CA1194985A

CA1194985A - Light detecting and measuring devices

Info

Publication number: CA1194985A
Application number: CA000420972A
Authority: CA
Inventors: Roger T. Lees
Original assignee: Eastman Kodak Co
Current assignee: Eastman Kodak Co
Priority date: 1982-02-12
Filing date: 1983-02-04
Publication date: 1985-10-08
Also published as: JPS59500196A; EP0103583B1; US4570179A; WO1983002866A1; DE3360250D1; EP0103583A1; JPH058628B2; IT8319547A0; IT1161887B

Abstract

IMPROVEMENTS IN OR RELATING TO LIGHT DETECTING AND
MEASURING DEVICES
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
A color scanner for scanning a color transparency includes a beam splitter located so as to receive light transmitted through the scanned trans-parency. Some of this light is scattered by scratches and dirt specks on the transparency. Such scattered light is contained and directed through the beam splitter by internally reflective optical path defining means including mirror boxes and/or lenses located between the trans-parency and the exits of the beam splitter. Additional mirror boxes and/or lenses may be positioned between the exits of the beam splitter and respective photo-multipliers to ensure that all the scattered light is detected.

Description

3~

--l_ IMPROVEMENTS IN OR RELATING TO LIGHT DETECTXNG A~D
MEASURING DEVICES

'~his in~ention concerns the detection and measurement of light by photomultipliers or similar photoresponsive devices having a cletecting surface whereupon the light to be detectecL and/or measured impinges. One example of an apparatus of this kind is a film scanner wherein a spot of light scans an area of film such as a photographic negative and the transmitted light is arranged to f'all on the detecting surface of a photomultiplier. Such detecting surfaces do not have exactly UnifOI~ response and it is known to arrange the light to fall on a predetermined static area of the surface. In this way, all specularLy transmitted light is detected and measured.
In a colour scanner, the light transmitted -by the film is split into a plurality of beams of different wavelengths, each beam imp;n~;n~ upon a predeteremined area of a detecting surface of a respective photomultiplier.
Such an apparatus is described in U.S. Patent Specification No. 2947810. The transmitted light may be split into the separate beams by dichroic mirrors or by part silvered mirrors in either case with an appropriate colour filter in front of each detecting surface.
One problem which exists in measuring the -transmission o~ light through a fi:Lm is that dirt often exists on the surfaces of the film or scratches are present in the surfaces of the film. m e dirt or the scratches scatter the light imp;nEln~ on the film and the scattered light is no longer transmitted specularly in a controlled manner to the predetermined area of the detecting surface of the correct photQmultiplier.

'` `~''''~

Such scattered light may be (a) lost (b) impinge upon the detecting surface outside the predetermined area and/or (c) impinge upon the wrong detecting surface within or outside the predetermined area thereo~.
In each case~ the response of the photo_ multipliers is incorrect and the electrical output signals do not ~aithfully represen-t the picture content of the scanned area of the film.
If the electrical output signa~s are used to produce a picture either directly as in a television system or indirectly by controlling the exposure of a photosensitive material 3 the incorrect signals produce a line or spot of contrasting density which is particularly noticeable, for example~ as a white spot or line on a colour print4 Similar incorrect output signals are obtained if 9 for example~ faults or spots of dirt are on any optical surface of the apparatus adjacent the film.
An electronic partial solution to thls problem is described in the above mentioned U.S. Patent Specification No. ?947810 and a further similar electronic par-tial solution is described in U.K. Specification 1409153.
The present invention seeks to overcome or m;n;m; se the problem of scratches in and/or dirt on film in an extremely simple manner and is based on the fact that, in a reproduction, changes in colour are much less noticeable than changes in density.
In accordance with the present invention, the response of the photomultiplier or like photo_ responsive device to scattered light falling on the detecting surface outside the predetermined area is enhanced relative to the response there to specularly transmitted light falling on the detecting sur~ace within the predetermined area by the location of an attenuating filter over the predetermined area of the detecting surface of the device.
In film sc~nning apparatus, the prede-termined area is preferably coincident and co~mensurate with an image, on -the detecting sur~ace of the photo_ multiplier or like photoresponsive device, of the aperture of an objective used to focus the sc~nn;ng spot onto an area of film to be scanned.
The invention will be described further, by way of example J with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:_ Fig. 1 is a diagrammatic view of a film scanner in which the attenuating filter of the present invention finds utility;
Fig~ 2 is a diagrammatic front elevation of the photocathode surface of a photomultiplier having an attenuating filter in accordance with the present invention;
Figs. 3 and 4 are diagra~matic views o~
alternative sC~nn; ng apparatus in which attenuating filters in accordance with the present invention may be used; and Fig. 5 is a diagrammatic view of a modification applicable to the sc~nni n~ apparatus shown in Figs. 3 and 4.
Referring to Figs. 1 and 2 of the drawings, a film scanner 10 is arranged to sc:an a colour transparency 11 (positive or negative) and to provide image information as to the colour content and density of the transparency in the form of electrical signals at the outputs of three photomultiplier tubes 12, 1 and 14.
The scanner comprises a cathode ray -tube 15 9 the electrical circuits o~ which provide horizontal and vertical time bases to produce a raster on the face 16 thereo~ of relative dimensions at least '3~5 commensurate with the dimensions of the transparency 11 to be scanned. An objective 17 images the raster onto the transparency 11 located in a film gate 18.
Lenses 19, 20 directed light transmitted by the transparency onto a dichroic beam splitting cube Zl so that specularly transmitted light impinges at approxim-ately 45 onto a first dichroic mirror 22. The mirror reflects light of one wavelength range, for example, red and transmits light of the r~m~ining visible spec-trum range ~or example, blue and green. The reflected red light exits from the cube 21 and passes through a lens 2~ to strike the photosensi-tive area, the photo_ cathode 24 of the photomultiplier 12. The raster on the cathode ray tube faceplate 16, if lmaged on -the photocathode 24, would be rectangular as shown at 26 and lack of uniformity of the photosensitive surface, the photocathode 24, would give rise to incorrect signals as the imaged flying spot moved across the area 26. For this reason, the lens 23, together with the lenses 19 and 20~ image the aperture of the objective 17 onto the photocathode 24 as a circle 25 or polygon if the aperture is formed by an iris diaphragm. In this way, the whole of the area of the circle 25 is used continuously and any lacX of uniformity of response is avoided.
All red light, specularly transmitted by the transparency 11, will fall within the circle 25 o~ the photocathode 24.
As mentioned above, specular blue and green light are transmitted by the dichroic mirror 22 substantially without deviation and pass to a cube 28 similar to the cube 21. The cube 2~ contains a dichroic mirror 29 which reflects blue light and transmits green light. m e -transmitted blue and green light entering the cube 28 strike the mirror 29, the blue light being reflected towards the photomultiplier 13 and the green light being transmitted -towards the photomultiplier 14.
The "blue" path o~ the photomultiplier tube 13 and the "green" path to the photomultiplier 14 are optically identical to the "red" path to the photo-multiplier 12 and reference numerals for optical components of these paths are suffixed la' and 'b' respectively and will not be described further.
In the prior art, it is known to position over the surface of each photocathode or in the optical path thereof, a filter (not ~hown) to match the response of the respective photomultiplier to the wavelength of the light imp;ng;n~ thereon and to act~ with the dichroic mirror to provide sharper cut-off of the wavelength band reflected thereby so that the electrical outputs of the photomultipliers correspond to the respective densities of the transparency.
If there is a scratch in either of the surfaces of the transparency 11 or cLirt on either surface thereof, light from the flying spot of the cathode ray tube 15 will be scattered. This would normally lead to an incorrect output of one or more of the photomultipliers 12, 13 or 14.
The film scanner of the present invention has mirrors 30 of truncated pyramidal form surrol~nd;ng the gate 18 and all scattered light which passes through the transparency 11 is reflected by the mirrors 30, passes through the lenses 19, 20 and into the beam splitting cube 21. This scattered light impinges upon the dichroic mirror at all angles from the optimum 45 angle up to nearly 90 and down to nearly 0. Red light impinging on the mirror 22 at approximately 45 will be reflectedO
Blue and green light imp~ngin~ at approximately 45 will be transmitted.

~9~

~ 6_ At angles deviating from -the optimum 45~, the reflection and transmission oharacteristics of the mirror 22 vary. In this way, some blue and some green light will be reflected -towards the photomultiplier 12 and conversely some red light will be transmit-ted by the mirror 22.
me dichroic mirror 29 also has an optimum impingement angle of 45~ and consequently will transmi-t some sca-ttered blue and red light and will reflect some scattered red and green light.
Ir.-espective of towards which of the photo-multipliers 12, 13 and 14 the scattered light is transmitted or reflected by the mirrors 22 and 29~ box mirrors 31, 31a and 31b reflect and contain such light and pass it towards the lens 23, 23a and 23b~ and truncated pyramidal mirrors 32, 32a and 32b reflect and contain such light and pass it towards the photo--cathode 24, 24a or 24b. Such light is scrambled by the mirror boxes and then strikes the particular photo-cathode substantially evenly everywhere withln the rectangle defined by the abutting end of the respective mirror 32 as shown in Fig. 2.
However, ~Lth scattered light some losses are inevitable. Such losses may occur because of absorption by dirt or because OI total internal reflection within the transparency 11 caused by scattering. There is loss upon reflection by the mirrors 30 9 319 31a or 31b, and 32 9 32a or 23_~ Some light is lost within the cubes 21 and 28 and the lenses 19, 20 and 23, 23a or 23b.
me resultant ef~ect is that the output signals of the photomultipliers 12, 13 and 14 are lower than would be the case if no dirt or scrat.~h exists at the particular part of the transparency 11.

--7~

In accordance with the present i~ention, a respective attenuating filter 33, 33a and 33b (see Fig. 2), indicated in dashed lines to differentiate the filter from the circle 25~ is located over the area 25 of the photocathode 24, 24a and 24b. Any light which falls on the photocathode outside the area ~5 and within the rectangle defined by the mirror 32, 32a or 32b, which ligh-t must be scattered light 9 iS not attenuated and the response of the photomultiplier to such light is thereby enhanced.
The at-tenuating filter ~3, ~3a or ~3b may replace the normal photomultiplier response correcting filter or may be additional thereto. It may be of radially decreasing density from the circle 25 out--wardly. The attenuating filter may be larger than the circle 25 provided that the signal due to scattered light is enhanced relative to the signal due to specular light impinging within the circle 25.
The resultant outputs of the photomultipliers can, by choice of the correct attenuation by the filters 33, ~3a and 33b 9 provide substantially level signals varying only by image density information.
I-t will be appreciated that the individual signals o~ the photomultipliers 12, 13 and 14 may be incorrect as far as image colour information is concerned but the human eye is much more sensitive to density variations than the colour variations. A scratch which, for example, would normally reproduce as a white line in a print will be reproduced at substantially identical density to the adjacent areas and not be detectable by the human eye because the only difference is in colour.
Similarly a spot of dirt may be reproduced as an undetectable spot of identical density to adjacent areas instead of as a very noticeable white spot.

In monochrome reproduction, scratch~s and dirt on a monochrome transparency merely lead to a slight loss of definition in the reproduction and are otherwise undetectable.
The apparatus shown in Fig~. 1 of the accompanying drawings is described in more detail in our accompanying Canadian application ~o. 420,979 filed on even date herewith in the name of P. B. Watt.
It is possible to utilize attenuating filters in other scanning apparatus, for example, that shown in Fig, 3. In this Figure like parts have been given similar reference numerals, prefixed by "1", to those shown in Fig. 1.
Because of the efficiency of the attenuating filter of the present invention, it is not essential to contain all scattered light. The proportion that is contained can be enhanced relative to the specularly transmitted light to an extent sufficient to minimise or eliminate the noticeable reproduction of scratches and dirt on the film. Thus 3 it is not essential that dichroic beam splitting mirrors be mounted in cubes. As shown, crossed dichroic mirrors 122 and 129 mounted in air may be utilized.
It is difficult to make and mount crossed dichroic mirrors and consequently F'ig. 4 diagrammatically illustrates a scanning apparatus using two separate dichroic mirrors 222 and 224. In this figure, like parts to those shown in Fig. 1 have been given similar reference numerals prefixed by "2".

~, A defect arises when beam spl~tting cubes are not used. This is due to the fact that the amount of scattered light which is lost when the cubes are not used may be laterally or vertically biased depending on the location of the dichroic mirror and the entrance to its respective first mirror box.
This can be overcome by the apparatus shown diagrammatically in Fig. 5. In this figure, like reference numerals prefixed '1311 are used for similar parts to those shown in Fig. l.
The only difference in this apparatus to that shown in Fig. 4 is that loss matching '~oles"
340 and 350 are provided behind the dichroic mirrors 322 and 329 respectively to compensate for lateral bias in loss of scattered light in the apparatus o Fig. 4-. ~

Claims

1. A light detecting and measuring device comprising a photomultiplier or like photoresponsive device having a photosensitive detecting surface, a predetermined area of said surface being arranged to detect light specularly transmitted to the device, an attenuating filter covering said predetermined area whereby the response of the device to scattered light impinging upon that part of the detecting surface not covered by the filter is enhanced relative to the response of the device to light impinging upon the filter.

2. A device as claimed in claim 1 wherein the filter is a correcting filter for matching the response of the device to the wavelength of the light impinging upon the detecting surface.

3. A device as claimed in claim 1 or 2 wherein the density of the filter decreases radially outwardly from the predetermined area.

4. A film scanner comprising a gate whereat a transparency to be scanned may be located, means for generating a raster and means for imaging the raster on the transparency, and a device as claimed in claim 1 for receiving light specularly transmitted by the transparency within the predetermined area of the photosensitive detecting surface and for receiving scattered light transmitted by the transparency on the photosensitive detecting surface.

5. A film scanner as claimed in claim 4 including beam splitting means for splitting light transmitted by the transparency into red, green and blue light beams.

6. A film scanner as claimed in claim 5 including respective devices each as claimed in claim 1 or 2 for receiving and detecting the red, green and blue light.

7. A scanner as claimed in claim 4 further including light collecting means for containing light scattered by the transparency and for directing the scattered light to the device.