIGURE 3 depicts a logic flowchart illustrating the association of multiple status attribute lists with the receipt of electronic mail objects; and FIGURE 4 depicts a logic flowchart illustrating a modification of multiple status attribute lists in response to the activities of an end user in accordance with the method of the present invention.
..
'' : ' `:
.
:
.: : . -: ' - . ..
.
.
-- 7 ::
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE P~EFERRED EMBODIMENT
With reference now to the figures and in particular with reference to Figure 1, there -is depicted a block diagram of a distributed computing system which may be utilized with the method of the present invention. As may be seen, distributed computing system 8 comprises a Local Area Network (LAN) which serves to connect a plurality of end users. -In this manner Users A, B, C, D and E are all connected together in a manner which will permit the ; transfer of electronic mail objects. Of course, those skilled in the art will appreciate that other distributed computing systems may be utilized, such as, for example, a Host processor and a plurality of Interactive Work Stations tIWS).
Referring now to Figure 2, there is depicted a block diagram illustrating the different types of multiple status attribute lists associated with the method of the present invention. As may be seen, the process of th~
present invention is applied u~on a receipt of mail 10, which may comprise one or more mail items which have been received from the distributed computing system. Of course, mail 10 may include a group of associated mail d~scriptors 12 which provide general information concerning mail 10 such as: addressees; folder information; data/time sent and/ox received; and, other such information.
; 30 Next, in accordance with the method of the present invention a plurality of "view profiles" are established.
In the disclosed~embodiment of the present invention there ; ~are provided three different view profiles, each of which is :
. . . . .
~. ' . ''' ' '''~ ; ' 1 31 975~
utilized to aid in the specification of an indication of the status of a shared mail object or a component of a shared mail object with regard to all of the recipients, a subgroup of the recipients or an individual recipient. For example, public view profile 14 is a specific view or profile of a particular electronic mail object which is presented to all users having access to that shared electronic mail object.
Naturally, only one public view is permitted per mail object.
Similarly, group view profile 16 may be utilized to aid in the specification of the status of the mail object with regard to certain subgroups of end users specified by ; the mail object owner. Of course, the mail object owner may not specify any subgroups for a particular mail object so there may be no group view profile in that case. In this manner, the mail object owner may elect to specify selected subgroups o~ end users for which status may be determined.
Finally, private view profile 18 may be defined for any end user having access to a particular shared electronic mail object.
From each view profile defined above, a set of attributes is established and maintained whereby the status of a shared electronic mail object may be determined with regard to all recipients, a subgroup of the recipients or an individual recipient of that mail object. By way of illustration, shared attributes 20 serve to provide the public view of a selected electronic mail object which is visible to Users A, B, C, D and E. Shared attributes 20 ; will preferably contain status indications such as "New" or "Old", "Opened" or "Unopened" which are perceived by all users having access to thè mail object.
' .
,~ ....
.
' ' ., ~ ,. ' 131~759 .
g The public view attributes associated with shared attributes 20 may also be utilized with user set attributes 22 and 24, in addition to other specific user group attributes, such as action items. Each user set of attributes may be associated with a particular subgroup of end users. As is illustrated, user set attributes 22 are associated with Users A and B and user set attributes 2~ are associated with Users C, D, and E.
Finally, user attributes 26, 28, and 30 are each associated with an individual end user and may be utilized to provide a private view of the status of an individual mail object. For example, a mail object may be "Opened" by any user having access; however, the object may not be "Seen" by a user who has not previously opened the mail object. In this manner, the status of a shared electronic mail object may be accurately determined with regard to a particular end user.
In accordance with the method of the present invention, each set of attributes is continually modified by the activities of individual end users in order to update the status of each shared mail object. Additionally, the "status" of a mail object may disclose more than the transmission and receipt status of electronic mail. For example, the user set attributes may be utilized to provide action items which are only visible to a particular set of end users, based upon the nature of the action item.
Similarly, user attributes may be utilized to provide personal reminder notes placed by a particular user which are then privaté- to that user and not visible to other users.
: ~' . ' ' .
.
With referPnce now to Figur~ 3, there is depicted a logic flowchart illustrating the association of multiple status attribute lists with the receipt of an electronic mail object. As may be seen, the process begins at block ~0 which illustrates the receipt of electronic mail from the network which is placed into the electronic mail-basket of a particular end user within a group of end users. Next, as depicted in block 42, the shared attributes are set based upon the public view profile which is determined by the recipients of the shared mail object. Thereafter, the user set attributes are set based upon any group view profiles which may have been defined by the mail object owner, as described above and as illustrated in block 44. Finally, the user attributes are set, as depicted in block 46. The user attributes are set based upon the private view profile which is established by any end user having access to the shared mail object.
Thereafter, as illustrated in block 48, certain automatic actions may be performed based upon the public view profile. For example, a mail waiting notification may be sent to all affinity users after the receipt of a mail object. Similarly, certain automatic actions based upon the group view profile may be accomplished, as depicted in block 50. one such example may be the placing of action items for a particular defined user set, as defined above~ Finally, certain automatic actions may be accomplished based upon the private view profile which has been established, as illustrated in block 52. - Thereafter, the process terminates, as illustrated in block 54.
Referring now to Fi~ure 4, there is depicted a logic flowchart illustrating the modi~ication of multiple status attribute lists in response to the activities of a particular end user. As may be seen, this process begins at block 60 with the user wishing to view his or her mai1-basket. Next, as depicted in block 62, the list of mail objects within the mail-basket is presented to the user based upon the aforementioned public, group and private views. As illustrated in block 64 the user may then view and manipulate any mail object within his or her mail-basket. Automatically, in response to the activities of the user depicted in block 64, each appropriate attribute set for that particular mail object is altered to reflect the change in status brought about by the activities of the end user, as illustrated in block 66. Next, block 68 depicts the determination of whether or not the end user is to continue processing and if so, the process returns to block 64 so that the end user may access and possibly modify a subsequent mail object. In the event the end user elects to discontinue processing, then the process terminates at block 70, as illustrated.
` 20 Those skilled in the art will, upon reference to the foregoing specification, appreciate that the applicants I
have provided a novel and useful method whereby the status o~ individual shared electronic mail- objects may be determined in a user dependent manner. That is, rather than the global status which has previously been possible utilizing known electronic mail systems, the method of the present invention permits individual users to accurately and rapidly determine the status of a particular mail object with regard to all recipients of that mail object, selected subgroups of recipients of that mail object or individual recipients of that electronic mail object.
' ` ~
:
' While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
~5 ~5
Thus, it should be obvious that a need exists for a method for providing a user dependent status indication suitable for utilization with shared electronic mail objects.
:, --' .
.. .
.
SUMMARY OF T~E INVENTION
It is therefore one object of the present invention to provide an improved electronic mail system.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an improved electronic mail system which permits multiple users to share access to a single electronic mail object.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide an improved electronic mail system which permits multiple users to share access to a single electronic mail object and which provides a user dependent status indication for such shared electronic mail objects.
The foregoing objects are achieved as is now described. In modern electronic mail systems multiple users are sometimes permitted to share access to selected electronic mail objects in := a so-called "affinity"
relationship wherein more than one user is permitted to access a designated address space within the computer.
Within such systems it is difficult to ascertain a particular status of a selected electronic mail object due to the fact that multiple users may have access to that object. In accordance with the method of the present invention an attribute list- is associated with each electronic mail object which may contain multiple sets of attributes, each set associated with a group of recipients, a subgroup of recipients or an individual end user.
Thoreaftor, the act.vlties of each end user are utilized to ~ , 131~75q modify each attribute list associated with that end user.
An end user may then periodically determine and display the status of an individual mail object with regard to the entire group of recipients, a subgroup of recipients or an 5 individual end user.~ -:.
' BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF TEIE: DRA~INGS
The novel features believed characteristic of the S invention are set forth in the appended claims. The invention itself however, as well as a preferred mode of use, further objects and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description of an illustrative embodiment when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
FIGURE 1 depicts a block diagram of a distributed computing system which may be utilized with the method of the present invention;
FIGURE 2 depicts a block diagram illustrating the different types of multiple status attribute lists associated with the method of the present invention;
.
FIGURE 3 depicts a logic flowchart illustrating the association of multiple status attribute lists with the receipt of electronic mail objects; and FIGURE 4 depicts a logic flowchart illustrating a modification of multiple status attribute lists in response to the activities of an end user in accordance with the method of the present invention.
..
'' : ' `:
.
:
.: : . -: ' - . ..
.
.
-- 7 ::
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE P~EFERRED EMBODIMENT
With reference now to the figures and in particular with reference to Figure 1, there -is depicted a block diagram of a distributed computing system which may be utilized with the method of the present invention. As may be seen, distributed computing system 8 comprises a Local Area Network (LAN) which serves to connect a plurality of end users. -In this manner Users A, B, C, D and E are all connected together in a manner which will permit the ; transfer of electronic mail objects. Of course, those skilled in the art will appreciate that other distributed computing systems may be utilized, such as, for example, a Host processor and a plurality of Interactive Work Stations tIWS).
Referring now to Figure 2, there is depicted a block diagram illustrating the different types of multiple status attribute lists associated with the method of the present invention. As may be seen, the process of th~
present invention is applied u~on a receipt of mail 10, which may comprise one or more mail items which have been received from the distributed computing system. Of course, mail 10 may include a group of associated mail d~scriptors 12 which provide general information concerning mail 10 such as: addressees; folder information; data/time sent and/ox received; and, other such information.
; 30 Next, in accordance with the method of the present invention a plurality of "view profiles" are established.
In the disclosed~embodiment of the present invention there ; ~are provided three different view profiles, each of which is :
. . . . .
~. ' . ''' ' '''~ ; ' 1 31 975~
utilized to aid in the specification of an indication of the status of a shared mail object or a component of a shared mail object with regard to all of the recipients, a subgroup of the recipients or an individual recipient. For example, public view profile 14 is a specific view or profile of a particular electronic mail object which is presented to all users having access to that shared electronic mail object.
Naturally, only one public view is permitted per mail object.
Similarly, group view profile 16 may be utilized to aid in the specification of the status of the mail object with regard to certain subgroups of end users specified by ; the mail object owner. Of course, the mail object owner may not specify any subgroups for a particular mail object so there may be no group view profile in that case. In this manner, the mail object owner may elect to specify selected subgroups o~ end users for which status may be determined.
Finally, private view profile 18 may be defined for any end user having access to a particular shared electronic mail object.
From each view profile defined above, a set of attributes is established and maintained whereby the status of a shared electronic mail object may be determined with regard to all recipients, a subgroup of the recipients or an individual recipient of that mail object. By way of illustration, shared attributes 20 serve to provide the public view of a selected electronic mail object which is visible to Users A, B, C, D and E. Shared attributes 20 ; will preferably contain status indications such as "New" or "Old", "Opened" or "Unopened" which are perceived by all users having access to thè mail object.
' .
,~ ....
.
' ' ., ~ ,. ' 131~759 .
g The public view attributes associated with shared attributes 20 may also be utilized with user set attributes 22 and 24, in addition to other specific user group attributes, such as action items. Each user set of attributes may be associated with a particular subgroup of end users. As is illustrated, user set attributes 22 are associated with Users A and B and user set attributes 2~ are associated with Users C, D, and E.
Finally, user attributes 26, 28, and 30 are each associated with an individual end user and may be utilized to provide a private view of the status of an individual mail object. For example, a mail object may be "Opened" by any user having access; however, the object may not be "Seen" by a user who has not previously opened the mail object. In this manner, the status of a shared electronic mail object may be accurately determined with regard to a particular end user.
In accordance with the method of the present invention, each set of attributes is continually modified by the activities of individual end users in order to update the status of each shared mail object. Additionally, the "status" of a mail object may disclose more than the transmission and receipt status of electronic mail. For example, the user set attributes may be utilized to provide action items which are only visible to a particular set of end users, based upon the nature of the action item.
Similarly, user attributes may be utilized to provide personal reminder notes placed by a particular user which are then privaté- to that user and not visible to other users.
: ~' . ' ' .
.
With referPnce now to Figur~ 3, there is depicted a logic flowchart illustrating the association of multiple status attribute lists with the receipt of an electronic mail object. As may be seen, the process begins at block ~0 which illustrates the receipt of electronic mail from the network which is placed into the electronic mail-basket of a particular end user within a group of end users. Next, as depicted in block 42, the shared attributes are set based upon the public view profile which is determined by the recipients of the shared mail object. Thereafter, the user set attributes are set based upon any group view profiles which may have been defined by the mail object owner, as described above and as illustrated in block 44. Finally, the user attributes are set, as depicted in block 46. The user attributes are set based upon the private view profile which is established by any end user having access to the shared mail object.
Thereafter, as illustrated in block 48, certain automatic actions may be performed based upon the public view profile. For example, a mail waiting notification may be sent to all affinity users after the receipt of a mail object. Similarly, certain automatic actions based upon the group view profile may be accomplished, as depicted in block 50. one such example may be the placing of action items for a particular defined user set, as defined above~ Finally, certain automatic actions may be accomplished based upon the private view profile which has been established, as illustrated in block 52. - Thereafter, the process terminates, as illustrated in block 54.
Referring now to Fi~ure 4, there is depicted a logic flowchart illustrating the modi~ication of multiple status attribute lists in response to the activities of a particular end user. As may be seen, this process begins at block 60 with the user wishing to view his or her mai1-basket. Next, as depicted in block 62, the list of mail objects within the mail-basket is presented to the user based upon the aforementioned public, group and private views. As illustrated in block 64 the user may then view and manipulate any mail object within his or her mail-basket. Automatically, in response to the activities of the user depicted in block 64, each appropriate attribute set for that particular mail object is altered to reflect the change in status brought about by the activities of the end user, as illustrated in block 66. Next, block 68 depicts the determination of whether or not the end user is to continue processing and if so, the process returns to block 64 so that the end user may access and possibly modify a subsequent mail object. In the event the end user elects to discontinue processing, then the process terminates at block 70, as illustrated.
` 20 Those skilled in the art will, upon reference to the foregoing specification, appreciate that the applicants I
have provided a novel and useful method whereby the status o~ individual shared electronic mail- objects may be determined in a user dependent manner. That is, rather than the global status which has previously been possible utilizing known electronic mail systems, the method of the present invention permits individual users to accurately and rapidly determine the status of a particular mail object with regard to all recipients of that mail object, selected subgroups of recipients of that mail object or individual recipients of that electronic mail object.
' ` ~
:
' While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
~5 ~5
Claims (6)
1. A computer implemented method for use in a distributed computing system for indicating the status of an electronic mail object transmitted by a selected user via said distributed computing system an freely accessible by a plurality of recipients coupled to said computing system, said computer implemented method comprising the steps of:
in response to the receipt of said electronic mail object by said distributed computing system automatically establishing within said distributed computing system a plurality of independent attribute lists each of said plurality of independent attribute lists indicating the status of said electronic mail object with respect to the status of selected activities of an associated recipient or an associated group of recipients having access to said electronic mail object wherein each said recipient and each said associated group of recipients having one of said independent attribute lists;
automatically modifying portions of a selected one of said plurality of independent attribute lists in response to activities with respect to said electronic mail object of a recipient associated with said selected one of said plurality of independent attribute lists;
determining the status of said electronic mail object with respect to a selected recipient by means of an associated modified attribute list; and periodically displaying the status of said electronic mail object within said distributed computing system to indicate the status of said electronic mail object by accessing a selected one of said plurality of independent attribute lists.
in response to the receipt of said electronic mail object by said distributed computing system automatically establishing within said distributed computing system a plurality of independent attribute lists each of said plurality of independent attribute lists indicating the status of said electronic mail object with respect to the status of selected activities of an associated recipient or an associated group of recipients having access to said electronic mail object wherein each said recipient and each said associated group of recipients having one of said independent attribute lists;
automatically modifying portions of a selected one of said plurality of independent attribute lists in response to activities with respect to said electronic mail object of a recipient associated with said selected one of said plurality of independent attribute lists;
determining the status of said electronic mail object with respect to a selected recipient by means of an associated modified attribute list; and periodically displaying the status of said electronic mail object within said distributed computing system to indicate the status of said electronic mail object by accessing a selected one of said plurality of independent attribute lists.
2. The method in a distributed computing system for indicating the status of an electronic mail object transmitted by a selected user via said distributed computing system and freely accessible by a plurality of recipients coupled to said distributed computing system according to claim 1, wherein at least one of said plurality of attribute lists comprises a set of attributes containing an indication of the status of said electronic mail object with regard to a single recipient.
3. The method in a distributed computing system for indicating the status of an electronic mail object transmitted by a selected user via said distributed computing system and freely accessible by a plurality of recipients coupled to said distributed computing system according to claim 2, wherein at least one of said plurality of attribute lists comprises a set of attributes containing an indication of the status of said electronic mail object with regard to a selected subset of said plurality of recipients.
4. The method in a distributed computing system for indicating the status of an electronic mail object transmitted by a selected user via said distributed computing system and freely accessible by a plurality of recipients coupled to said distributed computing system according to claim 3, wherein at least one of said plurality of attribute lists comprises a set of attributes containing an indication of the status of said electronic mail object with regard to all recipients having access to said electronic mail object.
5. The method in a distributed computing system for indicating the status of an electronic mail object transmitted by a selected user via said distributed computing system and freely accessible by a plurality of recipients coupled to said distributed computing system according to claim 1, wherein said step of periodically displaying the status of said electronic mail object within said distributed computing system comprises the step of displaying the status of said electronic mail object in response to a selection of said electronic mail object by an end user.
6. A distributed computing system for indicating the status of an electronic mail object transmitted by a selected user via said distributed computing system and freely accessible by a plurality of recipients coupled to said distributed computing system comprising:
means for automatically establishing within said distributed computing system a plurality of independent attribute lists each of said plurality of attribute lists indicating the status of said electronic mail object with respect to the status of selected activities of an associated recipient or an associated group of recipients having access to said electronic mail object in response to receipt of said electronic mail object by said distributed computing system wherein each said recipient and each said associated group of recipients having one of said independent attribute lists;
means connected to said establishing means for automatically modifying portions of a selected one of said plurality of independent attribute lists in response to activities with respect to said electronic mail object of a recipient associated with said selected one of said plurality of independent attribute lists;
means connected to said establishing means for determining the status of said electronic mail object with respect to a selected recipient by means of an associated modified attribute list; and means for periodically displaying the status of said electronic mail object within said distributed computing system by accessing a selected one of said plurality of independent attribute lists.
means for automatically establishing within said distributed computing system a plurality of independent attribute lists each of said plurality of attribute lists indicating the status of said electronic mail object with respect to the status of selected activities of an associated recipient or an associated group of recipients having access to said electronic mail object in response to receipt of said electronic mail object by said distributed computing system wherein each said recipient and each said associated group of recipients having one of said independent attribute lists;
means connected to said establishing means for automatically modifying portions of a selected one of said plurality of independent attribute lists in response to activities with respect to said electronic mail object of a recipient associated with said selected one of said plurality of independent attribute lists;
means connected to said establishing means for determining the status of said electronic mail object with respect to a selected recipient by means of an associated modified attribute list; and means for periodically displaying the status of said electronic mail object within said distributed computing system by accessing a selected one of said plurality of independent attribute lists.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US07/288,499 US5093918A (en) | 1988-12-22 | 1988-12-22 | System using independent attribute lists to show status of shared mail object among respective users |
| US07/288,499 | 1988-12-22 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA1319759C true CA1319759C (en) | 1993-06-29 |
Family
ID=23107380
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA000612655A Expired - Fee Related CA1319759C (en) | 1988-12-22 | 1989-09-22 | Method for shared mail object user dependent status indication |
Country Status (5)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US5093918A (en) |
| EP (1) | EP0375143B1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JPH0683250B2 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA1319759C (en) |
| DE (1) | DE68924525T2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (88)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP0387462B1 (en) * | 1989-03-14 | 1996-05-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Electronic document approval system |
| GB8918553D0 (en) * | 1989-08-15 | 1989-09-27 | Digital Equipment Int | Message control system |
| US5414844A (en) * | 1990-05-24 | 1995-05-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for controlling public access to a plurality of data objects within a data processing system |
| US5249291A (en) * | 1990-11-20 | 1993-09-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for consensual delegation of software command operations in a data processing system |
| WO1992022033A1 (en) * | 1991-05-24 | 1992-12-10 | Bell Communications Research, Inc. | Active messaging system |
| EP0549104B1 (en) * | 1991-12-20 | 1998-05-06 | International Computers Limited | Program attribute control in a computer system |
| US8352400B2 (en) | 1991-12-23 | 2013-01-08 | Hoffberg Steven M | Adaptive pattern recognition based controller apparatus and method and human-factored interface therefore |
| US5555426A (en) * | 1992-01-08 | 1996-09-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for disseminating messages to unspecified users in a data processing system |
| US5537586A (en) * | 1992-04-30 | 1996-07-16 | Individual, Inc. | Enhanced apparatus and methods for retrieving and selecting profiled textural information records from a database of defined category structures |
| US5550977A (en) * | 1992-05-18 | 1996-08-27 | Fujitsu Limited | Multi-media mailing method and apparatus |
| JP3252454B2 (en) * | 1992-06-30 | 2002-02-04 | 富士ゼロックス株式会社 | Shared data change status monitoring device |
| EP0746936B1 (en) * | 1992-09-30 | 2003-05-02 | Motorola, Inc. | Electronic mail message delivery system |
| US5675733A (en) * | 1992-11-30 | 1997-10-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Statistical analysis and display of reception status of electronic messages |
| JPH0787128A (en) * | 1993-09-16 | 1995-03-31 | Fuji Xerox Co Ltd | System for receiving electric mail |
| US5465359A (en) * | 1993-11-01 | 1995-11-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for managing data and users of data in a data processing system |
| US6216127B1 (en) | 1994-02-22 | 2001-04-10 | Oracle Corporation | Method and apparatus for processing electronic mail in parallel |
| US5504897A (en) * | 1994-02-22 | 1996-04-02 | Oracle Corporation | Method and apparatus for processing electronic mail in parallel |
| US5490244A (en) * | 1994-03-24 | 1996-02-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for transmitting a computer object |
| US5826241A (en) | 1994-09-16 | 1998-10-20 | First Virtual Holdings Incorporated | Computerized system for making payments and authenticating transactions over the internet |
| US5619648A (en) * | 1994-11-30 | 1997-04-08 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Message filtering techniques |
| US5732271A (en) * | 1995-01-23 | 1998-03-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Data processing system and method for processing an object oriented development environment employing property inheritance using prototypical objects |
| JPH08272875A (en) * | 1995-03-29 | 1996-10-18 | Hitachi Ltd | Method for transmitting data in job process |
| US5805810A (en) * | 1995-04-27 | 1998-09-08 | Maxwell; Robert L. | Apparatus and methods for converting an electronic mail to a postal mail at the receiving station |
| US5729682A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1998-03-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | System for prompting parameters required by a network application and using data structure to establish connections between local computer, application and resources required by application |
| US9530150B2 (en) * | 1996-01-19 | 2016-12-27 | Adcension, Llc | Compensation model for network services |
| US6264560B1 (en) | 1996-01-19 | 2001-07-24 | Sheldon F. Goldberg | Method and system for playing games on a network |
| US20090012864A1 (en) * | 2007-07-02 | 2009-01-08 | Goldberg Sheldon F | Compensation model for network services |
| US5823879A (en) | 1996-01-19 | 1998-10-20 | Sheldon F. Goldberg | Network gaming system |
| US5809242A (en) | 1996-04-19 | 1998-09-15 | Juno Online Services, L.P. | Electronic mail system for displaying advertisement at local computer received from remote system while the local computer is off-line the remote system |
| US5848397A (en) * | 1996-04-19 | 1998-12-08 | Juno Online Services, L.P. | Method and apparatus for scheduling the presentation of messages to computer users |
| US6453327B1 (en) * | 1996-06-10 | 2002-09-17 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for identifying and discarding junk electronic mail |
| JP2001519130A (en) * | 1997-04-15 | 2001-10-16 | ブリティッシュ・テレコミュニケーションズ・パブリック・リミテッド・カンパニー | Message service |
| US6249805B1 (en) * | 1997-08-12 | 2001-06-19 | Micron Electronics, Inc. | Method and system for filtering unauthorized electronic mail messages |
| US6199102B1 (en) * | 1997-08-26 | 2001-03-06 | Christopher Alan Cobb | Method and system for filtering electronic messages |
| CA2318849A1 (en) * | 1998-01-31 | 1999-08-05 | Aveo, Inc. | Method and apparatus for attribute-based addressing of messages in a networked system |
| JP3681277B2 (en) * | 1998-04-24 | 2005-08-10 | 富士通株式会社 | Message processing apparatus, message management method, and recording medium recording message management program |
| US6112227A (en) | 1998-08-06 | 2000-08-29 | Heiner; Jeffrey Nelson | Filter-in method for reducing junk e-mail |
| US6615348B1 (en) | 1999-04-16 | 2003-09-02 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for an adapted digital signature |
| US6085321A (en) | 1998-08-14 | 2000-07-04 | Omnipoint Corporation | Unique digital signature |
| US6356935B1 (en) | 1998-08-14 | 2002-03-12 | Xircom Wireless, Inc. | Apparatus and method for an authenticated electronic userid |
| US7013305B2 (en) | 2001-10-01 | 2006-03-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing the state of coupling facility structures, detecting by one or more systems coupled to the coupling facility, the suspended state of the duplexed command, detecting being independent of message exchange |
| US6115709A (en) * | 1998-09-18 | 2000-09-05 | Tacit Knowledge Systems, Inc. | Method and system for constructing a knowledge profile of a user having unrestricted and restricted access portions according to respective levels of confidence of content of the portions |
| AU5822899A (en) | 1998-09-18 | 2000-04-10 | Tacit Knowledge Systems | Method and apparatus for querying a user knowledge profile |
| US8380875B1 (en) | 1998-09-18 | 2013-02-19 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and system for addressing a communication document for transmission over a network based on the content thereof |
| US7966078B2 (en) | 1999-02-01 | 2011-06-21 | Steven Hoffberg | Network media appliance system and method |
| US6609138B1 (en) * | 1999-03-08 | 2003-08-19 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | E-mail list archiving and management |
| US6636965B1 (en) * | 1999-03-31 | 2003-10-21 | Siemens Information & Communication Networks, Inc. | Embedding recipient specific comments in electronic messages using encryption |
| US6393423B1 (en) | 1999-04-08 | 2002-05-21 | James Francis Goedken | Apparatus and methods for electronic information exchange |
| US6505233B1 (en) | 1999-08-30 | 2003-01-07 | Zaplet, Inc. | Method for communicating information among a group of participants |
| US6463461B1 (en) | 1999-08-30 | 2002-10-08 | Zaplet, Inc. | System for communicating information among a group of participants |
| US6523063B1 (en) | 1999-08-30 | 2003-02-18 | Zaplet, Inc. | Method system and program product for accessing a file using values from a redirect message string for each change of the link identifier |
| US6691153B1 (en) | 1999-08-30 | 2004-02-10 | Zaplet, Inc. | Method and system for process interaction among a group |
| US6507865B1 (en) | 1999-08-30 | 2003-01-14 | Zaplet, Inc. | Method and system for group content collaboration |
| US6496849B1 (en) | 1999-08-30 | 2002-12-17 | Zaplet, Inc. | Electronic media for communicating information among a group of participants |
| US6453337B2 (en) * | 1999-10-25 | 2002-09-17 | Zaplet, Inc. | Methods and systems to manage and track the states of electronic media |
| US7421472B1 (en) * | 1999-11-19 | 2008-09-02 | Ross Jr Robert C | System, method, and computer program product for providing a multi-user e-mail system |
| AU2001245754A1 (en) * | 2000-03-17 | 2001-10-03 | Ebay, Inc. | Method and apparatus for facilitating online payment transactions in a network-based transaction facility using multiple payment instruments |
| US8706618B2 (en) | 2005-09-29 | 2014-04-22 | Ebay Inc. | Release of funds based on criteria |
| US7499875B1 (en) | 2000-03-17 | 2009-03-03 | Ebay Inc. | Method and apparatus for facilitating online payment transactions in a network-based transaction facility using multiple payment instruments |
| US20040186996A1 (en) * | 2000-03-29 | 2004-09-23 | Gibbs Benjamin K. | Unique digital signature |
| US7130885B2 (en) * | 2000-09-05 | 2006-10-31 | Zaplet, Inc. | Methods and apparatus providing electronic messages that are linked and aggregated |
| US20040068477A1 (en) * | 2000-10-31 | 2004-04-08 | Gilmour David L. | Method and system to publish the results of a search of descriptive profiles based on respective publication policies specified by owners of the descriptive profiles, and a profile service provider |
| WO2002042860A2 (en) * | 2000-11-20 | 2002-05-30 | Xante Corporation | System, method, and computer program product for providing a multi-user e-mail system |
| JP2001350699A (en) * | 2001-04-16 | 2001-12-21 | Fuji Xerox Co Ltd | Electronic mail acquiring method and device, and information displaying method and device |
| JP2001350698A (en) * | 2001-04-16 | 2001-12-21 | Fuji Xerox Co Ltd | Electronic mail acquiring method and device, and information displaying method and device |
| JP2001350697A (en) * | 2001-04-16 | 2001-12-21 | Fuji Xerox Co Ltd | Electronic information management device and method |
| US20040008368A1 (en) * | 2001-09-07 | 2004-01-15 | Plunkett Michael K | Mailing online operation flow |
| US7516182B2 (en) * | 2002-06-18 | 2009-04-07 | Aol Llc | Practical techniques for reducing unsolicited electronic messages by identifying sender's addresses |
| US9805373B1 (en) | 2002-11-19 | 2017-10-31 | Oracle International Corporation | Expertise services platform |
| US7954043B2 (en) | 2002-12-02 | 2011-05-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Concurrent editing of a file by multiple authors |
| US7620691B1 (en) | 2003-02-10 | 2009-11-17 | Aol Llc | Filtering electronic messages while permitting delivery of solicited electronics messages |
| US7290033B1 (en) | 2003-04-18 | 2007-10-30 | America Online, Inc. | Sorting electronic messages using attributes of the sender address |
| US7590695B2 (en) | 2003-05-09 | 2009-09-15 | Aol Llc | Managing electronic messages |
| US7627635B1 (en) | 2003-07-28 | 2009-12-01 | Aol Llc | Managing self-addressed electronic messages |
| US20050033811A1 (en) | 2003-08-07 | 2005-02-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Collaborative email |
| US20050080863A1 (en) * | 2003-10-14 | 2005-04-14 | Daniell W. Todd | Providing indicators in group email messages |
| US20050125667A1 (en) * | 2003-12-09 | 2005-06-09 | Tim Sullivan | Systems and methods for authorizing delivery of incoming messages |
| WO2005062843A2 (en) | 2003-12-19 | 2005-07-14 | America On Line, Inc | Community messaging lists for authorization to deliver electronic messages |
| US20050193130A1 (en) * | 2004-01-22 | 2005-09-01 | Mblx Llc | Methods and systems for confirmation of availability of messaging account to user |
| US7469292B2 (en) * | 2004-02-11 | 2008-12-23 | Aol Llc | Managing electronic messages using contact information |
| US7650383B2 (en) * | 2005-03-15 | 2010-01-19 | Aol Llc | Electronic message system with federation of trusted senders |
| US7647381B2 (en) | 2005-04-04 | 2010-01-12 | Aol Llc | Federated challenge credit system |
| US20070088793A1 (en) * | 2005-10-17 | 2007-04-19 | Landsman Richard A | Filter for instant messaging |
| US8239598B1 (en) | 2005-12-13 | 2012-08-07 | Teradata Us, Inc. | Techniques for tracking status within object chains |
| EP1850227A1 (en) * | 2006-04-28 | 2007-10-31 | Sag Ag | Data processing system and metod for providing a status management service |
| US20080104181A1 (en) * | 2006-10-26 | 2008-05-01 | Tal Golan | Electronic mail processing system |
| TW200839561A (en) * | 2007-03-22 | 2008-10-01 | Wistron Corp | Method of irregular password configuration and verification |
| US8959158B2 (en) * | 2009-10-12 | 2015-02-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Leveraging point-in-time knowledge to respond to e-mail |
Family Cites Families (26)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4283599A (en) * | 1979-01-16 | 1981-08-11 | Atalla Technovations | Method and apparatus for securing data transmissions |
| US4264782A (en) * | 1979-06-29 | 1981-04-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for transaction and identity verification |
| US4333144A (en) * | 1980-02-05 | 1982-06-01 | The Bendix Corporation | Task communicator for multiple computer system |
| US4375582A (en) * | 1981-02-04 | 1983-03-01 | Gist Larry B | Telephone answering system and method |
| US4466079A (en) * | 1981-02-17 | 1984-08-14 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Mailing system peripheral interface with communications formatting memory |
| US4410961A (en) * | 1981-02-17 | 1983-10-18 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Interface between a processor system and peripheral devices used in a mailing system |
| US4476349A (en) * | 1982-03-30 | 1984-10-09 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Call message service |
| JPS58223939A (en) * | 1982-06-23 | 1983-12-26 | Toshiba Corp | Electronic mail system |
| US4574284A (en) * | 1983-01-26 | 1986-03-04 | Trw Inc. | Communication bus interface unit |
| US4558413A (en) * | 1983-11-21 | 1985-12-10 | Xerox Corporation | Software version management system |
| US4731750A (en) * | 1984-01-04 | 1988-03-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Workstation resource sharing |
| NL8400186A (en) * | 1984-01-20 | 1985-08-16 | Philips Nv | PROCESSOR SYSTEM CONTAINING A NUMBER OF STATIONS CONNECTED BY A COMMUNICATION NETWORK AND STATION FOR USE IN SUCH A PROCESSOR SYSTEM. |
| US4604686A (en) * | 1984-01-27 | 1986-08-05 | Martin Marietta Corporation | Associative data access method (ADAM) and its means of implementation |
| US4823122A (en) * | 1984-06-01 | 1989-04-18 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Local area network for digital data processing system |
| US4646346A (en) * | 1985-01-22 | 1987-02-24 | At&T Company | Integrated message service system |
| US4713780A (en) * | 1985-04-15 | 1987-12-15 | Express Communications, Inc. | Electronic mail |
| US4754395A (en) * | 1985-05-06 | 1988-06-28 | Computer X, Inc. | Network interface module with minimized data paths |
| US4791560A (en) * | 1985-07-31 | 1988-12-13 | Unisys Corporation | Macro level control of an activity switch in a scientific vector processor which processor requires an external executive control program |
| US4800488A (en) * | 1985-11-12 | 1989-01-24 | American Telephone And Telegraph Company, At&T Bell Laboratories | Method of propagating resource information in a computer network |
| US4825354A (en) * | 1985-11-12 | 1989-04-25 | American Telephone And Telegraph Company, At&T Bell Laboratories | Method of file access in a distributed processing computer network |
| US4851988A (en) * | 1986-03-31 | 1989-07-25 | Wang Laboratories, Inc. | Loosely-coupled computer system using global identifiers to identify mailboxes and volumes |
| US4780821A (en) * | 1986-07-29 | 1988-10-25 | International Business Machines Corp. | Method for multiple programs management within a network having a server computer and a plurality of remote computers |
| US4783730A (en) * | 1986-09-19 | 1988-11-08 | Datapoint Corporation | Input/output control technique utilizing multilevel memory structure for processor and I/O communication |
| US4932026A (en) * | 1986-12-19 | 1990-06-05 | Wang Laboratories, Inc. | Apparatus for distributing data processing across a plurality of loci of control |
| US4791566A (en) * | 1987-03-27 | 1988-12-13 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Terminal device session management protocol |
| US4985831A (en) * | 1988-10-31 | 1991-01-15 | Evans & Sutherland Computer Corp. | Multiprocessor task scheduling system |
-
1988
- 1988-12-22 US US07/288,499 patent/US5093918A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1989
- 1989-09-22 CA CA000612655A patent/CA1319759C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1989-11-10 EP EP89311678A patent/EP0375143B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1989-11-10 DE DE68924525T patent/DE68924525T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1989-12-08 JP JP1317878A patent/JPH0683250B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US5093918A (en) | 1992-03-03 |
| JPH02194750A (en) | 1990-08-01 |
| EP0375143A2 (en) | 1990-06-27 |
| DE68924525T2 (en) | 1996-05-30 |
| JPH0683250B2 (en) | 1994-10-19 |
| EP0375143A3 (en) | 1992-09-02 |
| EP0375143B1 (en) | 1995-10-11 |
| DE68924525D1 (en) | 1995-11-16 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA1319759C (en) | Method for shared mail object user dependent status indication | |
| CA1321656C (en) | Method for restricting delivery and receipt of electronic message | |
| EP0420779B1 (en) | User selectable electronic mail management method | |
| US6442591B1 (en) | Method and system for automatic electronic mail address maintenance | |
| US8131806B2 (en) | Automatic email consolidation for multiple participants | |
| Kayany | Contexts of uninhibited online behavior: Flaming in social newsgroups on Usenet | |
| JP3525042B2 (en) | Electronic mail system, electronic mail transfer method, and recording medium recording electronic mail program | |
| US6816887B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for sending private messages within a single electronic message | |
| US6584471B1 (en) | System and method for the adaptive, hierarchical receipt, ranking, organization and display of information based upon democratic criteria and resultant dynamic profiling | |
| US20040119740A1 (en) | Methods and apparatus for displaying and replying to electronic messages | |
| US20020107886A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for automatic document electronic versioning system | |
| Forester | Megatrends or megamistakes? What ever happened to the information society? | |
| JPH05282221A (en) | Method and device for automatically distributing document in data processing system | |
| CA2385619A1 (en) | Messaging application user interface | |
| US20060031366A1 (en) | Method for dynamically ordering instant messaging lists | |
| US5109519A (en) | Local computer participating in mail delivery system abstracts from directory of all eligible mail recipients only served by local computer | |
| JP2005063138A (en) | Information processor, information processing system, method of searching for database, and program | |
| JP4146109B2 (en) | Knowledge storage support system and message hierarchy display setting method in the same system | |
| US6417819B1 (en) | Background image display control system used in chat system | |
| US5438658A (en) | Method and system for time critical response management in a data processing system | |
| US5995966A (en) | Electronic communication system and recording medium | |
| JP4146101B2 (en) | Knowledge accumulation support system and public summary providing method in the same system | |
| CA1321841C (en) | Method for managing an electronic mail basket service | |
| US7876891B2 (en) | Electronic communication distribution system | |
| Kantor et al. | From group memory to project awareness through use of the knowledge depot |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKLA | Lapsed |